Resubmitted cuz of auto mod.

It’s interesting how I’ve seen texts from a particular subreddit where the guy would make sexual advancements and laments about ‘nice guy finishing last’ when rejected, sometimes even calling OP a slt/whre/tr*mp and saying there are no more high value women in the world.

Even as a dude, other dudes perplexed me. I’m pretty certain some of these dudes want a prude virgin as a gf and shame other women in general for promiscuity, but would harass other women in private to be promiscuous for them?

I’ve kinda dabbled in Madonna-whore theory but I wanna know all of y’all thoughts on ‘nice guys’ and where this thought process exists.

Before you tell me I’m a white knight or some dumb shit, just know that none of my other guy friends would have such sore-a** mentality of “nice guy”-ing a girl (which is the antithesis of red pill). They the type of people who would express displeasure for a few hours through beers and move on to improve what they can until they succeed.

My take is that - multiple failures (rejections); - bad advice (be yourself, be nice and she’ll jump all over you); - bad socialisation; - correspondence bias (aka fundamental attribution error which makes people assume a general character of others, in many cases people they call “Ch*d” from certain situations rather than holistically); - lack of self-awareness of flaws and actual sexual market value (SMV), aka self-enhancement and; - manosphere propaganda which resonates with their anger

are variables to some of the thinking. But how do you explain the cognitive dissonance of DMing people in private to be sexually open, but publicly shame them because of being sexually open?