Inspired by a post with a similar name.

Every year there over 20 million of people, including young women that apply for the lottery based visa to move to the United States, yet less than 1% get selected.

At the same time, there are millions of men complaining about how hard it is to date women, amd there is data that backs them up, like when you look at dating app response rate difference between men and women, or the fact that young men are twice as likely to be single as young women. Also at the same, governments around the world are complaining about the "birth rate decline".

These problems can be solved together. What the government allows a "dating visa" ; women are allowed to move to the U.S, as long as they are dating a preapproved man who is having a hard time finding a girlfriend, and the women consented to this?

If you think about it, there are enough women in the 3rd world to supply every man in the 1st world with a girlfriend. Men could experience dating the same way some women experience dating and have an app with hundreds of women willing to date them.

And for the women, this would be massively beneficial as well. Contrary to popular belief, there are "middle class" women in South America, Southeast Asia, and Africa. A single, college educated nurse in the Philippines can make $500 USD a month, but if she dates an American and has a sponsored visa, she can make $5000 a month.

The women wouldn't get paid directly by the men, but they get to 10x there income and massively improve their quality of life by moving to the US. And the government would support this because more less single people would directly correlate to more babies to solve the birth rate decline, and they wouldn't have to use much government spending, just change laws.

Since most blue pill women agree women should have agency over who they date, they should have no problem with this. No longer would it be difficult for a man to find a woman to the point where most young men are single. But they will have a problem with it because women would lose a certain amount of control over men's dating lives.

They, for some reason REVEL in the idea of men not having sex, it excites them. Go to the more radical subs, like the one that rhymes with "highC" they actively cheer on birth rate decline and not for environmental reasons, but to "punish" men by not having sex with them.

Men would be happy, the government would be happy, the women dating the nen would be happy, but women not dating them would shame the men and do everything they can to block their happiness.