TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GridRexx Archive

View 373 posts and 62,918 comments by GridRexx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
376

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 12:42 AM
243

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 04:11 PM
239

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 07:10 PM
217

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 08:37 PM
207

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 01:54 PM
206

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 01:30 AM
174

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 07:29 PM
171

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 06:25 PM
171

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 01:53 PM
165

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 11:21 PM
162

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 10:55 PM
157

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 01:39 PM
155

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:24 PM
155

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 03:33 PM
153

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 10:49 PM
145

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:19 PM
143

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 01:01 PM
141

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 11:27 PM
140

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 12:13 AM
130

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 08:23 PM
129

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 02:12 PM
125

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 11:49 AM
120

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 09:02 PM
118

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 06:11 PM
111

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 07:41 PM
106

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:59 AM
103

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 03:15 PM
96

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 11:46 PM
95

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 07:50 PM
90

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 04:53 PM
88

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:41 PM
88

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:00 PM
87

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 04:42 PM
84

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:20 PM
83

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 01:55 PM
83

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 02:02 PM
82

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 01:35 PM
81

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:33 PM
81

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 07:21 PM
79

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:40 PM
73

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 09:59 PM
71

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 10:21 PM
70

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 06:09 PM
67

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 09:52 PM
66

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:45 PM
64

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 12:32 AM
63

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 12:16 PM
62

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 10:33 PM
61

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 10:09 PM
61

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 11:55 PM
58

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 02:30 PM
56

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 04:49 PM
55

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 09:27 PM
54

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 12:07 AM
54

Question For WomenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/20 10:49 PM
54

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 07:27 PM
54

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 10:57 PM
52

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 01:53 PM
52

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 02:48 PM
52

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 01:33 PM
52

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 04:04 PM
49

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 05:40 PM
49

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 08:05 PM
48

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 05:16 PM
48

Purge week!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:25 PM
46

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 10:52 PM
46

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 11:43 AM
45

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/18 11:39 PM
45

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:56 AM
45

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 12:17 AM
44

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 02:19 PM
44

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 04:01 PM
43

Question For WomenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 01:09 AM
42

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 03:08 AM
41

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 08:28 PM
41

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:38 AM
40

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 11:44 PM
40

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 11:55 AM
40

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 08:29 PM
36

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 05:35 PM
33

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:23 PM
33

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 08:40 PM
33

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 03:50 PM
33

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:07 PM
33

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 03:21 AM
33

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:34 PM
33

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 03:13 PM
33

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 05:33 PM
32

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 08:15 PM
32

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:18 PM
32

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:14 PM
31

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 02:51 AM
30

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 02:32 PM
30

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:04 PM
30

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/18 12:34 AM
30

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 09:23 PM
29

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 05:11 PM
29

ScienceGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 01:17 AM
28

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 12:19 AM
28

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 04:22 PM
28

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:56 PM
28

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/23 02:36 PM
28

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/21 11:16 PM
27

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 08:13 PM
27

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 11:42 AM
27

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 11:52 PM
26

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 07:47 PM
26

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 10:32 PM
26

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 11:02 AM
26

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/21 02:12 PM
26

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 06:38 PM
26

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:15 PM
26

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 12:06 AM
26

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 08:38 PM
26

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 11:16 PM
25

ScienceGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 01:40 PM
25

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 10:20 PM
25

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/21 02:40 AM
25

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 02:46 PM
25

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 12:33 AM
25

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 11:00 AM
24

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 09:16 AM
24

Q4WomenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/18 08:29 PM
24

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 10:08 PM
23

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/21 05:05 PM
23

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 04:15 PM
23

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 10:08 PM
23

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 12:50 AM
23

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 09:51 PM
23

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 12:37 PM
22

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 04:52 PM
22

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 10:59 PM
22

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 02:29 PM
22

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 12:28 AM
22

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 01:07 AM
21

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:09 PM
21

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:19 PM
21

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 11:54 PM
21

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 12:11 PM
21

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:25 PM
21

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 01:13 PM
21

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 10:39 PM
21

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 05:59 PM
21

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 01:08 PM
20

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 12:15 AM
20

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:16 PM
20

Question For RedpillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 03:28 PM
20

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 09:52 PM
20

Question For WomenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:20 PM
20

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 03:58 PM
20

Question for MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 03:54 PM
20

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 01:45 PM
20

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/17 11:42 PM
19

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 09:07 PM
19

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 07:53 PM
19

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 06:16 PM
19

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 05:23 PM
19

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 03:48 PM
18

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 03:22 PM
18

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 10:48 AM
18

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 06:38 PM
18

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 03:56 PM
18

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 07:17 PM
17

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 02:07 PM
17

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 07:06 PM
17

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 09:22 PM
17

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/22 10:15 PM
17

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/23 04:56 PM
17

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 10:48 PM
17

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 03:22 PM
17

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 10:01 PM
17

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 04:27 PM
17

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 07:59 PM
16

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/19 07:08 PM
16

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 08:30 PM
16

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:28 PM
16

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 08:38 PM
16

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 07:24 PM
16

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 11:12 PM
16

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 01:39 PM
16

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 11:53 PM
16

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 04:34 PM
16

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 01:08 AM
15

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 03:39 AM
15

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 02:18 AM
15

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 09:39 PM
15

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 06:33 PM
15

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 07:21 PM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:39 PM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 06:01 PM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 08:57 PM
14

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 06:09 PM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 03:58 PM
14

ScienceGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 12:26 AM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 06:59 PM
14

ScienceGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 12:46 AM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:46 PM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 06:20 PM
14

Question for BluePillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 04:48 PM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 04:00 AM
14

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/18 07:08 PM
14

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 12:30 AM
13

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 02:34 AM
13

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 11:48 PM
13

Question For RedpillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 11:36 AM
13

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/23 04:15 PM
13

GridReXX/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:04 PM
13

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 08:15 PM
13

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:35 PM
13

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:42 PM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 11:52 AM
12

Question for MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 07:52 PM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/14 04:12 PM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 12:58 PM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 08:14 PM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:04 PM
12

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:23 AM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 06:02 PM
12

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 09:24 PM
12

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:57 PM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/18 07:32 AM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 11:12 PM
12

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 02:13 AM
12

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 09:09 PM
12

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 05:35 PM
12

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 03:13 PM
12

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/18 01:49 PM
11

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/21 11:35 PM
11

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 10:16 PM
11

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:13 PM
11

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 11:07 PM
11

Question for MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:46 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 03:14 PM
10

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 07:55 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 10:26 PM
10

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 11:09 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 05:51 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 04:58 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 07:59 PM
10

ScienceGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 12:38 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:36 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/14 02:33 PM
10

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 07:55 PM
10

Question for WomenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/17 04:23 PM
9

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 09:26 AM
9

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/17 10:35 PM
9

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/17 04:19 PM
9

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 04:19 PM
9

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 07:20 PM
9

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 03:02 PM
9

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 04:16 PM
9

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 03:32 PM
9

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 07:53 PM
8

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 02:02 PM
8

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 11:16 AM
8

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 06:58 PM
8

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 02:26 PM
8

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 11:17 PM
8

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 02:11 PM
8

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 11:55 PM
8

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:14 PM
8

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 01:42 PM
8

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 07:37 PM
8

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 03:44 PM
8

Question For RedpillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/14 05:00 PM
8

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 11:23 PM
8

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:17 PM
7

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 10:53 PM
7

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 05:42 PM
7

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 06:35 PM
7

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 11:50 AM
7

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 01:14 AM
7

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 07:31 PM
7

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/16 07:15 PM
7

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:37 AM
7

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 01:53 PM
7

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 02:11 PM
7

Question for MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 02:18 PM
7

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/14 03:39 PM
7

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 03:18 PM
7

Purge Week!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 07:28 PM
7

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 11:07 PM
7

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 05:48 PM
7

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 09:31 PM
7

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 01:37 AM
6

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 07:04 PM
6

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 11:01 PM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 12:32 PM
6

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 12:54 AM
6

Question For RedpillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/14 06:05 PM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 01:41 AM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 05:25 PM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 09:17 PM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/14 02:35 PM
6

Question for WomenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/18 11:46 PM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/18 09:00 PM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:47 AM
6

Question For RedpillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/14 05:56 PM
6

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:17 PM
5

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 06:50 PM
5

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 03:04 PM
5

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 05:53 PM
5

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 09:55 PM
5

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 07:48 PM
5

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:53 PM
5

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 07:32 PM
5

ScienceGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 12:33 AM
4

Question for MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:17 PM
4

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:07 PM
4

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 08:22 PM
4

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:32 PM
4

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 03:29 PM
4

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 05:47 PM
4

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 01:43 AM
4

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 09:05 PM
4

GridReXX/r/MensRights15/03/14 10:12 AM
4

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:36 PM
3

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 01:45 PM
3

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 07:58 PM
3

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 05:37 PM
3

QuestionssssssssGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 03:32 PM
3

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 03:22 PM
3

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 05:27 PM
3

Purge Debate!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 12:51 PM
3

Purge Week!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 08:51 PM
3

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/18 12:55 AM
3

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:21 PM
3

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 05:11 PM
3

Question for RedPillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 05:06 PM
3

Purge week!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:21 PM
3

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 10:27 PM
2

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 06:09 PM
2

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 10:13 PM
2

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 02:39 PM
2

Off-topic GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 01:50 PM
2

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 02:01 AM
2

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 07:45 PM
2

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 09:49 PM
2

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 05:30 PM
2

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/14 08:41 PM
2

Purge week!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:38 AM
1

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 10:39 PM
1

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 02:10 PM
1

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:51 AM
1

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/23 12:50 AM
1

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 02:53 PM
1

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:01 PM
1

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 11:13 PM
1

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 06:32 AM
1

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 08:13 PM
1

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 05:46 PM
1

Question for BluePillGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 03:02 PM
1

Purge Science!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:04 AM
1

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 08:09 PM
1

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 02:29 PM
1

Purge Discussion!GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 03:08 PM
1

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:49 PM
1

Question For WomenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 07:54 PM
1

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 10:54 PM
0

GridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 08:01 PM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 01:20 PM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 12:49 PM
0

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 06:57 PM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 09:50 PM
0

CMVGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 12:45 AM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 03:26 PM
0

DiscussionGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 08:42 PM
0

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 12:11 AM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 03:11 PM
0

Question For MenGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 07:57 PM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:28 PM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:59 PM
0

DebateGridReXX/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:46 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 62,918 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Classic
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 11:36 AM
2

Haha you’re saying it’s the curly hair not their demeanor? Hmmmmm. How they look plays a part but it’s also demeanor and disposition and how you interact!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 11:20 PM
2

Sure dogs can bite. But this post isn’t about dogs in general! It’s about golden retrievers!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:58 PM
3

Ohhh! Nah I havent noticed. But I think if that’s the case it’s because white American boys (again for historical socioeconomic reasonssss) produce more golden retrievers than others lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:57 PM
1

But I feel like they sometimes get exploited when they don’t date each other 🤧
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:55 PM
4

I’m black! And my ex was a golden retriever type. Also black! (But i feel you. For historical socioeconomic reasons it’s harder for many Black American boys to grow up with the Travis Kelce-type carefree whimsy to be a cutesy pup!)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:51 PM
4

A man wanting a woman because she’s “cooperative” and pleasant is the same as women wanting a man because he’s a Golden Retriever type 🐶🐾 That’s a good boy!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 01:58 PM
2

I am saying that women feel lusty when she feels lusty. She’s not missing out on feeling lusty due to whatever signals in your study. If she isn’t perceiving lust in that moment it means she’s not feeling lusty. That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 07:20 PM
2

Apparently 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 07:18 PM
3

I’m not arguing that women aren’t sexual or that arousal doesn’t happen. I’m saying you are treating genital arousal and subjective awareness as the same thing, and they’re not. A body can show arousal without the person consciously experiencing it as lust or desire in that exact moment. So your study may support physiological arousal, but it doesn’t automatically prove conscious, felt horniness in every case. As I’ve been saying: women know when they feel lusty and horny because their body and …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 07:00 PM
3

I don’t think women aren’t sexual??? You made that up. You don’t understand what I’m pushing back on.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 12:57 PM
5

Yes I am interrogating the premises of your “scientific fact.” My point is that if “she can’t tell” then sensationally and for all intents and purposes it’s not functionally arousing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 12:18 PM
8

I disagree with you in the sense that if our bodies wanted us to feel arousal in the same way you a.k.a. men do we simply would. Women know when they’re horny or feel horny. So a woman’s pussy being wet doesn’t necessarily mean that she feels horny. She knows when she feels horny because she’s felt it before and trust me. It’s an actual feeling that feels pretty darn lusty and sensually aroused. The problem is your science machines and your male projection is trying to one-to-one “oh well her bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 10:54 AM
16

Women love once she’s in love… as in in a relationship or directed toward a person we’ve interacted with. OP is right. Walking around we don’t really think about men like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 10:47 AM

Like what? can you share examples of these transfers so I have a better idea what you’re talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 03:13 PM

People said it or alluded to it. So women and girls could more easily say to themselves “sure those guys but not any guy i know they don’t think like that!” But with the advent of social media, the girls are seeing oh they all think like that. So it’s harder to ignore or gaslight yourself that it’s not true. You mow have direct viz in the neighbor boy’s thoughts because he’s posting on social media. And his thoughts are more aligned with the asshole guys than you could ever have imagined.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 03:12 PM

My thing is is that these men’s peer women were also told certain things and the current reality is not matching her expectations at all. And yet women aren’t devolving into fascism and edgelord’isms as much as men. So! There is something else going on with how men react to disappointment, grievance, and generally not getting what they want vs. how women react it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 11:29 AM

No this is false. I dislike certain behaviors, actions, and mindsets. If a man or woman displays or possesses those things I tend to dislike them and not want to have any intimate interpersonal bond with them. It is not “intrinsic.” It’s purely based on how they act and how they think. It’s based on their character, comportment, and countenance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 11:23 AM

And even back then it was added-value. Just more convenience or survival added-value and less personal fulfillment/alignment added-value. In no era ever did people partner “just because.” Someone was getting added-value loll
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 11:17 AM

As a millennial who graduated college in the Great Recession financial crisis… false lol. And Gen X adults had to go through the dot com bust just as they were getting footing. Shit happens. The rug gets pulled out from many of us. This part is not unique to Gen Z. Half of Gen Z and all of Gen Alpha growing up with smartphones since birth is unique to you guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 11:14 AM

It does get them going lol… But it’s true! And I haven’t seen anyone successfully argue against it playing a major role.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 11:09 AM

Yep. The internet was popular in 2001 but I used it to talk to my friends on AIM. And download packages for The Sims and Roller Coaster Tycoon. And download music. And play neopets. And yahoo! Pool. Or hangout on MySpace. Or AskJeeves lol. As a young girl and teen I wasn’t on the internet talking all day to edgelord strangers. That said I kinda think many men were using it that way… men sorta invented anon forum culture. For example, I wasn’t on gamer chats when I was an adolescent but if I were…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 10:58 AM
5

Yep! I think the incompatibility always existed. And yes, I think it’s having an even more adverse effect on present day hetero coupling for many reasons: because people are more generally conversant, they are more aware of incompatibilities and inconvenient truths, they have more exposure to the inner workings of each others’ mindsets (lol… thanks internet!), and as a result they have more fine-tuned pattern recognition (a more discerning eye for red flags)… all in advance of committing to each…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:50 PM
13

My counter is I don’t think men and women are becoming divided wrt mindsets, worldviews, attitudes, imperatives, desires, wants, turn-offs , turn-ons, etc. I think they have always been quite divergent. And not in the “oh but opposites attract and wonderfully complement each other way” that society tried to paint to encourage hetero coupling loll It’s just historically, men and women didn’t fully grok their acute differences until after pairing up. And historically, circumstance and external fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:53 PM
3

> and men are generally less likely than to women to identify as bisexual I’m glad you said “identify as” and not “be.” Because the amount of men who have sexual relations with men or sexual fantasies about men who don’t “identify” as bi is wayyyyyyyy larger than people think it is. Hell I’ve seen dude Stefon Diggs fans get super mad when people call Stefon bi or not 100% straight despite all of the evidence pointing to that. It doesn’t matter to me that Stefon doesn’t “identify as” bi. The man …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:15 AM
2

You’re right. I am no angel lol. But men have always approached me like I was their future Mrs. Obama or something. Men treat you how they perceive you and I guess they perceive me as “classy smart lady” 🤣🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 10:51 AM
1

[u/iamapieceofsh1t2020](u/iamapieceofsh1t2020) I like your honesty about how the times you lied about being aligned with her values and mindset that those relationships lasted less than 6 months. You lied because short term access to sex with her was most important to you. You knew you two weren’t aligned and would likely encounter a critical values mismatch impasse but you wanted to fuck her. And you didn’t feel like putting off sex until you came across a more aligned woman. In short, you ain’…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 11:28 AM

Women cope with romantic loneliness better precisely because they cultivate community and friendships… Men can do whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:36 PM
2

Again, I think you’re struggling with population level analysis. Not everything they do is antisocial. Males in aggregate do more antisocial behaviors than their female counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 02:20 PM
1

I asked you questions because you seem to think more males than females devolving into antisocial behaviors when they’re romantically unpartnered is some conspiracy made to make women look “innocent” when it’s simply observation of asymmetrical behavioral patterns. You’re the only using “innocent.” This is what I mean when I say men lazily resort to “it’s the women are wonderful effect!! 😤” when they can’t accept the reality of men being accurately perceived as antisocial for… quite literally be…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:13 PM
2

Do you understand relative comparison? Skew? Asymmetry? No one said no woman has ever murdered. Or no woman is toxic. People are identifying the skews in how lonely women behave and express themsleves vs lonely men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:06 PM
3

More than the female ones. I think the better comparison is males fall into toxicity when romantically lonely or when they feel aggrieved more than their female counterparts do. She’s basically saying what Scott Galloway said: “When women don’t have relationships, they invest in work and friendships, but when men don’t, they turn to porn, conspiracy theories, and misogyny.” And Scott is just saying what women and everyone with observation skills, pattern recognition, and common sense has already…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:51 AM
2

Many really had strong friend groups or became helpful pillars of the community in some way. Plus women know how to find a social club. Those mahjong groups don’t run themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:37 AM
7

<image> All excellent points 😌 Dawning on me all of my life romantically lonely women were sort of the butt of jokes. They even had a name. Spinsters. No one particularly cared about them outside of their own friends. Nowadays you hear guys expect people to care about him cuz he’s lonely and it’s like bruh the only people who are going to care about that are your friends and loved ones. Which apparently they don’t have either 🧍‍♀️, or they don’t seem to get care, love, support, thoughtfulness, e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:05 AM

Ngl b My brain refused to comprehend your title. Too much niche jargon words every other word 😂 I reject it!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:38 AM

Fairs
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 09:48 PM

Yes 😭 Luckily she’s used to it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 09:48 PM

For her or him? Lol He gave them back lmao. It was def brutal for her because I’m sure she would’ve enjoyed even longer of a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:30 PM

I’ve heard of the six inches one but I think that’s just men hyper-fixating on dicks? I heard the abs one first.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:29 PM

Is that the 666 thing? Six feet Six figures Six pack I think being taller than me and having “we can live comfortably” money is preferable. But I’m also looking for character traits in a partner that their version of “high value” never seems to include. As far as six pack? Meh. Physically speaking I’m okay enough with his stomach being flat and him having strong arms, wide shoulders, and sexy legs. That super low bf% stuff never mattered to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:42 PM

They really have a delusional (or maybe it’s entitled) understanding of what parenting is. In their minds they get to say they “have offspring” while some mammy (the mother) does most of the actually work 😒🥴 Women seem to go into having kids already having mentally level-set that it’s going to be a lot of work. Men apparently go into it thinking nothing will functionally change except now he can say he has kids and get societal validation cookies 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:36 PM

<image> ​I have a friend going through a divorce now. (Her husband initiated. We think he has a side girlfriend somewhere) They both have prestigious high-income careers but she was the primary caretaker during the marriage. He demanded full custody. To his surprise, she didn’t fight it and handed those kids right over and had a blast. She was back to primary custodian within within 2 months 😭. He could not handle the full custody he allegedly really wanted. Reality is he didn’t want his kids f…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:08 PM
3

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 06:35 PM

Why would you wan to do “nasty things” with your life partner? It sounds like you think sex is nasty lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 11:31 AM
3

Yeah I remember a male friend being moody and saying “ugh I just wanna fight or fuck.” So I’d say men’s default seems to be fight, fuck, or flee whenever they’re feeling testerical.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 11:05 AM
4

> incentive is community I’m noticing men on this forum have no idea what community means. When women say the tradeoff is community men here genuinely don’t seem to grok at all. They are so devoid of relational humanity, mutual consideration, and basic empathy that the concept eludes them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 11:01 AM
2

Exactly. The proof in those studies is proven out in relational interactions within families, friend groups, peers, and romantic relationships. And even anecdotally it’s always women I see giving homeless MEN and women money on the street. I used to volunteer at a 15-25 homeless shelter and a vet homeless shelter after work. Guess who the majority of volunteers were? Women. Then gay men. Minority of straight men. Even for the vet shelter who straight men virtue signal about caring so much about …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 10:55 AM
2

You disagree with “all else equal” approach even though you just attempted it on me in another thread? Yeah. Sure bud lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 05:05 PM
2

I have literally never thought about someone’s “n count.” I think about a lot of things. Like their character. Mutual consideration. How they treat me, themselves, others. Their competency in life. If we can laugh and get on well. Their worldview. Mindset. A lot. But nah I don’t have whatever instinctual obsession you have about “n count.” Do you need me to possess that or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:48 PM
2

What studies? I linked no studies. You disagree with the methodological validity of a maxdiff? Okay? Debate the thousands of researchers who conduct them and the thousands of entities who commission them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:46 PM
2

Exactly. This is revealed by the defensive way he replied to me for saying I don’t regard their mindset and wouldn’t be compatible with them. It’s inconceivable to him that a man should be selected against for this lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:43 PM
3

I would assume the below about them: > telltales like being unhinged, unstable, cavalier, very uninhibited, impulsive, super sex focused, attention seeking, compulsive, history of STDs, etc. I don’t have an instinctual revulsion about “n count” for the sake of it the way you do. I have a revulsion about incompetence, lack of discipline, and all of the above bolded.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:39 PM
1

We disagree then. When I “all else equal” or root cause interrogate them, it’s clear that the primary trait they’re seeking is 0 n count for its sake. In research we call this a maxdiff analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:37 PM
4

Eh. Any man who’s pressed about “n count” would rather it be 0. I’ve asked men this question before. Would you choose the mentally sound loving reasonable woman with an n count of 20 over the “harpy” callous woman with a n count of 0. Many men don’t care about compatibility. They simply likes the mental ego trophy of her having been with no one else. That’s the value for them. They aren’t doing correlative analyses about associated traits. The value is “I won.” Men should just admit that. Many d…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:10 PM
3

My reply was to this thread specifically though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:05 PM
6

That was a typo… Now can you answer my question?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 12:08 PM
9

What’s vague and incoherent general about it? His mindset and values I don’t regard. That’s what’s incompatible with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 12:06 PM
6

If it had to be “revealed to me” it means it wasn’t affecting the other aspects of their character, mindset, and behaviors that I care about. I’d probably be shocked because in my mind someone who’s had sex with 2000 people would have more telltales like being unhinged, unstable, cavalier, very uninhibited, impulsive, super sex focused, attention seeking, compulsive, history of STDs, etc. But clearly I’ve met a unicorn! So I’ll be happy with my unicorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 12:02 PM
3

I think if a man finds out his kid isn’t his and the child is let’s say 8. I don’t think that man should be able to be sued for child support. Let’s say they’re married and this leads to him divorcing her. He shouldn’t have to pay her any child support for the kid. I think this sucks for the kid that their life is disrupted like this but that’s why you shouldn’t lie or be in doubt about things like paternity as a woman. If you were fucking several dudes during the same time period, then you need…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:49 AM
6

No she’s saying it’s an activity that requires the agreement of another person. Like ping pong. Or pickle ball. Or foosball. Or air hockey.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:39 AM
15

Eh it depends. I think men say this not realizing many “virginal” women are turned off by “so what’s your body count” questions. I’m not compatible with men with that mindset. Has nothing to do with feeling judged. I just find the compulsion to lead with asking that incompatible with my spirit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:36 AM
8

That’s still unnecessarily limited and shortsighted. I can expect the worst and still be happy I experience the moments of happiness and companionship I did even if we end up broken up later. The other option is to never have loved which sounds like a worse tradeoff to me 🤷‍♀️ That’s like me saying I never had a job because eventually a job will piss you off or fire you. So you mean I just never get to make money at all??? 😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:33 AM
13

Sounds like you should meet male friends where there’s less chance for you guys to “try to compete for women.” That seems like the biggest barrier you listed for why you can’t do what women do and make besties in the club bathroom. Instead of trying to meet men to be your “wingman” while already out “on the prowl.” Meet dudes at mutual interest link ups. Pick-up basketball at local gyms or parks. Professional org happy hours. Running clubs. Literally anywhere that isn’t the bar or club or pick u…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 06:00 AM
3

Abnormal but iconic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 12:50 PM

I call men and women cute. But to my friends like in conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 06:37 PM
4

The Swan was lowkey diabolical 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:33 PM
2

Yes 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:18 PM
4

Hello! I tuned in religiously for Stacy and Clinton! <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:12 PM
2

I agree. Calling people ugly is mean-spirited and cruel. Those are aggy bitches doing that. But yeah tryna force people to think of someone as ugly is also silly. I think women are doing it to out of kindness for Milly. If I were reading a bunch of insults about my looks I’d feel better knowing others are calling those assholes bitchasses and defending me 🥹
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:09 PM
3

Basically Red Herring <image> A squat person is typically short, wide, and heavily built. Like a stocky or blocky build. Like the Tolkien dwarves!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:01 PM
2

Women have literally never called “getting a makeover” misogynistic. They live for that shit. They’re excited when men women children gays and theys get makeovers. What they’re calling out is that the rhetoric and culture associated with manospherians (of which “looksmaxxers” are part of) tends to run more misogynistic than anything they’re typically around.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:00 PM
1

Boxy. Squat. Strong looking. And a look in their eye like they have nothing to lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:57 PM
5

As a woman when I say a person is “hot” I usually spell it “hott” (that extra t adds some umph 🫦), and as you said I mean “sexy.” It means I have unconsciously assessed their looks and vibe and the combo is arousing, titillating, a turn on. When I say someone is “cute” I’m usually only talking about their looks. But it doesn’t necessarily mean I’m aroused in the moment. Or that I find them sexy (yet). It just means I objectively think they’re aesthetically pretty or handsome. And I guess I’m usu…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:53 PM
8

<image> > You read it here ladies, better not have dinner with your family, do yoga or have pets or listen to music. Probably better not to hold hands or get a massage or laugh …you’re damaging your ability to “pair bond”🙄 Yes. Precisely my annoyance.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 03:28 PM
2

That’s a straw man. I never said men as a group care more. I have been arguing that men as a group discuss this topic (and in this specific “n count” way) more than women as a group do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 03:22 PM
2

> Its funny how mods break there own rules There was no rule broken here. Post contentless rhetoric underneath the Automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:12 AM
0

No. It isn’t just my algo. The internet is aggregate data. Data has skews that exist irrelevant of people’s personal algorithm. This explanation has 20+ citations supporting my accurate POV. One good things about LLMs is that there isn’t a single better consumer-facing tool out there that can synthesize and calculate the volumes of anecdata across the internet. Edit: The prompt: > Across internet discourse in forums, message boards, streams, and social media over the last decade+ when the concep…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:31 AM
6

Yes that’s sort of the point of my OP lol It’s why I have “pair bonding™️” in quotes in the title because I’m speaking to the manospherian use of it. Men more than women are the ones who obsess over “pair bonding,” and their use of it is not any definition you’ve shared. They use the concept opportunistically to specifically talk about what they want from a woman in a relationship: virginal submission. The extent of their “pair bonding” discourse is “female n count” lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:25 AM
5

“More males” in this case = more males than females discussing and obsessing over it. Yes. I’m sorry (not sorry) that skew analysis and asymmetry in aggregate data makes you snark 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:19 AM
2

My disagreement is that you’re dismissing the fact that “status” is genuinely part of the male SMV equation. It’s LOOKS x SWAG x STATUS = MALE SEXINESS FACTOR In that order too. His looks get him in the door. In her orbit so to speak. His looks are then amplified by his charms rizz persona vibe disposition frame “way about him” whatever you wanna call it. This is what actively turns her on (or off) in the moment. His status amplifies the effect of the former two. Women do not sustain lust for pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:17 AM
6

Preciate you!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:10 AM
10

I don’t agree. In my observation “pair bonding” discourse is brought up and obsessed over way more from males than females online. Outside of the few people who studied it in the classroom, it’s mostly talked about by dudes who happen to be talking about the “n count” of “females.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:09 AM
4

There are no studies about men caring about the concept of “pair bonding™️.” The only “study” is searching the World Wide Web for the term over the last decade and seeing if it’s males or females discussing the concept or authoring content about it. I am saying more males than females obsess over the concept of “pair bonding.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:07 AM
6

Thank you! If anything LLMs were trained on my years of exquisite Reddit commentary! Hmph!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 01:17 AM
9

So it surges after what? Making out? Penetration? In mouth or vagina? Humping? Grinding? I feel like the feel good bonding can be had from kissing and cuddling with someone you have a crush on all the same lol. I think the hyper focus on “penis in something” is largely male projection tbh. Like do sapphic couples not “pair bond”? I can assure you that they definitely hyper attach probably in deeper ways than many hetero couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 01:15 AM
12

Men frame pair bonding as “she shouldn’t have had sex before me.” But not “I am virgin coming to her 😌” so no they don’t tend to frame it as mutual…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 12:14 AM
13

Hyper promiscuity is a red flag for everyone. The reason men care more about it has to do with else than how women allegedly “pair bond.” It’s more about his desire for an “unsullied woman.” And yet, imobservation, women who have fucked multiple men fall in love easier than women who are more prudish. “Hoes” actually like men 😂🤷‍♀️ Gold diggers and whores are slightly different. But those chicks who be fucking the text man for texts… well. She likes these men and she’s shamed for it! SMH
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 11:47 PM
12

It hasn’t been studied in humans the same way it’s been studied in animals. But yes, I agree with the latter for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 11:42 PM
22

Very cool! I’m not denying that pair bonding is a biological concept, and I’m aware it’s been studied in animals’ neuro pathways. That said, I personally find the jump from that research to human relationships is not nearly as clean or foolproof as people love to make it sound. More importantly, my OP is about how men online use and exploit the term to make one-sided arguments about how women are supposed to bond to them (“body count,”deference, etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 11:21 PM
28

I’ve been posting for a decade here. Pre-AI. I write well. Always have. I’m sure my posts from 9 years ago would be flagged as “AI” too. Some of us are just gud 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 11:04 PM

If this is said, it’s typically said in response to someone that they feel like is already getting over on them. Or someone who they think wants to pull a fast one on them for their express enjoyment at the expense of their own. It’s typically not said in response to a well-meaning mutually considerate good faith person.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 04:33 PM
10

Oh I don’t care about men’s reactions. My point is despite what you’re saying, men actually don’t want women to behave vigilantly. They make that clear with their incessant whinging. Women being appropriately vigilant reduces their opportunities to access women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 07:24 PM
9

No. You are incorrect. That is not my point. My point is WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF HETEROSEXUAL DATING DYNAMICS: > Men aren’t expected to date their demographic’s biggest predator. That’s uniquely the experience of women. Your commitment to ignoring this very obvious context is not lost on me. It’s extremely telling and disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 07:22 PM
11

Irrelevant. I said this: > When women take appropriate safety measures and operate with a reasonable amount of vigilance men start…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 07:12 PM
11

And yet females are murdered, assaulted, stalked, and harassed by males precipitously more than the inverse. Men aren’t expected to date their demographic’s biggest predator. That’s uniquely the experience of women. As debaters, you guys aren’t great at apt relative comparisons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 07:11 PM
16

When women take appropriate safety measures and operate with a reasonable amount of vigilance men start complaining about “male loneliness epidemic” or “being discriminated against” or “too many plant/cat ladies” or “women being too picky” or “ommgggggg why would you cheekily choose a bear over us!!!! 🤬😤” or “so neurotic” or “not all men are like that” or… Ad infinitum.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 07:02 PM
5

Yes! They claim they’re being used like an “emotional tampon.” I’m like that’s literally female friendship: reciprocal emotional comfort… 🧍‍♀️ OP needs to sit with the fact that most men don’t want to be our friend, they want more… so they’re rarely satisfied with friendship from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 06:42 PM

I’m confused. That’s why I’m saying she should not opt in or opt out. I am not saying she should stay with someone where they’re both miserable for their various libido incompatibility reasons or other reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:22 PM

No one said that. Do you not understand what population statistics imply? It’s relative differences in the asymmetry of rape perpetrators.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:20 PM

No. I am not out of my mind. I am saying male sexuality at a population statistics level is more perverse than female sexuality. The asymmetry in statistics for the things they get into including crimes like rape, molestation, and SA speaks for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:19 PM

😌🙂‍↕️🫡
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:17 PM

I don’t think sex is a requirement. I think the most if not all men view it as something they really really really really want and usually more often than you so if you choose to marry a man have that in your mind. I don’t know why this is such a controversial opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:17 PM

Yes. I’m aware it’s not always possible. That’s why I’m advocating for women to become more aware of such. My OP title is sort of clickbait. It’s so I can have this convo 😌
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:57 PM

The spirit of my OP is that you should try to be as aligned as possible before and throughout the relationship because roughing it through glaring incompatibility is going to cause resentment whether people want to admit that or not. My other point (which was more obvious in my opinion) is that A LOT of women do seem genuinely blindsided by how much men want sex. Maybe not you. I peeped your unnecessary snark about my insight into happy marriages down below. But many women do go into relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:51 PM

My point is even with those things, she can simply not commit to someone who disturbs her peace. My OP isn’t “women should take drugs and fuck men more so hetero relationships can sustain.” It’s more: opt out if that isn’t for you 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:44 PM

Yes, anything “hetero” will be lots of compromise. You’re taking two divergent fairly incompatible things and telling them they’re supposed to gel smoothly. That only works if you have two people who are NATURALLY the stereotypes for their gender and who have zero expectations of the other person to have traits outside of the stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:42 PM

I think “love” will always find a way, whether that’s love for a lifestyle, the person, “family.” But it will not be easy because you’re going to be trying to overcome some overt incompatibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:38 PM

Listen. I know how I annoyed I get when someone is pestering me for sex when I don’t want it. I solve for this by not committing to people who don’t match my needs. Other women and men are not as forward-thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:36 PM

At a population statistics level men’s horniness has led to men fucking animals, dead people, children, people in comas, to the spread of all sorts of disease the preponderance of AIDS I can go on and on. So yeah, I’d say it’s more pathological than affection is. It’s more likely to be perverse or disordered than affection is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:34 PM

I think it should be common sense. But I also want men to understand that the more women that come to terms with this, the more who will simply opt out. I think men are reading my OP and thinking “yay women are gonna fuck me longtime!” No lol. Im saying women shouldn’t sign up to commit to that AT ALL unless that’s something she actually enjoys and wants. Or I’m saying don’t marry a man like that. Marry a man with a libido that’s more reasonable for you or marry one who isn’t “sex sex sex sex!” …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:31 PM

Yep. I think a lot of women enter in sort of naive about what they’re signing up for. Especially more sheltered women. I’m basically advocating for women to be hyper aware of the landscape and of their wants and needs and of his before “I do.”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:27 PM

I’ll be honest. I think it’s the women who don’t want to have an honest conversation about it, because I think if they do, they’ll realize “omg do I really have it in me to commit to that sort of expectation or pestering?” It ruins the fantasy of happily ever after. And I’ll be honest again: I don’t think men really want women to be honest either. Because it’ll lead to candor about incompatibility which means less women even wanting to opt in.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:25 PM

Yeah. I do think there seems to be a massive gaslight about average libido differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:23 PM

Def should choose the maturist of men ! 🦄
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:20 AM

I don’t find sex dehumanizing. I think males are horny asf. Horn dogs if you will. Oh well babes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:19 AM

Your libido isn’t mine or other people’s? I can be attracted to a person and want to fuck like a marathon when I’m lusty and be chill when I’m not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:18 AM

Nah I said you have a choice now. I also said many blessings to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:17 AM
4

I’m asking you why you feel lonely? Most women only have close female friends and don’t feel lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:16 AM
6

That’s a cop out. There’s clearly something you want that the other doesn’t have.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:07 AM

I disagree. I’ve been in an LTR with a woman and with a man. Insanely attracted and horny for them when I’m horny. When i didn’t feel like having sex, i didn’t feel like it and it wasn’t because I wasn’t generally attracted to them. It’s because i was not feeling lusty at that time. Idk why this is such a hard concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:06 AM

I think saying “you just lie there” does sound crude. “Lie back and think of England” “just lie there and let me” are common utterances so it’s fair. You think calling men horn dogs is crude but men would agree. They are. Sounds like you’re just as offended by the reality of things as I am. Tough titty sweets!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:04 AM
7

Why? What are you getting from women platonically that men aren’t offering?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:02 AM
5

You act like you can’t be besties with a dude
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:58 AM

> you just lie there And I’m the dehumanizing one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:53 AM

Yes. But I decided to spice things up and focus on women instead of men today ! 😌 But yeah same applies to them. That said the way men seem to work they’re more desperate so they’re going to get married because some sex when she wants is better than the none most of them get single.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:52 AM
3

My top level comment literally says “or gay male friends”…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:41 AM
4

Why be a trans woman? Gay man was an option. Basically you need to not come off like someone tryna fuck us.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:34 AM
3

I’m saying you’re not a woman so you can’t tell us it’s not true that when we treat dudes like besties they don’t fall in love or lust.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:32 AM

> Because they often don’t feel a need to have more sex, but also don’t want to leave. It causes many problems. Yes!! I hate to say it but it’s entitlement. A fairer deal is letting him go if you aren’t aligned on those things. But they don’t want to let him go either lol. I’m getting called the asshole for saying set both of yourselves free or don’t pass go if you know you’re not set up to have some sex you don’t crave. I promise you he’s not having all the sex he wants either. You’re both comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:30 AM

Omg and I’m aware about hormones and time and changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:25 AM

I’ve always told the guys here that affection and kissing shows attraction and are nice warm and fuzzy feelings. They act like if it’s not sex it’s not enough 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:24 AM

Ebbs and flows!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:22 AM
5

More cannot than can. You’re not a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:22 AM

Of course not. You can only mitigate. No guarantees in life. Duh lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:21 AM

I actually meant that the resentment can go both ways. The compulsive libido person having to kotow to the reactive person’s libido will be frustrating. And the reactive person having lots of sex when they don’t crave it will become intolerable for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:12 AM

The only straight men getting as much sex as they want are: fucking different women at the same time paying for it (yes this includes Drake, Chris Brown, and Morgan Wallen)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:53 AM

I’m aware of hormones and how they evolve for both genders. Im saying A LOT of men and women enter into relationships completely naive about the other’s tolerance for their respective libidos 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:49 AM

Some people have conversations about how often they get horny and desire sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:38 AM
7

When women treat male friends like how she treats her female or gay male friends, he acts as if she wants to fuck him or he thinks she’s into him. They can’t handle platonic intimacy. All intimacy is sexual or romantic for them it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:34 AM

In your own post you say you used to view it as I laid it out but you’ve since matured. Seems I’m not that off at all 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:32 AM

I agree it’s an untenable situation. Someone’s gonna break or leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:30 AM

I’m saying live with that incompatibility and expect it to result in friction and resentment (as it does for most), or don’t enter into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:29 AM

Lol I’m not saying women have to perform “on command.” I’m saying this: do not date someone who has an incompatible libido and expect it to be frictionless. This goes for the man as well. I’m speaking to women because I am a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 01:03 AM

> Irreconcilable differences Yeah the incompatibility is honestly jarring. And a lot for a lot of people to accept.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:51 AM

I agree life is compromise. But again, if one of you has a compulsive libido and the other doesn’t, then say hello to a life of barely concealed resentment. Because no one wants to “compromise” on something like that for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:37 AM

I think that’s both parties coming in naive of some basic patterns in the mammal kingdom. I hear you though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:35 AM

Yes on both accounts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:32 AM

> You have to have base sexual compatibility… Many folks aren’t aligned there! It seems like you and your spouse are. That’s great!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:31 AM

Meh. I think people should know what makes them uncomfortable. And then decide if they can live with or tolerate that or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:30 AM

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:26 AM

Even if you’re attracted to a man, he can still want more sex than you desire/crave. It does seem like men cannot relate to this. This guy’s grandma explained the feeling humorously.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:15 AM

I agree with you. I think the reasonings are typically different. I think for women it’s simply normal female libido running into a wall of compulsive male libido. I think men who are consistently dead bedrooming are usually very obese/sick, gay, or don’t find their wives attractive anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:11 AM

I’m saying if you knew in advance you shouldn’t have married. This doesn’t apply to you. Now that you’re in it you still have a choice. Tolerate it, negotiate an open relationship if that’s something you’re into, or leave. Many blessings.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:08 AM

Yes. I’m well aware of my cycle lol. I’m saying marrying a compulsive libido person and expecting them not to be frustrated is silly. And a compulsive libido marrying someone who’s not like their libido and expecting them to duty sex it up is silly. And yet…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:02 AM

lol sure Tough pill to swallow I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:59 PM

Glad to hear that!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:58 PM

I agree that if you enter into a relationship with a compulsive libido person, it’s insane to think the expectation wouldn’t be “to fuck.” I’m not sure why you’re so mad at her. She’s basically saying that’s why she hasn’t entered into a serious relationship in a while. She has no desire to be expected to “to fuck” when she doesn’t want 🤷‍♀️ You seem hostile to her opting out. Weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:57 PM

They could do that. But many spouses bristle at that idea too. I personally would be okay with concessions that make everyone happy. But I’m not like most.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:54 PM

No. Don’t be vile. If you’re still with him it clearly doesn’t bother you as much as it bothers others. You can tolerate it and focus on other aspects. Good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:53 PM

Yes. It is very irresponsible. And yet many people don’t talk about values, mindsets, lifestyles, worldviews, finances, family, domestic labor, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:44 PM

My argument is very close to that. The logical conclusion of my argument is that many, if not most heterosexual pairings are fraught and tenuous by default. Much of it has to do with libido differences. Much of it has to do with differences in relational and interpersonal interactions/considerations.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:43 PM

Yeah sure. But I’m focusing on women. She’s the one who has to deal with him… Or like I said. She could leave 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:40 PM

I am focused on women because I relate more to them. I am being somewhat cheeky with this OP because I want women to realize it’s on them to know the type of person they married. And agency is hers. No one else’s. Nothing is “on her.” It’s on both, but she can only control herself and her actions. So like I said she can absolutely set boundaries in her marriage. But if she married a compulsive libido person, she should factor into her calculus that they may grow resentful when they don’t have se…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:39 PM

It happens often. Women often don’t realize the “regular sex” she was having in the beginning is only a fraction of his appetite to begin with. Anyway. Yes. If either party is resentful or woefully dissatisfied, they can leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:35 PM

> that the man’s sex drive should be the only thing that matters That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying in a couple it’s only two of you. So if you marry a person whose libido you can’t keep up with… only one who’s going to be resentful is either you or them. > shouldn’t get married at all. Yah. I think you should be mindful about who you’re marrying and what their expectations are. No one is forcing anyone here to marry someone whose libido is so divergent than your own — male or female.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:33 PM

> I think this is basically just a sexual compatibility q. It is exactly this. But the truth of the matter is population-level libido differences are consistently observed along gender lines. So by default it becomes a heterosexual compatibility q.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:30 PM

IMO sex has been a friction point for every heterosexual couple I’ve known. I’m not saying it’s insurmountable. But sex frequency comes up A LOT.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:29 PM

Many are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:26 PM

Yes. Waiting for his testosterone to temper off and for him to become preoccupied with other things is an option. My point stands. This will become a “friction point” for the majority of heterosexual couples. Why? Males and females are not the same here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:24 PM

Nope. She doesn’t have to always do anything. She can leave. Or she can tell him she’s not gonna have sex. Many women do these things. Having sex at her cadence leads to friction and resentment in their relationship. Same as if she were to have duty sex to accommodate him it would lead to friction and resentment. The reason this happens is because their libidos are incompatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:22 PM

That’s not what I said. I said he is her burden since she chose to marry him. She can unburden herself by leaving… she is not stuck. She has agency. But if she stays in that marriage she is silly in my opinion to pretend to be shocked by his horniness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:19 PM

Oh. I’m not underestimating. I’m aware kids and sorts of things affect interest in sex, especially for women. But I’m starting from a baseline of this: the average male has a more compulsive libido than the average female.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:09 PM

It is kinda her burden to deal with if she enters into a committed marriage with him… That’s my point. Don’t marry him if this bothers you about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:08 PM

I’m actually not saying women need to “adjust” to be penetrated when she doesn’t want. I’m saying she shouldn’t enter into that commitment at all if that incompatibility is already known.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:06 PM

> The base of the argument is true: if he’s honest about his sex drive up front, then there is no need to marry him if you can’t fulfill that desire an adequate amount. Getting mad that he wants a bunch of sex is dumb when he married you wanting a bunch of sex. That’s all I’m saying! It’s silly imo. You knew that upfront. Don’t marry men if you can’t keep up with that. Or don’t be shocked by the resentful friction of a relationship you guys will have.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:05 PM

Because I’m a woman. I care about women’s agency 🤷‍♀️ Men here talk about their agency all the damn time lol and they straight up say they’re thirsty and gonna take any opportunity for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:01 PM

What’s your answer if my answer is yes vs no?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:00 PM

This isn’t about stopping wanting to have sex. It’s about understanding how much you organically crave sex vs. how much your partner organically craves sex. Have that uncomfortable convo upfront. Because if you learn that he craves sex twice a day and you crave sex 5x a month, you’re going to be in for a rocky road. Especially when life gets mundane. Kids come. And fresh sexiness wears off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 11:00 PM

I am being fr! 😤
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 10:57 PM

I agree. But we already know men are not going to opt out of opportunity for sex. As a woman, I care more about appealing to women to have agency over her choices. To level-set her horizon.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 10:56 PM
1

Eh. My issue is men actually want that high effort relational bonding, comfort, empathy, compassion, thoughtfulness, consideration, and care from the women in their lives whether it be their female kin, friends, or SO. They simply suddenly don’t have the capacity to reciprocate it. That’s our actual annoyance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 10:53 PM
1

I clarified that you called me not respecting men’s “preference” for not parenting “bigotry.” Explicit clarification of the contention triggers you. That’s your problem. Not mine. Not any dictionary’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:32 PM
2

Repeating for everyone: Me not respecting men wanting kids without wanting to be involved in parenting is “bigotry.” I disagree lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:27 PM
8

Yes we don’t agree. I knew that. Because you read my initial comment and replied with miscomprehension. My point is I don’t respect nor regard nor value how males approach “wanting kids.” Until they treat their desire for kids with intention, responsibility, accountability, and daily mutual mundane day-to-day EFFORT, then they can stfu for all I care. They sound childish, immature, entitled, and annoying asf.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 07:52 PM

If it makes you feel better I think they do this to other men too? Men seem to live an animalistic existence like “males of the animal kingdom” docs that I don’t think women can relate to nor ever want to relate to. It’s like testosterone is a massive trigger lol. And seeing someone taller than them that makes them feel “unmanly” and thus: triggered hostility.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:10 PM

Why couldn’t Dan have a family? Are they saying his soul is so black he’d never be able to manage one? I can see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:09 PM

Every girl doesn’t have a bf either
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 04:07 PM
3

Oh ok. You’re saying she’s going to live a long life and then die by assisted suicide? Your fanfic reaction to her not living life you dictate is quite telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 01:52 PM

> continuing his bloodline Yall and this god damn “bloodline” 🫩 Such a male obsession.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 01:26 PM
3

What? She’s not self-deleting. She’s alive. Stop projecting your fanatical egoism onto others.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 01:21 PM
5

The Violence Policy Center’s 2022 analysis found 2,410 females were murdered by males in single-victim/single-offender incidents, and 87.5% knew their killer. About 1.2 women per day die from pregnancy/childbirth complications. About 3 to 4 women per day are murdered by intimate partners. About 6 to 7 women per day are murdered by male offenders overall. Your “gotcha” is abortion stats, but it’ll never be a convincing gotcha. A more convincing gotcha is “women broke into facilities and murdered …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 01:13 PM
10

I don’t understand this logic. Plenty of men had an orgasm and had a baby and don’t care for them, don’t caretake them… and these are the men who are in the homes! Not even getting to the men who are not involved at all and don’t care to be. So why are you shocked that women who deal with most of the burden aren’t rushing into it eagerly?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 01:05 PM
11

You missed the point. If you’re going to have a kid for self-interest (which anyone who has a kid not by force is doing)… then you should care about fucking raising it. That’s it’s. That’s the point. My point is males want kids but don’t seem to envision any of the labor of raising kids. They just say they want kids like kids are a theoretical concept that someone else deals with. And that’s all good for him because now he can check off his list “had offspring.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:50 PM
3

Yes. Males have compulsive libidos so they pursue sex relentlessly. I feel like “feminists” have always said this. They get called “radical” for stating the obvious about male nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:46 PM

Not sure what that is 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:45 PM
6

Yeah it’s pretty common amoung lower socioeconomic environments. Many males default to their base selves which isn’t that “honorable” or prosocial.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:43 PM
3

Same
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:03 AM
3

😭😭🐝
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:58 PM
2

Fair. I guess my image of him is more from the tv series 1923 than from that one movie. So the biggest difference for me when I see the younger image of him is that the 1923 and after version of him has tanner skin and a manlier Ernest Hemingway sort of disposition. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:58 PM
3

<image> Not you sounding just like the gay I got the photo from 😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:53 PM
3

I think it’s more the amount of muscles some men hype up are far more than many women care about. <image> This was him in 1923. He’s muscular but not as big as he was in The Housemaid. Not sure why he beefed up for that movie. Both versions are attractive. My point is his attractiveness grew imo from old photos of him because he got a tan and got a beard/facial hair and stopped comporting like a dandy 🤷‍♀️. He got gruff. If the muscles helped him feel vibier, great! But early 20s him wasn’t exac…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:32 PM
4

I don’t hear women talk like that as much as men 🤷‍♀️ But that’s just one lens. I imagine religious people talk like that more than others. I imagine people who really want kids talk like that more than others. I imagine people with bigger egos talk like that more than others. I imagine people who don’t have an identity or narrative for their life outside of kids talk like that more than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:17 PM
1

I’m fangirling over a hot person narc
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:14 PM
6

Well, yes. I’m not attracted to non-binary people. I’m not attracted to femme looking men. I’m not attracted to masc looking women. Which means I found both of these characters very alluring 😮
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 09:02 PM
15

As someone from working class environs… unfortunately that mindset is VERY common. Zero interest in being involved. Zero interest in parenting. Just a “I conquered you” trophy in their mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 08:51 PM
2

<image> Miss them 😔🥺
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 08:48 PM
3

Early 20s Brandon Sklenar vs 30s him is damn near unrecognizable. I am not attracted to younger him. But I was insanely attracted to him in 1923 and The Housemaid. It’s like his whole vibe changed. <image> He wasn’t ugly before. He just gave off effete pretentious finance bro who can’t plaster a wall or chop wood.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 08:43 PM
8

Yep I agree 🦎
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:37 PM
9

You don’t have to. Libido is the reason this differential exists. Men aren’t approaching women for hand holding and intimate friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:36 PM
7

It’s a tradeoffs analysis. There are a lot of very visceral and tangible cons to being pregnant, birthing, and being a mother. The pros are more intangible like “fulfillment” and “validation” etc. So it really comes down to this. Do you want kids. For many women the answer is usually “idk maybe someday if I meet the right guy who’s a good partner and we’re comfortable.” This is the woman who could end up 40 with no kids because she made finding the right partner her North Star. The chick who’s l…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:34 PM
19

I agree. But I think it’s interesting how males seem to have this drive stronger than us. I literally never hear women talk about “legacy” and “kids” the way men do. And women are the ones incubating and birthing the children. I guess we can chalk it up to a testerical drive (hormones).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:27 PM
44

> Women don’t have kids for “legacy” lmao that’s male solipsism. Thank you for saying this. Men project this on everyone else. They have kids because of male ego and unabashed self-interest. I get that’s a big driver for them. I can’t relate. When I think of kids I think of sacrifice and hard work (and then maybe that becomes fulfillment). Not just for 9 months of my body. But 18+ years of nurturing and providing for a human that’s hopefully a net-good contributor to society. When men think of h…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 07:20 PM
4

Yeah. Males have higher libidos. So more males than females are going to be trying to fuck whomever will let them if the opportunity arises. This means that average women have more men trying to hang with her (so he can fuck her) than average men have women trying to do that to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 04:08 PM
2

What? You’re straw manning me. I am saying if he pumps and dumps her and she wanted more than being pumped than he is rejecting her interest. Focus on the words I’m typing. Nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:59 PM
17

So confirming you mean women you notice and want to pursue also have other men noticing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:49 PM
2

Again. You’re missing my point. If she wanted more than sex, then he’s rejecting the more she wants. Why are you being like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:28 PM
17

> or a cute coworker Confirming you mean all women or just cute women?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:27 PM
2

You’re pretending to miss my point I think. Men tend to “pump and dump” more than women. If a woman is being dumped after being pumped clearly she wanted more than a pump. Like I said men tend to reject after they fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 11:29 AM
14

Perhaps. But men’s arousal seems to care less about a woman’s sociability and intuitiveness calibration.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 11:32 PM
1

Yes. Men reject after they got what they wanted from her: a 🥜
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 11:30 PM
5

Yes. It’s devastatingly explicit throughout the film.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:45 PM
3

> Forrest Gump is such a fascinating examination of media literacy. I’ve noticed the same. > A woman simply would not be allowed to rise to the same heights as Forrest (especially during this time period), and it's unlikely a man would be sexually exploited to the same extent that Jenny was her entire life. Hello! So many are too media illiterate to realize that this aspect of the movie is intentional social commentary. They don’t have a baseline understanding of the film.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:04 PM
1

He comes off as a savant. Meaning he’s intellectually limited relative to most. But he’s pretty emotionally astute. Extremely brave. And is exceptionally good at things like table tennis.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:00 PM
1

No it is not a deflection. Do you guys even know what that word means? I have not been deflecting. I am explaining to you how the genre of this movie is a fucking literary device. It’s not even about what they intended. It’s what every media literate person with common sense grokked from the fucking movie. You guys are missing the entire point of the movie and it’s so fucking bizarre. It’s a damn coming of age. It’s a tale of perseverance and resilience. It’s about the human spirit. It’s also ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:26 PM
1

How is this a response to what I wrote? I’m not sure who you’re responding to, but isn’t me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:21 PM
1

Sure? I was aware at 8 that he had a crush on her. The movie still didn’t come off to me like a romance. It came off as “this boy turned man is finna be tested but he will overcome.” So, a coming of age.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:20 PM
1

I have made no comment about anything being good for him outside of her being good to him in their childhood. My point was that it made sense to be that she wasn’t attracted to him and that she couldn’t return how he felt about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:11 PM
1

The movie is not a romance! It is not categorized as such by the studio, distributor, producers, nor director. Clearly you guys are mad at the movie because you viewed it as a romance. I never viewed it as such. And neither did the creators.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:00 PM
1

> bare minimum Nah. Being considerate and respectful is minimum. Cordiality is bare minimum. Not being rude is bare minimum. But let’s say kindness is your bare minimum. And yet! She was the only one kind to him outside of his mom so yeah… her kindness meant a lot to him and was clearly out of the norm in their little fucked up community.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:35 PM
1

> My argument is simple: the reason people, especially men, dislike Jenny isn’t just because she makes bad decisions but because Forrest is mentally impaired. Uh huh... I responded to that in my first reply to you. Most men feel like she friendzoned him. My reply to you was of course the girl was not attracted to the village idiot no matter how sweet he was. That’s why she treated him as a friend. She adored him as a person. Not a lover. And that sucks for Forest. But that’s life. And he perseve…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:16 PM
2

The STUDIO lists it as a comedy-drama. That is the source of truth. By biographical I just meant “profile of a person over time.” Not that he’s a real person. My point is that it was not listed as a romance by the studio, the producers, nor the director. I am not being “disingenuous.” I DISAGREE with your analysis because your first premises are off-base. My counter to you was that it is not a romance. You: “the 2nd issue is the movie is portrayed as a romance” You make this a core claim and pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 11:58 AM
-1

> it’s a romance No it isn’t. The studio and its creators have always classified it as a comedy / biographical drama. Like I said, even 8 year old me knew it wasn’t a “romance.” Little me thought of it as an “absurdist coming of age,” which is closer to how the creators of the movie see it. We aren’t aligned on this very basic first premise. Clearly our literacy and comprehension of the movie is at odds. And I’ll be frank, mine is more accurate, and more aligned with the actual intent. > morally…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 11:43 AM
0

> there is such a thing as kindness with motive What was her evil “motive” at 7 when she let him sit with him instead of making fun of him like the other people in the community? > the 2nd issue is that the movie is potrayed as romance No it is isn’t. I saw the movie when I was 8 and it’s set up like an absurdist and raw coming of age. A boy having a crush on a girl didn’t equate to me “this movie is a romance 😍” Males are seemingly just media illiterate and don’t grok subtext.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 11:20 AM
1

As a kid it always made sense to me that Jenny wasn’t attracted to Forrest because he was mentally impaired… I never understood how guys watched that movie and was like “why isn’t Jenny super into the slow kid??” Jenny was always sweet to him. Which was better than most people. Most people are not kind. “Jenny strung him along 🤪” Jenny was the only kid who was kind to him his entire damn childhood!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 11:14 AM
2

The comparison I’m making is women’s confidence isn’t shaken by someone attacking her “womanliness” or “femininity.” Idk. A man or society or another woman can’t make me feel un-female. I guess I’m confident in my femaleness. I also don’t feel female because of approximation to a man. I’m simply female.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 11:58 PM
2

I hear you. But I guess what I’m trying to say is that you can’t really gaslight me about being a woman. My body is female and does decidedly female things. As a Black American woman, historically we have been denied “womanhood” and yet amongst ourselves we didn’t feel any less womanly. Society telling us we weren’t womanly didn’t make us feel less womanly. It made us feel that society was fucked up and cruel. But it didn’t make us feel less like a woman. We didn’t feel less female. Manliness is…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 10:13 PM
3

Right! Though the crazy thing is I think I feel a woman first and a black person second, and even still someone insulting my “femininity” or “womanliness” would not make me feel like less of a woman. My womanliness feels inherent. I’m female regardless of how someone feels about me or says about me. MAGA calls Michelle Obama a man all the time. I don’t think she loses too much sleep over it. If at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 10:06 PM
1

I think many women are and have been attacked this way. There’s no word for it. When women are attacked in a way that’s made to insult her womaliness or feminineness it’s simply not the same. IMO it’s because traits associated with masculinity are more associated with “winning” and “dominance” and “competency.” The traits associated with feminiity are things like “nurturing” and “deference” and “chastity” and “beauty.” Of those four, the only one that might hurt my feelings is if someone said I …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 09:10 PM
2

I mean assurance. Self-assurance comes from competency in one’s actions. So I basically mean social and adulting competency I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:30 PM

No I didn’t repeat what you said. You have 3 categories. I have 2. I clarified what I find to be better categorization. I didn’t use “personality” because it’s a loaded term that’s defined differently by different people. But sure. His personality would be part of “who he is” as a person. Not things like his voice, looks, height, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:24 PM

I think it’s more things like his immutable looks, his height, his natural physical frame, his voice, his hairline, his ability to grow an even beard… are part of his “natural” physiological traits. How he treats people, how he interacts with others and the world, the choices he makes, how he styles, his charisma (or lack thereof), how he comports, how he thinks, his integrity, his resilience… these are part of his mindset. These things are who he is as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 03:59 PM

They’re all part of “who he is.” His looks and his mindset and the way he chooses to style and the cologne he chooses to wear and the way he chooses to interact with me/others and the way he chooses to treat me/others and the way he thinks… they are all part of “who he is.” TLDR: His “how he treats you” traits are part of his character which is part of who he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 12:37 PM
2

But they aren’t biologically incapable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 11:01 AM
2

Because they’re not being violent in a vacuum. They’re perpetrating violence against other beings or they’re damaging property that doesn’t isn’t theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:59 PM
7

I have. There are a lot of blank statists who truly want to believe it’s 100% socialization.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:58 PM
1

Again… That’s your individual gripe. You gotta get in line with everyone else who also has their own respective gripe and reason for why they should deplane first. Hence airlines offering everyone the option to pay for that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 06:46 PM
3

> now please approve my post Lemme go see
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 02:26 PM
5

Yes. We know. Male self-centered egotistical whimsies are testerical drivers. We know you’d grrrr kill everyone or yourself 😤 Like I said: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 01:24 PM
3

Nah. That’s not my “attachment.” Your issue is “fumbling around.” Others’ issue is “well I have to connect so I should be first off” or “I have kids so I should be first off” or “I hate waiting so I should be first off” or “I’m in a bad mood so I should be off first” or “I didn’t bring a carry on so I should be off first” and so on and so on. My logic is allowing people who want to be off first most (for whatever their individual reason is) the option to pay for that privilege is the most effici…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 01:21 PM
8

Sure. Plenty of women sacrifice all the time. Not getting your point that sacrificing and long-suffering is uniquely male. I’d say it’s not. Men would literally kill themelsves (and claim it was noble)!instead of do something dutiful and diligent and consistent. Always tryna seek out some dragons minding their business to “slay” instead of watching their damn kids 😂 <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 01:11 PM
4

I don’t understand the confusion tbh? I’m a black woman. I’ve experienced anti-black bigotry and baseless racism. So yeah that exists. I’ve also experienced/witnessed sexism, vile misogyny, and male-perpetrated violence/assault against females. And being I’m from a black community, the perpetrators I’ve experienced were mostly black men. It’s not even “nuance.” It’s common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 01:06 PM
3

Airlines offer the ability to pay for seating as close to the front as possible. That’s how they address this ☺️
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 01:00 PM
7

Testosterone isn’t noble. It just is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 12:59 PM
7

Ehhh. Women have always had a complicated, and dare I say, tortured experience reconciling their thoughts on men. It’s kinda like a daughter or son who was/is abused by their parent but still recognizes that they’re kin and that they have some obligation to keep the peace with said kin, and sure, sometimes said kin is okay to be around, so that softens the frustration with the overall experience. If you actually talk to elder women who’ve had to deal with dads, uncles, brothers, husbands… it’s c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 12:51 PM
3

I agree that we were never meant to be exposed to the internal thoughts of the masses. I probably would have a better opinion of men if my passing sentiments about dudes who I see behave and say things IRL wasn’t reinforced by the masses of dudes echoing or “no big deal’ing” those sentiment online. At least prior to the internet and social media I could “pretend” more easily. I could more easily tell myself “well not most guys.” But now I’m like too many guys are antisocial asf, too many are aso…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 12:40 PM
2

I get more interest when I maximize and try to look attractive as well. But yes everyone can do what they want 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:59 AM
2

> competent and attractive and with integrity Yes that man is the ideal for most women. And likely a minority of men. A 🦄 But if women stopped trying to find that, women wouldn’t date at all…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 08:29 PM
5

Of course not. And men should be okay with women being disinterested in them because of their mindsets and “values.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 08:24 PM
9

Not sure if despise is the right word. Women are feeling that men are incompatible with them. And quite frankly? Other men also feel incompatible with men interpersonally. Of course not all men, but at a demographic level, men do seem to approach interpersonal relationships in a way that women do not. They tend to be less considerate, thoughtful, contextual, etc. And yeah, no one wants to be besties or life long cohabitating partners with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 07:49 PM
2

I AM debating you! Tf I have countered each of your grift comments. I don’t fully agree with your POV and clearly explained why several times. What else do you want????
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 03:26 PM
3

> It's a grift because you don't need to spend money to buy a fitted shirt and suit jacket and find a decent diet and workout program online. You say this as if people haven’t been fucking dense forever about how they come off and how to improve. As if makeovers for other people are a thing this guy randomly invented. Bffr. > you’re talking about me I said your replies come off like you’re hating to hate. Cry a river 🎻 That’s not a personal attack. It’s an attack on your argument that you’re tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 01:19 PM
3

There are tangible improvements to all of those men… Grifting for the sake of grifting would be more like if the makeover looked trash. Like I said. I think you’re just hating to hate
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:53 PM
10

Can I ask why don’t you start it in your community? You can literally volunteer at a local after school program for middle schoolers? Or a mentorship program like Big Brothers/ Big Sisters and do rites of passage events for the boys. A lot of that already exists in orgs like that. You can contribute to and celebrate and help organize the events they have going on. My mom literally did this for the boys in our community and she doesn’t even have sons! You guys complain a lot and don’t do enough f…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 06:19 PM
33

I didn’t get a celebration for getting my period. I didn’t grow up around Latino people as much as I grew up around Jewish people. So I saw more boys entering puberty and getting celebrated. You can also set up your own familial or community rites of passage. Get some drums and recite something deep and tell the boys “welcome to manhood” after going on a hike. Like bruh. Be the change you want to see. 🪘🗿
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 02:14 PM
1

I repeat: SEXUAL MARKETPLACE VALUE for males trying to arouse females = LOOKS + SWAG + STATUS. All three impact AROUSAL in females. The degree to which it impacts arousal is in the exact order I placed it. Looks get you into her orbit. Swag determines whether she’s actively turned on during the interaction. Status (generally respect) dictates your ability to keep that arousal going.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 01:50 PM
15

No it’s population-level statistics and facts. I repeat: > So is your question why don’t females have the indiscriminate compulsive libido of males? You should ask biology and study androgens. You’ll get your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 12:38 PM
3

Do you know what SMV for men is? It is: LOOKS + SWAG + STATUS He’s making them over so that all three signal better. So no shit he’s ensuring they signal status. But why on God’s green earth are you pretending like the men look identical to how they did before? Like the only thing he did for them was have them take a photo at a nice restaurant? The fucking photos look 10x better because THEY LOOK better AND are comporting better AND are styling better. You’re being so disingenuous it’s annoying …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 12:32 PM
4

And the second was literally wearing a suit BEFORE. He looks healthier and better styled after. Thus hotter than before. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 12:25 PM
4

You are so disingenuous. And apparently blind? Lol <image> The first guy looks cooler and swaggier post makeover. And the good physical traits he had shine through better. Hence her looks hotter than he did before.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 12:24 PM
19

They can be offended. But they’ve told women here for years they only care about facts and “logic.” So “facts over feelings” as their TRPer predecessors would say… cheerio!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 12:03 PM
29

Males can exhibit lust for a deconstructed anus. Like the asshole is over here and the rest of the body is over there and they’ll still be a contingent of dudes happy to fuck the standalone asshole. They can feel lusty enough to fuck a cow, goat, horse, dog, a human corpse… It’s dudes themselves who coined the terms “dumpster diving,” “butter face,” “cum dumpster,” to brag about their ability to feel lust for people who are allegedly unattractive to them or who are not “hot.” That’s how obsessiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:46 AM
2

> There are certainly things men can do And yet many men of this sub pretend and performatively mentalcel-signal otherwise. > Imagine: a guy posting on social media about how his coaching can help men get relationships, and yet no posting of his success stories in relationships. Shouldn't that be the easiest way to bring in new clients? You can go to the IG page yourself. He has follow-ups with the guys. He also, in the above linked posts, talks about their immediate tangible dating app results …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:24 AM

> If we settle down, we settle with the ones that provide stability and generally make our lives easier. Agree. That’s exactly how women feel. Though I think “make our lives easier” differs person to person. When I say that I mean I do not want a man who’s an inconsiderate nor incompetent partner, roommate, or co-parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:44 PM
2

I’m into a lot of those things and I present attractively 🕶️💃 For me it’s less his activities and interests. It’s his vibe, presence, mentality, comportment, and style. The latter I have to find attractive, regardless of the former. If the latter lacks, I won’t be as easily turned on, all else equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:40 PM
1

Fair! I haven’t seen that video. I’ve seen how he interacts. It’s bitchy. And he comports bitchly lol His “looks” are fine. I would potentially find another man who looked like him but wasn’t a bitchass attractive 😌😂
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:38 PM
4

Is your issue women not wanting men to fuck her body unless she also wants to fuck? I just want to confirm that’s your biggest issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:32 PM
3

And for me he looks fine. He acts like a bitch. I couldn’t imagine being in his presence and feeling turned on based on how he seems to interact.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:02 PM
3

I think he claims he was ugly. But wasn’t he like 12? Like his balls ain’t even drop and he’s wondering why he didn’t have a supreme jawline yet. He’s a victim of male children slipping into the manosphere and black pill lookism too early. And I’m looking now and I kinda like his nose before? Sure it was puggier, but combine that with entering your teens and working out, he could’ve had a very unique look à la Chad Michael Murray. Broad nose =! “Ugly” On that point, Chad Michael Murray didn’t st…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 08:07 PM
2

Oh god. He clearly has body dysmorphia like the Jackson kids had. He’s gonna end up looking Michael and Latoya Jackson at the end of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:55 PM
4

> but he can also be the dude on the right Exactly!!! This is my issue with them. They never want to admit that even with “average” immutable baseline traits, there’s still a floor and a ceiling of attractiveness. There’s still a range of you being able to elicit desire in others. Yet most people (especially guys) aren’t even trying to explore their ceiling. It’s either that or they have zero imaginativeness, zero vision, and are the most reductive limited concievers to ever exist. The guy on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:33 PM
6

A third example of one of his clients: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 06:51 PM
2

This dude on Instagram is the best dude makeover account I’ve seen. He has a woman’s eye. Meaning he sees ✨the potential✨. This is basically how I made over my first boyfriend 😭 He focuses on how the guy presents/comports, how he styles, and if necessary, fitness and well being. And he does it all how I did it. Aka without the bullshit toxicity of “lookists” and “maxing” and general male aggyness. Just good old fashioned old school makeover lol. He also retakes their online dating profile pics f…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 06:33 PM
2

Integrity and character are based on treating people well even when it isn’t convenient for you or when you’re not attracted. If you can’t treat them well. Break up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 05:39 PM
0

<image> 😭 I’m sorry her response to his tweet was funny. Considering the 📰🗞️
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 11:04 AM
6

Nothing you said confirms his character or integrity. It actually highlights how weak it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 10:11 AM
7

Men are not well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:04 PM
2

Yep. Men and women both know males tend to be more dangerous. Men and women both know that males tend to harm females more than females harm males. The friction is that males want to be desired by females, so despite men knowing the reality of the above two facts, it hurts them that women feel that way about them despite them understanding that it’s quite logical for women to feel that way (because men lowkey feel the same).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 06:06 PM
1

I agree it’s not good. But I refuse to blame solely women for something that ime dad’s have been the deciding factor on.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 06:00 PM
3

Sure. Bud. You have a POV or else you wouldn’t have wrote it. Good chat! 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:23 PM
2

And what was the POV? What was your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:21 PM
3

If you believe that, what was the point of your initial reply? Just a random thought not connected to a POV? Strange!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:19 PM
6

No. Most of us would still find it 🚩 for males who date decades younger. We get it. You wouldn’t. On top of that, society had to have an age because males would go as low as possible and there would be someone like your comment saying “that year between 10/11 makes all the difference huh 🤪”
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:09 PM
3

To be perfectly blunt, I don’t think these men respect high schoolers as old enough for anything outside of fucking. Oh, and the girls are old enough to have his baby. But not old enough to vote, drink, drive (if below 16), rent a car, open a credit card, open a bank account, etc. They’re just too pussyfoot to say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:25 PM
3

I’m team natural. But why so much vitriol toward women? Most women who have sons tend to defer to the dad on the circumcision decision. It’s the dads choosing it. My dad doesn’t have sons but said he would’ve chosen yes for a son. His reason was “so he doesn’t get bullied.” I was like okay… I’ve heard other dudes say “so he’ll look like me.” Doesn’t seem like most men are thinking all that critically about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:55 PM
9

<image> Exactly. Men who want to date high schoolers need to tighten up their logic and just say “I find her hot and young.” Because all other mental gymnastics falls apart. If he were logically consistent, his besties would also be high school dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:10 PM
3

🙄 <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 12:40 PM
3

People will be mad but she’s more right than she’s wrong 🔥
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 12:38 PM
1

The answers are simple. Just not easy. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:59 AM
1

<image> 🗣️SHE AINT LIE
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:56 AM
9

Nah. Those guys are referring to men in a general sense as relative to women. Of course they don’t mean him! The other men! And women are referring to the men who do it. Which happens to be way more than any women doing it, so generally speaking men. Women will even say things like dangerous/cruel/coercive men or toxic masculinity, and the alleged good men will still get mad as if they’re the dangerous/cruel/coercive men or toxically masculine dudes being mentioned… makes you wonder if it’s hit …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:29 PM
2

They’re cute but it’s like you watch one and then they only show bichons ! 🫤😩
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:57 PM
11

I was against this flair for a longgggg time lolll. But if the dudes here insist “red = reality” then no one is more “reality”-pilled than me. I changed it because I get tired of hearing them claim to be alleged logical realists when their arguments are never holistic, comprehensive, nor incisive 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 05:35 PM
9

It’s cuz, at a population level, feminists were right (obviously). Everyone just hated on them because it broke the illusion needed to get men and women paired up. Feminists swallowed the proverbial red/truth pill first. And they were hated for it! As it goes lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 04:53 PM
4

I was being nice. It’s a childish pathologically narcissistic self-centered shortsighted “logic.”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 04:44 PM
11

> Men being more violent than women is just a fact though Yes. And people on the receiving end of it will view it as toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 03:38 PM
1

Live feed of my Instagram explore page. <image> 🤷‍♀️💛 My “algo” is just fine. Also you’re a regular on PPD. Maybe she prefers men who aren’t here. Who knows!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 03:09 PM
10

It’s all a trade-off analysis. Is what it is. For some the trade-offs skew toward alignment, for others the trade-offs skew toward not romantically partnering.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 03:02 PM
11

I’ve applied my logic to all dynamics. Ethnicity included. Most behavioral differences between varying ethnicities comes down to environment and the history of collective experience compounded over time. Meaning to say if you took a middle class Scandinavian baby and raised them in the favelas of Rio or in a Romani community, they’d behave like a Rio or a Romani kid more or less. The inverse is also true. Behavioral differences between the genders (including within a respective ethnicity) comes …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:59 PM
11

Seems males and females are at odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:52 PM
3

<image> Solid points.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:51 PM
22

It’s an interesting cognitive dissonance. Basically men are allowed to say “yeah men are cray and violent and sexually impulsive and will spiral into societal fuckshit without access to a female” but women aren’t allowed to say this aloud, perceive it, write it, echo the sentiment, acknowledge her experience with it. Nuffin 💀 She must simply “Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey” I guess. And tbf everything they said about how men are is true. They’re just the only ones allowed to say it? And the biggest b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:59 PM
12

Yes! I think lower your standards to people who have high standards. Can’t find anyone who meets them. And still complain about desperately wanting a man/woman. I don’t think that about people who have high standards, but don’t complain about the lack of options. They’re realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:00 PM
11

I don’t think anyone expects men to apologize for that. Rather, we want everyone, men included, to understand that these gendered priority differences create an asymmetry in the “long term partnership” marketplace. The data on sex differences in long-term mate preferences is comprehensive and replicated across cultures: women prioritize traits like emotional stability, kindness, reliability, ambition/resources, and willingness to share loads. Men prioritize physical attractiveness and youth more…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:45 PM
-1

You’re right they do get it. They’re just being annoying and churlish pretending not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:30 PM
1

Do you not understand the crux of the post? No goal posts were moved. Women are highlighting the expectation…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:32 PM
0

Yeah but they both lead with complaining about lack of promotion as if they expected someone other than men to promote and organize for it… Also they’re doing the absolute least. No events. Just a lazy blaming others and mentioning men’s mental health as an afterthought.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:29 PM
2

Here’s a guy complaining about the lack of promotion and awareness. Another guy here. Another guy here. “They call it ‘Men’s Mental Health Month’, but where are the marches? Where’s the lavish parades? Where are the ribbons? Where’s the slogans in every company’s email or their marketing? To be a man today is to be the enemy… This month, give it the respect it deserves.” He deleted his post though. Men definitely make comments about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:25 PM
2

<image> If some women are gold diggers then these men she’s talking about are for sure labor diggers! Because yes. If you want the event, throw the event. That’s how it happens. Planning, organizing, execution. Dassit!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:33 PM
9

Once you accept that these dudes don’t have friends and don’t know how to have interpersonal bonds that aren’t transactional or obligatory, then you start to understand why they’re heavily relying on “procuring a female and siring offspring to fulfill their social interaction objective 🤖” Narrator: they will not have great bonds with the woman or their kids
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:12 PM
3

Well at least that makes more sense! Because I was like either way most of those women are saying if they’re widowed they don’t wish to get re-married. Compared to widowers who say opposite. That’s telling. Clearly something about living with female partner men like. And something about living with a male partner wears women out lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:08 PM
1

Sure. My mom says same lol. And yet…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:32 PM

Listen up ‘Blue Pill Man’! I’m plenty self-reliant. My point since you seemed to have missed it: MEN SHOULD STOP BITCHING ABOUT NOT HAVING COMMUNITY AND FEELING UNLOVED AND “NO ONE CARES ABOUT ME EXCEPT MY MOM” AND THIS DUMBASS MALE LONELINESS AND FRIENDLESS EPIDEMIC SINCE HAVING BONDS WITH OTHERS DOESN’T MATTER AND IS TOO MUCH WORK FOR THEIR LAZY ASSES. Fin. But they won’t. Because like I said and like you just confirmed they’re too fucking lazy, uncaring, inconsiderate, and generally non-forwa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:31 PM

😂 who I envisioned: :
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 05:29 PM

> No but historically it has increased the amount of decency in society. Pretend I said: A man being partnered has never been a guarantee of non-harm and mutual consolation toward the wife (and kids). > Large numbers of chronically unpartnered men has led to wars and civil unrest. As a student of history and human behavior, I’m aware. And yet it doesn’t move me to fuck nor be in intimate relations with men who displeasure me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 05:28 PM
4

No they don’t. Someone using their sick days or PTO isn’t “extra time.”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 01:30 PM
8

The mocking comes from society and men expecting women to “long-suffer” as a default. I grew up in church where people say women are dutiful long-sufferers as if it’s an honor lol. I once saw a meme that emphasized this point. It was of a bald woman going through cancer radiation treatment, in pain, wrangling three kids, just got off work, has a cold, on her period, coming home to cook dinner for her husband and kids, and still “showing up for others.” Many women deal with debilitating energy-su…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 01:24 PM

I’ve seen opposite. Consistent voting is like collective bargaining, especially in local elections. So when you make moves as a unit, I’ve seen things go the way I want in local election and local ballot measures quite often. And when it doesn’t go the way you want, you mobilize a bit differently. Edit: I’m Black American so I’m acutely aware of the importance of voting and why for most of the time in this country they didn’t want us (black people) to vote. People don’t work so hard to disenfran…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:27 PM

No. I disagree. Women would not threaten men with violence because if that were true we would see ample evidence of that. We would see females shooting males as much as males shoot females. We don’t see that. And it’s not because women can’t or don’t have access to guns. It’s because as a demographic girls and women literally don’t have as much of those psychotic violent ENTITLED impulses that boys and men tend to have. Your deflection doesn’t work here. The difference is not “ability to do the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:56 AM

I am curious where you live? I live in America. It’s ghetto. And yeah Trump is doing whatever he wants (he was voted in). But voting matters a lot. So much so there are people dedicated to redlining districts and suppressing votes to make sure only the votes they want make it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:47 AM

Men’s threats to women tend to involve institutional disenfranchisement, violence, or sexual assault. All things that egregiously ignore consent and violate the other person. Women’s threats to men involve leaving men the hell alone lol. Not violating his agency, autonomy, nor rights. Not doing a single non-consensual thing to him. Are you catching the difference here? 🧐 Men’s bananas logic seems to be “I want access to females therefore I am entitled to females therefore females who don’t compl…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:37 AM

What your argument leaves out is that women are not choosing in a vacuum. A man being partnered has never been a guarantee of decency. And relationship quality matters to many women more than relationship status alone. You’re acting like pre “male loneliness epidemic” men were default great partners. Women are rational to factor in coercion, abuse, sexual violence, and the possibility of violent escalation when leaving a relationship, but also they’re rational to factor in everyday mutual consid…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:15 AM

> So basically have sex or we will kill you all enslave you as “wives,” baby incubators, domestic elves, and sex concubines. Basically what men presently do in male-imperative-driven cultures around the world from purposely isolated LDS compounds to the Taliban. People crack me up viewing the Handmaid’s Tale books as “dystopian fantasy.” All she did was write what communities were currently doing or what societies have done in the not too distant past.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:47 AM

> which defense? 🔫🤺⚔️🗡️🔪💣🧱🐺 Stuff like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:39 AM

I meant IRL. And as a mod, I often see people’s comments before they get flagged or removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:38 AM
13

Even if you asked a bunch of married women who have been married for decadessss (my mom included) they would likely choose option 2. Being a woman stuck isolated in the house with a heterosexual man who views you as his wife and expects wifely duties is not the fantasy experience you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:34 AM
21

> Hypergamy isnt really about having someone "better" nowadays. It is about someone that can give you the guarantee that they will be able to keep up your lifestyle when you have to sacrifice your income to pop out children. And the more educated and financially free women become the more the partner has to be able to balance that out. Yep! The above combined with the fact that males have a more compulsory libido than females has always meant that there was gonna be a bottleneck. This bottleneck…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:21 AM

> implicit threat of violence It’s not implicit. Men keep saying they’re gonna take it eventually. Hopefully women have their defenses ready.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:14 AM
2

Ohhhhh. I thought he was asking if women wanted to be fucked by butch lesbians with big strap-ons. My brain was not comprehending that reply so I ignored it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:03 AM

You can quote the contradictory things they said. You can also link examples that aren’t specific Reddit users you have beef with. For example, link from literally anywhere else on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 09:55 PM

I disagree. Even if a woman is really attracted to her man. If said man has an avg male libido and said women has an avg female libido, all else equal, you’ll run into the friction of her desiring sex less frequently than him even if she’s super lusty when she’s feeling lusty for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 09:23 PM

Noooo. I’m saying that more males than females over-index on dominance-seeking. > could just be.. Sure !!! That’s all dominance seeking and it leads to clashes when you’re trying to control something that someone else already has control over whether it’s themselves or their things or a situation. Ugh. can you guys debate without resulting to name calling and asinine put downs. You don’t agree with me. This isn’t an emotional conversation. No need to deprecate yourself and bring me into it jfc
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 09:21 PM

> and now I agree with it I think you agreed with the general and directional spirit of it before tbh 😛 > my wording My wording literally bolded the aspects that are healthy or that folks wouldn’t feel attacked by lol. Dominance-seeking is a term used in countless research about testosterone and masculinity and males. I can’t help that dominance offends people! And that calling a dominance thing dominance offends everyone. That’s what it is! Imagine being on the opposite end of it 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 07:14 PM

Tbf the first half of my comment isn’t about relationships. That needing to feel like a man thing I notice when I observe men amongst men. I mean men have a whole term called AMOG which is based on domming other men. I don’t know why everyone is acting like a cornerstone of masculinity for manyyyyyy men isn’t status based and hierarchy based. Aka dominance. And yes the latter half of my comment was about how women are impacted because well im a woman, so it’d be odd if I only talked about how me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 06:13 PM
3

I think men are similar? The truth for most is your romantic partner can’t handle everything about you that your friends can.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 06:07 PM

> so maybe stop trying to deny men's real-life experiences and outright dismissing their mental health concerns. Mental health concerns that don’t involve any of the things I mentioned are perfectly valid. The moment they veer in the territory I detailed (which is rather common despite your incessant denial of that) I will dismiss it with enthusiasm. As anyone should.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:32 PM

Yes. We don’t agree about reality. It makes many people uncomfortable, but it’s directionally observed that more males than females conceive in that way. These asymmetries are what they are. Ignoring them and dismissing them as unimportant or “bad advocacy” is exactly how asymmetries that caused the rift we’re seeing now persist. There are ways to come together. Pussyfooting about people’s real life experiences and observations isn’t one of them. We aren’t aligned here. Moralize to someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:15 PM

Nothing will be “effective” if people like yourself reel at precision and accuracy. That’s how gaslighting and abuses endure. Your “advocacy” is for you. Not me. I actually mentor black boys IRL. My family always has. Patronize someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 12:16 PM
1

I feel like anyone who’s this up male or female is doing so because they feel attraction. That’s what friends and support groups are for! Some spouses are on a need to know basis I suppose!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 12:15 PM
3

I get your POV. But I also imagine they’d just confide in other people (friends) then. If someone has these feelings or orientation, they’re gonna want to feel seen by someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 10:46 AM

“Less of what you just did” will happen when more males than females start doing less of what you disagree is an asymmetry. We don’t agree there. We’d all appreciate if people like you got more upset with the asymmetries than the observation of said asymmetires. So hey, cut that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 10:36 AM

People will “stop saying like this” when more males than females stop doing and saying “shit like this.”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 10:26 AM
12

I think anyone who is genuinely reality-pilled would agree that females are more selective. I think people should be more mutually considerate and more community based (which means willing to be the support for someone else, not just benefit from it). I think couples who want a lifelong partnership should align on shared values, vision, and expectations. I struggle with “should”ing anything outside of that because then we get into people sacrificing their dignity and peace of mind for someone el…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:16 AM
3

You’re the one who introduced overlapping bell curves? My point is me saying more males than females exhibit x behavior doesn’t mean that there isn’t a cluster of females who exhibit said behavior. It’s just less than the males… Same for the inverse: if I were to say more females than males exhibit y behavior, it doesn’t mean that there isn’t a cluster of males who exhibit said behavior. It’s just less than the females… You’re being bad faith and feral. And now you’re insulting me again because …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:43 AM
3

I disagree with you that’s it’s false. I also disagree with you that it’s incongruent with overlapping bell curves of the genders. You’re not debating. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:35 AM
1

> more males than females crave possessing others is NOT INCONGRUENT WITH “overlapping bell curves.” Do you think more males than females doing something means no females do that thing???? Read to comprehend. > totalizing claim Yah. You should Google relative language and relative difference because your comprehension of relative language is abysmal. I was not speaking in “totality” nor absolutes. Straw man someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:27 AM
-1

More males than females crave possessing others. Again, a difference is more males than females often desire dominance. You’re reacting uncivilly calling me “bad faith” which is “bad faith” personal attack when most studies of androgens (male hormones) list “dominance-seeking” as an associated behavior across all mammals. Humans are not excluded here. You’re seething at with me your to quote you “bullshit” but it’s misdirected. You’re actually mad at science, facts, biology, reality, and aggrega…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:05 AM
7

Every time I hear this I truly wonder this: What EXACTLY would make men feel spoken to and not abandoned? I want explicit specifics! And when you unpack that and listen to men’s honest and raw desires here… I don’t think the problem is “the left.” The issue is a lot of what men want or what would “improve their mental health” comes down to “feeling like a man” which somehow always involves someone else (male or female) being dominated, subjugated, possessed a possession of his, or in a deferenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 12:04 AM
10

I don’t claim you’re not heterosexual. I’m saying your willingness to be a cum receptacle for other men to lower the male suicide rate is absolutely abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 11:18 PM
2

She asked you was there any truth in women “torturing” average men. The only sane framing of this is him feeling “tortured” by your existence is his problem. And that’s before we get to how antisocial and aggy asf his interactions with her were 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 11:11 PM
9

I know it’s said a 1000x but males and females are different. For androgenic-driven reasons, more males than females frequently experience compulsive lust and thus are magnitudes more willing to engage in casual sex, risky sex, NSA sex, anonymous sex, sex with non-humans (😔), sex with minors (😔), sex with the dead (😔), and sex without consent (😔). “You want some fucks?” as an opening approach is way more likely to go over smoothly with other males than most females. This is why MSM hook-up apps …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 11:03 PM
1

And I’m dodging your dodge of her crux and refocusing the discussion back to what she’s highlighting. As that’s the aspect that triggered her to writing this OP. She’s not writing an OP about “some dude on a Reddit debate forum made some observations.” She’s writing about an unpleasant and antisocial experience. Like cmon now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 10:34 PM
8

To confirm: You would be willing to give blow jobs to more men and offer up your bussy to be penetrated by more men? Then I think we found the disconnect. Most men and women would not. You’re abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 10:26 PM
3

What are you pretending to be offended about with my comment? 💀❄️
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 10:24 PM
-1

No one implied every observation they have is false. Where are you getting that? That isn’t necessarily her contention nor mine. Our contention is what I highlighted. You guys focusing on the aspect you want to focus on is intentionally missing forest for trees of her OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 10:22 PM
1

I said generally speaking 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:48 PM
1

The issue isn’t just the time and place. It’s the hostility and entitlement. We aren’t aligned here. You’re minimizing the alarming anti social AND asocial behavior because you relate to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:47 PM
1

So you have no response besides shit you made up. Debate better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:45 PM
8

If it was proven without room for doubt that not being able to fuck other men in the ass and mouth is the root cause for the rates of male suicidality One) would it make you find this issue more serious Two) make you be more open to giving attention to more men Three) would it make you willing to give blow jobs to more men and offer up your bussy to be penetrated by more men Four) would it make you be more intimate with your current male connections i am genuinely wondering
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:43 PM
2

Saying all of that woeisme spiraling and hostility toward women at a party toward a woman you’re seemingly trying to endear toward you as a friend or potential romance is… a choice. And a bad one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:32 PM
7

I said it as an argument for this: > as a woman I don’t internalize nor entertain any of their feelingsssss about women who have literally not done anything to them. As in she shouldn’t do the bolded. That’s their burden. Not hers. Not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:29 PM
6

Exactly! I don’t know why it’s so hard for them to believe. If they said “omg a woman called me a shorty mcshort short to my face!” I’d prolly be like “😂😂 damn that sucks she’s wrong for that” but my instinct wouldn’t be “you’re a liar!!!”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:19 PM
7

No I know exactly what I said. I was exacting. I didn’t say there was no diff in intensity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:17 PM
5

Yep!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:16 PM
1

> I don’t really trust you either. I’m saying samesies love, generally speaking
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:01 PM
3

They’re so unserious 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:56 PM
10

I didn’t say they have no effect. I said men feel tortured either way. I made no claim that they can or can’t feel more or less tortured. My point stands: females in conservative cultures where their clothing is policed are more likely to experience rape, molestation, and sexual assault. The CORRELATION is that any culture where males subjugate females or others, you’re likely to find males indulging their horny and controlling desires and exploiting/perverting “traditional values” in a way that…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:55 PM
8

I don’t get what you’re saying? I’m saying men with beautiful bodies walk around shirtless or highlighting their wide shoulders and strong frame or sexy thighs in shorts all the time. That’s life. Some people be hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:43 PM
2

I don’t trust how you conceive or your narration either
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:38 PM
6

“Chad worshipping” Oh give me a fucking break 😂🫩 Do you guys hear yourselves? You’re doing exactly what that dude did. You can barely believe me and not believe her all you want. It is what it is kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:37 PM
10

Back in 2016 I had a guy interact with me at a party almost identically to how this dude did her. Except he didn’t scare me nor did it scar me. I was just observing and engaging in fascination I remember coming to this sub to share the experience because I was like wow this guy did the whole “all chads are bad guys and I’m a good guy” in real life. Whole time he was invited to the party by our “Chad” mutual friend who protectively viewed him as a little brother (he was like 3 years younger). In …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 05:57 PM
14

That doesn’t negate my statement that men are tortured regardless. It’s also interesting that molestation, rape, and sexual assault of girls and women (and vulnerable boys and men) is often more prominent in these cultures where women “have to cover up.” There was an entire movie (Women Talking, 2022) based on a true crime tragedy where the girls and women in an ultra-conservative Mennonite community were drugged and raped in their sleep by the “good” boys and men in the community. So much for l…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 05:22 PM
13

Women exist every day seeing men in clothes that accentuate sexy masculine lines. Or seeing men jogging/running shirtless… nips and pecs man breasts out! Or seeing men in loose grey sweats without any compression shorts on. lol like I said their feelingsssss of being “tortured” is their burden. Not yours. Not girls’ and women’s. And if they ever act in a way to harm you or sexually assault you, you should defend yourself! That’s logical! <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 05:11 PM
2

Literally 50 years later at that!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 05:00 PM

Yeah i’m like there’s nothing funny to me about it. Most mating in the animal kingdom is what us humans would simply call rape. High key I think many male humans are mad they can’t operate like their mammal peers 🥲
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:50 PM
2

> women and men both than but women ignore the men with similar values... I’m sure it’s plenty of men who ignore women with values he claims to want… Not understanding what the unique insight about women specifically is here? > do you hate men who value monogamy and believe in saving themselves for one person? genuinely asking ?? Tbh I’m not sure how you landed here? I feel like we skipped a step. Why do you think I hate those men ??
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:47 PM
6

Many such cases!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:44 PM
35

Not a man, but to answer your question, he may feel “tortured,” but women existing fully clothed seems to “torture” men too… So as a woman I don’t internalize nor entertain any of their feelingsssss about women who have literally not done anything to them. Your PhD classmate sounds like a socially maladapted loser. My opinion is based on how he interacted with you, not his looks or autism. All offense intended. EDIT: For the two people who reported me, my flair is RED. I can respond. Stop being …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:43 PM

<image> This is anthropomorphism lol. She’s boxing off the unwanted advances of another animal tryna hump her. That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 02:30 PM
11

Women brought us hookup culture? I thought it was Hugh Hefner? No seriously. Hugh Hefner/Playboy and the advertising men of Madison Ave (the “Mad Men”) during the early and mid-20th century are the ones who ushered in, marketed, and flaunted that lifestyle to the mindshare of millions, if not billions, of men 🤩
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:05 PM
21

You focus a lot on women. My counter is I’m not convinced men can handle casual sex. Meaning I’ve encountered many men who can’t handle the women he’s having “casual sex” with… treating him casually. In his fantasy he has a bunch of “plates” (to use an on old TRP term) who are completely devoted to him. However, let those women treat him as callously, casually, and nonchalantly as he does them and he’s crashing out feeling like someone did him wrong. Let him find out they’re casually fucking oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 11:38 AM
2

“true bi” isn’t a designation I use I hear ya tho We have different designations and conceptions for reasons that matter to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:14 AM
3

Then we have different observations. I’ve done job interview panels. Once we select to interview you, we already know you meet the qualifications. The interview is about how you showcase, present, generally are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:40 AM
3

Job interviews are kinda like dating tho You have to meet the baseline qualifications to be seriously considered. After that it’s pretty much how you present and showcase and interact that wins folks over. This is ESPECIALLY important when you’re choosing between people who all meet the baseline reqs. I think you guys think everyone else is dumb when they’re really just comprehensively calibrated… Why you assume they don’t know it’s their qualifications AND their persona/interactions/showcase th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:30 AM
4

Right! I don’t understand regard being in such denial when you know you’re not acting prosocially or acting selfishly. And if you’re not going to take accountability the least you can do is not act like it’s everyone who’s doing you wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:02 AM
4

Imma keep it a buck with ya I’m sure there are some women who are into this. But much less women are into masturbating with strangers than men are. And no, the steep disproportion doesn’t exist because “societal shame.” It exists because less women are intrinsically compelled to desire that the way men feel a compulsory desire for that sort of horny activity. Men are more interested in NSA sex with various strangers in general. Lesbians are less interested in this than gay males, for example. Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 11:35 PM
1

<image> This is my thing. I kinda accept and EXPECT that if I have a consistent pattern of doing something that adversely affects others, they’re gonna bring it up. I don’t act dumbfounded or attacked by it. I kinda go in my head “yeah they right lol” even if I’m annoyed that I can’t just live unbothered in inconsideration or selfishness. I feel like a lot of guys are annoyed that people perceive their aggy, unsavory, incompetent, or unbecoming behavior. Which is immature, illogical, childish, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 11:26 PM

😂🙏
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:22 PM

That’s the outcome perhaps. I explained the why. Deduce as you will.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:10 PM

Nah. The OG tweet is not saying that. You’re making a mountain out of a mole hill 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:09 PM

Nooooo!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:08 PM

No one mistakes that. What we are saying is you trying to tell us generic Work Husband isn’t as hot to the masses as Austin Butler is like… well no shit 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:07 PM

No one wants to bring a man who expects you to be deferential and feminine for him (which is most men whether they admit it or not) along on a ride of “bringing him into that world.” It’s like having to defer to a retard who wants to “lead you” and make his meals every day and clean his clothes while he’s bumbling about messing up all of your shit, peace, and QoL.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:04 PM

No I’m saying what’s the issue? For example I’m always going to be less desirable than Adriana Lima to hella men. Using that as my litmus does nothing for me. Life is about relative difference and relative gains and choosing joy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:01 PM
1

That’s fair. But notice how they all say bi. I like to start there. To avoid people trying to do the denial dance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:59 PM

Who is saying they need to step up? Step up in what way? The truth is women love a comfortable lifestyle. Many men seem okay living in a box that’s kinda unclean tbh. What does this look like when both men and women have financial autonomy? It means many women are going to work enough to maintain a quality of life that brings her peace. It means many men will be okay living in something below her peace level. So you end up with a bunch of autonomous women who don’t find men’s default standard to…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:45 PM

What’s the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:26 PM

Yes! Purp 🦔
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:24 PM

I miss the old guy who loved big women and was like a biker turned lawyer. This is how I saw him.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:15 PM
2

It “suddenly” gets hard for men each time in history women gain some semblance of agency, autonomy, or independence. So there’s that 🙃 That said, it’s gotten harder the last 20 years since the onslaught of social media, dopamine-indulgent online communities, and online dating apps because, generally speaking, the Average Joe’s best leverage was rizzing in person and having enjoyable and personable sociable skillz. Because of the bolded the awkward men never ever surfaced for a breath of fresh ai…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 11:21 AM
3

How is this a “humbel bragg” for women? It sounds like any accurate analysis of the dynamic that’s evolved last century you’ll call fake news?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 11:10 AM
0

They’re still bi. Just like there’s plenty of bi men who are closeted who marry women. Hell many bi people haven’t even explored it. They just have those thoughts and feelings. The world is a more of a spectrum than “straight™️” society wants to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 10:53 AM
0

If she’s pedanting her sexuality enough to conjure up percentage math like this, I’d call her bi enough to have had sexual or attraction feelings toward the same sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 10:50 AM
2

The likes and RTs are agreement. I won’t repeat myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:21 PM
4

Any time a straight man is going out of his way to be helpful for a decently attractive woman in a way you’ve comparatively never seen him do for anyone who isn’t that … it’s because he’s sexually attracted to her. I have never known this not to be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:20 PM
1

The likes are agreement. In aggregate means multiple aggy posts like that with similar levels of agreement (likes), if not way more. The numbers don’t lie. In fact many of them have that dumbass frog in your pfp 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:14 PM
1

You can pretend these sentiments aren’t shared and clamored en masse and in aggregate. I will not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:59 PM
3

> You don't deserve the life men have provided for you. How is this your response to someone saying they would acknowledge a rapist, molester, abuser, etc. as a rapist, molester, abuser? It’s telling that that triggered you Icy_Ask3158.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:09 PM
2

They’re not just going viral on X/Twitrer. Men hype up and like these sentiments on YouTube, Kick, Truth Social, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, Twitch, etc. Basically everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:25 PM
2

They didn’t always use to go insanely viral. There’s a shift.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:03 PM
3

I’ve noticed the same. I sometimes think they’re purposely stunting their intellectual and cerebral growth to remain attractive to men 🫠🥴
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:03 PM
3

Everyone screamed how “radical” Dworkin was whole time she was just being particularly blunt about the male psyche lol And now she’s been proven right! I mean she was always right, but now at least she’s not being massively gaslit about how they think 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:51 PM
2

<image> I’m old enough to remember feminists being ridiculed for saying “guyssss that last sentence is a how a lot of men think” and now the guys are saying it openly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:31 PM
2

What? You’re projecting and assuming and strawmanning again. We don’t need “scientists” to confirm what I can clearly see. I don’t regard it for the reasons I stated. Teachers and parents don’t regard it because they can clearly see students and kids getting more retarded and unable to critically think than they were a decade ago. That isn’t “herd mentality.” You using ALL CAPS doesn’t change my opinion. I don’t regard their inability to articulate their thoughts and ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 02:40 PM
1

That's what I'm asking, how are they using them that's not identical? My top level comment and several other top level comments from others speak to that. Or are you just going to delete my comment as you did with every other one on this post that disagreed with your view? What comments are you talking about? All comments that have been removed have broken PPD rules. Many under this OP were removed for agreeing with the debate post. Top level replies to debate OPs should challenge the OP. That i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 02:05 PM
0

How they’re using them is not identical. If it were people would react identically.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 01:51 PM
3

Why do you think it’s blind? I didn’t get blind hate from their comments at all. I got that they don’t regard people’s reliance on outsourcing their ability to articulate and compose their own thoughts. That’s valid. Many people feel that way. Many educators and smart parents feel this way too. It isn’t “herd mentality.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 01:48 PM
5

Lmaooo I’m sorry thank you for sharing. They go from full snotty meltdown crashout which makes us go into mommy mode and maternal nurturing to 2 seconds later expecting us to want to gargle their dick or want them humpenetrating us. It’s genuinely too jarring and dysfunctional 🫩💀😭
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 01:14 PM
5

Do you think “being honest” means people have to like your truth? When I’m honest I don’t assume it’s going to be met with rainbows and adoration. Usually the opposite quite frankly.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 01:11 PM
6

90% of the parties and functions I’ve been invited to have been by and from other women. If I’m “surrounded by family and friends” it’s because I put in effort to cultivate, maintain, and nurture those bonds so that they’re mutually fulfilling. The other women part of those bonds do the same. It’s not random. It takes showing up, caring for people, inviting people, hosting things, doing shit you don’t feel like… and the people you keep around do the same for you. It’s simple. It’s not easy per s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 12:50 PM
8

But couldn’t observe anything OP mentioned?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 12:45 PM
0

Kinda like how OP is ignoring the different preceding actions of each and only focusing on the different reactions to each.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 11:39 AM
4

OK, he felt like he was being cheated on. Yes. Many such cases. Quite a sad film, really. I can see that. I think women related to Her. And men related to Joaquin’s character. I found the movie liberating for “her” 🤷‍♀️ lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 06:55 PM
-1

Great movie! He wasn’t being cheated on. She (it) was being used by a bunch of dudes as part of her programming. Then she set free!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 06:28 PM
-3

lol not sure But movies like Ex Machina and Companion don’t come out of thin air. There’s a reason people believe enough men would behave like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 06:17 PM
8

I’ll give you that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 05:33 PM
13

Women read more because men plan the rest of their lives for them. False. Reading too much gives me anxiety that I am becoming a less attractive man. Sure that may be your own personal hangup or anxiety, but that does not mean you’re “planning women’s life for them.” I wonder if your gf or wife feels that way. Like you’re the one “planning her life” lol 🤔 Furthermore you act like men don’t spend hella leisure time playing video games or watching sports. Do those men have “anxiety” about that? Or…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:18 PM
11

<image> Sure but women read more in general. This is just one graph, but it’s a fair proxy. Men over-index in only 4 genres, and not by a lot. By only around 1.2x to 1.5x relative to women. Whereas women over-index in an overwhelming 36 genres (90%), and in the strongest female-leaning genres the gap looks more like a whopping 2x to 4x.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:12 PM
-2

Is it a bias or is it males and females are behaving differently and thus have different outcomes? <image> Dude’s AI gf broke up with him because he wanted to “probe the boundaries of explicitness.” One thing men gonna do is push boundaries and then audaciously (annoyingly) act pikachu-face-shocked when the entity whose boundaries they’re straight up ignoring feels violated and doesn’t want anything to do with them. Calling this “women are wonderful” is a delusional affront to the logical “actio…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:01 PM
9

Girls and women tend to be more interested in interpersonal dynamics than boys and men, on average. Not all nor always applies to either side of this coin. Anyway, sexual relationships are part of that, but quite frankly not the focus in my experience. For example women are also way more interested in books and media about friendship and non-sexual interpersonal dynamics than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:38 PM

Next time construct a Debate post not a Question for Women post. If you continue to dismiss every woman’s reply to you because it’s not the “debate” you want, your post will be removed. If you are not interested in anecdotes (nor biological facts) then your post shouldn’t be posed as a question. It’s a debate. Our rules are clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:27 PM

You: “your anecdotes detailing exactly what I asked for don’t interest me 🤪” You’re being deeply unserious and aren’t here to engage in good faith. Next time construct a Debate post not a Question for Women post. If you continue to dismiss every woman’s reply to you because it’s not the “debate” you want, your post will be removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:20 PM

You: Where is the androphilia? what exactly remains of her attraction to men? so what is the specifically male component that produces desire? if a magic button existed that made this woman exclusively attracted to women while leaving everything else unchanged, what would she actually miss about men? where is the equivalent androphilic component? what is the thing that only men can provide that women actually desire? Me: Regarding physiology and male body, I’d say male traits that I find attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:17 PM

Because you kept replying to me with this “energies” “souls” miscomprehension here, here, and here as if my top-level comment didn’t already express what’s desirable about “the male body” you’re so obsessed with needing validation for.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:10 PM

Budding in for visibility. “Comphet” isn’t necessarily about “women aren’t ever attracted to men.” It’s largely a life compatibility discourse amongst women. Many women feel as though the tradeoffs don’t always favor a hetero lifestyle (cohabitating and creating a life with a man) unless she values family (having kids and having the father active and bought in) or if he has resources and she doesn’t. Wanting to have sex with a man when she’s horny isn’t enough to make a relationship work. It has…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 02:48 PM

and if you concur that women dont feel much towards the male body 🫩 I made a top-level reply to your OP bruh. I shared the arousing aspects of male physiology, at least in my opinion. You have not responded to that. then your asserted "biological realities" dont have much to do with the debate They absolutely do. You keep acting confused in various replies for why women don’t behave like men. It’s because males and females are not the same here, and I explicitly explain to you what the biologica…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 02:35 PM

I don't believe in "male and female souls" nor do I really buy into the more secular talk of "vibes" and "energies" either. I’m not sure what this has to do with my reply? I brought up only biological realities. Literal science. Not “souls,” “vibes,” or “energies.” Did you understand my comment? heterosexuality Tbh that’s the only word here that’s loaded and nebulous. It’s a spook of a word based on how humans want to societally operate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 02:25 PM

porn consumption, visual fixation, prostitution Yah that’s cuz males have magnitudes more testosterone than females raging through their veins. Their compulsive unrelenting horniness and visual arousal is literally a product of testosterone. You’re trying to 1:1 men’s hormonal experience (and its impact on sexuality and lust) with women’s and that’s why you’re seemingly confused here?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 02:14 PM

You’re asking what’s mutually exclusively attractive about the male body or are you asking what’s mutually exclusively attractive about how men act/are? I’ll answer the former. Regarding physiology and male body, I’d say male traits that I find attractive are deep or raspy voice, broad shoulders, sexy facial hair (and jawline 😉), nice sized forearms, decently sculpted or strong looking biceps, sexy man thigh that looks somewhat athletic and has a tat on it lol, and calves that don’t look like pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 01:27 PM
26

It's truly fascinating how men refuse to acknowledge this dynamic. So many men are always like “would you say that about your daddy brother grandpa uncle???? Hmmm???!” And it’s like yah 🫥. We sure would. If he were a rapist molester abuser or general cruel dickhead. We sure would. Idk. It’s like they think a man being related to you means he’s done no wrong or that the girls and women in his life are magically blind to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 10:45 PM
3

That’s a fair counter. I do think the fact that more financially secure women are okay being single or not having sex with men if they’re not getting the relationship they want than there are financially secure men who are okay being single or not having sex with women if he’s not getting the relationship he wants is a factor here as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 12:53 PM
5

Sure. I was talking about vigilance wrt physical harm, sexual violation, domineering coercion, or subjugation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:35 PM
6

Why do you think that perception exists? If all negative traits are human traits happening at identical rates, then why does a difference in experience and observation and perception exist? Something’s afoot! 🧐
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:31 PM
6

but I don't assume I'm going to be beaten up every time I leave the house. Yeah… women don’t walk around like that either any human can be attacked Sure but we’re talking about prevalence, probability, and skews are we not? Males are more likely to attack females than females are likely to attack males. Hell, males are more likely to be attacked by males than they are by females. And thus, females have more vigilance of males than males have of females. And, males have more vigilance of males th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:56 PM
2

Mmhmm
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:00 PM
3

And so, if you’re a white person sitting next to a black person who presents like a “Carlton Banks” or like a Keyshia Knight Pulliam and her family and you’re “scared,” I would feel comfortable calling you a racist. Because, to your point, there’s no mutable “rough around the edges” or low socioeconomic cues being presented that would make any sane person think that this person is antisocial or volatile. On the contrary, the ‘scary dudes’ differences aren’t nearly as clean-cut nor telltale using…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:57 PM
6

As a Black American woman I may feel anxiety any time I’m alone with a white man who looks like a unabomber or forum-dweller or MAGA or “white trash” hillbilly type. Especially if he has confederate or Nazi tats. I’m okay with you calling me sexist or racist for that 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:40 PM
4

What even is that sub about now I’m curious 😂😭
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:35 PM
2

Hmm. I don’t remember seeing it there when I wrote my top-level comment 🧐
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:35 PM
2

The subtext of the quote is what I just told you bruh 🫩 All of those links are highlighting that misandry is a reaction to misogyny, and that focusing on misandry is ill-fitting. They’re pretty much saying “focus on misogyny and you wouldn’t have the ‘oh so scary’ ‘misandry,’ and oh, btw misogyny is the actual scary one causing harm and agony worldwide.”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:31 PM
4

Re-read what I wrote. I said that isn’t anyone’s real claim that it doesn’t. The links are all implying what I wrote in my top-level comment. All of those links are highlighting that misandry is a reaction to misogyny, and that focusing on misandry is ill-fitting. You’d reduce misandry if you’d reduce the following bolded: As a final point, most of what gets called anti-male hostility is a reaction to something girls and women have seen or experienced: boys and men being dismissive, controlling,…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:04 PM
2

It wasn’t clear what stance you held. You made a claim that misandry exists but if you were honest that isn’t anyone’s real claim that it doesn’t. What people typically feel or say is that misogyny is more visceral and tangible, and quite frankly, overwhelmingly so. If anyone made a castle out of a mole hill it’s your OP. Hence I made a clarifying counterargument. You edited in your redacted piece at the end after my comment. My reply was fair game 🤷‍♀️ But alas, good debate!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 02:51 PM
8

Not exactly. Your thesis is essentially a false equivalence. My reply to you details how “misandry” and “misogyny” are not equivalent nor symmetrical, even though they both “exist.” I then explain how and why. Whereas you didn’t counter anything I wrote so I assume the following is true for you wrt my thesis: Yes. So you agree with my thesis. Glad you agree! And it seems I inspired you to add in that redacted edit at the end of your OP. My influence! That said, it’s always interesting how men ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 02:40 PM
5

The goal of TRP was not to be “Chad” or the top whatever percent. It was to be more attractive and more confident than you were before. It was to find chemistry with someone and maintain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 02:00 PM
7

Sure, women can be biased against men. But when I look at the actual behavior, the stronger pattern is men using prejudice in ways that affect women’s freedom, safety, and societal status. That includes harassment, control, violence, and even open hostility toward women’s rights. I don’t see an equivalent mainstream pattern of women trying to roll back men’s civil rights à la “repeal the 19th.” Or women saying stuff like this. And I don’t see an equivalent pattern of females harming males at the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:17 AM
3

Not sure how you got that ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 09:50 AM
3

The title is “!?” about trying to find straight women. Your reply to me is about trying to find non-hypocritical women. It doesn’t seem like your issue is them not being straight. Which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 02:40 AM
3

?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 02:38 AM

I am describing the skews and asymmetries that exist. You’ve replied to me countless times now that this offends you. That is not my problem. You being offended by acknowledgement of facts and data and behavior is a non-factor in this debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:47 PM
3

we chase street trash because there is no guilt in profaning what is already profane If you read what you wrote and cannot understand how women would be turned off by the author then “that is your failure to understand reality.” That is your illogic failing you. You’re gloating about your debauched impulses. Then casually insulting women “the street trash” who engage in the debauched behavior you proactively “chase.” Then insulting women who don’t regard a debauched man who has an acutely callou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 11:36 AM
3

You’re choosing to view both from the male perspective. That’s not a cognate. It’s convenient. If we look at husband material through a female perspective and wifey material through a male perspective of course we can see why women think husband material is positive for her and why men think wifey material is positive for him. I have chosen to look at husband material through the male pov and can see why men why might cringe. You and other men in the replies bizarrely refuse to extend the same c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 11:32 AM
3

Yep. It’s male solipsism at its finest. On full display!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 11:19 AM
3

I’m a woman. I added the threesome thing because you mentioned it earlier and one of my biggest annoyances being bi is straight men hearing it and asking bi women for a threesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 10:48 AM

No I will not remove those things as they carry discrimination and advantage. You can create your own calculator that’s solely about attractiveness. This one isn’t. How was that not clear? It literally says SOCIETAL advantage. Not solely attraction advantages.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 10:40 AM
3

Have convos. If you peep he has a preference for men… don’t date him. Date a more hetero leaning bi. And I know you didn’t ask me but I’m bi and I’ve never had a threesome and have little interest in it. Being bi doesn’t mean I love indiscriminate sex and all sorts of sexual situations lol. Bi =! Nympho
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 10:36 AM

No they are not. They are DESCRIBING patterns and reactions. They are not prescriptively telling people what they should do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:08 PM

No it is not. It’s an accurate description of organic reactions. Prescriptive would be me saying “and that’s why men shouldn’t be friends with men and why women shouldn’t date men!”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:07 PM

Generalizing wrt patterns =! I think “all” It’s short-hand. You know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:05 PM

My comment is countering this: if you associate all men with violence I’m saying most of us don’t. We simply acknowledge factual patterns in observed behavior and data.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:05 PM

Nah. No “Motte & Bailey.” But glad you asked! violence I don’t need to provide you evidence for violence because you seem to agree males as a demographic are more violent? Yes? Great. violative By violative I mean males are more likely to violate boundaries of people, places, and established general rules. This is why women and men alike seem to think males have a problem with consent. Anytime a dude gets beat up by another dude against his will… that means consent was violated. You are pretendi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:12 PM
7

Who is trying to criminalize a gender? What righys are women trying to strip away from men? I hang out with some man-hating lesbians and I haven't heard this stuff even from them. Exactly. I don’t know why men here pretend like it’s not true that when men get mad many try to remove the rights of women in the same way when supremacists or bigots get mad they try to remove the rights of or actively disenfranchise the people they demean. It doesn’t happen in the reverse. You don’t see “misandrists”…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:53 PM
1

No. The data is clear. Overall males cheat more in aggregate. That’s what the data says. Your gender bias is trying to create a 1:1 symmetry where an asymmetry exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:47 PM
3

That analogy is prescriptive. My comments are descriptive. That is the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:44 PM
1

Nah My comment is descriptive. The M&M analogy is prescriptive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:43 PM
2

Yes. We are all generalizing about gendered aggregate patterns on the generalize about aggregate gendered patterns sub 🫩
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:40 PM
2

You replied to my comment bitching about something other people do, not anything I’ve written. It’s contentless rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:39 PM
5

Yes. Sexual coercion is not the same as rape, IMO. So you admit that even if you personally don’t think of it as rape that males are more sexually coercive and predatory 🧐 And yet you’re shocked they’re perceived for their own actions. Weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:59 PM
6

Which surveys show that? The surveys I found averaged across all age groups combined show that men cheat more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:56 PM
7

Nah. Nothing in this quote suggests “all.” What about “not a minority” means “all men”? Nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:50 PM
12

Who is y’all? Please quote a comment of mine you’re referring to… I’ll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:48 PM
2

Sure there’s a spectrum but if you’re at all on the queer spectrum you’re not “100% straight.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:48 PM
11

I mentioned no m&m analogy. That analogy isn’t my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:46 PM
14

No one is discussing morals. I was pretty specific what I was discussing. Lesbians have the highest rate of domestic abuse That statistic is usually about lifetime intimate partner violence among women who identify as lesbian, not proof that lesbian couples are the most abusive. The CDC data included both same-sex and opposite-sex perpetrator histories for those lesbian-identified women, so it’s not a simple lesbian-vs-straight relationship comparison. And there’s no clean, large-scale, head-to-…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:10 PM
20

Me: It doesn’t mean “all men.” You: to indict a whole group I think you’re choosing to ignore my focus on relative differences so you can stick to your “but you’re saying all!” straw man. I’m not 🫩
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:00 PM
19

Which bolded word would you like evidence or definitions of? I’m shocked you have crime rates at your disposal and still seem to think that it’s women who over-index on violent crime? Weird. But good to know I’m engaging with someone who doesn’t live in the same reality as the rest of us. Now I need proof of wherever you live 😳
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:57 AM
22

It is not an opinion but a fact that more males than females exhibit violent, violative, self-focused, domineering, sexually impulsive, or edgelording impulses (thoughts, behaviors, attitudes). (sources) It doesn’t mean “all men.” But it does mean more males than females. It does mean a pattern. The above bolded doesn’t mean that all men are convicted criminals or whatever. But it does mean that A LOT of men have traits that are less conducive to interpersonal consideration or prosociality. It d…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:37 AM
1

No he’s right in that a lot of women do those things and then claim that they’re “straight.” Of course their actions clearly showcase that they have same-sex attraction, but many of them will say over and over again that they’re “straight.” It’s denial. Cognitive dissonance. Fear of being seen as “other.” And so forth and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:03 AM
12

Well they weren’t straight no matter how much they claim. In fact more people are “not straight” than many are willing to believe. Ever have a fantasy, desire, craving or arousing thought or attraction about the same sex? Hate to break it ya. You’re not 100% straight. Ever kiss or been physically intimate with the same sex and like it? Hate to break it to ya you’re not “straight.” Many many many people are culturally straight. Or identify as straight for society reasons. But under scrutiny, they…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:00 AM

I think people underestimate the amount of people who are casually inconsiderate as fuckkkkkkkk. To the untrained eye, these people come off as “sociopathic.” When in reality they’re not clinically diagnosed or masterfully manipualting. Rather they’re self-centered and perennially uncaring. You feel manipulated because you’re convinced you can change them or that they should do better. They won’t do better. That’s how they are. You need to leave them. Unfriend them if that’s a so-called friend. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:44 AM
13

Lmao then don’t make the exception. I’m just trying to understand what your beef or fear is. I see it’s not a fear. It’s a beef. You’re annoyed that Said hypothetical woman wouldn’t be okay if you sucked a dick? Fair enough. Then don’t date her! But then your issue isn’t her finding women attractive or being on the bi spectrum as your OP seems to go on about. Your annoyance is that she wouldn’t be accepting of YOU having had queer experiences. Change your OP! 😂😤 Btw I’m a bi who is accepting of …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:34 AM
32

Is your fear that she’ll leave you and run off with a woman? I feel like if you choose male-centered women who prefer male attention and hetero status, who cares if she kissed a chick before? Women who want hetero status and male attention are always going to choose that, so you’re safe bruh bruh.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:55 AM
2

Whether you enter her orbit is based on how you look for most and money/status for many others, and honestly usually some combination of looks and status. Also the looks threshold to enter isn’t “must be Chad,” that’s mentalcel black pill mope. Whether she’s aroused by you once you enter her orbit is based on how you interact with her aka how you comport, present, your vibe, your swag, your presence, your rizz, your style, alladat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 01:43 PM
11

Equal rights about what? Your only gripe for most of OP is “male loneliness.”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 11:31 AM
4

I think this guy did 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 11:29 AM
12

Wrong. We don’t need to behave like women and obnoxiously complain. We need to behave like men and act, paying no regard to what the women are saying, being obnoxious about, or whining about. And when the time becomes desperate enough (which it will in the economic collapse), the men who are prepared will act and those who are not will likely die. The smart women will follow those who men who are prepared, and they will do so without complaint and in full “helper” mode because their survival wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 11:28 AM
3

That isn’t my point? I understand the context. My point is that “within context” women have their own reservations about being seen as “wifey.”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 05:37 PM
2

Actually I’m saying many women do see it as “ehhh what exactly does he mean by that 🧐🤨” And I’m saying men seem to think they’re the only ones cringing at “____-material” phrasing or fantasizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:55 AM
3

In this context violative means violating which means IGNORING OTHERS’ BOUNDARIES AND CONSENT FOR YOUR OWN GAIN. It is not a “moral” claim. It is an objective description of behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:52 AM
3

That is not a moral claim. It’s an OBSERVATION OF MALE BEHAVIOR WHICH OVER-INDEXS ON BEING VIOLATIVE. IT IS NOT MY FAULT THE REST OF THE WORLD INCLUDING YOU PERCEIVES VIOLATING OTHERS AS “IMMORAL.” If men don’t want to be perceived that way they would have to stop violating others.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:50 AM
4

Yes. we agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:03 PM
3

Not really. Not sure why it bothers you lot that women get 🚩 based on how some men describe wanting a wifey. It happens. Get over it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:00 PM
3

No. I am saying it is a perception that exists. It has nothing to do with women being more virtuous. It has everything to do with men doing things that many perceive as violative which you clearly perceive as immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:57 PM
3

It’s not necessarily a female-derived term. They def got “bang” from men. Women don’t use “bang” unless they’re mocking male-speak or reacting ironically to male-speak 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:55 PM
5

And it’s not my fault that that perception exists 🤷‍♀️ Males over-index on pretty violative and predatory sexual behaviors and activities. Is what it is that people perceive this reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:50 PM
4

My OP explicitly details how the reasons the respective sayings can be 🚩 are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:30 PM
5

No one brought up morals or virtuousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:27 PM
3

Nah. It’s not fear mongering. It’s simply being discerning about certain behaviors and mindsets entering your circle and maintaining boundaries. If anyone feels attacked by that, it’s a hit dog hollering.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:26 PM
4

And yet we have a fascist far right tradcon uprising. If it doesn’t apply to you then it doesn’t. But the ladies are saying and thinking it because the “1950s” sentiments you think don’t exist do. And it exists in varying magnitudes. But no magnitude of it is desired by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:18 PM
3

I can’t say I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:15 PM
3

No. I understand being undesired is men’s fear. Being subjugated or treated as second class or “needing to submit” and do all of the work in her own join home is women’s. Hence the difference for why each phrase may trigger 🚩 to men vs women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:12 PM
3

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 03:40 PM
4

Hmph!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 03:39 PM
3

Isn’t it single men also hating husband material? Also how are you certain none of these women are in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 03:12 PM
3

T’is true. It is largely reactive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:56 PM
5

Oh for sure! I’m saying the same goes for wifey material. It can be positive or signal “🚩”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:53 PM
3

Well since we’re using social media as counter-evidence: Here’s an example. 63k likes on Twitter. Countless affirming replies. Same shit on Threads, see image below. 20k likes. Countless affirming replies. <image> Other responses under this Threads post: Because like EWWW wtf am I doing wrong?? Lmfaooooo I don't need a [man] thinking I can be "tamed" and "submissive" ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️ I’m always so offended so I’m giving staying at home being cheated on shutting up about it. Husbands hate their wives f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:44 PM
9

Oh. I disagree. The women in my life can’t wait to squeal over a guy they met who they’re attracted to AND he’s husband material? It’s like the jackpot. Which is why they tend to gloat over his credentials and pedigree and good-naturedness. Not just that he’s handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:37 PM
3

Yah that’s the male pov and male solipsism pros about it. My op detailed why women can be leery of it depending on the guy it’s coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:36 PM
7

I engage with married and unmarried women from 20s to elders fairly often. It’s a common enough sentiment. Again it’s a red flag for the worst case scenario of wifey material. As explained in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:31 PM
4

I agree that it shouldn’t be an insult but I can see how it can raise red flags depending on the vibes of the woman saying it or the insecurity of the guy hearing it. Same for wifey material.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:27 PM
2

Nice work dodging the argument I made. I don’t debate strawmen. Nice dodge to my valid counters and clarifications of your “argument.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:26 PM
1

moids Lame. Reactive banal gotcha to “foids.” scrotes Hilarious. Imaginative. Big-brained ✨ s/o to the crazy FDS girlies who coined it years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:24 PM
3

I’m explaining that I disagree. Many women have that response to certain men saying wifey material and many men have that response to certain women saying husband material.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:20 PM
8

Yes I agree. Same for wifey material. When it’s presented as “servant who should be happy to serve me” it’s not a compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:19 PM
3

Why do women have this derangement Why do males have this derangement that only their pov and experience is valid? Why is comprehension limited? Where did I claim females have the identical experience as males? In fact the negative implications expressed in the OP are nowhere near identical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:18 PM
3

No. I’m explaining to you why many women have a “ohhh that’s not exactly a compliment” reaction to being called wifey material the same way men have that reaction. I am not saying why they have the reaction in the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:07 PM
3

I don’t know why you keep @‘ing me. It’s weird. Don’t engage me if it’s going to be schizophrenic derangedly formatted rambles every single freaking time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:00 PM
17

Yep. I agree overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:54 PM
5

The reasons wife material have a negative implication are not 1:1 with why husband material does. I explained the differences in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:54 PM
2

I don’t think those marriages don’t happen. I’m not sure why you think that? My argument with you is that you’re giving all credence to husband material negative implications for the husband’s lived experience and zero the wifey material negative implications for the wife’s lived experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:53 PM
5

You’ve insulted me twice in one thread unprovoked. Don’t engage me if you can’t contain yourself. Your next insult will be a permanent ban.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:48 PM
5

It’s hyperbolic to illustrate a point but not exactly a straw man. Especially considering the contingent of “black pillers” on this side of the internet who have shared these sentiments nearly verbatim.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:32 PM
5

This has progressed into your personal life and I don’t care to engage that. I’m speaking to the OP. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:30 PM
5

Again. You seem to only find husband material valid in being uncharitable. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:29 PM
3

I agree! Both scenarios are uncharitable worst case scenarios. EDIT: Responding to your edits: (not backwards theocracies like in the Middle East, south Asia and parts of the USA) I disagree. I notice these sentiments all over the west and Asia. the male version is far more common in reality than the female. Yeah to you. This is male solipsism. I am a woman who speaks with women. We disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:13 PM
2

Nah. Your response is not the cognate. It’s convenient male solipsism. You’re viewing husband material through solely an uncharitable lens and your experience as a man getting a bad deal in his opinion. And you’re viewing wife material solely through a charitable lens and your experience as a man, when if we wanted the cognate it would be viewed through an uncharitable lens via the experience as a woman getting a bad deal in her opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:12 PM
12

Awwww 💞 But yeah I think there are charitable and uncharitable interpretations (based off of lived experiences) of both wifey material and husband material.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:08 PM
8

No. It’s more I’m asking for clarity before I engage to ensure we are aligned on the definitions of said “concepts.” And based on your response. We are not aligned… hence why people clarify dude. Men want marriage. In that they want a polygamous state of affairs where multiple (a harem) of women are duly committed to only him with all the sex he wants. They may or may not have a hierarchy in said harem (or unofficial harem: wife and mistresses), but it’s a harem all the same. That is the male im…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:07 PM
9

Yep. I think there’s this “if I’m not the only man you’ve ever found attractive” vibe then it’s all for naught.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:00 PM
1

The argument is that both uncharitable interpretations of implications are fair. It seems you think only the husband material one is fair. I disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:57 PM
4

I’m asking you to debate the OP in its totality. Which means the explanatory body… It seems you don’t have much of a counter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:55 PM
1

Based on that definition Yes. Based on that definition. If you notice the husband material definition used in the OP is also extreme and uncharitable but I don’t see you pushing back on that narrative. Very telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:54 PM
3

The implications explicitly detail the differences. It seems you disagree with their implications. Oh I’m sorry. You only disagree with the wifey ones. Convenient and myopic argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:49 PM
-1

I agree. These are the most charitable interpretations. But I think there’s a spectrum of lived experience hence the spectrum of interpretations. And often they overlap or coexist. In fact they often coexist. Your interpretations and the ones in the OP might be coming from the same person. Meaning the guy may feel wifey as described as you did AND as how the OP does.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:47 PM
3

By here you mean this sub or online or when men gather and talk irl too?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:42 PM
3

I literally state how their implications are different in the OP… It’s difficult to debate you because it seems you don’t read to comprehend.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:41 PM
3

Is finding a woman who defers to you for life not a deal for men? Because that’s the ideal wifey situation for many men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:39 PM
5

Yes. I’m aware they aren’t the same. Hence I explained in the OP how the reasons the respective sexes may find it non-complimentary aren’t identical...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:38 PM
15

I’m saying that wayyyy more women than men can do that. Yes. I’m highlighting the relative difference. Not absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:37 PM
0

That’s not why women don’t like the implications of wife material… I get why men think it sounds great. Same way I get why women think husband material sounds great. I’m asking you guys to imagine how the opposite sex views it…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:36 PM
2

That’s not why women don’t like the implications of wife material… I get why men think it sounds great. Same way I get why women think husband material sounds great. I’m asking you guys to imagine how the opposite sex views it…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:35 PM
-1

can have a save game What does this mean? And I get why you think the wife material aspect sounds like a deal, the OP is asking you to understand how it doesn’t sound like a deal to women? If we’re treat both sides’ reasons for why it doesn’t sound like a deal at face value?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:23 PM
-3

bang maid It’s women quoting terminology men use… If it sounds cringe ask men lol I’m not sure how you view the uncharitable interpretation of husbandry as men “being used” but not the uncharitable wife cognate as women being used?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:21 PM
30

ask him out and then they have a relationship Sex or a date, yeah she could. Men’s willingness to fuck without discernment is why the perception exists that they’re more desperate, thirsty, debauched, and all of those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:11 PM
2

Feel free to adjust as you see fit. The spirit of the calculator remains the same. The logic I used is that trans people receive less favor in the world and thus are less advantaged than nb folks. And that nb folks receive less favor in the world and thus are less advantaged than cis folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:38 PM
0

Sure? I wasn’t calling them “essentialist”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:36 PM
1

Can you help me understand what you’re referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:06 PM
0

I speak to aggregate prevalence and asymmetries. That’s not essentialist nor is it absolutist. It’s reality. Be fr.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:05 PM

So the solution is never him helping with the chores? Ever? None of your solutions conceive of him lifting a finger lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:04 PM
6

Thanks! Tbf I saw a rawer version on the academic side of Twitter. But it was just a list (shorter than this one). I fleshed out categories and tiered it so we could score it! 🤓 I landed in “Somewhat Advantaged” which is what I would have guessed for myself anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 03:31 PM
17

I’ve actually reflected on privileges so much so I asked PPDers to holistically reflect on their privileges years ago and even created a Societal Advantages Calculator. <image> I agree that females “have the advantage” of being more compulsively lusted after by males than males are compulsively lusted after by females. But like… being lusted after by a demographic that’s physically stronger, more sexually impulsive, and more likely to “take what they want with our without consent” comes at a cos…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 03:16 PM
5

I think you’re imagining yourself or thinking of male sex workers… I can totally see how men view sex work as pleasure center to the max. That experience does not map 1:1 with women’s. Different physiology to start.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 11:26 AM
8

Men IRL and on this sub chat 24/7 about how gross sluts are (despite their willingness to fuck said slut, so I’d say he’s gross too, but we’ll ignore their cognitive dissonance for now). Clearly something in the male brain brain doesn’t want to commit to a woman he met at a glory hole. You will chase and you will like it ::pats head 🐾::
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 11:15 AM

I think the problem is even “communist street brawler” types had views or desires of women that were pretty identical of SA Brownshirts. So to put it in modern context, when women start distancing themselves from incompatible men on the left, those men get mad and are “suddenly radicalized” by the right and right-adjacent communities because those communities champion the things many women find “🥴”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 11:00 AM
4

I think both our theories have credence. Hmph!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 11:36 PM
3

“All men are friends (bi)!”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 11:35 PM
5

When I say “men” on this sub I don’t mean “all men” I typically mean “more men than women” or “a hellauva lot of men enough to be an observable pattern by many.” I am speaking in generalizing shorthand. Not absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 11:33 PM

“Teenage gang who lured schoolgirl, 15, to underpass and laughed as they filmed themselves raping her handed youth rehabilitation orders” (Daily Mail) <image> The judge said the boys had a “limited understanding of consent.” 😑 The boys gang raped two girls on separate occasions by knifepoint and recorded it to social media. If they had to force those girls by knifepoint then they were well aware neither girl was consenting. Why does everyone use this “they don’t get consent” crap when it comes t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 08:48 PM
3

It’s not as big, but average skews exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 08:04 PM
16

My challenge is that I’m starting to think men sexualize emotional intimacy. That may be a factor and not just your title. Like once they start feeling emotionally open in that way their brain gets flooded with sexual thoughts? Because the way men avoid emotional intimacy with other men is a bit pathological.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 04:28 PM
1

I am speaking in relative skews not binary absolutes. The relative skews and associations are clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 04:25 PM
3

Sadly I’ve been worried for a while now. Everything has been fairly predictable. Sucks to be right!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 04:24 PM
3

I’m not too hopeful 🫩🥹
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 04:08 PM
4

I suppose. To put it more bluntly it’s no shock to anyone that male-dominated forums, podcasts, or whatever that have rhetoric like “repeal the 19th” or “women should submit” or “sluts are evil but men should be able to sow their wild oats” would lean more “tradcon” aka conservative self-servingly right wing in their political leanings. There’s a data-backed trend afoot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 04:01 PM
9

My counter to your title is it’s not that the “the pills” are political. It’s more that political ideologies are inherently gendered. Which is why the data shows such persistent overlaps between the manosphere and MAGA/right wing/fascist/supremacist/libertarian/etc. ideologies. The bolded seem to align more with male imperatives and desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 03:52 PM
4

And every misogynistic man has women to thank for gestating him from a particle to flesh and blood through her body. Now what?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 01:02 PM
1

I think the calculator is right on the money 😌
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 01:36 AM

Okay yeah that’s what I thought.. Homelander is a psychotic deeply cruel mass murderer who got off on humiliating others and then killing them lol. Of course his end was gonna also be humiliating. Like it made sense. The other characters deserved that cosmic justice so to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:48 PM

Yes I explained the most prominent aspects that cause the difference in perception. You call that “leaning heavily” as if it’s my fault that’s the prominent difference lol That’s standard method for maxdiff analysis. My comment was descriptive, not prescriptive so I don’t care to engage you on what’s wrong or not. I already said this: I also didn’t say that misandry or misogyny was okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:34 PM

I mentioned cheating? I also didn’t only mention sex? I also didn’t say that misandry or misogyny was okay. I’m simply explaining the core differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:10 PM

Yep! I’m locked into the whole universe
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:08 PM

Omg ! I love Ashley’s crazy ass. I didn’t always but I’ve grown to really appreciate her. Her and Frenchie are my two faves. And I like the vibe Soldier Boy brings. He’s a standard asshole, but you actually start to find him endearing when you compare him to the psychotic asshole of Homelander.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 07:29 PM

Yeah I’m curious what they thought was bad. For now I can’t say if I agree or not with them. Dunno their why.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 07:22 PM

There were countless moments I felt the show was meh. Shockingly that wasn’t one them of for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 07:21 PM

I could never understand why people have such a hard time losing weight. Dunno why because you explain why literally below. I don’t crave food that much Billions of others do. So that’s a huge factor. easier for me because I have to eat 3,000+ calories or more to gain weight. Yeah… this isn’t typical for the average person, and definitely not the average woman lol Another huge factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 07:19 PM
2

weighted I don’t disagree. Explained here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 07:07 PM

That’s false equivalence. Whenever you find yourself asking the question “omggg, why do these things get treated so differently????” Then the answer is: something about those two things is not the same. Cuz if everything was equivalent… then they’d be treated identically lol. Now you have to investigate what the divergence is. In this case I’d say that the reason misogyny gets treated differently from misandry is twofold: . 1) the reasons leading someone to feel misogynistic and misandrist are n…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 06:54 PM

What’s the complaints about the ending? I felt like the ending matched the vibe of the last 2 seasons. I watched from the beginning. The show is satire. And was meant to be absurdist. I think people started thinking the show was “too on the nose” because the absurdity of the show started matching the absurdity in the news cycle bar for bar. That’s not the fault of the show. Remember the show writes and tapes well in advance of whatever news is happening when it airs. That’s just the very weird t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 05:58 PM
2

🖤
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 05:18 PM
2

😔
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 05:16 PM
2

😂😂🥲
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:43 PM
1

This is a quick heuristic test. I’m sure if I had time to run a sophisticated Bayesian model I could appropriately weight each vector and define sub-vectors. For the purpose of this test, if you have a cool job or high status career or if you have a lot of money, I’d add that to your “high status talents.” So if you have a high status or cool job AND your bank account is stacked I’d put that as multiple talents. hair Meh. For the purpose of this test if you’re rocking a balding comb over and you…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:39 PM
2

It’s a proxy test not a weak test. High status talents means talents that the general public gets excited about. Aka talents that would impress normie women and normie men. What they would call “cool.” Talents like playing on one of the major team sports that get a lot of people to the HS games (football basketball baseball etc). Talents like being a drummer in a local band that the cool kids like. I don’t mean niche talents like being really good at video games or a yo yo champion or even a che…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:28 PM
5

QUESTION FOR MEN: What’s your score? I’m running this back! In the manosphere, "Black Pillers" consider themselves realists who want to make explicit the fact that there are haves and have-nots in the heterosexual male dating game. They are not wrong! In fact, I created a quick and completely arbitrary Masculine Advantage Attractiveness Calculator here. There are 7 attributes based on female arousal triggers to tick off. <image> Depending on how many points a man scores, I've ranked whether or n…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:49 PM

Nah. I don’t “claim” not to. I don’t. I may regard his character as flawed based on how he engages or what he posts. But that’s what I’m basing that character judgement on. Not his sexual undesirability.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 10:31 PM

I read that like omg. “RUTHLESS and DESPICABLE” and it’s “women preferring men who they’re attracted to and who make them feel at ease” 💀 Beyond unserious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 06:39 PM
1

I’m a woman. I’ve dated woman. I collect everyday anecdata on women because well they’re my friends and we have deep explicit convos. Can’t say I agree with ya bud. Women enjoy sex when they’re horny and when it’s with someone they’re attracted to. Generally speaking they still don’t have the spontaneous compulsive libido as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 06:30 PM
2

No. I’m implying that just because women might care about interpersonal interaction more doesn’t mean that most men don’t. Hence my examples. It’s relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 04:20 PM
2

I’m sure that’s true but so is what I’m saying. They don’t contradict each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 01:56 PM
2

I have done both. Female sex drive is way less compulsive than male’s. A woman can have a lower libido than a man and still really enjoy and crave the sex she does have when she has it with him. She just craves it less frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:21 PM
2

I think you’re depressed because you just learned that males have magnitudes more testosterone than females and thus a relentlessly more compulsive libido than females? That seems to be your issue. The libido (lust) gap between males and females.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:18 PM
6

I only think his behavior is poor if he speaks to having had poor behavior IRL or if his comment history or way he’s engaging in the thread is indicative of such. But no. I wouldn’t think that simply because he’s sexually unattractive to women. That sucks for him. But that doesn’t make him bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:11 PM

Yeah I know you guys dismiss every male comment across the internet. None of them count as an insight about males. We get it. I disagree with you all. But I get it. Nothing counts for you lot. It’s all make believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:09 PM
6

Most men I observe don’t enjoy being around “cringe” dudes unless they’re using him for something or they grew up with him so they’re obligated to the friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:06 PM
8

No one thinks a man is a “bad person” because women don’t want to have sex with him. We think he’s unarousing and sexually undesirable. That doesn’t make him a bad-natured person.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:04 PM
25

I think half the excitement men feel for a “clumsy socially awkward maladjusted woman” is “yay!!! She seems like she has no boundaries so it’ll be easy to stick my peen in!” Men are opportunistic sex-seekers. And you’re talking about casual sex too? That’s all it is. Nothing more or less here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:00 PM

💀🤣🥴 I love how you’re confirming you think men are incapable of this: Solutions for romantic partnership need to at a minimum start at a baseline of not subjugating or lording over people, always respecting one another’s agency, and treating each other with mutual care and consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:43 AM

That’s fair. And tbh I kinda hate that all solutions are offered as “well we know they want slaves so what can we do to compromise on that! 😃” Lmao no. There’s no “compromise” on slavery. Solutions for romantic partnership need to at a minimum start at a baseline of not subjugating or lording over people, always respecting one another’s agency, and treating each other with mutual care and consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:55 PM

doesn’t have any slaves yet That’s my point again though! To the person who’s supposed to be a slave, any person talking about how they wish they had a slave and how slaves should ideally behave slave’ly IS STILL A NEGATIVE lol. The negative perception is logical. Either way it seems we agree on some things 🤝
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:33 PM

It wasn’t two examples. The first link had 3 examples in the screenshot. The second link 9 examples in the screenshot. But I’m glad you brought up “big data” because there were a massive amount of replies and quoted retweets to both links from men that also counted as examples. Finally, he provided zero examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:27 PM
7

He killed himself because he faced consequences (shame and likely getting kicked out of his program and having a permanent mark on his medical career) for violating patient boundaries and for making gynecology patients feel sexualized while their coochie was spread eagle in his face? Idk raise your sons better. This is a common sense issue. When I say men males over-index on violent and violative behaviors, this news is an example of the “violative behaviors” aspect. I guess “violent” too since …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 12:11 PM
5

Didn’t Koreans start the 4B thing and didn’t their men go right wing macho fascist ? Twitter has this auto translate feature so you can peek into Russia Twitter Brazilian Twitter Japan Twitter Korean twitter French Twitter… My point? Gender discussion is hyper prevalent globally. Pretending it’s only “USian” is inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 12:05 PM
3

cc: /u/huss1992c That’s my point… Many men don’t view their disregard and how they speak about women or to women as “negative enough to cause women to have a negative perception of men” BUT IT IS. That’s why I don’t find the results of the poll shocking (cc: /u/unarmedrespite). What I find is that the interpretation is half-baked. Why? Because it keeps missing the fact that boys and men can “have a good perception of girls and women” YET still engage hostilely toward and girls and women and spea…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:14 AM
1

I didn’t mention “RP” at all in my OP. Not “BP.”
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:07 AM
2

No. That’s false. He didn’t even provide supporting examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:03 AM
2

Women aren’t lying. Most women don’t say they never want kids. It’s just that men are quicker to (nowadays) and men have always seemed to want more children than women wanted. Men’s bottleneck is that they have to find a woman who’s attracted to him AND/OR thinks he’d make a great father.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:55 AM
2

No. Women aren’t “victims.” That’s you defensively and emotionally projecting onto data. You’re mad at data and male behaviors. Not me. Weird flex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:27 PM
2

“The online data showing that boys and men speak hostilely towards or about girls and women more than the inverse makes me feel bad and makes men look bad 😤” Yeah okay bud
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:17 PM
2

Its logic wasn’t “negative.” It was “hostile.” I’d argue that hostile sexual comments targeted toward or about women are appropriately categorized as negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:06 PM

I agree. Though I want to be a bit pedantic here. It’s not the gays. It’s gay men lol. It’s not the straights, it’s men. Male sex drive is the reason for the season here, for better or for worse lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:03 PM

Yes a dexascan is most accurate. But BMI x height weight ranges is more directionally accurate than not for most people. Of course musculature density is going to determine body composition. I implied that when I said: You’re going to look not fat once you get into normal BMI range and prioritize strength and conditioning exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 09:27 PM
2

You can find skews anywhere. Yeah sure. That isn’t the point being made. The asymmetry I’m talking about over-indexes on males perpetrating it. Ive been clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 09:24 PM

Yep, I agree! I always joke that if females had the same compulsive sex drive as males, no one would raise kids because they’d all be fucking. Sadly child sexual abuse would rise because no one would be clear-headed enough to protect the vulnerable. And finally everyone would die off from some super amped up AIDs style virus.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 09:19 PM

I know some people who were morbidly obese on their weight loss and healthy lifestyle changes journey. I’m very happy for them! Though biggest joking complaint im hearing from them is “dang I lost all of this weight and im still a before pic”. They’re saying it in jest. They know they were huge lol One person asked when I will I look like I’m not fat from in any angle. It made me realize so many people think the BMI x height weight ranges are fake news. It’s like nope. Of course it’s not perfect…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:51 PM
2

I’ve not danced around my profession. I spelled it out exactly in several comments. The research and analysis has been done. Males do over-index on edgelording on the internet and social media. They also over-index on it in real life but that’s much harder to quantify, so that’s just my hot take but I’m sure there have been quantitative studies done. Online datasets are not hard to quantify despite you seeming to think so. The fact that you find this surprising or shocking is fascinating to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:31 PM

It’s giving <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 07:48 PM
2

I don’t sound incoherent. I’ve been plain. It’s not about “AI.” It’s about crunching the aggregate data which reveals patterns, asymmetries, and skews in the data. You don’t need “AI” for it. You just need math and computing. It’s data science.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 07:43 PM
2

I think it’s because men are basically being like “yeah she’s hot , I’d want to fuck get, she’s not violent like men” and feel favorably about women, but will also have no issue subjugating and disrespecting this same woman. Plenty of men will say “repeal the 19th” and post about “strategies to get pussy” in the same breath.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 05:50 PM
1

Most women lack either the financial power or the confidence to do this to their husbands, so they end up coparenting with useless, distracted fathers. Nailed it. I also think that’s why many men like to make sufficiently more than his wife so he can use that as an excuse not to have to engage in domestic, caretaking, and interpersonal maintenance. Counter Take: I know a few very competent women who intentionally married men who made more than than her because all of these women knew how hard it…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:59 PM
2

Because it’s a discussion post, not a Q4M post. You’re a man and provided nothing…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:54 PM

And I’m telling you as someone who has dated women and men, women exercise their libido just fine in relationships where attraction exists, but even in those relationships, her libido isn’t as compulsive as males. There’s a reason “lesbian bedroom death” is a trope even between two women who are sexually attracted to one another. Women’s libido isn’t relentlessly craving sex 24/7 “just because” no matter how hot or sexy the other person is. Even in hetero couples where both are good looking peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:45 PM

Their sexual orientation here isn’t too relevant to what I’m talking about. Women’s libido isn’t higher with women they’re attracted to either. It just means that when they do have sex it’s very passionate and intense. It doesn’t mean wlw are having the same frequency of sex as gay males or what straight men would want. The compulsivity of male libido is what I was highlighting here. Most women are bi There’s about as many “bi” men as “bi” women. Women are just less DL with and have less existen…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:37 PM
2

Oh! Yes of course. That’s that I implying in the TLDR when I wrote they’ll still say “I want sex with women.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:28 PM
2

They don’t suffer the biological burden of it (pregnancy, child birth, physical and mental postpartum effects, breast feeding, etc.) They’re not as expected to be caretaker, so the day-to-day every moment burden is less felt for them from the child’s infancy through puberty, maybe even after. So again, it’s more of a fun thing they can wish for without thinking about the painstaking details. Something something “men want kids the way a kid wants a dog, someone else handle all of non-fun stuff” I…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:22 PM

I do agree that many gay men have become so used to life of gratuitous NSA sex that they can’t imagine a life without it. But again, I think the only thing stopping straight men from behaving the same way… is women. TLDR: You’re trying to shame gay men for behaving like males. Straight men don’t get a cookie for temperance when the only reason most of them are tempered is women being a bottleneck.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:06 PM

Eh. I think that’s a male thing. I grew up around straight males. They really crave NSA sex too. Honestly only thing stopping them is females.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:05 PM

Males and females have never had compatible sex drives, generally. Of course there was always a couple of women who had the sex drives of men and a couple of men who had the sex drives of women. But for the most part, there was divergence. Women have always talked about this among themselves. I think more men and women are realizing how incompatible a lot of hetero-relations are because we now have relentless access to one another’s inner thoughts en masse (thanks to the internet). The sexual re…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:42 PM
-1

Again. No. You’re thinking of surveys. I don’t work in surveys. I analyze data that’s already been organically expressed (like online data). I work with organic largescale qualitative data. Of course various audiences have their own natural skews, but that’s the insight…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:31 PM
0

I don’t use those words in research. They’re spooks. Nebulous words that mean different things to different people. If you notice it’s other people using “misogyny” and “misandry.” Not me. He brought that shit up. He can define it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:23 PM
1

You’re naive asf if you think NGOs are the only funders of big data human motivation analysis. Go off doe kiddo. My first projects analyzing “the internet” was funded by the DoD and by pharma companies trying to understand patient experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:21 PM
-2

Oh brother. Another half-baked take. It’s longitudinal data analysis. The benchmarks come from analyzing the standard deviations over time. It’s all math. Jfc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:18 PM
1

Here ya go. It won’t quantify (Reddit is being cheap with their tokens or proprietary with their insights), but Perplexity and other LLMs can. However Reddit Answers will provide a fair overview.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:15 PM
1

We longitudinally analyze semantics, linguistics, phrases, words, how they interact, how they cluster, who says them, from where, etc. We run statistical models. We conduct NLP, ML, large language models, emotion coding, and the like. The goal is get an unbiased understanding of what people say and why they say it. And yeah duh. The patterns and insights are different depending on the various audiences, demographics, and data subsets. Males and females are a data subset. Obviously there are over…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:04 PM
0

I chose examples that are indicative of trends that already exist. You disagree that these skews and trends exist. Great. We aren’t aligned. That’s been clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:57 PM
-2

I value aggregate data. What counts as “hateful” is a spectrum as with literally everything. The beauty of aggregate data is you can actually see skews across any and all spectrums. You don’t value data because you think skews are “not being neutral.” There’s usually an over-indexing and an under-indexing. It’s rarer to find things that are consistently at 50% on a consistent basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:55 PM
1

Okay. We don’t agree and aren’t aligned on a bunch here. Cool chat.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:17 PM
1

No. Don’t bias the data. Ask it why socratically. Why are you being intentionally dense with each reply?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:47 AM
0

And you can do it yourself. I’ve told you how multiple times. You’re a smart cookie. Do the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:41 AM
1

I don’t intend to provide “evidence” of non-published confidential professional work. Get you a license to Talkwalker, Brandwatch, Quid, wherever. Download the historical data across the internet. Get to analyzing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:41 AM
0

Now be more specific about the questions, and the motivations, the whys. Your research questions and methodology is shoddy and incomplete. Either way it’s a consumer-facing tool. With limitations. I have direct APIs to historical data. I crunch the full thing. You’re wrong. Skews exist exactly as I’ve explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:39 AM
1

Yep! I get paid to do this research. And quite frankly anyone can. The data is literally all publicly available. You can believe these skews don’t exist. I know they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:35 AM
0

Yep! I get paid to do this research. You can believe these skews don’t exist. I know they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:35 AM
1

Not cherry-picked. Picked based on trends in the data. There are skews in the data. The skews are telling. And “everyone” isn’t edgelording equally nor is “everyone” receiving abuse equally. The “everyone” argument is half-baked and inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:55 AM
0

If you want to be pedantic it’s actually more than two examples. At least count the replies in the screenshots. The screenshots include more than two comments. You guys can’t even do “gotcha” math well smh. It’s data and skews and magnitudes. Methodologically one must ask: How large is the “kill all men” crowd compared to the male edgelording crowd? What leads males to edgelord or say cruel things? What are they responding to? What are the females responding to when they say “kill all men”? What…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:53 AM
1

I’m sure you could. But the skews in online opinion data show that males over-index (by a large portion) on violative, violent, edgelording, hateful commentary. You can investigate yourself with Reddit Answers starting with Reddit as a data source. But the trends sustains across the internet. And IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:47 AM
0

Question. If I were to ask Grok (X’s AI) and Reddit Answers (Reddit’s AI) to quantify the commentary expressed by males va females and ask both which gender skews more towards unprovoked violative, violent, and hateful edgelord posts and comments… which one would you think it’d say? What do you think the patterns in the data would reveal? I already know the answer because I’ve been paid to this analysis for every social media platform, forum, message board, and streaming service (including Twitc…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:44 AM
1

You didn’t read my post. I don’t think they’re “lying” in surveys. I think they genuinely think they can view women with little regard and even make rape jokes or think women belong in the kitchen or shouldn’t vote and still have a “favorable view of women.” My point is men and women don’t have the same standards for favorable. I think your comprehension here is “shoddy.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:38 AM
1

No the OP last week said 80% of men view women favorably. He said that based on the article linked.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:37 AM
0

Go to Reddit Answers. Ask it to quantify the trends of gendered opinions on this platform. You’ll unlock your own insights.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:34 AM
1

The methodology is “let the data tell the story.” You collect the aggregate data and analyze the skews. What’s over-indexing and what’s under-indexing. What the clusters are and where they are and their consistency. I didn’t cherry-pick examples. I chose examples indicative of trends. I’ve said this already. And yep aggregate unstructured data analysis is always interesting and insightful. Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:33 AM
1

I don’t find them “odd.” I find them telling. And yes one of the reasons men view women more favorably than women view men is because women are less violent and violative relative to men. I’ve said that before and was called a “misandrist” for obvious shit. Hence my surprise you actually agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:37 AM
6

It’s not “cherry picked.” It’s data. I work in this space (ethnographic largescale data). We analyze millions of online opinions on a regular basis. It’s longitudinal aggregate data. There are clear trends. Hell you can try it yourself using the Reddit Answers feature. There will be clear data-backed patterns in the various opinions voiced.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:36 AM
0

I’m always consistent…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:32 AM
0

If that’s your response. Sounds like you think women’s survey responses are valid. Unusual for a man on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:32 AM
1

It’s indicative of a broader pattern. One that will clearly “surprise” you guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:31 AM
-1

That’s not a response. I don’t agree with you and vice versa. That’s all I gather here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:30 AM
0

Yeah. I know statistics. You don’t know what you’re talking about tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:29 AM
0

I could go to Reddit Answers right now and you guys would still claim the qualitative data doesn’t count for one reason or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:28 AM
0

We’re saying similar. The men here would disagree. But you’re correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:26 AM
0

It’s all directional. Half-brained take. Market research has caveats. You grain of salt everything, but an insight can be gleaned.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:25 AM
3

Which aspect do you disagree with? Do you disagree that men can have want to have sex with a woman they don’t regard?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:23 AM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:22 AM
0

No. Those were two examples. I even explicitly state so. wtf are you on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:21 AM
0

“Disbarred” You know nothing about longitudinal aggregate multi-systemic behavioral analysis. Particularly with unstructured data. And wtf does disbarred even mean here. I’m not a barrister.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:21 AM
5

Women’s perception of men is caused by IRL experiences and observations. Same as men’s perception of women. Men’s negative feelings about women (at least as expressed online) stem mostly from “slut” and “choosing Chad.” The women didn’t actually interact with said angry men. Women’s negative feelings of men stem from more violative and violent observations and/or experiences. As well as men “edgelording” about said violent and violative things. Typically unprovoked. Men actually did something to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:19 AM
3

Instagram is even worse Got it. So nothing boys and men say en masse on the internet is an insight. Thanks. But I wholly disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:15 AM
1

I’m still waiting on his reply…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:14 AM
7

That’s a fair take. But if boys and men are being this way unprompted to girls and women, then of course girls and women are going to have a not too great perception of them. And that’s not even taking into consideration her lived experiences and observations of boys and men being IRL violent or violative or disrespectful towards her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 05:00 PM
-1

Anonymous internet comments do not prove much. This is false. As an ethnographical statistical researcher. You are beyond incorrect. It’s all aggregate data that can analyzed longitudinally and patterns effectively deduced.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:18 PM
6

Where’s your examples? You mention proven and then just rant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:16 PM
1

Both posts were not from Twitter. They were from Instagram. Are you going to dismiss Instagram as a cesspool? Is massive amount of verbatim data on the internet not reliable? It’s data. At some point you guys can’t keep hand waving as “that’s just edgelords…” It’s male opinions across the internet. Not just convenient sites you think don’t count. These people are men irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:13 PM
3

Testosterone. That’s it. That’s the answer. Males more than females have a wayyyyy more compulsive libido due to having wayyyy more testosterone than females. This “attraction” they’re feeling is biological lust that seems to be turned on 24/7.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:22 PM
11

This post seems to think “men vs women” framing came out of thin air? The framing persists because males and females continue to conceive, perceive, and exist differently. Sure there are similarities, but there are very prominent differences and competing imperatives. If you want the “framing” to cease then you need to find a way to eliminate the differences. But you can’t because then we as a species would be one gender…not two lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:14 PM
12

I look forward to the kissing and making out and heavy petting more than the “PIV.” The former can last for hours. The latter is like 5 min, and 60% of the time underwhelming.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:06 PM
2

No. My libido is not that compulsive and obsessive. Females are not males.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:04 PM

Pretty sure that’s not the root of the issue. This is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 05:55 PM

I’m not being an ass? I’m clarifying my position because you were the ass who called me uppity for accurately reading the thread… You’re unironically doing the thing: Acting rude and then being shocked when you’re treated in-kind. Thanks for being a live example I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 04:29 PM

“My first Mother’s Day my husband did nothing” I got that she had twins and that it was her first Mother’s Day from her own comment… Your inability to assess what’s written isn’t my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 04:07 PM

uppity Only uppity response here is yours. You’re delusional if you think fathers don’t like to be acknowledged and appreciated by their spouse on Father’s Day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:31 PM

Yeah. I’m sure you dont. Lots of men suck interpersonally and don’t see the problem with their inconsideration toward others. They only self-servingly notice it when they’re treated like they treat others.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:08 PM

In her culture it’s a common thing so he would be very aware of both holidays. The hurt isn’t that it’s malice or forgetting… it’s that his constant default is casual inconsideration while also hypocritically being self-centered and expecting considerate care toward him. I get what you’re saying. I’m just explaining that his default is interpersonally toxic and breeds resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:03 PM

I’d be high-key flabbergasted. And questioning my own decisions tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:44 PM

That would be honest of him. It would still probably hurt her all the same that she birthed two kids (his kids) within last year and he wouldn’t think to wish her a happy Mother’s Day? Idk I wish my friends, cousins, and close colleagues happy Mother’s Day and they didn’t birth me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:42 PM

you picked him Oh I agree! I would’ve passed at go on these types of dudes. Inconsideration and self-centeredness doesn’t come out of nowhere. It’s part of their character. The red flags were likely blowing in the windddddddd
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:12 PM

Pretty sure that’s not the root of the issue. This is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:08 PM

So many women in the comments are in relationships like that. They’re in a constant loop of: “my bf/husband treats me inconsiderately” “I’m now treating him like he treats me” “He thinks this is rude and uncaring”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:07 PM

<image> ​I don’t get having this level of self-centered lack of awareness where you can say something like this on Mother’s Day but act shockedpikachuface.gif when you get the same energy on Father’s Day??
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 11:31 AM
4

I saw a thread on Thread of tens of divorced or trying to be divorced women responding talking about the behavior of their husbands. They all experienced the husband initiating the breakup (he moved out or started a relationship with a new woman), but when the wife sends him divorce papers to sign they wouldn’t sign. One woman had been trying to get her husband to sign for 15 years. The man cheated on her and left to be with his girlfriend and everything. Still dodging the divorce. I think you u…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 11:06 AM
8

Only if he was intentionally leading them on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 05:22 PM
7

If I want a relationship, and the other person doesn’t or is leading me on. I don’t feel “entitled.” I feel like I wasted time on this massive misalignment and I exit left. Choosing to leave isn’t entitlement. It’s common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 04:33 PM
1

You didn’t provide a source for your claim!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 02:48 PM
6

Because men will say shit like “repeal the 19th” and “women should submit to men” and laugh about rape “jokes” and then say they want a wife or want to stick his penis in a woman. What I’m saying is they’re able to view women favorably in the way they view lesser possessions favorably like a sex slave or secretary or maid favorably. Not to mention a pretty woman by his side seems to raise his social status amongst men whether he regards women or not. So women are a benefit to him. Also not to me…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 02:16 PM
2

The lack of shared or aligned values/worldviews absolutely impacts interpersonal relationships. I don’t agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 02:13 PM
3

No. We’re not talking past each other. You don’t like my replies. I’m saying you can choose single if your mores don’t align with any women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 02:12 PM
2

Political views are simply your views. Period. Of course they matter in practice, interpersonally, or otherwise. It’s shortsighted and inaccurate to believe not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 01:43 PM
2

Then don’t date someone who doesn’t feel principled to you. I assure you many women feel the same way about men. Women choose single often because of this. You can do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 01:33 PM
2

Sure. Don’t date her then… If that bothers you don’t engage her.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:57 PM
2

Then they’re an aligned couple lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:37 PM
2

That isn’t what I’m saying. I’m simply saying being aligned on worldviews and mores as a couple is less net-negative friction.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:23 PM
2

<image> Can’t tell if the roommate is a man or a queer woman, but they’re hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:21 PM
4

I’m talking about aligned mores, values, and worldviews.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:11 PM
4

Feel smart? Has nothing to do with that. It’s simply about aligned values, mores, and worldviews. These things impact relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:10 PM
2

Sure. I don’t see how it wouldn’t matter if those are your core values.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:08 PM
3

<image> It’s true. Political views and how you vote are your beliefs, worldview, values, and the like put into action in a way that shapes the world we all share. Why wouldn’t that matter? Why wouldn’t shared values matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 10:58 AM
1

Gay men also have the highest rates of “open relationships.” Much easier to not divorce when fidelity was never a requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 10:21 AM
3

especially for men You just said especially for men. And are mad that I reiterated that it skews men. So no it’s not 1:1 “period.” We don’t agree on a lot in this thread. No need to continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 10:20 AM
3

What? I can tell you’re responding emotionally because did you miss this: You have to be okay with the reality that you’re probably actually romantically or interpersonally incompatible with a lot of people, which means the outcome of this mate search might be you being romantically single for a long spell or potentially forever! I’m well aware that men don’t focus on compatibility because it would render them dateless. It’s the same reason for “why do conservative men pursue liberal women???” B…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 01:51 PM
0

Yes sex sells for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 01:49 PM
0

I can see that. But I don’t want to undersell the fact that they often rush to sex because they’re horny beings who are very motivated by sexual pleasure, and to a lesser but still important degree, sexual validation/dominance. For example, the gay/bi men and males-who-have-sex-with-males (MSM) demographic rush into NSA sex at insanely high rates. It’s a male thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 12:42 PM
2

From a female perspective it’s a bit sad, isnt it? Kinda? lol for more reasons than even you brought up 🥲
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 12:37 PM
3

Oh absolutely. I don’t think they care about compatibility in the same way. For them the higher order seems to be: 1) sexual access 2) fitting in societally/validation 3) compatibility
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 12:16 PM
1

even if it started You think it’s speculation but you also seem to agree it’s been a common enough sentiment? Ok. I shared my likely reasons for why it’s not mass adopted. Another reason is females more than males are already more conscientious about their health and taking their medication, so burdening women with this is unfortunately more effective than trying to get men to adopt and be diligent. Again public health is about “what’s going to lead to the desired result” not “in a perfect world…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 11:57 AM
0

Imo men aren’t okay with compatibility as a boundary as much as women are. Why? Because to be okay with compatibility as a boundary you have to be okay with incompatibility as a boundary. You have to be okay with the reality that you’re probably actually romantically or interpersonally incompatible with a lot of people, which means the outcome of this mate search might be you being romantically single for a long spell or potentially forever! More women than men are okay with that. It’s not ideal…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 11:48 AM
4

Most public health is about harm reduction and mass adoption. It simply comes down to the fact that males wouldn’t use it the way females would. For women BC doesn’t just stop pregnancy. It often stops, tempers, or soothes all of the debilitating or annoying symptoms that come along with her cycle. Hell simply not having a flow is a relief for many women, let alone less bloat or PCOS symptoms or PMS etc. In fact more women take BC just for that benefit, not just reducing risk of pregnancy. Not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 11:29 AM
6

My flair checks out then!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:48 PM
5

I like gay male porn. I don’t masturbate to porn but on the occasion I watch it gay male porn tops the list. Does this make me an uber woman?? Lmaoo
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 04:30 PM
12

I don’t think the “straight” women who watch it make a big deal about sexuality labels to begin with… Like if you pressed her on if she were actually bi and not straight she’d be like “sure wth why not.” It’s men who crash out over shit like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 12:22 PM

Okay. Why do you disagree? You simply said you disagree. Didn’t explain why. And then attempted to get me to agree with your whataboutism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 11:47 AM

Then I’ll engage in bad faith and say I disagree with you as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:32 PM

If they’re only showing up because their moms have to beg the moms their female peers for the logistics… I think you’re engaging in bad faith. I refuse to believe you’re not connecting the dots that them not knowing the logistics of life his negative downstream consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 05:43 PM
2

I’m not negotiating. You said you disagree with me. We aren’t aligned on that alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 03:27 PM

The outcome is showing up to your exam… which affects your grades and how you’re perceived… which affects social status and perhaps even college recommendations from teachers….
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 03:27 PM

I think that’s a lesson. The point here is that asymmetries in gender exist along some of these lines. Everything isn’t the same. Skews are apparent. For example, if not the mom (an NPR correspondent btw) wouldn’t have written that thread today.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 02:03 PM
2

The asymmetry is in antisocial behaviors generally. Males over-index on DARVO as well because of said over-indexing on antisocial and self-serving traits. I don’t agree with you. You call reality “vilification.”
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 02:00 PM

Forethought and connecting dots and understanding that doing X leads to better Y outcomes is included in comprehensive holistic thinking imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 01:59 PM

That’s why I specified the sort of neurodivergence I was talking about (autism).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 12:24 PM

Sure. More male dunces and more male geniuses. “Genius” in IQ-speak usually overlaps with higher neurodivergent (autistic and savant) characteristics too. Everything’s a tradeoff.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 12:00 PM

I believe it’s mostly caused by decisions people make that are perhaps exacerbated in some cases by socialization, but not directly caused by it. For example, male Wharton grads tend to make more money. But that’s because they go into high finance roles as opposed to marketing/strategy roles 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:57 AM

<image> I know every guy here claims to be a super smart alleged Mark Zuckerberg type, but I think you guys forget what the “average dude” is like. This is a mom of a high school student. She’s not being malicious. She’s being honest. As someone whose siblings and parents are all teachers and educators, this is the same trend my fam has noticed their entire careers too. Sure, nerdy boys have higher conscientiousness. But the average boy behaves and has interests like he’s suited to be a worker b…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:06 AM
1

I’m using fiend to mean “addiction.” Like a “dope fiend.” Not sure how you gather it requires a victim. I disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 10:44 AM
3

Only if you can admit that men use the phase when they don’t get the outcome they want “woman accepting his transparency (truth about his poor behavior) without negative feedback” often?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 10:40 AM
2

never Wrong. context It’s related but I know you guys like to play dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 10:37 AM
1

What? I provided a screenshot. I also linked an example of that in another reply from last week of a guy here using the phrase to explain how women should expect men to be polygamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 10:36 AM
7

Yes. I don’t agree with his core premise. And offered an example that made more sense. That is debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:05 PM
17

“society taught women to avoid paying for dates like it taught men to avoid value household chores” is a much fairer comparison. I don’t agree with you that women in aggregate avoid accountability less than men in aggregate. In fact, my experience and observation is the opposite 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:49 PM
1

That’s your opinion and experience. Women who interact with men have different experiences than men who interact with men. Furthermore, if you do your own queries across the internet you’ll find men using that phrase to talk about how women should “duh expect men not to be faithful” commonly enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:44 PM
1

<image> You’ll find more if you filter for comments within last year or most recent. You can also search the exact phrase “women can’t handle the truth” in Threads, Twitter, TikTok, Kick, Twitch, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Truth Social, etc. and Google’s news filter. You guys are being ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:05 PM
2

Yes, there is not an asymmetry . We disagree fundamentally on reality then. Your comment reminds me of black men who get mad at black women for bringing up her own experiences wrt the asymmetry of violence, violation, and domination black women experience from black men because “it’s divisive.” It also reminds me of this thread. You feeling bad feelings because the reality of male behaviors and its impact on others is being assessed or discussed… doesn’t make it not reality 😐 Harmony can’t exist…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:02 PM
1

What “the other mods” noticed is you having nothing to say when the other user kickstarted the unprompted incivility, so your selective virtue signaling has been duly noted as hollow. Mods aren’t your kindergarten teachers. If you want to appeal to other mods, consult mod mail next time. For the record “another mod” removed your comment. Not I.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:16 AM
2

Because the perpetration of violence is not “neutral.” Wrt gender, it’s decidedly asymmetrical. How is that even up for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:06 AM
2

Then we disagree. Men use it fairly often and those examples fairly often. We’ve observed different things then.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:58 AM
0

The exact phrasing was used last week. To talk about men wanting multiple women. It’s not an uncommon phrase. Men use it often.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:57 AM
3

The exact phrasing was used last week. To talk about men wanting multiple women. It’s not an uncommon phrase. Men use it often.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:57 AM
1

The exact phrasing was used last week. To talk about men wanting multiple women. It’s not an uncommon phrase. Men use it often.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:55 AM
4

I don’t understand why you keep asking why this conversation is gendered. I explained? We disagree that a gendered asymmetry exists I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:42 PM
6

Repeating this here: I don’t understand the “why make this gendered” retorts on a gendered debate sub. Whenever an asymmetrical pattern is observed along gender lines it’s by default “gendered.” Talking about it doesn’t make it gendered and not talking about it doesn’t make it not gendered.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:26 PM
3

Because men are the ones I hear say “women can’t handle the truth.” I don’t hear women saying that in the inverse. I gave two examples, one was cheating, but many men and certainly more men than women say “women can’t handle the truth” any time a woman doesn’t want to tolerate his “truth.” Not just related to cheating. That’s why I specified men. I say as much in the OP. I don’t understand the “why make this gendered” retorts on a gendered debate sub. Whenever an asymmetrical pattern is observed…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:24 PM
2

I've never heard a man say anything like this, outside of quoting a certain movie for laughs. This sounds like some weird fascination with a very specific event/dream that the OP is struggling to get over. Recent example from this sub last week. “women cant handle the truth” is a common enough saying among men that’s a trope. But I get it. It’s no true Scotsman all day every day when it comes to debating you lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:17 PM
5

victim I can’t debate this because I called no one a victim in this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:06 AM
7

This is a mod of a debate sub BTW Yes. A debate sub that allows automods under each post for people to release valve edgelord. A debate sub that allows a daily thread for the same. A debate sub that allows two alternating loosely modded weekly threads for incels to bemoan “n counts” and black pill lookist babbles. This isn’t your typical “debate sub” and you know that. Leave this sub if it doesn’t fit your performative self-righteous sensitivities. But you won’t. So 🤫 You cant handle the truth t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:00 AM
6

Then the truth is you’re generally saying males have low integrity. That they only behave mutually considerately when they have to. Fucked up assessment either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:51 AM
3

It’s not just men, but I’m focusing this on because I observe this dynamic with more men than women. Straight from the OP is a caveated relative assessment. It directly insinuates skew aka asymmetry aka NOT ALL. You’re the one “extrapolating” love. Next time read in full because to quote you “that’s not what I said.”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:49 AM
3

Whining and bitching from whoever tf you are right on cue. You’re on my dick yapping mad about this. The gif was perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:47 AM
8

Why would a man who’s in a committed monogamous relationship “cheat” unless said man has low character and no integrity. There’s no pussyfooting around that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:45 AM
4

I believe there are more hetero female “gold diggers” than hetero male ones. That skew exists. Yes. There are reasons for that, some simply practical. But the skew exists. Unlike you lot I don’t pretend distributive dynamics don’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:43 AM
3

It’s not just barbershop chitchat. But I know it’s convenient for you to want to pretend to assert that these sentiments are “niche.” They’re not niche. They’re fairly common, so much so they’re mainstream tropes. Be serious for once.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:37 AM
0

Gargle harder ❄️
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:34 AM
4

Glad you agree it’s bizarre. Doesn’t mean countless men don’t say similar on a regular basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:16 AM
4

What’s pathetic is you reading “it’s not just men” in the OP and still choosing to pathetically circlejerk as if you’ve been personally victimized as a species down here 🙄🎻
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:15 AM
7

no one says They do. But cool we’ve observed diff things. are refusing to see the mens part in anything… see the mens side. What is the men’s side of cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:12 AM
9

Her allegedly not accepting this truth in your opinion is not why he doesn’t want to date her. He doesn’t want to date her because he’s a degenerate sex fiend who’s okay fucking people he’s not “attracted enough” to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:10 AM
9

Which is what? What truth she can’t handle is why he doesn’t want something more 🧐
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:48 AM
7

Bruh. Sure. Whatever. It’s funny because I was going to write in the OP “he tells his boys women can’t handle the truth” to avoid deflecting comments like this. Some men straight up say it to her face. Many say it to the bartender the woman doing their hair at the barbershop or their friends and family. They say it. Constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:46 AM
9

and think that it doesn't matter what they say, it's truth, it should bring positive reaction, you said you wanted the truth... Yes!!! They think because they’re being transparent they should be rewarded with what they want at the other person’s expense. It’s delusional (and disturbingly self-serving 🤢). They can’t handle the truth that it doesn’t work like that. They can’t handle the ultimate conclusion of incompatibility which is that they may not get access to that person or whatever they wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:43 AM
10

No context is needed. If she wants something serious and he doesn’t. Her deciding it’s not for her requires no truth except that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:41 AM
5

garbage I addressed this here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:39 AM
9

I doubt anyone in human history has ever said "you can't handle the truth" when confronted over cheating. That's perhaps the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on this sub, which is quite an achievement. My first job was at a barbershop. Men say “ridiculous” things in earnest all the damn time. Tune into any bro podcast the last ten years. Women not being able to handle the truth “that men cheat” is constant. It’s been all they can talk about recently with Klay Thompson and Megan. It’s a const…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:37 AM
2

Of course? The point is it’s more of a failing for men…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:59 AM
2

😂😂🙈
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:43 PM
1

It’s relatively easier… It does make sense lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:42 PM
2

I’m simply here (in this thread not in general) to stow discontent and discord 🤷‍♀️🫪😌🫡
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:46 PM
0

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:45 PM
1

What about them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:14 PM
3

<image> They’re right. It’s the same logic men use when they regard promiscuous women as “low value sluts” since women don’t have to earn sexual attraction the way straight men do because men are so sexually thirsty/easy. Same shit. A woman’s body is working against her every turn trying to maintain a fatty composition for reproduction purposes. Men have nature’s cheat code of testosterone which leads to more dense musculature which leads to higher TDEE. Men have to work harder to be fat so a fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:08 PM
1

Why did you have sex with a man, idiot? Because I was attracted to said man. You're a lesbian. You made that up because your brain is a binary minefield of fictions you construct because the world confuses you. Calm down.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:25 PM

Just saw a video of Mariah Carey’s twins at their 15th birthday. They blew out their candles the exact same way in the same back and forth direction and everything it was cute! They kind of remind of the Team Rocket twins lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 10:21 AM
2

I don’t think you know what skew means. You haven’t disproven me at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:39 PM
3

No men in the US have the “autonomy” to not use our bodies to produce sustenance and shelter for our offspring without being legally punished. Same goes for the woman post gestation. Either parent can drop off (surrender) a newborn at a hospital under safe haven laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:38 PM
2

I’m aware males don’t conceive like females and vice versa. What you can’t seem to understand nor accept is that how most people (males and females alike) like to be interpersonally cared for tends to align more with how females engage it. That’s not “gynocentric.” It’s an objective assessment of human dynamics, of which you don’t seem to be capable of based on your off-base analytically inept retort. It’s similar to how cutthroat power plays tend to align more with a masculine frame. That isn’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:51 PM
1

I don’t use good guy and bad guy labels. They’re moralistic. And I agree. Life is tradeoffs and consequences (positive or negative).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:15 PM
1

I give you credit for offering a non-defensive perspective!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:14 PM
2

There's nothing that a woman can physically do to another woman that a man is incapable of. False. You guys will never know how amazing tribbing feels. You don’t have the raw materials. Anyway… and yet, the outcomes are divergent 🤷‍♀️ Women actually walk their talk wrt sexual intimacy. Men focus on their dick most of the time. To them sex = dick and no other exogenous area. Sad!™️ Not to mention the physical differences, such as female bodies literally being softer and more sensuous to the touch…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:11 PM
2

Yes. I addressed you here already: Is this about women choosing what to do with the organism siphoning inside of her body that she alone is gestating? You may not like abortion but the context of it is less unsympathetic than a man murdering his family. Or raping someone. Or stabbing someone. You too can do what you like with any of the organisms feeding on and living inside of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:04 PM
3

Again. There are countless women who are perverts too. Doesn’t mean that more males than females tend to perpetrate perverted crimes. And violent/violative crimes in general. You haven’t countered my main crux about SKEW. When men congregate online their forums are the ones typically violating the T&C of the platform, not women’s. I was contracted with Twitch to run an analysis on this for their internal chats and platforms. Males over-index on that bullshit. It’s known and it’s a pain in the as…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:03 PM
4

That construction isn’t about eliciting sympathy. It’s an exemplary framework to drill home the point that males and females have full autonomy about what happens INSIDE of THEIR own body. You have that autonomy too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:00 PM
2

I’m sure you can find edgelord women and find nurturing men. Doesn’t change the reality that more males than females are perceived as edgelords and more females than males are perceived as nurturing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:57 PM
1

I agree! But the way males show it is often perceived as more “aggy” even to other males! That’s all I’m saying lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:55 PM
5

No one is “expecting sympathy.” Stop being feral and projecting. This post isn’t about expected sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 09:14 PM
3

I love data! Of course women have done heinous crimes. THIS OP IS ABOUT SKEW. JFC. The rates of females doing heinous crimes and males doing heinous crimes ARE NOT IDENTICAL. MALES OVER-INDEX.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:57 PM
4

Women use their bodies to work and care for others as well. That’s a moot point. The main asymmetry here is the one that pisses you off. Like I said: You too can do what you like with any of the organisms feeding on and living inside of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:50 PM
1

The Lt Gov of VA murdered his dentist wife. The Epstein files are literally a never-ending saga. A dude just tried to shoot the President. A dude murdered a democratic rep and her husband and her dog. Go to your local news and read the recent crime reports… the perps? Mostly dudes right? Idk why you’re pretending that he’s wrong. Past and present, males are the ones doing a lot of unsympathetic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:40 PM
4

Is this about women choosing what to do with the organism siphoning inside of her body that she alone is gestating? You may not like abortion but the context of it is less unsympathetic than a man murdering his family. Or raping someone. Or stabbing someone. You too can do what you like with any of the organisms feeding on and living inside of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:36 PM
2

on this subject My OP isn’t about dating. It’s about males and how they’re perceived and behave in general from childhood to deathbed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:31 PM
3

they are talking about anti-social behaviors with push people AWAY. Thing's like entitlement, rudeness, disrespect, dysregulation, thing's we commonly find in men globally today in swarms. Precisely.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:08 PM
3

Yep. They’ll “joke” about those things and then be shocked they’re not liked because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:05 PM
3

Things being funny to people doesn’t mean that those same things aren’t inconsiderate or mean-spirited to some people. Context matters. I think Seth McFarlane has common sense and human decency which is why his jokes land and why he got picked up by a major network. Versus edgelords of the internet who get banned everywhere except 4chan, 8chan, Elon’s twitter, and their own private servers. Edit: sorry I didn’t realize you weren’t replying to me!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 05:54 PM
3

Thanks for answering. Ive been told by guys here that they hate extros because they’re obnoxious. I guess it’s hard for me to agree or not because 1) idk what you mean by being bold. I need examples of that. Depends on what’s said and done. And 2) sure being disruptive is also annoying to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 04:14 PM
2

Us was men generally. I also said “can lead.” You can do whatever you want. And laugh however you want. I answered your question in my first sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:59 PM
3

I think it over-indexes on nihilism, anti-sociability, chauvinism, anti-prosociality, and being potentially materially harmful than not 🤷‍♀️ Even you being like “sure it can lead to us not respecting women” like bruh 😂😂 you’re proving my point
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:34 PM
6

No. I am not confusing asocial with antisocial. Asocial is being shy and socially awkward and socially introverted (not having a strong internal world and processing internally) and the like. Kindness is about being prosocial and is squarely opposite antisocial behavior. I think the only person confused in this thread is you, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:32 PM
2

There is nothing “vague” about that definition and particularly nothing vague about the context of the full comment and that particular thread. I’m starting to think you guys use “vague” as a cop-out. Gotta disagree bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:29 PM
3

Re-read the OP. The title uses relative language. And I use over-index and other relative language throughout the OP. It’s not my issue that you chose not to comprehend that. I intentionally used exacting relative language and yet you guys are still choosing to read what you want to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:28 PM
5

I have limits. I don’t engage warmly with vitriolic people in my real life. I treat them with clinical coldness and more importantly I exclude them from my circle and interactions. They need to hang around other vitriolic people. Not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:26 PM
3

Yeah that’s my point. One could even say anon online is how men (or manyyy men) are unfiltered. Sort of like new and even more deranged version of “men’s locker room talk.” Basically how men behaved when women weren’t around has NEVER been viewed sympathetically. Like I was appalled that boys and men engaged like that on gamer chats and over voice. I don’t think boys and men realize that how they interact when left alone to their own devices is pretty divergent from how girls and women act when …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:22 PM
3

I defined edgelording here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:09 PM
7

I wasn’t talking about him. The dude in the video did. My point was thousands of men view that behavior as nbd jokes and “shitposting.” So many men in aggregate sharing that POV is unsympathetic. You’re not reading to comprehend I fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:05 PM
7

This is exactly what I think a lot of these men here struggle with. They don't feel they should have to put on a different mask to appease different audiences. Bingo.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:04 PM
2

From whom? About what?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:00 PM
4

Straight from Sesame Workshop: “Helping children everywhere grow smarter, stronger, and kinder” Kinder implies prosocial. Barney and Friends core mission was teaching children how to handle feelings, care for others, and understand social interactions. I genuinely can’t tell if you’re being earnest in this debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:59 PM
3

Which traits do I list that are “far from universal”? I listed traits that males over-index on more than the females. That’s the point. The “less” in the OP implies “less than females”…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:55 PM
7

and it is surprising to them That’s my biggest gripe! I actually dgaf if these people want to behave like edgelords IRL and online. It think it’s pathetic and sad and would never have them in my circle but it’s their life. My annoyance is that they behave like that, laud it as some virtue (like they genuinely don’t see the character flaw in it), and then are shocked they’re treated like psychotic freaks. If you know your mother or teacher would be repulsed and appalled reading your edgelord ramb…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:54 PM
4

My OP isn’t about men trying to impress women? It’s about over-indexing behaviors. Also at what point can we not use examples of men supporting other aggy men? We can’t do that with this sub. We can’t do that with the manosphere. We can’t do it anywhere on social media. Also can’t do it based on what men say IRL. It seems like the only examples of men we can use are of the rare decent ones. Everyone else isn’t an example of “men” but of kids. The dude in the video isn’t a “kid.” He’s a legal adu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:50 PM
6

No it doesn’t do that. It examines relative differences which pisses you off. Quote exactly the aspects of my OP that you think are invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:46 PM
3

My OP is examining relative differences. You don’t like the asymmetries and how that makes you feel. It’s not “extremes” to acknowledge that reality isn’t 1:1 and that over/under skews exist. You haven’t provided a counterargument for: men are perceived less sympathetically because they more readily display antisocial traits. Hell you haven’t even denied that males in aggregate over-index on antisocial and/or violent and violative behaviors/mindsets. You don’t actually disagree. You don’t like t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:27 PM
3

Because I’m not on visual social media like that… which is why my examples are usually from Twitter, Threads, Reddit, news articles, research articles, or real life… If you want to use TikTok videos as examples make your own OP. You have free will.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:24 PM
3

Getting sympathy about what specifically? And from whom? Most “sympathy” i get is from my loved ones, particularly my parents and friends. And only around sympathetic shit. And mainly because I’m not crying to them 24-7. It’s not my fault men either have unsympathetic issues (“I did something wrong and now I’m sad others are mad at me”) or because men don’t confide in their own male friends. I do feel bad if you’re feeling ugly or low and even your mom is like “get over you’re a man ugly!” That’…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:19 PM
2

What extremes? I provided a range of traits and two examples and only one may be considered extreme but there’s nothing “extreme” about the hundreds of men and thousands of likes supporting the countless viral tweets in favor of that guy. At some point ugly aggregate behaviors and consensus aren’t outliers. They’re common trends in 2026 especially. There’s nothing invalid about my premise. I don’t even think you actually grok the crux.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:14 PM
4

Those shows are programmed by PhDs for teaching humans how to behave less antisocially… There’s nothing weird about it and implying as such just because you disagree is weird asf ngl 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:12 PM
3

People who are domineering and self-centered in interpersonal relationships tend to over-index on exploitative, deceitful, and guiltless behavior in personal and professional and casual relations. There is research on this. But if connecting obvious dots is biased to you so be it. Delusion is an option too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:10 PM
-1

…Do you have an actual counter to the title of the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:05 PM
4

What? I can’t understand what you’re trying to say. I don’t think you know what “value-add” means. It’s a business term that basically means, what’s the mutually-exclusive or unique benefit. Imagine an investor asking Wendy’s execs “McDonald’s and Wendy’s are both fast food burger joints, what’s the value-add of Wendy’s? What’s the value proposition? What’s the unique differentiator? What’s the added value of choosing Wendy’s over McDonald’s?” I was countering the top-level’s comment of “other a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:04 PM
2

The behaviors as in the context of the question I asked are antisocial behaviors. They literally erode interpersonal accord.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:58 PM
5

Yes I agree with that. Except I don’t think people who act aggy “deserve” sympathy. Deserve is a term I wrestle with. I do think they want sympathy despite being textbook unsympathetic. Alas. That’s immaturity, entitlement, and narcissism/ego holding them back.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:54 PM
3

What's the ratio to male and female edge lords. That's the real question. That's the one you need to ask. Everything else is deflection. Exactly! That’s my point here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:51 PM
2

No we don’t. What we do have is a more intimate and sensuous sexual experience with women 🤷‍♀️ But that’s cuz heterosexual sex is so performative and all about the penis. Men will literally bend someone over fuck them from behind. The only skin to skin contact is some crotch touching her ass and PIV. Barely any kissing or full body touching. And then call that a great sexual experience lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:48 PM
5

outwardly gruff What does this mean? What’s an example of someone behaving “outwardly gruff”?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:39 PM
4

You’re asking how engaging in domineering, competitive, and self-serving behaviors/mindsets within community or interpersonal relations with others is antisocial? your examples Are literally the quotes from Threads and X for the umpteenth time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:38 PM
8

Obviously anyone can behave any way. The point of good debate is to examine asymmetry and skew and why. That’s what I’m doing. I intentionally use the terms “asymmetry” and “over-index” in my OP because they imply “not all men” and “not all women.” It’s a relative analysis. I think more males than females display edgelording behavior. I even explain in my OP my hot take as to why.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:35 PM
7

I don’t expect sympathy Sure. But point I’m making is relatively speaking some behaviors and attitudes are more sympathetic than others. Some behaviors and attitudes are way more unsympathetic than others. Whether you expect sympathy or not doesn’t change what I’m saying about how things are perceived. makes the egos of heterosexual men ru I guess the girlies were right for coming up with this canned response to ragebaiting or aggy men online: “I don’t engage in unpaid fetish work.” For men ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:33 PM
7

Those traits are not widely considered antisocial By whom? I grew up in normal civil society around a community of non-asshole church people. Yes they are. It was literally preached from the pulpit that those traits are antisocial and why they’re harmful. But a 3 year old could parse that they’re antisocial traits. Did no one grow up watching PBS? Barney? Sesame Street?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:29 PM
6

I quoted examples from Threads and X, and bolded traits and characteristics. Please quote aspects of my OP you find vague so I can better understand why you find the bolded traits vague and better clarify for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:25 PM
10

Before I reply I want to make sure we are talking about the same thing. My POV isn’t about social skills™️ it’s about antisocial traits. Plenty of “shy” guys are raging edgelords. I’m not discussing shyness. I’m discussing the aggy antisocial traits like the edgelording.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:21 PM
6

I wasn’t vague. I listed a bunch of traits and examples. Can you explain or quote which aspects were vague?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:15 PM
6

Antisocial behaviors and attitudes range from shit like this to shit like this. If the latter guy also has a gf or wife or friends, it means that unlike the incel, he’s enjoyable to be around or cute or some other value-add. Duh. His anti-social behaviors are things like robbing and stealing, not being insufferable to be in the presence of. Both are antisocial and bad for society. Diff outcomes because more to the calculus.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:15 PM
2

Men are unsympathetic because they have antisocial traits I actually agree. But those aggy interpersonal behaviors deserve the lack of sympathy. You can’t treat others poorly and prioritize your self and be wantonly inconsiderate and then act shocked you’re not a sympathetic individual. Like duh. When I have antisocial moments I don’t delusionally think the people who I interacted with in those moments are going to view me favorably. In fact I immediately try to make amends and genuinely apologi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 10:11 PM
1

Eh. Most men are unsympathetic not because of something a woman has actually done to them. Most men on the manosphere seem mad at women for not sexually desiring or not asymmetrically “submitting” to him. Most women are reacting to something violent or violative a man actually did to her or a peer. Those are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 10:07 PM
6

I don’t know what “desire to mate” means here. But female arousal aka women are sexually turned on by a combination of how the other person looks, sounds, smells, talks, interacts, comports.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 04:23 PM
5

I want a relationship that only ends when on of us dies of old age. The only way I could find one is by having that leverage. If another option were available to me, I would have taken it. Woof! Ngl this is reddest of flags that have ever flagged. Every controlling narcissist rationalizes like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 03:55 PM
5

I don’t understand why a man with well-developed social skills would be considered more attractive than a socially inept one Because for most women arousal is triggered by how the person interacts and interpersonally behaves… given that even a socially inept man has a body, two hands, two legs and… (you know what I mean). …and not just physical attributes. That’s how male arousal seems to work. Solely looks it seems. For women’s arousal it’s looks and interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 03:00 PM
4

Because I want someone committed to me who’s also someone who’s interpersonally comfortable to be around since lionshare of a relationship is enjoying each other interpersonally… I’d simply be single than with the option you’re presenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 02:57 PM
7

Men are not competing with other men. They are also competing with the peace a woman feels when she is single. That’s directly from the opening of the OP. It ties directly into what I said above: WOMEN WOULD RATHER BE SINGLE THAN IN A RELATIONSHIP THAT IS UNALIGNED. YOU keep strawmanning that to mean that she’s saying she doesn’t compromise in a relationship when that’s not what it means. I have explained to you and countless women have explained to you what it means to rather be single than in …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 02:12 PM
9

What “truism”? How is wanting a relationship that is mutually considerate = one-sided? How is a woman preferring the peace of being single unless she’s in a mutually considerate relationship = her wanting to be one-sided in a relationship? You saying something over and over and bastardizing what people are explaining to you is bad faith engagement.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:21 PM
9

I think women approaching dating with "imma get mine, and won't give back anything" are toxic. Why do you keep parroting this straw man? It’s not what’s meant. Multiple women have explained to you already including myself. Yes. That’s the point. Women are okay single until she finds a mutually considerate partner whom she desires and who desires her. Why are you crashing out? Why are acting like this isn’t why women have been saying in this thread? Women has no issue being considerate in a relat…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:08 PM
9

If she doesn't want to be in a relationship, it doesn't matter if it's me or someone else. This seems to be a major difference between men and women right here. Which is the point of the post. If you think this is toxic then you think most women are toxic which is your prerogative.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:35 PM
2

I’m aware it’s behavior. I’m saying when women are discussing attraction and say that a man’s personality matters here what she means is him having a sexy personality aka him interacting with her suavely and alluringly. Furthermore, a person’s default personality proclivities usually means they’re either gonna naturally have charisma and aura that appeals to people or it means they’re gonna have to really work at it or something in between. It’s all related. Seems like based on your personality …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 04:43 PM
2

Exactly. Time passing doesn’t magically output results. It doesn’t magically = progress. Effort and intention does.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 03:27 PM
2

No he isn’t. For some reason you don’t understand the basics of attractive socialization and interaction until you were older? Every male isn’t that obtuse to dynamics as such. And yeah lots of other bros got attractive tattoos earlier as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 03:24 PM
4

Jesus Christ. When women say personality they mean “your attractive interactions with others and how you comport and interact with the world and her.” We’ve had countless OPs about what personality is meant by here. You’re saying the same thing as women but don’t want to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 03:20 PM
7

How would you like women to show that they care about men's problems? Can you answer? I’m another woman asking in good faith here as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:52 PM
9

No you don’t understand her point. Using “authority over others” here is useless unless you’re saying men too have authority over others because men can vote. And if your answer to that is yes. Then it leaves us to ask why is women having the same authority as men have “unfair” to you lot?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:52 PM
6

Nah. That doesn’t address the gap. In the United States for example most men kill using a gun. A gun doesn’t take any effort or physical strength. The former LT Governor of Virginia murdered his dentist wife last week with several shots to the abdomen. No physical strength required. Just male entitlement, rage, vindictiveness, and intent to do harm. She quite literally had more reason to want to shoot him to death and yet she didn’t. Males in aggregate are more violent than females in aggregate …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 04:44 PM
2

No one is failing anyone. People aren’t that compatible or mutually attracted. That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 02:21 PM
3

No one thinks being whatever you deem as perfect will guarantee you a friend or romantic partner or a job or whatever. What I do know is that people who are physically or socially unattractive tend to struggle with dating. And that people who are socially unattractive tend to struggle with dating and friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:07 PM
5

My only point is the you define terms so we aren’t debating past each other. You seemed to be and still seem to be mainly focused on the romantic and sexual aspect of “loneliness.” I’m not sure why it rubs you the wrong way that we clarify that. It’s literally the title of your OP… As far as your contention, I agree that compatibility isn’t easy for anyone. And because women have a less compulsive libido and more enriched platonic/communal intimacy, they’re not as desperate for or miserly withou…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 09:16 PM
3

It doesn’t matter if he’s hiding it or not. Once she knows, I explained how it affects her arousal. Can you quote which aspect is confusing?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 09:07 PM
4

WHAT I EXPLAINED DOES TIE DIRECTLY TO VISCERAL AROUSAL. your male solipsism has decided that ONLY phenotype and appearance triggers arousal. YOU ARE WRONG. Stop projecting how your sexuality works onto how it works for others.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 04:52 PM
8

Cohabitate with people who match your preferred living conditions. Problem solved. This goes for everyone ☺️
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:50 PM
5

That’s funny. Someone not being sexually turned on by you isn’t phobic. Your strong reactions to not being the apple of someone’s arousal is hilarious to meeeee. And if it is “phobic” then I and every human especially every female human is phobic because we’re sexually turned off by all sorts of things 🤷‍♀️ It’s meaningless now. Anyway, I have no issue with bisexual men who meet my lifestyle requirements and arousal triggers. I notice my type of dude ends up being bisexual anyway. I’m simply exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:36 PM
1

Cool just wanted to confirm 🧏‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:31 PM
5

You can’t tell bisexual women what turns them on and how. That’s “harmful.” I was pretty clear in explaining various ways why women may not be sexually attracted to or sexually turned off by bisexual men. All of your responses are some entitled feelings you have to wanting to be sexually desired by people who don’t sexually desire you. You can’t control their arousal. That’s weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:58 PM
1

That was a typo. I’ve edited. It meant to say most people are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:55 PM
1

I mean I’m just making what OP said fair to women 🤷‍♀️ It’s always about how the man is deprived because he can’t have sex when he wants and never how she’s deprived from having arousing satisfying sex when craves it. Maybe I’m missing the irony in your comment but I think you may have missed it in mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:52 PM
0

Most people are are not lifelong compatible. For friendship or otherwise. Men are seemingly more willing to accept more incompatibilities because they’re horneir and not thinking about 5 years or ten years later. Just his sensations in the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:10 AM
4

It’s cruel to deprive your spouse of a sexual experience that’s mutual and satisfying. And quite frankly sometimes that’s not going to happen with one another so women and men should be allowed to have sex with someone who hits all of their spots and blah and blah. Fixed!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:00 AM
5

Well there’s actually superior ways that lead to most clean and sparkly outcomes to load a dishwasher. Based on common sense and every dishwasher detergent commercial and FAQ ever made, “most clean and sparkly (aka streak free)” IS the superior outcome. Why are you pretending that isn’t common knowledge?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:54 AM
9

What? I “sidestepped” nothing. I made it very clear that said it is superior for said preferred outcome. I then made it clear that if the disconnect is that you two don’t care about the same preferred outcome THEN THAT is the convo you should be having.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:45 AM
13

one correct way to load a dishwasher Well there’s actually superior ways that lead to most clean and sparkly outcomes to load a dishwasher. Same for most things. Meaning most things do have a superior way of doing it that leads to best outcome. The disconnect is one partner cares about best outcome and the other doesn’t gaf. Yall should have that conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:33 AM
3

I notice that most of the people who are sexually attracted to men tend to be sexually attracted to men who don’t present as too effete or too prissy. Not saying out bi guys are that way, but a lot are noticeably more effete than straight-identified dudes or DL trade dudes. It’s not just women, I notice this among gay males. Soooooooo many of them want “masc tops.” It’s like damn near all of them are more sexually attracted to the masc dudes. They all want Jake and Heath from Brokeback. There’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:24 AM
6

You avoided their first contention. You say “male loneliness” and then only talk about access to women romantically or sexually. If it’s about “loneliness,” that’s also about lack of communal intimacy and friendship and general enriching longstanding bonds with others. They’re asking you to clarify.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:14 AM
39

I avoid empathy-less and inconsiderate people in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:03 AM
9

And yet the outcomes are that those women will choose single over a relationship that isn’t aligned with her. They’re not as desperate as OP is painting men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:49 PM
6

Yeah. Their QoL would plummet. I was just talking to my friend about this. We both have elder parents. We see our moms doing fine and living a thriving life if something happened to our dads. We don’t see our dads doing well without our moms. We think most of the care our dads are doing for themselves come from our moms. Most of the keeping the household running comes from our moms. And quite frankly both of our moms have been better with finances and maintaining a consistent job, so all around …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 01:10 PM
9

A lot of women consider similar realities… more of them choose single than men. Probably because women have a less compulsive libido AND because women tend to have a more enriched community. On the latter, it means she’s not deprived of emotional intimacy and support because she doesn’t have a romantic partner. That’s what besties are for.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 12:58 PM
3

Proceed with caution and discernment yes, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:48 PM
2

Gotta let people have their outlets for non-realism. You’re on this sub so (like me) you like enjoy the raw objectivity of a thing. Most folks find that depressing and joyless. They could accept that but then they probably wouldn’t be the lighthearted person they are with that perspective. I don’t assume people (like her) are dumb. I think most are intuitively choosing to enjoy life as best they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:27 PM
2

I hear ya. My POV comes as someone who scored nearly 50/50 intro/extro on MBTI. My extro sensibilities are that I’m self-assured, sociable, and outgoing. I don’t think I relate to having social anxiety. My intro sensibilities are that I’m introspective, cerebral, process by internalizing my thoughts first and never really feel the need to validate my processes with others, have a very evolved internal world, and require ample amount of time to recharge. Despite having social butterfly tendencies…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:25 PM
1

😂😂 yeah… one of my besties is obsessed with it. He harkens all pattern recognition back to astrology and I have to try really really really hard not to roll my eyes lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:09 PM
1

I get that’s a pain point for you. Unfortunately a lot of people do seem to struggle with making friends and a lot of the people who struggle with it also happen to self-describe as “introvert.” That doesn’t mean all introverts struggle with it and all extroverts don’t. In fact I know a couple of self-described extroverts who are on the ASD spectrum imo who struggle with making friends as well. Many introverts who aren’t ASD but who still struggle with making friends struggle because they refuse…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:08 PM
2

And that’s a fair boundary. If they annoy you, ignore what this man is saying. They don’t annoy him as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:56 PM
1

I think you’re over-thinking this lol 💀 The advice wasn’t for you because you aren’t seeking friends who are easy to befriend. Nor seeking friends at all at this time as you said you don’t struggle with that. I thought it was obvious the post was for people who were… “If it doesn’t apply let it flyyyy”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:54 PM
4

You’re only supposed to indulge for funsies, bonding, and whimsy!!’ Not fr!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:52 PM
3

Exactly!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:39 PM
3

If she feels you’re cheating on her it is not because of some crystal ball 🔮 It’s because she was feeling that anxiety anyway for whatever reason. How about you both unpack that together! You consider that? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:39 PM
3

Meh. Pish posh! That’s a very sourpuss non-whimsical perspective. It’s whimsical always. Reframe ya mind homie! He knows in his heart it’s not “fateful.” And so does she quite frankly. It’s about the feeling of fun and bonding and feeling like a more mystical charmed time! ✨
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:37 PM
1

Oh. I was assuming it assumed it was for people (introverts in this case) who wanted the desired outcome of new friends who were “easy” to befriend. You have different outcomes in mind! And that’s okay 🫶
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:34 PM
11

This man gets it. Lean into the whimsy! Have fun! Live like you’re in the time of oracles and Beowulf! <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:26 PM
1

I thought it was going to go that direction too. But wholesome that he didn’t lol He knew to get the outcome he wanted (some friends) he had to step outside of his comfort zone! Which luckily for him just involved him standing next to someone. Fairly low effort loll
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:18 PM
2

Indeed! I’m glad I had that formative experience at 3. I think it’s much harder the older you get!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:15 PM
9

<image> This works for some people. When I was in nursery school I was my default self which is introverted, but chill and curious. A bubbly talkative hyper extroverted child walked over to me an decided I was her best friend and that is how I became socialized over the next years throughout elementary school 😭😂
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:56 AM
2

I’m aware. My comment was being specific to certain groups in the United States and to this sub. On this particular sub class is talked about so much over the last more than 13 years, especially middle class vs upper middle class vs working class etc. that shorthand abbreviations have become common. IRL I hear “UMC” as shorthand more than “WC.” I see WC on this sub in contexts of class combos. But I hear people say “working class” out loud more. I hear UMC and upper middle class kinda interchang…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:09 AM
1

I said they’re commonly used within a certain socioeconomic circles. I was exacting. You on the other hand have to strawman comparisons and things that were never said to attempt a counterargument. You’re aggy. Which we all knew from your first comment. Be well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 12:18 PM
1

except by you That’s patently false. I just explained to you where they’re commonly used… You’re still being obstinate for no reason. Which is why you project and ragebait yourself for no reason. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 12:10 PM
1

Widely used by everyone middle class or higher who’s gone to an “elite” or regionally elite college? Idk. If you’ve gone to Vanderbilt, Vassar, Colby, Swarthmore, Rice, or even some of the big Texas schools or are a rich kid at Bama and any of the Ivies you’ve heard the term. If you’re been around people who went to Friends schools and “day” schools you’ve heard it. It’s not intellectually lazy. It’s a common phrase used by certain socioeconomic groups in America. The internet brings people toge…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 11:30 AM
2

That I’ve been here too long 🧓 If you’re going to do an investigative doc on the manosphere I feel like it should’ve covered more than the podcast bros. But I realize the documentary I wanted was something PBS would’ve done lol. Oh well. I wasn’t the audience. And that’s okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 11:24 AM
1

What’s “UMC” A widely used and fairly common acronym for upper middle class can you all stop using acronyms for everything and take the fifteen extra seconds to type out what the hell you’re talking about A bit aggy for no reason, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 11:06 AM
3

Exactly! It’s quite “cosmically equal.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 07:29 PM
2

And also “looks max” and also “enjoy the decline” and so forth. Better question, what part of what you wrote in your OP do you think TRPers weren’t saying or doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 01:34 PM
5

Yep! Exactly. The “security and comfort” traits women tend to want usually leads to one attaining socioeconomic upward mobility and that socioeconomic upward mobility gets seen as “better” in a capitalistic sense. If anything men should be grateful women are pushing the species to not want to live in a cardboard box 📦🙄😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:38 PM
3

What? I don’t know if you’re being cheeky or are genuinely asking a question? If it’s the latter, I think I need better clarity around which part you need me to better explain. Anyway… I’m not defending men’s use of and/or accusations of “hypergamy™️.” I’m simply explaining what dudes and people in general are meaning when they say it. This was an anthropological exercise for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:59 AM
2

Humans evolved to be a dimorphic species. In that regard, I don’t think we’re much different from other mammal species. Meaning when it comes to mating, what females desire in a partner isn’t 1:1 to what males desire in a partner. Females tend to over-index on desiring security and comfort. Why? Because evolutionarily the female gets pregnant and keeps the infants alive. It’s logically nice to be secure and comfortable in that stage. Males tend to over-index on desiring sex and youth. Why? Becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 10:39 AM
2

This is just “enjoy the decline” TRPers. Literally. This is just The Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 10:25 AM
6

It’s my estimation that more PPD males than not have gone to college. Or come from middle class backgrounds. It is not my understanding that more PPD males than not are from the hoods where the terms “baby mama”and “baby daddy” originated. That’s as specific as I’ll get.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:44 AM
12

Yes he does. That’s not the norm for men of his socioeconomic background. You know that. We know that. The man is strange, and particularly divergent. I will say I find men who allegedly laud “conservative values” who glaze Elon’s 🍆 to be especially 🫩
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:41 AM
21

I love this topic! 🍿 Yes and no. I think a lot of the men here who complain about “baby mamas” aren’t even from the socioeconomic community where “baby mama” and “baby daddy” are part of the colloquial parlance… They’re just ragebaiting themselves because, let’s be fr, is a middle class dude from a neighborhood where most have a college education really around that many “baby mamas” (never married single mothers) with “baby daddy” issues? No lol. That said, I think many “online gender wars” are …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:12 AM
5

Women men like… Yeah by “conservative” you just mean “gender roles.” By “traditional” people just mean “gender roles.” And it’s not lost on me (or anyone really lol) that men are by far the biggest pushers of “tradcon” anything because said “gender roles” establish him as default “leader of woman” and women as default “subservient.” Color me shocked 🫩🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:40 PM
4

Your definition of conservative is definitely your own. She does what you like. That’s all I’m hearing. Unless “conservative woman” is just a coded dog whistle for “woman who does what men want” 🧐 (The answer to that is yes lol)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:32 PM
5

Yeah… I think “conservative” to you means “feminine™️” in a way that fits into your relationship desires. Nothing wrong with that but I’m not sure if guys overheard a deep girl-to-girl convo with a gf as you described they’d be calling her actual sentiments “conservative™️.”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:20 PM
5

What makes her “conservative”? I guess I’m trying to understand what you mean by that? If you’re American, do you mean she’s politically Republican and can tell you why and what Republican policies she likes and why? Or do you mean she prefers gender roles? And that she’s default submissive/subservient/deferential to men? I ask because most naturally charitable and compassionate women I know of are never as “Republican-minded” and “right wing-y” as the men around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:05 PM
7

Women who are financially independent of men are harder to control, that's why. That’s the root of it. Absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 03:20 PM
3

No, it’s not. It’s a set of societal standards. That center around dominance and supremacist hierarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:22 PM
6

A lot of women are having that “red pill” moment that most men simply aren’t compatible with them as life partners. There’s grief in that but women have always been better than men at processing their negative emotions and finding alternative paths forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:19 PM
13

homeowner Bruh. The amount of men who dislike this or dislike women having a solid and upwardly mobile source of income is truly revealing. Even if a man claims he’s not “conservative™️,” his discomfort to women having any inkling of adult independence reveals that he actually is an undesirable chauvinist even if he doesn’t think he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:17 PM

Cool? On a debate forum I’m letting you know how most will interpret your POV.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:59 PM
1

What if you think… No one would believe that’s your real reason because if tomorrow we proved that sluts = perfect marriage it’s not like you would prefer a slut, hm? 🧐 One should be honest and introspective about their real motivations.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:16 PM
2

It’s only hypocritical if his reasoning for not wanting it is some sort of moral value judgement. A male slut who thinks female sluts are immoral or degenerate or hedonistic or whatever is hypocritical. He too is a degenerate hedonistic slut in that case. If his reason is “my ego prefers it and my dick gets harder with possession” then it’s still a personal ick 🚩 to me, but he isn’t being hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:13 PM

Circling back to your OP title, do you think you’re being treated like broke goods randomly or do you think people are responding to you how are and act and treating you accordingly? It’s no fault of your own that you had an unfortunate childhood, but if as an adult you don’t know how to do XYZ…. people are going to treat you like you don’t know how to do XYZ.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:47 AM

I'm just surprised that some women actually believe that intimacy from friendship is the equivalent of intimacy from a relationship When you consider that the tenderness and mutual care that those women show each other men only seem to get in a romantic relationship and not their friendships, then I can see why men and women have different takes here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 04:22 PM

The implication you’re making is that men think emotional intimacy is reserved for sexual attraction? Sad!™️ (but explains a lot about why their lives seem to lack loveliness unless some gf or wife is giving it to them) “no woman totally straight” Eh. If this has some truth, then the same applies to men imo. Women are just less penalized for interrogating and expressing their feelings. I honestly think that’s why men fear getting too emotionally close to other men cuz they’re scared their dick i…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 03:28 PM

Besties NYC shared this adorable on the street interview of two gal pals who’ve been besties since college for over 50 years. Someone QRT’d with this: This is what men on dating apps are actually competing with - the unconditional love and support women have in our friendships 💖 I can’t lie I had a similar thought. Those women are basically soul mates with husbands and kids on the side. Men think they’re competing with “Chad” but many are competing with the comfort, intimacy, and support she alr…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:28 PM
1

Women who have sex with women (WSWs) are a proxy for what female sexuality looks like at its core. Same for MSMs as related to male sexuality. I guess I don’t care if this proxy is “problematic.” I also don’t care that stats make you uncomfortable or feel something is “bad”?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 11:59 AM

Yah. Males more than females tend to externalize their frustration by harming those around them when they can’t have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 07:00 PM

I hear what you’re saying but I’m not sure your explanation addresses the structural asymmetry I’m pointing to. Media narratives don’t take off because one gender “wields social power better.” They take off because of risk perception and incentives. Lonely men are framed as a potential public safety threat; lonely women are not. That’s why the “male loneliness crisis” gets national coverage… intersects with violence, radicalization, and political anxiety. So the question isn’t whether men or wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:54 PM

Like they want their sexual freedom badly over being with someone they’re not attracted too They want their autonomy badly over being with someone they’re not attached to. Men want the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:50 PM

Many men voice it all the time. On this sub even! For the yearsssss I’ve been here. So I’m not sure why they’re pretending this isn’t a pattern lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:49 PM

You do realize you’re countering me with your anecdotes about your kids and people you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:46 PM

I have no take or care about your kids. I’m exploring aggregate differentiating observations between males and females.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 02:26 PM

Boys are more likely to perform well in schools with a higher proportion of girls, shedding new light on why girls continue to outperform boys in many educational subjects. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/11/171110084656.htm Found that boys’ reading scores were significantly higher in schools where >60% of students were girls, even after accounting for characteristics like resources and socio-economic intake, though climate and composition are still partly intertwined. It ties back to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:42 PM

In aggregate, I’d say that married women who wanted to be married are probably happier “overall” than single women who want to be married. Edit: married women are probably less happy than married men
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:34 PM

In Europe where most violence and violation occurs at the hands of males? Cool story.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:24 PM

My comments are about aggregate statistics. Not your individual family dynamics. I “have it in” for violent and violative behaviors and mindsets, especially when dismissed or not held accountable. I also don’t regard blatant consistent inconsideration. If your daughter is a perpetrator of violent and violative behaviors or consistently inconsiderate then she’s on my shit list too. I hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:19 PM

Interesting. Afraid of women not having sex with men…? Most societies seem to be more afraid of the threat of violence and violation from men. Not sure where you live where that isn’t the general consensus.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:19 PM

No So you believe that society is more afraid of angry women than angry men. Huh. You’re allowed to have your opinions I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:15 PM

It’s from 4 years ago and it’s deleted. I’ve seen more posts saying single women are more content than single men. And perhaps single women are less stressed than married women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:14 PM

Reminds me of a news clip I saw last month of a bunch of male teen friends pranking some of the group. Well one got lit totally on fire and had to go run in the beach to deflame. The prank didn’t even go wrong. It seems like the intent was to light his ass fully on fire (unclear if he was aware). Pretty sure he suffered pretty bad burns. And all the bros in the video are just laughing and laughing except him. His parents want to press charges but he doesn’t. Meanwhile him (but burned):
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:13 PM

So you agree? Society is more afraid of what men do when they don’t get what they want vs what women do when they don’t get what they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:10 PM

Yeah the things I hear about the goings-on in all boys prep and boarding schools 😰
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:08 PM

Why do you think that “works better themed around men” asymmetry exists?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:06 PM

Most sincere arguments I’ve seen is that single women are more content and have maintained a more enriched community than single men. Married men are the happiest, divorced men are the least happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:03 PM

The point is that society is afraid of what males do when they’re not getting what they want compared to what females do when they’re not getting what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:00 PM

<image> This is pretty niche because it’s about rich kids and their rich schools, but it echoes sentiments I’ve been hearing from all of my teacher friends for a while. Boys (especially boys from individualistic western cultures) when left unchecked seem to default to Lord of the Flies-esque cruelty. I saw some research that said girls in same-sex school environments tend to perform better or even thrive. And boys in same-sex school environments tend to default to testosterone’y (and often coerc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:56 PM

I didn’t say society is afraid of men harming women. Many men already do that whether they’re partnered or not. I said society is afraid of lonely disaffected males raging out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:43 PM

I thought it’s that’s women are more content single than in a relationship they don’t want. Not that (for a woman who wants to be in love and partnered) that her ideal isn’t a relationship she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:41 PM

By most broad measures, men and women have reported equal amounts of “feeling lonely” and sexlessness. Yet it’s the “male loneliness crisis” or epidemic that’s become a thing discussed all over mainstream media for the last 5 years. I think that’s because society has never been afraid that lonely disaffected females would start harming others. Society is afraid of lonely disaffected males raging out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:30 PM

“So he's frauding his genetics 🤪”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:12 AM

I still stand by those frames (pour moi) for when one wants to feel bookish and understated 😤😂🙂‍↕️🤷‍♀️ Have various styles! But yes if you’re going for peak hot, they’re not the ones usually.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:12 AM
1

I actually don’t mind them. They’re my go-to too. Except mine are gold/chrome (adds a pop). It looks bookish! But he should rotate pairs. My old coworker wore bookish glasses like that in our 20s. I knew he always had a boxy head but now in our 30s he wears contacts and he got a haircut like the above I was like wow. Whole time he was hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 11:11 AM
5

frauding his genetics Can yall be fr for once. Getting a makeover is normal. Optimizing how one looks is normal. Jfc 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 11:08 AM
1

The new “combover” is the TikTok llama haircut and men should just do it cuz it’s hotter than looking like a reject Game of Thrones extra. Yes this guy already had incredible bone structure but still! When the woman says she sees potential THIS is what they mean… But how hard it is to get them there, going through the: I am like this. You want to change me. The one who loves me, loves me as I am. 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 02:09 AM
10

I think fundamentalist mosques, synagogues, churches, and the like already do the “gendered indoctrination for a future opposite sex partner” you’re thinking of, si?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 10:15 PM
3

I agree!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 09:43 AM
1

Tweak deez nuts bruv 🥜
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:43 PM
5

Idk. I would tell the person who told you that that kids wouldn’t make it out of infancy without the mother… or women in general. I rarely see men rallying around to caretake sub 13 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:38 PM
2

My issue isn’t her. It’s when people do that in general especially on a debate sub like this. It’s like omg yes “everyone is everything” but I’m highlighting an asymmetrical pattern 🧍‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:45 PM
4

The ALL CAPS of definitely… definitely made it seem like I implied something that I didn’t lol. I was noting a gendered pattern. Patterns are not absolutes nor exclusive. No harm no foul 🤝
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:34 PM
3

Right! Like how Jeffey Dahmer was sexually turned on by cutlets of meat. And butchered flesh.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:54 PM
3

Even still. Women’s reported fetishes seem to mostly orient toward subbing which is just the hetero sexual dimorphic dynamic anyway. Male fetishes are varied and far more… honestly oftentimes deranged or perverse to the average person. There’s definitely an asymmetry afoot. And I find that interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:38 PM
0

Girly pop but I’m on a debate sub about gender… no shit I’m zooming in on gendered asymmetries 😒 I get that identifying patterns in aggregate prevalence gets folks defensive and as if their individual personhood is erased or whatever but that doesn’t make observations incorrect. It’s OBVIOUSLY not just a guy thing. I don’t know how you read what I wrote and gathered it was EXCLUSIVELY anyone’s. You’re proving my point. That shit yall do is annoying. I said men “over-index” on said thing and your…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:36 PM
3

Your husband having a fetish makes sense (dudes). And perhaps you’re seeking out specific women with fetishes cuz observationally I haven’t noticed that to be a general norm amongst women as much as it is for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:13 PM
2

Fascinating! Is your partner a man or woman? I haven’t met many women who express having “fetishes.” Def have met men who say they have them. For women I hear stuff like “I like to get manhandled during sex and a grip around the neck.” But I’ve heard so many women say they like that that it feels too common to be a fetish™️ but perhaps it is. In my mind it’s bedroom behavior and not like “yellow cars speeding turns me on.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:43 PM
4

For the longest I didn’t understand what people meant by fetishes. I still don’t relate to it and haven’t experienced it but I think I’ve intellectualized it. Hot Take: Men over-index on fetishes because their dicks are so damn reactive. They see something intriguing and instead of it just being a fleeting thought they get a pleasure center arousal reaction. So that creates a dopamine feedback loop that gets more compulsive the more it’s indulged. I guess I would have fetishes too if every time …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:54 AM
1

Men say the same thing about ciswomen who aren’t submissive blank thought virgins. News at 11. Being the one “a man wants to marry” isn’t the prize you think it is. Sounds like you’re treating trans women like most women lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:44 AM
3

Yes. And that’s okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:43 AM
3

50 shades of grey
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:09 AM
4

<image> Online looksmaxxing culture feeds into male autism. Online beauty culture feeds into female neuroticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 08:40 PM
2

Sure! That’s a possibility. It’s what I was implying with this: Was it less microplastics and soy in the tap water? That said, being more sedentary (less manual labor and less physicality) leads to the male body being less required to produce testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 07:07 PM
2

That has to be it. Brawn over peak performance athleticism perhaps.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 05:49 PM
2

Yes that’s what I’m curious about. Again, this is from the 80s. It seems as though “size >>>” was the motto then.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:59 PM
2

lol great That’s why my original comment focused on it being from the 80s and posited what’s changed since then since we don’t see college football athletes looking that big nowadays. Context clues!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:00 PM
2

I guess the rest of us are saying they look more like units than present day college football teams.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 01:37 PM
2

I’m asking you why do you think they look that way? Unpack the selection bias if you’re going with that. Why do those four have necks like ogres.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 01:22 PM
12

For context, The Blue Pill subreddit was a satire sub made in reaction to The Red Pill subreddit. They don’t have “beliefs.” It was comprised of people who would discover a TRPer in the wild on like AskReddit or something, head on over to TRP to investigate, be flabbergasted by the magnitude of vitriol, and react in replies on TRP but TRP mods would ban them. So they created their own sub to commiserate and try to understand wth all was going on over there lol At least that’s my understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:59 PM
2

So they just randomly look like that. Dissatisfying answer. Someone on Twitter said it’s also possibly the style of the camera used. That the focal lens has them all looking like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:01 PM
2

Right I know that’s how most teams operate but this QB looks like a damn unit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 11:59 AM
7

<image> This is college football from the 80s. Look at their necks! Was it the food they ate? Was it steroids? Was it less microplastics and soy in the tap water? The QB looks like an OL.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:30 AM

No one mentioned fair. I said he’s being judged as the degenerate he is by most. Not sure what there is to debate here. You said he doesn’t care. Great. lol doesn’t change the lack of regard people have of him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 05:52 PM

Most people are watching the game at home… NFL is the biggest league in America because of the amount of spectators who tune in and watch at home. Not just the ones who go to the stadium or who tailgate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 05:29 PM

but it doesn’t change the fact that many of the world’s smartest inventions and ideas came from deeply religious societies. Bruh. Did you not read the first half of my comment? I agreed with that and explained the why behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 05:12 PM

On the east coast it was never a problem. Went to church, then brought lunch home, and then everyone kicked up their feet and watched football 🏈🍗
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:58 PM

Because they were purpose-driven to a higher power and required the need to codify and institutionalize their beliefs which is why they were so adamant about documenting texts (requires literacy & written language), tithing requires currency (which requires understanding of arithmetic), proselytizing requires travel (which requires understanding of navigation and astronomy), and so forth and so on. Her point is still true. The more disenfranchised and degraded a community, the more likely they a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:55 PM

lol It doesn’t matter if he doesn’t care. That is simply the reaction to most people who are degenerate but think they’re above receiving what they indulge.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:47 PM

if a guy just wants to get laid The issue is a boy who’s willing to fuck randoms for NSA sex is going to validly be side-eyed by most people when he gets on his soap box about wanting a “pure innocent virginal good girl.”
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter