I was watching a video about medieval jokes yesterday and at one point the narrator said a lot of medieval jokes were about women and their uncontrolable horniness (https://youtu.be/3EA--U3PY9M)

That made me remember some things

The first was the ancient Greek play Lysistrata, where a group of women had a sex strike to stop the men going to war. I have seen some comments on threads on Reddit about how in the play the mere fact that women could do a sex strike was absurd, because women were seen as the hornier sex

https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/5g3tn7/comment/dapf4ov/

One of those comments, but if you search for "Lysistrata Reddit" on Google you will certainly find more in other threads (I found 3 more total, one of which was the best and most complete but I cant find it again. It also talked about how Renaissance jokes were about women doing everything and going to absurd lenghts to have sex or cheat)

The second was a Wojak meme about women saying they are into buddhism, contrasted with sexist buddhist quotes. One of those quotes (supposedly from Anguttara 2.6.10) go along the lines that "women are never satisfied in sex and motherhood"

And this got me thinking... could it be? Is our modern view of men as hornier than women just a consequence of puritanism, from the Victorian era when women were literally sick and doing Exorcist stuff from sexual repression (aka the hysterics)? And now after sexual liberation we are beggining to discover women are horny as hell, as new research suggest? (See for example https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/06/turns-out-women-have-really-really-strong-sex-drives-can-men-handle-it/276598/)

And then I researched a little. Some gems:

“The notion that women’s sexuality is somehow lesser than men’s is actually quite new. Before the 1700s we regarded both sexes as obscene, passionate and immoral. This meant we believed women and men were equally sexual and that sexual pleasure wasn’t just a male priority. ” This however shifted in the 18th century when we started to view women’s sexual pleasure and desire as something unnatural. Something sick. Women went from immoral beings to morally superior beings who were deemed fragile and passive. Men were still viewed as sexual and depraved.

From

https://leighnoren.com/human-sexuality-blog/who-has-more-sexual-desire-men-or-women-according-to-science/

This is from a 15 centhury book:

A woman who was once asked by a man, why, if the pleasure of cohabitation was equal for both sexes, it was generally the men who pursued and importuned the women rather than vice-versa, replied: “It is a very wise custom that compels the men to take the initiative. For it is certain that we women are always ready for sex; not so you men, however. And we should therefore be soliciting the men in vain, if they happened to be not in the proper condition for it.”

Cited on a blog by a guy. Some interesting sources cited: https://noseriouslywhatabouttehmenz.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/on-libido-part-two/

Also interesting this other blog commenting on this guys post:

https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/the-myth-men-are-horny-women-are-not/

On the buddhist camp again, theres this quote

The texts repeatedly describe celibate monks as embodiments of dhamma (the path of enlightenment) while the lustful insatiable women are described as embodiments of samsara (the cycle of death and rebirths).

From this article ( https://qz.com/india/586192/theres-a-misogynist-aspect-of-buddhism-that-nobody-talks-about/amp/) about buddhism and sexism. It maybe about the historical perception of womens libidos, but might as well be about monks demonizing women when trying to be celibate

Theres also this very good one, lots of sources:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150213090711/https://www.alternet.org/when-women-wanted-sex-much-more-men

Quote:

Early twentieth-century physician and psychologist Havelock Ellis may have been the first to document the ideological change that had recently taken place. In his 1903 work Studies in the Psychology of Sex, he cites a laundry list of ancient and modern historical sources ranging from Europe to Greece, the Middle East to China, all of nearly the same mind about women’s greater sexual desire.

And this one:

https://medium.com/sexography/in-the-medieval-times-women-were-the-horny-ones-e09ec039ab65

And this other site cited in this one:

https://www.brown.edu/Departments/Italian_Studies/dweb/society/sex/sexual-desire.php

Honorable mention:

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/women/idea-middle-aged-women-sexual-victorian-myth-history-1594161

Is about older womens libido specifically but talks about historical changes in sexual perception of female libido

Edit:

Not all the examples are jokes, but jokes can be insightful about the perceptions of a culture. For example, the full quote in the text about the 15 century book goes as follow:

One of the earliest known postclassical joke books is the 15th-century Facetiae of Poggio, in which we find the following anecdote, presented in the painfully stiff English translation:

A woman who was once asked by a man, why, if the pleasure of cohabitation was equal for both sexes, it was generally the men who pursued and importuned the women rather than vice-versa, replied: “It is a very wise custom that compels the men to take the initiative. For it is certain that we women are always ready for sex; not so you men, however. And we should therefore be soliciting the men in vain, if they happened to be not in the proper condition for it.” Somewhat later, in the first season of Curb Your Enthusiasm, we find this bit, described thus in the DVD package for those who don’t want to watch the video:

Larry is drifting off when Cheryl asks him, “Why am I the one that always has to initiate sex?” Larry explains that he’s always available, and all Cheryl has to do is tap him on the shoulder. Otherwise, he tells her, “I’ll just be mauling you all the time.”

in other words, it is the exact same joke, but the genders have reversed. (Also, the original version had a perfectly good boner joke, but 21st-century assumptions are forced to omit it. This is not a net gain, from a comedy-writing standpoint.) What the hell happened between the 15th century and the 21st?

Edit 2: an observation: pretty funny how in every debate here theres always a portion of people saying that biological factors arent that strong and culture is much more important. But when it comes to this shifting perception of female libido, it seems few people are inclined to think our current research into it reflects more social circunstances than biological ones, and the responses are either about how men are actually hornier and we know now because science, or how men said women were hornier because patryarchy, but few people in the comments seem to even entertain the idea that it could really be that in the past women acted hornier. There could be a reason for that shift, industrial pollution changing behavior, visual porn making men more prone to sexual urges, women internalizing sexual repression cuturally when in fact they were hornier before, etc I dont know, Im just imagining possible explanations. But to most people here that seems to be something beyond questioning, men are and have always been hornier