~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
geyejoe7
[–]anon_likes_tendies39 points40 points41 points 3 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link
FDS should be front page on Reddit.
A great dose of reality
[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man42 points43 points44 points 3 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
The Cognitive Dissonance is so wild there it reads more like satire. Imagine thinking you are a high-quality person unironically calling men "scrotes".
[–]PostModernFascist24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Yesterday there was a thread saying if a guy doesn't propose to you within the first three months of dating, then he's not going to and he's is just stringing you along, so you should dump him. After all hvm know within the first few dates whether or not they're going to marry you.
What a joke. Three months is nothing.
[–]noheyokay4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Link? Though as much as I hate FDS I can't see them even advocating for that.
[–]Bordersz4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I know what thread they're talking about and it was not 3 months, it was 3 years. The link is here. Long story short, they're talking about how men are not indecisive and they're pretty much know early on whether the girl they're seeing is "wife" material or not. And that a 3 year timeframe is a good rule of thumb for marriage minded ppl.
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They aren't at all talking about men being indecisive but if the guy wants to marry you or not within 3 years.
[–]flyinghorse10 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Its one of the worst echo chambers online
[–]sassylittlespoon0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It didn’t happen. Someone said that men generally know pretty early on if they are interested in marrying a girl or not.
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I wager it didn't happen, especially when there's a thread literally talking about divorce rape and various threads talking about being against marriage. I really wonder if FDS women even want relationships with men.
[–]sassylittlespoon0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Some do, some are just over it all. FDS isn’t entirely or even mostly about dating. It’s about women working on being the best version of themselves for themselves. If that includes finding a dude, that’s good. If not, that’s good, too.
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Dating is literally part of their name and what they are about.
It’s about women working on being the best version of themselves for themselves.
Total and utter bullshit. Unless you mean that is to be as toxic as heck and hate men, then I agree.
[–]sassylittlespoon-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Just because it started as that doesn’t mean it can’t morph into something else.
And you can say it’s totally bullshit all you want. It literally doesn’t matter to me. I thought you were genuinely curious so I was trying to be helpful. You want to shit on it, knock yourself out!
The whole sub is about dating and the focus is on dating. And why would I be curious to what FDS is when I know what its about which is not even close to what you think it's about. You thinking its about women bettering themselves is outright laughable.
[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Talking about marriage too early will scare off some women but some women want to know you're open to it and thinking about it. There is really no winning formula, other than absolutely being genuine and honest. Also, being totally OK that some women will not be for you.
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Would say depending on age bring up marriage won't scare women away if you ask them what are they looking for relationship wise. Now talking about getting married early on to the extent your planning it ya I think that will scare most women off no matter their age.
[–]April_blossoms1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
My husband and I got married after three months.
[–]SonicBackScratcherGreen Eyed Devil0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I didn't propose until we dated 5 years
[–]April_blossoms1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
That's a long time for a girl to wait and hope he's actually got a plan.
[–]SonicBackScratcherGreen Eyed Devil2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
To be fair she was 18 when we met. That's 4years for college. No one was getting engaged then.
[–]April_blossoms1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's fair!
[–]Brainless-Wonder4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
“Scrotes.” ”Scrotes.” Can they make a more unappealing term? It’s on par with “femoids” and yet they’ve somehow fooled themselves into thinking they’re better than that crowd.
[–]Shanghai-on-the-Sea0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I thought it was supposed to be a femoid parallel
[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I thought it was satire
[–]Tongue371 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I have a girlfriend that's a feminazi and she couldn't even handle the Fds sub. I'd like to see what that subs members look like.
[–]SlashCo802 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Over half of them are regulars on radfem subs, so you can imagine.
[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
YAASSSS KWEEEN!
I have to reply to myself and congratulate myself because I am so proud?
[–]tickledpic3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol, you go girl!
[–]noheyokay3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can't image what will happen if they made /r/all. Feminists and that women will falling over themselves in trying to defend them.
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
God forbid more young women get poisoned by that shitm
[–]anon_likes_tendies2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
More men need to see what they’re going up against.
[–]xFallacyx690 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mentioned FDS on r/nicegirls and you wouldn’t believe how many people went there and got cringed out immediately
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I never understood the people wanting it banned, it is one of the most useful ways to see the dark side of modern women clearly.
[–]anon_likes_tendies0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because Reddit bans or quarantines any sub they disagree with or accuse of “wrong think”
[–]ItsTheHardCockLifeWinners don't take drugs24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have never seen these two images on Reddit ever.
This feels like some 4chan inception.
[–]silentium-est_aureum59 points60 points61 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I have to say as a woman I do read the posts sometimes. But this is the most accurate representation ever. Thank you whoever made this for existing. You my friend rock
[–]supercactus66632 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Also unhappy women cyberbullying each other out of any relationship they hear about
[–]noheyokay5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And being prostitutes while against sex.
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I made it actually
[–]silentium-est_aureum8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Then I guess you are amazing
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hahaha thanks
more proof that wojack is peak reddit
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You missed out on the first panel saying how he treats her like a queen.
[–]Lokipoki2932 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
😂fds in a nutshell , god I am loving the purge
[–]kvn_cher0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
what purge?
[–]sleeparalyzis7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don’t get it. Where’s the joke ?
[–]69_Watermelon_4200 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not every post is a joke, Jake.
[–]cast-away-ramadi064 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Look, if you're some type of engineer whose fairly boring, why don't you just date other boring people who are making the same amount of money? That way you don't have to worry about this betabucks issue?
In the real world, adults make compromises all the time. It seems like too many unhappily single people either haven't matured to this point and/or are pretty arrogant.
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Or just become more interesting? Your job doesn't define you.
[–]cast-away-ramadi067 points8 points9 points 3 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link
Your job doesn't define you
It's a question of degree, not something as simplistic as a yes or no answer; the real world is more nuanced. We are all defined, in part, by our experiences and we spend a great deal of our waking hours at work. Subsequently, for a lot of people in high-commitment careers, their career does define a good part about who they are. If you have any inclination to make the world a better place through what you choose as a career, it will probably define you in part.
I was a Marine, and it defined a good bit about myself (because the Corps and the deployments shaped me so much, it still does define me to a degree even to this day). My cousin has been an NYC firefighter for 15 years, with as much time as he spends at the firehouse it sure as hell defines a large part of him. My father was a fighter pilot for ~30 years (Vietnam through retirement), sure defined a lot about him. One uncle was a preacher, which sure defined a lot about him. One brother is the proverbial troubled artist and it sure sure defines a lot about him. One of my ex-gfs was an NYC homicide detective, sure defined a lot about her. One was a teacher in troubled schools and she was very passionate about what she did, so it obviously define a great deal about her.
Now, these folks certainly had more going for themselves than just their career, but it was still nevertheless a significant part of who they are.
Honestly, if you don't have passion for what you do for 8-12 hours a day, that sounds like a rather uninteresting existence.
Or just become more interesting?
Hmm, see last comment. Also, I'd rather see people live an authentic life and surround themselves with like minded people who are out to make an impact according to their abilities and interests, as varied as they may be.
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
The vast majority if people don't have passion for their work. Most get paid shit-all for it on top of that. Even just having stable work on a liveable wage is becoming hard these days.
I'd love to get an arts degree as I find that far more interesting than tech or engineering. But where's the work for an arts graduate? Rent is expensive as hell and buying a house that isn't in the middle of bum-fuck nowhere is practically undoable. STEM degrees are the most reliable ticket into the middle class. I come from a poor family (parents are part-time janitors) so I don't have the luxury of finding my passion. Jobs are for money. If you're making enough to live comfortably you're doing really well for yourself.
[–]cast-away-ramadi06-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Design work is exceedingly competitive, but if you're good enough at it there is significant money to be made there - even as it applies to technology.
Personally, I don't believe in the dichotomy between technology and art. I'm not terribly smart about tech, but I do know that a lot of the most successful people in that industry are able to blend the humanities with their understanding of technology. Also, one of my ex's is a math professor at a fairly prestigious university. While I couldn't follow any conversation she had with her colleagues, there was one conversation where they talked about the biggest reason most PhD students fail graduate level math - lack of creativity. That really stuck with me.
Edit: But yes, I agree that being able to do something you love and can feel passionate about is a bit of a luxury for some people, but I think it's something that's attainable by most.
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I think liberal arts is invaluable for both soft skills and general education. But a liberal arts degree on its own won't land me a job. Especially in my country where the government is actively discouraging liberal arts and making it twice as expensive.
Everyone I know with a non-STEM degree is waiting tables, working retail, or at call centers. The IT guys hate their jobs, but they get paid twice as much as the rest of us, and we still hate our jobs.
I desperately want to believe you, but I'm 25 now so I'm too old to take the risk with a non-STEM degree. But that still leaves time outside of work to do interesting things, and having money opens a lot of doors.
[–]cast-away-ramadi060 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Especially in my country where the government is actively discouraging liberal arts
Which country is that may I ask?
The trouble here in the US is that, from an labor economics perspective, there's a huge skills mismatch between new graduates and businesses requirements. Even in finance, industry leaders have been saying for a few years that everyone needs to learn technology which scares the crap out of me.
If the gap continues to widen between folks with tech skills and the demand, there will be a relative increase in salary for those with those skills and a relative decrease for those without which will only exacerbate income inequality.
There are only two ways I can see that this ends well. The first is more redistributive tax policies, which I don't think some people will like. This approach risks these people leaving for places where they don't have to subsidize others; we already see that happening with people moving from Cali to Texas. The second is we will have to start putting more restrictions on what degrees are eligible for federal student loans so we can ensure a better alignment of skills with market requirements; the power of the purse strings. Academics love to talk about how the job of higher education is not to build skills but to build people. IMO, that's rather naive approach to reframe the discussion so they can avoid any responsibility that comes with the use of public funds. Since the later half of the 20th century, the entire purpose of government funding of education is to build up a higher skilled workforce. To think that governments do so exclusively or even primarily for learning's sake is incredibly narrow minded, shortsighted, and naive.
Edit: Having said all that, I much prefer the general education requirements of the US university system compared to the narrow scoping of learning in the UK system. I'd hate to see a world where techies and engineers fail to learn humanities. There has to be some sort of dystopian book about that.
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm in Australia. Our government hates the humanities and considers science useless, so they've decimated funding. A lot of STEM majors don't let you pick non-STEM electives. For the most part tech jobs won't even look at if you don't have an the right degree. Nobody I know who studied IT or engineering has done any humanities subjects. Most business majors don't either.
I think Aussie degrees are way too specialized. You should be able to just study whatever you want and if you earn the right credit points in the right subjects be awarded a diploma/associates/bachelors/masters. But universities instead want you to know exactly what your degree will be before signing up.
[–]cast-away-ramadi060 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, it sounds like you have close to the UK model. In the US, almost everyone has to take some collection of basic humanities courses to graduate - history, English lit, sociology/psychology, etc. Granted, our education takes 4 years vs UK's 3 year and we have a host of problems on the quality control and pricing side of things. So I wouldn't say our system is better, but in this one specific area, I prefer people take a year longer and learn some basic himanities.
Being from a non-STEM field myself, I think we do need to start making Calc 1 & 2, Physics 1 & 2, and some sort of basic programming course mandatory for non-STEM students. When I was at Uni, they were trying to get rid of the meager math requirement when they should have upped it to Calc 1 & 2. Might more people have struggled and dropped out? Sure, but I don't see that as a bad thing. We need people who are mentally resilient enough to get through hard coursework.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Tl;dr: I think you raise a fair point, but I don’t think it applies to everyone. I think the nuance extends further, and can mend to different lifestyles. Different lifestyles will result in a career drawing upon different degrees of defining you/someone.
Continued: I personally am like you and/or a lot of your family/friends. I embrace my career as either an extension or a part of myself. I think across the board most people do, though maybe more so men than women, I’d guess.
It’s a choice, and for me, I see it as an easier way to go about life. Like you said, any job requires considerable time and dedication. In the firefighter example, your cousin can’t turn on and off the part of him that has to be able to handle those types of situations, so he has to incorporate it into his identity, full-time, but that isn’t the same for every life-path.
I used to work in bars and restaurants a lot, and amongst the low lives, the young people building their lives up, the late bloomers working to turn their life around, there were some graceful souls well twined into the mix. By that I mean, they had been working, and would continue to work, the industry forever, but it was graceful and fitting.
For instance, I knew this one guy who was a spear fisherman, surfer—general water man. He worked the bar at this restaurant I worked at, maybe pulled $150 average, 2-4 days a week. He also sold the fish he caught, and idk how much be made form that, but I think it was either comparable or better than his bartending wages. My point, is that while he was certainly a decent bartender, it didn’t require too much commitment from him. It was as though his personality was defined by the other things going on in his life, and he found a gig where he could slide that disposition into a workplace with little-to-no compromise. A lot of people could write him off as a bartender, but they would honestly just be missing the mark: he was him, as defined by xyz, and brought that into work without changing it much. I think this happens more often in society than people think, because you have to sit in one place for along time to see it, and most people are usually trying to move up.
In my case, I was sorta stuck in restaurants for awhile, so in making the most of it I got a real honest glimpse into how people can make it work, wholesomely.
In any case, I think your point is interesting and still applies, I just wanted to extend it. This sub is full of generalizations and toxic crap. I just follow+read the craziness and occasionally get involved, accidentally. Read your comment and figured you might do the same, so I thought I’d throw in a response for a record 2 consecutive civil comments in this sub lol End rant
[–]cast-away-ramadi061 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'd agree with everything you said!
In the 15 or so years we've seen a bit of a renaissance in artisanal work in everything from bartending to barbering. People like that really excite me and I'm always glad to pay extra for their work. In fact, it's not unheard of in some larger cities for clients to follow senior bartenders if they move to new bars.
As for your bartender friend, I hope he was able to find something to do for work that excited him; I hope he was able to make a career out of something he's passionate about!
Found the non American user.
[–]Doctor992681 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol that would never happen, women would want a chad to be making the same amount of money, otherwise the Boring guy would have to be making way more.
[–]sinfulthep0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women don’t want the same they want better
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA29 points30 points31 points 3 years ago (143 children) | Copy Link
Most men in the dating pool are nice. Women get hurt because they don't know how to choose.
Edit: Clarification.
[–]pandora_box-24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (138 children) | Copy Link
This isn’t true. I never got hurt because I was good at noticing red flags & would end things as soon as one appeared. Vast majority of men have red flags. 85% of men in my dating pool were eliminated by red flags, then another 14.9% eliminated by not meeting my other standards despite being decent people. I’m happily married.
[–]stageib4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Which are the most common red flags you disqualified men for?
[–]pandora_box-10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
My caution has served me well. I’m one of the few women I know who’ve never been sexually assaulted or pressured by a date into something they weren’t comfortable with. I was always prepared to walk away in the beginning of a dating relationship and had high standards but I also was willing to be single indefinitely until I found someone worth marrying.
[–]Kaisha0017 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I dunno, many of these 'red flags' can range from completely benign to definitively egregious.
85% of men in my dating pool were eliminated by red flags
I think the problem was with you...
[–]pandora_box-3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Well... I’m happily married so I don’t think there really was a problem with my standards in the end :)
[–]Kaisha0017 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
And If I won the lottery, should I be giving financial advice?
[–]pandora_box-2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t think a happy marriage is as rare as winning the lottery. I know multiple happily married couples (including my own parents, my in laws, and both sets of my grandparents) but I don’t know any lottery winners. There is obviously some luck in finding a good partner however there is also strategy. A happy marriage also doesn’t just happen— it takes work on both sides to get there. Not waisting time with men who didn’t meet my standards meant I was single and available when my husband and I met. If I’d been in a relationship with a subpar man, I wouldn’t have been able to enter into a relationship with my amazing husband.
My main concern when dating was finding a man who treats me right but at the same time wasn’t a simp for me; so I cared less about looks as long as I at least found him attractive. I also prefer more traditional relationship dynamics which means there was extra risk in choosing a man— since I’m handing over even more control over my happiness to him than most women are willing to do these days. I also don’t believe in divorce except I’m cases of infidelity or abuse. Picking wrong would be even more disastrous for me than the typical woman so i vetted men like I was interviewing them for the most important position in my life (because I was). I had to get it right the first time. I didn’t let my guard down until I was satisfied that they met my standards. I’d rather be single indefinitely than have lowered my standards— which I was prepared to do if I hadn’t met my husband.
[–]Anthony-waltzs2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
NICE COMEBACK
So winning the lottery is a common as finding a good man? Got it.
[–]Shanghai-on-the-Sea4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
1 Pushing for intimacy too early.
Yeah I can see how that'd eliminate 80% of men lol
Lol yes. It was super common & the reason I broke off the vast majority of dating situations early on. I also waited until marriage so there were many who obviously had a virgin fetish and thus were so highly motivated to get into my pants that they failed to treat me like a human being so I’d end it. For me being a virgin while dating, the pushing for intimacy too early part was also often about kissing. I wasn’t comfortable kissing a man I wasn’t in a relationship with and SOO many tried to kiss me anyways despite me being pretty up front that kissing was for relationships (at least when I was attracted to them, I’d tell them up front to prevent myself from being tempted). I didn’t want to waist anyone’s time, so I generally told men I was waiting until marriage on a first date or even before unless there was no chemistry then I didn’t bother. If he wanted more than a side hug, he needed to commit to me first.
[–]Inevitable-Fruit1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Saving this.
[–]SirenaGatita-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🙏🙏🙏 A thousand times yes
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (116 children) | Copy Link
Listen, I get your point. But you mind I telling mine?
The point is that all those women who try to justify their shitty love lifes with those "men are trash" and "men are all the same" bullshit clichés are wrong.
They're saying that their love life is shitty because of a lack of good men. Their love lifes can be horrible by many reasons, but by a shortage of good men in the dating pool? That's plain bullshit.
There are plenty of men in the dating pool who aren't jerks. If women actually knew that, they wouldn't blame men for having a shitty love life.
I don't want fuckbois to learn how to behave. (Actually I do, but that's for another subject). Instead...
I want single women to lower their standards so the already-good men in the dating pool that try to have a shot with her finally get their chance.
Women, lower your standards. Your SO is probably a guy that tried to score you but failed because your standards were too high.
[–]reluctantly_red5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If a woman can't get hot and decent she has a choice to make. Hot and despicable or decent and not hot. Her choice to make but if she chooses poorly I don't want to hear about the ever so predictable consequences.
[–]pandora_box-1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s why you need to get hot / stay hot yourself if you want to land a decent hot guy. In the US at least it’s not that hard— just don’t be overweight, get toned, learn to do minimal style makeup well, dress well for your body type, take care of your skin (including using sunscreen to delay aging), and take care of your hair. As a woman, that places you in the top 5% easily. If you have a decent personality & can earn a decent living— your RMV will be higher than your SMV so you should be able to land your looksmatch with a decent personality as well. If you’re not willing to put in the effort to be hot, don’t expect a hot partner unless they have major character flaws that cause them to be rejected by their looksmatches (goes for both genders)
[–]Inevitable-Fruit4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Lower my standard? No, thank you. The bar is already so low I don't need to be waist deep in dirt to be able to find a mate. I tried that, didn't work for me.
I get it, women should have a keen eye in finding red flags early on. But why are we even trained to do that? It's because shit is the standard. And the responsibility to pick diamond underneath all that shit falls on our hands. As I told you, the bar is already so low.
It would be nice to have 3 out 5 decent guys in a dating pool. Not 1 out of 5. That's just sad.
[–]psypD1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It would be nice to have 3 out 20 decent girls in a dating pool. Not 1 out of 50. That's just sad.
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Define what you mean by decent . It could cover such a wide range of traits
[–]terrn19818 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link
So, you think women who are not attracted to you should give you a chance? Would you give a woman you are not attracted to a chance? Why is it women that are expected to "lower their standards" and not men? Would you, as a guy, really want to be having sex with a woman, knowing she really isn't into it?
[–]mannyso2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
I don't think they should lower their standards at all.
But at some point they have to realize its them that's the problem not men.
We all know women who always pick the wrong guy for them and they end up hurt. Blaming men is not the answer. We are all responsible for our decisions in life and consistent failures in one aspect point to an internal problem not external (men).
[–]sassylittlespoon2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
So men hurt women and it’s the woman’s fault? How does that make sense?
[–]mannyso1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
If the type of men they pick repeatedly hurt them, their responsibility in that event don't you think?
Blaming men is the same self loathing attitude that incels have championed on the opposite side of the spectrum.
It would benefit both sex's to take responsibility for their feelings instead of blaming it on an external scapegoat (no matter how easy this may seem). I have to work on this myself.
[–]sassylittlespoon1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
So if someone hurts me, likes lies to me or hits me or cheats on me, it’s my fault because I chose them? I’m just trying to make sure I’m understanding you correctly.
[–]mannyso1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
He sounds like a terrible person but what to do now? Do we mope about how all men are trash? Where does that get us?
It's not your fault he did bad things. Terrible people do bad things without cause. All you can take responsibility for are your feelings. He doesn't care about them and truth be told very few people probably do. Letting him further taint your heart is your responsibility.
If a women is consistently picking men who hurt, cheat and lie to them at some point they have to look internally. Why are they choosing these types of men?
[–]sassylittlespoon0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I don’t necessarily disagree with you, but I don’t think that self reflection is the only or best answer. It’s always good to examine ourselves after a relationship has ended, but blaming a girls “picker” after a bad relationship just smacks of victim blaming to me. There should be personal responsibility at play, absolutely.
I don’t think all men are awful, and I’m certainly not bitter about past relationships, but I do think that awful men are celebrated and it’s socially acceptable to be awful to women. And until that changes, it doesn’t matter how I or any other woman behaves. If we have standards, we’re stuck up, gold digging bitches. If we lower our standards we are miserable because we compromised when we shouldn’t have. If we decide that being single is better, we’re lonely, delusional bitches. There’s no winning honestly.
The biggest issue, IMO is that the awful men are celebrated and the good men do nothing about it.
[–]reluctantly_red4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Guys generally will give plane (as opposed to butt ugly) women a chance.
Guys standards are not that high though. If a woman is cute and feminine then we will date them. It's really that simple, we don't care about her education or job or what car she drives or how popular they are. Just maintain a nice body shape and be cute and feminine. Seriously this isn't asking for too much
Women seem to want a mix of very opposing traits in the same guy
[–]otter6461a0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Yes and yes. “Attraction” is a terrible indicator of relationship success.
[–]rhyth71 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
When the sex dries up men aren't happy in their 'good' relationship. I've had good relationships where everything was great but I wasn't attracted to them and they obviously noticed. It's not good to have to be drunk to sleep with someone even if everything else about them is very nice.
[–]CentralAdmin4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
When the sex dries up men aren't happy in their 'good' relationship.
Of course. Who wants a sexless relationship?
I've had good relationships where everything was great but I wasn't attracted to them and they obviously noticed.
That means you're not attracted to good men despite them offering you a 'great' relationship. The issue is with you then.
It's not good to have to be drunk to sleep with someone even if everything else about them is very nice.
If you're okay with never having a stable LTR then you'll be fine. Leave the decent guys for women who can appreciate them. I've never seen a woman who prioritises excitement and physical attraction happily settling for someone who provides stability, unless he's really wealthy.
The kind of man who is both exciting and yet able to offer a stable LTR is so rare he is probably off the market already. By the time most women realise they should have stayed or even chosen a decent guy, it's usually too late.
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Why is that man rare though? Shouldn't men work to make that the norm? To be the best person possible should be the norm for all people. Women and men alike.
[–]Kaisha0011 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
The kind of man who is both exciting and yet able to offer a stable LTR
Because these are generally traits at the opposite ends of a spectrum.
If you are exciting, then you are impulsive, spontaneous, live for the moment. Which makes you crappy for long term planning, or stable living.
Its like when men state they want a virgin with a high sex drive and that is sexually adventurous. Sure, maybe there's 1 or 2 out there, but really??
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or a person can cycle through states? Like I'm a homebody half the time and and adventurer the rest, it's good because the homebody period allows me to save up for things and take care of things a little bit.
I don't want to be with a man who wants to watch football and drink beer every single day. We can do that some of the time but not all of the time. Or a man who wants to be out all the time, that's exhausting.
Before work beat all the creativity out of us, most people are good at being stable and fun.
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lol most men are greatly exaggerating when they talk about wanting virgins though. Most men will accept many other types of women and be fine with it . Be Somewhat attractive, have decent body shape and be feminine ..these 3 things will get most guys interested and willing to pursue you.
[–]mannyso0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Definitely but the guy you really want has a lot of options which makes him put less effort in this endeavor.
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Having a lot of options seems great at first but then you realize most of the options are crap. The dating landscape is like shopping at Walmart, everything is cheap and flimsy. Why put lots of effort into something when most people aren't that deep? I don't blame rarer types for not putting much effort into something that will never bear fruit.
[–]TheUniqueProperty0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I'll just go back in time and undo all that trauma and social exclusion, then I'll get some new genetics so I can be good looking. No big deal.
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
There's always room for improvement.
[–]Coder-Cat1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why can’t men just, idk, raise their level of self respect and values to meet the standards of women?
It’s sad because a reoccurring theme in the “nice guy” realm is they are explicitly focused on women complaining about jerks and dudes countering that with “well I’m not a jerk! Why can’t I get any ladies?”. As if they don’t understand that hygiene, self respect, physical fitness, intelligence, cleverness, generosity, creativity, loyalty, and a myriad of other attributes make up a personality.
I just read a post about a women complaining about the disgusting state of her dates apartment and not one man bemoaned “but my apartment is super clean!!”. They mostly attacked her for judging other people’s lives.
It’s a theme that most men completely gloss over every other complaint women have, insisting that “not being a jerk” is some sort of massive accomplishment when it’s literally the lowest bar a man needs to cross in order to be not just datable, but live in a functional society.
It’s not just insulting to women when men claim that they’re so hard to deal with, so foreign and obnoxious that any man willing to put up with them is worthy of their love, in spite of every other one of his flaws. It’s also insulting to men to claim that being “a nice guy” is the highest bar they should ever hope to achieve.
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are right.
But at the same time, I still feel bad for men who happen to be genuinely nice but unlucky with women for being unattractive for another reason.
I mean... Men don't deserve a pat in the shoulder for doing the bare minimum, but considering there men shitty enough to do LESS than the bare minimum and still getting laid, I don't blame men for their "I'm not trash, where's my SO?" kneejerk reflex.
I'm not saying it's a justified reflex. I'm saying I understand where they are coming from.
[–]ThrowAway473847299235 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh c’mon man! Don’t you know men are ALWAYS trash and women never choose poorly?
You see how it always goes back to men being trash and there’s never any accountability for women making poor choices? But let the sexes be reversed, and women are more than happy to tell men we are making poor choices in women.
Women good, men bad. Always remember that.
[–]pandora_box-4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, lowering your standards is a terrible idea because then you’ll be resentful of your SO not living up to them. Learn to be happy as a single person and to not compromise/ waist peoples time so that you can be available for the person that does meet your standards. You shouldn’t date someone because they are “good enough” — you should date someone because they excite you. If they don’t then be single instead of making both of you miserable.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (68 children) | Copy Link
It shouldn’t be difficult if most men aren’t hot garbage right? Just pure numbers wise we’d all accidentally end up in mostly good relationships.
And lower our standards for what? Men don’t add anything to our lives such that it’s necessary to have one.
[–]CentralAdmin2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If none of the relationships you were in were with good men, you're the common denominator, therefore you're the problem.
If most men were hot garbage, half of them wouldn't be off the market at 30. But, eh, it's not you that has to change amirite? It's an entire gender that needs to change for your benefit.
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Just pure numbers wise we’d all accidentally end up in mostly good relationships
No because you actively select for the "garbage" because that's what you find sexually attractive.On the off chance you make a mistake and end up in a good relationship, you sabotage it and end it.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Right because ugly men are somehow all good men in your worldview. It’s impossible to be a sexually attractive person and good person.
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
No, it's that you see assholes as more sexually attractive. A good man can be sexually attractive but he is sexually attractive DESPITE being a good guy. Him being a good guy is a demerit he has to compensate for.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
All men are assholes, some of them are just attractive enough for us to tolerate it.
And I love how men reinforce this binary like women aren’t ever allowed to be with men we find physically attractive and if we do we deserve abuse.
[–]sinfulthep2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you’re so shallow that you only want to fuck a person based on looks, you do deserve abuse. It’s literally only right. You only want his looks he only wants your pussy. So what you are is a pussy. A talking realistic fleshlight. A highly advanced sex doll. NOTHING more.
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/cux0dm/discussion_research_finds_that_women_do_not/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.650.5749
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283732665_How_Alluring_Are_Dark_Personalities_The_Dark_Triad_and_Attractiveness_in_Speed_Dating
I usually wouldn't bother with this on purge week but I see dumb shit like yours so often that I have these saved and ready to be copy pasted
Also
https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/hhj5o2/Weekly_Community_Chat_Megathread_%2828_June_2020%29/fwc9jp8/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
[–]LitBastard1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh shut the fuck up.Those assholes that These women date are not assholes from the get go.They pretend to be nice guys,they listen to them,they take care of their needs,are caring.They CAN be extremely charming.Hell,I got that stuff in me but I actively avoid it and try to be better.
Once the women are in love or the dude convinced them to bang,they change.They get abusive,physically and mentally.
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Of course not. They are assholes from the get go with a very thin veneer of civility.
If what you said was true, then the ACTUALLY nice dudes would be the ones getting laid over the ones that PRETEND to be nice.
[–]steadfast_desireSex Positive5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (56 children) | Copy Link
Men don’t add anything to our lives such that it’s necessary to have one.
Lol sounds like you've never had a good relationship. Just like the RP guys who see women as holes. It's really sad.
[–]ThrowAway473847299235 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (53 children) | Copy Link
That’s EXACTLY what’s going on here. She can’t handle the fact that she chose trash because that would be taking responsibility for those choices. We can’t have that. All blame MUST always be placed on men. lmao! I bet she thinks she’s a catch too, despite the very obvious emotional baggage.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link
Yeah males are totally not the problem I guess I’m just imagining worldwide female oppression, all the popular rape and abuse porn on this website and the explosion of physical abuse, incest, and teen exploitation.
[–]ThrowAway473847299238 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link
No we’re not “the” problem, but we are indeed part of the problem. That’s my view and has been my view because I myself have had to work on myself to become a better man in general, but also to set myself up to be a better potential partner. I’m not ashamed of that so I have very little reason to try to excuse the behavior of toxic men.
It’s funny how you reply as if I’m making excuses for men who are objectively shit human beings when really what’s happening is men telling you that woman can be trash too, and it’s got you very upset clearly.
You’re so riled up at the audacity that men are speaking up about the toxic things they’ve experienced with women, that you seem to think calling that stuff out means I’m ignoring men’s shit behavior.
Ironically, you would benefit from worrying less about your ego…just like the men you hate would benefit from it as well.
[–]Jaylen-Gads2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
She’s a mod on FDS and probably one of the ones that created the sub. I even bet she told them what to say and post. She has issues and needs therapy.
[–]ThrowAway47384729923-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That explains a lot.
FDS is a cesspool of bitter, angry, women. It’s the female version of incel subs.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago* (27 children) | Copy Link
Your part of the problem is like 85%.
[–]ThrowAway473847299234 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
Lol…what do you gain from coming up with an arbitrary percentage of how often it is men that are the problem? This is 100% an ego thing for you, and it’s very obvious.
I literally grant you the point (because you are correct) that men are indeed part of the problem, and that wasn’t good enough. It’s not enough to say yes were part of the problem, you want men to take all of not most of the blame. Your Princess complex is truly hindering your growth in the same way men who are arrogant enough to think things like “its mostly women who are the problem”.
Your thinking is part of the problem 100% of the time.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Also, We can’t select for a population of men that don’t exist. There’s always this attitude of “why don’t women choose better” like there have always been all these amazing options and we’re all just too stupid to see them.
77% of Indian men think hitting your wife to discipline her is justified. Now are Indian women all “choosing wrong” or perhaps it’s actually impossible not to “choose wrong” when the vast majority of the population has decided to be trash? You got an almost 8/10 chance to choose a man who thinks it’s cool to hit you. Those are impossible odds. And I bet Indian men will be using the exact same excuses of “well if you were more feminine and submissive” you’d be treated better, which is of course, horseshit.
The pool is garbage and it’s not women’s fault and no amount of “law of attraction”, therapy and self work will change that.
[–]CentralAdmin4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
77% of Indian men think hitting your wife to discipline her is justified.
"Assholes in another country are a reason why I can't find a decent partner here".
What? Since when does that even make sense?
You're using India like the standard as if the US, Canada, Australia, Scandinavian countries and most West European countries don't exist.
Why not use those as a starting point and avoid cultures that are problematic? Those cultures exist because men don't believe in treating women that way. Hell, there are plenty of women in the US who buy clothes made through slave labour or women in the Middle East who benefit from slave labour. If you're going to call the men in a culture garbage solely while ignoring women's contribution, you're willfully being ignorant.
There are women who support FGM in Africa. There are women who are very racist in the US. There are women who harm and kill their kids around the world. There are women who use men for their money and who harm their partners through deceit.
If you only notice the shitty people then all you'll have are the shitty people. Or, better yet, if you cannot find a decent partner, perhaps you're not a decent partner yourself.
[–]ThrowAway473847299234 points5 points6 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
No one is calling you stupid. I definitely didn’t. Again, your letting your anger take over how you see things.
Pointing out the women chose toxic men doesn’t mean they’re stupid, wtf? It just means she chose a shit guy. Sometimes that’s caused by prior trauma or deep seeded issues that have no been resolved.
In regard to India, it’s a shit show over there right now, and there are many variables that contribute to it, one of which is religion and conservative views on relationship. That’s not an excuse for men to behave like animals.
Obviously the more shit men there are, the more likely you are to end up wit one. That’s a mathematical fact. However, that doesn’t somehow invalidate that women still make poor choices in men.
The problem is that people like you hear “women pick shit men” and you CHOOSE to interpret that as “what are you talking about? There are no bad men!” when that’s not at all what that means.
[–]ThrowAway473847299230 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Here’s how “progressive” India is…
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/13/india/tanishq-jewelry-commercial-india-scli-intl/index.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=fbCNN&utm_content=2020-10-18T21%3A30%3A28&utm_term=link&fbclid=IwAR0k_W9iLHKtPv7X0fuko_uNqXJXXhvN1WvaiohFsyqcY_CQCMsKYQ_JaO8
It’s hardly a good example of what healthy relationships should be.
As if you women are totally without flaws and totally perfect. Please.
[–]Kaisha0010 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ahh, the usual feminists strawman. Time to move them goal posts.
[–]pandora_box--1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Most single men, especially perpetually single men, are trash though. The good ones are typically in stable relationships. The trash ones circulate the dating pool over and over since no one can tolerate them for long. Often, they learn from experience how to masquerade as a decent guy for a while but since it’s not who they are they can’t keep it up for long. I’m happily married to a wonderful man. I know many wonderful men as well— but almost all of them have been in a LTR with the same girl since before they were 25. You’re looking at the wrong sample data— all men— when you should be looking at the sample data among single men for how terrible the dating pool is for a single women.
I’m sure the reverse is true. A lot of terrible women circulate the dating pool for years & make single men bitter about dating. It’s just that being in a toxic relationship is more dangerous for women than men due to the statistics around intimate partner violence. Now I’m not saying men should just put up with it because it’s not as bad for them— men should definitely leave toxic relationships too.
[–]ThrowAway473847299231 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Most single women, especially perpetually single women, are trash though. The good ones are typically in stable relationships. The trash ones circulate the dating pool over and over since no one can tolerate them for long. Often, they learn from experience how to masquerade as a decent woman for a while but since it’s not who they are you can’t keep it up for long.
I’m not going to do the entire thing, but you get the point…as evident by your acknowledgement. And yet that very realizations that both genders have the capacity to be toxic is ignored in favor of constructing this fantasy where men are evil and women are perfect little princesses that can do no wrong.
Intimate partner violence is one of THE MOST overlooked issues for men because our society is sexist and believe women can’t harm men, or that when they do, it causes no real damage.
In essence, you’re preaching to the choir here. I’m not someone who denies male toxicity, but I do advocate for the destigmatization of having similar discussion about toxic women.
I’m not in need of the message you’re posting because I already agree and accept your most of your points, but it would seem from the recoil of many women here that it’s women who need to hear this because by the looks of it, merely stating that women can be toxic too (not “only women” but TOO, meaning there’s shared blame) is met with gasps and cries of “misogyny”.
Long story short is I agree with pretty much everything you’re saying except your point about domestic violence, NOT because violent men aren’t dangerous to women (they are), but because society simply does not see violence by women against men as dangerous, regardless of the circumstances or severity of that violence.
Women are “more” in danger is relative when you consider if a man hits a woman, he’s going to get arrested, but a woman can hit a man and it’s chalked up to [insert literally any excuse here]. Pair that with “a woman punching you doesn’t hurt” and similar excuses made for why violence by women doesn’t need to be taken seriously.
It’s arguable that women are in “more” danger given the physical traits of men, but I’d argue that if you live in a society (as we do now) that simply doesn’t take violence by women against men seriously, it’s pretty dangerous for men given that she can assault you and basically get away with it.
In either case, I don’t like getting into the whole “who has it worst” because it’s just not constructive. My whole thing is all the things feminists and women say about men, we experience a lot of that stuff from women too, but we are NOT ALLOWED to talk about it because “misogyny”.
[–]pandora_box-0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I agree that intimate partner violence is a different kind of struggle for men in that society overlooks it— but that doesn’t change the fact that women are significantly more likely to be hospitalized or murdered by their spouse in a domestic dispute involving violence. The increased likelihood of injury or death is why it’s more dangerous for women. Violence by women should be taken seriously but they are less likely to kill or seriously injure their partners— and their violence is more likely to be driven by self defense / fear (aka in mutually violent relationships) while for men it’s more likely to be driven by the desire to control. Of course, something being more of an issue for one group doesn’t mean that the other should be overlooked. Women are still arrested for violence against their partners so it’s not completely overlooked. Men who experience violence should be encouraged to get out of that situation.
Just for clarity, I wasn’t contesting any of that. I wasn’t contesting that men have the physically ability to violently harm and even kill women. But when it does happen, men are generally arrested and charged. That’s not always the case with women so they effectively get to get away with being violent.
[–]Inevitable-Fruit0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
That is actually a very good analysis. I stopped dating for a good while when I settled down a long time ago. I installed the app after two years, lo and behold, they same faces of guys were there. Uninstalled dating for good.
[–]psypD0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Did you really went trough all of them enough to remember them after 2 years? Do you live in a town with 500 people? What gives?
[–]Inevitable-Fruit0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Online dating is not very popular in my country, and yes it was a small city. It could also be that they did not delete their profiles. I lost interest altogether.
Also, dude, stop following me around to antagonize me. Lol what gives.
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As much as I understand your reasoning, I really dislike this "most single men are single for being jerks" argument.
Since when not being a jerk alone is a guarantee of anything?
Men have to bring more to the table than not being a jerk.
Most single men are not single for being jerks. Most single men are single for not being attractive enough.
It can be a lot of things: being ugly, having less-than-basic grooming skills, having poor social skills, being too shy/homely, having no self-confidence, having no game with women, being a bad lover (kissing badly, sucking at bed, etc), being professionally failed, etc.
A lot of men aren't jerks but are unattractive because of one of those reasons above.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
“Men” in general add nothing - very specific men do.
And hate to break it to you but most women don’t have mostly good relationships. And that’s my point. We deal with men because we’ve been brainwashed our whole lives into a subservient role and most women dont figure out the swindle until they’re married with two kids and freaking out on breakingmom. The “feminine” role we’ve been pushed into is manufactured consent for domestic slavery.
[–]steadfast_desireSex Positive2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
We deal with men because we’ve been brainwashed our whole lives into a subservient role
You don't think this is a little outdated? I can't remember the last time I spoke to a woman in a relationship and got the impression, "wow, she's really subservient to him". I can't remember if I've ever gotten that impression. At least, not before "wow, he's a real asshole".
As your high value yourself. Your not by the way.
Lol if men don't add anything of value to women's lives, why do 99% of them crave to be in a rekationship with said men? Guys could say the same thing about women, that they add nothing of value beyond a vagina and that could be had without commitment
Let's be honest here, women need men much more than men need women.
[–]mannyso0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You really want them to lower their standards and settle?
If I was that guy I would run the other way no matter how attractive she was. There's nothing better than true female desire for you, regardless of the medium...lol ok not like 200lbs
A slightly chubby or butterface that worships you is way better imo. Who cares about those girls fighting for men above them, as long as your taken care of sexually, emotionally, etc, you'll have a happy life
[–]pussandra-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Who counts as a good/nice man then... you? The anti feminist... or what. Do you think they scream yo the heavens how toxic they are every 5minutes. No, the trap you with obligations, dogs, kids, shared living. And then pounce.
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Simply not being a shitty person. If you're male and you're not evil, you're a good man. It's that simple. :)
[–]pussandra0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Do you think that describes you?
My looks are good? No, they are average-to-good at best. (People say it's better than that, but that's my opinion about my looks)
But heart-wise? I'm an angel. Friendly and kind in an almost Sponge Bob level.
I can come as naive and socially awkward sometimes but that doesn't make me, like... a downright EVIL person, you know.
[–]Poshey1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So FOR YOU this isn't true
[–]sinfulthep0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
People don’t know math and that 85+14.9 is 99.9 and don’t get that this is a joke. It’s a joke right
[–]psypD0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No those are her stats. She collected 999 data points until she got to her 1 husband,
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Vast majority of men have red flags.
Find that hard to believe but I can only guess your FDS.
I’m happily married.
And I live in a castle.
[–]pandora_box--1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nah FDS isn’t my thing— it’s way to feminist for me. I’m actually red pilled / tradcon leaning so RPW is more my jam. Common misconception is that RPW women are trying to date TRP men— when we actually just accept basic sociological truths about dating. TRP men are exactly the kind we try to avoid.
Yet TRP men promote traditionalism just like FDS women and RPW women do.
[–]ItsTheHardCockLifeWinners don't take drugs-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have never been hurt and pretty much all I've been intimate with have all these "red flags" that are discussed on the internet—most of them are cynical, have a poor relationship with their parents, never compliment, insult me and others all the time and yet they've all never hit or hurt me and I enjoy their company.
Fuck "red flags".
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Most men in the dating pool are nice. Edit: Clarification.
LMFAO. BYE SCROTE.🤣
Women get hurt because they don't know how to choose.
Maybe because you all don’t look all that different
[–]no_name_needed_limtj1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
HAHAHHAHAHAHA SOMEONE FORGOT TO VISIT THEIR OPTICIANS
[–]ThrowAway473847299233 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can smell her dryness. Musty. Ugh.
[–]shininGbannette0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LVM, HVM, NVM, when did we start letting women declare or decide our worth? FDS’s whole thing is about ensuring women can find the best possible mate, but when did it become our worth that gets declared. Honestly anyone who wants to date a FDS female who’s going to pay for all your stuff, etc, etc, etc, that may be a HVM to you, but to most other guys and regular people, his « value » goes down rapidly when you see that he’s essentially just a chaperone. Same thing w/ girls who follow FDS, YOU ARE LOW VALUE WOMEN, to anybody who’s not part of your community but nope, you consider women to be low value if they don’t subrscribe to your dogma. That sounds less about empowering women to get the right guy and more like pure audacious ignorance
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
FDS: Where they’re strong independent women unless he’s Chad.
[–]ThatGirl501 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Not at all a representation of FDS as we would never fuck an ex.
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Is what you say
[–]ThatGirl50-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What’s the point of fucking an ex? No ones dick is good enough to disrespect myself with. A vibrator can accomplish so much more.
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
The amount of women I've seen run back to their ex, after he did some nasty shit to em...
I know a girl who had a bf with a 10 incher (not joking, actual size).
They broke up, and she fucked him regularly. She said she hated him but the sex was too good. Unreal...
[–]ThatGirl500 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Repulsive??? Damn.
[–]ThatGirl500 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Anyone who can make fun of a domestic abuse victim should be bred out of the gene pool like the vermin you are.
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't make fun of actual abuse victims. I'm making fun of women who pick bad men, that they KNOW are bad, and are then surprised when these things happen.
I know girls personally who've been with actual gang members, drug dealers, etc. What tf can you expect???
[–]OXOzymandiasPurple Rain and Strawberry Beret5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Sisters"
lol i thought about fds gals as nuns on the moment lmao
[–]GloeSticc2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Tf is this
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A meme on fds
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Sexism and ignorance, fueled by someone’s inability to connect with people on an emotional level, and thus also not able to connect physically.
Jesus you were deeply hurt...
[–]GloeSticc0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Damn and thats putting it lightly too.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Figured I would be a polite human today.
[–]DangZagnut2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Still ducking the ex. FDS would spend way more time discussing the money.
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
FDS girls be like:
"Men are horrible for liking women for their looks, but liking men for their money is ok"
I do like how often FDS lacks any total self awareness in their double standards and hypocrisy.
[–]terrn19810 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Women like men with ambition and drive to succeed- its not about "money".
Lazy men with no drive, sitting in front of video games and porn for hours are a turn-off
[–]kanray86No Pill10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
it most definitely about money. i've been on fds and as they say, it's important that men should be able to take care and provide for the family or for you. it's ironic because as a self-proclaimed feminist sub they sure like to uphold traditional gender roles (men asking out first, only men paying for everything, men providing money) when it's convenient for the woman. very one-sided
[–]sinfulthep7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
No FDS literally promotes gold digging and divorce rape. WOMEN will choose the guy who’s already successful over the guy who’s trying to make it every time.
The “I like his ambition” LIE is a way to turn your gold digging thirst for his money into a personal trait. We’re not stupid. It doesn’t work. You like money bitch.
[–]terrn1981-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It "literally" doesn't promote divorce rape. In promotes women having successful careers instead of being housewives, so they ars not trapped in abusive situations. Also, no worry about getting a divorce, if you are a good man that is a partner - does 50/50 and doesn't expect your wife to do 90 percent of the emotional and mental labour of adult life.
[–]sinfulthep3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Shut the fuck up bitch
In promotes women having successful careers instead of being housewives
Why you lie? They promote men being the breadwinner which makes them the housewive.
[–]Tongue372 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, women don't like naked ambition. I know many men that are very ambitious yet haven't succeeded yet in their career and women steer clear of them for the most part. Yet just watch when he finally starts making $300k a year. Women will be pursuing him and we all know this.
Ambition alone is meaningless to women, they want what it usually brings which is money, comfort and nice vacations and clothes
Its about money as well. Yes women like men with ambition as gain from that is making more money.
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I understand your point, but... Don't you think it's wrong approaching rich men and pretending to genuinely like them?
Being nice to people with ulterior motives is wrong, just sayin'.
[–]terrn19810 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
I dont approach rich men. I have a career and have had a higher Income than the men I have been in relationships with. I date men I am attracted to. Part of my attraction to men is their work ethic. More often than not, men with lower income tend to not have the highest of ambitions- thats unattractive to me, and has nothing to do with their actual income. They tend to stagnate and do nothing about it. These men get angry women won't date them, but date men who make more money than call them gold-diggers.
That being said, do you think its wrong to approach women and pretend to like them, just so you can use them for sex?
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, both sides are wrong. That's basically what I meant with the parent comment.
Young women who fake love for a rich man just because of his money are as trash as men who fake love for a gorgeous woman because of her looks.
This is not about justifying bad behaviours of men just because "women do something similar". It's about dismantling a double-standard.
[–]terrn19811 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The thing is, most of the older rich men who date young, attractive women know already that she only wants their money - they don't care. Hence the actual sugar daddy sites. These men aren't dumb, they didn't get rich by being stupid. They know, and they agree to it.
I have a career and have had a higher Income than the men I have been in relationships with.
Bitch please.
has nothing to do with their actual income.
Sure it doesn't.
These men get angry women won't date them, but date men who make more money than call them gold-diggers.
Gee its like as if MONEY is a factor. I get your FDS and such a prostitute and all, but don't say its about ambition and not money when FDS is all about money. If it wasn't about money they won't be dictating that men must pay for all dates while you don't do jack in return (this makes you a prostitute by the way).
[–]Grand_Duty0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's why so many women are dating Asian dry cleaners who wake up at 5am and work till 10pm every day, because their "ambitious." You liar, stop gaslighting!
[–]Lokipoki290 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And looks on top of that don’t forget
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link
It’s almost as if our society normalizes and romanticizes women’s abuse
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link
I don't normalize it. I don't romanticise it.
I hate it. I am not a part of it. And anyone that participates in it is a disgrace to human kind.
That being said, women pick bad men, and often they KNOW they're bad men, they just ignore it because of his status or because he's hot.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago* (39 children) | Copy Link
going to repeat myself since you clear have reading difficulties
IT’S ALMOST 👏AS IF 👏OUR SOCIETY 👏NORMALIZES 👏AND ROMANTICIZES 👏WOMENS ABUSE 👏
[–]shininGbannette1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’d argue that society romanticized and normalizes abusé in general, jokes about women getting hit and hurt because it’s what it deserves, jokes about men being soft or less manly because their girlfriend screams and yells at them; the biggest difference is abuse against women is rightfully seen as more likely to happen and a more real threat
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
Society doesn't do that.
Women's abuse, unlike men's is BEING TAKEN SERIOUSLY.
And is actively mentioned in the news.
Men are arrested at the first sign of him abusing a woman.
They're put in jail at just an accusation of rape.
[–]ThrowAway473847299239 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
I respectfully disagree and have to slightly push back on this. Men are not always held accountable for being abusive. This is true for women as well though.
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Men are held way more accountable for their actions than women are and likely will ever will be.
[–]ThrowAway473847299231 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
What actions are we talking about exactly?
[–]noheyokay5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I am talking about in general. Men are charged with crimes way more often than women and that get longer sentencing than women for the same crime. You have the whole metoo thing. Then you have stuff like /r/niceguys and constant talk about men sending dick pics etc.
[–]ThrowAway473847299230 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Hold up…
I actually studied criminal justice in college and have studied constitutional law as well.
Men are charged more OFTEN (frequency) because men commit more crime. So if your issue is with frequency, that can be partially resolved if men stop committing so much crimes.
On the flip side, you are correct about the severity of the punishment for same crimes. That’s one of the things that is 100% valid criticism.
As far as MeToo goes, I have been falsely accused so I have a biased opinion on MeToo.
There’s constant talk of men sending dick picks…because men are constantly sending unsolicited dick pics. Are women suppose to just shut up about that? Nah, bro. As a dude, I’m with them on that issue. Men need to cut that shit out.
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
No they are arrested more often. There's nothing showing they outright commit more crime than women. Women get away with not even being arrested as they are never seen as the aggressor only as the victim. For example every guy knows if you call the police for domestic violence your wife/girlfriend will likely never be arrested for it let alone charged, in fact you the guy are more likely to be arrested as the victim.
Men need to cut that shit out.
And I agree, but the point is that men get held accountable far more than women do. Holding women accountable is seen as misogyny.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Not only are they not held accountable, women are taught that this behavior is flattering.
Go search our sub for all the women describing being told “he’s mean to you because he likes you” as a response to a boy hitting, kicking, groping, pushing, and/or insulting us and how the behavior was shrugged off as “boys will be boys”.
Women are indoctrinated to accept abuse from men as an inevitable consequence of being female from the time we are small children.
[–]ThrowAway473847299234 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is a thing men hear as well though.
“If she’s mean to you, she likes you.” So AGAIN, you’re making this a gendered thing when women do this shit as well and men have to deal with it too.
If she gets jealous, it’s because she cares.
If she hits you, it’s out of fear that you’re not paying attention so she needs to find a way to get your attention.
If she yells at you, it’s because she’s passionate about what she’s saying.
And one of my favorites…
If she cheats on you, it’s because she didn’t want to hurt you by leaving and instead chose to get her needs met elsewhere so she can stay with you.
lmfao…
We’re literally told that if our wive/gf cheats on us, it’s because she was trying to save the relationship. So miss me with that nonsense about being expected to just deal with abusive behavior.
And that doesn’t even touch the elephant in the room regarding domestic violence by women against men.
It goes both ways though. I've had numerous women hit me in attempts at flirting.
No one should be searching your sub for any reason though. The level of mental illness festering there is high
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not always.
Exceptions exist to every rule.
The point is that society DOESN'T PROTECT THEM.
It hunts them down and rightfully punishes them.
[–]ThrowAway473847299231 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, I understand that. I don’t disagree generally. I was just challenging what seems to be an assertion that men are always held accountable.
[–]yellow_sugar4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Only 5% of rapists get put in jail so no an accusation will most likely not get them put into jail. As someone who was raped, nothing was done even though I was a child and it’s very unlikely that a child would even know was rape is if it wasn’t done to them.
Abuse to women are definitely romanticised. Have you watched any romance movies lately? It happens all the time because we don’t consider the things they are showing as abuse.
3x as many women die from abuse than men. So please don’t say that only men abusing women is taken seriously when women die way more than men from abuse.
Only 5% of rapists get put in jail
Would very much like to see valid evidence of this. If there is a statistic, they're reported. If it's reported, there's a mans name on a police list. If it's on the list, he's found and arrested if the charges are valid. So many reports are fake. Literally women putting innocent men in jail because they regretted having sex with those men, or simply wanted to ruin their lives.
As someone who was raped
I'm very sorry that happened to you. And hopefully the man will be behind bars one day. Come forward with evidence or at least an accusation to police.
Abuse to women are definitely romanticised. Have you watched any romance movies lately?
50 shades of gray is essentially BDSM. And exclusively a film made for women.
There are disturbing statistics about % of women that watch abuse or rape porn...
3x as many women die from abuse than men
Never said most abuse didn't come from men. Men are more aggressive, and abuse will occur more often with men as the antagonist.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Oh so you’re an incel. Makes sense why you’d post this now, carry on.
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Oh, I'm actually engaged. And I talk to incels every day because I care about young men, and don't want them to get into the hateful mindset of hating society, especially women.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
LOL I’m not sure what the blind leading the blind is going to do
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your assumptions make you more blind than I
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Look at you making assumptions!
Femcel.
[–]ThrowAway473847299232 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
That’s hilarious considering 50 Shades of gray was a huge hit with WOMEN. But sure, continue with your Princess complex and refusal to take any responsibility for your choices. 🐸☕️
[–]fatalcharm2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
That’s exactly their point, abuse is being romanticised in society.
[–]ThrowAway473847299230 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
And female audiences enjoyed it. That doesn’t mean I’m denied it was romanticized, clearly it was, and women played a role in creating the demand for that kind of content. That’s all I’m saying.
[–]fatalcharm2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You are right, it’s women who rushed to see the movie and who loved it, not men. However, this is what people mean when they say that society romanticises women’s abuse. The women who rushed to see the movie (or read the books etc.) saw the abuse that happened in the movie as romantic. They found the relationship in that movie to be acceptable, when it wasn’t a healthy relationship at all.
This is the problem. Those women who loved the movie/books, have been conditioned by society to romanticise abuse and accept it.
[–]ThrowAway473847299232 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I agree. But I believe it’s important to highlight how many women enjoyed it because these issues are often ONLY framed as men oppressing women through a variety of channels including sex and relationships.
If we are going to try to “re-educate” (so to speak) men to reject the romanticization of abuse, then women need to hear that too. I simply reject the idea that the issues between men and women are EXCLUSIVELY the fault of men. Women need to be held accountable for their role in perpetuating this.
So much of the rhetoric is about what “men do to women” while we conveniently ignore the role women play. In the case of FSG, it was women who were the ones demanding this kind of content so women bare at least some responsibility.
This is just one example, but women perpetuate the same toxic male qualities they complain about by choosing these kinds of guys for sex and relationships. And it is that CHOICE that is currently being protected from the kind of criticism that men don’t get protected from.
With the sexual liberation and emancipation of women and the ability to CHOSE to make your own decisions about your sex life comes the responsibility of taking full ownership when you make poor choices. And that’s a message that is very unpopular because women don’t want to hear it, so it’s often outright dismissed as “misogyny”. Sexual freedom means you take full responsibility for your choices, including the poor ones.
By the way, my view on the movie is that it’s disgusting.
[–]fatalcharm1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thank you for explaining your view so well, I’m 100% with you.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Yeah because one poorly written book for bored white middle aged suburban housewives that is arguably hyped by media via manufactured consent is indicative of “women”.
[–]medlabunicorn3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don’t forget ‘Southern, Christian’ in that description. Iirc it sold the best in Missouri or something.
[–]ThrowAway473847299232 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I care VERY little that you’re annoyed by an example that proved the point.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It doesn’t prove anything is my point
[–]ThrowAway47384729923-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You don’t have to like or agree with the point for it to be valid.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Anecdotal evidence proves nothing
[–]no_name_needed_limtj0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
HAHAHHAHA IT IS ALMOST AS IF YOU ARE BEING SERIOUS
Lay off the drugs.
Why would any man give a shit?
[–]DoUEvenRedditBruh0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Which obese black FDS mod are you? Were you the fat one with pancake tits?
You are delusional. How does society romanticize women's abuse? You should stop huffing paint immediately
[–]TheUniqueProperty0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hello, yes, I would like some proofs, plz.
[–]sinfulthep-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women like it. Give the bitches what they want
[–]medlabunicorn1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is misandrist.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
The funniest part is that, yes, dicks that big do really exist in real life.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
No
dick 👏size 👏matters👏
https://www.therealfemaledatingstrategy.com/post/dick-size-matters
stop coddling these losers egos
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Depressi-n2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Especially the idea that its so important women are willing to put up with abuse for a big one.
If you put it that way, it's kinda sad, Someone accepting abuse(psychically and psychologically) just because the partner has a body feature the want. idk, it demonstrate the lack of self love the person has. that's something to worry about
[–]shininGbannette-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Im not denying that dick size matters it is what it is, but why are guys dicks then for caring about weight?
I’m sure a 10 in dick would literally ram into a woman’s cervix. If you want do to say that they matter, then go ahead, but people can and will call you a shallow slut.
[–]begonescrote-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It adjusts, not shrink
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]JorTZD3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ok this makes sense
[–]decoy88Black Male in London-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
X to Doubt. It has never been proven
[–]superincongruent0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Accurate.
Didn't know that hoe from Dragon Quest or whatever went to FDS.
[–]jodibusch0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh I was permanently banned on fds because I commented on some bs thread that if you cannot handle a healthy sex positive relationship as a fem-dom, and find you still struggle with emotional labor, you likely have boundary issues, and thus need to learn to set clear boundaries. Instant ban. Lmao. Oh boy, they are cray-cray. Q
[–]ChocolateTuxedo0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What the hell gentlemen! This leaks mega bitter energy. From the FDS comments i read yesterday they said HVM is more about personality than looks. She told the other women him being 6ft and his looks doesn’t mean high value. The good in bed part probably still applies annoyingly so cause women are lazy in bed themselves.
[–]banned101 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
r/FemaleDatingStrategy u/TheOGJammies u/HaveNoIdeaWhatToPick u/carameals u/liondale
[–]shininGbannette1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Shit you got the cavalry
[–]banned10-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes. Us kweens are sick of your lvm shit and there’s strength in numbers. Get him sis! r/FemaleDatingStrategy
Great. What are you guys gonna do call me a lvm for having my own ideas and not wanting to pay for everything? Maybe try to act superior and like you’re above these arguments, but un ironically call me a scrote? I’m genuinely quaking.
[–]passepar2ttreats objects like women0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Finally, a funny post.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
The funniest part about FDS is criticizing male shitty behaviours and then condoning those same behaviours when WOMEN do it.
[–]whatdidshewrite1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What’s a good example of FDS doing this? Genuinely curious
They say bodyshaming is wrong, but are the same who think it's okay to make short men feel bad with themselves (or men with small dicks).
Its like as if FDS are nothing but hypocrites or something.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
We’re the deciders and we get to decide the decisions
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Don't criticize shitty behaviours in men if you don't criticize then in women.
'Cause... You know, self-awareness.
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Who said we weren’t self aware? We just don’t give a fuck.
[–]KeyAd496 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
lol hypocrite
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Men and women are not the same
[–]KeyAd491 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
For lots of things sure but for the things I see lots of you complain about but still do to men is just plainly hypocritical. Examples are things like your sub being super against body shaming for women but have a bunch of posts body shaming men or saying it’s fine for women to date multiple men but not fine for men to do the same. This stuff is just being hypocritical. Saying “We’re women, get over it.” doesn’t make this any better.
[–]Crust_Lover0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why do even allow roasting random people on online dating? You would complain about men roasting woman. FDS is literally most hypocrite subreddit I seen.
[–]Urbantexasguy0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are you a female supremacist? You seem to come across as one. I’ve always been an egalitarian myself.
[–]supercactus6662 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow this comment opens the pandora shithole lmao
[–]Cloak770 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Citation?
[+]Vivid-Strawberry-180-10 points-9 points-8 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
delusional. white men are trash.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
racism is for LVW/LVM
[–]Vivid-Strawberry-180-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
To be fair all men are trash, but white men somehow think they are better. And they are not. You see it all the time on here about how FDS is just a black chicks corner and it cant be a meeting ground for white women having problems with trashy white men.
You sound like a very hurt damaged woman. Stay away from all men from here on out. You'd be doing them a big favor 👍🏻
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Say it with your chest!! 👏👏🙌🙌
Aww sounds like someone has been played and dumped by numerous white men 😂😂
[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
PURGE WEEK Auto-mod comment. Attention!
IT'S PUUUUUUURGE WEEEEEEEEEK
Booyah.
Once a year there are no rules.
(Well, there are still reddit wide rules. No Breaking THEM or the admins will fuck us up.)
Otherwise go nuts.
For a limited time THERE ARE NO RULES HERE
Explanation of Purge Week
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]otter6461a-1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don’t forget the more-or-less constant, “why do scrotes insist on calling us ‘females’?”
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]anon_likes_tendies39 points40 points41 points (32 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man42 points43 points44 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]PostModernFascist24 points25 points26 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bordersz4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]flyinghorse10 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sassylittlespoon0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]sassylittlespoon0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]sassylittlespoon-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]April_blossoms1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SonicBackScratcherGreen Eyed Devil0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]April_blossoms1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SonicBackScratcherGreen Eyed Devil2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]April_blossoms1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Brainless-Wonder4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Shanghai-on-the-Sea0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue371 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SlashCo802 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tickledpic3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]anon_likes_tendies2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xFallacyx690 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]anon_likes_tendies0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ItsTheHardCockLifeWinners don't take drugs24 points25 points26 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]silentium-est_aureum59 points60 points61 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]supercactus66632 points33 points34 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 13 points14 points15 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]silentium-est_aureum8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shanghai-on-the-Sea0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lokipoki2932 points33 points34 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]kvn_cher0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sleeparalyzis7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]69_Watermelon_4200 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cast-away-ramadi064 points5 points6 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)3 points4 points5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]cast-away-ramadi067 points8 points9 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]cast-away-ramadi06-1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]cast-away-ramadi060 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Empyrean_MX_PrimeI Found Pills (And ate Them!)0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cast-away-ramadi060 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cast-away-ramadi061 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Doctor992681 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sinfulthep0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA29 points30 points31 points (143 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-24 points25 points26 points (138 children) | Copy Link
[–]stageib4 points5 points6 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-10 points11 points12 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kaisha0017 points8 points9 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kaisha0017 points8 points9 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anthony-waltzs2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sassylittlespoon-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Shanghai-on-the-Sea4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inevitable-Fruit1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SirenaGatita-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA5 points6 points7 points (116 children) | Copy Link
[–]reluctantly_red5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inevitable-Fruit4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]psypD1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]terrn19818 points9 points10 points (32 children) | Copy Link
[–]mannyso2 points3 points4 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]sassylittlespoon2 points3 points4 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]mannyso1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]sassylittlespoon1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]mannyso1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]sassylittlespoon0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]reluctantly_red4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]otter6461a0 points1 point2 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhyth71 point2 points3 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]CentralAdmin4 points5 points6 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kaisha0011 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mannyso0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheUniqueProperty0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhyth70 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Coder-Cat1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299235 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial2 points3 points4 points (68 children) | Copy Link
[–]CentralAdmin2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country3 points4 points5 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial6 points7 points8 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country-1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]sinfulthep2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LitBastard1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheJim66Red God-Emperor of Slut Country0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]steadfast_desireSex Positive5 points6 points7 points (56 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299235 points6 points7 points (53 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial4 points5 points6 points (43 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299238 points9 points10 points (40 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaylen-Gads2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway47384729923-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial4 points5 points6 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299234 points5 points6 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial6 points7 points8 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]CentralAdmin4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299234 points5 points6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299230 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kaisha0010 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box--1 points0 points1 point (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299231 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box-0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299230 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inevitable-Fruit0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]psypD0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inevitable-Fruit0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]steadfast_desireSex Positive2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mannyso0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pussandra-1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]pussandra0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Poshey1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sinfulthep0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]psypD0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandora_box--1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ItsTheHardCockLifeWinners don't take drugs-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]no_name_needed_limtj1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299233 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shininGbannette0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThatGirl501 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThatGirl50-1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThatGirl500 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThatGirl500 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OXOzymandiasPurple Rain and Strawberry Beret5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GloeSticc2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GloeSticc0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut2 points3 points4 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA13 points14 points15 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]terrn19810 points1 point2 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]kanray86No Pill10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sinfulthep7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]terrn1981-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]sinfulthep3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue372 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]terrn19810 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]terrn19811 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grand_Duty0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lokipoki290 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial7 points8 points9 points (46 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 10 points11 points12 points (40 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-2 points-1 points0 points (39 children) | Copy Link
[–]shininGbannette1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 5 points6 points7 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299239 points10 points11 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299231 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay5 points6 points7 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299230 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299234 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299231 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]yellow_sugar4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-4 points-3 points-2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial-5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]geyejoe7No Pill[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299232 points3 points4 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]fatalcharm2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299230 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]fatalcharm2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299232 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]fatalcharm1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]medlabunicorn3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway473847299232 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway47384729923-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]no_name_needed_limtj0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]psypD0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoUEvenRedditBruh0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheUniqueProperty0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sinfulthep-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]medlabunicorn1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (12 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA2 points3 points4 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (9 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial9 points10 points11 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Depressi-n2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shininGbannette-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]69_Watermelon_4200 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]begonescrote-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]JorTZD3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]decoy88Black Male in London-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]superincongruent0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jodibusch0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChocolateTuxedo0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]banned101 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]shininGbannette1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]banned10-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]shininGbannette0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]passepar2ttreats objects like women0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (20 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA9 points10 points11 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]whatdidshewrite1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noheyokay1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoerAntifeminist but not MRA9 points10 points11 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]KeyAd496 points7 points8 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]KeyAd491 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Crust_Lover0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Urbantexasguy0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]supercactus6662 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cloak770 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Vivid-Strawberry-180-10 points-9 points-8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vivid-Strawberry-180-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheOGJammiesPlatinum Select While You Free Trial1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tongue370 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]otter6461a-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link