I don’t think most of the pushback against red pill is actually about it being wrong. it feels more like people just don’t want certain things said plainly. like there’s this unspoken agreement that some parts of dating are supposed to stay dressed up in nicer language

what always stands out to me is how the conversation goes. at first it’s all moral pushback. you’re bitter, you’re generalizing, you feel entitled, you hate women, you don’t understand how dating works. it’s framed like you’re saying something crazy or offensive just for pointing something out

but if you keep going long enough, the same points start getting admitted anyway. suddenly it’s yeah of course attractive men have more options. yeah women tend to like taller guys. yeah status and confidence matter more when the guy already looks good. none of that is controversial anymore once it’s said a certain way or evidence and and argued deeper about

so what was the problem in the first place. it clearly wasn’t the observation itself

it’s more like people don’t like the framing. saying it bluntly strips away the nicer story about dating being mostly about personality and good intentions. it starts to look more like people respond to attraction, status, and social proof way more than they want to admit

and another part people is people want unselected men to just shut up about it. not only are they told they’re wrong, they dont want it to even be discussing it with each other.

that’s why it feels off. if something is actually false, you don’t need to police who talks about it or how much they talk about it. you just shrug and move on(especially if these men arent important). but that’s not what happens here

it’s more like people argue morally first, then quietly concede the reality later once it becomes too obvious to deny. Then tell you Your a bad person for noticing or bringing up said observations