Many manosphereans use the term "divorce rape" to describe a situation whereby there is a traditional heterosexual relationship wherein a male breadwinner works and a female stays home to cook, clean and look after a child.

In such a relationships, there is inequality of wealth and income. The man earns more while the woman usually earns nothing or very little.

The argument manosphereans use is that after no fault divorce was implemented, housewives started to see their breadwinner husbands as a pot of gold to be looted. As a result, these women talk to a divorce lawyer, initiate divorce proceedings, and take half or more of the man's wealth.

However, can't this be prevented simply by ensuring that the man and woman are equal? If someone gets into a relationship with someone else, they can make sure that both of them earn similar amounts and also have similar wealth. This equality removes the incentives of divorce. If you have a net worth of $1 million but your partner also has a net worth of $1 million then if you try to steal your partner's million then you also risk losing your own million, so you end up not divorcing. However, if you have zero net worth but your partner has $1 million in net worth, you have nothing to lose if you try to take that money via divorce.

So equality can prevent divorce by ensuring both parties to a relationships have skin in the game.