The reason most women get used for sex is because, under hypergamy, most women have nothing to offer men outside of their vaginas at any given SMV exchange.

Hypergamy, as most will know, is the social phenomenon where women will always seek to date/mate with their superiors. Absent strong social institutions and/or values, humans are naturally hypergamous. As such, modern western women for the most part practice hypergamy, only seeking to date/mate with men much higher in SMV and RMV compared to themselves.

At the same time, women are also complaining more and more about men who only wish to use them for sex, and the men who actually use them for sex. I draw a distinction between these two groups of men, because virtually all men will wish to use women of most SMVs for sex, but the focus of this post will be the men of superior relative SMV that can actually obtain sex with their inferior SMV counterparts, thereby creating these female complaints from men.

Let's examine three different examples. Remember, hypergamy mandates a woman seeks out her superior. Therefore:

Man 1: Top 5% Woman 1: Top 35%

Man 1 is likely to be every woman's dream guy. He is handsome, tall, and makes good money. He would pass on great genes to his children, and be able to properly provide and father them to boot. All women in society wish to land with this man.

Woman 1 makes okay money, probably isn't too tall or too short. And is definitely good to look at. Nothing too bad in her sexual history, no drug abuse and good home life growing up. She isn't remarkable like her male counterpart, but she's a solid woman that most men would be happy to be with.

And that is the problem. Most men would love to be with this woman. But for Man 1, he could have five of these women lined up in his DMs at any given time begging for his sperm. All women in the top 25% are seeking Man 1 due to hypergamy, and this allows Man 1 to juggle all of them as his personal sex toys because he is their superior.

Now let's examine Man 2, the kind of man who would kill to be with Woman 1.

Man 2: Top 35% Woman 2: Top 65%

Man 2 is a great guy. Has a solid job, makes good money and is well educated. He isn't the best looker but not ugly. He also isn't short but isn't guaranteed to be tall either. No bad criminal history and again overall a solid guy. He strives to be with his counterpart Woman 1 in the long term. However, woman 1 is preoccupied trying to land Man 1.

Woman 2 is not remarkable, and in many cases below average. She is probably still educated, but in a degree that isn't useful. Which gives the double whammy of high levels of debt with low income. BMI is probably getting into the overweight range, with some bordering on overweight and others being close to obese. Man-hating attitudes will also likely start becoming commonplace here as well. Possible abuse in childhood, long sexual history, and drug use to boot.

Woman 2 does not want to be with an ugly man, but also wants a good provider to help support a potential family despite her poor earnings. If she actually makes good money, she will likely demand Man 2 have better looks in addition to making the same money despite her own shortcomings. She will also expect the man to tolerate her misandrist attitudes and also adopt all of her opinions and values as her own. Low tolerance for opposing opinions is common.

And these are the women presented to Man 2. If you are Man 2, this seems like a horrible deal, and it's because it is. The women who are actually Man 2s equal are all preoccupied chasing Man 1. Either Man 2 has to wait until women 1 are done with their "hoe phase" or take woman 2. Both are terrible options. Woman 2 is not a suitable partner or net benefit to Man 2. The only thing Man 2 can do is attempt to bed woman 2 while he tries to wait for some woman from Woman 1 to come to her senses and stop being used by Man 1. So Man 2 simply uses woman 2 for sex, because that's all she has to offer him.

And lastly we come to our final pairing

Man 3: Bottom 65% Woman 3: Bottom 35%

Man 3 can be described as having one or the other. Either he is a nice guy with an okay job that pays the bills, or he is taller and more good looking but has little going on for him financially. None of these guys will be particularly good looking or very wealthy, but it's enough to get by. Much like woman 2, they aren't horrible but they aren't remarkable either.

Woman 3 has virtually nothing to offer. Almost all women in this category are overweight or obese. Many will be single mothers, often having multiple children and long sexual histories. They will probably have large levels of debt and live paycheck to paycheck. Women in this category are probably incapable of love, and simply seek to use men as a utility. They will speak of men in very disposable terms, and the only male she will ever commit to valuing is her own son. (Potentially).

If you are Man 3, it becomes overwhelmingly evident why you want nothing to do with woman 3 outside of bedding her. She literally has nothing to give you. Nothing. She is either overweight, a single mother, or misandrist. Unless you are in the bottom 10% of men, you stand to gain absolutely nothing by committing to this woman. Your only hope is to bed this woman until hopefully someone out of Woman 2 comes to her senses and tried to seek commitment from a man who is her equal.

So the overall takeaway from this exercise is that while men and women both have things to offer one another most of the time, the relative valuation at any given SMV always favors men due to hypergamy. Women are always looking to trade up, therefore they are their partner's inferior. This makes it very easy for those potential partners to juggle them around and use them for sex, and there are always women lower down the totem pole willing to put out to bag a man higher up. In fact, you as a woman, are likely doing that to another woman when you attempt to sleep with a top 10% man if you are only a top 30% woman. I can say almost to a certainty in that situation you are being juggled around.

Which is fine if you are okay with being used for sex, and indirectly causing other women being stringed along and used for sex. But please don't blame men for this. Its women's action, specifically hypergamy that causes this. Because it truly is the case that most women that offer themselves up to men for relationships have very little to offer. That's the very reason they are offering themselves for a relationship, because they deem you higher enough value to satisfy their hypergamy requirement. But if I'm high enough up to do that, I'm also high enough up to leverage that difference into having casual sex other women thinking the same thing.

Though not discussed in this post I think hypergamy can also explain the rise in male selxlessness. As at a certain point women get so low in SMV that men will simply not be attracted enough to want to bed them. Men in the bottom 30% might only have access to the bottom 10% of women. Who are so overweight or off putting them men would rather stay virgins for life than be with them. Sure, having sex would be preferable to a relationship. But having nothing is preferable to sex.