tl;dr: we know "you don't need a relationship to be happy" is bullshit because people balk when challenged to apply it to their own lives.

If you looked hard enough, could you find someone who was single their whole life and says they were happy the whole time? Sure.

Generally, "you don't need a relationship to be happy" is not true. Going deeper, happy vs. unhappy is too simple: if you want to be obtuse, just redefine "happy"--move the goal post--enough.

The science is out there, you can read it yourself, so I don't need to go into it here.

Instead, I want to make my argument based on looking at what happily coupled people on this sub do, or rather, what they aren't willing to do.

Usually, "you don't need a relationship to be happy" is said to single people who are displeased with their sex/romantic life. If it were true, it would also apply to people in good relationships too.

I say "good relationships" because I want to set aside dysfunctional, abusive, codependent, etc. relationships. When we say "relationship" we're only talking about a relationship that works.

People of PPD who are happy in your relationship: are you willing to end it today, and live the rest of your life single? Single means: no "casual" sex, no dating, nothing romantic. You can have platonic friends, even best friends, but not a romantic partner. Yes or no: are you willing to live that life yourself.

Obviously, the answer is no, or some kind of equivocating. Regardless, when it comes down to it, they aren't willing to live the kind of life they say other people should settle for, and their behavior is all the proof you need to see that "you don't need a relationship to be happy" is bunk.

Equivocating: I'm sure we'll get comments to the effect "yes, I could be happy if I was single, but I'm happier with my partner." That's what I mean by "move the goal post": that "happier" state is what we're talking about when we talk about "happy," not the "single-happy." I'm sure we'll also get comments that will try to side step the issue, like "I can't break up with my partner, because it would make my partner unhappy," as if they 100% would participate in the social experiment, were it not for their responsibility to their partner. If you see comments like that then you'll know that those people did not read the whole post.

For those who are single: if you can't use yourself as an example, then what about the happily partnered people in your life? Do you know any? If you do, propose this social experiment to them, and report back to us; tell us what they say and how they react.

For those who have always been single, and have never known even one person in a good relationship: consider a thought experiment, putting aside all practicalities and ethics of the situation. Let's assume we've already resolved the practical and ethical issues, as if we had some god-like powers. What do you really think would happen if we took a large group of happily married people, and then randomly assigned them to one of two groups? The two groups are:

  • control group: do not change anything in their lives

  • experimental group: immediately make them single, and make them stay single for the rest of their life, including no dates--not even a first date with anyone--and no casual sex, even if they'd be open to that.

On average, which group is going to have happier lives?