Feminists will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that women objectify themselves whenever it's convenient, and would rather demonize male sexuality instead.

https://youtu.be/-mAERkqeFwQ?si=xS26qUj8o-18Sz\_V

6:07 Maybe because those women still get attention from men.

6:55-7:55 Cut the emotional labor bs. Because women like this person in the video always have to start the convo with "women have it worse, men are privilege." So no shit men will have this response. She would probably get upset if some red-piller said that women have life on easy mode or talk about how bad men have it than women. So again, she is being bad faith here.

8:36: OK, now that we get this out the way let's get to the main topic.

9:07 Ok, we agree that sex sells. let's move on.

10:40 to 11:05 how tf did she come to that conclusion.

It's funny and ironic how show she use the same old "women have no agency" arguments in the video. By saying men forced women into doing only fans or porn. But at the same time, though. She says men are also jealous of these independent girl boss sex workers. So which is it? Are women being forced to do sex work, or are women slaying (💅) in sex work? 🤔.

The real answer here is the cycle of shit. Someone already pointed this out in the comment.

This is something I call the cycle of shit. Where there are 4 stages. Stage 1 encourages men. Stage 2 demonize men. Stage 3 judges men for doing the alternative. And, finally stage 4, repeat the process. And everyone plays a role in this cycle. Especially Feminists too.

Stage 1: Society encourages men to cold approach women. Because that shows a man is confident, and have "game/rizz/aura" (I.E. cringe). Encourage men to be hypersexual. In order for men to not look gay, odd, or less masculine in the eyes of women.

Stage 2: And the next part (you guys are going to love this part /s). Society then demonize men for being sexual predators. Saying how uncomfortable men make women feel when they approach them. Saying how men objectify women's bodies and don't see women as humans.

Stage 3: And then men are judge for doing the alternative. All of a sudden, men get their sexuality questioned for some reason (why are you ghey?).

Stage 4: And finally, it repeats itself. Hence why I call this the cycle of shit.

This is why the cycle of shit is a better explanation for “rape culture” than most feminist arguments. It describes the contradictory expectations placed on men from every direction, including by the same communities that insist they’re challenging sexism.

The same behavior encouraged in Stage 1 becomes dangerous or immoral in Stage 2.

So men are attacked whether they act sexual or whether they don’t.

And the whole thing loops back to the beginning.

Feminists like the one in this video will use all sorts of bad faith tactics like the "mEn dOn'T uNdErsTaNd wHaT cOnSeNt is" gotcha.

Again this is the mental gymnastics they always do. They will always use this strawman whenever their cognitive dissonance around women sexualzing themselves is brought up.

I have two scenarios here.

Scenario 1: Woman A: Walks outside at night, dress as a stripper. She gets no attention from men. She keeps walking everything is normal.

Scenario 2: Women A: Walks outside at night, dress as a stripper. She gets no attention from men. And she ends up complaining about men not giving her attention.

My point here is, that what the woman wearing isn't the problem. The problem is her behavior and thoughts. You can't pick and choose when you want the male gaze.

This has nothing to do with men asking for consent. A boss would get fired for sleeping with his female employees. Doesn’t matter if the women consented. Because that's not professional or appropriate for the work place.

My point here. It's the same concept here. Men shouldn't hit on women in public because it's appropriate. RIGHT feminists? Doesn’t matter if the woman might like it.

Again it's the cycle of shit. Encourage men to hit on women, demonize men for hitting on women, judge men for not hitting on women, and then the cycle repeats itself.

And like the title says feminists will ignore the cycle of shit, because it exposes their cakism. So they come up with this "men don't understand the difference between consent and non-consent" strawman/gotcha.

I remember getting downvotes on a post. Where a OP ask this question "Do men look at random women asses in public". And I said "No I don't, because that's weird". And got a lot of downvotes for saying that. Note this was progressive Reddit sub, (which is ironic). And im being honest here, I didn't say anything rude. I just said that this is something I don't with women in public. And that got pushback.

So my point in bringing this up. So whenever feminists use this "men don't know what consent is" gotcha. Explain to me how I can stare at a woman ass in public in a non-creepy way? 🤔. I'll wait. Because Reddit seems to think a man is a weirdo for not sexualzing random women in public.

In conclusion TLDR: Some women (not all) sexualized themselves and like the male gaze whenever it's convenient. It's considered scary when a unattractive man tells a woman she has nice hair. But meanwhile, it's ok for Chad to say "damnnnnn girl'' when looking at the same woman ass