I saw the following in a previous thread:

And about 60% of those people are women who married a beta bux after getting banged out for 10 years or so; and men who couldn't do any better than to accept a banged out woman.

The women lose attraction for him because he's not as hot as the guys she used to fuck. He can't figure it out. She has kid. Kid gets into kindergarten. She divorces him, takes kid, keeps house, and gets child support for the next 15 years.

He moves to shitty apartment. She keeps the house and gets banged by a string of shitty men. The kid turns into a thug, a frustrated beta, or a woman with borderline personality disorder, daddy issues, and a substance abuse problem.

Firstly, I feel for the guy in this scenario. I do. Losing your family is awful.

However it seems that a lot of men in the manosphere and TRP believe that the reason this happens because "the women lose attraction to the guy because she had better."

As a woman, I vehemently disagree that this is the dynamic at play. It may be for a small portion of women or it may factor in only the slightest, but there's a far graver issue here and it's this:

Her husband is simply sexually unattractive or what TRP calls "beta." Who she fucked or didn't fuck in the past has no bearing on his actual personality and comportment. She could've married him with her hymen in tact and it wouldn't change that she think he's sexually unattractive.

I replied to that user with the following:

Men seem to think the only reason women don’t like these men is because they had sex with other men prior to him.

This isn’t the case the majority of the time.

These men you're using as examples weren’t inspiring lust when she was an 18 yo ingenue or a 30 year old experienced woman. There’s a reason he couldn’t attract her then and barely attracts her now.

So even if she married him back in her virginal days without any other experience she would have still resented him and / or divorced him because he’s beta and / or unattractive. Not because she’s had sex with other people.

These women lose out marrying these men when they’re young virgins or when they’re “used up post-wall slut” at 30.

At least the “used up slut” got to enjoy physical intimacy before marrying or divorcing this so-called "beta" man.

The virgin woman loses out completely in a scenario marrying the beta when she’s younger or older — either way she wastes her best years not enjoying physical intimacy and will still probably want to divorce her beta husband 🤷🏽‍♀️

To quote /u/DarkLady789

Sexual liberation and marriage don't go together. Few people realize this. Women have a lot of pros staying unmarried as opposed to marrying. Not sure about guys.

I can see how it makes the "beta" husband feel better for the woman who resents him to marry him at 20 as opposed to 30. He gets to fuck her unenthusiastic youth and even though she’s not sexually attracted or turned by him he at least says to himself “well she never experienced pleasure with another man so I win”

😪🙄

But for the life of me I don’t see how it benefits her marrying him when she’s younger as opposed to later if the end result of marrying a beta or unattractive man is still the same — lifetime resentment or divorce.

Could people help me get what a woman gets out of marrying the beta guy in her youth? Seriously.

Also, I'll concede that TRP has the right idea, albeit a problematic spirit. You can't change women's attraction triggers. All you can do is become more attractive.