To put it in estimate math terms:

  • ✅: 30% of guys have a holistically attractive balance
  • 🟡: 30% aren’t undesirable, but are also not desirable. They don’t elicit arousing energy from her, nor repulsion. They’re Beta Bob “AFC” energy. Generally… unsexy, but sometimes are able to lock down a girlfriend or wife through good timing, persistence, or societal expectation
  • 👎: 20 % are fuckboys who may be cute or sexy but who are terrible in relationships or don’t want one (with you) and thus are not desirable for LTRs
  • 👎: 20% are physically unattractive (ugly) or behaviorally repugnant (Omegas), either way they’re not desirable by most for a mutually romantic pairing

So that means, at any given time, 70% of guys aren’t holistically attractive.

This doesn’t mean any particular guy can’t oscillate between categories. These aren’t static nor permanent categories. You aren’t stuck a dweeb or Average Frustrated Chump, nor are you stuck a fuckboy. Hell, “a balanced guy” could devolve into one of the lesser categories just as well. We’re all human. We change over time. Sometimes for the better. Sometimes for the worse.

I’m sure you could do the same analysis for women, but create your own post for that!