BPers keep saying that hypergamy is not real, women's tastes are just variaed as men's ones. evo-psych is sexist pseudosceine. According to BPers, women are selective only because of threats and slut-shaming. If this is the case, would befriending a progressive woman to the point where she feels safe being alone with you allow you to get sex as eaasily as women and gay men are getting it?

Assumption 1

Men find most women sexually attractive, this is what studies and data show. If you have ever tried gay dating apps you'll see that gay men also find most average and below average men sexually attractive.

thus

If women's testes are just as varied as men's ones, they should find most men physically/sexually attractive.

Assumption 2

Women face many dangers and slut-shaming in dating, this is the reason why are more selective than men.

thus

Getting a progressive female friend, better if she participated in casual sex in the past, who feels safe around you should bypass these two obstacles women face or at least greatly reduce them. If she's less progressive you should at least be likely to get dates.

If you don't agree with this as you don't think social reasons are enough to explain the issue, what do you are the exact biological/evolutionary differences between men and women's sexuality? Are you opene to concede that evo-psych has its merits or do you think there are other explanations?