I'm asking this as a legitimate question rather than going on a rant about it; I don't suffer from any mental illness. I'm not a racist. I'm not a misogynist. I'm not an American. I've never killed anyone. Why are feminist journalists comparing me to Elliot Rodger?

Over the past few days, it seems like all I've read is this sense of "white male entitlement" that Rodger had (in spite of the fact that Rodger wasn't white, didn't identify as white and it was something of a sticking point for him in his manifesto). I'm a white male, which presumably places me firmly in that category but can't recall ever feeling "entitled" to anything and, if I ever have, it would certainly not be because of my race or sex (and never have I felt entitled to another human being).

The big problem with all of these claims about Elliot Rodger is that they are demonstrably false. Rodger had no connection to the Men's Rights Movement. He wasn't white. The overwhelming majority of men don't feel "entitlement" of any kind outside of what they are granted by law. And if feminist journalists are so eager to spew vitriol at Elliot Rodger for being a white guy (not that he was white), why not blame other kinds of groups? Eurasians. Americans. Virgins. The mentally ill. Pokémon fans.

I actually used to be hesitant to group feminists together as one entity because I didn't want to alienate any good ones in the group but between "male entitlement" and "#YesAllWomen", it doesn't bother me anymore. It's clear now that feminism has reached the same level as Jack Thompson; using tragedies to further their own agendas. In Jack's case, it was trying to ban violent video games. In feminism's case, it's using sexist (and racist) biases to demonise men and groups interested in supporting men's issues. I don't think the fact that four men and two women died even matters to them.