I'm seeing 'just world fallacy' arguments by BP/feminists rear its ugly head into this sub. It's the height of delusion.

http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/

I will have to use virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. 35% of MIT grad students have never had sex, compared to only 20% of average nineteen year old men. Compared with virgins, men with more sexual experience are likely to drink more alcohol, attend church less, and have a criminal history. A Dr. Beaver (nominative determinism again!) was able to predict number of sexual partners pretty well using a scale with such delightful items as “have you been in a gang”, “have you used a weapon in a fight”, et cetera. An analysis of the psychometric Big Five consistently find that high levels of disagreeableness predict high sexual success in both men and women.

The funny thing about this analysis is that MIT Virgin Boy is statistically probably more likely to be an 'egalitarian' who treats women well and the guy who is 'in a gang and used a weapon in a fight' probably treats women like garbage (but still gets laid like crazy). This is why feminists are so aggressive against 'nice guys' who can't get laid, because it's a reflection on the failing moral character of women when bad men get laid and nice men don't, so they have to INVENT a moral defect in these men to sooth their cognitive dissonance.