I’ve noticed some weird contradictions in regards to progressives regarding this topic that I’d like answered. They’ll say the male loneliness epidemic isn’t a real thing but also somehow real enough to be the entire fault of men, is it real or is it not?

They’ll also say women are just as lonely as men so it’s wrong to label the loneliness epidemic as just a male thing. And at the same time say men should talk about their own issues and stop coming to feminist with men’s issues. Men talking about the loneliness epidemic is them talking about their own issues, and if women want more attention on the female loneliness epidemic why don’t they start talking about it instead of trying to put men down for talking about their issues?

The above paragraph comes with a second contradiction though, they’ll say women are better at forming friendships and keeping friends than men (yes I have genuinely seen, mostly women, say this) they’ll say women are better at forming friendships and bonds than men, but this also runs in direct contradiction to something else they say. They meaning the blue pill and progressives in general, will say women are just as lonely as men. If women are better at forming and keeping friendships than men then why are they just as lonely as men?

The way I see it is, if you’re going to say women are just as lonely as men then it’s a contradiction to say women are better at forming and keeping friendships than men. And if you’re going to say women ARE better at forming and keeping friendships than men then it’s not only a contradiction to say women are just as lonely as men but it’s also perfectly justifiable to label the loneliness epidemic as a male focused problem.