TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Toxic Masculinity

JohnKimble111

March 10, 2018
5904 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://imgur.com/YV0ooPN
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Toxic Masculinity
Author

JohnKimble111

Upvotes 5904
Comments 467
Date March 10, 2018 5:06 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/83d4wp/toxic_masculinity/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/toxic-masculinity.904623
https://theredarchive.com/post/904623
Red Pill terms in post
toxic masculinity
Top posts by JohnKimble111

Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission Says

6700 upvotes
March 25, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake news

6298 upvotes
December 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women

6153 upvotes
February 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women

5789 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years

3826 upvotes
April 16, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands

3770 upvotes
September 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Amber Heard loses bid to get $50 million defamation suit by her ex Johnny Depp thrown out

3737 upvotes
March 28, 2020
/r/MensRights

Girl Who Falsely Accused Kpop Star Kim Hyung Jun of Sexual Assault Sentenced to 8 Months in Jail

3645 upvotes
October 1, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]What_Is_X 1483 points1484 points1485 points 8 years ago (551 children) | Copy Link

This seems to be a misunderstanding of the term. I haven't seen anyone referring to all masculinity as inherently toxic (although I'm sure someone will now link an example). The term refers to a toxic subset of masculine behaviours, such as being "tough" and not talking about issues.

[–]TheYatesMachine 201 points202 points203 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

I think there's a time and a place for all things. I was never taught to be "manly", but I was raised by a single father who probably fits the bill.

We could openly discuss anything as a family and my relationship with him became even more emotionally candid later in life.

But through his actions and my emulation of them, I gained a lot of respect for stoicism, and understanding that I have control over my emotions. I don't think it's "manly" to be tough when the situation calls for it, I think it's pragmatic.

We're also a military family, if that changes things, but there are situations in any life that cause distress, and suppressing that distress allows you to more rationally handle situations.

I think a lot of problematic issues today are being addressed by people fueled with emotion, and that has a tendency to escalate discussion and create divisive narratives.

It takes a calm head to reach compromise.

[–]What_Is_X 39 points40 points41 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I agree with all of this. There is a difference between suppressing emotions out of socially conditioned emasculation fear, and a rational choice to deal with (rather than suppress) emotions as you see fit - which, as you mentioned, may include expressing them to a father or whoever.

[–]DaSaw 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I see it as more the ability to put emotions aside when the situation warrants it, and deal with them later (once a crisis has passed). Some people fall apart in a crisis. Some people do not. At least in Western society (cannot comment on societies outside my own), boys have been heavily pressured to develop this skill, while girls have been anywhere from allowed not to develop it, to actively discouraged from developing it.

[–]Jagrnght 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I rarely see toughness as the leading vice of masculinity. I would say that masculinity turns toxic when empathy is disregarded for another in order to fill one's desires - sexual, economic, athletic. Look at the best MMA fighters - they are actually quite empathetic toward their opponents - hugging them after a win, congratulating the loser on good technique, etc.

[–]flo850 47 points48 points49 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with the fact that decision making is best when your emotions are under control, but that doesn't mean I should bury them. I can cry with my childs , and I do, I can be angry, and I can have fun . Also I get to this point after getting confronted to a situation where stoicism was not applicable.

My father's version of manly was about not showing emotions, I disagree.

[–]feralestfelune 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That was pretty good insight. You weren’t outright taught to be “manly” but shown the example of the beneficial and healthy way to deal, from the masculine figure in your life, with the inevitability of difficult life situations. Pragmatic was a great word, and I found it helpful to see it as stoicism rather than “masculinity”. So thanks for helping give me a new perspective! Just started following this sub and sometimes I find pretty good and pertinent information, I love learning!

[–]strangepostinghabits 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

sounds like you got the balanced version of it, and that it works for you. There's plenty of men out there however who would do a lot better if they knew how to seek emotional support.

There's good and bad sides of everything, and the whole idea of the term toxic masculinity is to talk about the bad sides of masculinity. I don't think you can pinpoint many parts of masculinity that is 100% bad, but IMO it's plain as day that the masculine ideals as a whole often end up hurting men instead of helping them.

OP is quoting a complete asshole that has plenty of interest in men's votes and none in their wellbeing. The message is intentionally misleading and divisive.

[–]Source_or_gtfo 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

So why is talk of "toxic femininity" from feminists so rare (and when it does exist, it's typically about women being too selfless, being too nice, not about selfish power-seeking attitudes in women which ultimately harms both sexes)?

MRAs do talk about the pressure to "man up" a lot, one common phrase in the MRM is "when someone tells you to "man up" they're trying to convince you to do something against your own interests". The difference is MRAs won't call it "toxic masculinity". There's a reason. The term forms part of a larger feminist framing, which seeks to dump all of the blame and shame on men/boys while absolving women/girls - depriving men/boys of recognition of misandry (and the internalisation of it by a large number of men/boys) and stopping dead any cultural calling out of women/girls who advance selfish sexism against men/boys.

Imagine there was a huge and powerful "white-ist" movement which culturally (and institutionally) dominated discussions of racism, which always framed race issues entirely in terms of black perpetration/aggression and white victimhood. Now imagine they routinely cited "toxic black culture" as not just a thing out there (as one factor in a very complex equation, which is very hard to sociologically separate from white racism), but used it as the sole go-to explanation for everything, everything which others might reasonably see as the result of racism against black people. It shouldn't be hard to see what the "white-ist" agenda in that example is.

Imagine "whiteists" saying things like "Black Lives Matter don't care about black people, they just want to shit on whiteism. What are black lives matter doing to end toxic black culture?" And perhaps worse, thinking this is some warm, fuzzy, benevolent, "progressive" thing, not even seeing why it is controversial, why anyone would consider it offensive.

The standard feminist explanation of "toxic masculinity" is that it's ultimately based on the costs men (as a group) are willing to pay for dominance over women. What happens if it's women forcing/coercing this stuff on men? Or boys? https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-of-shame-are-organized-around-gender/275322/

What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor.

"Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed to fall apart." Ironically, she explained, men are often pressured to open up and talk about their feelings, and they are criticized for being emotionally walled-off; but if they get too real, they are met with revulsion.

What happens if the "special respect" which pressures of "manning up" are supposedly about securing, simply isn't there, but the demand of "being a man" still is? Not as a thing of male dominance, but of male disposability? Again, a narrative of "toxic masculinity" (especially as typically advanced by feminists) shuts down any potential for cultural recognition of this.

Another thing "toxic masculinity" achieves is that it functions as a means of perpetuating stereotypes (particularly everything you think of when you hear the term "testosterone poisoning"), rather than challenging them. Articles like this

Scientists and laymen have spent the last 50 years dispelling myths about women. I worry that journalists, academics and laymen will continue to perpetuate an equal number of myths about men.

are very rare from the feminist movement, I've literally never seen one on any major feminist platform. Imagine what evidence-contradicted racist stereotypes a "whiteist" movement could push if allowed to wave away accusations of racism by simply declaring "look, we're not saying it's biology, it's toxic black culture, therefore it's not racist to declare all the negative stereptypes about black people to be true".

Where does male privelege end and female privelege begin? It's a very hard question. What would be vastly more productive is to just focus on the sexism itself, and to call that out, in both sexes.

[–]Azurenightsky 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The masculine ideal as a whole is very simple.

You need strength, honor, mastery and courage.

Strength to hold back any attack, honor to uphold your own integrity and be a reliable ally, mastery over yourself and your emotions to maintain calm in the face of adversity and the courage to never back down from the dragons that surround us.

There is nothing within masculinity that denies emotion, it is wholly a strange time in human history that we act like men are emotionless creatures. Men among men are vastly different than men among women.

[–]DaSaw 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Makes me think of that episode of ST:TNG, in which Guinan and Worf talk about whether or not Klingons laugh. Worf, in response to Guinan telling him she's never seen him laugh, says "Klingons do not laugh". Guinan responds by pointing out that no, Worf, that's just you.

[–]Skyboy91 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Found the Vulcan 🖖

[–]kaian-a-coel 37 points38 points39 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

This is motte-and-bailey arguing. Textbook.

[–]Mens-Advocate 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Precisely!

[–]magestik12 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

TIL

[–]Now_Drop_It 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

How so? This is exactly how I learned the terms too.

[–]kaian-a-coel 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The bailey is "masculinity is toxic". Aka men are inherently bad. It's indefensible, but ideologically valuable. The motte is "some men are bad people in some ways". Completely unattackable, but also worthless.

Because really, what's the point of calling a subset of bad behaviours "toxic masculinity" if not to attack masculinity as a whole? If I called city-gang behaviour "toxic blackness", or infanticide "toxic femininity", that would be seen as a racist attack on all black people, or a sexist attack on all women, with much #notall thrown at me. And rightly so.

The difference is that no amount of "but I'm only referring to specific behaviour by some black people/women" would bail me out of trouble, whereas "toxic masculinity" gets a free pass.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Seeing normalization of feminist terms on this sub worries me.

[–]Now_Drop_It 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, words are pretty dangerous. Don't want to catch wrongthink.

[–]Now_Drop_It 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You seem to have an incomplete understanding of the definition of the term toxic masculinity. "some men are bad people in some ways" is an enormous misunderstanding of the meaning of the term and it's usefulness. Literally no one with a solid education on the topic uses it in that way. I can understand why you'd think it was worthless.

The term doesn't describe men's actual individual behaviors; it's instead a term encompassing society's idea of how men should act. Specifically the more destructive parts. When someone says toxic masculinity is bad, they aren't even talking about men, they're talking about society at large. Several of the objections you raised aren't an issue when using the term correctly. If you're interested I can give you a brief rundown on the term and how it's used. If you still think it's useless after that, no worries, but at least you won't be arguing from ignorance.

[–]kaian-a-coel 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, of course, explain to me in detail exactly how fortified your goddamn motte is, this will surely refute my point.

Which is that there is two definition of toxic masculinity. One to be used when not challenged about it, and one when you're being called out about being a sexist cunt, to insist that no, you're not actually being a sexist cunt. But by all mean, keep repeating the second one like a broken record.

[–]Wsing1974 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Explain how please.

[–]kaian-a-coel 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This seems to be a misunderstanding of the term. I haven't seen anyone referring to all blackness as inherently toxic (although I'm sure someone will now link an example). The term refers to a toxic subset of black behaviours, such as being "gangsta" and not obeying the law.

Does that sounds like a racist trying to backpedal his way out of calling black people names? Because it sure does to me, and it works the same way for any race or gender.

[–]Wsing1974 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah, I gotcha. I thought you were referring to the original post.

[–][deleted] 56 points57 points58 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–]Blutarg 42 points43 points44 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That says a lot. If I heard someone using "toxic blackness" I would definitely think they had something against black people. To associate any specific black person's crimes with their blackness instantly puts one on the road to racial animosity. When I read about a black person who commits a crime, it never occurs to me to blame it on their race even a tiny fraction.

[–]pacmatt27 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is one of the biggest problems with feminism and is a throwback to the origins of the movement. All of their terminology is inherently antagonistic and sexist. If you used that kind of language towards any class other than white males people would be appalled. But apparently it's ok to be a disgusting, racist, sexist prick if it's against white men. We have all that privilege I've heard so much about.

[–]ExiledSenpai 283 points284 points285 points 8 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link

"Men don't cry"

"Man up"

"You throw like a girl"

Just a few small examples of toxic masculinity. Toxic femininity exists as well IMO. To say that Masculinity or femininity is inherently toxic is not really what these terms mean, though I'm sure there are those who take them to mean as such.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But how is that toxic masculinity? Can't women propagate those views as well? Why gender the attitude of expecting one to act like a stereotype?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 57 points58 points59 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

What about the meme "lol male tears"?

[–]GreyInkling 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Toxic people being toxic by persuing an extreme version of a social issue for personal gratification in putting others down and co-opting the language used in the issue to do it.

What did you think it was?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mainstream feminism in action. So pretty much what you said.

[–]Tallaf124 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thats nore akin to all the salty memes and whining then saying actual men crying

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 42 points43 points44 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But it only works if there's something shameful about men crying.

They wouldn't say "lol female tears".

They're propagating the gender roles they call toxic masculinity.

[+]IterMercator1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Male tears is spunk lmfao

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah.

But the feminists using the meme are being literal. They think men crying is funny.

The fact that it also means jizz and they were apparently unaware just adds to the humor.

[–]BadHabitMagic 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When did Hegemonic Masculinity become Toxic Masculinity?

[–]v574v 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Female sex selection and male sex competition are aspects of toxic masculinity?

Human sexual reproduction is the goal of life and the methods supported by men and women can’t possibly be toxic.

[–]Azurenightsky -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

The second one is not toxic.

Reality is, you either man up and hold onto the rope for dear life or you don't and we can't trust you with us when we are in actual danger.

The way of men evolved over a hundred and fifty thousand years, for about 135,000~145,000 of those years, men had to secure terrain and ensure the safety of the tribe. If I cannot trust you to have my back out there in the chaos where I might die. Then I cannot bring you with me. I cannot have half my focus watching out for someone else. Lives are on the line.

If you think a mere five thousand years is going to overcome that when by and large we've had to face off against it for most of that history as well. I'm afraid reality simply won't hold.

It is not toxic masculinity to uphold a standard that separates Men from the boys and the women. It may not be very PC, but nature and reality do not care about being PC.

[–]mrBatata 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Your answer is not far off from the truth.

Where I live no one considers that to be toxic. Just standard. It's not to trow you down it's to force you to be better. It has the purpose of training men to get though and to spite them to be better, train harder, get new solutions.

None of them WOULD BE toxic if we lived in a competition favorable culture. Instead we live in a feminist culture that tells us that being weak is ok and there's nothing wrong with not trying to be better. Thus men become passive and self destructive, they don't understand that all our evolution has required us to be strong in order to mate and to defend our species.

This thread is the perfect example of why this sub exists, you guys fall into the female narrative (that by way does not know shit about male behaviour) and let yourselves and by extension the rest of us get shat on by women. And get butt hurt with by anything.

Go ahead prove me right downvote this.

[–]Azurenightsky 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They will. Because they think they can deny reality. They think they can live in a bubble. There's a reason we use war to reduce the livestock of human men. Disgusting a practice as it is. It separates the wheat from the chaff and the species improves because of it.

It's a fucked up time to be alive and it's absolutely because we're trying to feminize masculinity. Women have spent eternity getting men to submit to their will, Men have had to spend eternity keeping Order while trying to balance the desires of the fairer sex.(In beauty, certainly not in absolute fairness.)

[–]Azurenightsky 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

A downvote is not an argument <3

[–]Temujin_Temujinsson 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Best thing I've seen today, I don't agree with what you said but that was good.

The point is we don't live in the same world as we did 5000 years ago. We live in a world (I'm talking about the US, Canada, Europe, and so on) where the majority of us don't have to risk our lives. I agree with you, in a life or death situation there are no other options then to "man up". But that's not how most people use the term, most of the time when I hear that phrase it's to people who are only sad. To men who've suffered through a breakup, to men who have lost someone, to men with depression. In all of those cases you shouldn't just "man up" you should talk to someone about it and be allowed to feel whatever you feel.

Hope I got my point across, English isn't my first language.

[–]pasta4u 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Actually men still live in that world as we make up 95 percent of work place deaths. We don't have the luxury that woman do

[–]Azurenightsky 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You're correct, reality is not the same, but our biology is.

I would also smack upside the head any dumb ass I heard use the term in the manner you describe. That helps no one.

To man up is not to deny your emotions and your mortality, to man up should be reserved for times when it is not wise to focus on those aspects. I recognize it is not an easy divide, but as professor Oak in Pokemon says "you can't use that here!" There are times and places to parse through our emotional torment.

To repeat myself though and to be fully understood. I fully condemn the use of the phrase in relationship to the situations you described. No one is helped by that.

[–]slow_mutant 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You're being downvoted because you literally just described toxic masculinity and are saying it's not bad, and that's not an argument.

As a man, if I don't fit into your mold, I'm a boy then? I'm a woman? Great, thanks. Just because I can't punch someone in the face, I'm less of a man?There's no "Nature" that makes me "man up" now. There's just a jerky society that has that idea.

[–]Azurenightsky -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You certainly are a boy if all you can do is dismiss my points and miss them altogether. I'm sorry son.

[–]TheCancerousMeme 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The way I always took the phrase "Men don't cry" is that it doesn't solve anything to cry, not "you can never cry because you are a male". "Man up" to me has always meant to take responsibility for your own actions. However "You throw like a girl" is mean and we should probably just stop saying it.

[–]tyhote 307 points308 points309 points 8 years ago (132 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, when I talk about toxic masculinity I'm talking about the stupid bro shit guys make each other do. I hate that, and it sucks to deal with. Girls have the same thing with other girls being really negative towards girls they don't feel are "feminine" enough.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 42 points43 points44 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

If you want to get banned try going to any feminist sub and discuss toxic feminity.

[–]romulusnr 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

On the other hand, if we were to start using the phrase "toxic femininity...."

[–]tyhote 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then I would agree with it.

[–]zeldamaster666 136 points137 points138 points 8 years ago (106 children) | Copy Link

So it's not so much toxic masculinity as much as the problem is toxic people.

[–]tyhote 157 points158 points159 points 8 years ago (96 children) | Copy Link

I mean, it's people being toxic in regards to masculinity. I'm not trying to attack men in general, or even the idea of masculinity. Some people are super comfortable with masculinity, and it suits them, and that's perfectly fine. I love seeing people be comfortable in whatever way they desire.

What I don't love is when people police other people on their "manliness". It's not like addressing this hurts men; in fact, it helps men to recognize that there can be a very toxic factor towards people who aren't as masculine and accepting people for who they are. I personally believe there's a reason men tend to commit suicide more.

[–]TheNorfolk 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

But you can replace everything youve said with femininity. Its not a male issue, its an everyone issue. Women face these pressures far more than men with the whole beauty industry with its makeup, waxing, painful shoes, etc just to look hot.

Toxic masculinity would be useful if it gave people and society shit for bullying men who cry or wear pink or whathaveyou. Instead its used to belittle those who conform to societal pressures. Its a fair concept that is bastardised into man hating.

[–]tyhote 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I mean, yeah. That's why I'm trying to get people to use it in the way it's intended. I think toxic masculinity is a great analysis of social pressures on men, but people tend to use it wrong.

[–]harbo 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

What I don't love is when people police other people on their "manliness".

I have no sons, but if I did, I would sure as shit "police their manliness" and teach them not to cry in public because other people - particularly women - will judge them as weaklings if they do. When I tell my friends to man up, it is not because I personally think there is an issue, but because I know there is nothing to be gained and everything to be lost by showing weakness in front of other people.

[–]Halafax 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My life went to shit. I cried, a lot. For the better part of two years.

The men I worked with were incredibly kind. Men I barely knew offered me support. Not the women. They stopped making eye contact, they stopped talking to me. There is your toxic femininity: they enforce these values and have the gall to complain about them.

[–]big_babushka -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

That right there is exactly what toxic masculinity is. That’s an extremely damaging thing to teach men.

[–]mensmod 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"These traits men have suck, so I am going to label it with a negative term that refers to their gender. But it doesn't mean all men, just all men who have that trait that is indicative of their gender. Not all men, just their gender. All men who have that gender."

The argument behind why "bitch" is a gendered slur that insults all women applies here. Same with any other pejorative that references an entire group.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (69 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mymarkis666 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

To be fair there's no lessser number of men complaining about women being emotional than there is women complaining about toxic masculinity.

[–]Arasin89 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

It's not a degrading term for inherently male traits, it's a term that refers to a set of traits that have traditionally been associated with males through history but that have now become increasingly problematic in our modern society. Constant jealousy, an obsession with power dynamics, an aversion to becoming emotionally vulnerable and discussing intimate feelings, all these things were, evolutionarily speaking (so to speak) beneficial for men in a time when one's survival depended on one's ability to exert constant control on ones safety and ability to procreate, and when to bare ones feelings or doubts would indeed have made one appear weak and instill doubt in one's followers or friends.

Now however these traits are maladaptive. The society we live in has largely secured our physically safety and women are no longer seen as simply procreation vectors to be controlled. What it means to be a man has changed from what it meant, say, 500 years ago. Despite this the ideal of masculinity which existed 500 years ago still persists in many communities, and does alot of harm to young men trying to find their place. They find themselves caught between an inherited idea of manhood they think they should live up to and a society that seems confused about what men should be, and sometimes downright hostile towards the idea these young men inherited from their fathers, for whom the old notion of masculinity worked much better than it generally will today.

Of course there's misandric sentiment that can get involved in some of the instances of male behavior being called out as toxic. There are times when ordinary human behavior that would be seen as innocuous in women can appear to some as sinister or toxic when coming from men, often due to over corrections in portions of society as backlash against the rampant sexism against women that has existed for generations. Nonetheless, toxic masculinity, which certainly exists outside of whatever various misandric groups who may wish to use it to bash some men unfairly, does the most harm to the men it catches, as until they are able to let go of it, they will tend to become only more and more frustrated with their seeming inability to operate in the modern world, despite their feeling that they have done everything that society (certain parts of it, certainly) has asked of them.

[–]tyhote -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

I'm not trying to suggest that masculinity has all to do with suicide, or even a majority of it. It's just when it's toxic that it's a bad pressure. And some people may use "toxic masculinity," to be degrading, but honestly, for me it's like when people call each other "retard" or "faggot". It's super frustrating, and I think it only adds to the stress that actual toxic masculinity brings.

Not only will they not believe you when you claim you're having to deal with it, they'll make fun of you for actually admitting it.

I get the frustration behind the idea of "toxic masculinity," especially how I feel are like TERFs in this area, but when I'm talking about toxic masculinity, I mean it in a very humanistic way.

[–]_Mellex_ -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

-21 -40

👏👏👏

Yeah, this thread is completely organic, free from brigading. Yep. Yep.

[–]QiPowerIsTheBest 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, that's not it at all.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You want to...like, expand on that?

[–]laalpacagrande 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Behaviours toxic to the individual which are reinforced by a peer group engaging in the same behaviours.

[–]Halafax 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And if it’s enforced by an outside group? Most issues complained about are results of behaviors that women prefer.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]reachout_throwaway 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Throughout my entire life, I can count on one hand the times where I was explicitly told to do anything because it was manly. And I went through boy scouts. I have always been someone who cries easily, and I have never felt less manly.

I think the scope of this toxic masculinity is overstated.

[–]GreyInkling 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's describing actions not people and a subset of toxic actions that specific people do. Things are easier to address when you categorize them. Being upset with toxic behavior in general is too vague for a lot of things.

[–]LittleGoblin -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It stems from overcompensated insecurity for sure

[–]AlphaNathan 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Make each other do?

[–]anonlymouse 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Funny how nobody talks about toxic femininity though - except when being called out for being misandrists using the term toxic masculinity.

[–]want_to_join 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure they do, there was even a movie about it.

[–]NoOnesAnonymous 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Mean girls"?

[–]PanderjitSingh 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you accept the definitions of a hate group, feminists in this case, you are supporting them and spreading their hatred.

[–]tyhote 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just because someone calls something by the wrong name doesn't mean that word now must take that meaning.

It doesn't provide any support to those people to undo their work on turning the word into some derogatory rhetorical garbage.

[–]eddlette 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You don’t get to just make up your own definitions of you don’t like the providence of the real one. Also toxic masculinity was definitely by sociologists not feminists.

[–]BroaxXx 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Being "tough" is toxic?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Depending on how it’s affecting your life, it can be. Conditioning boys to ignore pain, your body’s signal that something is wrong, can be a toxic behavior. Approaching every problem from a place of anger, even when understanding would be more effective, can be a toxic behavior. Discouraging young boys from expressing sadness can be a toxic behavior. And parental pressure to be tough can encourage boys to bully their peers who don’t display the same typically masculine traits, because they’re taught that it’s wrong to be gentle or shy or to prefer “girl games.”

My husband was raised by a former military stepfather who I’m pretty certain struggled with PTSD. While my husband is grateful for some of the lessons he took from his upbringing and believes that having that very tough, very masculine influence in his life made him a stronger person (and I don’t completely disagree), there were some other things he had to unlearn in order to have a happy relationship. Repressing negative feelings and refusing to communicate them was actively hurting both of us; it hurt him because he wasn’t addressing the thing that made him unhappy, and it hurt me because I had to see a person I loved being miserable but couldn’t help.

[–]BroaxXx 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yes I appreciate that but, again, being tough isn't inherently toxic. Like everything in life it only depends to which degree you are tough. I think being a bit tough is very positive as it helps you not shy away from challenges and adversity.

Ignoring pain is, obviously, wrong but being able to withstand some pain is positive. Not expressing sadness is wrong but being so sensitive that you take emotional pain from irrelevant things is also bad.

I don't think masculinity is inherently bad as I don't think being tough is inherently bad. It's just to which degree you take things. At some extreme point it does become detrimental as anything else in life (like femininity).

Either way I'm glad to know you and your husband were able to pull through his issues and that things are better now. :)

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I just want to clarify, I don’t think toughness and masculinity are inherently bad. I was trying to say that it’s only when taken to extremes, and applied in ways that hurt yourself or others, but perhaps I wasn’t clear enough. And “toxic masculinity” as a concept isn’t referring to masculinity in general, but to a specific set of toxic behaviors that are associated with traditional masculinity taken to unhealthy levels. It’s an unfortunate name for an important concept, and I wish we had a better way of referring to it because I think it’s an important conversation to have.

[–]BroaxXx 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It’s an unfortunate name for an important concept, and I wish we had a better way of referring to it because I think it’s an important conversation to have.

Yeah, I can understand that. It is rather unfortunate, specially under the current climate where it seems that anything a men does is wrong but I understand what you're saying...

Hopefully some marketing guy can rebrand it and we'll start having a more honest (and less defensive) conversation on the topic...

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem is that "subset" is constantly expanding and doesn't seem to be tied to anything concrete.

[–]PanderjitSingh 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

No. It is a hate term. A phrase designed to generate hatred fear and contempt. As always this can be detected despite potential biases by substituting a term identifying a different group for the one in use. So in this example someone who hates men could detect ‘toxic masculinity’ as a hate term targeting men by replacing the term ‘masculinity’ with ‘Jewishness’ or ‘Africa-ness’ and using the new phrase to describe all things negative associated with that group by bigoted haters.

One doesn’t need a term defining all the terrible things one imagines to be wrong and harmful in a group of human beings unless one wants to drum up hatred in order to drive general attacks on that group.

[–]XenoX101 38 points39 points40 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

Originally I agreed with you, however I'm starting to see problems with this notion.

The term refers to a toxic subset of masculine behaviours, such as being "tough" and not talking about issues.

The first claim is framed in a very negative way. Think about 'being tough', what traits underpin this behaviour? Resilience, steadfastness, bravery, commitment, and sure sometimes arrogance and egoism. Most of those traits are not negative, but they are portrayed as such under the definition of "being tough"

Now lets look at the next example, "not talking about issues". This one is more objective since it is a literal statement of an action. However, there is one important detail missing here; talk to whom? If you are talking to your loved ones or therapist, absolutely this makes sense. But what if it's a public meeting, or a discussion with a business partner, would this be an appropriate time to talk about your issues? Now if you're especially open-minded you might still say 'sure' to this, but let's think about what we are doing when we talk about our emotional issues. Essentially it is an act of revealing one's vulnerabilities to others. In the hands of a therapist, this can act as a release and allow the therapist to find an appropriate solution to the problem. In the hands of an enemy, you have just provided them a key to bringing out your most painful experiences. Think about children who may encounter bullies, would you want them to talk about their issues to these bullies? So I would say this one is a half truth (the part that relates to opening up to specialists being the truth component).

The problem then with having an overarching definition of 'toxic masculinity' is that it bundles in good behaviours such as resilience, and not revealing your vulnerabilities to those who may exploit them, with bad ones such as being arrogant and not seeking help for mental issues. If you are extremely careful (as I hope I've been), then you can pick these out. However many journalists do not pick these out, or do so haphazardly with what comes across as disdain for masculinity overall, not just the more 'toxic' components. In essence, it is too easy of a shift from 'toxic masculinity' to 'masculinity is toxic', that this becomes the argument, rather than taking a more nuanced approach that acknowledges the reasons why manly behaviours that seem antagonistic are in fact desirable (such as toughness).

[–]ChainedHunter -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How did you manage to miss the point so hard in such a long comment?

[–]XenoX101 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was responding to the secondary claim that "The term refers to a toxic subset of masculine behaviours, such as being "tough" and not talking about issues." rather than the misuse of the term in the picture.

[–]Darth_Odan 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

The problem is that if one wants to be objective in regards to the term "toxic masculinity" one has to examine which attributes or characteristics are deemed "toxic". Once that is done, you should be able to determine whether or not the term is really objective or just a cover to attack a general concept. Nobody every points out that a characteristic or attribute generally given to women/ femininity may be toxic, rather anything and everything toxic is attributed to male/ masculinity. Likewise, if toxic masculinity is a thing, there must be an opposite as well, let's deem it "good masculinity" or something similar. However, no masculine attributes are highlighted as such.

That objectivity never existed in regards to the use of the term, so it isn't being misunderstood.

Edit: spelling

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody every points out that a characteristic or attribute generally given to women/ femininity may be toxic

Nope. And if anyone ever did discuss toxic feminity the feminists who use toxic masculinity would immediately screech "misogyny."

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

women dont ever really have to come into it, but there are plenty of "toxic femininity" behaviours that women do that are detrimental to themselves and other women.

Could you link a discussion by people who use toxic masculinity (feminists) where they are discussing "toxic feminity"?

And no, "internalized misogyny" doesn't count.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

How is this the most upvoted comment here? The whole notion of toxic masculinity is an attempt to vilify and pathologize specific behaviors and attribute them to men and masculinity. It's a thinly veiled attempt to conflate masculinity with all things evil.

Seeing this comment get such a good response makes me think this subreddit has been fully co-opted by feminists.

[–]What_Is_X 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Well yes, are you pretending like men are flawless beings and masculine culture does not have any toxic behaviours?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

No, I'm saying that the term is ambiguous and intentionally so for the purpose of shifting the blame of social ills on "masculine culture."

I've never seen anyone who brings up "toxic masculinity" even attempt to look at other factors to explain what leads to a negative behavior. It's quasi relgious bullshit and you buying into it is either you enabling disenguous assholes into further harming men, or you're complicit in it for reasons that I can't figure out since nobody gains from this except the very few snake oil salesmen who push this idea.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There is no such thing as toxic masculinity, stop trying to make it a thing. It's just bullies being bullies, regardless of gender. You don't hear too many people complaining about "toxic femininity" or "toxic whiteness" or "toxic blackness", although the same kind of people who would complain about that will complain about "toxic masculinity" because it's similarly bigoted. So, congratulations on being both a bigot and a misandric apologist.

[–]What_Is_X 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What does "false confidence" imply about confidence?

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hust91 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think they mean feeling pressured to seem unaffected and tough and independent when it really is okay to lean on others and admit to needing help or being hurt?

My own dad had issues with always being the tough guy that never hurt, which caused huge issues for the entire family later when he couldn't admit to having issues that caused the entire family to have to fix his mess.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How is being tough toxic?

Because it's associated with men and they start with the premise that men are toxic and work backwards.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being tough is not toxic. It's the expectation of being tough that is toxic. As in, the inherent notion that men should be able to deal with any calamity at any time without losing their resolve.

[–]Gareth321 30 points31 points32 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

However the term is currently utilised, it is a gendered and offensive term created in feminist theory to reinforce the notion that all males contribute towards a patriarchal system through negative behaviour. To illustrate the issue, I ask where feminism defines, "toxic femininity". Presumably femininity imbues its own negative behaviours, and yet you won't find the term anywhere. To even suggest such a term will invite criticisms of sexism. We should never paint men with broad brushstrokes, just as we should never do the same for women. We are unique, and men and masculinity is inherently good.

This isn't to say we shouldn't work on negative attitudes within our culture. Just that we should never use the term "toxic masculinity", and we should certainly never use any social framework which was developed using a feminist and therefore feminine perspective. Our challenges are unique and should be tackled from within.

[–]Rumpadunk 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's unfortunate, because toxic masculinity could've been a good term to use. If someone's using it to help culturally and not demean I'm okay with it, but that's generally not how that type of thing works. See: Moron/imbecile/mentally retarded

[–]HotDealsInTexas 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To illustrate the issue, I ask where feminism defines, "toxic femininity". Presumably femininity imbues its own negative behaviours, and yet you won't find the term anywhere. To even suggest such a term will invite criticisms of sexism.

To clarify this: Feminists DO have a term for this: Internalized Misogyny. But they refuse to use a comparable term for similar behavior/traits in men, because that would imply that misandry exists, and/or that there is sexism against men which cannot be blamed exclusively on men as a class.

[–]theothermod 35 points36 points37 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Nevertheless, the choice of words implies that masculinity is toxic.

Feminists know what they're doing. They object to terms like "fireman" and "chairman", since they imply that these are typically male positions.

"Toxic masculinity" implies that masculinity is toxic. Like "mansplaining", its existence is a deliberate sexist attack on men.

[–]What_Is_X 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

"toxic masculinity" does not imply that all masculinity is toxic any more than "false confidence" implies that all confidence is false. It specifically refers to a part, not as a descriptor of the whole.

[–]theothermod 32 points33 points34 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The way it is used, in context with other feminist attacks on men, "toxic masculinity" is very much a part of a concerted campaign to demonise men in general.

[–]PanderjitSingh 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very sadly there seem to be some here in dire need of deprogamming. If we cannot even detect and reject hate speech targeting men we have much work to do before we can hope for progress toward equality.

[–]ChainedHunter -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists don't use toxic masculinity as an attack on men. They talk about it as an issue affecting men that is bad and should be fixed.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Difference is you can describe non-false confidence.

Feminists cannot describe positive masculinity. I've seen them attempt.

[+]ilikecombos11 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

They feel that any positive description of masculinity implies a lack of those qualities in women.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. But they have no such issue with praising women or condemning men.

Women can be equal or better. Never worse.

Men can be equal or worse. Never better.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–]foster_remington -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That makes no sense... the very fact that the qualifier toxic is added proves that the term isn't inherently toxic.

If I say 'the red car' am I implying that cars are usually red?

If masculinity was inherently toxic we wouldn't have to call it "toxic masculinity" we would just say masculinity

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But it implies that to the layman, which makes it an unacceptable term. Many believe that this term means masculinity is inherently toxic. Why? Because that term gives this implication.

Imagine someone rationalizing the use of “toxic blackness” because ‘if blackness was inherently toxic, we wouldn’t call it “toxic blackness”, we would just saw blackness’...—it doesn’t matter toxic blackness gives that implication which makes it unacceptable to use, regardless of what it actually refers to.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So is it okay to use Toxic gayness, toxic blackness, toxic femininity, toxic jewness etc?

[–]What_Is_X 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure, there are toxic aspects in every culture/group.

[–]Walkabeast 33 points34 points35 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

The misconception probably has something to do with the fact that masculinity is never brought up in a positive light, aside from right wingers lashing out and maybe TRP (for whatever that's worth).

Only person I can think of that praises masculinity is Jordan Peterson, at least in the sense of toughing up and taking responsibility for yourself. Just look at the treatment he's getting just for saying that. So IMO, there's definetly some sort of anti-masculinity trend going on currently.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And those movies are condemned for it by the same people who invented "toxic masculinity."

[–]Fuego_Fiero -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"When all you've known is privilege, equality looks a lot like discrimination."

[–]Halafax 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When women aren’t given preferential treatment, they tend to feel like they are being oppressed.

I’m not a fan of gender roles, it’s unfortunate that feminists do so little to break them down. Instead, they’re doing things buffet style: they keep what they like and agonize when anyone else gets anything.

[–]What_Is_X 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That simply isn't true. Many popular figures such as Tony Robbins and Joe Rogan, as well as basically all dating gurus like Mark Manson are outspoken about the positives of real masculinity such as true confidence.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]cereal_killer1337 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In your opinion what does the term "cultural marxism" mean? I've seen it used in a variety of context, None really makes sense.

[–]Halafax 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You’re claiming Rogan as a feminist?

Go listen to his podcast with Dave Foley.

[–]What_Is_X 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, none of those people are feminists. Believe it or not, some of us are capable of thinking for ourselves to adopt nuanced opinions instead of clinging blindly to dumb fuck group think from one "side" or the other.

[–]punchgroin 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Masculinity is not the same thing as machismo. Terry Crews is undeniably masculine, but lacks bullshit machismo. The desire to compete and the desire to dominate are two very different things. One is extremely socially healthy, and one is toxic. Competition is everyone striving to improve themselves, domination is striving to knock others down.

We should be elevating each other, not crushing each other.

[–]iRepth 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well-said. I also think that when most people use the term "toxic masculinity", they are referring to "machismo". I understand wanting to make the distinction between masculinity and machismo. As a very feminine man, I was pressured for a long time (and still am) by my peers to have more machismo. And that's pretty toxic. But I'm not over here acting like it's toxic that they are traditionally manly, in the way that someone like Terry Crews or Nick Offerman is traditionally manly. What I don't like is that they make themselves feel like they have to out-manly each other past the point where it's productive. Especially when it comes to emotional openness and sensitivity.

[–]L1M3 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're 100% right, the problem is that it's a term that's just asking to be taken the wrong way.

I think the word "machismo" would be a better choice, but maybe it doesn't have the same faux collegiate ring to it.

[–]What_Is_X 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, but the argument still works. If most boys grow up without fathers, then isn't their mothers the ones teaching them this toxic masculinity?

[–]Demonspawn 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

then isn't their mothers the ones teaching them this toxic masculinity?

Perhaps

[–]cheshiredudeenema 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not a misunderstanding. It's a recognisation that it's just the latest vaguely-defined feminist buzzword (see: patriarchy) that due to the looseness of its definition can be used to blame almost any problem you like on men. It's why you never see women policing other women's femininity called "toxic femininity". It's why there's never any discussion of the role women play in shaping and encouraging these behaviours in men, despite the fact that most seem to stem from sexual competition and trying to meet attractiveness standards (being strong, confident, assertive, "manly"). It's just another way for feminists to shit on men.

On this sub we often have discussions about how expectations and stereotypes of men can be harmful. It's very possible to have those discussions without being derogatory, accusatory and, frankly, bigoted towards men. But I've read a lot of feminist discourse on it, and they have no interest in anything other than blaming everything men and creating their own set of negative stereotypes of men.

[–]lasciate 34 points35 points36 points 8 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

There's no misunderstanding. Feminists mostly deny the existence of gendered behavior until there is an opportunity to blame masculinity for [insert any evil] or applaud femininity for [insert any good]. The end result is a picture of masculinity that is always "toxic" and femininity that is always benevolent (and put upon/exploited/abused by men).

Pure coincidence, of course.

[–]What_Is_X 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

That's a baseless assertion, so yeah cool I guess.

[–]azazelcrowley 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you name a positive masculine trait that feminists wouldn't insist is a neutral trait?

The fact is, if it's positive, they actively try to disassociate it with masculinity, if it's negative, they blame it on toxic masculinity, even when that erases female perpetrators.

It also implies toxic male influence is the problem, rather than the truth that it's lack of male influence, which could be laid directly at the door of the feminist movement for its campaigns demonizing male sexuality to the point their interest in childcare and teaching collapsed, and their opposition to presumed joint custody for decades leading to fatherless households.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]tritisan 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think any gender studies class should include a section where all the students have to take testosterone supplements for a week.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Could you link some feminists discussing how great masculine men are?

[–]Halafax 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

(crickets)

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny how asking for a citation always shuts them up.

[–]MahouShoujoLumiPnzr 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

So is your claim that "toxic masculinity" isn't just a term used to pathologize masculinity, shrouded in sophistry.

Since we're both making baseless assertions, why don't you fuck off back to whatever shithole you crawled out of and make your baseless assertions there? Not making this one any better, that's for sure.

[–]PanderjitSingh 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I suspect he’s getting course credit for derailing here. Or perhaps a government cheque.

[+]What_Is_X -10 points-9 points-8 points 8 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

I'm inclined to think that whoever resorts to ad hominem attacks in a discussion does so when they lose and are too weak to admit it. The voting population here seems to agree with me.

[–]eddlette 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists don’t deny gendered behavior they disagree about the origins of that behavior, wether it is inherent to biological sex or learned.

Feminists wouldn’t deny that more women are nurses then men are nurses, aka denying gendered behavior, they would just argue that rather than there being some biological cause that makes women better nurses, that is about societal expectations of caregiving and pressure on men to measure value by career prestige.

[–]NondescriptWriter 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad this was said. Masculinity isn't inherently toxic and nobody worth listening to perpetuates that idea. However, toxic masculinity is a thing that's directly hurting the development of young boys and impressionable teenage boys and disenfranchised adult men. Without a resonant masculine figure, toxic masculinity can potentially fill that void. It looks like, talks like, and walks like masculinity but without the nuanced traits or paternal undertones. Alpha is a myth, Providers are the truth.

[–]wateroclock 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

Choosing to be tough and not talk about issues is not worse than choosing to be weak and open up, I think most men make this choice not because they think they have to, but because they feel it’s better for them. Men are different, people need to stop pushing these memes about “seeming tough”.

[–]What_Is_X 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

There's nothing "weak" about opening up. It is ironically weaker for you to suppress your emotions for fear of being vulnerable.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]wateroclock 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Not everyone agrees on that. You choose that — good for you. Most men still choose to be less emotional because that’s how they are. I don’t think it’s wrong to say it’s all right to open up and be weak if you choose so, I think it’s wrong for you to suggest it’s better for everybody to do so. Again, that’s just your suggestion.

[–]What_Is_X 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

It's not just "how they are", it's pure social conditioning. Most men choose not to express their problems because they're afraid of being perceived as unmanly, and turn to alcohol or kill themselves as a direct and undeniable result.

[–]wateroclock 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Men are not taught to shut up and don’t express what they feel, we constantly open up to people who we want to talk to — our male friends. And we rarely really want to cry about anything. We are taught that we better prioritize solving a problem rather than ramble about it. I think it’s wrong to tell men that they need to be emotional. No. We don’t need that encouragement. It usually comes from women who don’t understand how different men are, and it’s generally a bad advice.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Until now, you didn't bring evidence for absolutely anything you wrote. I don't know why these people are even replying to you, all you do is poison the well and espouse some outdated bigoted memes.

Nobody know why men are killing themselves, there's no long term study on this. Some men say it's because too much stress and pressure to conform/deliver and some feminists say it's "toxic masculinity" a deliberately vague term in order to demonize men without having to take the trouble of fixing their issues from the system.

Do yourself a favor and bring arguments and proof to your posts or you could just simply fuck off and stop pretending you care, nobody's buying it anyway.

[–]Skidlybap 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think it's accurate to say 'choose to be emotional' as no one can really control their emotions. You can control how you deal with your emotions, but you can't control your emotions. I think you say ahead that guys are better at tackling problems, but where 'masculinity' becomes a problem is when guys bury their emotions and don't deal with them properly because with 'masculinity' guys aren't supposed show that they are having a hard time with emotions. An example being seeking help for depression.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is one of those intentional misunderstandings

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

misunderstanding of the term

No, it's simply that feminist extremists have redefined the term to refer to anything that is the social equivalent of 'manly', ranging from spreading ones legs on the tram to being attracted to breasts.

While it may have had an actual meaning at some point, no one with an understanding of why feminism is in itself toxic will associate the phrase with that definition for that reason.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (34 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+]ilikecombos11 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Feminism is an ideology. It's not at all comparable to attacking a group based on born traits.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

A group is a group however you define it. Making a judgement about a whole group based on the opinions or actions of a minority is exactly what men’s rights folks hate about feminists, yet they do identical stuff towards feminists. It shows very little self awareness.

[+]ilikecombos11 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

You are taking it to the opposite extreme which is just as silly.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Feminists aren't the equivalent to men.

Men don't share a set of beliefs and buzz words.

[–]ChainedHunter -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Feminism isnt a monolith.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're more alike than men are. It's a shared belief system. Male isn't.

[–]PanderjitSingh 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Toxic masculinity is a core feminist concept. It cannot be unlinked from feminism.

It’s like trying to disconnect antisemitism and nazism. Not only is doing so rationally unsupportable it raises the question of why one would try to do so.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You're thinking of the radical Nazis.

You shouldn't lump them all together.

Some Nazis said mean things about Jews and smeared them with a broad brush.

So then people said mean things about the Nazis and smeared them with a broad brush. Same thing. Both are equally bad.

The fact is Nazis were trying to help Jews by addressing toxic judiasm which is behind all the problems they face, like being greedy or people hating them for drinking the blood of Christian babies.

Really the Nazis were about equality for everyone, they just focused on Aryans because they needed it the most.

/S

[–]JosephStalinski 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

He said “feminist extremists”

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

and then he said

feminism is in itself toxic

So it follows exactly the logic I laid out. It's an identical falsehood as 'some men rape therefore all men are rapists'. 'Some feminists are toxic therefore feminism is toxic.'

[–]voksul 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Almost invariably, anyone who thinks the radical feminism is a pervasive and relevant problem has a very, very low standard of what "radical" is.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]letsgocrazy -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have they really done that though?

[–]MoveOfTen 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I've never heard anyone claim that "masculinity is toxic", thus the "If masculinity were truly toxic" premise makes no sense. Even if they think something stupid fits "toxic masculinity" like leg spreading, that doesn't mean they'd think fathers staying home with their children is "toxic" somehow. It is a misunderstanding of the term and a retarded tweet.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I've never heard anyone claim that "masculinity is toxic"

If the list of things that are toxic is apparently limitless and there's nothing good about masculinity then what does that tell you?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I had never been exposed to that level of delusion - and frankly didn’t believe it existed- until I attended a left-wing college. Masculinity-hating is pervasive, prevalent, and institutionalized in its discourse.

[–]MoveOfTen 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That sounds unpleasant, but I've attended three left wing colleges and never saw any "masculinity-hating" at all (at least none I can remember). Also, you may well interpret things as "masculinity-hating" that I don't and vice versa. I simply can't do much with an anecdote like that as far as drawing conclusions goes.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]MoveOfTen 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That isn't an accurate quote... The quote is:

Masculinity can be extremely toxic to our mental health, both to the people who are pressured to perform it and the people who are inevitably influenced by it. We would like to encourage discussion on how to openly talk about our emotions and our wellbeing, and how to engage in masculine identities in a healthy way. Relevant to this discussion is how masculinity can harm our relationships with people and one's ability to cope when relationships are difficult or end. We want to create a safe and open space where we can talk about masculinity and its various intersections with our identities and experiences.

They obviously aren't saying "men are toxic" or anything that would imply kids would be better off without fathers.

[–]FreddyFoFingers 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Read past the headline.

[–]voksul 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, that is a fucking shitty article. The actual quote is "masculinity can be extremely toxic to our mental health;" the quote in the title suggesting a unilateral condemnation is maliciously and intentionally misleading.

The discussion is about how the pressure to conform to standards of masculinity is bad, something this subreddit talks a hell of a lot about in between dumb right-wing posts like this.

[–]letsgocrazy -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have they or have you just invented that they have because you hate feminists?

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Exactly right. Toxic masculinity isn't all masculine behavior, simply masculine behavior centered around aggression, dominance, hierarchy, violence, etc.

[–]PanderjitSingh 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So all the wonderful stuff that dragged us out of the Stone Age?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Is the word toxic blackness okay to you?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you define it?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Toxic blackness isn't all behavior by black people, its simply black people's (especially black Americans) behavior centered around aggression, dominance, violence, etc.

[–]voksul 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's both inherently bad manifestations of maniless (e.g. violence) and the pressure to conform to general standards of manliness like pressure not to show emotion.

[–]tritisan 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And women never exhibit these behaviors. Right.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen it from self described SJWs. We're talking poly-vegan alternative types wherein not a single man has even the slightest masculine tendencies.

I mean they're my friends and I have no problem with how they live, but they have described all masculinity as toxic and angered me by stating that in conjunction to my masculinity. Of course they disliked the fact I got angry and started arguing with them over it and called that behaviour "toxic masculinity".

[–]Boner-b-gone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This exactly. A more descriptive term might be “the toxic masculine stereotype,” or even “the socially toxic effect of the masculine stereotype.”

Basically, it refers to all the bad behaviors that a man tends to exhibit when they don’t have strong male role models in their life. We end up with a lot of men who are just pretending at what it means to be a man because it’s what they think men’re supposed to be: aggressive (instead of relentless), angry (instead of passionate), great shows of machismo (rather than quiet assured confidence), etc. Just like Edward Norton‘s character says in fight club: “I’m just a 32-year-old boy.”

So yeah. The phrase was never intended to paint all man as being toxic. Anyone, even women, who use the phrase in that way are actually exhibiting a form of toxic masculinity themselves.

[–]JohnKimble111[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

Being tough can be an great attribute though. Also, men tend to talk about their problems side to side rather than face to face, so instead of demanding mfn become like women we need projects such as men's sheds and similar communities. Fuethermore, even when men do talk, who exactly is actually willing to listen?

[–]What_Is_X 52 points53 points54 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

No, repressing issues isn't healthy at all, it's toxic and should not be supported. There's nothing un-manly about getting therapy or being vulnerable, talking about issues.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being "tough" and "repressing issues" are not the same things. Cinderella [Disney] was tough. She knew her situation was shitty, but she remained strong. She had a few lapses when things got really traumatic, the dress being destroyed. But all in all, she remained tough.

She was not repressing her reality. But she also wasn't balled up in her room crying all day, which is far more unhealthy than how she acted.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (19 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]What_Is_X 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

It's funny because you do understand part of the truth (confidence being attractive) but have the rest of it completely backwards. You couldn't be more wrong. Women do not find your fake facade of silent problem repression attractive, they see it (correctly) as weak because you're afraid of being perceived as such. Truly confident men are not afraid of and do not shy away from acknowledging and discussing problems to solve them. Vulnerability isn't unattractive, it's highly attractive because it shows true inner confidence rather than fake outer confidence. This is explained ad nauseum and well accepted in the modern dating community.

That said, there probably are some ditsy bitches who think vulnerability is weak, and they desperately wish to be consoled by a facade of strength even if it is fake. That's fine; worthy men don't want anything to do with such women. There are plenty of try hard cave men to fill that demand, such as it exists.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]B0Bi0iB0B 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like you lead a sad life. I feel sorry for you.

[–]NibblyPig 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

What part of it is sad exactly? Why do you feel sorry? Or were you being flippant? A non-response like that suggests you have little to add, so why not say something constructive?

[–]111122223138 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What is it with feminists and giving this shit such awful names?

My theory is because they want to say all masculinity is toxic when they're around people who agree with them, but then hide behind "Oh no we don't mean all masculinity" when called out. Like one of those "dog whistles" I hear so much about.

If you didn't want people thinking that you think all masculinity is toxic, you shouldn't have called it "toxic masculinity".

[–]What_Is_X 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does the popular pickup term "false confidence" imply that all confidence is false?

Ding ding.

[–]MostLikelyABot 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A feminist didn't create the term "toxic masculinity." Shepherd Bliss of the mythopoetic men's movement did for the purpose of contrasting it from mature or "deep" masculinity.

[–]lizardclaw11 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Toxic masculinity to me is when someone blocks their emotions and thoughts from being expressed because they might be seen as non masculine, and the act of keeping others down for the same reason. I see it a lot in kids in my high school, where they talk too much about shit like "being alpha".

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Behaviours aren't always toxic though.. Being tough and dealing with your own issues without talking about them is evolutionarily preferable, and many men have the capacity to do that without any backlash

[–]redjedi182 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, the studies on single vs multiple parent homes suggest the benefits come from living in a house with two parents vs one. In other words the make up matters less than the quantity.

[–]azazelcrowley 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you name a positive masculine trait that feminists wouldn't insist is a neutral trait?

The fact is, if it's positive, they actively try to disassociate it with masculinity, if it's negative, they blame it on toxic masculinity, even when that erases female perpetrators.

It also implies toxic male influence is the problem, rather than the truth that it's lack of male influence, which could be laid directly at the door of the feminist movement for its campaigns demonizing male sexuality to the point their interest in childcare and teaching collapsed, and their opposition to presumed joint custody for decades leading to fatherless households.

[–]GreyInkling 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank god this is the top comment.

[–]Cryhavok101 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is what it is supposed to mean, but people commonly use it the wrong way. They also commonly find justifications to claim anything that isn't feminine is toxic masculinity.

If it wasn't used as a buzzword that they consider an adequate counter argument by itself, like calling someone an nazi, or racist, then it would be fine, but is basically in the same boat as things like sexist, racist, nazi, etc.

It's got the same problem "institutional racism" has.

[–]WhalenKaiser 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the problem is partly the pervasiveness of the term, without a "positive masculinity" or "toxic femininity" conversation. If you just link the words toxic and masculinity together over and over it starts to feel like everyone is calling masculinity itself as toxic. I'd like to suggest "compassionate masculinity" as I know some awesome guys that are good at empathy. I think it's completely undervalued to be a dude with a compassionate perspective. Argument: Mr. Rogers

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just visit any college and you’ll see Social Justice morons saying all masculinity is toxic.

[–]Mens-Advocate 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Balderdash. Notwithstanding the double-talk, the proponents of the term do indeed intend to demonise all masculinity and all males.

[–]lackofagoodname 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See and I think most guys would agree that there's some shit we do that needs to change.

The issue is when screeching girls try to take charge of that movement. And its sad because they take an issue people readily agree on, switch the normal language with emotional buzzwords and divide the country

[–]peanutbutterjams 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

But 'being tough' and not talking about issues is something society imposed upon men. They suffered from it. Which means that 'toxic masculinity' comes out sounding like victim-blaming.

From white fragility to male tears to mansplaining to toxic masculinity, I'm constantly seeing re-explanations of what the terms "really mean". Maybe the social justice movement should be a bit more considerate about the language it uses rather than trying to explain after the fact that things don't mean exactly what they sound like.

[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

How often do you see feminists talk about "masculinity" without putting the word "toxic" in front of it?

Almost never.

Feminism believes and says that all masculinity is toxic. It's only when they're challenged on their misandry in front of the general public that they use the same weasel words as you for a figleaf of deniability.

[–]Duderino732 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The big misunderstanding is that that isn’t a subset you can easily change. It’s like trying to change rams from head butting to decide mates.

Also I’m not sure being tough is a toxic masculinity. When you consider the nation that isn’t tough is going to lose any war you realize it’s needed subset of masculinity.

[–]What_Is_X 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I never said anything about it being easily changed, so that's not a misunderstanding at all.

I've been told by a number of apparently masculine tough cunts that women can't assault or abuse or rape men, and had my life threatened as a result of talking about it. I've been assaulted by yet another masculine caveman/animal, and been told to suck it up, that I deserved it and been threatened into submission to not report it by my masculine father. Does any of that "tough masculine" behaviour sound a little bit toxic to you? Because I've had more than enough of it and the next cunt who tries that shit with me will regret it.

[–]LedZeppelin1602 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My issue with toxic masculinity is fourfold

  1. There’s never any talk of positive masculinity so it infers that all masculinity is toxic.

  2. it blames men for men holding back emotions and being ‘tough’ and ignores the evidence of when men do open up and get told to shut up and how society not masculinity expects men to be tough. I’m of the opinion that men would open up more if society had the same level of empathy and concern and support services for men as it does for women.

  3. There’s the problem of how feminists and some women react when men do open up. “Masculinity so fragile” is a phrase used when men express emotions that feminists don’t want to hear as well as drinking mugs with “Male tears”. So basically opening up emotional is only good if it’s the right emotions and doesn’t become inconvenient for women

  4. It’s often misused to apply to anything men do that Feminists don’t like. Outside of he definition

  5. Men express themselves differently than women. So showing emotions to people isn’t necessarily men’s way of dealing with things

[–]Series_of_Accidents 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. The people complaining about toxic masculinity would be the first to argue that children need good, positive images of masculinity in their lives. Not that they need to remove all images of masculinity.

[–]MahouShoujoLumiPnzr 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I'm sure they would be, if it weren't for whatever mysterious magical force prevents them from actually doing so. I sure do wish we could destroy that mystical field that only allows them to comment on men's issues in order to police how men talk about men's issues.

[–]Series_of_Accidents -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I haven't had the same experience. The people I know who are concerned about the issue teach about it, and much of the focus is on different understandings of what it means to be masculine. Only some "masculine" things are considered toxic. I gave a guest lecture in one of those classes and my talk focused on the incels community on Reddit. They are a perfect example of toxic masculinity.

[+]ilikecombos11 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link

A group of sad and frustrated men suffering from poor social skills so hounded by people who hate them that they weren't even allowed to keep their sub? That's who you want to pick on?

[–]Series_of_Accidents 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I didn't pick on them at all. But I did discuss how to best interact with them. Until they were banned, I had held many very positive conversations there. Conversations that often resulted in those same men PMing me with questions like "do women really want to feel connected before having sex?" They are examples of men who have latched onto the ideals of toxic masculinity paired with the frustrations of unsuccessful dating attempts.

[–]Jasontheperson 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They broke reddit rules.

[–]Cheveyo -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

When did you feminists start showing up here?

Couldn't destroy the movement so you infiltrate?

[–]What_Is_X 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What makes you think I'm a feminist? Wishful thinking?

[–]Cheveyo 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bullshit apologetics.

[–]What_Is_X 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for your well reasoned and convincing argument.

[–]PanderjitSingh -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I agree. They are successfully derailing all conversation here. Standard feminist behavior I suppose. Those who cannot create and build work to destroy.

[–]everadvancing 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Derailing conversation or your echo chamber?

[–]RubixCubeDonut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Considering the halfhearted (and sometimes completely missing) responses to MRA points... it's definitely the former. People leaving their own echo chambers with no understanding of their own arguments coming here simply to tell MRAs how it is.

[–]hivoltage815 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s also a term that is supposed to be sympathetic to the boxes society puts men in to be “assertive”, “strong” and “breadwinners” and how that leads to stress to constantly be aggressive and dominant and, on the flip side, leads to suicides and violent outbursts when men feel weak.

I would’ve thought that should be a huge part of what this sub was all about? But from what I’ve seen on most of the content here, what happened is men feel this pressure and instead of diagnosing and talking about this root cause they are lashing out at bogeymen like “feminism” for it instead.

[–]RapeMatters 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's the problem though - toxic masculinity has the same connotation as toxic blackness, which would be an unacceptable term in our society.

No amount of rationalization of "well we're just talking about a toxic subset of black behaviors" would prevent you from being pilloried for making that kind of a link between blackness and toxicity.

It's also why no one ever ever uses the term "toxic femininity". It's viewed as a slur.

Switching from race to gender and making it men does not make it any more acceptable.

[–]steak4take 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you. That tweet isn't anything more than dogwhistling.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FreddyFoFingers 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

While those are arguably examples of dominance which is part of the masculine expectation that toxic masculinity describes, so is being unemotional and extremely self-reliant. It's right on Wikipedia so at least one person has said that (multiple according to the sources and further readings). Here is a more academic source

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15732090/

From the abstract, and I encourage you to read the full article (if it's not free on that link it's on google)

Toxic masculinity involves the need to aggressively compete and dominate others and encompasses the most problematic proclivities in men. These same male proclivities foster resistance to psychotherapy.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FreddyFoFingers 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But clearly the quote and study goes beyond "overbearing abuse" and into the issue of not seeking help.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 43 points44 points45 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It isn't accepted here. This thread has been brigaded. The votes are screwy and the top comments aren't from people who normally post here.

[+]PessimistIdealist1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

why is it being brigaded? did it end up on /r/all?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It appears so.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–]Pathfinder24 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Agreed 100%. Thinking that all negative traits are intrinsically male is wrong and sexist. Period.

[–]cereal_killer1337 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Thinking that all negative traits are intrinsically male is wrong

I don't think it's about men being intrinsically bad. It's about societal pressure trapping people in rolls they would otherwise avoid.

For instance society expects women to be good at raising children. There is nothing wrong with being a stay at home mom. But if a woman feels like a horrible person or bad mom for not wanting to give up her career, that would be toxic femininity.

It's not about women being toxic or stay at home moms being toxic. It's more about people being able to live their lives without being made to feel like shit.

Or without having to put yourself in danger to live up to someone else's idea of being a man.

Well that's the way i see it anyway.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–]cereal_killer1337 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't say i understand where you're coming from. You dislike a term because it could be misunderstood to mean all masculinity is bad.

Do you think the term radical Islam is equally repugnant? Nether Islam or masculinity are inherently bad, but they can be harmful.

I think masculinity has a lot of great things associated with it. Being honorable, brave, strong, stoicism. It having harmful parts doesn't make being a man any less awesome.

Also the "toxic blackness” doesn't make much sense. blackness only refers to the amount of melanin a person has in their skin. Masculinity refers to qualities traditionally associated with men in society.

[–]theothermod[M] [score hidden] 8 years ago stickied comment (6 children) | Copy Link

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing.

This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society.

We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men.

These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a documentary made by a feminist who investigated our movement. If you want to know more about the issues we are concerned with, try these books: The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers or The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrell.

Thank you for being open minded.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm curious where the brigaders are coming from. The votes are crazy on this thread.

[–]theothermod 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The thread has probably hit r/all, but even so the voting pattern is unusual.

That's all I can say, since mods have only the same access to voting information as any other user.

[–]PanderjitSingh 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Great comment. Hopefully this means the open feminist derailing of conversation here will stop. There can be no progress on men’s rights so long as we accept feminist hate terms and ideology in general.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I understand there are a lot of posts trying to rationalize the use of toxic masculinity to refer to something. So I need to make it clear that isn’t is an unacceptable term.

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Something you'd never see in a feminist forum.

[–][deleted] 63 points64 points65 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

There are toxic people. Period. Some of them are male, some are female. Period.

Cut them off from your life. Period.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes, and no reason to associate toxicness with masculinity. The use of that word toxic masculinity is unacceptable.

[–]Mr-Zero-Fucks 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment is criminally underrated

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It makes sense if you hate men and want to express your bigotry in a way that allows you to deny it later.

[–]Chris153 123 points124 points125 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is a gross oversimplification of larger issues. It's not as though these boys need more or less masculinity in their lives. It's that they may be getting it from other subpar sources.

Society, at present, communicates the idea that children should grow up to be more like the adults of their own gender than the adults of the opposite gender. You could say this is a good thing, or that it's bad. Either way, a male child in a single mother household is going to look to other role models for notions of what a 'man' is. Single mothers may be more likely to expose their boys to subpar masculine models (dude on the street corner, irresponsible celebrities, etc.). Or, there may be a representation bias whereby aggressive and criminal men are the ones we know came from single-mother homes whereas we never hear about the success stories.

It's not a matter of degree of masculinity (more or less, positive thing or negative), it's a matter of what that masculinity means in context. Does it mean aggression and criminality? Or does it mean moral fortitude and responsibility. Y'all remember that karate mentorship video? I loved seeing that redefinition of masculinity to include crying.

[–]HTPCandme 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And who deems the masculinity sources, "subpar"? The narrative anymore is that men are simply defective girls.

[–]TherapyFortheRapy 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The mods should just start banning the brigaders.

But they don't do that, because the mods here are feminist shills.

[–]HTPCandme 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Eh, I disagree. Under various accounts, I've been on reddit for a long time and I can't remember a single instance of a subreddit being ruined by "brigading". The closest thing I can remember is atheists flooding into r / christianity in large enough numbers to wreak some havok. But that doesn't even compare to the damage I've seen caused by the mods of certain subreddits that have crushed the whole idea of an open forum and fashioned them into Communist-esque totalitarian echo chambers.

I appreciate the mods here.

Echochambers are bad and we don't need that here. Use the downvote button and the comment boxes.

[–]Meyright 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If we would start banning people for differing opinions, we would end up like the feminism sub.

The mods here are as far from feminist shills as it gets.

[–]Duderino732 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Reddit is the worse place to discuss this. Full of liberal nu-males who see “toxic masculinity” as a good narrative to challenge their stronger counterparts.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (42 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Pathfinder24 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Naming negative traits after men isn't acceptable.

[–][deleted] 59 points60 points61 points 8 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–]peanutbutterjams 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. How you talk about something is as important as what you talk about. I learned that as a liberal, so it's confusing and frustrating when it's applied consistently.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I understand the term refers to a legitimate problem that I actually want fixed. However, that term itself is unacceptable, just as unacceptable as “toxic blackness”

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

You don’t understand what gender is. Gender is not a choice and neither is masculinity and femininity which is also a social construct.

Gender is also determined by societal pressures, yet it is still not by choice.

And I disagree with you entirely. The use of “toxic blackness” would be unacceptable.

And you are also wrong about race. Race also is a social construct. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15641918/

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

[–]TheNorfolk 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Both examples are ungendered and so is toxic masculinity at its core. Women face the same thing but on an even more extreme level, ie you HAVE to wear makeup. Both stem from insecurity and societal pressures. Its toxic adherence to being manly or womanly.

Toxic masculinity should be addressed at society for forcing bs rules on men, instead its used to belittle those who conform to those societal pressures. Its hard not to see the whole concept as an attack on men.

[–]JaggerA 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But you're agreeing that men (and women) being pressured into certain societal pressures and stereotypes is a bad thing right? Personally, I've only ever seen the term used in an attack against those who attack others for not fitting into the stereotypes we're talking about.

[–]TheNorfolk 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's weird because I've only ever seen it used to criticise those who don't push back against those who say its not okay to cry, etc.

[–]JaggerA 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then that sounds like some serious bullshit, for sure (not what you're saying but what you're describing)

[–]EricAllonde 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"Toxic masculinity makes it sound like there is some other kind", writes feminist journalist & academic, in a rare moment of honesty.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That sounds like narcissism. Why label it masculine?

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Meyright 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, you got it backwards. Men don't cry because nobody gives a shit about a weak, crying man. There are no woman that find a crying weak man more attractive. There is no society that cares about weak men. The world is only interested in strong, tough, responsible men.

If you teach men to be weak, you will set them up for failure in life. But start teaching women to sleep with weak men, and you will see how quickly men's behavior will change. And if that proposition sounds "misogynist" to you, you know how many men feel if you tell them how toxic their masculinity is.

[+]A_confusedlover -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't think anyone expects that anymore?

[–]TheConman888 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Idk why you got down voted, but people definitely do. I lived with my grandparents for a few weeks in the summers. Do you think I ever got to complain about anything, let alone cry? I would get instantly made fun of or made feel like my problems or emotions were nothing, ignored. My parents were slightly better about it.

[–]A_confusedlover 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can only talk about my experiences, everyone I've met has always been incredibly supportive, I've personally never seen anyone shamed for crying. If any parents do that then it's just bad parenting.

[–]PanderjitSingh 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Society never did expect men to be unemotional but rather to persevere despite their emotions (as required) while children and women collapsed sobbing to their knees. Thankfully we have somewhat higher expectations of women now.

Similarly, great emotional expression was thought to be the exclusive domain of men. Hence all great art being created by men. Again we are more enlightened now and realize women can do likewise.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Pathfinder24 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was thinking the exact opposite. All the comments are defending the philosophy of toxic masculinity. Seems more feminist than ever.

[–]HugeMongo 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/ MensLib/wiki/meta/profeminist

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Menslib is a sub for male feminists to apologize for being men and learn how to be better servants for women.

[–]FuckedByCrap 180 points181 points182 points 8 years ago (57 children) | Copy Link

No one is saying that masculinity is toxic. There is a distinct subset of uneducated males who are toxic and push their version of masculinity as a way to dominate others, because they lack the skills to behave in productive ways. Comments like these, that are latched onto by the Red Pill Club, do nothing to advance anything.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Is it okay for people to use toxic blackness just like toxic masculinity?

[–]cereal_killer1337 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They do. They just call it "problems in the black community" instead. If you want to popularize toxic blackness that's up to you.

[–]Meyright 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, because in every other aspect that affect women, feminists know how important the right language is. They complain about words like, chairman, fireman or humankind. Only when it comes to men, they suddenly don't care anymore about how inclusive and careful language to describe men.

You have to think about how feminists think language creates and influences reality and how they use terms like mansplaining, -spreading, toxic masculinity, patriarchy, feminism etc. It's deliberateness.

[–]FuckedByCrap 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's so funny?

[–]azazelcrowley 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you name a positive masculine trait that feminists wouldn't insist is a neutral trait?

The fact is, if it's positive, they actively try to disassociate it with masculinity, if it's negative, they blame it on toxic masculinity, even when that erases female perpetrators.

It also implies toxic male influence is the problem, rather than the truth that it's lack of male influence, which could be laid directly at the door of the feminist movement for its campaigns demonizing male sexuality to the point their interest in childcare and teaching collapsed, and their opposition to presumed joint custody for decades leading to fatherless households.

[–]charisma6 107 points108 points109 points 8 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

There are definitely people saying that all masculinity is toxic.

[–]FuckedByCrap 43 points44 points45 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

And they are very, very wrong.

[–]MahouShoujoLumiPnzr 67 points68 points69 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah well go tell them that, not us.

[–]Halafax 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Those people scare them, people here don’t. So they come here and talk down to us, knowing perfectly well they aren’t being honest.

[–]DarthCerebroX 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep, but then they still throw their support behind those “other people” whenever out in public because they are afraid of being shamed/ostracized if they don’t.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they suffer from toxic feminism.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]_Mellex_ 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know damn well why lol

[–]voksul 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

When he says no one, he means no one meaningful. He means that ninety nine percent of the people talking about toxic masculinity aren't calling all masculinity toxic.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But aren't they? I've seen a number of threads by such people where someone will ask about any kind of good masculinity and they'll get no response or hostility.

If someone referred to "toxic Jew culture" and couldn't think of anything good Jews did and the definition just kept expanding to pretty much anything a Jewish person does is it possible they just don't like Jews?

[–]EricAllonde 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Toxic masculinity makes it sound like there is some other kind", writes feminist journalist & academic, in a rare moment of honesty.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And why are they wrong, why do they assume that toxic masculinity means masculinity itself if toxic? Because the usage of that word implies so. It is an unacceptable term.

[–]Pathfinder24 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you arguing against yourself? Fuck off

[–]TherapyFortheRapy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And you use the same language and terms they do, so I'm lumping them in with you.

Talk like a Nazi, get treated like a Nazi. Coming in here and brigading like you all do doesn't exactly prove that you're decent people.

[–]PanderjitSingh 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Bullying violent behavior has always been condemned. We do not need a feminist hate term to describe or address it. You specifically don’t need it and in using it further the cause of those who hate you.

[–]iRepth -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

has always been condemned

Except for the fact that it's almost universally not condemned

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No one is saying that masculinity is toxic.

You've never met a feminist?

When "toxic masculinity" can encompass pretty much anything and they stare at it blankly if you ask about good masculinity it's pretty obvious what they mean.

[–]Heartless07 -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You've obviously met a youtube grade feminists. If you close up your view of the world, youll always be the same.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No it's pretty much all feminists.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–]Whanny 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Except that it is an excepted term in University and it covers make attributes as being bad. Male traits can be amazing directed in the right way.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've yet to see a feminist extol these amazing male traits.

Go post about how amazing men can be by adhering to good masculinity in a place like menslib. After you get banned for exceptionalism report back.

[–]_Mellex_ 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This gonna be good.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think it will be unfortunately. People like /u/Whanny here know that using toxic femininity would never fly and that it's explicitly intended to tear down men.

So he definitely won't attempt what I asked.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Male traits can be amazing directed in the right way.

That’s true. But the term “toxic masculinity” isn’t referring to directing male traits in the right way. It refers to a specific way of interpreting masculinity that hurts men. For instance, men are more likely to commit suicide, partially because they choose more direct methods than women, but primarily because a lot of men view it as “weak” to confide in other men. Many men aren’t comfortable expressing negative emotions other than anger, so they bottle their sadness up and let it eat them from within.

And traditional masculinity is very much a double edged sword:

  • Assertiveness (a traditionally masculine trait) in the workplace has the ability to push your career forward, but trying to be dominant in the workplace can push people away.

  • Knowing when to be strong and how to hold yourself together during difficult times is important, but refusing to ever share your pain with another person hinders relationships.

  • Being protective of your partner and wanting the best for them is essential to a healthy relationship, but being jealous and controlling can potentially cross the line into abuse.

  • Knowing how to defend yourself is useful, and standing up for yourself is important, but reacting to every dispute with anger and aggressiveness is unnecessary.

  • Preparing your children to deal with a world that isn’t always kind will serve them well in the long run, but telling your son to “toughen up” when he’s in genuine pain (emotional or physical) only perpetuates a toxic cycle.

  • Boys wanting to run and chase each other on the playground is fine, but making fun of a boy who would rather sit and read or would rather play with the girls can quickly turn into bullying.

Being male and embracing stereotypically male traits is fine. The concept of “toxic masculinity” isn’t referring to those traits. Toxic masculinity refers to taking typically male traits to extremes and applying them in ways that hurt yourself or other people. Toxic masculinity refers to degrading other men when they don’t conform to specific masculine ideals. I understand that the name can be off-putting, but the word “toxic” is not being used as an adjective for masculinity in general, but to specify a set of harmful behaviors which fall under the larger umbrella of traditional masculinity.

[–]Halafax 23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Toxic masculity is an intentionally provocative term. It’s meant to be misused to propagate it’s use by the angry fringe.

Feminism doesn’t like to talk about toxic femininity, and it doesn’t like to talk about how women encourage most of the traits they deem toxic. It’s just a excuse to blame everything on someone else, something feminists do constantly.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I literally talked about it in this same thread. Toxic femininity isn’t usually referred to by the same name, but the same kinds of behavior from women (punishing other women for not adhering to gender roles, forcing harmful gender roles on children) is something that feminists have been pushing against for decades.

[–]pasta4u 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men commit more suicide because women receive at least 10 times more funding to prevent suicide than men here in the states. Women also have access to domestic violence shelters and a slew of other government programs designed to help them. Men are an after thought in this world. Work more hours , drive further , do more dangerous jobs and constantly get told your the root of all evil by women and it will wear anyone down

[–]Stephen1985 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So we use toxic masculinity to describe things that men do that harm other men? Sounds a bit like we are blaming men for their own problems but ok I'll go with it. What's the female equivalent of this?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Bitchiness, cattiness, and cliques. Girl on girl bullying has been a recognized issue for years, we just don’t refer to it in the same terminology. It’s also worth pointing out that it’s less of an issue now than in the past, because the definition of what it means to be a “real woman” has broadened significantly. But in the past, it was common for girls to also be raised with a very specific notion of how women were expected to behave, speak, and dress. Girls were guided towards specific careers, or away from the workforce entirely. There are still vestiges of that attitude, obviously, primarily in conservative areas/families, but feminism getting into the mainstream has helped quite a bit.

However, societal notions of what it means to be feminine have changed a lot. For instance, it’s less common for parents to be outraged that their daughter wants to be a firefighter than for parents to be upset about their sons wanting to be a ballerina. Girls get to wear pants now (as recently as the 50’s, my grandmother had to wear skirts to school), but a boy in a dress would likely be out of dress code. A girl trying out for her school’s football team and making the cut would be applauded, but the one male cheerleader at school gets called gay. We haven’t yet successfully expanded the definition of a “real man” the same way. Hopefully men’s rights movements will make some progress on that front in the coming years at reducing that stigma.

And that’s where I have to disagree with your first sentence a bit. Toxic masculinity isn’t just men hurting men in a general sense. The motivation is what matters. A man mugging you on the street would probably not be an example of toxic masculinity. A man shoving you into a locker for wearing nail polish probably would be. It specifically refers to behaviors that stem from a limited view of what it means to be a man, and forcing those views on others in a harmful way.

[–]Stephen1985 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can agree with most of what you say but would you say that women who are old fashioned are exhibiting toxic femininity?

Or women who criticise other women for not upholding feminist values? Would that be an example if toxic femininity?

I feel that toxic masculinity describes asshole behaviour not male behaviour.

[–]MahouShoujoLumiPnzr 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Today? "Harmful gender roles." Which are sourced from the Patriarchy, naturally. You used to see the term "internalized misogyny" a lot but it seems to have vanished for some mysterious reason. I bet it has nothing to do with the accusatory phrasing or anything.

[–]Liams_Nissan -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very good explanation

[–]FuckedByCrap 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. For example, George Michael was very masculine, but toxic males reject him because he was gay. Prince, very masculine, but rejected by toxic males for being too "feminine." I guess I'm in the minority for understanding the difference.

[–]peanutbutterjams 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Toxic Masculinity

 

No one is saying that masculinity is toxic.

[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why don't you now tell us all about "toxic blackness", which is definitely not a claim that all black people are toxic, but rather just refers to the toxic behaviours which some black people engage in.

If you really believe the nonsense you just spouted about "toxic masculinity", then put your money where your mouth is. Go post in a public place, under your real name, about "toxic blackness". Your Facebook timeline will do nicely - go post there and share the link here so we can see that you said it.

I bet you won't do it, coward. Because you're lying about "toxic masculinity" and you know it. You just enjoy indulging in the last remaining socially acceptable type of bigotry: misandry.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–][deleted] 71 points72 points73 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Did this hit all or something? So many people getting lots of upvotes defending this absurd term.

Toxic masculinity is ridiculous. Nevermind that the same feminists who say things like that also say things like "masculinity so fragile" when men do try to talk about anything.

It's just a way to attack men. It's not a legitimate term. Nor is toxic femininity. I'd prefer to refer to any toxic behavior... as toxic behavior. Rather than be a sexist idiot. But I guess if people want to be sexist, that's their business.

[–]Babill 41 points42 points43 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This thread reeks of brigading and vote manipulation. All top responses are defending this bullshit sexist term, and people arguing against it are getting down voted.

[–]lethrowaway4me 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, the fact i had to scroll two-thirds the way down to find anyone not parroting the exact same defense shows massive brigading and derailment.

[–]LittleGoblin 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yea the term toxic masculinity has turned into a man hating movement. Instead of just pointing out bad behaviors being used as masculine traits like, “suck it up and be a man; don’t cry” or to put women down, or to not be a loving/affectionate person. It’s just bad behaviors in general and shouldn’t be seen as anything masculine. On the contrary. The examples I’ve said are not “manly” at all. They are misguided and cowedly behaviors and are not behaviors ANYONE, including men, should be using as a basis for their character.

Great men are loving, supporting, proactive leaders; and, so are great people.

[–]TheNorfolk 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Toxic masculinity as a term is used to belittle men who are bullied into conforming to bullshit masculinity stereotypes by society. If it wasnt an attack on men then it would be calling out society, not men trying to conform to it.

[–]TherapyFortheRapy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The mods here refuse to ever do anything about the brigaders, under the idea that 'better arguments' will somehow be able to overcome brigades of thousands of users.

In reality, I suspect that some of the mods are just flat-out feminist, and refuse to actually do anything about their own coming here and brigading. Every. Single. Day.

[+]MrButtholePoopy1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

what you resist, will persist, instead of fighting the use of the term, try redefining it.

thats the only way to win this fight my brother.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Vast majority of the human population don't buy into feminism ideology deep enough to attach themselves to "toxic masculinity" as a concept. So no thanks.

[–]himynameis2442 67 points68 points69 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm seeing a lot of women in this thread telling me what it's like being a man but if I dared to try and tell them what it's like being a woman of be called a misogynist faster than light can travel...just observing something. Also ladies you may hate it but men and women are different. I'm not broken or toxic because I deal with my shit differently than you do. Toxic masculinity is a derogitary term. How would you like it if we called over emotional acting women toxic feminity? How would you like it if you reacted in a way that wasn't deemed manly enough that we called you toxic just for displaying your emotions the way you want to display them? Stop using that term. It's sexist and demeaning and does nothing literally nothing to help anyone

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 44 points45 points46 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. And if MRAs dismissed every problem women had with "toxic femininity, stop being such terrible people and it'll go away" we'd be called misogynists.

[–]WORD_559 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. I don't deal with my problems myself because I'm male, I do it because I'm introverted and prefer dealing that way. If I feel a problem warrants it, I'll share it, but I normally prefer dealing with it myself.

[–]peanutbutterjams 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But your feelings are wrong. It's a scientific term so it can't be wrong. Which means your feelings are wrong.

[–]theothermod 36 points37 points38 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The choice of words implies that masculinity is toxic.

Feminists know what they're doing. They object to terms like "fireman" and "chairman", since they imply that these are typically male positions.

"Toxic masculinity" implies that masculinity is toxic. Like "mansplaining", its existence is a deliberate sexist attack on men.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine, someone uses the word “toxic blackness” to describe-issues in the black community. Even if it is an academic term and refers to legitimate issues, the term itself is unacceptable because it carries a negative implicit connotation on blackness. It is a disgusting term that would infuriate me if ever used. I feel the same way about toxic masculinity. Masculinity and gender is not by choice..even if toxic masculinity refers to legitimate problems, it is an unacceptable usage of the word.

[–]JustWanderful 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow! So many effeminate responses in here, arguing against the posted statement. Sheesh.

[–]Blutarg 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, great point!

[–]Rethgil 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For all the denials about the Left being worse than the Right when it comes to men's rights, this is an example of how that's a dead argument.

There's similar UK Right wingers openly saying the same as the posted link

But you would NEVER, NEVER get a Left wing politico daring to do this. Most of them believe men are toxic.

Now don't get me wrong. I'm Left wing. But I'm sick of what there become and their joining in and enabling the feminist anti male doctrine. Its time we were honest with ourselves about where the real problems are so we can challenge and change them, and let them know we will not put up with it anymore.

[–]II3D 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Get out of here with those statistics. We all know statistics are misogynistic and racist.

[–]ChiefBobKelso 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Lost of people here saying that feminists don't actually say that masculinity is toxic. Given how the base assertion of feminism comes down to men set the system up for men at the expense of women, I don't know how they could believe anything other than men are inherently selfish and bad, and thus that masculinity is inherently toxic.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

This isn't entirely true. I'm male and a feminist

You know they hate you right?

I believe men and women should have equal rights.

That conflicts with your feminism.

A woman beats her husband. Who should go to jail?

According to feminism the man.

Equality would see her arrested.

Pick one.

You seem to be referring the militant, SJW-brand of "feminism" where every problem is blamed on a bias towards men and the solution is to reverse the bias and make women have more rights than men. That's just misandry, not feminism.

It's also feminism.

Tell me, how many complaints have you heard from feminists where women are ahead?

[–]ChiefBobKelso 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well you're always going to have some exceptions. What problems would you say that women have today, and why do you think they have those problems? You're saying it has nothing to do with men setting the system up for men at the expense of women?

[–]Meyright 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The following is a very informed and highly reusable comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists:

So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists".

That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self deception.

Listen, if you want to call yourself a feminist, I don't care. I've been investigating feminism for more than 9 years now, and people like you used to piss me off, because to my mind all you were doing was providing cover and ballast for the powerful political and academic feminists you claim are just jerks. And believe me, they ARE jerks. If you knew half of what I know about the things they've done under the banner of feminism, maybe you'd stop calling yourself one.

But I want you to know. You don't matter. You're not the director of the Feminist Majority Foundation and editor of Ms. Magazine, Katherine Spillar, who said of domestic violence: "Well, that's just a clean-up word for wife-beating," and went on to add that regarding male victims of dating violence, "we know it's not girls beating up boys, it's boys beating up girls."

You're not Jan Reimer, former mayor of Edmonton and long-time head of Alberta's Network of Women's Shelters, who just a few years ago refused to appear on a TV program discussing male victims of domestic violence, because for her to even show up and discuss it would lend legitimacy to the idea that they exist.

You're not Mary P Koss, who describes male victims of female rapists in her academic papers as being not rape victims because they were "ambivalent about their sexual desires" (if you don't know what that means, it's that they actually wanted it), and then went on to define them out of the definition of rape in the CDC's research because it's inappropriate to consider what happened to them rape.

You're not the National Organization for Women, and its associated legal foundations, who lobbied to replace the gender neutral federal Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984 with the obscenely gendered Violence Against Women Act of 1994. The passing of that law cut male victims out of support services and legal assistance in more than 60 passages, just because they were male.

You're not the Florida chapter of the NOW, who successfully lobbied to have Governor Rick Scott veto not one, but two alimony reform bills in the last ten years, bills that had passed both houses with overwhelming bipartisan support, and were supported by more than 70% of the electorate.

You're not the feminist group in Maryland who convinced every female member of the House on both sides of the aisle to walk off the floor when a shared parenting bill came up for a vote, meaning the quorum could not be met and the bill died then and there.

You're not the feminists in Canada agitating to remove sexual assault from the normal criminal courts, into quasi-criminal courts of equity where the burden of proof would be lowered, the defendant could be compelled to testify, discovery would go both ways, and defendants would not be entitled to a public defender.

You're not Professor Elizabeth Sheehy, who wrote a book advocating that women not only have the right to murder their husbands without fear of prosecution if they make a claim of abuse, but that they have the moral responsibility to murder their husbands.

You're not the feminist legal scholars and advocates who successfully changed rape laws such that a woman's history of making multiple false allegations of rape can be excluded from evidence at trial because it's "part of her sexual history."

You're not the feminists who splattered the media with the false claim that putting your penis in a passed-out woman's mouth is "not a crime" in Oklahoma, because the prosecutor was incompetent and charged the defendant under an inappropriate statute (forcible sodomy) and the higher court refused to expand the definition of that statute beyond its intended scope when there was already a perfectly good one (sexual battery) already there. You're not the idiot feminists lying to the public and potentially putting women in Oklahoma at risk by telling potential offenders there's a "legal" way to rape them.

And you're none of the hundreds or thousands of feminist scholars, writers, thinkers, researchers, teachers and philosophers who constructed and propagate the body of bunkum theories upon which all of these atrocities are based.

You're the true feminist. Some random person on the internet.

[–]PanderjitSingh 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You misunderstand feminism. Which isn’t surprising at all since they work to ensure you do. Feminism is not about equal rights. Academic feminism is what drives governmental and corporate policy and numerous of its core tenets are indeed the product of simple-minded hate-based bias. This feminism is what changes the world and so it is the feminism that matters. People can claim the label ‘feminist’ and reject the bigotry of effective feminism but that’s like embracing fascism because you like trains to run on time.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It shouldn't be called feminism if it's about equal rights, bruh. That name implies it pushes an agenda for women ONLY, where equalitarianism implies each should be equal, which they should. Women and men get shit on in different ways in different circumstances, and in no way will having two separate movements (feminism or men's rights) create a world of equality because y'all gonna be too busy arguing over whether or not toxic masculinity is a thing (which it isn't). It boils down to groups being so insecure with themselves that they push the blame onto the opposite sex, where it's a systemic failure somewhere in society that's creating a preferential bias to one sex or another in certain situations.

I'll probably get downvoted for using logic instead of REEEEing, but that just means I'm even more vindicated in my assertions.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was going to upvote you until your last line, which was pathetic. You should know that on reddit, people always downvote people complaining about downvotes.

[–]konjo1 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or maybe its the fact that these boys dont have fathers that show them that men aren't brutish animals that solve everything with violence.

So they learn their behavior from less than savory sources.

[–]happy_love_ 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My mom never let my dad see me, apparently lied to me about him my whole life. I grew up really fucked up.

[–]Dhorso 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Any contact with him today?

[–]happy_love_ 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I wish, my mom still won't help me or give me any information

[–]Dhorso 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry. Any legal way you can find information? Legal documents, white pages, depending on country it might even be on your birth certificate. Stay strong happy_love!

[–]Taxus_Calyx 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

What’s up with all the feminist apologists reaching the top comments on this post? Are we actually going to pretend that mainstream modern society isn’t trying to force feed us a narrative of ALL MASCULINITY being inherently toxic? In r/MensRights of all places? Must be because the title is “Toxic Masculinity” so it’s attracting a bunch of feminists sympathizers.

[–]MahouShoujoLumiPnzr 27 points28 points29 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I guess if you haven't been around long you wouldn't have heard, but brigading is the open secret of Reddit, particularly if the subreddit getting brigaded stands in opposition to any social justice ideology. The voting trends are blatant, but the admins don't like subs like these, so they don't do anything about it. It's been going on for years and it's just been accepted as the way things are now.

[–]BossMan4714 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This thread hit /r/all. Expect more people from out of the sub to show up.

[–]Taxus_Calyx 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s like a bunch of racists showing up at r/blackpeopletwitter to defend their positions on “the problem with blacks” by saying “Oh no, you’re misunderstanding the term. We aren’t saying all blacks are a problem, just that some people are a problem and some of them are black.”

[–]PanderjitSingh 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I know nothing about it but it seems it ought to be a simple matter to remove comments & commenters using feminist hate speech unironiclly. Surely that has to be a part of any discussion that hopes to progress in an otherwise universally toxic environment.

[–]TherapyFortheRapy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The mods could start banning the brigaders and the dishonest liars but they won't do that, because they're feminists.

[–]Auctoritate 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, this is dumb, dude. Masculinity isn't bad, having a father is good. It's that shitty culture can form that expects men to be emotionless and bottle feelings up, and other negative things, and it's super shitty.

[–]gmanperson 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

This is wrong in so many ways. Being a father is isn't just being masculine, and acting as if that were the case degrades fathers themselves.

[–]LittleGoblin 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

Fathers are the family leader and it really is an important role for our children. Sure it’s not just about being a MAN and being a model of how to be MANLY. But having a strong father figure with positive leadership skills is what kids really need.

[–]gmanperson -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I am saying that a father figure isn't there to be MANLY. Positive leadership skills are certainly a must, but so is empathy and being able to solve problems without resorting to raised voices or anything physical.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

manly doesnt mean raised voices or resorting to physical violence

Not sure what youre trying to imply here

[–]cum_penibus 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

so is empathy and being able to solve problems without resorting to raised voices or anything physical.

That's pretty much the definition of "gentleman" and that has been the masculine archetype since at least Victorian times.

This idea that society teaches boys to solve their problems with violence etc. I.e. "toxic masculinity" - is the unsophisticated or willful misinterpretation of what men have been teaching each other for centuries, by a group of people who either aren't male or aren't masculine.

[–]Sks44 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Media logic:

“Video games cause violence”

Reality: Since mid-80s when Nintendo hit, violent crime in the US has gone down.

“Toxic Masculinity is a problem!”

Reality: lack of male role models has been proven to be a negative for female and male children.

“Sexism and improper behavior are rampant in (insert industry here)”

Reality: The media was rampant with such behavior and was silent about it. They were also silent about NY and LA entertainment industry behavior. They then claimed they knew nothing about it.

[–]Fire_God_Vargas 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just hate when literally every problem in society is blamed on men. Of course there are some bad elements, but overall we're keeping society together.

I think it's a lack of masculinity that's driving us downward. Telling men they they are the problem isn't gonna help your cause when you are looking for allies.

[–]Sandman019 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Growing up with your dad has nothing to do with this at all.
Growing up without your dad messes you up because your father, a person who is supposed to love you unconditionally left you, making you feel like something is wrong about you.

[–]PanderjitSingh 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Most family break-ups are female caused and bigoted feminist family courts then force men out of families.

[–]Sandman019 -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Source?

[–]TherapyFortheRapy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's a very minority perspective that man-haters like you love to show down other people's throats.

[–]Sandman019 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where did I even slightly imply That I'm a man hater?
But stilly point is a bit flawed, losing any of your parents can do that to you and every case is unique

[–]bulkheads 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There seems to be some confusion between what toxic masculinity is and what being a positive male influence is.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Masculine is not toxic.

[–]JohnKimble111[S] 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago* (41 children) | Copy Link

There's an amazing disconnect in SJW/feminist theories. On one hand we hear that single mothers are amazing and such a family structure is just as valid and great for kids as any other and fathers are all violent monsters of little or no use whatsoever.

The same types of groups arguing he above then also tell people to check their privilege, one such privilege being having been brought up in a stable home by both your biological parents.

It's hilarious that they don't realise how these statements are so at odds with each other.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago* (19 children) | Copy Link

I genuinely believe that you are just misinformed, if you are secure in you're beliefs then you should have no problem seriously considering my argument below.

On one hand we hear that single mothers are amazing

Yes, being positive towards single parents is a good thing. They are inherently disadvantaged compared to two parents families and were historically seen as invalid, they need support.

and such a family structure is just as valid and great for kids as any other

Yes they are valid, no they are not great, they can be, but they're generally not. A single parent family is generally financially disadvantaged and there are less people to help out. This is a systemic issue and therefore not inherently an issue for single parents. To explain this; the method of wealth and labour distribution are two examples of factors dependent on a system, in our system families with less people can provide less labour and produce less wealth. To provide two examples of systemic changes that can alleviate the previously mentioned disadvantages, child benefits and cultures in which extended family help with child care.

and fathers are all violent monsters of little or no use whatsoever.

You're going to have to provide evidence for this claim, I do not believe the people you are describing believe this.

The same types of groups arguing he above then also tell people to check their privilege, one such privilege being having been brought up in a stable home by both your biological parents.

It's hilarious that they don't realise how these statements are so at odds with each other.

You just misunderstand the people you are describing, the fact that something is valid does not imply systematic equality. So to restate, single parents are disadvantaged, this is a systemic issue not related to the validity of the family structure.

[–]Korinthe 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Hi, male (mature, 30 years old) student on an Early Childhood Studies degree here. I'm the only bloke on the entire degree, looking to enter a sector represented by 99% women.

Every day I am reading literature which either; completely ignores that some parents are men, uses feminine gendered terms in isolation (motherhood, not parenthood f.ex), states that fathers involvement has minimal outcomes, etc etc.

The situation is absolutely dire.

[–]Halafax 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Hey, thank you for trying. We need a few (10 to the power of many) more folk like you.

When my daughter needed help, the school bent over backwards. When my son did, all the doors closed. When I went to therapy to recover from an abusive marriage, they couldn’t find any literature that talked about a female abuser or how a man should recover. The bias goes all the way through, and the people enforcing the bias won’t budge.

[–]Korinthe 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's because (typically) female personality traits, and learning styles, are the default position in schools. They are more conducive to that environment, and its simply getting worse as class sizes continue to grow; pushing even more emphasis on conformity due to educators being stretched so thin inside the classroom.

As I've said, I am a mature student. The reason I decided to return to studying at 30 is because for over a decade prior to this, I worked in primary schools. I've experienced this first hand, not just read about it.

It's even worse in reality; the amount of times I have had to advocate for boys both in the classroom and in the staff room against other colleagues is frankly upsetting.

Boys as young as 6 have already internalised their inferiority to girls based upon an environment which deems them toxic.

We are raising half the population to believe they were born wrong, and I won't stand for it any longer. Hence, I will be trying my best to make a change; once I have this piece of paper which society mandates as a requirement for my opinion to be valid and that I have gone through the process.

[–]Skidlybap 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Super interesting. It's interesting to hear from a guy who is on the receiving end of feeling slighted by a gendered term. I see people get up in arms about women wanting some terms gender neutralized, but this is the first time I've seen it from this side. It's a thing! Also, congrats on pioneering males into there! High five from a male nurse!

[–]Korinthe 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh it most certainly is a thing; you identifying yourself as a male nurse, because the default understanding is nurses are female, as a show of differentiation is quite telling of that fact, too.

We absolutely need more men in caring professions!

[–]armaadi 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's not a systemic issue, it's a choice. If you are single and choose to have kids, you can't claim a disadvantage. This is like saying people who quit jobs voluntarily are systemically disadvantaged.

Sure, single moms should be treated with dignity, but then again, everyone should be treated with dignity. The fact is that a double parent household is typically a superior environment to raise kids than a single parent household. Don't blame society on women's choice to have kids out of wedlock.

Sure there are single parent homes that do better than double parent homes, of course, but on average, double parent households lead to better financial security, better developed children and more productive adults later on. Oh, and fewer criminal adults.

Singles moms need to work like a mofo to make sure finances are ok, which means they aren't doing a lot of parenting. Kids who don't have parenting, will get it from other places. A lot of times, those other places are people with less than virtuous intents.

[–]TherapyFortheRapy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Statistics say that you're full of shit. And you're literally contradicting yourself saying that single parents are disadvantaged...but that it somehow doesn't relate to the validity of family structure.

[–]Revoran 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Statistics say that you're full of shit.

Post them, then. I'll be waiting.

And you're literally contradicting yourself [by] saying that single parents are disadvantaged... but that it somehow doesn't relate to the validity of family structure.

You may have a point here.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Edit: this was a big wall of useless text. Condensed;

Regardless of if "SJWs" and "feminists" hold this incorrect belief that all men are violent monsters or whatever that does not invalidate the position that single parents are both valid and oppressed since this position does not require the belief that all men are violent monsters.

[–]implosionatic 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

They are not at odds with each other. You are reading into it as opposites. Single moms are amazing because they are able to raise a child evein though they have to work alone and have no other close person to rely on. Having a stable family is extremely important for children for them to feel safe. A stable family doesn't necessarily include a man.

Edit: I should say that single dads are just as amazing as single moms.

[–]armaadi 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That doesn't change the fact that had any of those single parents had a partner, they would have created a better environment to raise kids. A stable family doesn't necessarily include a man, or a woman for that matter, but a stable family is much easier obtain with two parents over one. People who are looking to have kids should be striving for having kids with a partner as the most ideal situation. They should really avoid having kids without a partner, as they are setting themselves and their kids up for a very difficult upbringing.

[–]PanderjitSingh 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Most single mothers chose to be single mothers. Being able to intentionally harm your own children and be celebrated for it is real privilege.

Oh no! I just acknowledged something negative done mostly by women!

[–]chambertlo 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Single mothers are the greatest detriment to a healthy upbringing.

[–]Revoran 50 points51 points52 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's not the single mothers. It's the lack of the father.

Mothers aren't just naturally shitty parents or anything.

[–]charisma6 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mothers are fine. Mothers who think a single mother household is a better environment than one with both a mother and father, are not fine.

[–]TherapyFortheRapy 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

One's just a PC way to say the other.

Mothers, by themselves, are naturally shitty parents. They aren't meant to parent alone, and it shows.

But fuck it, I'll just block you for white-knighting.

[–]Revoran 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

There's nothing wrong with being accurate in our statements and specific in our use of language. If you think that's "PC" then I don't know what to say to you.

But fuck it, I'll just block you for white-knighting.

Lmao. But of course, I'm the one creating a safe space with my PC "language". Right...

Good riddance, snowflake.

[–]Skidlybap 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some mothers are single cuz some really shitty dude walked out on his family. Fuck those "men".

[–]Teakill 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]gorbatsh0ve -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

God, you’re an idiot. How is this shit upvoted?

[–]Korinthe 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I enjoy the content you bring to this sub, I don't post often but check it daily.

A substantial minority of content here is too extreme for my tastes but the stuff you post and comment on is normally much more grounded and well rounded.

Just wanted to say thanks.

[–]LittleGoblin 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And not weak men either. Our children and society need confident, strong, and goal oriented men.

Maybe a controversial topic right now, but the clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson really is an amazing individual to follow on the topic of masculinity. But not just for topics like masculinity and how to be a better man, he also talks about being a healthier PERSON mentally. A lot of what he talks about is a paradigm shift in our thinking/belief system society pushes on men/ourselves in order to build better characters.

Honestly? his YouTube videos and podcast he’s featured on are great to listen to. They are positive, encouraging, and intelligently designed.

Sure there are behaviors that some people put into a category of being “toxic character parading as masculinity” and misunderstandings of what a man should be, but the movement has turned into a man hating witch hunt.

It has turned men into second class citizens. It’s outright wrong and with an outright political agenda basis. Makes me sick. Do NOT let this changing world undermine you as not just a man, but an an individual.

I believe it is also the duty of us women to encourage better men. Stronger men. Loving and supporting, family oriented men.

I take what I have learned from this sub, from JP, and from other places to gauge my everyday interactions with my future husband. I’ve seen his character build JUST by my attitude and encouragement towards him. And, I hope one day we have sons so that I can teach them to be better men as well.

[–]AtheistComic 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm all for the masculine in life for myself but these blanket statements are rooted in fallacy. A child growing up with ONE PARENT fucking suffers. Guys. This is some blue pill shit for dudes and we gotta step back from yanking our dicks about it.

Men can be abusive if they don't follow the Lion's example. THAT is what mens rights means to me, but you can of course have your own free will interpretation if you want... but every step you take back from a good example, promotes a negative stereotype.

[–]ifelsedowhile 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The point is that women have an important role in causing "toxic masculinity" because they reward those behaviors that lead to an excess of competition but feminists have a hard time admitting it because their ideology is designed to relieve women of every responsibility and because it goes against their notion that everything is a social construct while scientific evidence suggests certain traits in men and women are the product of evolution.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ifelsedowhile 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

An excess of competition is toxic, competition in itself can be good.

[–]Yoji_84 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

An excess of competition is toxic

There's no such thing as "an excess of competition", end of story.

I will give you a quick and dirty example - the Natural world is pure competition. "Live or Die" levels of competition. Survival of the fittest.

Competition is the driving force behind evolution, and as such there's no way there can be an excess of it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A trait that would lead to depression and would be toxic would never be evolutionarily preferable

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If boys didn't need men then black boys in the US would doing as well as Asian boys.

[–]Momochichi 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd like to see those studies that say children raised by single moms tend to be more depressed, aggressive and criminal. Did they control for economic status? Because the only studies I've found say these children don't perform any better or worse than those raised by two parents.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Toxic Masculinity:

"Real Men don't" cook, garden, sew, wear makeup...the list is endless..

Last time I checked if I was born with a penis I am a man regardless of what I do.

[–]beetholder -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

This just betrays the fact that she (and probably OP) doesn't know that toxic masculinity is, or just ignores its real meaning.

What's funny is that if you people really cared about men's rights, you would've been all over toxic masculinity as a societal phenomenon. Societal pressure to behave in a specific way, to ignore your feelings until you want to commit suicide because you don't want to open up to anyone (it's not manly, real men don't cry or care), to act against your own interests just because people around you will think that "you're not a real man"? It sounds like exactly the thing MRAs should stand against.

But no, let's stop at the name and ignore the concept itself. It's probably just feminists trying to tell everyone that men are toxic by default, no need to actually look into it.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's funny is that if you people really cared about men's rights, you would've been all over toxic masculinity as a societal phenomenon.

If MLK really cared about black people why didn't he spend all his time calling blackness toxic?

Societal pressure to behave in a specific way, to ignore your feelings until you want to commit suicide because you don't want to open up to anyone (it's not manly, real men don't cry or care), to act against your own interests just because people around you will think that "you're not a real man"? It sounds like exactly the thing MRAs should stand against.

Those are gender roles. Calling masculinity toxic is a very deliberate effort to attack men.

[–]MahouShoujoLumiPnzr 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

But no, let's stop at the name and ignore the concept itself.

The "true definition" is a lie. It is a falsehood constructed with the intention of deflecting blame. Toxic masculinity means whatever the hell it needs to mean at the moment in order to attack masculinity. If you don't want that to be the case, then fucking act like it rather than trying to tell people that everything they've read and heard on the subject just outright didn't happen.

[–]armaadi 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At what point should we stop when it comes to toxic masculinity? At the name that infers masculinity is toxic? At the definition that assumes a set of behaviors are toxic and are then applied to men? At the notion that men, and seemingly only men, police what is and isn't masculinity? As if women hold no hand in defining what masculinity is.....

It's sexist no matter what way you spin it, and it's a shitty word. I'm not going to blame all feminity for women slut shaming each other or women being catty. That's just those people being shitty.

[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Toxic masculinity makes it sound like there is some other kind", writes feminist journalist & academic, in a rare moment of honesty.

[–]OnTheSlope 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Societal pressure to behave in a specific way

that's not toxic masculinity because it isn't masculine. Sacrificing who you honestly are for the sake of societal approval is not masculine.

[–]Clongjax 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Modern Feminism (NOT Classic) is a mental illness.

[–]v650 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Its having a father figure period. I know a woman who raised 5 kids on her own, the dad was a total asshole. All the kids, 4 of them girls, turned out perfectly fine (none of them working the pole!) except for dealing with the dad issues of having a asshole of a dad. They even send her father's day cards because she was both the mom and the dad. It's not about being masculine it is called being a FATHER. Big fucking difference. You want to be masculine man up and be a father, not a sperm donor.

[–]PanderjitSingh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Such a shame she never figured out just how those kids came to be. She might have stopped before five.

[–]v650 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I always wondered that myself. But they are all good kids, so at least there is that.

[–]SniffedMDMAWithUrMum 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly stop fucking trying to suppress masculinity because it boils over. Nothing is worse than angry young men.

[–]sassybanana 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If sugary drinks really hurt kids, then presumably kids without drinks would be better off, but research shows they actually die. Truth is, we need more soda, not less

[–][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your comment was automatically removed because we do not allow links to that subreddit. You may use a screenshot instead.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was under the impression that masculine father figures weren't necessarily what mattered, what made the difference was having two parents in the child's life

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think adding more masculinity is the answer. Just let people be who they wanna be. Live and let live.

[+]recoil6691 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

In the many discussions I've had around toxic masculinity, it's defined as it's own kind of masculinity. If people are saying "Toxic masculinity" as in all masculinity is toxic those people need to jump off a bridge.

I do think there is a lot of merit to the term (There are ways that masculinity presents itself that can be harmful to people), but to imply that all masculinity is Toxic wholly unhelpful and should be immediately refuted.

[–]EricAllonde 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Toxic masculinity makes it sound like there is some other kind", writes feminist journalist & academic, in a rare moment of honesty.

[–]ConfusedPuddle 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We need more healthy masculinity not toxic masculity they are two different things

[–]a_pile_of_shit 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I there are many sides to "toxic masculinity". Some people use it to say all men are bad but at the same time there's the whole thing about how men should just deal with their own issues and that leads to things bottling up which is what should be addressed when talking about toxic masculinity

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are a lot of things wrong with this, lots..

[–]RedForman- -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Depressed because they had to listen to their bitter mother go one about how their dad left when in reality the mom was just a dumb cunt.

[–]GlobTwo 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You sound kinda bitter there, man...

[–]RedForman- 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Am i not allowed to be bitter? Or is everyone in a happy fucking mood all the time?

[–]GlobTwo 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair call I suppose.

[–]LoneKharnivore -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's almost like putting an adjective in front of a word changes it.

'A boat' and 'a green boat' are different. 'Food' and 'dog food' are different. 'Masculinity' and 'toxic masculinity' are different.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Grammatically yes. But not in how they're used.

Like a racist who always calls out black thugs. It implies he thinks there are blacks who aren't thugs or thugs who aren't black.

In reality though...

[–]supacrusha 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Toxic masculinity as a concept is the idea that the general psychological traits of men (masculinity) are toxic and to blame for male "badness". Its a sexist term, made by sexist people, to promote a sexist agenda surrounding men in the hope of gaining the power of the victim.

[–]romulusnr 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's masculinity, and there's toxic masculinity.

[+]MrButtholePoopy1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

i always thought that toxic masculinity was a phrase used to describe over the top macho "men don't cry" types.

[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/83d4wp/toxic_masculinity/dvigkgb/

[–]TherapyFortheRapy -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another day, another post that proves how worthless the mods here are.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Toxic masculinity is more referring to the "shut up and take it" attitude that's commonly ascribed to males. Luckily, children are meant to be raised by their mother and father together, so that they can see both sides of the coin.

[–]GlobTwo -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That's not what people mean when they talk about toxic masculinity. It's not a suggestion that being masculine is inherently toxic. I think you'll make more insightful contributions if you read a little more on this topic, OP.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's not what they say they mean. It is what they actually mean.

[–]GlobTwo 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I suppose anyone can be painted as wrong if you decide what it is they're really thinking.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm basing it on what they go on to say.

If you can go on and on about toxic masculinity but can think of a single good thing to say about it you probably just don't like men.

[–]GlobTwo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Why would someone have something good to say about toxic masculinity...?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The fact that you can't even concieve of non toxic masculinity kinda proves my point.

[–]supacrusha 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its the suggestion that the concept of masculinity is somehow toxic and applies to all men even though masculinity and gender are social constructs, somehow. Masculinity is not a social construct and neither is gender, and to insist that general physical and psychological traits possessed by a certain gender are somehow wrong is the real toxic thing here.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This person is either misinformed or purposefully obtuse.

Often times men struggle more with suicide and depression because we're societally conditioned to be less open and emotionally vulnerable with our other male friends, or even other people in general. The "masculine ideal" is to be stoic and independent without needing to rely on help (especially emotional help), and you don't have to look very far to find people who still think that it's unmanly to cry or see a therapist.

If there is an aspect of masculinity that is actively hurting people and contributing to the overall societal problems that men face, is it not accurate to describe it as "toxic"?

There are other examples that I could give to highlight this person's misunderstanding of what toxic masculinity means, but I feel like this demonstrates my point most accurately.

Nobody other than fringe idiots actually thinks that masculinity is inherently toxic, just that some parts of our current masculine ideal are harmful.

[–]RubixCubeDonut 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Often times men struggle more with suicide and depression because we're societally conditioned to be less open and emotionally vulnerable with our other male friends, or even other people in general.

Honestly not going to read beyond this point because this is constantly asserted by never really justified.

I'd more lean towards the idea that men don't talk about their problems because the issues they're facing are so severe that talking about them won't help.

I mean, that's such a common feminist suggestion to men: just do what women do, it works for them. (But then it turns out that it works for women because of our gynocentric psychologies so it's pretty worthless advice for men.)

[+]thevinci335 -13 points-12 points-11 points 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

She is writing for a conservative blog it seems. Is it right when I think of conservatives, I imagine overtly macho men that make penis jokes, was or wished they were in the service, wear ball caps, wranglers and a goattee?

[–]Typicalredditors 18 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think they way you look at conservatives and the way conservatives look at the left is the root of most of our problems as a country. No need to fix anything if we can just blame shift everything away all the time.

[–]Atomskii 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Men who make penis jokes with there buddies often have daughters who love and adore them too.

Nothing wrong with penis jokes... penisi can be quite funny :)

[–]TheBadger40 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can confirm.

I have a penis and it's hilarious.

[–]theothermod 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it right when I think of conservatives, I imagine overtly macho men that make penis jokes, was or wished they were in the service, wear ball caps, wranglers and a goattee?

No. It means that you're thinking in stereotypes that don't reflect reality and therefore mislead you.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter