Women had nearly flawless PR until social media which has inadvently led to the Redpill

It’s no secret that the Redpill philosophy has been gaining traction over the last decade. Critics chalk it up to bitterness, misogyny, or just men being salty about rejection. But the real reason runs deeper and it’s rooted in the unraveling of a long-standing societal myth: the women-are-wonderful effect.

Social media has been a literal curse for women and it's because of their own doing. Back in the day l believe a lot of ladies used to get away with a lot of misdeeds owing to the societal beliefs that women are "innocent like". lt was all because of their pretty faces and pretentious demeanor, like you'd look at this fine fine shawrry and you wouldn't imagine she was ill mannered. That's why majority songs back in the 90s and early 2000s were love songs, these women had men singing in the rain and shiit.

But the internet era came and people were more connected than ever through social media. Women now started revealing their true colors on instagram, X, facebook etc. Proudly sharing their explicit photos, thot stories and sexual escapades. They shared what they really feel about men, how they manipulate & use them. They revealed their selfish, entitled, self centered and narcissistic selves. Lol just check the posts of some of the ladies here on this sub.

I think much of Romance hinged on men viewing women through a rose-tinted lens, leading to the adoration seen in old love songs and chivalric gestures. Women's behavior was rarely scrutinized because society operated on the assumption of their innate innocence.

Back in my blue-pilled days, I used to believe the romanticized narrative about women’s preferences when it came to intimacy. The media, romcoms, and even those overly idealistic conversations about love had me convinced that women were all about candlelit dinners, passionate kisses under the rain, and tender lovemaking where every touch was about emotional connection. I thought intimacy was a slow, poetic dance where feelings reigned supreme, and the idea of aggression was antithetical to what women wanted.

So imagine my surprise when I stumbled into the world of female erotica. I went in expecting something romantic, maybe even poetic. I thought I’d find stories that mirrored the cultural narrative I’d been fed: respectful courtship leading to passionate but tender intimacy. Instead, I found tales of choking, slapping, being "ravished," and dominant-submissive dynamics that walked the fine line between consensual and outright alarming.

I honestly thought sex for women was all about feelings, a slow and delicate exchange rooted in trust and love. I expected flowery prose about love and connection, something akin to Jane Austen meets Nicholas Sparks in bed. Instead, I found tales of dominance, submission, choking, slapping, and power dynamics. This wasn’t some fringe content either, female erotica thrives on these themes. As I dug deeper, I found studies and forums where women openly discussed their fantasies of submission, degradation, and yes, even simulated non-consent (CNC). The Fifty Shades of Grey phenomenon suddenly made sense, it wasn’t a fluke that it became a bestseller. It catered to desires that, during my blue-pilled phase, I wouldn’t have believed women harbored.

The reality I was encountering clashed hard with the wholesome, sanitized version of intimacy I’d built in my head. For years, society had sold men this idea of women as delicate, pure creatures who wanted nothing more than tenderness. My blue-pilled self thought intimacy was about making a woman feel safe, loved, and adored in the softest, most wholesome way possible lol

**Tldr: For decades, men were conditioned to see women as morally superior beings. Women were portrayed as nurturing, innocent, and emotionally pure. They were the heart of the family, the moral compass of society, and the untouchable ideal men were supposed to worship. This illusion worked for generations because women largely operated behind closed doors. What you didn’t see, you couldn’t question.

But then social media happened, and it shattered the illusion. The Redpill is rising because it fills the gap left by this cognitive dissonance. It provides an unfiltered, albeit controversial, framework for understanding female nature in a way that society refuses to acknowledge. This isn’t about blaming women, it’s about accountability. The women-are-wonderful effect shielded women from scrutiny for generations. Now that the veil has been lifted, the world is seeing women as they truly are: human. Flawed. Self-interested. Capable of both good and bad.**

Disagree if you want, but the rise of the Redpill isn’t about hate—it’s about survival in a world where the old myths no longer apply.