When you associate men who can't get laid with violence and associate men happiness with being in a relationship. You are ironically blaming women for why lonely men exist.

It's common for a lot of women to say that it's not women fault why men can't get laid. And it's not their problem to worry about that.

Ok cool. But these are usually the same women to say that men are more likely to be violent when they can't get laid. Or bring up statistics about men being more happy in marriage. And saying that men are less happy without women. Saying men are more likely to die earlier.

I recently argued on another thread about this. Where women are pushing the narrative that men who don't get laid are more likely to harm women. Even though women are more likely to be harmed by their husbands or boyfriends (you know men that can already get laid). But this would go against their "men who can't get laid are violent losers" narrative though.

But use your brain here guys. If women are not the blame for men feeling lonely. Then how are women the source of men's happiness? I think this is another example of society wanting to have it both ways, want their cake, and want to eat it too. You want men to not blame their relationship problems on women. But you still want women to be the source of men's happiness and success in life though. Don't you see the contradictions here?

“It’s not women’s job to fix men’s loneliness,” and also say:

“Men without women are miserable and dangerous, so it’s women who stabilize them.”

That makes women both not responsible yet simultaneously the primary source of men’s well-being.

Again It's so funny how people don't see how they ironically blame the male loneliness epidemic on women, every time they try to put women in the center of male happiness.

If women aren’t the cause of male loneliness, then they can’t also be the cure, yet society constantly frames them as both."

Title: on*