It's always funny going into redpill communities and seeing them swear "Women are loved for who they are", "Women are looked at as perfect", "Women only care about resources and will only "tRuLy DeSiRe" the few top men", "Look at these statistics on how much easier things are for women", "Women get more government help than men" but they never look at statistics and experiences that show men in a negative light.

Now, getting into the point of the title/post, when we talk about generalizations based on gender, why wouldn't you treat the less problematic people in society better? One gender is responsible for the majority of crime, and overwhelmingly so when it's violent crimes. One gender is known to more likely externalize their problems. One gender is less likely to cultivate social bonds of any type. One gender has an outgroup bias that the redpill and MRA doesn't want to acknowledge. One gender is less likely to go get professional help for their instability and mental health problems.

So think about it. Why wouldn't people not like unstable, finger pointing, violent, selfish people who make their problems everyone else's problems?

"OMG, LILITH IS JUSTIFYING MISANDRY! I KNEW IT! SHE HATES MEN."

I'm addressing the generalizations with deliberately ignored generalizations with statistics and studies to back it up. Similar to how guys here will complain about dating dynamics but then ignore the hookup statistics, difference of sex drives, and differences in orgasm rates.

And there's a difference between "a woman and a man do the exact same thing and society decided the woman is better" and "alot of people who do these terrible things are generally men, so people become more cautious of men and the people who less favorable just so happen to be men". While most people are upset about the former, the manosphere is more upset about the later.