This is the context, please watch if if you can.

A man genetic programming is about being protective and provider, so men are measure by this two metrics, and we consider a man successful when he becomes rich.

A woman genetic programming is being caring loving and having kids (I'm not saying that's what woman should do, I'm just stating what is the evolutionary programming for the last million years)

But instead of being measured by that qualities, now men measure them by mostly looks and women by their economic achievements.

I understand man care only about looks because we are programmed to find a healthy partner to reproduce, but we left the personality part far behind...

My question is why measure women by their economic success instead of for what they are made for?

Like Einstein said:

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”

Please I'm not saying women should only stay home and have kids, I'm not defending that.

I'm asking why that is not considered successful at all? shouldn't we celebrate femininity as much as a CEO? shouldn't we be looking up to women who are great mothers? instead of women that make millions by selling their ass naked? ( Cardi B for example)

I'm sorry if Im offending anyone, but when we do what are we made for, we feel good, that's why sex feels good, eating feels good, men enjoy defending their family, they would die for it. Men love hunting and collaborating with other man to achieve something ( that's why we watch sports so much ) , doesn't it happen when a women do feminine stuff? do women really get that much satisfaction by being rich as a man do? honestly?