TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Students will be marked down if they write ‘mankind’ in North Carolina State women’s studies class

LoisLane1975

August 31, 2015
1357 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/24025/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Students will be marked down if they write ‘mankind’ in North Carolina State women’s studies class
Author

LoisLane1975

Upvotes 1357
Comments 231
Date August 31, 2015 2:04 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3j34c0/students_will_be_marked_down_if_they_write/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/students-will-be-marked-down-if-they-write-mankind.972263
https://theredarchive.com/post/972263
Top posts by LoisLane1975

Sex partner must say ‘yes’ every 10 minutes or it’s rape, 10th graders taught in California

2013 upvotes
October 15, 2015
/r/MensRights

Scorned female student’s false claim gets student kicked out of university for consensual sex

482 upvotes
May 21, 2015
/r/MensRights

Student-athlete acquitted of rape says university won’t give him his degree

397 upvotes
July 26, 2016
/r/MensRights

Sexual assault includes ‘whistling,’ ‘unwanted phrases’ at UC Santa Barbara

362 upvotes
August 12, 2015
/r/MensRights

Female SDSU student goes to guy's dorm specifically just for sex. She even finishes him off with BJ. Now she claims rape. He's been expelled.

166 upvotes
May 24, 2016
/r/MensRights

Female Student Admits to Incredible Lie That Got Auburn Football Player Kicked Off Team

95 upvotes
September 9, 2016
/r/MensRights

Feminist scholars berate female professor for writing ‘Three Cheers for White Men’

89 upvotes
February 18, 2016
/r/MensRights

Conservative female author of ‘The War on Men’ disinvited to speak at Williams College after protests

89 upvotes
October 21, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]JaytDude 546 points547 points548 points 10 years ago* (61 children) | Copy Link

Mankind comes from the Old English mancynn which was in use before "man" was gendered. Back then people were "wereman" (male) and "wifman" (female). Man was 100% nongendered and the word mankind reflects that. I had some girl in a class try to claim this silly shit where "mankind" was somehow ignoring females and it hurt my head then, too.

[–]danpilon 122 points123 points124 points 10 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

I've brought this up before, and the usual response is to shift the argument to why men are called men, then. I don't really have a good response to this, but I'm honestly fine with being called a wereman if people want.

[–]JaytDude 88 points89 points90 points 10 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

My response would be that it's irrelevant since mankind still has a gender-neutral etymology. Man now referring to male humans is a separate issue altogether. I'd also like to be called a wereman since it gives the illusion that I turn into a man under the light of the full moon.

Side note: upon further research, it seems my "100% non-gendered" claim needs some clarification. While the term "mankind" comes from the gender neutral definition of "man," the term man/mann could have served a dual purpose in Old English to refer to both the human race and adult male humans, depending on context.

[–]TheYambag 70 points71 points72 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

It all begs the question, if the gender bias of words matters to feminists, and if feminism really helps everyone, then why don't they remove the gender bias of the word "feminism"?

In my experience, reminding feminists about us having to change gender bias job titles such as the title of "policeman" to "police officer", and then calling that "the right thing to do", and asking the feminist if she is willing to change her ideological title from the gender-bias "feminism" to the non-gender bias title of "egalitarian", is one of the more effective ways of getting some of the more rational feminists to realize that feminism might not be perfect.

Oh and when the try and use the excuse "but women were oppressed more" I like to ask them what unit of measurement they are using to compare the levels of oppression between men and women. It's a laugh!

[–]T34_B4991n5 31 points32 points33 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The quickest way to see how misandrist a feminist is, is to try to get them to convert to the egalitarian label.

[–]Fragile_Blue_Bird 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can be their ass that they don't want to change "mad gun-man" to "mad gun-person".

[–]rykocolor8 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The main reason i cant be bothered by feminists is this kind of thing - too many mutually exclusive principles at the same time, and too many 'feminisms' mean there isn't a coherent theory.

[–]lowkeyoh 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

It all begs the question

No it doesn't.

[–]TheYambag 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Darn, I have been using that wrong. Thank you for sharing.

[–]lowkeyoh 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's a super pedantic correction, and the phrase has entered common usage as 'raises the question' but it's a pet peeve of mine. And apparently someone else who cares enough to dedicate a website to it.

[–]FreudJesusGod 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Heh, my favourite "technical misuse" is valid. People have no idea what it is supposed to mean and I still find it grating when everyone used it to mean "defensible".

But that's English for you. Popular usage defines meaning, not ivory tower folks. Which is why the OED uses real-world instantiations of usage to make their definitions.

[–]RoseEsque 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How do poeple use the word valid as defensible? Care to give an example?

[–]FreudJesusGod 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Cotton/spandex mixes fit better than pure wool". (speaking of opinions about socks and how they fit)

"I thought his views on that chardonnay were pretty valid." (on whether Californian terroir was the same as the best of French soil)

By "defensible', I mean empirically-sourced . Which has nothing to do with its technical meaning. Oh well.

[–]Detox1337 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Oh come on we could care less about the technical meaning /s

[–]GoblinLoveChild 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but techinically correct is the best kind of correct

[–]Whitezombie65 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He should of known.

[–]Saerain 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's a mute point.

[–]BloodlustHamster -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You da real MVP

[–]MonsterBlash0 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

is one of the more effective ways of getting some of the more rational feminists to realize that feminism might not be perfect

In my experience, it's an efficient way at finding those for who it's not about logic, morals, ethics or equality.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Mann" is a proto-Germanic word for person.

[–]BookOfGQuan 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because that is the undifferentiated base. All humans in the tribal group would have to provide some function or benefit to the group to justify their getting a share of the provisions, support, etc. They perform useful tasks. The females, for better or for worse, had their role automatically assigned due to simple biology. It's not that the default is male as such, it's that the females will never be default because they automatically carry a particular status and assumed role, that of carrying, birthing, rearing children and holding the domestic fort. I find the desire to view the use of "man" as a claim to male dominance to be unfortunate - one could just as easily twist it and point to the poor way in which plain old "man" is viewed. Let's take a hundred of our men and march on that enemy encampment? Man has always been disposable. Those who can claim or have claimed for them some additional status are more valuable. Apex males and females VS low-status utilitarian males, essentially. The More-than-men and the simply, undifferentiated "men".

[–]ztsmart 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We're were-men? or we were were-men before?

[–]SweetiePieJonas 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whenever this topic comes up, I like to mention that girl used to mean "[non-gender-specific] child" and boy used to mean "servant."

[–]NeedHelpWithExcel 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ask them if it's sexist to use the word Human instead of HuWoman

[–]Saerain 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or if it's sexist to use the word woman instead of wowoman... wowowoman... wowowowo—

[–]NeedHelpWithExcel 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How dare you? Everyone knows the correct word for "Woman" is WOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOMYN. Obviously.

[–]Lucius_Martius 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A vague idea of an explanation comes when you look at what happened to the terms 'boy' and 'girl' around the same time. At that time both were ungendered as well, where 'girl' meant 'child' and 'boy' meant 'servant' (try garcon in french, where the same thing happened).

Somehow they decided that female children were just general persons, while male children where closer to servants. Once a boy graduates to a man he seems to become the more general person while the 'girl' becomes the 'woman', a general person with something extra... a womb perhaps?

I am not an etymologist and not even a native speaker, so these conclusion may be wrong.

[–]turntheradioup 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd say its because just like in current day news stories, gender only matters and is mentioned when it is female. So I'd say they likely only started specifying when it was specific to the female gender, which by default left the original to be the male gender.

[–]dyrikaas 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's why, dear englishmen, you should not simplify your language that much. Many european languages have 3 different words for man, woman and mankind.

And for the men argument, just ask why women are bloody called woMEN.

[–]Grubnar 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It is the same in Icelandic (and many other "old" languages too), Karlmenn =males, Kvennmenn = females.

Pointing this out got me banned from /AskFeminists

[–]Lucifirius 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But did you really want to be able to post there?

[–]Grubnar 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At the time, yes, I did.

[–]The_Mad_Pirate -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For some reason 3rd wave feminists get "offended" by fact and logic at an alarming high rate.

[+]illustrious_gubbins 10 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mank ind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words- "mank" and "ind". What do these words mean ? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.

[–]squeakyonion 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks, Jack.

[–]aDAMNPATRIOT 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What are cows?

[–]Cthulu2013 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am Jacks flared nostrils

[–]The03k 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Before someone on /r/TumblrInAction said something similar, I always just thought about it this way.

"Mankind"

"Man"

"Woman"

"WoMAN"

And that was that.

[–]SpaceDog777 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I always thought it was because we a human.

[–]Vance87 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

we b hoo manz.

[–]Turn_Coat 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about hueman?

[–]SweetiePieJonas 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Human comes from the Latin humanus, meaning "of the soil," which itself comes from humus, "soil."

[–]PeregrineFury 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Holy fuckin fuck, so much feels over reals in that article. They're also saying it's not okay to refer to people who have illegally entered the country as "illegals" or "illegal aliens" because that's not nice. If you enter a place without permission or documentation, you are doing something illegal. Did none of these "lecturers" ever have to take an English class? Wtf.

[–]Keiichi81 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Haven't you heard? The term illegal alien is triggering because it overtly implies that they're here in this country illegally. Which they are. But as we all know, being overt and truthful is bad. So we're supposed to obfuscate the fact that they're illegal by calling them "undocumented" instead...which essentially means the same thing but doesn't sound as "icky".

Political correctness is all about feels before reals. The reality is that they're illegally residing in their host country, but pointing that out makes people feel bad.

[–]PeregrineFury 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It really is all about that. I got into an argument with my sister in law over political correction recently. She's a college freshman who's immediately filled her schedule with gender studies and other stereotypical nonsense classes and she's from Northern California so you can imagine the dumb shit coming out of her mouth. She didn't like that I refused to be politically correct and said it was hate speech and stuff for just calling things what they are. She didn't want to hear that being politically correct actually highlights and reinforces gender/cultural/racial differences and drives people apart. It's one of the worst things people can do, and yet they think it makes them a better person and gives them validation. Yeah because pointing out differences and defining people by them is much better than just ignoring and forgetting them.

[–]terlin 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel so bad for you

[–]elwood78 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck these people..

[–]Honeycone 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You sir are a genius and a scholar. You smart, you loyal. I appreciate you. Matter fact, you a genius. Go buy yourself a house. Go buy your momma a house.

[–]_MistressRed_ 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

UGH wifman is so lame! I wanna be a guy so I can be called wereman.

[–]Saerain 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least if you somehow become half-wolf you get to be the wonderfully fun to say wifwolf.

[–]BICEPSUPREME 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I always figured it stood for humankind.

[–]wurrukatte 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. It's Germanic, man+kind. 'human' is from Latin. If 'human' had been shortened it would have been shortened to 'hum(e)', not 'man'. The '-an' is a suffix.

[–]Cthulu2013 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I knew "man" was the suffix for human since I was 8. How is this getting into post sec?

Hilarious, the feminist shithole Wikipedia added "(implied male)" to every etymology of -man as a suffix, yet in the etymology it directly quotes man as simply being a human.

Appealing to logic with feelings.

[–]Saerain 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not, though. Human is from the Latin humanus (of the soil). That it contains "man" is a coincidental.

[–]UrbanRenegade19 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You don't happen to have a source for that? I'd like to save that for future use.

[–]statist_steve 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't let morons change the meaning of words to suit some momentary political agenda. You win when you don't listen to that side. Don't give them power.

[–]TheRedThrowAwayPill 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"The more you knowTM "

[–]ExpendableOne 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You said the f-word twice! fail! Stop oppressing womynkind!

[–]sjwking 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In my country the world humanity is feminine. The irony is that feminism is masculine. No one has a problem. Words are words.

[–]thungurknifur 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So I guess female werewolves should be called "wifwolf" then?

[–]mattreyu 82 points83 points84 points 10 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Pride Center Director Donna Braquet wrote on the office’s website: “In the first weeks of classes, instead of calling roll, ask everyone to provide their name and pronouns. This ensures you are not singling out transgender or non-binary students.”

Because calling out people's names is so triggering

[–]neveragoodtime 70 points71 points72 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Because we don't want to single anybody out, we're going to make them each individually announce their gender differences publicly in front of everyone, whether they want to or not.

[–]PeregrineFury 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Does that mean I would say "______ and he/him/himself, because I have a penis so I'm biologically male and I don't have a mental illness"?

[–]MonsterBlash20 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You can also say " __ and apache/apache/apache, because they're not allowed to tell you you have to conform to anything ever.

[–]alarumba 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I would tread carefully when suggesting a gender identity issue is an illness. Disorder, maybe, though even that sounds cruel.

[–]PeregrineFury 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks, but I'm not gonna bother. I may be wrong, but I believe it is medically classified as one.

That's just semantics, and what does it matter? I don't put feels over reals.

[–]alarumba 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This how sub is about feels. This whole thread is about the close mindedness and people that only fight for their side. Calling people with gender issues mentally ill is a bit of a dick move.

No, I'm not from srs. They hate me over there.

[–]niquorice 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Logic checks out

[–]Snevitje 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. I wouldn't have come out as trans to an entire class; I generally let people work it out themselves (by eventually looking unignorably different). The alternative, in this case, would have been to actively announce myself with the "hated" name and pronouns instead. Joy.

[–]blueoak9 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Which goes to show how much these moral posers actually care about trans people and how their little preachments actually affect them.

[–]Snevitje 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It might have been meant well enough as a step toward a safe and omni-accepting environment. Obviously, not everyone feels secure enough in themselves to be put on the spot like that. Now that I'm "full-time" and "out" (and have been for years) I don't usually have to make those statements; before, I would still have found it hope-crushing to have to point it out.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Snevitje 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd probably prefer to leave it blank as well, or say "use whatever pronouns you see fit, but at your own risk :D". At the same time - I remember that when I first spoke to my "trans doctor", he asked me how I'd like to be addressed. I didn't have the self-confidence or -esteem to answer that, but it was the best feeling I had had in a very long time.

As for a classroom/college sort of setting, I guess just saying "Feel free to let us know now or in private if we get it wrong and it bothers you. No judgies, etc." would be a nice gesture. Less like being drafted into activism and/or put on the spot when you're not comfortable with it.

[–]ld2gj 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don, and I have dick. So figure it out from there. /s

[–]tallwheel 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can I use "His Majesty" as my chosen pronoun?

[–]elebrin 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or just take attendance by barking out last names. If you don't here the single word 'here' pronounced in a timely manner, too damn bad.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How about we just not take roll because it's a college class and adults can decide to show up or not.

[–]elebrin 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The school usually wants roll taken the first week of classes for the purposes of handing out grant and loan money. If you don't show up to anything without any notice, they'll drop you.

[–]adelie42 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wasn't aware there were gendered first person pronouns. What's the weremann version of 'I'?

[–]Matvalicious 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I honestly can not fathom this is actually real...

[–]heimdahl81 173 points174 points175 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If only feminism would apply that same line of thought to the name of their own movement.

[–]Rullknufs 52 points53 points54 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, how can feminism be for equality when mankind can't be for all people? :O

[–]alarumba 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh boy, that phrase is a keeper!

[–]blamb211 52 points53 points54 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How do you not get it? They're not the sexist ones!

/s

[–]Anonymous7056 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Something something power plus prejudice.

[–]turntheradioup 23 points24 points25 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Won't accept Mankind, but will accept huMan and huMankind. I bet they also just love that woMan contains man in it too.

[–]S133py 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It speaks to how half-assed that teacher's beliefs are.

[–]Anonymous7056 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe the PC term is now huperson.

[–]wraithevolution 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Forgive me if I'm wrong here, but shouldn't this class be called "Human Studies" then?

[–]Drakaris 142 points143 points144 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

A women’s and gender studies lecturer

The very first sentence tells you everything you need to know which is to stay the fuck away from crazy...

[–]bbuck96 25 points26 points27 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I just don't get how that kind of course exists...there's no "men's studies" class (though I don't even want to see the shitstorm that would follow if it did exist)

[–]FangornForest 26 points27 points28 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because schools don't really care about what you are learning, they just want to to sign up for class to send them tuition. They see this whole mess of whiney social justice warriors and they start seeing dollar signs in their eyes. "Sure! You can sign up for the gender equality class, that won't get you anywhere in life, or teach you any valuables life skills, all while learning from an under-educated teacher who we pay half the price as our normal professors, yet still charge you at the same rate as those actual professors. Yea... let's make more of THOSE classes."

[–]thebard2000 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because, according to people like this educator, every thing else is men's studies.

[–]YouGotJaked 21 points22 points23 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

We have men's studies; it's called history.

[–]FreudJesusGod 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey, shitlord, don't you mean his-story??

And yes, I have heard the occasional crazy woman say this with a straight face. Not very frequently, but it happens.

I'm pretty sure Eleanor of Aquitaine would have a problem with that characterization, but whatever.

[+]rykocolor 10 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Please tell me you forgot the /s?!?!?

[–]smasters908 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it not a joke?

[–]mariners77 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I actually agree with the need for a women's studies class. I think History is filled with events that primarily involve men. Most important events in history didn't involve women. Not even getting into the reason why, I think it is beneficial to have a class that goes beyond traditional history and analyzes important roles women played.

[–]happydadd 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about we just include the roles of women in world history?

Cleopatra, Jane Grey, Queen Mary, Queen Elizabeth I, Queen Victoria, Catherine the Great, Marie Antoinette, Joan of Arc, Geraldine Ferraro, Margaret Thatcher, Susan B. Anthony, Betsy Ross, Golda Meir, Marie Curie, Mother Theresa, Helen Keller, Anne Frank, Pocahontas, Sakajawea, Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Amelia Earhart, Angela Merkel

These are the names of women that I can recall off the top of my head in just a couple minutes that had major roles in history -- and I have never taken a women's studies / history class. (If I thought about it longer, I'm sure I could come up with more women too.)

[–]adelie42 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because all other classes are men's studies classes! /s

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

wait i thought it was to never stick it in the crazy, that way they cant repopulate, and eventually die out...

[–]414RequestURITooLong 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Crazy, uh, finds a way.

[–]FangornForest 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yea... it sneaks into your home late at night and pokes holes in your condoms...

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

or just flat out straddles you in your sleep >_>

[+]friskydingo2020 10 years ago [recovered] (23 children) | Copy Link

I was marked down in my English 102 course at the University of Alabama for using 'mankind' vs. 'humankind'. I never struggled to get A's in any composition classes but I took a low B in there because I didn't want to tailor my language and my papers to her whimsical worldview.

The crazy is everywhere.

[–]gellis12 49 points50 points51 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

humankind

Wow, sexist! Everybody knows the politically correct word is "humynkind," shitlord!

[+]friskydingo2020 10 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

I think she may have been using an old Femynism rule set at that time. It probably predates the amazing buffs the Pedant class received in the last few updates.

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Your Feminisim skill rises by .01!
Your Feminisim Skill reaches Level 99!
You have learned the "OPPRESSIVE SHITLORD OF THE PATRIARCHY" Attack

dear god.... i want to make an RPG about this now.... Main villan is a bloated landwhale....

[+]friskydingo2020 10 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Hah! And of course this land whale is in her throne room attended by white-knight adds at the top of a giant ivory tower. She's impossible to damage until the party observes that her castle and therefore her legacy is a giant phallic structure. Patriarchy Penetrative Strike! Defenses are down!

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

dude.... we need to get together and make this a game >_> get it up on steam lol

[–]friskydingo20204 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yes!! haha our niche market would make us dozens of dollars!

[–]jb_trp 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

bloated landwhale

Snorlax Femlax? She's blocking the road that you need to pass through to see Warren Farrell and you have to fat shame her to move?

Don't forget to put Big Red in your game, with her fiery "SHUT THE FUCK UP, FUCKFACE" attack.

[–]tmpick 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Better Big Red soundtrack.

[–]Hypersapien 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaLiWVTRVeU

[–]LilyBentley -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Trigger!

I am transcat, you humanist!

[–]jb_trp 27 points28 points29 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

When I first became passionate about men's rights, I wanted to talk all the time about these things--especially with SJWs and feminists. But now I'm a lot more careful with my speech. When you make your intentions clear you give up a level of power and influence to others. If you can learn their jargon, and don't make your intentions obvious (e.g. "I'm a supporter of men's rights..."), you can have a conversation with some of these nutjobs and actually be listened to without being written off. I'd rather be listened to than labelled.

If I were to take a class where the professor asked for gender neutral language, I'd try to gain influence by following their rules and making solid points using their language (e.g. "The current handling of sexual assault cases on college campuses furthers patriarchy by holding men responsible for not only their own bodies, but also for the bodies of women. This is bad for women because it takes agency away from them and gives it to men."). Is it black knighting? A little. But it furthers men's rights and advocates for equality for both genders.

[+]friskydingo2020 10 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

This was a few years back so I wouldn't have really even identified as someone concerned about men's rights. So I didn't really have a particular viewpoint I was defending. From day one she made it very clear, and spoke at length on, her defining characteristics such as feminism, some ultra hardcore version of veganism, and so on. She was older too, not the young crowd like I might have expected. She was pretty much a walking stereotype, and my problems in that class were not limited solely to my choice of pronouns and word choices. There was a general question about her competency and reliability in general.

Went on a bit of a tangent though. What I really mean to say is that I definitely agree with your suggestion to not explicitly state your intentions. As a closeted atheistic liberal from the deep south, I used this to great effect to make some compelling debates with my highschool friends with occasional racist or homophobic tendencies. I wasn't thought policing by any means however. I just did notice that if topics like religion or politics came up, I always insisted that I don't identify with any group but would give them my opinion and I think they tended to respect my divergent opinions more than they would have from your typical angry <insert stereotype>.

As I am now more interested in men's rights, I probably will adopt that strategy in future interactions should it be necessary. I think everyone has the capacity for understanding or compromise, but we are still very tribal animals and wearing your colors on your sleeve can definitely be interpreted as a hostile gesture by either party!

[–]FreudJesusGod 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She was pretty much a walking stereotype, and my problems in that class were not limited solely to my choice of pronouns and word choices. There was a general question about her competency and reliability in general.

When you push your agenda to the forefront, the subject you are teaching tends to suffer.

[–]blueoak9 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was marked down in my English 102 course at the University of Alabama for using 'mankind' vs. 'humankind'.

Literature instructors can be quite ignorant of basic English grammar and vocabulary. Ask the next linguist you come across.

[–]SpaceDog777 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Jesus, I would have taken that to the dean of the department and if that didn't work all the way to the damn Chancellor if need be.

[–]FreudJesusGod 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good luck. That probably wouldn't work at most colleges. "Inclusive language use" is the norm at a lot of places.

[–]FreudJesusGod 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Precisely the same thing happened to me fifteen years ago with a feminist psyc teacher. A/A+ average over six years of university, and my only B-. It's funny how a hostile learning environment can affect your grade.

[–]blamb211 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Seriously. If I was in such a class, I'd just say fuck it and not care.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]blamb211 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Obviously. I'm an IT major, I'd only be in such a class only if it was required. Not required? Fuck that noise, I'm gonna take something that doesn't shame me based on the sex I was born as.

[–]elebrin 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bad plan. You want to pass the class so you don't have to take it again.

I always approached these sorts of classes from a particular perspective. I would quote the authors and re-state what they were saying to show that I'd read the material, but I didn't really inject what I thought into my papers.

[–]blamb211 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Luckily, I know for a fact that there's no gender studies or similar requirement at my school. So I'm not gonna have to take it, thank Christ.

[+]SharpAccuSet 10 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Would I be correct in assuming that if you get a degree in Women's Studies and put it on your resume, it pretty much announces to potential employers that you are lawsuit-happy and bat6shit insane?

[–]thatiswhathappened 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol. They don't get jobs, they marry men who work and then abuse them.

[–]razikain 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess it's just as useful as a filter to know whom not to hire.

[–]thefisherman1961 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can anyone say Newspeak

[–]IcarusBurning 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Newspeak

[–]Miralian 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In my gender studies class we were supposed to talk about history as herstory. That drove me insane.

[–]razikain 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I know that some students have to take irrelevant classes because they need the credits, but weren't there any other slightly less worse or retarded classes you could've taken?

[–]Miralian 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not if I wanted to graduate when I did. It was a summer class that was my only option for credit for my major. It was take that class and graduate after the next semester or not take that class and graduate two semesters later. College is stupid. Glad I went, but it's stupid in so many ways.

[–]BookOfGQuan 41 points42 points43 points 10 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

Man is the base unit. A policeman polices the population. A fireman puts out fires. A businessman runs a business. A chairman chairs the meeting. A woman - well, it's derived from old Germanic for "wife-man", a man who is a wife. Women are men, it's there in the damn word.

Man, the base, disposable unit, has no function; man earns status by assuming a particular function for the group. Typically, a female's biology meant she automatically had a particular function - annoying for those women in more modern, technologically comfortable societies who don't want to be forced into that limited role (and such women always had/have my sympathy) but quite a relief and a privilege for most women throughout history who were thus assured of some worth and support, and didn't have to earn it.

Really, in the modern age the very practice of referring to female men as "women" should be retired. It's also why titles like "spokeswoman" or "chairwoman" annoy me. If her current designated function - the conceptual/culturally position she's holding - is not that of child-rearer/home-maker (and it's not, her current role of primary significance is speaking on others' behalf or chairing the event) then she is a spokesman or a chairman. She's not a woman at all, yet alone a "chairwoman", which would be like claiming the title "policefirebusinessman".

Feminists want to retain "woman" because, once again, they know that traditional female status grants power, grants a right to provision and protection superior to that of one who does not hold that conceptual space. If you want to push for sexual equality through quibbles over language, do away with "woman" altogether and embrace the label of "man".

[–]Arakin 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIN5aT0Y17Q

[+]pretzelzetzel -8 points-7 points-6 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Revisionist poppycock. As everyone else has already said,

THERE IS NO FUCKING IMPORTANCE IN THE MEANING OF THESE FUCKING WORDS.

[–]BookOfGQuan 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Then "revisionist poppycock" shouldn't bother you, loudly fuck-happy friend, because it is merely further words, which are unimportant and without meaning. Except that words change, meanings change, dictionaries don't always keep up, people fight over what a certain word or phrase connotes or denotes, many things are implied or conveyed through choice of word and how that word is perceived to fall on the ears of the listeners; how we perceive and what we understand by particular words and word choices.

[–]pretzelzetzel -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Man, the base, disposable unit, has no function; man earns status by assuming a particular function for the group.

Utter bullshit

Words do change. You're right. Man perhaps used to be the base unit, or anyway was the gender neutral term. Now it just means adult male human. Not a politically charged word except for cunts like you who insist on weaving these fanciful narratives based wholly outside of any factual historical context. Your writing style sucks, too. What is this fluff?

... many things are implied or conveyed through choice of word and how that word is perceived to fall on the ears of the listeners; how we perceive and what we understand by particular words and word choices.

[–]Commander_Uhltes 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now it just means adult male human

When on its own in an English sentence, yes. But not in words like "human", "mankind", "policeman", etc, which is what is being talked about here. Those have never meant anything related to male.

[–]BookOfGQuan -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am not a cunt. A cunt, I believe, is a slang term (often perceived as derogatory) for a vagina. Yet you use this word non-literally in order to convey certain things about how you perceive me.

Do you see my point?

[–]xixoxixa 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is it a title IX violation if a school offers a women's study curriculum, but not a men's studies curriculum?

[–]Thats_absrd 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's called the engineering department.

[–]SporkTornado 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Another reason for men to not take Women's Studies. The first being is that women's studies is one of the top ten worst degrees in terms of the career options it gives you.

[–]clockworkgirl21 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women shouldn't take it either. I'm a firm believer that college should be for a general education too, not just getting a job. Women's studies has shown it isn't even teaching critical thinking.

[–]Halophilic 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh fuck that's my school.

Reading the title I thought for certain it would be UNC-Chapel Hill but no. I am now sad.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What about mother nature?

[–]texdeveloper 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL /s I consider "mother nature" to be oppressive towards my male self. From now on I will be calling it "outside"

[–]neveragoodtime 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least there's a scientific explanation to her argument. It's "thanks to evolution". You know, that thing that creates the dimorphism of the sexes in the first place. So she insists on another word that also has the letters m-a-n in that specific sexist order!

"Woman upset that all other women adopted a gendered term to codify and protect their special status in society. Film at 11." It's like a homosexual being upset that the term queer is still being used.

[–]DillipFayKick 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's easy, just go to admissions office and withdrawal from that class.

[–]cactusjack- 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess that's what you should expect when you waste your time in a women's studies class.

[–]Wargame4life 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

and people wonder why STEM is held in high regard, chiefly because it isnt susceptible to this nonsense.

[–]clockworkgirl21 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Careful, might misgender an atom!

Honestly, liberal arts shouldn't be susceptible to this BS either. As a history lover, it hurts me.

[–]Stephen1985 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can we all agree that we don't give a fuck and these petty little shits can change it to womankind if they promise to shut the fuck up

[–]Craysh 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I used the term "Man" as an abbreviation for mankind when I was in my 2nd grade class. My teacher surprised me when she said "Oh, so only for men?"

I was 7. I was so shocked I didn't remember the word mankind in the middle of her accusation.

I didn't give a shit about being PC, I was just sad I thought the teacher hated me...

[–]clockworkgirl21 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It scares me that a place of education doesn't know that man was a general term for humans before it become specifically for males. That's why a lot of terms still have the word in it; not because they want to screw over women.

[–]worthlessfucksunited 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When will people understand that words aren't real things? They only make you feel what you let them make you feel.

[–]WWLadyDeadpool 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

WoMAN. Man is in the word.

The English language defaults to the masculine. Also annoying, anyone who uses 'him or her' 'he or she' or '(s)he'.

[–]gellis12 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Also annoying, anyone who uses 'him or her' 'he or she' or '(s)he'.

Why not just use "they," or "them?" Hell, that's what Facebook would do before they required you to tell them what gender you are. If Facebook doesn't know if you're a man or a woman, they say "<name> has changed their profile picture" instead of "<name> has changed his profile picture."

[–]Riktenkay 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hell, that's what Facebook would do before they required you to tell them what gender you are.

You don't have to tell them, I haven't, mine still says "they".

[–]gellis12 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure that if you're creating a new account, you need to specify. I could be wrong though, this is just what I've heard; I haven't actually tried making a new account to test it.

[–]modix 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

People already do this all the time, though it's considered grammatically incorrect. We've already got you meaning singular and plural... it's not a big deal for they to mirror it in times of unspecified gender. My guess is this is the way the language will go eventually, but people get pissy about it still.

[–]sugar_free_haribo 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

though it's considered grammatically incorrect

Actually, it's not. Most grammarians accept it now.

[–]modix 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Perhaps on the fringes, but I wouldn't write it in a professional paper in any form. Trust me on that, I've dealt with this issue in law many times.

[–]sugar_free_haribo 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope, most grammarians/lexicographers/linguists/whatever support the use of the singular "they" but still advise sparing use because it tends to irk pseudo-literate idiots.

[–]WWLadyDeadpool 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My professors don't.

[–]Jimmysal 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually I prefer grammatiturge

[–]gellis12 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It gets the point across clearly, and isn't awkward as fuck to say or write out.

I know which one I prefer.

[–]Adventures_Of_Anand 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Soon people won't even be able to write the word "human"

[–]MagicalPowerfulEvil 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Offemded

verb

To be offended at some irreverent, silly or obviously neutral statement or event because "women"

[–]dhottawa 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

...I guess it should become "womanslaughter?" is that okay?

[–]eletheros 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like ebonics, feminists have ceased speaking English. It's close enough to English that you think the words should be making sense, but they absolutely don't.

[–]Capitalsman 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But I Thought words with man as the prefix was all the rage, or is that only the case when they do it.

[–]thebard2000 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We are one step closer to installing Verbal Morality Stature Fine Machines everywhere.

Mankind

BZZZ

You are fined one credit for violating the Verbal Morality Stature.

[–]The_BeardedGentleman 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

They realize the word man is in the word human right?... right?.........

[–]iffen 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It isn't. 'Human' is hum-(homo) + -an(us), like 'Rom-an', 'Americ-an'.

[–]S133py 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't sound like this teacher knows the first thing about etymology, which is what makes the fact that she doesn't object to any word with "man" in it so surprising.

[–]Tak7ics 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_%28word%29

[–]iffen 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for providing sources for my claim.

[–]darwinsaves 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

While we are at it, let's change human to huwomen.

[–]ndewing 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A stupid/unnecessary decision, but one that can be easily circumvented. Just write "humanity" instead.

[–]OozingCrotchSmegma69 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

MANKIND.

[–]epicureanmanslut 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey bro, you change hate by changing language and this works for some reason.

[–]Electroverted 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If there was ever any question whether it was the Women's Studies students that turned out this way or their teachers that sculpted them, the answer has been solved.

[–]Grubnar 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Connection timed out after 10000 milliseconds

Anyone have a copy?

[–]Kensin 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is certainly stupid, but not I don't think it really hurts Men or their rights...

[–]mcavvacm 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This title. All it does it make me laugh uncontrollably at how ridiculous it is.

[–]pseudonymeria 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm relieved that many of these nutcases go into gander studies. Imagine if they were in a position of some importance to mankind.

[–]alkyjason 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"One small step for man, one giant leap for ??? "

[–]Godofwar123 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We should change the word human. It has the word man in it . Lol

[–]razikain 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Huperson. You're welcome.

[–]tedcase 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What about huMANity?

[–]razikain 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess we should all switch to "personkind" or "hupersonity".

[–]razikain 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/nottheonion

[–]ParaBDL 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone feel like explaining to ignorant me how they expect gender neutral pronouns to be used? When am I using ze or xe? Or will I only know which pronoun to use if I actually ask the person I am referring to?

[–]HippopotamusMaximus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like the perfect class for me to write my Mick Foley biography.

[–]FredtheFailLord 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn, foreign students who speak gendered languages will be confused.

[–]MenandBoysareGood 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

God forbid you have the word "man" and "kind" in the same sentence.

[–]roseffin 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

‘Failure for the semester’ if you keep calling women ‘females’

I don't understand. Aren't women females?

[–]alclarkey 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

MRA here, saying "females" instead of women, is ghetto speak, and is actually disrespectful.

Example?: "Man, all these females out here be frontin"

Should it mean course failure, no. Markdowns I can agree with.

And frankly like the poster above me pointed out why should anyone care anyways, none of us here would be caught dead in one of those classes.

[–]roseffin 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It may be a lot of things. But it is literally an English word that carries no negative connotations. Anything that you (or the teacher) are reading into it is in your own head, not mine.

Thanks for the info though.

[–]belil569 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its baddy worded granted but not disrespectful at all. Just bad english.

[–]mlwarren88 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's my alma mater and I'm disappointed, but women studies at NCSU is a complete joke. NCSU is primarily an engineering and agriculture university. The best thing to do in these women studies classes is to encourage the students to drop them in favor of something more useful... Though I had to sit through a bunch of useless required courses as well.

[–]jasiones 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

getting tired of this overly PC BS.

[–]rocelot7 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But Mick Folley is a man.

[–]ChicagoRunner 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a women's studies class. Jesus this subreddit is dumb as hell. Like, what the fuck do they think would happen?

[–]darkshine05 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's really not that hard to say human kind. I'm not sure how I would feel if we called it woman kind

[–]Tomppeli 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In Finnish there isn't different pronouns for women and men (like he and she). I mention this because it's a mystery to me what it feels like to grown up speaking a language that always makes this difference.

In Sweden some people are following the same principle by replacing han and hon by hen. Människor seem to think it's fundamental part of the language, so it seems to be catching on slowly.

"Människa" means human being and interestingly it's feminine. So Swedes say: early Man and her tools (in Swedish).

[–]Daredevilpwn 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does context even matter to these people?

[–]ExpendableOne 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

‘Failure for the semester’ if you keep calling women ‘females’

lol, these teachers are such a joke. Apparently male and female can't be appropriate terms in any context, and "female" is oppressive because the term is also used for male and females of other species, right? People who take offence to the word "female" have some serious fucking psychological issues. It is on par with creationists trying to teach science. These people should not be teachers.

[–]goingoverseas 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Woman's studies"....

[–]STEM_logic -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

I don't see anything wrong with wanting inclusive gender neutral language. We are a pro-equality sub, right?

Edit : not to mention (as mentioned above) that this is a major argument against the word feminism. Implicitly excluding terminology does have psychological effects, arguments about the history of a word don't change this (isn't this the argument a lot of feminists use too?).

[–]rsresnor 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah.

This is really just a clash between those educated in classical English, where "man" is gender neutral and contemporary English where "man" is masculine. In classical, "human" would be distinguished from "ape-man" or similar terms for non-civilized humanoids, and really only used in those or in field specific contexts. It's much the same reason woman has "man" in it.

Now we hear man and we think male human. This means the language has changed and we should adjust accordingly. In the meantime there will naturally be some confusion.

Edit: I guess it's more complicated than I thought. Either way, it comes down to two different perceptions of the English language. I would not argue in favor of language policing, I'm just saying I can see both sides of this.

[–]GiskardReventlov 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In classical, "human" would be distinguished from "ape-man" or similar terms for non-civilized humanoids

Actually, the -man in human has nothing to do with the English word man. They are false friends. Human comes from Latin, and man comes from Germanic.

[–]lasciate 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is really just a clash between those educated in classical English, where "man" is gender neutral and contemporary English where "man" is masculine.

Words have multiple meanings in contemporary English.

Now we hear man and we think male human.

Except we aren't idiots and can understand context clues. No one hears "mankind" and thinks this excludes women unless they've gone out of their way to do so.

[–]rsresnor 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Except we aren't idiots and can understand context clues

Unfortunately for you and I, most people are idiots and can't pick up on simple clues.

:(

[–]gprime 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, he's right. Most people get it. But some feminists are deliberately obtuse in furtherance of their agenda.

[–]skipdo 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I'm with you on this one. I would see an issue if they were trying to force the use of "womankind".

[–]lasciate 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"man" is the gender neutral word. It comes from old German. It means "person", essentially. The "wo" part in woman refers to a female or "wife".

The fact that there are college professors operating on the public dime who don't know this should scare you to death way before you even begin to consider ideologies being forced down people's throats.

If these Women/Gender Studies people really wanted to make a reasonable yet radical move towards equal terminology they would drop the "wo", but they don't. They want to keep the special privileges that come with simple recognition of femaleness and the self-worship it facilitates, and they want an easy way to continue to discriminate against males.

[–]ChrisAshtear 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Humankind also has man in it. Its a stupid argument

[–]MarcusRivers -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Mankind is a simple term used to describe humans collectively. Only someone painfully insecure would have a problem with that - so much so that they'd subtract points from students assignments.

Further, mankind is cool word; two syllables, rolls right off your tongue, great feel to it, defines so much, almost poetic. Leave it to a bunch of insecure pussies to whine about it like it's oppression and ruin that by adding an extra syllable to it.

"It's no longer a fireman, it's a fire-human. Policeman? No! No! No! That's offensive! Police-human."

LOL get the fuck outta here.

[–]skipdo 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I love that! Police-human and fire-human. I'm going to start using those just because it sounds so ridiculous.

[–]thebard2000 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even better, let's just replace the a with a "y" in "Man" for everything.

Humyn. Firemyn. Policemyn. Mynkind. Mailmyn. Garbagemyn. Businessmyn.

Oh, my breath stinks. Anybody got a Mynt?

[–]skipdo 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

is that pronounced minn?

[–]MarcusRivers -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't forget to relabel your old Atari cartridges Pac-Human and Ms. Pac-Human too.

[–]skipdo 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LMAO!!!! :)

[–]FangornForest -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

STFU BITCH

[–]fosterco -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who uses "he" or "him" to refer to both men and women?

[–]The_Mad_Pirate -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am starting to believe that "Gender Studies" it's just some kind of secret gynocentric religious cult....

[–]i_am_the_blood_ninja -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who cares and why is this here. Let's face it, if you're talking a women's studies class, you probably don't care about this.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter