Dating “inequality” “data analysis”-🤣

FUBARfromLSA · 2022-04-16T15:29:26+00:00

Oh look the patriarchy telling women to lower our standards AGAIN.

Where’s the advice telling men to level up?

magnoliaashei · 2022-04-16T21:39:43+00:00

I really like this study because it's obvious that some male data scientist wanted to definitively prove that he really can't get laid, and it's not just that he's an unappealing dweeb, it's that he is statistically unlikely to get a woman to like him. And all they actually do is show that they are concretely, numerically, objectively, not good enough to most women. It's almost... what we've all been saying all along? Men like this look at the options and they realize that they absolutely require monogamy in a society in order to have any chance of reproducing and having a woman companion. Women look at the options and realize we could have neither monogamy or polygyny and instead take care of ourselves and never have to settle for a man we don't like or a man who fucks around. We actually have all the power.

FDS-GFY · 2022-04-16T14:34:34+00:00

I was dead reading this. Like everything FDS tells us men think, he actually put out there for the world to see as a so called “objective” analysis.

“It seems hard to avoid a basic conclusion: that the majority of women find the majority of men unattractive and not worth engaging with romantically, while the reverse is not true. Stated in another way, it seems that men collectively create a “dating economy” for women with relatively low inequality, while women collectively create a “dating economy” for men with very high inequality.”

He the goes on to push the “polygyny” theory of women and suggest the answer to all this “inequality” is for more women to be “progressive” and date unattractive men.

Wtaf. It’s like all of Reddit neatly packaged for the average scrote to digest.

Men, in a free market, supply and demand rules. Capitalism dictates in the dating market you actually need to work harder for things. Deal with it.

DrildoBagurren · 2022-04-16T15:59:44+00:00

Well i think some inc3ls photoshopped a woman to have a beard and chest hair and generally look as unattractive as possible, put her up on tinder and she actually got plenty of matches.

It's not that men have "created a dating eco omy for women with little inequality" it's just that they are thinking with their dicks as soon as they see a woman - "is she fuckable?". "how desperate are you right now? because you could probably bag this one for a quick lay." See that article where the guy accidentally sent the photo of his match to her, called her a "solid four" after calling her beautiful in a message meant for her. Men are beggars and beggars aren't choosers.

They'll only consider a relationship if the woman is someone they can present to their friends and/or family or they're desperate but keep it on the DL.

Women are looking for relationships and are unlikely to pump and dump an ugly guy for no reason. We just don't operate like that. We see human beings and we also try to choose men who will treat us well as best we can. Have you seen men's profiles ??

All this analysis says to me is that men put in zero effort and get what they can.

FI-REfox · 2022-04-16T15:18:03+00:00

What a fascinating study! Thank you OP for finding and posting it.

I do have a major problem with its findings and conclusion, however. The entire premise of the study is flawed, because the women and men on dating apps are "liking" each other for completely different reasons. The women, in general, are evaluating men for relationships, and the men are evaluating women for hookups.

Most of the women are "pickier" because they are rating a whole individual, while men are merely rating a set of physical characteristics. Of course they are less selective.

We may pity the large majority of men who are regarded as unattractive and who have few or no romantic experiences while a small percentage of attractive men have many. Just as much, consider that we live in a monogamous culture, and so the 20 percent of men who are regarded as attractive can only be in committed relationships with at most 20 percent of women. We may just as well pity the rest of the women, who are destined to be in committed relationships, if they pursue a relationship at all, with someone who
they regard as unattractive.

We all know that we can't change others, we can only change ourselves. Women are already bringing love and care and value to their relationships. These "lovelorn" men could be better, act better, love better, and earn a relationship, but they would rather get something for nothing.

ButterfliesHurricane · 2022-04-16T20:51:33+00:00

🤯 it doesn’t mean anything, from what I read men swipe on all women to maximise their chances so going by number of swipes has no significance if the majority of men look for sex and women for relationships. The poor dude is comparing the GBP price of an apple with the USD price of 1lb of pear. Someone please tell him to go out and enjoy the fresh air, sunshine and flowers because if he can’t find anyone to date it’s probably because he spends 24/7 producing non sensical gibberish from the depth of his dark basement 🤦🏼‍♀️

millions_ofpeachs4me · 2022-04-16T15:37:21+00:00

Good find, OP.

I believe this massive inequality is the reason for patriarchy in the first place.

There’s an inherent value in femaleness. I would even say that the very best of men are still below that inherent value because of the female ability to create new life. Obviously not everyone wants kids, but that doesn’t erase the biological facts of what it means to be male or female. The subjugation of women is about (artificially) lowering that female value so that most men have a shot at sex and reproduction. Given incel rage attacks, there’s a peacekeeping aspect as well.

It’s amazing that so many people, men and women, can highlight the symptoms (inequality in dating, wages, recognition, opportunity, medical care) but never get to the root of the issue: womanhood is erased and devalued. The only folks I ever hear talking about celebrating womanhood as womanhood, not off-brand manhood that libfems sell, is radical feminists. Food for thought.

flirtyfriedkahuna · 2022-04-16T22:57:29+00:00

Could all these dating gender differences be attributed to the fact that most men cant be arsed to wash their ballsack more than once a week?

Sage_Planter · 2022-04-16T15:23:57+00:00

I know we've talked about taking microphones away from men, but do we need to ban them from the internet entirely?

I've spent many years on-and-off online dating apps, and my biggest issue with crap like this is that 90% of men on dating apps just don't give a shit. They put 0.02% effort into creating their profile with poor photos and missing information then get upset when women aren't swiping. I read a stat here once that 40%(!) of profiles don't even have photos. I've come across many, many profiles where I was like "well, if he put in some effort into his appearance/prompt," I would have swiped right.

Then of the 10% that put in a base amount of effort into crafting their profiles, 8% have some other non-starter like a creeper first message or a wife. So there's maybe 2% (if that) of men on dating apps that are even dateable to begin with.

desertcoyoteazul · 2022-04-16T21:19:13+00:00

What a strange way to say majority of women are out of a males league. Using words like “inequality” doesn’t make me want to give ugly losers a shot or even the pleasure of me glancing their way.

I’m a business woman, I don’t give out freebies. If a male needs sympathy he can find himself a pickme or go to his mother.

I mean really, do they think women don’t already know that most male genes are inadequate? Lmao! It’s not some new finding.

Erocitnam · 2022-04-17T09:54:41+00:00

"The institution of monogamy is itself a “redistributive” type of policy: like capping the income of billionaires, it caps the total allowed romantic partners of the most attractive, so that unattractive people have much better chances to find a partner. The marriages that we read about in historical accounts that are based on prudence and family arrangement make more sense when we realize that basing marriage on mutual attraction leads so many—both men and women—to be unsatisfied with the outcome, since most women find most men unattractive. All of the world’s great religious traditions have extolled chastity as a great virtue and taught that there are higher goals than sexual satisfaction—these teachings add meaning to the otherwise “poor” lives of the majority of people who are regarded as perpetually unattractive."

"Even in centuries-old fairy tales ... we see our culture’s attempt to come to terms with the paradigm of a woman regarded as attractive pairing with a man who she regards as unattractive... In these fairy tales... the beautiful woman first accepts or even loves the hideous man. The sincere love of a woman transforms the unattractive man into something better: more handsome, richer, and royal."

Reading this part was a fun little whiplash ride. I was nodding along to this section like, "good point, these are tactics that have been used to trick and opress women into suffering in unhappy marriages!" And then he revealed that he thought they were a societal good, instead of a poison! Wtf!

Also absolutely unhinged of him to refer to survival of the fittest mate selection as "the most barbaric, unequal animal social structure that ever existed". What do you want to bet he doesn't have any complaints about how men's "natural" urge to pursue young "fertile" women is barbaric and unequal?

Just a shameless attitude of "if evo psych says it's inherent to humanity, but it hurts men like me, then it's barbaric, uncivilized and bad. We should rise above our nature! On the other hand, if evo psych says it's inherent to humanity and yet it hurts women, that doesn't matter. It's normal and natural and therefore justified!"

BooksandEarlGreyTea · 2022-04-17T00:04:48+00:00

That is a lot of words for I want women to be automatically given to men and laws changed so she can never leave him. And I will attempt to use religion and big words to hid my incel tendencies.

MyBeautifulSweetsong · 2022-04-16T22:58:45+00:00

I also love how they are acting like men have been so generous in"creating" a dating field. The fact of the matter is that because men will fuck anything that moves...or stands still long enough they have created an atmosphere where they are texting women they haven't even met and talking about horrific , painful and degrading sexual torture acts such as fisting and wondering why we don't want to talk them in this generous climate they have created.

spaghettiforhair · 2022-04-16T14:51:15+00:00

This is such a stupid article. First and foremost, it's completely neglecting the fact that people have bios? When I used online dating, I swipped left on most men because their bios were either super boring or had red flags. It had nothing to do with how much I wanted to have sex with them. It also assumes that everyone is hetersexual and attractiveness is something objective and unchangeable. I think men with muscles and tattoos are super attractive, some people are into smaller guys or dadbods and don't like tattoos. But if I'm a millionaire, that isn't subjective. If you don't groom yourself or put much effort into your appearance (like a lot of men), then yeah no shit of course you're not going to be attractive.

This is such a flawed "study" and even if it wasn't, dating apps are not translatable to real life. You can get a lot of matches and still be chronically single. The very idea of a "sexual market economy" is degrading and dehumanizing to both men and women.

wefwhat · 2022-04-16T20:25:55+00:00

Lmao. That was hilarious.

No mention at all about how women are told societally to optimize for looks while men are told to optimize for money/success. Yes I’m sure that has no impact on why so many men are found unattractive by the average woman /s. Seriously men are basically told it makes them homosexual if they care about how they look but all those swiping studies are based on apps where the POINT is how you look.

In real life, your humor, charisma, hell even how you carry yourself, all play a role in whether people are attracted to you.

But yes let’s just assume women have and should marry men they aren’t attracted to and then have sex with men they aren’t attracted rather than the much more reasonable solution men should make a larger effort to be attractive to women and perhaps even search out women in the big scary world rather than hiding online.

This man is myopic and sees only his own POV. Thank god I think he’s in the small minority

Afraid-Procedure586 · 2022-04-16T22:27:33+00:00

Am a data scientist. This entire article is so stupid.

NotMyRealName814 · 2022-04-16T19:58:18+00:00

Bradford Tuckfield, huh? Nice porn name, loser. I have never seen a better example of loser incel ideology dressed up as "data science". He and his unbridled misogyny can fuck right on off.

modernmedusaa · 2022-04-16T18:28:53+00:00

How are they surprised by this?🤣

Men complain about everything they created

I’m starting to think they’re permanently impaired by porn consumption and their struggling grey matter cannot comprehend reality any longer

Men own most of the big media outlets, take most positions of political power, porn companies are owned by men, most cosmetic labs owned by men, most cosmetic surgeons profiting = male

They set extremely high beauty standards for women (higher than need be) and frequently compare them / put women’s appearances down and that’s why most men find more women attractive because women genuinely put in more effort regarding grooming

That’s mostly a result of immense pressure and frequent media brainwashing though they are now jealous of women for meeting these standards and want to punish them for that with cheating / negging & abuse

Men created extreme porn and Hollywood movies where hideous loser men get highly desirable women and shoved this down our throats as if we agree

When in real life we know settling for low value men often ends in abuse & humiliation - him using us to get a foot up the ladder. He is not Prince Charming here to protect us. He is covert narcissist.

Before women had financial independence they kept us trapped with religious brainwashing & gatekeeping women from politics / law etc so it was difficult to escape them

So those women’s choices weren’t natural anyways when you could be locked in a mental ward for having kids out of wedlock & refusing to marry an abusive cheat in the 1930s

Yes that’s right, even in the U.K., many women were locked inside mental asylums after discovering their child’s father was a cheating liar & refusing to marry him . Divorce was taboo & shamed upon so kids grew up around more toxic marriages in poverty

They’re now crying at women complaining they don’t even put bare minimum effort into themselves whilst expecting attractive women to chase after them

Also WHY are they surprised attractive people do better on visual image based dating apps?

Most men don’t even read bios anyway because they’re not looking to date, they’re looking for sex with someone THEY find sexually attractive - there’s nothing mutual about their parasitic mindset

Most haven’t put any effort into their profiles and there’s plenty boasting about what a clown they are

And why do these losers act like it’s the only place to find people to date? Oh because they’re lazy and want women to play into their delusions, so they have a haram of hot women to use whilst keeping a high value wife they don’t deserve

Of course lazy game/ porn addicted men would prefer dating apps to scout for women, they don’t have the balls to approach in real life

Idk why the most mundane broke male believes his genes / personality is worthy of a haram but it’s probably due to copious porn consumption

Lazy low value men love crying about the ‘inequality’ of not being able to order several attractive women off dating apps a week for casual sex because they’re lazy pornsick gamers and delusional

In real life if I’m being brutally honest I find about 5% of men very healthy looking & instantly attractive to the point where I feel primal sexual attraction off first look

They already had good genes but were very fit / well groomed / dressed & had stable tempers

Though some of those would ruin it with their mouth and attitude later

A lot of attractive men don’t think they need a personality bc the bar is so low

But a lot of unattractive men are also very boring, manipulative and bitter and cheat

There’s about 20% who could roughly scrape ‘tolerable’ - Aka made some effort but aren’t giving me flutters off first sight but they had put some effort in .

Most men ruin everything with their mouth, insecurity and foul entitled attitude.

It’s rarely just the looks. They always have a foul attitude on top of it.

And being honest most unattractive/ broke men have worse attitudes than the attractive / wealthy ones these days. So what gives? Date down to receive worse treatment?

Not to mention dating apps tend to attract the male dregs of society - anti social lazy men, men with records, no conversation skills, men who lie a lot & can’t keep girlfriends

The types of men who would match me on dating apps I’d say 80% wouldn’t approach me in real life ever so they weren’t even viable options to me

They just flicked yes on my face cos they liked it

They don’t think about whether the woman finds him attractive back bc they only want sex & the male brain suffers from conformation bias - it thinks everyone he wants , should want them back instantly.

So I’m not surprised by those figures.

In real life I see way more attractive women with sociable personalities than I do men. It’s hardly shocking information.

And dating apps attract more of the bottom tier lazy pornsick men who don’t do well in real life. Bottom tier as in - across the board they have very little going for them. But are still rude, low effort and entitled.

I see very few ‘head turning’ healthy looking men in real life anyways. And very few of those men have tolerable personalities. That’s their problem not mine, men as a collective are like a giant anti climax. Take sympathy on their looks/ financial setbacks and they will still turn out far worse than you possibly imagined.

I only see multiple fit well dressed guys at festivals or large scale events in hot weather. Probs cos they put in more effort leading up to it.

The truth is most men don’t make effort AND have foul attitudes on top of that.

They feel entitled to women who look good, are caring, sociable & affectionate whilst they breadcrumb, do the minimum, act abusive & cheat. It is not a mutual exchange - it’s parasitic. And they deliberately antagonise women & push boundaries until they’re hostile & too drained to try.

Idk why these low value men are addicted to pushing their luck but it’s really not our problem.

Also I have found in general, unattractive/ broke men are far more sexually aggressive, entitled, rude, cocky and low effort. Bad for insecurity & cheating & being possessive. Many have deep misogyny they can’t hide well. Have fragile tempers, sky high demands & bring too many power games. I find them less safe and more controlling. So I do not find them the ‘safer’ option by far, despite how they perceive themselves.

I genuinely feel a bit safer with a simple gym bro these days. What it says on the tin. Straight forward. Simple. Most modern men are too unhinged, insecure & aggressive - that’s why they’re being rejected.

Platipus6 · 2022-04-16T22:50:38+00:00

Porn addled male writes nonsensical dribble based on one flawed piece of data - it's SINGLE men on dating apps being rated for attractiveness, and yes, 80%+ of men that other women have thrown back are undesirable. The barely tolerable or adequate looking men are paired up.

To then extrapolate these unfuckable leftovers as "all of society" then write a wankifesto about it.. someone should take his mechanical keyboard away.

Guys, if you're facially malnourished, go yell at your dad for impregnating your mom and not caring about your love life.

JulyParade · 2022-04-16T16:11:48+00:00

What a crock. Total failure to mention that most men using online dating platforms are already in a relationship. Why should polygamy be encouraged if men are already in relationships? I wonder if the author got dizzy from his mental gymnastics.

Edit: For those of you wondering about this statistic, several years ago the number was about 40%. I imagine that number has only gone up. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/07/dating-app-tinder-married-relationship

Just this morning I saw a FB post from a girl who found out her boyfriend of 4 years was on Bumble. I doubt he's there to "make friends" no matter what the "just communicate and ask him how he feels" crowd would have you believe. FWB maybe. I used to date online and I'm pretty sure I went on several first dates with men who had girlfriends. That's not even counting the men who said they were in open relationships but I wasn't allowed to verify with their girlfriend because she "doesn't want to know". My pickme friends even introduced me to a man with a girlfriend. I didn't date him, but I knew him for 3 months and he NEVER mentioned her. So one day I said "how's your girlfriend" and he said he was considering breaking up with her... exactly what he had said to the pickmes 3 months earlier. I saw him ask out dozens of women and I doubt his long-term girlfriend ever came up. But we're supposed to give him credit for "being honest" when called out? No thank you.

dolphiya_or_parateen · 2022-04-17T10:46:03+00:00

Lol. As if looking at online dating provides an accurate data set. Men skew the data themselves by swiping on everyone indiscriminately 🤣 they literally buy apps to swipe for them. Meanwhile, over in the real world, half the beautiful women I know have boyfriends that look like fkin sea monsters. This is incredibly stupid and unscientific.

spicyspa · 2022-04-17T12:57:43+00:00

I feel sorry for young women. I am constantly appalled at the lack of grooming and hygiene in young men. I think the major turning point started around 2010. Makes it super easy not to want to be a cougar lol. Having said that, older men aren't much better since men don't age very well.

No-Function613 · 2022-04-16T22:36:11+00:00

Women are the ‘choosers’ of nature. That selection is the reason that our species evolves. For as long as we are of a certain sentience, I believe it will forever be this way. There will always be this ‘inequality’ because that’s just the way it is. I’ve started to refer to men blaming women for things like this as an ‘Adam thing to do’. Ie the competition in dating that makes this ‘inequality’ something for some men to complain about, is partially down to how men are competing with each other, it’s not women’s fault. Just like it wasn’t Eve’s fault Adam ate the apple…

Peaches-McNuggs · 2022-04-16T21:26:17+00:00

I see caliper weekly is running incel ideology propaganda now.

MyBeautifulSweetsong · 2022-04-16T21:31:37+00:00

Did anyone see that article going around the internet a couple of years ago about a guy complaining about "cutoff culture" and then he described basically stalking an ex. He was skewered so hard. He went to the girls job and she ignored him and he tried to make her out to be the bad guy.

He got roasted off the internet for trying to turn a break up he didn't want into a new thing called cutoff culture. I'll see if I can find the link.

Edit: found it read down to the part where Emma, the ex tells him she doesn't want to speak to him anymore and threatens to file a harassment report against him. He is really trying to spin this thing. It's scary.

https://jeffreifman.com/2014/01/11/breakups-and-cutoff-culture/

Colour_riot · 2022-04-17T16:25:18+00:00

wtf is this attempt to label anything men impose on themselves "inequality". Sex is not a fucking human right. Even if they don't have hands, they can just buy one of those new age toys for men

Hypatia-etal · 2022-04-16T17:12:51+00:00

The presentation of this information is flawed. But there is another, partially told story here. Only 20% of men are worthy of 100% of women. These men should be donating to sperm banks so women don’t have to reproduce with unsuitable men. The entire social structure of dating , marriage, property ownership, government control, money etc achieves one thing. It gives men unworthy of breeding the power to force women or con women into bearing their offspring. We shouldn’t be competing for those limited high quality men. It serves the best interest of humanity for women to only reproduce with 20% of them. According to this article 20% of all men should be fathering 100% of the children. It is to the detriment of humans as a species to allow other men to reproduce. In fact allowing other men to reproduce may be what contributed to this disproportionate number of high quality vs low quality mating partners. Females of most species are responsible for choosing their mate. They choose the highest quality available. That mate fathers most of the offspring in a given community. Our social structure defeats this. But bc we aren’t in control this can’t be fixed by male centered practices like poly. The only real solution is by some dystopian high tech manner of ensuring only a set class of males reproduce, requiring the top 20% to do so, where all females can access. While all other males are only permitted to engage in sex that doesn’t result in reproduction or none at all. One result is in just a few generations the % of high quality men would increase by virtue of good genes. (Eyeroll eugenics) It is apparent to me how centuries of forcing women to marry any man for survival has created a large population of unsuitable male mates.

P.s. He lost me at “dating economy.” He presents this like women hold all the power & men are unfairly treated. His comment that “there are no villains here,” is utter bs. There is one set of villains here & their selfish, self serving catering to their immediate urges has created a deteriorating situation caused by centuries of their denying women access to community equity & power, autonomy, self sufficiency, & self determination. Like always, women get stuck with the hard work of addressing the problem.

😂 The angry DM’s have begun. Read a dystopian future book if you think I made this up. Start with brave new world.

Incels think women are pampered, a delusional, self serving way to frame male privilege.

2022-04-16T22:21:14+00:00

It felt and read like a mansplanning article?

Sad_Performance9015 · 2022-04-16T18:11:35+00:00

I can't take any piece seriously where the first word itself needs some serious editing.

KateJ1982 · 2022-04-18T02:25:25+00:00

I skimmed, but it appears the data is taken exclusively from Tinder and Hinge. Which is lunacy because these are where people primarily to hookup, not for deep meaningful long term relationships. And so these Sherlocks have determined that men are willing to hookup with almost any woman (sometimes almost anyTHING), and the women on these apps are slightly more selective. Something common sense could have told them for free. I hope no taxpayer money was wasted on these inane studies.

Now why men are becoming increasingly low value and what could be done to motivate them to change this behaviour - that's a study that would benefit society.

Equal-Ear2312 · 2022-04-19T04:49:50+00:00

reported on the Gini coefficients he had found in his company’s abundant data, treating “likes” as the equivalent of income. He reported that heterosexual females faced a Gini coefficient of 0.324, while heterosexual males faced a much higher Gini coefficient of 0.542. So neither sex has complete equality: in both cases, there are some “wealthy” people with access to more romantic experiences and some “poor” who have access to few or none. But while the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing.

The bottom 80% men are at the bottom because the reality says they are not dateable. They do not embody the masculinity that they themselves worship. Guess what! No one is owed a date or a partner! It's also proof that "good men" are rare and not abundant. This is also reflected in a society's data on crime. How many crimes against women committed by men? The misogyny is in the details. There are only a handful of good and desirable men and 70% of women are flocking in that direction instead of looking at "dad bod 50-50 I'm on foodstamps, twice divorced with 18 children" Steven....

ceramicunicorn · 2022-04-17T05:53:13+00:00

Huh. I actually didn’t have a real problem with this article, and I love Quillette in general. It lays out the facts. I only take issue with the fatalistic tone, as if for men there is nothing to be done.

Here’s something to be done. Men actually do have more control in this situation than they claim. Stop prioritizing asserting dominance over having a healthy, equitable relationship. Recognize the inequities between male and female sexuality, and the imbalance of emotional work in relationships. Start seeing women as people, not potential packages of bundled services that can “do for” you, and have something to say about who she fucking IS on a dating app, not just that you looked at her photos and they made your rather indiscriminate penis twitch. Stop bitching out women for their reactions to the worst of men, and go bitch out the source of the problem- those men.

And of course, the usual leveling up with hygiene and grooming and finances and such.

There are still going to be women that want 6/6/6 and that can’t be changed, but there are plenty such as myself who would be perfectly content with a short king with an average salary and body, who sees me as a fucking human and recognizes he’s fortunate- not entitled- to have the benefits I offer him. There is literally nothing sexier to me than men who truly understand the harms of the patriarchy….because so few men have the balls to confront a system that benefits them, even when it harms the individuals they purport to want.

Most men pretend like this is asking for the world, and as such, shall struggle. If they choose dominance over the love of a woman, so be it. They can dig their own hole and when the dimensions are to their liking, put their penis inside it.

masterofthebarkarts · 2022-04-19T13:14:15+00:00

"We took one single measure of attractiveness from one dating app and extrapolated to all heterosexual dating activity" is a hell of an audacious bit of data analytics.

Mamainas · 2022-08-16T04:54:19+00:00

Another “lower your standards” theory. Such BS. It’s really hard to find a high-value man nowadays. Funny because they want us to lower our standards and not to step their game up.

That’s why I gave up dating. I’m just plainly hooking up right now till the deserving man comes. I use either POF or Adult Friend Finder when I am looking for a hookup. No commitments.

Title	Dating “inequality” “data analysis”-🤣
Author	FDS-GFY
Upvotes	351
Comments	115
Date	April 16, 2022 2:32 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/u4z1th/dating_inequality_data_analysis/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/dating-inequality-data-analysis.1112433 https://theredarchive.com/post/1112433

Comments