"It Didn't Mean Anything!"

Dzuari · 2015-06-24T15:56:27+00:00

Since reading TRP for a few months, woman have taught me more about economy than econ class ever did.

prodigy2throw · 2015-06-24T15:31:54+00:00

So fuckiing glad I learned this at 24. Huge thanks to the two of you for posting this. Needed to hear it.

nyrp · 2015-06-24T16:49:47+00:00

However, the implication of those words is that those five months of, what on the surface looked like "passionate" "loving" sex, was also, ultimately, meaningless to her.

Nailed it.

This is a subtle distinction. And you explained it very well.

I had a relatable experience with my ex and it didn't even involve cheating. Rather, she was very jealous. So the appearance of any women in my life: a friend, a Facebook post, a stranger on the bus, was a cause for her to get her claws out and have an uncontrollable fit of jealousy.

During one fight, caused by me mistakenly (but desperately) trying to reason with her about her jealousy, she tried to flip the table on me and cover up her jealousy by telling me about how many men she's fucked. I don't mean numerically. I mean "attitude"-wise. Let me explain. What she said to me, in a nearly blind, screaming rage, was "I've fucked guys with big dicks who didn't know how to use them, and I've fucked guys with normal dicks who used them very well." Off the bat, I took this in a very literal way. I thought maybe she was even referring to one of her exes in particular, to taunt me with the image of his "big dick". (N.B. I broke up with her within 3 days of this incident.) Later, I thought it was just her trying to generally stir up the meanest kind of thing she could say. A nuclear shit-test to push me to fight back against her childish bile-spewing.

I eventually realized there were two factors at play in this. One, she has absolutely no control of her emotions. Her jealousy pushed her to say the meanest things possible to "get revenge on me" for giving her these jealous emotions. (And this obviously implies a high level of insecurity.) An irrational, but emotional, reaction. Two, and this is what OP helped me understand, she revealed just how broken she is as a woman. To tell the boyfriend she desperately wanted to keep by her side how she's fucked all kinds of varieties of men shows that she no longer understood that sex had ANY VALUE. It is meaningless, apart from the neurological stimulation it provides. As she said in another choice quote from that evening, there were times where she just "needed to be penetrated." Fair enough, I understand the physical need for sex. But to be so broken that you tell your own boyfriend how meaningless sex is to you because it's so meaningless you can't imagine anyone else would find meaning in it, is really tragic.

The lesson to me was that she would always hold sex over me, even without cheating or threatening to cheat, because she told me how little she valued it, and therefore, how little I could offer her by physical intimacy.

My only move against someone who basically told me without words that they have no sex to offer me was to take away the commitment I had offered her. Do you see what I mean? We had good sex all the time; she liked it with a very high frequency. But at the same time, there was nothing in it to offer me that I couldn't get from any vagina-owner. She gave away all the power of her sexuality till she had no shame in telling me sex meant no connection for her. So she had no sex to offer me.

She was 32 years old, FYI, but stylish, fit and Eastern European. I feel like me breaking up with her was her official run-in with the wall. She didn't see it coming. She was totally confused. She wrote me a few days after the breakup that there was a guy who would be ready to fuck her in 30 minutes if she only called him. Amazing. You still don't get it. You're telling me yet again, how cheaply you value sex. And then a few weeks later she wrote me to tell me she was fucking her new boyfriend and the sex was the best she's ever had. Obviously, this wasn't even true or she wouldn't have wasted time telling me about it. But just another sign of extreme brokenness. But she saw it as her empowerment. It was truly just meaninglessness upon meaninglessness that she tried to sell to me as something of value in her.

IVIaskerade · 2015-06-24T16:06:56+00:00

Women value sex, that is undeniable, but they value emotional commitment more.

If you cheat on a girl, she's going to be hurt, but if it was a purely physical relationship it won't hurt as much as if you were emotionally involved. Now comes the solipsism.

She assumes the same is true for you, because she doesn't comprehend how it could be otherwise. Thus, when she says “but it didn't mean anything", in her mind she's mollifying you. In reality, she's filled a fire extinguisher with gasoline and tried to put out an industrial fire with it, but again, she doesn't realise what she's doing.

Hence her confusion when her pained admission that “it was purely physical" does the opposite of what she thought it would.

IllimitableMan · 2015-06-24T15:13:25+00:00

A woman who reaches 33 and is still single is single for a reason, and 99/100 times that reason is cock carousel.

Pure. Fucking. Gold. Great post dude. Gotta tweet that shit.

Tarnsman4Life · 2015-06-24T15:00:10+00:00

A woman who reaches 33 and is still single is single for a reason, and 99/100 times that reason is cock carousel. A woman that old, who is even mildly attractive, has undoubtedly turned down multitudes of "good men" who tried to lock her down into an LT

100 times this. We have a pretty good looking solid 8 in my office, she is actually 37 but looks 25 still. Reason she is still single is she fucks pretty much anything with a hard cock. She sucked off no less than three guys from my office during and after the last office Christmas party. Has a new boyfriend every other week, but can't figure out why she can't find "a good guy". The wall is approaching and now she is trying to tie down one of the guys here whos already been divorced twice. Her family is an AF/BB CC factory though.

I actually met her sister at a company party last summer, she was the younger, hotter, better, albeit dumber version of her. 21 and without a single ambition in life other than "living comfortably". She was a pretty good fuck though, gotta love those Latinas.

Finding an attractive 35 year old without a husband or a career that sucks up all their time is one of the biggest red flags out there.

Nazrath2112 · 2015-06-24T15:38:11+00:00

Fungible good

If Alice lends Bob a $10 bill, she does not care if she is repaid with the same $10 bill, two $5 bills, a $5 bill and five $1 bills or a bunch of coins that total $10 because currency is fungible (noting that, in practice, some denominations might incur additional operational or processing costs). However, if Bob borrows Alice's car she will most likely be upset if Bob returns a different vehicle—even a vehicle that is the same make and model—as automobiles are not fungible with respect to ownership. However, gasoline is fungible and though Alice may have a preference for a particular brand and grade of gasoline, her primary concern may be that the level of fuel be the same (or more) as it was when she lent the vehicle to Bob.

Thanks for the lesson.

GayLubeOil · 2015-06-24T19:59:08+00:00

If you want to know what it is like to be a woman get a reasonably fit picture of yourself or some random dude. Then get on gay tinder and start right swiping. Dont worry you dont actually have to suck any dick. Calm your butthole.

Unlike hetero Tinder you are instantly going to be flooded with matches, requests to meet up, compliments and requests for sex. This is what (normal BMI) women experience. They litteraly have sex on tap any time any place.

Now imagine having an unlimited cock pass for 15 years. That's why uggo chunkler women treat men that are far more attractive and accomplished then them like shit. The smart phone compliment extravaganza has warped their sense of reality.

dontdrinkthekoolade · 2015-06-24T18:13:48+00:00

Women can never understand the "double standard" of why it's okay for MEN to have a high partner count but why it's so terrible for WOMYNS to do it too.

Your post was spot on JP. Women don't appreciate or value what they've always had available.

Cyralea · 2015-06-24T17:22:33+00:00

Another universal truism is that women who have discovered this do everything in their power to conceal or lie about the fact. Deep down every slut knows that men don't want sluts, but with enough cheerleader support and self-delusion they manage to live with the mental dissonance.

Great post JP. The way sex is distributed works exactly like a marketplace, with all of the economic principles intact.

battery_licker · 2015-06-24T15:06:26+00:00

Women who have rode the carousel have built up tolerance to the powerful chemicals released during sex, rendering those chemicals powerless. Those chemicals normally bind a woman emotionally to the man she's having sex with; if they don't work anymore, it's quite literally impossible for that woman to form a deep, committed emotional bond with a man.

Of course, men will be fine. We'll find another woman who hasn't broken her body's normal functioning, if we want a long term relationship at all. Like must other doctrines of feminism, encouraging women to pursue casual sex is in direct opposition to women's legitimate best interests.

LastRevision · 2015-06-24T15:18:44+00:00

"you are never going to out-slut a slut."

For sure agreed.

To build on this, I think the myth that a carousel rider faces necessary dire consequences is also false; I have a Facebook friend who rode the carousel hard in her twenties (hundreds of partners), who is now 37, with a strangers kid, and has a beta provider happy to be A REAL MAN for her.

Charm is powerful and thirst is real.

theHangedGod · 2015-06-24T17:18:50+00:00

I think it is worth noting that in addition to this woman not valuing sex, she placed high value on the emotional connection. Her years of riding the CC and living in western society has separated her heart from her genitals. Monogamous relationships worked when the heart and genitals were one and the same, when sex and love were inseparable. Now that sex has been so polarized and trivialized by media throughout the entire life of anyone under 40, emotion can be easily separated from the act.

This is a primary cause of this archaic fuck-your-weed-dealer-while-in-a-committed-relationship female mentality. RedPope's ex-lady would have been ashamed if she cuddled and talked for 3 hours with her weed dealer. That would have been cheating to her.

Kiyanavasala · 2015-06-24T16:39:55+00:00

Penis is simply the cheapest resource on the planet.

TitsAndWhiskey · 2015-06-24T15:31:08+00:00

One thing I feel is important to point out is that women have ready access to sex with men far above their pay grade, i.e. good ol' Chad Thundercock. They must, however, lower their standards drastically to find that post-wall BB to lock down into a relationship. Locking down a Chad to them is "getting lucky."

As a reasonably attractive and successful single male, I too have access to pussy on demand. I could send a text and have my Johnson serviced RIGHT NOW if I wanted. However, I might have to lower my standards to do so. Now, I know that many of you are big dog alphas, so this doesn't apply to you or your Thundercock. You are outliers.

Conversely, I could easily get into a LTR with a very attractive woman with as little effort as it would take a HB6 to fuck a Chad.

Point being that the market drives the value (as JP says), but it's not black and white. A woman will not automatically put great value on a LTR; it is a function of SMV. Just as you put a greater value on your HB9 conquest, she will put a greater value on her relationship with Chad. Do NOT for one second believe that she automatically places so much value in your relationship that she won't do something to fuck it up. That's like a HB6 thinking you're in a relationship just because you banged her a few times.

Part of me thinks this comment is unnecessary, but a bigger part of me feels that our growing ranks need a reminder of the fundamental differences in the dynamics.

DestroyAllBarriers · 2015-06-24T16:37:10+00:00

What I don't get is if "it doesn't mean anything" and "it wasn't a big deal" than how does she understand that this is something she should hide?

dr_warlock · 2015-06-24T17:42:27+00:00

An unmarried woman at that age (early- to mid-thirties), who's been riding the cock carousel for 12 to 16 years, has completely divorced the act of sex from the concepts of love, commitment, and passion.

Boom goes the dynamite.

A woman who reaches 33 and is still single is single for a reason, and 99/100 times that reason is cock carousel.

If a post wall woman has been single for a long time, and isn't in acoma and needs a poop bag, then there is definitely something wrong with her. She is either crazy, completely unpleasant, and/or slutty. Women need men, but not a particular one. They have a constant need to have men on stand by as a safety net should they fall off the carousel whether it be for attention, provisioning, and/or venting. It's their insurance policy, their retirement plan should their SMV no longer be noticed by Chads.

A woman that old, who is even mildly attractive, has undoubtedly turned down multitudes of "good men" who tried to lock her down into an LTR.

She didn't turn down 100 'good men'. The cock carousel is exclusively for 'alphas', 100 alphas turned her down. Any betas in the notch count were used as a water break from the carousel ride, more security. Promiscuity never trickles down.

When 100, supposedly decent quality men, turn her down in a row, it shows that 100 men didn't deem her worthy of commitment. That should tell you something. 100 men found her only useful as a pump and dump. She's just some slut good for nothing else.

favours_of_the_moon · 2015-06-24T16:20:08+00:00

You know what really "doesn't mean anything" and is "no big deal?" Your relationship with a whore.

BlackHeart89 · 2015-06-24T19:15:45+00:00

An unmarried woman at that age (early- to mid-thirties), who's been riding the cock carousel for 12 to 16 years, has completely divorced the act of sex from the concepts of love, commitment, and passion. Sex is no different than smoking weed, drinking her mimosa with her girlfriends at Sunday brunch, or riding with the top down in her Mazda Miata convertible. It's just another source for serotonin release, and nothing more.

This explains everything very well. Low body count women are the best for LTRs.

Things to note: if she drinks and/or smokes a lot and/or parties a lot, its only a matter of time until she's fucking someone else. Real talk.

greencrack · 2015-06-24T20:17:19+00:00

Every chick, "I used to be a slut" lol

RedPope · 2015-06-25T03:20:28+00:00

Glad my post has led to so much great discussion. Allow me to confirm this:

A woman that old, who is even mildly attractive, has undoubtedly turned down multitudes of "good men" who tried to lock her down into an LTR.

During our first month of dating, she bragged about having turned down marriage proposals from two previous boyfriends.

dabayer · 2015-06-24T15:37:19+00:00

The sex is no big deal and is given out freely, but only a few will receive the best part of her: her love.

Great.

ECoast_Man · 2015-06-24T21:51:29+00:00

To be honest, women don't need to hit the wall for this phenomenon to begin. The average 26-28 year old women is not just on a path to the dark side but already a slut Sith Lord.

We've all seen it. Off the top of my head the ones I've heard from women, all under 30 include -

1) 'it was just sex?'

2) 'but everyone knows that I'm in love with you?'

3)'But I don't even care about him?'

And so on. Also, every time they have a look on their faces while they're saying these thing that screams 'isn't it obvious?!'. They've reached a point where they can't even comprehend that what they're saying isnt true.

Assassin1476 · 2015-06-24T18:26:31+00:00

Women can get dick at any point in time. It's so valueless to them; that's why sex isn't that big of a deal to them as it is for men because they don't ever have to work at all for it. Giving pussy away for them is like someone giving out free money. Extremely easy to do. The curse on their part is they never raise themselves to be bigger than their vaginas; which will ultimately set them up for failure.

[deleted] · 2015-06-24T18:53:28+00:00

I don't know about you guys, but this really shakes things up on previous LTR's where the writing is on the wall.

They were cheating on me long before I found out. Tough to swallow but these posts have hit home.

RPAlternate42 · 2015-06-24T20:41:00+00:00

Well, this just got added to my "manosphere" bookmark folder.

JP_Whoregan · 2015-06-25T01:49:24+00:00

I read recently that the number one reason people cheat is because they can. That is, having the opportunity to cheat is the most likely reason to cheat than any other.

So then, who has the most opportunity to cheat? Men who work all day and must have high SMV to attract a woman to have sex with or a woman who on average works fewer hours, has more free time, and can get sex when she wants much easier than males can?

Since coming here I've all but given up on the idea of monogamy and LTR. Marriage was already ruled out. I simply can't imagine a woman being faithful and have yet to piece together the methods and behavior by which I might guarantee her fidelity. And while I consider an open relationship, previous posts have shown me that men always get the short end of that deal.

B_uckets · 2015-06-24T16:49:44+00:00

An unmarried woman at that age (early- to mid-thirties), who's been riding the cock carousel for 12 to 16 years, has completely divorced the act of sex from the concepts of love, commitment, and passion.

Is this true? I always got the impression that sex and emotion were inextricably linked for women, while the opposite is true for men. I'm not in my 30s yet though, so I don't associate with women who have reached the point you're speaking of (30+ with at least 12 years on the CC).

That emotional connection is what makes a physically unfaithful woman so much worse than a physically unfaithful man, at least in my mind. If a man fucks some random girl, big deal? It was just a wet hole to stick his dick in, there's less than zero emotional attachment in most cases. Probably some spur of the moment impulse -- pump and dump. But if a woman fucks another man, she most likely formed an emotional connection with him first. Then she probably fantasized about it for weeks or months before acting on it. She's cheated in both senses of the word (physical + emotional), and in the most egregious way possible. Oh, and she's probably already fantasizing about their next encounter while she fucks you...

my_redpill_account · 2015-06-24T17:18:10+00:00

Amazing post, you've helped me understand a lot. I read the other post then stopped back here to read what you said, and you put it together perfectly for me.

I needed to hear that sex is meaningless to her because you're so fucking right she has had plenty of it and it's just like eating rice. Not a big deal. It's exactly how we should feel, because we've been brought up in school/church/whatever that sex is some magical romantic bond of love and you're fuckin right. It's all bullshit

Thank you and cheers, friend.

JP_Whoregan · 2015-06-24T20:49:16+00:00

This is a great follow up. The original post and this analysis which further develops the perspective of women are exactly why I check TRP daily for top posts.

I have a question for OP: "Since women do not value sex due to it's availability, then what do they value in their experiences with men? What is the most valuable and scarce commodity?"

RampantD · 2015-06-24T22:41:19+00:00

Died at fungible good. Awesome post btw

moose_war · 2015-06-25T02:56:06+00:00

but her past doesn't matter...and since she fucked him yesterday, isn't it technically in her past already? Checkmate redpillers

[deleted] · 2015-06-25T01:23:47+00:00

Funny story : when I broke up with my ex girlfriend, she tried to get back with me and she came back to fuck me. Her goal was to make me commit again.

Here is the interesting part : she didn't want to make me want to commit to actually get back together. She did that so she could be the one who left. She waited for me to come say hi normally because we agreed to get sort of back together after she got me back. In the meantime she has been telling all her friends and everyone (we were at the same college) that I has been desperatly trying to get her back and that I was the one who came to her and that obviously she said no. All those SJW were waiting to dig their claws in me in order to defend this girl. Finally I picked up on the signals (she refused eye contact, very clearly tried to avoid me) but instead of acting beta and going up to her asking why she is behaving that way since we were supposed to be back together, I didn't give one fuck about her behavior.

Now, h ere is why it is related to OP's post : I broke up with her because she has basically been cheating with at least three men and 2 women in a timespan of...4 months. When we fucked the night she came back to persuade me to commit, she actually had already commited to another guy. So not only she cheated on me, but she cheated on her new guy with me.

It astonished me that she would give away her pussy (and asshole, I got the most out of it that night) just to harm me later by publicly humiliating me.

That was when I understood than contrary to everything I've been taught, women's body and sex are something they give away for anything...because they are bored...because they just feel like it...it's literally like video games or chocolate for us.

purpleblossom · 2015-06-25T02:43:29+00:00

I'm a new red piller but I completely agree. I see women do this with men so much more than I see men do it to women (but there are those who do, not saying they don't exist) and yet women scream and shout that it's only the menz!

Of course no one hates women more than women, but women hate men more. At least, that's what I've found.

ToTheSummit · 2015-06-25T03:38:46+00:00

Ha, you remind me of my surprise as a teenager when one girl ask another girl if she loved her boyfriend....up until that point I had never thought a relationship can be faked or that it would be so common that they have to ask each other.

should_ · 2015-06-25T03:19:45+00:00

There's something here I felt that the article touched a little bit on but not completely, and it's that for a woman, a guy cheating, for example, or banging around doesn't mean much to her, even if she's seeing him and she's interested. A woman prefers sharing a high-quality man than being a loser's one and only (~Rollo Tomassi). Whereas it's unforgivable to a man for his woman to go astray. That's because a girl's value is basically genetic and he is providing the value, whereas a guy's value is his masculinity and honor, which are his religion, even if he doesn't consciously follow it. A girl deciding another brand is better is sabotaging his own. Men are the sellers, women are the buyers.

Palpetinus · 2015-06-25T05:53:57+00:00

I'll admit I'm quite new to TRP and still need to read up on all the sidebar stuff but I have a quick question: How is it that all the women out there are sluts but still complain that there are no "good men", often even when swarmed by orbiters? How in any stretch of human imagination do they think that they make any sort of sense?

RedPillAnonymous · 2015-06-24T17:25:01+00:00

Even the most adonis-belt, six-pack adorned, monied, good looking HB9 of a stud male will not have anywhere near the access to immediate, at-will sex that even the most average HB6 of a woman in her early 30's will have. There's a saying we used to have here that I haven't seen in months, and that saying is you are never going to out-slut a slut. She will always have access to more cock than you will have to pussy.

Everything you said was correct except this paragraph. Beautiful women are far more abundant than beautiful men. A man blessed with beauty lives a life where sex is equally meaningless, in fact its not hard to imagine a beautiful man in his 30s cheating on his post wall wife and mother of his kids and seriously considering it meaningless due to how easy women and sex have always been, whilst still believing he is a good husband because he loves his wife.

[deleted] · 2015-06-24T16:59:44+00:00

I thought sex was a more personal act for a woman due to being penetrated,and there was more emotion attached to it.what is the difference between a a woman who can no longer pair bond and the average polygamous man.we can still pair bond after fucking 20women. Women can play the field better than men,and not get attached,tl.they appear as cut out if not more cut out for casual sex than men and id say worse for long term relationships than men. The fact that women lose there ability to pair bond after only 1 or 2 dicks,and the constraints for a successful marriage are so tight (virgin) ,that they inherently cant be meant for monogamy.im still prone to getting oneitis even spreading my seed

DOEADEAR1 · 2015-06-24T20:13:50+00:00

Im 26, been with 50ish or so ladyfriends. I've felt that the large majority were or are below me and subsequently they've been ok/fun for a while. The woman or women im truly after looks wise I feel are accustomed only to a higher level of catering and bitch man type spending that only a higher socioeconomically ranked man can provide. I do not wish to provide that level and my frugality and savings minded habits keep me from doing things like taking a woman out to a $20 or $30 dollar dinner.

I feel as though I am trained to approach lower socioeconomic women because of their ease of lay and lack of discerning taste.

How should I approach this matter? On one hand I am so viscerally repulsed by the spending habits and princess mentality of the women I desire that I do not even wish to approach them... on the other hand they're usually fit and hot.

thedeathofgod · 2015-06-25T00:30:04+00:00

Dopamine realease*. Other than that a very good post.

jx234 · 2015-06-24T17:44:29+00:00

Don't be scared of women's sexuality. Both men and women are able to separate sex from love. When I've cheated I've used that line about meaning nothing. Sometimes both men and women's desires are too strong to make them rational. Some girls will dump you for cheating, I knew that but my desire was too string, same goes for women.

jx234 · 2015-06-24T17:41:40+00:00

Not true. Sex is a big deal for women because of the consequences of pregnancy. The risk of a beta cumming in them makes them selective.

Stonish · 2015-06-25T12:16:18+00:00

So what if a man is in his 30 and is single? Do we have "expiration date" as well?

RWDMARS · 2015-06-24T23:38:49+00:00

Oh come on. I can't believe he dumped her for one mistake. She had so much sex with him! And she seemed like a great person too. And him being cold-emotionally is not a good thing. He should have just been himself and talked to her about it. Waiting till the next day over text is so fucking passive, especially for somebody who's a part of this group.

A real man would have talked to her about it, been brave enough to express his emotions, and forgive her if he still wanted to love her.

Sir_Shitlord_focker · 2015-06-24T16:35:31+00:00

"you are never going to out-slut a slut. She will always have access to more cock than you will have to pussy."

Nah, go to thailand :D Outslut anyone by a factor of 10.

Atheisticles · 2015-06-24T19:25:33+00:00

Just one thing though.

Sex doesn't mean much to a guy like me either. I treat my plate as someone I like fucking and that's it.

What's the issue here?

through_a_ways · 2015-06-24T22:29:08+00:00

See, dick for women is what economists would call a fungible good.

This is not true.

Fungibility of an item means that two separate instances of that item are interchangeable for the purposes they're used for.

Money is fungible, because one $10 bill is perfectly equal to another $10 bill for the purposes people want a $10 bill for.

However, no two humans look the same, except for twins (and even then, most twins show a significant difference in appearance).

Theoretically, there could be several different looking men who have the same objective value. Objective value could theoretically be calculated by having the men date several thousand women, and having the women rate the men. There could be men who don't look totally alike, but attain the same objective attractiveness score.

These men are objectively of the same value, but not fungible for a given individual woman. This is because they have differences in appearance/habits/interests.

As an example, there are some women who are legitimately into Asian men. For the vast majority, though, white men is the preference. Objectively, an inherently attractive Asian man would be equal to an average looking white man.

But, if you ask a woman who happens to genuinely prefer Asians, or has little racial preference, she will prefer the Asian. One instance greatly serves her purpose, while another does not, even though they have the same objective value across the population.

R984 · 2015-06-25T11:07:09+00:00

Women and man fuck exactly the same amount. In order to fuck you need a man and a woman. Saying that women have more access to sex its just stupid. Who they fuck? the air? A ghost? They fuck men! And it is a 1:1 ratio if we exclude homosexual men and women.

sex is orders of magnitude easier to obtain for women than it is with men.

Do you understand that women fucks men, right? If a woman has sex that means a man has sex. You can't say they got it easier because they still have to fuck a man. And for that man it's easy to get laid as it is for a woman. 1:1 ratio.

deadgrave · 2015-06-24T21:54:19+00:00

What if I wanted to have kids? Should I just ditch that whole notion altogether? Everything RP seems solid to me except having kids. From what's said, no woman above 30 can even be close to being a worthy mother.

[deleted] · 2015-06-25T01:13:13+00:00

So it's not her explication who is important but the implication. And the implication is : she had divorced sex from love long ago and she will get her sexual needs met by anyone whether or not it was dr Pope.

But with this reasoning, one understand that she could still love him.

I don't really understand the problem here, could you enlighten me please?

[deleted] · 2015-06-25T19:45:35+00:00

Remember: monogamy is a social construct. Inherently all human beings want and need to fuck as many other human beings as possible, to perpetuate their blood and DNA.

That's why marriage is so toxic to a man - not only does it hinder you from pursuing other women like the innate hunter you are, it actively transforms you into a pacifist incapable of attaining true sexual glory. Listen to your biology, and everything about human sexual interaction will begin to make sense.

Tl;Dr - women will be women, and men will be men. Maximize your gains, and cut your emotions out of the picture.

DOEADEAR1 · 2015-06-24T20:00:15+00:00

What's our goal here.. locking down someone young who is a female who hasn't been with many men? Are we after pussy in terms of quantity here or is the goal an emphasis on quality of woman and promotion of bonding?

Or is it just a study of female sexuality? Im semi lost..

Wambo45 · 2015-06-24T21:02:06+00:00

There is hamstering apparent in her justification for why what she did is "okay", or "not a big deal". However, I think it's inaccurate to say that women are more likely to regard casual sex as meaningless. In fact, I think it's far more typical for it to be the other way around. This aspect of your dissection seems like it's coming from a place of hurt, and not from a logical and objective place of observation. The truth is that the sex that woman engaged in with the pot dealer WAS meaningless. The sex she had with the author was meaningful. There wasn't anything untrue about what she said, nor did what she say imply that all, sex she has is equally meaningless. The only thing to learn from this as far as TRP goes, is that women will justify their disrespectful behavior and ultimately tend to be ungrateful about what they have.

Entershikari · 2015-06-25T02:12:03+00:00

In the guy's case she was probably Nymphomaniac, she craved dick even from low SMV guy which is disgusting.

[deleted] · 2015-06-25T03:53:32+00:00

[permanently deleted]

plentyoffishes · 2015-06-24T21:58:48+00:00

This is pretty solld, however, if you are a guy in his 40s, an early 30s woman can be a catch, especially if she was taking care of herself in her 20s. And I don't buy into this "still single" crap, marriage is more disastrous for men and women than being single, or dating, or in a non-marriage LTR.

Title	"It Didn't Mean Anything!"
Author	JP_Whoregan
Upvotes	860
Comments	253
Date	June 24, 2015 2:37 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3ayffe/it_didnt_mean_anything/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/it-didnt-mean-anything.34021 https://theredarchive.com/post/34021