TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Don't hide how you feel. Men are allowed to feel sad.

Jobdb2001

September 8, 2017
10807 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/oph9q9800pkz.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Don't hide how you feel. Men are allowed to feel sad.
Author

Jobdb2001

Upvotes 10807
Comments 459
Date September 8, 2017 5:16 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6yw5n4/dont_hide_how_you_feel_men_are_allowed_to_feel_sad/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/dont-hide-how-you-feel-men-are-allowed-to-feel-sad.1071512
https://theredarchive.com/post/1071512
Top posts by Jobdb2001

Maybe it was just that the Ghostbusters remake fucking sucked?

585 upvotes
June 7, 2017
/r/MensRights

So this article has been written by a white man...

268 upvotes
August 30, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]theothermod[M] [score hidden] 8 years ago stickied comment (1 child) | Copy Link

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber of this subreddit, please take a moment to read this comment and understand what you are seeing. Likely this post that brought you here is a low quality format of a highly emotional issue - the problem with Reddit as a whole is that clickbait posts get more attention and quicker voting. So please don't judge the subreddit based on just this one post.

This subreddit is dedicated to discussions surrounding the issues currently faced by men in our society. Don't think that men have any issues? Please visit our wiki and see for yourself the kinds of issues that we are discussing.

You don't have to agree with these points of view to take part in the discussion - we won't ban you for disagreeing. While it is common for people here to disagree with the feminist ideology, that doesn't mean we are anti-women or anti-equal rights. Keep in mind that feminism is a full fledged philosophy and not simply a statement about the rights of women. There are alternatives to feminism that focus on equal rights. Either way, we would still welcome your contributions to discussions on such topics. Only through discussion will people's minds change.

If you want a quick review of some of the most interesting discussions that have occurred on this subreddit, please check out this link. If you are interested in understanding the views of a feminist who investigate the men's rights movement, please check out this link to her documentary all about it. If you want to know more about the issues we are concerned with, try these books: The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers or Who Stole Feminism by Christina Hoff Sommers or The Myth of Male Power.

Thank you for reading this and not judging us before you know more about us.

[–][deleted] 511 points512 points513 points 8 years ago* (365 children) | Copy Link

Vain social media campaigns won't improve suicide rates – we need to listen

The question we need to ask ourselves, then, isn’t “why are men so crap at talking about their problems” but “why is our society so crap at fixing the problems that can lead to male suicide”.

Male suicide is not simply an internal problem caused by the unwillingness of individual men to talk or get help, but a complex, external issue exacerbated by our collective inability to acknowledge and address the many different problems that are known to put men on the pathway to suicide.

The social problems that can increase men’s risk of suicide include unemployment, relationship issues, being separated from your kids, financial trouble, being a victim of violence or abuse, being excluded from school, alcohol and substance abuse, long-term illness, homelessness, social isolation and mental health disorders.

Of course, in a world where all things masculine are framed as strong, assertive and independent (and all things feminine are seen as vulnerable, passive and intimately connected), our conversations about gender are inevitably shaped by the sexist belief that "women have problems and men are problems".

It simply doesn’t work to keep saying that suicidal men are the problem because they don’t talk, when we, as a society, are so hopelessly ineffective at talking about the problems men have.

But there is no point any of us posting suicide selfies telling men #ItsOkayToTalk, if we are not prepared to open our hearts, minds and ears and listen to whatever men say in response. You see, if we want to stop male suicide, it isn’t just suicidal men who need to learn#ItsOkayToTalk, it’s the rest of us who need to #LearnHowToListen.

[–]mgtownigga 121 points122 points123 points 8 years ago (41 children) | Copy Link

seriously. until the stigma associated with mental illness and men is gone, these campaigns are fucking useless. Most men have learned to hold evertyhing in because ti proves detrimental to relationships, romatnic or otherwise. Good luck being too expressive as a man and being successul in a sexual sense lol

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 30 points31 points32 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The "lol male tears" campaigns from feminists aren't helping either.

[–]DarkMarksPlayPark 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Try being expressive during the breakup of a relationship, it gives them all the ammunition they need if there's ever a custody battle.

I once cried after loosing out on a job while I was unemployed, we were broke and looking at having the house being repossessed. We are no longer together but she reminds me of it when she feels like deflating my character a little.

[–]mgtownigga 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

yeah it's all shit man, i dont think im long for this world anymore. I'm just fed up and tired. I don't even want sympathy, I just want rest lol, preferably eternal. It sounds relaxing at this point. To just leave it all. Fuck everyone

[–]DarkMarksPlayPark 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My plan is to get to an age we're I can live in a VR opioid comma, so I'm playing the long game.

I truly believe that technology and drugs will bring us the afterlife we deserve. So come 70 I want to jack in, jack up and fuck off!

[–]dadibom 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

are you sure you didn't mean "jack in, fuck up and jack off"?

[–]rockhartel 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Real talk

[–]BigWolfUK 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell me about it. I can't talk about 90% of what's going through my head because it'll cause me so many problems with family, friends, and even authorities.

[–]carnevoodoo 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I've cried six times this week. My wife still loves me. Maybe don't buy into this bullshit.

[–]misfortunecookies 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe your wife is unique? Give her some credit. Most men have been abandoned.

[–]minion_is_here 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My wife is the same. However, people like our wives exist despite how society conditions people not because of it.

There is still a societal problem even if there are also some healthy open-minded people.

[–]mgtownigga 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

well im happy for you. A lot of men do not have this.

[–]Rawrination 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The social problems that can increase men’s risk of suicide include unemployment, relationship issues, being separated from your kids, financial trouble, being a victim of violence or abuse, being excluded from school, alcohol and substance abuse, long-term illness, homelessness, social isolation and mental health disorders.

What kind of prize do I win for getting bingo with most of the above?

[–]DarkMarksPlayPark 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are not alone mate, PM me if you need to trade stories.

[–]TheBookOfSeil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another free game of bingo.

[–]Rethgil 68 points69 points70 points 8 years ago (315 children) | Copy Link

Well said.

Problem number one. Men face harder lives than women. Full stop.

Problem two. Society, and often women, don't accept men should be allowed to equally vocalise their feelings.

Solution. Part one. Men shouldn't face so many hardships in life compared to women.

Solution. Part two. Its WOMEN, not men, who need to learn to be more tolerant.

There's a reason women live substantially longer than men.

[–]rosellem 565 points566 points567 points 8 years ago (177 children) | Copy Link

Problem number one. Men face harder lives than women. Full stop.

Right there, you lost. This isn't a pissing contest to see who has the hardest life. You don't gain anything by making it a contest. Women face unique problems. Men face unique problems.

Men face hard lives. Full stop.

That needs to be your opener. If you make this about men v. women, you lose.

[–]cynoclast 78 points79 points80 points 8 years ago (83 children) | Copy Link

I dunno, workplace deaths, and injuries, suicides, shorter life span, non-consensual genital mutilation, harsher sentencing for the same crime, more likely to be the victim of violence, the draft are all way more serious than a lot of women's issues.

Bring up female genital mutilation, and all of society goes fucking berserk. Bring up male genital mutilation, and people tell you to shut up, because women have it worse. Which, while admittedly some of the practices can be worse, it leads to the whole issue being never addressed at all.

I agree that it shouldn't be a pissing contest. But the problem is society, and especially women have already made it one, with all this 'patriarchy' nonsense. And as a result of that men are told to sit down and shut the fuck up, and get back to work.

Or just look at cancer funding:

According to estimates from the National Institutes of Health, in the United States in 2010, 207,090 women and 1,970 men will get new cases of breast cancer, while 39,840 women and 390 men will likely die from the disease. The estimated new cases of prostate cancer this year — all affecting men — is 217,730, while it is predicted 32,050 will die from the disease.

Dan Zenka, the Prostate Cancer Foundation’s vice president of communications, says the similarity in numbers is hard to ignore. “Prostate cancer is to men what breast cancer is to women,” he told The Daily Caller.

Breast cancer awareness advocates have done an inspired job getting out word and excitement for their cause. Despite their success, prostate cancer has been left in the dust — both in terms of awareness and federal funding. Case in point, prostate cancer research receives less than half of the funding breast cancer does.

In fiscal year 2009, breast cancer research received $872 million worth of federal funding, while prostate cancer received $390 million. It is estimated that fiscal year 2010 will end similarly, with breast cancer research getting $891 million and prostate cancer research receiving $399 million.

http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/05/breast-cancer-receives-much-more-research-funding-publicity-than-prostate-cancer-despite-similar-number-of-victims/

Breast cancer gets more than twice the funding, despite the incident rate of prostate cancer being on par. That's a serious issue. If we're going to achieve egalitarianism, that's one clear cut and obvious gap that needs to be closed.

[–]chinachinachina3 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Your argument falls flat because even if men had much easier lives, they're still deserving of a society that will listen. Why the he'll does the difficulty of life dictate the empathy to which a man is entitled?

Lose all of your talking points. Suicide is preventable. Society must care for its members. Rich and poor, hard and easy, long and short lives are all deserving of help.

Not everything has to be a pile on of manhood tropes.

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Er no. Its not a single issue problem, its a multiple issue one. And one of those is men face unbearable struggles when alongside they live in a feminised intolerant society that talks of masculinity as 'toxic'.

So try not to freak out when you are faced with the fact that women are part of this equation and must be discussed.

[–]chinachinachina3 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, I was away for two weeks.

Your argument still starts with a Men's issues are larger and more serious statement. I don't claim societal issues to be a singular problem as you indicate in your response. I'm simply saying that everyone deserves assistance regardless of the difficulty of their lives.

[–]ONLY_COMMENTS_ON_GW 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

Circumcision is a bad example, because female circumcision definitely looks like it's a lot worse than male circumcision. Also male circumcision is being done less and less these days. The fight against it isn't as loud, but it is there.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

That's like saying that if a school hostage situation happens and one class has 30 hostages while the other has 29 you should just ignore the other one.

It's non-consensual cosmetic surgery en masse that involves cutting off a body part. It is no less than that and it's horrible. This is an issue that Women do not face and that the media doesn't care about.

[–]bigstephen 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I was dancing with two fun girls tonight, for hours, then the doorman threw me out because I appeared too drunk. I'm bummed. This has nothing to do with the topic.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The doorman likely wouldn't have thrown you out if you were a woman.

Boom, now this has something to do with the topic.

[–]DrunkonIce 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Woman would have been thrown out but due to PR concerns transportation would be provided in some form. Clubs don't care if a drunk male is beaten but they do if a drunk female is attacked.

[–]BigWolfUK 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

As a former doorman, I'd say we would have thrown the woman out also

Difference is, we'd be more likely to ensure a woman is at least able to get to a taxi, because a man being attacked after doesn't raise any concerns, a woman being attacked leads to a PR nightmare for the club. Even though women are often worse drunks than men

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, thank you for being honest at least. It sucks that you had to do that, but you have to do what you have to do and I wouldn't expect others to endanger their job and livelihood to make a statement.

[–]ONLY_COMMENTS_ON_GW 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This conversation is based around "Who's got it worse". If there are more hostages in one situation than the other then they've got it worse.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This was to refute you on two levels, assuming one has it worse than the other that doesn't mean the other's problems aren't worth addressing, thus arguing who's got it worse is pointless.

The second refutes the basis that Women have it worse. If Women had the higher suicide rate and were the victims of the vast majority of work-related deaths, I would relinquish it to them and say they have it worse. But they don't.

[–]NightmareInn 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Edit: sorry replied to wrong post.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's like saying that if a school hostage situation happens and one class has 30 hostages while the other has 29 you should just ignore the other one.

More like ignoring an ongoing school shooting because "Columbine was worse".

FGM almost never happens in the US.

MGM happens every day.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Picking out the one point that is debatable doesn't really help though, either.

Most of his post is about addressing the fact that there are very serious issues that men face, simply because we are men, that go almost entirely ignored by so many people because gender roles are taken as Gospel.

Let's stay on the same team (with women, too, because without them on our side, our problems will never, ever be taken seriously).

[–]ONLY_COMMENTS_ON_GW 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I never debated any post here, I just said it's a bad example.

[–]cynoclast 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's a perfect example. Because for the most part FGM doesn't happen in the west. So discussing how much worse a hypothetical issue is, is a waste of air, compared to MGM, which occurs to ~81% of men. So comparing an act that doesn't happen to one that happens to thousands a day is a night and day clear picture of which gender (not individual) has it worse on that particular front.

[–]turtleenergy33061 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The most severe form of FGM is worse. But many types of female circumcision are about as severe or even less severe than male circumcision.

[–]cynoclast 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But they don't happen in the west, so it's a red herring. It's like saying it's worse to for Earth to be hit by a comet, so people concerned about hurricanes should shut up.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. It's like interrupting a breast cancer march in the US by screaming that malaria is worse.

[–]Castellan_ofthe_rock 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Comparing the 2 is kinda silly regardless. One involves removing most of the ability to have pleasurable sex, the other doesnt. frankly, I'm happy I was circumcised, but that's just me.

[–]elonsbattery 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Plenty of female circumcision is only the clitorial hood - exactly the same as male circumcision.

And male circumcision definitely has a negative effect on sensitivity. It was originally introduced to limit sexual pleasure.

Both are barbaric and should only be performed on consenting adults.

[–]_Mellex_ 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But the issue isn't about how much it hurts or the likelihood of complications. The only issue is consent.

[–]ONLY_COMMENTS_ON_GW 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That is definitely not the only issue

[–]_Mellex_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*only issue one needs to mention

[–]Eryemil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Female circumcusion is not worse than male circumcusion. Sounds to me that you've allowed yourself to buy into the gynocentric brainwashing being peddled by feminists and other groups complicit in the neglect of men and boys.

[–]mgtownigga 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah and female circumscisoin is illegal in all western countries...try again dumbass

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Circumcision is a bad example, because female circumcision definitely looks like it's a lot worse than male circumcision.

Except it is virtually unheard of in the modern West.

Men being drafted and sent to fight in Vietnam is worse than women facing sexual harassment at work. Except the former doesn't happen anymore.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"because female circumcision definitely looks like it's a lot worse than male circumcision." This statement only makes sense through the lenses of culturally normalized male circumcision. We routinely mutilate the genitals of baby boys and very few Americans bat an eye over it.

[–]dadibom 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you could say that about most arguments..

[–]7times9is42 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the thing to understand is that, as long as you're discussing personal issues, any attempt to classify any one thing as worse than another means that the people you're trying to get your point across to might try to invalidate it if they've experienced what you've described as the lesser issue. This would lose you the opportunity to change their mind if that's your end game

[–]DrunkonIce 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a huge problem with this sub. Instead of working alongside feminism (not radical feminism) many of the users here turn into the male versions of radical feminist and claim women face little to no problems or that it's a contest and we should only focus on the supposed harder life.

It would be like a racial rights activist telling Black Americans to quiet down about their issues because Native Americans have it worse in most categories.

Sexism hits both sides hard. Men and Women both face it, are both hit by it, and both need assistance. We can't fix both sides of the issue by only focusing on a single side.

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points 8 years ago* (78 children) | Copy Link

This isn't a pissing contest to see who has the hardest life.

But nobody bats a fucking eye when it's "women have it worse."

Edit: Alright, let me explain this shit for all of our mentally challenged friends from /r/all who couldn't find their own ass with a map and a compass. This should all be clear to anyone who doesn't need help dressing themselves in the morning, but let's assume you're all at least a little bit literate, even if you're incapable of thinking for yourself.

There are a limited amount of resources to go around when it comes to solving social issues, especially gendered ones. Right now, as it has been for decades, the prevailing assumption is that women have it worse. This has basically gone unchallenged in any meaningful way. As a result, almost every single major institution on the planet dedicated to solving gendered issues is focused entirely on women's issues.

This has continued even as male suicide rates rise, and they were already high to begin with. This has continued despite men's sentencing rates being utterly insane compared to women's. This has continued despite almost every single workplace death being a man. This has continued despite extreme reluctance to spend any amount of money on men's health, despite their lower expected lifespan.

Now, you can point to some random woman and potentially find somebody who has it worse than your hypothetical "average" man. Obviously this is the case. However, this is not how social programs work. It goes back to how resources are allocated. You can't just send out millions of little social helper soldiers to seek people out and fix their problems on an individual basis. You have to generalize. A lot. You have to look at the numbers, figure out what issues are most important, and put more of your resources into those.

Well, here we are. Again, the most powerful organizations solving gendered issues are trying to solve women's issues, but they're doing it in a society that's figuratively (and, in some cases, literally) built on the corpses of men, and at no point, has our society decided to step back and maybe address this issue.

tl;dr go fuck yourself, read the whole thing. If you've got time to bitch about my pointless comment on Reddit saying men have it worse, you've got time to go march in the street over women having it worse being the institutionalized assumption, which I would assume is just a tad bit more important.

[–]rosellem 89 points90 points91 points 8 years ago (56 children) | Copy Link

Idk, I see plenty of people complaining about that all the time. That's half the posts/comments in this sub.

Look, I think the "women have it worse" idea is wrong. But responding with "no, men have it worse" is just childish and counterproductive.

[–]NibblyPig 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, we are not allowed to say we have it worse. We must hide this. Wait...

"you need to talk about feelings more if you're sad"

"ok... Well I'm sad that I'm treated so badly, I seem to have it much worse because society does nothing to help me"

"lol fag you don't have it worse how dare you say that, lol stop crying about it jesus"

"..."

[–]the_calibre_cat 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Look, I think the "women have it worse" idea is wrong. But responding with "no, men have it worse" is just childish and counterproductive.

Ditto. Men DO have it worse, at least, in Western countries. And it's not going to get better. There's a looooot of shit stacked against us, men specifically, in the coming years.

But political realities. That shit will never fly, and if this movement hopes to get off the ground (it's taxiing to runway three right now)... that can't be associated with it.

Lols. Men are angrier, too, which the public sees, and makes them harbor even more disdain for the male plight. Man, we suck.

[–]keonkla 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Something is going to have to give eventually, Its either going to be good or bad depending on the outcome. I don't expect feminists with how far there heads are shoved up there own ass to get this tho.

[–]Ted8367 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

But responding with "no, men have it worse" is just childish and counterproductive.

When it comes to deaths from suicide, it's just the fact. You are deflecting attention from the facts, in this case.

Why is that?

[–]rosellem 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

This conversation was clearly about men's and women's lives in general, not just suicide.

[–]Ted8367 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Although that was the subject of the OP, and is numerically quantifiable. Moving the discussion away from specifics is one way of starting to ignore the facts.

[–]rosellem 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Problem number one. Men face harder lives than women. Full stop.

That was the comment I responded to. I'm not the one who moved away from specifics. Take your issue up with the person who said that.

[–]Ted8367 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So, just to be clear, do you think that pointing out that men kill themselves at a much higher rate than women do, is "childish and counterproductive", or not?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If men have it better why do they kill themselves so much more frequently?

[–]abananafullofpoo 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Idk, I see plenty of people complaining about that all the time. That's half the posts/comments in this sub. Look, I think the "women have it worse" idea is wrong. But responding with "no, men have it worse" is just childish and counterproductive.

It's not a matter of whether you happen to think the ''women have it worse'' idea is wrong. This isn't about your no true feminist pendulum. It's about creating a content mill the likes will make buzzfeed editors have nightmares.

[–]williaminlondon 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Before anyone gives this poster too much credit they should pay attention to the toxic vomit she spews in other subs:

Their pussy-ass 1 post every 15 minutes for everyone that isn't a Jihadcoin cocksucker downvote-technique rule in their ''unmoderated'' subreddit hasn't thrust its roger up my ass yet, so make hay while it lasts I say. Man, that Roger Very shit guy is the stereotype of nouveau riche isn't he, blergh.

[–]mgtownigga 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

in what metric do women have it worse? I'm being 100 percent serious here. They have unique issues, no one is denying that, but by every metric that severely affects qol, it seems men are doing worse across the board. I really don't see how this can be denied, and I think pussyfooting around it and softening that stance is a problem

[–]ONLY_COMMENTS_ON_GW 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Uhh I think most people do, especially on Reddit, so if you haven't seen it you must just be blind to it.

[+]AkiraZXE1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

It's been the unchallenged position in society and in government for the last, what, 50 years? Pretty sure a handful of Reddit comments haven't changed that.

[–]ONLY_COMMENTS_ON_GW 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What? 50 years ago the idea was still around that women should find fulfillment in homemaking and childbearing. Ever heard of the Feminist Mystique? Wife abuse was almost expected 50 years ago. This is literally an ad from 1971 that plays on domestic abuse. Woman definitely had it worse 50 years ago. The "men have it worse" argument wasn't even around.

[+]AkiraZXE1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Ok, let's say I take your stupid poster as evidence that I'm 10 years off and that in the 70s, women were just chattel being beaten and traded for sex, something we didn't get around to solving until the 80s.

40 years then. Point is, it has been multiple generations where women have not had it worse, men have, but the institutional power is focused entirely on solving women's "issues" while virtually every single person who dies on the job is a man, most people who commit suicide are men, and so on and so on.

[–]ONLY_COMMENTS_ON_GW 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol you think as soon as women asked to be treated equally they were suddenly equals? Look how well that worked out for the blacks.

[–]livingcode[🍰] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

A good portion of the posts on this sub are people "batting an eye" towards woman claiming that women have it worse than men, so I'm not sure where you get the idea that no one thinks making this Man Vs Woman is idiotic

[–]Yuo_cna_Raed_Tihs 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Stop being so childish and giving this sub a bad name.

[+]AkiraZXE1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, rather than writing a long comment explaining my thoughts even though it's going to be received horribly, I should just call people whiny bitches.

[–]EeeeeeevilMan 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Wrong. 100% fully disagree.

Right now we "gain nothing" for our efforts because a large portion of the world believes that women have much harder lives than men, when the opposite is actually true. Because of that, our legitimate complaints are treated as the privileged whining.

The "we all have different problems" approach only allows them to continue to dismiss us.

Not to mention, it's bullshit. Men have much harder lives--it's not even close.

[–]Blutarg 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who said anything about a contest? He's stating a fact.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, this is something I try to get my feminist friends to appreciate as well. It's about gender equality.

[+]se7enpsychopaths1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

If you make this about men v. women, you lose.

Says something about equality doesn't it.

[–]Jethr0Paladin 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Found the feminist.

[–]Ryuksapple84 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, there are plenty of problems to go around. It is just that our problems don't get attention and there are not many significant platforms for changing that.

[–]lolwomen321 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Talk about preaching to the choir, when all the people from all are here. Feminists have literally done this shit for decades, culminating in men constantly killing themselves, mutilating mens genitals still being legal, people seeing abuse and cheating as a thing men do more even though all evidence points to the contrary. Boys are still falling behind in school. Why do you come here with no posts beforehand and post something like that? Do you do the same on female or feminist subs?

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Please provide any evidence to back up your hilariously obvious attempt to avoid debating the facts. Happy to wait.

You get faced with a clear factor even the UNITED NATIONS acknowledges about men forced to face wars, workplace deaths, shorter lives etc...

...and you try to derail?

Given there's 10,000 plus upvotes for the OP, I wondered how long it would be before the feminist organised trolls waded in to try to defuse this time bomb and all clubbed in together to upvote one agreed post. Bet there was much rubbing of grubby little hands in glee.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

YOURE the only one who tried to turn it into "a contest". You also tried a strawman tactic to attack men by using the term " pissing contest" which is associated with males. Your agenda is clear.

All I did was state a fact. Men face tougher lives. Cancer and suicide are closely linked to stress. This is therefore a vital valid fact.

Why are you so afraid of it and also unwilling to respond or follow up your conveniently and mysteriously upvotes anti male post?

[–]rosellem 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First, I'm not sure you're clear on what a strawman argument is. But I'll rephrase the first Part: "This isn't a contest to see who has the hardest life." Still the same point.

Second, what constitutes a "tougher life" is a subjective judgment. It can't be a fact. That's why it's a waste of time to argue over.

[–]No_More_Candy 143 points144 points145 points 8 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

Solution. Part two. Its WOMEN, not men, who need to learn to be more tolerant.

I disagree, I've had far more men call me a pussy for expressing vulnerability than women.

[–]NightmareInn 59 points60 points61 points 8 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor.

"Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed to fall apart." Ironically, she explained, men are often pressured to open up and talk about their feelings, and they are criticized for being emotionally walled-off; but if they get too real, they are met with revulsion. She recalled the first time she realized that she had been complicit in the shaming: "Holy Shit!" she said. "I am the patriarchy!"

https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-of-shame-are-organized-around-gender/275322/

Edit: if feminists actually wanted to see men express their emotions more these campaigns would be aimed at women. "Women, stop being so judgmental of men who occasionally show emotions! Men aren't robots!" Demanding that men do something they know will garner social disapproval is not helpful. Ironically it's just another way of placing all of the responsibilities on the man (ie man up). When women have problems the solution is "Men! Fix this problem!" When men have problems the solution is "Men! Fix this problem!"

The more important point is that these "cry more" campaigns are simply a way of skirting the real issues. Why are men killing themselves in record numbers? Could it be that they are being relentlessly demonized by feminists? They no longer have a role in society that they can feel proud of? They lack economic opportunities? They don't have as much money devoted to their health (including mental health) as women? There isn't enough support for the homeless? They are treated much harsher by the criminal justice system? They are subject to severe discrimination in the family courts, and are often unable to see their children after divorce? Etc. Etc.

[–]SOwED 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor.

This doesn't actually say anything either way about whether men or women shame men about a lack of masculinity more. What it does say is that men care more about women shaming them for a perceived lack of masculinity than they do about men shaming them about it.

My experience agrees with /u/No_More_Candy in that I've had far far more men in my life tell me to man up, call me a pussy, etc, but usually in contexts where it doesn't really cut very deep. If I'm drinking with friends and someone tells me I'm a pussy for not keeping up with drinks, that doesn't really say anything about me not being a "real man" so much as it's just the way my friends communicate, and I think a lot of other male-only groups work similarly.

When I've had women tell me to man up, or tell me I'm not a man/a real man for something I'm doing or to coerce me into doing something I don't want to, it carries a lot more shame with it. This is undoubtedly because when women have said this type of thing to me, I've been emotionally involved with them beyond friendship, and it's a sort of betrayal of trust. It's her saying, "I know my opinion of your masculinity matters to you, and I'm going to leverage that in order to hurt you or control you."

On the contrary, my friends don't say stuff like that to hurt me, and only to "control" me into drinking a bit more, and if I'm uncomfortable with that, they drop it.

TL;DR: Men probably do it more, but it carries more shame when women do it.

[–]NightmareInn 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Men probably do it more, but it carries more shame when women do it.

Put it this way: if women valued femininity in men then men would be competing in the sensitivity olympics rather than going to the gym. As noted by Marvin Harris and other anthropologists, male behavior is largely determined by female sexual selection. It is unhelpful if not downright cruel to urge men (and especially boys) to become more feminine so long as women primarily value masculine traits.

That's why these "cry more" campaigns are a diversion and waste of time. We need to look at ways we can make mens lives better. Opposing feminism is the first step. They lobby for laws that harm men and boys while opposing those (eg shared parenting) that would help.

[–]lhjkhjkljklhjkl 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is unhelpful if not downright cruel to urge men (and especially boys) to become more feminine so long as women primarily value masculine traits.

They don't seem to care. They don't see men and boys as people like they do girls so them having sex, or being socially successful, or having a good family, aren't even things to consider.

We constantly are pointing out that men don't cry because men are much more tolerant of both male and female behaviors in women, but women are not tolerant of female behavior in men, so the men have adapted to the environment as necessary to survive. They don't care. They won't even admit they and other women do this. They would rather keep up the charade while men kill themselves. The charade means that much to them.

They don't care. The entire thing has so little to do with caring, it's insane.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think a case could be made that the push for more feminine men is a subconscious shit test of sorts.

Women may really want men who never genuinely need support and who can endure hardship without 'breaking' because that is a masculinity they are attracted to. They say they want men to open up and be more vulnerable but maybe they really want men who can respond to that request by not ever needing to. In doing so as a group, women are filtering out the most masculine from the least. Men who reject this request and remain productive are more desirable.

Or not, just a thought.

[–]NightmareInn 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think it's anything that dramatic. I just think it's complete cluelessness about what it's like to be a man.

[–]SOwED 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think "cry more" would be the answer regardless of women's sexual selection.

The goal should just be "be able to cry at an appropriate time" not just blindly increase emotionality.

[–]SexualDepression 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps a more accurate statement of intention with the cry more campaigning is to increase the occasions and circumstances where it is appropriate for men to cry.

[–]Plasmabat 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When men tell other men that are their friends to act more masculine they're trying to help them become more appealing to women.

[–]SOwED 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes, yes.

[–]Cpt_Autiszmo 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you think that the message to men and what women look for in men biologically isn't the same?

How the virtuos message is that men should open up more and talk about their feelings, but what drives attraction for women is men who are stereotypical who don't feel much and are strong?

[–]flaming-penguin -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Well maybe don't be such a pussy then

[–]No_More_Candy 49 points50 points51 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

If you're trying to convince people that /r/MensRights is not about helping men but instead about hating on women then you're doing a bang up job. Luckily I see you're not actually regular here.

[–]lolwomen321 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So one commenter makes male pro subs hateful. What do you think of the thousands of comments over at trollx and askwomen, that shames mens bodies, and are sexist? Let's not forget these comments easily reach +500 comment karma and +5000 link karma. Seems like it's supported by a lot of women. Why don't you brigaders ever call out their man hatred? It's almost like you don't care or have an agenda to push. Hmmm.

[–]Source_or_gtfo 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those subs are heavily censored. It's sad to see that clean-up job actually fools some people.

[–]EndGame410 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Bro I think he's just making a joke

[–]Dray_Gunn 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Turns out he wasn't. Check his reply..

[–]EndGame410 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fucking seriously

[–]Warhawk2052 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/Troll

[–]No_More_Candy 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know, but I wasn't wrong about him. He's not on this subreddit because he wants to help men. Just read:

I fucking hate feminists but you faggot pussies bitching on and on about "oh boo hoo, men have depression" or "men get raped too" are just as bad.

[–]EndGame410 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good lord really

[–]NightmareInn 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but instead about hating on women

Err, I'm failing to see how he was "hating on women."

[–]Imissmyusername 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. For years I tried to talk my ex husband into getting help but he was so stuck on the idea about the guys at working finding out that he wouldn't do it. He was finally ordered by a judge to get help when he became a danger to himself.

And it's not just men who catch shit. Another ex of mine didn't believe depression was real and I could just snap out of it if I wanted. This shit needs to be recognized as a whole, that it's ok to get help regardless, it's not a gender thing.

[–]Sum1Um 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One should choose their company carefully before wearing their heart on their sleeve.

[–]lolwomen321 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And I've had countless women assault me, shame my body, abuse me, harass me and sexually assault me. And also seen them do similiar to other men, Don't let this detract from your detraction of issues like womens group bias though. It would be the worst thing ever if biases like 'women are wonderful effect' ceased to exist amirite.

[–]outsidetheboxthinkin 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would you prefer being called a badass for expressing vulnerability? You understand you're literally showing weakness but you want it to be seen as strong ? Lol

[–]cum_penibus 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think sometimes if a man teases another man for being unmanly he's doing it out of a sense of concern: that if his friend / brother / son keeps acting like that he'll never attract a mate. If he doesn't toughen up he'll not be able to cope in the real world and make a success of himself. Other times of course, it's just sadistic bullying, and there's a very fine line between the two.

This kind of social conditioning evolved for a reason and it's entirely shaped by wider society's expectations of male gender roles. A man teasing another man in this way is acting as a proxy, channelling society's views, including women's, into his fellow man, and doing so in a relatively emotionally safe environment: in a context where it can be laughed off. It's the emotional equivalent of cubs play-fighting to prepare them for adulthood.

It's all very well to point the finger at men and tell them not to call each other pussies, but without this kind of emotional sandbox, unmanly, unconditioned men would be judged directly by women, bosses, father-in-laws, elders etc. instead, potentially leaving much deeper emotional scars.

I can only speculate that in a society that was less hostile to men, this kind of fraternal ribbing wouldn't be as common. But telling men they are the problem for calling other men pussies is putting the cart before the horse.

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 32 points33 points34 points 8 years ago (66 children) | Copy Link

I disagree with this entire post.

Problem number one. Men face harder lives than women. Full stop.

By what metric? This represents an inability to see things from any point of view other than your own. It would be trivial to find examples of women who have lived objectively harder lives than your average man.

So why the Full stop.

Problem two. Society, and often women, don't accept men should be allowed to equally vocalise their feelings.

I'n my experience, I've never had a women put me down for rationally expressing my feelings. I sure as hell can't say the same for men.

I'm at a loss for what in the world you are talking about.

[–]NightmareInn 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

By what metric?

By most metrics.

It would be trivial to find examples of women who have lived objectively harder lives than your average man.

That's certainly true. It's why the whole concept of "privilege" should be abandoned. There are simply too many variables.

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago* (44 children) | Copy Link

By most metrics.

Your "source" is clearly biased and in this context hilarious. It proves my point. You have no ability to put yourself in the shoes of someone else. The idea you think that represents "most" is laughable.

But fine, lets look at these things.

-Most of the statistics pertain only to a tiny percentage of people ever: 80% of men die in war, yet WW2 only killed 3% of all people. I've heard estimates at 1.6% in recorded history and around 2% for the last 600 years. So why do I care? Has this made my life harder? Is it fair. No. But that's not what we are talking about.

-Many( most?? ) of them are purposfully misleading: Men may account for 77% of homicide victims but commit 96% of homicides. Men killing men is sexist apparently?

-And some, are just fluff. 10% of men are victims of paternety fraud: I fail to see how these support your points.

-Some are meaningless in this discusion: Men make up 93% of work fatalities. They also choose more dangerous jobs for higher pay. Your life is hard due to the choices you made. Gender doesn't even factor into it.

-A lot of it is laughable: Men earn 61.5% of all income but only account for 25% of domestic spending. Who is forcing them to do these things. How is a choice you make of your own free will proof your life is objectivly harder. Are you just mad women aren't buying you things?

All that aside, the vast majority of the things listed don't apply to me. And of the ones that do. I wouldn't call them making my life harder?

Even if I ignore the cherry picking and the misrepresenting, Most simply don't affect my daily life in any way. I would venture to guess it is the same for the majority of Men.

Many many of these things however, i have witness on a daily basis . I can't imagine what it would be like to be a single female in her 30's trying to climb the corporate ladder. I'm thankful every day I'm a man.

Edit: formating and stuff

Edit 2: And for the record, as I posted elsewhere, I think the debate over who has it worst is somewhat subjective. It's not a clear hard line. I'm mostly raging at your "Men have it worst Full Stop Factual statement you can't argue with this." comment. Both sides get raw deals, but IMHO women have it worse.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's legit hilarious that you just chastised someone for using a biased source and then used fucking everydayfeminism.com for your information about how horrible 30something women have it in life. top kek

[–]NightmareInn 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Most of the statistics pertain only to a tiny percentage of people ever:

lol what? Are you saying that eg only a "tiny percentage" of boys go to school?

I've heard estimates at 1.6% in recorded history and around 2% for the last 600 years. So why do I care? Has this made my life harder?

And you previously claimed that I had a lack of empathy? Claiming that being forced to die in war is "no big deal"? That's pants on head retarded. Even today men are still obligated to sign up for selective service before they can vote.

Men may account for 77% of homicide victims but commit 96% of homicides. Men killing men is sexist apparently?

Of course it is. Men have an instinctive bias toward protecting women. The vast majority of violence by both men and women is targeted at men and boys. And your argument is completely irrational: it would be like saying that black murder victims don't count if the murderer is black.

10% of men are victims of paternety fraud: I fail to see how these support your points.

Hint: women cannot be victims of maternity fraud because they give birth to babies. Get it? Social scientists have noted male victims of paternity fraud suffer similar psychological trauma to rape victims.

Men make up 93% of work fatalities. They also choose more dangerous jobs for higher pay.

Yes, because (a) women are hypergamous, which requires men to work harder in order to earn more money and (b) men have to support their families or suffer imprisonment.

All that aside, the vast majority of the things listed don't apply to me.

Irrelevant. You've lived a charmed life, so have many women.

I can't imagine what it would be like to be a single female in her 30's trying to climb the corporate ladder.

Lol most men and women are never in a position to "climb the corporate ladder." You reek of class privilege.

The reality is that on most qualify of life indicators men fall short. They can be legally mutilated at birth; they suffer much more abuse as children, including sexual abuse; education systems discriminate against boys; boys who are sexually abused often see their female perpetrators given a slap on the wrist; males are now a shrinking minority of college students; their sexuality is demonized; they are not even recognized as rape victims in most countries; entire departments at university are geared toward vilifying males; they are discriminated against in the workplace due to affirmative action programs; they are much more likely to suffer violence, including murder; they are often arrested when they are victims of domestic violence due to the feminist Duluth model; they have zero reproductive rights; they are treated massively worse in the criminal justice system (one British study revealed that if men were treated like women in the criminal justice system five out six male prisoners would be free); they are subject to bias in the family courts and are often denied meaningful contact with their children; they are more likely to become alcoholics and drug addicts; they make up the majority of the homeless; the majority of suicides; they have less state resources devoted to their well being even though they pay most taxes; they die younger; etc. etc. etc.

I mean, admittedly these issues aren't quite as serious as "Manspreading" and "Mansplaining" but still...

[+]ilikecombos11 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link

-Most of the statistics pertain only to a tiny percentage of people ever: 80% of men die in war, yet WW2 only killed 3% of all people. I've heard estimates at 1.6% in recorded history and around 2% for the last 600 years. So why do I care? Has this made my life harder? Is it fair. No. But that's not what we are talking about.

How many people have manspreading and mansplaining killed?

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

None.

Statistics aside, I know far more women than men who have been assulted. And I could find plenty of sources to back up my experience.

Now there are a lot of statistics and a lot of controversy surounding them.

That site however did some funny math and tried to make something look far worse than it was.

Do I want to have a fight over who is killed/assulted more through no fault of their own. No!

Does that site prove anything. No!

If someone is gonna go all "Full Stop.", and then post some BS to back up theit supposed indisputable factual claim, I'm gonna call that somebody out.

[+]ilikecombos11 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link

I know far more women than men who have been assulted. And I could find plenty of sources to back up my experience.

Then do so. Unless you mean sexual assault specifically, that is incorrect according to every source I've seen.

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Do I want to have a fight over who is killed/assulted more through no fault of their own. No!

Not a fight I really want to have mostly because it requires to much nuance for reddit.

Yes, If you break it down by pure murder men win.

If you look at all reported violent crimes( anything involving force or the threat of force), it bounces around 50%.

If you look at other metrics, you start to see it has more to do with economic status than gender. While males are incredibly unlikely to be murdered.

That being said.

I don't think the fact that Gangbangs are more likely to be killed really means life is harder for a man.

I don't think the fact that women have been taught not to go out by themselves at night really means life is harder for a man.

I don't think the fact that men are for 1000's of times more likely to start a violent altercation( evidenced by 96+% of murders robbers, attackers, and aggravated assaulters ) really means life is harder for a man.

But yes, if we mean murder rate as a whole you are correct.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Can you link that? Because the sources I see say all violent crime besides sexual assault and maybe domestic violence have more male victims.

[–]poloppoyop 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Statistics aside, I know far more women than men who have been assulted. And I could find plenty of sources to back up my experience.

Following your thought process, if it is 5% of women, those stats are useless. From this https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence , 300k case per year (all gender) so that'd be less than 2% of the population per year. If I copy your way of dismissing stats, assault and rape stats can be discarded in any conversation.

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

2% of the population every year?!?! So every 50 years a number equal to the entire population was a victim of sexual assault.

Damn, even I didn't think it was that high.

[–]Plox_downvote 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Look, I wanted to be fair and balanced but...

-Most of the statistics pertain only to a tiny percentage of people ever: 80% of men die in war, yet WW2 only killed 3% of all people. I've heard estimates at 1.6% in recorded history and around 2% for the last 600 years. So why do I care? Has this made my life harder? Is it fair. No. But that's not what we are talking about.

Irrelevant straw man bullshit intentionally or.. you're a troll.

-Many( most?? ) of them are purposfully misleading: Men may account for 77% of homicide victims but commit 96% of homicides. Men killing men is sexist apparently?

I.. don't... are you trolling here or are you being serious? Are you a flat earther?

-Some are meaningless in this discusion: Men make up 93% of work fatalities. They also choose more dangerous jobs for higher pay. Your life is hard due to the choices you made. Gender doesn't even factor into it.

OK... OK... I'm sorry but you've got to be an idiot or troll. I'm honestly not trying to put you down here but its like you are trying to talk about nuclear physics without knowing grade school math.

If ya trolling, fair enough but if you are serious here.... Honestly man... You need to stop. You should be embarrassed to express such shallow, poorly thought out baseless opinions you've plucked out of thin air. I mean, everything you just posted is so moronic I'm in awe of it.

If its a troll tho, 10/10 with rice.

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Irrelevant to the point straw man bullshit intentionally or.. you're an idiot.

Um, you are claiming men have it worst. So you post a statistic that accounts for less than 3% of all men and you call the point irrelevant.

I guess I am an idiot.

I.. don't... are you trolling here or are you being serious? Are you a flat earther?

...... I have no response lol.

You should be embarrassed to express such shallow, poorly thought out baseless opinions you've plucked out of thin air.

Same.

[–]Plox_downvote 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, I'm not claiming anything other than if these are your serious 'well-thought-out' opinions; they are not well thought out at all. It's like you've read something on Reddit, went 'omfg' and hit that post button without any forethought.

I've not stated any opinion on the subject its self. I have not claimed men have it worst. I've no idea where you're getting that from other than you're not very bright perhaps. I don't know.

[–]DrunkonIce 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This sub is half radical redpillers that are the male equivalent of Tumblr feminist, a quarter radical feminist that brigade, and a quarter genuine intelligent people that want both men and women to be treated as equals.

You ran into that 50%, don't try to argue intelligently you're just gonna somehow be called sexist for it.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Are you aware that any metric you use to prove women are oppressed can be dismissed the same way?

"Oh 6/4 college women are raped? Well most women don't go to college so who cares?"

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Actually, more women go to college than men.

My point was it's not a cut and dry men's lives suck more period. Full Stop.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Actually, more women go to college than men.

Yes somehow that proves women are oppressed.

But anyway most women don't to to college.

That's a fact.

My point was it's not a cut and dry men's lives suck more period. Full Stop.

But it is cut and dried that women have it worse always.

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But it is cut and dried that women have it worse always.

You clearly haven't been paying attention to me. It's not.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So who has it worse overall?

[–]Throwawayingaccount 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It would be trivial to find examples of women who have lived objectively harder lives than your average man.

It would also be trivial to find examples of women who are taller than the average man.

It doesn't change the fact that men are on average taller than women.

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

O so he meant men on averge have a harder life than women on average.

That would be different. The whole Full Stop thing threw me for a loop. Almost as if he was saying all women have it easy and all men have it hard.

[–]Ted8367 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By what metric?

Deaths from suicide for one. The subject in the OP.

This represents an inability to see things from any point of view other than your own.

As you've just demonstrated.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

By what metric? This represents an inability to see things from any point of view other than your own. It would be trivial to find examples of women who have lived objectively harder lives than your average man.

On this same thread you're saying women "objectively" have it worse.

Does that mean your can't see things from any point of view other than your own?

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

No I'm not. I'm saying I think they do but I certainly can't prove it Full Stop Period.

Men have it worse in some ways. women have it worse in some ways. IMHO I think women have it worse overall.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

No I'm not (saying women have it worse)

I personally feel women have it worse off on the whole.

Um.... K....

[–]bigblackcuddleslut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Lol

Overall

On the whole the final tally so to speak may be rather subjective.

You are a funny little troll. What part of IMHO Implys objective truth

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Solution. Part one. Men shouldn't face so many hardships in life compared to women.

how's that a solution ? How about - Solution. Part one. Men shouldn't be sad.

Nobel Prize me!

[–]FirstToSayFake 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Half the time I can't tell if this sub is some big elaborate joke or not. The titles rope me in, the comments do something else.

[–]dylanlolz 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How on earth can you argue that the stigma of sucide is perpetuated solely by women? The stigma is a problem with our society as a whole. Are you saying that only men expierence depression and suicidal thoughts? How would you even know that?

[–]KeeperWolf 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bravo. Very well said.

Ultimately though it is a fools errand.

The way things are - including the treatment of men as expendable - is a manifestation of hard wired biology. An extension of the simple Darwinian fact that on the whole, men's place in the species is to assume greater risks. And such, are not as valued as women and so have less social support for issues.

They are simply expected to die.

The society will go on.

As much as I would change that if I could - you may as well change the stars or the colour of the sky. It is derived from the Nature of the Universe. It evolved this way purposefully. And it is as written into our genetics even more firmly than if it were carved ten miles high in stone.

Until we are willing and able to totally overhaul our fundamental genetic makeup, we will never change the derived social structure it provides.

Our best bet is to make our peace with this, and if possible help each other as men.

[–]Qualanqui 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

I actually noticed this at polytech the other day, all the women in my class all found the smartest guy and proceeded to wrap them around their fingers to the point where the guys are pretty much doing their assignments now and to top it off the tutors tend to flutter around these groups so the rest of us have to rely on either brute force or aptitude.

E. There/their. I know, it was a throwaway comment on something I noticed.

[–]ghjm 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You'd think that the 10th most attractive woman would be better off going after the 2nd smartest guy, who is probably almost as smart but is not being competed for by 9 more attractive women.

[–]Qualanqui 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I should have put guys, there's only like 4 women in my class.

[–]SexualDepression 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

In any scenario, the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Don't forget to directly and deliberately ask for the help you need. There is no shame in being vocal and direct to get the tutors' attention and assistance.

Once they're near your group, someone else can perhaps mention that the people who are getting it don't need their help, but y'all are struggling and could use some attention.

[–]Qualanqui 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know this in my head but I'm so shy it's so hard for me to jump up and down, I'm also extremely kinaesthetic so I don't get the subject (programming) at all and feel bad monopolizing so much of the tutors time with my ineptitude.

[–]SexualDepression 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Approaching the smart kids for some assistance may not be a terrible idea either. Sit near them and listen to them explain stuff to the other students; classmates are also a resource. Some of the students, whom it seems possible you have written off, could genuinely be learning from the smartest guys in the room.

I had to brute force my way through my own ineptitude in trig during college. "Idiot's Guide to..." books scattered on my dorm bed, tears of frustration wrinkling the textbook and my notes - it was a total shitshow. The prof was very good too, I just needed a dozen explanations for the same concept because no one of them presented it to me completely, and in such a fashion that made it clear.

Don't underestimate the power of additional resources (woooo, libraries!). A simple change in the words used can make a difference in how it clicks in your brain.

Good luck!

[–]Qualanqui 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Me and you are very similar it would seem, that didn't mean to sound like a whinge I have my ways and it's coming along. Thank you all the same for your kind words.

[–]Standingbylxgo 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe the smartest guy knows the difference between 'their' and 'there'.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

You should focus more on that apptitude aptitude.

smartest guy and proceeded to wrap them

wrap him

around there fingers

their fingers

there assignments

their assignments

[–]Plox_downvote 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Did I walk into an English lesson somehow? If not then, contributing to a discussion by correcting spelling is about on par with cleaning the toilets at MIT.

[–]Qualanqui 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This fella gets it.

[–]kylebaked 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

An important and dirty job that someone has to do? A necessary contribution to a functioning society?

[–]Plox_downvote 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. But of less worth to the production of valued discourse within the discussion. As in, its nothing to get on a high horse about.

I'm sure if a cleaner banged in to a room in the middle of a discussion interrupting its flow for no other reason to take the bins out, everyone is going to think that guy's an ass or at least tactless.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Did I walk into an English lesson somehow?

no, but you're complaining that women have it easy while you have to rely on your aptitude. So before being spiteful of others, maybe work on that aptitude, that's all.

[–]Plox_downvote 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

complaining that women have it easy

What are you talking about? Where have I said women have it easy!?

All that time with spelling and you've failed to look at user names.

If you're going to go correcting people, don't fuck up basics yourself.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

My bad, let me take you back to basics by rephrasing:

one complaining that women have it easy while one has to rely on one's aptitude. So before being spiteful of others, maybe one shall work on that aptitude

[–]WikiTextBot 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Generic you

In English grammar and in particular in casual English, generic you, impersonal you, or indefinite you is the pronoun you in its use in referring to an unspecified person, as opposed to its use as the second person pronoun.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.27

[–]Plox_downvote 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Even rephrasing your reply here, rather than to 'op', makes your comments lose its contextual thread. Although to be fair, your phrasing does stand alone as a statement.

[–]MildlyChallenged 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

maybe someone will some day realize that there are an immense number of circumstances that would inhibit one's ability to spell and use correct grammar without inhibiting their overall intelligence or ability.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

ability

is that the same as aptitude ? Cause you can't really complain about how women have it easy while you're left fighting for yourself using only your aptitude yet you can't spell, in college.

[–]MildlyChallenged 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

well I certainly don't have the aptitude to decipher the last half of what you just said was supposed to mean, but yes aptitude is synonymous with ability. What I'm saying is that ability to spell isn't exactly indicative of their intelligence or worth to a subject since inability to spell can be explained by language barriers, minor cognitive disabilities, and just plain fatigue or forgetfulness.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

decipher the last half of what you just said

I described OP's claim, that he's at some sort of disadvantage because women yet he can't spell. And I did not claim he lacks intelligence, I only pointed out that maybe before pointing fingers and blaming others one can revise their own aptitude and see if there's any blame to be found there.

[–]Blarty97 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with a lot of what you say, which is very positive. My only different point would be that not everyone wants fixing.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said. A balanced and honest view.

[+]I-Cut-Myself1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

His book "Reasons to stay alive" is brilliant, really helped me out when I was destroying myself

[–]Forrestpg 36 points37 points38 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The owner of the gym I train at and a very good friend of mine committed suicide on Wednesday. I'm still trying to understand it. He was 48.

[–]Blutarg 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Poor guy.

[–]Skjags 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry that you lost your friend. That must be really hard.

We can't go back, but we can always do our best to look out for those left around us. Take care out there.

[–]KIngofHypnotoads 123 points124 points125 points 8 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Can someone please explain to me what is so wrong with this tweet? As a 30 year old man that is alive today because I spoke to someone about my feelings instead of bottling them up as I had been for 28 years, I don't get why this is getting bashed so much. I believe that being able to speak about your emotions in the open is a show of strength, even to strangers. You are not doing it for them, fuck what they think about me speaking out, I do it for me. Because if I let this one thing that bother me fester inside without speaking about it then I am giving it the power that they want it to have. I don't frequent /r/MensRights but I am surprised by the reaction to this tweet. Maybe I am just missing a point and would like to have a conversation about it.

[–]Skjags 53 points54 points55 points 8 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

I don't think there's anything wrong with this tweet in particular. Maybe some people don't think being a man is about being 'strong'. Personally I support the tweet.

I think the sentiment people are expressing is that we need to start doing more as a society to address male mental health than continuing to only frame it as a result of men keeping things bottled up.

Yes we should speak up, and I am glad that you did. But it is important to strive for a change in behaviour in society at large, not just the individuals suffering.

I hope that everyone strives to reflect and put in the work to better themselves and those around them.

[–]KIngofHypnotoads 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Ok, this is the sensible approach I was hoping to hear. Maybe its me, but the responses on this thread made it seems like that way of thinking is toxic. I do however agree that there is more to this issue than the tweet expressed, and maybe we should start seeing people tweet about the greater scope of the problem. Thanks for responding

[–]Skjags 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Another side is that, from my experience, when I was in a bad place I was full of venom and I spat it out often. It was like a survival mode.

I fought every battle head on whereas now I try not to chase my losses but instead invest that energy where I think it will lead to most benefit. It is still tough and I don't always get it right, but I'll always try.

(Edit: For an unrelated example of me not getting things right please see below where I managed to post this reply what seems like a thousand times.)

When you are feeling under attack it is understandable to reject outright insufficient solutions, but having made it out the other side I realise now that instead of tearing down incomplete ideas we should recognise the parts that have merit and build on that together.

The greatest journeys are still made of small steps and all that.

I don't pretend that our society and all the players in it are ideal, right or fair. But it's what we have and we need to work with good intentions to make our visions a reality.

Progress is better made by building on and nurturing ideas not tearing them down.

[–]levelupmv 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Address male mental health" yes.

[–]Scared_of_stairs_LOL 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have no reaction other than the premise is false. Leading cause of death is accidental injury 2 to 1 over suicide for males under 50. Suicide is a serious problem but there's no need to lie to give it attention.

[–]iainmf 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The issue I have is that it places the emphasis on the individual man to solve his own problems. It's still asking men to be strong. In that respect 'open up' is not that different to 'man up'. Our society just doesn't like to see men as vulnerable, even when they are.

The alternative, rather than to expect the man to act, even in a state of poor mental health, is for others to be proactive in helping distressed men. There's a whole range of things that can help, from reducing the causes of distress, to improving health systems to identify distressed men, to providing environments that protect against stress and prevent poorer mental health (eg Men's Sheds).

I think a better way for Mr Haig to approach it would be something like this.

Suicide is the biggest killer of men under 50. Take time to catch up with your mates. See if a friend needs someone at their back. We can prevent more unnecessary deaths.

[–]WikiTextBot 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men's shed

Men's sheds or community sheds are non-profit organisations that originated in Australia, to advise and improve the overall health of all males. However some have expanded their remit to anyone regardless of age or gender, and have similar aims & functions to Hackerspace's. They normally operate on a local level in the community, promoting social interaction and aim to increase the quality of life. There are over 900 located across Australia, with thousands of active members.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.27

[–]CalvinsCuriosity 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The heart of it is competition. Part of that "toxic masculinity" is that men are disposable. Promoted by the very women that gate keep sex and conveniently keep mum about the double standards. It's a Vicious cycle that will not be fixed until an extreme paradigm shift happens and will not; very likely, happen. When being told to " man up" is the goto response for men who lack proper social support structures due to competition and don't have access to male oriented council and shelter its a give in.

No not every situation is the same but would you claim that with women? If a man snaps and beats his wife because he is supposed to be a provider for an entire family in an age that has constantly made excuses for women's choices while grinding men down into labourous dangerous jobs. Why is our first question always "how could you beat a woman? " instead of what lead to this? Bad examples.

Ah fuck I'm just repeating. I'm deficient. Anyways I hope we could admit in the west that men; in my social circles, shouldn't have to work a deadly labor job to get by. Women have choices men have the illusion of it.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think there's an issue when you come at depression with a narrow view of the solution. Just talking is not the actual solution. It can help some people, but it's not going to be the one size fits all solution that people act like. Men talking about their emotions more isn't going to fix, for example; not being able to see your kids. No amount of talking is going to make you feel better that you can't see your children.

And society won't listen to it even if you try to. Because male privilege~ and patriarchy~ the empathy gap is certainly a real thing. When CH Sommers went on MSNBC years ago to talk about how boys were [still] falling behind in education, and the host(s) ganged up on her and cut her off and ended the segment with "I think the patriarchy is safe" that highlights perfectly the contempt society tends to hold toward boys/men and boy/men's issues.

And that was a woman speaking up about it! Obviously some people care, but I don't think the solution is to just go "talk about it~". That's a fairy tale solution. How is talking about it going to fix a problem like not being able to see your kids and the court not doing it's job to ensure you have parental rights and enforced visitation with your children.

Men try to speak out about this. They get shut down. Women try to speak on behalf of men about this. They also get shut down. The patriarchy is safe. Male privilege. Men talking about men's issues is "dangerous" to women. And so on.

Talking doesn't work at all if no one is there to listen and empathize. And it's not a solution to the problems causing men pain.

[–]CyberToyger 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's nothing wrong with this tweet, it's posted here because it's an example of what a lot of people here go through themselves. It's more of a supportive/discussion type post rather than the usual calling-out of feminists or showing examples of men getting screwed over. We agree with the tweet. We want men to be able to speak out and get help without being ridiculed by both feminists and people raised under Traditionalism -- the latter being men and women alike who were raised 'the old fashioned way' and find crying to be 'unmanly' and spew the tired old "man up!" mantra.

[–]Swiss_Cheese9797 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think there's too many of the wrong people to open up too. People can be turned off by it even though they would feel bad to.

[–]outsidetheboxthinkin 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How is it a show of strength ? It's not a show of strength, it's just expressing how you feel. You're just using "show of strength" to make yourself feel better about not being in the place you want to be and having to talk to someone about it which inherently shows that you are weak at that stage of your life. Admitting your weak is not a display of strength, it's a display of honesty. No need to lie about it, but whatever makes you feel better dude.

[–]KIngofHypnotoads 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You are entitled to you opinion. I do however think that if you are weak, and you are willing to do something about it and pick yourself up out of that place, then you are showing strength. If you think that the display of honesty while going against everything that has been engrained in you about not crying, or talking about your feelings is not also showing strength, then we have nothing else to talk about.

[–]ancientsnow 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Respect for any guy that has the courage to look for help.

[–]Blutarg 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed.

[–]Rethgil 122 points123 points124 points 8 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

What makes me sick generally is how any man openly expressing "negative" emotions is stereotyped negatively as a 'grumpy man' by women, and usually dismissed too. Then there's feminism that openly mocks such human feelings with comments like them "enjoying the taste of male tears".

Just look at how female emotional displays are tolerated, however extreme, in society. Women can scream at men in public, or their kids, or police, and it will usually be not thought twice about.

Meanwhile if a man cries in public, or raises his voice, or says he is angry even in a calm manner, people will often literally physically cross the road to avoid them, or step in if there's a woman being spoken to.

I think we are seriously only JUST beginning to wake up to the double standards and intolerance men face everywhere that is closely tied to male suicides and health issues, and stress. This imbalance has been there for too long.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said, good points

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's amazing how quickly women can switch from the screaming entitled chimpanzee to the shocked frightened little doe when a man raises their voice - really playing to the stereotype that we are all meant to be trying to change. Really boggles my mind how people still hold these generalizations as facts... I immediately categorize anyone like that as an idiot.

[+]Dglsdms1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you suggesting women don't get judged for their behaviour?

[–]SKNK_Monk 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not to the same level, they don't.

[–]ericfoster2003 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

From personal experience, I am a white man. I don't and can't have problems because of my privilege. I am expected to just deal with internal struggles and stay strong for my family. If I appear weak, society will eat me. No matter what I accomplish, I didn't earn it, regardless of the pain and suffering I endured trying to succeed.

These are the things movies teach us men early in our childhood. The white addition applies to me personally but the non-race issues hold true for most other men.

I struggle to not always appear strong as I have a young daughter. I am her hero and will save her no matter what the situation is. She has softened me quite a bit but the need to appear invincible will never go away.

[–]LPT4retards 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As a man who has gone through quite a bit, its not the rest of society that caused my life to turn to a living hell, in fact, it was often the minorities and women who came to help the most.

Almost every single problem was caused directly from some sadistic piece of shit that we not only allowed to behave that way, but was encouraged to behave that way by other men.

The first step to improving how we are treated is to stop promoting men who are sadistic bastards.

For instance, at the few major corporations I worked for, many of the other men would do things like intentionally mis schedule other men so they would have to wake up in the middle of the night to work, only to find out they have to wait unpaid at work because the work was really scheduled for the previous day or following shift. Turning a 14 hour shift into a 24-28 hour shift.

Not just that, but intentionally targeting other men who are suffering from illnesses, and intentionally targeting other men who have had family members die or in the process of dying.

The whining I hear from the rest of society doesn't even come close to how absolutely sadistic other men can be. Why in the hell do we promote these absolute piece of garbage?

Honestly, men like this deserve to be dead or in prison. Instead we make them managers of major corporations.

Until that is fixed, nothing will get better.

[–]Skjags 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We all need to look out for each other and try to make things better whenever we come across another person. I don't care who it is or where they come from.

I don't think that means you need to put too much stock in what toxic people think of you, or to overextend yourself and put yourself at risk, but just do what you can to support people with the resources you have.

Drive out hate and selfishness by making the world better for everyone you can, and if enough of us can do it then every day could be a good one.

Deny toxic people the ability to feel maligned and justified and we will win in the end.

[–]iSlayStrange 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Actually it's opiate overdoses in the US now.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/overdoses-are-leading-cause-of-death-americans-under-50/

[–]The-HilariousFingers 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think the Tweeter is from the UK though.

[–]PotatoSalad 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

UK data lumps suicide in with accidental overdose, so it's really hard to say if it's suicide or drug/alcohol deaths.

[–]contractor808 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't be sure there's a difference other than how long it takes to kill oneself via substance abuse. Self medication and suicide have similar root causes and are often co-morbid.

[–]Frostii98 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I used to bottle everything up and never let my true feelings out. I met a nice girl, started dating, and I finally felt like I could say my feelings without getting bashed. I had so much inside. I cried a lot in front of her, and I never cried in front of anyone but my parents, literally for as long as I can remember. She broke up with me "because she needs a man, not a boy". Now I feel guilty about crying, which just makes me want to cry more. I thought I had someone to be there for me. It's rough, man.

[–]TheBlackQuill 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

😔 I am sorry to hear that... I am a crybaby too... It really sucks and I usually cry when I am alone at night after bottling up my emotions for long time or I cry when I thought no one is watching. Do your parents understand you? Maybe you can seek comfort from them if you cannot get it from anyone else. After all, they are your family 😊.

[–]Frostii98 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I do the same thing, cry at night after a day of bad things. And yes, my parents are the most supporting and helpful people in my life, I seriously couldn't have asked for better people to take care of me. I recently moved to college though so I don't see them as much, so that's also been rough. I haven't had a good nights sleep in about 2 months because of everything that's happened. Sometimes i wish i could just say how i felt into a machine and it would hug me or something.

[–]TheBlackQuill 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you can try to call them whenever you can? I think that would be helpful :)

[–]Frostii98 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe. I like the physicality tho. Crying on someones shoulder. Idk.

[–]TheBlackQuill 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

aww... sending virtual hugs 🤗 🤗 🤗

[–]Frostii98 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Thanks :) i still havent really made friends in college, but im hoping i do soon and they can be there for me. I have a couple friends back home, but i dont really want to tell them how i feel. I have a little before but i feel like its too much

[–]Pithong 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It really sounds like you should find a therapist to talk to. With everything you've described it's exactly what you could use right now, they are someone to talk to and can help guide you to the reasons for why you are sad all the time and give you ways to cope with and overcome them.

[–]Frostii98 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Are they expensive? Also, I'm not sure about how I feel. I'll go from what I am now, which is just kinda low and down, and then I'll like say a magic word and I'm hyped up and feel incredible about myself and so confident, then I go back into a really bad low. I also really really struggle with saying how I feel in person. My mind will literally empty and i freeze. Its made people angry at me because they think I just dont want to tell them, but in reality i just cant think of any words, and it makes me feel a lot worse.

[–]Pithong 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll go from what I am now, which is just kinda low and down, and then I'll like say a magic word and I'm hyped up and feel incredible about myself and so confident, then I go back into a really bad low.

That doesn't sound "normal", but you have to see a professional to know for sure. You need emotional support and are pushing too much emotional baggage onto girls you are dating. The girl you mentioned doesn't necessarily dislike you crying, it's that you are emotionally leaning on her far stronger than she'd like for where you guys were at in the relationship. It's likely that it's not that crying isn't "manly" enough for her, it's more if a "kid versus adult" thing, emotionally mature girls want emotionally mature guys and you don't have outlets for all the emotional stuff you have inside. So you come across as a kid unable to cope with his emotions and require a lot of outside support to handle them, and she wants an emotional adult. It's a chicken and egg thing, the only way to attract a girl who will give you the emotion support you demand is to already be a person who gives themselves the emotional support they need

[–]chaveznieves 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If she's the type to differentiate men and boys by whether they let their emotions out or not, then honestly she's probably not the type that would ever be a positive influence in your life. A "man" might cry a lot, or not at all. He shouldn't care whether someone thinks less of him for being open emotionally. Be what you are naturally. Only way to know how anyone will treat you long term is if you are able to reveal and generally portray your true instincts to everyone. That doesn't mean it'll make anything better, but if you're real from the start, there's none of the adjustment and change of behavior that you'd see if you try to put on an act early to "get in" and slowly reveal yourself over time. You see people's true colours a lot quicker

[–]Frostii98 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I wish I would've known sooner. I really loved her, even though I'm just young and stupid. I really did everything I could but nothing seemed to work. Ive always been one to be me. Never gave in to peer pressure, said no when i wanted, had my own views on stuff. Its hard when being me doesnt seem to work. I still think about what i couldve done differently. Ive moved on though, trying to find more out there. Im falling back into my old habits of being self conscious about things, which i had been really good about not doing in the recent past. I used to be really introverted and had very few friends. Then i finally started opening up and it was great. But now that im on my own (ish), im returning to my old self.

[–]chaveznieves 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well get your instincts to realize that opening up and being yourself is what provided those great opportunities, and she left you because SHE was misguided on what it takes to be a man. Keep doing what you did, keep trying, and don't get discouraged when shit goes wrong, cuz it usually will. But that's how you grow and learn exactly what you want and represent in life

[–]Frostii98 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I want a hug is what i want. But thank you for your words. I dont try to let things get to me, but usually something just triggers a downward spiral and then im unhappy.

[–]Lethn 86 points87 points88 points 8 years ago* (76 children) | Copy Link

When it comes to the man haters and so on I at least know where they stand so they don't actually piss me off that much these days even though they always amaze me with how incredibly stupid they are whenever they comment on something you know where they stand.

However when I see shit heads going on constantly about how how men should 'show their emotions' more and so on I immediately want to pick a fight with them because it is inevitable if they have developed these views about men that they've then picked up all sorts of other feminist bullshit along with as well because they are often the first to try and shut down men's issues whenever somebody talks about them.

Is it me? Or has this 'show your emotions men' spam become more frequent lately? Do feminists have such a bad rep that they're desperately trying to act like they care? I'm just wondering because men have been trying to tell people about their problems for years and they always get attacked and ridiculed for it.

[+]bman00011 points 8 years ago [recovered] (20 children) | Copy Link

It's blaming the victim. Most men are quite capable of discussing how they feel. We just stop bothering to once we realize no one is actually listening.

[–][deleted] 72 points73 points74 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's blaming the victim. Most men are quite capable of discussing how they feel. We just stop bothering to once we realize no one is actually listening.

Repeated for truth.

[+]akamustacherides1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

I realized today that everything I do, say, ask, etc. is either questioned or ignored. I ask the wife to shut the car off while I get her mother's groceries out of the trunk when we drop her mom off. We are parked in front of her mom's house and just unloading and leaving. She not only ignores me but gets mad at me when I walk around and shut the car off myself. Now I get to enjoy the silent treatment, her banging every door close, and fer rudeness. Marriage, who thought this was a good idea?

[–]TheElPistolero 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

please talk to your wife about these issues instead of reddit.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

His need is to express his feelings and not be judged.

His wife isn't listening with an open heart, and so he is venting to the only place he knows he can find solace.

There is nothing wrong with that.

It would be good for them to go to marriage counseling, but maybe there are financial issues, or maybe she won't go, or maybe he's tired of explaining what he thinks should be obvious for some who professes to love him to understand.

[–]akamustacherides 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I did but I also wanted to tell someone that would listen.

[–]JohnnySkidmarx 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Men talk about their feelings while we're drinking beer watching football with our buddies.

[+]bman00011 points 8 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Which is why the most important thing men can do for male mental health is nurture brotherly bonds and defend male spaces.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep. And I suspect that's the reason that some feminists hate male spaces so much.

[–]morerokk 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists hate anything that excludes women in any way.

[–]SKNK_Monk 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I heard it expressed this way: Women bond face to face, but men bond shoulder to shoulder.

[–]Four-Fox-Eggs 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What if you don't drink beer, or watch football, or watch any sports? At that point, you're just ostracized.

[–]JohnnySkidmarx 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then you need to find a male relative or friend to talk with. It doesn't have to be over sports or beer. Go out for coffee or lunch.

[–]CalvinsCuriosity 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll watch sports as much as the next guy but I don't have those kind of support structures. Mostly having been unstereotypical. I see problems in major sports that literally kill men. Brain trauma anyone? And pointing that out usually gets you ignored or mocked. It's promoted; in my eyes, by gynocentrism, which might cause anyone who reads this to write me off. But who are the successful; typically, guys that you know like this? Usually in a dynamic that leans heavily on competition and being "alpha". It doesn't always mean being a "chad". I only use these terms because I just woke up and I'm not very articulate at this point. They are there for reasons but; usually, stem other issues of fathers being demonized anddenied custody or being a proper role in a child's life. I have the weirdest relationship with my father. But that goes into racism, abuse, "toxic masculinity" (my best way of saying "confidence and charisma" that is promoted by women. I. e. The choosers) and economics.

It sounds really anti "normative" but it's just the best way I can express myself. I've made plenty of mistakes but I didn't make them all on my own. And it's really such a complexe issue it can't be boiled by an idiot like me.

[–]bonerpotpie 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said.

[–]condorama 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great analysis.

[–]--Edog-- 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said.

[–]Im_A_Realist 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bingo. That's my biggest problem - I don't think anybody cares to hear what I have to say about my personal life. It doesn't help that when I do say something, I've heard "Stop playing the victim role."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn. That hits home.

[–]BeholdTheHair 53 points54 points55 points 8 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. The problem with advocating men be more emotionally expressive is those doing so often (sometimes deliberately) fail to understand men generally being taciturn isn't a result of sociological factors so much as biology (to be fair, the former plays a part, but usually not a significant one). Men don't cry much, for example, because most of us simply don't want to. It doesn't help the situation any and it's emotionally draining.

One of the most stark psychological differences between men and women is in how we experience, process and express our emotions. Telling men to be more expressive isn't helping them, it's telling them to be more like women.

[–]Rethgil 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

We shouldn't be "told" how to be by any women. That's the dodgy part. But I do think we are denied the personal choice or freedom to make that choice for ourselves because of the social shame, ironically, largely thanks to women.

It is generally seen that too much repressed emotion is bad for health. Though everything in moderation, and too much expression over everything is often a sign of psychological issues (ahem, women take note?) The point is it should be our choice, but yet again we are being told how we should be, whatever our personal preference may be.

[–]Terminal-Psychosis 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Some preferences work better than others.

Crying in public, or even in front of your woman (heaven forbid "men" that promote this) does not bring results that are of benefit to anyone but those that promote it.

Stoic strength in men is rewarded. Weakness is not.

We can be weak, we are only human, just be VERY careful who you show it to. Best to cry alone. That is part of what it is to be an adult male.

Giving up the unconditional love we had from Mama is part of growing up. Nobody will ever love us like that, ever again. Boys that grew up without a mother have it extra tough. They need to be very strong.

[–]FeierInMeinHose 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Crying in front of your woman isn't something that should be discouraged, if you can't cry in front of your wife or girlfriend, then you really shouldn't be with them because that means you don't feel completely safe around them. That person should be the person you can be closest to. This obviously only applies for crying in warranted situations.

I would put wife or long-term girlfriend at the same level of closeness as your parents, you should be able to tell them almost anything without fear. I'd honestly prefer to be alone than have to treat my significant other like an acquaintance.

[–]ghjm 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't like feeling completely safe. I like feeling like other, more vulnerable people are completely safe because I stand between them and danger. I absolutely understand that this is an idiosyncratic feeling of mine, and I make no moral judgment about others not feeling like I do. But if I'm sad because my friend died, I get better when I'm allowed to inhabit my preferred role. I grieve by standing, silent and alone, and looking out over the ocean. My grief is not less when it's shared - it's more. When I don't want to talk about it and want to go fix the hole in the fence instead, it's not because I don't feel safe around my significant other. It's because I need to feel needed, much more than I need to feel understood. The thing that heals me, that sustains me, is the knowledge that all the million complicated and important things my loved ones do, their aims and accomplishments, their loves and losses, are safe from bears because of how well I mended the fence.

[–]ThisCatMightCheerYou 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sad

Here's a picture/gif of a cat, hopefully it'll cheer you up :).


I am a bot. use !unsubscribetosadcat for me to ignore you.

[–]Friskyinthenight 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm surprised to see this so up voted. Crying is a normal, healthy emotion. If you feel the need to cry, go ahead. Be careful of languishing in self pity but cry if you want. Don't let anyone tell you that your emotions are bad, it's normal.

The Stoics would certainly not agree with this interpretation of their life philosophy.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that the popularity of this particular post has meant there's also a large number of trolls who have woken up and chosen to spread their usual agenda. Its pretty obvious certain posts are just deliberately anti male and hateful.

[–]Qualanqui 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

How about boys who grew up getting the mental and physical shit kicked out of them by there mothers and haven't seen them in 20 odd years? I'm so screwed.

[–]Blutarg 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, not all mothers are gold star parents. But you don't have to let that hold you back.

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Best to cry alone. That is part of what it is to be an adult male.

Are you serious?! Are you trying to raise the suicide rate?

[–]DelicateWhiteMen 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You are literally describing toxic masculinity

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck off troll. Reported you already. Your name is clear. You are deliberately trolling in relation to men who take their own lives. People like you are scum and it wouldn't surprise me in the least f you had a feminist agenda behind your trolling.

ALL your other posts in other sections are constantly switching the agenda to insulting all white males, no matter the topic.

People like you are why feminism is cancer.

[–]mymraccount_ac 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When I was young and I cried in public, I was laughed at, got hostility from teachers, punished by parents, lost friends and was bullied for it. I was more emotional that most boys my age. That could be for any number of reasons - genetics, too much attention when I cried as a baby (I had colic), maybe not enough socialisation when I was very young (I had a speech delay too). But at some point I think every boy learns that being a fucking crybaby solves nothing.

As an adult, it's rare that I ever cry nor want to cry, and when I do it's on my own. I know that under some rare circumstances (a death of a family member say), it might be acceptable to cry in public. But most of the time, it would be mercilessly berated. Sometimes that's useful, because I'm blowing shit out of proportion by getting emotional. Other times, when I've been frustrated or depressed, it's really fucking not. It's incredibly isolating and dehumanising in fact. Regardless of the situation though, it's rare now that I even get the urge.

So I guess I'm trying to say, yes it's genetic but it varies even in men. But it's also environmental, because no-one, not even the most holiest of feminists wants to be around an emotional man for an extended period of time, let alone in a crisis.

[–]BeholdTheHair 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right. I was, of course, speaking in generalities; the standard disclaimers re: individual variation naturally apply.

[–]foster_remington 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

So are men "biologically" more likely to commit suicide? How do you explain that one?

[–]Blutarg 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. It makes no sense.

[–]RoryTate 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, it is a kind of "just so" hypothesis, but evolution would favour suicide as a trait for males who became unproductive, unwanted, or could not contribute to the group in any way. Unlike a female that could give birth and nurture/raise offspring, during our hunter/gatherer past an unproductive male (whether due to physical or even mental injury) would be a large drain on scarce resources.

Basically, given two competing tribes, where one had this male suicide tendency and the other did not, under the appropriate survival pressures, the tribe with the male suicide tendency would be successful and alive, while the other would become extinct.

I don't know of any specific research proving this kind of connection though. It sounds plausible, but the brain is complex and there is no known mechanism for this that I am aware of. However, there is a fair amount of data that would suggest further study, like the male propensity for risk-taking and sacrificing their lives (literally) for their families and others, which is biologically driven. And please note that this doesn't mean that any of this happens in a vacuum. The special conditions have to exist in the environment for these traits to come into play.

[–]Ted8367 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

explain that one

Well, men do commit suicide at a much higher rate than women. And, the difference between men and women, known as sex, is biological.

[–]Warden_de_Dios 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is the relationship between sex and suicide you see a correlation or causation?

[–]Ted8367 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a correlation.

As for causation: could suicide cause sex?

[–]Blutarg 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All differences? Men prefer blue, women prefer pink--that's biological? For centuries, it was the other way around.

[–]Ted8367 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men prefer blue, women prefer pink--that's biological?

Your selector - men, women - comes from a biological distinction. It's innate. The color preference, on the other hand, is a statement coming from you which you can change around how you like.

[–]foster_remington 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How could higher male suicide rates lead to those males having increased fecundity?

[–]Ted8367 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We can try to come up with possible causal chains. One possible mechanism is that it's not the individual male who has the improved fecundity, but his close neighbors, likely to include his relatives. That is, he decides he's useless (depression) and a burden to others, and offs himself. When resources are limited, this improves the position of the rest of his group.

[–]BeholdTheHair 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't see how one could reasonably take that from what I wrote.

I promise I'm not being flippant here, though I'm willing to accept I'm probably being a bit thick.

[–]foster_remington 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Men have a higher suicide rate than women in America. If men "being taciturn" is biological and not sociological, then is men committing suicide more also biological? And if it isn't, then doesn't that mean we need to look at the sociological aspects?

[–]BeholdTheHair 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right. If I understand you correctly (and I'm not at all certain I do), I think we're speaking past each other a bit here. Or you've simply skipped ahead a few steps and I'm having difficulty keeping up, which is equally likely.

I didn't really mean for my response to be an answer to the problem of male suicide, I was simply pointing out the fault in the logic of admonishing men to be more open and expressive as a way of resolving the issue. IME, said admonition is usually coming from people who don't understand (or refuse to accept) the differences between men and women go beyond the physiological. Which isn't to say men never benefit from talking things out, of course, just that they probably won't go about it the same way women do and that's okay.

As to why men don't try that approach more often, it's probably a combination of both. On the one hand, most men tend toward the taciturn which naturally makes them reluctant to open up to those they don't consider close confidants. On the other hand, those who do so have generally found men showing vulnerability isn't rewarded (at best), so they've learned to avoid it due to negative reinforcement. Inasmuch as anything can be done about either of these conditions (which I also think are ultimately rooted in our biology), I think a more positive approach is to try to help people extend the sympathy and understanding they naturally have for the men directly in their lives to other men who may need a degree of that.

Minor aside: I don't think biology and sociology are mutually exclusive, I simply think a lot of people consider the latter to be far more significant than evidence merits. As I understand it the fundamentals of human behavior are largely rooted in our biology. Socialization can influence that to some degree, sort of smooth down the rough edges and/or play up particular tendencies, but on its own it isn't going to radically alter the way people generally behave, and acting or speaking as if it might is doing a disservice to everyone.

[–]Rethgil 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There is clearly a link between feminists on the one hand telling men to show emotions then criticising them when they do. As best we can, whilst challenging them, we have to do what is right for us as individuals and not get tied to their demands. Where we can, where we're comfortable, we should be free to show our emotions. We must at least have the CHOICE and not be insulted for our decisions.

But then, feminism is often the source of hypocrisy.

[–]DelicateWhiteMen 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you have an example of feminism criticising emotional men?

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry but I won't even dignify that with an answer. Do you have an example of proof why water feels wet?

How about the comment I already posted of feminists talking of men's tears? Shame on you for trolling trash.

Your name alone is clear. Back to the feminist sub with you now. Away with you oh little insignificant sad one!

[–]Macheako 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Here's my issue with that statement...

What the fuck does "showing my emotions" even MEAN

Like, what's the context here? lol. Have we not been showing any emotions this whole time? Is "getting carried away" by your emotions what they mean when they say "show your emotions"? If not, then aren't I "showing" my emotions by simply telling them how I fucking feel? What else is there to show exactly?

And why is it when I feel a certain way, I often get told I shouldn't feel that way by women? Best example is anger. You're straight up not allowed to be angry in today's society.....it's an online fuckin insult for gods sakes lol "Y u mad". Like....Y iz it a bad thing? Is what I wanna ask lol Is ALL anger truly bad? What about the anger the world feels towards Nazis? Is that anger bad?

When women tell men we need to show our emotions more they're just trying to manipulate us emotionally yet again. I AM showing you my emotions, I'm telling you what they are right f'ing now lol by all means, feel free to address anything....but they don't. It's all a sham boys. Men do have emotions, and they're ours, not theirs. A lot of the time I'm just kinda in my "happy/fun" zone emotionally...that IS my emotion. So if something happens and I'm not upset about it, why exactly is that a problem? In every scenario of something "bad" happening, if I, a man, am not upset or dismayed by it, is this REALLY a problem of me not showing my emotions? Or, perhaps, might the problem have to do with women showing too much emotion?

Let's start there lol.

[–]foster_remington 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If you saw a man crying in public, what would you think about him? You personally.

[–]Macheako 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

sorry man, but this "situation" is too vague to be of any use. It depends on what the guy looks like, HOW he sounds when he's crying, also, just cause I see a chick cryin don't mean I give a fuck either lol I"ll walk past a wet bitch any day a the week if I gotta, but again, I'm prone to stopping to depending on the situation.

What's ya point?

[–]foster_remington 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're perpetuating men bottling up their feelings and killing themselves you idiot

[–]Macheako 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No im not lol

[–]Friskyinthenight 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Usually letting base emotions like anger impact your judgement leads to less happiness in your life. Feeling emotions of any type are not only not bad, but inevitable. But, if you are often taken by bouts of anger or jealousy or whatever negative emotion, then that'd probably an issue you need to address.

Also, I think a partner saying show your emotions more is another way of saying they want you to communicate more often. Not necessarily show emotion at that time but communicate smaller stuff that you might not see as important,generally speaking.

[–]Macheako 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If anger is only a negative emotion....then could the world do us all a favor and when you find your partner fucking your best friend, yeaaaaa, that "anger", if you could just stop, we'd really appreciate it ;)

I'm being sarcastic. Not all anger is bad. But I know what you're tryin to say here and I agree....except for the blanket statement of anger being a negative emotion, for me it's one that CAN be, depending on who controls who.

[–]Terminal-Psychosis 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Women, or boys, that tell you that "men can cry" are NOT doing it for your benefit. They are doing it for theirs.

This is a test.

Of COURSE men can cry, if the situation fits. The thing is, that most likely the ones promoting that men should be half woman are not interested in your pain, only in taking advantage of it.

This is a test.

Crying is best done alone. The release is a biological stress reliever, but dangerous if done in hostile company. Like the ones that would love to see any man they can get to, show that weakness publicly.

Again, this is a test.

Do not cry in front of these people. IF, then in front of a trusted brother, but best alone. Men are not rewarded for weakness, regardless of what some would try to fool you into believing.

[–]Friskyinthenight 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm sorry that you've led a life that's made you feel this way. I have cried in front of my partners and loved ones many times and they have been there to give me the emotional support I needed at the time. It's surprising to me how many men here are saying that someone saying it's okay to cry are up to something or trying to "test" you in some way when op admits that it is okay in the very next paragraph.

Sure, be selective about who you are vulnerable around, but not everyone is out to break you down.

[–]cnndownvote_bot 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Def with parents partners and other loved ones but the point of the first dude was that you should talk to people that are hostile to you.

[–]smileybird 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just to offer a counter perspective, I have cried in front of my wife on a couple occasions; she took care of me and I felt better after. Sorry for whatever you've been through to make you think this isn't possible.

[–]DelicateWhiteMen 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

woman are not interested in your pain, only in taking advantage of it.

Jesus dude, who hurt you?

[–]DemiDualism 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It hasn't caught on yet. I don't think that means misguided feminists who are trying to be better about it are worth shitting on though

First people need to parrot it around.

Then when when there is resistance people will realize that the thing being parroted around is relevant.

Then their behavior will change

There will be martyrs. Men who face the ridicule for putting themselves out there and get nothing back for it. But if they collectively continue to do so while this sentiment is carried out then they will help make an impression on that kind of interaction for other people in the future. It's not a hopeless endeavor, as they may find some good listeners if they can't sift through the hate

These men will need to be emotionally strong. It is a volunteer service.

If you can't handle negative feedback then pick your audience carefully. Its not your fault you are in this position, but that's no reason to ignore pragmatics

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If it hasn't caught on yet it's been a long time and it hasn't been for lack of trying.

It's been 40+ years since Free to be You and Me was telling boys that It's alright to cry. We sat through that movie presentation or something along its lines during our schooling, told to get in touch with our emotions and to access our "feared" feminine side. Gary Cooper, John Wayne and Clark Gable had stopped making movies before most of us were born - our movie role models were more likely to be sensitive nerdy outsiders in John Hughes or Wes Anderson movies. We had enlightened parents who fully supported the project of bringing up boys to be sensitive.

We've been "parroting it around" for decades. We volunteered for that project, or we were the test subjects of the campaigns of the 70's, 80's, 90's, and 00's to make boys more like girls. We put ourselves out there and exposed our vulnerabilities. We were told that vulnerability was a strength. How was that supposed to work? That was never very clear.. It didn't work most of the time. So we eventually got smarter and more discreet about sharing our emotions.

When we're cynical about these projects to make boys and men more sensitive, we're talking from experience and evaluating the results of such campaigns over decades. It frustrates us to see these campaigns reinvented every year, and every year they pretend that men have been emotionally repressed until last year, but that this year's hashtag is sure to make the difference.

[–]DemiDualism 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ahhhh I very slightly but significantly misunderstood your point.

Yes I agree. By pushing this agenda it can have the side effect of actually reinforcing the narrative by making people think they need to do something active for guys. Or just generally putting the idea in their head that its common for guys to not want to talk about their feelings. Which isn't really the case as much as it's fruitless to talk about our feelings because people don't know how to handle it

Still though the population is ever changing, and although acceptance is often perpetuated it's a never ending battle of education. I don't know what a normal amount of time is for this kind of thing to become majority level common, but maybe 40 years isn't a lot of time on that scale.

I mean we still have racism and shit and that's been "fixed" for more than 40 years as well

[–]Blutarg 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I immediately want to pick a fight with them

Well, that would be showing emotion, alright.

[–]rhea84 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It sucks that there is such a social stigma against men talking about their feelings or just having certain ones like sadness or depression. It's ridiculous and stupid.

If you are depressed, you're not damaged or less of a man. It's a medical condition that needs treatment, whether it's through medication, therapy, meditation, etc.

Please remember that there are people that care and that will help and want to help should you need it. I've seen the aftermath of suicide and it destroys the people and communities that loved them. Please, please seek help if you are depressed or are having suicidal thoughts even though it can be really, really fucking hard if not impossible to ask sometimes.

If you still feel like asking for help is something you don't want to do or feel like you can't do then try a few things.

  1. Start exercising and eating better - these have been shown to dramatically reduce depression. Speaking from personal experience it works.

  2. Start with small things. Make your bed every morning and add things to a list that you do during the day. Small accomplishments, no matter how small improve your mood.

  3. Do not berate yourself. Negative self talk sends us down a spiral that keeps getting more and more negative. Tell yourself you are awesome even if you don't believe it at the time. Keep doing it, keep complimenting yourself for little things it will improve your mood as well.

  4. Forgive yourself. You're human, humans aren't perfect. Forgive yourself, make the effort to not do whatever it is you feel guilty for again, and move on.

  5. Sleep. Get sleep. If you have insomnia try the z-quils or other over the counter sleep aids. Get yourself into a regular sleep routine if at all possible. The brain needs sleep and not getting enough messing with our whole body and mind.

  6. Go and get a checkup at the doctors. There are tons of conditions and diseases that can cause or make depression worse. Diabetes for example.

  7. There are anonymous ways to get help online. There are online chat rooms and there is even an online text therapy now.

  8. Try to avoid negativity. Whether it's a specific person, the news, twitter, whatever just try to avoid it or limit contact to small amounts until you are in a better place.

  9. Try meditation. Seriously try it. There is lots of phone apps, youtube videos, and websites that offer instructions and even guided meditation. I would suggested guided first so you have something to focus on and bring your mind back to when it wanders. If you are concerned about people "catching" you doing it, pop in some earphones when you are laying in bed although you may fall asleep.

I know it might not feel like it but you are important. Please be safe and remember there are tons of people here for you if you need them.

[–]Blutarg 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a great post 👍

[–]Krissam 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's nothing inherintly wrong with the list of tips you provide.

The problem is, at least for me, I don't want to feel better, I just want to not wake up tomorrow.

[–][deleted] 60 points61 points62 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Lol. I can foresee how well that will go...

"Open up to me. What's bothering you?"

"... I've never told anyone this, but okay. My girlfriend sexually abuses me and..."

"Woah there partner. That's not a thing. You're just a whiny manbaby. Lol. Only women can be sexually abused. You're taking away from the attention that female victims need. 1 in 4 women will be blah blah blah....."

[–]Do_your_homework 55 points56 points57 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Have you people never had a decent friend to the point that you expect this sort of reaction from people?

I mean honestly don't talk to people that would act like that.

[–]stupidCSstudent 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. I agree. But sometimes loneliness can leave people with no resort to turn to those who have no capacity or are unwilling to support them. I'm just lucky I've had a solid support growing up and have no problem letting those close to me and those I trust know how I feel. But I can certainly empathize with those who have only those "man up whiny baby" people to turn to.

[–]CalvinsCuriosity 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

Edit kinda points to the lack of social structures for men. No?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've never had a friend or family member that continued to speak with me for more than an hour about my issues when I do open up, or talk with me about them a second time. So yes.

Also congratulations on utterly failing to understand gallows humour.

[–]mikenew02 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

How about this

"My girlfriend sexually abuses me"

"So leave her"

[–]jake354k12 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean that's not always how it works in real life.

Edit: would you say that to a woman?

[–]NatureBaker 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ummm is it bad I agree with that?

[–]mikenew02 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Nope, this is how healthy conversations with rational people work.

[–]CalvinsCuriosity 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't "leave them" when reversed genders usually result in " heres some social support structures in place to help you"?

Edit: who do I goto when I discover my ex trying to put my cum from a condom or her belly inside herself to get preggo? Or that I have expressed bisexual interests(with less seemingly typically masculine men) too; that don't fit the "normative culture", but she lied to me for 5+ years and waves it away by hoping ( and leading me on in the process) that it was just a phase while being plenty fine with failing to mention that the women we had included in our sexual exploration were past partners of hers?!

[–]Killgraft 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not so easy sometimes to just hop out of an abusive relationship for the people stuck in them. It's not that "leave them" isn't sound advice, but it isn't enough and not much in the way of support.

My uncle was in a relationship where his wife was often physically abusive and it took him a while to get out of that one, and it's not 100% over either.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You need to check your privilege. Women lack the institutional power to be abusive. Actually she was probably defending herself.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

me me big disappointment

[–]Gambizzle 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I think one of the problems is that both men and women want us to fit into a certain model. Also, people ACTIVELY criticise mental health issues!!! ACTIVELY. We are a society where you can't call somebody a cunt because it's a part of a female body, BUT... you can call somebody a 'psycho', a 'mental', a 'screw loose', a 'few loaves short of a dozen', a 'spastic' or whatever without repremand. It's totally cool to do this to somebody when they feel like shit and can't hold onto it mentally.

I have a range of mental health conditions (which I discovered in adulthood, after being bullied heavily as a kid) and have attempted suicide multiple times (despite being a very calm, mature, high performing person at work). To be wrapped into a generic 'privileged white male' group is quite frankly insulting. I mean yes, my family has a reasonable amount of generational wealth and I'm reasonably well educated. HOWEVER... I see a therapist on at bare minimum a monthly basis, have been on some pretty hard meds and live a very different life to 'normal' people. It's difficult to explain how you're not 'shy'... you just randomly freak out in particular situations. People read it as 'shy' or lacking in social experience... something you can just 'fix' by going out a bit more. It's impossible to explain to people that you CAN'T and you'll always be an easy target for sharks/bullies.

We all have our strengths and weaknesses. My mental health is a life long battle for me. I wish I was allowed to just have a mental health condition, talk about it (without being outed for doing so) and without going through the bullying/disadvantage that I've copped in life as a result...

[–][deleted] 147 points148 points149 points 8 years ago (145 children) | Copy Link

Don't hide how you feel from other enlightened men. Blue pillers and women will not empathize and will probably use it against you.

[–]Fitzzz 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Can you explain to me what red and blue pillers are? I really don't quite get it, other than the reference to the Matrix. I tried visiting the redpillers or whatever sub to try to see what it was and just... didn't get it

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yah I did the same and I don't understand either aside from us being grouped in with them. What are they?

[–]nforne 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol, I went to that sub before I found here. It wasn't what I was looking for.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A red piller is someone that has chosen to "swallow the pill" of reality, even though it's harsh. Ie women are not really "the fairer sex"

A blue piller is someone that continues to "live in the matrix", i.e. believes the lies that society has told them about men and women

[–]DelicateWhiteMen 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait are you seriously suggesting red pillers love in "reality?" You know, the guys who talk about women as sex objects and use sex strategies to rape them?

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Red = truth about men's current lot in life, gender politics in general, blue = living in gynocentric society none the wiser

[–]TheStumblingWolf 96 points97 points98 points 8 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

While I agree with you, most people on r/mensrights probably won't. The way I see it though crying is a sign that you lack control over a given situation, in other words: weakness. There's nothing wrong with that, but I prefer to save my weak moments for when I'm alone or with a trusted few. People can act like wolves - no reason to give them an easy opening.

[–]Baka_kage 44 points45 points46 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Fix the problem now. Cry later. I read it in a book when I was 11 or 12, and it resonated. Been my motto since.

[–]TheStumblingWolf 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. My mom told me about something my grandpa used to do. He's still alive but was born in 1927. In the time he grew up if he showed up to work with Legionnaire's Disease, he was told to stfu and carry those huge sacks over there. He's been through some shit, although he didn't serve in the war.

Whenever my mom had a problem and was crying about it he would just look at her with a stoic calmness and go "...so what are you gonna do about it?". It's something I try to ask myself as often as possible.

Also: bake me a cake please...

[–]keonkla 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep. As a Mens advocate who admittedly Became a hard core red piller from the more harsher times Of my life. I hardened my ass up to alot of the Cold truths about the situation for Men in this society.

Doing this at such a young age turned me into a very warped/Cynical Man with a complete lack of human Morals. However after somewhat distancing myself from the more "hood/Thug nigga/Psycho bad boy" Life style, I realize that there is some Remnants of hope For the situation of Emotional vulnerability.

So fellas I have some advice for you, When your with a girl, at some point you should do a "male shit test" If you will. Open up a line about how maybe your having some issues with a job, or you feel that maybe your life isn't going as you planed. Only do this if you think that the situation is gonna go farther then some type of casual fling.

If she shows some type of disgust towards you, For showing that there can be a softer side to you, That sometimes shit happens in your life that you couldn't predict. Dump her ass and move on from it. Get a women/A brotherhood of friends that got your back in life. That's the most any man can do to have a life filled with purpose and meaning.

[–]Rethgil 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That's not true. Its about perspective. Suppose you grew up around caring tolerant expressive people. You'd likely not think twice about expressing emotion. But men grow up being told from day one what we 'should be' and to be strong. So of course we are wary of confiding in others. Meanwhile women are comforted every time they express emotions from the day they are born. So of course they see no problem doing so as they'll always find a friendly shoulder.

Its about choice. If one CHOOSES to reveal their emotion because they expect people to kind, because its what they grew up with andand know, I really don't see that as 'weak'. Its just how they experienced the world. Im not saying they would be as able to cope with tough situations as others. I'm just saying I don't think things are as simple as someone being "weak" if they reveal emotion.

We grow up with what we know, and I think us older lot were brought up with a strong bias to hide how we feel.

[–]TheStumblingWolf 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well that's not my experience. I grew up with a single mom and was pampered like no tomorrow. I could do no wrong, and my mom is a firm believer in the softer values so feelings was a very legitimate thing and I was encouraged to be open about them. As I've grown older and observed the world I realized I was never in touch with my masculinity because nobody showed me what it was, or that it existed. Attitudes like the one I described above is one I've developed later and it serves me well.

It doesn't matter how you rationalize it - others see it as weakness. That's what I do no matter the gender. As I said - it doesn't make it illegitimate or something you should be ashamed of. Those feelings will be there whether you want them or not. I just choose to be strategic about it because the world is not a nice warm fuzzy place, except in your inner circle of people.

[–]Camacho1 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather people who don't know me think i'm weak, then live in constant fear of someone thinking i'm weak. I cried watching The Bucket List the other night, shit was beautiful. Don't put up some bullshit front for others, they aren't worth the effort.

[–]TheStumblingWolf 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whatever you choose to do just make sure you own it. If you cry just go "yeah I cried, what of it?"

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather people who don't know me think i'm weak, then live in constant fear of someone thinking i'm weak.

I'm still working at this. You're right and I admire it. Sadly I've spent too much of my life being terrified of showing my 'negative' emotions because I was brought up in an environment that punished me as a man for 'not being strong'. It was a female dominated environment and for a long time I believed the narrative I was spoonfed that she was a saint and that women suffered because of men.

The more I realise how toxic that bullshit was and the more I learn to find balance, and feel OK to talk about and accept my feelings, all of them, good and 'bad', the more I am able to cope with things and enjoy life. The easier things get.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How do you personally deal with things when your emotions are hard for you to deal with-do you have a strategy that works for you? I get this might be something you don't want to share but I'm interested to hear what works for you in your own environment.

[–]eccepiscinam 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

that's fucking retarded bro

[–]TheStumblingWolf 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about you explain why you think that? Your comment isn't really constructive in any way.

[–]foster_remington 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

You've got wolf in your own screen name - I think you need to ask yourself if you're perpetuating the exact culture that leads to increased male suicides.

[–]Do_your_homework 64 points65 points66 points 8 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link

Oh yes women are incapable of empathizing with men. /s

The hell happened to this sub?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Speak up about how you feel, it's ok.

Ok shut up I don't like how you feel.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

It's not that women are incapable, he never said anything like that at all. It's a very simple concept - women don't respect weak men and don't want to fuck or date them.

It's kind of a scale, though. There's basically a limit on how much weakness you can show to any individual woman before you become "weak" and therefore need to be replaced.

[–]Do_your_homework 54 points55 points56 points 8 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

That's red pill bullshit and people that think like that should probably spend some time trying to relate to people as individuals.

I'm sure there are both men and women out there that won't respect someone that has emotions. Those people should all be excised from your life.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

That's red pill bullshit

It's been my lived experience, as well as a lot of other mens'. I don't read redpill, so I don't believe it because I read it there. I believe it because I've seen it firsthand, more than once, and secondhand through friends and acquaintances.

Telling someone that something important to them which they know firsthand to be true, is not true, is called gaslighting and is considered a form of abuse. It creates cognitive dissonance which has a number of ill effects on the victim's psychological wellbeing.

[–]Rosti_LFC 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Telling someone that something important to them which they know firsthand to be true

The guy is claiming that all women in the world find men showing emotion or weakness a huge turn-off. Even if that was actually the case (and it isn't), there's no way he could know that to be true first-hand because I seriously doubt the number of women he's broken down in tears in front of is even in double figures, let alone all women.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

He didn't say "all", it seems like that's what you wanted to read (eg. strawman). I read it as "this is a trend among women", and I agree. You don't need to experience it a large number of times personally. Between personal experiences, that of friends, coworkers, family members and acquaintances, the experiences of other men we read about on the internet and the experiences we see fictionalized on TV and in movies, a picture starts to become pretty clear. Add to it the facts that women consider 80% of men to be below average and that women initiate about 80% of divorces and the picture expands to show that women are rather picky in general, so small things including (but not limited to) displays of weakness are enough to incite their finicky nature. But #NotAllWomen, heh. It's just the trend.

I've noticed that "redpill" is like a red cloth, and there are a whole lot of bulls on reddit who charge at the sight of it without thinking very deeply. Again, I don't read that sub, so I've got no horse in this race, I'm just laying out my observations.

[–]TheHoboExpress 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Where are you getting these stats?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Which ones? You could always google them yourself. You should look up the statistic for how many women initiate divorces when there are children involved. It's pretty staggering.

The world of dating and relationships is extremely female dominated right now, and a byproduct of this is that men truly can't afford to be weak. Relationships are easier to get out of, men aren't needed for providing or anything. It's a woman's world, but the byproduct of this is that men are killing themselves in droves and kids are way worse off for it.

[–]PM_ME_UR_SHEET_MUSIC 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Boy am I glad I'm gay.

[–]TheHoboExpress 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yikes.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The OKCupid data, gathered from millions of its customers (very large sample size), showed that women consider 80% of men to be below average: https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e

I have heard separate, distinct figures of 70%, 80% and 90% for divorces being initiated by women. I went with the middle figure of 80%. Here is a source for 70%, and here is another source in the neighborhood of 70%. Perhaps the 80 and 90% figures are from smaller, less well known and potentially less accurate studies? Either way women certainly initiate the majority of divorces and are highly favored by divorce courts for child support, alimony, assets and custody. Whether it's 70% or 100% is not very relevant.

[–]mgtownigga 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's enough that you have to be wary. Generalizations can still be useful here

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

That's red pill bullshit

Okay, so because a certain community believes something it must inherently be bullshit?

Lol, you can deny it all you want but it's absolutely true. Women do not respect weakness, period. There are very very few exceptions to this rule.

[–]Do_your_homework 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No it's not bullshit because a community believes it. It's bullshit because it's fucking retarded and treats an entire gender like one cohesive group.

Don't get me wrong, everything redpillers have to say is also bullshit and frankly detrimental to society as a whole, but "you can't be weak in front of women or they'll leave" is idiotic entirely on its own merits.

[–]mgtownigga 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

i've had women leave me for being weak more than the alternative. Is my experience invalid? A shit load of people I know irl would share the same sentiments.

No one is saying it's all women, not even trp would say that, but it's enough to be an issue for MANY men.

[–]pappyon 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Why do you think that?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Men can't afford to be weak any more. A study done by okCupid showed that women perceive 80% of men to be "below average" in attractiveness. For the vast majority of men it's already an uphill battle, so to be able to attract and keep a woman we need to be exceptional.

From my own personal experience men are FAR more developed in certain areas than women because women don't struggle in the same ways or (in my opinion) as much as men do.

Women aren't ridiculed for being physically or emotionally weak. They don't get shamed for crying like men do.

But, I actually don't see ridiculing men for being weak as an inherently bad thing. Being weak of mind or heart is a genuinely negative thing. Weak people are often jealous and shitty, they don't care about themselves and because of that have a hard time caring for others.

It's a girl dominated dating sphere to an extreme degree. Men can be weak all they want, but weaker men will not be nearly as successful in the dating world as the strong men. Men who handle their emotions and get shit done, men who aren't controlled by their feelings and can steer their relationship in healthy directions.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody respects weakness. Everyone can empathize with moments of weakness though.

I'll just break it it everyone now, men and women both are attracted to resilience. It's attractive.

[–]Rosti_LFC 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

There are very very few exceptions to this rule.

Based on what? Numerous sets of peer-reviewed scientific studies? Or the perceptions of a bunch of redditors that are convinced that the only reason they're single is because women love abusive guys rather than any social ineptitude or other glaring negative qualities on their part.

If you think that all women don't respect a man who cries watching a movie or when things get too stressful, then you need to actually get out and meet and emotionally connect with more women, because plenty do.

Whole shitload of comments here about how women are the problem because they won't tolerate men showing emotion - actually it's men assuming that women won't tolerate emotion that's the problem.

And for the record, I'm a guy.

[–]Yuo_cna_Raed_Tihs 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, based of the fact that nobody will fuck him so it's obvious that they're the problem and not him

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

is because women love abusive guys

Lol wtf? How did you get that from what I said?

If you think that all women don't respect a man who cries watching a movie or when things get too stressful

These are two very different things, and yes I think a lot of women absolutely would not love a man who cries when he gets stressed. Again though, I already said there are limits and exceptions.

they won't tolerate men showing emotion

Nobody says this, emotion =/= weakness. I only said women don't like WEAK men, as in a definiing characteristic which could be portrayed by being emotional too often or complaining too much.

And for the record, I'm a guy.

Okay?

[–]BeefsteakTomato 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People on this sub are saying this because of a peer reviewed study that was passed around in this sub. It's not RedPill just because it goes against what your favourite source of entertainment news media says.

[–]Caesarjamesss 103 points104 points105 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Did I stumble into r/niceguys sister sub?

[–]rices4212 58 points59 points60 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah the post was good but some of these comments are cringey

[–]alex891011 38 points39 points40 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Cringy? It's straight up depressing reading some of these comments. Some people here legitimately think all women are out to get them....like holy fucking shit

[–]Whisper 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

[–]Yuo_cna_Raed_Tihs 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment was 3rdd by controversial, I think this post got invaded by red pillers more than usual and upvotes that abomination of a comment

[+]mikenew021 points 8 years ago [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

/r/mensrights is sort of a cross between /r/theredpill and /r/incels. It's really quite unique.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No it isn't, you just have no critical thinking skills. /r/mensrights doesn't think we're being actively "oppressed" by women, we just recognize that there are SOCIETAL inequalities that impact men much more than women.

Many of these are legal, such as the duluth model, alimony, child support, abortion rights, etc.

So you're just an idiot.

[–]keonkla 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Its Essentially What happens When Ideology's Have a overlapping theme. Similar to how say Feminism Can't Escape Radical feminism, And the more Extreme Ends of it. mensrights will always be associated with theredpill.(this might be something were going have to accept). I have my Disagreements with the red pillers as someone who Embraced it a while back.

Hears the thing, Men Nor women are really "Oppressed". Both genders just have certain important Issues regarding there rights. Both sides tend to Exaggerate the problems but, that doesn't mean there not real.

Lack of a sex life Ain't a mens rights issue. (anyone who does think that is pathetic.)

Fatherlessness/Biased court systems/Anti male Education/Abusive Girlfriends. Those are mens rights issues.

[–]mikenew02 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's fair, and you're right, people in these sort of communities take their values to extremes which is unproductive.

[–]Caesarjamesss 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I didn't downvote btw, I ageee

[–]mikenew02 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's cool, I can take it. Because I'm a man.

[–]Caesarjamesss 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well like someone else said to me, the post was good, men don't need to bottle emotions, but this comment section is stupid.

[–]mikenew02 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

100% agree. You'll find that all the comment sections are like this though.

[–]Caesarjamesss 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not to mention the posts sometimes goodness this sub is annoying. But I hope you have a nice day & weekend!

[+]mymraccount_ac1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

These are just men expressing their feelings. And here you are confirming that only 'socially acceptable' feelings are permitted. You'd call a suicidal man bitter, a suicidal teen a neckbeard.

[–]Caesarjamesss 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Bluepillers and women will not listen"

[–][deleted] 45 points46 points47 points 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Blue pillers

Is this serious? because the people who give the most shit to me for my emotions are who i'd define as 'red pillers'

Calling me beta for even having emotions. Like seriously, are you for real? I mean the top comment responding to you is saying crying makes you weak wtf? that's not blue piller talking, that's red pill.

[–]MiataCory 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup. Mens rights sub has gone downhill like crazy. We used to distance ourselves from the 'redpiller' dating subs.

To see 'Redpill/bluepill' on the top comment for THIS post? That's some bullshit right there.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was actually banned from trp because i said it was possible for a man to be a poly amorous relationship and be happy.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wrong takeaway. Manginas, white knights, blue pillers, call them what you will

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who do you think came up with the "lol male tears" meme?

Was it feminists or.... It was feminists.

[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 46 points47 points48 points 8 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

This shit can't be upvoted enough. Women don't respect weakness... and men you don't know well enough won't understand you enough to care and empathize.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Women don't respect weakness

but neither do men, as shown by the top comment here being "crying is weakness"

[–]Sedfvgt 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think they meant crying itself is weakness but that being unable to control when to cry is weakness. Like shit, sometimes there's no time to cry and shit needs to be done. Other times, you can cry for relief then set on a plan. But to be unable to get past one's emotion and end up incapacitated into inaction is pretty fucking weak. How would you help someone like that? You can sympathize, but it's really hard to empathize. And you certainly can't carry them through their issues and baby them bc then they'd never get past more difficult issues in the future. Sometimes no one can really help, being encouraging doesn't help, being consoling will have a negative effect, and being there is taxing to yourself. What are you supposed to do when faced with a man like that?

[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Of course not! What do weak men do? They are not good for defending your tribe. If you need to rely on the man next to you to help you defend your village.. would you want a weak man next to you?

[–]mikenew02 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's clear that you've never been in a stable healthy relationship, but I hope that you will be some day.

[–]Mr_MRAnarchist 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And it's clear that you don't know me, my relationship or anything else. Keep your opinions to yourself if you don't know what you're talking about.

[+]EnriqueRoz1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (18 children) | Copy Link

You are triggering the beta males here who think we can talk through our differences with feminists.

[–]Yuo_cna_Raed_Tihs 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes you can you fucking moron. The majority of feminists aren't extreme. The majority of feminists don't disregard opinions from men with "male privilige". At least in my experience.

[+]Dglsdms1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

The sad thing about MRA is they don't see that feminism and equality benefit men too. A society with less harsh expectations on gender roles and behaviour is better for everyone, and exactly what the OP is alluding too.

[–]Yuo_cna_Raed_Tihs 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't consider myself and MRA, but there are valid reasons to oppose feminism, but saying that feminists can't be reasoned with them beyond arrogant

[–]Killgraft 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

see positive post on sub

second top comment uses it as an opportunity to blame the opposite sex for everything

So it goes...

[–]CopyX 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Blue pillers and women

Fuck that noise. Women are anti-toxic masculinity.

You think women don't want you to be open and vocal about your emotions? Feminists hate toxic masculinity just as much as /r/mensrights does. Cut the fucking bullshit with this straw man nonsense.

Edit:

Power (in an authoritarian sense) is not a virtue, but strength is. The problem is so often we confuse actual strength with the various ways it’s presented. Stifling emotion, for one, is unnecessary and strange, as emotions are biological entities, not fabricated ones.

...

It’s how we grow. If we shame an entire gender for experiencing and using empathy, we hold humanity back. And for what reason? Because caring about other people strips us of our ability to fight them? Because fighting other people is the point of being a man? Because we must greet non-sexual, non-heterosexual and pacifistic men with ridicule and persecution or else risk dying out as a species? These things are simply untrue.

http://everydayfeminism.com/2017/08/masculinity-vs-toxic-masculinity/

[–]Singulaire 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women are anti-toxic masculinity.

Except when they aren't. Plenty of feminists will try to attack your masculinity as a first resort if you start disagreeing with them. Plenty of feminists will respond with #maletears if you complain about issues that are hurting men disproportionately. Here's a prominent feminist columnist writing in one of Australia's biggest newspapers about how women are justified in hating men if they experienced abuse, but the same justification just doesn't apply to men. Really working hard to dismantle that toxic masculinity.

[–]lily-mae 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Instead, feminists and non-feminists (or, as I call them, dickwads) alike

Oh hey, the feminist you linked just awared me that I am a 'dickwad'. Thx, feminist.

[–]mymraccount_ac 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists hate toxic masculinity just as much as /r/mensrights does.

Men's rights does not even accept the definition. It is a contrivance made up by sexist people. If we were to start going round saying that there is such a thing as toxic femininity, and that women should not act in certain ways to prevent it, that would rightly be seen as gender role enforcement and sexism. It is no different with toxic masculinity. The people that use the term are man haters.

[–]WeAreYourOverlords 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a "blue Piller" (I think that's how I'd be described on here), I couldn't disagree with you more, at least from my experience. In my Gender and anthropology course (admittedly from around 10 years ago), male suicide and the cultural expectations of men to "man up"/"suck it up" and bury their emotions was an important topic that we discussed. Not one person thought it was trivial.

[–]yoghurt_monitoring 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck? Y'all got some problems.

[–]TheBlackQuill 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imo, the reason why men committing suicide is because no one wants to be bothered to listen to their problems. The one you see on the internet whine and bitch about their problems don't necessarily want most people in the society pity them. They just want someone to listen to their grieving because they literally have no one else to talk to. If every men have someone they can talk to and listen to their problems, I think they will be much happier and care less whether or not other people in general care about them.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Our society represses emotions way to much these days that it's only acceptable to experience the positive ones and shun the negative emotions. It's an epidemic.

Depression is an emotion, like sadness, guilt, shame, joy, etc. it's when men are made to feel bad about these emotions and not show them it creates a toxic shame which leads to further depression. It's the same for anyone who's denied their emotions, m or f. Just men in society struggle with it a lot more. If you turn to other emotionally immature men it's not really validating because most men are conditioned to not talk about emotions.

[–]cynoclast 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depression is an emotion, like sadness, guilt, shame, joy, etc.

Eh....it's more like the lack of all the positive ones. Like a void that devours motivation and happiness with guilt, and shame.

source: depressed

[–]Darqhumor 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you feel suicidal it might feel like no one will miss you when you're gone but they will feel it harshly and forever. We need you to speak up so we can help you. Let us carry you now so you can carry us later. We are all in this together and we need you.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I always thought of it as the 'manly' thing to do is not lie to yourself. You have a duty to accept reality, including the reality of your own situation and problems. To be a man is to be a problem solver, including your own problems. That often means asking for help. Getting help is better than languishing in your insecurity and fear.

[–]Claireah 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I had anger issues, depression, and social anxiety by the age of 10 because my mother got addicted to pain killers when she started to get intense migraines, as well as a herniated disc. I lived with my father as well, but he worked a lot, especially once my mom couldn't work anymore. Because of this, I was left alone with my mom a lot when she was messed up.

Unfortunately, no one but my Grandma believed I needed help, and my father convinced me that I didn't need to see a counselor. He also often took his anger out on me (not physically, thankfully) because he didn't know how to handle the situation, especially if I started to cry. Of course, that also means I couldn't really talk to him about anything that was happening. All of this lead to years and years of suffering as a kid with no way out other than to go to my grandma's house for a day or two once a week.

Luckily, I was able to move in with my grandma around age 13. I still saw my parents often since they were still legally my parents, which means there was still a lot of fighting. Unfortunately, I also started taking my anger out on my grandma as well. I was basically in a constant state of anger/depression.

Fast forward to 16, I finally pulled myself out of the hole just enough to go to a counselor. I've been seeing her for a few years now, and everything is so much better. I'm still depressed, though not nearly as much, my anger is gone, and my life as a whole is improving so much.

The whole point of this sob story is this: find someone you can trust and talk to them. I was lucky to have my grandma at first, but since she was so close to the conflict, I still took my anger out on her as well. However, once I started seeing a counselor, everything got better, though it did take some time. Talking to someone about your problems really can help, because often times it not only leads to you being able to take a load off emotionally, it also leads to action. If you can talk to someone about your problems, you might just find a way to work through them as well.

tl;dr: Talking to someone you trust can not only help you emotionally, it can also help you find solutions to your problems, or find a way to cope.

[–]graygarb 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For anyone interested, Matt Haig (the tweet poster) wrote a phenomenal book titled Reasons To Stay Alive about his own battle with depression; the short non-fiction piece helped save my life and is an insightful read

[–]JuliaDD 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely! It's awful that men are taught to hide their emotions. It's inhumane. Everyone deserves the right to show emotion, and it seems awful that men so often feel they can't share how they're feeling. Please, men, understand that a worthy women will respect your feelings, and you should feel free to share! It's not healthy or needed to bottle thing up!!

[–]Pathfinder24 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I don't think this is good advice. Do we know that "speaking out" actually reduces risk of suicide?

[–]crimsonkodiak 34 points35 points36 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do we know that "speaking out" actually reduces risk of suicide?

Do we even know what "speaking out" means?

[–]DatGrass14 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think he means men should stop being ashamed of their feelings and we should be more aware of suicide and mental issues

being open about your feelings and having support is an immense part of mental healing process

[–]Rethgil 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah we do. But only if its done in a balanced way with people one can trust or is confident of getting a kind response from. Its not simply about an extreme black or white of 'crying at the drop of a hat to a stranger', nor about shutting it all off no matter what.

Its about knowing when its safe to open up that safety valve. Sadly, for many men, due to social bias that privelleges women, that means only a few select close friends. Women are meanwhile comforted by even total strangers.

As with all things, its a complex balance. But the point is, men are never given balance, because all privellege currently goes to women. Men face tougher lives. Its that simple. We've more reason to cry, but less choice to do so or to manage in a different way. As with everything lately, the problem is we're being told by women what we should be rather than letting US figure it out for ourselves.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can I say when I hear man up I don't think of bottling shit down, if someone tells me to man up I go out and do the shit I need to do and go and get the help I need

[–]Taminella_Grinderfal 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My ex boyfriend suffered terrible insomnia for about two months. Combination of the death of his father and switch of a new job at the same time. I wanted so badly to "help", but I didn't know how because he kept saying he was fine, but just couldn't sleep. Men, when you're sad, most likely you would be making your SO or other loved ones feel valued that you could confide in them and let them comfort you.

[–]chaveznieves 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately not everyone is as understanding as you seem to be. Sad truth is that many actually DO treat us negatively for trying to confide and being open. People who truly care are rare, and it's easier sometimes to assume that no one does, because getting shot down 9 times to find the 1 that cares is hard to do

[–]MrNudeGuy 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Find strength in your vulnerability. I know its hard but it takes real strength to be vulnerable as a male. It has it benefits especially in making connections with others. You spend all this time being strong and its only a barrier cause by the armor you put up to deal with the world and its shittyness. I have found that sometimes people need to see you bleed to know your human. Don’t be afraid of your humanity, people will respect you for it. But on a side note don’t discard that armor, it still has its place.

[–]Ultramegasaurus 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The issue isn't that men aren't speaking up, it's that no one wants to listen. Women feel incredibly offput by men displaying weakness and generally, empathy for men is extremely low.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And yet feminists still reply to male issues with "lol male tears".

[–]Carebearkiller15 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Looks like there's finally something that Feminism and MRA agree on.

[–]cswanger22 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is an epidemic. I lost a brother and an uncle to suicide.

[–]Blutarg 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a damn shame. Sorry for your loss, and for theirs.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A post in men's rights that's actually about pro-man stuff? Fuck it, have an upvote

[–]DataBound 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would love to see a shift in this sub. I started coming here hoping it was about actual men's rights and removing stigmas. But it started being more about bashing feminists and women in general. Then calling any man that may show emotions or believe in feminism 'beta males'. It's still in some of the top comments here. But it won't change over night obviously.

[–]kaldrazidrim 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I couldn't find stats to back this up. Anyone?

[–]MiataCory 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

CDC says it's fake.

https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/lcod/men/2014/all-males/index.htm

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Under 50. The list is all males including things like Alzheimer's.

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also suicide is top 3 starting at the ripe old age of 10-14, so in aggregate it may be greater.

[–]uglydavie 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We need more of this on the sub.

Posting something that's actually uplifting instead of just infuriating is a nice change of pace.

[–]rocket_raccon 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is this true? This stat?

[–]FaggotSlayingCunt 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are hard on each other. Some of us will belittle other men just for being "weak" and "emotional". But society needs strong men, we can't all just be Lovey dovey. Sometimes we need to just take life with a pinch of salt and finish what needs to be done

[–]iHeartCandicePatton 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I fully support this notion

[–]daoogilymoogily 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't normally agree with everything on this sub, but fuck yes guys. They're a lot of things that our reaction is to just man up and ignore it, including suicidal inclinations and depression. We need to start addressing them rather than allowing them to simmer and explode.

[–]itgscv1 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Comment ratings are really off in this thread, 4k+ up votes and yet the vast majority of comments are well under 100.

[–]dvcat5 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I call b.s on that statistic. Most deaths are suicide for men under 50? No way.

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Considering 70% of suicides are male I wouldn't be surprised, particularly in safe developed countries.

[–]lily-mae 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

2nd leading cause of death for men age 10-34.. 3rd for men age 35-44 after accidents and heart attack.

That's how many men are choosing to kill themselves.. it's horrific.

[–]magicfatkid 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

According to some statistics I just made up

Wait, what?

Is this a satirical article?

[–]Rawrrawrrawrtheboat 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most people don't like to hang around depressed people, tho. Which is awful since social contacts play a major part in fighting depression.

So if you don't want to be surrounded by pity friends it still seems like a good idea to hide your depression.

[–]viper12a1a 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

While I do believe it's bad to always hide your emotions, I personally feel that it is major strength of being a man that I am able to control my emotions, not having to constantly be emotional about things. How I feel about things is my business, I don't think the world needs to be privy to all of my thoughts and feelings.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

I completely support this. I think that if men were allowed to be more sensitive, there wouldn't be such a stigma over femininity or typically feminine traits in general. I think the same sexism that leads to women often feeling undermined is the very same that discourages men from speaking out about their emotions.

I think that the genders should work together to support one another on this journey to equality, and as a feminist I will work hard to ensure points like these are also heard.

Edit: Nevermind, I don't support this. Two assholes below me told me that my attempt at empathy was insulting to them somehow. Fuck that.

[–]NightmareInn 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I completely support this. I think that if men were allowed to be more sensitive, there wouldn't be such a stigma over femininity or typically feminine traits in general. I think the same sexism that leads to women often feeling undermined is the very same that discourages men from speaking out about their emotions.

This is a perfect example of the problem. You're not able to put aside your gynocentrism for even a second. Newsflash: there is nothing stigmatized about femininity. It is celebrated in every way possible -- even toxic femininity and irresponsible behavior. There are gigantic lobbies in Western governments devoted to helping or privileging women and girls in every aspect of life -- often at the expense of men and boys.

Feminists are a major reason for the suicide epidemic. Suicide rates for men skyrocket after divorce because feminists won't allow alimony reform and equal parenting rights. There are dozens of other issues where feminists are the primary obstacle in helping men and boys.

So give yourself a big pat on the back, feminist.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, this is really rude of you, to be honest.

Attitudes like this are really not going to help anyone get on board with your message. If you want to be heard, try listening to others. If you're going to continue to suggest that your problems are yours alone and somehow different or completely irrelevant to other people's problems, all you're doing is making yourself unrelatable, you're turning away someone's attempt at empathy, and you're coming off as kind of unlikeable. Like, oh sorry I tried to relate to you? Is this not literally a men's rights group, the exact inverse of a women's rights group, aka a feminist? Are you trying to make us opponents? Shouldn't you be trying to unite? Do you care more about men than you do about equality?

Yeah, nevermind then, I'm going to redact my statement that I support this at all now. You did a terrible job convincing me that helping you would do anything good for the world with my support.

A lot of people want to see eye to eye but you aren't letting them, and that's a pretty fucking shitty of you to do. And then you wonder why the stereotype of feminists you've created for yourself hate men like you and act like a victim over it. Wow.

Edit: This mad dude is you

[–]NightmareInn 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

someone's attempt at empathy

I didn't see any empathy in your post. I saw someone trying to turn the issue into "misogyny backfiring" or "patriarchy hurts men too", the standard feminist tactics of marginalizing male voices and blaming the victim.

Are you trying to make us opponents?

We ARE opponents. Not due any actions by MRA's. Feminists literally lobby against men and boys achieving equal rights. They shut down our attempt to organize. They constantly lie about us in the media. Watch the documentary "The Red Pill."

Yeah, nevermind then, I'm going to redact my statement that I support this at all now.

Kinda goes to show that, as suspected, you never had any empathy to begin with. It's all just about you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

On the surface, this seems like a reasonable point of view, but you really betray yourself by not being capable of refraining from declaring which team you're on, attempting some half-baked virtue signalling, then making it all about yourself in the end anyways.

"I think the same sexism that leads to women often feeling undermined is the very same that discourages men from speaking out about their emotions."

Well, I'm glad that our troubles can be twisted and repurposed to give your cause another talking point. It's sadly hilarious to me that we become an afterthought even here.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually I'd argue that trying to make it so that your problems have nothing to do with anyone else's problems is not the right way to go about anything, and you're only isolating yourself.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not what anyone here is doing, don't misrepresent me.

Though if anyone is doing that, it makes sense to me. When your issues and problems consistently become overshadowed by someone elses, maybe it's okay to have something to yourself once in a while.

[–]SarniaMelee 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Is that a global statistic?

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not likely, but the sex ratio in suicides is similar in all but a few countries in which women suicide more.

[–]SarniaMelee 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just mean like in countries that are not as advanced I would assume more men die from disease and murder and such than from suicide.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What did Diane have to say? I suspect it wasn't kind

[–]ghostofthecosmos 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Life is hard. Shit's sad, yo.

[–]Drfilthymcnasty 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with the message here but for me, when I say "man-up" to myself, it works. It helps me put things in perspective and it does help me find true inner strength because I am very proud to be a man and I know we are strong. I guess I feel like that saying is getting a lot of flak lately and I actually like and use it and I don't think it's a bad thing.

[–]_PEN15 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stuff it down with some brown

[–]SHUTUPCYRIL 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There was a good documentary about this called man up I think?

[–]balne 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What did Dianne say?

[–]I_will_draw_boobs 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My shit is so repressed I cry when I watch Cartoons.

[–]saysthingsbackwards 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Eh. No one has time to help me except myself

[–]Freeman0032 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm sad I used to get angry. Now days I just stay sad.

[–]ThisCatMightCheerYou 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sad

Here's a picture/gif of a cat, hopefully it'll cheer you up :).


I am a bot. use !unsubscribetosadcat for me to ignore you.

[–]Emperorvoid 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can feel it, then you can build a bridge, and get the fuck over it. Men USED to be Men. Too many fucking pussies these days with no integrity, no balls, and no grit.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

not to put down the issue itself but this seems highely unlikely to be true. statistics wise that is

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not gonna lie, I just had a dream of putting a knife to my chest. Not really sure where that came out of, but lately the thought of killing myself has been on my mind. I don't want to, but it comes up.

[–]WTFppl 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This has probably never happened, but is it okay to kill yourself if over 60 and happy, but in pain?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Human beings acting like human beings. Thanks guys

[–]rangamatchstick 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes an no, men need to be supported if they are going to go to far, saying that something men do well is handle the hardest emotional situation with little to no emotional reaction.

[–]sennhauser 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can confirm. Pretty sure I will be one of those below 50s.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've always thought that this is nothing because people are very depressed, but because we live in such a safe and medically advanced society that the biggest threat to us is ourself

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You say people, but men are 3/4 of suicides. Why aren't women killing themselves as much if it's only a reflection of safety? Further consider that men are less safe than women in terms of crime victimization.

[–]Invicturion 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a 35yrold male that is currently battling a bout of depression, this shit needs to stop.

[–]IntenseCuddling 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men aren't allowed to be sad. Men aren't supposed to be feel anything. Men are to be rocks in the storm, stable and unbreaking. Anything less than this is to be not a man.

[–]pink_pamplemousse_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Y'all know this is an idea that's been central to scholarly feminism for a long time, right?

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just like original sin--- I mean toxic masculinity.

[–]LadySaberCat 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the most truthful and empathic thing I've read all day.

[–]SublimeSC 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the activism this subreddit needs to pay attention and have discussions about. Not what some dumb feminist said on twitter.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Friendly reminder to "tough love, man up" folks that men are people with hopes, dreams and feelings too. We all want to love and be loved for who we are.

[–]mrdbacks10 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Was this July 9th or September 7th?

[–]dfsasdsdsfdasfdsf 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"allowed."

[–]ArdentGamer 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"it's preventable"

Oh, did you find a magical cure for systematic misandry and one-sided gender roles? Neat!

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Well this thread has generated ten THOUSAND upvotes and over five hundred comments, and is clearly one of the bigger ones we've seen.

No surprise then that its caught the attention of feminist organised trolls who have posted both some vile hateful posts (thankfully reported), but also some obvious feminist agenda posts, which has "coincidentally" got 500 upvotes (wonder how many WERENT from organised feminist subs? Not many).

We've read of such tactics by feminist trolls, to derail and divide. Trouble is, the numbers stand out like a sore thumb. Ten thousand upvotes yet one of the argest single comments is apparently one that rubbishes the entire thread? Thankfully the other posts reveal the one obvious exception.

These tactics are about as subtle as a cockroach crawling across a white rug. Shows us we must have got them rattled for them to get so desperate and sloppy.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter