~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
LowCreddit
[–]SorryEmTraditionalist 122 points123 points124 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Probably my most bluepilled take but attractive women on r/roastme should just be ignored
[–]Naebany 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think being ignored would also trigger her so that's not such a bad idea.
[–]Mainboii 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah like no wonder these kids don’t get laid. She has a dead end job and smokes weed that’s free ass
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 76 points77 points78 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
she got mad btw so yeh the roast did work
[–]Reptheft 47 points48 points49 points 3 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link
The point is to roast the OP, how did that guy even break the rules?
[–]LouisdeRouvroy 60 points61 points62 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He hurt a woman's feelings.
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (41 children) | Copy Link
How was that a roast? He literally made all that shit up and most of it didn’t make any sense. Weed is super expensive? She’s got a super pretty face but also she’s meh?
He just kept saying she was going to waste her 20s over and over. “Your face is really pretty but you’re flat” ooooh sick burn dude.
[–]Affectionate_Pen_623 42 points43 points44 points 3 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
How was that a roast? He literally made all that shit up and most of it didn’t make any sense.
Soooo....a roast?
[–]Zombombaby 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
A roast tends to be funny and light hearted dark humor. This was just an unhinged rant about how much this dude hates women and a great display of untreated mental illness. It's just sad at this point.
[–]Salt-Jaguar-1014 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Didn't know you were the arbiter of roasts. Plenty of people laughed.
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Yeah and I've seen videos of people torturing animals and laughing too. Humor is clearly subjective. Doesn't mean murdering kittens is considered a comedy roast either. Lol
[–]Salt-Jaguar-1014 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Hes not torturing animals, you ignoramus. He's roasting someone looking for attention and it's pretty well deserved.
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
He's not roasting though. A roast would have a punchline or at least a joke in there somewhere. It's literally in the subreddit rules that there needs to be an actual joke in the response.
Where's the joke, bud?
[–]Salt-Jaguar-1014 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Didn't you just say humour is subjective, bud? She's the joke, not that hard to grasp.
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Oh, so your hatred of a woman participating in Society is the joke. Got it.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
No it was hilarious because she was obviously just fishing for omg you so hot. How on earth should one roast that face or what she put out there . He did what people who knows comedy do he took it to another deeper and more real level
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, he took it away from a roast into a sad personal vendetta. Thanks. I agree.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Vendetta haha i love that word . If I ever do a vendetta it will definitely be sad .
So what should he say? You smoke weed and you look gorgeous..boom roasted
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Iunno, maybe try an actual joke? Why is this such a hard concept for some men?
[–]ThisBoringLifeLife is a mix of pills 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
In a sub like roastme, you expect the insults to be based on reality?
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Well usually they’re based on the photo the person submitted or their looks. So yes?
[–]Fichek 18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
You are delusional. That was a perfect roast. A shallow good looking woman posting a pic fishing for compliments on r/roastme is a prime "target" for a psychological and emotional roast!
[–]DisasteridWoman-Liker[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What makes her shallow in your eyes? That she’s attractive?
[–]MamaAbroad 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
How do you know she’s shallow? Because she’s good-looking?
[–]Knight_of_Inari 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
She's literally posting a good photo of herself to get free compliments, that's so stereotypically shallow and needy lmao
[–]MamaAbroad 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s not an overly posed photo or anything. She doesn’t have particularly heavy makeup on and it doesn’t look like there’s a filter… I’m just saying, I have seen unattractive people post photos that were more filtered and made-up for “roasting” but no one accuses them of being shallow.
And even if she was hoping for attention/compliments, that’s more insecure than shallow.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Jesus cristh what a moron you are. She is so obviously fishing for omg you so hot that is what make here shallow and everyone with a brain can see it
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A shallow
How is she shallow?
a psychological and emotional roast
"Psychological" roasts are such a reddit moment. It's a bunch of assumptions, faux intellectualism and cliches all wrapped up in overly verbose writing to try and give the impression that the poster is super cool and witty. They're terrible.
[–]BirdMedication 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
How would you roast someone who doesn't have any obvious physical flaws? You'd still end up having to make something up about them having a "weird nose" despite their nose being perfectly normal. Which makes no sense and defeats the purpose
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
who doesn't have any obvious physical flaws?
Bruh, the top of her head looks like an old barbie doll with most of the hair pulled out. Her hair is thinner than a lot of guys I know and her eyebrows are atrocious.
If you could stop seeing women as otherwordly beings you can treat them like normal people and see the same flaws in them as you see in anyone else.
You'd still end up having to make something up about them having a "weird nose" despite their nose being perfectly normal.
Everyone has flaws. It doesn't always have to be physical, but it at least needs to make sense.
[–]BirdMedication 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Way to assume that I don't also think some men have no obvious physical flaws as well lol
That said your example roast does bring up an interesting point though, that physical flaws can be subjective (between individuals or genders). Like some people (especially women) might notice the tiniest details about someone's "atrocious" eyebrows or lashes, but personally I would not even consider that a flaw on a man or a woman because those aren't features I spend a lot of time lot of time focusing on.
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Way to assume that I don't also think some men have no obvious physical flaws as well
I didn't assume that at all, but it's interesting that you immediately jump to that as a defense.
personally I would not even consider that a flaw on a man or a woman because those aren't features I spend a lot of time lot of time focusing on.
You're thinking about it too logically, it's not about looking for actual flaws. It's about thinking of something funny or absurd to point out. I really don't care about her eyebrows, but if you wanted me to roast her picture that's what I'd go with.
It doesn't even have to be a flaw, I've seen guys get destroyed by jokes about how much they work out.
[–]pandenubes [score hidden] 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Anon… I’m sorry to say but… This may perhaps have rubbed you the wrong way as well
?
[–]LaPolloGrande -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You seem like the kind of person who puts mayonnaise in their underwear and then complains about it
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You seem like the kind of guy to ask girls "where's my hug?"
[–]AnUnstableNucleus 24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Did she ever respond to that one?
[–]CliffPR 65 points66 points67 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
She apparently whined to the mods. Does that count?
[–]redditlovestobanus 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Reeeeee
[–][deleted] 54 points55 points56 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
What a fucking bitch, you don't go on roast me and do that when the heats too hot.
[–]maplehobo 46 points47 points48 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well the guy was spot on. She didn't go there to get roasted.
[–]NationalistGoyRed Pill Man 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women like her are so used to compliments, treating her like a queen means nothing to her. Be mean to her and you'll give her an emotion roller-coaster.
[–]Signal_Adeptness_724 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not to mention that if you're posting a pretty pic, there isn't much to roast about because the person knows they're attractive. The roast was basically the only thing that could get under someones skin that looks like that lol
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't think so.
[–]Glittering-Aioli-972 31 points32 points33 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
loneliness and singlehood can dramatically increase the IQ of a man, leading to high IQ takes like on the right hand side above.
[–]IMOY21 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
IQ is not intelligence . you must be drowning in pussy
[–]Audactiyexceeds 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Doesn’t IQ literally stand for “intelligence quotient”?
[–]Mark_FreedRed Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Great take... I think it's more like the growth that comes out of surviving the gruelling hardships
[–]EnricoLUccellatore 21 points22 points23 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Go to r/roastme
See a post
Roast op
Get banned
[–]Ainsleygz 36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Dude needs a joint
[–]ScaryMovie57 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Can't we just settle this over a joint?" -Shrek, probably
[–]tritter211Pragmatic 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
yeah guy went on a unhinged rant on a woman just because she's pretty.
Which is weird. I don't usually see MEN jealous of a woman because she's pretty. (Its usually women showing that jealousy)
[–]mrrockydongChillpilled 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She asked to be insulted. She got insulted.
[–]redditlovestobanus 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I think these men only get mad when such women complain about their life, how bad they have it, etc.
[–]RadicalQueenBee 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She's complaining about being broke and friendless, she's not complaining about being ugly. Was she supposed to take a bad picture on purpose so that she'd be roasted on her looks as well when that doesn't apply?
[–]Due_Box3639 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Certifiable psycho behaviour
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 52 points53 points54 points 3 years ago (95 children) | Copy Link
He mentions her looks will fade but then says pretty girls don't need careers. Um, okay, what about when her looks fade? Does she need a career then? Unless you want to be at the mercy of other people, then you need your own income.
[–]platinirismsBlackpill 32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (51 children) | Copy Link
Just ride the beta bucks until divorce or death.
Looks fade but not enough for a BB to divorce her for it.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 31 points32 points33 points 3 years ago* (49 children) | Copy Link
Most households are two income. Many marriages don't work out. Why does it seem like that guys who say this are speaking at us from 1959?
[–]Old_Speed_7861 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Her looks will be able to get her a rich men or one with more resources. When she divorced or has kids she gets money from that
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
What if she doesn't want to divorce?
Meeting a very rich man that doesn't care that she is unemployed, can singlehandedly provide for her and the kids and who happens to be extremely compatible with her, a good person, good father and also physically attractive enough that she doesn't need to just starfish and hope it's quick isn't a high probability no matter how hot you are.
So I think she should just do her best to find her person and ignore all the BS hot girl fanfiction from the red pill.
[–]Glittering-Aioli-972 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
and what woman doesn't want to divorce? XD
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I think it will only go up now we have red pill destroying the minds of men everywhere.
[–]IFuckingHateAllergyRed Machiavellian 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There will be no divorce because most red pill men will not get married. Its a terrible contract that has basically no benefit for the men.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good.
[–]Audactiyexceeds 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Red pill was just a reaction to the feminist BS destroying the minds of women everywhere. Try again
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Well. Two destroyed minds are better than one I guess. Feminism was a reaction to sexism is a patriarchal society. Red pill is crying about having to actual be desierable instead of necessary due to women having independence from men.
[–]Audactiyexceeds 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Women aren’t “independent from men” 😂😂😂 single mothers are mostly impoverished. It’s just that feminism has convinced women that living in poverty is somehow better than being desirable to a man
[–]Ionicomica 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
There's no way you actually think like this.
[–]Glittering-Aioli-972 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
women love to divorce and breakup, its like a past time to them. i can't see why they won't either, you literally have a line of guys round the block waiting for you there is literally no incentive to stay XD
[–]Old_Speed_7861 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
But it would still be redpill right. She exchanges looks and him money. It’s a transaction
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Depressing.
[–]Old_Speed_7861 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why?
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bcz women get bored very fast and after divorce she can return back to party life
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Despite most having two incomes, a disproportionate amount of the actual bills are paid by men.
God I wish it was the 50s
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Proof?
You're looking at it through rose-tinted glasses. I did like the fashion though.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
OMG, how disingenuous.
Look, if women keep screaming about the pay gap - who the hell do you think is paying the majority of the bills in relationships?
How can you come on PPD? Is this your first day on earth?
Ok, yes this SOURCE is from AdviceForMen, but I'm using it because it's taking the reported data and slicing through all of its obfuscation and boiling it down. If you want the 'real data' it's out there.
And sure, you can say "well this is new zealand" all day. It's ALL western "progressive" nations.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How is it disingenuous to ask for proof of someone's claim?
The gap between men and women's income is forever shrinking but I don't know why you guys complain about it so much with the amount you say you don't care about a woman's career.
Well, because you can and probably should ave looked up some information before entering a debate forum and questioning my position on it. Like, just a cursory web search can find you this shit. So, although you might have just been ignorant about it, I presume you're being disingenuous when I guess you're just 'low effort'.
We don't really care about a woman's career or the finances or status it beings because we do not have access to it.
Furthermore, due to hypergamy, high earning women are only looking for men equal or higher. So the guy's that are lower than she is don't care either because we are out of that competition.
That doesn't mean I want a jobless woman. Not now.
But when I talk about how only men are net tax contributors (because not only do women earn less - due to their own choices - but they take WAY more out of the system than they put in and more than take out of the system). So yeah, that kinda pisses me off in this supposedly 'equal' world where women actually walk around thinking they contribute equally with men, generally speaking. And don't take more out of the system than men.
But these are hard ass truths that women don't want to admit and they certainly don't go looking for evidence (you proved that) for anything that doesn't work as a positive for them and their arguments.
SOOOO, us men have to do the heavy lifting ONCE AGAIN, to expose the negative side of females. And of course women try and shut that shit down real quick through censorship, shame, guilt, reputation destruction and screaming HATE all over the fucking place.
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/Workingpapers/PDF/wp1620.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj_p_3h9MP_AhUquaQKHRljC7gQFnoECCwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3P1HEuS01rHyifGgZ5jNVc
Coupled with other facts like the gender gap in financial literacy (most women literally don't have an emergency fund for their bills, whereas most men do).
I mean, I'm not black, so I think I'll do fine buying a house on a blue collar salary.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can't manage to download that file to my phone so I guess I can't fact check it to see if it said what you were claiming.
There were ups and downs, i s'pose.
[–]I_AMYOURBIGBROTHER 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Bro did you even read the abstract of that paper you linked? Or read into the paper at all?
Abstract: “The data reveal that that women, even when they are the primary earner, are much more likely than men to have the major responsibility for household shopping and bill paying. With regard to financial decisionmaking, however, there is a greater propensity to share responsibility equally, and income ranking is more important than gender in defining household roles, with higher earners more likely to have a larger share of responsibility.”
Page 13: “Figure 9 shows the estimated frequency of rating distributions for each financial activity and household type. Uncertainty in these estimates is provided in Appendix C. These results suggest a clear dichotomy in the four activ- ities. Financial decisions are much more likely to be shared equally, with over 50 percent of households estimated as doing so no matter the member’s gender and relative income. The share of households equally sharing responsibil- ity for bill payments or household shopping is much lower. Instead, women have the major responsibility for both tasks in close to 50 percent of households, regardless of their income ranking. This difference between activity types reflects both the higher proportion of 2 ratings in the data for financial decisions (see Figure 4) as well as a lower rate of consistency among dual-sampled households (see Figure 2).”
You realize this directly contradicts your claim of “Despite most having two incomes, a disproportionate amount of the actual bills are paid by men.”
[–]Vapelord420XXXD 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
All that means is women control the household cash regardless of whether they earn it or not. Most asian families are like this with the working husband being given an "allowance" by his wife.
[–]I_AMYOURBIGBROTHER 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
So then why did the guy link the source? He said men paid the bills and then linked this source, you realize that right? All I’m asking is what does this source have to do with his argument. Maybe he can point me to what I’m missing in that pdf because why else would he link the source?
[–]Vapelord420XXXD 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No idea. Either didn't think someone would check or read it wrong?
[–]Audactiyexceeds -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It’s the man’s money, even if the woman is the one “paying the bill”. She’s paying with the man’s money. Is it that hard to understand?
[–]I_AMYOURBIGBROTHER 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hey I’m still confused as to where your source says that men pay all the bills disproportionately, can you send me the section you were referring to?
[–]Scandi_Navy 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Most households are two income because women want to be able to leave.
Many marriages don't work out because women leave.
So why do women leave? Well the statistics say money and monkey branching (cheating to get with more money).
A long relationship for women just means that's a ceiling they've hit.
But honestly if they had used their 20s better, they could have gotten the best option for them straight away. Instead of spending their 30s and 40s trying to get to what they once could attract.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
No. It's because of the economy and perhaps women wanting more autonomy and not to be stuck indoors bored all day but mainly the economy.
Women file more, doesn't automatically mean they initially end it.
Actual evidence of this?
I hear people say this but I disagree. Options for women in their very early twenties are often from narcissists that want to control someone or a trophy or people after an easy bang. I think people after age 25 get better options for commitment and understand themselves more to be able to maintain a relationship with someone they're compatible with.
The risk of commiting in your early twenties is that your childlike crush will probably wear off and you'll find you're a different person at 27 than at 21. It works for some people but for most that is usually the case and that's why statistics suggest 28-34 as best age for marriage for lowest risk of divorce.
[–]Scandi_Navy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People could live on less. It's a choice. Actually forced into people by feminism as women increase workers and drive down wages.
Yes you can divorce statistics and causes for whatever region you live in.
Those options already exist, because there is a group of men that is older.
No they are not more able to have a relationship. Maybe if they stayed virgins, but they are not. And the more previous partners the more dissatisfied they are with their relationship. They can't accept the fallibility of humans. They want every good trait of every previous partner in one. And the storm wind of a fling into a years long relationship.
You are a different person at 30 than at 60 as well. Your solution is just a never ending stream of partners you can't build with. Well then why would anyone invest more into you than a couple months of sex. Because that's men's reaction to it.
No it doesn't show that. In fact that is one of the main contributing factors to the ever growing high divorce rate.
The reason it being peddled by women is this idea that they should have a slut phase in order to be happy. Not because it's good for their future but because instant gratification and don't judge my debauchery culture. Because age 30 fits us women as we are running out of time, and we don't want younger competition.
They could have their top Chad their whole life. And whore culture, I mean feminism, is lying to them. Drive down the wages by increasing the work force. And drive those very same young women into the porn industry. Where it's okay for them to get railed by 3 men over 60. Milked for their beauty for profit. As long as they are not competing for the 30 year old woman's Chad.
[–]Audactiyexceeds 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Control” as in… set boundaries in their relationship? I think men will start calling women “controlling” when they tell us not to get with other women. Stop controlling me you narcissist!
[–]rhagaeas_executioner 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Men still significantly outearn women in married/cohabitating couples and most men don't mind settling down with a woman who earns significantly less than him. Even if she's still working full time after settling down, she will in all likelihood have a far better standard of living thanks to a higher earning partner.
Many marriages don't work out.
If it "doesn't work out" chances are she still gets a payout.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
thanks to
I don't think its a "thanks to" when men are willing chosing those arrangements and often say they dont GAF about a woman's income.
[–]basteandpilled 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
“I can’t fuck your degree.”
“Career women are disagreeable and masculine.”
“Men don’t care about money like women do.”
“Half the marital assets? This is a TRAVESTY!!! Damn you, feminism!!!”
[–]rhagaeas_executioner 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Most men can't afford to be too selective in that regard, because women prefer higher-earning men.
And I don't see how that justifies the status quo of joint assets in marriage.
[–]Audactiyexceeds -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What do the first three have to do with the last one? Taking half of someone else’s money has nothing to do with having a degree or a career. Those divorce laws are from times when most women didn’t work at all. Now, most women do work. So even if you don’t have a degree or a “career”, that still doesn’t mean that you need half your man’s money just because you left him. Pick up some extra shifts Ms. Strong and Independent!
[–]rhagaeas_executioner 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Did you fail english in grade school? "Thanks to" in most contexts is synonymous with "because of".
Instead of addressing the main point you're trying(and failing) to nitpick my word choice.
[–]platinirismsBlackpill 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Don’t know about yourself, but in almost all marriages I know, the man makes more money and/or works more hours ontop.
M1: He works for government, she’s a part time cleaner
M2: Self employed plumber, part time cleaner
M3: Drives Taxi’s 50 hours a week, she’s unemployed.
M4: He works for government, she’s unemployed
Etc, sure she might still work, but highly likely for less hours and for a lower wage. (At least in terms of Gen X or older, this sort of wage gap is closing in with Gen Y).
Did you just make up examples?
Do these couples have kids?
[–]platinirismsBlackpill 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, these are examples of couples I personally know, yes they all have kids.
I should probably mention I’m from the UK, so that also plays a role.
[–]Safinated 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
That isn’t a free ride, lol. Post wall women aren’t marrying 5%-ers who can pay for a housewife and kids
[–]Over_North8884 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
An attractive 50yo can still land a wealthy 80yo, wait for him to die, and inherit his estate.
[–]CissyXS 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why would a wealthy 80 go for a 50yo and not 30yo?
[–]Over_North8884 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know, but it happens. Maybe the maturity gap remains an issue with some geriatrics.
[–]Mr_Chad_ThunderpenisZherkapilled aka Red Pill Rage and Cocaine 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In her dreams, maybe. Most of his assets at that point has already been passed down to his kids. Also, if he made it to 80yo and managed to amass significant wealth, he is probably neither stupid nor naive. He isn't getting married to a woman to give her rights over his estate, and certainly not a 50yo woman. At that age he is more likely to spend his money on young hookers, cocaine and viagra to go out with a bang, than spend it on some menopausal woman. I mean sure it might happen occassionally, but for every 5 gold diggers who succeed, there are probably 95 who fail.
[–]utopista114 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Unless you want to be at the mercy of other people,
You're always at the mercy of other people.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But there's degrees to that.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Ok ok, he wasn't writing a book/thesis. It should have said that "pretty girls don't THINK they need careers", and a lot don't actually "need" a career AS LONG AS THEY TAP OUT EARLY....otherwise yeah, she will find herself at the mercy of some beta bux (we all have a boss) and she'll resent him..
And BTW, this whole idea that women are scared to 'settle' because 'what if it doesn't work out' is crazy... You get HALF plus the kids. The whole system is setup that women can't fail unless.... UNLESS THEY CHOOSE SO FUCKING POORLY (jobless, petty thug baby daddy).
Hell, pick, marry and have children with a guy that at least has a job and you'd be doing better than most of the baby-mammas out there.
Yeesh. That scarcity mindset is real. But women can't sit around waiting for the 'perfect situation' either. Like, cmon, we all gotta have jobs. We all gotta submit to someone.
When I graduated college (for electronics) I didn't get to sit around waiting it out for the perfect job. I had to take what I could get, and electronics made sure I didn't have to work in a factory on a line.
Same with a pretty woman (well, most women). They can keep going "just one more spin", but eventually that shit runs out. And then inevitably, they blame men. But remember, the men they blame are the ones they were hot for. The ones they wanted to tame. The guy that had a crush on you in grade 10, well, he never counted anyway right? Now he's an accountant, hell, even a truck driver.... meanwhile, baby-daddy is a roofer with a criminal record and a meth-addiction.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Ok ok, he wasn't writing a book/thesis. It should have said that "pretty girls don't THINK they need careers", and a lot don't actually "need" a career AS LONG AS THEY TAP OUT EARLY.
I don't agree with this either. How will a woman not need a career if she "taps out early" can you explain this? Who is the hypothetical man she is "tapping out" for? Where is she meeting him?
Yeah but maybe you don't want to be a divorced single mom but in the dating market.
[–]Atomic_Thr0away [score hidden] 3 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
I refuse to believe any woman has never had some sweet guy that was in love with her. What a pile of garbage. You may not have noticed, but he was there. He was the guy that rode his bike past your house. He helped with homework. He asked (or wanted to ask) you to the dance. You remember. Use the force. Think about it. He was there.
This is the 'I want a guarantee' entitled mindset of women.
You basically get HALF of what you built together and you usually get the kids. Don't wanna be a single mom in the dating market? Well, then don't take the kids. But they always take the kids. Why? Fucking easier, that's why. The kids are an asset you have NOW, not a bet on the future.
And why is it that women seem to think that they're the only ones that suffer 'lost opportunity' and feel entitled to be re-reimbursed for it?
"I gave up my (potential, not guaranteed) career to take care of the kids" - where's the agency in that? You didn't "HAVE TO"... but, in divorce court it always sounds like she had no choice. Like WTF.
In life, there are trade-off's, that's all. Trade this for that. If you traded your (potential) career to stay home and take care of kids, well, that was your trade. And if shit goes sideways, well, you basically get half + the kids (money in the bank for a while). It's what you both accrued TOGETHER.
And why is it always women imagining the "man leaves for a younger hotter model" when all the stats are clear, women initiate divorce 80-90% of the time (depending on her prospects)? MEN AREN'T LEAVING.
And even in the WORST situations where the dude is ACTUALLY kicking her ass, she can run to family, friends or at least a womans shelter which is basically a fucking hotel resort compared to men (here's the cot on the church basement floor, "see you in the morning, if you make it")
And then she gets a TON of access to resources and councilors that are busting their ass to get her into subsidized housing on an "urgent" basis" And then she gets a free lawyer (legal aid) to get those child/spousal support arrangements.
Why is it a woman.women feel they are the ones getting the shit end of the stick in these scenarios? What, it's gonna be a tough couple years? What, you've lost sexual market value because you're older and have have kids? WTF... ok, don't have kids. Like, there are so many variable and so many ways to avoid all this shit... but women want KIDS (after the 304 phase (finding herself)).
I don't like quitting a job without another one (monkey branching), but I've done it. I've been promised a bunch of shit, quit my old job, took new job, found out it was shit, and left, still got Employment Insurance, it just took a little longer and some fucking proof.
And as we ALL get older, most of us are losing market value anyway, not just sexually, but I'm (48) and not playing the same game I was at 28. I don't have the energy. I know I was taken advantage of, but I also know that the reason I don't work for minimum wage on some warehouse floor (and the reason my employer 'gets it too') is because of my past history.
They know I am "educated" even if it doesn't apply to this job. They know I don't have gaps in my resume (equivalent to a 304 phase). They know I still have other options (now that I'm a truck driver). And quite frankly, I'm where I belong.
But not women... oh nooo... they don't "belong" anywhere or to anything. (rolls eyes).
Look, this is hard to say, and no one likes it, not even men, but at the end of the day, if a woman is still ready, willing and able to provide sex, she will get resources and utility in return.
And I get it, women can and DO resent this. But I also resent being looked at like a resource and utility.
At the end of the day, when the veil is pulled back off of all of our eyes, this is the essential trade between men and women.
And the fact that you say "but maybe you don't want to be a divorced single mom in the dating market." PROVES that women KNOW where their currency is.
How many man do I have to know that have been absolutely CRIPPLED (financially) by divorce, out here, crawling around, begging for a drop of hope, fucking killing themselves because they know that if they drop that far in FMV (Financial market value), they're FUCKED. Because men don't want old used up women and women don't want no broke ass man.
"Pay me now or pay me later" was something my old boss used to say. But, for men, when the TAB comes at the end, we're paying for shit... we're like "WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS LINE ITEM... EMOTIONAL LABOUR?" And women be acting like "Yeah, remember when your dog died and you were crying, well, I had to sit through that, so Yeah, $300/hr as your therapist" and we be like "So caring has a price" and she be like "It does NOW BITCH". lol
I wish I could say "Ok, I'm being dramatic for rhetorical purposes" but that shit is REAL MAN.
Anyway, in case anyone is like "Damn, that was along post, he's triggered, must be an INCEL with PTSD" and "Who hurt you", nah, I'm good. Just making points. I write like I talk, firm, direct, overt, to the point.
And this was me and my baby, the one that 'got away' in 1991.
Ya know what happened? She told this dog (me) to sit and beg for treats (3 months). I said no. We broke up. A few months later she met her "Who is the hypothetical man she is "tapping out" for? Where is she meeting him?" and married him. Had a couple of kids. He was always trying to fuck other women. She was never jealous (because he was a "safe bet" beta bob). 26 years later she got diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. Looked around and went "Where the fuck is Atomic?" Left her family and the matrimonial home, didn't take the kids (why, she didn't have much time) and we barely fucking made it. Fucking lived in my van for a while, in winter, in Canada. She got her free lawyer. It took a couple years. She got her half, albeit too late, she got over 6 figures, 16 days before she died. But we had ONE HELL of an adventure together.
Why'd I take her back? Well, you seen the picture. It wasn't just her beauty. She kept her motor clean. It didn't matter than when I got her back she looked like this. Because she was SOO MUCH MORE THAN PRETTY. But she was pretty though, like cmon.
GOOD GIRLS DO WIN IN THE END.
I've had a couple 'old flames' from 'back in the day' try to reach out to 'see what's going on'. But they were sluts. I wasn't having ANYTHING to do with them... I'd have taken a 'good time' (and they knew it) but I wasn't going back in quality. Not after my Trishie. I'd never commit to them 304's.
Women, good women, women willing to make sacrifices, they're a good investment.
But make no mistake, women, almost all women, have sexual options. It's just that by 40, those are just sexual options (unless you were a Trisha).
Now I'll leave you with this for some comical (but tragically factual relief):
Patrice O'Neal Asks Women A Very Important Question
EDIT: GOOD MORNING SUNSHINE
[–]basteandpilled 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Least unhinged PPD man.
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
obviously you would use your looks to your advantage before that
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How? Just bag the nearest guy with a wallet or something?
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
yeh pretty much
[–]Rude_Macaron2021 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He mentions her looks will fade but then says pretty girls don't need careers. Um, okay, what about when her looks fade? Does she need a career then?
At that point the idea is the man invested in you enough for not feel compelled to divorce you.
Some Women, in their retardation, initiate divorce and then cannot find another guy that earns as much after spending the money they took from their ex.
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, not how this works.
You take advantage of your looks to land a good man while you're still capable, is it really that difficult a concept to grasp?
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
Yes because looks doesn't guarantee the "goodness" of a man you'll get. In fact, you're probably more likely to come across narcissists. The fat ugly girls in my school actually ended up in the most healthy relationships the soonest.
If you wait until you mature enough to learn good discernment in the people you date, a slight dip in your looks or "SMV" will pale in comparison to the advantage that will give you in finding a truly good and compatible mate.
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Having good looks = having more options.
Having more options = having a higher likelihood of finding a good partner.
Simple math, it is megacope to claim that you're more likely to enter fulfilling relationships if you're ugly.
I can also claim, probably with more validity, that you're more likely to be pumped and dumped if you're ugly.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link
Having good looks = having more options. Having more options = having a higher likelihood of finding a good partner.
I strongly disagree with this. I think this is a constant confusion by men from the outside looking in but it comes with it's own set of downsides.
More options means choice paralysis, more time wasters, more exhaustion, high likelihood you'll end up with someone you're incompatible with because they personally think your looks are enough to sustain a relationship and attraction on their end and will actively lie in order to lock you in.
I have always been above average in looks and dating in my early twenties was a nightmare. Men try and rope you into relationships or make you stay when you're clearly not compatible because they're only thinking with their eyes and their dick.
The more homely looking women just get offers from men that genuinely like them for them, share more interests and likely meet organically.
You only need one partner, one compatible, good person. Thousands of options just distracts from that, it's like trying to navigate your way through a sandstorm. With the higher likelihood of being agreeable because of your age and having less maturity and discernment to spot red flags, it can often be a rough experience after the initial, short-lived validation of "hey, i must be pretty!".
Being an attractive young women is equivalent to being a rich agreeable man with no game. You just get taken advantage of for the one fact. But game takes time to develop so settling down when you're very young is a bad decision imo.
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Choice paralysis does not mean you are less likely to find someone compatible, the theory simply posits that you likely to be less satisfied with whatever you choice you pick regardless of compatibility (even if you picked the best option in your pool of mates)
I don't understand how the rest of your comments refutes anything I said.
You are, mathematically, under the rules of the Theory of Probability, more likely to land a suitable partner by virtue of having more options, this is not male specific, this is pure and simple maths.
In fact, I would call into question your female view of the situation when you are blatantly ignoring probability maths in favour of emotional appeals like the following:
You only need one partner, one compatible, good person. Thousands of options just distracts from that, it's like trying to navigate your way through a sandstorm.
Reality doesn't work this way, if your rate of suitable partners is 10%, that number doesn't suddenly drop to 1% when the number of potential customers goes up, that number will forever remain constant, assuming of course your standards don't become warped due to an overinflated ego. In which case, I'll have to call into question your assumption of knowing what your "perfect match" should be in the first place.
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
That isn't what choice paralysis is. Definition from wikipedia;
Analysis paralysis describes an individual or group process where overanalyzing or overthinking a situation can cause forward motion or decision-making to become "paralyzed", meaning that no solution or course of action is decided upon within a natural time frame
Human relationships aren't mathematical. They're emotional. There you go.
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Sorry, I confused it with Sunk Cost, although many of the original depictions of decision paralysis came from Fontaine Fables which did describe a scenario in which an animal regretted his decision due to having hundreds of other options.
Now we're operating on two different normative understandings, relationships being emotional endeavours does not mean that they are immune to the probability theory, which affects quite literally all things in the universe that are subject to cause and effect.
Can we at least agree that the mate selection process is measurable and we can start from there?
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
You can try and quantifying mathematically all you want. Human emotions will always end up dictating outcomes in the end and if you're honestly expecting hormonal young people in their late teens and very early twenties to navigate relationships like a robot then no wonder you end up disappointed with the actual reality of these situations.
You guys put way too much pressure on young women. You wouldn't give the same advice to young men. You'd tell them to mature, develop discernment, good judgement, build a stable foundation, wealth, connections and not succumb to external pressures or marry unless they're 110% sure with their mate choice, yet you don't extend the same empathy for young women but instead try and push them along into marriages as soon as they're of age and then wonder why there's so many divorced single moms.
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
If you genuinely don't think that prospecting relationships can be measured then explain to me the existence of salesmen and the entire trillion dollar industry of sales that they work in???
If you can measure client-business relationships, then you can measure boy-girl relationships, the world quite literally runs on probabilities.
I'm sorry but we're just operating in two different realities here.
[–]CissyXS 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Yeah because men never leave their wives for someone younger and hotter /s
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Impressive, very nice.
Now let's see who initiates most divorces, and which young demographic is more likely to cheat.
[–]CissyXS 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Doesn't change fhe fact that there's always a risk of being dumped for another. Being dependent is always a risk
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
And?
[–]CissyXS 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
And ot makes sense that women still need to work to support themselves when that happens
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is literally irrelevant to the original point.
[–]Old_Speed_7861 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
She wouldn’t need one if she is smart. During that time the man pays for everything and gives her allowances and she is able to save up during that time. After her beauty fades some loser will find value in her and pay for all her stuff. Also she could have kids or divorce and gets money from that
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If she cares more about that then actually romantic compatibility then sure but most women in my experience want to find someone that actually love and connect with, not just a wallet.
[–]Old_Speed_7861 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We r taking about the example of pic which I explained. Women will use certain men for love others for money
[–]Rude_Macaron2021 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The sad thing of these women is that they give a child to the loser so they are unhappy, bad moms and take bad genetics because desperation to be moms.
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
He says what she will do in the picture. Why didn't you just read it?
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's too long but I did read it and didn't see it.
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He says she will leverage her looks into a marriage and then treat her husband poorly. You don't need a career to do that and there are many working class women doing it.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Classic Redpill logic.
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
DAMN that guy nailed it. No wonder they gave him 90 days - the truth will cost you.
[–]-AvatarAang- 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
you'll date a lot of "Chad" guys who will f*ck your face for a while
Is this really what happens to most pretty women? Even the innocent-looking ones? Because I've seen videos of that in my prawns-watching past and it honestly disturbed me. I'd really prefer to imagine that most people are not engaging in such acts. I want a partner who has never partaken in such acts.
This is what happens to pretty women with bad personalities. Good women leverage their looks into a few LTRs before marrying.
[–]-AvatarAang- 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But do people do those things in LTR's too, or just hookup scenarios?
bad personalities
In what sense? Why do they allow men to treat them like that in the first place?
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They do in pseudo-LTRs where you want someone because you are lonely but you know it won't last. They pick those men either because they have bad taste or they aren't able to keep good men. Women only know how to dress provocatively and stand in front of men they like. They aren't very sophisticated.
[–]eye_fuck 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Autism
[–]InjectAdrenochromeSpecial-K Snorter 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Huge essay to write over an attractive woman with no prospects. Seems too high effort imo
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thank you for posting this. Men if you ever hit your 30s and didn't have much success that's what's waiting for you if you decide to not aim younger.
There's always the chance that a 30s women will have some real character. But why take the chance? When you don't have to.
[–]Naebany 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow banned for roasting too hard even though that was the point. But that probably caused existential crisis in this girl might have been too close to home for some.
An oracle and a prophet. Of course he got banned.
[–]Flightlessbirbz 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link
Dude is jealous af no matter what he says.lol More of a self-roast tbh.
[–]barryjordan586 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link
Roasting someone on a roast-me board makes him jealous? What about his post is wrong?
[–]Furbyenthusiast 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link
That's not a roast. It's a whole ass book about why he hates pretty women.
[–]barryjordan586 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
He clearly roasted her specifically for fishing for compliments on a roastme subreddit, and for not having anything to offer aside from a pretty face. It's a harsh roast, like it or not.
[–]Zombombaby -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
Because pretty people shouldn't participate socially. Got it.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
She was participating on /r/roastme
Are you daft
[–]Zombombaby -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, and you don't bring a nuclear bomb to a neighbourhood water fight, babe. It's called reading the room. Do comics just go on stage during celebrity roasts and provide an entire multi page presentation on the benefits of genocide or the holocaust? What is not clicking here?
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
A roast like that is on brand for reddit. You're the one who needs avoid the room sweetie
Why are you bring up the Holocaust... What an apt comparison. Talk about reading the room 🤣
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
Okay, bud. Go to a comedy show and recite this exact post then. I'm sure the room will be filled with laughter. People clearly only go to roasts to hear incels' personal vendetta and beliefs against women.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
Is a comedy club the same as a text based reddit forum? Normal people go to comedy club. I stand by what I said, an incel rant is 100% on brand for a reddit roastme.
[–]Flightlessbirbz -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It wasn’t a roast. “Roast me” is supposed to be funny little insults about the specific person. Not a rant about how easy attractive women have it with a revenge fantasy thrown in. That’s called a PPD post.lol
[–]barryjordan586 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
He roasted her, specifically, because she posted on roastme as a stereotypically attractive person, clearly fishing for compliments (he said this in the very first sentence of the roast). Aside from fishing for compliments in bad faith, he roasted her for not having anything to offer aside from her pretty face. It's absolutely a roast, albeit harsh, whether you agree with the roast or not. Suggesting it's not a roast is just bizarre denial on your part.
[–]Flightlessbirbz 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
“Clearly finishing for compliments” on a roast sub? Can pretty people not post there? “All you have to offer is a pretty face” could’ve been the roast I guess, but the rest was just a jealous rant about attractive women in general.
[–]barryjordan586 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sure pretty people can post there, but that's fair game to be roasted for fishing for compliments. The roast is harsh, and long, but it's still a roast.
EDIT: he briefly mentions "it's common for girls like you drift aimlessly..." But for the most part he talks about her, specifically, the entire time.
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
That dude is suuuuper jealous that she is a young and attractive woman. Men whine about Hypergamy, but the reality is that her SMV is EQUAL to that of a successful software engineer. A chubby weird looking female software engineer is the equal to like a male schoolteacher.
[–]DoinIt989A misandrist against time 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Her SMV is way higher than a "successful software engineer", unless the SWE happens to also be a good looking huwhyte man.
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You are conflating SMV and RMV. Software engineers aren't sexy.
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I don’t see men getting into relationships with women they don’t find hot.
[–]Admirable_Spare797 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You’re incredibly naive lol . You gotta be under 35 or extremely sheltered . Plenty of people ,including men , get into relationships with women that they don’t find attractive just so they can have regular sex and a romantic relationship.
[–]Happy_Nuclear_End 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh my sweet summer child
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So you don't refute my point. You just move the goalpost to "men do it too." Do you ever have any serious thoughts or is life a stream of unconsciousness for you?
[–]Accomplished_Pie_153 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
we actually have no idea.
i've met many women who had like 1 or 2 good photos like this in online dating. then, in real life, they can be very different looking, going down even 4+ points for the worst frauds.
but even if you assume she is above average, i know many girls like that who hit 40, and are still single. it isn't all that easy for good looking people to marry a successful software engineer. even from just the man's perspective, they really need to ask: Is this person trustworthy? Do they enjoy the same hobbies, like Star Wars? Etc.
the few chubby female software engineers i know are married to people in tech.
[–]DoinIt989A misandrist against time 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hot women are probably more likely to fall into this trap because they have so many options tbh.
[–]JianJiaHei 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Now I'm offended... I'm a male teacher.
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Don’t worry your software engineer waifu who is chubby and average looking will provide for you
[–]JianJiaHei 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lol I'm good, self sufficient
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No hypergamous
[–]redkoicarp 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I always find it bizarre how schoolteacher is not an attractive job in the US lol..
[–]forking_guy 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Living near or below the poverty line has that effect.
[–]WYenginerdWYpro-woman pill. enjoys shitting on anti-feminists 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
A misogynist when an attractive woman posts in roast me:
Cracks knuckles
My time to whine has come. All shall now read my treatise on how much I hate attractive women and DESPAIR
[–]Admirable_Spare797 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How dare he hurt a woman’s fefes. He should’ve checked his privilege.
[–]Beanicus13 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No one cares if the girl felt roasted or not. It’s just this incel is clearly a miserable whiner. Not just an uninvested roaster.
[–]WYenginerdWYpro-woman pill. enjoys shitting on anti-feminists 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh nos, I criticized the incel. How dare I hurt his fefes over here where he can't see me 😭
[–]REDDITmodsDIALATE 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He's honestly not wrong and that's what she asked for lol
[–]fuck8ng-hebhob 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i aint readin allat
[–]Unnecessary-Training 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
I love how nobody here realizes that good looks take tremendous time, energy and abstinence from various bad habits to maintain.
[–]Mr_Chad_ThunderpenisZherkapilled aka Red Pill Rage and Cocaine 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
She's 23, even if she had various bad habits, it wouldn't show on her face just yet. Unless she enjoyed eating 3 pizzas a day and gotten fat, that's the only thing that would have been instantly visible.
[–]Unnecessary-Training 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
According to her, she smokes a 'disturbing amount of weed'. That will quickly harm her health.
[–]BirdMedication 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Looking good is, like, a full time job"
[–]barryjordan586 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Having a pretty face (we don't even know about body) as a girl is genetics and makeup.
[–]Unnecessary-Training 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Genetics, makeup and health.
[–]basteandpilled 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Attractive people also tend to be more intelligent and successful. Everything your mum told you as an awkward 13 year old BTFO.
[–]420KUSHBUSH 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You expect this subreddit, and people who support the person on the right, to be capable of critical thinking and rational thought?
[–]daylightxx -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
What a loser that guy is.
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
she asked to get roasted and he tried his best
[–]caption291 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's true, losers tend to say things that are accurate instead of playing the social games you're supposed to play to not make women uncomfortable.
What a fucking loser.
[–]ParralyzedGrassmaxxing 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Found the girl from the OP
[–]Old_Speed_7861 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Annual_Ad_1536 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What a self-own. Look at what she's wearing. Her reading level is obviously like 5 grades above OP. She just got him banned because he sucks lmao.
Ironic how the peron who posted the screenshot deleted their account, which leaves room for them "getting off of Reddit" and maybe doing something productive while the person on the right's Reddit account is suspended, which means they've probably had multiple bans and infractions, and already speaks volumes about their character if they typed out all that for OP's post
OP contradicts themselves "placing a bit more value on [their] life than [OP] does" because they're on /r/roastme in the first place and if they were busy living they wouldn't care about writing all that to a person. How any has respect for the person on the right is beyond me
[–]_demidevil_lesbian chad 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is so cringe. How is this guy not embarrassed? I guess he’s playing make believe Freud, except he probably got his psychology degree from Hustlers University.
[–]KitchenEmotional9373 [score hidden] 3 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
roast me is pretty cringe cause it's filled with sexual pariah Redditors looking for a chance to hurt other people the same way they've been bullied and cucked in real life, so I can't really get on board with some bearded sexual leper dabbing on a woman like that.
[–]ThisBoringLifeLife is a mix of pills 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why would lady even post on roastme if she wasn't looking for someone to attempt to insult her?
Why invite yourself to be the target of cringe if you don't like it in the first place?
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
the time it took for tht lol wtfff😭😂😂 guys r eww asf🤮
[–]PlainTundra -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Eff around, find out.
[–]GG55222 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Im happy for you or sorry that happened
[–]Affectionate_Pen_623 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The dude is definitely giving incel, but its a roast...thats kinda the point.
The girl in the OP is interesting to me though. I've never believed too much that women are done after 30 but I do genuinely think that rant got to her because she probably isn't really bartering on anything other than her looks.
There's pretty and then there is "her" pretty, She's a very presentable hot, blonde white woman likely in America. I've seen so many who look like her who studied some horseshit for 4 years in uni and go on to find themselves in respectable careers earning decent salaries who then go off and shack up with some random middle-upper middle class white dude who'll happily have her at home not working on his comfortable salary raising 2.5 kids with some picket fence in the suburbs.
And yet, there she is, 23 years old and posting on a sub as lame as "roast me". I strongly believe that the "incel" epidemic goes both ways. Yes a lot of men are struggling to get laid but I also think a lot of women are struggling to date. What isn't at all being discussed is how mens standards are increasing too. Wouldn't be surprised that her lack of friends, excessive weed smoking and lack of prospects/ambitions is hurting her dating options with the men she actually wants.
To be that attractive and posting your pics on subs, specifically incel/weirdo magnets like roastme, is a sign your real life must be shambles.
[–]DoinIt989A misandrist against time 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Based on her description "dead end job" "only friends are old people", my guess is that she lives with her parents in some shitty small town, and doesn't like "country boys" and has a pretty crummy dating environment in general. If she lived in a bigger city, she might get pumped and dumped a bit but would probably find a guy and some friends eventually.
I love her
[–]Vapelord420XXXD 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Psyops analyst woke up and chose violence
[–]djmedicalman 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Absolute freaking gold
[–]DiamondLilyD 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is what happens when autistic men aren't thrown into asylums.
Imagine going on a comedy themed subreddit and using it as a substitute for professional therapy to vent about your own unhinged theories about women. When incels ask why nobody wants them I would like to show them this post as an example of why.
[–]SillyMushroomTipr e d p i l l p l u g 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yo I remember this one!
Anyone remember that story about how: This girl broke up with her boyfriend because he didnt make enough money and then turns to find out he was a secretive millionaire /or made a bunch of money
[–]notabot091 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Came here to say that roast is 100% spot on. Roaster deserves an award. Banning for that is hilarious.
[–]SeanIsAThorne 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Getting banned for roasting someone on the roast subreddit is weird.
[–]randus2019 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don’t know you other than what you posted. Do you enjoy the old people you hang with? Do they smoke weed? Concerning the “disturbingly” amount of weed you smoke to escape. Do you feel it’s too much or is that what your being told? I am an older guy who smokes a lot of weed. Everyone couple of months I take a weed break for a week. My roast of you is smoke all you want and if you feel you need to slow down or take a break, do it. I swear by this. Not much of a roast. If I knew you, I could roast you until you were well done. Especially if we had just smoked a disturbingly large amount of weed. ✌️
[–]Andgelyo 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy shit, this girl got destroyed
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]SorryEmTraditionalist 122 points123 points124 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Naebany 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mainboii 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 76 points77 points78 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Reptheft 47 points48 points49 points (43 children) | Copy Link
[–]LouisdeRouvroy 60 points61 points62 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 10 points11 points12 points (41 children) | Copy Link
[–]Affectionate_Pen_623 42 points43 points44 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 8 points9 points10 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt-Jaguar-1014 2 points3 points4 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt-Jaguar-1014 0 points1 point2 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt-Jaguar-1014 0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisBoringLifeLife is a mix of pills 9 points10 points11 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 5 points6 points7 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fichek 18 points19 points20 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]DisasteridWoman-Liker[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MamaAbroad 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Knight_of_Inari 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MamaAbroad 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BirdMedication 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BirdMedication 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pandenubes [score hidden] [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LaPolloGrande -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ockwordsa homage to their hidden genitalia and hidden estrus 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AnUnstableNucleus 24 points25 points26 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]CliffPR 65 points66 points67 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]redditlovestobanus 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 54 points55 points56 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]maplehobo 46 points47 points48 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NationalistGoyRed Pill Man 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Signal_Adeptness_724 27 points28 points29 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Glittering-Aioli-972 31 points32 points33 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]IMOY21 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Audactiyexceeds 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mark_FreedRed Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EnricoLUccellatore 21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ainsleygz 36 points37 points38 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ScaryMovie57 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tritter211Pragmatic 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]mrrockydongChillpilled 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redditlovestobanus 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RadicalQueenBee 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Due_Box3639 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 52 points53 points54 points (95 children) | Copy Link
[–]platinirismsBlackpill 32 points33 points34 points (51 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 31 points32 points33 points (49 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old_Speed_7861 13 points14 points15 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 2 points3 points4 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]Glittering-Aioli-972 8 points9 points10 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 5 points6 points7 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]IFuckingHateAllergyRed Machiavellian 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Audactiyexceeds 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Audactiyexceeds 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ionicomica 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Glittering-Aioli-972 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old_Speed_7861 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Old_Speed_7861 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 11 points12 points13 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 7 points8 points9 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 7 points8 points9 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_AMYOURBIGBROTHER 2 points3 points4 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vapelord420XXXD 2 points3 points4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_AMYOURBIGBROTHER 2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vapelord420XXXD 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Audactiyexceeds -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_AMYOURBIGBROTHER 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Scandi_Navy 10 points11 points12 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 13 points14 points15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Scandi_Navy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Audactiyexceeds 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhagaeas_executioner 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]basteandpilled 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhagaeas_executioner 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Audactiyexceeds -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rhagaeas_executioner 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]platinirismsBlackpill 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]platinirismsBlackpill 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Safinated 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Over_North8884 7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CissyXS 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Over_North8884 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr_Chad_ThunderpenisZherkapilled aka Red Pill Rage and Cocaine 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]utopista114 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atomic_Thr0away [score hidden] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]basteandpilled 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rude_Macaron2021 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 5 points6 points7 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 7 points8 points9 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 12 points13 points14 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 12 points13 points14 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 8 points9 points10 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 6 points7 points8 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]CissyXS 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]CissyXS 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CissyXS 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AdultHumanMaleXY 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old_Speed_7861 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Old_Speed_7861 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rude_Macaron2021 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Salt_Mathematician2428/UK/Married 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]-AvatarAang- 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]-AvatarAang- 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]eye_fuck 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InjectAdrenochromeSpecial-K Snorter 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Naebany 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr_Chad_ThunderpenisZherkapilled aka Red Pill Rage and Cocaine 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flightlessbirbz 7 points8 points9 points (34 children) | Copy Link
[–]barryjordan586 22 points23 points24 points (33 children) | Copy Link
[–]Furbyenthusiast 2 points3 points4 points (28 children) | Copy Link
[–]barryjordan586 3 points4 points5 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby -1 points0 points1 point (26 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby -1 points0 points1 point (24 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flightlessbirbz -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]barryjordan586 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Flightlessbirbz 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]barryjordan586 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 4 points5 points6 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoinIt989A misandrist against time 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 12 points13 points14 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Admirable_Spare797 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Happy_Nuclear_End 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LowCredditI am Kenough[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Accomplished_Pie_153 2 points3 points4 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DoinIt989A misandrist against time 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JianJiaHei 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]JianJiaHei 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AnyIntroduction3288No pill woman 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redkoicarp 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]forking_guy 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WYenginerdWYpro-woman pill. enjoys shitting on anti-feminists 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Admirable_Spare797 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Beanicus13 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WYenginerdWYpro-woman pill. enjoys shitting on anti-feminists 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]REDDITmodsDIALATE 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuck8ng-hebhob 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Unnecessary-Training 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr_Chad_ThunderpenisZherkapilled aka Red Pill Rage and Cocaine 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Unnecessary-Training 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BirdMedication 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]barryjordan586 1 point2 points3 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Unnecessary-Training 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]basteandpilled 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]420KUSHBUSH 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]daylightxx -3 points-2 points-1 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]horonlapsiMGTOW 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]caption291 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ParralyzedGrassmaxxing 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old_Speed_7861 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Annual_Ad_1536 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]420KUSHBUSH 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]_demidevil_lesbian chad 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KitchenEmotional9373 [score hidden] [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThisBoringLifeLife is a mix of pills 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PlainTundra -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GG55222 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Affectionate_Pen_623 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DoinIt989A misandrist against time 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoinIt989A misandrist against time 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vapelord420XXXD 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]djmedicalman 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DiamondLilyD 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombombaby 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SillyMushroomTipr e d p i l l p l u g 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]notabot091 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SeanIsAThorne 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]randus2019 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Andgelyo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link