TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

What possible alternative is there...?

catcatdog

February 20, 2016
1190 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://imgur.com/U3VUYvp
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title What possible alternative is there...?
Author

catcatdog

Upvotes 1190
Comments 211
Date February 20, 2016 11:53 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/46psvi/what_possible_alternative_is_there/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/what-possible-alternative-is-there.955703
https://theredarchive.com/post/955703
Top posts by catcatdog

Matthew Hussey on "Who pays on a first date?"

6 upvotes
June 14, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]omegaphallic 265 points266 points267 points 10 years ago (56 children) | Copy Link

The government doesn't decide if you were raped or not, the courts decide if you can PROVE it sufficently to punish that person under the law.

[–]IHateNaziPuns 71 points72 points73 points 10 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. OJ murdered his wife as a matter of fact and as a matter of civil law, but not as a matter of criminal law. Our system recognizes that it will not always punish the guilty. If you were raped, then you know you were raped, whether your assailant is in jail or not. Stop looking to the government to be your ultimate decider of truth.

[–]ellimist 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

...

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago* (20 children) | Copy Link

Except she's specifically referring to a case where all the victim is asking for is to be let out of a legal contract because of being raped and sexually assaulted, and they are trying to say "no you have to stay in the contract because you weren't raped."

She's not even asking him to go to jail, and her career kind of depends on the courts being the deciding factor. It's not even about justice, all she's looking for is freedom.

Edit: since people are missing the entire point, I'm saying that IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE, the personal "justice" DOES depend on the courts. Whether that be for her or for Dr. Luke. Nowhere did I say my personal beliefs or judgements about who is right, the point is that comparing this to the OJ case makes absolutely no sense.

[–]galloog1 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Then she should sue and provide proof. Otherwise she is just trying to get out of a contract. The only recourse here is to prove in a court of law that you have had a crime committed against you with a preponderance of evidence. That is literally why we have a civil court system.

[–]pluvoaz 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately for her the only 'proof' available is her own prior deposition where she said she wasn't assaulted or raped. This is a contract dispute disguised as a rape. That's why they're in civil court & not in criminal court. This kind of nonsense is a disservice to real rape victims.

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Well that's what she's attempting to do. She's been engaged in a legal battle.

[–]enjoycarrots 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't see how this changes the argument very much. If you want the government to act against a rape, you need to provide evidence and establish that it took place. The specifics of that will depend on which system you are trying to go through, be it criminal law, a civil case, or otherwise. A mere accusation or your own personal knowledge that you were raped is not sufficient to get you out of a legal contract.

It's a shitty situation to be in, for sure. But she can't expect the government to act without something more than her accusation.

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What argument? He said if that's the case, she should sue and provide evidence, to which I said well yeah, that's what she is trying to do. As in both sue and provide proof.

So, again, what argument? If she's telling the truth, and doesn't have proof, it fucking sucks but there isn't much anyone can do about that, just like literally anyone else who got wronged, but can't prove it, gets boned. I never said anywhere that she should get what she wants just because she wants it. If someone says well if she wants to change it, then she should do this, and that's exactly the steps she's taking to change it...and I point that out...what's being argued? I stated a fact.

[–]enjoycarrots 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I misunderstood your point a bit, because in context we're talking about Gaga's statement in the OP, that laments the government's involvement in this process. Gaga seems to think she should get what she wants, without having to prove it.

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

It's been happening a lot in this thread, I've noticed. People keep responding to me arguing about stuff I never even said and it's weird. Personally, I don't think that's what Lady Gaga is saying, or at least was trying to say, wording aside, as there was more to the quote, and to me, it was speaking for all people that deal with rape and assault in any manner, men included, but that's not even something I want to get into because that's all personal interpretation and whether or not she used the right words and blah blaaaaah

Edit: typos

[–]enjoycarrots 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that's what Lady Gaga is saying, or at least was trying to say, wording aside, as there was more to the quote,

I agree. What she said wasn't as simple as the OP is saying.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay, but I'm not talking about any of that, one way or another. I'm not looking to discuss who's innocent, who's motives are what, I'm strictly talking about what's being claimed, and what's being asked for, in a factual sense. Comparing it to the OJ case doesn't make any sense. I am seriously only saying that in this particular situation, the result she is hoping for does solely depend on the court system. That isn't the case for other people who depend on the systems decisions just for closure, which is a bad idea, as sad as that is to say. That is literally all I am trying to say.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

She chose to sign a contract, not get raped and abused by the person involved in the contract. Pretty sure those terms weren't outlined. That's a ridiculous argument to make.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Actually, no, I'm not arguing that she was definitely raped, I'm arguing that you're saying entering into a contract is a choice, which it is, but being raped is not part of that contract, so if she was, then the fact that she signed the contract willingly is irrelevant.

People keep saying that she chose to sign the contract so she should be blamed for her choices, not even caring about the outcome of the trial. Everyone that's convinced she's making a false rape claim, and absolutely crucifying her for it, without knowing all of the details are just as bad as the people that are immediately convinced the accused is absolutely a rapist. And no one sees the irony I guess.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What? Can you read? That's a serious question. The contract was absolutely the subject of this discussion, and I'm not arguing about whatever the hell t is YOU keep trying to argue with me about. YOU KEEP arguing shit that isn't even there, I assume just to feel special.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Let's say that you contracted me to make some recordings for you, because you or your professional head hunters heard me sing and experienced my charisma that electrified an audience at the local tavern and farm show, so you offer me a contract not knowing how successful or lucrative it will be.

You believe in me for some reasons and you invest in me, get me expensive training and lessons, and perhaps you even pay to move me out to Hollywood or Los Angeles, set me up in a nice apartment, give me spending cash, buy me all sorts of clothing and stuff. Then you pay for expensive studio time, pay for a band, and pay all the engineers and assorted staff. Then you pay for advertising and radio spots and recording production, cd's, and distribution. Then you pay for concerts, road crews, tour buses, lodging, food, misc expenses, equipment and all the staff required to put on the shows. This is a drop in the bucket as theres many more expenses to get a me from a normal life to stardom, and it's all a risk. I might never even become a star. All your investments may never pay off. All those millions of dollars you invested in me...

Do you believe that you should be paid per our contract stipulations?

Do you believe that you deserve to have your risks and investments protected?

Do you believe that you deserve your contracted compensation for your investment and risks that you took... the chance that you took on me?

... or am I your slave and deserve my freedom from your oppressive reign over me?

... or am I obligated to you for what you paid me and invested in me?

Should I pay my dues for fame and fortune, complete my contract with you and be thankful for the opportunity and success, then after our contract has completed I can then negotiate a better contract with much more bargaining power now that I am so popular and have much more value than I had when I was a nobody that you took a chance on?

Maybe I accuse you of rape to get out of the contract... should a court allow me out of your contract even though I have previously admitted that you didn't rape me and have absolutely no evidence that you raped me other than my word?

Should a court deprive you of the fruits of your investments in me based on nothing but my word?

What if I am lying and falsely accusing you??

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry that you wasted your time typing that all out considering it's completely irrelevant to what I said. I'm sorry you read what I said and somehow took that as me arguing he's absolutely guilty, and she's absolutely innocent, but if you want to, go back and read it again and maybe you'll actually see what I was actually saying, but that's up to you.

Nothing I said was about whether or not it's a legitimate claim. I was responding to someone saying that you can't depend on the system for your personal feelings of justice, and I'm saying that unfortunately for her, if operating under the thought that she IS telling the truth for arguments sake, that her only option IS to depend on that, considering what she's asking for, so that isn't a valid argument in this case. And really, "the justice system failing ANYBODY, and we're just supposed to swallow it" shouldn't ever be a valid argument, and yet I see it all the time, regarding both victims of rape, and victims of false rape claims.

I am not even remotely arguing that she's to believed at all costs, but who the hell wants to even open that can of worms?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"She's not even asking him to go to jail, and her career kind of depends on the courts being the deciding factor. It's not even about justice, all she's looking for is freedom."

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes? I'm perfectly aware of what I said, but you aren't. I think that's where the problem lies.

[–]68696c6c 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stop looking to the government to be your ultimate decider of truth.

If you look to the government to find the truth, you're gonna have a baaaad time.

[+]justcantwin1111 -19 points-18 points-17 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

and whites are mass murderers as a matter of fact and a matter of civil law but got away with it in history because they wrote the fucking laws.

[–]JackBond1234 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Don't tell Rwanda.

[+]justcantwin1111 -9 points-8 points-7 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

and damn sure don't mention it to those damn natives.

[–]KaBar42 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is what happened in America shameful? Absolutely. Did all whites do it, absolutely not.

But where the fuck is anything you said relevant? OC mentioned OJ. An individual. You mentioned whites. An entire race of people.

So I'm failing to see how any of this is relevant to what /u/IHateNaziPuns said.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why not? Its not like they're descendents of the winners of wars. Where's the harm?

[–]Uncletime 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically every race mass murders.

[–]Plain_Bread 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

But the government decides on the definition of rape, therefore deciding if you were raped or not.

[–]whiteguycash 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Semantics is a rapist. we should repeal all language because language is oppressive by nature. Anybody attempting to communicate using vocal cords, writing, or any otherwise communicable language ought to be hung by the neck until they are dead.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

No, the government examines whether the suspect commited the criminal act of rape

[–]Plain_Bread -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

http://bensguide.gpo.gov/a-who-makes

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Since there are no laws against being raped, the government is not in a position to determine whether or not someone was raped. There are laws against committing rape, and as such the government is in a position to determine whether or not someone committed the act of rape.

the more you know

[–]Plain_Bread -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You have been raped if somebody raped you, so whoever decides what rape is also decides if you have been raped.

[–]i_got_pig_iron 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

A verdict of 'not guilty' means that the prosecution failed to demonstrate a fact (or set of facts) beyond a reasonable doubt. It is not the same as saying that a thing did not happen, but that the evidentiary threshold has not been met. We do not, technically, find people innocent.

Thus, a person may have had sex with another without that person's consent, but there may be a lack of evidence to prove that this occurred beyond a reasonable doubt.

[–]Plain_Bread -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was talking about definitions, not legal prosecution.

[–]i_got_pig_iron 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Legal definitions are not necessarily exhaustive, nor should we solely rely upon them to determine whether or not something is rape. To accept the premise that the legal definition is the sole definition would, in many places, require us to hold that men cannot be raped. That is utterly inconsistent with the values of this sub.

[–]Plain_Bread -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, legally the legal definition is what counts and that's all I was talking about.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Some might find that the logical conclusion of the court's decision, some might not. The point still stands: the government does not decide if someone was raped, they decide if someone committed the act of raping

[–]Plain_Bread -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was talking about definitions, not legal prosecution.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Someone could be found not guilty of rape, yet the victim could still have been raped by someone else.

[–]Plain_Bread -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone could be found not guilty of rape, yet the victim could still have been raped by someone else.

And could it be that this victim fullfills the definition of having been raped? Which does not include having your rapist convicted?

I feel kind of silly defending my jokish comment to people who don't seem to read my answers.

[–]Meistermalkav 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

counter example.

A was with B at night, after a party. For a period of 3 hours, A and B were in the room. when they come out, A is crying and claiming A has been raped, while B says A threathened B if B would not give A 100 bucks for the sex, A would say B raped her.

Can you think of a case where the people who decided what rape was can resolve if A was raped by B?

[–]Plain_Bread 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, if they magically know all of the facts.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Plain_Bread 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank god the parliament isn't a part of the government.

[–]corezon 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for being the voice of reason in this thread.

[–]Bobsupman 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

To be fair the police have to investigate and decide whether or not an assault occurred and then a prosecutor has to decide whether or not to prosecute a case (and that decision isn't based on whether or not someone was raped but rather can they win that case or not). So in a way they do decide whether or not you were raped.

What she said was slightly stupid but in a way right.

[–]Caelamid 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To provide an alternative perspective: If someone asserts, even fully believes, they were raped.. then it's as good as true to them. They can have feelings all they like. They were "raped."

What the cannot do is consequently punish whoever they choose.

So this statement reads better as, "don't want to live somewhere where the government decides who to punish".

That's the feeling I take away, at least.

[–]locks_are_paranoid 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I don't want to live in a society where the government decides if someone was murdered or not."

See how stupid it sounds.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even if the person raped them or not, their reputation and anything is already fucked despite the outcome. So even if a rapist was set free, they'd be screwed socially where no one wants to be around them and jobs will never hire them because of the media attention. Now the downside is the ones who don't rape and were accused, those guys are the victims of wrongful accusations and their lives are never the same again.

[–]DavidByron2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Story appears fake:

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/46w3p0/did_lady_gaga_really_say_that_the_government/

[–]Lagkiller 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The government doesn't decide...the courts decide

TIL that courts aren't part of the government

[–][deleted] 388 points389 points390 points 10 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

Well if she doesn't want to live in a country where that is so, then she should go to a place in the Middle East for example and have a religious leader decide instead.

[–]mikesteane 127 points128 points129 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Or a country where law and order (patriarchy) has completely broken down and nobody decides if you were raped because nobody cares.

[–]SyllableLogic 48 points49 points50 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Somalia?

[–]kjpster 36 points37 points38 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

South Sudan

[–]Voidwarlock 35 points36 points37 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

New Jersey

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Detroit.

[–]Vance87 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

British accent Hello Cleveland!

[–]just_zhis_guy 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Easy there Guardian.

[–]Voidwarlock 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If Russia looks like the way it does, imagine New Jersey.

[–]dominotw 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

but, religious leader is the govt in the middle east.

[–]Revoran 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

That's a bit of a broad statement. It varies from country to country. Some of them are absolute monarchies where the clergy have a lot of influence on laws / judiciary (Saudi Arabia), others are actual democracies but with theocratic elements (Iran), still others are secular democracies albeit most of the country is one religion (Turkey, Israel, Kurdistan), others are actual theocracies (IS). Some were ruled by secular dictators until recently (Iraq, Syria).

[–]Noodle36 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The Islamic Republic of Iran is most definitely not a democracy. It has a democratically elected parliament and preident, but they're secondary to the Supreme Council of Islamic clerics, and everything is subordinate to Ayatollah Khamenei. The clerics decide who can run in the elections, and what laws they're allowed to pass. You could also make an argument that post-2008 the IRGC and militias are at least as powerful as the clerics themselves, but it is most definitely a theocracy before it's a democracy.

[–]waffenwolf 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair I think Irans governmental structure is perfect for the Middle East, Have democratic institutions but with a dictator on the sidelines to suppress the inevitable periods of chaos.

[–]Mikeavelli 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't they have a puppet democracy for show or something?

[–]waffenwolf 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The democratically elected president runs the contry on a diplomatic and economic level. The supreme leader has full control of the military and religious establishment and can and does dictate the president if and when he needs to, if that makes sense

[–]hypnobearcoup 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or a country without that pesky legal system where a mob sorts things out.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is one of the best comments I've seen in a while.

[–]digger64 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hey! No fair! Those countries just imprison raped women now; they almost never stone them to death for adultery.

That aside, I'm pretty sure she's NOT intending to suggest that accused rapists should be punished without a trial - she's talking about comforting victims rather than cross-examining them and treating them skeptically. In other words, she wants therapists instead of, or in addition to, police. Yeah, in a perfect world, with governments that weren't already in debt...

But...adequate money for rape crisis centers does sound like a good idea - a lot more important than that new stadium. You have the right to victim's counselling. If you cannot afford one, a grad school psych intern will be provided for you immediately - be better than asking cops to be shock and trauma experts.

[–]Wasuremaru 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The thing is, you HAVE to be able to cross examine. That's a basic thing that a defense lawyer does. You have to cast doubt on or disprove the testimony of witnesses that testify against you. If you cant, you end up with kangaroo courts.

[–]digger64 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Obviously. I was suggesting that even Lady Gaga knows that. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe she cannot think calmly about the matter. She doesn't seem that stupid, but if she personally knows women who were treated badly by the police...

There's been a recent case in Canada where three women have seemingly made badly exaggerated accusations against a former CBC radio personality. Accusations that went first to the media, then to the police, and eventually to court - where they FINALLY they fell apart under obvious questions that the police should have asked long before going to court, especially since the purported crimes were not fresh.

And then there's Julian Assange, of Wikileaks.

It's tricky. The police ought to be asking skeptical questions as soon as possible, but initially, ordinary police officers are far from ideal people to be interviewing victims in deep shock. Long before court though, people claiming to be victims need to face skeptical interviewers.

[–]Diplomjodler 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or maybe she could just move to the moon.

[–]DavidByron2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Story appears fake:

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/46w3p0/did_lady_gaga_really_say_that_the_government/

[–]mwobuddy 185 points186 points187 points 10 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I just decided I was raped. The government can't decide it for me. Time for the government to go arrest and imprison my 'rapist' for a long time, because I decided for myself what rape was.

Apparently, I still need the government to decide what rape was, because they have to imprison based on that decision. They just shouldn't get to decide if I was or wasn't raped.

Am I missing anything else logically inconsistent in the argument?

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]poolsidepoop 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Unacceptable!

[–]RobDog101 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh my god...Lemongrab is a feminist. It makes so sense. He blames all his faults on the man (who ironically is a princess), doesn't believe in due process, is ruled by erratic emotions and dictates what is and isn't "acceptable" speech. He even has a compulsive eating disorder that caused him to eat his own "brother". And to top it all off his name was originally going to be Lemonsnatch, a play on sourpuss.

[–]ziekktx 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not if you raped me first!

[–]humanmeat 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Comment Rape was approved unanimously by Tumblr in 2015 "as a thing", the law of social media.

You've been raped, seek counselling, steer clear of triggers.

[–]Dualmilion 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She said something stupid without really thinking about it. She seems ignorant of the fact that there are plenty of false rape accusations

[–]justcantwin1111 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she doesn't give a shit to be honest.

[–]Everythings_Rape 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Am I missing anything else logically inconsistent in the argument?

Now you got it. Everythings rape.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]brightheaded 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

We are not the biggest country

[–]Mrmojoman0 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

that would be russia. canada comes in second.

[–]WaitingToBeBanned 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And then China, depending on who you ask.

[–]Plain_Bread 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Taiwan if you ask Taiwan.

[–]WaitingToBeBanned 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, they say the US.

[–]Meistermalkav 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lady Gaga "is" a "talented" "performer", phenomenal "musician", but "she" should "probably" "stick" to "music".

Fixed that for you.

[+]corezon -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Am I missing anything else logically inconsistent in the argument?

You're definitely missing the difference between "government" and "jury of your peers." Maybe actually read a thing before making a snap response?

[–]Lagkiller -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're definitely missing the difference between "government" and "jury of your peers."

A jury selected by the government? Also, one can choose not to have a jury trial and have a trial by judge.

[–][deleted] 104 points105 points106 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This whole thing is such a fucking joke.
The message to women: If you're sexually assaulted, don't go the police right away, don't go them next day, the next week, or month, or year, or five years, go to them ten years later where no possible evidence can now exist and use it as leverage to get something you want, custody of the kids, settlement money, termination of your contract with Sony, anything you want. Incredible.

[–]dungone 25 points26 points27 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, you don't even have to get raped. Just say you were 10 years ago. Then bitch about the injustice!

[+]WaitingToBeBanned -14 points-13 points-12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

termination of your contract with Sony

Replace Sony with Microsoft/Xbox Live and crying rape suddenly seems semi-reasonable.

[–]locks_are_paranoid 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just like women are doing to Bill Cosby right now.

[–]DavidByron2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Story appears fake:

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/46w3p0/did_lady_gaga_really_say_that_the_government/

[–]Fall_of_the_west 47 points48 points49 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

So lynch mobs?

[–]Commander_Uhltes 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, so progressive!

[–]Tyrone_Shekelstein 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lady Gaga raped me, go get her boys!

[–]kenba2099 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't be afraid to use your fingernails!

[–]SubutaiBahadur 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

We've officially gone full 360 degrees since the Bronze Age.

[–]chaku89 36 points37 points38 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I dont want to live in a Country where the Police decided if my house was broken into or not. They should #believe if i feel like ive been robbed and put someone in jail.

[–]acelister 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone broke in and stole my collection of stamps worth ten million. No, officer, you can't investigate unless you're not representing the laws of this government, because you might decide I wasn't broken into, and have never collected stamps.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"I don't want to live in a country where the government decides what is and isn't a crime."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We can dream.

[–]TheDongerNeedsFood 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If Lady Gaga is to be the one who decides whether or not she was raped, then her rapist should be able to decide his own punishment.

[–]Political_Cuttlefish 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Context?

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (20 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Doctor_Loggins 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

She was allegedly raped and abused by her producer for a long time starting ten years ago. Slightly different.

It's a terrible situation to be in, and probably indicative of how shitty and shady the recording industry can be. It's not "rape culture." It's "the law."

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]acelister 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It does sound really strange, that she would consider signing a new contract in the first place.

[–]Doctor_Loggins 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not about to berate people for treating dr luke as guilty before the trial and then turn around and treat her as guilty. There are doubtless a lot of facts we're not privy to, so I'm treating everything with the same level of healthy skepticism.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If buyers remorse = then raped.

[–]Darkling5499 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

she, under oath, admitted multiple times that he's never raped or sexually assaulted her.

[–]matthewhale 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Source on that please? Would love to read that.

[–]Darkling5499 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

there's quite a few, here's the first one i found via a quick google: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2802370/kesha-swore-oath-2011-deposition-dr-luke-did-not-sexually-abuse-undercutting-rape-allegations-latest-lawsuit.html

[–]matthewhale 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was just being lazy, and lots of other people probably didn't know about this information either so it's best to give links to statements like that :)

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think /u/Darkling5499 might be referring to this https://www.tmz.com/2014/10/21/kesha-dr-luke-sexual-assault-rape-deposition-lawsuit/

[–]matthewhale 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you very much!

[–]Doctor_Loggins 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If we believe she might lie about being abused, is it such a stretch that she might lie about not being abused? I'm not talking in a legal context here. Just as an outsider speculating on events.

[–]Darkling5499 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

there's a difference between going around and telling people he raped you at the same time you want out of your contract, and telling a judge he didn't rape you while under oath.

[–]Doctor_Loggins 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's hardly unheard of for people to lie and cover for their abusers, especially in official settings. My step mother was an abusive piece of shit but i covered for her for years. And ultimately, like kesha, i have only myself to blame when she never suffered for it. But that doesn't mean she wasn't a piece of shit, and it didn't mean that my living situation wasn't bad.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So if you filed charges against her today, would have the reasonable expectation of winning?

[–]Doctor_Loggins 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Again, not what I'm saying. All I'm saying is it's a shit position to be in.

[–]Celda 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Stating that someone has not attacked you in 2011 doesn't mean that you're lying about an attack that happened in 2016.

But if the alleged attack happened before 2011, then that's relevant.

[–]Darkling5499 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

her statement is that he's been raping / sexually assaulting her since she was 18, not just one time in 2016.

[–]coachbradb 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

What is wrong with these people. So if someone says they were raped we just convict? We have laws for a reason.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]coachbradb 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

With her music.

[–]LaGrrrande 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Involuntary aural sodomy.

[–]coachbradb 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She did do pretty good on the National Anthem though.

If she would just stick to singing.

[–]Lrellok 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well apparently that rules Germany out now too.

[–]bertreapot 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On the plus side, more and more when I see stuff like this in my feed, rather than everyone rallying for mob justice, most people just ignore it. People are less willing to engage with SJW madness because they know they're crazy. So in a slightly sad way, progress is being made?

[–]condemned2bfree 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I have no clue what the context was here, but it is important to know. There was a situation during the 2010 and 2012 elections where politicians were arguing about "legitimate rape." In other words, right wing nutjobs were arguing you could not have an abortion exception in the case of rape because it might not be "legitimate" rape. Gaga might have been talking about having a bureaucrat decide whether or not your rape was legitimate enough to terminate your pregnancy. I really don't know, but that's why context is important.

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

She's referring to Keshas legal battle, in which Kesha is trying to get her contract voided due to claims that Dr. Luke raped and sexually assaulted her, and the judge denied the injunction, which is what she's responding to.

Edit: Clarity, due to the gross amount of misunderstandings that ensued from a simple answer.

[–]condemned2bfree 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Then I really don't understand because apparently no one can find Lady Gaga ever saying this, and certainly not specific to this context. That's why these things should be sourced.

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay so I typed this huge long thing, and then went searching for a source and it all got deleted, so I'll type a shorter version. I saw it on a Twitter Moment about Lady Gaga defending Kesha, unfortunately that is gone so that doesn't help you, and also it's still just a Twitter moment, but I answered because you were asking for context and I wanted to provide it.

Had something typed out about how I was pretty sure it wasn't specifically about Kesha, as the longer pictures of the quote seemed to be about how we treat rape victims in general, but that the other pictures suggest it was an interview of some kind. I went in a quest to find out which, and that turned into a shitshow, because it was very difficult to unearth.

I'm honestly impressed anyone dug up this quote to put on a picture in the fucking first place! But anyway, it's from this Times Talk interview about a song she wrote for this movie/documentary/whatever this technically is, called The Hunting Ground. The full quote seen in the other pictures can be found starting at roughly 26:40.

Link: http://timestalks.com/detail-event.php?event=the_hunting_ground

So I guess someone on Twitter/tumblr decided to make propaganda photos to generate support for the Kesha case, implying she said it specifically for this instance.

[–]toooooommmmmy 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What possible alternative is there...?

There are at several alternatives. For example,

  • in primitive cultures as well as in families etc people just gather around an decide what's right
  • blood feuds are the normal way to see that the justice is done outside centralized states
  • sharia is an example of a religious law
  • some aspects of life are ruled by international laws
  • private courts have been used in ships or other places where no-one else has the monopoly of legal violence

[–]JupeJupeSound 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship.

If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]Unenjoyed 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It just seems wrong to have a serious conversation with someone who chose to be called Lady Gaga.

[–]WaitingToBeBanned 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Marketing, and it worked.

[–]CSMastermind 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it possible that she meant a jury of her peers should decide?

[–]wiseprogressivethink 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Then emigrate, cunt. Good luck finding a country where the government doesn't have some definition for the crime of rape, though.

[–]Superafluid -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the Islamic State might be just the place to look.

[–]HoboJenkins911 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

it's a messed up time to be a man.

[–]Clockw0rk 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a messed up time to be a human being when fuckers that vote say "I don't believe in the rule of law, I believe in unverified testimony"

Welcome to the Salem witch trials.

[–]Vance87 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Girls never use their tears to get what they want! To suggest otherwise is pure hate!!!!

/SSSS

[–]WaitingToBeBanned 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/crying intensified

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok, well I was raped by Lady Gaga. And you'd better believe me or you're a sexist, and the government should put her in jail with only my statement as evidence.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What's the context here? I'll hoping she misspoke.

[–]dominotw 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

kesha thing.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Loving big government and wanting more government programs or having no government judicial control over crime. Pick one.

[–]zen_affleck 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually no government can decide whether you were raped or not. They can only decide whether or not to prosecute or convict someone based upon jury decision, which is itself based upon evidence presented.

[–]miroku000 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I suppose the one case where it has been proposed that the government determine whether or not you have been raped is in the context of abortion laws. Some places proposed prohibiting abortion but making exceptions for rape. But then that sort of raises the question of what kind of bureaucratic procedure there would have to be to get approval to have an abortion under that exception.

[–]Vance87 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lady Gaga doesn't want laws against rape, you heard it here first.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Doesn't she realize this would have to work both ways? Therefore I'm claiming Lady Gaga raped me

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Take a number, she raped me first!

[–]RobDog101 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Trial by Twitter?

[–]JobDestroyer 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Real answer to op question: Polycentric anarcho-capitalism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I dont want to live in a country where women decide if you were raped or not. They seem to get it wrong most of the time.

[–]RUoffended 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And what about actual rape? Would it be better if we lived in a country where, with the all the evidence available, the government wouldn't have the power to decide if it was actual rape?

[–]DavidByron2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This story seems to be false.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/46w3p0/did_lady_gaga_really_say_that_the_government/

[–]redgreenyellowblu 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe she could live in a nice institution?

[–]Walrusmelon 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lady Gaga raped me. I'm sure you all believe me, therefore she should go to prison.

Case closed.

[–]docdarrel555 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't want to live in a world where a woman can claim rape and it not be so... But we can't have it that way now can we?

[–]atred 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's simple, we should teach women not to lie.

[–]Gnometard 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We can't even teach them that sex has consequences

[–]Princeso_Bubblegum 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The obvious solution then, if the government isn't doing its job, is to let the free market decide on who was raped. /s

[–]JupeJupeSound 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship.

If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]Mikesapien 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Context?

This comment comes as a surprise since Lady Gaga is quite vocally not a feminist:

"I'm not a feminist. I hail men, I love men."

Without knowing the whole story, I would speculate that she means she doesn't want to live in a country where rape is defined by a legislative body rather than determined by a criminal investigation.


EDIT: And for those of you jokingly chiding "Gaga raped me," very clever. So original. There's only like 12 other people in this thread who said that. Well done.

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Context: Times Talk Interview, talking about a song she wrote for a movie about rape victims (both genders, although I believe the movie mostly leaned female.) starts at 26:40

http://timestalks.com/detail-event.php?event=the_hunting_ground

[–]Mikesapien 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Damn Gaga, nice prison jumpsuit.

Full quote:

"It's the philosophy of the nation, you know? It's important for us to– are we gonna take the power away from the people? So when you say something happened to you that, 'oh, we'll let the government decide if it happened or not.' I don't want to live in a country like that. I mean, I wanna be somewhere, where when a child says 'I was raped,' that every adult in the room says, 'Are you okay? What happened? Who was it? We wanna help you'."

She's not saying what OP says she's saying. Look at OP's no-context hatchet job versus the full context.

Gaga is not saying she doesn't want to live in a country where the gov't decides whether you were raped or not.

She's saying she doesn't want to live in a society in which people who hear about abuse throw up their hands and unhelpfully say "We'll let the gov't decide."

In other words, she wants to live in a country where sexual violence is taken seriously. And I'm 100% with her on that. Notice how her hypothetical questions are even investigative in nature.

OP is either dishonest, disingenuous, or a dunce. Not sure which.

[–]YeOldeBaconWhoure 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, I know haha. Tried saying the same thing elsewhere and got screamed at, people already had their pitchforks out.

I'm gonna go with all three!

[–]alclarkey 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Before there can be a criminal investigation there actually has to be a crime to investigate, and crimes are defined by legislative bodies.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I imagine she will continue to believe that right up until a friend, family member, or she herself is falsely accused of rape. Then I bet she's suddenly going to be a big fan of the rule of law.

And I have no doubt she will find nothing in the slightest hypocritical about those two beliefs.

[–]bat_mayn 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She doesn't want the government to "decide" (whatever that means) whether she was raped or not, but she definitely doesn't want to rid of the system whereby the government punishes or imprisons the man that allegedly raped her.

Listen and believe. When I point my finger and lay on accusation on you, you will go to the dungeon.

[–]eloquentnemesis 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If the government doesn't decide, the government can't punish. I can't believe Gaga wants all rapes to go unpunished.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe she wants vigilante justice.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm really disappointed that she would say that. I've listened several interviews where she seems to be well spoken and put together. And even said she likes be traditional in a relationship with a man.

[–]dominotw 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think she was speaking about the whole kesha kerfuffle.

[–]MalibuStayZ -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Poe's law strikes again. Did she just forgot the "/s" or is she really serious? I just can't tell.

[–]TheDude41 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess just think whatever you want, and let rapists roam free then.

No on second though, let her go live somewhere else.

[–]Bailie2 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's like saying, You don't want to speak a language defined by a dictionary. There is a difference between forcible rape and regret sex.

[–]Jamesathan -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This only takes 1/6th of what she said. Its not about the government deciding if a girl was raped or not. I't was about the attitude towards rape. She says we should act more considerate and talk to the victim and ask if they are okay, rather than ask what they were wearing and if they had taken any drugs or alcohol.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't want to live in a country where people get plastic surgery to look like fish. These fish people freak me the fuck out.

[–]Spoonwood -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah... maybe we should get Paul Elam to decide instead! /s

Only women can rape [emphasis in original].

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/ill-decide-if-you-were-raped-not-you/

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You do know that's a parody, right?

[–]Spoonwood 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes I know it was a parody. I don't believe that Paul Elam actually thinks that way either, note the '/s' in my original comment.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good point. For some reason I just wasn't sure.

[–]DDworkerthrowaway -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the context is important here. She was saying that she wants the first questions we ask a potential rape victim to be along the lines of "are you okay?" versus "what did you do to bring this upon yourself", and that is totally fine. Also, by posting about this in mens rights aren't you also enforcing the stigma that rape only happens to women?

[–]Ricwulf 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What do you think the first reaction to a man saying he was raped by a woman be? It wouldn't be "are you okay?" or "What did you do to bring this on yourself?". I'm thinking more along the lines of "How did it happen?". (That is if they even believe a man can be raped)

Which is how it should be. A police officer should, as harsh as it is, be as neutral as possible to the case. It sucks. It's horrible. But that is how it is. Because their job is to determine what happened. That includes if it even happened. Otherwise, a biased investigation occurs.

You know who should be saying "Are you okay?"? An actual social worker trained to help in exactly that situation. You know what would be the best situation? Is if immediately after the police have finished their preliminary questions, they are met with by the social worker, to try and get the best possible help for the possible victim.

But hey, we should give them comfort for as long as possible and really try to let all possible details blur. There is a reason cops ask harsh questions. It's because the mind gets blurrier the longer you wait. It's a shitty situation. But the best action is to apprehend the rapist and then deal with the trauma.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish that trainwreck would take her own advice. Or die, preferably die.

[–]Peytoria -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She just raped my brain give me miney

[–]swaite -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was raped by Lady Gaga.

[–]r12ski -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We need a czar! Quick, who would like to be the Rape Czar!?!

[–]BrainBumbler -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh god, this twat.

Let's remember that Mrs. Ga-Gueh is also the type of person to use her fame as a moral stepping stone. IIRC there was an interview she did sometimes last year where she essentially said, in a completely unironic way mind you- that she was unquestionable in her SJW attitude because she was famous; because she sold millions of albums, and that therefore, she was better than other people. Now, while there is some truth to the fact that she might be good at creating popular music, she seems jaded by her popularity. In short:

I'm really not surprised.

She sees herself as the ultimate authority, and when a conceited person meets feminism- I'm pretty sure they make a baby.

[–]NUMBERS2357 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only other alternative is to not have rape be illegal. Or, I guess, a poll of Internet feminists to decide?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She can fuck off to Iran then

[–]ThePigmanAgain -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When did she say that, in between exploiting Bowie's death for publicity purposes?

[–]CryptoMonger 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No after the meat dress and before the egg arrival.

[–]Electroverted -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's very misogynist of Gaga to not want law enforcement to punish rapists anymore. That wouldn't end very well for women.

[–]sincerely_ignatius -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she's mostly right, but her point is unsophisticated.

gaga may not be the brightest bulb, but her point is that a crime is a crime and that victims are victims, regardless of how the government decides. meaning... i don't think Nicole Brown Simpson's family thinks she wasn't murdered by OJ just because the government found him not guilty. What comes across though, is that she's implying victims should be the judge and jury. I don't think she's doing that. I think she's mirroring the abortion argument.. that the government should decide what women get to do with their bodies. it's just a little unsophisticated how she says it. perhaps there is more to the quote?

[+]liquidtops -10 points-9 points-8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When did Men's Rights become a hate group? Sheesh.

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She is right. The government does decide whether or not to let in Muslim migrants.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter