Today's crack-me-up - turns out even basic preferences like earning average pay and not being obese is statistically too much to ask (in the US). Stay strong, american queens!

BlueSkiesOverLondon · 2021-08-11T01:26:12+00:00

This reminds me of that post about how redpillers think women couldn’t possibly reject 672 guys a year. I DON’T CARE if the man I’m looking for is unusual; I’m not looking for tons of men.

shockingupdate · 2021-08-11T03:04:21+00:00

Scrotes’ to-do list:

1) Complain about FDS

2) Harass women on OLD

3) Prove “single tall male” is too high a standard ONCE AND FOR ALL

4) Fap

spinsterchachkies · 2021-08-11T02:50:45+00:00

I don’t know how they don’t see this as a self own. It’s fucking embarrassing. When we trash talk men, we should link to them and be like “according to men on X sub, on X blog, men are trash lol” here’s the receipts

08__80 · 2021-08-11T02:53:18+00:00

So they admit it. They are content with being losers and angry that we won't lower our standards for them.

_Agrias_Oaks_ · 2021-08-11T00:31:02+00:00

Lol, who wants to bet he built this model assuming no correlation between the variables?

I would love to see the data tables behind his model as well as the underlying assumptions; I'm sure they're all super accurate and well thought out!

Hostileovaries · 2021-08-11T02:44:33+00:00

Lol. I literally put in no preferences outside of 'not married' (any shade, any age, any height, any income, obese ok) and still got a 45.5% chance and a delusion score of 2/5.

Any_Indication_2754 · 2021-08-11T00:13:04+00:00

Number 1...not married. Excuse him wtf?

SkiesEclipse · 2021-08-11T06:31:56+00:00

They’re mad that modern women would rather die alone than marry a below average man, and it shows.

frustratedmarxistfem · 2021-08-11T01:24:35+00:00

I tried the calculator and it told me that finding a man over 5'7 who makes 30k a year was delusional, I'm guessing its not very accurate.

MadamePotpourri · 2021-08-11T01:37:37+00:00

My ex boyfriend meets all these criteria. I really don't think it's that hard to find a guy who meets these basic criteria. The hard part is finding one who is high value.

Looks like another desperate attempt to convince women to lower our standards. No thanks, scrotes!

nikkirosex3 · 2021-08-11T00:15:30+00:00

how is wanting someone who’s not married too much ? Wtf?

Phoenix__Rising2018 · 2021-08-11T00:36:11+00:00

This guy is a liar and these numbers aren't correct. Plus no one ever said white or 6'1.

kwallio · 2021-08-11T05:14:50+00:00

I'd rather stay with my cats and houseplants.

starlight_sequence · 2021-08-11T01:07:11+00:00

2.2% chance of finding someone with my standards, and yet my boyfriend meets all of them ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

spicyspa · 2021-08-11T01:55:00+00:00

Most men I've dated made well over 55k and were over 6 ft. That wasn't really even my criteria. I'm really short so height isn't an issue. While I insist that a man be employed, I never had a number in mind. Having said that most sucked due to personality issues.

planethoneyy · 2021-08-11T05:03:02+00:00

I cant believe this dude (99 percent sure he's some neckbeard tech bro 'software engineer') wasted this much time building this BS app and gathering data.

AyemHerself · 2021-08-11T02:46:56+00:00

And clearly we must draw the conclusion that women are too picky and must settle for whatever we can get.

Not that men fall short of basic standards.

Why must I make concessions for mediocrity?

Vmchik · 2021-08-11T01:23:55+00:00

Yeah this is bogus. Unless I’m insanely lucky, a majority of the men I’ve dated or been on dates with have made significantly more than 55k a year, were taller than average, and not married. Why didn’t he show his work?🤔

Hhjjuuy · 2021-08-11T07:28:32+00:00

0.65%

That's 7 men for each FDS subscriber.

klops_fighter · 2021-08-11T09:49:37+00:00

I got 0.12... Wow men must be like radioactive trash in the US 😂

europoor24 · 2021-08-11T08:43:48+00:00

bahaha I just saw this, and even after putting in a height requirement of 5'9, obese, 50k I got a delusional score of 3/5. I must be really lucky because most men I've dated have been at least that height all the way to 6' something, made at least 50k and not obese or married. Those are basic standards and we can't even have those? I'd rather get cats.

miwamus · 2021-08-11T02:49:52+00:00

Men can't math.

veniphyl · 2021-08-11T07:36:47+00:00

Don't they know we're happy without them?

princessdiane · 2021-08-11T06:59:47+00:00

LMAO ladies what's your score? I put unmarried, any race, 5'9", not obese, and 200k and got 0.17%. Somehow even with those odds I manage to find different guy to go on a date with every week that meets those basic standards 🤔 i guess it's delusional to want someone literally just my equal but hey its a good thing I love cats 🥰

Muffcakelord · 2021-08-11T00:47:50+00:00

In all fairness; the percentage of non-obese americans is shockingly low even though it seems to improve. This is the doing of many scams done by the capitalist system alongside with expensive education, so bear in mind that this fact alongside with the calculation probably being false, pretty much means the odds should be higher in reality. But - i'd say the odds for finding your hvm would be somewhere between 0,5 and 10 percent. I'd expect to go on at least 10 dates before finding someone promising, and that could be the result of screening and filtering out 200 people. It's not easy no matter which numbers we apply to it

genderless-triangle · 2021-08-11T03:26:17+00:00

Completely open question, but if the average salary for males is supposedly 53K, then how come only 0.65% make at least that much? Erm...

SpectralCadence · 2021-08-11T13:15:37+00:00

They really did a self-own - WHY would I ever want to be with (and/or be impregnated by) some loser male who can only worsen my quality of life? It's better to remain single!

chainsawbobcat · 2021-08-11T14:51:22+00:00

Where is the "has all teeth" metric here? 🤣

The bare minimum has gotten spicey

SoSurrealItsUnreal · 2021-08-11T00:47:54+00:00

It doesn't matter what criteria you enter into that calculator. You can put "male, not married, between the ages of 20 and 80" and it will still show you as being delusional.

Freeweed333 · 2021-08-11T05:57:53+00:00

Mens Calculator would be easy.

Question one: Have Vagina

axkate · 2021-08-11T06:13:36+00:00

This webpage is a self-own to its creators and all men in the US lmao

ApartPersonality · 2021-08-11T04:46:52+00:00

I literally know plenty of dudes like this, and some of them have shitty personalities. I bet this is bs data that’s meant to convince women to lower their standards.

Muffcakelord · 2021-08-11T18:05:33+00:00

!!!UPDATE!!!
Some crote sent me a DM saying "to get the 1% you need to be the 1%, too bad you're not well educated for a well educated man :) Get exercise and a PhD"

What a odd way to roast someone who goes to the gym 3x/week and has a robotics' degree that makes me so privileged it's honestly insane, along with having a partner who's on his way to get his masters (which is basically as valuable as a PhD if you want to be actually hands-on in our field). It basically translates to him congratulating me on being "the 1%", something i'd be very uncomfortable to proclaim myself, but maybe he's right? Before we know it, being well educated and healthy won't be a 1% thing anymore (if it even is, for women, since we're increasingly dominating in everything! Well done <3 )

It only goes to prove how delusional these men are, that could visit this sub and NOT understand how intelligent we are. They think we're just like them, yet how would that make any sense? Looking through the comments here it's obvious how you queens actually think through statistics, meanwhile the guy behind this very calculator was blind to the data he himself was working on.

Love you all and hope some of you're feeling some ego bloating from the comment i got since a lot of you probably can relate 100%! And if not - i know you're here to build yourself the exact way you want to be!

MostlyPeacfulPndemic · 2021-08-11T05:02:42+00:00

Most mens criteria for women:

100 lbs
Eats steaks and burgers all day
Loves anal
Loves that i watch porn
Is actually infinity women at the same time

0% of women fit this criteria

Optimal_Grapefruit_5 · 2021-08-11T21:29:54+00:00

That "calculator" is nonsensical because if you select any age (default 18-85), not married, any race, any height, not obese, any income the result is 26.3% (delusion score 2/5).
That makes no sense for a variety of reasons:

This search was far less selective than the previous one yet the probability of finding a match was lower.
It states that you have less than 3/10 chances of finding an unmarried man that isn't obese in the United States. That would mean over 70% of unmarried men in the US are obese. I know you got issues over there, but damn.

Seriously, try it.

New search including obese men (still excluding married ones): probability 45.5%, delusion score still 2/5.

New search excluding obese men and including married: probability 57.9%, delusion score 1/5 = "easy to please". Like wanting an unmarried man's asking for too much lol.
Note that having at least 5' tall and not obese as the only standards place you at 57.8% probability and the delusion score goes back up to 2/5. Think about it. Think about a friend coming up to you and saying her ideal guy is over 5' and not obese and it's ok if he's already married. Would you tell her "Hmmm you're verging on delusional, but you're still in the acceptable range"? Or would you tell her "Love yourself, you have almost no standards. Who hurt you?"?

Notice how the only way to get a delusion score of 0/5 = "are you even a woman?" is searching for: 18-85, any race, any height, any income, include married and obese = 100% probability = no standards.
Such a self-own on their part though. I mean, dude made a whole website where the main takeaway was the overwhelming majority of unmarried US men between the ages of 18 and 85 are obese = the main thing they don't want in a woman. Yet US women are still somehow framed as those with lofty expectations.

Far-Zookeepergame644 · 2021-08-11T01:59:09+00:00

Men acting like our standards are about race or height is such a distraction tactic. They're about behavior, and what you bring to the table, you racist fucks.

GreatOrchidAmbition · 2021-08-11T03:18:01+00:00

I was raised like a princess growing up (private school, car for 16th birthday, etc) so I absolutely refuse to settle in any capacity for anyone that is less than my standards. My parents didn't raise me with this much love and care for me to even talk to a random scrote who will try to neg me/use me/take advantage of me. HELL NO.

I want my future children to have the same opportunities/lifestyle but better so why would I settle? That is a smack in the face to all the hard work my parents and I put in to becoming me. I'm done with bad relationships because I would consistently have to make myself smaller because they would be so threatened by me even if I was breathing because of all the luxuries I was afforded that they were not.

My conclusion I've gotten to is that I must elevate MYSELF so that my choices are literally ample af. I only want to marry someone who makes minimum $750k a year + family money 8million+ MINIMUM (ideally more, this is honestly bare minimum because of high living costs) or is in a field that will get him there (read: finance or company head). I know I will not find this if I am not a 10/10 in every single way, but ironically it's made me put in more effort. I don't want anything less. I refuse to lower my standards so I'm only trying to raise myself up. That is the FDS way.

LogisticalConundrum · 2021-08-11T03:44:04+00:00

I put a man who is basically my equal. If you assume that human male/female populations are going to exist on similar bell curves than there should be roughly equal numbers of male equivalents to my stats.

Not married
Any race (I'm mixed)
Late 30's age range
90th percentile for male height (6') (5'7" female)
top 10% for male income (150k+) (100K+ female)

I got a 0.24%, but if that is true, how can I exist? I may actually be some kind a AI masquerading as a human on the internet. What's the reverse of solipsism?

Here's the thing, female hypergamy doesn't exist, soooo many women choose men who are objectively inferior to them in these very stats ranges and the abuse and divorce drama subs are filled with the stories of how horribly these men end up treating said women after they've been locked down. The truth is that men cannot tolerate relationships with women who they perceive as superior so they obsessively and systematically tear them down to size if they think they can get away with it.

Men on dating subs why say that a woman's career and income and all that doesn't matter, what they really mean is that they actively screen out women who excel in these areas because most men ruthlessly vet for hypogamy in heterosexual mate selection. How can they not when so many men associate femininity with submissive traits and when these male power structures for money and looks are what makes men feel entitled to their male power?

Men absolutely fear being on the receiving end of the power structures that they benefit from, that type of conversation always comes up when following discussions in anti-feminist circles. They never consider the fact that dismantling patriarchy means dismantling the means of patriarchal power, they always envision it as patriarchy but flipped.

If women are practicing hypergamy it's only in response to men's rejecting attitudes towards women who make them feel 'emasculated', and because emasculated men are a very real threat to women's personal safety and security.

m00n5t0n3 · 2021-08-11T12:56:44+00:00

What is this based on? Census?

FirePreferred_theOG · 2021-08-11T23:16:37+00:00

Got my first hate mail (male!) message today from my new account and it related to how I'll die alone and clearly only want men for what they can do for me. He must have been the type of underground troll that uses this calculator!

Also, lovely, a biased calculator created by men to complain about women's standards they don't fit. #proveourpoint

2021-08-11T14:25:56+00:00

[permanently deleted]

Comments