I wonder why a lot of redpillers believe that women who have advanced degrees (Master's or above) would be at a disadvantage when it comes to dating. When reading redpilled content (or content that I believe is redpilled) on the internet, they seem to favour women who are "young, fertile and feminine" and that "no men care about a woman's career or degrees."

Ironically, these same men ask these same women "what do you bring to the table"? This seems to be regarding their resources, as well as personality traits, fertility and femininity. These are also the same men to outright reject a woman if she brings nothing else onto the table other than beauty, but they'd go for that type of woman rather than a woman with a degree simply because they assume she is older and "used up".

I have also noticed that these same men either tend to have nothing to offer themselves or are much older.

Well, many people get degrees in order to kickstart their career at a higher position than their non-university educated peers, therefore earning money at a faster rate. Similar things can be said about apprenticeships.

But why all the bashing of women with degrees/a stable career? Wouldn't that bring him money, responsibility and resources to the table? Or is it because they're intimidated by these same women? Or maybe they assume these women "have hit the wall"?