I am 1 hour into this podcast of Tom Bilyeu interviewing his wife, Lisa Bilyeu, where she discusses red pill talking points [https://youtu.be/-VFz5yO2SO4?si=lBCtSHfbSYG5WL9I]. For context Tom is the founder of multibillion dollar company Quest Nutrition and Lisa is the cofounder. The first ~45 was her discussing women’s sexual preferences. She goes on to admit that women usually prefer men who are tall (she said she prefers a man who’s 6 ft tall even though she’s 5’1), physically strong, mentally/emotionally strong, ambitious, hardworking, etc because of evolutionary reasons. She talks about how hookup culture may be bad for women because they tend to fall in love with the man they are continuously having sex due to women’s innate biology. I agree with all of this, of course because women, just like men, have certain evolved mating proclivities hardwired into them that are rooted in millions of years of human evolution. I am no science denier. I think even most blue pillers would agree women generally like to be protected, provided for, get more emotionally attatched during sex, etc. However right after that, she adresses how men don’t like promiscuous women but totally drops the biological/evolutionary reasoning she previously was using and starts saying that men who don’t want promiscuous women have egos and suggests men who don’t want promiscuous women have small penises or are not good in bed. She says “so what if a woman has been with 100 men … (xyz nonsense)”. My problem here is that this reflects overall societal views that women’s evolved mating preferences and behavior are seen as valid because of biological reasons but men’s are not. Men’s preferences are seen as due to men being insecure, sexist, misogynistic, etc.

To those of you who do not think there men are not actually hardwired to not prefer permiscuous women, there is plenty of scientific evidence supporting men have an innate preference against promiscuous women for long term mates due to paternal certainty, because this can kill the man’s reproductive success.

“In species where females gestate offspring, paternity certainty is a significant factor in male behavior, particularly regarding paternal investment. Males are more likely to invest in a partner and offspring when they are more certain of their paternity. Conversely, when paternity is uncertain, males may be less likely to invest or even abandon the partner and offspring” Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior Rachel Schepke & Todd K. Shackelford

“Men have evolved to exhibit a desire for chastity and sexual fidelity and an abhorrence of promiscuity in long-term mates” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916300964

“Men seeking a long-term mate are hugely turned off by a women's promiscuity, since it jeopardizes his paternity certainty.“ https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2013/02/The-Evolution-of-Desire-Ency-Entry-2016.pdf

There are a ton more double standards on this very topic of men vs women’s preferences acceptance. If a woman says she wants a dominant man, that’s seen as a preference. If a man says he wants a submissive woman, that’s seen as sexism and misogyny. If a woman wants an older more mature man, she is mature for her age. If a man wants a fertile younger woman, he is immature or a predator. If a woman wants a man who is tall, that’s seen as a preference. If a man wants a woman with big tits, that’s seen as that man sees women as sex objects. I can go on and on and on. But the point is there is this ridiculous double standard where women’s mating preferences is justified through science, evolution, and biology (which I agree), but people don’t want to apply the same science, evolution, and biology justification to men’s preferences, rather most people try to delegitimize and even villainize male preferences