...how do feminists, liberals and sex poz people then turn around and justify them having some "right" to go get drunk at parties withotu chaperones, go home alone with strange men, and constantly put themselves in positions where they can be "raped" or what used to be called "taken advantage of"?

is this not really an argument for the idea that women arent fully responsible adults with agency who can lead independent adult lives? is this not an argumetn for returnign to campus "in loco parentis" rules that had curfews for women and didnt allow mixed sex dorms and mixed company on the dorm floors?

i understand that its usually different groups of women makign different claims, but im curious how the people who promote female sexual liberty and right to go party and go aloen with men then justify the attitude that woman "Cant" fight back, say no and get up and leave

i personally believe women should be free to do whatever they want but should also be responsible for the consequences of those choices, not keep trying to turn courts, judges and campus tribunals into daddy on the porch with a shotgun for them when their free choices go awry

discuss

edit: i did not mean to imply there should be no criminal cause of action for rape with the final line, but to say that women have an ATTITUDE that they can engage in whatever behavior they want without consequences and if there are consequences they can go cry to proxy "daddy". im really addressign campus rape, not crime