I was browsing through another post and this comment chain inspired my question.

It's undisputed that the manosphere argues that women who have sex with men are made worse off as a result, meanwhile men who have sex with women are made better off. In the former case the woman's value somehow decreases and the man's increases. This "double standard" is one of the most prominent beliefs within the manosphere. You'll find many analogies they try to use, such as the lock and key.

The title in the thread I linked is indicative of this mentality, and the comment I linked caught my eye.

POST: a threesome is 2 girls 1 man (self.PurplePillDebate) If you a girl and you fucked 2 guys at once, that's not a threesome. You had a train run on you. Choo Choo bitch. God bless

COMMENT: Yeah women are the prize and bless anyone they come into contact with, men are subhuman trash and are so filthy that they lower the value of a human being just by touching them. More women = good, more men = bad. You can apply this to every area of life. Any situation that involves more men than women is not something you want to be a part of.

Another guy who replied to that comment was clearly angry. However, if that guy agrees with slut-shaming, then exactly what part of the comment is he denying? Now, that's only one guy responding, so that's why I'm asking the rest of you here. Do you agree with this idea?

Another thread also had comments expressing the same theory:

Men are inherently tainted or “dirty” while women are inherently pure like an unblemished like a sheet of snow. A woman becoming sexually involved with a man is equivalent to running a white dress through the mud or cow manure. While a man getting involved with a woman is like being dirty and taking a nice bath. No one knows this more than men themselves. Disclaimer: these aren’t necessarily my personal beliefs but observations I’ve come realize from men and society.

To me it's quite logical to come to that conclusion. If you believe a woman loses her value & are made worse off by having sex with men, and for men it's the opposite, then clearly the common denominator in the first case is that men are making her worse off, and women are making him better off.

When you consider that sex between men are responded with more disgust than sex between women, this idea makes even more sense. The presence of men in a sexual activity poisons it, and the presence of women does the opposite: the more men are involved in a sexual activity the more disgusting it becomes. Shaming a woman -- or man -- for having sex with men is essentially synonymous with "ew, you had sex with MEN". Encouraging a man -- or woman -- for having sex with women could then be summarized as "nice, you had sex with WOMEN". Men are so gross and icky that a person is now damaged and ruined as a result of having sex with them. Women on the other hand are so beautiful that a person is now made better off and happier as a result of having sex with them.

Whether this is the intentional or inadvertent conclusion of slut-shaming -- or more broadly, shaming people for having sex with the male gender specifically, and doing the opposite for sex with the female gender -- I do want to ask whether you agree with this idea:

  • Are men who slut shame actually doing a "self own" by implying their own gender makes people worse off & women make people better off as a result of sex?
  • Are men who slut shame actually benefiting themselves?
  • Do you agree with this idea? Do you think men should be thought of as gross and disgusting, and women should be thought of as the opposite?