I feel like this ends up happening in a lot of spaces where I've ended up being candid that I believe that there are issues that predominantly effect men and they are worth fighting against now as opposed to some indeterminate time in the future.

Without fail, I'll get a response from some exasperated feminist saying that they aren't obligated to help (true) and that if I want to do something for men, I should just do it myself because women did the same. After all, they say, there's nothing stopping you.

And that right there is - in my opinion - a major blind spot in the fabric of gender issues. People see men as so empowered that they don't perceive there to be any forces that would impede men from making a movement. To them, it's out of laziness and entitlement that men don't have a movement - we expect everything to be done for us.

It blows my mind because I can see pressure against my views everywhere I look, and it feels like someone would almost have to be intentionally ignorant to the backlash against men's issues (outside of "men should be able to cry") to think that there's nothing stopping a real male driven movement. And frankly, often times the people I see stating there's nothing stopping men from having their own movement are the first to say that such a movement serves no purpose or even hurts the issues that women face. I know often it's not intentional, but how is it possible that people genuinely don't see men hurting?