When a topic about gender differences, dating preferences, or cultural practices about men and women, it very often seems like the feminist narrative/critique/defense (depending on the context of the issue) always boils down to current/historical misogyny and not much else.

It just seems so lazy and narrow minded to assume that hatred of women is some kind of foundation for how practically all societies operate and interact internally. More often than not, the "everything is misogyny" argument seems like a deflection from the real issue/reason why something is the way it is. Used in debate, it appears more like an attempt to derail a conversation, use emotion/empathy to gain moral superiority, and/or avoid accountability that might make women look bad.

Some common examples when this tactic happens include, but are not limited to: mental load, passport bros, age gap relationships, religious/traditional ethics, male dominated hobbies/professions, right wing politics, false/doubtable accusations, "who set the system up?" and so on.