~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Theboredshrimp
[–]Rayne2522FDS Newbie 334 points335 points336 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I can't remember what country it was but in the 1970s every single female in that country did no work for one day. They didn't go to school to teach the children, daycares didn't open, fathers had to feed and dress their children. Fathers couldn't go to work because they had nowhere to take the children and no one to watch them. The whole country stopped, and women were finally paid equally. I would love to see something like that happen in the United States.
[–]penelopekittyFDS STRATEGY COACH 206 points207 points208 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It was Iceland.
[–]Rayne2522FDS Newbie 41 points42 points43 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thank you
[–]FitncurlyFDS Disciple 100 points101 points102 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Holy crap what country?! We NEED to do this in the US!
[–]Rayne2522FDS Newbie 87 points88 points89 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I agree, I think women need to show this country exactly how much work we do.
[–]MixWideFDS Newbie 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What's sad is it could theoretically have happened in any country in the world.
There is literally no nation in the entire world that doesn't depend on the unpaid labor of women. There is no economy in the world that could function as it currently exists while paying women fairly for all the work they do. There is nowhere in the world a woman could go where this situation is reversed and men are the ones doing the bulk of unpaid and unrecognized labor.
[–]itsyourgirlfinnFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, this was Iceland but even here(I live in Iceland), women were still paid around 25% less. There was a law made in 2018 that requires all companies of 25 ppl or more with one year or longer contracts to pay men and women equally tho so that's promising. That law went into effect in 2020.
[–]KuanzhaixiangziFDS Newbie 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I just read the Wikipedia article about it. It said employers prepared for the day by buying sweets, pencils and paper to entertain children brought to work by their fathers. That part just really emphasized to me the difference between how men and woman are treated still today. If a woman couldn't find someone to watch her kid for the day and took him to work with her, that shit would not be tolerated. If a man does it though, the employer will probably let it slide, as it's assumed that there will be women somewhere who will care for the child usually and this is a one off.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think this was Iceland.
[–]Jokkitch 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow that’s incredible
[–]MyplummmsRuthless Strategist 362 points363 points364 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Men want women to work for free - it's a tale as old as time
[–][deleted] 67 points68 points69 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Makes me think of Beauty and the Beast.
[–]superderpina_FDS Newbie 34 points35 points36 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
... true as it can beeee :D
[–][deleted] 99 points100 points101 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Barley even friends...then his pornsick dick bends... unexpectedly.
[–]OrangeyPanda503 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
Completely true. In anti-work dubreddits I always hear people say "back in the day someone was doing all the cooking, cleaning, chores and child-rearing. We don't have that anymore so now life is unfair and there is no free time". Hmm it's almost like those women wanted to escape their own work prison where they weren't even PAID, had no breaks, no retirement and their "boss" could leave them homeless and penniless at any moment. It wasn't fair back then and it isn't now either. Not until UBI exists.
[–]lluuniFDS Newbie 60 points61 points62 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
UBI as well as public housing and subsidized daycare.
[–]BBQCoolRanchQueenFDS Apprentice 54 points55 points56 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
UBI just got proposed and immediately rejected in my province (BC, Canada). We were so close to getting some semblance of freedom for women here. The status quo of female reproductive slavery favors the current system. I was just on another post here about how women practicing self defense is also illegal in Canada. It seems the government is taking the easy way out when panicking about declining birth rates. It's easier to remain a scrote than to do the difficult thing and change for the better.
[–]CoffeeAndCorpsesFDS Newbie 25 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Wait - self defense classes are illegal? Does that include martial arts?
[–]BBQCoolRanchQueenFDS Apprentice 36 points37 points38 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Martial arts isn't illegal, using them against an attacker is, depending on police discretion. Police frown upon womens' use of force generally
[–]barbedwiredaisycrownFDS Newbie 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As a fellow Canadian also pro UBI, come the fuck on BC.
[–]bitchyrussianbotFDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What is UBI?
[–][deleted] 38 points39 points40 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Universal basic income
[–]BaconSquaredFDS Newbie 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 318 points319 points320 points 5 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link
Absolutely true, 100%.
Men want CONTROL over women. That's their ultimate goal. I've said it before, if men were the ones to be pregnant, there would be "abortion booths" in every corner and the morning after pills would be free and given as candy.
The governments of the world (male dominated obviously), could have easily made vasectomies obligatory for men, you know, like they have laws that make abortion illegal? Same thing, other perspective. Make vasectomies obligatory and their reversal free of charge and no one would get pregnant unwillingly and no woman would have abortions. Easy, right? Instead of implementing a law with this simple procedure for men, which takes a few weeks of recovery time and would solve almost ALL problems, they instead make laws for WOMEN'S bodies yet again. Because men's bodies and their bodily autonomy should be respected, while women's should not. It's ALWAYS women, never men.
Imagine the OUTRAGE from men if obligatory vasectomies were even suggested.
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 215 points216 points217 points 5 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Male birth control pills. Men will not ruin their hormones and expect women to do that.
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 220 points221 points222 points 5 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Are you fucking serious? And risk our precious men putting CHEMICALS in their precious bodies and have side effects??! /s
The sooner women realise that men don't give a single shit about them and start acting accordingly, the better.
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 46 points47 points48 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Is a guy who doesn’t want you to use hormonal birth control and is willing to use condoms until you are ready to have a baby a hvm?
[–]MagnfiqueMaleficentFDS Disciple 105 points106 points107 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He needs to be involved in birth control, yes. If he balks even once about your request for him to wear to wear a condom, he SUCKS. No HVM will guilt trip you over this reasonable and appropriate request.
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 115 points116 points117 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
The "is willing" is a huge red flag for me.
He shouldn't be "willing to", it's his obligation to use a condom if his partner doesn't want children. If YOU don't want children yet, I would absolutely get on birth control because 1. Condoms can easily break and 2. "Stealthing" is -unbelievably- a thing the disgusting creeps do. I would never rely on a man for anything that would have repercussions on me.
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
His willingness is his idea. I’ve only dated religious guys and they view it as a huge sin to use condoms. He said he doesnt want me messing with my hormones. He is also willing to wait for sex with me until marriage so we have not had sex.
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 32 points33 points34 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Do YOU want to have sex or do you want to wait until marriage?
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 25 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Im making him wait :-D. Im more religious than he is and he said he will wait for me.
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If YOU want to wait, then you should of course wait. Since you're not having sex, you have no problem. 😊
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Lol "religious" guys shouldn't be having sex before marriage at all. A general good rule is to steer clear of these men, regardless of religion lol. They fuxk around then want to marry a virgin.
[–]thowawaywookieFDS Newbie 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
True, plus their backward ideas about women. Is there any religion where women aren't below men?
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He grew up with zero religion.
[–]ferociouslycuriousFDS Newbie 36 points37 points38 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
One characteristic does not make a HVM. A HVM is more one who exhibits many HV characteristics and no LV characteristics. The problem is many LVM hide behind a collection of HV characteristics. They see themselves as superior because of it and the toxic LV characteristics persist, sometimes hidden for quite a while.
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Well he doesnt seem to push me for anything, he has a job, doesnt make me pay, comes to get me. It was my birthday on wednesday so Ill see what he got me for my birthday. He didnt see me on my birthday because I have a covid scare, getting tested right now. Some guy who knew he was positive gave a girl at my party covid and she spread it to my friends and possibly myself.
[–]ferociouslycuriousFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I hope you stay well ❤️
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And yet millions of women (not counting the ones who are forced into it by religion/culture etc), but one who date terrible guys, STILL choose to reproduce with them? Tbh I feel that biology has fucked women over but also the average woman is too scared to stand in her own two feet and not rely on a man, and take whatever scraps they get... And ultimately, reproduce with these fuxkers.
But yeah, the absolute ultimate F you to to society and the patriarchy is to be a childfree, and unmarried woman, ideally helping other women.
[–]sekhmetwisdomFDS Newbie 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've finally taken the black pill...so eye opening
[–]gingerwabisabiFDS Apprentice 38 points39 points40 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, except they don't even need vasectomies - Vasalgel does the same thing in an easily reversible injection, with no hormones!
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Yes but that means they have to think it, which means their brain needs to give the order to the hand's muscle to move and reach the gel and then apply it to their Twinkie and you know this becomes impossible to do at the word "brain".
[–]berryberrykicksFDS Apprentice 44 points45 points46 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Vasalgel is injected into the vas deferens, so this contraception wouldn’t be self administered.
But your premise is spot on.
I remember my friend asking her husband about getting a vasectomy, so she could stop battling birth control that was ruining her skin and mood stability. He said that he had never even thought about the procedure or idea that he could (or should) shoulder the burden of contraception. It wasn’t even in his realm of reality.
Men are the shittiest people.
[–]yolosunshine 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I repeatedly had this conversation with my NVex.
Men either care about you or don’t.
If they wanna be black and white about it then I get to say it.
[–]thowawaywookieFDS Newbie 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sounds like the tiniest easy procedure for a man yet many still refuse to do it even when they're certain they don't want more children. But Viagra, not a bit of an issue taking that. Zero fucks given about side effects then.
Cowards.
[+]akashyaboaFDS Newbie -31 points-30 points-29 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
There wouldn't. Men would just be the ones being paid less, being slut shamed, being underappreciated, being told to stay home and take care of their offsprings. Or something like that, because cycle hormones make them emotional and unfit for public eye
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 49 points50 points51 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I think they wouldn't. They would never let this happen, as things are now, which is what I meant. If a proposal for obligatory vasectomies was done today, it would be automatically rejected by EVERY single man in power. And the excuse would be bodily autonomy, the same thing that men don't give women. It's disgusting.
[–]pitifulparsnipFDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They should do this. If their excuse for rejection is bodily autonomy, then maybe we can use that as a precedent to stomp down anti-abortion laws for women too.
[–]advice1988 234 points235 points236 points 5 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
Why do you think the governments talk about the birthrate ? Because it depends on it to increase the countries GDP and resource the future workers and consumers by encouraging narratives that include women having children as soon as possible and facilitating it via the gender wage gap, that then allows society to equate a woman’s worth with her reproductive organs & the yield because if you can’t beat or be equal to them (being equal to a man lacks ambition imo) you have to make them.
It’s all connected.
[–][deleted] 80 points81 points82 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They think it does, but educating women and girls does more to increase a country's GDP than anything else.
[–]advice1988 34 points35 points36 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
That would take having to dismantle patriarchal practices and would result in questioning if the hostility (men would have to rethink their roles & what they have to offer in society = cue the breakdowns eg violence ) from men would be something worth having to address, manage and contain the consequences, for them to invest in women and girls properly.
History shows us how society has been beholden to men and priorities men and their choices / ideas that their violence, tyranny and ego have resulted in humanity not progressing but reverting to archaic ideology that they promote to remain in power and insure they stay in power that they hold regardless.
[–][deleted] 58 points59 points60 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
100%
We have forgotten marriage was invented by and for men.
When women stop marrying men there will be a backlash.
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's started in the East Asian countries, other places just need to catch up.
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
omg this is awesome, can u link any articles abt this sis?
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
For sure 😘
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1ZJ02Z
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/South-Korean-radical-feminism:-No-dating,-sex,-marriage-or-children--48879.html
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/31/634048279/chinas-marriage-rate-plummets-as-women-choose-to-stay-single-longer
There is one amazing one about Korean women who are shunning makeup, dating, marriage, and sex, but sorry I can't find it (here's one about the makeup though) https://youtu.be/r80pp5qSlNo
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Already starting. I don't think I'll ever get married because I don't think I'll meet a HVM.
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's very freeing to live life without the "prize" being... a man.
[–]Lazy-Design1979FDS Newbie 265 points266 points267 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
As long as the 1% has the 99% to exploit for labour and resources, it will. If the population of the 99% starts to shrink significantly though, it causes a problem for the 1%. I think the low birth rates in western countries are an unintended byproduct of the push to get more women into the workforce in the 70s & 80s to help drive down wages and the value of labour. Problem is, nobody accounted for the fact that if women could have their own bank accounts, housing, and jobs, then they'd no longer be dependent on men for those things and consequentially, less likely to have the time or energy to have children. Because wages have been pushed so low, a household needs 2+ incomes to do what it previously could with 1, so fewer children are being born. The choice is either pay people a living wage and provide maternity benefits or force women to have children they don't want. Society seems to be trying to do the latter.
[–]Squidwrd_Tortellini90 points 5 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
because by doing the latter, they benefit from a large, poor, and exploitable population.
[–]Lazy-Design1979FDS Newbie 51 points52 points53 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yup. I almost wouldn't even be surprised if once things got dire enough, rape was decriminalized. It's already got such a low conviction rate and with porn so abundant, we've desensitized at least 2 generations to it.
[–][deleted] 37 points38 points39 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
it scares me that The Handmaid's Tale could easily become a reality
[–]daisy_0720FDS STRATEGY COACH 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The fact that job losses due to Covid have primarily hit women really frightens me. We're moving backwards.
[–]bitchyrussianbotFDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Praise Jah I’m sterile, can’t play those games with this uterus.
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 209 points210 points211 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
I agree and I would also add that EVEN for childless women they also depend on us for: our emotional labor, our ability to empathize, care, resolve conflicts, connect resources, our ability to keep the customer service attitude and “make nice” , be it in the context of a relationship or an organization. We have been blindly complying to perform femininity at zero cost to them.
[–]barbedwiredaisycrownFDS Newbie 90 points91 points92 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
ABSOLUTELY THIS. All this, and then they act like you're deficient for failing to produce children, like it's some trauma or emotional hole you have or something.
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 88 points89 points90 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Well we ARE traumatized, from putting our resources into raising man-babies in personal relationships. Man-babies that their mothers failed to raise themselves because they were too drained, because 50-70s propaganda pushed women “into the work force” while women had always been IN THE WORKFORCE it s just that domestic labor wasn’t counted as “work” 😡
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 76 points77 points78 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Not the '50s. That was the period men were trying to make women forget about Rosie the Riveter, and the fact that the country ran well when women held a shit load of the jobs during WW II. When men came back, they pushed women out and wanted women back in the home. The 50s was about normalising housewifes again.
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Noted. Thanks for correcting me <3
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Oh, I wasn't trying to be pedantic, sis. I've read so many books...why not share the info? You're fabulous.
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Ah no you're fine!!! I just appreciate the new information. TBH the years are always a bit fuzzy to me. I know you meant well!!
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Cool. I'm a teacher irl. I like to share. Hugs.
[–]horrorqueen797FDS Newbie 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sorry off topic but this is 1 of the reasons I come back to this sub every day. Wholesome 😍
Do ya see what the world could look like when we respect each other? 🌹
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🙂
[–]TheDameWithoutASmile48 points 5 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Also women are more likely to be carers for elderly relations, as well. Even if you're cf, the system depends on women to provide care.
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yesss. I know a married couple where the wife gotta be personal assistant to both the in-laws and the husband, especially when his parents were getting sick and needing someone to help and keep track of doctors visits 🤦🏻♀️
[–]madeyoulurkFDS Newbie 26 points27 points28 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I was going to reply, but this is stated absolutely perfectly. I’m the BOSS at my job and still expected to be everyone’s mom and therapist. NOPE.
[–]randowordgeneratorFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, it's ESPECIALLY single women. u kno the ones w nothing goin on
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That why you try and opt out of that shit too :D
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yepppp Or at least charge for it somehow 😂
[–]bombay_girlFDS Newbie 183 points184 points185 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If your business model depends on another human being exploited, it’s not a good business model. Period.
[–][deleted] 183 points184 points185 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
100% It was never about religion or right to life. It’s all the bottom line. Women make children, become single mothers, and stay poor. The children are raised with little opportunity. Then are willing to work in a factory with low pay or join the military. The capitalist machine keeps going. Nothing to see here folks.
[–]2y-omonkeyonafarmFDS Newbie 39 points40 points41 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So in theory, celibacy and abstinence would be the perfect solution, right?? Wrong! We must satisfy men’s peepees! We literally can’t win
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 100 points101 points102 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah doing the unpaid labor is fine for me if it is not in addition to a full time job. But men these days don’t earn enough money so women now need to be double exploited by taking on 2 jobs. Even the curse of Eve is just childbirth, now we have to take on Adam’s curse too? Not happening.
[–]Alpha_AriesFDS Newbie 127 points128 points129 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
This is actually very close to core radfem ideology: oppression based on sex.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh fuck thank you.. the penny just dropped.
We live in a radical patriarchal society ..
Most people are like "Well rad fems are extreme feminists" and I would stumble
Now I can be like " Uh yeah - we live in a radical patriarchal society so radical feminism makes sense. Have a nice day!!!!"
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also funny that it's termed "radical" when women stand up for their basic rights.
[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
I had a very similar thought to this Twitter post after seeing a recent news clip on how "experts" are worried about the declining birth rate in the U.S.
They wrongly predicted that lock-downs caused by the pandemic would create a "baby boom", but the opposite has been happening. The experts on the news clip were concerned that the declining birth rate would negatively impact the economy, and there will be a lack of people to care for the elderly.
I honestly found the whole thing sickening because it proves to me, yet again, that many people in society look at women as baby incubators, which disgusts me 😑
I also don't know why these so-called experts are surprised that most women of "childbearing age" are opting to delay or even forgo motherhood altogether when we are in the midst of a global pandemic, many people are struggling financially, and most women risk damaging their careers if they have a child. Additionally, society expects women to not only be mothers, but to work full-time while still being responsible for the majority of the domestic responsibilities! It's literal insanity!
I have no interest in being a mule for society. I refuse to carry all of these burdens that society is continually trying to place on the backs of women.
I am living my life on my terms. ✌️
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
what is the birth rate in us?
[–]Stuffnthings1840FDS Newbie 29 points30 points31 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If republicans really cared about kids we would have done had hikes in minimum wage, healthcare, education reforms, and no kids in cages. All this pearl clutching about abortion is just to keep poor women in line and stuck clinging to their shit husbands/partners.
[–]Stuffnthings1840FDS Newbie 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not sure every democrat is on our side either. Should also have added evangelicals.
[–]ThrowRAanonymouspickFDS Newbie 55 points56 points57 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Seems like we were born into a business model and our compliance keeps it going.. oh we not my prob I'm not the government. Everyone who doesn't want kids should get sterilized soon! There is a childfree doctor list on the subreddit
[–]honeybeerollFDS Disciple 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
This is true no matter what economic system you have. When the Soviet Union was born, society didn't achieve true gender equality overnight. It never did and Russia is still a bad place for women (worse than America for ex). When I was studying stuff about post ww2 Russia, this one piece I read mentioned how women still did all domestic labor, childcare, plus many people had farm animals which the woman took care of. The USSR had Women's Day, and this essay noted the irony of how a man would invite his friends over to celebrate women's day, and the wife had to wait on them all hand and foot, simply because she was a women and they were men. I know Lenin and his wife Nadezhda Krupskaya were very dedicated to the liberation of women from domestic work, and wanted to set up communal kitchens and daycare, but I don't think it ever really took off. I think if Lenin had lived longer they may have been able to set this foundation.
Somebody - 99% of the time a woman - is doing the "invisible" work of domestic labor and childcare, so someone else - 99% of the time a man - can go to work and achieve intellectual pursuits because he doesn't have to think about these things. Sofia Tolstoy and her vile piece of shit husband are the epitome of this imo. Except these days many women are expected to do all this and hold a full time job too.
Thankfully these days women in many countries can say no to this arrangement. We can support ourselves, we don't have to rely on marriage for our livelihood and be stuck with a vile piece of shit for decades, like poor Sofia Tolstoy. We can achieve financial independence and therefore be free to choose a partner that respects us.
EDIT: Also want to add the typical family unit of just parents and kids isn't how any of us were ever meant to live I think. We're supposed to have other family around to help us take care of children so we don't have to trust them to strangers at daycare. I don't think I want kids but if I had them, I absolutely would not trust them to daycare, and I know many others feel that way. Universal daycare, or jobs offering daycare, would help for those comfortable with it. But I think we need to stop thinking of the family unit as just the parents and kids - this needs to be tied to a support system of trusted relatives who either live w/ you or very close. Because the reality is two people can't take care of kids all on their own. When that set up happens, too many burdens fall on mom rather than dad.
[–]TheFinalGirl_2164 points 5 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
BOOM! I’m not creating more people to be consumed by the machine. Healthcare? Unaffordable. Childcare? Unaffordable. Public education? Inadequate. Higher education? Unaffordable.
Tell us again why we should make more American babies?
[–]A-U-R-AFDS Newbie 33 points34 points35 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I hope our governments start opening their eyes and addressing why so many millennials are refusing to reproduce. We aren’t going to suffer to fulfill a societal expectation.
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, but the problem is the government won't even try to find the reason why. They will just ban abortion.
[–]entpgirl415FDS Newbie 39 points40 points41 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes yes and 1000x yes. Wow I never made this connection before finding FDS. God I love this page ❤️❤️
[–][deleted] 36 points37 points38 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It’s also why patriarchs whine about a rapists career being over. Men being punished for their sex crimes leaves a big hole in the capitalists pocket. Especially since about 90% of rapists aren’t convicted.
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
wait sis, i didnt get you
[–][deleted] 51 points52 points53 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Checks out.
This is why abstinence is taught in school: because it fails and produces teen pregnancies which equals cheap laborers or soldiers.
[–]AntinatalistChickFDS Newbie 33 points34 points35 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Finally scrotes start realizing that the survival and existence of the whole human species is at our mercy.
It astonishes me how all children bear father's name and surname as if his LV sperm means more than women birthing and caring all these years for their kids....
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
that why if i ever meet a hvm and have a kid , my last name is going on there
[–][deleted] 57 points58 points59 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Capitalism depends on the oppression of most people. That’s all part of it, but it also works to create competition to survive amongst the majority of workers. It creates “they took our jobs” type of attitudes instead of “the system was made to keep people struggling and poor in different ways.” I pity the men that are turned into morally-bankrupted zombies by porn because they’re unlikely to ever experience the good in life, but it’s an objectively more comfortable way to live than as expected laborers and mothers without guaranteed control over our own bodies. Unfortunately, it also means that the burden to improve is heaped on us as the class with an obvious view of what’s broken, so we have to translate fear and oppression to people who are raised as a stunted-yet-privileged class to get them to catch on that women were never their oppressors.
Our fights will never be as urgent to anyone else. It’s part of why women need to run for elected office as much as possible. Things won’t change otherwise.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Honestly_th01 points 5 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Hasn’t there been a baby boom though? Just maybe not as large as expected?
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
From the first two google results:
“The U.S. could have about 300000 fewer births in 2021.” -USA Today
“The decline in births could be on the order of 300,000 to 500,000 fewer births next year.” -Brookings Their update: “ Based on our previous methodology and a labor market that improved somewhat more quickly than we anticipated, we place more emphasis on the lower range of our original estimate, likely closer to 300,000 fewer births. However, additional factors that we did not incorporate into our model – in particular, ongoing school and day care closures – might very well mean a larger reduction in births than that.”
In short, no. (Millennials are killing the pandemic child-birthing industry or something) The pandemic pulled a lot of women from the workforce for existing children, and discouraged potential parents from risking experiencing the same. Economic insecurity scares people right out of child-bearing.
[–]panicpixiememegirlFDS Newbie 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Absolutely. This is why it pisses me off when childfree people in the childfree groups I'm in dont recognize that child rearing and housework should be paid labor.
[–]FitncurlyFDS Disciple 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yup, the societal machine needs more workers and taxpayers, and those at the top will not risk losing their money—even if it means forcing women to be broodmares. They don’t care, as the women of the 1% will never be forced into such positions.
[–]GingerRabbitsFDS Newbie 40 points41 points42 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Completely true.
Our economic system is an intergenerational pyramid scheme that requires ever increasing layers of wage slaves to fill out the new bottom rung and work themselves to death trying to move up a level or two.
That can't work forever even if they do manage to keep most woman as broodmares because the planet itself is reaching it's biological limits. One way or another the pyramid is going to collapse. Don't manufacture more cannon fodder for the system, don't sell your body/labour to a system that's fundamentally designed for exploitation.
[–]dak4f2FDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Agreed. Our system is set up on an assumption we can (and must) grow infinitely. That's just insanity.
[–]w0rmsongsFDS Apprentice 25 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This makes me eternally grateful for receiving sterilization surgery with nothing but acceptance and zero pushback or comments. It's horrifying to think that's an exceptional experience, though.
Our fucking bodies.
[–]blacklikeyourheartFDS Newbie 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I urge everyone to read Caliban and the Witch by Silvia Federici. It explores the transition from feudalism to capitalism and talks of the devaluing and control of women’s reproductive labour, porn/prostitution as an opiate for the male masses, and the functions of the witch burnings. IMO it should be required reading.
[–]TheboredshrimpFDS Apprentice[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Will definitely check it out
Love Silvia Federici!!! I don’t agree with all of her politics, but her feminist rage is pure and focused and it gives me life.
[–]CroneRaisedMaidenFDS Newbie 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Communism is a farce of “equality” for women. The marxist feminists do have a few good theories but I’m far from convinced that the “means of production” can mean anything different for women. Don’t forget that women are seen as those means of production in both neoliberal and marxist societies. —source: economics minor, declared
[–]popsthrowsupFDS Newbie 27 points28 points29 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Not sure if anyone follows Bernie Sanders.
But he recently tweeted in favor of raising the minimum wage.
highlighting that 59% of tip employees are woman, and that they then are sexually harassed routinely at work!
Imagine how many of those women are single mothers?
They have to pay crazy amounts of money for childcare (some of which isn’t even all week just 3days a week). All because they need to work a job that could only guarante 2.30/hr, where they’re then sexually harassed.
Only to still be struggling to put a roof over their head and feed their child
[–]BBQCoolRanchQueenFDS Apprentice 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That $2.30 an hour BTW? Yeah, it is the amount that gets deducted by the tax man. Servers in the states live solely off of tips. So in reality, the bosses are paying servers $0.00 an hour.
[–]DallasOMalleyFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow. I've never thought of it like this before, but completely agree! Thank you for sharing this.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/magazine-34602822
Here is the link to the 1975 "Women's day off" movement that shook all of Iceland. An interesting and inspiring read. Shout out to @Rayne2522 for bringing this piece of history to my attention.
[–]TheboredshrimpFDS Apprentice[S] 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Apparently iceland is the most gender equal country in the world (financially speaking) no wonder 👏👀
[–]t3ddiFDS Newbie 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is why what I like to call the "unmothers" are ostracized so hard.
[–]PartypuppersFDS Apprentice 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I work for a Fortune 100 company and I realised that most of its historic profits are based on the fact that it's (mainly male) employees were only able to do their 60-90 hour a week jobs because they had wives to do the emotional labour at home. Think about that - billions in profits made for one single company off of the back of women's unpaid labour at home.
It blew my mind when I had this epiphany 🤯
Women's work is so valuable and capitalism requires that women don't realise this.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is spot-on. Yes. I don't have a lot to add that hasn't already been mentioned here.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 49 points50 points51 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
But any system that ISN'T based on capitalism ensures everyone suffers on an equal level
You're really gonna sit there and say you're okay with oppression so long as some people have it better than others? Then you're part of the problem.
If everyone suffered equally, everyone would be equally motivated to solve the problem collectively.
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
I get the annoyance with capitalism and income inequality but.. you know that exactly none of the European Nordic countries that have the happiest quality of life are socialist right? They’re all capitalist. This seems to be something that Gen Z cannot accept. Just saying... I don’t expect FDS to be objective but there seems to be a lot of confusion about what socialism is. Cuban people can tell you all about it. They often flee from Cuba to come here.
I think social democracy is a good thing but that is normally implemented within a capitalist system. At some point we should probably admit that hating on capitalism is just a trend and that the best economic models we’ve ever come up with are capitalist with heavy socially democratic policies
That is what the actual facts tell us, as opposed to Gen Z leftist Twitter that is convinced it is all knowing and all powerful despite having the least life experience and a tendency to bandwagon some of the worst ideas I’ve ever seen any generation espouse before.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty much. As bad as capitalism can be, what were the options for women before? Marriage, something religious, or prostitution. All 3 depending on men to get resources.
Patriarchy have been there since the beggining of time, being it capitalism or communism. It was there in primitive communities as well. Male dominance is innate in human groups due to their physical streght, higher agression and no pregnancy downtime. And that's how it is for many other primates, as biology is unfair to female mammals.
As I see, the options have been: We can be private property, or we can be state property.
With recent improovements allowing women to own property and resources, and work for those, we achieved being our own owners.
And when we have our own money and freedom, we have companies developing producs for us. Such as birth control, something males don't care enough as it doesn't greatly benefits them.
Perfect? No, but it is the best we had in the whole history and we should acknowledge it so we can keep the good, and improove the bad.
Patriarchy is still there with some men wanting to use institutional power to control women's bodies, but in the recent decades, we got more of the resources that allow us to fight back or just straight up disobey.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Capitalist realism moment 😩
[–]HeavyMetalLobsterFDS Apprentice 44 points45 points46 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Kindly think on this.
Edit: nothing you’ve added is helpful or adds meaningful discussion to the topic. From your post history you’re either a troll or very new to this sub and women’s issues in general.
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
DUDE DETECTED
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]the-worst-FDS Newbie 41 points42 points43 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Tell that to the women in states like Alabama where they can't have an abortion. That's part of reproductive rights.
Tell that to the women who aren't allowed to have their tubes cut/tied unless she has a husband and he approves or she's already had one child... Even though men can have a vasectomy without being married, having children, or having permission from his wife.
Tell that to all the women who swear they don't want kids but keep being told "that's just a phase!" Or "you'll regret not having them!"
Tell that to the teen girls who's boyfriends make it a literal game to see how many girls they can knock up (no joke, my first boyfriend was like that and it's more common than you expect).
If we can't openly seek BC, abortion, procidures to make us sterile, or a life without children... Then we don't have reproductive rights. We have reproduction forced upon us from an early age. "Sex ed" clases don't teach about SEX. They teach about reproduction.
[–]miasmicivyphsycFDS Newbie 51 points52 points53 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don’t agree. The entire economy revolves around the exploitation of women. On a personal level, it’s men expecting women to work full-time jobs at work and then come home to work another full-time job. They cook three meals like a personal chef, scrub the house like a maid, and make sure their husbands do the shit that needs to be done like a personal assistant.
On a reproductive level, creating more children and making it impossible for women to benefit from having children keeps them out of the workforce. It keeps women down out of the workforce and allows more men to enforce capitalism by accumulating more capital in the long run. That’s why abortion is so stigmatized because it gives women opportunity.
When women have The opportunity to not have children and not be tied to a single man, they have a chance to pursue a career and accumulate their own capital. But if they stay with a man, and worst case scenario become a housewife, they are expected to do all this free labor for a man in order to have the “privilege” of having a home to sleep in. That’s what it comes down to – without the exploitation of women at home, men can’t run the economy and enforce brute capitalism.
[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well said!
[–]sekhmetwisdomFDS Newbie 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes yes all of this and I add that they want us to continue birthing future military
Sounds right.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Rayne2522FDS Newbie 334 points335 points336 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]penelopekittyFDS STRATEGY COACH 206 points207 points208 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rayne2522FDS Newbie 41 points42 points43 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FitncurlyFDS Disciple 100 points101 points102 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Rayne2522FDS Newbie 87 points88 points89 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MixWideFDS Newbie 28 points29 points30 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]itsyourgirlfinnFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KuanzhaixiangziFDS Newbie 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jokkitch 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MyplummmsRuthless Strategist 362 points363 points364 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 67 points68 points69 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]superderpina_FDS Newbie 34 points35 points36 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 99 points100 points101 points
(1 child) | Copy Link
[–]OrangeyPanda503 points [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]lluuniFDS Newbie 60 points61 points62 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BBQCoolRanchQueenFDS Apprentice 54 points55 points56 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]CoffeeAndCorpsesFDS Newbie 25 points26 points27 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BBQCoolRanchQueenFDS Apprentice 36 points37 points38 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]barbedwiredaisycrownFDS Newbie 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bitchyrussianbotFDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 38 points39 points40 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BaconSquaredFDS Newbie 18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 318 points319 points320 points
(29 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 215 points216 points217 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 220 points221 points222 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 46 points47 points48 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]MagnfiqueMaleficentFDS Disciple 105 points106 points107 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 115 points116 points117 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 28 points29 points30 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 32 points33 points34 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 25 points26 points27 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 31 points32 points33 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 21 points22 points23 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]thowawaywookieFDS Newbie 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ferociouslycuriousFDS Newbie 36 points37 points38 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ferociouslycuriousFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sekhmetwisdomFDS Newbie 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gingerwabisabiFDS Apprentice 38 points39 points40 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 12 points13 points14 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]berryberrykicksFDS Apprentice 44 points45 points46 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]yolosunshine 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thowawaywookieFDS Newbie 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]akashyaboaFDS Newbie -31 points-30 points-29 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoneOfYourBusinessPSFDS Newbie 49 points50 points51 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pitifulparsnipFDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]advice1988 234 points235 points236 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 80 points81 points82 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]advice1988 34 points35 points36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 58 points59 points60 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 24 points25 points26 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lazy-Design1979FDS Newbie 265 points266 points267 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Squidwrd_Tortellini90 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lazy-Design1979FDS Newbie 51 points52 points53 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 37 points38 points39 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]daisy_0720FDS STRATEGY COACH 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bitchyrussianbotFDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 209 points210 points211 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]barbedwiredaisycrownFDS Newbie 90 points91 points92 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 88 points89 points90 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 76 points77 points78 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 12 points13 points14 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 12 points13 points14 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]horrorqueen797FDS Newbie 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NovemberinthechairFDS Disciple 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheDameWithoutASmile48 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]madeyoulurkFDS Newbie 26 points27 points28 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]randowordgeneratorFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Only_Lime2520FDS Newbie 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bombay_girlFDS Newbie 183 points184 points185 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 183 points184 points185 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]2y-omonkeyonafarmFDS Newbie 39 points40 points41 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterviewImaginary46FDS Newbie 100 points101 points102 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Alpha_AriesFDS Newbie 127 points128 points129 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]immortallogicFDS Apprentice 28 points29 points30 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Stuffnthings1840FDS Newbie 29 points30 points31 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Stuffnthings1840FDS Newbie 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowRAanonymouspickFDS Newbie 55 points56 points57 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]honeybeerollFDS Disciple 22 points23 points24 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheFinalGirl_2164 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]A-U-R-AFDS Newbie 33 points34 points35 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]entpgirl415FDS Newbie 39 points40 points41 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 36 points37 points38 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 51 points52 points53 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntinatalistChickFDS Newbie 33 points34 points35 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]moonartemis1989FDS Newbie 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 57 points58 points59 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Honestly_th01 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]panicpixiememegirlFDS Newbie 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FitncurlyFDS Disciple 28 points29 points30 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GingerRabbitsFDS Newbie 40 points41 points42 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dak4f2FDS Newbie 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]w0rmsongsFDS Apprentice 25 points26 points27 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]blacklikeyourheartFDS Newbie 21 points22 points23 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheboredshrimpFDS Apprentice[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CroneRaisedMaidenFDS Newbie 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]popsthrowsupFDS Newbie 27 points28 points29 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BBQCoolRanchQueenFDS Apprentice 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DallasOMalleyFDS Newbie 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheboredshrimpFDS Apprentice[S] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]t3ddiFDS Newbie 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PartypuppersFDS Apprentice 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 49 points50 points51 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HeavyMetalLobsterFDS Apprentice 44 points45 points46 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]the-worst-FDS Newbie 41 points42 points43 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]miasmicivyphsycFDS Newbie 51 points52 points53 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sekhmetwisdomFDS Newbie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link