We all know the classic illogical paradox for men.

Woman experiments with past hook ups, don’t like it. Men find out, are offended that their girlfriend experimented with past hook ups but not them.

Would you women be offended if you find out your boyfriend took you to Macdonalds, Burger King etc for your first few dates. Then you find out later on that he used to take past dates and hookups to be the like of Morganfield’s for the first few dates.

His explanation was that Morganfield’s was expensive to sustain for all the women, so he decided to stop doing that. Also, he realised women were treating him like a meal ticket or dating him for his money. Equally logical an idea.

So PPD women, would you be offended by this gesture?

Edit: Some people have said it’s too drastic a comparison. I’m not well versed in the culinary world over in the US so I’ll try my best. What if the premise was changed to say, Olive Garden instead of fast food? And you realised he went dutch with you, only to find out he paid in full for his past hookups and ONS at a fine dining place/Morganfield’s?

Edit 2: Many women seem to be saying it’s a false equivalence between sexual experimentation and date restaurant. By your logic, if a full grown adult doesn’t get his ideal job, a kid would feel equally disappointed. Wouldn’t a fairer comparison be the child not getting his favourite lego set? Life has never been about absolute equivalency but rather the reaction it draws out