TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Archwinger Archive

View 103 posts and 7,504 comments by Archwinger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community. PDF version
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1782

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 03:28 PM
1077

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 06:22 PM
1029

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:21 PM
1007

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill16/02/15 08:42 PM
958

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 05:50 PM
913

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill10/02/17 06:20 PM
880

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 04:21 PM
877

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 03:48 PM
876

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 05:41 PM
864

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 04:37 AM
845

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 07:56 PM
844

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 08:12 PM
785

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill24/07/14 09:17 PM
758

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 09:23 PM
731

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 05:41 PM
725

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 08:41 PM
725

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 06:20 PM
706

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 02:59 PM
682

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 05:29 PM
680

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 04:00 PM
630

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 03:04 PM
622

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 04:29 PM
619

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 05:27 PM
611

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 03:33 PM
603

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill04/07/16 04:35 PM
593

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:15 PM
574

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 05:22 PM
567

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 02:36 PM
548

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 06:14 PM
541

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill24/06/16 07:14 PM
523

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 08:45 PM
508

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 03:34 AM
504

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 02:01 PM
487

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 04:38 PM
484

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 04:42 PM
472

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill22/03/16 08:17 PM
470

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 05:40 PM
466

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 04:54 PM
465

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 08:40 PM
446

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 04:24 PM
435

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 05:21 PM
427

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill28/01/15 03:00 PM
426

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 03:40 PM
420

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 05:12 PM
413

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill06/03/17 10:15 PM
412

LTRArchwinger/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 04:27 AM
405

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 03:51 PM
396

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 07:31 PM
387

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill06/12/14 12:34 AM
386

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill10/03/16 04:31 PM
385

LTRArchwinger/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 08:32 PM
385

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 03:24 PM
382

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill01/08/16 04:00 PM
377

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 03:42 PM
362

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:07 PM
355

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 03:38 PM
342

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:41 PM
334

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 08:13 PM
334

LTRArchwinger/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 04:07 PM
332

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 04:56 PM
332

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 07:56 PM
328

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill17/03/16 04:20 PM
314

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill08/09/16 05:38 PM
294

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 07:17 PM
276

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 07:14 PM
273

Off TopicArchwinger/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:22 PM
264

LTRArchwinger/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:35 PM
251

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 07:19 PM
244

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 09:09 PM
240

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 03:10 PM
224

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 07:59 PM
217

LTRArchwinger/r/TheRedPill06/11/14 03:58 PM
208

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 06:19 PM
202

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 08:39 PM
199

CultureArchwinger/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 05:10 AM
188

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill14/12/15 06:48 PM
178

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 06:19 PM
167

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill13/10/16 11:04 PM
147

Men's RightsArchwinger/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 03:27 PM
141

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 02:36 PM
140

Archwinger/r/MarriedRedPill27/06/17 06:26 PM
135

LTRArchwinger/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 09:32 PM
127

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 03:44 PM
111

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 06:17 PM
106

Off TopicArchwinger/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 11:01 PM
96

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 02:07 AM
86

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 06:30 PM
85

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 06:34 PM
66

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 03:01 AM
63

Blue Pill ExampleArchwinger/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 07:36 PM
58

Archwinger/r/MarriedRedPill12/03/16 06:07 PM
57

Men's RightsArchwinger/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 10:02 PM
46

Archwinger/r/MarriedRedPill11/04/15 04:31 AM
32

Question for BluePillArchwinger/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 05:11 PM
19

Blue Pill ExampleArchwinger/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:36 PM
19

Rant/VentingArchwinger/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 03:07 PM
13

Question For BluepillArchwinger/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 08:00 PM
13

MetaArchwinger/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 04:18 PM
9

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 06:06 PM
7

Question for BluePillArchwinger/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 09:02 PM
6

Question for BluePillArchwinger/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 07:23 PM
6

Red Pill TheoryArchwinger/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 04:12 PM
4

Archwinger/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/14 07:43 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 7,504 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I could probably get her to agree to 50-50 custody beforehand. Under the premise that it's best for our daughter, and every cent we don't spend fighting with lawyers is a cent we get to divvy up between ourselves. Then, it's just a matter of refinancing the house to cut her a check for half the equity. Giving her half the savings account plus half the value of the furniture. And signing our cars over to each other. It wouldn't be a hard divorce. But once real money and time with the kid are actu…
/r/MarriedRedPill13/07/17 11:17 AM
21

That's probably true. Every time I sit down and type something that sounds smart, it's just something somebody has already typed before in different words. Everything you need to know is already out there. Now, there's apparently some kind of contest to bury that stuff under a mountain of philosophical quotes and other trash posts.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/17 05:16 PM
12

It's just a stupidly inane uphill battle. You can't win Reddit or control the internet. There's always some asshole you don't agree with or you don't think is good enough running his mouth. And the only power you have over the internet is to ask that asshole to shut up or to ask others to censor him. Then, there'll just be another asshole. It's kind of like Islam running around murdering all of its non-Muslim neighbors, then when it ran out of those, killing each other for not being Muslim enoug…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/17 05:12 PM
63

If a girl is talking about sex with you, that means you're at either end of the bell curve, but not in the middle. She's either interested in sex and dropping major hints. Or she considers you such as sexless loser that she'll talk about all of her sex acts with you with no filter like you're just one of the girls.
/r/askTRP11/07/17 01:05 PM
63

The difference between Reddit and a personal blog is that nearly any dipshit can post anything he wants on Reddit, and nearly any dipshit can ignore the drivel of any other dipshit. This isn't exactly a platform for carefully curated content. It's a place where dipshits write stuff and other dipshits vote on it and write commentary. You're asking internet dipshits to police themselves. You don't actually expect that to happen. You don't actually expect internet dipshits to change anything about …
/r/TheRedPill11/07/17 01:00 PM
1

Women's self-defense is an entirely different market than general martial arts. A dude will study BJJ because he wants to learn how to kick ass, wants to get stronger, wants to compete in tournaments, and wants to get better at something difficult and physical. A girl will go to the same BJJ studio because the media tells her that she has an astronomical chance of getting raped any minute and if she doesn't learn self defense, she's just a walking victim. And she needs to go to woman-only self d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 08:04 PM
13

Just general creepiness. When a woman knows that a man is not desirable to other women, she doesn't even want to talk to him. She won't even tell him what time it is or give him directions. Because the fact that this guy can't get women means that if she so much as talks to him politely, he's going to interpret that as meaning something and start trying to be talkative, friendly, and annoying, which could lead to a confrontation. I suppose the equivalent would be a guy who has a reputation for c…
/r/askTRP10/07/17 07:57 PM
3

There's a difference between: 1- "You are X. Because you are X, you very strongly believe in viewpoint ABC, because you've seen a lot of that. Also because you are X, you have a really hard time accepting that viewpoint DEF is the slightest bit legitimate. The fact that you are X makes it difficult to debate with you about DEF because you aren't open to the possibility that DEF is even a legitimate viewpoint for a person to hold." 2- "You are X. Because you are X, it's not even worth debating yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 02:12 PM
13

Yeah, seriously. She set up a date with her big-dicked ex-boyfriend behind her husband's back, LIED to him about it by telling him she was just going to see a high school friend, spent the night drinking at his house, and came back in the morning. And it sounds like she has the gall to gaslight her loser-ass husband, too. "We didn't DO anything! It was just meeting up with an old friend! I lied about it because I knew you'd be a controlling insecure baby about this! I was just trying to spare yo…
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:05 PM
38

Divorce. It doesn't matter whether your wife fucked this guy (likely) or not. Even if she didn't fuck him, she probably still did some things that would upset you if you knew. Even if she didn't do anything overtly sexual or romantic, she still communicated with her big-dicked ex-lover behind your back, set up a one-on-one date with him that involved his house and alcohol, and kept all of this from you. And she stayed at his house overnight and came back in the morning. Even if she did nothing s…
/r/askTRP10/07/17 01:58 PM
1

I don't know all of the tiny details about your relationship. I just know that most non-ugly women that go out to a meat market location without their boyfriends or husbands get hit on. And that women who really respect their men and their relationship don't engage in behavior that looks even a little suspicious or inappropriate, even if they don't plan on doing anything wrong.
/r/askTRP09/07/17 12:37 PM
17

The best part about your marriage being over is that you no longer have to worry about what she's going to do, what she'll think, or how something will make her feel. Now that you're in a position where none of that is your problem, what do you feel like doing? Go do that. What's she going to do about it? Withhold sex? Treat you disrespectfully? She's already doing all of that. So just do what you want, say what you want, and to hell with her. She'll come around, or she won't, but even if she do…
/r/askMRP09/07/17 11:57 AM
3

When your girlfriend goes out, it's different. She can just sit there, and guys will hit on her. Often, that's part of the fun for girls when they go out. It's not directly their doing or their fault, so they can feel innocent about enjoying attention from other men and at least passively keeping half an eye out for any really interesting or exciting opportunities. Even if your girlfriend doesn't do anything overtly sexual with someone else, should she really be touching other guys (even if the …
/r/askTRP09/07/17 11:46 AM
10

Your wife apparently doesn't think it's okay for you to say no when she asks for something. But this isn't about the dogs and whether or not they should get to sleep on a people bed. This is about your grown up child thinking you always say no all the time about everything. Remember, kids don't get it. When you say "no you cannot have candy for dinner", your kid doesn't know that this is in her best interest. She just thinks you hate her. When you won't buy her a new car because you don't have t…
/r/askMRP09/07/17 01:57 AM
13

You should be busy. You should be the one ending the conversation at about the 10 minute mark because you have important shit to do, and asking for her number when you go. The general roadmap is within the first 15-30 seconds, you know whether this girl is going to blow you off completely, give you two-word polite answers, is just making polite small-talk, or whether you have a chance. You spend the first 2 minutes having banal smalltalk about nothing, without scaring her off with personal quest…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/17 09:30 PM
1

Maybe. Do you hit on girls when you're out all night drinking and come back in the morning?
/r/askTRP08/07/17 08:16 PM
32

This post serves as an important reminder that going into "monk mode" and hitting the gym and reading books for six months is stupid. While growing muscles and learning shit and developing hobbies and skills is very important, developing yourself socially is also every bit as important, if not moreso. Going out and gaming girls is developing your social muscle the same way squats develop your quads, and refusing to do this simply because your quads aren't massive yet is shooting yourself in the …
/r/TheRedPill08/07/17 01:22 PM
15

There's too much inaccuracy here to have an intelligent discussion. A small minority of radically feminist women complain that breasts are useless. Most women don't mind their breasts. Many women like getting attention for their breasts (from quality men they are attracted to). Many women even breastfeed their children. Nobody says that only "low status" men prefer large breasts. Many low status men prefer large breasts. Many high status men prefer large breasts. Women only complain when the man…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 01:04 PM
10

While you are correct that you shouldn't be needy and clingy and insist that you're with your girlfriend 24-7 and that she never goes out without you or has any friends without you present, because that would be retarded, it is definitely possible to go too far in the other direction. If your girlfriend is acting single, she's not respecting you or her relationship with you. If she wants to go out for a couple of drinks with a female friend once in awhile, that's great. If she wants to go out cl…
/r/askTRP07/07/17 05:09 PM
12

Maybe your girlfriend cheated, maybe she didn't. Maybe she wants to cheat, maybe she doesn't and is just talking crap with her friend. Maybe she deleted messages to hide bad shit from you, maybe she didn't. All of this doesn't matter that much. You're with a girl that doesn't respect you or your relationship. And if you really want to know the measure of a girl, check out the friends she keeps. Girls worth making into a girlfriend don't have a bunch of slut friends.
/r/askTRP07/07/17 05:07 PM
12

This is highly accurate. Most men nowadays are very used to trying hard to please their women, which leads them to doing what their women tell them. Having honey-do lists, asking their women where they should plan dates and what they should do, asking their women what they want for their birthdays. Eventually, you end up with men who don't do things unless their women ask them to. Then, their nagging wives get home and are like, "What? I've been gone all day and you didn't bother picking up the …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 04:10 PM
8

If you're dealt a 2 and a 7, the flop might turn up three 7s. It's not likely, but it can happen. Or the other people at the table with you might have shitty hands. Or you might play the hand, bluff a bit, and other people fold. Or you play the hand, and that last card turns out to be a 7, and you edge out another guy who had two 6s. If you play hard and game the table, things might turn out okay. But you'll have to play ten times harder and with a lot less confidence and certainty than the guy …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 02:09 PM
7

Loser is an accurate term. Because nobody is exempt from the game. You're playing it simply by being born, and many men are losing it, by default, simply by being who they are. If you're a loser man, then simply existing and being who you are is losing at life. You were dealt your cards. A 2 and a 7. You can fold or play them. Neither one is going to be pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 01:10 PM
17

I'd say that the SMP makes loser men cold-hearted, but non-loser men keep their hearts in tact just fine. The path to success in the SMP is really pretty damn simple: be attractive, don't be unattractive. If a woman is sexually attracted to you, you can be the biggest asshole on the planet, all of her friends will tell her you're an asshole, and she'll defend you. She'll show up at your apartment at 2:AM with no panties on, with groceries, and spot you for rent when you're short this month, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 12:52 PM
9

Nooooo. Don't go! You are very important to us! That's why you're posting an announcement that you're going instead of just, you know, not reading or typing shit on the subreddit any more. Everyone! Quick! Pay attention to him! Validate him! Maybe he'll stay with us then!
/r/askTRP07/07/17 10:05 AM
5

Here's what really happened, in one sentence: "While away from her boyfriend, this girl set out to spend some alone time with an ex to see if he was better than her current boyfriend."' It doesn't really matter who held whose hand, who cuddled who, or whether they fucked or not. This woman set out with the deliberate goal of cheating or leaving if the opportunity was a good one. Maybe the opportunity wasn't. Maybe "Jim" sucked at life and she didn't do anything. Maybe the opportunity was just an…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/17 10:51 PM
5

This further heightens my suspicious that you're dealing with a guy who is very unaccustomed to doing well with women. You seriously told him, point blank, on your first date, that you are fucking another guy, right now, outside of a relationship, but that you'd be willing to cut that off to date him seriously. And fully knowing how he feels about casual sex, he still said yes. When he clearly was not okay with your past. I'd bet good money you were his only/best option, so even though he wasn't…
/r/RedPillWomen06/07/17 08:34 PM
5

That was actually what led to my conclusion about the guy. He fucked her on date #1 but was somehow surprised to learn that she has a sexual history that includes casual sex. He hamsters away her fucking him on the first date with some kind of, "Oh, that was okay because we both knew we wanted a relationship after the first date." As though any guy who's worth a shit is ready to commit to a girl after one date. Especially with a girl that fucked him on date #1. This is a guy who got lucky and du…
/r/RedPillWomen06/07/17 07:40 PM
3

So he's going to quit drinking, and that way he can "overlook" this issue by hiding his real thoughts and feelings. He'll always feel the way he feels about sex, but as long as he doesn't bring it up or say anything mean and just keeps that bottled up inside, that's cool with you? Do you really think that after dating him for a few months, years, or however long it'll take, he'll feel differently about this, and the fact that you've had casual sex won't matter to him at all? That you'll win him …
/r/RedPillWomen06/07/17 06:12 PM
41

Your boyfriend isn't a great guy, but not for the reasons you think. It is totally cool for him, or any guy, to be sexually conservative and hold a woman accountable for her sexual past. That wouldn't be insecurity or evil judgement. It's just a guy with standards who wants a girl that feels the same way about sex that he does. But that's not your boyfriend. If he is sexually conservative and can't abide by a woman with a non-conservative sexual history, then the two of you aren't compatible. He…
/r/RedPillWomen06/07/17 05:55 PM
1

Shit that you'd never say out loud can be kind of funny as a text message. Because you're already trying hard just by virtue of the fact that you're sending a text message. There's no playing it nonchalant like you could in person. You'd just ignore the text if you weren't trying. So because the very act of sending a responsive text message is automatically try-hard, it's funny when you exaggerate and your message is super try hard, slightly cringy, an something you'd never say in person.
/r/askTRP06/07/17 01:26 PM
6

I don't get this alt-right Trump fear. Sure, Donald J. Grab 'em by the Pussy Trump is a sexist, misogynist asshole. And a vocal minority if his supporters are bigoted wackos. But other than being sexist and getting elected, and having bigot supporters, what has Trump and the dreaded alt-right actually done or accomplished to keep women down or ruin the world? Why all the fear mongering?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 10:15 AM
6

This one's a fine line to walk. A lot of women won't fuck on the first date because this is how they can tell themselves they're not sluts. And if a guy is really grabby and puts the escalation on really hard, she's going to remember him as pushy and uncomfortable. On the other hand, if the guy doesn't escalate much at all and doesn't make much if any move toward sex, this is every bit as bad, if not worse. Doubly so if she wanted to have sex and he didn't make the moves, but even if she was goi…
/r/askTRP04/07/17 09:34 PM
18

"You got me. I'm a cannibal. But I don't usually eat girls until the third date, so you've got one more freebie." "It's true. I'm so awesome that everywhere I go, women keep hounding me. I finally had to start telling all of them I suck in bed to get rid of them." "I do? Shit. I hope it's not my taste in girls that's broken. You don't suck in bed, do you?" "Yes! My act worked! Now to go crazy on her!" "Oh, sorry. Mistext. That was supposed to go to my mom."
/r/askTRP04/07/17 07:30 PM
6

The key to being great at this is to be awesome, THEN share your inner monologue with people. If you're a boring fuck-up or a weird-ass, walking up to strangers and talking to them about your coolest Dungeons & Dragons character because that happens to be on your mind isn't going to make you friends just because you're authentic about it and own it. Being yourself, as hard and authentically and awesomely as you can, only works when yourself is actually worth a shit.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/17 07:18 PM
37

About 50% of the reason most men fail is a fear of rejection. Most men don't talk to strangers in McDonalds and try to make friends. They're too shy, timid, and worried about rejection. Most men don't motion over some hottie with a cool tattoo and lay their hands on her. They're worried about rejection. People don't know how to talk to people any more. 99.9999 percent of your friends are either people you go to school with or used to go to school with, people you work with or used to work with, …
/r/TheRedPill03/07/17 09:35 PM
6

Do you seriously think that a hot girl with no boyfriend, who walks into the bar and instantly turns heads, hasn't paid for a drink in 6 years, and is the subject of male attention everywhere she goes, who has the pick of any guy in the room or no guy if none of them excite or interest her, is really unhappy? All because she doesn't have a boyfriend? A lot more women than you think are single by choice. The idea that most men who are worth a shit don't want to commit to women they have sex with …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 08:50 PM
7

Quit being stupid. You're supposed to be the dude her boyfriend worries about. Not the dude worrying about the other dudes she's fucking. How many other girls are you currently fucking?
/r/askTRP03/07/17 01:14 PM
23

I don't think you know what a plate is. Why does this bother you?
/r/askTRP03/07/17 10:02 AM
7

Your man's a badass. It's a pity that most husbands today are Rick Moranis instead of Gregory Peck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 07:11 PM
4

So if I posted an OP about how my wife kicked me in the balls and asked if that was disrespectful, then 30 comments into the post, I happened to mention that I was coming at her with a knife at the time, you'd probably consider my original post to be a bit dishonest, right?
/r/MarriedRedPill02/07/17 06:41 PM
13

Assuming 18 is the age of majority where you are, contact the boyfriend's parents and tell them to return your minor child to avoid kidnapping charges. Take your minor child's communication devices and just about everything she owns except for the clothes she's currently wearing. Tell her she's grounded until she reaches the age of majority, she will attend school, then return home immediately afterward, and that if she is anywhere but school or home, the police will be contacted to locate her a…
/r/MarriedRedPill02/07/17 05:21 PM
4

Our daughter. I love that girl more than anything. I know it's not dominant, "alpha", or very good leadership to tolerate crap from my wife, but I don't want to lose my kid. If loving my daughter and prioritizing her isn't very Red Pill, then The Red Pill can suck it.
/r/askMRP02/07/17 03:34 PM
7

My advice is the right advice for most guys. Because most guys are losers or recovering losers who will sacrifice every inch of ground they've gained, and more, if they start whining to their wives about how her behavior is inappropriate. Now I think what you're getting at is that every once in awhile, even if you're a badass, your wife is going to forget how badass you are and she's going to test you by pushing the envelope and doing something inappropriate. And at that point, you use about 4-6…
/r/askMRP01/07/17 10:43 PM
6

The main idea is that you don't mate-guard your wife. If she wants to cheat, she's cheating already, and you'd never have a clue. If she wants to go out drinking with her single friends, stay out all night long, and come back in the morning, she KNOWS that is not something good wives do. It's not something she needs to be told. If you get butt-hurt about her behavior, you demonstrate that she's the powerful one. If you don't give a flying fuck if she goes out, or when or if she comes back, or if…
/r/askMRP01/07/17 08:55 PM
5

We can argue about amounts, but however we want to subdivide the category of dads who want custody but don't get it, my overarching point is that dads who want custody but don't get it far, far, far outnumber the dads who don't try for custody because they don't want it on account of the awesome single life they want to start pursuing unburdened by children.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 08:11 PM
3

Most of the time, men are advised by their attorneys not to waste time and money fighting custody. It's money they're pissing down the drain for absolutely no gain, and prolonging the proceedings like that pisses the judge off and he's less likely to think the man's a reasonable dude that's easy to work with when he's making other decisions. Most states have a standard custody arrangement. It's usually something like Mom gets primary custody, Dad gets one weeknight, every other weekend, and alte…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:36 PM
6

You have a very dim view of men. You have this ingrained assumption that the reason most men don't end up with primary or even joint custody is because they don't want it -- they want to run out and be single again and have fun lives unburdened by children. While this is undoubtedly true for a small number of men, this is absolutely false for the huge majority of men. Most men are advised by their attorneys that unless the mother is certifiably and demonstrably unfit, it is an extreme waste of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:08 PM
3

If most men didn't automatically lose their children, their homes, the majority of their assets, and a huge chunk of their future income to leave, and did I mention their CHILDREN, I think more men would divorce their wives instead of cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 06:47 PM
45

I'd shut my damn mouth. I truly believe in my heart of hearts that staying out all night at bars and clubs and coming back in the morning is inappropriate behavior for a married woman, hands down, just on principle. This is not some wildly oppressive, crazy, out of left field, ultra conservative Donald Trump view on women. Lots of normal people would agree with that position. But logic doesn't matter with women. All your wife hears when you tell her not to do that shit is, "I'm an insecure loser…
/r/askMRP30/06/17 08:50 PM
22

A lot of this depends on the dynamic you've established with your wife already. Lots of married women go out with their friends, drink, have fun, and come back late. It's disrespectful if your wife comes back later than she said she would and doesn't check in with you or let you know what's going on. But your wife going out with her girlfriends at night isn't something you can put a stop to without looking like an insecure jackass -- which is what you'd be. Here's my rambo story. It's always bee…
/r/askMRP30/06/17 08:34 PM
3

I dunno. I don't really tell people what to do. I just tell them what I'd do. I assume most people are smart enough to think to themselves, "Nah. I don't really care about that", without being given a multiple choice list of priorities.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/06/17 07:43 PM
2

Vaguely. A lot can change in over a decade.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/06/17 06:15 PM
10

I guess. If I were some MGTOW fucktard who cared more about my solitary hobbies and my money than my child, I suppose I'd be all about muh freedom. But since I'm not a fucktard and I actually love my child and enjoy my life with her, and currently have my wife reasonably under control, it's not so awful.
/r/MarriedRedPill30/06/17 05:31 PM
9

Currently, I'm in my little girl's life constantly. Every day. Every school drop-off, every meal, every bedtime, every after-school activity. She and I are close. If I get divorced, I'm in my little girl's life every other weekend, Wednesday afternoons, and alternating summers and holidays. I go from being with her 100% of the time to 2/7ths of the time, while paying for the privilege. The other 5/7ths of the time, she's with Mom. She'll turn out just like her mother. Not to mention her mother w…
/r/MarriedRedPill30/06/17 04:47 PM
3

I think most affair seekers still go with craigslist. Some have luck with tinder, though the assumption with tinder is that you're single, so you may have to lie/pretend. Though a decent number of married women use tinder, many of who also lie about being single. 9/10ths of the affair dating sites are scams. The usual dating site money extraction method: thousands of fake female profiles, spamming you with auto-generated fake messages from fake girls to try to get you to sign up for a paid membe…
/r/askTRP30/06/17 01:01 PM
14

Women aren't supposed to do anything. That's why The Red Pill is a male-centered form for men to have discussions about male sexual strategy. If women don't want to fuck you, you're supposed to change you. Because women sure as shit aren't going to randomly decide to change. Women are supposed to stay exactly the same. Remain stupid, remain shallow, remain predictable, remain in possession of the body parts that can create babies and gratify men sexually. Men are supposed to learn how to get wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 08:13 PM
9

You talk to them like you'd talk to anybody else. Like they're your bratty sister. Like they're some old lady in line at the bank. Like they're some dude in front of you at the coffee shop. The reason you're fucking up is because you're imagining that there's some kind of special technique or preparation or approach you need to deal with this special kind of person. There is not. Because these are not special people. They're just women, like any other. So you talk to them like any other. What's …
/r/askTRP29/06/17 08:01 PM
4

Here's a good rule of thumb: if it's more than 6 words, don't text it. Here's how it should have gone: "blah blah I'm gonna fuck other guys b/c u won't commit blah blah" "k"
/r/askTRP29/06/17 12:05 PM
16

Exactly. Months later, I'd bring up that time my wife said or did something absolutely vile, hoping she'd realize how awful she was being and change, and she'd have no recollection of it. That incident wasn't even a blip on her radar. It wasn't an incident at all to her. She was just talking and feeling and venting. This interaction that was a huge deal to me and pissed me off royally wasn't anything to her. She didn't remember it. It was just another day of interacting with her loser husband in…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/06/17 10:13 PM
10

Let's get real for a sec. If you spend about 30 seconds reading a few posts on the red pill, right now, you will see misogyny. Obvious, clear as day, undeniable misogyny. You don't seriously think this is hidden, do you? That innocent guys are seriously lured in, totally unaware of any misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 08:07 PM
19

You can find common misogyny, bigotry, and alt-right garbage anywhere on the internet. If you remove this common bullshit from The Red Pill, all you're left with is sexual strategy, male self-improvement, and ways to increase a man's power in his relationships. I'm on to you, Red Pill! You claim you're some kind of woman-hating, bigoted, right-wing subreddit, but when you strip away all of the common shit you can find anywhere else, you're left with crap that helps men out! You lured me in with …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 06:41 PM
33

My GF is very loyal and I'm not worried about her cheating, Even if your girlfriend doesn't fuck your friend, she clearly is an attention whore who enjoys it when other guys make a bid for her. "Worried" is a strong word. You should be very aware of the possibility that she'll cheat. She really isn't LTR material. I don't like that she gives him this attention. Especially because J only gives her this attention since J obviously wants to fuck her Which she knows. It's like she is encouraging thi…
/r/askMRP28/06/17 06:17 PM
1

This guy was dumb. When you find a lost child at a public event, you take the lost child to the people in charge of the event, not to the parking lot. And you do it immediately, without putzing around carrying around someone else's kid from place to place. It doesn't matter if you mean well. If my daughter disappears at a softball game, and I see her being carried in the parking lot by another guy, I'm punching first and asking questions later, too. And if he says, "Wait! I'm totally not taking …
/r/MensRights28/06/17 02:54 PM
22

There was one time with me, shortly after our daughter was born. I'd always done our laundry, but I suck at folding clothes. I mean, the job gets done, they go into drawers, but they're not perfectly folded. I'm just not a clothes surgeon. It's not something I have any aptitude for. So sue me. But if I don't do it, we'll be living out of the laundry basket, because my wife just doesn't put laundry away. She has a pathological inability or something. So I just started taking care of the laundry. …
/r/MarriedRedPill28/06/17 01:25 PM
4

There's not really much of an argument to be made. The main difference between "Dude, can you believe that she made Johnny Quarterback wait three weeks before she'd fuck him" and "Dude, can you believe that that hypergamous slut was such a bitch to Fatty McGee" is that Johnny is cool and Fatty isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 08:35 PM
7

Yes. Bitching about women while slapping each other on the asses in the locker room is quintessentially masculine. The only difference between TRP and manly jocks in the locker room griping about women is that TRP is typewritten text on the internet (meaning longer passages and bigger words and more elaborate thoughts), and the guys typing it aren't actually manly jocks. So really, OP is pissing on TRP for being computer nerds instead of manly jocks. The difference between the football team and …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 08:28 PM
16

Exactly. OP is promoting toxic masculinity. Essentially, you're not a "real man" if you do things that women don't like. If you are unattractive, can't get laid, and bitch about it on the internet, you're not a real man. Real men don't whine, because they're masculine, attractive, and get laid. Real men don't use The Red Pill. Real men think The Red Pill is silly. If you don't conform to OP's narrow expectations of male behavior, you're not a real man. "Whining on the internet is for girly girls…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 05:15 PM
3

Change 99.99% to about 60%, and everything this guy's saying is dead-accurate. A lot more women cheat than most people think. And they're really, really good at getting away with it. And many women that cheat aren't looking for that next branch to grab. They're just having fun. It feels good, validating, powerful, to be able to get a good dicking from a fun guy, and to be able to pull the wool over beta bob's eyes back home. Over time, women start to actually convince themselves that dutiful bob…
/r/askTRP27/06/17 04:53 PM
9

You're not asking the question you think you're asking because you're hung up on greek letters. "Alpha" is really just internet shorthand for "exhibits traits and behaviors that are, generally, sexually attractive to most women, some of these traits and behaviors negatively affecting women's feelings of comfort and security." "Beta" is really just internet shorthand for "exhibits traits and behaviors that generally increase most women's feelings of comfort and security, often negatively affectin…
/r/askTRP27/06/17 03:53 PM
5

Truth. The divorce rate in upper middle class suburbia is in the 20s instead of the 50s. Though that doesn't mean that 80% of upper middle class marriages are happy. It's just easier and less expensive and better for the kids to stick with a marriage of convenience.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/17 07:36 PM
14

This is kind of a pointless discussion. "What if we lived in a magical universe where this impossible situation and set of hypothetical circumstances could happen? Then, would it change this one Red Pill thing?" Well, yeah, but it would also change 5000 other things. The world would be unrecognizeably different in so many ways, if this implausible set of hypothetical magical circumstances came to pass. So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/17 03:56 PM
7

This is kind of a "duh" thing. Rape is physically terrible, yes. But worse than the physical aspect is the loss of power. One moment, a woman is walking down the street at night, thinking about what she needs to get done at work tomorrow and that funny thing her boyfriend said, and the next moment, some guy who's stronger than she is is actively demonstrating to her that despite all of her accomplishments, wants, hopes, and dreams, she's just weak flesh. Helpless. That guy, and any guy like him,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/17 01:30 PM
3

The problem with a story like this is that while it worked well in this particular situation, among 30+ year olds, one 49 year old, and a late 20 year old blowhard, in a controlled, preplanned gathering where all of these people were to meet and converse over food and drink, it's going to sell a false story to some of the loser men around here. Some idiot is going to read this and think that if he goes to the bar and sits in the corner, sipping his beer quietly and creepily, not trying to be a b…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/17 01:23 PM
4

Maybe 5%. The blue pill guys who get casual sex every five minutes don't do it by going out to bars and meeting strangers. They have a social circle of sex-positive pot-smoking friends who all rotate and fuck each other for fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 05:21 PM
8

Short answer: Yes. Lots of married people cheat. About 40% of wives cheat and 50% of husbands, though more recent trends indicate that wives have caught up to, or even passed up husbands. Most cheating husbands end up fucking a random bar slut (or a string of them if attractive), while most cheating wives end up fucking a top 20% married guy and maintaining a relationship with him -- 2 years is the average length.
/r/askMRP23/06/17 05:15 PM
2

Speaking of autism... The goal isn't to actually be a medically diagnosable sociopath. It's to cultivate the ability to emulate certain sociopathic traits for the purpose of getting women to fuck you. Women are attracted to [some] sociopathic traits. Not to medically diagnosable sociopaths. Duh.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/17 11:38 AM
0

Then at least some of the time, recreational sex might at least be a yellow flag, right? Something you'd definitely want to check into and ask a few questions about?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 11:11 PM
2

At the very least, it seems prudent to consider sluttiness as a yellow flag. Something you need to check into and ask a few questions about. Some might call this process "judging" whether a particular promiscuous woman's past is deal breaker or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 11:10 PM
1

Yes. Rape is obviously terrible. But it illustrates that some kinds of past sexual activity are negative. They make a woman worse off rather than better. They're not positive, enriching experiences. It's not so far-fetched to reason that sometimes, consensual sex could also be negative. Nobody thinks that a bar slut going home with a random dick every weekend to fill the voids in her life with the validation and touch of men is having enriching positive experiences, even if the sex is consensual…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 10:30 PM
6

It seems like we're in agreement that at least some of the time, some sex can be negative. Slutty behavior, if not a red flag, might be at least a yellow flag that you'd want to check into and ask some questions about before marrying someone, right? Due to the fact that sometimes, slutty behavior can be negative, some people may choose to judge women for their sexual past and put the onus on them to prove that they're not the bad, unhealthy kind of slut. Which seems fairly rational. Lots and lot…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 10:28 PM
3

Right. That's what consensual means. It's her choice. But just because she chose it doesn't mean the experience is automatically positive, right? For example, a bar slut trying to fill the voids in her life with the touch of men by going home with a different stranger every weekend is exhibiting unhealthy behavior. That recreational sex, while consensual, isn't positive. It's negative. At the very least, it seems like you agree that at least some of the time, some sex, even when consensual, may …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 10:23 PM
0

So we're in agreement that at least some of the time, slutty behavior can be a negative? Something you should watch out for. A red flag. A sign of damage. A sign of a woman who honestly shouldn't be having all of that recreational sex because it's doing more harm than good. On the flip side, I don't think many people say, "Watch out for her. She's not a slut. Something must be wrong with her. What kind of girl is 27 and hasn't fucked at least 30 guys yet?" Sexually conservative behavior isn't a …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 10:04 PM
1

He can do whatever type of job he wants. I don't judge him. I even buy his produce at the farmer's market. But I wouldn't marry him. I'm marrying a doctor instead... is pretty close to: She can be as slutty as she wants. I don't judge. I fuck sluts all the time. But I wouldn't bring her home to Mom. I'm marrying a good girl from bible class.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 09:58 PM
6

Very true, but one might wonder whether the kinds of people who seek out large quantities of recreational sex are more likely to have these kinds of problems than the kinds of people who have more conservative sex lives. One might even decide to judge women for their slutty behavior and put the onus on them to demonstrate that they're not the bad kind of slut before considering them as relationship prospects. I would actually be inclined to believe that the women having huge piles of recreationa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 09:32 PM
6

Agreed. Feel free to replace my extreme rape example in your mind with the example of a psychologically unhealthy woman who is filling the voids in her life with the touch and attention of men, who goes home with a different guy from the bar each weekend. In her case, all of that recreational consensual sex is doing more harm than good. That sex is a negative. It might really be making her worse of a relationship prospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 09:28 PM
3

I think that's probably as close to agreement as any of us across party lines will come. At the very least, you recognize that sometimes, consensual sex and slutty behavior can be very negative things. And I recognize that at least sometimes, these are not necessarily negative things. We'd primarily disagree on where to put the line, what's normal, and how to define positive. And honestly, that kind of difference may be accentuated more by whether you live in urban California or rural Alabama, v…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 09:24 PM
3

Rape is an extreme example, obviously, but illustrates that some sex can be a negative experience that does not enrich the woman, but instead leaves her worse off. In that case, it's not too far-fetched to think that maybe sometimes, consensual sex could also be negative. It's not exactly regarded as the most healthy behavior in the world for women to go home with a different guy from the bar or club each weekend. Many women are trying to feel valuable, in control, and complete through the touch…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 09:16 PM
3

Right. Some sex, such as rape, is a negative experience that does not enrich the woman, but instead leaves her worse off. Along those same lines, couldn't some consensual sex also be negative? Very few people think it's healthy for a woman to go home with a different guy from the bar every weekend, as she desperately tries to fill the voids in her life with the touch of men. Even though this example woman is having consensual recreational sex, most people would consider this to be a negative exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 09:06 PM
9

Then in this case, isn't it a valid position to assume, or at least wonder, that if a woman is slutty, maybe she really is used up, damaged, unhealthy, or otherwise unfit as a relationship partner? Being slutty very much can be a negative behavior, as you've agreed. So wouldn't it be appropriate to judge a woman for her sexual past, and put the onus on her to demonstrate that she's not the bad kind of slut? I would actually be inclined to believe that the women having huge piles of recreational …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 09:04 PM
9

In this case, then, is it possible that a woman who goes out to bars and clubs every weekend and has recreational sex with lots of men could be having some negative sex? I mean, a lot of people out there think that trying to feel valuable, in control, complete, and successful by seeking out the touch and approval of men isn't healthy behavior, even if the sex is consensual. In at least some cases, could being a slut and having lots of sex actually be a negative experience, rather than a positive…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:58 PM
8

Right. So rape is obviously terrible. Even though it's sex. So then some sex is a negative experience that leaves you worse off than if you hadn't had it, right? While other sex might be positive?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:56 PM
3

So if sex doesn't use up or cost anything, and is a positive experience, is a rape victim more experienced with sex and better off than a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:50 PM
4

Female bullies are far, far meaner than male bullies. They just don't punch you. Young girls take a bunch of pills and kill themselves over the shit other girls do to them. Boys just get bruises.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:11 PM
7

That's a very sex-positive mentality. Since the pussy isn't used up and can be used again, nobody's lost anything, and sex was a positive experience for everybody involved, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 07:46 PM
1

If "studs" think being a slut is shameful, they shouldn't be studs imo since they're encouraging slut behavior. That's kind of like saying if you think being a farmer is a low class profession and you wouldn't want to marry one, you shouldn't eat meat or produce.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 07:42 PM
7

She is 21. Dating for 1.5 years. Recently got engaged 4 days before I was set to deploy for one month. Compare notes with the guys deployed with you. I'll bet a full third of you have this exact same story to tell. She then proceeded to tell me she felt happier alone, didn't want to be with anyone, and wanted to go discover herself. Women don't leave a guy to go watch TV and eat bon-bons. They leave a guy for a better guy. In her case "better" could have just meant "here instead of deployed". Sh…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/17 05:13 PM
1

I dunno. I'm pretty average-ish. Cute, but not hawt. Fit, but not buff. Tall, but not strikingly so. Well-off, but not rich. I do okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 03:29 PM
1

Having sex, for fun, outside of a relationship, is kind of textbook slutty. Like, that's the definition of slut. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but you have to treat sluts appropriately. Sluts are for fucking. They're not the ones you marry or date seriously.
/r/askTRP22/06/17 03:27 PM
2

1- 5 2- No. I'm skinny. 3- Zero. 4- 5. 5- Gym, various fitness classes outside of the gym, martial arts 6- No and no. 7- Yes, though the key word is "generally". In most cases, the kinds of guys every woman on the block wants to have sex with are the kinds of guys that most other guys want to be. But in some cases, a random idiot will slay pussy for reasons unrelated to being awesome. 8- Yes, but only if we complete the sentence. Men who have casual sex are better than those who want to and try …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 02:49 PM
6

So respect her wishes, fuck other women, have fun in Argentina, and fuck more women there. Seriously, what do you want with this slutty 37 year old? A long distance relationship? You got laid, she says she doesn't want to have sex again. Now think to yourself, "What would Chad do?" Chad would shrug, give her a kiss on the forehead, walk out the door, and fuck someone else the next night. And by not pining after her and being an idiot, and pretty much not caring what she does or doesn't do, there…
/r/askTRP22/06/17 03:39 AM
32

You're doing good for 18. You recognized a woman's signs of interest. Many guys are blind to this, or they mistake mere politeness as interest. You approached and made a move. Most guys are too chicken-shit to do that and will creepily stare across the room at a girl and spend six weeks working up the courage. You told her what you were going to do rather than asking. Most guys vaguely ask if a girl is free sometime, then if she's interested in something, then if she wants to do it. And she resp…
/r/askTRP21/06/17 07:48 PM
37

It doesn't matter whether your girlfriend is or isn't fucking her male friend. She's in a relationship with you, but wants to act single. It is not appropriate for a girl in a committed relationship to act like a single girl. If she hasn't done anything shady up to this point, and the sex is good, consider this a shit test. Just tell her that if she wants to act like a single girl, you can help her along. You don't own her, you don't control her. She can do whatever she wants, but your girlfrien…
/r/askTRP21/06/17 06:27 PM
4

For reference, your 49 points is "not privileged at all", while my 52 points is "quite privileged". Some time in the past, somebody must have called you a terrorist, and that has changed you from a privileged asshole like me to worldly intersectional and complex person.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 04:06 PM
2

I got that beat. Under the modern loosey-goosey definition of rape, I've been raped like 20 times. And my identity is so wrapped up in The Red Pill that I'm my own gender and not cis.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 03:48 PM
5

I don't have to respond to terrorists like you. And I think less of you for every single one of your identities. There. Now the score should be more even.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 03:12 PM
17

This one really depends on the dynamic you've established for your marriage and what is and isn't appropriate. In most marriages, wives go out with their girlfriends (other wives with kids in a similar situation -- not their slutty single friends), usually to a classy-ish bar or restaurant (not a meat-market club), drink cocktails and get comfortably buzzed but not drunk, have a good time, then come home and if they like their husbands, fuck their husbands due to all of the positive energy they'…
/r/askMRP21/06/17 03:03 PM
8

How am I, a straight white affluent male, less privileged than you. This test is completely messed up. The internet is wrong and stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 02:57 PM
2

I'm a 140-point shitlord. This quiz is rigged! I'm totally more privileged than this. And 52 out of 100 ("Quite privileged") in the other test.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 02:52 PM
1

Agreed. Serial monogamy isn't a good female strategy. It's just what most women do. Short-term relationships are how women can be sluts without officially being sluts, since they're in a real relationship and they're monogamous. When things run their course in 2-4 months, she's usually with another guy within a week, wash, rinse, repeat. But she's not a slut because she's in a relationship and she's monogamous. However, a lot of guys think to themselves "I want to find a real partner. I don't wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 02:43 PM
2

So >2 but less than super-slutty. To a sexually conservative guy like me, "enough experiences to know what I like" means "slutty" but maybe not "super-slutty". Every first you guide him through is going to be your third, fourth, fifth, or even greater, instead of the two of you figuring this stuff out together.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 03:20 AM
2

Also, I don't see why men who marry the first person they date NECESSARILY will be in for a "surprise". I'm saying this as a woman who is likely going to marry the man I'm with now. And I'm his second girlfriend and second N. he has no hangups , worries, or concerns about me. Why should he ? Is he your 1st or 2nd boyfriend and your 1st or 2nd N, too? Or is just one of you inexperienced?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 02:58 AM
7

Spinning plates is how you look for a partner. You date and fuck a lot of people, non-exclusively, and eventually decide to be exclusive with someone. Serial monogamy is for women. It's a bad vetting process for guys. Honestly, most guys aren't fit to pick a real partner until they've fucked a few dozen girls and seen what there is to see. Guys who marry the first girl who'll date them are in for a nasty surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 09:58 PM
6

You don't dump the girl with ADHD. You fuck her, and six other girls, non-exclusively, enjoy hanging out with her while things are good, and when ADHD girl finally wavers and tries to push the "what are we" conversation, you replace her with another girl. Because she's not special. There's another girl just as good, or better, right around the corner. And when you're an awesome man who has options, you don't need to worry about letting any particular girl get away. Because there are more girls. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 09:51 PM
11

"I can't find a girl as good or better than this one, so I'd better lock this one down, flaws and all" is the exact opposite of The Red Pill approach to life. It is probably the #1 mistake Red Pill guys used to make in their pre-red-pill days. It's the mentality of a guy who doesn't have options. A guy who is terribly uncertain whether he'll ever be able to find anybody as good or better.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 08:43 PM
27

If you're born with a gimpy left arm, it's not your fault, but you still have a gimpy left arm. It's going to affect you in life, and it's going to affect your spouse and children. Even if you learn and master every coping strategy and alternative way of doing things in the universe. If you have a choice between two identical people, but one has a gimpy arm, you take the one with two good arms. If your body is fine, but your brain has a gimpy arm, the same logic applies. It's not your fault, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 07:43 PM
2

Here.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/17 05:13 PM
6

Life is so easy now. Instead of being off fighting wars for the crown, knights are people like Elton John. Gurus used to have hard to pronounce names and live in the mountains and you had to scale to the peak for an audience. Now, they have names where you take three words that are four letters or less and mash them together, and you can find them on the internet. Yet some guys can't even do that, because the mountain is in their mind. "WTF? I don't need to talk to some asshole. Talking to men a…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/17 05:11 PM
4

If you were serious about divorcing your wife, you'd have met with your lawyer, had papers drawn up, gotten your financial ducks in a row, had a plan for the next few months at the very least, and come home to serve your wife with papers. It's not like this is a new issue, and it's not like you haven't addressed it with her before. And it's not like she doesn't know exactly what she's doing and whether it's something a good wife does. She is deliberately being the exact opposite of a good wife a…
/r/askMRP20/06/17 03:13 PM
3

Hey! I'm an awesome cook. It was the laundry that threw me. I can't fold a pair of panties to save my life. I lost so many opportunities with women because of that. I always always knew when I started finding suspicious stains in the panties that it was time to propose before I lost her for good. But I always acted too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 11:42 AM
5

Oh man, I watched six weeks' of fetish porn studying techniques and taking notes. But it was too little, too late. I didn't have a chance to supplicate more. She'd already moved on. I spent the next twelve years cooking and cleaning for random women, but none of them ever panned out into sex or dates. One girl let me rub her back once, though. It was sweet.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 03:40 AM
10

Women. The last time I spent an entire day stroking a girl's hair, she was like "get a job, loser". So I got a job and she was like "you're never around any more. You used to play with my hair all the time and make me feel special." She spent all of my money I made working on fancy head massagers but couldn't fill the void until she found Chadwick. He made her feel special the way I used to, and it was over. Though I heard they recently started fighting because she wants Chadwick to get a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 03:34 AM
9

You don't want me to give you six-hour footrubs and play with your hair from breakfast until dinner? That wouldn't make you so hot you have an orgasm just from the overwhelming selflessness and attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:49 AM
2

So we agree that telling a normal non-rapist not to rape is pointless, right? And telling a criminal rapist not to rape is also stupid, right? Neither one of those will stop rape. But you genuinely believe there is this, apparently massive, segment of men who are raping women and don't know it? Like, the women aren't saying yes, but not really saying no, they're kind of going along with sex, but they're not really really enthusiastically going along with it, and everyone's drinking but we're not…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:40 AM
3

Well, your example of why men need to be taught differently is because RooshV, radical edgy internet personality who posts extreme shit on the internet for attention and clicks, said that he raped someone. From RooshV's behavior -- well, actually just his written words that may or may not correspond to actual behavior that took place, you've concluded that countless men clearly don't know that you're not supposed to fuck sleeping women who haven't said yes. So obviously, it's more fruitful to te…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 08:45 PM
2

I recently bought a copy of Hillary Clinton's autobiography to learn more about best e-mail practices for my business. Additionally, everything I write on the internet is 100% true and is not intended to provoke thought or emotional responses from anybody, because it's just annoying when people click on things I write and read them and respond. I actually hate this internet hobby I have and would never type words for transmission to others over the internet for reasons other than a 100% communic…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 07:01 PM
3

So men are stupid now, but they can learn if feminism teaches them something that should be mind-numbingly obvious to anybody?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 06:25 PM
5

Well, duh. If you transport your mind to this magical hypothetical universe where you are 100% likely to get away with it and there will be zero consequences and nobody will ever know, yeah, I'd rape a full third of the women I see in a given day. I'd also rob banks and murder people who annoyed me. When you erase consequences and put me in a hypothetical place where I'm 100% likely to get away with it, what's there to stop me? Especially if you ask me more subtle questions that avoid use of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 05:28 PM
4

I got nothing more. You have a very dim view of the average man. We're not actually all stupid apes. But stick with feminism long enough and you start to unconsciously assume that. Ideas like "we need to teach men not to rape" and that a huge majority of men are cluelessly fucking unwilling women without consent because they're dumb, sexually aggressive apes, start to seem logical when you're a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 05:21 PM
3

I really, really think that focusing on the 0.000001% of guys who are super-retarded and think it's okay to fuck an unconscious girl while she's sleeping, or forcing themselves on a whimpering girl, is a largely ineffective use of resources. With the time and money we've wasted on the minuscule percentage of men who are super-retarded, we could have put guns in the hands of thousands of women, and taught thousands of intelligent women not to get drunk in bars in the bad part of town in the prese…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 04:29 PM
8

Yeah... My daughter takes martial arts. And she's learning how to use a gun as soon as she's old enough. And if she's ever on the wrong side of the tracks past sunset, I'm turning her ass red. Teaching me not to rape is stupid. Because I'm not a rapist. And nobody I know is a rapist. All that shit does is piss me off and make me hate women because they're too fucking stupid to not get drunk around strange men and blame me and my non-rapist friends for their own stupidity. And teaching a rapist n…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 02:42 PM
9

Feminists are very into men's issues. They want to fix the rape of women by fixing men. Teaching men. Having harsher punishments for men. They want to fix the workplace by putting laws in place to keep men from favoring men and to force places to do more for women and less for men. They want improve female comfort and security by regulating the way men are permitted to behave to ensure that men are less toxic, less aggressive, etc. All of these women's issues are about fixing men and controlling…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 01:18 PM
1

Yes, you are angry. But that doesn't mean that you are wrong. They are all sluts. But you eventually reach a point where that makes you shrug instead of making you mad.
/r/askTRP19/06/17 12:34 PM
18

You sound like you're no fun. "I followed the formula! I'm tall and 43 percent funny because 45 percent would be too much. And my entertaining, interesting, socially skilled friend is living life spontaneously and genuinely without following any formula at all! How come girls don't want to fuck me?"
/r/askTRP19/06/17 12:31 PM
3

Definitely. But all paths aren't equal. Everyone is free to do as they please, but there are unspoken consequences. A lot of people won't be successful, at least in some ways, because of the path they chose. But they think that all paths are supposed to be equal. Because they have a right to do something, and doing that something is a valid, non-illegal choice, they get pissy when they're judged unfavorably or have negative outcomes and consequences for this choice they have a right to make. Jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 01:15 AM
3

Most women prioritize their men for being high status like that. They don't want to marry a loser with no status or ambition, who does on them all day. Far fewer men seek or prioritize status in their women. They want a girl that's into them. Not into her own awesome life while they're just along for the ride.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 11:15 PM
2

Everybody is always so black and white about this. There is this huge gulf of possibilities between a stay-at-home leech who never does or amounts to anything besides an incubator, maid, and home cook and a super-woman overachiever who's too busy being a valuable human to the universe to be a decent wife or mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 10:20 PM
3

The fact that you're spewing four paragraphs of word salad responsive to an implication, on the internet, that you're a low value man is... exactly something a low value man would do. Are you telling me what you wish those mean ladies at work would understand? What you wish you could tell them?
/r/askTRP18/06/17 12:38 PM
4

I think in your mind, you're equating "traditional" and "conservative" with "not smart" and and "not driven/ambitious" and "not confident", and various other negatives. Because the sex-positive, ultra-liberal, pro-woman crowd assumes any woman who's sexually conservative and traditional is automatically dumb. Because in their narrow minds, nobody could ever possibly choose to be that way unless they were totally stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 06:40 AM
6

About 10/300ish words in my comment had to do with that particular nuance you seem to have cued in on. The other words you only vaguely skimmed explain why a feminist super-woman that OP would love to give a high-five is a poor marriage/relationship prospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 03:11 AM
6

A woman can be good wife material without having to be some kind of dimwitted waitress with thousands in credit card debt who spends your money irresponsibly and makes your life more difficult. I don't understand why people are so black and white about this issue and automatically assume that a traditional, conservative woman is dumb, uneducated, and unable to handle basic societal survival tasks like spending less money than she earns. Sluts are for fucking. You obviously don't marry sluts and …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 12:23 AM
11

I'm surprised this comment is lower in this thread than it is. This woman didn't ask the OP for coffee in front of the other women to test whether he was worth a shit. She asked him because she knew he wasn't worth a shit. As did all of the other women. Whatever he has or hasn't done up to this point has already failed whatever tests he faced and/or demonstrated his low value. These women are old, ugly, most of them married, some with kids. They're not looking to see if OP is worth cheating with…
/r/askTRP17/06/17 08:54 PM
5

Women can do whatever they want. That's no big deal. If a woman has six PhDs and cures cancer, that's good. Great, even. It's wonderful. It makes her a very valuable human being and a very valuable contributor to society. But none of that gives me an erection, and none of that makes her a good marriage or relationship prospect. And when I want to have sex, I want it to be with a sexy woman. And when I want to date/marry, I want it to be with a woman that's going to be a good and valuable relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 08:29 PM
3

Bonus points for having a sense of humor. I'll bite. If you actually want to debate about The Red Pill, try the Purple Pill Debate sub. If you think that you are in possession of actionable advice and strategies that will get men laid and give them more power in their relationships with women, stop taking drugs.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 06:22 PM
4

Yeaaaah. But actually discussing your viewpoints validates them, and you, as though you said something worthy of discussion. And doesn't lead to sex. I haven't sprung for the magic laptop yet that can let my dick reach 1000 miles. Not that my dick isn't huge. Just not 1000 miles long.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 06:15 PM
6

Oh boy! A woman! And she is expressing concern about The Red Pill's viewpoints! I wonder if there's a term for somebody expressing this kind of concern. Never mind. Maybe if I'm nice to her, she'll have sex with me! Oh...wait...it's the internet. I need to see some tits to be sure you're a woman. Then we can arrange for sex via PMs.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 06:01 PM
407

Let's cut to the chase: Random kidnappings, rapes, and murders are SUPER RARE. People only think there is a lot of that going on because every time something like that happens, there's a six-day media shitstorm about it, followed by numerous op-ed pieces about how we have some kind of woman-targeting crime epidemic. Cheating women are SUPER DUPER COMMON. But people think cheating women are rare and that men messing around behind their womens' backs is the more likely scenario. As though attached…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 02:11 PM
13

Make sure that in addition to improving, you're also making a habit of shutting the hell up about it. Don't talk about your dieting, fitness, or nutrition. Don't bring it up. Don't let others see or know how hard you're working. If someone comments about your changed appearance, just politely and vaguely agree then move on (e.g., "you've lost weight!" "I guess so. How's work going?) The idea is to look natural and nonchalant. Like being fit and good looking and successful is just a natural part …
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 11:15 AM
3

I very much do. But if somebody says something, dismissing what he said with, "Bah, he's biased. What he said is probably wrong because he's biased" is dodging the real issue. What he said might be true. It might not. Focusing on the traits of the person doing the speaking distracts you from the truth (or lack of truth) of the statement. His bias can very much cloud people's judgment -- the judgement of the people listening to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:26 AM
3

Like I said, apples are red even if the man telling you they are is blind. "Don't listen to that man! He's blind!" doesn't address whether or not apples are red.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:21 AM
2

So we're in agreement that the presence or absence of bias doesn't matter and that the issues should be discussed instead of discussing the person stating the issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:18 AM
2

It's not a credible argument to say "Women don't suck because the person saying that women do suck is biased." If a colorblind person is telling you that apples are red, the fact that he's colorblind doesn't prove that apples aren't red. You'd look like quite the fool arguing that apples aren't red simply because you don't like the person arguing that they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:50 AM
2

I think it would be more intellectually honest to discuss the truth of the issue rather than discuss whether the person presenting the issue has a character flaw to see if we can find a flaw that will let us dismiss the issue without discussing it. "You're a bigot!" may or may not be true. "Women suck!" may or may not be true. These are two different statements and whether one of them is true doesn't affect whether the other is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:44 AM
2

It sounds like being not biased is a serious pain in the ass, and that you could argue that anyone and everyone is biased, all the time, simply by finding a gap in evidence or a stray factor that wasn't addressed. It also sounds like any time somebody finds a statement or position (s)he doesn't like or doesn't agree with, it would be really easy to point out that the statement or position is biased and use that to dismiss the statement or position without having to worry about whether there's an…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:38 AM
2

So in order to not be biased against females, you can only say something negative about females when you have proof that this negative statement is true, and when making this statement, you have to thoroughly recount all factors about the situation you're speaking on and not just the ones that are about women?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:28 AM
2

"Women destroy civilizations" definitely counts as "something bad about women". So it's okay to say something kind of bad about women, in the absence of conclusive proof and without disclosing the thorough and complete recounting of every other factor in play. Just not okay to say something reeeeeealy bad about women without proof and full disclosure?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 03:39 AM
2

So it is only okay to say something negative about women if there is conclusive proof that the statement is true? And only if you also disclose the thorough and complete truth about every other factor in the situation (e.g., "men, too")?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 03:22 AM
3

So then your issue isn't that the video makes a true statement about women while neglecting to mention all of the other causes, thus unfairly implicating women, as you previously stated. It's that the statement about women is completely untrue and made solely due to anti-woman bias? You're kind of shifting your viewpoint. I think your real issue is that some guys on the internet said something negative about women. Which is sexist. Because it's negative about women. It wouldn't matter if it's tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 03:04 AM
3

To be fair, nobody wants to sleep in moist sheets that have semen in them.
/r/askMRP15/06/17 12:55 AM
1

It doesn't matter how many red pill buzz words he tries to cram into a post. We're not his dear diary or ask Abby hug box.
/r/askTRP15/06/17 12:46 AM
6

Isn't this kind of like the highly irrelevant "men, too" argument? As in, a red pill guy will say "women are/do [insert negative thing]", which is a 100% true statement, and some blue pill guy chimes in "but men also do that!" Which is great advice for people who are trying to fuck men, but off topic for the red pill. It's almost like TRP is sexist by design. OMG!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 12:17 AM
4

So it includes negative things about women that are true or partly true, but doesn't include other negative things about the situation, which creates an implication that women are the only negative thing involved in the situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:12 PM
4

Probably. So what? And you'll have to clarify what you mean by biased. Is it biased because it's untrue, but people are pushing the idea and believing it because they hate women? Or is it biased because, while true or at least partially true, people are unnecessarily using extreme and negative language to really paint women in a shitty light? Or is it biased because, while true, this truth casts women in a negative light?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:01 PM
7

There's a difference between recognizing that something about women, while negative, is true, versus choosing to believe something negative about women that is not true because you're biased against women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 08:43 PM
2

Nope. I don't know what possesses people to randomly spout personal bullshit on The Red Pill, like this focused group of people with a very specific purpose is their own little generic self-help group, just because they happen to be men. That level of entitlement is the very essence of male privilege. It makes me want to dye my hair blue and get on Twitter.
/r/askTRP14/06/17 06:56 PM
8

I stuck at it, mostly with variations on "pardon me, which of these food products is superior?" This is a good opener (when worded correctly, obviously, and not like a Grey Poupon commercial) when you're approaching a girl at Whole Foods. It's short and to the point, without a lot of extra words trying to explain yourself or why you're asking or giving unnecessary details and backstory, as though you're some kind of loser who needs to come up with an excuse to talk to a woman. And it's innocuous…
/r/askMRP14/06/17 06:37 PM
1

This is Ask The Red Pill, not AA. I know you're going sober, and they both start with A, and focusing is really hard for you right now, but your personal struggles with quitting alcohol 2.5 days in, the mix of supplements you're taking instead of getting real help -- none of this shit has anything to do with sex or masculinity or anything Red Pill-ish. Even if you somehow try to tangentially tie this personal issue of yours to The Red Pill, this really isn't the right crowd to be giving you alco…
/r/askTRP14/06/17 06:23 PM
3

I'd contest that this is only partially true, to a limited extent. Women need to have a threshold minimum level of confidence to succeed. If they run away every time a guy looks at them because they don't think they're good enough, and they stare at the ground and mutter and can't articulate their wants or needs, or hold a conversation with a guy without stammering like a child, and generally lack enough confidence to function as half of a romantic relationship, of course they'll fail. But confi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 03:45 PM
3

You'd be surprised how many guys fail at every approach. Granted, even in a meat market venue where girls are trying to get picked up, at least half to two thirds of the time, you're going to get blown off even if you didn't do anything wrong. Or just milked for free drinks and bailed on at closing time. "Red Pill" advice helps slightly increase the percentage of women who will be open to talking to you and giving you a shot, and significantly increases the number of shots you'll convert. "Appro…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 03:04 PM
2

You should have stuck with the one post instead of trying to extend the troll story.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/06/17 10:07 AM
6

Goddamnit. Time to ground the wife from the internet again. First she votes Clinton, then she starts watching The Handmaid's Tale, and now she's posting rebellious thoughts on the internet. The Jews (other than me) probably planned this. I need to have a chat with them at our next world domination convention.
/r/askMRP13/06/17 11:36 PM
6

Part of the reason people have a hard time with this dark corner of the internet isn't because any of the information or advice is outright false. It's that it's negative toward women. When you remove your emotions from the situation for a second and just look at a statement. "Is X true about women/men/sex/relationships?" The answer is often yes. But even though the question was never asked and the statement was never made, your mind is making the second statement "If X is true, then women are '…
/r/askTRP13/06/17 10:38 PM
2

It's more of an art than a template. You have to practice that a lot and get a feel for conversations and how they ebb and flow, and for noticing body language and tone of voice. Figure out if a girl is interested, how interested she is, get her number, move on. You'll probably get one number for every 5 girls you talk to. Meeting girls during the day time is different than meeting club and bar girls. Even when you're meeting the very same bar/club slut by day and in 90 minutes, she's going to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:52 PM
2

That's why people have to learn and practice game and not just wing it by trying to talk to people and be friendly. How to meet a girl during the day without running her off or getting her bitch shields up is a bit of an art. It's also worth noting that even if you do "everything right", approaching a girl during the day will get you blown off about 25% of the time, the girl will end the interaction quickly about 25% of the time, the girl will tolerate you with disinterested one-word answers and…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 03:55 PM
3

People don't really make friends any more. People make acquaintances. 90 percent of our friends are coworkers (or schoolmates if you're still in school), your neighbors, and people who used to be coworkers, schoolmates, or neighbors that we've kept in touch with. The huge majority of our friends are people that were forced into proximity with us due to life's circumstances, so they had a good excuse to be there in our lives and us in theirs, and for us to get to know each other. The other 10% ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 03:09 PM
3

Yeah. Women live in fear of being conversation-raped. This is far more common than actual rape. She already has friends. She already has a life. She doesn't need him. It's annoying as fuck when some chump who doesn't get it tries to insert himself into her life, even when he's not hitting on her and genuinely just wants to be friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 02:52 PM
16

This. Op knew the answer to his question before he even asked. Guys don't typically run up to random girls and just have a random innocent conversation. If a guy talks to you, 99.9 percent of the time, that innocent conversation is a probe for sexual or romantic availability. People used to know this, but today everyone denies it for some reason. I guess women want to have the just friends/innocent conversation out while feeling out other possible options, and men want to have plausible deniabil…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 11:01 AM
2

Red, Male, Heterosexual, maybe $50,000. She'd probably only go up to $10,000 for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:59 AM
2

Agree and amplify. "Do you think I need to lose 5 pounds?" "No, 30! But not in the breasts." Then grab her somewhere, give her a kiss, and move on with your day. This conversation very easily could have gone the other way with the way you responded.
/r/askMRP13/06/17 12:35 AM
2

It's a bit of an oversimplification, and kind of internet shorthand, to lump all of the things that go along with being a confident, attractive, social, fun, interesting guy who gets it, with being a douchebag asshole. I think it's kind of a given that when somebody says to be a Red Pill asshole, he means "asshole" with the quotation marks. Somebody who's outgoing, confident, interesting, fun, and maybe a little bit too cocky, but not in the way that's going to make everybody in the room hate hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 08:55 PM
4

If a girl is a virgin, but is seriously into you and wants you to be the one she marries, she goes out of her way to do just about everything else under the sun to prove her worth to you, so that you end up marrying her. If a girl lies about being a virgin to get out of sex with you and doesn't want to get found out, she'll follow up her bold proclamation by telling you that she needs a break from you, and if she does contact you again, it will be on her terms, and she'll shout you down any time…
/r/askTRP12/06/17 07:38 PM
113

You should post this more publicly. Reworded, obviously. I'd be willing to bet that the Reddit administration and 9/10ths of the right-thinking, liberal-minded Reddit users would pay good money to get The Red Pill off of Reddit.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/17 07:33 PM
3

I don't even send my own wife "good morning" or "how are you" texts. What the fuck? This woman is allegedly your girlfriend, but you think that you have to ping her phone every few hours just to stay on her radar and keep her attention. What a loser. No wonder she doesn't respect you. Why the hell aren't you too busy with your awesome life to be sending meaningless, attention-seeking texts? Not passive-aggressive, butt-hurt silence, or "cold" text messages, but actually busy living an awesome li…
/r/askTRP12/06/17 03:57 PM
9

If you're hot, fun, and successful, and you act like a confident, sexually assertive Red Pill asshole, loser men will think you're a jerk. Women will call you an "asshole", but it will be an asshole with the quotation marks, as they giggle and playfully punch you in the shoulder while they say it, just to have an excuse to touch you. When they go home with their boyfriends, they'll talk for two hours straight about what an asshole you are, they'll text their friends about you, you'll be constant…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 03:03 PM
9

If you're ugly and socially awkward, and keep approaching women and confidently spouting off asshole conversion lines, while being completely oblivious to the woman's social cues and body language screaming that she's not into you and doesn't want to keep talking to you, that prickles her danger sense. If you're ugly and socially awkward and you start dropping sexual innuendo into your conversations with women and touching them against their will, thinking that you're being an awesome, confident…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 12:30 PM
24

The red pill is a fantasy (e.g. Another blue pill) for the lower echelon of men. It won't work for them and is just internet candy as far as they're concerned. It's meant for average guys who've been playing the wrong game and failing, and need a few tweaks to how they interact with women to get laid more often. It's not meant for bottom of the barrel ugly guys with bona-fide medical social disorders. That guy acting like a confident asshole will just be seen as an ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 10:07 AM
3

The effort required to go from not sucking to being a decent relationship prospect is larger than most women are willing to make. It's too easy to delude themselves into thinking that the sex with fun guys is the real deal, or that settling for a less awesome guy later on will be tolerable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/17 10:27 PM
4

I think you may be extrapolating a few weirdos on the internet and maybe a bad past boyfriend into something that's not really a thing in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/17 11:34 AM
12

Will an average girl get laid tonight if she wants to? Yes. Hell, will a below average girl get laid tonight if she wants? Yes. Will an average guy get laid tonight if he wants? Nope. Will an above average guy? Maybe 50-50. Girls suck because the only requirement for a girl to get laid is existing. There's no incentive to do more. Well, that's not entirely true. There's no incentive strictly if a girl's goal is to get laid, but there are various other benefits to not sucking, including attractin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/17 11:29 AM
7

I feel your pain, brother. I'm a white male, so everywhere I go, racist women assume I'm just like Donald Trump. They don't take the time to get to know me. They just avoid me because they secretly think all white guys are Donald Trumps. But every time I post about how Donald Trump is ruining my chances on The Red Pill, nobody takes me seriously and they think I'm just trolling. I'm so sick of being shunned and downvoted because of my race, like I can't even discuss this fairly.
/r/askTRP10/06/17 08:23 PM
3

No contact. Ghost. Any contact she does manage to get through your barriers just destroy or delete unread. Don't even be curious. The fact that you can recite her excuses to us and know she's been seeing a therapist means you're way too busy paying attention to her and not busy enough fucking I other women. Get another girl. Hell, get 3.That will make this one leave you alone .
/r/askTRP10/06/17 04:30 PM
11

Holy shit! It's so simple! Nothing is sexier than talking about the lack of sex with your girlfriend! I wish I'd thought of that.
/r/askTRP10/06/17 01:55 PM
1

This position assumes that every time a woman has sex, she's trying to procreate. Some women have sex for fun, because the guy is hot/fun/interesting/whatever. They're on the pill or have an implant and the chance of pregnancy is nearly zero, plus the guy wraps his dick, so they can have sex that they would not normally have, since they're not worried about pregnancy. Along those same lines, some women have sex with guys to grease the wheels of an otherwise good relationship, even when the sexua…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/17 01:39 AM
69

The difference between a girlfriend and a plate is that with a girlfriend, you've agreed to be exclusive with her. That means that you've agreed not to have sex with any other women. Only with her. If she's not having sex with you, you don't have a girlfriend. You've essentially agreed to not have sex with anybody...just because this girl who's not fucking you asked you to do that. Sounds stupid to me. But here's the good part -- the difference between a girlfriend and a wife: You can walk away …
/r/askTRP09/06/17 10:42 PM
6

If your wife is performing well at home, there is absolutely nothing you can do to reward or validate her via text message that can't be done 1000 times better in person. Plus, doing so in person leads to sex. Sending her a lazy-ass "thinking of you, sexy" text message just comes across as needy. You're too busy for that shit, even when she's been dutifully cleaning your house top to bottom. I suppose, since you're obviously super-autistic, that I should note that texting for logistics only does…
/r/askMRP09/06/17 09:07 PM
1

It's more like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTO6fAJf1GM
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/17 07:17 PM
1

Yeah, even before. Absent something out of the ordinary, I don't really feel a lot of strong emotions, or really empathize with other people's strong emotions. I've always had a mostly "It is what it is" attitude about life. There aren't many things out there that are really worth strongly emotionally investing yourself. My wife or daughter does something aggravating? Meh. Women. My boss or a client annoys me? Meh. Job. Some careless idiot bumps into me and makes me spill my coffee? Meh. People.…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/17 07:11 PM
1

Nah. Not much gets to me. I'm pretty chill. I'd say I gravitate between mildly amused to mildly annoyed, and everything in between. Something pretty special needs to happen to piss me off or really get me happily excited.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/17 06:45 PM
1

Love exists in the sense that all of your other emotions exist. And what are emotions? Pretty much hormones. Physiological responses to stimuli. You feel love when the conditions for love are present, and stop feeling love when those condition are absent. The same way you feel anger or sadness under certain conditions, then get over it. So yes, love, the emotion, exists. But love, the magical force that conquers all and is somehow different and special and completely separate from who you are an…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/17 06:01 PM
3

You do not own a magic cell phone. You can not fuck a girl through your phone. If you're 10 miles from a girl, unless your dick is about 10 miles and 6 inches long, you can't fuck her right now. This doesn't just apply to text messages, but to any interaction with a woman: You have to have a plan. 99% of the time, your plan is sex. So everything you say and do is intended to steer the interaction toward your plan. Every time you engage a girl conversationally, you're doing so with a purpose. A p…
/r/askMRP09/06/17 01:44 PM
3

Nah. 99% of the time, if you're already at the point where clothes are coming off, the deal is sealed. Girls very rarely stop things at that point, try to take control, and demand certain sex acts. If a girl has decided it's on, then she's giving into her lust as you lead her through the sexual encounter, and is turning off the part of her brain that imposes a bunch of rules and conditions and restrictions on sex. That part of her brain is for her boyfriend, not the guys she hooks up with. In th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 09:29 PM
10

My wife and I both work. So our kid's in school, and attends the after-school-for-working-parents stuff until the evening. This is supposed to be bad for kids, but she's an only child, so playing with other children is far better for her than watching TV alone at home. On days when she has activities, one or both of us will pick her up early, drive her, and work that night to make up for the lost time. We pay maids to clean our house. We pay a lawn service to handle our yard. We take our cars in…
/r/askMRP08/06/17 07:08 PM
5

Your positive qualities are what make you attractive, silly. If a woman is willing to interact in a friendly manner with you, then at the very least, she thinks you're attractive enough to get it, not get the wrong idea, and not make her awkward and uncomfortable. If you were a loser, she'd worry that you don't get enough girls and that you'd misinterpret her willingness to talk to you as you having chance. If you were a loser, she'd have to actively snub you to avoid that awkwardness. But due t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 11:32 AM
1

It sounds an awful lot like you're dating a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 02:22 AM
2

It's not an easy question. The answer definitely shouldn't be who you're dating, where you party, or who your friends are. But it also definitely shouldn't be your job and where you work. I think a large portion of life and this crazy journey is figuring out the answer to that. When somebody asks you to tell them about yourself, and the very first thing that comes to mind and the very first thing you say is "I'm a programmer" -- that's your identity -- that's who and what you are, I don't know i…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 08:03 PM
6

Yes. On multiple occasions, with multiple past girlfriends, as well as with my current wife, I lost myself. I began to sacrifice things I wanted and the things that made me who I am to combine my life with theirs. To do more things for the woman I was with at the time. To spend more time with her. To make my life more focused on her. Rather than communicating my love and my devotion, as I intended, the women in my life found this behavior to be needy, clingy, and controlling. I cheated these wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 05:22 PM
11

It's a real thing. If a 100% blind, 100% merit-based test results in a disparate impact among different sexes, races, religions, sexual orientations, or socioeconomic classes, it is completely impossible that this could indicate that one group of people is better than another group of people at a certain type of task. No way, no sir. Everybody is equal in every way. If your test disparately impacts different groups, then your test is obviously flawed and bigoted. This is a real thing. Schools ha…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 01:57 PM
5

If somebody asked you, in casual conversation, "So, Stay_Anon, tell me about yourself", what would you say? Or assuming you'd blow off and have fun with that kind of question, what would the true answer be? Who are you? Are you your job? Are you the women you date and fuck? Are you The Red Pill? If you were to truthfully answer the prompt "tell me about yourself", what would you say? If the first thing out of your mouth is, "I'm a coder for quibisoft dot com", how sad is that?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 02:15 AM
38

The general rule in life is that if something is fun, like a party, nobody will pay you money to do it. People would instead be standing in line paying to buy tickets. If somebody is compensating you for doing something, then it's not fun. It may be satisfying and fulfilling in many ways, but it's still something you're doing for money. If you hit a point where you're independently wealthy and don't need money, then what you choose to do with your time may very well be what defines you. But for …
/r/TheRedPill07/06/17 01:06 AM
69

I like my job, too. But at the end of the day, if I had a few billion dollars and money was no object, would I continue to voluntarily go to work every day, or would I find better ways to spend my time? You definitely need a job you can tolerate -- even enjoy. But your job isn't your source of identity. At least, it shouldn't be. When somebody casually asks you to tell them about yourself, the first thing you say shouldn't be your occupation or where you work. That's not who you are. You're not …
/r/TheRedPill06/06/17 10:12 PM
185

Yes. Quit being stupid. Why do you work at a job? Are you seriously trying to change the world for the better from your cubicle at some software company's office? Fuck no. You work your job to make money. You then spend that money on goods and services that make your life easier and better, and save a good portion of that money in an investment vehicle of some kind that will support you when you retire, preferably sooner rather than later. The same way when you go to a bar and interact with wome…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/17 08:39 PM
691

If a blind, merit-based selection process favors men over women, then the selection process must be flawed. And if fucking with the merit-based selection process until some women start getting included results in the generation inferior software that nobody buys or likes, then what people like to buy and use must be wrong. If you like your computers to run fast and efficiently, to function correctly, and to accomplish a lot of useful tasks, you're a sexist. The evil patriarchy has convinced you …
/r/TheRedPill06/06/17 08:15 PM
2

Some people suck. Vet your partners. No vetting process is perfect. Sometimes, you end up with somebody who sucks anyway. Sometimes it's your fault and you just don't know it or notice it. Sometimes it's not and the other person just sucks. If you suck, then your relationships will most definitely fail, or be limited to shitty people who have no choice but to date someone who sucks. If you don't suck, your relationships may still fail or include shitty people, but there's also a chance you'll do…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:40 PM
3

If a woman is giving you total respect, total fidelity, and sex on demand, and is maintaining her appearance and actually working to be pleasant and interesting to be around, it's actually more work to find women to cheat with -- especially one that's nearly as good -- than it is to fuck the woman you're with. Part of the way you maintain power in your relationships with women is by rewarding good behavior. Not just punishing the bad behavior. You want to encourage your woman to continue doing g…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 05:43 PM
2

I'm male. Respect. Fidelity, which is really just #1. Sex, which is really just #1 as well. Maintains her appearance, which is also really just #1. Not a bitch. See #1. Hates any and all non-whites, non-heterosexuals, and people with household incomes less than 150k a year and wants them all sent off to camps per Hitler, our Red Pill hero. No, wait. Just 1-5 is okay. And expects the same from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 05:24 PM
8

Follow the money. If anybody finds out that Harvard turned a blind eye toward the presence of bigots among its student body, that would be bad press, less dollars from alumns and organizations, fewer applicants, stupid-ass protests. That shit costs Harvard money. So when some dipshit sends Harvard a letter saying, "I discovered some of these incoming freshmen are bigots", or some right-thinking liberal-minded employee brings this to a higher-up's attention, Harvard can't ignore this information …
/r/TheRedPill06/06/17 03:02 PM
13

At a bar, you can use beta men all you want. You're chatting up a girl, escalating with your hands, and jealous beta Bob runs over to warn her about you? All you need to do is give him half a glance and ask her "Is this your boyfriend or something?" She'll be so embarrassed that she'll creep-shame him the fuck out of there and double down on her efforts to prove to you that she's not the kind of girl who fucks losers like that. She's the type of girl who deserves winners like you. But at work? U…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/06/17 12:14 PM
3

Technically, anybody can be president. Even you. Realistically, only wealthy, well connected superstar humans can actually be president. Sure, a kid can still succeed with a mediocre life, and fail horribly with a life of abundance and opportunity, but if you want to give your children the best chance possible, you go with column B and don't bank on being one of the column A success stories. You and your kids only get one life.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/17 10:43 AM
7

And why exactly wouldn't I want my kids to go to a good school ? What's the point of bringing them into this already very competitive world and having them go into life from disadvantageous position ? Don't ask me. I was 30-ish when we had our daughter. We lived in a 2800 square foot home in the burbs at the time and have since moved to an even bigger home in an even better, richer, whiter burb. She's always had her own room, she currently plays sports, does gymnastics and a martial art, and we'…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 06:11 PM
14

Having children, on its own, isn't expensive. But if you want to have children who have their own bedroom in a 3000+ square foot home in a good neighborhood, zoned to good schools with primarily upper middle class white students and good teachers with bonafide college prep and advanced placement programs, and you want your sons to play sports with their friends every season and your daughters to do gymnastics and dance with the other girls, and you want to make sure your kids learn a musical ins…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 05:44 PM
27

You probably should have read a few more lines and you'd have come across the point you made. Anyway, I'd point out that you're wrong about relationships. The idea that women sell sex and men sell relationships is incorrect. Women do sell sex, but women also sell relationships. There are countless thirsty men out there who would give their left nut just to have a girlfriend or even a date. Women can find dates and relationships with only slightly more difficulty than they can find sex. But with …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 03:56 PM
181

Dating applications aren't the source of the problem, per se. They just turn the entire city a girl lives in into one large bar. Women live lives of abundance. The same abundance mentality we strive to develop, or at least fake, women are just born into automatically. This is the primary source of the disconnect between the sexes. Every single time a woman wants to have sex, she can find someone willing to have sex with her. It doesn't matter whether she's in a bar, a club, a coffee shop, or onl…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 02:27 PM
17

Stage 6 would be a woman coming up and sitting in your lap (often with subtle grinding once seated), rather than sitting next to you and asking you interview questions. Maybe swatting your butt as you walk by. Sitting or standing in a manner that involves shoving her tits in your face. In a dance setting, she'll initiate grinding. During a hug, her thigh or hips, depending on her height, will find its way between your legs or be pressed up against your groin area. Honestly, I thought generalizin…
/r/askTRP04/06/17 04:03 AM
13

This. Sex is easy enough for girls to come by that any girl who wants one (or more) FWB-style relationships has them. Why the hell would a girl risk fucking some stranger she met at a hostel ,who lives 1000 miles away, for just one night when in 3 days, she goes back home to where she's FWBs with three different guys that she knows, trusts, and enjoys fucking? She knows her FWBs are safe, she knows she'll enjoy the sex with them, and because they're a quasi "relationship" for her, she doesn't fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 10:00 PM
11

"Unstable" is girl code for her being uncertain about your financial future. It has nothing to do with the stability of your relationship. "This relationship isn't going anywhere" means that in her eyes, you aren't going anywhere. She's not talking about the relationship. She's talking about your income. If you're a high-status guy with a kickass job and lots of money, you bolster her socially, and she can spend your money on shit. If you're in a lower-status position in life, her friends don't …
/r/askMRP03/06/17 09:21 PM
71

You're at stage 5 out of 6. Stage 1 is where women actively avoid you, give you dirty looks for existing in the same room, and won't even give you directions or tell you the time. Stage 2 is where women pretty much ignore you unless you get in their way or approach them or otherwise try to get their attention, in which case they try to end the interaction as quickly as possible, using as few words as possible. Stage 3 is where women mostly ignore you unless you approach them and try to talk, at …
/r/askTRP03/06/17 06:44 PM
4

You made this post like it's some huge "gotcha" that The Red Pill subreddit includes misogyny. I mean, do any of us still run around declaring, "Hey! There's no woman-bashing or female-hating going on here! We're strictly just male self-improvement! Guy stuff!" It's not deniable. Of course we're sexist misogynist assholes. This isn't some huge "gotcha", where, because Fisher isn't hawt, everyone clearly loves TRP because we hate women -- PROOF! GOTCHA RED PILL! Seriously, just click over to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 06:23 PM
8

Closure is something for women. You don't need to waste your time meeting with her again. She's just going to spin you a line of bull, while you probe for ways to resurrect the relationship. You'll be validating her and making her feel powerful, while demonstrating what a loser you are. An "explanation" from her won't make you feel better. Fucking a hotter woman will. Handle this like a man, not a woman. Box her shit up, ship it, don't see her again, no contact, fuck other women.
/r/askTRP03/06/17 10:44 AM
6

On one hand, Robert Fisher isn't hawt. So he's probably not beating away constant unsolicited attempts by ladies to grab his dick every 30 seconds. On the other hand, I did this Red Pill shit to the T and my sex life, my relationship with my wife, my interactions with not just women but men, too, and even my professional life all improved. My life went from moderately shitty to moderately good, and I owe it all to hating women. Misogyny made me fifty times more successful, not to mention happier…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 10:15 PM
3

Double standard aside, women are far better than men at memorizing information and recalling the memorized information on an exam, but far worse at applied knowledge or problem solving. So given what school is today, women are definitely smarter. Out performing men at school is expected. Give a female student a test question that says "take these two chemicals and show the steps they go through to become this third chemical", which appears in chapter of 7 of the textbook, and she's got an A. Giv…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 10:42 AM
3

100% sexual success is a guy who has sex every single time he wants to have sex, with somebody he wants to have sex with. That could be a married guy whose wife is down every single time he wants it, a popular guy with a rotation of 6-12 fuck-buddies, or a super-player who effortlessly picks up new girls at bars or online any time he wants to fuck. Obviously, nobody in the real world actually reaches the theoretical ideal of 100% sexual success, but the idea is to get as close to that as you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/17 04:13 AM
11

Don't go the slippery slope route of being a doormat, though. You're not offering to be her servant and start following her instructions. You're being the leader of your family. When you recognize that one of your subordinates is having an issue, you ask her what her issue is and figure out how to make the ship keep running. If you approach this like a child asking Mommy what chores she needs done, doing them dutifully, then running back to her for a pat on the head and a piece of candy, you're …
/r/askMRP31/05/17 05:16 PM
16

I started out with baby steps. When my wife bitched at me, I'd say "Stop", and nothing more until she quit bitching. If she kept it up, I might add, "I said stop. That's enough." The first few times, when she wouldn't quit, I just left. But once she actually started shutting the fuck up, I didn't chastise her for her lack of respect. I just said, "What do you need?" Invariably, she'd say "Huh?" "You're being a bitch. If you were five years old, I'd think you were hungry or tired. How about we ta…
/r/askMRP31/05/17 05:08 PM
20

So you: 1) Make money; 2) Have a degree; 3) Are good at your job; 4) Are "intellectual"; and 5) Have an amateur gym hobby. I don't think your problem is that you're too alpha and not beta enough, buddy. And responsive to the man you are today, your wife: 1) Rules the roost while homeschooling your kids and also working part-time; 2) Doesn't keep the house clean; 3) Is stressed out and lets it show/complains about it; 4) Is constantly angry and disrespectful and resentful; 5) Doesn't appreciate y…
/r/askMRP31/05/17 04:22 PM
13

I don't know if this is a regional thing, or just a disconnect between camps on what kind of guy is "average". It is 100% my experience, and the experience of nearly everybody I know, that guys I consider average struggle heavily to have casual sex with any degree of frequency. Every guy can find a girlfriend, eventually. The huge majority of guys that want to be married eventually end up married. Only the biggest losers in the universe can't end up with a wife and can never find a girlfriend. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 02:48 PM
44

I think you underestimate the difficulties of the average man, or overestimate what an average man actually is. An awesome man (e.g., "Chad") can have casual sex with reasonable frequency, with fairly good looking women. An awesome man also has the option to enter into a relationship with a woman if he wants. An average man has very few opportunities for causal sex, if any, and the opportunities that he does have are not with awesome women. However, an average man will eventually be able to find…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 02:03 PM
1

It's usually the other way around. In most industries, women are paid around 94-98 percent of men for the same work, but the reason isn't sexism. It's that women are risk adverse and can't handle rejection. Women hardly ever negotiate for a higher starting salary, or directly request raises and promotions from their boss. They sit in the same position for 12 years getting small annual cost of living pay increases, see an ambitious guy who asks for it get promoted over them, and think sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 10:07 AM
3

I met her in the day and we did it that night. So there's no illusions here. She's a casual sex slut. Sluts are for fucking. You used her for fucking, which is her purpose, which you and she both understand to be her purpose. Then she asked if I could come over the next night and do it again, and I told her I couldn't because I was out of town. That's fine. You have a life. about an hour later sends me another text saying she is going to fuck a stranger since I'm not coming. Because she's a casu…
/r/askTRP30/05/17 07:57 PM
15

You're doing everything just fine except for one big one: Cut all contact with your ex. Delete and block her on everything. Actually move on with your life. That's actually kind of therapeutic. When you physically remove her from your phone, your computer, your life, and take active steps to block her so you don't have to get her stray messages and calls and whining any more, you actually feel a little different. Knowing that she has disappeared from your world makes it easier to move along with…
/r/askTRP30/05/17 07:50 PM
3

Well, duh. I mean...it's Donald Fucking Trump. Even the Republican party hates his ass. But anyway, urban liberals are still the minority, while most of the country thinks they're lunatics. Meanwhile, urban liberals think that the entire country is just like them because they think if you take three steps west from New York, you're in California, while the rest of the country is just a barren wasteland with a few isolated pockets of bumpkins.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 05:20 PM
3

Definitely real 'murica. Urban liberals are really caught up in their bubbles. They're surrounded by people just like them, and they're in a large population center, so they think that the entire country is mostly like they are, while people who think differently are a small minority of backwoods bumpkins. This is exacerbated by the media, which is more focused on agendas and selling products than reporting news, so you hear things like Clinton winning the election being a given, gay marriage be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 05:08 PM
2

"I was kidding four comments ago" doesn't translate well in text form.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 04:24 PM
2

That is still a thing that is highly exaggerated by manosphere nutjobs on the internet, that is extremely uncommon in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 03:39 PM
2

The odd-ball manosphere guy you see on the internet who goes to Asia for allegedly easy pussy isn't that common in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 03:34 PM
2

I don't think we've hit a point where people choose where they live based on the opportunities for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 03:10 PM
3

They aren't? I think most normal, traditional guys would far prefer a down-home normal girl from a medium-sized town in Texas versus a New York club slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 03:05 PM
3

Blue Pill people (and most liberal internet circles) tend to have an over-representation of people who live in United States urban coastal population centers + Chicago + Austin. People who live in large cites on either coastline are in these bizarre liberal bubbles where 99.999 percent of the women go to Ivy League law schools and marry unemployed bearded guys with man-buns who hang out at coffee shops all day living on their wives' income. And they are completely ignorant of the fact that if yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 02:59 PM
5

The real reason women end up as secretaries instead of engineers isn't systemic gender role sexism. Not directly, anyway. It's because we give women an out: Women are allowed to work a low-paying job, work part time, or even not work at all, get married, and enjoy a higher quality of life through their husband's income. So women have the choice to be engineers or secretaries, and a huge number of women take the out. They choose not to work as hard, they get married, and they enjoy a higher quali…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 02:52 PM
4

A little of both. I felt like some social commentary instead of the usual "here's how to trick women into fucking you" spiel. Seriously, people have forgotten the 1980s. Back then, Atwood wasn't nearly as well known, Handmaid's Tale was considered edgy and kind of fringe, women faced actual workplace discrimination and lower pay/fewer opportunities instead of the made up bullshit feminists spout today, and the book was hardcore feminist literature primarily read in colleges. While the dystopian …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 02:44 PM
4

So because being a secretary is important (though nearly anybody can do the job), we should pay secretaries the same as brain surgeons? And because women take time away for kids and household duties, we should give them an artificial salary bump because those other duties are important and valuable?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 02:15 PM
2

It's just amusing that a piece of fringe feminist anti-marriage literature from the 80s, written before the author was very well known, and read primarily by college students as required indoctrination, has become a mainstream fad. And that 3/4 of the women watching it on the internet today think these are fresh new ideas and some kind of modern political commentary about Trump, and totally miss the anti-marriage feminist argument Atwood was trying to make.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/17 12:13 PM
11

Women earn 25% less than men for different, lower skilled or less in demand work. Which is exactly what men would earn doing the same lesser work. And this is in spite of long years of encouragement, with parents, teachers, and society as a a whole teaching women how amazing they are. How they can do anything they put their mind to. How they're as good as any man. Even with all of this encouragement, women still end up as administrative assistants instead of engineers. If women want more money, …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 12:07 PM
16

When I say "The average man struggles to get laid, get dates, and get relationships with regularity", I most definitely mean that the average man is making an effort but failing. Losers who sit in the corner and drink at a bar, don't talk to anybody, no girls come up to them, then they rant on Reddit about how girls only talk to top 20% ultra-Chads aren't average men. They're well-below average. Most men make an effort to try to get laid, get dates, and get relationships, and most men struggle w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 03:46 AM
4

My caveat is: Are these things this guy's girlfriend has never done before, and she is completely unwilling to even try with him? Then you are right. 100%. Are these things the guy's girlfriend has done in the past with other men, but she doesn't want to do them with him because she didn't like the way those things made her feel about herself as a person? Then you are right. 100%. Are these things the guy's girlfriend used to do in the past with other men, but she doesn't want to do them with hi…
/r/askTRP29/05/17 03:45 PM
21

It's definitely programming. The novel was primarily only known in feminist circles, being required reading for many east coast college women's studies programs. It wasn't social commentary on Republicans. It was commentary on modern marriage. Back in those days, feminism was still actively attacking marriage, as an evil institution that oppressed women. The idea was to try to make normal wives feel unsettled about their normal marriages to normal husbands. To make them feel like husbands having…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 01:02 PM
27

Just because a girl won't do every single thing you want in bed doesn't necessarily mean she sucks or you suck. Some things are just physically uncomfortable for some people, or not things that turn them on. She might just not be into certain things, for reasons completely unrelated to you or your relationship. However, are these things she's never even tried before? Or are they things she's tried in the past (I guess with you, assuming the virgin thing is true), and didn't like? If she won't ev…
/r/askTRP28/05/17 02:08 PM
1

Maybe. Being born with a brain problem isn't that different than being born with one arm. It's a source of difficulty in your life, both for yourself when you try to do normal life activities, and socially due to how others perceive and treat you. I don't think parents or society are really all up in arms about "ewwww trannies!" or "Down's kids are inferior!" or "I want a perfect baby, not a messed up one!". Your kids are your kids. It's more that life is hard enough, even for a "normal" person.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 01:59 PM
2

Then do you think mental gender identity is something we'll one day be able to detect? And even fix? Will trans-gender become a thing we can eliminate in utero?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 01:08 PM
2

It's an interesting topic. So what do you think makes a person a boy or a girl, then? If you're biologically male, have XY chromosomes, male hormones, are heterosexual, you live the traditional male gender role life and like it, then it's hard to say that you have a "female brain". Your genetics, hormones, and the sexuality and behaviors you gravitate toward are pretty male-brained. If you have that tickling feeling in the back of your consciousness that makes you feel like you're a girl, what d…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 07:53 PM
1

If the world had no such thing as a gender role -- no expectations for any person to wear anything, do anything, or live or act a certain way -- so you could be biologically male or female and do anything freely without any social boon or consequence, and it wouldn't reflect on your gender at all... Would some people still identify as a different gender than their biological one, even though they could live any way they wanted as their born sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 03:32 PM
3

So to clarify, you're biologically female, heterosexual (at least biologically) and are sexually attracted to and prefer sex with biological males, but dress and act according to the traditional male gender role (mostly)? However, your statement is that gender roles don't matter - being a man or woman is just how you feel inside? So even if you lived the traditional female gender role and loved every minute of it, you could still be a man inside your mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 01:16 PM

To a crazy liberal person, gender is faith. You believe in gender like you believe in God. I can be biologically male and have testosterone and a penis, heterosexual and prefer sex with women, dress and act like a man and fulfill the male gender role and like it, but still "identify" as a woman because of some magical feeling that despite my biology, sexual orientation, and preferred gender role and way of life, I'm a girl inside. It's like this nagging feeling that your soul is female and you b…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 11:48 AM
3

It doesn't matter what men want. The idea is to be the best T-shirt possible to maximize the number of women who want to wear you. And when a woman gets rid of you don't sweat it. It happens. And realize that when you're an awesome shirt every girl in town wants to wear, women are just interchangeable bodies for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 11:40 AM
1

The idea is that a woman is not "more committed" to you when she has options. She's just committed differently. She's the love of your life. You only have one of her and you treasure her. You're a T-shirt. She has a drawer full of them. If you get worn out or she just stops liking you, she can change shirts with minimal effort. Even if she chose to wear this particular T-shirt, from among many options, because it looks and feels awesome and goes great with her current outfit, it's still just a T…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 04:39 AM
52

The corollary is that you don't actually have to be a basic boring dude. You just have to play the role of one once in awhile. Fucking girls is one of many hobbies a well-rounded guy should have. And when you go out to fuck girls, you say and do certain things that are geared toward that purpose. When you're done fucking girls, you go home and do whatever other important shit you want to do, which may require a completely different set of behaviors. A lot of guys get caught up in this mental mas…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 09:27 PM
7

I don't think it's so much a matter of the "natural alpha feminist male" not being a thing that can exist. It's more that a guy who's attractive to women doesn't need to be a feminist to get laid. He could be a total asshole and still get laid. Being a feminist isn't what's making him attractive. When a guy is attractive to women and doesn't need to work too much at it (e.g., by doing Red Pill shit), whether or not he's a feminist is kind of like whether or not he likes peanuts. Except being a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 07:20 PM
21

There are two kinds of male feminists. The first kind is a reasonably attractive, socially apt, fun, interesting dude that women are choosing to fuck. So of course he's all for female sexual liberation, normalizing sluttiness, and all of the sex-positive jazz. Because when you give women unrestrained sexual choice, they're choosing to have sex with him. And he has a spine. The second kind is a reasonably unattractive, socially below-average, kind of boring dude that women don't want to fuck, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 05:31 PM
3

Arthur's linked post is a really good one that I think goes into some depth that is often overlooked by TRP. Not every person who is "dominant" necessarily needs a "submissive" partner. A person's tolerance/need for their partner's dominance can be completely separate from a person's own dominance. For example, a high-dominance man might not have any tolerance for a low-dominance woman. He's busy doing shit and needs a woman who can take care of herself, not a mopey, needy idiot hanging around t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 04:49 PM
2

"Work wives" just happen. You work well with someone, make each other's lives easier, like each other okay, and hang out sometimes. Nobody officially agrees to be work wife and work husband. What is this shit? She wants to work-go-steady with you? The fact that she's sat you down and tried to make this some kind of official thing means she's had official work husbands before and that this is some kind of relationship she intends to use or benefit from. Don't take the bait. The next time she brin…
/r/askMRP26/05/17 02:54 PM
5

100% of women on the internet will tell you that everything about me is a compete turn off, and they'd smell the evil misogyny a mile away, and they'd never ever put up with even one tenth of what I do. The internet doesn't translate well into the real world. This shit works miraculously, even though it sounds completely crazy on paper.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 11:16 PM
4

Social power as well. Whenever one woman is your only opportunity for sex, that one woman is a billion times more likely to deny you sex, treat you poorly, and make demands of you. Women are bitches toward you when they know you can't walk away, because you have nowhere else to go. No other woman wants you. It's either putting up with her for the faintest hope of sex, maybe, if your behavior pleases her, or having no hope of sex at all. She has all of the power in that situation. You have none. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 08:28 PM
5

The Red Pill is, primarily, sexual strategy. Men attempting to increase their sexual success and opportunities. On a more general level, The Red Pill is about male power at the expense of female power. Essentially, reducing women to interchangeable sex objects. No particular woman is unique or special. There are billions of them out there. For any woman you're looking at right now, there is another woman out there every bit as good, or better, in every single way. So it's never worth giving any …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 07:30 PM
7

Hey, I used to think like you. I thought this Red Pill shit was kind of silly, and probably a sure-fire way to destroy a relationship. I hit a point where I was pretty much done with my marriage anyway. Mostly-sexless, wife constantly bitching, fighting all the time. I just didn't care any more. I figured this Red Pill shit would be a fun way to hurt my wife. It was like magic. Standing my ground, telling her "no" any time I didn't feel like doing or not doing something (and sometimes telling he…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 06:02 PM
6

The Red Pill doesn't have a PR department. It's not trying to gain acceptance and understanding from the internet or get anonymous internet people to like it. It's not trying to gain followers. It's just dudes comparing notes and trading stories and ideas about getting laid. It's not "true" because of "science", or because of the caliber of the people who like it. It's "true" because 200,000 men casually surfing the internet stumbled across these stories from other men and thought to themselves,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 02:52 PM
3

You're 150# and built like a rail, and you think you need to cut? You're 17 years old. Eat shit-tons of protein, 2500-3000 calories a day, and lift HEAVY shit to exhaustion 6 times a week, doing a split so you're not working the same muscles two days in a row. 2500-3000 calories should be a fairly controlled, very slow bulk, as opposed to packing on a gut and layer of blubber and hoping you're building muscle underneath it. Especially if it's mostly protein/fat, and maybe 200g of carbs on liftin…
/r/askTRP24/05/17 07:22 PM
2

The other 90 percent of women fuck the fit-looking guys and piss on the nerdy trilingual guy. "Talk French to me" is only sexy when it comes out of the mouth of a guy you actually want to fuck. So if I'm Joe Regularguy, and I'm only going to live a certain number of years, and I want to maximize the number of opportunities I will have in my lifetime for dates, sex, and relationships, I think my time would be better spent at the gym than learning French. You might not fuck me, but a larger portio…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 04:39 PM
3

That's fairly standard TRP advice. Always hide your work. Women don't want to know how hard you work for anything. If anything, letting a girl see you work obsessively at something will make her think less of your achievement. It makes you seem try-hard and narcissistic and inauthentic. Women prefer a guy who's just magical -- who is hot, successful, socially apt, interesting, fun, exciting -- and all of this just seems to effortlessly come naturally to him. It's just a seamless extension of who…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 03:42 PM
6

I do not contest in the slightest that women prefer a lean-ish, fit male body (e.g., a professional soccer player, college athlete, magazine underwear model, boyband star physique), over a jacked-up, circus strongman, beefy linebacker roid monkey. There is also a segment of women that like the beefy, manly, broad-shouldered, bearded linebacker build -- just not the sculpted pecs, Tinder abs, oiled up, gay narcissist look. More of a "real man" manly look. The issue I'm raising is that most women …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 03:33 PM
1

There have been multiple threads where pics of a jacked-up roid monkey with huge muscles are posted next to pics of a fit, lean lacrosse player or underwear model, and women all go "See! We like guy #2 better! The Red Pill is wrong! Women don't like muscular men!" Because women don't realize that guy #2 is a "muscular man" who devotes a lot of time to his body. Not just some dude who casually hits the gym once in awhile and eats chicken. And guy #1 is just guy #2 on steroids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 02:06 PM
3

Two things: First, get your shit together. Not for your fiance. Not to save the relationship. But because not having your shit together is making your life harder, for you. You come first. So your health, your lifting, your fun activities and hobbies, and your finances come before her. If you have to drop her to help get your finances in order, do it. Because getting your own life together is more important than any woman. Second, drop the woman. She's seen you weak and depressed and poor. And w…
/r/askMRP24/05/17 01:36 PM
5

Don't have time to comb the internet for hot pics today, but picture your average leggy brunette suburban yoga pants soccer mom, who drops the kids off at school at 7:30, and spends her spare time before 3:00 lifting dumbbells in some workout class or boot camp with her girlfriends, going jogging, and eating salads. Not the slightest bit fat, but not one of those willowy rail-thin cardio bunnies who looks like you might break her if you hug her too tightly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 01:09 PM
6

Political correctness. Duh. You can only point out a woman's strengths, not her weaknesses. Only her positive qualities, not her negative ones. This isn't just a sex thing. If you see two men standing across the room, one white and one black, and say "Look at that guy over there!", and your friend says, "Which one?", you're supposed to bend over backward and say "Uh...the one that's 3 centimeters taller in the gray shirt with the darker hair and brown eyes." Anything, anything, except saying "th…
/r/askTRP24/05/17 01:04 PM
14

I like fit women, a lot. When a woman is just skinny, but not actually fit, her body looks funny to me. Her butt and legs don't move right when she walks. Her shoulders and arms seem non-proportional and out of place. Women who don't work out and don't have any defined musculature to speak of are just funny looking. Now if by "muscular woman", we mean the very rare and small sliver of curiously strong, beefy, butch professional female muscle builders, that's not sexy at all. Not because I'm all …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 12:56 PM
4

Here come the posts where women fail to understand that the fit but not super jacked college soccer player physique they drool over actually takes more gym time and dietary restriction than the buff muscle men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 10:10 AM

We at the red pill discourage critical thinking. Everything written by the grand pubarate of priests is the word of god. Anybody who does not believe in the literal truth of every word is not a true disciple, and is out of the club. No hot virgins for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 10:07 AM
16

This is a satire post, but mark my words: the day is coming when it will not be satire. Under the guise of reducing violence and rape, and improving the attention and performance of young boys in school, male children will no longer be prescribed Ritalin. They will be treated for excess testosterone. Studies will show that reducing testosterone to approved levels reduces aggression, lowers incidents of violent crime across society, and results in improved performance in school. Society will push…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 11:37 PM
7

So this girl you love so much (but lives far from you), who is on Tinder (e.g., a super-slut who meets guys and fucks them the day she meets them), was allegedly raped by a man she met on Tinder. I'm assuming that she went to the police immediately and filed a police report, and the authorities are hunting for this man as we speak, and she went to a hospital and had a rape kit processed, and she's undergone a full barrage of STD and pregnancy tests, and is currently speaking with the hospital me…
/r/askTRP23/05/17 03:47 PM
4

She found a boyfriend. Fuck other women.
/r/askTRP22/05/17 11:18 PM

That should be the standard in court. "Of course he shouldn't have talked to me, your honor. Just look at him! He's a 4 and I'm a 7!" "Agreed. Guilty!"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 08:50 PM
1

Some male feminists are cute guys who get laid on the regular, so they think women are awesome. Of course they love women having free choice in everything and being powerful, independent, and equal. Because the women are choosing to have sex with them. Other male feminists are unattractive "nice guys" who think that siding with team girl and making female friends and trying to understand women better will get them laid. A small percentage of them are probably emotionally unstable, snap, and beat…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 08:04 PM
12

Right-o. The small percentage of guys that are regularly having casual sex with lots of different women are pretty proficient and smelling what's coming next and cutting things off right before she brings up the "what are we and where are things going" conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 07:55 PM
27

So women have a relatively easy time scoring casual sex on demand...but don't like it and prefer emotional intimacy. I'm a grand poobah vanguard endorsed high priest at this subreddit that says exactly the same thing! It's uncanny!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 07:10 PM
1

Don't shoot yourself in the foot. Escalate toward sex. You seem pretty sure she'll stop you, but instead of just assuming she will, see if she does. (If she doesn't, or depending on the way she goes about doing it, you'll know loads more about her than you did before.) It's totally okay to respect her no if she stops you. However, demonstrating value beyond sex is her job. It's not your job to assume it's there and wine and dine her for X number of sexless months. And her just showing up, being …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 05:42 PM
1

Your job is to demonstrate value and pursue sex, with your value demonstrating your worthiness as a sexual prospect. Her job is to demonstrate value (either through sex or through non-sexual sources of value) and pursue a relationship, with her value demonstrating her worthiness as a relationship prospect. Never be ashamed of your sex drive. The fact that you are attracted to a woman and want to have sex with her is not wrong, nor should it spook her. If anything, she should worry very severely …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:40 PM
3

The old me would have done exactly that. Because the old me genuinely believed that the path to a great relationship went: Friends > Dating > LTR > Serious LTR/Sex > Marriage Boy, was I dumb, huh? So I was friends with lots of women, dated a few who were willing, dove almost immediately into an exclusive relationship with any girl I dated, never quite got to the sex stage with 99% of them, finally got to the sex stage then married to my current wife. And ended up in a low-sex, unhappy marriage u…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 02:50 PM
17

First off, face matters a lot. A skinny guy (not skeletal and freakishly skinny, just not buff) with a cute face and hair that could land him in a boy-band or underwear ad will far outperform a plain or ugly-faced guy with broad shoulders and tinder-abs. And a good-faced guy looks good in anything, so he doesn't have to dress sharp. Second, one of the arch-types many women like is the brooding, silent, too cool for school type. I promise that skinny, poorly dressed guy you loathe so much isn't a…
/r/askTRP22/05/17 02:40 PM
2

That's exactly the issue. "Hate" used to mean something real. In today's retarded social media generation, hate just means "saying mean shit on the internet".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 11:06 AM
2

Real hate would be deliberately not hiring and restricting the opportunities of females at your company solely because you don't like women and how they are. Real hate would be you and your bros running women out of your favorite bar because you don't like having them around. Real hate would be specifically targeting, killing, beating, robbing, and raping women because you think they're sub-human and deserve it. Saying mean shit on the internet is barely even an action.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 04:40 PM
3

This whole gender war thing is primarily an internet fabrication. In the real world, very few people care about feminist or MRA issues or even know what The Red Pill subreddit is. So when a post begins "women find it hard to sympathize with Red Pillers/men because their anger", by "women" it really just means "The small percentage of women who discuss gender war issues on the internet, and even among them, only their internet behavior, because 99.9% of women, including these same women off of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 02:28 PM
19

Don't date girls that have slut friends. Girls that actually aren't sluts tend not to be best friends with girls who have wildly different values. A sexually conservative girl is not best friends with a super-slut who's likely to hire a stripper -- such good friends that she makes this slutty woman her maid of honor. If your girlfriend seems like a virtuous snowflake, but her friends are sluts, that is damn near proof-positive that you're being played, and the virtuous snowflake is an act.
/r/askTRP21/05/17 02:04 PM
20

While not every single bachelorette party involves the bride having sex, generally, if your bride is the kind of woman who has slutty friends and who has a stripper party to begin with, I'd give it 60-40 odds that she (and many of the women there) at least give the stripper a blowjob, and probably 40-60 odds that the bride also has sex with the stripper. When women get together among slut friends, there's drinking, and everybody is egging the bride on for her last night of freedom, and everybody…
/r/askTRP21/05/17 01:41 AM
21

Amused mastery is kind of like this. You find the basic-ness and conformity of the places you go and the things you do to get women mildly amusing. You say the right things, you do the right things, but you carry yourself with this certain swagger and very slight smirk, as though you know something she doesn't and find everything she does cute like a six-year-old. You're the perfect "nightclub guy" or whatever kind of guy fits the situation to get laid, but still "different from all the other gu…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/17 09:08 PM
5

Whoops. Time to reset the counter: It has been 0 days since the last Indian post at The Red Pill.
/r/askTRP19/05/17 06:40 PM
2

That's where the "ideologies" diverge. The Blue Pill paths, while numerous, mostly include being yourself -- authentic and respectful. Just be yourself more and harder -- improve yourself, use the gym, dress better, groom better, practice social skills, listen to women better, and probably aim a little lower at some of the less attractive girls -- and if you become the best possible version of yourself, surely you'll find someone. The Red Pill path is more empirical. Continuing the path that's b…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 04:03 PM

The "Blue Pill ideology" is simply that "The Red Pill" is incorrect. Generalizing a bit, I'd say that the huge majority of blue pill people don't believe that a successful "ideology" is necessary, or in many cases even possible, when dealing with the opposite sex and seeking sex and relationships. You just ... you know ... talk to people and get to know them and if you like each other, you date and/or have sex. It's really hard for humans to put themselves in another human's shoes. Red Pill peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 02:45 PM
6

Testosterone declines with age.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 09:00 PM
2

Agreed. Making abortions illegal isn't going far enough to handle the woman question.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 08:11 PM
5

why would someone who is RP actually tell you they are RP, if they were a politician? "Greetings, fellow citizens and numerous illegals masquerading as citizens! I need 51 percent of your votes to win this office and make your region great again! By the way, it is my personal belief that the 51 percent of you who own vaginas are stupid cunts, and I don't respect you at all, and as soon as I am in office, I will modify your legal status so that you are property! ...Why is my campaign advisor givi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 08:06 PM
14

This isn't much of a discussion topic. People vote for people whose views they agree with. You are a person (legally, anyway), so you get to vote for people whose views you agree with. You expressed in your post that you intend to vote for people you agree with, which is your legal right. What's the discussion point? Are you asking people to try to convince you that you should vote for Red Pill politicians independent of your personal views?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 07:47 PM
4

It's a bigger issue with how women think, how women argue, how women write or tell stories -- just the use of language (or the use of unspoken language) in general. Women don't feel like they have to tell you, "I'm going to tell you a story about this weird thing this guy did to me", then tell the story, then conclude with "So after he did that, these are the reasons I think he was a serious ass." Women just tell you the middle part. A random smattering of things the guy said or did, with very l…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 05:53 PM
2

You laugh, but it's true! They'll go on and on about how this one time, her friend Jenna did this and that and this and that and this other thing ... without really telling you any context or introduction or why she's telling you this, and the story finally ends with this last thing Jenna did, without really concluding the tale or having a final point. So you ask, "And?" And she replies, "Well, that was weird, wasn't it?" "What was weird?" "That stuff Jenna did." "No, you're weird."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 05:30 PM
4

No. Women can't explain anything anyway. Women just tell these long, boring stories that don't have a beginning or an end. Just one enormously long middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 04:11 PM
11

Put your cell phone in the freezer. Check it exactly 3 times a day and no more. You've turned into a woman. Constantly checking your phone for validation. You should have better shit to do than fucking around with your cell phone, messaging people about nothing. You're messaging people about nothing because you have nothing going on. Get busy. Make money, develop some skills, get some hobbies. When some girl leaves your place, you should be excited to get back to hobby #43, or to catch up on wor…
/r/askTRP18/05/17 04:06 PM
124

"Secure relationships" are pretty easy to come by for most women. Average guys who would give anything for a chance at sex with a decent-looking girl and can't believe their luck when she's willing to be their girlfriend are a dime a dozen. If average dude #1 dumps her because she fucked some hot guy at the bar, she'll be dating average dude #2 within a week. An industrious woman may have a dozen average dudes in her cell phone, all waiting in the wings. So she's not giving up anything of value …
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 02:55 PM
12

The number one way you can spot a non-masculine loser man is when he doesn't know how to interact with other men. That guy at the party who's only talking to the women and thinks he's being "alpha", but he doesn't really have much in common or much to talk about with the guys -- everybody actually thinks he's a creep. Why else would he be avoiding the men and singling out women? When you can't engage a dude in a normal conversation and your girlfriend has to do it, it's not because she's disresp…
/r/MarriedRedPill17/05/17 08:54 PM
47

Waitwaitwait... So you and your girlfriend are out with other people, one of who has a really interesting job that makes for great conversation, and your girlfriend, naturally, asked the guy questions about his job and was really interested in it? But I guess you weren't interested, because you're boring or something. She wasn't flirting with the other guy, or doing anything inappropriate. She was just paying attention to the guy instead of to you? So your feelings were hurt? And when you got ba…
/r/MarriedRedPill17/05/17 06:08 PM
2

Play the numbers game a bit, then. Like, seriously, approach 100 girls. Even slum it a bit and aim a little lower than you'd usually aim. Surely, you'll get at least one girl to fuck you. Once you get laid and stop pissing on yourself, it'll be easier the next time. Also, try showing up places with a girl (I'm assuming you can at least make some female friends?) for pre-selection purposes. When you're somewhere with a decent-looking girl, other girls notice you. When you're not, the first time t…
/r/askTRP17/05/17 02:34 PM
3

At this point, if you're hot, successful, and socially apt, you need to get off the internet. You are definitely doing something wrong when you interact with girls, and it's putting them off, making you look worse than you are, and costing you lays. But it's beyond what a bunch of guys over the Internet can diagnose. You need to go out with your real life friends, game girls, and get some critical feedback on whatever it is you're doing that you don't recognize. Your body language might suck, yo…
/r/askTRP17/05/17 02:22 PM
1

Beats me. Probably the internet. Everybody looks like they have a great, adventurous, and prosperous life on Facebook. If you're normal and boring, and married to a normal, boring, decent guy who goes to work, comes home, drinks beer, watches football, and doesn't stand out or bolster your life socially, then you're not special. And women have to be special. Because if a woman isn't special, then she's just a baby-maker, married to a normal guy, possibly working a normal job if she's employed. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 09:38 PM
3

Okay... Look. When you see a girl you find attractive, the normal, non-loser, non-creepy thing to do is to walk up to her, say hello, and start a conversation. Literally, within 30 seconds of seeing a girl you think is hot, you go talk to her. That sets you apart from all of the losers and creeps out there who are too chicken-shit to talk to girls. Girls travel with groups of people. They don't go places and hang out alone, because when they do, creepy guys bother them. So the normal, socially-a…
/r/askTRP16/05/17 08:45 PM
2

Exactly. He's 16, he has this girlfriend who won't fuck him, he dumps her because she won't fuck him ... but isn't fucking one or more other women the next week? What the heck? If he were fucking other women, the fact that his ex-girlfriend is talking to him wouldn't be some kind of big deal. It wouldn't even register as anything special.
/r/askTRP16/05/17 07:47 PM
2

Why is this woman that you've never even fucked a blip on your radar? Aren't you too busy fucking other women? If not, you need to fix that, instead of worrying about the comings and goings of some random girl you used to date and never fucked.
/r/askTRP16/05/17 07:39 PM
3

I'm looking for the parts of this post that are about sexual strategy, or at least about masculinity, and can't find any. I think what OP is trying to say is that smoking makes him better at giving blowjobs, and if that's what works for him, then we should support him. The Red Pill isn't just for heterosexual men. All men can benefit from the advice found here, including men like OP.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/17 07:37 PM
5

A girl I like has a history of violence, I'm unsure what to do Oh man, this is a really easy one. First off, you're full of shit. The mere fact that you know to ask the question means you know exactly what to do. But I'll bet good money that you're going to turn out to be a real dipshit who argues and justifies and tries to convince everybody that this girl is worth a shit, and not listen to anything anybody says. So there's a girl I like for some time. Right out of the gate, you already suck. I…
/r/askTRP16/05/17 07:29 PM
1

Sometimes, the sex and housework is worth the slightly increased effort of diffusing a shit-test instead of just peeing on it. You're supposed to be the benevolent leader in the relationship, exercising a little bit of care for his subordinates. Not a facist dictator who's all, "Rawr! You dare shit test me?! Fuck you! Go away! I tolerate no shit tests! Rawr! I shall get other women to replace you! Rawr!" If you really want a girl who never shit tests, check out the cemetery.
/r/askMRP16/05/17 07:19 PM
2

Depends how smart or bitchy of a woman you're dealing with. For some women: "No." "Why not?! Are you hiding something!?" "If you don't trust me there's the door." will blow everything up and cost you the relationship, when just a tiny bit more can get her to stop, shut up, and quit bothering you about it.
/r/askMRP16/05/17 05:31 PM
4

When a woman says, "I'm so sick of all of these guys who find me attractive and want to hook up. I wish guys (cough cough, like you, cough cough) would just talk and be friends without trying to hook up with me", she's testing you, dum-dum. The answer is to show outcome independence. You don't care if she's fucking anybody else (e.g., "If you don't want to fuck them, then, duh, stop fucking them"), then be silly about it. And to not take the bait about being friends. You're still there to fuck, …
/r/askTRP16/05/17 03:13 PM
11

"If I hand you my phone and you don't find anything incriminating, are you actually going to accept that I'm wonderful, or will you just assume I deleted and hid everything?" "Uh.... " "Right. So there's no point. Keep being suspicious. I don't care."
/r/askMRP16/05/17 11:40 AM
2

I'm expressing what actually happens on mother's day. You're expressing a scene from a sit-com as though it's real life. (If your life resembles a sit-com, sorry!)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 01:00 AM
3

Some men are. Most men are women with penises. Going to college, getting a BA in Business, a middle management position in some random insurance or durable goods company, marrying your college girlfriend at age 27, having 2-3 kids, networking your way to a new company and a six-figure management position around age 40-45, lucking out and not being one of the 50% who ends up divorced or who has a heart attack scare by age 55, and retiring at 65 to live modestly off of his 401k isn't "manly". It's…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 12:56 AM
10

Seeing my dad and countless other men go through that meatgrinder, no thanks. I'd rather be free. You know, we just had Mother's Day, and it's interesting that you noticed that. On Father's Day, dads everywhere get homemade crayon and marker cards from their kids, a crappy novelty tie, and maybe a few dress shirts, symbolizing their primary role to the family: a paycheck. It's the thought that counts anyway, so they're supposed to express great appreciation for the gifts. They are then supposed …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 08:17 PM
6

You're having trouble putting yourself in the mindset of a woman. When you're a woman, 80% of all men are completely invisible to you. If one of those 80% ever gets in your way or does anything that forces you to focus your gaze and attention on them for a minute, it is fucking annoying. The only attention that matters is the attention from the top 20% of men. All other men are completely invisible. So when a formerly good-looking woman spends her 20s partying, drinking too much, doing drugs, an…
/r/askTRP15/05/17 06:31 PM
20

I think the best way to put it is that you get the behavior you incentivize. If women are fucking men for going to the gym, being fun, and being aloof and not committing, then you're going to see a lot of men going to the gym, being fun, being aloof, and not committing. Back when society ostracized the heck out of women for fucking before marriage, and back when birth control and abortion weren't so abundant and pregnancy was a serious risk every time a woman had sex, most women weren't having s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 05:33 PM
18

When women say, "The reason I don't behave better and conform to conventional societal norms such as marriage and children at a certain age is because the men suck too much", they're telling the truth. They're just not telling you the full story. If men were men, then most women would be settling down with a good man and starting a family. But most men aren't men, so most women aren't comfortable trusting their lives and the lives of their children to these non-men. The few men who are actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 05:16 PM
3

You don't want The Red Pill to "fix" or "save" society. That would make you a second class citizen. Maybe even talking cattle. And I'm a Red Piller saying this. If you let me redesign society, you'll be property. Marriage will work, women will be well taken care of, men will be men, but you'll be a reasonably intelligent and creative human being that doesn't exercise her reasonable intelligence or creativity and just has babies with her man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 03:40 PM
6

It's not so black and white. "Alpha" and "Beta" aren't things you are or become. They're just shorthand for attraction-building (and often comfort-diminishing) behaviors and comfort-building (and often attraction-reducing) behaviors. It's not a matter of which one of you is "alpha" in the relationship and whether you "become the bitch" or not. It's a matter of whether you remain her best option, with 100% certainty, from now until the end of time -- and she's the one judging what her best option…
/r/askTRP12/05/17 06:39 PM
119

Who's knowingly living with a guy who wants her that she doesn't want back, and who constantly brings home guys to fuck. This isn't some virtuous woman that OP ruined. Nor is it some strong, independent woman who's chasing after what she wants. It's a desperate, lost woman, trying to find herself in men rather than trying to find herself in herself.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 06:36 PM
16

The idea of the "good alpha" -- a confident, good-looking leader who cares about his woman and mixes the right about of "beta" with his "alpha" to become a perfect man who never gets cheated on or left is a myth. That's not actually a thing. Once you commit to a woman, you are weaker. You lose power, she gains it. And she hates that, even though she thinks it was what she wanted all along. There is not some kind of magical fine line between alpha and beta you can walk that will let you keep a wo…
/r/askTRP12/05/17 05:43 PM
1

Haven't we already seen that in history? Or even versions of that in a few non-first world countries today?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 05:40 PM
15

Nothing says awesome leader like a guy who flops around with no direction, can't stick to his guns regarding any major decisions, capitulates like a little bitch any time someone says no to him over something major, but thinks that saying no when someone asks him to fetch a glass of water counts as taking the power back.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/05/17 03:58 PM
10

Once you've fucked a few dozen guys and had 9 or 10 relationships, you start to realize that there's always another guy you can fuck out there. A better guy. And that it's boring and tedious to be tied down to one guy and have expectations and responsibilities to live up to. As long as a woman can get fucked by a decent guy each weekend and make enough money to pay rent, she doesn't need a boyfriend. Once women like this are older and it gets harder to fuck guys, and the guys that want to fuck t…
/r/askTRP12/05/17 03:54 PM
1046

This right here is probably the most pro-woman piece of writing on the internet. A lot of idiots claim that The Red Pill objectifies women. Tricks them. Manipulates them. Hates them. But this guy here really, really understands this woman. He sees her humanity. Her real humanity -- not the rah-rah, you-go-girl, YOLO, proud to be a slut, sex-positive, strong, liberated feminist bullshit that people pretend to appreciate in women to appear politically correct. He sees her for who and what she real…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 03:46 PM
65

Let's cut to the chase: No man actually wants to share his woman with one or more other men. The men who end up doing that are men who don't have other options. Their shared woman is the best they can get. If a man is receiving offers from a dozen fine-looking women who are all begging for his dick, he is not going to respond, "No. Sorry. I don't want to have sex with one or multiple fine-looking women like you. I would rather be a cuck with my average wife who's fucking another man, only vaguel…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 03:01 PM
43

"Alpha" isn't "the guy women never want to leave". It's "the guy with sexually attractive traits that women want to fuck." She fucked him, she's gotten bored with him, she needs a guy who has money and takes care of her, she moves on. "Alpha" and "Beta" aren't superior and inferior men, respectively. They're just shorthand for various traits and behaviors. Alpha characteristics are things that make a woman sexually attracted to a man, sometimes (in fact often) at the expense of feeling comfortab…
/r/askTRP12/05/17 01:37 PM
1

If we lived in a truly lawless anarchy, sexism toward women would be the least of our concerns. Most of us would be shot, robbed, or enslaved, regardless of sex. But if the OP comes to pass and we live in a world that is magically the same in every way, except women aren't legally protected humans, but all other laws exist, then women would essentially be talking cattle.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 10:04 AM
1

Hell's bells! We can't have that! Slutting is one of the greatest virtues!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 12:40 AM
111

There are two kinds of male feminists. The first is a guy who's not bad looking and is socially outgoing. Throughout his life, he's never had problems meeting women and getting sex and relationships. He typically lives somewhere fairly liberal and travels among liberal, sex-positive social circles, and the strong, independent women in those circles choose to have sex with him, because he's good looking, fun, and social. He, of course, has no problem with feminism, female choice, or female sexual…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 07:56 PM
64

You're fine. Girls don't want to let it get out that they're sluts, especially in a professional setting. She leaves and goes back to her country, you never see her again, and sex with her becomes a fond memory. That's exactly what she wanted anyway -- why the fuck else would she be having sex with you the night before she leaves the country? Do you seriously think she's trying to rope you into marriage or professionally discredit you or something? Of course not. She's a slut, and she wanted to …
/r/askTRP11/05/17 04:54 PM
2

An apology is for when you actually wrong her. She wronged you, and you acted like a bitch. Which you have a right to do. It's not "wrong", just the opposite of sexy and valuable. Saying sorry for that is like saying "sorry for being a worthless loser", which is an admission of your worthlessness. The farthest I'd go is "I shouldn't have lost my temper with you." And leave it at that. Delivered from the position that you're the man around here, and you recognize that your previous approach isn't…
/r/MarriedRedPill11/05/17 12:20 PM
3

If you are sexually attracted to a woman and make sexual advances toward her when you don't know her as a human and don't appreciate any of her human qualities - the sole reason you want to fuck is sexual attraction - most women would consider that objectification. So the large majority of guys at bars who aren't trying to make friends first are objectifying women. The fact that the women are willing doesn't make it not objectification. It just makes them sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 10:51 AM
2

Why would I aspire for my daughter to be a secretary? She's going to have a phenomenal cage fighting career.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 07:13 PM
2

Yeah. I don't think any parent or educator or mentor or guidance counselor tells any female growing up, "Hey, you should look into being a secretary or teacher, or just a maid if you don't want to go to college." These people tell girls they can do and be whatever they want, that their career paths are unlimited. Guidance counselors today help women with scholarship applications for special girl-only scholarships. Nobody is telling girls they have to be secretaries. If anything, parents and teac…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 07:00 PM
59

It's okay to be angry. To want to hurt your wife for being a disrespectful cunt. But you're going about it all wrong. If you really want to take a stab at your wife, when she says she's frustrated about something you're doing or not doing, just respond "k", then go out with your friend like you planned, come back late, try to fuck your wife, and when she turns you down, shrug and go to sleep. Doing THAT enough times will get her the message louder and clearer than explaining yourself and arguing…
/r/MarriedRedPill10/05/17 02:52 PM
2

First, I like that this article openly notes that women do NOT receive 79 cents on the dollar for the same work as men. Women receive less money than men when they do different, lower-paid work than the men. So if you add up every single woman's salary and divide by the number of women and add up every single man's salary and divide by the number of men, the average woman's salary is lower. Duh. Because female secretaries outnumber male secretaries and male engineers outnumber female engineers. …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 01:32 PM
5

I disagree with all of the reasons listed above. They all suck. There's only one reason you need: Women are not valuable and women deserve it. Any time you feel the inclination to demand The Red Pill justify itself for some kind of anti-woman words or position they have, just remember: Women are not valuable, and women deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 07:54 PM
6

Why do you want to stop chasing things? That drive to experience things, try new things, chase more things -- that's your edge. That's what sets you apart from fat Cheeto men playing video games in Mom's basement. A man's capacity to succeed is based on two things: His drive, and his wisdom. A guy with a lot of drive but no wisdom will constantly do the wrong things, fuck up, and fail at life. Picture a loser before The Red Pill trying to get girls. He's trying hard at life, but doing all the wr…
/r/askTRP09/05/17 02:30 PM
5

It's more that the Red Pill isn't some kind of overarching model of human behavior. It's not some kind of scientific proposal or set of algorithms where if you do these things and follow these rules and check off these boxes, you will get the same result every time with every woman. It's not about the explanation. It's about getting laid. The Red Pill is a bunch of guys comparing notes. Locker room talk. Bros dishing out sexual strategies. Things that worked to get them laid. Things that failed …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 10:49 PM
6

Tell you what. You go try that respectful, egalitarian emotional connection thing and let us know how it works out.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 09:30 AM
3

Suck it up, Princess. You should always feel a little uncomfortable. That's part of being a man. There might be a hungry predator around the next hill. And you're always on edge, because that edge might save you where a comfortable, weak man or a woman would get eaten. If you're ever completely comfortable, you're failing at life.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 12:57 AM
1

Whoops. Spotted the cheeto-crusted mgtow video gamer!
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 12:54 AM
1

She kicks ass because she and I are on the same page regarding pushing our kid to succeed rather than being her buddy, coddling her self-esteem, and letting her quit anything that's hard or makes her feel bad the second she stops winning easily. Do you even have kids? At least read a book on parenting or something. Make real friends instead of trying to be friends with your kid. Your job is to turn your kid into a successful adult. Not into a happy teenager.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 08:54 PM
1

Shitty parenting is trying to make your kid happy instead of successful. You can feed your offspring candy and tell them how special they are. Mine can break your kids' arms on the playground.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 04:28 PM
4

My last text to my wife was five pages, single spaced. She read every single word, then proceeded to touch herself unconsciously due to my manly verbosity. I keep things shorter for you guys so you don't get too turned on. That would be awkward and uncomfortable.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 04:13 PM
6

Worrying about whether a statement about women is also true about men is an excellent strategy for homosexual and bisexual guys who are interested in strategies for fucking men. I admire your openness and courage and have no issue with men like you benefitting from my advice.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 04:08 PM
10

You have to pick a thing that the woman is supposed to know how to do (something most people can do), and ask her it in front of others. They hate taking a status hit worse than they hate failing.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 09:15 AM
9

Men shoulder the burdens and risks for women. And the blame if something doesn't work out.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 03:16 AM
7

No reason why not. Might as well own it and fix some shit. She's going to blame one of the men in her life anyway.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 09:40 PM
6

This V is false primarily because it only considers looks. If I'm average looking but socially awkward, I'm going to strike out with an average looking woman, but a fatty will settle for me despite my social deficiencies. If my social awkwardness is something that's not very self-aware, like something on the autism spectrum (which seems seriously common among internet gender war debating people), I'm going to think I'm normal -- even cool -- and not realize that nobody likes me and that's why on…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 06:46 PM
1

I don't care what you're feeling. Neither does she. Shut up about what you're feeling, quit worrying about what she does or doesn't think, and stick with the plan. Don't address past behavior, or even discuss it. You're a busy guy who's gaming lots of women. The specific behaviors one particular woman undertakes aren't even a blip on your radar. How can you have time to be annoyed by something that one girl did when you're busy fucking six more just like her? And if you're not, instead of spendi…
/r/askTRP05/05/17 04:57 PM
2

That's where The Red Pill diverges from all of this. The Red Pill is about helping men get laid. What can a guy to do get laid more and to avoid blowing it less? What things should a guy look for in women to judge her interest and to judge her value? What things should a guy watch out for in women to avoid getting screwed over? In short, how can a guy maximize his sexual opportunity and outcome? So whether or not women have it hard or bad or get screwed over isn't really a Red Pill issue. As far…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 04:54 PM
1

How long does it take to send a text message? Like 30 seconds? Game both women. And don't demonstrate how butt-hurt you are about some past behavior. Just stick with the plan. Place, time, escalate, fuck. Your job is to meet and fuck women. Let them worry about proving whether they're worth more than a fuck. That's their job. Your job is to fuck them.
/r/askTRP05/05/17 04:40 PM
2

Agreed on the middle part. Women tend to intuit rather than judge. And some women have okay intuition. Many have shit intuition. But you don't really learn intuition. It doesn't improve. Women with shitty intuition usually have a string of asshole ex-boyfriends. They don't learn. That same shitty intuition often leads them to divorce the decent boring husband they locked down. Women with better intuition don't learn either, but at least they get things right more often. You can learn better judg…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 04:27 PM
2

In my experience, women are really shit judges of character. They think they're very perceptive, though. But women are actually really, really bad at judging people. They're quick to judge, but really, really bad at doing it accurately.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 04:17 PM
1

That's where the "only" part of "fuck-only" comes into play. You're not friends. You're not emotionally involved. You're fucking.
/r/askTRP05/05/17 04:14 PM
1

What made things click for me was the realization that everybody else is just like me. They're all out at some place, usually with some other people, sometimes not. They're all socially uncertain. They're all strangers to everybody except maybe the small group they came with. If you were out at a place and a stranger came up and started a conversation with you, you wouldn't be put off or an asshole, would you? Because you're out in public at a social gathering place, so you're open to meeting st…
/r/askTRP05/05/17 04:13 PM
2

"Some level of emotional involvement" is often as simple as talking to a girl for a few hours at a bar, moving to another location with her closer to your house, talking a little more, warming her up, then going home. Even for less slutty girls "some level of emotional involvement" is often as simple as two or three dates. Knowing the guy less than a month. That kind of vetting process is enough to verify hot + no weird behaviors, but not enough to verify emotional involvement or eventual commit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 04:09 PM
1

She's either being perky to try to attract you and/or other men, or she's actually happier when he's not around and she's free to flirt it up with dudes, so her behavior is more upbeat. I wouldn't stress out trying to figure out the motivation behind a girl's behavior. She's either expressing her genuine feelings, or she's not. But that doesn't matter so much. The one thing she is not lying about that her behavior always tells you is what she wants you to believe she's feeling. So whether she's …
/r/askTRP05/05/17 03:35 PM
0

I take the opposite approach. I can find misogyny anywhere, especially on the internet. If you strip away all of the common misogyny you could find anywhere, you end up with all of this sexual strategy for men. You can't fool me, Red Pill! I'm on to you! You pretend you're misogynists, but I know you're helping men get laid!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 03:04 PM
2

Things are a lot more simple than you're making them. A typical man problem is "I am not happy because either I cannot attract women for sex or relationships, or the woman I am currently with is unwilling or reluctant to have sex with me and/or treats me disrespectfully." That's what The Red Pill helps a man fix. And nothing more. The Red Pill is not some universal thesis on the answers to everything about humanity and human interactions. It's sexual strategy. What things can a guy do to get lai…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 02:41 PM
2

While 100% of women will not necessarily cheat on a man, 100% of women will either cheat, or leave, or be a disrespectful sexually cold and annoying bitch toward their man, if he becomes a loser or if she comes across an opportunity with a better man (which makes her current man seem like a loser). That's the AWALT part. Women like winners and don't like losers. Which is kind of a "duh" thing. Whether a woman will cheat, dump her guy, be a serious bitch, or a combination of these things may vary…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 01:54 PM
2

Agreed. He's a timid little pussy, impotent and afraid of the world, and taking it out on his father, probably due to the fear that one day he'll end up a loser like his dad and has trouble staring that reality in the face every day. If he really, really wanted to get out on his own, he could have done so. At least by now, when normal people have been out of college and in the workforce for 4 years. But there's risk involved. And work involved. It's hard and it's scary. It's a lot easier to just…
/r/askTRP05/05/17 01:45 PM
2

I dunno. I can see a "normal" guy located somewhere where the cost of living is enormous, like the bay area, New York, or the swank areas of England or Australia if he's non-American, getting a shitty job coding stuff for 40k a year and not being able to afford anything, so he chooses to stay at home rent free to save up for a bit. I just don't see this extending all the way to age 26, still being in school at age 26, and on top of that, pissing on the guy who's letting him stay in his home rent…
/r/askTRP05/05/17 01:40 PM
3

It sounds like what we disagree on isn't whether what my comment says is true or not. Just whether it's true for 100% of women, 51% of women, 49% of women, or 10% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 01:35 PM
2

I'm just curious what happened to the guy. He says he works in programming and has a good job, and that he's currently in school, too. But he's 26. So there's this funny gap in his life. Most kids go to higher education from ages 18-22, maybe post-grad from 22-26 if they're really smart and so inclined. Sometime between 22 and 26, they get a job and move out. But this dude is 26 and still in school and still living with his parents. He had to save up for awhile just to get enough finally conside…
/r/askTRP05/05/17 01:25 PM
3

This would all be fine and good if two things were true: Contraception and abortion didn't exist and sex resulted in pregnancy a large percentage of the time, thus necessitating that women only choose sex partners that have the potential for parental involvement if a child results. Women chose 100% of their sexual partners 100% of the time based on logic rather than emotion and hormones. Unfortunately, both of these things are not the case. Women often have sex with men who will not commit becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 01:17 PM
3

The usual "date" set-up. Tell her you're going to be at place X at time Y and that she should come. (Don't ask. Tell.) Make sure that X/Y is something you enjoy and want to do anyway. Then go anyway, whether or not she comes. Enjoy doing the thing you want to do. Meet girls and other people there. If she does come, she sees you, having fun and enjoying yourself, socializing, and interacting with other women. Plus, you already have a drink in your hand (assuming you're somewhere with drinks), so …
/r/askTRP05/05/17 12:59 PM
10

Most men are not awesome enough to reliably get casual sex with hotties. It is also a lot of work for a guy to get casual sex. Therefore most men would rather lock down one hottie who gives him sex on demand for much less work. That eliminates the hard work and uncertainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 10:16 AM
2

"I'm not an unfuckable loser! I just reject the game entirely because I'm too awesome for it!"
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 10:00 AM
2

Where did all of the extra time come from? Did you have a drug problem or some kind of tragedy? Anyway, I wouldn't cling too hard to that ideal of not caring what others think. We live and die by what other people think. Other people determine whether you get jobs, promotions, and raises. Or fired. Other people determine whether you have friends, get laid. A huge portion of your success depends on what people think of you. I'd ditch this lone wolf bullshit fast if I were you.
/r/askTRP05/05/17 09:58 AM
3

Are you Indian or Chinese or something like that? Some culture where living with mom, dad, and grandma well into adulthood isn't strange or something only losers do?
/r/askTRP05/05/17 02:59 AM
16

A 62 year old man who can't hold his tongue or temper his language is a sad sight. There are about a dozen ways you could have said the same thing without outing yourself as a Red Pill misogynist. You also could have just shut the hell up. Because why were you opining on this woman's relationship anyway? Was this 30 year old daughter of your 60-something-year-old girlfriend going to change course because of this thing you told her mother? Was her mother going to pass the message along? Was her m…
/r/askMRP04/05/17 10:04 PM
6

How to handle some chick who has a boyfriend? Like any other girl. In fact, a girl who's looking to cheat on her boyfriend with you has done you a huge favor by outright telling you that she goes into the fuck only box. So fuck her. Only. And fuck six other girls. What's so difficult here?
/r/askTRP04/05/17 09:57 PM
21

You're 26 and living with your parents, but are concerned that your father is a loser? And his loser-ness has finally driven you to move out? That's what it took to get you to move out of your parents' house? Worry about yourself, dipshit.
/r/askTRP04/05/17 09:55 PM
3

It's the opposite. Some shit is so basic that nobody even has to prove it, and it's idiotic to demand proof. The idea that some behaviors are sexually attractive to a large swath of women, and some behaviors are not, and some behaviors actually turn a large swath of women off is completely 100% undeniable. There aren't any studies on that, because nobody would bother. It's just too obvious. Where this guy goes off the rails is that some dudes on the internet nicknamed these concepts "alpha" and …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 07:38 PM
5

People really get hung up on stupid shit on the internet, like word definitions. It's like the internet is just chock full of autistic weirdos who can't see big pictures. Look, the overarching concept is that some behaviors are sexually attractive to women, some behaviors build comfort and rapport with women, and there is often very little overlap between these two types of behaviors. In fact, in many cases, attraction-building behaviors can make a woman less comfortable (that's why sexual tensi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 07:11 PM
3

Just accept, right now, that your first time is going to be awkward and lackluster. Be ready to laugh at yourself, laugh with her, put elbows and knees in the wrong places, and not use your dick in an optimal manner. Also just accept, right now, that things may not pan out with this girl. Getting carted around by your Dad and stressing out over holding hands don't exactly put a girl in the mood. This is a practice girl. You're going to practice getting as far as you can get, and if you get to se…
/r/askTRP04/05/17 06:19 PM
4

You need a small edit. Women are attractive based on how they look. Men are attractive based on how they look and act. If you don't pass the basic looks threshold, you don't get past hello. But if you do pass the looks threshold, you can still blow it with loser behavior. The hotter you are, the less ideal your behavior needs to be.
/r/askTRP04/05/17 04:22 PM
7

She didnt cheat on her ex with me, she was super resistant, not even a kiss until she broke up w him. Uh...so the part where she met you, got to know you better, flirted with you a bit, continued to meet with you, trade messages, and get to know you better over time, set things up, and made certain that she had a sure thing with you -- all behind her boyfriend's back while she was dating him -- that part doesn't count as cheating since she didn't kiss you?
/r/askTRP04/05/17 03:25 PM
0

Women do not enjoy attention from creepy low-value men. Women do enjoy attention from higher value men and from other women, which they can get by complaining about all of the loser men who keep hitting on them. It's kind of like bragging ("Look at all the guys who hit on me because I'm hot and awesome"), but you get to disguise the bragging as a complaint. The internet is one thing, but when you're out in public, shaming creeps becomes even more important. A woman can't talk to a creep. When a …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 03:09 PM
3

Despite your colon and lower-case p at the end of your comment, that's actually about 98% true and only 2% funny. If you want to make a man feel happy, fulfilled, and non-suicidal, you need to help him substantively. Just being there, as a friend, and supporting him in his sucky life will not help him. What he needs is to not suck. So helping him to not suck is addressing the situation. Patting him on the head and telling him it's okay, he's still a real man, and you're there for him doesn't wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 03:03 PM
1

It's an important male-female difference, actually. (most) Women care as much or more about how they're perceived by others than about whether they actually suck. The worst woman in the universe will feel great about herself if she's got a strong social network that supports her in her sucking (even without substantively helping her to suck less). The best woman in the universe will take a bunch of pills and and try to kill herself if people in her social circle are mean to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 02:57 PM
3

I don't think it's the act of having a social network, itself, that makes men less likely to off themselves. It's the fact that your social network of bros will work in your garage with you building computers, or hook you up with contacts to get you a job -- so now you're not an unemployed loser. You're employed and making money thanks to your bros. It's the fact that your social network of bros will wing for you at clubs -- so now you're not an unfuckable loser. You're getting laid with your br…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 02:43 PM
2

There are more expectations and standards placed on men. And harder ones. At a time when men are weaker and more feminized than they've ever been, and more men than ever are failing to measure up. And at a time when society's solution to the epidemic of losers and failures is to try to change the standards instead of changing the failing men. Men who suck don't need a pat on the head and a hearty "don't worry. You're still a real man even though you suck". They need to be taught how to measure u…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 11:10 AM
36

If I have to read one more bullshit post full of philosopher quotes, platitudes, adages, and inspirational drivel, I'm going to punch something. You want a platitude? Here's one that's actually true: Changing your mindset isn't the answer. Going to the fucking gym, talking to girls, excelling at your profession/hobbies/skills, and actually reaping some discomfort, failure, rejection, pain, and life while doing the goddamn work is the answer. Reading bullshit on the internet, then living the same…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 03:29 AM
13

You don't have to brainwash people when this shit actually works. Now, you have a bit of a straw-man thing going on. For example, it is 150% true to state that every single woman in the entire universe prefers a confident, assertive man who...get this...actually tries to have sex with women, over a timid loser who kind of creeps around and hopes women favor him with sex. It is 150% false to say that every single woman in the entire universe is completely into the specific act of being spit on an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 03:19 AM
2

There are way too many details involved in a situation like that. You almost have to feel it out and over time, develop a sense for those types of situations. Women very rarely directly tell you "I'm not into this. Stop what you are doing." They also very rarely directly tell you "I am into this. I like what you are doing and want you to continue and to escalate farther." Women are risk-adverse. They don't want to risk an awkward confrontation with you, so if they're not into something, they'll …
/r/askTRP04/05/17 02:35 AM
2

Every situation is a little different there. For some girls under some circumstances, the moment pants start coming off is the moment shit starts getting real, so if you haven't thoroughly greased the wheels and warmed her up by then, that will cause her to stop you. But if this guy is already ass-grabbing her through pants, the pussy isn't that far away. And she can probably feel his boner pressed against her. Taking her hand and putting it on his crotch is a little less direct than just taking…
/r/askTRP04/05/17 02:04 AM
3

Just assume every girl is into you until you get a direct, clear, obvious, overt, hard NO. Especially if your hands are all over her (including her ass) and you're alone in her place of residence. I mean, you seriously wouldn't have recognized that behavior as anti-slut defense?
/r/askTRP03/05/17 08:00 PM
6

It's the female perspective. Sex is easy for them. Finding a guy willing to fuck them takes about 30 seconds. Relationships/romance are more valuable. So being romantic with a guy feels more like cheating than just fucking a guy. Because romance is what separates her boyfriend from any other guy. Any guy is a possible sexual partner, but her boyfriend is her romance partner. So if you follow that logic to its warped conclusion, as long as she has sex-only partners and no romantic partners, it's …
/r/askTRP03/05/17 07:58 PM
5

He's escalating with a girl. They're spooning on the couch alone. He's grabbing her ass freely. She stopped him from kissing her but didn't say "stop" or "we shouldn't" for anything except kissing. She said she can't kiss him because she has a boyfriend -- specifically referencing kissing -- and said that kissing, specifically, "makes this real". The door was 100% propped open for him to make it clear that he wasn't after romance/kissing, and that he agrees that what's about to happen definitely…
/r/askTRP03/05/17 07:19 PM
7

Right. That won't work now. It would have worked then. But when he didn't fuck her and kept trying to cuddle/kiss/be romantic, what he was unconsciously telling her is "I'm a loser and an idiot who doesn't get it. I'm trying to be your boyfriend when you're telling me you just want to fuck (without romance) and are making your intentions clear to me. And I'm such a social retard that I'm missing the message, even right now with my hand on your ass, and am still trying to be your boyfriend instea…
/r/askTRP03/05/17 07:02 PM
2

The number of women leaving stable government jobs to marry unstable criminals and live in third world countries is not large enough to state "women have X" as some kind of generality. If anything, when you look at women as a whole rather than just this one crazy woman and trying to extrapolate from her, it makes more sense to conclude that women are extremely risk-adverse and have a strong inclination to pursue things like low-risk, stable, easy government jobs.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 06:01 PM
0

Hypergamy is a very serious problem False. It is a feature, not a bug. it only occurs in a specific subset of women. False. It occurs in all women. TRP defines hypergamy too broadly Maybe. Playing word salad games isn't important. The overarching concept that all women attempt to maximize their sexual/relationship opportunities, date up, and trade up is the main point. Whether or not you define some buzz word as wanting a tall guy or wanting a muscular guy or wanting a rich guy or wanting a conf…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 03:29 PM
23

"Fine. I promise to keep everything below the waist!" Follow that up with a big grin. The girl all but told you that you were in. She even told you how to get in. But you blew it by trying to be her boyfriend instead of being the fun sex guy she could fuck on the side.
/r/askTRP03/05/17 03:19 PM
13

Stop asking girls to do shit. Tell girls you're going to be at place X at time Y and that she should come. Make sure that the thing at X/Y is something you're going to enjoy anyway. Then just go do it. Meet girls while you're there. If the girl comes, great. You're there, having fun, socializing, pre-selected by other girls. If she doesn't, you're there, having fun, socializing, and meeting other girls. Romantic boyfriend bullshit like walking under the stars late at night happens afterward. If …
/r/askTRP03/05/17 02:10 PM
35

Some girls justify cheating by "just" having sex with other guys. As long as it's "just" sex, without romance, kissing, etc., then she's not really cheating on her boyfriend. Because the thing that makes a boyfriend special is the romance. Sex can happen with anybody. So as long as she's only romantic with her boyfriend, he's special. He wins. She's not cheating. Right?
/r/askTRP03/05/17 02:04 PM
5

Holy flying fuck. After something like two years of coexisting on Reddit, I'm reading something you typed and thinking, "This reasonable fellow gets it, even if he disagrees. Let's glance up a few lines at the user name...holy crap!"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 01:07 PM
1

Hey, I'm all for every human's DNA to be on file, Gattaca style. Man or woman. If you're not doing wrong shit, you don't have anything to hide. I actually think your proposal would go a long way toward accomplishing the same goal (eliminating/severely reducing recreational and extramarital sex) by disincentivizing men from having non-marital sex. If the woman cries rape and your DNA shows up in the rape kit, there's no getting out of that one. And even if you end up with conclusive proof that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 03:09 AM
13

And based on the further info, you did a D-minus job vetting her. You had plates and at least thought about things for a few months, so I can't fail you. But you made a girlfriend out of a plate who had no problems fucking you outside of a relationship, has slutty friends, and had a European all-girl getaway planned. It's not like you made her into a girlfriend three months after meeting her and then and only then, the very next day she said, "Oh, BTW, I'm going to France in four months." I'm go…
/r/askTRP02/05/17 10:40 PM
2

I really don't think messing around on the internet debating antagonistic misogynists like me is the best or most healthy use of your time if you're as messed up as you say you are. The real world isn't nearly as dark or scary as the inner recesses of Reddit, and putting you face too deep into this corner of the internet can make you lose perspective on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 10:37 PM
11

Essentially, you're arguing that instead of grading your vetting process an F, it should be graded a D-minus. Okay. Fine. Your vetting process is now a D-minus.
/r/askTRP02/05/17 10:02 PM
17

Nah. Why waste a good lay? Keep her as a plate. Your issue isn't that this girl is going on a trip. Your issue is that you met her 121 days ago, and 120 days ago, you made her into an exclusive girlfriend instead of one of the six girls you're fucking. The fact that plate #4 is going on a trip to France and might fuck someone seems one hell of a lot less important when you're fucking five other women. You didn't choose this woman from among multiple options. You happened into her and locked her …
/r/askTRP02/05/17 09:06 PM
38

I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that your girlfriend and her two female friends are in their 20s. They're not 40 year old professional lecturers on architecture and art that are taking a sabbatical to France for research purposes to help with the next round of papers they're going to write, correct? When 20 year old girls go on an all-girl trip to France, the highlight of their trip is not going to be all of the pictures they took in various museums. It's going to be the European night …
/r/askTRP02/05/17 08:36 PM
320

This isn't a Red Pill thing. This is an actually crazy woman.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/17 08:23 PM
8

You're pretty much describing an attractive man who gets laid at this point. If any of the above turn you off, you're a minority among women. Men that women fuck and admire will playfully banter and turn it into a joke when a woman brings a "serious" problem to their attention, but respond appropriately when a woman brings a serious problem (without the quotes). Getting a woman laughing when she's bringing a silly issue (that she thinks is serious) to your attention is a far better way of diffus…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:53 PM
5

Recognizing the problem is half the battle. Most women are seriously entitled bitches. Honestly, most men out there have pretty low standards: Be at least average looking. Frequent sex. Don't be a bitch. If you're not a bitch, that pretty much puts you in the top half of women. If you're a bitch, you'd better be seriously hot and have lots of sex to make up for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:19 PM
13

Once again, an anti-red pill person expresses a very cartoonish view of what a real world red pill person might be like. Red Pill people do not strut around calling women sluts and cunts to their faces. Red Pill people do not strut around sneering with disdain, talking down, and being overtly condescending and patronizing toward women, constantly interrupting them and dismissing everything they say with very clear and obvious rudeness and disregard that makes their sexism obvious, like some kind…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:13 PM
1

Are you sure that debating gender war issues on the internet is a good hobby for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:08 PM
6

This was a shit test. You passed the shit test. If you wanted to, you could probably keep plating her.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/17 04:23 PM
9

That is a 100% true statement. You are the common denominator. You are the one with a problem. And your problem is that you can't possibly generalize over half the population. Once you learn how to generalize over half the population, you fix your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:21 PM
15

Yeah. That's an even funnier progression. TRP doesn't work! Uh, I just got laid last night. Well, she was an uneducated, poor, damaged woman with daddy issues and no self-esteem. Uh, she has a master's degree, a thriving career, considers herself a feminist, and is very close with both of her upstanding, still-married, successful parents. Well, you just tricked her and manipulated her into sex. Probably raped her! Um...The first thing she told me in the morning was how attracted she was to my di…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:13 PM
3

Holy shit! A special snowflake! Plz marry me!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:58 PM
23

I was surprised by how alike all women are. I genuinely thought that I had experienced exceptionally bad and/or aggravating women in my life, but that most women were pretty normal. And then, here on the internet, exposed to women from all over the world, all walks of life, I can see the thoughts women express under anonymity. Allegedly healthy, sex-positive, equalist, special women who definitely insist they aren't like all of the "damaged" women I've dealt with in the past. And they are exactl…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:24 PM
1

That one is more to enforce honesty society-wide. If every single baby is automatically paternity tested, by law, rather than individual men getting accused of being evil insecure untrusting losers and getting dumped for buying a paternity test, cheating goes way down. Every woman on earth knowing every pregnancy is automatically tested by law enforces more honest women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 11:15 AM
8

Women don't go to divorce lawyers just to research their options. She's not in the decision-making process. She is decided. At this point, she's just interviewing lawyers to find the one she thinks can get the most out of you the quickest, get her the best custody deal, and the best strategy to catch you unprepared. So don't get caught unprepared. Get a lawyer, be completely open about your situation, do everything your lawyer says to get your ducks in a row. And if you can, file first and beat …
/r/askMRP01/05/17 06:36 PM
1

I don't think that anybody is asserting that all women on a dating site have boyfriends. Only that you'd be surprised at the number that do. But when you compare a woman's and a man's experiences at online dating, as you're doing, there's really nothing to compare. Virtually no commonalities. Online dating is a bad deal for guys. A sucker's game. Guys who invest in online dating aren't buying a chance to meet girls. They're buying the fantasy of the possibility. For non-hot guys, about 3/4 of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:52 PM
1

We should do an experiment about that. Get a really super-hawt guy but instead of having him send low-effort humorous openers, have him send neckbeard sonnets. Drive women insane. "Errrgh....he's so hot! But so creepy!"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 04:17 PM
2

The old me would tell you that can't possibly be a thing, but after seeing the true depths of loserdom and idiocy on the internet, there are some weird-ass guys out there who seriously don't have a clue and probably do open with love poetry on a dating site thinking it'll help them stand out from all of those other assholes. I mean, hell, I sucked ass with girls and ended up on The Red Pill learning how to emotionally abuse my wife into fucking me using the inner secrets of pure evil misogyny, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 04:07 PM
2

I'm considering a witty/funny opening line first Tinder message as equivalent to "hey sup". And I'm considering a two-line "Hey, I'm Bob. You seem really interesting and I really like your profile. I'm into [stupidmodernband], too! Want to get drinks sometime?" as equivalent to a loser message. Obviously, there's a spectrum. Witty/funny opening Tinder message guy probably edges out a guy who literally types "hey 'sup". And two-sentence stupidmodernband guy probably edges out a three-paragraph, p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 04:00 PM
2

It does. If women wanted to be a man's employer, wanted him to dance and sing and perform for a job, and supplicating job seekers were sexually arousing to them, this would be a fine strategy But the guys women want to date are the guys that don't need to take that kind of time and effort, because they bring enough awesomeness to the table to get dates regularly without going to that kind of trouble. Effort messages just come across as desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 03:21 PM
7

Then you understand why saying, "Well I take some time with online dating profiles" isn't a particularly strong position to take, because the other 98% of the universe isn't wasting time reading bullshit people typed looking for hobbies in common. They're looking at pics, then looking at whether the messages someone sends are funny and interesting. Women are far more inclined to meet with the hot dude who didn't read her profile than the guy who read it, considered it, and sent a more in depth m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 03:05 PM
10

You're a minority. Most girls will see a guy who wrote a three-paragraph message referencing things in her profile, not even read it or barley skim it, click over to see his profile, then click away 2 seconds later after seeing his picture without reading a word of it. Most girls will also see some variant of "hey 'sup" from some guy who clearly didn't read anything about her or take any time, click over, see a hot picture, and send a message back. After a few months of online dating going like …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 03:00 PM
4

Any time the extent of someone's response is "nuh uh! That's not true!", with absolutely nothing more, that just reinforces that everything I said is 100% correct and accurate. Because nothing is 100% false. A better-reasoned response might have been, "You're right about X, but Y and Z don't happen. Instead, A and B happen for this other reason, which is why it might look like Y and Z when you put it next to X, but it's really different." A response that goes "nuh uh! That's wrong!" comes across…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:53 PM
5

You are eyes-deep in your wife's frame, instead of the other way around. If your wife is fucking you, whether or not she gets off, then your wife is submitting for your pleasure. Quit trying to be some kind of vagina technician and worrying about touching this part or that part and what tools you're using. Just fuck your wife as hard as you want, get yours, and continue being awesome. Lift weights and get hot, dress well, groom, and smell good (even just around the house), go out and do your own…
/r/askMRP01/05/17 02:21 PM
4

You would be surprised how many girls on online dating sites already have boyfriends. And not guys they met on a dating site. Women need validation or they shrivel up and die. A woman standing at a bus stop for 5 minutes is going to pull out her phone and post something to social media to collect some "likes". Or go through her contact list and start randomly texting guy friends that she has no intention of ever dating or fucking just to get immediate and eager responses back from them. Those li…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:01 PM
3

So if we don't have evidence proving a guy's innocence, it's perfectly legit for some people to assume his guilt?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 03:05 PM
5

That mentality sounds an awful lot like a presumption of guilt. "Just because nobody could prove he did it doesn't mean he isn't a rapist. Women don't lie about that shit. He's probably guilty but just got away with it on a silly little technicality like no evidence."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 02:07 PM
1

Judges need to be elected/appointed. If they don't maintain a pro-woman stance in liberal locations, they don't stay in office. If they don't maintain a "child needs the mother, mom is the primary caregiver" stance in conservative locations, they don't stay in office. Plus, it's just bad press when Mom can cry to the local news station about how her kids were cruelly seized from her and given to evil Dad. Additionally, the court gets a percentage of each child support payment, so they're incenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 04:20 PM
1

While this may vary a little bit state to state, in my state, and especially in some of the more conservative counties, Dad has a very small chance to get a favorable custody arrangement unless Mom agrees to it. Unless Mom is a documented criminal, drug addict, child murder, etc., Mom is getting primary custody pretty much automatically, and even then, the court's likely to say, "ehh...while Mom killed those three kids last summer, she hasn't tried to kill these kids yet. Let's give her a chance…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 04:12 PM
58

If not a martial art, guys should at least do a sport. First off, having a fitness hobby besides the gym gives you a social outlet to meet bros (and sometimes women). Second, it's weird and autistic to be spinning your wheels at the gym for no purpose at all. Everyone else is trying to get to a healthy weight, training for races, for a sport, for a martial art, for a competition of some kind, and you're just there lifting for solely body-image reasons because TRP said girls like muscles? Strange…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/17 03:35 PM
5

Nobody goes to a club, without her boyfriend, for the ambience and overpriced drinks. When a girl goes to a club (especially alone, but also if with a slutty friend), she is trolling for male attention and free drinks. Even if she doesn't think she's intending to cheat on you, she's very definitely intending to meet and talk with guys, enjoy the attention, and mooch some drinks. Everyone knows guys hit on girls at clubs -- especially girls who are there without their men. She may not think she i…
/r/askTRP28/04/17 03:20 AM
5

Quit mentally investing. You sent your one follow up text. Now go fuck other women. You do have other women, don't you? Which you're busy fucking, thereby not having the time to worry about this one girl not texting back? Right?
/r/askTRP27/04/17 11:26 PM
1

Then we're back to what I said originally. The real reason men don't file for divorce and "it's easier for guys to stay married" and just check out or cheat is because men stand to lose their children, not to mention piles of present and future assets. If a man wants out of a marriage, he has to sacrifice his children and pay his wife off. If a woman wants out of a marriage, all she loses is her husband. And she doesn't want him any more anyway. If you were unhappy in your marriage, but getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:42 PM
3

On the contrary, you seem to have this anti-male bias. You've approached the issue of "women file for divorce inordinately more often than men, primarily because men stand to lose so much more via divorce" with "Nuh uh, women file for divorce because men push them to do so by checking out and having affairs". I actually agreed with you and said that it's both things. Men check out and have affairs because it's the only option they feel like they have when they're unhappily married -- they stand …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:32 PM
3

If you ask a cheating woman, she'll tell you that people cheat for all kinds of reasons, and that if a woman is screwing around on her husband, it's at least partially his fault. I tend to give that same benefit of the doubt to cheating men. If a guy is getting well-fucked on the regular by a pleasant, respectful, devoted wife, he's a billion times less likely to go blow up his marriage just to fuck another pussy. If a guy cheats, he had a reason. Yes, the ideal would be two people sitting down …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:17 PM
1

I really hadn't given much though to "why do I feel this way?" I think a lot about what most men and women are like and how to use that, but not as much about how it makes me feel or why I have those feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:40 PM
3

It's a bad situation to be in for a man. On one side, he's trapped in a loveless, sexless marriage with kids, to a disrespectful, ungrateful bitch who treats him as less than human. On the other, he loses his children, his home, his children, more than half of his assets, his children, a substantial percentage of his future paychecks, and did I mention his children? So he tries to make the best of a shitty situation by staying legally married and in his children's lives, not feeding the beast he…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:38 PM
2

I think you overestimate the stupidity of Red Pillers by assuming they casually make sexist comments or jokes about women or are obviously derisive toward women. I mean, we live in the real world. We know the score. We know what does and doesn't fly in polite company and what does and doesn't get you hired, get you clients, and get you laid. It is 100% possible for a normal-looking, normal-acting guy to live a double life, where he's one way online, but somebody you would never guess in the real…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 05:39 PM
0

Sounds like you just barely missed the last generation where boys actually grew up into men and got raised, fatherless, in the midst of the self-esteem special snowflake era. So now, when normal men banter with other normal men the way that normal men talk, it sounds like a bunch of unchecked aggression, anger, toxicity, and hatred to your fragile little special snowflake ears. Oh, poor you! You've had a past trauma! You're in therapy! How can people be so insensitive by saying general things ab…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/17 05:18 PM
3

This 500%^ If men got 60% of the assets, the house, primary custody of the children, and a check from their ex wives every month, you'd see a lot more men initiating divorce. Men don't want to lose their children. So men don't initiate divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:18 PM
2

They're both true. Women nag to be a bitch, under the plausible deniability of expressing a legitimate grievance of some kind. But they are bitches because their husbands are losers. Women who are married to awesome guys don't act nearly as bitchy, because they actually respect their men, don't want to worsen their relationship or risk losing them, and give them the benefit of the doubt when they do, fail to do, or do something differently. Women are nagging bitches when they don't care if their…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:01 AM
2

What? But I was the one who used manly caps-lock! Why are you giving him anal and not me? You're such a slut!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 07:19 PM
8

Fisher needs to listen to his PR people (or get some PR people). First, you don't deny knowledge of something, then turn around tomorrow and admit it. Second, you need a far better story. I'd have gone with: "I was 20-something, said some bad shit after a bad break-up, anonymously, on the internet, and I've moved on. I started an internet forum with the intention of helping men with good advice on dating and masculinity and by giving them a safe space to anonymously vent about women. But I under…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 07:17 PM
7

HA! PROOF! THE RED PILL WINZ!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 07:05 PM
13

"If you want to keep me home for an hour, I know something you can do!"
/r/askMRP26/04/17 07:04 PM
2

Ideally, the most convenient division is when the man handles the traditional man shit (things that are physically difficult or that require leadership decisions like major budgetary things), and the woman handles the traditional woman shit (things that tend to be more time consuming and tedious but less physically or emotionally demanding). Who does what isn't really the issue, though. If a husband truly owns his shit, leads the family, handles things, has his own separate life, and his wife is…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:46 PM
10

While I do agree that women are relied upon for too much by their men, it's not the combination of career woman and maid that's leading women to divorce their husbands. It's the combination of wife, best friend, mommy, and boss. Wives are supposed to be wives. Not fill half a dozen other roles for their husband. Washing the dishes isn't what's making women resent their husbands. It's the fact that their husbands don't have healthy social lives and are constantly there smothering their wives, don…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:32 PM
3

You're picturing some kind of cartoon character stomping around calling women names instead of an actual red piller.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 10:05 AM
3

You, and a lot of the blue pill people, have a strong tendency to picture this very overblown, cartoon character version of a red piller. If not strutting around calling women sluts and cunts, then at least sneering derisively, talking down to girls condescendingly, getting awkwardly grabby with strangers. And if not that, then obviously creepy, talking primarily/only to girls, staring creepily, exhibiting extreme social awkwardness. You imagine that every normal asshole, sexist, or autistic guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 10:03 AM
2

Never ask a girl out. Tell her that you're going to be at place X at time Y and she should come. Then go anyway, meet other girls while you're there and have fun. If she flakes, fuck some other girl. If she shows, there you are, having a good time, preselected by other girls. And you already habe a drink in your hand, so she can go get one herself rather than sending you to buy her one when you go get yours.
/r/askTRP26/04/17 03:21 AM
0

Check out r/TheRedPill Meet and fuck girls. See what they're like. You'll be cured of trying to find some kind of special magical just for you unicorn woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:13 AM
1

While some kind of codified rule with numbers probably isn't necessary, nothing shows you what women are really like better than seeing multiple fuck-only girls competing with each other for your attention while cheating on their doting boyfriends. If you've never seen that up close, you're not well prepared to date women seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:10 AM
6

So most people I meet and hang out with know that I'm an evil misogynist, and they just don't care? Even the women? They all grudgingly put up with my existence but take great pains to pretend to like me so I'll never know they know?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 02:35 AM
3

And any time you say anything the least big generic about anything in the universe, women always make it about themselves. You can write an article about poodles and how they're the perfect dog for people ages 20-40, and some woman will always show up in the comments and tell you that she's 21 and likes pugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 10:21 PM
10

I haven't given it a lot of thought. Off the cuff, it's probably society's fault for creating a backdrop where women get bonus points just for existing and men have to work their asses off just to be average. You end up with this alien race of vagina-owners who haven't had to work nearly as hard, get nearly as smart, become nearly as interesting, or really do all that much except be a woman and not be too fat, and end up with an easier life. Men flock to fuck them, date them, even marry them, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 10:15 PM
2

I said: "The Red Pill isn't (only) a bunch of losers in Mom's basement. It's a lot of men people would consider successful, and it's stupid and crazy to argue idealism over reality, such as: 'But Archwinger, if you think wrong things in your head, you're still a loser. The least successful guy on Earth who thinks right things is better than you.'" You said: "But Archwinger, idealism is what leads to positive change." I, assuming your comment was in response to mine and that you supported the ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 10:09 PM
9

So how about you? You're pretty self-assured, female, and liberal, right? Easily more happy and wholesome than I am. How's your mental health? Ever taken anti-depressants, seen a therapist, or been diagnosed with any mental illness?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 10:05 PM
4

Changed to be at least 15% more PC.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 10:04 PM
10

What's not to believe? I have a wife who fucks me and treats me all right, a beautiful child, a good job with great hours, benefits, and quality of life balance but still make a six-figure salary, I live in a great city, great neighborhood, with great people, I'm in the best physical shape I've ever been, I have friends and hobbies I enjoy. Life's pretty good. I mean, it's not perfect. My car needs new breaks and I need to schedule a dental appointment soon. I hate the dentist. Whether or not yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 09:44 PM
13

It never ceases to amaze me that if you take liberal ideology to its extreme, you practically end up with religion. Jesus himself would declare that the meekest of the good people is better than the strongest, wealthiest, most accomplished wicked man in the universe. While sure, that meek good person will fail and suck ass in the real world, his place in heaven is assured. Just instead of heaven, you replace God with a sense of self. That unsuccessful person who thinks right things instead of wr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 09:39 PM
8

That's just a slightly different shade of the same idealism. Clinging to the belief that the whole point of existence is to be haaaaapy. And if you think negative thoughts about anyone or anything or don't live life the same way that I do or think the same things that I do, then you can't possibly be haaapy like I am. You're pretty well-adjusted and liberal, right? Have you ever been on antidepressents or diagnosed with a mental illness or seen a therapist for any issues? I hate women. A lot. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 09:35 PM
6

Yes. Doxxing is too lenient. I would show up in my trenchcoat and fedora and skillfully seduce them. Even the guys. Because The Red Pill isn't sexist. I would totally be temporarily gay to harm someone who thinks differently than I do on the internet. No homo.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 09:30 PM
11

I don't know about that. While the angry internet loser is definitely among us, a lot of us have girls we're seeing, some have girlfriends, some even have wives and families. Many are highly educated with good jobs and are well respected in various industry, hobbyist, and peer groups. Most people would regard this segment of The Red Pill as successful men. That's the real world. Actual success. Only an internet loser would assert, "But if you think bad stuff inside your head, that makes you a lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 09:11 PM
24

You should hear the internet warriors in an uproar about this. "I hope he's kicked out of office and can't find another job anywhere, even as a grocery sacker. Guys like that have no place in society and deserve to die!" Internet warriors are scared shitless. Real world evil internet misogynists aren't actually losers in Mom's basement. They're politicians, doctors, lawyers, financial advisors, and even the guy serving you drinks at the bar. Secret evil internet misogynists are hidden among us, …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:53 PM
40

The story arc for every romance novel and movie is an immensely hot, successful, badass guy who falls for a fairly average woman for no particular reason, and while he is still a badass, successful, hot guy to everyone else in the world, he is tender and sweet and emotional and romantic for her and only her because she is just so special solely for existing and has tamed his badass-ness.
/r/askTRP24/04/17 06:21 PM
1

You can pull that off just fine. Just stay away from pink fruity drinks with umbrellas and swirly straws. Otherwise, all men everywhere will call you gay for not conforming, which is the worst thing ever. I'm sure women will treat you just fine, however, and probably suck your dick no matter how you behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 05:51 PM
15

Women also have an easier time getting attractive men to date or have sex with them. (See #3 and #4 above.) Now admittedly, it's harder for Fat Bertha to get Awesome Arnold to date her seriously, but there's a decent chance she'll find a guy like Arnold who's slumming it or in a dry spell who'll fuck her. Even date her for a bit until he finds better. Because unlike women, even awesome men have dry spells. (Note: involuntary dry spells, not dry spells because they're holding out for a decent opp…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 05:13 PM
60

1- Is it easier for a man or a woman to get an unattractive person to have casual sex with them? Woman. 2- Is it easier for a man or a woman to get an unattractive person to enter into a committed relationship with them? Woman. 3- Is it easier for a man or a woman to get an attractive person to have sex with them? Woman. 4- Is it easier for a man or woman to get an attractive person to enter into a committed relationship with them? Woman. Just because #4 is harder than #1 for a woman, and women …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 12:55 PM
2

Women. Men are far emotionally stronger. Exception: feminine men. They're as weak as women. So I guess the OP would have been better worded if it had asked feminine people vs masculine people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 11:03 AM
33

It's a thought crime today to celebrate being a man. Those people genuinely believe that the number one problem facing men today is masculinity. That the main reason men are unhappy is because other men will supposedly call them gay if they don't burp and watch football. That non sexual bro touching and crying and talking out our feelings will solve all male problems. But frankly, even the MRA wankers hate masculinity. They think it's horribly unfair that men are held to any kind of societal sta…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 03:25 PM
9

Anybody with the 88 signaling in his username shouldn't be preaching morality.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 03:11 PM
18

When a woman says no to sex, you pull away, then she wants to have sex, that's when you have sex, stupid. That's the whole point of pulling away. You don't get all butt hurt and quit fucking a girl entirely because this one time, she shit tested you. If you really want a woman who doesn't shit test, check out the cemetery.
/r/askTRP22/04/17 10:52 AM
6

Because women are stupid. They'll fuck players anyway, regardless of their sexual history. Sometimes even because of it -- a guy who's good with women is, obviously, good with women. You get the behavior you incentivize. Women fuck a certain kind of guy, so you see certain kinds of guys being prevalent, or in some cases, bodies of information like PUA and The Red Pill that teach guys how to act or be more like the kinds of guys who get laid. Guys marry and pursue relationships with a certain kin…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 06:27 PM
5

I'd probably point out how it doesn't apply to me, specifically, then accuse you of trolling, because nobody can seriously think that about men. You'd just be saying it to get to me and try to rile me up. If I could find you in the real world, I'd also make sure to get you fired from your job for being sexist on the internet, because people who don't agree with my viewpoints deserve to fail at life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 06:19 PM
2

You genuinely believe that fucking a guy a few hours after you met him doesn't count as being a slut? I got nothing to help you here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 06:17 PM
3

Always. Women cannot separate their thoughts and feelings from their human worth. Women also have a complete inability to put themselves in another person's shoes or contemplate that any other way of seeing the world is even possible. If you disagree with a woman's viewpoint, it is because you hate her. Because no other legitimate viewpoint other than the way she feels exists. If you are expressing a different viewpoint, this is seen as a passive-aggressive way of attacking her while pretending …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 04:56 PM
19

Only you know how good of a liar your girlfriend is. It sounds like she had a legitimate reason to think that she was exchanging contact information with this guy for a business-related reason. He works in the arena football business, and she wants tickets to an arena football event (to go with you), and she very well may have thought she was making a legitimately useful contact that could help her in that regard. Now obviously, it's totally possible she met a cute football player and wanted to …
/r/askTRP21/04/17 04:48 PM
11

So your pregnant girlfriend dumped you. And not even as a shit-test. She rebuked all of your attempts to reconcile and was very clear. She wanted the relationship over. Then she was gone from your life for two whole months. Now she's two months more pregnant and reestablishing contact with you, as the reality of needing money for the baby set in. What do you think went on for the past two months after she was so quick to get you out of the picture?
/r/RedPillParenting21/04/17 04:39 PM
3

Um, a virgin who gives it up to some rando she just met a few hours ago is very definitely a slut. Fucking some guy you just met is pretty textbook slut behavior. Backward rationalizing it as "well, I'm not really that kind of girl. I never was before. That was just a one-off sudden impulsive thing. That doesn't count. No need to tell my next boyfriend about it. I'm definitely not a slut" -- that's the mind of a woman for you. Being a slut "doesn't count" if you're not reeeeealy like that. You c…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 04:31 PM
5

The right answer isn't "Don't worry, baby. I love you so much and would never ever thinking of cheating on you or leaving you no matter what." It's "Hey, I'm happy. The sex is good. My wife is fun and supportive and respectful. Our family has its shit together. As long as that's the case, why would I go elsewhere?" The implied message is that your eternal commitment is not guaranteed. You could leave any time. You're not stuck with her. You have the ability to get other pussy and she knows it. Y…
/r/askMRP21/04/17 01:30 PM
9

Why? If a woman is stupid enough to have sex with you the night she met you, the fact that it was you who fucked her doesn't change the fact that she's a slut, or make her any more worthy as a serious relationship prospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 01:01 AM
11

So it's wrong to have sex with someone you don't like and admire, for selfish purposes? I mean, women have been dong that for ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 08:15 PM
7

The real lesson in all of this is for other guys: Don't leave your personal shit where your wife can get to it.
/r/askMRP20/04/17 06:32 PM
2

It's like people don't know how to vet people any more. They just meet, hook up fairly shortly afterward, then when things don't work out, they repeat the process every 2-4 months and have a double-digit partner count by age 22. This is because despite all of the hogwash that modern women are so socially smart and have high emotional IQs, women are shit judges of people. They can't tell the difference between a guy acting attractive and nice and into them and a guy who wants to fuck them and is …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 02:44 PM
1

There's this stupid idea that women who slut around "get it out of their system" before they're stuck with a husband. That's idiotic. Slutting around gets it into their system, not out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 02:40 PM
3

These two things are the same thing in 99 percent of cases. A woman with a few strong, lengthy previous relationships and no infidelity is going to have a low count compared to the current modern woman's string of short term monogamies. If you're looking at one woman with a few past LTRs who also did some casual fucking between relationships, and one who didn't, that's a real no brainer. Sluts are worse. That's just how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 11:14 AM
2

It's not exactly "attention from men they're not attracted to" that women "fear". To an extent, women like the attention, as long as it's all positive and doesn't have any drawbacks. They'll trade texts with orbiters all day. It will mean the world to some loser guy who thinks he has a shot, when really, she was just spending 5 minutes going through her contact list at the bus stop trolling for validation. But when a woman is in public and is seen talking to a loser guy, she believes that other …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 03:18 AM
4

You are wrong. Women still live in fear of men. Women genuinely believe that any time Creepy McCreeperson is alone with them, he's going to rape them. Or worse, he may try to have an awkward conversation where he slowly and clumsily works up the courage to make a move, and she'll have to be uncomfortable and confrontational and shoot him down. Obviously, if Chad McStudly made a move, she'd say yes. Or if he tried to rape her, it wouldn't really be rape because she'd be jumping him instead. Every…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/17 04:59 PM
16

Marriage will make a woman stop trying. No more effort to keep you. Her positive traits diminish by half, and her negative traits get 50 percent worse. You sure you want to invite that into your life?
/r/askTRP19/04/17 10:07 AM
6

The part that really gelled with me is how Blue Pill society often argues that if Red Pill anything works on a woman, then the woman was clearly deficient somehow. She has issues, low self-esteem, probably past physical and sexual trauma, bad parenting, mental illness, or whatever. Because, as we all know and as is generally accepted across the entire universe, men and women are equally smart, capable and exactly alike except for genitals. And no strong, smart man would fall for Red Pill crap. S…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 07:12 PM
4

Sorry, dude. Islam's gotta go. All 1.7 billion of them. From the day the religion first appeared until the present day, Islam has been all about killing its non-Muslim neighbors for not being Muslim. And when there weren't any convenient non-Muslims to kill, they'd start killing each other for not being Muslim enough or being the wrong kind of Muslim. This is going to keep going until there are only two guys left on earth, and they're still going to be trying to kill each other for Allah. It's t…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 02:25 PM
4

Try actually fucking 6 women on rotation before you decide to you want to get married and have six kids. Not because that's a better life, but because you clearly need to learn what women are actually like. Your wish list is born from idealism. You need to grow up before you even get a serious girlfriend. Much less married.
/r/askMRP18/04/17 12:17 PM
30

Oops! Sounds like you listened to something a woman said instead of judging her 100 percent based on her actions. One hundred percent. Not 90. Not 95. Not 99. Not 99.999. One hundred fucking percent. You are a special breed idiot, because this woman you're idolizing is a tinder slut. And she's not even hiding it. You met her on Tinder! She admits to having slut sex to scratch the itching need for male attention and validation. She admits to enjoying all that dick. And you still think she's speci…
/r/askTRP18/04/17 11:15 AM
143

Truth. You don't need to be a jacked roid monkey to get attention. Just fit. I'm 6 foot ish and slightly over 160. An objectively skinny guy. But I was 150ish a year or two ago. The difference 10 pounds of muscle makes is astronomical. I'm not buff. I look good with a shirt off at the pool, but people don't see me and think "there goes a big strong man". But it is very evident from my body that I work out and am in good shape. Just going from scrawny to lean and fit gets you 5 times the attentio…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 11:43 AM
4

One daughter here. If she can't have an awesome cage fighting career, this post outlines the second best route for her.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 11:35 AM
6

There's a lot going on when you're picking up bar sluts, such as "hmm. my odds of fucking that desperate but still cute 30-something 6.5, who's practically throwing herself at me, are way higher than my odds of fucking that 7.5 20-something."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 07:26 PM
6

The wall for men is a lot more of a fuzzy issue. With women, it's pretty clear. You're either hot enough to fuck or you're not. The boner test. But women judge a few more characteristics when it comes to men, not all of them being age-dependent. So while there's definitely going to be a point where a man is too hideous to ever fuck due to his age, there's a lot more range and flexibility allowed for a man who looks okay-ish but is packed to the gills with status and has amazing game. No guy says…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 06:26 PM
10

The wall is such an obvious thing that it's not even a debatable issue. Nobody contests that a wall of some kind exists. Now clearly, there's not some kind of bright-line, hard and fast barrier where at age 29.9, you are dateable, and at age 30, you're an old hag. The wall isn't necessary a numerical age line. It's more of a looks/attractiveness line. Eventually, you're going to be too ugly for a guy who's worth a shit to date and fuck. And ultimately, it's really, really stupid to bank on being…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 06:21 PM
13

When it comes to threatening divorce/separation, that's a hard boundary that absolutely must be set. No agree/amplify, no fogging, no stonewalling, no ignoring. Every married woman needs to understand, plain as day, that threatening divorce is not some casual move you make to get what you want from your husband. And the first time a wife ever pulls that shit, you tell her immediately that that's her one. If she ever says the D word again, it had better fucking be with papers in her hand for you …
/r/askMRP13/04/17 03:06 PM
4

(Assuming the story is not fabricated, which is a huge assumption) She did and continues to do more than right by the guy. The fact that the guy isn't up to parenting is a separate deal. He's a real shit for trying to lean on the mother, who's already done and continues to do a lot for him, to get free help instead of turning to his own family, friends, or hiring some.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/17 12:11 PM
6

You're doing a shit ton of explaining yourself to your wife and trying to justify yourself. The fact that you believe you need to justify yourself to her before your behavior is okay tells me who the leader is of your family really is.
/r/askMRP13/04/17 11:10 AM
1

That deviates a bit from the traditional definition of nuclear family, e.g., one mom and one dad, who are married, and raising their biological (or in some cases, legally adopted) children. If we're going to go full-bore and just call any two married people with a dependent a nuclear family without caring about biological relationships, we can just shuffle babies around at the hospital and assign random kids to each married couple.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 06:00 PM
7

Day game is a little less direct than club game. You need to talk to a girl for about...let's say 2 minutes, about some banal small-talk topic, before you ask any personal questions. During this interaction, you gauge her interest by her body language and how she talks with you. You also drop little prompts that might trigger her to ask you a question about yourself or to tell you more about herself, but without asking. After about 2 minutes of this bullshit, but no more than 5, it's okay to ask…
/r/askMRP12/04/17 05:55 PM
1

The mandatory paternity testing prong, as well as the limitation of child support to only biological children of the payer ought to limit cuckholding. Women would be far less likely to cheat due to the increased pregnancy risk (due to lack of contraception, per #2), and the inability to obtain a safe abortion (per #1). Coupled with the mandatory paternity testing of the newborn (#4), the lack of social welfare (#3), and the fact that if her husband divorces her, he wouldn't be paying child suppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 05:35 PM
2

I waffled on that one, actually, but I think things weighed in favor of not having it. If you let married women go on the pill, get IUDs, or just hand out condoms to married couples, there's no way to track whether that contraception gets used for in-marriage sex or out-of-marriage sex. If the goal is to eliminate risk-free sex, thereby eliminating recreational/extramarital sex, I think we'd have to do without contraception. Which means married people would be fucking a lot less, but also cheati…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 05:02 PM
4

I'm fairly sure a few comments ago, I specifically noted that The Red Pill is not the only path by which a man can get laid. Lots of non-Red Pill guys get laid. Hell, most men in the world end up married, if they want to be. So clearly, lots of non-Red Pill guys are having some sex, some of the time. That's part of the blue pill trap for a lot of guys. Because some guys are successful your way, other guys think that if they try it your way just a little harder, things might work out for them, to…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 03:52 PM
7

I think you're having trouble putting yourself in the shoes of an average Red Pill guy. Not a hideous, socially stunted, autistic retard. But a more "normal" guy who ended up at The Red Pill. I'm not talking about ugly social retards who've amounted to nothing and are boring as shit. There are a LOT of guys who are average-looking, average socially, have an average level of accomplishments, and are kind of average-ish interesting. Maybe slightly below average in one or more categories, but not c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 01:54 PM
3

The one thing? And for "society"? I guess I'd go with saving marriage and the nuclear family, as follows: 1- Outlaw abortion. (except life/health of the mother or cases where the fetus is severely fucked up) 2- Outlaw contraception. (possible exception for married couples that have certain diseases) 3- Outlaw welfare. 4- Mandatory paternity testing of every newborn. 5- Outlaw child support, except in cases of a separating married couple. 6- Limit child support to 50% of the provable, documented …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 01:38 PM
1

It's a popular blue pill trope that The Red Pill only works on stupid, danged, inferior women with psychological issues, and that real, smart, strong, independent, healthy women are way too smart for those evil red pillers. Because it wouldn't be a fair world if evil red pillers were having sex with actual good normal women, or if good normal women were being tricked like that. Sorry, dude. I know it's harder to sleep easy at night in an unfair world, but it doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 10:11 AM
5

Like I said, The Red Pill is not the only path to getting laid. That's actually part of the blue pill trap. Many blue pill guys still get laid sometimes. Hell, most men eventually end up married. So obviously, lots of guys who aren't Red Pill men are still having some sex. Which gives many loser/non-masculine men false hope. They think that if they stay the course and respect women just a little harder for a little longer, things might work out for them. That path can technically work, for some …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 08:49 PM
4

Hating women (or at least recognizing how much they suck) is pretty key to getting laid with regularity. It's not the only path to getting laid, but it's pretty darn reliable. The alternate route of mutual respect and emotional connection is a lot more work for a lot less sex, and the women you chase using that route often aren't playing by that set of rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 06:39 PM
4

It is a popular blue pill trope that if only guys would know themselves better and understand themselves better and be true to themselves, own it, be positive, be authentic and genuine -- then the right women will like them for who they are. And that any man who isn't that way will have some kind of secret tell that women will pick up on and know not to date or fuck him. It doesn't work that way. Being a certain kind of man (or faking it) will increase your odds of getting laid astronomically, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 06:24 PM
6

The second argument blue pill/feminists/equalists always make when you point out something negative about women and "men too" gets shot down is "well, not ALL women". If you run around worrying about the 1%, 2%, 5%, or whatever portion of women aren't a certain way, and waste time individually evaluating every single woman you meet to determine whether she's that rare exception, you're going to miss out on fucking the 95% majority of them. That's stupid. I would also note that if there is some w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 04:49 PM
5

The fact that men are better than women is fun to talk about, but is hardly "red pill dogma". The Red Pill is not some kind of "human nature" discussion forum where men talk about men and how to interact with men. It is solely about fucking women. What women are like, what you can do about it, and how to maximize your sexual opportunity. It is true that a key element of that is realizing that you, the man, are not a special snowflake. And that most men are losers. And that life is not fair and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 04:44 PM
11

So about a week ago, my wife told me that she feels objectified by me, and I responded "Good", because she's supposed to. Objectifying my wife means she still passes the boner test. It's not like her professional accomplishments and the things she does for our daughter are what's been giving me an erection all these years. They're great, useful, and appreciated, but they're not why I want to fuck her. Even though she's my wife, I don't want to fuck her because she's special. I want to fuck her b…
/r/MarriedRedPill11/04/17 03:20 PM
2

Among other questions, you will be asked, "Why do you want to work here" or "Why do you want position X at our company". You need to know all about the company, all about the position, and be able to answer that in two minutes or less, speaking slowly, but not sounding rehearsed. And your response needs to have more to it than "My degree is in X, and this job positing is for X, and I need a job, and you guys are Nike which is cool..." You need to sound like after considering numerous internship …
/r/askTRP11/04/17 03:12 PM
59

This post is worth going over a few times. One additional thought I'd add is that The Red Pill, itself, tends to lead a lot of guys to invest too much. Example: Your girlfriend's not fucking you enough or the way you want. You start to think about it a lot. You become obsessed with how your sex life is supposed to be and how wrong it is currently. You read all day about ways to try to fix it. You try things. You focus on whether those things work or not. You obsess some more about it. You think …
/r/TheRedPill11/04/17 03:00 PM
6

Nobody said "men do not respond to social validation", nor did anybody say "the fact that men are driven by social validation is not a negative quality". Here's the thing: Purple Pill Debate is a subreddit for people who want to debate various views of The Red Pill subreddit. The Red Pill is a subreddit for men trying to improve their odds of fucking women. So a Red Pill viewpoint like "X is a negative trait about women" and how to deal with that or use that to your advantage is highly relevant.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 02:41 PM
10

So then the negative quality I noted about women is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 11:35 AM
9

Depends on the girl. Every woman has a different looks threshold.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 11:40 PM
13

Every time I point out a negative quality about women, there's always a few people who think that pointing out "men, too" somehow makes the negative quality about women less true or less negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 11:40 PM
16

This isn't exactly news. Everybody knows that you have to meet the minimum looks threshold to get past hello with a woman. Even a girl's mother doesn't want her daughter being seen with an ugly guy or a fatass. It reflects badly on her. Once you meet the minimum looks threshold, you can make up the difference between yourself and a hawt dude by being awesome. But if you're below the threshold, there's nothing you can do. At least not tonight. You can go hit the gym, get a haircut and some new cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 09:08 PM
46

The military is different for men and women. For women, it's kid gloves, desk jobs, government benefits, and a chance to get knocked up to avoid going overseas. But anyway, this is a complete non-issue. The reason men are disposable isn't the draft and the military. It's because men don't get pregnant. Therefore, men have the burden of performance. They have to work hard, be awesome, and compete with other men to have sex with women. Women just have to be there. It doesn't matter who joins the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 02:35 PM
6

If your partner brings a real issue to your attention, you address and fix it. If your partner brings a stupid non-issue to your attention, you trivialize it. What's so hard to understand? An issue isn't automatically important just because a woman had feelings about it. Running around seriously addressing every one of your woman's feelings is 100 percent guaranteed to worsen your sex life. Her feelings are not in charge. They do not determine what is or is not important.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 12:06 PM
36

The other way doesn't work. You don't buy sex and love with good behavior. A woman is either attracted to you, or she isn't. All of the complements, attention, generosity, and kindness on earth doesn't buy attraction. However, that shit can, very definitely, kill your chances with a woman. Because lavishing a woman with unearned, undeserved validation is FUCKING CREEPY! You don't buy your way into a woman's vagina with attention and validation.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 10:13 PM
4

This girl I was seeing several months ago moved back to her home country after her visit to America. And that's where you stop listening, stop communicating, and ghost. The end.
/r/askTRP07/04/17 08:30 PM
4

TurboTax is the current state of the art until someone makes something better. You should definitely learn the ins and outs of doing your taxes. This is your finances. Unless you have some inordinately complex rich-guy scenario with multiple complicated income sources and need an expert's knowledge to minimize your tax burden, paying somebody else to do your taxes is just lazy. Like paying someone else to do any other man work around your residence while you smoke weed and play video games.
/r/askTRP07/04/17 08:28 PM
1

78% Dominant 77% Vanilla 33% Master 21% Non-monogamist (WTF?) 19% Primal (Hunter) 17% Daddy 11% Owner <10% Everything Else
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 08:09 PM
205

Women aren't exactly people. They're person-like. A collection of masks, costumes, dances, and roles to play. If some hot guy they want to fuck is into comic books, suddenly, so are they. Even when yesterday, they just finished telling some repulsive guy that his comic book hobby was disgusting and dorky. For guy #1, she's a super slut. For guy #2, she's a good girl. She's whatever it takes to feel validated. Because without attention and validation, women wither and die. So the strategy is twof…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 07:57 PM
55

I love lists. It's like I don't even have to think. Neither does the poster.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 07:53 PM
4

You seem to be making the assumption that the only reason to be awesome is as some kind of attempt to attract women. That in the complete absence of women and pussy, we'd all be fat and drink beer and play video games and jerk off all day. Being awesome is fun. AND you get women. Being a loser sucks goat balls. AND you have to jerk off.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 07:52 PM
2

Let's follow this to its logical conclusion: Maybe she's not really pregnant. That means that if she was planning on maintaining the lie with you, then she needed to get pregnant pretty darn quickly. Since you were suspicious and probably not fucking her bareback, she was going to go get knocked up somewhere else and pretend its yours. Absolute best case scenario, if we give her the benefit of the doubt, is that maybe she was just going to fake a miscarriage in a month. Which is totally stable, …
/r/askTRP07/04/17 04:30 PM
10

Hypergamy, in isolation, is a good thing. It is the force that causes women to pursue and land the best mate they are capable of attracting, and causes men to compete to become the best mate possible in order to attract the best possible woman. But when we couple hypergamy with a society that has essentially destroyed any consequences associated with slutting (by both sexes), infidelity, divorce, and non-monogamy, we end up with unofficial harems. The best guys non-monogamously fucking multiple …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 03:38 PM
6

Nobody said that women are good judges. In fact, despite all of the brazen proclamations that women have high emotional IQ and are far superior to men socially, women are shit judges of character. That's why every single one of them spends more time on social media than the real world, shit-talks their girlfriends (and is shit-talked about), has one or more abusive asshole ex-boyfriends, and thinks the smelly nerds who would literally die for them and expect nothing in return are creepy rapists.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 02:49 PM
7

I'd argue that men ranting against feminists for not appreciating men is at least partially due to men overvaluing themselves. Having a job and being willing to date a woman just isn't that valuable any more. Most women have 20 other guys just like that, who also have jobs and are willing to date them. And women have their own jobs and money nowadays, so they don't even need guys like that. They can hold out for really awesome guys. Just being an okay, hard-working, respectable dude isn't good e…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 02:40 PM
2

Marriage (or cohabitation, or just a relationship) is a transaction. The man and woman are trading value. If the man is a good leader, responsible, has his shit together, and takes care of things, then most of the time, the woman is going to also take care of supporting tasks. Because she values the man and wants to do things for him to make it easier for him to bring what he brings to the table. This is true whether the woman is a feminist or a tradcon. If the man is worthy of respect, she'll r…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 02:32 PM
17

Girls aren't very sexual in general Girls are very sexual, in general, if and only if the man they are interacting with is sexually attractive. They can't really feel/get into the sex. Even when I watch porn I can tell they can't feel/get into it Girls very strongly get into the sex, even moreso than men, if and only if the man is sexually attractive. If the man they really really have the hots for is into porn, suddenly they're into porn, even if they wouldn't go near porn and thought it was di…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 01:18 PM
1

That gets a little metaphysical. I mean, who are we, really? And when and how do you become something else? If you wake up tomorrow morning and decide to be a vegetarian, are you a vegetarian immediately, as of that day? Or do you only become a vegetarian after you've stuck to that for a certain amount of time? Or do you get to back-date and become a vegetarian as of the date you began, but only after you've stuck with it for awhile? Or only after other people regard you as one, however long it …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 10:11 PM
1

No, but the reason for that is my daughter, not my wife or my marriage. If my wife left tomorrow, but moved six states over, gave me full 100% custody of our daughter, and left me with most of our assets, or maybe just got abducted by aliens, I'd have some fairly major adjustments to make, but life would be pretty good in a few months. If my wife left tomorrow and took my daughter six states away, and I had to sell the house and our furnishings at my own expense and give her 60% of the proceeds,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 09:11 PM
1

The only reason shit turned out okay for me (so far) is that I've been lucky. I wouldn't bet the farm on that. And my wife could up and leave any day and take my kid. Not to mention my house and most of my money. And I'd have to pay her most of my paycheck each month for the privilege of having once been married to her. The biggest change I made is that I'm not afraid of that any more. It's not ideal, but I'll be fine. My wife knew loser-me. And she hasn't forgotten that deep down inside, I'm st…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 08:45 PM
1

If I had my way, I'd change a lot of shit in the world, and men and women would be getting monogamously married successfully again. But I don't have my way, so we're dealing with a world where the best path for men isn't the traditional path.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 07:30 PM
2

Most guys find a way to take pride in their place in the world and in their mission in life. Something to give themselves meaning besides their jobs or their wives. You're less likely to jump off of the parking garage after losing your job if your job wasn't your identity, your shit is together and you have savings, and you have a social network and professional skills that can land you a new job soon, or at least put you on the path to do so. You're more likely to put a bullet in your head if y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 06:50 PM
3

Classic captain save-a-ho. Too nice and respectful and never got beyond the first few dates with a real relationship prospect. Married an older single mom. Now divorced. He was a bit of a momma's boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 06:42 PM
2

I think fewer people in general, of both sexes, have their shit together. Nobody has drive or a mission. Nobody has their edge. Everybody just wants to be happy today, right now. They work just hard enough to get a job, any job, that pays enough to let them go out in their spare time and have fun. There's no focus or direction to it. Eventually, most of these people grow up and get married and have kids, because they're supposed to. So they get better jobs and work just hard enough to pay for a …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 06:23 PM
110

I can't quite figure out if that comic is satire or not.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 06:08 PM
7

Honestly, I should have listened more to my grandfathers. One was a salt-of-the-earth, hunting, garden-growing, hard-working Joe. The other was a self-made businessman who got rich starting a supply company then investing well in the market. My Dad was by far the most educated one on his side of the family, but he's an anti-social, probably Aspergers if he were to get evaluated, angry weird dude. My mom had rich parents and a bitch of a mother, so she turned out this bizarre combination of narci…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 05:53 PM
3

I do. Obviously, in the real world, nobody actually meets the 100% theoretical ideal. But the idea is to aspire to get somewhat close to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 05:42 PM
7

Actual masculine men do cope. But they cope like men. They don't hug and cry and talk about their feelings with therapists. Which doesn't even work for women, so why the heck would it work for men? Men who aren't actually masculine on the inside but put on a fake masculine front to trick the world end up coping with alcohol and die by age 40 from a heart attack. It's not about working yourself to the bone at some high status high stress job for money while you're secretly dying inside, but prete…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 05:04 PM
7

The candle is definitely being burned at both ends. The small number of quality men that are left don't want a mannish bitch of a woman who's 30-50 pounds too heavy because she can't cope with the stress of having to work a real job and maintain her residence and eats too damn much. People in general suck more nowadays because society is hyper-focused on making sure everybody is happy, has an easy time of things, and their self-esteem is in tact. The problem is that women can suck all they want …
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 03:42 PM
9

Holding a job, maintaining a residence, and all of the other responsibilities that used to be traditionally male ones are hard and stressful. Women aren't built for stress. They're built for having kids and being taken care of by men. Women have a tough time coping with this stress and responsibility, which is why they eat too damn much and so many of them see therapists and take happy pills. Note that you also see high rates of obesity, mental illness, and drug use among non-masculine men. Femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 03:40 PM
8

Definitely. The candle is being burned at both ends. Men suck today more than ever due to the anti-gender role, anti-masculinity position that is adopted by BOTH feminists and MRAs. And women don't want or need an average guy who has a job any more. They have their own jobs. They can hold out for a quality guy...but there aren't many of those guys left, and the few that are left don't want a mannish bitch of a woman with a serious entitlement problem and about 30 pounds of extra weight on her as…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 02:43 PM
8

"Intentional" MGTOW make up an incignificantly small part of the population Heavily agreed. If a man is not actually turning down women begging to marry him, he didn't "opt out of marriage". He never had the option to begin with. The game changed. Women don't need a guy who's just okay, but pays the bills, any longer. At least not until they're older, having sex with non-serious guys is harder work for less return (and they're kind of over it anyway), and they're sick of working. Women only want…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 02:40 PM
8

Becoming "chad" is building a successful life. Not because Chad gets pussy, but because Chad works out and is strong and healthy and capable. And because Chad is socially connected which helps him professionally and helps him have fun. Being "chad" is way better than being some fatass or scrawny, socially stunted video gamer with a shitty cubicle job, even if Chad never got pussy.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 12:12 PM
-5

If you're not turning down hoards of women begging you to marry them, you didn't opt out of marriage. Women kicked you out.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 11:27 AM
3

I think this article is more accurate in some ways than the idiotic MRA/MGTOW fantasy. While marriage rates are indeed declining, this is not because men have wised up in large numbers and are opting out of marriage due to the bad deal it poses. A small percentage of men with extreme views who are very vocal on the internet claim to have done this, but most unmarried loser men would give anything for a woman to marry them. They're not unmarried by choice (though some losers pretend that they are…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 11:09 AM
5

Good idea. Since gender is clearly just a social construct...but then men who identify as women still physically perform better than women who identify as women, what we need to do is completely segregate trans people from the rest of the population. Give them their own league to compete in, their own bathrooms, their own communities. Maybe ship them to their own island or super-safe secured building where they won't have to face the dangers and evils of society. You know. Separate them for thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:45 PM
7

Sounds like your girlfriend is an attention whore instead of an actual whore. Why the holy fuck would a girl with a boyfriend get out of the shower, snap a picture of herself in a bathrobe or a clingy blouse, and send that picture to another guy who isn't her boyfriend? Even if the picture is not flamboyantly and overtly sexual and is just slightly suggestive, the fact that she is attention whoring for her orbiter friend is clear as day. The guy buys her clothing, for the love of God. He's clear…
/r/askTRP05/04/17 02:20 PM
2

Most guys who end up at The Red Pill are guys who are smarter than average, but a little bit socially stunted. The kinds of guys who tend to be a little bit above average at most things they put their minds to. Not super-awesome at everything. Just kind of above average at most things because they're bright. But because a lot of Red Pill guys are a little socially awkward, they have a hard time talking to people without coming across awkwardly. This is especially apparent when the conversation i…
/r/askTRP05/04/17 02:08 PM
4

You're still coming from the position that this one girl is somehow unique or special. That it matters what she does. That saving her from herself matters. She's just another woman. There are lots more of them to fuck. You'll be hard-pressed to find a Red Pill guy out to save some particular woman from the evils of the world. Most guys end up at The Red Pill after too much time wasted trying to save certain special women who weren't actually special.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:49 PM
5

Obviously, you can't mimic this guy's examples. He's not telling you what to say or do. You have to develop conversational skills on your own, then figure out your own ways, that contextually fit for you, to talk to girls. A fit guy wearing a dry-fit T-shirt and wind pants looks like he just came from a workout. A fat guy wearing the same outfit looks like a lazy-ass slob who couldn't bother putting on real clothes. You have to pick the conversational style that fits you.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 09:43 PM
6

I take great satisfaction in helping guys get laid. Her vote for fucking makes my world happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:39 PM
4

If a woman asked you, "Should I vote for Clinton or Trump", would you tell her to vote for the person you want to win, or the person you think would better promote her interests?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:35 PM
12

The Red Pill is not a female literacy program.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:21 PM
5

That would be a great route to follow if this woman were special and there weren't over three billion more of them. But she's just a girl. Who cares what happens to her? I'd rather her boyfriend get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:19 PM
11

How is it in the interest of any guy who reads The Red Pill for this girl to not fuck her boyfriend? I mean, what's a Red Pill guy going to say? Tell her not to do it, save herself, her boyfriend doesn't value her, and to come be with him instead because he loves her for who she is?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:15 PM
20

The Red Pill is all about male power at the expense of female power. If a woman showed up and asked me whether she should do thing A or thing B, I would pick whatever option was better for me, for her boyfriend, or for men in general. I mean, she's asking The Red Pill for advice. She's pretty fucking dumb. It's not like she was going to get three PhDs, cure cancer, marry a senator as a virgin bride, and change the world for the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:10 PM
4

new GF plate going to a rave with a male "friend" fuck-buddy Done.
/r/askTRP04/04/17 08:50 PM
7

The more important the decision is, the more important it is that you make it, not her. Women don't even want to decide what restaurant to go to for dinner. They want you to shoulder that burden, so that it's your fault if she doesn't like her salad. So they sure as shit don't want to be responsible for decisions that actually matter. If you make a decision and negative consequences happen, she'll bitch at you, tell you it's all your fault, but still respect you. If you back off and have her mak…
/r/MarriedRedPill04/04/17 08:22 PM
40

This is great and well-needed advice. A lot of guys around here struggle with social skills. Going to the gym is easy. If you do the work, you can't help not looking like shit. (If you don't do the work, fuck you.) Reading shit on The Red Pill is even easier. Lots of guys read shit all damn day. But the biggest questions people ask tend to revolve around "What should I say/have said to this woman?" As though there is some kind of magic bullet. As though the entire point of The Red Pill is figuri…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 02:56 PM
10

When you're dealing with married women -- especially married women with young children (e.g., daycare aged) -- you don't have to be super-awsomely hot and amazing. Just better than one man that she already kind of doesn't like. Right now, she and her husband wake up, get the kid(s) ready, go to work, pick the kid(s) up, get the kid(s) fed and off to bed, keep house, and repeat. Sex is probably infrequent and lackluster. They probably fight a lot, too. Having young children around is a difficult …
/r/askTRP03/04/17 07:07 PM
14

Don't listen to shit women say. Watch their actions. She fucks you and does shit for you? Then what you are doing is working. She likes it and is rewarding you for the behavior she likes. But she needs to make sure you really are that guy she likes and aren't faking it. So she shit-tests you to see if she can use her magic pussy to steal power from you in the relationship. She complains about things you do or fail to do, trying to get you to squirm and apologize and change and give in to her whi…
/r/askTRP03/04/17 04:00 PM
4

You do understand that making a girl into a girlfriend is an agreement for sexual exclusivity, right? I mean, that's what fidelity is. Sexual exclusivity. So you are sexually exclusive with a girl who's not having sex with you? That's stupid. If she's okay with you only being relationship-exclusive, then tell her that's fine. You'll agree not to be in a relationship with the other girls you're fucking. Then, you and she can be pen pals and talk about your favorite movies. That sounds hot.
/r/askTRP03/04/17 03:19 PM
3

You really want to get into some kind of dick-measuring contest? Look, your post had nothing to do with sexual strategy. It's off-topic. I'm going to assume by the way you've gotten so incensed over your failure to attain notoriety on the internet for your ramblings that you are sexually unsuccessful. Because if you were getting laid three times a week and had a dozen girls on rotation, you'd know that some bullshit about ratios of fertile people across the population has nothing to do with how …
/r/askTRP03/04/17 02:54 PM
2

Dude, your post was shit. When you go to a bar to pick up women, the phase of her menstrual cycle has zero importance on what you do to get laid. She doesn't know or care if she's fertile tonight. You don't know or care if she's fertile tonight. The #1 determining factor for whether you will get laid is your looks. Whether you lift weights, have non-thinning and well-styled hair, and symmetrical facial features with a nice jawline. The #2 determining factor for whether you will get laid is your …
/r/askTRP03/04/17 02:35 PM
3

Dude, I don't need science to know that I shouldn't have gotten married. But once your finances are tied up in a woman and you have one or more kids together, you don't just bail on your child(ren) over sex. You get your shit together, build yourself an awesome life, and get your wife to play ball.
/r/askTRP03/04/17 02:25 PM
3

Absolutely. I am not qualified to judge this guy's ex-girlfriend. But neither is he. He's moping about wondering how he gets over jealousy for this one particular "special" girl's past relationships. He genuinely believes the solution is some kind of mental trick. Some mindset he can adopt, where if he just thinks or believes something hard enough, he can make relationships like this work. The solution is to fuck other women. After he's fucked a dozen women, he'll realize that this one wasn't sp…
/r/askTRP03/04/17 02:11 PM
3

Even when you do approach and do "everything right", you'll fail with 75% of women. About 25% of women will blow you off immediately. Another 25% will barely look at you, answer everything with 1-2 words, and hope you take the hint and go away. A third 25% will try to milk you for drinks and feign interest, but flake on any attempt to isolate her. Sometimes, it's not even your fault. A woman just isn't open to getting fucked tonight. Maybe she's on her period. Maybe she had a shit day at work. M…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 01:49 PM
2

I want to help other guys get laid. When I was a young 20-something, I didn't get it. I didn't get laid much. I made a lot of female friends, I got cheated on a few times, dumped a lot. I was playing the wrong game and didn't know it was the wrong game. I married my fifth girlfriend, second girl I'd ever fucked, and had a barely-sexual marriage for years. It's taken more to fix my marriage over the past few years than it ever would have taken 22 year old me to get his act together and actually a…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 10:23 PM
2

Do you ever get the feeling that you might be spending too much time on the internet, reading gender war bullshit? That suddenly, everything you come across at school or in life seems like some kind of gender war Red Pill thing, even though it's really not related and has nothing to do with male sexual strategy in the slightest? Do you ever feel like maybe you're trying to wedge some random bullshit from your life into The Red Pill subreddit, hoping for internet points?
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 09:26 PM
2

So you're not addressing the sexual marketplace. You're addressing the baby-making marketplace? I mean, yeah, if you want to have a kid in 40 weeks, you'll want to be fertile and pick a fertile partner. But if you just want to have sex tonight, none of this shit matters, because any woman at the bar is part of the only ratio that matters: the ratio of men looking to get laid to the ratio of women looking to get laid.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 09:24 PM
2

So let's say if you're hot, successful, and have tight game, you have maybe a 55% chance of scoring with an ovulating woman and a 45% chance of scoring with a non-ovulating woman. You can't tell which one is ovulating anyway. So you just walk up to the hotter one. Because BOTH women are sexually available tonight. So BOTH women count in the ratio of sexually available men to sexually available women. Yes, if you're a scientist studying a population of animals, as a whole, and this population of …
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 09:17 PM
3

Precisely. Even if we were to assume every single word in the OP is gospel truth with a capital fish-on-your-bumper praise-the-lord T, none of it is actionable information. How does knowing that a woman's menstrual cycle affects my odds of getting laid help me approach a girl tonight and get laid? "Excuse me, miss. When was your last period? I'd like to know that before trying my luck." "Hey there. I noticed your low cut blouse. Women that are ovulating tend to dress more provocatively, so I cho…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 09:14 PM
-1

So you didn't even come up with this shit? You just pulled something from Wikipedia you think applies? Enlighten me. Why is it that you think that women who are not currently fertile should not be included in the pool of women that are sexually available tonight?
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 08:49 PM
0

Your position is that the "operational sex ratio" is the number of currently fertile women who are of fuckable age and attractive enough to fuck, to the number of horny men. My position is that the "operational sex ratio" is the number of fuckable women to the number of horny men, and that you randomly threw in something about the female menstrual cycle because you like multiplication and wanted to sound smart and sciency on the internet. If you put a woman on hormonal birth control next to a wo…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 08:43 PM
3

You're doing a terrible job of it. Let me summarize for you: Women often fuck high-status, masculine men, out of desire to do so. They do this more often when ovulating, but still do this quite frequently when not. In fact, they do this so frequently that we can pretty much completely ignore the effects of ovulation on your odds of getting laid if you're a high status masculine man. Women sometimes fuck lesser men for transactional purposes. They do this less often when ovulating. In no case, ev…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 08:28 PM
1

Everything past the 2:1 horny man to fuckable-aged woman ratio assumes exactly that. It's mental masturbation. Who the fuck cares if only 10% of women are ovulating today and that means there are 18 horny men for every ovulating, fuckable-aged woman? Women don't have to be in the right place in their menstrual cycle to fuck. There are still 2 horny men for every 1 fuckable-aged woman.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 08:18 PM
7

You seem to be in the habit of making a meeting with a woman into a significant event in your life. Turn that around. You want to go to place X and time Y and do thing Z. Doing Z is the event in your life, because you like Z and are interested in it, and happen to have the time to do it at Y. And oh, by the way, you invited one (or more) girls to show up and do Z with you. But if nobody shows, you still end up doing what you wanted to do. If a girl does show, there you are, at place X, where you…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 08:16 PM
14

This position presupposes that women only want to have sex when they're ovulating. Which is just plain not true. While sexual attraction is easier to generate when a woman's body wants to play along with you, it is hardly a limiting factor. If you're hot, successful, interesting, and your game is tight, you are most certainly not limited to the small fraction of women who happen to be highly fertile and ovulating this very minute. Hell, if this were actually the case, hormonal birth control woul…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 08:12 PM
9

what I hope for is that we can articulate something so that men can feel assured that they're men and be content in themselves and thrive. This is the classic blue pill, feminist position. That all that men really need is a pat on the head and being told "there there. You're still a 'real man' even though you suck at life and don't get laid. Your manhood isn't defined by sex or success. You're still a real man! Now please excuse me while I run off to fuck my high-status masculine boyfriend." Men…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 06:43 PM
120

If a woman tells you she has a boyfriend, that means one of four things; 1 - She has a boyfriend and is not interested in you. She is telling you about the boyfriend so you will know she's not interested and leave her alone. 2 - She does not have a boyfriend but is not interested in you. She is telling you she has a boyfriend so you will know she's not interested and leave her alone. 3 - She has a boyfriend, but is interested in you. She is telling you about her boyfriend so you know to be discr…
/r/askTRP31/03/17 03:53 PM
2

Look at you. Shaming a man for not living up to conventional masculine gender roles. Report to your nearest booth and confess your sins, you sexist shitlord.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 03:47 PM
12

This guy gets it. Women are for fucking. He's not trying to make her into something she's not. He's just using her for her purpose until she is no longer useful for that purpose, such as by leaving him for some other dude. Then he'll go find another person to fuck. If he's smart, he already has a few other irons in the fire.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 02:57 PM
27

I think you missed your classmate's point. Back in the "good ol' days", men were men. They learned how to be men growing up, presumably from their fathers, from other boys in school and their fathers, and from the men in society as a whole. They didn't need to whine about their feelings to avoid ending up in an institution or killing themselves. Because they knew how to cope with life. As men. It's not that they didn't cope or didn't have any coping mechanisms. They very much did cope, but not b…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 01:23 PM
8

Waaaaay too argumentative. Yes, her e-mail was formal and was clearly written that way to cover her ass and document your wrongdoings, should she need to get your ass shit-canned. But then you responded like a bitch instead of like a professional. Next time, keep it simple: "Dear X, I have not registered our company for any upcoming events. Unfortunately, I did not receive your phone call. This may be due to the fact that I was recently assigned a new phone number three weeks ago and am no longe…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 05:38 PM
1

True. It's a question of the better sexual strategy at that point. A good lie isn't sustainable forever. It can get Sally to fuck you tonight, but probably won't turn her into a reliable plate. At least not long-term. Depending on what you do for a living and what hobbies you're into and what your time and resources look like, constantly chasing the next Sally may be an ineffective use of time when with just a little more investment in yourself to actually be a worthwhile dude, you can cut the t…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 04:27 PM
7

The other half of this equation is that women have sex to connect (or to bargain for the connection of) a man that they respect. More than being a relatable fellow who's good at conversation and making a woman feel close to him, you have to be a respectable guy. Respectable meaning decent-looking, decently successful, decently socially apt and connected, decently interesting, decently skilled. You don't have to be perfect and go into "monk mode" for ten years trying to sculpt the perfect body an…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 03:16 PM
18

It's hard for an avowed blue pill sex positive guy to get it because it's impossible to imagine a world where girls aren't open and honest with them and where being open and honest back doesn't get them laid. The idea that girls only fuck some kinds of guys and that other kinds of guys don't get laid, no matter how open, honest, confident, and authentic they are about it, is kind of foreign to them. Which leads to ideas like, "What? How could you not know that women like rough sex? That's like s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 02:42 PM
20

I think it's more that a lot of red pill guys, growing up, dated girls who didn't really want sex with them at all. So of course they didn't want real sex. They just performed a starfish quickie. Enough of that, and you start to think that girls liking it rough, or hell, girls liking sex at all is just a porn or Internet fantasy. To get it, you have to try to put yourself in the shoes and mindset of a guy who didn't get girls, and when he did, it was always a one sided relationship because that …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 12:20 PM
3

You aren't qualified to judge girls until you've fucked a few dozen. After you've bedded lots of women and seen how non-special and non-unique they all are, then you can laugh about how you thought one day you'll find this good girl who's different. That sweet, virginal good girl is wearing a mask. Dancing for approval. For the right man, she'll change her dance. You need to learn how to be complete and fulfilled without women. Build yourself a great life. That's the goal. Then, you can add in w…
/r/askTRP30/03/17 12:13 PM
6

This gets better as you get older and actually do shut with your life. Assuming you are a reasonably normal person who actually develops skills and hobbies. You also need to focus on being present. Actually listening to people. Taking an interest in learning about something from someone else, asking questions. Not every conversation is going to be earth shattering, but if you can't take pleasure in a little friendly chat, that outs you as an unfuckable social retard.
/r/askTRP30/03/17 11:15 AM
10

Complicating matters is the fact that this is instinctive for most women. Before you've even finished your sentence asking her to grab a drink with you, she's already saying no. That's just her default response. She's not supposed to say yes to guys who try to get her to go somewhere with them. That's what sluts do. Unconsciously, she is weeding out losers by saying no before she even thinks about the question she was asked. "Suzy, can you make a copy of..." NO! Whether or not the guy shrugs and…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 07:52 PM
1

Judaism is a religion, not an ethnicity. If you go to Poland, some of the Polish people are Jewish. Some of the Polish people are Catholic. They all look like Polish people and are all genetically Polish. Same with British Jews - they're as white as the Brits. And genetically identical to some British protestant. Same with Ethiopian Jews. Russian Jews. And so on. And the huge majority of Jews are white. Caucasian. European descent. Pale skin. White bread. Crackers. Most Jews are white, dude. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:46 PM
1

Jews tend to be a little smarter than average. Not a lot. Just if you were to take all of the Jews in America and get the average IQ, the mean would be around 110 instead of 100. A small cut above, but not a huge deal. However, that means that when you look at people with 130, 140, or even 150 IQ, that's an entire standard deviation above 100 when compared to 110. So proportionally, the percentage of American Jews with 140+ IQ is way higher than the percentage of American gentiles. So you end up…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:14 PM
4

You do know that "jews" are just people who go to synagogue instead of church, right? 99 percent of Jews are normal folks that go to work each day. Maybe 1 percent is part of the ultra rich elite, if that. And it's the ultra rich part, not the jew part, that gives them influence. That monolithic edifice known as "the jews", an elitist block of haters who secretly control the banks and the media and want to bring down the west from the inside using liberal politics, isn't actually a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 01:47 PM
19

The internet advice is to confidently be authentic and genuine and true to yourself and own it, and you'll eventually find the right person. That's shit advice. The red pill advice is to confidently look and act like the guys women are actually fucking, and they'll fuck you, too. I've never seen "change" or "trick women into thinking you're someone you're not" or "treat women like disposable objects" as typical advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 11:18 AM
13

Sometimes. But in this case, she never would have asked her boyfriend "Is it okay to go hang with and spend the night with these two guys at their place? Don't worry. Nothing will happen." Not if he was worth a shit. If she cared what he thought or did, she'd have at least hid her intent to cheat from him rather than putting it in plain sight and saying, "I dare you to call me out. Nope? Didn't think so." Then again, maybe OP is the one she's lying to. Maybe she told her boyfriend something else…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 09:52 PM
11

On one hand, women do engage in the "apex fallacy". Most people do. Nobody notices the invisible worker bees and says, "I wish I could be like them". People see the highly privileged, the wealthy, the successful, and say, "Look at how all of those people are men! Clearly men are privileged!" Or if you're black, you blame the white man, or if you're a white man, you blame "the jews". Forget the fact that 90% of men/whites/jews are normal schlubs. Clearly, the fact that so many upper echelon peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 08:36 PM
4

Exactly. The lesson you should be providing is: "At time #1, I didn't know shit about cars and couldn't unclog a toilet, much less fix my garbage disposal. But at time #2, after learning those things, I was able to apply/demonstrate them in this manner, and use those skills in these ways to get girls to fuck me because I was an awesome manly man". Not "So I'm an awesome manly man, then I went to the big city, where lots of guys are mamby pamby non-men who can't fix cars. So seriously, guys, to b…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 07:08 PM
12

I'm gonna level with you: The Red Pill has veered off course over the years. A long, long time ago, The Red Pill was about understanding sexual dynamics -- the interactions between men and women. What's actually sexually attractive, and what things have clueless guys been doing that are actually unattractive or neutral? How do we change our lifestyle and our behaviors to maximize our sexual outcome? Sexual strategy. That's what it's about. You do X, you get laid. You do Y, you don't get laid. Th…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 06:49 PM
26

If her boyfriend was worth a shit, when she said, "Is it okay if I go spend the night over at datsikboy92 and his friend's place", he would have cheerfully agreed, then she would have come home to her shit in boxes. But if her boyfriend was actually worth a shit, she wouldn't be cheating on him anyway.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 06:09 PM
6

Sexual strategy is situational. If you live in a small or medium sized town in the deep south and you don't know how to change your own tire, and have to call AAA to send out a tow truck and have a real man put your spare on for you, you're not a man. Good luck getting anywhere with a local girl. If you live in New York City, you probably don't even own a car and take the subway everywhere, and the guy in the paragraph above this one would be an ignorant bumpkin in your world. Dressing sharp and…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/17 06:03 PM
26

Let me explain this without the benefit of your girlfriend goggles. LTR of 9 months. You've been with a girl for 9 months. Barely enough to know shit about whether she's actually girlfriend-worthy. Everything is going great. Girlfriend has proven that she is very trustworthy. Never hides anything and places huge emphasis on trust. You have yet to catch your girlfriend being shitty because she is really good at hiding it. She broke up with her ex of like 2 years and ended things civilly. They bot…
/r/askTRP27/03/17 08:48 PM
3

Did you miss the point of my comment? There is no such thing as a "sigma male". Or an "alpha male". Or a "beta" or "omega". There is shit you can do that is sexually attractive to women, shit you can do that is emotionally comforting to women, shit you can do that is sexually unattractive to women, shit you can do that is emotionally uncomfortable to women, shit you can do that is sexually and/or emotionally neutral to women. Most behaviors are more than one of the above. The Red Pill is not "ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:39 PM
25

Why is "Sigma male" so rarely discussed Because greek letter categories are stupid. The whole "alpha" and "beta" thing was originally shorthand for "behaviors that generate sexual attraction in most women" and "behaviors that generate emotional comfort in women but often at the cost of sexual attraction". Then, a bunch of autistic retards on the internet decided to jump on to the SJW bandwagon with their own brand of identity politics, deciding how to "be an alpha" and who's a "beta man" and who…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 02:15 PM
11

My girlfriend Some girl I used to know is... Come on, idiot. Did the world run out of women last night? Surely this isn't the only woman on Earth that will fuck you. Don't mess around with shitty lying cunts. How can you possibly expect anything positive to come of this? And you're not even smart enough to be fucking this trainwreck of a girl outside of a relationship. She's your girlfriend?! Fuck off.
/r/askTRP27/03/17 02:11 PM
2

It's a bit of a silly CMV. Because the CMV essentially goes: "There is nothing morally wrong with doing X, except for morality." Which is true for about 99.9999 percent of everything. People have a right to do whatever they want, within reason (e.g., no murdering people). Lying to people? Taking advantage of them? In fact, pretty much anything that isn't already against the law? The only thing "wrong" with any of this is morality. Duh. Unless we're counting, "That's stupid and wouldn't work and …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 02:08 PM
1

The general rule of thumb is that when dealing with humans, you get the behavior you incentivize. If the risk and/or consequences are low and the potential for gain is high, people lie. If the risk or consequences are large or there's nothing to gain by lying, people tend to lie less. Very few people refrain from any sort of lie, solely for moral reasons, when the potential for gain is huge, the chance of getting caught is zero, and even if they get caught, the consequences are nil. Sure, it pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 01:04 PM
3

Wait. This isn't everybody in the world's view already? I just assume everybody lies. "Of course I'm serious about you and want to marry you one day, babe. We can keep having sex." "No, I did not cheat with that guy from work. How can you even ask that?" "The dog ate my homework." "I totally get laid all the time. Typing long Internet ramblings on morality is just a tiny hobby of mine, and my real life is actually very awesome."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 10:13 AM
7

So when your real friends joke around with you, do you suck all the fun out of those situations, too? Like by refusing to laugh at yourself, going quiet, getting deathly serious, then lecturing the room on why the remark at your expense was totally inappropriate? You sound like a real hit at parties.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 05:25 PM
31

Here's her plan: She wants to stop fucking you and "talk to other guys". This isn't a religious thing or a moral thing or even a physical sex is painful thing. This is her wanting to look for her next guy, but stringing you a long in a no-sex relationship while she looks. She just doesn't want to be alone and doesn't even think she'd mind if you fuck other people as long as she gets to look for the man she really wants and doesn't have to be alone while she does it. Here's what you should actual…
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 02:53 PM
39

Essentially, having sex with a woman is rape. Or at least sexist. What you're supposed to do is sit on your hands, in a line with other men, and wait to be chosen. If you're chosen, let her lead you in bed then apologize profusely when she doesn't enjoy the sexual encounter she led because that's your fault, shitlord. If you're not chosen, keep your mouth shut because you're not entitled to anything, shitlord. And also give her all of your money, because she's entitled to at least that much for …
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 01:10 PM
3

Nobody gets more sexual attention when they're fat, slovenly dressed, socially awkward, and have zero social status. I stand behind my 99.99999 percent. More sexual attention doesn't have to mean a sudden jump to a 100 percent success rate for fucking chicks. It's not so black and white.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 10:09 AM
2

The manic days are great. It's the downhill side of the mountain you have to watch out for.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 01:43 AM
8

It's more like we're looking for ways to get ahead in the real world. Not on the internet. In the real world, there aren't any academically interesting but ultimately silly hypotheticals like "do men or women have it better?" You're either a man or a woman. There's no changing that. None of us will actually have the opportunity to trade sexual attention for menstruation. And as fun as it is to shit on women on the internet, worrying about who's better than who doesn't matter in the real world. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 08:19 PM
13

No fucking way. Women are physically inferior to men, and honestly, the female reproductive system is just the tip of the iceberg there. There is no need to trade anything drastic like that for increased sexual attention. A man can just work out, dress well, learn game, and gain status, and he'll get increased sexual attention without having to shed his uterine lining once a month.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 07:40 PM
1

Women can't deal with rejection or failure. They don't ask for shit. It needs to be your idea. That way, it's your fault if anything doesn't work out well. I get it. You don't want to feel like some kind of tool/slave who jumps to please her because she drops hints and says something passive. Doing her a favor feels less valuable to you (and her) if you volunteer to do it while she was talking about her day. You'd rather be asked directly, agree, perform, and be thanked for your direct favor. Th…
/r/askMRP23/03/17 11:13 AM
95

I'm not sure where, in your interactions with a woman, the "I'm 20, never had a girlfriend, never been laid" issue would come up in a normal conversation. You're a dude in college. You should be fucking a girl BEFORE you get to some serious conversation about your past. Remember, the following is the way of the past that doesn't work any more. Nobody does this: Dating > Relationship > Sex > Marriage This is how it works now: Sex > Hanging out/sex > You get stupid and go for a relationship > You …
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 02:52 PM
3

Women take breaks from relationships to make themselves available for other men. They don't take breaks to be alone and watch television. You know this. But you also knew it when you married her, and you married her anyway. But that doesn't matter now, right? Because you're large and in charge of your marriage? Your wife fucks you nightly, however you want? Every time the two of you are alone together, your hands, mouth, and dick go wherever you want, and "no" isn't a word in her vocabulary? She…
/r/askMRP21/03/17 10:23 PM
15

This isn't a system of beliefs. It's not a faith. This is plain jane English. If you don't give a flying fart whether or not you lose someone, then you don't love them. If you're afraid to lose them, then you might love them. You could be afraid of losing someone and not love them, but you can't love someone without being afraid of losing them. It's just not possible. Not caring and being indifferent to losing someone is the exact opposite of love.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 07:49 PM
84

We all have that story. Most men have that story. Any time a woman wants space from you, it's because she wants to feel like she's available for other opportunities with other men. You might not have even done anything wrong. She could have just been out, talked to some guy for 10 seconds, felt a little flutter, then realized how unhappy she's been with you for the past six months. Even though if you'd asked her 11 seconds ago how she felt about you, she'd have told you she's totally in love and…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 07:02 PM
16

Arguably, fear and love are inexorably tied together. When you fear losing something, that's love. When you'll do anything to avoid losing something, that's love. Abundance/indifference are the opposite of love. Fear goes hand in hand with love.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 06:57 PM
44

Essentially, making a woman feel like she doesn't have abundance, or making her feel like you do, is dubbed "emotional abuse". Why? Because that is a form of fear. Making a woman feel like you're the best she can get or that she won't find anybody else, or won't find anybody as good, is classic "emotional abuse". Likewise, withdrawing, flirting with other women, and making her feel afraid of losing you or like she has to compete to avoid losing you is also ... you guessed it ... "emotional abuse…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 06:36 PM
623

The most powerful force that keeps a woman with one man is fear. Not love. Fear. The fear that if she fucks this up, she'll be alone, or at least never get anybody as good or better. The very second she doesn't feel like the above is true, the relationship is done. She might not cheat or dump you for the first dick, but even if she doesn't, the fact that another dick came along will make her feel trapped. She'll start resenting you, treating you like shit, dry up the sex, and blow up your relati…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 02:18 PM
4

There are lots of smart people in the world. But when one of them is sitting across from me at the interview table, I'm only going to hire him if he's cool, we get along, and he seems like he'd be a good fit in the office. Socially abnormal losers, however smart they may or may not be, don't fit in in the real world. This isn't about women. Your piss-poor attitude and your complete lack of social aptitude is going to hurt you in life as a whole.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 05:55 PM
30

Troll. Nobody asks about this tiny fringe internet thing in the real world. I get it. You read this shit all day long and in your mind, it starts to seem like this is a really big deal. People debate about it online. But it's really not. Nobody's heard of it. No need to make up some internet story or lay awake at night worrying some girl will recognize your behavior as "Red Pill". It's not gonna happen. In the highly unlikely event that you stumble across the 0.0000001 percent of women who would…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 05:45 PM
2

You made your intentions clear. You informed her, using a language she understands, that you were interested in sex in the absence of (or at least preceding) commitment or emotional intimacy. She made it clear she wasn't down with your intentions, also using girl-signaling. You made it clear that you were not interested in anything besides sex with your response, again, using her language. Assuming this is what you intended to communicate, you did just fine. Just keep in mind that you're not goi…
/r/askTRP20/03/17 05:40 PM
1

You have sex dates lined up with other girls. Just ignore this one. And get out of your own head. This isn't about you. She's not suddenly avoiding you because this one time, you ate bad lentils and had to excuse yourself to go puke. She's avoiding you because she got a better offer, and is just stringing you along in case it doesn't pan out. That's just how plates work. Your bad for trying to make this one more than a plate by not fucking other women.
/r/askTRP20/03/17 05:33 PM
40

"Wait. You're non-exclusively fucking him, too? And he invited both of us here at the same time? That means he's okay with us being sluts and doesn't judge us! Whew!" And here they were, trying to hide the other guys they're fucking like suckers, and you made their day by making it okay to be themselves. That's all women really want.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 05:30 PM
1

Day game is a little different than picking up a girl at a bar. Women who aren't mentally in "club mode" are kind of silly in that walking up and introducing yourself (an obvious "here to hit on you" approach) runs a lot of them off. If you're really cute or charming, that still works a lot of the time, but it's also costing you a few opportunities in the wash. Which is hilarious, because that same woman might be planning on hitting the club in 3 hours wearing the world's shortest dress and gett…
/r/askTRP20/03/17 03:34 PM
247

You're playing the game just fine with this woman, but you need to keep catching yourself when you get thoughts about this one being cool or special or fun to be with, or even that the pussy is that good. There are a million more women just like this one out there. Better, actually. Again, you're playing this girl just fine. But don't get attached. Over-enthusiastic, intense, druggie chicks have about a 1 in 3 chance of going bonkers on you, sometimes without warning.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 03:24 PM
16

Even among the sex positive druggie house party every weekend hookup with your friends crowd, nobody fucks the ugly or weird guys. In fact, girls among those groups absolutely loathe the unfuckable guys in their circle. Because they feel like those guys are expecting something. Entitled. Like they're waiting in line for their turn. There's nothing a casual sex, fuck my friend circle slut hates worse than the unattractive friend who keeps nagging her because she's fucking everyone in their group …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 10:13 AM
1

You have very limited experience with humans if you really believe it's not possible for people to hide what they really think or how they really feel. A lot of people are uncomfortable with the idea that guys who "resent" women could be tricking them into sex. So they desperately try to convince themselves that unworthy men must have some kind of tell. That smart women don't fall for it. Sorry, bud. It just isn't so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 03:18 PM
3

Then when this plate is out getting laid, go fuck one of them. This is how plates work. Quit expecting some slut you're fucking outside of a relationship to behave like a girlfriend.
/r/askTRP19/03/17 05:40 AM
4

There is too much wrong here to unpack and address individually. Dump her. Tell her things clearly aren't working out. You need to set yourself free. Feeling like this about a girl who isn't into you any more and doesn't value you isn't worth it. Quit putting yourself through this. End it for your own sanity.
/r/askTRP19/03/17 03:25 AM
1

How many other women are you currently fucking?
/r/askTRP19/03/17 03:22 AM
4

LTR - > plate There. Done. Why did you type so much drivel?
/r/askTRP19/03/17 02:44 AM
58

It's perfectly normal for 99 percent of women. You're fucking other girls, too, right? If not, you should fix that. Oh, and don't make this one a girlfriend. She's probably out getting laid tonight.
/r/askTRP19/03/17 02:41 AM
7

The red pill is not a political ideology. Numerous subscribers to the red pill subreddit are politically conservative. This is unsurprising, because nearly every anti-male movement in the universe is backed by left wingers. It's hard - practically impossible - to be pro male and lean left.
/r/askTRP19/03/17 02:39 AM
0

Once again, we see a post that assumes that women are powerful mind readers. That if you are secretly an evil Red Piller who hates women (but says and does absolutely nothing to indicate this), women will pick up on small nuances and know to turn you down and get away from you. This is simply not the case. Women being good judges of character who can spot unsavory men who don't respect them is a fabricated myth. That's why every single woman you know has an "abusive asshole ex" and a string of b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 05:36 PM
3

This position presupposes that the problem men face is social acceptance and shaming. It's one thing of some guy really, truly, from the bottom of his heart, does not want to be conventionally masculine, and come hell or high water, living his life the way he wants means more to him than anybody else's opinion. That guy honestly isn't the one who's killing himself due to severe depression. The depressed, suicidal men who are harmed by their lack of masculinity are guys that want to be masculine,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 05:15 PM
3

Explain. People literally argue that male suicides and mental health issues are so high because of the pressure to conform to conventional masculine standards. That men measure their success and happiness by their sex life because they were taught that this is part of being a real man. My retort is that an abject failure of a man is unhappy because of the failure itself. Not because of the pressure to be a man. It's not like men wouldn't want to have sex at all, but evil society taught us that r…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 12:18 PM
13

Honestly, I think one of the larger problems that leads men to TRP isn't sucking with women -- that's a by-product. It's sucking with men. Lots of "beta" guys have no problems hanging out with girls, making friends with girls, and so on. They just have problems succeeding at sex and relationships. What they suck at is making male friends. They don't know how to fit in with men or be masculine. And as they age, it gets worse, because not having male friends means they never learn how to be mascul…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 09:37 PM
11

The "gender war" is primarily an internet thing. People don't talk about crap like this in the real world. So no.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:24 PM
6

People keep insisting that the root of male unhappiness is gender roles. When an unlovable loser can't get laid to save his life and no woman will touch him with a 10 foot pole (even if they formally accept his right to be however he wants to be), this loser of a man is horribly unhappy. And the reason he's unhappy isn't masculinity. It's lack of masculinity. He is unhappy because he is lonely, unloved, can't get laid, and fails in various other areas of life. He is not unhappy because he's fail…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:15 PM
34

I'm looking for the sexual strategy in this post. How do I use this to fuck Amy Schumer? I heard that it's really hard to get her to put out.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 05:57 PM
49

You're missing the point: Women are for fucking. If you're not fucking a woman, what is she doing for you that nobody else can? I can cook you a better meal than your girlfriend. Hell, the majority of the master chefs in the world are men. I can clean your apartment better, too. I can be a better and more loyal, lower-maintenance friend. I can do everything your girlfriend can do, and more, and do better at all of it. Except fuck you. For that, you need a woman. If you're not fucking a woman, wh…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 05:39 PM
47

You can condense those "3 ways" into one big point a lot of guys around here ought to take to heart: Do shit. Quit reading and writing about shit and do shit. You will learn more about how to fix your life in one night of going out and making yourself talk to girls than you will learn in an entire year of reading bullshit people piss out of their keyboards on to the internet. But also, guys need to quit being so hard on themselves. You don't have to be perfect to get laid. Just good enough. 50% …
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 05:19 PM
26

If you really, really want this girl (or any girl in the future), the solution is pretty damn simple: Fuck other women. The very second other girls want your dick, the ones who "don't think of you in that way" immediately start thinking of you in that way. Afraid of losing their chance, they rush to try to reclaim you, and you can add them to the rotation if you really want. But if they don't, hey, you still have a rotation of girls you're fucking. If you ever want any particular girl, you absol…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 05:14 PM
5

You're still kind of working from a position where sex, kisses, touching -- these are all things you feel like you have to earn by somehow doing or saying the right magic Red Pill things to impress her. You should just go out and have a good time. Do something you want to do and bring a girl who's agreed to a date along. Have fun doing the thing you like to do, talk to lots of people while you're out doing it and meet other girls. Guys, too. Have fun. Be fun. Pull your date along with you while …
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 05:03 PM
7

It sounds like you're more awkward than you think you are. Whatever it is you're talking about with girls, however it is you walk or talk or carry yourself, it's not exciting the girls and making them eager for your touch. So when you do reach over to touch them, it feels forced and unnatural. They stiffly sit there and let you, but don't ease into your touch or respond with their bodies in a way that lets you know it's okay and makes it feel natural. You're not getting your signals right. And y…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 02:53 PM
2

Off topic. No sexual strategy. Additionally, you're not entitled to anything just for existing and being male. That's lame-ass blue pill thinking. That you're special and have value just for being there. In the times long ago when biology really was the ruler of all things, guys like you didn't breed. A small fraction of the most awesome guys did. Then, people started farming and owning land and getting specialized pansy ass city jobs and religion took everything over and monogamous marriage was…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 02:46 PM
2

This is a line of thinking that is, on its surface, correct, but dangerous if taken to an absolute/autistic extreme. A lot of people think that they can walk out the door and get laid by doing the same old shit they've always done, but just change their mindset. That's loser-ass blue pill thinking. "If you're authentic and genuine and true to yourself, then all you have to do is confidently walk up and talk to girls, be yourself but own it and be confident about it, and you'll be successful." Wh…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 02:40 PM
14

This is one of those really, really basic things that guys forget when they get all tangled up in this manosphere BS. They read theories upon theories about women this and sex that and men this and frame that. A reformed slut wife puts a bunch of barriers in the way of sex with her dutiful beta husband because .... drumroll please .... she doesn't want to have sex with him. It's not cashing in on her transaction, it's not evil manipulation, it's not ensuring his investment before dishing out the…
/r/MarriedRedPill16/03/17 06:58 PM
1

This is actually a pretty interesting Red/Blue schism. A Red Piller would believe that a woman was the most real and the most true to herself and the most free and emotionally intimate when she was passionately interested in this hot guy the moment she saw him. When she just let go and gave in and let this attractive man lead her about the bedroom in an amazing sexual experience, then they just laid in bed for an hour afterward and talked about everything and nothing. They never saw each other a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 05:27 PM
3

I'll revise that first part a bit for you. Most natural guys don't have a problem with sluts being sluts. Not all of them would necessarily marry a slut, but when a guy has no problems getting laid from day one, some woman being a slut isn't a big deal to him. The ones who take serious moral objection to the existence of sluts are the loser men who can't get laid. Mostly incels. And their real complaint isn't "sluts are bad because low value" it's "sluts are bad because they're fucking everyone …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 05:16 PM
6

Most former manwhores marry sluts with little to no reservations about doing so. They don't care that she used be (is) a slut. They ran in those circles previously, they know a lot of slutty girls, and they're okay with slutty girls. Because they know exactly how to handle them, what to expect, etc. Most importantly, the kinds of guys who are able to be manwhores successfully are the kinds of guys who know with 100% certainty that they can find other women to fuck them. And the women they end up…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 04:43 PM
5

I think the greater issue than women devaluing themselves is that the women devalue you when you're their plan B guy. If you're Chad T. Cock, ultra-stud and wealthy entrepreneur with an amazing social life and fountains of pussy-on-tap in every city in the country, you don't really care if your wife or girlfriend is or was slutty, other than the financial risk you're taking marrying her. Because she's not your only source of sex. So her sex, whether she's having it or had it with you or anyone e…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 03:41 PM
3

When I married my wife, my count was 2, including her. Her count was 1, including me. This is just counting sexual intercourse, not every kiss or orgasm for either of us, because you have to draw the line somewhere. I probably would have married her if her count was 1-3. Including me. Not zero because not having sex with me before marriage and me still marrying her wasn't an option, even back in my lame-ass blue pill days. I would have liked to have had more sex before her, and think that my lac…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 02:08 PM
3

The blue pill sub is definitely hilarious. 99% of the "I just found out that my boyfriend is a real life red piller! Validate me!" threads are really just me trolling them. Classic internet shenanigans.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 06:17 PM
5

I still don't understand what makes this particular genetic abnormality special. I mean, if a guy prefers blonds to brunettes, won't date fat women, won't date black women, won't date a woman in a wheelchair, won't date women with any mental illness of any sort, won't date rape victims, won't date girls over 30, doesn't like girls who wear glasses, only fucks sluts without dating them, or any of the other 50,000 preferences a guy might have or shit that a woman might have wrong with her, then su…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 08:42 PM
12

Nope. I mean, let's get real. Lots of guys will say on the internet that they'll date a woman in a wheelchair, but will find a reason not to in the real world. In the real world, lots of guys don't date fat chicks, don't date different races, don't date chicks with mental illness -- I don't see how or why a serious genetic disorder that prevents puberty, renders a woman sterile, and requires lifetime hormone replacement therapy is somehow different or better than any other crap that can be wrong…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 08:08 PM
13

I don't think "outlier" means the same thing to most people that it does to you. For example, "That red pill crap would never work with me. I'm a billionaire with six PhDs who worked for twelve years as a prostitute and I'm also blind and deaf so the only way you can connect with me is emotionally, thus proving that the Red Pill is all bullshit and doesn't work!" would be an outlier. "Sometimes, you walk up to a woman and say/do the 'right' thing and still don't get laid" doesn't make her an out…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 07:58 PM
3

I think you're focusing on edge cases. For example, if you're psychologically screwed up -- like you have terrible parents, suffer abuse as a kid, are bona-fide autistic, have the serial killer gene, or something like that, to where you have very obvious psychological issues when you talk to somebody, then yes, your psychological issues will make you unattractive. I mean, essentially, at that point, you're like a guy in a wheelchair. You have a glaring disability. Your brain is in a wheelchair t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 11:03 PM
11

You're putting the cart before the horse. The root of everything is attractiveness. If you look like shit or act weird, most people, not just the opposite sex, will not like you. The less you're accepted by other people, the worse you maintain your appearance and the more socially weird you become. Because you are unattractive and fail at life, friendships, and relationships, you develop psychological problems and a hatred of the other sex. It's not the way you said (problems+hatred makes you un…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 10:46 PM
2

It's a no-win situation for women, engineered by women. If only 10% of the people in an industry are women, there's clearly sexism in play! But if no women are studying for or want to go into that field, that's clearly sexism as well! So we force people to have special woman-hiring programs, special woman incentives, and so on, so we end up with a lot of mediocre women in a field who never would have gotten hired if they'd been men with the same credentials and experience. Then, nobody likes the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 07:22 PM
2

That's generally been the liberal agenda. Indoctrinate children in elementary school. It's raised a lot of confused boys who hate themselves and other men. A few of them even want to become girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:11 PM
2

Normal people -- meaning not middle to upper middle class white people in Europe and in United States coastal urban centers -- are too busy working hard to worry about ideology. You can tell your local mechanic to respect his wife and hire more women, but he works with his hands, not at a desk, so your internet campaign won't reach him, and your TV commercials are just interrupting his football game, pissing him off. When your mechanic shows up and wants tax advice or legal work done, his paltry…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:07 PM
3

This wasn't employment discrimination. The employer was just fine. Even supportive. The clients of this business didn't respect the woman. Back in my first year of law school, we had a judge tell the students in our class that the women all needed to wear skirts in the courtroom. Not because he's sexist, but because the juries they face will be made up of working class people too stupid to get out of jury duty, and that class of people is a conservative class of people who don't like women in pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 03:52 PM
3

I don't think anybody argues against the fact that guys who look naturally manly are hawt, while guys who look like they heavily obsess over their appearance (like girls do) look gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 11:48 AM
2

Without sufficient money, you lose the house, the lights turn off, water stops running, your credit rating goes to hell. Even if you have enough money to subsist on one salary, the second salary is the difference between being able to eat out, go to events, enroll your kids in extracurricular activities, own nice things, and not have to dip into savings every time something breaks, versus counting every penny, scraping by on coupons, and having lots of anxiety over the budget. The #1 reason coup…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 11:27 PM
23

It's usually the other way, though plain old attraction does cause a woman to overlook your flaws and accentuate your positive traits. For example, a woman never thinks, "Wow! That guy is seriously muscular, and he sure seems like the life of the party. I can totally ignore the fact that he's unemployed and sleeps in a sleeping bag on the floor of an apartment in the slums and gets puking drunk every weekend because I just respect his muscles and outgoing socially apt personality so much!" Inste…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 09:29 PM
1

The blue pill position on this one is that sex is completely contextual. With hot fun guy from the bar she just met, sex can be 100% fun, casual, and meaningless. Just a recreational activity to scratch the itch. Like playing a video game. With serious relationship marriage guy, sex can be a big deal romantic activity, so she'll only do it if she really, really trusts him and his behavior has been top notch. And this makes perfect sense, because withholding sex from people you really love unless…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 09:21 PM
1

The next logical step for them is that because rape is often unprovable, then it's a given that some real rapists are getting away with it. And if some real rapists are getting away with it, then other men will be incentivized to rape because the odds of getting convicted and punished are smaller than the odds of conviction and punishment for other crimes. Therefore, as a society, we have an obligation to make the accusation into the punishment. Otherwise, real rapists are getting away with it a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:55 PM
2

This is often coupled with the fact that rape is hard to prove. It nearly always happens behind closed doors, women allegedly never report it or have a rape kit done so there's never any physical evidence. Just some she-said/he-said crap. Because it can't usually be proven, retarded liberal people believe we have this social obligation to do away with the need for proof entirely. Because otherwise, we'll never catch rapists. In crimes that are really heinous and really hard to prove, they're fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:07 PM
2

This goes beyond a feminism thing. It's a retarded liberal ideological thing. In the unamerican, retarded liberal mind, most "normal" people go their entire lives never being accused of rape or going to trial for anything. The mere fact that you were accused of a serious crime and went to trial, which most normal people never do, clearly means you did something wrong. You're clearly guilty of something because normal people don't get accused of rape and go to trial. Maybe you're better than a co…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 06:55 PM
64

You could probably simplify this down to just #1. Respect. If a woman truly respects you, then she respects your leadership, she's sexually open to you, she sees everything you do in the best light possible, and she's unlikely to cheat or leave (until she finds someone else she respects more, at which point her behavior toward you will noticeably change as she ceases to respect you). All of the specific advice like hygiene and not acting needy essentially boils down to "be respectable". Women re…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 06:49 PM
2

I suppose every family needs to weigh the costs and benefits. If you're a college-educated woman with significant earning potential, in most cases, the money you can earn working is far more useful to your family once your children are in school the majority of the day. When you can pay a maid service to clean your house, probably better than you would on your own, for as much as you make in an hour at your job, staying home from work and cleaning the house doesn't make any sense. Food prep, lau…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 04:44 PM
5

There's this theory that a lot of people buy into that being the social face of the family while the husband is at work is the woman's job. Being active in the community, joining the PTA and organizing school events, joining church groups, going to book clubs, having people over for dinner, organizing playdates for the kids, finding or organizing events and activities for the kids and their friends, keeping track of birthdays and weddings and babies in the extended social circle and sending gift…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 04:07 PM
2

Practice. You only learn that rejection isn't a big deal after a thousand rejections. Even Chad T. Cock, dudebro extraordinaire, gets blown off by women. Let's say you walk up to a girl. Before you even open your mouth, no matter who you are or what you look like, there's a roughly 50% chance that she's not going to be receptive to your approach. She could be having a bad day, her period, a raging yeast infection, a death in the family, be gay, have a husband or boyfriend she doesn't want to che…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 06:50 PM
2

False. But the reason isn't that women are useless and don't do anything. It's that not even women are stupid enough to skip work for no fucking reason just because of some made up internet thing. The only women skipping work are the radicals and primarily those who live in urban population centers at either coast. I live in an at-will employment state. It's not a thing here. The "Day Without Women" isn't going to prove anything about anything because it's not happening. A very small number of w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 06:31 PM
5

There are a few gems in there for the astute reader. 1) Talk to women. 2) Have a plan to get from saying hello to sex. Don't just talk, wait for her to say something, then react to what she says. Who's in charge here? 3) Don't listen to shit women say. Stick with the plan. Anything she says that moves toward sex (e.g., building attraction then building comfort), respond to in a fun manner. Anything she says that doesn't, ignore, withdraw, or neg/agree-amplify/make fun of her. 4) Throughout the p…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 05:23 PM
19

It's just stupid. The Wall Street bull isn't a symbol of Donald Trump, or a symbol of men and the patriarchy, or even a symbol of the government. It's a symbol for a bull market -- a period of success, growth, and prosperity. And on women's day, the women have chosen a symbol for themselves: A petulant, defiant child, standing in the way of success, growth, and prosperity. This is EXACTLY how misogynists picture women, too!
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:41 PM
35

Once again, women prove that they will stand against and defy prosperity and success for the sake of their own feelings and ideologies. "What do you mean a bull market is a good thing? Wall Street is a bunch of MEN who keep women down so our statue is opposing the bull statue! What do you mean Wall Street has nothing to do with misogyny? Men work there!"
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 12:33 PM
6

If you're a gambling man, statistics say that the huge majority of the nice girls you tried to turn into girlfriends over the years said or thought something similar while fucking some other guy outside of the context of a relationship, with no intention of pursuing a relationship with him. Not all women are fucking strangers in bar bathrooms five minutes after meeting them, but a huge number of women try out casual sex, and more women than you'd think have a few guys they fuck when they're in b…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 06:36 PM
2

Loving your kids is "emotional labor". Women shouldn't have to do that bullshit. Time for real men to step up and stop abusing women like that.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 06:00 PM
7

My kid's school has a male principal. Him and half the dads would easily take their lunch hours from work to cook the kids food. There'd be more volunteer help than the cafeteria could handle. Because men solve problems. Women bitch about problems until men solve them.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 05:53 PM
5

Exactly. Women experience an encounter with you as a series of disconnected events that just seem to magically happen. First you meet at this place and talk about this first thing, then this second thing, then out of the blue, the guy suggests they take a walk, and they just happen to end up at this other cool place where the guy knows people and seems really popular and awesome, and somehow, the conversation drifts to his exotic fish collection, and she comes over to see his aquarium and he's j…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 05:41 PM
17

To the untrained eye, the sock example seems like a stupid exaggeration. Like no real woman would act pissy over something so dumb. I assure you, women definitely notice and act badly over exactly that, and even stupider shit. Which is why, when a woman is acting badly, you don't bother directly addressing it. You stick to the plan: Sex. Too many guys are obsessively worried about coming up with the correct response to shit women say. As though the right responses to the right girl behaviors unl…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 12:03 PM
2

Do you have options with other women?
/r/askTRP06/03/17 07:17 PM
1

When you tell her no or make her pay her own way for something, does her treatment of you change, or does she withhold sex?
/r/askTRP06/03/17 06:58 PM
3

Those are yellow flags. Maybe not big red flags, but yellow ones. Doggy is a submissive position, and blowjobs are for your pleasure. Ideally, a woman submits to you in the bedroom, and is excited to be giving you pleasure. She gets off on getting you off. On an awesome, quality man having an orgasm over her. It makes her feel attractive when she can cause an awesome man to have an orgasm. How does she treat you? Respectfully? She never tells you to do anything -- always asks politely. She admir…
/r/askTRP06/03/17 06:49 PM
1

Good sex, on demand, any kind you want? And she lets you lead the sexual encounters?
/r/askTRP06/03/17 06:43 PM
23

Girl says... OOPS! You were paying attention to shit women say. If she is fucking you, she's into you. If she is not fucking you, she is not into you. If she is trying to get you to say and do things before she'll fuck you, she is shit-testing you, responsive to which you withdraw attention and fuck someone else, and maybe try her again in a week. Three times in a row and you just go no-contact. Maybe she reaches out to you in the future, maybe not, but if she does, you immediately escalate and …
/r/askTRP06/03/17 06:41 PM
1

How's the sex life?
/r/askTRP06/03/17 06:38 PM
46

Should i give no fucks about a woman status,(boyfriend, married, etc)? When a woman is "in a relationship" with another guy, but you're fucking her, that doesn't mean you're the backup plan. It means the boyfriend is. You're getting the pussy without having to commit or invest in a relationship. He's spending money on dates and gifts and putting a bunch of time into her for chaste cuddles and the occasional fuck just to keep him strung along. What do you think of telling a woman who is taken to …
/r/TheRedPill06/03/17 05:12 PM
35

Why are you arguing with a woman about shit the woman said? Women are for fucking. Every single woman on Earth is going to have other guys waiting in the wings. Intentionally. If she leaves or cheats, it just means it's not your turn any more. She found someone she likes better, or she just thought she could get away with it. Time to move on. You get to keep fucking the woman by not giving a shit, because: 1) You know you're better than 99.999 percent of the guys she has sniffing after her; 2) Y…
/r/askTRP06/03/17 05:04 PM
164

The lesson to take from Jake is that when your friends are telling you that your girlfriend is a slut and a half, it's not because they're jealous of your happiness. A lot of otherwise good guys get bogged down by pride. "I know my woman. I know our relationship. I know more about this than any of you because I'm right here, on the inside of this relationship. What the fuck do you guys know about my girl? She'd never be a slutty ho!" Guys forget that when you're close to something, it's impossib…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/17 03:11 PM
18

A lot of exes do that. They want to verify that their old boyfriend is still into them. That they could get him back again if they wanted. Once he verifies that yes, he is a total loser that would consider her again, she stops replying. She's validated, and she's confirmed that the guy she dropped is a loser. No need to keep communicating until the next time she needs a little affirmation.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/17 02:05 PM
6

I'd have responded "who is this" or not at all.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/17 12:47 PM
16

There is absolutely nothing wrong with not drinking. But going around telling people that you're not drinking, explaining why you're not drinking, justifying why it's okay not to drink at this occasion, and so forth is stupid and weird. When you're sipping some clear fizzy liquid from a glass that includes ice and a wedge of lime, you don't need to run around telling all of the women within earshot that it's just club soda, then begin explaining why you're not drinking and why it's okay.
/r/askTRP04/03/17 07:02 PM
2

Daygame is easier anyway. It's really just "how to have a conversation". The aggressive "game" guys spit out at clubs and bars late at night doesn't fly when you approach a girl alone in a coffee shop by the light of day. Even if she's a club slut that's about to go get fucked in three hours. By day, she's not in slut mode. So really, all you have to demonstrate to her is: 1) I'm good looking; 2) I'm confident enough to walk my ass up to you and talk; and 3) I know how to talk to people and be r…
/r/askTRP03/03/17 09:11 PM
12

You fucked up by not closing. Women cuddle their oribters all the time. They use "beta" losers for emotional cuddles while fucking better men who don't bother cuddling them. You stood up and tried to tell her, "Nuh uh. I belong in column A, not column B". She then proceeded to treat you like a column B guy, didn't fuck you, just like a column B guy, and you were placated by the cuddles, just like a column B guy. You've upgraded yourself from chatty orbiter to cuddling orbiter, if you really cons…
/r/askTRP03/03/17 09:07 PM
1

Why force yourself to go to places you don't like where you won't have fun? It's not like you can't meet people somewhere more low key and quiet. If you think bars and clubs and parties are the only sources of sluts in the universe, you sorely underestimate the number of sluts in the world.
/r/askTRP03/03/17 09:02 PM
11

Make her a plate instead. You already know she's not special. So why not actually experience that she's not special? If you don't want to be with her, have FUN with her. Keep fucking her brains out and keep your balls drained, all while cultivating other women. Move on when you're sick of her, she becomes difficult, or you don't have the time due to other women. Treat her the same way she's treating you. Go through the motions, have some fun sex, find other partners, cheat or leave if you find s…
/r/askTRP03/03/17 09:01 PM
1

Yeah. I meant to type "MGTOW losers except for Typhoon_Ashbite", but then decided I don't care enough about you to make 20 more keystrokes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 08:17 PM
2

You know, I read that as him using "cunt" twice instead of "chinks" the first time and "cunt" the second time. Goes to show where my head is. I love Asians and hate women!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 06:39 PM
1

Reddit is a great example of this phenomenon. Most people think something about a topic. And they believe they're right. They believe it's obvious that they're right and that it's crazy that anybody else could think a different way. It's soooo obvious that they're right that anybody who expresses a different viewpoint is clearly just trolling, and if not, there's something wrong with that person. No, that person doesn't just think something different -- there is something wrong with that person …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 04:41 PM
3

You don't understand the mind of the justice warrior. They aren't out for a just world where the punishment fits the crime. They're out to change the world. They genuinely want to purge the world of bigotry and wrong-thinking and usher us into a new era where everybody is taught to think the right way from birth, discrimination doesn't exist in the slightest, and we dance about in this great utopia where everybody can just be whatever which way they want with no judgment or expectations, because…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 04:02 PM
2

Today in society, bigotry is the worst boogeyman ever. And the same free speech some guy has to say and think whatever he wants also applies to the people who go out and try to ruin his life for thinking and saying wrong things. It cuts the other way, too. If you run a business, you don't have to hire, promote, or serve people you don't agree with. I pass over women's resumes all the time because I don't like working with them. If I can get a guy talking about dumbass liberal ideologies during a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 02:59 PM
3

Honestly, you fell for internet rage-bait. Someone wrote an article full of click-bait terms, you clicked on it, you read, and you reacted. This dude is some Tinder asshole. He introduces himself as tall and white, and because he used "white" as a descriptor of himself, the article runs with that and declares "look at this racist sexist asshole!" He didn't say anything negative about any race. But if you see a title that says, "See what this racist sexist guy did on Tinder!", you'll click. And o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 01:59 PM
1

We're splitting hairs over word definitions at that point. I'd call the want/need for a challenging, assertive, dominant partner a form of submissiveness. You don't have to like being spanked to thrive with a partner that's in charge of at least some things in your joint life. If we really want to get hyper-technical, we could divide submissiveness into actual BDSM-style submissiveness versus a need/tolerance for partner dominance without actually "submitting" to them, but it's kind of the same …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 01:51 PM
17

That's Bob! I taught him everything he knows! He's totally one of us! Anybody who's mean to a woman is!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 11:08 AM
2

Right. Dominance and desire for dominance/submissiveness in partners isn't an on/off switch. More of a spectrum. I might be a 5/10 for dominance, while my wife needs a 7/10, resulting in a strained marriage and a wife who doesn't want to fuck me or treat me like a human unless I go all Red Pill alpha manly man. And I might be a 3/10 for submissiveness, so my wife's 6/10 dominance irritates the shit out of me. An "average man" probably wants a woman who ranks about 3-5 in dominance. But there are…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 11:15 PM
2

He might, he might not. That's what I meant by dominance and submissiveness being separate axes. A guy could be highly dominant, but have zero need or tolerance for dominance in his woman. Or a guy could be dominant, but have zero tolerance for a submissive mouse of a woman who can barely articulate what she wants from him in plain English. And everything in between. Likewise, a guy could be very non-dominant, but also have no use for a controlling bitch of a woman trying to boss him around or c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 09:26 PM
8

That's a really great link! I think more broadly stated, dominance and submission are two different axes. For example, you can be non-dominant without also being submissive. "Submissiveness" is just your tolerance (or need) for your partner to be dominant. That link really only discusses a woman's tolerance for dominance, but this all applies to guys, too, not just women. For example, some guys are totally non-dominant, but also non-submissive. Take some MGTOW loser who's slovenly, underemployed…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 06:26 PM
4

Look. Your roomie/best friend is getting used. Your plate probably wants you to up the ante and make her a girlfriend, so she's messing around with your roommate. It's not like she thinks you're not going to find out. And he's the kind of dumbass guy who thinks he can save a ho. That all she's really missing is the love of a man who treats her right. Which is silly. She's not after the love of a wiener loser man. You're the one who's treating her right. She's after your love. But if she thinks s…
/r/askTRP02/03/17 05:32 PM
2

Right. You're not supposed to show up at her girls' nights or go through her phone. But the idea that you could at any time, and that it would be okay and acceptable (rather than something she demanded you not do because it's her private time and not your business), keeps her honest. When you're married, you don't have parts of your lives that are walled off from each other. If your wife's friends don't like you or want you around, or are the type of people who insist she seek privacy from her o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 05:25 PM
6

So...what exactly? You're not exclusively dating this girl and don't want to. But you want to be kinda sorta restrictively non-exclusive? As in, she can date and fuck other people, but not your roommate? So, not exclusive, but restrictively non-exclusive? And you want your roommate, who you're also not dating and doesn't owe you shit, to date and fuck whoever he wants, but not any girl you're non-exclusively fucking? You need a new best friend anyway, but not because he did anything wrong. Your …
/r/askTRP02/03/17 04:40 PM
2

Intersectionality is Essentially a desperate grab by feminism to attempt to remain relevant. Because women's issues are fairly trivial and unimportant nowadays. Feminism already accomplished its goals. Women vote, go to college, have jobs, own properly, file for divorce, and have 100% of the same legal rights as men. So now, in order to remain relevant, feminism needs to piggy-back on every single other bigotry issue in the world. "Your race is discriminated against? So are women! This intersect…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 03:22 PM
2

There's a difference between, "You really don't want to come, and frankly, my friends and I would have a better time on our own" and "You absolutely can't come. This is my private time to do what I want and it's none of your business." Flip it the other way. If your wife is going out to bars with her girlfriends and makes it clear that she doesn't want you there, you're not welcome, and what she does when you're not there is none of your business -- you just have to trust her -- that sounds pret…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 02:24 AM
2

I would assume, if you're married, that your wife is invited to every single one of your hobbies and to hang out with your friends every single time you go, right? I mean, she may choose not to, and you may even prefer she not be there, but she'd be invited if she wanted to be there, right? You wouldn't say, "No, you can't come out with me and my friends. This is my time and my personal private life" to your wife, would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 08:44 PM
3

I don't find most black women hot, but that one's a cutie. I'd give her an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 04:15 PM
23

Agreed. Going to the gym is a solitary endeavor. It's a great foundation for other fitness activities, but is not, on its own, a full source of physical development. If you don't do a martial art, you should be doing something besides just moving weights at the gym. Get into a sport. Train for races and join a running group. Or cycling group. Or go out for those crazy-ass fitness games competitions. Or learn rock climbing or get into hiking or mountains or spelunking or something, anything, besi…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/17 03:47 PM
3

College was definitely an eye-opener. Two days in, and I was face to face with the fact that my experiences were not everyone's experiences. Which is really the point of college. Getting good grades and a piece of paper that gets you job, even though you didn't learn anything about actually doing your job in the process of getting that piece of paper, is secondary to the socialization aspect of college life. I think a non-insignificant portion of this gender war crap came about because of the in…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 10:34 PM
7

Where are you from? And what years were you there? It was about 50-50 at my high school, and nearly exclusively along racial/socioeconomic lines. I actually was ridiculed among my peers, of both sexes, for losing my virginity at 17, and it was harder for me to find girlfriends among the circles I ran in because I'd had sex. The upper middle class white kids in honors classes starting college with enough credits to be a sophomore were primarily virgins. The ones that had sex were talked about. Bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 10:03 PM
14

This is a heavily generational and regionally influenced thing. For example, if you were born in the 1970s in the deep south and raised in nearly all-white upper middle class havens, a lot of kids from "good families" spent their high school days taking super-duper high level classes to get college credit ahead of time instead of partying. And sex education was pretty much all about abstinence. The college-bound crowd would date, but sex before college was a rarity. It was totally normal for a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 09:36 PM
2

So as a matter of decency, you want to have the ability to hide shit from your partner and want to have parts of your life that are none of her business? Because that's how she shows trust? By allowing you to have the ability to fuck around behind her back and just assuming you won't use it? Refusing to check up on you as a show of trust? That sounds harrowing and stressful. You want blind, implicit trust, and she can't even check up on you or she's being a bad girlfriend. Insecure. Probably eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 08:45 PM
3

If you're not doing shit you shouldn't with your cell phone, what's it matter if she goes through your text messages? You want trust to be assumed, but you also want to keep secrets from your partner and have parts of your life that are none of her business?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 07:43 PM
2

As I said, if a woman is 100% comfortable in the relationship, assured that you are invested in her, that you don't want to leave, that you trust her, and worst of all, that you're not in possession of any other opportunities with other girls were she to fuck up in a manner that would otherwise warrant dumping her, she will no longer continue to bring her A-game. A woman who wants to keep you will do exactly as much work as she needs to in order to keep you, and no more. Interestingly, it is ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 07:18 PM
5

You don't trust women. Women prove themselves. Every day. Every second is an audition. They need to constantly feel like they are working for your continued attention and interest. They need to value and respect you. Then, it practically doesn't matter if they're lying. Women don't want to fuck things up with a guy they value, so if a woman is actually a good one, she's gonna stay that way. And if she's not, she'll act the part for as long as it takes. You never just assume, "Okay. It's been X n…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 05:20 PM
6

99.9 percent of women aren't LTR material. It's up to the woman to distinguish herself and prove she's worth a shit. Not the man's job to dig and dig and find something worthwhile about her, or to assume she's great until she finally fucks up or gets caught in a lie. Putting out early is a huge slut-tell. If she's fucking you on date #1, then she's done it for others. She's no stranger to dick, early and often. But making you wait is a huge bitch-tell if and only if this is not her normal way of…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 04:42 PM
16

Don't tell women about your financial situation. You have money, you spend money on shit you want. Your shit is together. That's all she needs to know. You don't tell your children about the budget. Likewise, you don't tell women you're fucking how much you have left to pay on the mortgage. You have a place where you sleep. When you want to sleep there, you sleep there. When you want to fuck her there, you bring her there to fuck. That's all she needs to know about the place.
/r/askTRP28/02/17 03:30 PM
12

Yup. Maybe if she announces her engagement, it'll make the real boyfriend jealous enough to fly back and fuck her again. You are a prop. A tool to get what she actually wants.
/r/askTRP27/02/17 08:22 PM
20

The kind of guy who turned a girl into a girlfriend after two months, and has to ask the internet whether the e-mail conversation he snooped on is a bad sign, is not the kind of guy who can casually fuck her while cultivating other women on the side.
/r/askTRP27/02/17 07:23 PM
75

Fuck you. You actually have to ask if this is a reason to turn your "girlfriend" you met two months ago (LTRing a girl you met two months ago is already stupid) into an ex-girlfriend? Seriously, fuck you. Now for some constructive details: Do not confront her about this. Do not tell her you know about this. Simply tell her that things aren't working out, you're not feeling it, and you're done. She will yell and scream and cry and beg and plead and badger you to give her closure and reasons, hopi…
/r/askTRP27/02/17 03:30 PM
4

A man said something that a woman didn't like = misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 02:48 PM
6

You'd have to define "mansplaining" for this one. For some women, explaining anything while being male is misogynistic. For others, explaining is only mansplaining if you're talking down or dumbing down simple concepts by misogynistically assuming a woman won't understand otherwise. (But when a woman talks down to men, it's not sexist.) For others, mansplaining is simply a man talking too much and not giving women an opportunity to speak enough, or cutting off or interrupting women too frequentl…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 02:29 PM
9

The blue side believes girls are magical psychic beings. That all guys have a tell, and if they're not being 100 percent genuine, honest, and open, girls pick up on it. Therefore, if you fail it's never a woman randomly being shallow or bitchy. It's always your fault because she can magically smell socially awkward, red pill-ness, and if only you were actually confident and actually genuine and actually respectful, you'd get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 12:43 PM

Thank heavens feminism is going to fix these issues for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 01:54 PM
3

Sure, ideally, you have sex with someone you love, but it's quite the life quest to chase after love. Prioritizing romance isn't any better of a goal than prioritizing sex. Sex and romance are fun accessory things you do in your spare time. They're not the point of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 03:52 AM
4

The people you're friends with and the people you have sex with don't have to be the same people. They can be, but the hypothetical OP was essentially asking was "If sex was unlimited - no longer an uncertainty and you could get it whenever without playing the game and connecting with women (either for real or just faking it to get laid), then you'd start trying to connect with women more, right?" No. Some women you fuck. Some women and men you hang with. The two groups of women don't have to ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 03:42 AM
3

I want a santoku knife that slices really well and holds an edge when I go to town on a ten pound bag of sweet potatoes. I don't care if the knife is good for smashing garlic because I own a garlic press. Likewise, I want a fuck partner that's good for fucking. If I want a friend, that friend doesn't have to be my fuck partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 01:00 AM
7

A lot of guys place too much weight on who they're fucking. Even the Red Pill guys. Some part of them still desperately hopes that they'll eventually meet a good woman. Maybe they will, maybe they won't, but at the end of the day, fucking is just something you do when you're horny. Sex isn't a very good goal in life. Your life needs to have so much more to it than just the pursuit of sex. However, a romantic relationship is an equally crappy end goal. People who place all of this weight on who t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 12:40 AM
4

This is one of those man-woman things. In your case, the issue is that you have 10 willing men who will fuck you tonight, and a different 10 men every other day of the week, but you can only fuck one tonight, because the other 9 men are going to go away. So you want the best one of those 10 to make sure your experience tonight is a good one. Whereas, I'd want a quick fuck with a hot girl, then go back to something interesting. I'm not looking to her for someone to hang out with or be my best fri…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 12:23 AM
3

It's a bad hypothetical. You might have tried "if two women were 100% identical in looks, and you could only fuck one of them ..." The one who's less bitchy, more pleasant and fun to be around. Duh. Personality matters, but it doesn't outweigh attractiveness. If a woman doesn't pass the boner test, she doesn't get to play. And if you're just fucking her and not hanging out (which would be the case if you had a limitless supply of willing women to fuck), it barely matters at all. Luckily, in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 12:04 AM
1

This question presupposes that I would be hanging out with one or more of this endless supply of hot chicks for purposes other than sex. If I had an endless supply of hot chicks to fuck, that would completely relieve me of the need to hang out and build rapport with girls to get sex. I can talk to my actual friends and do my own damn laundry. I don't need women for that. I need women for fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 11:43 PM
3

Most omegas have given up anyway and just enjoy ranting on the internet. They don't want to be "beta" or "alpha", just to get attention and pat each other on the back for ranting hard. They'll tell you, "I went out to this bar and stared really hard at this girl with fuck-me alpha eyes for two full minutes, and she looked away first. So I knew she was ready to submit to me. But when I walked over, she ran off, said something to some of her big Chad friends, and they came over and beat me up. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 10:53 PM
5

It's almost like TRP needs some kind of charm school division. If your biggest problems are that you're visually unappealing, stink, dress like crap, are lazy as fuck, and the last time you left your computer and engaged in a conversation with an actual human being was six years ago, which resulted in you spending the night in prison, you ought to attend "how to be a good beta" school. Because even that would be a serious upgrade. I think an "omega" guy needs to learn how to be "beta" before he …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 09:26 PM
5

You would think that, but internalizing that women are dumbass children really helps you treat them in a fun way -- like they're your bratty sister. That's way more attractive than acting like they're equal human beings while you try to have a lively discussion about your interests and wait for her to invite you to touch her. I know, you read a bunch of woman-hating crap on the internet, and you picture real world Red Pill guys running around calling women bitches and sluts to their faces and sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:39 PM
4

Probably on The Red Pill subreddit. I also forgot to mention that women suck. I'm getting kind of forgetful and lazy in my old age.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:27 PM
5

Oh come on. If you'd met me in college, 15 pounds lighter and dressed like I raided a Wal-Mart in 1982, among all the goggles and beakers, and you knew how quickly and accurately I could titrate and tell you the molarities of the samples in class ... it would so be on. I was totally the alpha. I even helped girls with their labwork.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:08 PM
11

That's also the core message of TRP. It's just also fun to shit on women. Being completely honest with you, The Red Pill subreddit is about 20% normal "beta" guys who really benefit from changing their mindset, working out more, developing socially, and treating girls differently. The other 80% are unfixable "omega" guys who have some serious problems (usually appearance and social skills) that need to be corrected before they even have the slightest chance with a girl, but they'd rather complai…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:52 PM
5

Okay. Duncan Haldane, going on tour in your city giving speeches at local high schools, then showing up in town square to pour the cement for the new sidewalk being named in his honor -- very manly, very showy, he's the man of the hour, people are respecting him and listening to what he has to say. But he's an older, balding nerdy guy. Sexy?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:48 PM
8

Right. Gregory Peck building homes for habitat for humanity is way hotter than Rick Moranis doing so. Holding a hammer and making a difference is way sexier when the person holding the hammer is already your type.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:42 PM
5

Men battle to keep back the effects of age, much like women do. The big difference is that most men peak in their mid 30s instead of their early-mid 20s like women. While some guys are hot in their 20s and let themselves go a bit in their 30s, most guys in their 20s are not hot and end up getting their lives in gear and taking better care of themselves later in life. They end up looking better at 30 than 20. Plus, generally, society prefers the mid 30s male look over the young 20s male look. And…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:39 PM
12

When the bearded manly-man fixes his elderly neighbor's sink for her, that's not hot because it's nice. It's hot because it's manly and nice. When the grunge guitarist stops to give some change to a homeless guy on the way home and has a heartfelt human conversation with him, it's not hot because it's nice. It's hot because he's hot, and nice. When the artsy hipster takes the time to raise funds for the gay kid's hospital bills after the school bullies beat him up, his pro-homosexual, charitable…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:33 PM
3

Yeah. I'm picturing Rick Moranis without fame or money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:26 PM
14

Grown up nerds aren't masculine, and women who marry unmasculine grown up nerds aren't doing it because they're attracted to his masculinity. I'm not saying women are deliberately lining up a divorce target once Chad stops texting back. Women don't actually like being screwed over by Chad for the 150th time. The sex is good. The whirlwind short-term relationship is exciting while it lasts, and the thought that this time, it might actually pan out keeps her going...until it doesn't. But after mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:19 PM
6

Women are for fucking. Make real friends. Stop trying to use your girlfriend as a friend.
/r/askTRP24/02/17 11:08 AM
1

Good thing you didn't die in a fire.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/17 12:51 PM
2

It's just a bit ass-backward. A woman may say "I like X", but the full story is "I absolutely require Y and will not consider a guy who is not Y. If two guys are absolutely equal with regard to Y, I prefer the one that is more X. But if one of the guys is a single point higher in Y, I'll go with him, because X is 100% optional, while Y is 100% required. I have no fucking clue why I tell people 'I like X' and don't even mention Y."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 04:55 AM
15

GF told me... Long story short, GF and I had a talk and she said... WTF was she talking about? no one in my life has ever said anything like that... She said I... Whoops! You were listening to shit women say. How frequent and enthusiastic is the sex?
/r/askTRP18/02/17 03:47 AM
5

More of the same. However many men take an interest in The Red Pill, about 80% will be hopeless losers, and 20% will be fixable losers.
/r/askTRP18/02/17 03:26 AM
6

Often, women say, "I like X", but then end up dating an attractive man who's not X at all. A lot of the time, the woman saying that doesn't even like X. Her last couple of boyfriends just happened to be X and she kinda liked it, she guesses. Then some other awesome guy comes along, and she breaks all of her old rules about what she said she liked and what she thought she wanted because she just feels so special about this guy. Attractiveness is so important that "I like X" doesn't even matter. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 10:55 PM
18

Now, you are right that a lot of people on the Red Pill whine and complain about things so they probably associate all Red Pillers as being that way. True. I also think that a portion of them find the Red Pill true and they don't want to admit it so they vehemently disagree with it. False. Most people in the world have some sex, some relationships, and end up married. They don't do anything special for that to happen or for life to turn out that way. Only a very small segment of men in the world…
/r/askTRP17/02/17 10:49 PM
25

Let's get real for a minute. About 80% of The Red Pill subreddit's advocates are whining internet losers who suck at life. They lack even the basic building blocks for a successful life, and those that do have these building blocks lack the discipline to actually use them. About 20% of The Red Pill subreddit's advocates actually get laid and do productive shit. They were trying the wrong stuff and moving in the wrong direction, and TRP got them back on track. So when you show your face anywhere …
/r/askTRP17/02/17 09:38 PM
2

You don't think that's also needy? I guess he gets partial credit for killing himself without shooting anybody else first. But if he'd learned how to actually get laid, his life could have been saved. Threatening to kill yourself over a prospective sexual/romantic partner is something bipolar women do. It's a feminine move, not a masculine one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 09:04 PM
2

Needy. He supplicates because he thinks it will make a woman do for him when he wants something. He thinks he's scoring points by being a supplicating wimp and that he ought to be able to cash in on those points later. Then, when the woman won't put out for him or return his kindness, even after all he's done for her, and ends up fucking some asshole who doesn't do shit for her, he shoots up a university then kills himself. If he'd found the Red Pill, lives would have been saved.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 08:50 PM
2

Red Pill techniques work on beta men, because beta men are feminine. Beta men thrive on women dominating the conversation, leading them, and would just about cream their pants if a woman actually overtly escalated with them. They like to be told what to do by women so they can do it, expecting approval. When a woman they like doesn't text back for 30 minutes, they angst out wondering why. When a woman they like starts flirting with another guy, they rush to mate-guard and invest further in her. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 08:22 PM
22

The Red Pill shorthand for this is that unattractive guys (e.g., the lower 80%) are invisible to women. So when a woman says "I like nerdy guys", what she means is that after you eliminate every unattractive guy from view and focus on the small percentage of guys she'd actually fuck, she prefers the smarter portion of those remaining guys. Every time a woman says "I like X in a man", you have to append the clause "When selecting from among the small percentage of men I actually find attractive .…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:25 PM
2

Sounds like you're going to end up pushing a boat across a river and thinking you're really deep for taking solace in it.
/r/askTRP17/02/17 03:08 PM
5

"I like guys with impaired vision that need corrective lenses to drive" just doesn't sound quite as sexy as "I like nerdy guys". Everything sounds smarter if you put a lab coat and glasses on before saying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:03 PM
3

So "nerd" is synonymous with "glasses fetish" or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 02:42 PM
29

"I like guys who can hold a conversation about topics I personally feel are intellectual, who are also attractive." When a woman likes nerdy guys, she never likes the slovenly fat guys who play computer games and eat Cheetos all day, or the skeletal beanpoles with bad posture and four-inch thick glasses and zero social skills. Women who like nerdy guys like attractive guys who are also intellectual. It is not the "nerdiness" that makes a man attractive. It's the nerdiness that makes her choose a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 02:38 PM
2

I dunno about this one. It's fairly black and white. If you're over at another couple's house for dinner and the food sucks ass, you thank them for dinner. You don't tell them how to improve for next time. Not even as a gentle correction. You wouldn't think of criticizing them. That would be rude as hell. Why would you treat your husband worse when he cooks for you? You should be treating your husband better than your acquaintances, friends, and coworkers. Not worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 04:07 AM
1

It's downright rude to piss on thoughtful gestures with corrections and criticisms. If your husband cooks you dinner, and instead of being overwhelmed with gratitude for his thoughtfulness, you point out the five or six things he should do differently next time (thinking that you're being helpful), there may not be a next time. You wouldn't tell a friend or coworker that you hate the birthday gift they got you and suggest how they could improve next year. You'd politely say thank you. Why would …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:52 AM
2

A mundane chore can be a non-ordinary situation for a particular couple. Let's say you always wash the dishes, while your husband folds the laundry, but today, your husband gets home an hour early from work and washes the dishes for you, in addition to doing his own regular share of the chores. That's exceptional, for him. Yes, he did something basic and mundane and something that you were more than capable of handling, and something that's pretty expected for most couples. I mean, if you were s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:36 AM
5

Wow, her husband is a grown man capable of doing grocery shopping. Yeah, she should be kissing his feet in gratitude alright. You are a prime example of what is wrong with modern women. The very notion of showing gratitude to a man who did a basic task that was, yes basic, and yes easy, and yes something you could have well done yourself, but now that he did it, you don't have to do it, is beneath you. Not only is it mundane and expected that your man do this shit for you simply because he's an …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:14 AM
0

The "Red Pill" analysis of this is that it's a matter of attraction. If you look like a Greek god, fuck like a champ, make five million bucks a year, and every one of your wife's friends wants to fuck you and every one of their husbands wants to be you, your wife won't say a damn thing about the hamburger meat and will pick up the pile of dirty clothes you leave for her on the floor with a smile. If you're an average Joe, your wife will give you some pointers on how the dinner you cooked her cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:42 PM
2

There was actually some blog post or article out there that I read some time ago, about a reformed mean wife. One example of her past bitchiness that she referenced was this time when her husband came home with the groceries, but had gotten the wrong kind of hamburger meat. She was pissed off and tore into him. How could he not know what kind of hamburger meat she had been buying for years? How could he be so stupid and inattentive as to buy the wrong meat? Down the line, she realized it was onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:27 PM
5

If you're having a medical emergency, I think we can excuse your behavior until you're able to breathe again. More like your boyfriend is over at your apartment. While you're out of the room taking the world's smelliest dump, he sees the full laundry basket next to the foot of your bed and decides to fold your towels for you and put them away. You come out and say, "Oh...you folded the towels. But you did them the long way first instead of the short way first. Didn't you see how the rest of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:56 PM
5

If she were 16, that would be pretty illegal. She's 21. She's grown up. I mean, is she going to show up at professional work functions of yours wearing a cheerleader uniform, chewing gum, giggling like she's 12, and twirling her hair as she gets drunk and dances topless on the table? She's a real person, not a cartoon character 21 year old, right?
/r/askTRP16/02/17 07:48 PM
7

Lacking gratitude. When you do a good or helpful thing for a woman -- not a gift (everyone acts grateful for gifts, even when they hate them) but just something normal to help them along with their lives -- and she points out what you did wrong. Bonus points if she turns it into a backhanded complement (e.g., "I appreciate the thought/effort, but ...") Double bonus points if she starts expecting you to continue doing the thing you tried to do the first time, even though she pissed all over you f…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:41 PM
2

The accurate Red Pill analysis of this phenomenon is that effort isn't sexy. A beefy guy who looks like he played high school football, had summer jobs at a warehouse loading sacks of heavy shit into trucks, and knows his way around a shed of power tools and could fix everything in your house over the weekend is gritty and masculine. He's beefy and strong and capable, but not sculpted. He looks like the kind of guy who's naturally strong and manly, rather than the kind of guy who dedicates signi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:32 PM
2

Your returns get more and more marginal the more you put into fitness and nutrition. If you want to get rid of that last little pooch around your belly button, you have to be pretty insane about alcohol, sugar/carbs, cardio, and weights. If you're over 30 years old and your body fat is 10% or higher, you're gonna have a small bulge at the bellybutton. You'd need to drop to 7 or 8% to get away from that, which is way hard. I mean, if you have food in your belly currently, shit in your intestines,…
/r/askMRP16/02/17 06:12 PM
5

That's just like a woman. Thinking that when you're married to a guy, you own all of his shit, not just half of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:07 PM
5

Remember, the bottom 80% of men are invisible to women. So when a woman says, "I don't like big muscles", what she means is that after you eliminate the bottom 80% from view and are looking at the hottest 20% of men, she prefers guys who have average-ish builds among those men, rather than average among all men. So unless you're a jacked-up circus strongman roid-monkey, you don't have much to worry about. Just land somewhere in the middle of the upper echelon, and you're "not too muscular". Wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:33 PM
13

This post is only part of the problem. Where Reddit nerds go wrong at the gym is that they're socially inept weirdos who don't have friends. Starting strength is just fine if you read, watch, and research how to do the exercises properly, with proper form. A bad squat will fuck you up, or best case, won't build muscle worth shit because you're doing about 20% of the movement right. If you go to the gym with a friend who's also doing the same workout routine, he can tell you, "Dude, you're doing …
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 02:49 AM
2

You're diverging a bit into the trivial details. In theory, if I get paid more for my position than other people at my place of employment who have the same job title, then I'm a better employee and my employer has chosen to reward my higher productivity and the value I add to the company with greater compensation. It would be stupid to assume otherwise. Why would my employer hand me extra money just because I'm male? He'd rather keep his money. He's not sitting on a huge pile of extra money tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 06:26 PM
3

Feminism is the farthest thing in the world from equality. I mean, it's named "feminism", not people-ism. It's a pro-woman movement that seeks to elevate females. It is a movement for equalization, not equality. They believe that women have it bad, so we need to do things that lower men and raise women to equalize things. Something that lowers one sex or raises another is, by definition, not an equality-minded thing. A movement grounded in equality would care about human rights, not women's righ…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 05:11 PM
6

That's really the only logical definition of patriarchy. Not even socialism, actually. More like affirmative action for men because loser men can't succeed on their own. Men being elevated and privileged (above women and/or in general) simply because they are men and not due to their individual merits. Feminists fought to end the patriarchy because they felt that women were not being valued due to their merits, but were instead being automatically ranked lower than men, while the men were being …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 03:45 PM
65

It's a testament to our crazy modern society. People want to be good-looking. They're obsessed with looks. People barely think about health or strength. So the only reason most people work out or eat right is to be good-looking, the only reason they hate being fat is because they're not good looking, and the main reason they hate being judged for fatness is because they feel it's shallow to be judged based on their looks. Fat is unhealthy. If your wife is 300 pounds, she's going to cost more to …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 02:08 PM
1

This is how the left lost. They're not the party of the people any more. Just the party of those people. They completely alienated and marginalized normal people. And not just a little bit. They told the normal people who made this country great that they're evil. Then said "don't vote for the other guy, or you're a bigot!" Bigotry isn't as powerful of a boogeyman as it used to be. Telling people "if you're bigoted, you can't be in the club" doesn't work when you already kicked everybody who's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:02 AM
4

Bob and Chad think the patriarchy is gone because they both work hard for everything they get and don't get anything automatically for being male. Bob is especially incensed by this and rants on the internet about how unfair his life is. Chad actually amounts to something so he doesn't care. Stacy refuses to identify as a feminist or think too hard about anything because she's pretty and her life is easy as a woman. Walda has a lot of fun in her 20s, but once she's 37, she realizes she feels bad…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 12:17 AM
5

Cool. When I move to China, I'll make a point of reevaluating my position. In the event that I don't move to China, I will continue laughing at women.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 11:17 PM
6

There is still prejudice and discrimination against women in favor of men. So for a lot of women the Patriarchy continues to oppress The patriarchy is dead. Nobody likes Beta Bob. Even women outrank him in society. The hierarchy goes like this: Chad ("the cad") T. Cock > Stacey Slut > Walda Wallfower > Fatima ("fatty") Fatterson > Beta Bob > Srinivashiva Omegasarian Before the civil rights movement and feminism wiped out the patriarchy, it went like this: Bob > Chad > Stacy (not as slutty becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 11:04 PM
11

This is off-base. The "patriarchy" doesn't benefit masculine men. It benefits "beta" males. Back when a normal, average, loser man with a normal, average job, who didn't stand out in any way, could still make something of his life and end up with one or more women -- that was the patriarchy. Under the evil patriarchy, women were socially dependent on the institution of marriage and financially dependent on men. This forced women to marry normal, average, worker bee men and have their children. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 07:30 PM
14

The Red Pill literally saved my marriage. We were fighting all the time, on the brink of divorce, sex was nearly nonexistent. I did so much for her and for our daughter, and it was never right, never good enough. I poured everything into our marriage and our family and gave so much up, and it just kept getting worse and worse. I really didn't have anything left to give. I was far from perfect, but I was really doing my best, and frankly, was taking good care of my family. I actually tried this R…
/r/MarriedRedPill14/02/17 04:12 PM
2

What you say makes plenty of logical sense. Unfortunately, women aren't logical. The huge majority of women don't hold men to the same slut standards. Even women who say they care about promiscuity in partners suddenly care a whole lot less if the "right guy" comes along. Be hawt, make bank, have social aptitude, learn interesting skills and hobbies, and treat women like shitty children, and even the "good" ones who swear they hate muscles and promiscuous men end up sucking your dick on the firs…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 03:49 PM
14

Your slut girlfriend didn't lie about this particular thing? She's probably awesome and you should marry her.
/r/askTRP14/02/17 01:02 PM
0

"Is she hot" =! "Would guys message her on Tinder for a fuck"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:56 PM
3

How else would she pay for it? Rob a bank? In that situation, one wonders why she would try to keep an abortion secret from her husband at all. "Uh...just a minor check-up. They found something and have to remove it. Oh, no, nothing serious. Don't take the day off and come to the doctor with me. What do you mean why doesn't your insurance cover it? I don't know, some paperwork thing. Don't worry. I'll handle it."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 08:36 PM
2

Don't look at us! Women do this shit to themselves. If this Red Pill crap didn't work on women, it would cease to exist. It's so fucking stupid what women will do. I was just like you. I thought this stuff was crazy as hell. There's no way women fall for shit like this. There's no way guys who think and act this way could possibly score with women. I'm telling you, women are fucking stupid. There's just no denying it. And not just some small segment of damaged sluts. I'm talking all women. This …
/r/TheRedPill13/02/17 08:34 PM
7

If a wife and husband are not on the same page regarding family planning, the husband ought to know that so he can divorce his wife, rather than letting her secretly abort his children because she, unilaterally, thinks that's what's best for the family and doesn't want to discuss it with her husband. In no way, shape, or form should she ever require his permission to have an abortion, but it's a little extreme that she doesn't even have to tell him a pregnancy existed. Shooting down a proposed l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 08:16 PM
4

Not much. Other than going to respective religious buildings on our major holidays, neither one of us is extremely religious. Since I was slightly more religious than she was, we agreed beforehand to raise our children officially Jewish but celebrate both faiths. We met with a couple of rabbis and a priest and went through all of the hoops to have the marriage approved by both religions. So I guess we're double-married.
/r/MarriedRedPill13/02/17 07:48 PM
7

Telling your husband, "I'm pregnant, but I don't want to endure pregnancy and delivery" doesn't prevent you from having an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 07:42 PM
24

Nah. My wife was never attracted to me. Or at least was only marginally attracted to me. She was in the unfortunate position of being a virgin, only a couple of previous boyfriends and a little bit of non-intercourse sexual activity in college. I was a great guy on paper. Smart, funny, even kinda cute, on a good career path, we were on the same pages regarding finances and kids and most life priorities, we got along really well. She was good on paper, too. But we weren't having frequent sex, and…
/r/MarriedRedPill13/02/17 07:23 PM
7

The general thrust of Casey was that following Roe, no impediment to abortion, including indirect social obstacles, is permissible. Because some women may face abuse (as well as the social stigma and financial difficulty of divorce), those personal circumstances are effectively a ban on abortion, at least for those women and women in similar circumstances. Therefore, a law requiring women to inform their husbands about a pregnancy (not even get his permission, just tell him there's a pregnancy t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 07:15 PM
39

This is totally 100% key. Guys need to learn (or re-learn) how to flirt with their wives. You have to treat your wife like a girlfriend you're trying to fuck. I know that sounds a little blue-pill in writing, but armed with red pill knowledge, we know that treating someone like a girlfriend we want to fuck doesn't mean fancy dinners and chaste back rubs. The hardest part is getting this started. You've been in a shitty marriage and a dead bedroom for months. Some people years. Every single time …
/r/MarriedRedPill13/02/17 05:19 PM
48

If I sit in the parking lot at Wal-Mart, in the car with my daughter, for too long, somebody's going to call the police. Because a man being in a car alone with a five-year-old girl is clearly a child molester. Which is kind of funny because more than 50% of child abuse is committed by women. Single mothers are the worst, actually. The only worse places for a child to be than with a single mother is foster care or the street. There was a push to stop men from being seated next to children on air…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 03:32 PM
12

This is true only if we constrain the definition of "relationships" to a man and a woman verbally agreeing to monogamously "go steady". Women will absolutely shrivel up and die without emotional validation. That validation doesn't necessarily have to come from a man who has verbally agreed to be her monogamous boyfriend. It can come from her ability to go home with a different dick every weekend, her half a dozen fuck buddies, her circle of cackling yo-go-girl slut frenemies, and so on. But it i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 07:59 PM
4

Sluts are great. For fucking. Just wrap your dick. They're just shit for anything more. Luckily, there are a lot of sluts out there. If one particular slut becomes annoying, difficult, tedious, boring, or expensive, instead of playing her game, you just go find another slut.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/17 02:55 AM
38

My guess would be 10-15. High enough that the true answer is starting to be socially unacceptable and she feels she needs to hide it, but not so high that the woman is jaded enough to just say fuck all and stop hiding it (e.g., "Fuck it. Yeah, you're number 86.") Seriously, "2-4" is either two, three, or four. Most breeds of monkeys can count that high. It's not like once you get to four sexual partners, you lose count and aren't sure whether it was two, three, or four. Those are all really smal…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/17 08:46 PM
26

It's hard to judge the entirety of your marriage on a short, bulleted post on Reddit. My best guess is that you're going all push, no pull. You are failing to reward good behavior. Your wife starts fucking you, wants to experiment even. At that point, you provide her with comfort. You make her feel validated and emotionally close to you. You want to encourage that behavior to continue, rather than fucking her, nodding once, then going on with the completely separate life you suddenly started to …
/r/askMRP10/02/17 08:35 PM
266

We understand, deep within the core of our being, that when a woman fucks someone else for the cost of a drink but makes her real boyfriend wait and earn the right to fuck her, something is wrong. We tell ourselves that this is right, however. Because "just sex" and "real love" are different, and love is supposedly more important than sex. We try to tell ourselves how lucky we are to have love, even if the sex isn't there. But it still feels wrong inside. Because those guys she fucked for the co…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/17 08:11 PM
3

Absolutely. The OP question, however, isn't "are you completely worthless as human being if you can't get laid?" It's "Does one's ability to get sex or relationships reflect on their value as a human being?" The answer is undeniably yes. If some other man, identical to Elephant Man in every way, except he's super-hawt, existed, that other man would, hands down, be a more valuable human being than Elephant man. That doesn't mean Elephant Man is a zero, or that a man who can get laid but is an abs…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 06:18 PM
4

It's a little obsessive to try to come up with the weighted algorithm that defines our worth as humans. Appearance is one factor. Winning the Nobel prize is another. Being fuckable is not the sole determinant of human value, but if you are 100% unfuckable, then you have some flaws in your value, somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:46 PM
2

Of course. Take two Nobel prize winners. One is hawt, one is hideous. Everything else is identical. The hawt one is more valuable. I'm not saying the other Nobel prize winner is a zero. He's still a great human being. But appearance matters. That's why you're not fucking a burn victim in a wheelchair.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:22 PM
8

This girl has demonstrated that if the right guy comes along under the right circumstances and makes her feel something, she will be swept away in the moment and end up doing things with the right guy. There are 3.5 billion other women on Earth you could start fresh with. But here's your real problem: You're over-invested in this one girl. You're touting her good qualities (except for that one time she cheated on you! YOLO!), but at the same time, feel the need to go through her phone to make su…
/r/askTRP10/02/17 03:20 PM
1

You're not having sex with your wife, and you talk too much about stupid shit. How is this progress? Progress is when you talk less, look awesome, your wife is genuinely worried your might be cheating, and is relieved as hell when you pull her close at night to fuck her brains out, because that means an awesome guy like you still wants her.
/r/askMRP10/02/17 02:07 PM
9

Yes. Nobody fucks total losers. Not knowingly, anyway. If nobody is willing to fuck you, then something about your appearance, your social aptitude, your professional success, your usefulness, or your interesting-ness is lacking. It's one thing if this one particular person won't fuck you. That's no biggie. But if nobody will, there's something wrong with you. This doesn't mean your worth as a human is zero. You can have six PhDs and cure cancer, but be so ugly that nobody of the opposite sex wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 02:00 PM
1

It would be off topic in a discussion about the red pill for me to comment "women are X. And by the way, on a completely unrelated note, just to be thorough, politically correct, and avoid making women sound negative, men are also X. I know that's not really what we're talking about. Just wanted to throw that out there."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:05 AM
2

Nobody is claiming men are superior or more empathetic. However, Purple Pill Debate is all about debating The Red Pill, and The Red Pill is all about men trying to fuck women. So the statement "men don't have empathy for unattractive women" doesn't have anything to do with male sexual strategy. It's off-topic. However, the statement "women don't have empathy for unattractive men, and in fact, barely even notice their existence" is critical for male sexual strategy. Thus, that statement is on-top…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 11:05 PM
3

This is a very minor point in a larger issue. Women lack empathy or awareness beyond their own person. Every guy they swipe left on, every dating profile they ignore, every guy at the bar who's too ugly that they blow off -- those are all full-fledged humans. But they barely even register as a blip on a woman's radar. I'm not saying they should. In fact, I think it's right that they don't. Loser men don't deserve to amount to anything, and it's a damn shame that losers still end up getting some …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 10:23 PM
31

You can't sweat this kind of thing. Women aren't stupid. If your wife or girlfriend really wants to cheat on you and really wants to get away with it, she's doing it, and you'll never be the wiser. You can lie awake in bed, pissing the sheets and biting your nails all night long, or you can shrug, go to sleep, and hit the gym in the morning, confident that you're just fine with or without this woman, and could always replace her if needed. If you're not just fine with or without this woman, or y…
/r/askTRP09/02/17 08:27 PM
11

Good for you. Go make a friend in the real world instead of trying to make friends on the internet. Guys who give you cyber-encouragement aren't friends, just a band-aid to make your wittle feewings better for a few minutes, so you can tell yourself you're making progress when you're really not. You're going to need your legs and your voice, which apparently appear to be malfunctioning on account of the fact that women exist, so invest in some crutches and a dry-erase board.
/r/askTRP09/02/17 06:53 PM
15

You already gave up, idiot. Your entire post is a confession that you won't even try. And when an internet faggot like me shines a bright light on your loser-ness, your response is to ignore my sage wisdom and continue giving up? What the fuck are you after here? Some kind of pep talk? A big internet hug from your bros? A pat on the back, while we tell you it's okay to be scared and you'll get there one day? Fuck that, and fuck you. You accidentally clicked a link to The Red Pill this morning. N…
/r/askTRP09/02/17 06:23 PM
2

It's kind of tough to discuss sexual strategy and how to get laid without talking about women. A lot of people have taken this crazy notion about The Red Pill subreddit and run away with it. People think the subreddit isn't about getting laid, but is instead this master plan for life and manhood and the answers to the universe. The Red Pill is sexual strategy. How to get laid by women. It would be mind-numbingly stupid to somehow try to discuss this topic without saying the W-word. OF COURSE a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:55 PM
24

4 months on TRP cant still aproach woman So your legs are broken or something? Fuck out of here, loser. Quit shitting around with your ex. Quit shitting around with us. And quit shitting around with yourself. Walk up, talk to women, let them giggle at you, repeat. I mean, shit, a woman being mean to you and laughing at you has you so fucking scared that your legs won't work? But instead of fixing that, you're wondering how long to stare creepily at your ex? Fuck out of here, loser.
/r/askTRP09/02/17 05:50 PM
4

There's no such thing as either. Women don't really have "personalities" in the traditional sense. They have masks they wear, dances they perform, and strategies they execute. Tomboys, girly-girls, whatever. They're all women. Whatever a particular woman is acting like, this is what she believes will be successful at getting her sex from hot guys, time/attention/resources from successful guys, and validation from everyone around her. Because those are the things that make her happy. The actual a…
/r/askTRP09/02/17 05:42 PM
14

That just means you have more work to do. You're coming along well. Your wife is fucking you on the regular. She's letting you lead the sexual encounters and complying with your requests. She's even having orgasms. But after the fact, she still feels dirty and used for fucking you. She remembers who you were, she sees the remaining flaws in who you are currently, and after the heat of the moment dies down and the sex is over, she feels disgusted for letting you, a loser, make her into your littl…
/r/askMRP09/02/17 03:58 PM
8

The second your girlfriend says "I want to fuck another man", the only correct answer is to make her your ex-girlfriend on the spot. We live in this stupid-ass feminized sex-positive society where women are supposed to rule the realm of sex and any sexual act requested or denied by a woman is gospel. If a woman says no, we accept that -- we're not entitled to sex -- but then we're haters if we dump her ass and condition her relationship on her sexual availability. If a woman wants some sex act -…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 03:50 PM
4

The red pill makes sex and relationships less of a priority. Not more. Once you teach a man how easily he can get stupid sluts to fuck him, and he starts getting laid, sex becomes a whole lot less of a priority. Those nice, respectful losers who keep trying and trying to emotionally and intellectually connect with women, yet never seem to get anywhere romantically or sexually, are the ones who over-prioritize women. Once you realize that they're all fairly unspecial, non unique sex objects, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 01:10 PM
17

Bullshit. You make it sound like awesome guys who would otherwise be successful with girls are choosing not to try for fear of rape accusations or being labeled a non-feminist creep. The men who aren't approaching girls are refraining from this because they suck ass and would fail anyway. They just use feminism and modern anti male culture is as an excuse for sucking. "Oh yeah. I could totally score with lots of ladies. I just choose not to... You know... False rape accusations and stuff." "Oh y…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 01:09 PM
29

Idiot. You can't change a girl. All this shit does is tell her what she needs to hide or lie about, how she can get to you, and how weak and insecure you are. What you should have done is not LTR a flirt. Fuck only. You're already negotiating from a position of scarcity. She knows you suck and have limited options precisely because you LTRed her. If you were actually worth a shit, you wouldn't have to tell her to quit hanging out with other guys. She'd have done that on her own because she prefe…
/r/askTRP05/02/17 05:28 PM
18

The post guidelines are mostly just loser-deterrent. If there weren't any written rules, every loser with an internet connection would be posting some bullshit "what teh red pill means 2 me" shit-post on a daily basis as he trolled the internet for validation. If you come across a post that is, subjectively, pretty good quality and conveys useful information, nobody's going to bitch that it didn't have a TL;DR summary and a concise "lessons learned" section for people too lazy to read. Holding p…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/17 07:22 PM
8

The number one time my wife is most affectionate with me - receptive to touch, kisses, conversation -- is about five minutes after calling me an asshole for something I insisted on doing or not doing, often despite her request or protest. Having boundaries and acting like a man isn't some game you're playing to win power over her or get some kind of reaction or behavior out of her. It's something you need to do for your own psychological health. Even if you divorce your wife for being a bitch, y…
/r/askMRP03/02/17 05:24 PM
8

These three things are all pretty much related. Even the same thing in many cases. 1) Have boundaries; 2) Don't fight or argue; 3) Pass shit tests.
/r/askTRP03/02/17 05:17 PM
135

The best lessons are in the stories we have to tell. TRP isn't some set of hard and fast rules and "lessons", or some bulleted-list handbook of things you say responsive to things girls say that get you laid. It's bullshit a bunch of guys came up with based on their observations and experiences. It's guys comparing notes. This story is OP's notes. To think that people would somehow learn less from this and more from some kind of self-help post full of platitudes and empowering advice is crazy-ta…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/17 04:47 PM
2

How this isn't 100 percent clear to OP is beyond me.
/r/askTRP03/02/17 11:57 AM
3

Ghosting keeps you from driving away women that are into you, and from wasting your time on women who aren't.
/r/askTRP03/02/17 04:43 AM
20

Equal rights but an unequal burden to perform sounds an awful lot like privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 04:36 AM
8

While times have changed a bit since good old days, in Latin culture, Israel, and a few other places, guys and girls generally didn't hang out alone together on "dates" until things were serious. People would just go out, as a group, and hang out. Take a page from that playbook. Instead of asking a girl you liked to go to a movie or restaurant with you (BORING AND AWKWARD), just say, "Hey, some friends of mine are getting together at [location] on Saturday. You should come." Then, while there, a…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 10:14 PM
9

There's definitely such a thing as too alpha. If you're strutting around yelling, cussing, shooting your guns in the air like Yosemite Sam, and no matter how many times Bugs Bunny drops an anvil on you, you just get more ornery and more cocky, you start to seem a little bit like an overblown cartoon character instead of an authentic human. However, the HUGE majority of men seeking dating advice, and I mean like 99.9999999 percent, do not have this problem. Most men are waaaaaaaay too beta. They'…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 08:38 PM
10

This is fairly basic stuff that dates all the way back to early PUA tactics. For a woman to fuck you, she must feel: 1) Attracted (which is generated using alpha behaviors); and 2) Comfortable (which is generated using beta behaviors). Which is why you brazenly approach and act like a fun-loving, cocky asshole first, tease the fuck out of her, charm her friends, and make her feel inadequate and like she needs to work to measure up to you first. Then, and only then, do you isolate her from her gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 07:49 PM
0

Hey buddy, I don't like black people any more than you do, but I'll be damned if we let our great nation be ruled by Russia via their puppet Trump. It's time to stop grabbing women by their pussies, stop picking on innocent Muslims, and start worrying about the real problem: The enemy within. Conservative white men kill more people than heart disease, cancer, and automobile accidents combined. In fact, if you look at automobile accidents, the huge majority of them involve conservative white men.…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 07:30 PM
17

That's actually a very astute observation. When you're in a situation where you're expected to be "on", it's much more difficult to make a woman feel that you're genuine, authentic, badass, fun, awesome, and sexual. You're "on", she knows you're "on", and you both kind of tacitly accept that you're putting on an act, which puts a stain on your entire encounter. With time, you'll probably avoid scheduling formal "dates" in the future. Just meet people and hang out. Do shit that you want to do, an…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 06:55 PM
3

There you people go with your Soros conspiracies and racism again. Trump himself offered me five hundred bucks to go to Berkley and pretend to be a violent protestor, but I told him no. His goal is to make it look like we have violence everywhere so he can institute martial law and become an evil dictator! If this doesn't work, it's even worse! He and his Russian buddies will start World War 3, then he'll declare martial law that way! The Mayor of Berkley is getting paid to keep his mouth shut a…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 04:51 PM
30

There needs to be some better literature out there on "when and how to touch a girl without it being fucking awkward." That's where a lot of guys struggle. I think in your case, you just need to hang with a lot of girls, go out with a bunch of them (including a bunch you don't care about that much), and just try shit, don't try shit, watch, listen, and get some experience paying attention to how girls talk and move. Picking up on subtle cues and body language and going with the flow of an intera…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 04:27 PM
2

Don't be silly. This wasn't liberal people at all. It was some random group of "anarchists" just out to make liberals look bad. Probably paid by Trump to stage a riot to incriminate innocent liberals.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/17 03:38 PM
17

Don't get your gym membership revoked for an older woman.
/r/askTRP02/02/17 03:26 AM
1

Why do you want to vet women for relationships? Can't you just fuck them? What are you hoping to find by vetting women? A special one worthy of your love?
/r/askTRP02/02/17 12:36 AM
1

You seem to be of the opinion that some women are better than others. Some are even so good that they're not for fucking, but for loving. Do you have a dozen women on your fuck rotation currently? I'd find it tough to believe that a guy with a twelve woman rotation, who's played the game long enough to get there, thinks that there's some kind of better, special woman out there. Relationships with special women is not the goal. Relationships are just one more tool in your sexual strategy arsenal.
/r/askTRP02/02/17 12:13 AM
1

Sure. It's really pretty simple. Women are for fucking. Quit searching for a wife.
/r/askTRP01/02/17 11:25 PM
7

Not having casual sex with guys outside of a relationship, like this woman is doing with you. Not crying like an emotional basket case over stupid shit, like this woman did. Not using tears to attempt to manipulate, like this woman is doing to you. Being hotter than a 6.5, unlike this woman. Not pushing for a relationship, because she hotly desires your dick and respects you too much to risk losing it all by putting it out there like that. Unlike this woman. On the flip side, you sound like an i…
/r/askTRP01/02/17 06:40 PM
14

Is this for real? Fuck her anyway. If you're not into period sex and it turns you off, make her suck your dick. When you meet a plate, there is always sex. She's not your friend. She's not your girlfriend. She's a plate. You don't want to set the precedent of non-sexual encounters with her.
/r/askTRP01/02/17 05:06 PM
4

Society is not asexual. The huge majority of the people who claim that they're choosing not to have sex aren't really choosing anything. They just can't get any. The one or two guys who are beating away constant offers of pussy because they're choosing not to have sex due to "the risk" are extreme exceptions. The huge majority of guys who aren't having sex are in that position because women don't want to fuck them. On the flip side, women that choose not to have sex are primarily in that positio…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 05:02 PM
8

It's classic ego protection. A girl's not into a guy or rejects a guy, and he immediately tries to convince himself, "I didn't want her anyway." No, fucker. You wanted her. Bad. And you lost. Take your lumps. There's always another better guy, she's never yours, it's not always your turn, and at the end of the day, she's just one non-special, non-unique woman. Suck it up and go fuck another. If you can't, then that's what you need to fix rather than pissing and moaning about this one particular …
/r/askTRP01/02/17 04:39 PM
23

Fuck you, loser. Don't lie to us and don't lie to yourself. You didn't choose not to escalate with this girl because you were no longer attracted. You didn't escalate because she was into your friend, not you, and you didn't think you had a shot to salvage things. She chose. Not you. You did not reject her. You just tucked your tail between your legs and slunk off.
/r/askTRP01/02/17 02:00 PM
3

Your problem is that you're not fucking other women between rounds with this one. She's fucking other men. So you're starting to come across as clingy instead of fun and awesome. She'd rather be with those other men. You need to care less, be more scarce, and be more fun. And it all starts with fucking other women. When this girl you're so terrified of losing is one slut on your rotation of six, you realize she's not unique or special. Just a pussy you occasionally fuck. When you naturally start…
/r/askTRP01/02/17 01:18 PM
3

One or both of you are fatasses. As a result, you're not strong enough to move your wife around wherever the fuck you want during sex, no questions asked. When you have to grunt and strain and take ten minutes flipping your wife over, she'll stop and ask what the hell you're doing. But if she's already where you want her and enjoying herself before she has a chance to protest, she'll start getting into the habit of letting you control your sexual encounters.
/r/askMRP01/02/17 12:14 PM
2

In the wild, Gronk the big strong manly man took all the women. Bob the whiny loser man jerked off in the bushes. When your wife knows you're jerking it, her subconscious flags you as Bob the loser. The next time you try to escalate, she's not going think "Oh noes! He doesn't need me! He'll just masturbate! I'd better fuck him!" She's going to sneer at you with disdain and tell you to go touch yourself, loser.
/r/askMRP31/01/17 11:15 PM
2

Out of the plethora of discussions I raised, you sure zeroed in quickly on that one minor point. Husbands with tacitly accepted mistresses was a problem concentrated primarily in the wealthy sector of society. It happened. But it didn't apply to most people. We are in 100% agreement that this particular issue was a problem, not a good thing, in ye olden days. Therefore, regarding that particular point, the discussion can be concluded. You have this thing you do where you read twenty sentences, f…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 11:09 PM
7

Men never had a problem with sexual liberation. They were expected to have sex, be sexual, and so on. It became a TV comedy trope that the husband always wants to fuck and the wife never wants to and has to keep coming up with excuses to get out of sex. And there was even a time back in the day when many men had mistresses, but their wives just looked the other way, because men were sexual, that was expected, and as long as he was discreet and came home to his family, no biggie. Sexual liberatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 09:48 PM
1

The big difference is that a man needs to be competitive to find, not just a good woman, but any woman. A woman can be average and just show up. The fact that she's female means she'll have opportunities for sex and relationships. They may not be the sex or the relationships that she wants -- obviously, she prefers a high quality man, and the fact that she has a large pool of offers from normal guys means that normal men are pretty value-less to her. But an average guy who just shows up has few …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 05:49 PM
123

When a guy and a girl grab a meal together, get to know each other better, and see how much they enjoy spending time together, that's what most people would call a "date". When the guy and girl keep seeing each other, send texts in between their dates, and the texts are emotional/flirty in nature, that means they're "dating". The third date is coming. Your wife is going to have some after work networking function she innocently tells you about.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/01/17 01:15 PM
6

So you logically understand that the past can't be undone, and that 99.999 percent of people aren't virgins. You know it's not realistic to expect your wife to have never had sex before. So you're thinking that a good "fix" is you fucking more women. She got all of you, you only got some of her. You're worried you overpaid for half a woman? Be honest. What are you really worth. And what is she really worth. Because I don't think a whiner like you is the world's most valuable man. And by your own…
/r/askMRP31/01/17 11:50 AM
6

Exactly. You're not sad about what you didn't do. You're sad about what she did do. She gave herself to other men before you. So you're not getting all of her. You're getting the remainder. The thing is, it sounds like if you didn't know her sexual history at all and you just knew the woman, you'd be okay with the remainder. Whatever parts of her she has left and is giving to you, it seems like you have an okay sex life, an okay home life, and she's a good wife and mother, right? -- If that's no…
/r/askMRP31/01/17 02:11 AM
10

If women and pussy were special, I'd say that you missed out. But women and pussy are not. Your wife's pussy. Some other women's pussies. Pretty much the same thing. But this isn't about you missing out. This is about your wife not missing out. You feel like she's more valuable. Better than you. More accomplished. She got to fuck around a little before you. She gets all of you. You get what's left of her after she gave herself to others. But it sounds like what's left of her is still a decent sp…
/r/askMRP30/01/17 11:36 PM
7

What's with people giving you all of these non-answers? You're fucking other women currently, right? So go do that. Don't bother with this one for at least a week. Two if you're busy. Ignore all of her communications, unless she's offering to come over, in which case just tell her okay and a time, but nothing more. Assuming 1-2 weeks pass with nothing, just send her one communication to come over, with a day and time. If she doesn't respond, or responds in the negative without an attempt to resc…
/r/askTRP30/01/17 06:27 PM
2

Women hate this because Dad is possibly grooming his daughter to fuck losers. Dad is teaching his daughter to expect men to be please-the-princess beta schlubs. That dates are supposed to be with guys who hold the door, pull her chair out, and treat her to meals. She's going to grow up looking for that in men and if his evil grooming works, she's going going to miss out on a lot of vital sexual experiences in college when she restricts her self to traditional dating. Teaching a girl to seek trad…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 05:03 PM
2

There are two things in play: First, if there is a significant age difference between two people, they're not going to have a lot in common or a lot to talk about. So if a 35 year old guy is trying to date a 19 year old girl, he's pretty clearly after a mostly-sex relationship and isn't trying to connect with her as a human being. It's only okay if women seek fuck-buddies, which is empowering. Men are supposed to try to get to know girls as human beings first. Otherwise, they're objectifying wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 04:58 PM
6

It's amazingly easy for women to find a relationship. But much harder for women to find a good relationship with an awesome guy that has opportunities with lots of other women. Because in that case, she needs to be competitive, not just female.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 04:15 PM
86

Stop listening to the shit your woman says. Just watch her actions. What does she do when you're the way you are? Does she leave you? Nope. She stays. Does she withhold sex? Nope. She fucks you eagerly. Does she behave badly? Nope. She goes out of her way to demonstrate her loyalty to you. She is telling you, with every action, to stay the course. It's okay to reward her good behavior, though. Intermittently. Typically after good sex.
/r/askTRP30/01/17 01:22 PM
10

Women fuck up, not down. A female celebrity is going to date and fuck higher status male celebrities, not a random fan who pedestalizes her. Women fuck men they look up to, not men who adore them. When a famous woman does lower herself to fuck the hot pool boy or some other boy toy, the guy is never some random dumpy loser who idolizes her. He's still a very hot, talented, and/or successful dude (at least one of those three things), who could fuck other women. And she doesn't make it public that…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 07:37 PM
18

What insight? Don't get married. It's all risk, no reward. Women are giving away sex for the cost of a drink now. And sometimes not even that. And if a few women aren't, there are plenty of other women right next to them who are. You don't need marriage for sex. You don't need marriage for companionship. You don't need marriage for children. Marriage is more of a social convention nowadays, and as time goes on, it's become more accepted to not marry.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 04:07 AM
8

I would have shut the hell up, kept lifting weights, eating clean, dressing well, making bank, hanging out with bros, and subtly flirting with women hotter than my wife. You don't have to tell a woman "sending naked pictures of yourself to other men is a sexual thing that would warrant divorce". Women know this. Everyone knows this. You didn't set a boundary that she didn't previously know about. You just made it clear to her that you were worried she'd violated this boundary that everyone in th…
/r/askMRP28/01/17 04:04 AM
5

It's not a good strategy to ask a question to which you don't know the answer, when you're going to get the same answer from a liar that you would from an honest woman.
/r/askMRP28/01/17 03:33 AM
21

That's usually the best tell. Women don't normally make strong eye contact. Especially when dealing with a man they respect and admire. When a woman is staring at your eyes when she speaks, it's not confidence. It's one of two other things (or maybe both of them). It's either defiance or dishonesty. Most of the time, when she's staring into your eyes, she's either staring you down trying to get you to buckle, or she's searching your eyes for a reaction that will tell her how much you know or whe…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 03:27 AM
26

I don't sweat too much about my wife cheating. She's probably not, but maybe she is. She's as smart as I am. If she really, really wants to cheat on me and really, really wants to get away with it, she's doing it, and I would never have a clue. I can lay awake all night shitting my pants worrying about something that might not be happening, and if it is I'd never find out for sure anyway, or I can just sleep soundly and hit the gym in the morning, go to work, eat good food, and fuck my wife at n…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 10:58 PM
103

Mostly the kid. We've come a long way. Gone from monthly duty sex and constant fighting to maybe twice a week sex except on shark week and one outburst a month that's over within a day. I don't think things will ever be 100% awesome. I married my wife pre-red pill. She's seen me scrawny, jobless, struggling, and spent years watching me fold laundry and constantly seek her approval and permission for shit. It doesn't really matter how much I improve or who I become. She's not going to forget the …
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 10:52 PM
166

Here’s a really elaborate example where I had some fun with her: This one time, we had weekend plans coming up in about two weeks. They’d been on the books for several months. I find out that one of my wife’s favorite musicians is doing a concert that same night, tickets went on sale about a month ago, and the very day they went on sale, my wife went online and bought three tickets, with the intention of asking a few of her friends to go with her. She figured if she only found one person, she co…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 07:50 PM
170

Every so often, I ask my wife something uncomfortable that I know the answer to just to see what she says. I never get the unabridged truth, just the parts she wants me to know. I do it to watch her make perfect eye contact. Speak promptly and without hesitation. With a perfectly normal and unwavering voice, with no unusual inflections. It's important to remind myself how good of a liar she is, and how quickly and easily she lies to me about completely trivial things. That way, I don't feel bad …
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 06:04 PM
1

You do understand that the parent having primary custody pays for every single expense associated with the child(ren), including those that exceed the cost of monthly child support, right? Like, children actually cost money. A lot of money. They're not a source of income, even if somebody else is paying you a small chunk of money every month to support them. You don't have children, do you? That might be the source of your disconnect. You don't actually have a kid that you love and care about. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:46 PM
2

You need to do a little bit of research outside of whining internet MRA and MGTOW loser circles. I make good money. If I divorced my wife right now, the default amount of child support she would get from me wouldn't be enough to pay the mortgage, eat, and support our one child. I guess she might be able to move to the bad part of town and get a really shitty apartment, though we live in a town where housing is currently at a premium. And maybe the two of them could live on bulk sacks of dry bean…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:11 PM
2

You're essentially advocating socialism. If Mom has a kid she can't afford, don't have Mom OR Dad pay. Seize the kid, make it a ward of the state, and everybody pays for it via taxes. Piles and piles of children, raised by the state, collectively with everybody's money. That's even worse than making Dad pay Mom for Mom's non-abortion. Anyway, you're engaging in a bit of the apex fallacy here. Child support is a percentage of Dad's paycheck, and in most cases turns out not a to be living wage for…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 03:34 PM
2

It's not really a question of whether I'm behind the idea of child support for mothers. I'm just not some armchair internet anarchist/libertarian. We have a system where elected representatives pass laws and collect taxes, based on what they think the majority of people will want or benefit from (thereby increasing their odds of reelection). Because I don't live alone on a private island, I understand that elected representatives do things that may benefit other people who live in the same count…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 03:20 PM
3

Your reasoning is dumb. It's cheaper to ignore every crime. The notion that the reason some behaviors are legally enforced and some ignored ought to be cost is silly. Unless the crime is literally stealing money from a government bank and burning it, it's always cheaper for the government to sit on its ass. Essentially, what you're saying is "obviously, we should still jail people for big crimes like murder. Just not small crimes like evading child support. The big change I'm proposing is to let…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 10:54 AM
3

It's also cheaper to ignore murderers than it is to jail them. The odds of a murderer killing me is pretty slim, so why should my taxes pay to keep other people's murderers in jail? I have this fucking crazy idea! Why don't we elect a representative body that makes laws and collects taxes to enforce those laws, and if we don't like the laws or taxes, we elect different people next term?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 08:03 PM
4

He's like a shitty couple trying to fix their relationship by buying a dog. And he's old enough to know better. Kids staying in some kind of hazy eternal adolescence is how we end up with 30-something guys on this subreddit who still don't get it, whining about women. He knows how to "better himself physically" already. His real problem isn't his inability to search for a bodyweight workout routine on Google. It's his complete lack of the cognitive abilities to devise a strategy to get where he …
/r/askTRP26/01/17 12:59 AM
1

This kid thinks his problem is a lack of a good body weight workout routine. That what he really needs right now in life is a way to work out on his bedroom floor.
/r/askTRP26/01/17 12:14 AM
9

This is 100% the case. Women in the "good ol' days" weren't marrying nice-guy good-provider men because they wanted to. They were forced to due to financial dependency and social restrictions. It was not their "feminine nature" to "submit" to these guys. They just did what they needed to do to fit in socially and to survive. Marriage and sex were transactions, everybody knew it, and it was just how things were. She didn't really burn with desire to fuck him, but he gave her a good home and took …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 07:06 PM
8

There are two factors in play. First, most men are not picky. Many men will fuck a 4 or 5, especially if they don't have to put in much effort. So a reasonably attractive man will hit up a dating site and message every single girl there that's a 4 or higher, and just see what he gets. Second, women now use the internet to streamline the dating process. It's not that an average man is terrible to her. It's just that she got 100 messages today, so she only needs to respond to the top 10 to get lai…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/17 06:56 PM
5

Right. So you're scrawny and don't have any friends, and you probably suck at anything sport-like. So instead of telling your parents something that showed focus and drive, like, "I want to go out for the X team next year and I think it would help if I spent the next semester lifting weights", you asked them, "Will you guys pay for a gym membership for me?" Your parents wisely noted that acquiescing to this random request of yours would be a waste of time and money, because you don't do sports a…
/r/askTRP25/01/17 06:15 PM
2

What worked with your ex also works with wives, with girlfriends, or with anybody really. Say what you need to say. Then if the other person is unpleasant to be around, quit interacting and go do something else. Don't argue, explain, defend, or rationalize. You already said what you need to say. At that point, you're either conversing for fun, or doing something else because the conversation isn't fun.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/01/17 03:59 PM
10

You're leaving out some details. I'm going to assume you're very fat and/or scrawny, have poor social skills and few friends, no job or income, a middling performance at school, and that you've been asking your parents to pay for a gym membership for you out of pocket, and they refused because they don't think shelling out 50 bucks a month for their out of shape kid to pretend he's going to work out is worth the cost, but they're being polite by telling you it's because you're only 16. Because i…
/r/askTRP25/01/17 03:41 PM
7

Intersectionality is feminism, which is no longer relevant or necessary, stealing other group's issues in a desperate attempt to feel important.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 02:06 AM
30

It is 100% normal for your girl to have orbiters. All girls do. As long as you're the one fucking her, while the other guys beg for scraps of her attention, and she finds them amusing and pathetic (and maybe even laughs at them with you), you'd be fine. But in your case, your girl is actively soliciting positive male attention from other guys, then intentionally using it to shit test you. She sees this as a win-win situation. You either do nothing, and she gets to keep cultivating attention and …
/r/askTRP24/01/17 05:46 PM
9

This is key. Women interpret even an inoccuous question about their thoughts or opinions, or even checking to see if they're having a good time, as asking if a decision you made is okay. Asking if she permits that decision. Searching for her validation. She doesn't want you to ask for her opinion, because for women, having an emotional opinion and making a logical decision are the same thing. If ask for her thoughts, you're essentially asking for her to decide for you.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/01/17 01:20 PM
2

I'm still trying to picture hardened, hard-working 1920s women and feminized men huddled around the radio, listening to the election results, crying their eyes out, wondering how this could happen, proclaiming this isn't the America they know and love any more! It's filled with womanizing nationalists! Then skipping work the next few days to gather in the streets protesting. This is only the kind of shit that can happen when life is too easy. A bunch of middle class women and feminized loser men…
/r/askMRP23/01/17 09:24 PM
2

When a girl says no but tries to reschedule a sex date with you, she's down. She didn't want to make out in front of your friend circle and advertise that she's a slut. So meet her alone, fuck her brains out, and don't say shit around your friends. She's not going to.
/r/askTRP23/01/17 06:20 PM
76

Date outside of the drug culture.
/r/askTRP23/01/17 06:15 PM
19

It's kind of funny that the liberal party -- the ones who are anti-religion and heavily into separating church and state -- have turned their political ideology into a religion. There's no logically explaining things to these people, because their political ideology isn't just a set of opinions they have about what makes for good governance and good leadership, like it's supposed to be. Their political ideology is their faith -- and a huge source of their identity. It doesn't matter that 63 mill…
/r/askMRP23/01/17 05:17 PM
3

Nobody notices anybody nowadays. I'm a man. When I walk from point A to point B, I don't notice about 99% of the people I pass. I take note of people I know, really fine-ass women, people who are dressed very sharp or very funny, and occasionally really buff men in a totally non-homo healthy admiration sort of way. For example, I'll remember passing a girl in a wheelchair, even if she's ugly as sin. I'll also remember passing a super model, my wife, any of my male or female coworkers, or either …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 02:19 PM
5

The flip side of this is that The Red Pill isn't for everybody. Some guys have shitty, sexless marriages where their wives manage them and keep the family moving forward, and they're unhappy about the no-sex thing, but they kind of like not thinking, not leading, not working, and being told what to do and when. They like the easy monotony of being a go-to-work-every-day ATM for the family who gets to turn his brain off, coast through life, come home, drink beer, watch TV, jerk off to porn, and w…
/r/MarriedRedPill23/01/17 02:07 PM
5

If your wife actually found a "how to have more sex" book in your kindle, she'll think you're playing her. That any good shit you do is just something you read about that you're trying on her to manipulate her. Right now, she'd rather get divorced than fuck your fat ass. You're costing her social points with her friends and/or she's recently come across another possible opportunity with a man. Otherwise, she'd just keep profiting off of you and not fucking.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/01/17 10:26 AM
6

Evolutionary psychology isn't science because psychology isn't science. Science is a thing where you can propose a hypothesis, test it under controlled experimental settings where you modify only a single variable, multiple times, then record results that either prove or disprove your hypothesis. Unless we're going to lock thousands of infants in a dome and start running tests on them in isolated environments for the next few decades, shit like this can't be science. So you get a bunch of people…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 06:46 PM
2

Right. See, if somebody seriously suggested, "why don't we just desegregate all bathrooms", the first thing a feminist would say is, "No way! Then women are going to be getting raped and ogled and harassed left and right! We know how men are!"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:26 PM
0

Exactly. Here's a good example from my neck of the woods, actually. We have this middle school boy in the neighborhood who thinks he’s trans-gendered and identifies as a girl. I’m in the South, so there’s a whole lot of bitching and cussing about this boy-in-body-girl-in-mind using the girls’ bathroom. Not just because Jesus, but because he's a young boy kid with a penis and will be in a restroom with young girl kids who have vaginas. Some parents are all for it in the name of liberalism and equ…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:07 PM
10

Feminism is, by definition, a female-centric, pro-female movement. It doesn't pursue "equality", so much as it pursues equalization. The fundamental idea behind feminism is that women are disadvantaged while men are privileged, so there need to be various pro-female changes to increase female power/opportunity while decreasing male power/opportunity, to bring the two more in line with one another. What feminism is pursuing isn't equality -- what it chases after is very definitely female-centered…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 03:27 PM
8

Feminism's had a long time to teach women to value themselves as more than sex objects, but all it's seem to do is turn women into sluts who seek even more validation via sex than ever before. Sexual liberation had the exact opposite effect intended. Instead of empowering women, it made the link between human worth and sexual desirability even stronger. It made women even more dependent on male validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 07:15 PM
4

Heather Has Two Mommies is a book first published in 1989. It tells the story about this girl named Heather who has two cats, two dogs, two pens, two pencils, two mommies, two pillows, two TVs, and she lives on lollipop lane in a gumdrop house having an excellent life. One day, Heather goes to school, and the teacher is doing a lesson about what my daddy does for a living, and Heather starts to cry because she doesn't have a daddy. But then it turns out that the little black boy has two daddies,…
/r/RedPillParenting19/01/17 05:06 PM
13

Then people are right to call him a creep. A woman's appearance/sexual desirability and a woman's worth as a human being are one and the same. If you take a shot at a woman's appearance/desirability, it shakes her to the core, because you are assaulting her very worth as a living creature. This isn't some Red Pill misogynistic mumbo-jumbo. This is how women feel and act. That's why it's so heinous to call a fat woman fat and why you always have to tell her that you like her haircut and the dress…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 04:27 PM
2

So let's say somebody is fat. He/she knows it. Every single time this person gets a rejection on a dating site or somebody who doesn't respond, he/she knows it's because of his/her physical appearance. Everyone knows it. Take one look at this person's profile and you know exactly why this person isn't getting dates. We're all supposed to dance around this issue and not mention the f-word, because that's the accepted social norm. No matter how fat or ugly someone is, you never, ever say so. You j…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 04:22 PM
26

This guy's an idiot. If you really want to hurt a fat, old woman and take her down a peg, you respond, "Nope. Not interested" and don't say anything more. She knows she's fat and out of her 20s. She knows she's not desirable to hot men. No ranting message explaining this is going to hurt her more than her own imagination will. If you just say "Nope" and let her mind do the work, that will take her down 100 more notches than some angsty message explaining yourself to her. If anything, sending her…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 04:13 PM
1

Women generally don't want an open marriage if their husband is worth a shit. They only want to open the marriage when their husband is a loser and they're not sexually attracted to him. If he's a badass, they want that marriage closed tight -- so HE doesn't fuck around. If we follow this road to its logical conclusion, we end up with badass men having lots of sex with women without having to marry them first, and loser men married to the women fucking the badass men hoping that by marrying her,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 07:28 PM
5

Nothing shouts "great leader who's in control of his family and has his shit together" like a guy who bitches out his wife with passive aggressive ultimatums.
/r/MarriedRedPill18/01/17 07:25 PM
2

I'll modify that statement for you since apparently the context of the entirety of The Red Pill being about sexual strategy didn't make this clear: Women don't find the niceness, itself, sexually attractive. It's either neutral or negative with regard to generating sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 07:00 PM
2

Right. That's why The Red Pill is primarily a collection of observations, and why The Red Pill is primarily sexual strategy, not some kind of PhD dissertation on the whole of human psychology. Based on the observations of lots and lots of men, while some "nice" men do have some sex, and some "nice" men end up sexless, it's pretty clear that women don't find the niceness, itself, sexually attractive. It's either neutral or negative. So if you're focused entirely on sexual strategy -- increasing y…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:29 PM
3

That's usually where these discussions end. Your marriage is the literal opposite of mine and everybody I've encountered. And my experiences aren't the least bit true in your world. I don't think either of us deny that the other person's type of relationship exists. We just both think we're in the majority while the other person is a rare exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 03:44 PM
3

A lot of women would have a hard time being excited by a loser they had to teach to fuck like a man, at least when compared to a naturally masculine guy. For women, a big part of sex isn't just the friction. It's the hours leading up to sex. It's how much of a badass the guy is. The anticipation. How he acts and carries himself. You might be an exception, but for most women, a guy who's a pleasant, please-the-princess, dutiful husband by day, then who puts on a pretend-dominance act that his wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 03:37 PM
3

Your female strategy is missing sex. It is true that a woman who finds a nice guy who's 100% devoted to her, self-sacrificing, that makes bank, does all the housework, dotes on her, makes her feel special, and essentially makes marriage to him a paid vacation for the rest of her life, all while being content with the once-a-month duty sex she occasionally doles out, makes a woman "happy" to an extent. But what really completes the equation for her is sex. If the guy lets her (or if she can get a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 03:29 PM
2

I'm a bit mystified that there's actually such a thing as "Red Pill Women". The Red Pill strategies, for men, work on all women. Whether the women are feminine, conservative "Red Pill Women", or whether they're super-crazy feminists, or whether they're just normal girls you meet while out and about. You won't bed 100% of women 100% of the time, but you'll have a lot more sexual success and a lot more power in your relationships and interactions with women as a Red Pill man than before reading al…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 02:43 PM
3

It's somewhat shocking that after all of the time you've spent worrying about these gender issues and this Red Pill-Blue Pill crap, you still don't grasp that The Red Pill is for men. Not women. It's shit men can do to improve their sex life and have more power over women. Women don't do anything. Except have sex with men, and leave if they're not happy. Which doesn't really matter if you're a worthwhile man, because you have ten more just like her waiting for their chance. You absolutely should…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 02:33 PM
3

Most men have some sex, some relationships, and end up married if they want to be. So obviously "beta" men are having some sex. It would be stupid to declare "Only 'alphas' ever get laid!" But you're missing the major point of The Red Pill. The Red Pill is not some set of rules that we push for (e.g., "You MUST be alpha and not beta or you're a loser!"). It's a set of observations. Things like, "I've noticed that men who do X get laid often, and men who do Y don't get laid or get laid less. Ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 02:07 PM
2

Things haven't changed that much for most people. If a man and a woman hang out together and get to know each other better, that's a "date", even if they don't call it that because going on "dates" is some nerdy 1980s thing. It's not the name of the activity that makes it a "date". It's not even their intentions that make it a date. If your wife goes out one-on-one with one of her guy friends from work on a Thursday evening, and the two of them talk over drinks and get to know each other better,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 01:52 PM
8

This was true in 1950-60, and was true for small sects of upper middle class white kids in honors classes in high school in the 1980s and 1990s who actually believed most people weren't having sex. Today, in 2017, unless you have an explicit conversation about this issue, if you don't fuck by date #3, there is no date #4. For either party. Whoever doesn't want to fuck by date #3 doesn't get a date #4. If a girl fucks before date #3, she's a slut and she gets pumped and dumped. If she won't fuck …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/17 10:01 PM
7

Correct. Feminism is essentially a shit test that society failed. After society pretty much gave feminism the farm, instead of being grateful, feminism pissed all over society, called it evil and sexist, and now it wants two more farms and its own private island. And society will probably give it that, too.
/r/askTRP17/01/17 08:45 PM
15

Your head is full of ideas that aren't true. 1- Forget the "alpha" and "beta" crap. That's just shorthand for "behaviors that are sexually attractive to women" and "behaviors that make a woman feel comfortable and secure". The two behaviors are often (usually) mutually exclusive. Women like a nice guy who treats them well, but that nice guy doesn't make them horny, just comfortable. Hence why women tend to fuck exciting assholes while making friends with decent nice guys who never seem to be the…
/r/askTRP17/01/17 05:37 PM
30

Watch what women do, not what they say. Even your wife. If your wife really and truly felt bad about not having sex with you, that's a really easy fix. She just has to have sex. She doesn't want to have sex with you. She's doing the absolute minimum (once-a-week, scheduled duty sex) to be able to call the marriage a marriage, but anything more is off the table from her. She doesn't feel guilty about not having sex or about rejecting you. She feels guilty because she's not attracted to you, even …
/r/askMRP17/01/17 03:39 PM
1

That won't be the case forever. Marriage is going to become some archaic, patriarchal relic from days past that men used to use to enslave women and control their sexuality. Something rich elitists do to preserve their dynasty, while normal people scoff at the practice, and women fuck hot guys for fun while the village raises the children. The first step will be marriage being reduced from a sexual relationship to a companionship arrangement. The idea will be that you marry a woman for love, not…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 11:09 PM
2

Silly hypothetical. If every single loser man disappeared tomorrow, it wouldn't affect women. Those guys are already invisible to women. The idea that women rely upon having an eager pool of losers to marry, leech from, divorce-rape, and profit from, and without the mass of thirsty losers, women would be up a creek is loser MGTOW internet fiction. It's 2016. Women have jobs and attend college in greater numbers than men. And first world governments around the world hand out free shit like it's g…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 09:09 PM
14

Quit listening to shit women say. Of course she's a slut 99.9 percent of women are. Don't push for information (she will lie anyway) or out her as a slut or "reformed" slut. Just escalate, add her to your rotation, invest minimally, and fuck her until she stops giving it away (wrap your dick). Your goal isn't to make an honest woman out of her. It's to become the next asshole in her long list of fuck partners.
/r/askTRP16/01/17 12:35 PM
8

You know what makes The Red Pill subreddit so cool? It's on the fucking internet. We're anonymous. And we're unrestricted geographically. People can talk about whatever they want, anonymously, with anybody else anywhere in the world. How is meeting people in the real world, including people who will pretend to be down with your cause just to learn your identity so they can get guys fired, destroy their marriages, and ruin their lives, some kind of good idea that is better or more meaningful than…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 12:02 AM
4

I don't know if you've ever really talked to some of the TRP dregs. These aren't angry, lazy guys spouting male supremist prose to feel better about how fat and smelly they are. They're pretty normal guys who just don't get it. And the more they actually try brazenly shallow, sexist, asshole-ish crap and get something ten times better than any positive reaction they've ever gotten (from average or even frumpy girls, not even the unattainable hot ones), they lose a lot of respect for women. Guys …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 12:47 PM
5

Beats me. That's why I used so many question marks. I don't know why so many men don't get it. I didn't get it. I still probably only get about 2/3rds of it right now. There's nothing "wrong" with me. I'm not actually autistic, my childhood was pretty normal-ish. I just didn't get it and had to learn about it explicitly instead of just picking it up by inference. Whatever did or didn't change, or whatever came into the public view that wasn't there before, a lot of guys don't get it. And a lot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:40 AM
5

On one hand, it's really easy to be creepy. Just the way you sit or stand can be weird. Bad posture is ugly and something about your body position can unconsciously be off-putting to women, even if you don't say or do anything wrong. The tone of your voice being too nasal, high, low, breathy, grunty, or-what-have-you can be "creepy", even if you didn't say or do anything wrong. Just being ugly can be "creepy". If a girl can't stop staring at your terrible teeth and acne or your greasy bowl hairc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:11 AM
2

Even with my own wife, when we were trying to have a baby, we didn't discuss her fertility. There's just about nothing more unsexy than chatting about a lady's biochemistry as foreplay.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 02:18 AM
3

I can see your point. The 50% or so of TRP advocates who are "betas" (e.g., fairly normal guys with normal looks and social skills -- just shitty game because they never figured girls out) are very different from the remainder, who are "omegas" (e.g., hideous and/or socially stunted weirdos who don't just need a few tweaks and a new mindset -- they're practically disabled when it comes to women, or social interactions in general). However, even omegas proclaiming "what's the big deal about sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 02:01 AM
5

It is a bit of a mistake to assume that the specific way guys academically discuss relationships and gender interactions on the internet is the way guys actually interact with women in the real world. "Hi. You sure are looking tight and fertile today! Would you like to submit to my dominant nature? I am totally alpha, and I think you'd really enjoy some kinky sex with me. You're probably starting to tingle already!"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 12:18 AM
1

It's an infringement on bodily autonomy, similar to the abortion cases. But even more in line with the fourth amendment since a paternity test is actually taking some of a baby's genetic material off of its body (without consent - baby's cant consent), then testing it to find out details about the baby that it can't consent to disclose (so the state could step in on behalf of the minor child to argue that disclosing the info from that test, or even having the test done at all, is against the chi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 09:21 PM
2

That could be a state thing. For us, it was advertised during the hospital's preparatory childbirth/parenting classes, and we were told that this was regular procedure fairly early in the labor/admission process, but other than that, the husbands would be welcome in the room at any time, except if behaving baldy, requested to leave by the wife, of if the anesthesiologist did a spinal block.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 08:52 PM
1

If she's agreed to meet you, it's time for logistics. Set a time and place. Quit small-talking and validating her. Ignore anything about this phantom boyfriend you've invented and escalate as normal.
/r/askTRP13/01/17 08:01 PM
6

Doctors take an oath to do no harm to their patients. Administering an unnecessary test that is against your patient's best interests and provides no benefit to your patient at all (just a possible detriment) is a violation of that oath. Doctors have a duty to their patients, not to society as a whole. The U.S. isn't communist China, where doctors administer lethal injections to second children for the good of society. Even if this were proposed as a legal requirement, not a medical one, it woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 07:41 PM
1

We're probably splitting hairs here. The OP viewpoint is that high count men are "just as much a cheating risk" as high count women. My position is that even if high count men are as willing, or even more willing, than high count women to cheat, they have significantly less opportunity. Your position is that "less opportunity" means "the same opportunity as long at they work a little harder". So it seems like we can agree that Chad McStudly and Stacey Slutterson would have fairly equal opportuni…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 07:37 PM
17

When a baby is born in most states in the US, they put antibacterial eyedrops into its eyes, unnecessarily in 99.9 percent of cases, to proactively treat for gonorrhea. The eye drops are cheap, and the potential for any harm to the baby is nearly zero, so it was decided that every single baby would receive these eyedrops. The reason for this was that when doctors asked women in labor or women about to deliver via C-section whether there was any chance they'd ever been exposed to gonorrhea, women…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 07:28 PM
1

If she agreed to meet and you've set the date, time, and place, shut the hell up and quit messaging her. Message her once, the day before, to confirm that you're still on to meet. Unless you have a magic phone that lets you stick your dick into it and fuck her all the way across town, the only thing you can do by continuing to small talk with her in text form is ruin your chances.
/r/askTRP13/01/17 07:11 PM
1

If only effort equaled success. I'd wager that a lot of men -- not just high count men -- would cheat if they could. In fact, beta bob, slovenly IT engineer who is currently suffering with a low-sex marriage to fatty mcbitcherson-bob, would probably be MORE likely to cheat (if he had the ability) than Matt Manwhore on his promiscuous wife Stacey Slut-Manwhore. But beta bob doesn't have the opportunity. No matter how much effort he puts in. Matt Manwhore could probably cheat if he put in the dece…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 07:09 PM
1

Good point. I was distracted by the surrounding issues. In your example, a man is harassing random waitresses and sending unwanted dick pics to random girls in his life. I guess that's technically "cheating", the same way leaving your wife at home to go out and rape someone is cheating. I mean, at this point, we're dealing with an unstable, harassing creep. Whether or not his behavior is cheating is like 0.01 percent of his problem, and when his woman dumps him, it will be for the other 99.99 pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 05:32 PM
2

The V doesn't say "high count men are just as likely to fuck up a relationship as high count women, for reasons other than actual cheating". It says "just as much of a cheating risk." I would argue, however, that low count men are equally likely to fuck up a relationship, just for entirely different reasons. Being clingy, needy, whining about sex all the time, generally being a loser that other women don't want, not having many friends or much of a life outside of his girlfriend, etc. etc. That …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 05:22 PM
2

You're still comparing high count men to other men. (e.g., "most men" who don't have former fuckbuddies and exes who are DTF.) Yes, high count men are more likely to cheat than low-count men. If you'd said that, no arguments here. Maybe even more likely than low-count women. But your V said just as much of a cheating risk as high count women. And there's just no comparison there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 04:52 PM
1

If the V stated "High count men are just as like to want to cheat or attempt to cheat as high count women" it would be correct. But high count men don't pose as big of a risk of actually cheating as high count women for one simple reason: Most women can walk out the door right now and find a sex partner. Most men can't. Cheating requires both the will and the opportunity. Most men, even reformed manwhores, have far less opportunity. If the V said "high n count men are more likely to cheat than l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 04:39 PM
2

Nobody uses Tinder to find serious boyfriends. Even in your country, wherever it is. You're not interacting with some sweet virginal girl that needs to be treated with kid gloves. Women use Tinder for 1) Fucking; and 2) Validation. If you've come across a girl who's only interested in #2 and not #1, you screen that out by being ballsy. You want girls who are only interested in making loser guys qualify themselves to them, be sweet to them, and greet them with "good morning" messages each day to …
/r/askTRP13/01/17 03:38 PM
1

A few options, depending on how the rest of the conversation goes. You could hit her where it hurts. Her value. "Really? Sounds like you have a long line of shitty exes." or something like that. Implying that she's been with low value/loser guys who can't kiss is implying she's a low value girl. You could continue to agree and amplify. "Thank God. We can get right to the fun part." If she's going to insist that touching and kissing are disgusting, hoping you'll start qualifying yourself by insis…
/r/askTRP13/01/17 02:30 PM
5

This is an excellent point. If you used to be a badass, then became a married chump, becoming a badass again will often fix your marriage. But if you've always been a chump, and married your wife as a chump, and endured a low-sex treat-me-like-a-chump marriage for 5-10 years, becoming a badass may destroy your marriage. It might not. But it might. It's very different becoming the guy you used to be versus becoming someone you've never been. The thing is, this isn't about your wife. It's about yo…
/r/MarriedRedPill12/01/17 05:00 PM
11

Sounds like a good plate to me. Never should have been more. Girlfriends who are friends with their ex's are forever a few drinks, a bad fight with you, a death in the family, or any other emotional tipping point away from jumping on that familiar dick. When girls hook-up outside of relationships, and when girls cheat, studies show they prefer a familiar friend over a random stranger. And pulling from the Ladder Theory guy, no man is ever "just friends" with a girl he finds attractive enough to …
/r/askTRP12/01/17 04:50 PM
2

If you're only looking at videos of strangers, then you've essentially got Tinder. 99% of what you respond to will be looks. Duh. But out in the real world, interactions can be a little more complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 04:39 PM
7

The V is correct. The subsequent text that begins, "I keep seeing reds go on about..." is incorrect. The Red Pill is all about sexual strategy being amoral. It's not a push to change the world or how "unfair" it is. It's a push to change you. A bunch of observations about what does and doesn't work, and shit you can do and change about yourself so that you, too, have more sexual opportunity. Here's the difference: Incels: "Men like X have sex. This happens because women are shallow idiots who ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 07:57 PM
3

Honestly, if I were on the market, I'd be more likely to do something for a married woman than a single one. Men are in a pretty sorry state right now. Most of them are pretty loser-ish, and most marriages are sub-par. They're okay, just not great. Getting a married woman to cheat is significantly easier than winning over some hot single girl whose phone keeps blowing up with guys. Girls with boyfriends are kind of in between. They don't cheat as readily as married women since they can just dump…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 07:36 PM
10

When a girl (e.g., prospective sex/relationship partner) asks a socially clueless guy to do something for him, (e.g., "Would you do X for me?"), what the socially clueless guy hears is: "It would mean a lot to me if you would do X for me." He does X for her, and it doesn't mean shit to her. However, 9 times in 10, she knows he's going to say yes when she asks, she knows he's only saying yes because she's a girl, he's a boy, and he'd be interested in something more, and she knows he's only saying…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 06:07 PM
2

That's really the heart of it all. Red Pill, Blue Pill, feminist, MRA, pro-life, pro-choice, liberal, conservative -- what we're really dealing with is just intolerance. From all sides. Nobody walks the world with an open mind, ready to be changed. People generally don't think that other, disagreeing people have equally valid viewpoints, just different opinions and conclusions that are reasonable. Most people think that they are 100% right. So right that it should be 100% obvious to everybody ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:06 PM
0

Your original position was a bit of an oversimplification, then. You specifically said that a medical abortion is no different than donating blood or an organ. And that no partner should get a say in the other partner's "health care decisions". An abortion is very different than donating blood or an organ, and far more than just a "health care decision." That doesn't mean the mother's right to bodily autonomy should be disregarded, but you were coming across as pretty inhuman with your declarati…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 06:36 PM
1

You type this like it's some big "gotcha". Like The Red Pill is secretive or hides what it's all about. Increasing your power at the expense of everyone else's (primarily women's). Thus getting you laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 06:09 PM
2

We're talking about slightly different issues, although the division is subtle, I'll admit. The current legal landscape in most places (as well as the ideology supported by the majority of people) is that a woman's right to bodily autonomy is greater than the right of an unborn lump of cells to eventually become a human. Pregnancy and childbirth are big deals, and most people agree that it's wrong to force a woman to do that. Even though her choice to terminate the pregnancy (or carry it to term…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 06:07 PM
1

Grandma can probably give the younger girls some tips. I'd probably have to appoint an advisor in charge of screening the world population for suitability. I just don't have time to fuck everybody and still hit the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 05:39 PM
1

Hey, I'm all about equal opportunity. Archwinger doesn't discriminate! Women that aren't sexually servicing me can freely go do men's work.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 05:30 PM
4

It is a gross oversimplification to equate termination of a pregnancy with every other "health care decision". A zygote is the only lump of cells in the entire universe, that if left alone and not sucked out using a medical vacuum cleaner, will turn into a human being. No other lump of cells on Earth does that. People can argue and disagree for centuries on when life actually begins, and whether a woman's rights to bodily autonomy and a man's rights to parental determination should or shouldn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 05:27 PM
2

In my perfect world, or what I think is a realistically attainable world? I mean, perfect for me would be Grand Overlord Archwinger being sexually serviced by every single female on Earth, while all of the men work diligently to produce cool shit for my enjoyment, and everyone on the planet is eternally grateful for the opportunity to exist in my universe. But I'd be okay if I only attained maybe 80-90 percent of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 05:19 PM
1

Looks are correlated to status. When you see a good-looking guy with a fit body, well-tailored suit, full head of awesome hair, and polished shoes driving a fancy car, you assume he's a high-status badass. Even if he's not. How many bald, fat presidents have we had in office? Not many. People hire, promote, and choose to socialize with better looking dudes. Even other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 05:16 PM
1

That's the same thing for women. If women can brag to their friends about having sex with you, because you're awesome, then you have high status. If women who have sex with you would have to hide it for fear of losing social points with their friends, then you have low status.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 05:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter