Female applicants to be given preference for firefighting jobs: "preference in selection will be given to female applicants assessed as suitable" Male teacher applicants in elementary education are expected to remain silent.

DevilishRogue · 2017-03-13T13:14:21+00:00

I don't know about the rest of you but when my apartment is on fire and I need someone to rescue me the one thing I will insist upon is a gender representative rescue team or I just won't climb down that ladder with them!

Rasalom72 · 2017-03-13T13:34:18+00:00

And of course, even if they get some women who are interested (which most aren't, because firefighting is fucking HARD AND DANGEROUS, both of which are jobs women usually avoid like the plague), good luck getting any who can actually pass the tests.

These types of things need to fucking die. The reason there are not more women doing this is because WOMEN are discriminating against doing these types of jobs. Useless waste of tax dollars.

Dembara · 2017-03-13T13:41:01+00:00

And, unlike with teachers, having diversity of gender is effing irrelevant. I want whoever is the most capable, man or woman. On average, men will be more qualified, if a woman can meet the standards, she should have the same chance, not an easier one.

terribletweets · 2017-03-13T14:15:33+00:00

OK here's what to do. Make squads of women firefighters and have them tend only to feminists in need. Let's see how quickly this shit turns around.

WillMeatLover · 2017-03-13T14:01:20+00:00

This is retarded. A lot of you will say "if women can meet the standards" but that's stupid. Firefighting is an EXTREMELY popular career choice among men. MOST MEN will not cut it because the only guys who get paid firefighting jobs are so far beyond the minimum requirements.

The "standards" are totally irrelevant due to the context of the fact that the real competition is waaaaaaaaay above it and this is a good thing because professional firefighters should be the best available men. Not just "good enough".

It is absolutely idiotic, pure lunacy, to select women over men for firefighting. Thankfully, most women do the discrimination for us.

Source: tried to become a firefighter when I was 18 and had the experience firsthand. I easily beat the minimum requirements and I was nowhere near being good enough to beat the competition for the job. This is in Australia with regards to paid firefighting. There are also far more volunteer (read: unpaid) firefighters. Bush fires can be a big thing here. I'm not overly familiar with how different things will be in other countries, but I am doubtful that it's much different. I.e. firefighting attracts elite and motivated men.

crazypants88 · 2017-03-13T13:25:09+00:00

I'm 6'1 200 lbs. I'm not sure most women will be able to carry me, plus their equipment to safety should they need to.

SyllableLogic · 2017-03-13T13:49:40+00:00

[permanently deleted]

cymrich · 2017-03-13T19:06:43+00:00

what needs to happen, in order to shut this bullshit down, is someone needs to die... of course it can't be a man because then nobody would care... it needs to be a woman or child! and they need to die specifically because a woman firefighter couldn't perform the same job as a man but was made a firefighter anyway, despite failing to pass the same physical requirements. Only then will people start to speak up and denounce this bullshit! I'm certainly not hoping this actually happens, but it's the only way I foresee people opening their eyes to reality!

7hunderpants · 2017-03-13T17:01:47+00:00

In the uk there is a DESPERATE need for male teachers especially in primary schools. Huge lack of male role models , female teachers pushing the feminist agenda and turning boys into manginas.

GrandPoobah_ · 2017-03-13T13:01:51+00:00

a great step towards equality... /s

IronJohnMRA · 2017-03-13T15:05:02+00:00

If fire departments are forced to prefer female applicants, then they also are forced to prefer more destroyed buildings and more loss of life. Dead people, shattered homes, businesses, and churches are small price to pay to make sure an illusion is maintained. Sounds like equality to me.

Mykeru · 2017-03-13T18:38:50+00:00

Ironically, as Bill Burr has said, there aren't any feminists in house fires.

Tgunner192 · 2017-03-14T00:20:25+00:00

thought I'd chime in. Most of my adult life I was an artillery NCO in the army. Part of the standards is being able to carry 3 separate rounds from the ammo vehicle to the gun, lock, load and fire. (depending on the type of round they can weigh up to 75lbs or so). Lot of men and most woman can't do this. I'd go so far as to say that any woman that can is probably a pro athlete of one type of another. I had 1 too many conversations asking/demanding to know why woman can't be artillery and just do other stuff. (driving the vehicles, aiming the gun, pulling the chord and firing the gun) There was no explaining to them, yes-we all do different things during a fire mission but the people have to be interchangeable. That's the job, including carrying, loading and locking 3 rounds in about 30 seconds. (was in AIT about 25 years ago, honestly don't remember the exact standard) That's the job. It's 13B, there is no 13.5 Bravo where you do everything but load the rounds. I can't say there are no woman who can do this, but i can say I've never met one. I've met a lot of woman who just wanted to make the job less exclusive-actually had one thought the army should make 75lb rounds weigh less than 75lbs. I realize firefighters do other things beside break down doors and carry people. But that is part of being a firefighter and if it's a standard every male FF has to achieve I don't think a woman should be held to a lower standard.

2017-03-14T00:49:43+00:00

I'm a firefighter and this really pisses me off, not because of the sexual preference, but because they are potentially sacrificing quality to fit a narrative for "equality". I don't give a damn if someone has a dick or not, when shit hits the fan I want someone I can rely on to help me or get me out if I'm compromised. That's my priority as a firefighter.

BorealBro · 2017-03-13T22:46:59+00:00

A dept. in my town was taking this same approach. They held the fitness tests, and surprise surprise, no women passed. Instead of hiring men that did pass, they invited only the women back to redo the tests with lighter sled drag weights. Then placed both of them number 1 and 2 in the hiring pools.

Men and women are not equal physically or emotionally, there is a reason that there is unequal representation in many jobs, it happened naturally, they should leave it alone.

byecyclehelmet · 2017-03-13T18:05:01+00:00

Sweet, women fire fighters..... that can't pass standreds to be a firefighter, just like women in combat related jobs in the military can't pass the old standard ( we lowered the standard so they can pass )

So more people get to die so women's feelings don't get hurt.

Just like in every TV show and movie and comic and book there is now this super bad ass girl that is the first girl though what once was a all male program and then the girl kicks more butt then all the guys and is top of her class.

It plays well in fantasy so it must work in reality. Coincidentally we haven't integrated the Olympics or any professional sports... wonder why?

JackBond1234 · 2017-03-13T18:16:45+00:00

Only the ~~best~~ most sufficient and ~~brightest~~ female

2017-03-13T18:54:13+00:00

I say let them enforce these quotas and lower testing standards. Then we can watch the reputations of these firefighting departments rot away. Because it's going to take loss of lives and property to get these people to wake up and realize this progressive path is destructive.

flee_market · 2017-03-13T17:07:15+00:00

This is kinda ludicrous. The majority of men (like, upwards of 80% of men) wouldn't qualify for firefighting. You need to be able at peak human ability to run in and out of buildings with however many pounds of gear and rescue-ee's over your shoulder. Unbelievably physically demanding job. And some firefighters do it as volunteers? Just unbelievable.

RadioHitandRun · 2017-03-13T17:55:54+00:00

Oh? how's that 120lb female going to move that 220lb male firefighter when he goes down? Better have a RITT Team on standby constantly whenever they head in there.

2017-03-13T18:13:16+00:00

can i prefer male firefighters to carry my injured ass down 10 flights of burning stairs?

PM_ME_UR_THUNDERFURY · 2017-03-13T20:40:52+00:00

Gender equality-Female preference. What?

unbannabledan · 2017-03-14T01:23:35+00:00

The majority of women are not physically strong enough to carry the dead weight of a man. Decisions like these put lives at risk.

ChaosOpen · 2017-03-13T21:33:10+00:00

Want to bet this won't fix the disparity? Why? Because women don't want to be firefighters.

whatohhey · 2017-03-13T22:01:15+00:00

As a teacher, men don't need to speak up versus be silent. Play a sport? Look like you can coach? Bam! You will always get a job before a women. It fills the need for coaches and men in teaching. I had 3 men in my college graduating class. All of them sucked at grammar and did far below the rest of us. All of them were hired first. So, not a good comparison. As a firefighter's wife, you sure better be able to haul my husband or someone else out of a burning building. Pass the fitness requirements and by all means, get placed on the proper place on the hiring list. The proper place meaning where you stand after testing, interview, and qualifications.

Rethgil · 2017-03-13T22:01:16+00:00

Yet they don't have the same physical tests in such vital life or death work, such as the military.... Feminism literally costing lives.

Tech-Teacher · 2017-03-14T00:23:12+00:00

Actually male elementary teacher applicants are few and far between. From my experience male elementary teachers get hired quicker because they are sought after as a role model and provide support in areas that have been more comfortably in the male domain... I'm not saying it's right, but I have know multiple male elementary teachers get offered multiple jobs at once while female teachers must compete with 90% of the other teachers.

TheForeverKing · 2017-03-14T02:07:56+00:00

Ridiculous. These are jobs that literally save lives. Just give them to the most qualified people, man or woman.

I_Pee_In_The_Sh0wer · 2017-03-13T19:24:25+00:00

I'm a firefighter, and I work for a department that hasn't done this type hiring discrimination yet. I work right next to a city that has, though.

It's true though, women don't want to be firefighters. Very few show up to hiring exams and even fewer attend fire academies on their own.

It's so much bull shit.

bman0001 · 2017-03-13T20:11:05+00:00

Northern Territory fire departments soon to be less effective. Got it.

Gackles · 2017-03-13T21:26:53+00:00

In totally unrelated news: fire related deaths are soaring!

GreatSmithanon · 2017-03-13T23:25:27+00:00

Who in the shitguzzling hallowed halls of hell would think this is a good idea?

abend954 · 2017-03-14T00:15:40+00:00

A Female 'Firefighter' Shows Why You'd Want a Man to Rescue You

SublimeSC · 2017-03-14T00:28:11+00:00

If they are fit for the job they are more than welcome.

Rad_Thibodeaux · 2017-03-14T01:34:35+00:00

They'll reverse this when the number of children burned alive rises.

elebrin · 2017-03-14T02:11:56+00:00

Remind me to install a sprinkler system attached to a heat sensor in my house, should I ever buy one...

thrway_1000 · 2017-03-13T17:39:59+00:00

https://archive.is/umNd7

FissureKing · 2017-03-14T00:33:03+00:00

Female Firefighter Fail.

wolf6152ag · 2017-03-13T18:36:37+00:00

I don't give a shit what you have between your legs, I want the strongest, fittest, bravest firefighter to pull my ass out of a burning building.

minibabybuu · 2017-03-13T19:58:43+00:00

this makes no sense to me. its reasonable to expect to be treated fairly when working in construction (or firefighting for that matter), aka not being harassed for being female etc. but this... I've even told a boss off when he told me he gave me special treatment because I was female. Give me special treatment for my mental disorder, but special treatment because I'm female is the same to me as being told I shouldn't be there because its a man's job and I'm not emotionally capable of handling criticism.

futureisscrupulous · 2017-03-13T20:30:40+00:00

Hello 911? Yeah my house is on fire.... also can you not send any female firefighters? Thanks!

do_you_know_doug · 2017-03-13T21:09:22+00:00

sigh Between this and the NYC teachers, just like to remind everyone that SCOTUS has already ruled on this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_v._DeStefano

DerangedGinger · 2017-03-13T13:57:21+00:00

If they can find a woman who can pass the exact same tests as the men and wants the job I'd say hire her over the rest, because she's probably a total badass and very driven.

_LadyBoy · 2017-03-14T04:34:34+00:00

Would love to see the Fire Chief explaining to a family that their loved ones burnt to a crisp was still a positive win because #GenderEquality

Choice77777 · 2017-03-14T06:00:59+00:00

If we get nude female firefighter calendars i might change my mind after...or not.

Frontfart · 2017-03-14T07:59:04+00:00

I weigh 110kg and am 190cm tall. I hope the firefighters they choose to carry me out of a burning building aren't there just because they have a set of tits.

KingMong · 2017-03-14T08:24:46+00:00

Fucking Australia... Hardly the best place to be messing with firefighters, I predict deaths

DougDante · 2017-03-14T12:36:43+00:00

I support all female firefighters. Go and do a great job. Go save lives.

However, I don't support this sharply preferential hiring practice.

CRFlixxx · 2017-03-15T00:29:47+00:00

Comedian Adam Carolla said he once applied to be an LA firefighter. He did it around 22-23 years of age. He said to the guy he handed the application in, "How long until I hear something?" The guy said, good luck.

About 8 years later he got a reply to come in and take the written entrance exam. He sat next to a girl who wasn't white. He said to her, "So how long did you have to wait." She said she had applied a week ago.

2017-03-15T18:48:49+00:00

Just what we need, a "strong" woman who isn't physically capable of dragging a 200+ lb human out of a burning building. It's okay, it will just end up being a mans fault at the end of the day.

pipsname · 2017-03-13T16:07:06+00:00

There isn't enough things that can kill you in Australia?

EDIT: After talking with some local guys they think this is ok as long as the lower tier is sent to bush fires. While long and hard work it is more manageable by more body types. It's seems reasonable once put into that perspective.

Blutarg · 2017-03-13T15:39:14+00:00

Okay, but almost no women are suitable for this job, so now what?

http://www.laweekly.com/news/women-firefighters-the-gender-boondoggle-2151639

nocivo · 2017-03-13T16:36:14+00:00

This is stupid! I'm fine with cotas when companies like Microsoft or Apple do it because in the end will not affect me. But when they do shit in places that really matter and can affect me, this shit has to stop! If man or women can't carry gear and normal men out of a house in fire they should not be hired. I know plenty of people who can handle it! This is a hard job and only the best of the best should be hired. I don't care their race, gender. I want the best! Making cotas will not make the best work there!

chicagowaratah · 2017-03-13T20:57:37+00:00

Ahhh, remember the days when men were allowed to be men and women were allowed to be women and we were all allowed to do whatever jobs we wanted without feeling any sort of social pressure to do something different

2017-03-13T21:17:48+00:00

I hope the females would be shredded, carrying overweight humans out of a collapsing burning building isn't easy.

Whiteyak5 · 2017-03-13T23:13:35+00:00

It's like letting woman into combat jobs now. I'm perfectly fine with them being able to join those positions so long as they pass the exact same standard as men do. That's all I ask. The same standard for both sexes.

Satansyngel · 2017-03-14T00:34:05+00:00

Diversity is our greatest strength.

IAmDabaw · 2017-03-13T17:41:19+00:00

Thanks to you guys, I stopped being a lurker and made an account just to respond to this. I have many friends in the fire service, both male and female. I'm currently trying to get hired. Your comments here really annoyed me, because of one of my friends in particular. I've known her for years, and she has dedicated her life to being a firefighter. She's no more than 5'5", maybe 130 pounds. I'm 6'1 and 210. I have been on the receiving end of this woman hauling me out of a building, and let me tell you it was not comfortable. I was removed faster than I ever have been. Her strength is NOT in question in my mind. In fact, I'd rather have her come for me than some of the others I know. You guys need to understand that things are changing; get out of the past. If the fire service diversifies, we can grow as an industry. Stop thinking everything is an attack on you. It's not. Grow up.

chambertlo · 2017-03-14T05:54:45+00:00

Unacceptable.

If my apartment was on fire, they better send men or I will not respond.

smthsmthfreeesem · 2017-03-13T17:37:21+00:00

On the one hand, people are totally right on the point they are making when it comes to jobs in education, where no reforms are being made to promote male hiring. On the other hand, we should try and keep the discussion a bit more civil and logical in this thread. Sure, women will -on average- not be suited for a firefighting position. That doesn't mean that there aren't women who are perfectly capable of physically and mentally handling the job. I am willing to bet that out of 200 humans there are way more than 4 women able to be firefighters (simply put it's like saying only 4 in 200 women can physically be on par with males, which is absurd). The bar isn't being lowered to get random women into firefighting. What is happening here, will just be an incentive for a really small amount of women that are in a position to do the job and might had not been chosen due to their gender. Not more women are going to apply to become a firefighter, it is just a way of promoting the few that are able and willing to do so. People are gonna jump on me saying that "Sure, not more women will apply and all, but when they are choosing between a man and a woman that are equally skilled and qualified, they will DISCRIMINATE against the man and choose the woman". To which I can only say... Yeah, this is literally how it's supposed to work, lol. If the 2 are actually equally suited for the job then SOME decision HAS to be made and tipping the scales ever so slightly for 1% of women actually capable of doing the job, doesn't sound awfully bad to me. After all, isn't this what we want to happen in the sector of education for men anyways? At least that's what the title suggests.

We must remember that this is not a fight for who gets the most rights. We, as men, should not get pissed, because a reform is favorable to women in certain work fields, and to be honest in this case, rightfully so. It is still perfectly reasonable to argue for the same reforms in similarly misrepresented fields for us, but the picture people are painting in this thread makes it seem like anything positive going on for women is downright outrageous if men don't get the exact equivalent at the same moment. This is r/mensrights not r/bashwomensrights and I don't see how this reform affects men's rights in any way, other than giving us a reason to point out that the same principle should be applied to the education sector.

2017-03-14T05:28:48+00:00

r/neckbeardthings

omgwtf56k · 2017-03-14T03:19:32+00:00

to be fair, do firefighters actually carry people out of buildings these days? I feel like they just stand around spray shit down. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

blueburn654 · 2017-03-14T03:46:40+00:00

You're all a bunch of women-hating neckbeards

Comments