For me personally, it's very important. But I also think I'm pretty flexible in regards to what I deem as attractive. All I ask is for a pretty face & eyes, healthy up-kept hair, texture doesn't matter. A body that's for the most part in shape. Preferably curvy. Meaning her hips/waist being wider than her stomach if she's on the plus size side. Petite/skinny is fine. Big ass or boobs aren't important to me. I don't think that's asking for a lot lol as long as she falls within this, I can't see myself ever being pulled in other directions.

I can't see myself getting into a relationship without the attraction being there. And those that do sacrifice that & lie to themselves as if they dont value that, I feel like they wind up cheating. Not to say those types of individuals don't exist cause they do. But those who lie to themselves r only gonna wind up hurting who they're with and themselves in the long run.

I feel like 1 of my expressions to show how much I love someone is through sex and intimacy. Hell, it's probably 1 of my strongest ways to solidify and get across how deep I feel about that person. So if that sexual attraction isn't there I can't showcase that. But when I think about getting old, I wonder how that will factor in. Do we go the Will & Jada route and give each other passes to have sexual partners outside the relationship because we don't find each other attractive anymore? Or will the love be so deep that we accept each other's imperfections? Won't know til I get to that age I guess lol but in the meantime it's pretty important.

While I do think it's important, I think it's also important to not have such a rigid strict scale of attraction. I mean we all have an idea of what's the best of the best sexually attractive but how low on ur personal scale of attraction can u go that can still get u at ur sexual best in terms of intimacy and passion?