1. Men end 10% of all marriages, women end 40% of all marriages (that is, 50% of all marriages end in a divorce, and those 50% are composed of 10% plus 40% as follows: the 10% are ones where the man ended it, and the 40% are ones where the woman ended it - 40% of all marriages are ended by women).
  2. Thus a woman is facing a world where she has 90% confidence from the male sex that the marriage will continue (because men end only 10% of all marriages, meaning they do not end the other 90%, meaning a woman receives from the male sex 90% confidence that marriage won't be ended by the man, that marriage at all means something), but, a man, faces only 60% confidence from the female sex that a marriage will continue, since as we noted, women end 40% of all marriage, that is, men receive from the female sex only 60% assurance that a marriage would last (not because "men bad" but because feminism tells women "divorce! even without reason" and because feminists made the law incentivize no-reason divorce by women, for money or a capricious drive).
  3. So unlike for women, an unwanted divorce is a high-probability event for men, and, when this will occur to a man - and for men there is almost 50:50 chance it will - the man will usually have almost no equal rights, and sometimes not even human rights.
  4. For this reason, a man who reflects on marrying his girlfriend has the fear that should things go sour, he will be trapped - because the wife will have a bureaucratic-social gun pointed at him - "if you try leaving, I will end you", so he knows that once in, if it becomes abusive he will be locked under abuse or emotional harm with no way out (other than choosing to receive the pain of divorce-abuse, which unmarried men know sometimes end in suicide).
  5. Add to that, the fact that women are only human, and when humans are told "no matter what you do to someone, he will not be able to leave", they tend to become abusive because they know "no matter what I do, he will have to accept that". Unmarried guys are aware of this human tendency, that is, that not only that should she become abusive the divorce norms and laws will lock them for life in abuse - but that because of those very same norms and laws and the arbitrary power they create within marriage, the probability she'll indeed become abusive, is rather high.
  6. If the wife cheated and the kids are not his, the feminist institutions have the power to prevent him from ever knowing test results and if he is lucky enough to know about what was done to him, they have the power to force him to sponsor the cheater and her lover's baby.

If that's not enough, if women aren't having an orgasm, the feminist movement with the help of millions of women will order the man to satisfy the wife, but if a man wants sex, feminism will flip its position and tell the wife she owes him nothing, and if he even tries to object he will be called "a rapist". So in marrying he is consenting to giving his wife absolute power over him - power of demanding of him anything and being obligated to provide... nothing.

And, women are glorified for taking care of a child while holding a job - feminism demands of men to do the same - when men do this, they hear "you are not getting a cookie for fulfilling your duties". Are there any women who do both things and hear from society "shut up, it's your duty, don't expect a thank you for the bare minimum"?

This is why men won't marry. Feminists made women, make marriage, an abuse-system. Women need to choose: feminists and how they made marriage a tool for anti-male sadism, or men. If they want men in marriages, women must uprise against sadistic feminism and eradicate any influence that feminist hate had on relations and marriage including in propaganda, media and law. Until then, men will never marry under institutional, women-supported, feminist sadism, that made out of marriage an anti-men weapon of feminist hate.