Because there is, IMO, a single scenario when both male and female sexual strategy works for the average person.

Both guy and gal are part of big community say uni class for example, they aren't friends, but they are already aquaintances, so the women knows his "portfolio" and basically get's him preselected as a sociable guy because large circles tend to mesh and share people.

Since they know each other, and friends do too, they show signs of interest that friends tend to wingman in and confirm your "theories", then when the guy approaches he just has to not fuck up to get a chance at whatever the girl is offering.

And i saw another comment here about atomized socialization, very small, closed off friends groups, are a big gripe with todays men struggling, because having the social preselection is how most men got results in the past, and nowadays the girl isn't even present in these social gatherings, she just uses OLD when horny or wanting company and doesn't bother with going out.

Overall this is just bad for men mostly, who now aren't even getting screened, their profiles ELO just plummets and most women tend to ignore them, not counting the guys going in cold with DM's and approaches, women have so many suitors they have a paralysis of choice, and guys stuck by lack of it.

Restoring stronger communities would make women showing their interest and actually looking at what's around more approachable, and likely to act too, whixs is good for matchmaking in general because women approaching just has a higher success rate because obvious reasons.

We however get men lowering standards compensate which causes a cascade effect on women's self esteem in inverse proportions.

Thus i think we should mainly try to get people to prefer IRL socialization rather than online, this could solve a few bunch of the problems we discuss here.