Being tall doesn't automatically mean hot. So many men think women have unrealistic look standards for men because they don't know what women find attractive.

"But a fisherman doesn't ask the fish what it wants."

The red flag is that you see women as fish if that's your motto. Going with the analogy, if you're just guessing the bait, you're going to keep choosing the wrong bait until that lucky guess.

It still baffles me that so many men here think Pete Davidson is an 8/10. The reason THESE GUYS said he's hot to women because he's "Tall, white, and has a nice jawline". Like excuse me? There's a reason he kept playing the dorky smartass millennial on SNL and never as a ladies man like Justin Timberlake.

"But Pete Davidson not being attractive proves women ask too much!"

A post of women talking about men they find unconventionally attractive. The answers also differ greatly.

Also, I've heard more women claim Tom Holland is attractive and he's 5'8.

Other short men I actually find attractive: Elijah Wood, Prince, and even Peter Dinklage is more attractive than Pete Davidson.

I thought this was common sense, but face is far more important to attractiveness than body type. Being tall means nothing if the face doesn't pass a certain look threshold. And if you're grooming and fashion choice is terrible, it also bring down someone's rating.

But here's another thing: Attractiveness IS NOT a formula. It differs depending on what individual is being judged and who is doing the judging. Agreeing on general attractive traits doesn't mean we can agree on who is an attractive individual.