~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
reddit699
[–]Brockkilledspeedy 3291 points3292 points3293 points 7 years ago (499 children) | Copy Link
I'll never forget the Rhonda Rousey interview where she's like "uh, no I don't. I'm the best right now but I don't bring in as much revenue as the top man, so I shouldn't get paid as much as he does cause it doesn't make sense".
[–]TopHatCock 1381 points1382 points1383 points 7 years ago (336 children) | Copy Link
Someone said she should compete with men and she laughed at them. She knows it won’t end well. The men would have a biological advantage at the very least due to muscle density and raw strength.
[–]malfurionpre 1310 points1311 points1312 points 7 years ago (198 children) | Copy Link
She knows it won’t end well.
As clearly shown multiple times through sports history, but one of the funnier one will always be the Williams sister against Braasch
Another event dubbed a "Battle of the Sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[56] between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Williams had claimed that they could beat any male player ranked outside the world's top 200, so Braasch, then ranked 203rd, challenged them both. Braasch was described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple of bottles of ice cold lager".[57][56] The matches took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park,[58] after Braasch had finished a round of golf and two shandies. He first took on Serena and after leading 5–0, beat her 6–1. Venus then walked on court and again Braasch was victorious, this time winning 6–2.[56] Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance". He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game "fun"[59] and that the big difference was that men can chase down shots much easier and put spin on the ball that female players can't handle. The Williams sisters adjusted their claim to beating men outside the top 350
[–]ColonelError 888 points889 points890 points 7 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
The Williams sisters adjusted their claim to beating men outside the top 350
IIRC, he lowered his rank and challenged them again.
[–]The_MAZZTer 854 points855 points856 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
First ever recorded instance of a smurf?
[–]Fudgiee 261 points262 points263 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
facking green gg ez
[–]DfduuptIsFINISHED 70 points71 points72 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Pourrple y u trowing!?
[–]Bazurke 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
For a sec there I was wondering why there was a random comment in Welsh
[–]grendelsnightmare 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No joke, that was my first thought as well. I guess that proves that Welsh is not a real language, just poorly spoken English. :)
[–]Nangabatman1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
r/pourpelsupport
[–]_NotAPlatypus_ 82 points83 points84 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
He didn't lower it purposely, IIRC. He had a bad tournament and the range he was in was very turbulent, so it was a big drop.
[–]CiDirkona 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think /u/The_MAZZTer was referring to him playing as a 500 rank instead of 203.
[–]KrypticFade 30 points31 points32 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
this made me audibly laugh. if i had platinum to give i would give you all of it
[–]CouchMountain 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
/r/irlsmurfing
[–]Pacattack571 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
r/irlsmurfing
[–]Toph-01 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Smurf confirmed
[–]IsThisNameValid 61 points62 points63 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
r/madlads
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel 95 points96 points97 points 7 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
He can't do that, shoot him or something
EDIT:
You have been banned from participating in r/TwoXChromosomes. You can still view and subscribe to r/TwoXChromosomes, but you won't be able to post or comment. Note from the moderators: You've been banned for repeatedly posting to subreddits that a majority of our problem users are active participants in. An appeal will be started by replying to this message. Please be patient, each new message you send will put you to the bottom of the queue. If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for r/TwoXChromosomes by replying to this message. Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this subreddit ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspended from the site as a whole.
You have been banned from participating in r/TwoXChromosomes. You can still view and subscribe to r/TwoXChromosomes, but you won't be able to post or comment.
Note from the moderators:
You've been banned for repeatedly posting to subreddits that a majority of our problem users are active participants in. An appeal will be started by replying to this message. Please be patient, each new message you send will put you to the bottom of the queue.
If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for r/TwoXChromosomes by replying to this message.
Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this subreddit ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspended from the site as a whole.
bwahahahaha, this is fucking gold, I didn't know that place went around banning people that never even posted in their community and they browsed other subs to ban people that make star wars quotes on a post that's at the top of r/all, you absolute lunatic, power tripping mods
[–]yodarded 37 points38 points39 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
they wrote a script to find people to ban.
[–]Fsck_Reddit_Again 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
TFW when you have to invent marginalization as a modcuck
[–]homegrowncountryboy1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Didn't they get in a lot of trouble for doing that if i remember correctly, they had to find a way around it or something without using the automod to ban people.
[–]yodarded2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
i haven't heard anything about that.
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I can't find anything on that, let me know if there's something on this somewhere.
[–]Nickvr628 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yep, if you post and have enough karma in any "problematic subreddits" you get the auto ban. Them and a bunch of other political subs do it.
[–]GulfAg 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nothing like a carefully curated echo chamber to really let your delusions manifest into conviction.
[–]Aesthetiics 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Loving your username
ty ^ ^ remake HYPE
[–]attemptedcleverness1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Next try r/atheism
Why, what's there?
[–]xkbjkxbyaoeuaip1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
top class trolling!
[–]jrod814 156 points157 points158 points 7 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link
As a tennis fan. The sisters as well as alot of top ranked females could never hang with the top 200 males. The only thing about karsten was that he was very good. He was ranked 36 a few years before the matches. Watching Nadal's or Fed vs unranked guys that give them a good game goes to show how much better the men are.
[–]malfurionpre 66 points67 points68 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
Yeah true, he did peak at rank 36 literally the year before (actually, like 5 month before)
[–]ambulocetus_natans 41 points42 points43 points 7 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
Why was he smoking cigs so close to being a top 50 tennis pro
[–]Baybob1 135 points136 points137 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
Because when a man drinks a couple of bottles of ice cold lager, he wants a cigarette ...
[–]Aclef 27 points28 points29 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Just like my favorite children's book. If you give a man an ice cold lager
[–]Acid_Enthusiast1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Damn straight.
[–]JDGWI-18 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not a pro athlete. Stop being stupid
[–]brimnac11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except this is a pro athlete doing that exact thing...
[–]JDGWI-21 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except it's stupid. And a top athlete that wants to.go further doesnt smoke. Idiot
[–]Baybob15 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Chill out. I think there is only one person on this thread who deserves the names you are throwing out ...
[–]JDGWI-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Didnt ask you dickhead
[–]Baybob10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You kiss your mother with that mouth? You certainly are not impressing anyone on Reddit. I'm sorry you are so unhappy with your life, but this certainly isn't the way to make it better. Try getting away from your computer/phone and getting outside. An hour a day would be minimum. Get some exercise. Even 20 minutes 4 times a week would help. Try to help someone. Helping others is a good way to start to feel good about yourself. Only you can change your life and attacking others isn't the way ...
[–]D4rkr4in2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
there's a huge gap between top 10 and peaking at 36. Guys like Karsten Braasch know they cannot reach top 10 ever, so they don't give as much of a shit. He's happy where he is, he'll play to make a living, but he won't take it as serious as Rafa, Federer, etc.
[–]TheStateIsImmoral1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
As mentioned above...Miika Kiprusoff was starting goaltender for the Calgary flames and they went to the Stanley cup finals. He smoked like 2 packs a day...idiot.
[–]Baybob14 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Read the post before you comment. Karsten Braasch was a profession tennis player who ranked 203 for men in the world. The year before he played the Williams Sisters, he was 36th. How is that not a "pro athlete"? And he isn't the first pro athlete who liked to party. You haven't been paying attention to professional athletes for ... oooohhh ... maybe the last 150 years? Many have been hard drinking, hard partying people. Kenny Stabler was a legend and I could go on and on ... Babe Ruth anyone ? I'd Google some facts before I call someone else names if I were you ... Thanks for playing ...
[–]JDGWI0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wow you're stupid. I'm saying "not a pro athlete" regularly drinks and smokes. Man idiocy is rampant on Reddit
[–]Baybob12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Breathe deep. Go outside. Even take a walk ...
This is a copypasta from a few days ago and what I think of you:
Imagine what the average Redditor looks like. Imagine his voice, imagine his face, imagine his demeanor. Try to do this. Get that image in your head.
Got it? Ok.
That's who's typing out responses on /r/pussypassdenied
[–]Baybob11 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Breath deeply. Go outside. Try to develop interests .. Excercise ... Make real life friends ...
[–]JDGWI-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Miika kiprusoff used to smoke like 2 packs a day. He was a starting goaltender for years.
[–]JDGWI1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ok..? You know that smoking and rigorous activities lead to heart attacks easily and other health complications? I wonder how he is now
Irrelevant to you point that top tier professional athletes would never smoke cigarettes.
[–]BlakeClass 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Quitting smoking would more than likely have caused more short term negative mental effects than positive physical effects.
[–]troglador64-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You said "as well as a lot of top ranked females," would you say there are some top ranked females who could hang with the top 200 males?
[–]Traze-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well if Serena the best female player in the world and her sister one of the best female players couldn’t. I doubt any other could really. And you would need to specify what hang means. You mean able to get a game or two? Sure. But compete to where it is somewhat challenging for the male player. I doubt it
[–]Zeabos1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Serena was 16 when this game happened. She was still a junior in high school. I think 25 year old Serena actually would have done pretty well against him.
[–]twocentman1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Think again. My former tennis coach (a B2 player at the time, not a professional by a long shot) once played Jana Novotna (Wimbledon winner and #2 WTA ranked) and beat her 6-0 6-2.
[–]Zeabos1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That woman is not in the same universe of player as Serena Williams.
That’s like comparing Petr Korda to Roger Federer. Or Norris Cole to Michael Jordan.
And my former tennis coach isn't anywhere near a professionally ranked tennis player.
Cool so it was a completely useless comparison.
No... My tennis coach isn't even a top 50.000 tennis player and he managed to beat a former nr. 2 WTA ranked and 4 time grand slam finalist convincingly... It's a pretty clear comparison if you aren't daft. We can safely conclude no Williams sister stands a chance against a top 500 male tennis player. Which isn't a slight against any female player; the physical difference is just too big.
I mean a 16 year old Serena took games off this guy. She was about half as good then as she was at her peak.
You don’t need a totally useless comparison of another female player who isnt nearly as good playing who knows when (was this just after her slam?) against someone mediocre whose skill level we don’t know. It’s just way too far removed to provide any value to the conversation.
Alright. Happy New Year, mate.
Thanks - even though this post is from July.
It's not July now is it..? Jesus Christ. I take it back. You seem like a wanker.
Well, how do I compare to your middle school basketball coach? That should clear it up for you.
[–]jrod8142 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No. The best female players in the world could never beat or come close to beating a top 200 ranked male in my opinion.
[–][deleted] 7 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]hellraisinhardass 120 points121 points122 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Huh, it's almost like the Y chromosome was sculpted by millions of years of combat, hunting, and mating competition.
[–]Man_with_lions_head 75 points76 points77 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
No, this is just cultural programming.
Women and men are exactly, exactly and identically the same.
Fight the patriarchy!
[–]dukunt 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I came to say more or less what you said, but you said it way better than what was bouncing around in my head. You are being sarcastic right?
[–]Man_with_lions_head 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, I'm not being sarcastic. /s
[–]MerakiKosmos1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They're literally isn't any difference between males and females. We all come out the same, plain white, silhouette-esque figurine, and our gender differences are solely expressed in what color cap you're assigned at birth (blue or pink.)
It's only through years of patriarcle reprogramming that your traumatized mind starts to fill in the blanks and you falsely perceive these so called "physical characteristics" that "Men and Women" have.
[–]Jman-laowai0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Exactly the same! Except in specific instances when women perform better, and then women are better!
[–]Bigdaddy_J 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know it's crazy. Who would have ever thought only the fittest could survive and reproduce. And that those traits would be passed on.
Someone needs to do some kind of study and look into it.
Although with today's standards i don't think that is still applicable.
[–]ReasonReader1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You have just been banned from /r/lalalalalaICantHearYou. You're probably male, so there's no appeal.
[–]I_munch_butts_AMA1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
enabling efficient weapon use.
Ah yes, the tennis racket, my weapon of choice
[–]Xylitolisbadforyou 141 points142 points143 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Biology trumps ideology (or social constructs) every time. Humans are a dimorphic species. It's how we evolved and it's what we are.
[–]Namesbutcher 46 points47 points48 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Oh man, tumbler is going to have a field day with your comment.
[–]Xylitolisbadforyou 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Tumbler?
[–]Shagfabulous 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This makes me happy.
[–]Andre4kthegreengiant 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, those Yetti tumblers that seem to be all the rage these days
[–]these_days_bot1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Especially these days
[–]m0128921 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yetti?
[–]MacItaly 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Tumbler, I barely know her.
[–]Fsck_Reddit_Again1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The new batmobile
[–]TheEarlobe-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You know what he meant. Don’t be that guy.
[–]Man_with_lions_head3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I have no idea what any of this is about, and I'm not being that guy.
[–]Jman-laowai 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A lot of "social constructs" also come from our inherent nature and instincts that have evolved over time. They are preprogrammed into us at a base level. Why are traditional gender roles fairly similar of a wide variety of different cultures that developed in isolation? It's not because some global ancient conspiracy of a secret cabal of men. That said, I'm fine with people not confirming to gender roles, but it's silly to pretend like that are evil or inherently wrong.
[–]clamy24 50 points51 points52 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I feel like this deserves to be in r/therewasanattempt
[–]TopHatCock 82 points83 points84 points 7 years ago (103 children) | Copy Link
The only sport I’ve seen women win at is in some endurance stuff. Compared to men. It’s due to biology.
Also is it just me or am I the only one that fully believes those sisters are on steroids because of that event
[–]BiggusDickus- 118 points119 points120 points 7 years ago (78 children) | Copy Link
No, men win there too. Look at marathons. From what I understand women only have an advantage in long distance swimming.
[–]TopHatCock 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (52 children) | Copy Link
Isn’t that endurance
[–]Demi_Bob 123 points124 points125 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Endurance + floating
[–]Joooseph2 114 points115 points116 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Boobs
[–]godswater 30 points31 points32 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I upvoted for the tits
[–]Namesbutcher 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Personal flotation devices.
[–]Ryachaz4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Big Orbs Of Bouyant Stuff
[–]ANAXA-XXVII0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This guy gets it.
[–]TommyRiddle6660 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I’m a simple man. I see...I upvote
[–]Gwyntorias 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Also curious to see what differences swimming brings in.
[–]GymSauce 45 points46 points47 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Women have a naturally higher fat content allowing them to float better as well as also having higher set hips (or wider I can’t remember) that reduces their drag in the water compared to men which gives them an advantage over long distances.
[–]TopHatCock 28 points29 points30 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women have wider hips, men have wider shoulders. Hip structure allows them to push water easier
[–]Gwyntorias 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Interesting! That's good to know; thank you.
[–]atniomn 22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
In long distance swimming, women float more easily, they carry more fat.
[–]CromulentDucky 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What about fat guys?
[–]TryingToReadHere 29 points30 points31 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Yes, but if they don’t dominate all things labeled as endurance you can’t just say endurance.
[–]xo-thehost 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's why he said some endurance?
[–]noiserr1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Can't say some if it's one outlier can you?
[–]Jedditor-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except women do beat men at ultramarathons. Marathons are, relatively speaking, not thaaaat long for them to shine.
[–]TroggerFrogger5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Men beat woman in total endurance, there are only a few exceptions to the case
[–]Jedditor-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It would be cool for your point it "total endurance" wasn't a concept you just made up.
[–]TroggerFrogger3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I meant endurance “in total” as in how much endurance men have. Man the English language is wierd
[–][deleted] 7 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Buceteiro 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
If you don't consider marathons to be endurance you're crazy. But yeah, they do better in long distance swimming.
[–]Jedditor-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Compared to an ultramarathon. Where women do have men beat.
[–]Charlouse22 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Citation needed. Because this isn't true.
Google it. Might also want to google how to format comments.
[–]Charlouse21 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I confirmed the 50 and 100 mile record holders (and those near the record/old records) are all males. You're wrong. You should Google it before saying something so provably false.
[–][deleted] 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus-0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I am talking about long distance swimming, where they go many miles. Others have pointed out a few other more obscure long-distance competitions where women have demonstrated an advantage.
[–]Tehmaxx8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It only starts to even out when the distance go beyond 100 miles.
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He probably meant endurance as in ultra marathons, were women do in fact got men beat.
[–]SpecialSause0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
A woman won the Moab 200. If I remember correctly she won it by 20 miles/10 hours.
[–]GaiusGracchus1213 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
When you are getting out the tail end of the distribution in terms of participation it is hard to know what tot are from it.
[–]nikdahl3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not really though. I hear this a lot, but then when I go look at the top times on a bunch of different ultra marathons, and the men are out in front.
How long does the marathon need to be?
[–]sobbe92-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Look at ultra marathons
[–]dukunt-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wasn't there a female ultramarathon runner who beat the best male time by 8 hours or something insane? Ill look for it and edit if I find it.
Edit: This lady: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/jan/17/jasmin-paris-first-woman-win-gruelling-286-mile-montane-spice-race-ultrarunning
She beat the best male time by 12 hours. She was a fucking maching that breastfed her baby along the way! Deep respect to her!
[–]MisPlacedNeuroBlue 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The last moab 240 winner was woman. CRAZY race. She beat the 2nd place winner by more than a full day.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/05/sports/courtney-dauwalter-200-mile-race.html
[–]Tehmaxx31 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
While it is true that it eventually starts to get more balanced, it’s also noted that very few of the ultramarathon men go to do any of the MOAB events.
The guy winning badwater or western states isn’t showing up for a 2 day race.
[–]Baybob1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They're twice the man I am. Don't know though how they got there ...
[–]JonathonWally 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I have no doubt they take steroids. When the officials showed up to test her she ran and hid in her panic room.
[–]BiggusDickus- 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I believe that their medical records were hacked, and they had taken some banned substances under a "theraputic use" exemption. Something like that.
[–]Applied_Mathematics2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Regarding the first part of your comment: yep, the more endurance-like the sport, the more similar men and women become. Compare n*100 meter times to marathon times to ultramarathon times and the disparity progressively decreases. Source: some TED talk on running.
[–]ruleofmen1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Compare n*100 meter times to marathon times to ultramarathon times and the disparity progressively decreases.
Not really true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramarathon#IAU_World_Best_Performances
[–]WikiTextBot1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ultramarathon
An ultramarathon, also called ultra distance or ultra running, is any footrace longer than the traditional marathon length of 42.195 kilometres (26.219 mi).
<sup>[</sup> <sup>PM <sup>|</sup> <sup>Exclude</sup> <sup>me <sup>|</sup> <sup>Exclude</sup> <sup>from</sup> <sup>subreddit <sup>|</sup> <sup>FAQ</sup> <sup>/</sup> <sup>Information</sup> <sup>|</sup> <sup>Source</sup> <sup>]</sup> <sup>Downvote</sup> <sup>to</sup> <sup>remove</sup> <sup>|</sup> <sup>v0.28</sup>
[–]Applied_Mathematics1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]fat_lesbians_lul1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
they dominate the things where their equipment is lighter than mens, like disc throw or whatever it was wherexa woman uad thrown further
[–]Hobbesisdarealmvp1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women are really good climbers. Being honest I have no sources other than what I see at the climbing gym. A lot of women have a far better technique because a lot of men rely on muscle strength rather than technique.
[–]muricanwerewolf17 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, you’re lookin at the goober dudes at your gym though. The top climbers at the elite level are men.
Also the “women climbers are better cuz men haz mussels grrrr” is just progressive gym culture bullshit. I’ve taught a lot of climbers, and men and women are equally as likely to be intuitive climbers. Men and women can be pigheaded about bad habits, or benefit from instruction. The reason people say this nonsense is while a woman who’s been climbing for 5 years is projecting a v4 skillfully, a dude who’s been climbing 1 year is working the same project. Give him his four years to catch up and not only does his technique mirror the woman’s but he’s working v6.
They prolly just have higher testosterone level than the average women. Remains to be seen
[–]Amputatoes-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women are better sharpshooters, as well.
[–]Valac_7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I need evidence to that.
Since sharp shooting competitions are male dominated.
And basically every professional sniper is also male.
[–]troglador641 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
A woman, Shan Zhang from China, did win gold and set the Olympic and world record in the last mixed-gender shooting competition there was in the olympics (skeet, 1992), hitting 373/375. Since 1992 mixed gender events have been removed, and it's difficult to compare men's to women's shooting events now because the events themselves have differed in the number of targets per round, etc., though from what I understand the events will be equalized between the genders starting next olympics!
[–]Valac_1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I look forward to the results.
It's always interesting to see the differences our biology has on our abilities
[–]Amputatoes1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
http://www.realbiathlon.com/2011/11/who-shoots-better-men-or-women.html
This has some stats.
[–]troglador642 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Woahh! Great source!
[–]notmemes_exe2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Smith and Wesson, the great equalizer.
[–]Fudgiee-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah I heard about stories of wives going into ranges once a week and having better grouping than some people who go more than her,
And well of course, you have the female snipers in the USSR back in ww2
[–]Zeabos0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The key fact you are leaving out is that Serena Williams was 16 years old. So some 29 year old dude basically shit talked some high school girl after dropping a game to her.
Serena was still 10 years out from her prime, she might have beaten him then tbh based on how much strength and skill she added.
[–]Ian51502 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Then she shouldn't have talk shit.
She’s was a teenage sports star, talking shit and thinking they know better is basically their entire existence.
[–]VexonCross 108 points109 points110 points 7 years ago (44 children) | Copy Link
People got mad at John McEnroe when he said that Serena Williams was the greatest female tennis player of all time and then had to explain that she'd lose to just about any professional male player. Even though she herself has very clearly said it's a completely different sport.
[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 87 points88 points89 points 7 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link
People like to ignore that there's huge differences between males and females.
Because movies have made it seem like if women just work hard enough they better than men at everything.
The reality is that you could be the best female martial artist in the world and a dude who's 6'5" and has a basic understanding of MMA will destroy you. Let alone another male of your skill caliber
[–]Baybob1 58 points59 points60 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Hollywood is trying to make up for Harvey Weinstein and cater to "me too" by making movies where a 100 pound woman can beat up a 220 pound buff man. Unfortunately, this is getting women into trouble when they start bar fights with men twice their size. Good fodder for YouTube.
There is an episode of "Spenser For Hire", an old TV show, where Spenser gets into a fight with a guy. Spenser is a private detective about 220 pounds and in shape, who was once a pro boxer. He gets into a fight with a small guy who is a trained and cocky karate guy. Spenser kicks karate guy's ass. Karate guy is very bummed. Spenser tells him "Don't worry. You are a very good fighter. But a good big guy will beat a good small guy every time". That's the reality which present "feminists" refuse to acknowledge. But then, facts and reality usually have no place in an "activist's" head.
I'm sure there are some teenaged girls who buy the movies with the model bodied women beating buff men twice their size but I don't think the public in general is buying this remake of humanity from Hollywood. Several news articles this week have spoken about how Hollywood is failing to find an audience for their bullshit this summer and losing their ass financially. Reality VS Fantasy ...
[–]HeyGuyReachForTheSky 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
There are plenty of movies, video games, etc where a normal sized guy beats a ton of huge guys. In most cases, little to no believability is lost by having a female protagonist kick the same amount of ass.
So what is the point? We are teaching young girls that it is good to be violent and that they can hit men without retaliation. As intelligent women are working to stop relationship violence the dumb ones are going the other way. A brief look at YouTube shows that doesn't end well ...
[–]ArtsAlcoolique1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wait are you unironically trying to suggest video games, movies and comic books make people violent?
[–]yodarded 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The movie "Enough".
Jennifer Lopez takes a month of Krav Maga and kills her abusive husband.
Yeah, most Asian martial arts take about a month to learn. I saw it in a movie LOL ...
[–]zUltimateRedditor1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Now I wonder what the intellect differences are. I mean there has to be a reason why men are mostly at the top of the corporate game and women aren’t right?
[–]Shrew_Taming3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The majority of individuals in the upper echelons of corporate America tend to be of European or Jewish ancestry. Using your reasoning, does that mean that Europeans and Jews are inherently more talented and intelligent than African-Americans, who are underrepresented in higher corporate positions relative to their population?
It's all about who you know, not what you know. Or even demographic attributes like race/gender. Even in Japan, women outperform men in medical school entrance examinations, yet less than 20% of students entering Tôdai are female despite their higher performance.
Old conservative white guy here. Women are climbing the ladder quickly. The company I work for is printing money with its success and we have a preponderance of women in the top levels. A man runs the company, but he came in with decades of corporate experience already. We could easily have a woman running it when he retires. The women we have are very smart and passionate and work really hard. Their jobs come first in their lives, but the company is flexible with everyone. Everyone loves working here ...
[–]zUltimateRedditor2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Young, moderate brown dude here. I guess it’s aligned differently. Men are good at something’s abs women at others.
But it’s always men that seem to be in the brass management. Either that or they outnumber them 6:1.
[–]horusporcus1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not true, just look at Captain Marvel, she can kick anybody's ass /s.
[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I was taught in a college course that if you work hard enough you can succeed in anything
Even sports
I took a hit because I wasn’t gonna accept that lie lol
[–]Baybob1 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Oh yeah. "Activists" are not very good with the truth. Very narrow minded ...
[–]Baybob1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I was just banned from r/xchromasomes or some such site. I didn't even know I belonged. And I certainly wasn't commenting on their site. Maybe I commented on something on the front page but if so, I didn't notice what Sub it was. Seriously snowflake people . Obviously those yahoos are roaming other sites and harassing people who don't conform to their thinking. Maybe Reddit needs to look into this. Anyway, "Activists" at work.
[–]Vlaxilla 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Lol dude I was just banned as well. Apparently the reason is that I have commented on subreddits that don’t suit their agenda. Like this one here.
[–]Baybob1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Seems a bit Authoritative/Communistic to me. I hope all 12 of the active members feel safe now. They don't even have to nerve to challenge comments they feel disparage their "movement". They strike and run to their "safe circle" ... Golly, we will never be admitted into r/leftistchromosome now ... Let's start r/purgedfromnarrowmindedsubs
[–]cryptic_meme 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Get off the internet grandad.
Yeah, because everyone who disagrees with you is old, out of it, illiterate, uneducated, racist, sexist, and stupid. Prepare for a hard life ... And suffering from name calling goes away when you turn 15 usually if you are developing normally ...
[–]cryptic_meme2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No you just type like an old man. Your spelling, cadence and opinions are further evidence.
who disagrees with you is old, out of it, illiterate, uneducated, racist, sexist, and stupid.
Besides the age thing, where I was just making a wee joke at your expense, you're probably right, but you have the cause and effect backwards. Why would I argue with kind smart people who know what they are talking about, I probably agree with them on most things. Whereas ignorant people, (you brought racism and intelligence into this), are wrong about a lot of things, hence the disagreements.
Edit: I also take part in arguments in "echo chambers" like this one, where a group of people congregate to discuss one specific issue, which always leads to a concentration of the mutual characteristic that brought them together and amplification of whichever issue they came together to collectively dislike.
Have I taken up enough real estate in your head yet? I'm blocking you now. You have issues that I don't want to exasperate ...
It's ok to be wrong sometimes gramps, part of growing up is learning to accept that. I hope you change your mind about how you choose to spend your life.
[–]carseatsareheavy1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This statement can be true or false depending on the definition of succeed.
[–][deleted]2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
an example that was used was sports, specifically
ie if i train hard enough and put my mind to it, i can be Lebron
[–]sucks_at_usernames1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I was told in a college class by my professor that the reason women can't dunk is because we give them dolls to play with as children and it's all a matter of society.
[–]BiggusDickus- 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
That is absolutely the direction that every single action film seems to have embraced. Every franchise, all of them, now has this theme. It has become such a standard that I don't think the public even notices any more.
It was an interesting twist when it was first introduced like in "Alien" and "Terminator," but now the "woman as a badass" is worn out and the characters are boring. I avoid action movies today because of it.
[–]timeiwasgettingon 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But even then Ripley and Sarah Connor were not presented superhuman. They simply endured tough situations with a modicum of fortitude.
[–]BiggusDickus- 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. They retained their femininity and still acted as women when put in difficult situations. Today's female action characters are just men without dicks, and the scripts make them go out of their way to make a statement about how they can beat up men.
In any situation though, it worked because it was a twist on a standard plot. Now it has become the standard plot, and it is worn out and unrealistic.
My guess is that things will swing the other way at some point, but this era will definitely be remembered for it.
[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Some movies do it better than others.
Like I'd consider blackwidow from the MCU a great representation of a badass woman.
And that batman TV show with ruby rose is an atrocity. Rich kid to super bad ass because she was in the army.
Yeah no.
[–]BiggusDickus- 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But the whole concept is worn out. Even when it is done right, it is not entertaining any more.
[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't mind it when it's not constantly about how she's a strong woman.
If it's just a badass woman then I don't care at all but if you tout it out infront of everyone.
Then it's retarded.
[–]TroggerFrogger0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
“Weighs like 120 pounds at the max” “Beats up several large men” Wtf, and let’s not even talk about how they butchered the other parts of Batman
[–]Valac_3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Or how many times they pointed out she was a woman in the trailer.
Thankfully it seems to have gone over very poorly. 400k dislikes.
[–]Man_with_lions_head 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As someone who has been in martial arts a long time, and practiced with many, many women, who have been in martial arts 10+ years, they will be destroyed by a man with basic martial arts training.
Women can kick me as hard as they want to anywhere on my body (except for the head and neck), and it is like a 5-year-old's kick. Honestly.
This is not meant as detracting from the women. I absolutely have worked and sparred with women, been long time friends. I spar very hard against them, too, so they absolutely get as realistic view as possible.
That being said, women can still defend themselves. There was just a reddit post that showed a 13-year-old girl fighting back against a 25-year-old man trying to abduct her and she was able to prevent it. By fighting. Never give in, always fight, even if you are a 4'11" woman fighting against a 6'5" man, even if you will lose.
[–]Steeltrap6661 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Reminds me of this sketch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWn2uMphYN4
I had completely drank the kool-aide on this one as a homeschooled adolescent with minimal female contact from my own age group until one time when I was ~16 and was arm wrestling with a bunch of friends at a party.
There were a bunch of girls there and someone thought it would be fun to get them to join in, though they all vocally opposed it until I buffaloed one into going against me. It re-aligned my entire worldview to experience first hand how weak she actually was. (My at the time, six year old brother had more arm strength than her.) She could've been an outlier but still, very surprising.
Then about 3 years later I awkwardly realized how many girls really expected a guy to take the lead on things romantically after various stumblings. Smh
She was not an outlier that's the thing there's a reason pro women's sports teams get dominated by high-school boys teams.
There's a reason that men in the top 200 of their sport will repeatedly dominate women in the top 10 of the same sport.
Physically we're in an entirely different league.
They have to work nearly twice as hard to achieve what we do. When it comes to physical capabilities.
[–]Psy_Kira 53 points54 points55 points 7 years ago (55 children) | Copy Link
2 years ago I got into a heated argument with few people on reddit that were claiming she could totally take Floyd Mayweather. There were super serious about it...
[–]TheRandomRGU 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
https://www.espn.co.uk/mma/story/_/id/13414549/ronda-rousey-says-beat-anyone-including-floyd-mayweather-no-rules-fight
[–]Psy_Kira 41 points42 points43 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
She can say anything she wants, the fact is still the same Floyd would destroy her.
[–]GetRidofMods 62 points63 points64 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
And Floyd has experience beating up women.
[–]Foxyboi14 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
oof
[–]I_should_go_to_work1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The biggest help he has against a woman
[–]Baybob1 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
A good big fighter will beat a good small fighter every time. See my post above about that. And hell, didn't another small woman beat Rousey after that bit of verbal ignorance ?
[–]Gregapher_ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Eh depends on your definition of "good" . Royce Gracie won the first ultimate fighter competition against much bigger guys, even though his family sent him because he specifically wasn't the best or strongest member they had. If they're equally skilled then yeah the bigger guy will most likely win
[–]muricanwerewolf1 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No rules? Guess she plans on bringing s gun.
plus the bull dozer too.
In today's entertainment industry the motto is "any news is good news, especially controversial ones".
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I’m sure quite a few people on reddit could take Floyd mayweather in a street fight. Not boxing match. Very few people on earth could beat him in a boxing match.
[–]Baybob1 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well if you're "quite sure" Sheesh ... another Redditor ...
Occasionally you read about someone trying to take on a pro boxer in a street fight. It never ends well for the amateur. Doesn't matter what discipline of fighting the challenger uses. Pro boxers are like pro football players. Big, in shape and quick as cats. The worst NFL guy could beat the best amateur every time. internationally rated athletes are just superhuman compared to others.
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’m not talking about myself or Joe Schmo on the street. I’m not about an in shape athlete. I wouldn’t make the same argument with a heavy weight boxer but Floyd is listed at only 5’8 150lbs he’s not the big strong athlete you are referring to. He’s in shape and he’s quick but against a much larger opponent he would have some problems. He wouldn’t even fight someone his own size in a mma fight.
[–]ambulocetus_natans1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Pretty sure everyone here would be KO’d before they knew what happened and wouldn’t even see the punch coming
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You do realize how little of a man he is. He doesn’t produce as much power in his punches. Knocking people out isn’t his strength. He picks and pokes and dodges til he frustrates you into making a mistake. Any heavyweight with college wrestling experience could take him down and ground him out easily. Every fight is different and he always has a punchers chance. But if you were to pit him against a 250lb college athlete In a street fight 9/10 I’d bet on the bigger guy. Most people don’t realize how much of an advantage to bugging physically larger in a fight is. It’s not the end all but it’s a major factor. That’s why there are weight classes. Floyd was only great because he was fighting against other guys his size. In the real world that’s doesn’t always happen.
You realize that it really doesn’t take much power to KO someone, right? Floyd is accurate enough that he could knock out a 200lb guy who’s not on his skill level.
Yes...
Street fights and boxing are vastly different, yes. But you’re not going to get close enough to Floyd to turn it into a brawl. He’s going to hit you 20 times and then create 10 feet of distance before you even know what happened.
[–]sobbe921 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I think the idea is in a no rules fight the grappler has a big advantage if the size is kinda the same
[–]byscuit1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Maybe if you strap swords to her knuckles, Wolverine style
[–]TacosAreDope1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Honestly, I think in just a regular fist fight? She might have a chance. Even though she got fucked by Holly and Amanda, her Judo and submissions are amazing.
Floyd isn't really known for his knockout power, moreso his defensive boxing. If Ronda got close enough to him without being knocked out, I honestly believe she could get him to the ground and put him in an armbar, or a choke.
[–]Valac_0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I could take Floyd Mayweather.
Just not in a boxing match.
Dudes great at boxing but a no rules fight I'd destroy him.
He's a technical boxer not a fighter and I'm just way bigger than he is.
[–]ambulocetus_natans6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How could you get close enough to take him down? He’d get you square in the jaw with a lightning-speed punch before you could react
[–]Milsurp_Seeker4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The power of books.
[–]Valac_2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm twice his size with considerably more reach.
Honestly he's beat me everyday in a boxing match he's an incredible boxer.
But that's not a fight it's a sport.
I'd just grab his tiny ass and swing him around like a rag doll
[–]6ofakind5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I can't tell if you're joking, arrogant or just a dumb cunt
Sigh as usual people don't know how much of a difference size really makes.
For reference I could never in my life take Mike Tyson.
We're a similar size.
But I'm much bigger than Mayweather.
There's a reason they fight in weight classes size makes a massive difference in a fight.
A small guy like him will lose to a larger guy everytime..
I'd lose in a boxing match easily but in a fight I have every advantage. My reach is longer I'm stronger and he doesn't have the rules of boxing to hide behind to outlast me in an endurance match.
Floyd is a technical boxer not a fighter. He's the best at what he does but he's not a fighter.
[–]6ofakind1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ah okay I got it, so what you're saying is that it's the dumb cunt option
Mate I'm 6'4" 235.
He's 5'8" 150.
Im nearly 100 pounds heavier. And I'm not just round I'm muscular.
The difference in our size is massive I have the advantage he's got way more skill and would dominate me in the sport tof boxing.
But he's not gonna be able to win a fight like that he'll probably put up a good fight but I'm still gonna win.
[–]TheStateIsImmoral3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And how, pray tell, do you plan to eat a hold of him? As I stated, he’s probably literally 100x faster than you and I guarantee you would gas out before he even broke a sweat. Do people forget that boxers, especially counter fighters, have excellent foot work and maneuverability? You’d have a better shot beating a guy who isn’t strictly a counter punch fighter.
I'm not even going to try and win a striking fight I'm literally just going to grab him.
Unless his plan is to literally turn around and run the other direction you can grab him.
This isn't a hard concept.
Except he’s going to slip away from you. The man can slip a punch and land 3 counter punches before his opponent even gets a shot off. You think he’s just going to stand there and let you grab him? If your premise is that Mayweather would do this not move when you go to grab him, then yes, you’re probably right.
You could literally run at the man and he would side step you and throw you off balance. Lol it’s wild that regular people on reddit think that they can beat the best boxer history, simply because they’re bigger than him.
Boxing is a sport not a fight.
It's not the same thing I would lose a boxing match probably without a single point.
Boxing translates very poorly to real world fighting.
He's the best at his sport but size is much much more important than you realize it is. Speeds awesome but he can't generate half the force I can.
[–]sunnyskinhead2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No offence mate but you would not stand a chance against Floyd, it’s nothing to be ashamed of.
In a boxing match I absolutely agree with you.
I wouldn't score it would be a slaughter I'm not delusional.
Anything resembling boxing he'd beat me with ease.
But he's a technical boxer who's half my size I literally only need to grab him and he's done for.
He'd easily put up more of a fight than anyone else his size but in the end he'd still be to small to overpower me.
[–]sunnyskinhead1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah... nah you’d get slapped up (see the Caleb plant streetfight for reference)
Size is important if you know how to use it. This isn’t an “I’m so tough” comment, but I’ve beat peoples asses who had 6-8inches and a good 60lbs on me. Untrained big dudes are generally slow with very poor balance and tire out very quickly. If your tactic is to just come running at me in a street fight, I’m going to move out of the way and use your momentum and poor balance to send you to the ground.
[–]Kingspot0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I can almost guarantee you have no legitimate fighting knowledge or experience at all. You are just saying stupid shit.
"Dude hes literally 100x faster than you"
"Dude if you sprint at him he will side step you"
Floyd is a masterful boxer. But he is also a 50 year old 150 pound man. This isnt a fucking anime bud. If the dude is really 6'4, 230 lbs and also althletic, in a street altercation, this guy is a serious problem for floyd. Combat sports have weight classes for a reason.
"Its wild that regular people on reddit think they can beat the best boxer in history just because they are bigger"
This may blow your fucking mind, but I'd like to point out that having 80 pounds of mass and dam near a foot of reach over somebody is a extremely significant advantage in a fight.
One decent swing is going to rock you, and if the guy has a shred of fighting experience, u cant just flawlessly down somebody that is 6'4 when u are 5'8 without them getting a hand on you. You must be basing your opinions off shit u saw in the John Wick or something.
Lol what’s your legitimate fighting experience?
You don’t think Floyd has the footwork to dance around you and tire you out? What “legitimate” fight have you been where wildly barrelling towards someone is a good tactic?
[–]Kingspot1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But who assumed that anybody over 6 foot 2 "wildly barrels" at people like some stereotypical bruiser video game mob? You did. U cant create a hypothetical retard for floyd to beat to help ur argument.
And floyd can dance around the ring with no shirt and a ref to break up the clinch but assuming floyd would be untouchable by a 6'4 dude in a street fight is ridiculous. If he gets a hand on him he's got him.
Its relative to somebody who weighs 90 pounds fighting someone who weighs 150. Skill can only go so far.
My experience is training in boxing and a little bjj. U can be very skilled but if you spar with a new guy with 40 pounds on you, unless the guy knows literally nothing, its going to be a problem.
[–]TheCrabWithTheJab1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm gonna go with options #2 and #3
You're probably a punk with pimples in your mother's basement ... But good talk you have.
[–]ernie092 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Haha, in my mind I'm seeing this. .
Lol I fear you overestimate your ability to get a hold of a guy like Floyd Mayweather. You realize that he would just tire you out by dancing around you, right? He could make you swing and miss every punch and you’d be gassed out in no time. Man I wish the show “pros vs joes” still existed: I would love to see this attempt.
In boxing that would work perfectly.
I'd be exhausted in no time he'd slaughter me.
In a real fight I'm going to tackle him to the ground and bash his face in because he won't be able to fight me off.
I've already told you a professional of a similar size to me would absolutely decimate me even someone in the 180-200 range.
But he's just not nearly as big as I am faster definitely but it doesn't matter maybe he'd dance around till I was too tired to fight.
But if I get a hold on him at all he's done.
Ever seen game of thrones?
Think of the viper fighting the mountain. Everything was fine until the mountain grabbed him then it was over because he stood no chance against someone that much bigger than him.
I don’t watch game of thrones. But the fact that you’re comparing a fictional tv fantasy show to a real life fight, tells me that you have no idea what you’re talking about and have probably never been in a real fight in your life.
If you’re untrained, your size is not an ally against a trained person. You’re likely slow with very poor balance (no offence) fighting someone with the finest foot work on the planet. You’re not getting a hold of him. I would confidently bet my entire life savings on Floyd Mayweather vs Vlad, the white knight for fatties, in a street fight.
It was the most famous example of a small person fighting a much larger person I could think of.
I'm not untrained either. I have both military training (fat lot of good that is) and I've done MMA since I was like 17 I'm not where near professional level or even semi pro level.
But I'm not untrained.
You'd lose that bet.
Well having MMA training significantly boosts your odds. I still can’t pretend you’d win, though because I have no idea your skill level.
[–]NohoTwoPointOh1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You train MMA and can only think of a fantasy tee-vee show???? Just off the top of my head without searching, I can think of at least a dozen
Mike Tyson vs Scaff
Mirko vs Hong Man Choi
The dude who KO's Semmy Schlit in Pride...cannot remember his name
Royce Gracie vs Kimo
Royce Gracie vs Severn
Old Ass Royce vs Akebono (over 125# weight advantage)
Kaoklai vs Mighty Mo (ouch!)
Marco Ruas vs The Polar Bear Varelans
Mr. Perfect vs. Sapp I
Nokweed Devy (RIP) vs a bunch of huge guys. This guy even gave up 100 lbs to fight Jerome LeBanner to a close decision
Manny Yarborough vs Daiju Takase
Fedor vs Zuluzinho
Yuki Nakai vs The Pitbull
I didn't say the only I could think of I said the most famous example I could think of.
But your example isn't even a fight. It is fantasy novel made into a television show. There are fucking dragons and zombies in there, man.
I apologize if you are someone who simply plays at MMA and visits the gym a time or two per week. Otherwise, you greatly run the risk of your hubris getting you knocked the fuck out by a smaller, smarter fighter (as has happened countless times in the ring, cage, and on the streets). For every big guy who thinks his size makes him invincible, I've seen 5 guys half his size who simply use mobility to gas the big guy and pinpoint lightning strikes to put him on the ground.
I gotta agree with the ImmoralState. If you are serious about your craft, watch a LOT more film starting with RJJ vs John Ruiz or Kaoklai vs Mighty Mo. The first fight is a textbook example of how NOT to fight a smaller opponent. The second fight invalidates pretty much eveything you have said in this thread.
Ahhh ... No ...
Yes.
I've have nearly a hundred pounds on the guy.
I can't win in his sport he's waay to fast and would easily out score me.
But that doesn't mean anything in a fight he doesn't have stopping power at all.
He would be wearing no gloves. One combo of punches and you'd be disoriented. And this would happen even before you really realized the fight started.
[–]Valac_1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm massive compared to him I'm nearly twice his body weight and have almost a foot on him
He would decimate me in a boxing match no question.
But in a fight I don't need to fight fairly or within the rules of boxing.
I have every single advantage over him in a slugging match. He doesn't even hit that hard.
[–]GxPand 105 points106 points107 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You can't point out scientific facts, that's sexist.
[–]melgibson666 37 points38 points39 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Science is super sexist and racist. Fuck you science!
[–]OrangeKlip 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Wait, you're saying everyone ISN'T equal??? /s
[–]melgibson6661 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ikr! My hopes of being a little Jewish boy in the NBA were crushed.
[–]Baybob1 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, when you can't back up your stupidity, call people sexist and racist. The media eats it up and punishes the intelligent person. That's why people are beginning to disregard the media. They are more social agenda than news ...
[–]TheFakePhoKing 28 points29 points30 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
There’s a male to female trans mma fighter that broke a female fighter’s skull in a fight
[–]TheMeanestPenis 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Which JRE MMA show does Joe go off about that?
[–]jagua_haku 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Like every other episode, in between the chimp talk. Jamie pull that up.
[–]muricanwerewolf1 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Like every other one.
[–]dethmaul 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think it was something fox. Farrah fox?
Youtube Joe Rogan and farrah fox, that clip might be the one.
[–]rdrunner_74 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
There is a male to female volleyball player..
You cant say what you want… It just looks wrong:
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/7781e9ff3912a3ddbf5450da4b9b7607558deae8/r=x393&c=520x390/local/-/media/USATODAY/USATODAY/2012/12/04/c01-scov-05-4_3.jpg
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Wtf?
They look like they’re 40-50 and those look like high school kids
[–]HairyButtle 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
S/he/it identifies as a high school student.
[–]_realitycheck_ 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
S/h/it
ftfy
[–]Mystery_Man_141 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This isn't ok
[–]TheCrabWithTheJab 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's ma'am
[–]hellraisinhardass1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fighter name? I want to know more.
[–]noddddd1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Who?
[–]TheDoubleDoink 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Plus that might've been after the world discovered she couldn't box her way through a soaked square of toilet paper
[–]shaggy1452 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I mean wasn’t it obvious when the only thing she did was arm bars. I felt like every match was won by submission and every submission was arm bar, like we were watching first timer’s compete at a jiu jitsu tournament.
[–]a-real-crab 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Sure but when that armbar is happening 25 seconds in to the fight it’s still impressive. I guarantee her bjj skills were far above most girls even if arm bars were banned. It was just her first path and people couldn’t keep up
[–]shaggy14521 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah i mean, it’s a good arm bar, i guess i just like seeing an actual fight over jiu jitsu fundamentals, but like.... i get it, if it get’s you the win, and it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,
[–]a-real-crab-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sure you not enjoying the show is fine but to doubt she was the greatest female mma fighter of her time is poppycock.
[–]bjjpolo 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean you’re a bit mistaken. Ronda claimed on some talk show that on the right day she’d be able to take on Cain Velasquez and at one point did not argue with the claim that she could beat half the men’s bantamweight division. Not sure what you’re remembering.
[–]zUltimateRedditor 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If a man and a women of equal everything in terms of past athletic history and how often they work out were to fight, the man would eviscerate the woman 10/10.
One word: Testosterone.
[–]UniqueCoverings[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Right. Falon Fox broke the skull of a women he fought.
[–]KidHudson_1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
muscle density and raw strength
Have you seen how she looks?
[–]Zalapadopa1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
She beat up HHH, so I think she's ready for the men's division.
[–]skant1531 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
We all know how easily Fallon Fox is beating women. Good thing Rousey got out before being forced to fight him
[–]jw88151 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Rousey said she wouldnt even fight Fallon Fox, the God awful trans fighter who only won by, ironically, man handling the women "she" fought.
[–]sprvlnmo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol... She said she would beat Mayweather in boxing and could beat Cain Velasquez (who was the UFC heavyweight champ at the time) on the right night. She was far more delusional than you're leading on
[–]PetTheWolf1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Tbf Ronda Rousey could kick my ass
[–]Three_Muscatoots1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I thought reddit was mad at her for saying something completely opposite, that she wanted to fight a guy? Am I misremembering?
[–]MiscllaneousShitPost 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same goes for boxing, the average person can name at least 4 heavyweight boxers but couldn't name one flyweight boxer.
It's like flyweights asking for the same pay as heavyweights, it's not going to happen.
[–]gerald_targaryen 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
And that's why Rhonda Rousey is nowhere to be found , not that loss. Its the fact men respected her as an athlete .
[–]Brockkilledspeedy 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There's a how Rogan podcast that really goes into what he thinks happened. His theory is kind of like rocky III. She stopped getting better and others caught up to her.
[–]gerald_targaryen 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's probably more likely , the sheer number of women getting into MMA at gyms was insane at the time .
[–][deleted] 7 years ago (104 children) | Copy Link
[–]eccentricelmo 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
She had one, til Holly kicked it outta her skull
[–]Lifeless_burden 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Holly got hers kicked out on Saturday herself.
[–]eccentricelmo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Saw that.. was kinda disappointed.
[–]milespencer 87 points88 points89 points 7 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link
It's statements like this that make people think that men's rights is about hating on women, please just stop. Treat everyone as an equal bro, lead by example.
[–]massiveZO 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
lol this makes no sense. Next your going to say we have to treat blacks equally too. smh
[–][deleted]-11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Please add /s i got other comments to read i dont need to hand out unecessary downvotes :(
[–]massiveZO17 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
shut up I only put /s when I am joking
[–]foresttravestys8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Please learn to read obvious sarcasm. Or don’t. I got plenty downvotes to hand out :)
[–]kapinski 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The majority of women lap that type of inane thinking up and they're ruining the world as a result.
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why? Treating women as equals has been an abject fucking disaster.
[–]Sizzlingwall711 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's statements like this that make people think that no one understands jokes and are “snowflakes”, please just stop. Don’t treat everything so seriously, lead by example.
[–][deleted]-16 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Why would I treat everybody as equal when not everybody is equal.
You can live that fantasy if you want, but I won't. There is clear differences between men, women, races and even individuals.
[–]milespencer20 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because only when you treat others as equals will they do you the same courtesy, all you're doing is feeding a vicious cycle.
[–]VincentInVegas6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Exactly this, well put my friend.
[–]toffmudda0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Exactly this. Human equality is not a natural fact, it’s a moral fact or prescription.
[–]OldSchoolNewRules6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
We're all human. Everything else is semantic.
[–]MartyRobinsHasMySoul1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://files.catbox.moe/qvkpn2.jpeg
[–]OldSchoolNewRules2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Nah its because they werent as tall. Everyone knows tall people make better rulers.
[–]kapinski-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is idiotic.
[–]OldSchoolNewRules1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Make your case then.
[–]kapinski2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You might as well say, everything is made of atoms, everything else is semantic. There are important differences between both individuals and groups of people. You can separate us by height, weight, gender, race, hair color, and any number of other traits and you'll find noticeable differences in their behaviors, beliefs, outcomes, etc. If we're all just human, why only allow friends and family to stay at your home? Why not a serial killer? We're all just human, bro! Platitudes like that are worse than useless.
[–]Aesthetically1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You had me in the first half because no individual is equal but then you brought back in categories
[–]dukeofsnork1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's not treat people equally, everyone is the same, nobody is different. Obviously that's a stupid thing to say. It's "treat them as AN equal" so like equal to yourself, give them as much respect and value as you feel you should be given.
[–]Azurehue220 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
We’re equal in the eyes of the law.
[–]Chukchin7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No we are not lol. Have you been living under a rock?
Was half asleep and didn’t elaborate. I meant in terms of human made matters, we should be equal, but when it comes to natural matters, no one is equal.
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I guess the problem comes in sorting those out because so much of our lives have both things intertwined in them.
[–]invisible_bra-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
HOH BOY :)
[–]phughes-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]caitlinreid-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No shit you brain dead fucking monkey.
[–]catbandana0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except Rhonda Rousey is dumb as hell. So what’s that say?
[–]NeonRedSharpie-24 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Why...
[–]ProfessorBeast5524 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wym why? She admitted that her match didn't generate enough revenue compared to her male counterparts', and thus she should earn less money. Simple
[–]tothecatmobile-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But in the case of the US womens team vs the US mens team, the women generate more revenue.
You don’t do research do you??
[–]tothecatmobile0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html
https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/%3foutputType=amp
This article is more up to date and explains the new bargaining agreement better. And I hate to point this out but this only account for a screen shot of whole situation by only focusing on one fiscal year. They should do one over 8 years or so to get a better picture overall.
The above link is since 2016, not just for a single year.
[–]marsthedog 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Isn't it the opposite in tennis though? Womens matches brought in more viewers and such but they were still paid less?
[–]stationhollow 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No. From memory this was misinterpreted because in the US women's tennis got more viewers in a single year than the men's. It wasn't a regular thing either. Suddenly this turned into a worldwide more people watch women's tennis fact that was repeated. Worldwide men's tennis is far more popular.
[–]marsthedog 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh that I did not know. Interesting
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean, each sport is different and ebbs and flows. When I was in HS, my cousin and I played tennis all the time and the courts were packed all the time. The last 3 years anytime I go to a park that had courts, they're almost always empty. Not to say that means anything, but it's representative of the comment below. There was a time where it was super popular, men's and women's, and it's passed
[–]splatmynamedawg 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
And yet society hates her 😪
Who hates her?
[–]splatmynamedawg1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Most twitter users I’d wager
[–]AngryTrucker0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
She's also a shit fighter, have to consider that as well.
[–]Keladry1450 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The women's soccer teams has generated more money than the men's in the last few years though.
[–]Brockkilledspeedy2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Interesting, is there a source? Also, even if they are generating more money, OP shows that proportionally, the men are paid 9% of revenue and the women get 13%. So either way, your argument is moot
[–]Keladry1451 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"There was a long-standing gap between revenue generated by the men and women, but that has disappeared in recent years. The women’s team contributed close or more than half of the federation’s revenue from games since fiscal 2016. Overall, from fiscal 2016 to 2018, the women’s games generated about $900,000 more revenue than the men’s games."
This is a very complicated issue though, if you want to know more the article this quote is from has lots of information and analysis.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/
[–]Levsque0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Maybe if you dont get your lights shut out like Chernobyl...
This was before that big time loss, where she was on top.
[–]FloppyTunaFish1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Would u rather die in a plane crash or Chernobyl meltdown
[–]Levsque1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean you have a decent chance of getting the fuck out of there if its chernobyl.
[–]VickVinaigrette-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except the women do bring in as much revenue as the men…
“Except new audited financial reports that surfaced this week found that the U.S. Soccer Federation has been taking in more money from women's soccer than men's soccer. Between 2016 and 2018, the women's team brought in nearly $51 million from things like ticket sales, advertising, while the men's team brought in only $50 million. All of a sudden, the economic argument about athlete pay starts to fall apart.”
https://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=734901705
You idiots really don’t think the lawyers checked this stuff before their sued the US Soccer Federation?
[–]Insanity_Pills2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
the womens team makes 13% of generated revenue and the mens team makes 9%
The post says that men make 9% of revenue while women get 13%. Who's the idiot that doesn't understand that?
My point is still made because this is only for those two years though. It's recent. And they're still making more, sooooo?
[–]luck_panda-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That's some boot licking bullshit right there.
She was asked about being paid the same as the top men in boxing or mma and she was logical, rational, and informed. If that's your version of bootlicking, there's something wrong with you.
[–]luck_panda1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If you don't think you're worth more than what someone tells you, you're a bootlicker.
[–]Skepsis93-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There still are pay discrepancies between male and female athletes. I know for soccer the top paid male and female athletes actually aren't too different from each other in annual income, but if you start going down the list you'll see the female pay goes down fast. If you're a male player who rarely plays and are largely just a substitute player, you'll still be raking in a couple hundred thousand a year and whereas a female player of the same status may only make 50-60k annually. Basically, male sports seem to be better at spreading the wealth across all players while in female leagues only the best of best make anything and scraps are left for the rest of the players.
I don't really think this is a gender issue, but these discrepancies still need to be remedied imo. I'll try to look up sources on this but it's been since the last world cup that I looked into it and I'm only finding very recent sensationalist articles on it through google atm.
[–]Slizzoro4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is completely wrong though. The top female and male players have a huge gap in annual income. It's enormous. Also it is all about the money the sports attracts. The reason women are paid less in sports, is because the money just isn't there. People are not as willing to watch women sports as they are often not as exciting as watching the males. Everyone should be paid the same percentage not the same amount...
[–]Skepsis931 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Everyone should be paid the same percentage not the same amount...
That's the point I'm trying to make. Man, I really wish I could find the old article from like 2015 or 2016 it showed it really well with bar graphs side by side comparing the top 50 salaries between men and women in US soccer. For the first 10 or so athletes the gradient in pay as you went down the list it was comparable but after that it was such a sharp drop-off for the women the contrast was extremely noticeable. The percentages were not the same between the two groups.
I appreciate your argument, but that gap may exist because the men negotiate better or they have better agents. Or maybe the drop off in players' skill is massive? It's not a systemic problem gap to me. It's not like it's just "oh give them cunts less cause they have cunts".
Yeah, and I can't remember what all was factored in to the numbers given in the article and at this point Ive given up trying to find it again. Honestly, I think the best way to make sports wages equitable is for the leagues/teams to pay everyone the same living wage and let sponsorships/signing bonuses be the reward for being a good player.
[–]RubyRhod-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except they bring in more rev: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
[–]Lord_Teapot8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
no, they dont, lol.
[–]jayhawks16443 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They are cherry picking data. For the women, they are using the years where they compete in the World Cup, and for the men they are using the years where they do not compete in the World Cup. Also, you have to look at potential revenue too. If the US men’s team were to ever go far into the World Cup, the amount of revenue they would bring in would be astronomically higher than what it is now. The women’s team has essentially capped the amount of revenue they can bring in.
[–]RubyRhod2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except the Men’s team rarely makes it out of group play or even makes the WC. And that’s the point, they are way better.
[–]notreallyhereforthis3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The source article's headline should clear up any confusion
U.S. Women’s Soccer Games Outearned Men’s Games
Specifically, ticket sale profits for games are slightly higher than for mens. This is a small portion of the overall revenue. So why the anger? Let's look at an analogy:
Rhod and Futz both work at an accounting firm. Both put in 40 hour work weeks, both are diligent and excellent employees. Rhod is successful at brings in 20 clients producing $100,000 each. Futz is successful and brings in 100 clients producing $200,000 each.
A.) Both receive 10% of all profits from the business they bring in, so Rhod is paid $200,000 so Futz is paid $2,000,000
or
B.) Both receive an equal share of total company profits so Rhod and Futz are paid $1,100,000
People split over A and B clearly. I think its because some people believe that two people digging a ditch should receive equal pay for equal work and some people believe that if one person digs a ditch at 10 times the speed of the other, equal pay is unfair. But let's also not forget that sports is entertainment. These people are actors, musicians, as far as the economics are concerned. It doesn't matter that men will always outperform women in football, what matters is how many people want to watch it. And when we look at it like that, I find it confusing why people would argue for B. I support musicians I like, I think it would be weird if their label was like: "I know you support musician X but we're going to give half of your money to musician Y to help them make music."...
[–]giantgladiator2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well either mat Walsh or the CNBC is lying. I'm too lazy to find out.
A higher percentage of a bigger number won't leave you with less.
[–]RubyRhod1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol yeah I’ll believe you who is too lazy to do any actual research.
[–]giantgladiator0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The CNBC article and Matt's tweet contradict each other, I don't know who's right, I'm just pointing out that someone is putting out wrong info.
I’d assume the side that doesn’t want to pay people more similar to how to NCAA puts out false information so they can keep their indentured servants.
[–]10z20Luka-9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The US female team brings in more money than the US male team. That's literally the whole point. That's why you're hearing about it.
[–]internetmouthpiece7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Got a source to share?
[–][deleted]5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is hard to tell. Jersey sales, sponsorships etc make up a larger chunk of revenue than viewership. All you can do is speculate if rises in certain sponsorship agreements were due to a noteworthy event in either teams track record.
The women make a base salary and less bonus for winning- the men make no base and more bonus which they never receive because they suck. FIFA sets the amount of prize money for their events(World Cup). The lawsuit alleges that it doesn’t matter if FIFA allocates a TENTH of the men’s prize pool for women, the United States federation is responsible for making up that difference. To me that is asinine
And the post is saying proportionally, women take in more? What's your point?
[–]imbillypardy-13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I’ll never understand that argument. Cause there’s no argument UFC cant afford to do it
FIFA can too.
[–]Scabrous40312 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You know that companies exist to make money right, not just payout everything to the employees?
[–]imbillypardy-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean I do know that companies won’t exist for long if all of their employees or consumers decide not to accept that.
[–]Scabrous4032 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ok. You’re literally responding to the at one point most famous female UFC fighter saying she understands why men get paid more, as they draw a bigger crowd both at the event and on tv. If she understands it why is it so hard for you to. They would pay her more if more people cared, did you watch her, the World Cup, women’s hockey, wrestling etc. You’re more to blame than she or anyone else involved in those sports are.
No rational person is against paying women equally, and you’re right businesses that are unfair don’t stand to exist. Such as the vegan restaurant in San Francisco that just shut down for charging men 18% more (bcuz wage gap) than women. Because even women wouldn’t support that bullshit. Because guess what, women aren’t idiots who just follow what’s popular unlike you you fucking dunce.
[–]imbillypardy-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I didn’t say I don’t understand it. Nor do I think her logic is flawed. I’m simply arguing that everyone is pretty quick to apologize for these companies that post record profits year after year.
[–]Scabrous4031 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So they should be doing worse and not growing the sport then?
More money means more people watching, which in turn funnels more people down to the women’s side, which in turn brings more money to the players.
They have to make more money for the women you so care about to make more too.
[–]SimplyFishOil2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The UFC is known for underpaying pretty much everyone, so that's a different case
[–]imbillypardy0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean, only if people accept that answer.
[–]tionanny-9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Shhhh, thinking like that will just leave you mad at every CEO. Just be a good worker and blame foreigners/poor people/minorities/majorities/genders/gay marriage for all of the bad things.
[–]Sizzlingwall717 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Can you show an actual example of a large group doing this or you just reciting propaganda?
[–]imbillypardy1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
A bit of hyperbole but thanks for some support at the onslaught I’m getting.
[–]bassplayer96 412 points413 points414 points 7 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link
22 million viewers watched the women’s final. 1 billion watched the mens. Pump up that audience and maybe you can get more money.
[–]HermanGould 129 points130 points131 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not only that but, the quality of viewership is different. People do not watch women's football for long :
Women's world cup detailed viewership stats:
1+ minute: 764 million
3+ minutes: 555.6 million
20+ minutes: 327.8 million
30+ minutes: N/A
https://resources.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/tv/02/74/59/85/fwwccanada2015tvaudiencereport_neutral.pdf
[–]Vlaxilla 36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Im sure men’s stats drastically go down too, but yeah Im also sure percentage wise men lose less viewers.
[–]Boop121314 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I didn’t know so many people watched football/soccer how do those numbers compare to nfl or nba stuff?
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Men's Soccer is the most popular sport in the world, with the top 3 athletes on Forbes list all soccer players. The first US football player in the list is #6.
But I would say that soccer is as popular around the world (except maybe Asia) as football is in the U.S.
[–]SayNoMorty 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is why I always love calling football “The worlds sport” when someone asks “what football are you talking about?”
[–]GulfAg1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If you're in the US, assume that "football" = american football.
If you're in Australia... I actually don't know if it would most commonly refer to Aussie rules, league, union, or soccer. Any Aussies want to help me out here?
If you're pretty much anywhere else in the world, assume that "football" = soccer.
Doing otherwise just makes you a pretentious twat.
[–]stationhollow 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Football is getting bigger and bigger in Asia. It is one of the most popular sports in Japan and Korea and has been increasing in popularity in China over the past decade with the new Chinese Super League.
[–]PoopMobile9000 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
The difference is that the American women were playing in that final and the American men were watching on TV because they were knocked out in the group stage.
Nobody's saying women's soccer is as popular as men's soccer. They're saying the American women's team is more successful and more lucrative than the American men's team.
[–]JoeFalcone26 29 points30 points31 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
They are only more successful relative to their competition though, which is much weaker then the men’s competition
[–]PoopMobile9000-13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So? Serena and Venus Williams make more than plenty of no-name mens players who could beat them, because they are champions in their league.
[–]JoeFalcone2616 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They produce far more revenue, no name men players produce basically nothing compared to them. In the entertainment business you’re only worth what you’re worth. Ya feel me?
[–]PoopMobile9000-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It’s literally the same situation. The American men’s team is not attracting viewers to the World Cup finals, but the women’s team is because the women are actually good in their sport. The American Women’s World Cup team brings more revenue and ratings than the men’s team, even if the men’s sport is bigger—just like how men’s tennis is bigger than women’s tennis, but Venus and Serena are bigger than the 200th ranked men’s player.
[–]NinjaPenguinGuy10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ok I get what your saying I think about the 200th ranked player, and them being paid more while being worse at the sport; to compare that for soccer look at the wages of a U15 soccer team that beat the us women's team.
[–]JoeFalcone263 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The men’s team brings in more viewers generally, they just didn’t make the World Cup this past meeting.
[–]SuperSMT2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But again it's relative. The American women's team brings in a much higher percentage of the women's world cup, but those raw numbers are still tiny compared the men's cup
[–]super_ag 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Maybe they should play in the Men's World Cup if they want the money the Men's Team makes.
[–]Kizz3r-8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You do know the women’s team generates more revenue than the men’s team and they want to be compensated for it?
[–]HermanGould8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is false. Viewership of the world cup :
What revenue you talk about all you bots with the same lies ? of course it is stadium revenue ( tickets ) only, maybe you count T-shirt too which should be going to women already due to deals. And women has more revenue on tickets because they have more matches and it is promoted by the whole american media.. Pennies compared to what viewership brings. That is what generates money
[–]Kizz3r-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How much money did The men’s team make when they didn’t even qualify?
See this is the thing I don’t understand. The women’s team are more successful, they train with in the same sport and bring in more viewership than their counterpart men’s team. You have other national teams paying their women more and this is leading the American team to feel undervalued and underpaid and are negotiating for a raise.
Like it’s not a complicated aspect that women champions would think they deserve more than the men who couldnt even qualify and negotiate a raise. Especially when they see women in their field get the same raises and higher pay then they are.
I just don’t get all the hate against it. Like fuck let them try and get paid more money.
You sell the package of world cup not each team separetly that is what you dont get
Americans trying yo school europeans on football lol
[–]Kizz3r1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Both teams have different structures on a CBA agreement and has nothing to due with World Cup as they are paid by the US Federation. Women can earn a max of $100000 or $5000 per game while men can earn a max of $260000 or $13000 per game.
This is mainly due to different bonus structures between the two teams with men being allowed to earn significantly more money with bonuses.
The women’s team has had 3 of the last 7 World Cup wins (now 4/8) and 4 Olympic gold medals with the men rarely even qualifying for either events.
In 2015 Us soccer was expected to lose $400000 but after a US women led victory made the US federation $17000000 in profit.
The women do get less crowds at their games (70% compared to mens) but played 6 more games drawing more people in total. This also means they played more games and worked more than the men’s. And in total women’s national team events brought in more revenue the mens team.
The men do have significant potential drawing power to draw in more money and viewership but that has never been realized and it should be on the men to negotiate a pay raise if the potential ever does get realized.
But right now it’s easily argued that the women are significantly underpaid for the work and value they provide especially when compared to US men and this is a key aspect in the new CBA.
[–]valiantlight2 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
more lucrative
not that i dont believe you, but do you have a source saying that they are bringing in more profit dollars than the mens team? even as champions
[–]SweatpantsDV-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HillaryWon13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It explains right in the article that the women's team isn't necessarily bringing in more money:
"According to The Journal, this difference can largely be attributed to ticket sales. The USSF sells broadcast and sponsorship rights for the men’s and women’s teams together, and as a result, it can be difficult to determine the exact broadcast value of the two teams."
Are more people watching the men's team on TV even though they don't do as well? I have no idea, but if so that would explain a lot.
[–]SweatpantsDV1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://deadline.com/2019/07/megan-rapinoe-us-womens-world-cup-final-ratings-netherlands-team-usa-fox-1202642953/
Their TV ratings were higher, too.
[–]HillaryWon11 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That's comparing one game from the women's team to one game from the men's team. That says nothing of all of the other games played throughout the year or even other years, including ones when the US women's soccer team didn't make it all the way to the finals.
This also says nothing of sponsorships. Who brings in more money in sponsorships? There are a lot of variables going on here and no one seems interested in discussing them, or at least not in full.
[–]SweatpantsDV0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sponsorships are for the US Soccer Federation, not for the teams separately.
I've shown that the women produce more revenue,have higher attendance, and higher ratings. If you want to act as if the men still generate more revenue the burden of proof is on you.
That's like the entire point. Who is more of a draw for sponsorships; the men's team or the women's team?
I've shown that the women produce more revenue,have higher attendance, and higher ratings.
More revenue while not taking into account things like sponsorships or TV ratings, you know, a very big part of revenue for any professional sports teams. You think sports teams make all of their money off of ticket sales?
And you showed ONE game where the women's team had higher ratings compared to ONE men's team. All I'm asking is for who has more ratings OVERALL. Not just ONE game. Altogether, over the past several years, including years where the women's team didn't win the championship.
I'm not saying men bring in more revenue, I'm just saying show me the complete facts stating women bring in more revenue than men.
[–]CommanderHeMan 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The USA men didn’t even qualify for Russia 2018.
The USA men’s team has to compete with 150+ nations where men’s football is the predominant sport.
The USA men’s team doesn’t stand a chance.
Women’s football is rubbish compared to men’s football, everyone from “football countries” knows that, that’s why nobody watches it.
The USA women’s team is an anomaly in that it’s one of the only country’s where men’s football isn’t the dominant professional sport. That left a vacuum that women’s “soccer” filled in the USA.
[–]Shawn_Spenstar1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They are more successful tournament wise no doubt. They are not more lucrative in any way.
[–]PoopMobile90000 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"US Womens Soccer Games Now Generate More Revenue Than Mens"
Guess I'll just start copy and pasting myself whenever I see this story linked:
[–]PoopMobile90001 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I would guess that more American viewers watch a men’s qualifying or group-round stage than for the women, but I would also guess that viewership increases significantly for the tournament, and increases further as you advance.
You’d also, I guess, have to disentangle the impact of the sport itself. That is, I’d bet a much larger share of Americans watching the Women’s World Cup are watching specifically because the American team is there and really good, and a larger share of men’s viewers are watching the men at the main tournament just because it’s a major event bringing the world’s best talent. In other words, I bet viewership in the US drops much more for the women’s tournament if the team is shit.
[–]aybbyisok 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
U.S men's team bleeds money, while the women's rakes in millions in prize money, if you're hosting the World Cup or Olympics your national team doesn't get paid for views.
[–]The_Flowers_of_Evil1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It was actually over 3.5 billion. Huge discrepancy.
[–]bassplayer966 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
3.5 was the total viewer count, about 1/3 of total viewers watched the final
[–]clumzazael 74 points75 points76 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
US womens national team lost to 15U boys.
[–]super_ag 38 points39 points40 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
ThEy WeReN't TrYiNg To WiN ThOuGh!
[–]TylerD123483 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
But also they lost to a U16 girls team so next generation might be more talented
[–]clumzazael 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
We need to play the u15 mens and u16 girls, obviously
[–]TylerD123483 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The girls would probably lose because they physically have a handicap compared to boys.
[–]clumzazael 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But wait i thought women and men should make equal pay because they play at the same level
[–]NyteBag 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm pretty sure it was Australia.
[–]electric_screams 387 points388 points389 points 7 years ago (70 children) | Copy Link
We’re just in time to roll this over to Wimbledon too.
[–]Gordon-G 205 points206 points207 points 7 years ago (69 children) | Copy Link
Make the women play more sets?!!
[–]Denncity 246 points247 points248 points 7 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
The winner of the 2018 Wimbledon's singles championship won £2.25m last year - both men and women got the same.
The women's final was over in 65 minutes. The men's final took 2 hours and 19 minutes, even though it was a straight sets win by Djokovic.
[–]WorkIsWhenIReddit 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Match durations is irrelevant with regards to monetary reward. It's revenue that counts and when you start getting into that it becomes almost impossible disentangle how much revenue each gender brings in at a tournament like Wimbledon.
[–]DrMaxCoytus 36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I wouldn't say it's irrelevant. Longer matches means more ad placement and more coverage in general which can increase revenue.
[–]BeautifulType1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It’s making more sense that Wimbledon is fining players for short matches
[–]WorkIsWhenIReddit1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Things is, TV packages aren't sold per match but for the entire tournament, including men's matches, women's matches and every form of doubles/wheelchair/what-not. You could theoretically keep track of the price of each ad, and how many viewers each match gets but then you're introducing the opportunity for bias to creep into the system.
On top of that; it's the tournament that pays out the prices, but the TV station that sells the adverts. The tournament doesn't care much about how each individual advert costs, it only really cares about the prize it gets for selling the total package. I also doubt the TV station would be willing to share that kind of information.
And that's just one aspect of all the revenue a tournament like Wimbledon takes in. There's on-site sponsorship, deals for equipment, ticket money, concession sales, merchandise sales. There's an endless list of sources of revenue for these tournaments and it's virtually impossible to keep track of it all.
[–]DrMaxCoytus1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Agreed. My only point was that longer matches can have a cumulative effect on revenue. Maybe each source increases revenue slightly at the margin, but with all of the sources you just listed are compiled together, all of a sudden you see a big difference. Not saying it's the only reason, but it's one I don't hear spoken about much.
[–]gfa22 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Tennis is an exception imo. My dad played tennis in college and it is the only women's sport I've seen him follow.
[–]topspin49 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women's tennis is unique in the sense that it's one of, if not the only women's sport that isn't just a lower quality version of the same men's sport. For example when you watch women's soccer, it's pretty much the same as men's soccer but with much slower and weaker players. Women's tennis however is different from men's tennis in the sense that women tend to have longer rallies, more balanced forehands and backhands, and a higher focus on consistency. Some people actually prefer watching women over watching men slap the ball as hard as they can at each other for a 4 shot rally.
[–]Murasasme 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly this. Tennis is a pretty good watch regardless of gender. Watch a wnba match and even if you know nothing about basketball, you immediatly know it's a far inferior version.
[–]Scudstock0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I saw the arrogant announcers saying that the top 3 women athletes of all time were tennis players. I watch compelling women's tennis matches zbut I'm not diluted like these clowns.
[–]Fsck_Reddit_Again0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because they dont run around at half speed of the mens team for 2 hours.
Not really.
We know people aren't going to see women's sports.
[–]PumpingFeFe1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This logic is as stupid as the women from the World Cup logic. You don’t get paid by how hard or how long you work. You get paid by how much money you generate.
[–]brain_on_drugs8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not really. The men's final probably gets more viewers and it's a longer match - more time for sponsorships and advertisements = more chance for revenue gains
[–]PumpingFeFe2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s no what OP said at all. He was making an argument that the men should make more because they played longer. You’ve just tacked on that point after the fact.
You’re not wrong of course but that’s just not what OP was arguing.
[–]Biggordie1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Longer playing time correlates to more revenue generation. Either through concessions, commercials, or etc.
[–]DecentCake1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You don't need to be the third person to restate this in this comment chain.
I don’t see anyone else responding to the dude?
[–]bradtwo 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (44 children) | Copy Link
Tennis shouldn’t have a gender division. It should be anyone vs anyone.
Same with golf, bowling, archery.
Make it same terms and see how it pans out.
[–]Craig_M 101 points102 points103 points 7 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Women would be made irrelevant in the sport if that happened. The physical difference between men and women is insane.
[–]gobie25 51 points52 points53 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Just look at when the 203rd ranked male player decimated both the Williams sisters. And he wasn't even trying hard. It's laughable to think any woman could compete against a man of a similar level.
[–]Uws102 48 points49 points50 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
A decent men’s Sunday league team would win the women’s World Cup.
[–]Daedeluss 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I tried to get in to the world cup, I really did, but there's only so long I can watch farcical defending.
[–]Jmsaint 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would recommend becoming a saints fan...
[–]Swindel921 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Mate think about it - the more people watch it. The more funding goes into it and the more people are interested in trying to be a player.
The quality of football is only gonna improve.
You shouldn't compare the men and women's game it's a different sport.
[–]RyanG7 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nahhh... USWNT got beaten by a U-15 MLS academy boys team. I don't think their ego's would be able to handle going against fully grown men
[–]NoShameInternets-10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s absolute bullshit. Keep the trash talk realistic dude.
[–]Huggybear__12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
M8 the US women lost to a U15 team after winning the WC last time.
[–]IsThisNameValid9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://usatodayhss.com/2017/the-fc-dallas-u-15-academy-team-beat-the-u-s-women-s-national-team-5-2
[–]NoShameInternets-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s a pro level farm team. Basically equivalent to AA/AAA.
[–]brain_on_drugs11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol you have no idea what you're talking about.
My local AAA baseball team has professional players who are in their late 20s and early 30s, some of which have already made it to the MLB and then sent back down and others who are right on the cusp of an MLB contract.
A U15 academy soccer team is comprised of literal children who would get smoked by a U17 academy team. And a U17 academy team would get smoked by a D1 college. And a D1 college would get smoked by a pro team.
It's not even close of a comparison.
[–]NoShameInternets1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Okay dude. If this sexist circle jerk helps you all sleep at night, knock yourselves out.
[–]brain_on_drugs4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What's sexist about my post?
[–]GaiusGracchus1217 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hockey instead of soccer, but 10 years ago our random pickup skate players (mostly 35 year old ex high school guys), played a top 5 women’s college team and beat them.
[–]UGHToastIU1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Was that the one where he had a few drinks beforehand and was a regular smoker, too? Or am I thinking of another guy?
[–]gobie251 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yup. He warmed up with a game of golf and a couple of drinks...
[–]bogus_otis1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
In the same day no less
[–]beeshaas 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's either equal pay on an equal field on unequal pay with gender separation.
[–]ishibaunot 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Yeah that would never work in Tennis and Golf. Look at the swing/serve speeds.
Can't say anything about the other sports but I'm sure someone with more knowledge can chime in.
[–]TastyAnimal0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I agree on the Tennis front. But a quick search shows me the best score for 18 on the PGA is 58, and the best on the LPGA is also 58. So men and women can compete in golf. Obviously the ladies tee off from the ladies tee, and the men from the men’s tee.
[–]johnnysoccer12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women are also playing 40-50 yards shorter per hole, pin locations are entirely different, and green speeds are entirely different, also rough length is considerably shorter. If you put the greatest woman golfer ever on a certified USGA/PGA course it's not even close to fair.
[–]Loocha11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I don’t follow golf, but I thought men and women used different tees. Not trying to stir the pot, just don’t know pga rules.
[–]BlckMrkt4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They do.
[–]cclgurl952 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They do, and they get a handicap based on what tees they play from. The handicap would adjust their score based on their typical amount over par, which allows people of all different genders and skill levels to fairly compete against each other
[–]AnotherUnfunnyName4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Driving distance Men
Average Driving distance Women
The 2016 olympic golf tournament played 900 meters shorter for the women, and it was a pretty short course for the men.
[–]WikiTextBot2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Golf at the 2016 Summer Olympics
Golf at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was held in August at the new Olympic Golf Course (Portuguese: Campo Olímpico de Golfe), built within the Reserva de Marapendi in the Barra da Tijuca zone.
The 2016 Summer Olympics was the first time golf had been played at the Olympics since the 1904 Summer Olympics and featured two events: the men's and women's individual events.
[–]TastyAnimal2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s kind of why I said women tee off from the women’s tee and men from the men’s tee. The former is closer to the pin than the latter. That equalises things. I’ve been beaten by women often using that format when we have a four ball with men and women playing.
[–]rabelsdelta4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But then that’s not fair. Either you compete at the same level, or you don’t. It’s like if I went to play a game of hockey but the opponents aren’t allowed skates cuz I can’t skate very well
It’s a bit different to hockey though. I just think it’s worth a try with golf. Could be interesting.
[–]rabelsdelta0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yes it’s different but the point is the same.
One way to test the idea is to have the equivalent of mixed doubles in golf.
[–]rabelsdelta1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Can you explain? I still think if you want to mix, then it should be fair for everyone and that they tee off at the same point.
In golf women tee off closer to the green than men. It’s quite the equaliser in golf, as the shorter distance for women compensates for the strength difference. It would be unfair if women tees off at the same tee as men for obvious reasons. All I’m saying is I think mixed golf could be doable almost as is. You can still have men only tournaments and women only tournaments, but a mixed one would be really interesting to watch.
You can’t say that without changing the tee for every subject. Some women tee off further than others, while men tee off further as well. What the women’s tee does is focus on an average of what they think is fair. If you want equality then tee off from the same place but design the course in a way that tee-off distance doesn’t matter.
[–]BiggusDickus- 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Bowling and archery maybe, but women wouldn't stand a chance in golf. Men can drive the ball much farther.
There have been a handful of instances where top ranked women have tried to compete against men in a real PGA event, but they pretty much always miss the cut.
[–]ElementallyEvil 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Now I'm no expert, but wouldn't men still have a bigger archery advantage due to being able to use higher draw weights?
[–]DavenIII 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Bowling is a no go, been bowling at the semi pro level (and against PBA members often) men have significantly more speed and rotation on their shots, which while obviously transferring more power into the pins helping pin carry also, less obvious to the layman, opens up many more options on how to play the lane, lane oil often dictates where you can place the ball on the lane, with more speed/rev's you open up many more lines to the pocket.
[–]BiggusDickus-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hmmm, interesting. Thanks!
[–]TangoZulu 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's really not just the drive distance, as the Ladies Tees make up for that. But the distance they can hit the irons is insane and gives a huge benefit. For example, an approach shot from ~180 would be a 4-iron for the average LPGA player, while the average PGA player would be hitting a 7 or 8 iron. The difference in loft between those clubs is huge, meaning the women would have much tougher time controlling the landing where the men can drop a nice lofted ball onto the green and stop it on a dime.
[–]newtlong 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The 'men's' divisions are already open in tennis and golf. Wimbledon is an open tournament and any woman that could compete with the men is welcome too.
[–]colby983 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well they would have to qualify first, which wouldn’t happen
[–]hungry4danish 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What the fuck are you talking about? Tennis absolutely needs a gender division.
[–]Jmsaint 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That is the point.
[–]InsaneInTheManBrain 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The grunts and groans per minute will definitely increase. I'm in!
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t think that’s fair.
People should be based on how much money they bring to their company.
It’s like in the office, the guy who always does overtime and brags about how hard he works will still get fired if he isn’t bringing money into the company. While the guy who does 30 minutes of work a day can keep his job because he makes so much money for the company in that time.
Unfortunately in tennis. Outside of the top tournaments. The women can’t bring in as much money as the men.
[–]Latest-greatest 1464 points1465 points1466 points 7 years ago* (304 children) | Copy Link
Imagine chanting equal pay with absolutely no evidence to support that claim. Congrats to the women for their achievement but maybe they Should stay off Twitter and Facebook and learn some real facts
Edit: I appreciate everyone commenting their side of this debate and I appreciate that we are being respectful to each other. I’m not trying to knock these women or any woman. My whole point is in this age of social media it’s so easy to get misinformed and then run wild on something we saw on twitter that probably isn’t true.
[–]livear 7 years ago* [recovered] (83 children) | Copy Link
Imagine thinking its still about equality.
[–]ntvirtue 410 points411 points412 points 7 years ago (50 children) | Copy Link
Women have had the right to vote for close to 100 years....they have NEVER been required to register for the draft. It was NEVER about equality.
[–]livear128 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link
Before that women were allowed to vote just like men as long as they owned enough land.
[–]ntvirtue 85 points86 points87 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
True and non-landowning men also got the right to vote with the passage of that amendment.
[–]Mentalseppuku 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nope, that had happened about 100 years before, and land owning women weren't univerally allowed to vote and weren't allowed to vote in any state but wyoming before the 19th, landed or not.
[–]TCBinaflash 36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
According to the National Constitution Center you are incorrect about voting rights before the 19th amendment.
https://constitutioncenter.org/timeline/html/cw08_12159.html
[–]monkwren-17 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So advancing women's rights helps everyone? What a strange thought.
[–]MartyRobinsHasMySoul17 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah if you forget about the other responsibilities that came with the right to vote.
[–]Yungdodge91113 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Big jump of logic there
[–]LeviathanPWN 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well that isn’t quite right, in many cases women weren’t allowed to own property, so they were excluded by that restriction. I’m speaking from an English history perspective, could be different where you’re from
[–]ConstantineSX1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Eh not really, except in New Jersey which realistically only occurred due to a misworded State Constitutional provision for a time. Property that belonged to a women was considered to be the husbands property, even if it truly was the woman’s.
Credentials: Colonial American certified historian (moved on to a different better paying career, but still wanted to give some input on my past knowledge)
[–]Onein1024th-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Prove it
[–]Mentalseppuku-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is a complete lie. Voting right were state by state and while women were allowed a limited vote in a single state for about 30 years that was eventually taken away, a hundred years before the 19th amdentment.
You could have spent 5 seconds looking into your claims and instead you'd rather be ignorant.
Edit: if you want to know what kind of sub this is, blatantly false propaganda is being spread and upvoted simply because it puts women down. A very simple search would prove that it's false, but that post has gone up by at least 30 since being debunked, an the post debunking the false claim is marked as controversial.
[–]Poopsmcgeeeeee2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
In the 18th century, women over 30 could vote if they filed a claim that only took 5 seconds to file. Equal rights!
[–]Mentalseppuku2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Again this is a complete lie. These people are intentionally lying to you because they know you aren't going to look it up for yourself and they just want to perpetuate this false narrative.
[–]Poopsmcgeeeeee-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Haha, I know. I just used all your stats and rearranged them into the original narrative. I’m practicing my confirmation bias.
[–]Schnazzmizzlez 42 points43 points44 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
There is also the fact that women in sports even an international level, never surpass a mens highschool/collegiate skill level.
[–]Stephenrudolf 46 points47 points48 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Vancouver 2010 Olympics prove that too. Team Canada won the Gold medal. Team Canada also practiced against Junior A (who the OHL drafts from, so WAY under NHL level) level 15-17year old boys and lost to them in all of the televised matches.
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Recently, the (champion) US female soccer team also lost to the U15 children from the FC Dallas.
[–]Shadepanther 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I've seen people claim that they weren't trying to win.
The Swedish team lost to the AIK Stockholm U17 team 3-0 a few years ago. They also had only 10 "men" as they agreed to play with 1 less defender.
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which is what I would say, if I was beaten by literal children.
[–]orlandofredhart1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Thera an Australian example as well. Women's international rugby football team vs u 17 16 regional academy team. Boys won.
I'll try and find the source
Edit: fact checked myself.
Source: https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/australian-womens-national-team-lose-70-to-team-of-15yearold-boys-a3257266.html
[–]ntvirtue-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
True but not relevant to this particular argument
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It has only taken them that long to destroy 3,000 years of civilization.
[–]worfres_arec_bawrin1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s a good thing, no? There’s only so many non frontline positions and I sure don’t want some non beast mode chick stuck trying to drag my wounded 250 lb ass.
[–]coolcid21121 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What is it about then, sargon? What have the women been planning that cucks like me dont see?
[–]VegasLATraffic0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I can't even imagine how hard going through life must be for you with that extreme low level of intelligence.
[–]DrLumis-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Uh, yeah, so women weren't the ones who decided women didn't need to sign up for selective service. It sounds like it should make you angry at women, though, so good effort
[–]ntvirtue6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You mean the WOMEN who voted against the Equal rights amendment?
[–]SoykaBlyat-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
TF am I reading this tired point of view again for?
[–]187ForNoReason5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Don’t have to make a new point if the old ones are still valid.
[–]PintSizedPinata-14 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine knowing you are so oppressed in a society but instead of speak against it you take it out on those who do.
How dare women demand their worth in labor.
[–]ntvirtue10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ah yes the pay gap myth. https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2019/06/06/dispelling-myths-about-the-gender-pay-gap/#19d4593d46fa
[–]EVANO26 36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Imagine imagining either of these
[–]MouthSpiders 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Imagine how is touch the sky
[–]sirkevun 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Imagine dragons fly
[–]They_Call_Me_L 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine all the people.
[–]am_a_burner 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus
[–]BetterOFFdead007 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine dragon my balls across your face.
[–]Tehmaxx2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Equity
[–]benjick0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Is this an incel sub?
[–]livear3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You can have sex with women and still hate them, happens more often than you think.
Why hate women?
[–]GiantWindmill-28 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine being an incel
[–]YogaBoy91125 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How is it? White knighting getting you plenty of pussy?
[–]HotelMohelHolidayInn4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Their response: "Is that a Pokemon?""
[–]YogaBoy9116 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's time to Pokemon Go to the polls
[–]GiantWindmill-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine thinking that not being an incel is whiteknighting
[–]YogaBoy9112 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What about this post or comment would lead you to use the word incel? I mean it's already loaded and sexist language. But to come out of the blue with it is strange
[–]GiantWindmill-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This sub is practically an incel/sexism sub and the dude posts in /braincells
There you go with your sexist language again. I'd wager that the majority of people you label "incel" are probably just mildly autistic. I'm assuming youre a man, so you should be more concerned with your brothers' wellbeing than with shitting on them online
I only label people incels when they're sexist and/or post in incel subs unironically, you incel Trumpette
Okay den. I'm in a very happy relationship but I guess I'm an incel now. I've never posted in such a sub so I guess youre now saying that all Americans who support Donald Trump are involuntary celibate. You lower your bar for mudslinging and it betrays you
Well you're an anti-semite so it's okay
[–]YogaBoy9111 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Guess I need a stupid /s after every joke. I'm an atheist and couldnt give a shit less about that stuff
I looked through your post history too. We like similar things and TV shows and deal with similar mental health issues. Why focus on the things that we dont agree on? Support other men. They generally dont have anyone else who will
[–]GiantWindmill1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sure, if you renounce Trump I'll support you. But I don't care to support other men who support Trump or "honking" or "fren" subreddits or sexism subreddits like this, or fat hate, etc. The current plight of men is less important to me than the plight of humanity as a whole (which is the struggle against fascism and anti-egalitarianism, and the absurdly wealthy, people similar to Trump).
The barbarians are at the gates and you think fascism is the real struggle? Nepotism and plutocracy yeah. But where in the world is fascim accepted other than religious middle eastern countries? And maybe Poland
What barbarians? The only barbarians are the alt-right and those complicit with them (i.e, Trump, Pence, McConnell, the entire Republican senate, corporate democrats and centrists that don't oppose the right, and many more) Our president is a fascist and fascism is on the rise in the US and Europe, seems like it's gaining acceptance.
[–]livear1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm not an incel, I just hate women.
/r/braincels is hilarious.
[–]joshaayy-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not an incel, just a sexist?
[–]livear6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fucked enough women to know I hate them.
[–]ApplePeachPine3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fucking based
[–]TheBeardedSingleMalt-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So...none?
[–]livear5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
After about 4 it became kind of tiresome.
Juice just ain't worth the squeeze.
[–]kerayeu 62 points63 points64 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine chanting equal pay with absolutely no evidence to support that claim.
Doesn't this shit happen at basically every existing feminist rally/protest on earth?
God, even in my city.. we went protesting for better abortion laws. (I am pro-choice)
Feminists came and shat all over everything like they owned the place with their EQUAL PAY slogans... one of them was my completely talentless coworker who shows no incentive to learn anything. 6+ years on the job, still less skilled than an intern.
edit: Also I feel like I need to mention that we have a very skilled female senior developer on our team and guess what - she never complains about pay gap.
There are always individuals who want to hop one the ride with their bullshit.
[–][deleted] 88 points89 points90 points 7 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link
The feminist movement is the most successful bullshit movement since religion.
[–]TheRandomRGU 52 points53 points54 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Classical feminism was about equality which they have in most of the Western world. Modern feminism is about female supremacy.
[–]Fusspot1 32 points33 points34 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
You know modern feminism is full of hot bullshit when they support and praise Islam and call it a feminist religion.
I'm all for equality and rights and everything, but I'll never support modern feminism as long as they refuse to call Islam out on being a backwards, barbaric, hateful, misogynistic cult
[–]centipedesareano1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Feminists don’t do that. But ok bro.
[–]IbrahimAlgosair-14 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Dude are u serious? I'm sure we're not a feminist religion but i'm also sure we're not what you saying 🏃♂️
[–]Fusspot116 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Islam's greatest socially progressive move in the last 100 years was Saudi Arabia allowing women to drive with permission from their male owner. Gay people are still routinely murdered in Islamic countries for the crime of being gay. Female genital mutilation is practiced more among Muslims than among any other group. People leaving the religion are threatened with death, if not actually killed. Being critical of the religion gets rewarded with a lifetime in hiding because of Muslims supporting your murder. Drawing a cartoon of Muhammad gets your place of business attacked and 12 cartoonists killed. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera
[–]IbrahimAlgosair-17 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You're mistaken between islam and Saudi Arabia Yes women allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia last year, but they are allowed to drive in every other islamic country
Gay people killed?, i don't know about other country but I'm pretty sure none were killed in Saudi Arabia or arrested by the way Female genital mutilation ?, dude it's banned to do it in Saudi Arabia, you might loss your medical license if you did it as a doctor People leaving the religion is used as a golden ticket to become a refugee if you are broke, no one will care if you did it in Saudi Arabia and i never heard about someone get death penalty for leaving the religion. I'm sorry for any misunderstanding about my country (saudi Arabia) i think we're somehow shown as evil people or somehow, but i can correct any information if you want ❤️💕 Sorry for my English, not my first language
[–]drwuzer7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You practice the Taqiyya very well, I'm sure your imam would be proud, but we're not fooled.
[–]Robo_warlock2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You lie
[–]SicViPancakeParaBacn 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Classic feminism was a literal terrorist organisation and shamed "war dodgers" while arguing against the vote because they were afraid of being drafted.
The White Feather Campaign and the UK feminist movement are interesting topics to read about.
[–]the_k_i_n_g-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Facism? Communism? Just saying.
[–]cunninglinguist96-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Bullshit movement? I’m glad women can vote, are you?
First and second wave were actually about rights. Third is a hot mess of stupid and sexism
[–]cunninglinguist961 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yes, and the commentor I replied to didnt really specify which wave
[–]Mytownisbeingruined-18 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You forgot climate alarmists
[–]MyNameIsSushi6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Are you stupid by any chance? Your comment history tells me you're a propagandist but I still wanted to ask.
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There is nothing faggier in the world than digging through someone’s comment history.
[–]MyNameIsSushi-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I had to. He/she is denying climate change, I knew they were a nutjob.
[–]Flux_78 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Climate skepticism is healthy. So much propaganda out there.
We do not understand anything about climate change, the predictions have been way off for ages as well.
Skepticism is not the same thing as denial. With that being said, is "let's protect the earth" really propaganda? Skepticism is fine, stupidity is not.
[–]Mytownisbeingruined1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
alarmists
[–]GobBluth190 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The person you're replying to cant be any better, they're trying to shit on you instead of the climate denier and saying faggier
[–]MyNameIsSushi-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Most likely another nutjob.
[–]ruggnuget4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
In a sea of sexist, stupid shit, your somehow made the dumbest comment. Impressive in a way.
[–]NoShameInternets-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And there it is. I was wondering which direction this crazy train would roll.
[–]Taste_the__Rainbow-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Derp. Contrary to what Matt Walsh believes about sky fairies climate change is actually a pretty bad thing and getting consistently worse.
[–]coolshadesdog-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Based dumbass
[–]the_k_i_n_g-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, cause fuck science. /s
[–]sickofURshit420x69-10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Kill yourself
[–]nocivo 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They are all yelling in media and social sites about that. Ofc normal people that do not confirm the facts will miss leading
[–]VageCheese 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine taking a moment of national pride, because it is in a way, a football contest between countries---and turning it into a selfish panhandling moment to squeeze more money instead of being classy. Talk about dropping the ball at the worlds stage. Imagine how much the teams they sent away earned, especially Thailand. Pure greed and arrogance.
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
>women
>facts
Bro. You should be past that at this point.
[–]dodosphinx-9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How did I get to this sub? What year is this?
Christ, what a hole.
[–]illdothiseventually-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I’m thinking the same thing, i think it’s time to back out of this comment section
[–]whitewolf218 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Happy cake day
[–]Latest-greatest1 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Do you mean happy birthday? You’re the second person to say that but idk what it means. In any case thank you friend
[–]whitewolf2181 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No I mean happy cake day
Sorry had no idea what that meant but now that I do, thank you friend
[–]themasterbot 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Equal pay in sports is way different than equal pay in a 9-5 job. If you don’t have the fan support that male athletes have then it’s irrelevant to compare pay
Except thats wrong.
[–]ImANibba0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
America is pretty retarded and i live in cali. I really dislike california college students.
[–]xrock24x0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They want equal pay from the federation not FIFA
[–]Thunder_Munch-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Reminds me of people screaming "witchcraft." At a medieval trial.
[–]uk_8-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wow 🙌🙌
[–]Juan_Taco-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean, do you have evidence other than some random dude's tweet?
[–]Aver3-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine telling 4x World Cup champions what they can say on twitter or Facebook you fucking twat.
[–]nazihatinchimp-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Furthermore I love how the evidence you chose to believe is a scene shot on Twitter.
[–]Latest-greatest1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Honestly the irony hit me after the comment and made me laugh
[–]hawleyal-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They are getting paid less. This factor described is only a small part of their pay. Bonuses are less, salary is less. It's also about support like facilities. Maybe you should stay off Reddit and learn some real facts.
[–]50aneigth5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How can they get “paid more” if there’s no revenue for that? Where do you want the bonuses to come from?
[–]hawleyal0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Most of the money for support of the national teams does not come from revenue but instead subsidies and direct funding. They're not private sports teams.
Edit: Where do you think the funding comes for all the younger national teams? Or other national sports teams not soccer?
[–]TwatsThat-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They've been generating more revenue than the men. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
[–]RubyRhod-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except OP’s screengrab is actually wrong: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
[–]captainpuma25 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Matt Walsh refers to the World Cup, while your link refers to US domestic soccer games. See the difference?
[–]samdavi-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It’s about what the us soccer federation is paying the national team players, not what fifa is paying them. The fifa one we get. But the woman’s us national team makes way more money than the men’s, but the federation is paying them less.
[–]RubyRhod-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s not money generated in the US, just by the teams when they play. SeE tHE dIfFEreNcE?
[–]tothecatmobile-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
, while your link refers to US domestic soccer games.
No it doesn't, it about the national teams.
[–]packerpickens15 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They’ve generated more revenue in the last three years mostly due to the fact that the men’s team didn’t make their last World Cup. No comment on what that says about the pay ratio just pointing out the reason.
Isn’t that the point? That the men’s team is way worse and still get paid more?
[–]nosoupforyou3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
. From 2016 to 2018, women's games generated approximately $50.8 million in revenue, compared with $49.9 million for men's games.
Way worse? $.9 million less in earning. That's like 2%. I wouldn't call that way worse.
Note: I couldn't speak to whether they should be getting paid more or not.
I was referring to the fact that they perform bad.
Who cares if they do or not? They earn overall only a bit less than the womens teams. If they suck or not is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is the gates fees. The degree of their suckness can be shown by their gate fees. If they aren't entertaining, then no one would pay to watch.
They suck and they earn less therefore they should not be paid more than the mens team:
Women are paid 38% what men are paid. And the only reason why USSF made any money at all the past 5 years is because of the women's team.
The example listed in that complaint states that USSF was supposed to lose $477,000 in 2016 but instead made $17.7m because of the women's teams success.
Men make a minimum of $5000 per game, even if they suck ass and don't win any games at all. Women on the other hand, make a maximum of $4950. And they have to win 20 games to get that! If men won 20 games, they'd get $13,166 per game.
Men make a total of $5,375,00 for getting to the Round of 16 in the World Cup.
Women make a total of $1,725,000 for winning the World Cup.
[–]packerpickens2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well the entire women's world cup generates around $100 million in revenue vs around $5 billion for the Men's World Cup. Taking the estimated $131 million in revenue for the 2019 women's world cup and the $6 billion in revenue generated from the 2018 men's world cup, the women's world cup generates 2% of the money the men's world cup does.
With that big a discrepancy in the tournament as a whole, of course the women get less for making it much farther in the tournament. Any argument on tournament winnings has to take this into account. Now if you want to argue other compensation like base salary and % of revenue generated by each team (as both MNT and WNT are under US Soccer) that is a different argument.
[–]nosoupforyou1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Again, whether they suck or not is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is how much the teams earn through the gate.
But additional posts suggest that the mens team earns more in broadcasts.
[–]TwatsThat0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I think they were referring to their game performance, not their revenue generation.
The compensation structure for the men and women is of course more complicated than either side wants to admit. Percentage of revenue, tournament bonuses, and base compensation all play into it. Without knowing the details of their payment structure it’s hard to make a good case for either the women’s team or US Soccer, but that doesn’t stop people from arguing about it as you can see.
[–]DJanother110 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol. Nah. Yours is talking about domestic leagues. OP is talking about the freaking World Cup. Night and day difference. Nice try though!
[–]RubyRhod-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s not money generated in the US, it’s by the National teams when they play.
[–]knotty_pretzel_thief-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I had to scroll way too far to find this.
Edit: The Washington Post has the most interesting breakdown and analysis of this I've seen yet. TL;DR, it's all about the collective bargaining agreements:
When it comes to revenue from games, the women’s national soccer team has held its own against the men’s team since the 2015 World Cup win. But games account for only one-quarter of USSF revenue. Sponsorships make up half, and it’s hard to determine what the women’s team contributed to USSF without more data.
Are the women players paid less? Sometimes. When the female players have appeared to make about the same or more money, they’ve had to turn in consistently outstanding performances on the world stage. Even with those feats, earning the same amount as the men’s soccer players was near-impossible under the previous collective-bargaining agreement.
The new agreement has provisions that may reduce the difference in bonuses for friendly games and tournaments, but there is — without question and for whatever reasons — still a massive gap between men’s and women’s World Cup bonuses.
[–]riseofazrael-14 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Where is the evidence supporting this guys claim? If you actually care about evidence you wouldn't blindly accept a tweet as truth.
[–]SiIic0n10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I just searched "world cup revenue" and the literal first result was this https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/03/07/world-cup-soccer-pay-disparity-between-men-and-women-is-justified/#7d760a4f6da4 Furthermore, this shouldn't be very surprising news since it's common elsewhere like the NBA for example. Get your head out of your ass.
[–]Useful-ldiot3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You think female bball players should make what NBA players make?
[–][deleted]11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's actually far worse with basketball, the NBA subsidizes the WNBA to exist basically as a charity case their revenues are that bad. It's doable because the entire salary of a team in the WNBA is less than the minimum of one individual player for the men, so it's not too expensive to have the welfare program.
[–]SiIic0n5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No. It's pretty much the same situation as here where the revenue generated causes the disparity.
[–]Hi_Im_Insanity0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean he was just asking a question. It was a quick search for me as well.
No need to jump down his throat for asking for evidence of the claim. That should be commended.
[–]riseofazrael-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Asking for evidence is having my head up my ass?
[–]SiIic0n8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
More like the evidence is so easy to find it isn't really worth crying about. I'll admit my last comment was pointless though. Sorry.
[–]Taste_the__Rainbow-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This ain’t a sub of deep researchers, it seems.
[–]nazihatinchimp-15 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Here’s some evidence.
Sorry to interrupt the circlejerk.
[–]Craig_M20 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That still doesn’t paint the full picture. The time frame used is from the women’s last World Cup which US also won till the recent one. In that time frame the men failed to reach their World Cup and the women still didn’t earn that much more despite back to back victories. When the men play in the World Cup they blow the women out the water in revenue. The men make nearly the same amount of money just from participating in the World Cup that the women do for it winning it.
[–]Born_Ruff-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The men make nearly the same amount of money just from participating in the World Cup that the women do for it winning it.
But they have not participated in a World Cup for 6 years. They have generated less money than the women's team for numerous years now yet still get paid about 2.5x more.
[–]Craig_M4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
6 years makes it sound worse than it is. The Word Cup only happens every 4 years and they missed out on the last one which was seen as a failure. The men have more potential revenue than the women by a landslide. The men also compete against other professionals and face world class teams. The women play against a lot of part time players meaning it’s a lot easier to get results.
[–]Born_Ruff0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You are moving the goal posts here.
First it is a claim that they earn less because they generate less money.
When it's shown that the women actually generate more revenue, all of a sudden it's about *potential" revenue and all of these other non economic reasons like saying they play better teams (though if we go down that road we are just saying that we subjectively thank women are worth less).
If you believe that people should be paid based on the revenue they generate for the organization, there is no question that the women's team should be in for a big pay raise.
[–]Craig_M1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The women only earned more because the men failed to reach the World Cup. When they reach the World Cup they earn more than 4x the women do even when they win it. The goal posts haven’t moved. The US already fund women’s football by a significant margin than the rest of the world.
[–]Born_Ruff-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The women only earned more because the men failed to reach the World Cup.
Lol, that's kind of the whole point here. The women generate more money for the organization because they are more successful.
The goal posts haven’t moved.
It's a very significant difference from the conventional claim that men get paid more because they generate more money.
It's now that they actually generate less money, but hypothetically could earn more money for the team of they were better.
[–]Craig_M2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Why should women get paid more because of the men’s failure? The men failing to reach the World Cup was a failure. The US men’s should be reaching the finals minimum and the women should be getting to the final minimum. If anything the men’s should be paid less for failing to meet their targets not the women getting a pay rise.
Reducing the men's pay is certainly one way to go, though it's obviously not the favourite idea of men or women players.
The woman's team has surged in popularity over the last 10 years or so though, so they probably do justify more money. Their 2015 world Cup final game was the most watched US soccer game of all time for either gender. Their jersey is the best selling soccer jersey Nike has ever sold.
They generate real money for us soccer. This isn't a charity case.
Very little of shirt sales go to the team and where’s the source for it being the best selling top? I’m not convinced they out sold Barcelona
Edit. I just looked and you made it sound like it was the most bought Nike top when it wasn’t. It was the most bought top from Nike.com in a season.
[–]Born_Ruff1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Obviously neither US team is competing with Barcelona in terms of revenue generation.
The point I was making is that they have surged in popularity, and therefore ability to generate revenue, over the past decade. So it's not just them getting paid more because the men's team sucks.
[–]orangeblueorangeblue4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
In 2016-2018, the USWNT played 17 more home games than the men, and their per-game revenue was 68% of what the USMNT did over the same period. The $0.9 million overall gap in home game revenue over the three years could be cancelled out by the men playing one extra game or the women playing one fewer game.
Women: 2016 Home games: 21 2016 Total attendance: 335,433 2016 Average attendance: 15,973 2017 Home games: 13 2017 Total Attendance: 235,954 2017 Average Attendance: 18,150 2018 Home games: 18 2018 Total Attendance: 253,151 2018 Average Attendance: 14,064 Total home games: 52 3-year Total attendance: 824,538 3-year Average: 15,856 Total revenue: $50,800,000 Per-game revenue: $976,923
Men: 2016 Home games: 14 2016 Total attendance: 415,903 2016 Average attendance: 29,707 2017 Home games: 14 2017 Total Attendance: 411,598 2017 Average Attendance: 29,400 2018 Home games: 7 2018 Total Attendance: 169,141 2018 Average Attendance: 24,163 Total home games: 35 3-year Total attendance: 996,642 3-year Average: 28,475 Total revenue: $49,900,000 Per-game revenue: $1,425,714
[–]imbillypardy3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Beyond that I love that the argument turns to generating revenue and ignoring the fact FIFA rakes in insane profits
[–]nazihatinchimp-29 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This sub isn’t pussy pass denied, it’s how to be a Trump loving misogynist. These woman went out and represented their country and won. Fuck the shot birds in this sub that can’t even grasp the achievement of getting out of their moms basement.
[–][deleted]4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You fucking retards cherry picked a time frame where the women won 2 cups and the men didn't even qualify while neglecting to mention playing against waitresses and baristas.
[–]joshaayy3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They were favourites to win it. They were expected to win
[–]I-Code-Things-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Idk why you're being downvoted. Sure there's more to the story but you did provide some evidence. That counts for sure.
[–]nazihatinchimp-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I’m being downvoted because this is an I Hate Women sub and I don’t hate women. Fucking incels
[–]trumpeduppickles2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No you just hate white men.
[–]nazihatinchimp0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I am a white man you fucking incel. It isn’t with us or against us. That’s why you can’t get laid.
[–]trumpeduppickles1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I have a girlfriend lol
[–]nazihatinchimp1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sure buddy. I’m 100% positive a woman likes your anti woman point of view.
What comment of mine was anti-woman?
[–]nazihatinchimp2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The one where you attacked me for defending them.
Oh so the comment that doesn’t exist then. Carry on with your delusions mate.
Here you go
https://reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/cahjog/_/et9p4tr/?context=1
Go show your girlfriend this thread. Bet she will love it.
What is there to show? You might want to go to the doctor for these hallucinations
Oh wow, good one mate.
https://reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/cahjog/_/et978df/?context=1
Proof of my claim, now get me some for yours.
[–]bagelmakers-26 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There is actually a lot of evidence to support the claim that the USWSA is paid significantly less than the USMSA.
While it is difficult to find out exactly how much the men's and women's teams generate for the USSF, based on the research done by the Washington Post, they estimate the women's team actually brings in roughly 1 million more a year than the men's team. Additionally, the men's team received 5.6 million for finishing in the top 16 bracket and losing while the women's team only received 1.3 million for winning.
Some will argue that this is due to the collective bargaining agreements of the respective unions, but it is likely that those agreements were the best deals those teams thought they would get.
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/?outputType=amp
I don't doubt that collectively as a whole league, the men's teams make more than the women's teams. But looking specifically at the US where the women's team is successful and the men's team is not, it is pretty ridiculous the disparity in the pay.
[–]Aesidius44 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If you want to look at the level of success you also have to look at the level of the opponents. This women's world championship had amateur team participating.
[–]Thoughtofajoke2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I thought we were looking at how much revenue they generated. I thought that was the whole point. Isn't that what the OP tweet was saying?
Unless the info above is just flat out wrong, then that pretty much invalidated the whole thing. Why is it being downvoted?
[–][deleted]7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They're getting downvoted because, at the end of the day, including the world cup, the US men's team bring in more revenue. They are excluding certain games, main events, and sponsors to get to that figure.
[–]Thoughtofajoke1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Is it possible they're complaining about their direct salaries, specifically for these events, since this is where they're complaining about it? Doesn't sound like they'd be wrong in this instance. People are just assuming they mean they want the same Nike deals. Or maybe they're just rolling the overall message up for all women in general? I know lots of people have a problem with that concept, but there's still got to be a lot of industries where a disparity does exist. This just seems like a weird thing to get upset over.
[–]Aesidius1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm not replying to the OP tweet, in case you didn't notice.
And if you bring "success" as an argument of why women should be paid the same, "success" is relative to the strength of your opponents.
[–]Thoughtofajoke-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No, you're replying to a comment specifically discussing the money involved, on a post discussing the money involved, but tried to change the metric being discussed, when OP provided info that the money argument might not stand up here.
[–]Taste_the__Rainbow1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What does that have to do with revenue?
[–]Aesidius-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Winners are usually paid more then losers.
[–]startsbadpunchains28 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"but it is likely that those agreements were the best deals those teams thought they would get."
Lol. So how is that about inequality?
[–]saitselkis4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I know, this comes off as "it's not their fault, women are just bad negotiators."
[–]bagelmakers-16 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because of societal inequality. Even though the USSF (maybe) makes more money from the women's league, they still value the men's league more l. Why would that be other than our preconceived notions that men's sports should be paid more even if the women's team is more successful?
[–]startsbadpunchains6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You're blaming everyone but women for the womens USNT and their representatives undervaluing THEMSELVES in a contractual agreement? Jesus Christ I've heard it all now.
In the grand scheme of things international football pays pennies compared to club football - that's where the guys make the money.
There's exponentially more money in men's club football than woman's club football so tell all the women and men you know to start buying tickets, merch, sponsored products and watching ads in women's club football and it will improve. If people choose not to (which it seems they do but is improving) then tough shit stop blaming everyone else.
[–]HotelMohelHolidayInn5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
societal inequality
So why don't men make more than women in modeling and porn?
Should WBA make more than the NBA when people generally prefer male oriented sports over women?
Unless it's volleyball.
[–]TheRussian2724 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Do me a favour and watch a full game of womens football, then a full game of mens football. Then you will understand why the men get paid more.
Honestly, going from the World Cup to Concacaf final I was amazed at how much better a touch the men had with the ball.
[–]Drinky_McGambles-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Honestly that’s true for every sport except for football (soccer). The men just flop the whole damn game every single game. The women don’t seem to do that as much from what I’ve seen.
[–]bagelmakers-15 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I actually watch both series every year when they are around. I think the men's teams in general are more evenly developed which leads to more drama in the games, but the women's games are faster paced in my opinion.
[–]Craig_M17 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The women’s game is in no way faster paced. It’s one of the first things anyone who watches football regularly notices. The women can’t run as fast, can’t kick the ball as hard or as far and are not as fit as the men meaning they can’t keep up intensity for as long.
[–]SneakersInTheDryer3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It may be that the women's game is more end to end. Because they are not as fast or as big, there is more space on the field. This means the ball moves more, as the player on the ball in not closed down on as quickly.
[–]Craig_M0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I agree with that
[–]luciferisgreat15 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ridiculous why? Do you not understand how this stuff works?
[–]Benandhispets-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They've explained why
[–]luciferisgreat12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's not just about how good you are. It's how much money the league brings in...
Why is this a hard concept to grasp??
It's how much money the league brings in... Why is this a hard concept to grasp??
That's a very easy concept to grasp.
But I feel like you're not reading their comment becuase the person posted links that say the women's leagues seems to be bringing in more money than the men's US leagues now, or if anything the difference is greatly diminished. It has many numbers and sources to help make their claims. So the whole point about men's football teams earning more money for the leagues might not be as straight forward as people make it sound. Sure in Europe men's football is insanely huge compared to women's, but if we're talking about specifically the US the women's leagues might be earning more.
[–]tothecatmobile-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luciferisgreat3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/03/07/world-cup-soccer-pay-disparity-between-men-and-women-is-justified/#7cc1bca76da4
That compares all mens teams vs all womens teams.
The US womens team arent asking for the same pay as France, they're asking for the same pay as the US mens team. Who earn significantly less money than France.
[–]luciferisgreat1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Revenue Sponsors Popularity Prize pools (which is 30 million for women and 400 million for men)
Did you know that male soccer players don't get paid if they don't play in a game? Women get a 100k base salary by simply being on the team.
I can go on and on about this simple shit. The disingenuous shit from the people who can't grasp this really fucking annoys me.
[–]tothecatmobile1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Source?
[–]Trilodip76-24 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
US mens is worse than US women's, why should they be paid more? I love how everyone is sceptical of the source article but they trust this random dude who makes a shitty zing without any evidence. In short, get a life, forever virgin.
[–]I_Hate_Reddit15 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because they still generate more money.
Another example (both men leagues).
Players in a club like Porto/Benfica (Portuguese 1st League) that constantly place 1st/2nd make a lot less money than "lesser" clubs that place in the bottom half of the Premier League (England 1st League).
Because despite getting "better" results, they're playing in a League that generates less money.
[–]cepheus42-8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because they still generate more money
The women's league generates more money in the United States: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html
So then, NOT revenue. Hmmmm.... this is weird. The women win world cup championships, draw higher ratings, AND generate more revenue. I'm sorry, what's the next excuse?
[–]I_Hate_Reddit5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
*in the US
In 2016:
A whopping 0.9 million more (the article states 1.9 million, math is hard heh), that's less than 1% more.
But that's only for the US LEAGUE GAMES (broadcast rights for international tournaments are sold bundled).
Then you go and talk about wages of the National team (that competes in international tournaments, where revenue is, as I stated, vastly different between men and women leagues).
Wanna give me a link about wage differences in US soccer clubs between men and women? Maybe that should be the topic at hand?
Either you're being intentionally dishonest, or you're just not good at research. Either way, it undermines your point.
Edit: striked out extra maths.
[–]cepheus42-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yes, IN THE US. Literally this entire post is about the US women's team. But do downvote away because I responded to the assertion that they generate less revenues than the men's team *in the US with facts showing they generate more.
P.S. I don't care if it's 0.0001% more, or 100% more. They generate more, and the constant assertion that revenue and ratings are the key factors should mean the women get paid more *in the US leagues, and in any compensation provided by the United States for world cup appearances.
Additional P.S. You're welcome to find your own links. This is why you fail at logic, you're not just bad at research, you simply don't bother to do it at all.
[–]I_Hate_Reddit2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Quoting myself here:
But that's only for the US LEAGUE GAMES
.
Then you go and talk about wages of the National team
Edit: hoping trimming it down to 2 sentences might help your reading comprehension. If not, I'll just stop bothering with such a dense mind.
[–]k_p4nt4l00ns12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The US men’s team is less successful than the women’s team. The women’s team got beat 5-2 in a scrimmage against U15’s. The men’s team is better just less successful. Not to say there aren’t good women’s players, just that overall women’s teams are worse
[–]TheRussian273 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
US mens are better than US womens, not worse.
[–]King_Of_Throws3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
US men's are much better than US womens team, they dont dont place well. Why you might ask? Because top men's teams are so fucking good their isnt a single womens team even marginally close in skill level.
[–]Trilodip761 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Doesn't change the fact that US mens is trash compared to other men's teams
[–]King_Of_Throws1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yea but you're still missing the point that they are 1-better players and 2- men's leagues generate more income because they are more competitive in the sport.
lol you are one dumb fuck.
Of course men always draw more crowds. That’s just sports.
but lets not pretend FIFA cant afford it
[–]Sizzlingwall712 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How does that matter in the slightest to equal pay? All that is equity the exact opposite of equality.
Why are sports leagues judged differently than every other business in equal pay?
It’s all about like in most businesses, who brings in the most revenue. If you are at a job busting your ass and you look over to see someone sitting on there phone you expect to be paid more. Now where this changes a bit for almost all entertainment you get paid by how many people you put in seats. So you can be busting your ass but your “boring” or whatever the case maybe you will not be paid more than the headliner who doesn’t really care but they got those seats filled. I don’t believe that’s to complicated.
I don’t disagree, that’s the argument against is they have unions and contracts specifically for that reason. But there are league minimums in almost every pro league. You can argue it’s not fair that isn’t a baseline for women and men leagues.
[–]Sizzlingwall710 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Then state this and not “WOMEN NEED EQUAL PAY” because that doesn’t come across as equality for all, and sounds more like “PAY ME MORE EVEN THOUGH I DONT EARN IT” now that may seem harsh because it is but I wouldn’t think someone like Steve buscemi (no matter how much I love him) to be paid the same as Jennifer Laurence. This is why people mock things like this post it just comes across as ridicules.
[–]bedford_bypass0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's only not complicated, because you're over-simplifying.
If you're a mic operator on a TV show that happens to be a big hit, do you deserve to be paid more than a boom operator in a TV show that happens to not be watched? Even if you bust your ass on both?
Straight up not English in that last couple of sentences, I cannot debate what is unintelligible.
But if I understand correctly you are comparing salary/contract work to “talent” work? That’s just not the argument.
[–]ronin1066-49 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So, you haven't read a single thing about this topic except the headline above, I take it?
[–]HermanGould 789 points790 points791 points 7 years ago (148 children) | Copy Link
And they will be even more overpaid, UEFA has said he will promote women's football in the future, with what money ? with men's supporters money obviously
Feminism at its finest, claiming autonomy while getting men money
[–]p3ngwin 206 points207 points208 points 7 years ago* (36 children) | Copy Link
same thing happened in tennis Grand Slams.
Women only played 3 sets, to men's 5 sets, yet they campaigned for "equal money", but curiously not "equal work", and the tennis association caved.
So now the women get the same money, but the men still have to play more sets, the women literally are paid more for less work o.O
[–]queendead2march19 128 points129 points130 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
And the men bring in far more money.
[–]p3ngwin 84 points85 points86 points 7 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
yep, as they would in almost any physical sport, because men are physically more capable, as the Serena sisters found out when they had their "battle of the sexes" with Karsten Braasch :)
Forgot another great example, 5th in FIFA's women's rankings , the Matilda's (Australia) beaten 7-0 by under-15's boys team in friendly match :)
https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2016/05/25/matildas-beaten-7-0-by-newcastle-jets-under-15-boys-team_a_21383895/
Edit: Under 15's, because i cant read ffs o.O
[–]GurkanG 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Tfw you played 18 holes with some drinks, lowered your standard of play and still schooled the Williams sisters.
[–]p3ngwin 38 points39 points40 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
... and smoked cigars between golf rounds with beers.
Even the Willaims' coach told them "he went easy on you" lol
[–]Yungdodge911 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Under 15 team actually
[–]p3ngwin 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fuck me, technically still true, but thanks, edited :)
[–]Taha_Amir 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How about, men play less, and then argue for equal pay.
Just imagine how quickly they will reject the men's demands
[–]thedarkestone1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean, in that case, the men can stop playing and strike. The loss of revenue would be enough to force the association to act.
[–]HermanGould 36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
Yeah it is stupid none says anything because they are scared. It is just feminist supremacism
[–]p3ngwin 79 points80 points81 points 7 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link
yep, same for all the "gender gap" nonsense, with women demanding "more women in top jobs, STEM, CEO, political...".
Curious they don't campaign to equally be represented in "bottom jobs", often called the "Glass Basement", or "Glass Cellar", like garbage collection, bomb disposal, carpentry, electricians, factory labourers, lumberjacks, oil rigs, mining......
Apparently it's fine for THOSE jobs to be dominated by men, because women don't want to be equally responsible for the whole spectrum of work, just the prolific, and high-paid ones.
Equally curious is the complete lack of women supporting men in nursing and education, because when women dominate in those roles, at the expense of men, it's not a "gender gap" that needs solving.
Traditional roles it seems are fine, when it benefits women.
[–]rcrfc 32 points33 points34 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
As a male nurse I support this comment!
[–]p3ngwin 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
damned right, for some reason these women think they can displace men from top jobs, nursing, education, etc etc and then not care about all the unemployed, homeless gender gap they just made worse.
Same for equal parenting leave right, reproductive rights, etc they don't give a fuck when they hold all the privilege.
[–]rcrfc 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Equality” rarely means truly equal.
[–]Raptorsnest1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Male nurse here, my man knows what's up.
[–]GeraldoOfCanada 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
True, so annoying. I've literally never seen a woman garbage person, welder, carpenter but also nobody cares enough to bitch about it haha.
[–]sicosqurial0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
As a female nurse, men are more ambitious in our sector and usually go into management or higher paid areas of nursing much faster. Also they are more likely to be hired over a female nurse to bring more men onto a unit.
https://nurse.org/articles/Male-Nurses-And-The-Profession/
Couldn't find anything real to back up men being hired over females, but that is from experience. Also nurses in the UK and Ireland do not get paid that much.
[–]p3ngwin2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
what nurses are paid is not the topic, unless there's pay inequality there.
My point is the way these women want "equal pay", but don't want equal work, it seems after half a century of chanting "equal pay for equal work", it's has been demoted simply to "we want the same pay, but don't want the extra work".
They campaign for upgrades, for female supremacy. It'd female privilege in action under the guise of fighting for equality.
When they aren't paid as much as men, they fabricate reasons why they earn less, and when they aren't in jobs like STEM, CEO positions, political roles, etc they hallucinate imaginary "gender discrimination", and invented issues such as "underrepresentation", whatever it takes.
Yet when men are paid less, from porn actors, to modeling, etc... <crickets>.
When women are "underrepresented" in workplace fatalities and injuries ... <crickets>
When women are "underrepresented" in jobs like sewage treatment, lumberjacks, carpenters, electricians, factory labourers, oil rig workers, mining, drivers, pilots, etc .... <crickets>
Seems "gender gaps", "pay gaps" and "underrepresentation" are only problems needing a solution when it benefits women.
When other gender gaps exist that benefit them, from criminal sentencing, to child custody, divorce rights, reproductive rights, alimony, child support, parental leave, etc these women are strangely quiet, and don't seem to care about equality.
Equality, they keep using that word....
[–]sicosqurial-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You have mentioned a few times that men are displaced in nursing and teaching, so I would say it is relevant.
The fact that you feel terms like "underrepresented" or "gender discrimination" are imaginary or invented is ridiculous. It's present in every area of work, like you have mentioned above with both males and females. For me it's about equal opportunity, pay for the work that is done well and that goes for both men and women.
You mentioned porn above. Usually focus on the women, depending on what you are looking for, so by your beliefs she should be paid more. She brings in more revenue.
I know plenty women who work in construction, engineering, farming but yes they are still underrepresented but generally in manual labour work women aren't underpaid or unfairly paid compared to men. Women are under paid on office jobs and science but a lot of this is to the fact that they have been unrepresentated for so long that on average women will have less experience that male counterparts. That is changing so it should be expected to reflect that in the next 10 to 15 years.
Again my issue is being unrepresentated and having the same opportunity's in the workplace.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/ireland-s-pay-gap-between-men-and-women-in-r-d-highest-in-europe-1.3788854?mode=amp
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/03/22/gender-pay-gap-facts/
Their pay is irrelevant, as i said, unless it's an inequality issue. As for an disparity between the genders for nurses, what relevance is it if they are promoted to non-nursing roles ?
The fact that you feel terms like "underrepresented" or "gender discrimination" are imaginary or invented is ridiculous.
As i said, they are imaginary "problems", E.G. what relevance is it if someone feels not enough of one gender, or another, are in xy job ?
Gender equality means you don't place any merit on gender, and instead palace merit on competency, because you believe all genders are equal right ?
Same for the imagined "pay gap" that has been thoroughly debunked for decades.
These are manufactured "issues" to justify inequality "solutions" that benefit one demographic a the expense of others. Witness Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton, shakedown companies for "inequality" under the guise of "racism", when really they just want black people to benefit.
https://nlpc.org/2014/05/30/jesse-jackson-takes-shakedown-campaign-silicon-valley-extracts-concessions-timid/
For me it's about equal opportunity, pay for the work that is done well and that goes for both men and women.
I agree, but "equal opportunity", is not the same as "equal equity", and yet the former is used as a victim-card to achieve the latter, without the equal responsibility that goes with it.
"Gender quotas", "underrepresentation", "pay gaps", "gender gaps", etc are manufactured nonsense.
That's the point, where are the women complaining about the pay gap in porn? They don't care, because they happily accept inequality when they are the benefactor.
In OP's post, if the women't wanted to demonstrate their conviction for equality, the women should give up ~1/3 (4%) of their cut, or campaign to similarly solve the problem by demanding the men are given a 4% raise, so both genders are paid equally, proportionate to the viewers, and sponsorship, they attract
It's hypocrisy to campaign for "equality" only when you benefit from it, yet refuse to campaign equally hard for equality to benefit others when it means giving up your privilege.
I know plenty women who work in construction, engineering, farming but yes they are still underrepresented but generally in manual labour work women aren't underpaid or unfairly paid compared to men.
So you admit, if the "problems" of "representation", and "gender gaps" exist, it's curious there's no equally strong push to get more women in construction, engineering, farming, etc.
Women are under paid on office jobs and science but a lot of this is to the fact that they have been unrepresentated for so long that on average women will have less experience that male counterparts.
They're not "under paid", they're paid the same as any man in the same position working the same hours.
"pay gaps" are nonsense, and have been debunked for decades, if paying women less than men was true, then every company would save millions annually by hiring exclusively women.
Curiously, companies hire men too, and apparently pay them more for the same job and the same hours they employ women ?
If the pay is different, then the job role and/or the hours worked are different too, and the only "gap" it demonstrates is people's freedom to choose their career, and work ethic.
You've used nursing a couple of times in this thread to show that the there is a disparity between men and women, where women benefit and I'm telling you that it's not true here. Pay was relevant because nursing is a low level paid job here in Ireland and the majority are women. Men are promoted or seek higher paying jobs in nursing and I have no issue with that when and if right for the role.
I'm not going to comment on Jessie Jackson, as that means nothing to me. We don't have the same segregation or racial issues in Ireland, that seems like a USA issue right now.
With the female soccor players, I've never said that they are underpaid compared to the males. From what I've read they have different contracts, and they seem to earn an equal amount. Considering how the USA female team has dominated this year and the men didn't qualify, I can understand why the female team would be disappointed in equal pay as they have worked and won so much more than the men.
There are massive difference between prize money in the world Cup for men and women but that's fifa being fifa and I don't remember the female world Cup ever being this followed. They had huge support this year so hopefully they'll recieve a better pay on 4 years time.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/?utm_term=.ab223cbb888c
[–]p3ngwin1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You've used nursing a couple of times in this thread to show that the there is a disparity between men and women, where women benefit and I'm telling you that it's not true here.
what, there are most definitely more women than men in nursing roles, that's not even something you can be confused about. It's not something i care about IF the nonsense campaigns about "gender gaps" weren't complete hypocrisy in their goals and intentions.
Pay was relevant because nursing is a low level paid job here in Ireland and the majority are women.
What relevance is the level of pay for a nurse, are you citing that as pay inequality ? is one gender paid more as a nurse ?
Men are promoted or seek higher paying jobs in nursing and I have no issue with that when and if right for the role.
Right, so it's irrelevant then, why mention it, you already agreed that women dominate nursing, so what's your point ?
I'm not going to comment on Jessie Jackson, as that means nothing to me.
If you're just going to dismiss examples on global scale because "i don't live there", then we can't continue a conversation on inequality.
With the female soccor players, I've never said that they are underpaid compared to the males.
This isn't about you, who said you were the one making the claims ? Funny how you won't comment on Jessie Jackson because you don't live int he US, but you're fine to comment on the US women's football innequality topic ?
From what I've read they have different contracts, and they seem to earn an equal amount.
If you think 13% and 9% of revenue are "the same", you have more personal issues to solve before you discuss inequality elsewhere.
There are massive difference between prize money in the world Cup for men and women but that's fifa being fifa ...
You find it odd FIFA allocate proportional rewards for viewership ? So you want women to earn more despite not attracting larger audiences ? So, unequal pay for unequal work ?
[–]sicosqurial-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You are delusional dude, you just want to argue with anyone and I'm tired of repeating myself.
I see, can't reasonably discuss any further, so onto to the ad hominems.
Thanks for disgracefully quitting, saving us both any more wasted time and effort.
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
[–]confusedddddddd999-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Curious they don't campaign to equally be represented in garbage collection, bomb disposal, carpentry, electricians, factory labourers, lumberjacks, oil rigs, mining......
Isint this exactly what equality is all about? YOU think it's a man's job when equality is fighting about not having a gender orientated label on anything. Just because you don't see women in these sort of jobs, its mens job. I have personally seen many women in roles like this.
Why would anyone fight for something less profitable? For thousands of years women have been the lesser gender so when they are finally fighting, what is wrong in fighting for high paid jobs? Wouldn't you fight for something better too? Why is it when the women fight for it, it's just feminist bullshit? It's like getting an B for an exam and then fighting to get your grades changes to C. Doesn't make sense.
Based on what are you saying this? Again, if a men sees nursing and education as a more "feminine" role,then it's them that needs the education against that mentality. Which female organisation is against men in nursing and education?
Traditional roles it seems are fine, when it benefits women. You mean like how women are expected to be in the kitchen, but when it comes to being chefs in restaurants, again women are seen as a less compared to their male counterparts?
Isint this exactly what equality is all about?
What, having gender pushes for "gender equality" in STEM, political, and CEO jobs, while not having the same push for such nonsense as "gender equality" in ALL jobs, equally ?
No, that's not what "equality" is about.
YOU think it's a man's job ...
No, i don't, never said that, is imly stated the fact there are jobs dominated by one gender or another, which is fine. People should be able to choose their job path, without someone complaining "there aren't enough <insert gender here> in this role!".
when equality is fighting about not having a gender orientated label on anything.
Equality should have nothing to do with gender.
Equality is is recognising a person's gender should have no merit in why they chose the job they wanted, and why they were chosen to be paid for that job. Your gender should have no value on your resume'.
I have personally seen many women in roles like this.
Your anecdotal experience are irrelevant to the fact there are gender divides in how people choose work, there's nothing wrong with that, but there are people that believe some jobs should be "gender balanced" while curiously letting other jobs be completely gender imbalanced.
That's not "gender balance" in the name of equality, that's artificially displacing people who are more qualified, in favour of female privilege, because nothing says "women are equally competent" as giving them handicap bonuses and jobs they aren't qualified for.
Why would anyone fight for something less profitable? For thousands of years women have been the lesser gender so when they are finally fighting, what is wrong in fighting for high paid jobs?
They aren't fighting for equality, they are fighting for privilege. They want to only have CEO, STEM, Political jobs, they even literally call them "top jobs", in recognition they don't want to take their fair share of equal responsibility becoming garbage collectors, bomb disposal, electricians, miners, oil rig workers, drivers, etc.
They want a free pass to jobs they aren't qualified for, because they are women, or black, or gay, etc as if these "qualities" are relevant to performing the job.
You want to earn more money? Get qualified and apply for the job like everyone else, and don't use your gender, sexuality, religion, etc as an excuse for why it should matter more than the skills needed for the job.
Why is it when the women fight for it, it's just feminist bullshit?
Nothing stopping women becoming oil rig workers, drivers, mioners, surgeons, electricians, mob disposal, lumberjacks, field veterinarians, etc they simply choose not to.
It's like getting an B for an exam and then fighting to get your grades changes to C. Doesn't make sense.
To use your analogy, it's like more men get B's, and someone complains it's sexist, and more women should get B's, so there's a campaign to grade more women with B's, even if they didn't earn it.
Based on what are you saying this? Again, if a men sees nursing and education as a more "feminine" role,then it's them that needs the education against that mentality.
So it's ok when men apparently "choose" not to go into nursing and education, but when women "choose" not to go into CEO, political, and STEM roles that's "inequality" that needs hundreds of millions of dollars in women's aid ?
If you can't see the hypocrisy in that, i'm not sure what else i can tell you, this is where i choose to end this.
Which female organisation is against men in nursing and education?
That's not the question to ask, you need to realise, and ask, why women's organizations fight against equality when it means they lose privilege:
E.G.
https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/opposing-shared-parenting-the-feminist-track-record/
https://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2015/03/if-feminism-is-about-equality-why-do-feminists-oppose-equality/
https://recalculatingthegenderwar.tumblr.com/post/142883164331/most-powerful-american-feminist-organization-kills
https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/22833-opposition-to-florida-alimony-reform-paints-women-as-stupid-weak-and-helpless
Funny how not a single feminist organisation has campaigned against "inequality" that would require women NOT to be the beneficiary.
When you fight under the banner of "equality", but it only benefits women, that's not equality, that's female supremacy, or plainly put, misandry.
[–]Morbidly-A-Beast-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
feminist supremacism
LMAO. really?
[–]HermanGould1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
LMAO really what. None watches and promotes women's football because it is good football, we all know how pathetic most teams are, but because it is women playing it, hence that is supremacism
[–]Mattreddit760 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sounds like my office
[–]thepresidentsturtle-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
A couple of athletes making a few hundred thousand dollars more than they used to doesn't help solve any of the real problems women still face today.
i'm not sure what you're referring to, what "couple of athletes", and what does that have to do with these women in sports wanting to be paid more than the work they do ?
Do you believe in "equal pay for equal work", or what version of "equality" do you imagine is fair?
That's not "women facing problems in sport", that's MEN facing problems in sport, when women are paid more than men.
Where's the equality in that ?
[–]thepresidentsturtle-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm saying that while there are plenty of issues out in the real world than women face, making sure the women tennis players get the same money even though a) they play less) and b) they don't bring in as much revenue doesn't help the real issues. I couldn't give a fuck about Serena Williams making the same amount of money as Andy Murray, it's such a non-issue and irrelevant to the struggles normal people face.
... making sure the women tennis players get the same money even though a) they play less) and b) they don't bring in as much revenue doesn't help the real issues.
Complain to the women who campaigned for equal pay in tennis then, and the tennis association that caved, it wasn't men who campaign for female tennis players to earn equal pay without equal work.
I take it you mean bigger problems, such as women in the middle East, where women have the least rights of any country on the planet right ?
If so, yes, i'd agree, a bunch of privileged white Western women companing they aren't earning even more money compared to their fellow white Western men, without wanting to work for it, pales in comparison to the struggles of women who really have dogshit rights in other parts of the world...
... but here we are, that's what these White, privileged, Western women, want to complain about, they don't give a fuck about anyone outside their own privilege.
I feel like we're in agreement yet you're still mad about something else.
[–]p3ngwin3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Who's mad ?? we're having a civil discussion about serious issues here, please don't hallucinate emotional instability where there is none.
Fact is these women are complaining about not having enough privilege, and they have the gall to expect men to roll over and accept it under the guise THEY are the ones oppressed.
While we can agree there are more important problems facing inequality elsewhere in the world, that also doesn't mean we should ignore such examples of the same problem when they arise elsewhere.
Inequality should not be tolerated for any reason, for any amount of time, and should be addressed whenever, and wherever it arises.
Okay dude.
[–]sghettii 263 points264 points265 points 7 years ago (41 children) | Copy Link
The men generate their own money, and some may argue that the spectators are sexist for only watching the men’s game but men’s football is simply better quality so I’m not going to pay to watch a match just to be politically correct
[–]ruairidhrb 28 points29 points30 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
its like womens mma, i dont watch all woman events because they are of much lower quality fights than the average mens mma fights, the only woman worth watching in mma are the top 5 in each division because they far outclass everyone else in the division. Ronda rousey was the highest paid pro mma fighter at one point because she brought in the most views, its one of the only sports ive seen people not say equal pay blah blah, tbh every mma fighter in a big org is underpaid apart from the champs and even a few of them are underpaid.
Edit: grammar and shit
[–]Biggordie0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
TBH, I would say the average female MMA fight (on UFC) is more intense and entertaining than the men's. Those women go out there with something to prove.
But then again, it's UFC and everyone gets underpaid.
[–]ruairidhrb2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The average woman's UFC bout is better than a whole card on invcita FC, the UFC is the best of best type shit though.
[–]HermanGould 118 points119 points120 points 7 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
The easy alternative is : different federations. But then women's football would cease to exist. They use everything that men has archieved so far in therms of theory, federations, equipment, stadiums and yet they ask for equal pay when they don't deliver the same spectacle. They should PAY, not borrow men's football money
but in this society we live, women are threated like children, they let them pretend they are football profesionals and men pay for it, yet apparently this world threats women unfairly somehow. None of the players in women's national team would last a month in a 3rd division team.
[–]moobied 65 points66 points67 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
I think the best solution is to not have separate leagues at all. True equality will come when the sport is open to anybody of any gender, as long as they can compete at the required level.
[–]Vladimir-KG 153 points154 points155 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It would look exactly the same as a men’s only league.
[–]johnnymoha 83 points84 points85 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Everyone's afraid to say it but yep. That's literally the reason they branched off to begin with.
[–]rg90184 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's the point.
[–]Vladimir-KG 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol indeed.
[–]abdullah_4 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
lmao
[–]livear 7 years ago* [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link
There is no such thing as a mens league, women are already allowed to try out for all major sports leagues, they just cant even come close to competing.
Which is why they created their own league.
[–]Puncherfaust1 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
a few years a go the german woman team played against the u17 team of vfb stuttgart and got smashed 8:0 or something like that.
[–]werewolf914 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
US women team, the WC champion at that time, lost 2-5 to u15 of FC Dallas.
[–]frn1 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And swedens team got beat by a u15 team from Stockholm i think.
[–]dezmodez 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Seriously?
[–]werewolf914 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Seriously.
[–]stationhollow1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
7-0 for the Australian women's team against the U16 squad for one of our clubs.
[–]moobied 29 points30 points31 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, but that was when it wasn’t racist to acknowledge the physical differences between men and women. We should do away with women’s leagues and step into the world of true equality.
[–]I-AM-BEOWOLF 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Sexist* mate
[–]moobied 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Where have you been? You can't be one of the -ists without being all of them. Sorry dude, if you think there is a physical difference between a man and a woman you are a racist who hates trans people and abortions.
[–]The_Terminatah 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can’t tell if this is sarcastic or not. Lol
[–]majaka12341 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The race of women kind! 😂😂😂😂😂
[–]ChefSqueaky1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is not true for football.
FIFA does not allow for women to play in men's leagues.
This is definitely true for MLB, the NFL, the NBA and the NHL, tho.
[–]fahque650 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There is actually no rule prohibiting a women from being on a World Cup roster.
No country has ever broached the subject.
[–]Zelthia 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nothing new here. Men build, women benefit from whatever men have built and then complain about whatever they dislike.
The sooner you realize that women as a collective are cancerous, the better.
Find yourself a good individual woman if you are inclined to pair bonding and do your best to keep her away from feminist idiocy. If none of this sounds good to you, you are better alone.
[–]OptimalAdhesiveness 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Didn’t some study show even women watch women’s sports less than they watch men’s sports? Also the WNBA loses $10,000,000+ per year and is subsidized by the men’s NBA, but I don’t hear any feminists talking about that...
[–]chapterpt 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People could watch u15 games and see the same action as the women. People watch what they want to. Mens soccer exists as it does because people want to consume it. Womens soccer exists as it does because the women themselves want to play it more than people want to watch it.
[–]benjick 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The men generate their own money
It's just men keeping money between men you shortsighted incel
[–]slow_joke 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well put sir
[–]Tak7ics 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If they could stop faking injuries it would be better
[–]ProbablyJustArguing-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
As far as the USNT goes, you're wrong on both counts. The men don't generate their own money. US Soccer sells the broadcast rights to the men and womans team as a package deal. But in every other measurable metric, the USWNT makes more revenue than does the mens team. More tickets, better ratings, more swag, etc.
[–]Trollileo1235 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It doesnt matter if it is being sold as a package deal when the only reason the money is being generated is because of the males.
[–]ProbablyJustArguing-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's not. More people watch the USWNT than the men.
[–]Trollileo1231 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So where is the money coming from to pay the men? You think they pay them just because they have penises? Are you this delusional?
[–]ProbablyJustArguing1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Okay, but don't let the actual facts get in the way of your feelings.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-womens-soccer-games-out-earned-mens-games-11560765600
Yea good job linking an article that one cant read without subscribing to their shitty service.
[–]mlg2433 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same thing happened with the WNBA. The NBA propped it up because they couldn’t afford it on its own. I think it recently became self-sustained but barely. Hearing them complain about money is hilarious. Why can’t we get nba type contracts? Because one single max NBA contract would bankrupt the league lol.
[–]CabbageCarl 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The WNBA literally operates in the negative. The success of the NBA entirely floats that league, and they keep the league around for perception
[–]HermanGould 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That is what will happen with football
[–]CommanderHeMan 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It’s ok, nobody in Europe watches women’s football, they can’t support it financially forever.
[–]HermanGould 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Men clubs will support their women's counterpart... Barcelona will support barcelona women's division, and so on. Worst part apparently it all goes into the fair play accounts so it is like shooting your own feet.
Like the cost of the women's team is even a percent of the first team.
[–]tothecatmobile 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago* (24 children) | Copy Link
UEFA also take money generated by the biggest football teams and invests into smaller leagues.
Taking money from the wealthiest leagues and investing it to support smaller ones has been part of its operation for decades.
[–]HermanGould 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
And from one area to another. The problem is they ask for equal pay when they arent positive on its section.
[–]tothecatmobile-9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The US womens team have every right to call for equal pay, as they produce just as much if not more revenue than the US mens team does for USSF.
[–]HermanGould10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Data that they produce the same.
If they produce more why don't they have separate federations so they can earn as much as they want xd
[–]tothecatmobile-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Prior to a world cup. If they are getting scammed 900k they should have their own federation. The fact they dont means they dont share expenses and they are cherrypicking years( prior to a world cup)
Data seems cooked. Are they counting expenses or what exactly is the math because I cant read the source.
Of they coould generate more they would have its own federation ask yourself why they dont.
And that js only the most pushed and succesful team in womens national vs an irrelevant team. Equal pay is stupid.
Prior to two world cups, a men's and a women's.
And why do they need their own federation? When they could just be paid according to the revenue they bring in?
Then why is the irrelevant team paid more?
Because the tournaments on which men participate generate more. You are cherry picking data and think this is a rivalry between one team ( the most succesful one inwomen) and the male counterpart which is more about competition.
If I cant see the data I cannot just believe it out of nowhere
[–]tothecatmobile2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The mens team didnt qualify for the last world cup though.
So how much more the mens world cup makes than the womens world cup is pretty irrelevant here, because the US mens team didnt get any of it.
[–]HermanGould2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is why it is cherrypicking best year of women vs worst year of men in a competition where USA is the only real team vs a competition so harsh as men football.
Pre-qualifiers still give revenue and are part of the competition.
As I say if they get more, just make a federation to get that revenue. Easy as that.
You perhaps should have read the link past the title.
Literally the first paragraph.
U.S. women’s soccer games have generated more revenue than U.S. men’s games over the past three years.
Yes and where do they get that from ? That is the source. That sentence is a conclusion that comes from a source I cannot read.
You perhaps should start thinking with your fucking brain
The source is the USSFs own financial statements.
Again, literally says that in the article.
YEah and I Can't read the sources
Unlike you I don't blindly believe specially when they are pushing an agenda
The USSFs financial records are made public every year. People have known for a long time that the women's team is outperforming the men's financially.
You can see them all on the USSF website here;
https://www.ussoccer.com/governance/financial-information
From that source they do not separete revenues between women and men team they state ¨national teams ¨
Do you have a page or something ? I don't want to read the whole PDF to find nothing
The individual breakdowns are part of the USSF AMG book of reports.
[–]Houstonearler1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
they coould generate more they would have its own federation ask yourself why they dont. And that js only the most pushed and succesful team in womens national vs an irrelevant team. Equal pay is stupid.
they coould generate more they would have its own federation ask yourself why they dont.
Same reasons the terrible Houston Rockets of the early 00s earned a lot more than the 4 time champion Houston Comets of the early 00s.
If the womens team brings in the same revenue as the mens, do you think they should be paid the same?
Revenue? No.
Profit after all expenses, it depends. My understanding is that in 2017 the females collectively bargained for guaranteed salaries in exchange for less upside. The men have no guaranteed salaries. So in that circumstance, even if they bring in more profit than the men, no. Because it is the bargain they made. They should attempt to renegotiate when their deal is up.
Because the men's team screwed up last year and lost out on the world cup participation. I agree they should have received less pay for that year.
So I made som research, this is pure bullshit you are just counting revenue from ticket-sales, where women have 50% more matches.
Look at the actual viewership that is what moves money today :
Men's world cup detailed viewership stats:
1+ minute: 3.26B
3+ minutes: 3.04B
20+ minutes: 2.65B
30+ minutes: 2.49B
https://resources.fifa.com/image/upload/2018-fifa-world-cup-russia-global-broadcast-and-audience-executive-summary.pdf?cloudid=njqsntrvdvqv8ho1dag5
SO yeah fuck off with your propaganda bullshit
That's the entire world cup, not just the US mens team. Who the US womens team are asking for equal pay with.
[–]orangeblueorangeblue 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They’ll encourage big European clubs to continue to pump money into it. At most, they’ll promote the Women’s Champions League a little more.
[–]312land-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
LMAO, typical bitches though. They want more at the expense of men while they just lay there with there fucking legs open. I dream we could go back in time, we are surrounded by Idiocracy now. That's why MAGA makes sense. 40s and 50s was a great time for your hard working male! MAGA
[–]imbillypardy-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Can we not act like FIFA cant afford to do it
[–]HermanGould5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And where does fifa get that money lol where do these people come from
... consumers and advertisers. Why do we treat sports leagues different than every other business?
[–]HermanGould3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
exactly from men supporters
But you want to support women's football with the money of people supporting men football. I don't think you get it
Are you trying to make a Title IX argument? Cause that doesn’t apply to professional leagues whatsoever.
[–]RDay-18 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Oh good grief dude, get over it. They are ALL overpaid. Every 'pro' sports athlete in the plantation systems known as 'sports clubs' shouldn't be millionaires for being good at a sport. Sports in general help keep people divided and now politics looks like a zero sum game with 'winners' and 'losers' and two opposing sides.
Look, guys, I realize this sub is your safe place to shit on successful women. I get it. But defending pro sports and who gets paid what is a MUCH BIGGER ISSUE than if women get a larger piece of a much smaller pie (want to look up the revenue pie's sizes, or average payout per player?) Picking some random percentage to hate on successful women is really weak.
Grow up. Get laid. Find a woman and partner up in life. Do something besides what you are doing here, dude.
"Grow up. Get laid. Find a woman and partner up in life. Do something besides what you are doing here, dude."
Lmao le enlightened. They get paid proportionate to the money they generate moron. It's the every day people who buy tickets, merch, watch adverts and buy the sponsored products that fund these insane salaries. The money you get in sports is directly proportionate to that as they are businesses. It's not a difficult concept. No one is hating on successful women you vitue signaling clown.
No they are not they get what they generate. If you think it is too much go ahead and try becomming one you might realize why they get paid so much
I have a woman how is that an argument against facts? You stupid ignorant cunt. What a sad fuck you are. You should grow up and bring actual arguments to a debate instead of the propaganda you hear in other subreddits you act like fascist trying to silence those who dont get along with what is obscene
[–]RDay-12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sir...sir... sir
you have a 4 month old account with over 1000 comments, and 10k comment karma. Your most typed words have to do with sports, specifically euro sports. English is not your first language because you insult was clumsily worded. "I have a woman". really now, most of us don't refer to our own women as "a woman" we typically say, wife or girlfriend or SO.
Don't you think the pie is bigger for men because men's soccer has been around longer and supported more in our patriarchal society, than women's is? Isn't there a lot of stealing, theft and illegal shit going on with FIFA and the Olympic committee for paying bribes and shit? Isn't their slave labor building stadiums in despot Middle Eastern nations?
I don't have to be a soccer player to know anything anyone gets paid is too fucking much. That is my opinion, live with it, sport.
[–]nbxx5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Their earnings are backed by money generated. Your opinion is not backed by anything, so while you are entitled to it, it is worthless.
Also, what the fuck is that part about his account and his first language? Is that supposed to show how pathetic he is? Because if it is, well, that shit backfired lmao.
[–]Jabahonki5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You seem to enjoy patronizing someone you believe to be intellectually inferior to you.
Don't you think the pie is bigger for men because men's soccer has been around longer and supported more in our patriarchal society, than women's is?
It’s supported more becuase it’s more enjoyable to watch. Wouldn’t it make more sense If a team brings in more money, they would reap more in return? Or should we artificially deflate the role Men’s soccer plays in sports consumption for the average viewer, to make it seam fair?
To be honest, your coddling of women makes me suspect of you.
[–]RDay-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
To be honest, your coddling of women makes me suspect of you
given your tone and level of 'being offended' at my comments, it is not surprising you dwell here in this sub. Misogyny is displayed almost exclusively by lower educated men. It is what it is, brah.
Suspect away, my life will go on no matter if you approve my views or nay.
Fuck off if you dont have arguments stop spreading your sick propaganda about patriarchy
[–]RDay-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Son, you are not worth arguments. You have an agenda, to defend the patriarchy. You are meta tagged by reddit as a toxic site user, this site here. That is how often you post here.
Madrid, are you from Madrid? Are you a Formula 1 shill? Why are you in here...oh yes it was the sports angle, right?
Shill account. I'm calling it.
Most frequently used words
great 101 times team 100 times better 86 times madrid 85 times race 73 times people 71 times ferrari 62 times football 61 times leclerc 59 times bad 57 times sainz 55 times win 54 times best 51 times vettel 50 times watch 49 times women 47 times right 46 times player 46 times year 45 times hazard 45 times say 44 times penalty 44 times max 43 times money 42 times things 41 times big 39 times point 37 times position 37 times hard 36 times different 35 times driver 35 times play 35 times new 34 times saying 34 times shit 34 times level 33 times mclaren 33 times messi 33 times game 33 times love 32 times amazing 32 times lol 32 times players 31 times future 31 times hope 31 times years 30 times won 30 times match 30 times norris 30 times vinicius 30 times track 29 times problem 29 times start 29 times hamilton 29 times idk 29 times kroos 29 times stop 28 times season 28 times lap 28 times far 27 times getting 27 times guys 27 times having 26 times tyres 26 times easy 25 times wrong 25 times fuck 24 times
You are just salty that women are in sports and that this team and its cadre of lesbians beat your best.
Beat my best? They wouldnt beat a 16yo team of boys
Btw you were the one saying get a life yet you talk like a maniac
It is always the desperate maniacs like you that fall for totalitarism and drags the humanity with them
[–]RDay1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
In America, we call this "projecting"
[–]startsbadpunchains1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Dude that's some serial killer shit lmao. The women's team lost to a bunch of schoolboys. Are you seriously saying women can compete with men in sports? It's called biology chief 👍😂
[–]RDay0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Now, where anywhere, did I suggest men play sports against women? Where? How deep up your ass did you have to go in order to find that turd nugget? lmao
It's called 'deflection' chief. Equal pay for equal work.
Cute emojii...
Hahaha beat your best? Never met a pensioner incel before. What's cuckolding like?
Your mum seems to enjoy it. But your Daddy boi still creeps me out by quietly watching and masturabing furiously. Other than that, cuckolding is..interesting.
Hahaha on old man talking about daddy bois cringeee reddit has all kinds its great
You fucktwit, I've been on the Internet since it was invented. Who do you think came up with the term 'boi', you? Pft You are the come lately. Ageist.
Hahaha r/fellowkids.
Nappy nap time old man. Go whittle something.
You're losing this. You can't even keep up. Ageism is like racism, its for the weak minded. Are you ok, man? You seem angry
Edit: An analysis of your account shows you are not an American. Soccer boi. Whoo boi, now I know your issue. Jealousy.
Jealous of a memeing pensioner hahahaha. An "analysis" of my account hahaha. Also, it's called football gramps go put ointment on your joints or something.
This is comedy gold I love Reddit 🍿🍿🍿.
You'e not very convincing You are nervously looking around, to see if anyone is catching your bullying act, but no one sees it. No one cares.
No one cares about you, mate.
Hahah classic if not quite creepy. Like my own little peek over the wall to the Alzheimer's ward. Try more funny less serial killer thanks 👍
[–]TwentyReddit-51 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sorry but what is men money ? Money with a dick drawed on it ?
[–]sghettii32 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Men’s money is the money earned by men playing football, that goes to UEFA and will be used to promote women’s football
[–]TwentyReddit-28 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hum ! I see ! Didn’t know the benefits would go on the same wallet
[–]USMA18 259 points260 points261 points 7 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
The half filled stadium erupted in shouts I bet
[–]Ketsa59 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Generous.
[–]squirrelmonkie 40 points41 points42 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
The final was kinda full but Jesus watching some of the games leading up to it seemed awful. They couldnt even fill up the bottom 5th of the stadiums.
[–]CabbageCarl 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Especially the non-American games. The quarterfinal had like, 2000 people in the stands that weren’t related to the players
[–]ParmesanHomeboy2 points 7 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Which is one of the reasons that the US was able to get so far in the WC. I'll preface this by saying that yes, the US women's team is good, I'm not saying otherwise, but this whole cup was rigged in their favour. Almost all of the viewership comes from American viewers. Having the US lose early on in the tournament would DRASTICALLY drop viewer revenue. Take France - US for example. The clear handball on US player #5. Regardless of intention, her arm was not stuck to her body and they were in the box. The ref did not call it, and they did not call VAR on it. Why? Would France really deny / not ask for a VAR in such a pivotal moment when they could tie with a PK? This cup was rigged for the US, anyone who says otherwise is delusional.
[–]Cleavily0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I was there, it was a full stadium
[–]exoticsancheeze7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
people in attendance: 55,000 people in attendance at the CONCACAF Gold Cup Final :65,000
[–]Cleavily1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, men’s soccer is more popular than women’s, personally I enjoy watching the men’s World Cup over the women’s as well. But I just wanted to correct the guy above, it was a full stadium, women’s soccer is gaining a lot of popularity.
[–]amayako3532 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Full of seats doesn't count
[–]Cleavily2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol I’m just saying, the stadium was full, no empty seats. I don’t know why people are getting offended by a fact.
It's just a joke lol
Sorry lol, my bad 😂
[–]n1ckrath1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It really wasn’t based on clips I’ve seen
What lol? I was literally there, and so many news sites have reported full attendance. I don’t know how some of the people on this subreddit are so against the idea of a stadium being full for a women’s sport. I’m getting big sexist vibes lately, this subreddit is trashy nowadays.
[–]Maester_May0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s good! The amount of just flat out women hating in this thread (I guess I’ve come to the wrong sub, lol, but I got here from scrolling down the front page) is ridiculous. I agree that their pay should reflect their share of the revenue, but when there’s so much money involved I don’t even have a problem with men’s sports subsidizing the women’s, hell it’s what the NBA does with the WNBA, and you don’t see too many NBA players strapped for cash lol.
But back to the full stadium part, I’ve been saying for years that if people want players in the WNBA, women’s soccer, etc., to be paid more than those people need to do a better job of supporting them, i.e. attending and watching their games.
[–]jacobbrog0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sorry, no. https://www.ussoccer.com/stories/2019/07/usa-vs-netherlands-match-report-recap-stats-highlights
[–]tothecatmobile 131 points132 points133 points 7 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link
The players aren't paid by the competition organisers though, they're paid by their national football associations.
A fairer comparison would be how much money the men and womens team brings in for their FAs.
[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 7 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
Well FIFA does pay bonusses for the National football associations. These will then be distributed among the players after everything else is paid. In Europe the men´s national team make a surplus, which is used for the youth teams and the lady team, because these are running with a deficit.
[–]tothecatmobile 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
The US mens team didnt qualify for the last world cup. So the bonus given to the womens team will be much more than the mens.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
In Europe, many male national teams doesn´t even get a bonus unless they make it out of the group stage. The fact that USA didn´t qualify for the World Cup just means that there will be less money for U-teams and Lady teams. I hardly think the Lady team will be willing to share any of the profits with U-teams.
[–]tothecatmobile 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
How much teams in Europe get paid is up to their own FAs.
Players aren't paid by FIFA, they're paid by their national FAs.
The US womens team want to be paid the same as the US mens team, and considering they bring in more revenue for the USSF, who pays both teams. How is this request unreasonable?
That would be more than reasonable. But this is only in the US in the rest of the world no one watches Ladies football.
[–]rockyTop101 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
considering they bring in more revenue for the USSF
Citation needed
[–]rockyTop103 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
As stated elsewhere, that includes a women's world cup cycle but not a men's (the 2014 men's left off, 2015 women's included). So it's not really apples to apples.
Also, the current women's pay structure was collectively bargained and started in 2017 so clearly they were ok with the pay scale (which has guaranteed earnings while the men do not, among other things).
Also, the men's world cup pays out more to just the first place team/federation than the entire women's world cup prize pool.
There was a mens world cup in 2018, it does cover a cycle.
The men also took part in a copa america in 2016, and a gold cup in 2017.
The USSF points out that if this calculation is extended to fiscal 2015 — in order to include a men’s World Cup cycle — the men’s team brought in $10.8 million more for the federation.
Even including that, the difference in pay in much more than the difference in revenue.
Because here's the important thing, the women arent actually asking for the exact same pay as the men, they're asking to implement a revenue sharing system where each team gets paid according to how much revenue it generates.
[–]rockyTop102 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They collectively bargained this current deal 2 years ago. Also, they have guaranteed contracts, even if they don't play, while the men do not have those same guarantees. This doesn't scream gender inequality - it just seems like they aren't satisfied with their current CBA and need to negotiate better next time when the current deal expires.
[–]tremens1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Men didn't qualify for that one is the point.
[–]tothecatmobile3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So? They performed badly, and so lost out on revenue.
[–]pcyr99991 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah but you can’t use one year in which they happened to not get far to say “WoMeN MAkE moRe”
3 years, not 1
So what’s the deal with the pic in the OP?
It's a random stat that has nothing to do with the actual issue.
You didn’t respond to my other comment yet. Gate revenue isn’t the only source of income and according to [this article] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/) gate revenue is only a quarter of total income.
True that's a bit more difficult to work out, but you're joking if you don't think that commercially the womens team is worth at least the same as the mens at the moment
Either way it's a good job then that what the women want is to implement a revenue sharing system where each team is paid according to the revenue they generate.
But like you said that revenue is more difficult to figure out. If they can prove that they bring in equal revenue overall I would want them to make the same as the men but I don’t believe that is likely to be the case. Seems like I hear about the Men’s World Cup on a regular basis but I didn’t even know that the Women’s was happening until the US won. It’s anecdotal but it’s something.
Also that’s gate revenue only. What about all the other things that bring in money like TV, merchandising, licensing, etc?
If they want to set that precedent then they better be willing to earn less than the dudes next cycle lol. Instead of "equal pay" the dudes should get paid less if they don't qualify.
That's what the women actually want, a revenue sharing deal where each team is paid according to the revenue they generate.
[–][deleted]1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If there is any profits that is,
[–]orangeblueorangeblue1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The women got $2m for winning the 2015 Women’s World Cup, and $4m for winning this year.
The men got $2.5 million for finishing 4th in Copa America Centenario. They got $9m for 12th place at the 2014 World Cup.
The women have a lot of ground to make up.
It's a good job then that what the women want is to implement a revenue sharing system where each team is paid according to the revenue they generate.
That’s not what they want. They rejected that model in 2017, when they renewed their CBA. They want equal dollars to what the men make.
That’s not what they want. They rejected that model in 2017
[–]j-29 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
The U.S. women's team runs at a profit.
[–]Apprehensive_Clock 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Prior to 2011, Just the payments to the players was more than the revenue they produced.
[–]shlem1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
womens soccer has also become vastly more popular since 2011, the whole cup is only like 20 years old IIRC
[–]j-291 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Are you saying the didn't generate a profit before or after 2011. Your statement is confusing me.
[–]Apprehensive_Clock2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The women didn't generate a for multiple years after 2011. In 2011 they just reached enough to pay the roster. For more than 20 years the Women's team ran at a deficit that was subsidized by the men's team. Prior to that point the revenue of the team couldn't even afford to pay the players let alone all the other expenses that went into the program. 2011 was the first time that the salary of the players was less than the revenue of the team. 68% of the revenue earned went directly to paying salaries of the players, compared to 15% of the men. They still were not profitable at this point.
Okay, 8 years later, aren't they still profitable?
Running at a profit for 6 years doesn't discount running at a deficit for decades.
Amazon?
[–]CommanderHeMan 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
In the case of England, and I believe several other European nations, the men don’t get paid to play international football.
The money that would be salary gets donated to charity.
Footballers get paid by their clubs not their national football associations.
Club football is a for profit business.
International football is played for pride not profit.
I think it’s shameful that women are demanding to be paid for international football.
The US mens team are paid to play international football.
[–]livesomelearnsome 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rownpown0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is the important distinction. Is there any men that make the majority of their salary from their associations? Percentage pay women make more, but overall pay its way less. So it's kind of dumb for this guy to make the claim without recognizing that women don't make any money at the club level. (I am not advocating we should pay them more just because, but am solely stating the current situation)
How much they make at club level isn't really important as this is to do with international games.
Currently the WNT earn slightly more then the MNT, but the players of the WNT earn far less.
The request of the WNT is to pay each according to the revenue their teams bring in, this is about as equal as you can get.
[–]rownpown1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So this tweet is even less pussy pass denied than it appears. Kind of dumb that people don’t understand the actual situation.
That is the request but the difference is the bonuses issues by FIFA for men's teams who h are then distributed are far greater for men regardless of the revenue.
They want equal pay with the US mens team, not all mens teams.
[–]bonecrusher1 104 points105 points106 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
why i cant seem to notice any male models protesting about equal pay?
[–]IIceWeasellzz 84 points85 points86 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
because they're all smart enough to know they don't generate as much revenue or publicity as the top women models so they should earn less.
[–]bjarnehaugen 43 points44 points45 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
and what about Male pornstars? women out earn then by a lot and that doesn't sound fair
[–]Milsurp_Seeker 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Gay pornstars earn triple what hetero males earn last I heard.
“Gay for pay.”
[–]FoolishFishFood 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think it's all about the dick. You get that dick bonus, even if you're a straight guy and star in some man on man action you get that dick money. Would be some flexible straightness mind you.
[–]benjick-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What a fucking red herring 😂
[–]ThewannabeTemplar 88 points89 points90 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
Where would one find info on this? So I can show others and back it up
[–]thatsmybipolarshit 30 points31 points32 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Same here
[–]bagelmakers 48 points49 points50 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Here is a good article about it:
[–]WorkIsWhenIReddit 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's never quite as simple as what can be contained in a single tweet. That 13% is what FIFA pays out to all the FA's with the winner getting the biggest share. How much each player gets is up to the USSF which is where the rub starts. And that's just win bonuses, the players each get a standard fee per game they are selected for, that's also lower for women than it is for men.
BTW, several European nations have already pledged to bring the salaries of womens national teams in line with the salaries of men's teams.
It's more complicated then shown here since players are payed by the national football league not by FIFA directctly except in the form of bonuses
[–]VickVinaigrette-12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Please don't spread this bullshit. It's completely misleading. Women's games actually bring in more money than men's games: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
[–]kambo_rambo7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Its not misleading. OP is directly referring to the world cup. This one is about the US
[–]livesomelearnsome0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The women's team is sueing the US league, not FIFA
Listen to (or read) this NPR podcast about it: https://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=734901705
[–]VickVinaigrette-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sure, but the women aren’t fighting for pay for the World Cup alone… Their argument is to be paid fairly for the revenue that they generate. And the US Women’s team generate’s more than the US Men’s team
[–]sensefuldrivel2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
not on average, the article you're quoting specifically states that the women earned more revenue because the men's team didn't even qualify for the last world cup. not exactly a fair comparison when strictly speaking of total revenue
[–]VickVinaigrette1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
LOL exactly. Think about what you just said.
Employee #1 sells $45,000 worth of product, people like him but he’s not the best.
Employee #2 had such good interactions with clients that she got invited to the Las Vegas trade show and ended up selling $100,000 worth of product.
Who should be paid more?
Employee 1 only sells $45,000 but has $200,000 of repeat billings that aren’t counted for some reason.
Employee 2 sells $100,000 but only has an additional $50,000 of repeat billings.
Employee 1 should get paid more once all facts are considered.
The argument that “women brought in more revenue” only counts revenue from the gate and completely ignores sponsorships and stuff. It’s disingenuous.
[–]youthedog40 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But if the women are qualifying at a higher rate than the men for the World Cup, and bringing in more revenue due to their performance, which is a major basis for this entire argument, why does it not matter now?
[–]sensefuldrivel1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean I agree that they should get paid more, but them winning the finals doesnt automatically translate to a bigger pot of revenue to draw from. For example, the mens world cup 2010 in south africa brought in almost $4 billion while the women's only brought in $73 million.
All I was saying is you cant compare the revenue of a particular instance in which the women's team won against an instance in which the men's team didnt even qualify and then say "women bring in more revenue"
[–]PM_ME_Y0UR_B0OBS_2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Games account for only 1/4th of the total revenue. Sponsorships account for 1/2 of the revenue. Without actual data on how much money each team brings in from sponsors we cannot make a reasonable comparison but I’m willing to bet the men’s team brings in more money from sponsors.
[–]Beepboopcomrad 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
My wife likes watching American Ninja Warrior and I asked her if they make the women run the same course and hold them to the same expectations. If I remember correctly, they do, but have a system that also promotes more female participation without interfering with the actual competition, which has both sex as contenders.
[–]carterburkefuckyou 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sex contenders
[–]snizarsnarfsnarf 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
here would one find info on this? So I can show others and back it up
Well, i've watched almost every season of Sasuke (actual ninja warrior), and there has never been a woman on the program I'm pretty sure (and anyone can try out, best 100 are allowed to come to competition day)
They probably just let women participate in ANW, rather than making them try out
[–]legzMcGee[🍰] 70 points71 points72 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
That's like chanting equal pay at an arena football game cause NFL players get more
[–]PM_ME_YOUR_FOOD_ 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Afl is fun as fuck to watch though
[–]VickVinaigrette-19 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wrong. The women's league makes more money over the whole season, it's only the final that makes less money. So they truly are underpaid
[–]MarcusOReallyYes7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They aren’t underpaid. They’re welcome to play on the men’s squad if they’re good enough. Gender is a social construct after all, right?
Why would they want to play for the men's team? The men's team sucks lol. The US women's team now has four World Cups, the men's team has never won, they didn't even qualify last year, they are ranked 30th.
I thought they were upset about pay? If the men’s team pays more, why not just play for them?
[–]legzMcGee5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Isnt this the same team that lost to a 15 and under boys team. Not the same level. I think the Phoenix suns is a trash nba team and I feel I'm an ok basketball player but anyone of them will demolish me
[–]legzMcGee3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If this is true then yes of course equalize the pay, but I'm not finding any sources that state this
[–]Santiago13131 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The USSF points out that if this calculation is extended to fiscal 2015 — in order to include a men’s World Cup cycle — the men’s team brought in $10.8 million more for the federa
The men should be punished for failing to qualify for th last WC over anything else lol
[–]The3liGator1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Listen to this NPR podcast about it: https://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=734901705
The mens team should earn less for not making the WC. Their pay had been at a certain level with the assumption they would qualify and when they did they earned far more than the women's team.
[–]Santiago1313-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Here is the first article when I googled it. As always it’s more complicated than a percent, but the facts suggest they are likely underpaid. Read a variety of sources to get a good opinion and certainly don’t trust op’s screenshot tweet at face value.
[–]aroh100876 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I wonder if the crowd knows that tickets for men games are way more expensive, if they would be willing to pay the difference and if they would ever be able to fill a stadium to watch the women play.
Edit: fixed grammar.
[–]CommanderHeMan 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women’s football can’t even fill stadium when they give tickets away for free.
[–]LoveKina 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
This is the exact same thing that happened with the wnba. Except the NBA had to buy majority to keep them running and the wnba couldn't sell enough seats to even run the games in arenas anymore. But hey equality I guess.
[–]MakeGoodBetter 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I was looking for a WNBA comment. I know feminists/purists/equalists won't be for it, but they should lower the rim to 9 feet to give the game some above the rim excitement. I mean, they use a smaller ball because they have smaller hands, why not adjust the rim because they are shorter? Imagine the WNBA being able to have a dunk contest? How cool would that be? I'd watch it solely out of curiosity.
[–]LoveKina 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Theres any number of things they could do tbh, the only really unfortunate thing here is, unlike soccer, the men playing basketball appear outrageously superhuman. Like why watch regular people or just above average people play basketball when you can watch actual superhumans basically play the same thing. It's just more exciting. But I see where youre coming from, they should try something. I mean there is a team that had to resort to playing their games in a rec center, they dont really have anything to lose at this point.
[–]MakeGoodBetter 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I understand with wanting a woman's league to watch for a particular sport, but if the league is only operable because the NBA financially supports it then something needs to be done to make it more popular or profitable.
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is actually a very good argument for one theory how to improve women's sports - drop trying to make them exact copies of the male versions. Men and women are different, the sports they play can be different too, adapted specifically for women's bodies to bring out their strengths or minimise the impact of lower strength and speed. Sports were invented for men, by men, and obviously the standard is according to the upper limits of what men are capable of. Women have a much larger distance to reach that upper limit, so of course women's sports appear less skilled and less exciting to watch - even if those women were actually more skilled and talented.
There's nonreason why women's sports have to be less interesting to watch just because they're physically not as strong as men. If you look at popular women's sports, they're popular because they're not inferior versions of the men's game but have something different to offer. Women's gymnastics are different from men's gymnastics and make use of women's higher flexibility and gracefulness. Same for dancing, figure skating or synchronised swimming. Women's tennis can actually be more interesting because it's slower and you can actually see the moves, rather than it being just a blur. Lowering the rim in basketball is just one example. We could literally invent sports that only women play so that they don't have to compete with the male teams for attention and funding. Or we could put a different spin on existing sports for women's teams.
However, there are also some sports events that don't need to be any different, and literally aren't any different for women, but still get less attention because of sexism. There's no reason why any racing events should be considered worse in women's category just because they're ~10% slower, because the audiece can't perceive objective speed, only relative speed, and the entertainment factor comes from watching the close rivalry between a group of equally marched participants. Men aren't any more "skilled" at running, they don't have better technique, it's literally just running. So anyone who claims they don't watch women's sprinting or swimming because it's more boring is full of shit. Nobody would say they enjoy watching horse racing more than hound racing because horses are faster.
[–]MakeGoodBetter1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well done. I couldn't agree more.
[–]OliverCromwell1650 69 points70 points71 points 7 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
They also got beat 5-2 by a team of 14-15 year boys. Not even like a national team, mind you, just a fairly ordinary team from a mid-sized city where the sport isn't even that popular.
Those boys make exactly nothing, by the way.
[–]xxcups 30 points31 points32 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Free market baby - people pay to see the absolute best in the world.
Dear purple hair short hair trump hating soccer lady, You are as talented as Bayside High School varsity soccer. Maybe those boys should be paid as much as you.
[–]PortalsOfKamarTaj 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
The point is that women’s soccer only generates a fraction of the views and coverage that men’s does. The reason is because women’s soccer is incredibly slow and boring compared to the speed and tempo of a men’s game. It’s also much less competitive and entertaining.
[–]super_ag 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
So you're saying "Naked Women's Soccer" is the key?
[–]PortalsOfKamarTaj 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]super_ag 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'd watch that for a dollar
[–]xxcups1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The most realistic answer is to have 1 or 2 MtF transgender players on each team who dominate all the other players, knocking them down, outrunning and dribbling through them like super heroes.
[–]Velixis1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
She's probably more talented. He's just faster.
[–]Monistico 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Was hoping I’d see this somewhere! Notice how people just ignore everything you just said?
[–]CampariOW 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Even people responding to this information here are burying their heads in the sand and claiming the women weren't trying.
[–]chunkynyquil-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I mean...they probably weren't. They were just basically getting shots up.
[–]BeautifulType 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You are all circle jerking it hard here. Even the article states that the teams weren’t trying very hard and there’s no need to worry. Why bother citing this article when they won the World Cup? Or are you implying those boys would have won the cup too by a wide margin?
It’s one thing to talk about as revenue, it’s another to say they are so bad at soccer that they would lose to any city high school team
[–]OliverCromwell1650 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or are you implying those boys would have won the cup too by a wide margin?
Absolutely, and unequivocally, yes.
[–]andysaurus_rex-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You don't pay them for on-field talent compared to men who they'd never compete against. It's well known that men are physically stronger and faster and will beat women in almost any sport. That's not the point they're trying to argue here.
[–]NoShameInternets-16 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine thinking that was an actual test of skill. It was a practice scrimmage. The boys were playing as hard as they’ve ever played in their lives. Once in a lifetime opportunity for them. The girls were working on sets, passing, and getting in game shape for Russia.
It literally says that in the article you linked.
[–]super_ag12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Maybe the women should have played to win if they didn't want the shame of losing to boys under the age of 15.
What shame? I guarantee they don’t feel any. You’re projecting.
[–]super_ag2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fair enough, "to be shamed" would be more like it.
[–]Huhhuhuh1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Username checks out
[–]Half_Man1-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Maybe they didn’t give a shit and just wanted to have a good time playing against literal teenagers.
Edit: literally the fourth paragraph in the article you linked but evidently didn’t read-
“Of course, this match against the academy team was very informal and should not be a major cause for alarm. The U.S. surely wasn’t going all out, with the main goal being to get some minutes on the pitch, build chemistry when it comes to moving the ball around, improve defensive shape and get ready for Russia.”
[–]super_ag11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And you can't do all those thing without letting 14 year olds score more goals than you?
"Of course, the fight against a 90-year-old granny was informal and his losing to her should not be a major cause for concern. Mike Tyson wasn't going all out, with his main goal of working on his stamina, defense and footwork and get ready for his fight with Buster Douglas."
Also, let's say they were trying their hardest and got spanked by a bunch of adolescent boys. You think they'd come out and say, "We gave it our all, but those boys sure did bring it to us. Hats off to those lads." Of course not. They would say the same exact thing they said, "We weren't really trying to win. It was all just for fun."
[–]Half_Man10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I’m not trying to disparage the performance of the boys in question, I’m trying to point out that the women’s team didn’t have cause to go all out so it’s reasonable to assume that ahead of a match they did have cause to prepare for- they didn’t go all out. The granny comparison seems an unfair one considering these teens actually aren’t pushovers and some of them may end up in pro soccer.
It seems like you want to just degrade the women’s team right now. You have no way of knowing what the women would say in that hypothetical scenario but you seem to want to assume the worst.
Personally I know that men and women are capable of different things on a physical level. That doesn’t prove something against the women somehow being less admirable athletes though- and considering they, you know, won the World Cup seems to show that they are, you know, more admirable than the US men’s team that had their best result at third place in 1930. To me that seems to show that the women’s team is currently a better team, and more worth watching- and it seems most Americans would agree.
There are separate leagues for a reason. It’s not worth putting down the women for being outperformed by men because they’re two different showings of athleticism.
[–]super_ag6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I’m not trying to disparage the performance of the boys in question, I’m trying to point out that the women’s team didn’t have cause to go all out so it’s reasonable to assume that ahead of a match they did have cause to prepare for- they didn’t go all out.
For a group who is demanding to be paid the same as the men's team, the shouldn't have to "go all out" in order not to lose to a group of mid-pubescent boys.
The granny comparison seems an unfair one considering these teens actually aren’t pushovers and some of them may end up in pro soccer.
https://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-hyperboles.html
It seems like you want to just degrade the women’s team right now.
Now you have unique insights into my motives? Sounds like an ad hominem is coming to augment a losing argument.
You have no way of knowing what the women would say in that hypothetical scenario but you seem to want to assume the worst.
Yes, I am speculating, but do you really think they'd admit to getting shellacked by a bunch of boys who don't even have pubes yet? Honestly? You think they'd say, "Yeah, we tried out best, but those squeaky-voiced little tykes really brought their A-game. We didn't stand a chance"?
Personally I know that men and women are capable of different things on a physical level. That doesn’t prove something against the women somehow being less admirable athletes though- and considering they, you know, won the World Cup seems to show that they are,
In the context of the women demanding the same pay as the men, it does prove something. If the men's team lost to a bunch of teenage boys, they would be made fun of too, even if they didn't "go all out." It's ridiculous for the women's team to demand equal pay when their skills and abilities are not equal. Do you think the top scorer in the WNBA deserves the same salary as Steph Currie? If the Seattle Storm (WNBA champions) lost a game to an 8th Grade basketball team, do you think they'd have the right to demand to make as much as the Toronto Raptors?
If the women's team wasn't claiming they're as good as or better than the men's team, I really wouldn't care that they got beat by a <15 team. But they are, and so I'm pointing out how objectively they aren't.
To me that seems to show that the women’s team is currently a better team, and more worth watching- and it seems most Americans would agree.
They're the better team relative to their competition, not on any objective standard. Venus and Serena Williams are/were arguably the best female tennis players in the world, yet they couldn't beat the 205th ranked male player, despite him "not going all out."
There are separate leagues for a reason. It’s not worthy putting down the women for being outperformed by men because they’re two different showings of athleticism.
But they weren't outperformed by men. They were outperformed by boys. . .at the same time bitching about sexism causing them not to get paid as much as the men.
/r/MurderedByWords
[–]TrustTheFriendship5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine that a team of 14 year old boys from Dallas is competitive enough for the Women’s World Cup Champions to tune up against them ahead of an international friendly.
Hot take: men are more capable physically than women.
Hotter take: Those “boys from Dallas” we’re basically a minor league pro team. I don’t expect you to know a damn thing about soccer, but those kids were the Dallas farm team. Not just some high school team they found on a whim. I guarantee some of them went or will go pro.
Hottest take: none of this matters, you’re sexist as fuck.
[–]TrustTheFriendship6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lmao. I’m in my 20s now but in my teens I played for one of those MLS farm teams in the North East. We literally played against FC Dallas a few times. We weren’t the best academy in the nation but we always had an above 500 record.
Everyone from my club played D1 in college but exactly 1 person managed to stick with a pro club for more than a year. The pathway from youth player to full professional in the USA is nowhere near what you are making it out to be.
[–]brain_on_drugs5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hot take: 14 year old children aren't men.
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Only in modern times when we've created a strict cut off age for adulthood at 18. That's a cultural concept, not a biological one. Biologically speaking, a person who's gone through puberty and has a post-pubescent levels of sex hormones and developed secondary sexual characteristics would already be considered man/woman. If that 14 year boy has the teatosterone levels of a 25 year old man - as in, sufficiently high enough to give him a boost of ~30% more muscle mass for free - there shouldn't be any more shame for a woman to lose to that boy than to a 25 year old man.
Anyway, what's with all this current trend of shaming women for not being as physically strong as men? Have we suddenly regressed into 16th century? Why doesn't anyone shame men for having inferior underdeveloped mammary glands compared to women's?
[–]xxcups0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Real champions dont make excuses.
Unless you are a woman, then it's someone else's fault.
Who made excuses? Seriously, the projection here is unreal.
[–]digitalEarthling 31 points32 points33 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What a cheesy fucking clown world.
[–]GayWolfGoneOwO 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women has something men don't : sex appeal
Put it to good use and revenue gap will be closer
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The fact that the women don’t understand why they make less playing women’s soccer just reinforces why they make less. Ignorance isn’t bliss.
[–]Darigone 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Life is complicated and people make it more complicated.
That’s why people take things at face value, it’s easier.
No one wants to consider anything more than what’s at face value for things like women’s pay vs men’s pay.
Every hourly job I have worked woman have made the exact amount. This whole women make .75 for every dollar a man makes in America is very very outdated. Very very wrong.
Any wage gaps that may happen is in jobs you negotiate your contracts for. That just boils down to how well you can sell yourself.
[–]SpecialSause 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The study that gets cited for the "wage gap" has been severely misrepresented. Part of that "gap" is due to descrepency in how dangerous a job is (men tend to take more dangerous jobs) as well as time worked (part time jobs, maternity leave, leaving altogether after having children, etc.).
[–]Ganondorf-Dragmire 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The statistic may be true overall, but it doesn't account for important factors. Women work different (usually lower paying) jobs than men. Women don't ask for raises as much as men. Women take more time off for doctors appointments and for families and work less hours in general. All this shit adds up people.
[–]Lord_Teapot 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
all sports should be integrated, no more male/female leagues. the hilarity will be well worth it.
[–]super_ag 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We're starting to see that with this while "Men can be women" nonsense. Example 1
How would that be any different from the men’s leagues now?
All it would do is eliminate women completely from every single physical team sport on the planet.
[–]BohemianShark1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That seems the most literal way of showing equality. Branching off to make your own league that men can’t compete in seems against equality imo
[–]live3orfry 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine confusing prize money with salary...
[–]gahd95 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It would make sense to pay them equally if everyone in the crowd agreed to pay 4 times more for their tickets.
[–]Ketsa13 points 7 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Really the crowd chants equal pay? How spontaneous do you think it was? 100 percent prepared.
[–]Half_Man1-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
r/Nothingeverhappens
[–]welcum2erf-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So your thought is what, the crowd all got together and discussed this beforehand? That's a pretty dumb thought.
[–]NoShameInternets3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Par for the course.
[–]Ketsa3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You have low imagination.
[–]welcum2erf0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Nice dodge. Tell me how you think this was arranged in advance, and provide any receipts you have.
[–]LosebVis 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
look mayne people just aint as intrested in females sports as males
[–]MakeGoodBetter 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Correct. It's the same reason why I'm personally not interested in collegiate athletics. The level of competition is lower than the professional leagues. Why watch amateurs when I can watch pros?
[–]CommanderHeMan1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s basically how every single real football fan from “football countries” views women’s football.
Football is the no.1 sport in 150+ countries.
We already have high level professional men’s football that we’re used to watching. Especially in Europe.
Women’s football is like watching 11 year olds.
Which do you think is more popular and why?
[–]CommanderHeMan 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women really need to woman up and start watching women’s football.
[–]LosebVis1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
ur right in a way lmao
[–]williocheerio33 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
If they want equal pay, let’s get rid of the men’s team and the women’s team. In the name of equality, we should have one national team where the best soccer players play on it. If Alex Morgan can prove herself more valuable than Jozy Altidore, then so be it.
[–]Voltaire99 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
There would be no biological females on such a team. But maybe we could get some trans female representation.
So.....men? (Strictly from a biological, performance, and stature standpoint. I’m cool with trans people and with people expressing themselves)
[–]Voltaire991 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Oh, I agree. I was being a smartass. I'm personally against men competing in women's sports regardless of what they call themselves. But it would be poetic justice for these "gender is just a social construct" idiots to watch the best female soccer players in the world all be replaced by current and former dick owners, and to then watch those super maams absolutely annihilate every other extremely talented well trained women's soccer team in the world.
Sometimes you need to go backwards to get a better understanding and move forwards so maybe it would help idk lol
There are some cis women who just naturally have abnormally high testosterone levels, you just don't see them in sports because they get disqualified for "cheating"... Yeah, I guess if you automatically categorise every extremely strong woman as a man or a doper, there are no extremely strong women out there. But abnormal men don't get disqualified, they get celeberated, even if they literally have severe genetic abnormalities that put them a mile ahead of everyone else. Michael Phelps is literally an anomaly that no biologically normal male swimmer can hope to match; if he was a woman, he wouldn't be allowed to compete with other women, but men's sports don't have any arbitrary allowed upper bound point where the jury decides you're "too good". There's no separate "superhuman" category for those men, they just compete with other men, even when the gap between them and other men is no smaller than the gap between men and women.
This is about 90% bullshit, and crafting our competitive sports regulations based on that bullshit is going to result in every single women's sport being dominated by "women" who either still have, or until recently used to have, testicles. The fastest and or strongest "woman" in the world, across every single event, will be a biological male.
Those women are rare, but there are actually some women who have extremely high testosterone levels for women. The tallest woman in the world was 7 feet 7 inches, and shas biologically female. Exceptions always exist in nature. Unless they have proof that they're trans, you can't just automatically deny they're women. Last time I checked, sex was determined by chromosomes, because that's the only objective, mutually exclusive characteristic - either you have XY or XX (of course even there there are ezceptions, though, such as people with Down's syndrome). There is no exact threshold of testosterone or estrogen levels at which one becomes male or female, it's a spectrum. As with any gendered spectrum, even when most men and women end up at different ends, there have always been and will always be irregular people who cross far over statistical averages. That's just how nature works, things aren't as neat and tidy as some people want them to be. What else would you use? What should be the maximum allowed height for women until they're no longer women? I guess Gwendoline Christie who's 6'3 is not a woman, then? What should be the minimum allowed height for men until they're no longer men? Is Peter Dinklage who's 4'5 not a man, then? He's apparently a woman, even though he has a full beard and a masculine-sounding voice?
You're debating against a lot of things that I never said. All I am saying is that actual trans athletes and hermaphrodite athletes should not be allowed to compete in women's sports. If a person competing in women's sports, displays unusually high levels of testosterone, then have her medically examined for internal testes. If none are found, then she can compete. It's not a complicated system. Regardless of whether or not you were raised as a female your entire life, and regardless of whether or not you physically look like a woman, if you have or ever have had testicles physically connected to you anywhere in or on your body, then you cannot compete in women's sports.
Stop raging against strawmen.
All I am saying is that actual trans athletes and hermaphrodite athletes should not be allowed to compete in women's sports.
Trans women (as in, male to female) are no stronger than an average woman, even weaker if anything, because by the time they've finished transitioning, they actually have lower testosterone levels than an average woman - much lower, in fact, critically low, because they had to chemically block their testosterone all this time, unlike cis women who had naturally circulating levels. (This is why trans women often report no libido initially, because even in women testosterone still plays contributes to sex drive to a significant degree, and while women's bodies naturally need much less testosterone to achieve the same functions, trans women's testosterone levels are literally bordering on zero). By the time they've finished transitioning, after approximately a year of hormonal treatment, their muscle mass, bone density, tendon and ligment strength, even pelvic width and shape (yes, your bone structure changes too) and everything else that made them "male" is gone. The only advantage trans women can still claim is height, if they were higher than an average woman - but to that I say, what should be the maximum allowed height for women in sports, then? If you think there is one, then just arbitrarily choose it, and both cis and fully transitioned trans women below that height should compete. Height is one of those sex differences with a lot of overlap, and it's actually a smaller gap between athletes than the average population because top athletes tend to attract people on the extreme end, both men and women. I once saw a picture of American U16 basketball team standing next to Salvador's. They were like two heads taller. The Salvador's team got comletely wiped out, and would have no more chance of winning against the American team than against the same level guys' team, but still nobody had a problem with that and suggested teams should get segregated by height.
Discrimination against women in sports is so ridiculous because most of those people have no understanding of how hormones work and how they affect the body, and are just suffering from a confirmation bias. There's a ton of trans women that compete with other women and get a pass simply because they aren't winning - which alone is enough of a testiment that having had testicles once doesn't automatically make you physically superior for the rest of your life. Physical strength comes entirely from hormones. It's only a problem if some of those trans women happen to win, apparently only winning isn't allowed...
I suppose you just think it's an incredible coincidence that trans "women" are dominating competition with actual women in any sport requiring physicality. What a surprise it must have been for all these newly minted women to discover that they were actually the most dominant athletes to ever grace the surface of the globe. Female weight lifting records that have stood for decades are suddenly all being shattered by these dIsAdvAnTagEd "women." what an incredible story of heroism.
I'm not saying that every single male is stronger and faster than every single female in the world. That's ridiculous. There are women who could have outrun and out lifted me even when I was at my physical peak during my service in the Navy. But I wasn't a competitive weightlifter or runner. If I had been, and let's just say that I had ranked somewhere in the top ten thousand male runners or weightlifters in the world, then I could have had a full on gender reassignment including years of hormones, surgery etc, and I could have then proceeded to destroy every single record ever set by a biological woman in whatever sport I was proficient in. We're watching it happen right now. All of your pseudo scientific gender theory, and cherry picked data that you peddle as established fact, can't stand up to the reality of us all watching it happen before our eyes on a weekly basis.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2019/05/16/stripped-womens-records-transgender-powerlifter-asks-where-do-we-draw-line/?utm_term=.7937e00e7417
I suppose you just think it's an incredible coincidence that trans "women" are dominating competition with actual women in any sport requiring physicality.
Show me where all those dominating trans women are. I've literally only heard about a couple. As I said, selection bias. Nobody's interested in trans women who lose.
Female weight lifting records that have stood for decades are suddenly all being shattered by these dIsAdvAnTagEd "women." what an incredible story of heroism.
Stood for decades, what? They've been improving this whole time. Yes, believe it or not, sometimes there comes someone a bit far above the current norm and shatters it. Like Michael Phelps...
If people are worried about women being "too good" at power lifting, maybe they should start looking at doping. Except most male powerlifters use it too and nobody has a problem with that...
and I could have then proceeded to destroy every single record ever set by a biological woman in whatever sport I was proficient in.
No, you would have lost ~40% muscle mass and gain about 20% more body fat in the span of 3 months after starting to take the hormones. It wouldn't matter if you were pencil-skinny or a beefcake before transition, your muscles would melt away all the same, so you might as well not bother, and save all that training for after the transition. Do you know anything about human biology at all? Just read any trans woman's testimony, reduces strength is the most drastic change they always describe. You realise that muscle mass is literally just some flesh and it can fall off a lot more easily than it is gained? It's very expensive for the body to maintain and it gladly gets rid of any extra ounce if the calories or the hormones or the levels of physical exertion are not up there to support it.
Trans women are not allowed to compete with cis women while they're still transitioning. After that it's fair game. That's what the current science shows. If you have actual research, extensive research on a large enough sample size of trans athletes to show me that I'm wrong, then please show it, I'd gladly change my opion based on facts. Contrary to what you might think, I have no beef with this. But I was interested in this topic myself, and from what I've seen, there's currently no evidence to show that trans women have any advantage that would be out of bounds of cisgender women.
You know as well as I do that large sample sizes are not available, and the research you're suggesting I seek out, no university would touch with a 800 ft long pole.
We only have the amazing coincidence that out of millions of female competitors, a few biological males dominate every sport they're allowed to compete in despite apparently being "disadvantaged" lol.
Again, show me specific examples, please. I don't watch any sports so I wouldn't know. But there's like hundreds of different sports out there, you're claiming every single them is dominated by trans women, while in the same breath saying trans women in sports are too rare to conduct proper studies?
I literally know just a couple of athletes by names... Rhonda Rousey and Serena Williams. Last I checked, they were both cis. I remember Rhonda was asked whether she could fight in male MMA and she said no, and people on Reddit absolutely loving rubbing in everyone's face that time Serena Williams lost a tennis match to some dude, (as if for some reason she should feel ashamed of it even though this is literally the reason why we segregate sports and she's always competed in women's tennis from the start, so I honestly don't know what their problem is, just some weird obsessive flex).
So, any specific examples for your anecdotal evidence argument?
You mean in addition to the example I already provided? I can provide more examples, but you'll just call it anecdotal, and an incredible coincidence, and demand that I provide peer reviewed studies that we both know that no university would dare publish.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/39158/transgender-player-dominating-womens-handball-amanda-prestigiacomo
https://abcnews.go.com/US/transgender-teens-outrun-track-field-competitors-critics-close/story?id=55856294
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2038764-transgender-fighter-fallon-fox-and-her-slowly-fading-fifteen-minutes-of-fame
So she's 6'2 and 220lbs. That's the weight of an extremely buff male athlete. And still had high testosterone levels. Hasn't finished transitioning, then, should have been disqualified. Agree with you on that one.
They don't say anything about her physical metrics, this is not evidence.
Same. Not evidence either.
There anecdotal examples, and you're calling it a global epidemic? Ok.
and demand that I provide peer reviewed studies that we both know that no university would dare publish.
Yeah, sure, dude, it's all a massive conspiracy. Or maybe you just haven't looked for studies because you know they won't show what you want them to show... Like this one, for example. One year after transition, trans female runners has no higher levels of testosterone and hemoglobin than their cis female competitors, and the same trans runner were slower as women then they used to be as men - a difference mirroring the average ~10% difference between male and female runners.
What do you say to this one?
It's funny watching you attempt to wrap yourself up in the cloak of science as you casually dismiss the evidence. The two runners you claimed don't count, were track and field competitors as boys too. They were both ranked fairly low within the state. Then they became "women" and broke records that had been set by female olympians.
What percentage of female athletes would you say are trans? I bet it's something like .001% And yet they frequently compete at the very highest levels in women's athletics. WHAT AN INCREDIBLE FUCKING COINCIDENCE.
I didn't say it was an epidemic, yet. But that's only because the numbers of people transitioning and then competing in sports at a high level is still very small. But when they do, watch the fuck out little girl who worked incredibly hard your whole life to be the best female discus thrower in the world. Because here comes super ma'am, with his (excuse me, her) higher bone density, larger frame, and increased musculature developed over years of puberty with gallons of testosterone, to absolutely annihilate not only the best effort you could ever possibly make, but records set by female olympians decades ago. But don't get upset you bigoted little girl. Super ma'am actually did it all despite being disadvantaged!
Imagine believing that bullshit unironically.
Because here comes super ma'am, with his (excuse me, her) higher bone density, larger frame, and increased musculature developed over years of of puberty with gallons of testosterone
Did you read the study I linked at all or are you just being deliberately obtuse now? How many times I can repeat that neither muscle mass nor bone density, not even some parts of this "larger male frame" survive the loss of testosterone? Do you understand that older men tend to lose muscle mass as they age because of loss of testosterone? Do you understand that post-menopausal women lose bone density as they age because of loss of estrogen? Do you know that trans women literally develop boobs and hips? Or that pelvis shape still changes in adult women, getting narrower after the age of 40?
As for "larger frame", again I say, what should be the legal allowed height cut off for women until she no longer counts as a woman? Top level female sports are full of abnormally tall women. Unlike with physical strength, there's actually quite a substantial overlap in height between the sexes.
I'm sorry but I'm not going to continue this when you're so obviously arguing in bad faith. You claim that science is on your side while providing none of it, and refusing to acknowledge any studies that disagree with you. You clearly have an agenda you want to push and that's it.
I can't even bother to explain how ridiculous your idea is. You think there's some sort of mass conspiracy where mediocre male athletes switch sex just so that they can earn medals in an easier category. You seriously think an athlete, someone with a true competitive spirit, would not only choose to give themselves an unfair advantage that would give them a hollow victory and make everyone else hate them, rather than gathering fame, but also literally endanger their health in the process, deliberately become physically weaker and lose pounds of muscle mass (because even you can't deny they do lose muscle mass, can you?), and go through at least a year of very stressful, hard and annoying transition period. Say this to yourself aloud and maybe you'll realise how absurd this is.
You'd think if this was true, other female athletes would feel enraged about this, we'd see plenty of media coverage - since, after all, this is the age of public mass outrage. But, funny thing, I always see a lot more regular people outraged about female trans athletes, than the actual cost female athletes who are supposedly getting destroyed by a mile ahead in every sport. Last time I checked, the women's speed records were still ~10% lower than men's records, just like they've been for a while now. But ok, I'm sure they'll be up to ~5% any time now, with this looming epidemic.
Don't bother replying to this, I won't read it, I'm ending it here.
"All your examples don't count. Only my gender theory pseudo science counts. Never mind that it conflicts with the reality that anyone can see repeatedly taking place."
An idiot I met on reddit.
[–]bradtwo 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Give them 100% of the ticket price, I don’t care.
It isn’t a percentage, it the attendees. All those shouting “equal pay” aren’t really thinking where the money is coming from.
Where the fuck are they going to get it ? From the men’s league ?
[–]55Trample 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Every proposed model I see asks for pooling and redistributing money with the men’s league.
[–]HalfwayHoagie6 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
lol, just cancel the gender leagues and consolidate into one league. I mean, gender is a social construct right?
[–]55Trample 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Everyone knows it would turn into a men’s league
[–]HalfwayHoagie6 points 7 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Right.
Good.
Then women will complain, get their own league, enjoy it for a bit. Then bitch about pay, and restart the cycle.
[–]JoeFalcone261 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Brb this sounds like a great movie idea
[–]55Trample1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Circle of life
[–]TopPangolin 7 years ago* [recovered] (21 children) | Copy Link
The world cup doesnt matter. The amount generated from all games is important and the women make more money for the federation than men.
[–]I-AM-BEOWOLF 38 points39 points40 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
That articles source is a Wall Street Journal article hidden behind a paywall, can you provide another?
[–]bagelmakers 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Here is a similar article from WSP. https://beta.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/?outputType=amp
[–]2010_12_24 30 points31 points32 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
WaShington Post?
The abbreviation is WaPo.
[–]shr3dthegnarbrah 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I wish there was enough transparency for them to be more sure about these numbers.
I've asked for someone to point out what they are referencing in the "audited financial reports" for US Soccer which are publicly available online the 10 times I've seen the CNBC/WSJ/WaPo articles and nobody has ever replied.
[–]drwuzer 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is also behind a paywall.
[–]Moogatoo 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Only for world cup games. If you want to get men from a league where they make a good amount of money you have to compensate them for that... If you want to take a bunch of woman from a league that makes no money, you're going to pay less. Woman's world cup is the only woman's soccer that gets any ratings.
It's total revenue generated by games, not just world cup games.
[–]orangeblueorangeblue 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Over three years (2016-18), their home game revenue was an extra $900k over the men. Of course, the USWNT needed an extra 17 home games to do it, since their per-game revenue is less than 70% of what the men bring in (their attendance is about half the men’s).
[–]MeistariJoi-11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They work more but get paid less then
[–]tremens 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is in gate revenues, though - what are the total revenue numbers including TV deals, merchandise, etc? I don't have those numbers, but I'm guessing they're not nearly as close.
[–]honeypunchsofthr0ats 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks for this. Some actual data for the less informed. i.e. me
[–]scottishere 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
From memory the US is one of the few (if only) countries where this is case. You can argue the US women's team are underpaid, but not women footballers in general.
[–]ronin1066 -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Up to the top with you.
[–]GVas22 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Unfortunately not gonna happen in this sub
[–]imissmyoldaccount-_-18 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Exactly, they’ll call them a white knight and ask them if they get any pussy.... as if they’re not a bunch of incels lmao
[–][deleted]12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The hypocrisy of actually calling everybody incels then bitching at the potential of being called a white knight is riddled with hilarious fragility.
[–]imissmyoldaccount-_-13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Almost as fragile as having a whole subreddit dedicated to shitting on women lmao
[–]make-poo-poo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But when you really think about it this is a sub reddit that focuses on equality since it’s treating women the way men would be treated in these situations.
[–]Half_Man1-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Obligatory had to scroll too far down for this
[–]kigganon19 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Isn't the us women team generating More Money than men? I think i recall am article about this
Edit: found it https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html
[–]JudasRevived 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Those figures are for matchday earnings that only account for 1/4 of the FA's revenue.
Also, those figures include a women's world cup cycle and not the men's.
[–]doctorralph-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because the men didn’t make the World Cup ...
[–]JudasRevived11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Read the article that's been linked already.
The figures linked aren't for this world cup. They're figures from 2016. They include a women's world cup (which they won) but not the men's. If you extend the dates to also include the mens world cup the mens team generated 10 million more.
Here's a more in depth article.
No fucking shit, the men didn't make the WOMEN's world cup?! /s
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
For a cherry picked time frame where they won 2 cups while the men didn't qualify. Plus a large part of the world doesn't care about women's soccer and dressed 11 waitresses so the comp isn't even comparable.
[–]inkyness 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
For a cherry picked time frame where they won 2 cups while the men didn't qualify.
maybe that's because the men's team is garbage lmao
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They play against good teams.
[–]a-real-crab 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The men’s team has to qualify against some of the best international football teams on the entire planet.
[–]repsaj331 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I know this is from a month ago so sorry to randomly ping your inbox but I was just browsing and I had to say something because as an avid soccer fan this is completely untrue... the USMNT qualify in the concacaf region versus north and central American teams, such as Mexico, Jamaica, Honduras, Costa Rica, etc. If we had won our final game vs the tiny nation of Trinidad and Tobago, a country with a population of only like a million people, we would have qualified, instead we failed to place high enough to even get into the playoff game which only required 4th place. Due to the failure of an organization that is U.S. soccer we had a disastrous campaign and were beaten to the world cup by Panama, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Mexico. Mexico is the only one of those teams that could even be considered a serious contender and even that is a stretch. The USMNT does not have to qualify against the best international teams on the planet, in fact, they had to qualify against some of the worst.
[–]jerodmayo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I know they're not as good as the top countries but 2018 was the first world cup that the mens team didnt qualify for since 1986. A lot of countries can only dream of qualifying
[–]tamwin51 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is about the US's pay rates, not anyone else. And if the women's National team starts making less money/views, their pay should drop(or men's increase).
This isn't about "Give everyone equal money", it's the fact that the more successful and more popular team is making less money for it's players.
[–]brain_on_drugs3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Your first paragraph is slightly wrong. The women's collective bargaining agreement chose to receive a lower pay with the trade off being that they receive a salary regardless of whether or not they play in games. They also get maternity leave, health insurance, and some other benefit type stuff. It's in their contracts to get paid a salary regardless of what they bring in revenue wise. They then get performance bonuses on top of it.
The men's contracts are different. They get no salary. They only get bonuses based on performance and they only get those bonuses if they get a cap (an appearance in a game). If a man loses his spot, he doesn't get paid for that game.
[–]animebop1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Cherry picked? The men didn’t qualify and don’t really deserve to. That’s just their skill level
[–]Jeromestad5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The entire England (mens) football team has been giving all their wages to charity for the past 10 to 15 years.
[–]EagleDarkX 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All this tells me is that women's football isn't as corrupt yet.
[–]fatrick3 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Wait, there was a world cup?
[–]soyb0ybetacuck 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not the real one.
[–]Nybaz 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Underrated comment. Very deserved upvote, my friend.
[–]markanthony2487 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I enjoyed the games from the USWNT and would like to see more people pay attention to thier games. With that said it's not the men's fault that they draw a larger crowd. It's like the NBA vs WNBA. That's just the nature of sports right now.
[–]Japes- 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
It will always be the nature of sports. Men are objectively better at sports than women, therefore they are more interesting to watch.
[–]markanthony24871 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
For the most part yes, but can we really deny innthe world of women's sports there aren't truly great athleats?
[–]Japes-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There are certainly great women athletes, it's just that when compared to men the top women athletes equate to above average men athletes. There's a large skill gap.
[–]markanthony24873 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, hard to disagree. Our bodies are our advantages. I mean a high school boys socxer team defeated Austrials pro womens team. It says a lot there.
[–]Japes-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Don't get me wrong, women's sports can be entertaining to watch. But if you want to see the absolute best of the best records being broken, you'll have to tune in to men's sports.
[–]markanthony24870 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah I'm an Packers/NFL fan so yeah I know. Just trying to give the ladies some love
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's not a skill gap, it's a strength and speed gap. Women aren't inherently less talented, dumber or worse at technique than men, there are just a lot of spots where strength and speed wins over skill and technique. I mean, if giants existed (actual giants, like 20 feet tall), you could take one completely untrained and still have it wipe the floor with the men's world class team, simply because it has a huge advantage of strength, speed and reach. But you wouldn't say it won because it was more skilled.
Just want to point out this different because it's important. Female athletes can still be equally respected for their skill and effort, even if they don't get the same results. This is exactly why we segregated sports by sex, so that female athletes can be appreciated in their own category by the physical standards for their sex, which is the fair standard to judge by.
[–]Banned_For_Opinion 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's almost like women and people victimizing women, consistently don't listen to actual information and logic to keep pushing their stupid agenda...
[–]Kinzlei 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah it's like an unknown b grade actor demanding the same pay as a Hollywood superstar because it's"sexist"
[–]exoticsancheeze 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean, the ticket sales alone, the CAT 1women’s FINAL tickets are worth SO MUCH LESS than CAT 1 GROUP STAGE TICKETS, that’s why there’s so many people in attendance ig. (Russia 2018 vs France 2019: Fifa.com) Price: 925€ vs 84€
[–]SwagAntiswag 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Stupid third wave feminists.
[–]Gordon-G 37 points38 points39 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Women... always complaining
[–]BohdyP 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
It's just americans back at it again
[–]skitzofrenix013 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yep agree, had any other team won doubt would be seeing this crap.
[–]MyNameIsSushi 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I swear every braindead trend comes from America. I read so much shit about the US which I literally never see where I live. Mind boggling.
[–]BohdyP 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
And other countries are copying the US. I swear to god the US is the reason some ancient discussions are seeing the light of day again and I hate it. Everyone wants to be america and be friends with them but don't realise how far up its own ass that entire country is.
[–]pomlife 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
lol what? Most European countries loathe America and Americans.
[–]BohdyP1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
True, but in my experience mainstream media and the government of certain countries still want to remain best friends with the US so they adapt a certain american political correctness. Imo bringin back issues that have already been resovled (antivaxx, equal play)
[–]eldertortoise1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And gets promptly shut down by society because as you said, it's been solved
Hopefully
[–]benjick-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Men... never seeing women as equals
[–]Gordon-G2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Big lie...
https://youtu.be/xQu9-LR4GcE
[–]heckler5000 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean, isn’t women really not supporting their own causes? If half the U.S. population is women, then it’s women that need to buy tickets and jerseys. They’d only need a small contingent of men to bring numbers into parity.
If they want to be paid more and they are as popular as they claim, then raise the ticket and jersey prices, then let’s see what happens.
[–]abdullah_4 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link
yea.... I mean nobody gives a shit about women's world cup.... I know it sounds bad and stuff.. but it's only the truth.... maybe a tiny amount of people does give some shit.. but that's all.... I mean they aren't even aired in most countries.... most people doesn't even know a women's world cup started and finished.... but people start talking about men's world cup literally a year earlier.... men's football and women's football is not the same.... equal pay doesn't even make any sense here.... probably gonna get downvoted.. but this is only the truth....
[–]Spitzly 63 points64 points65 points 7 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
Is a period or a comma too much to ask for
[–]abdullah_4 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
well, I'm retarded.. so....
[–]Pwnage_Peanut 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh, carry on then
[–]Relevant_Answer 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
*too
Also, you didn't use a question mark.
[–]memphisballer125 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There were lots of periods!
[–]JungleMuffin-13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Make sure your own grammar is on point before you troll someone else, cunt.
[–]JamesonAFC6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Who shit in your cereal this morning?
[–]JungleMuffin-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Eat a dick, cockbreath.
[–]tolandruth 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean in America we cared for a solid 90 mins and will go on pretending like soccer doesn’t exist again.
In the US, people tend to care more about women's soccer than men's soccer. A lot of that is because most of the US's sporty guys go for Football, Baseball, Basketball, or even Hockey, where as a lot of spray girls go for soccer.
In other countries, soccer is MUCH bigger. This current discussion is about solely the pay rates of the US men's vs US women's team.
[–]CommanderHeMan2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
In other countries we call it football.
It’s the no. 1 sport in over 150 countries.
And none of them give a shit about women’s football.
Because it’s shit.
It’s like watching 11 year olds.
[–]Kerbalz1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If Americans care more about women's soccer than mens', explain to me why the women's soccer league has collapsed EVERY time it's been attempted while the men's league is growing year after year?
[–]RhEEziE-9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This comment is fundamentally untrue.
[–]TekkDub-10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
20 million watched the quarterfinal game.
[–]RhEEziE10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lmao that is a complete lie.
[–]Sage010101 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link
There is this famous case of the female tennis players asking for equal.peoze.kowny, even when they play best of 3 vs men who play best of 5. A top-200 male player once challenged and defeated both the Williams sisters when both of them were top-10 or top-20, just to show the gap in quality. The national team some sport in Australia (was football? Was it some other country? Sorry I don't remember exact details) lost to a boy's under 15 team pretty badly.
The point is equal pay for equal work is absolutely OK. A female cop should warn as much as a male cop provided she is doing equal time in the field. A male teacher and a female teacher should absolutely get paid equally for equal qualification and experience. Every profession must pay for the skill, output and experience irrespective of the gender of the worker.
[–]C_B_- 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
That was this American Olympic Winning team that lost to a under 15 boys Dallas team.
[–]kierdoyle-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Every country has some version of that story (the national team played some youth boys team and lost by some ridiculous scoreline), a reporter tried to actually verify a few of them and couldn’t, fwiw
[–]C_B_-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I live on the edge of frisco where the game took place. they played a U15 Dallas boys team and lost 5-2. Pretty sure I even read about in a newspaper dude
[–]kierdoyle-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah I don’t disbelieve that, im just saying there’s no official record of the score, or even the friendly being played. The closest they could find was a tweet from a U15 player saying it was cool to see them at the training ground or something.
When people retell the story 5-2 (which is a fine scoreline like whatever) becomes 8-2 becomes 10-1 becomes 15-0 or something ridiculous.
Um how about CBSsports? Or FC Dallas you know the professional club? Or the other pro teams that commented on it? https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/
Looks like more than a fucking tweet from one kid. Why do people like you not just admit they were wrong and move on, why try to play this game?
The link to the FC Dallas site is inactive, so 🤷🏻♂️ and relax dude, I didn’t do the reporting, just saw it a while back before the WWC.
[–]C_B_-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Looks active to me. And it clearly shows you’re full Of shit and it was more than 1 kid tweeting. You don’t know but have zero problems talking like you do because you mighta read something else online.
[–]youthedog4-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You don’t gotta be this toxic to provide a source holy shit
Also the FC Dallas link doesn’t work for me either
[–]C_B_-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I can be whatever I want. Specially to fucking idiots who try to tell me what’s true or not true, when they have absolutely no idea.
Good to see even retards get white knights
You’re very grouchy today huh? I mean you said the FC Dallas link works when it literally doesn’t lol, unless you’re an admin for that website, you can’t get there.
I guess if you want to call me a white knight, god forbid you don’t act like an imbecile when something could’ve been handled with some civility.
Yawn!! go be a faggot and talk about your feelings to someone else
[–]smenti-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is why you don’t get laid.
Projection much?
[–]youthedog41 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You call me a faggot then talk about projection? Looooooooool
Quick question How many people am I actually talking to. It feels like it’s all been the same person just on different names
[–]youthedog43 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I don’t know lol? This is my only account. Maybe the voices in your head are getting too much? I guess talking with proper punctuation and spelling makes everyone the same.
[–]C_B_-0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sureee
[–]smenti1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No?
[–]tamwin52 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
TBH, it doesn't totally surprise me, assuming they are a good youth team. That extra edge in speed and endurance is HUGE, especially with how much of soccer is running.
[–]Jinjrax-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If equal pay for equal work is okay the the male and female players should earn the same. The women's team work just as hard but they're limited by physiology. As it stands they're paid based on result/revenue generated in theory, though the US women's football team makes more money than the men's
[–]Sage0101013 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You gotta also have the same definition of work.
KPIs in this case will be:
When viewed in this wide definition not work, the differences will still remain. Working hard and running on the pitch is just one aspect.
[–]Jinjrax1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The players don't do most of those things. The only real effort they can give is playing the sport. Fan retention and marketing are down to the cultural perception of the sport and the management of the team for the most part. If we're talking about purely equal pay for equal work the women are doing the same thing as the men. Talent will result in different levels of production but the women are all limited by physiology as well so they cannot produce as high results. You can pay people based on revenue generated rather than effort but it's not "equal work for equal pay". The female equivalent of Messi talent-wise will earn nothing like as much. Again this is due not to effort or work put in but how the sport is viewed and how much it makes
[–]Sage0101011 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If you concede that women are limited by physiology, it is sufficient to show that it's not equal work
E.g. a male weightlifter can lift 200kgs, while a woman can lift only 150 kgs, or a male athlete can run 100m in 9.5 seconds and fastest a woman can do is 10.5 seconds
They work equally hard But results are different
So the outcomes based on the result will be different too
Any area where physiology plays a role will be a poor arena for applying equal pay arguments. For that matter, any area where there are structural differences will be bad for such arguments - women will always be better therapists as they can empathize better.
Fun fact: For Fortune 500 companies, average salary of a female CEO is higher than average male CEO
[–]Puncherfaust12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But thats the case only in the US. Fifa doesnt look to each country and pays the players in a therefor fair way. they have a pay setted for every player of every country and in every country other than the US man generate way more money that woman. when you want fair payment for the US players, the US federation should give them more, not the FIFA.
[–]Jinjrax0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fifa choosing to just pay by gender rather than by country is inherently unfair. Because it's not even based on revenue at that point it's just pure ignorance. If that's their prerogative they can do it, but it's not "fair".
[–]Puncherfaust11 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
well, the mens world cup brings more revenue than the womens world cup, so why isnt is based on that?
Its only the US where it is not the case, but not for FIFA.
It's fine if it's based on revenue the whole point is that it isn't based on revenue in the US and its unfair it's a double standard compared to elsewhere
Yeah, than the US federation can pay them more, so it's fair. But that's not the job of fifa
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If someone requires more effort to produce less run sults then they are inefficient and are not demanded as much, therefore their service is worth less.
The female players are producing better results than the male players and are earning less. The issue as you said is the demand. Male football is in demand so you pay more for the supply even if it is of lower quality. Also they're not "inefficient" because that implies wasting of resources, they're limited by physiology (and talent but that's true for blokes too), they're putting in effort at the same rate but their effort is less in demand, which is why you can argue they should be paid the same amount or that it should be results based pay like I originally stated
They are making an inferior product better than other inferior products
I don't agree that men and women's football are directly comparable products in the first place. If anything they're complimentary rather than substitutes. Inferior is just wrong too. Subjectively people enjoy men's football more because of the skill ceiling etc so it's a more desired product it's not superior
[–]okron1kPPD Poet Master 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
They should remove separate leagues, and let men and women play together. Then everyone can get paid on what they bring to the table.
If those percentages are correct, I’d be pissed if I was one of the men.
[–]startsbadpunchains 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
A combined league based on ability would literally just be a men's league.
[–]okron1kPPD Poet Master 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Then they will realize why some get paid more than others.
[–]Puncherfaust1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
they would get paid next to nothing because they wouldnt play in a pro league
[–]okron1kPPD Poet Master 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s the idea
[–]CrustyCumBollocks 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think that's the point.
[–]dmank007 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
REEEEEEEEE feminism
[–]TwentyReddit 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Making me think about these elephants in India playing football, should they ask for the same pay also ? 🤣😂
[–]Spe019 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People would be willing pay to see elephants play football.
[–]AwesomePopcorn 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Techincially they're still demanding equal pay for men though.
[–]GxPand 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fact of the matter is if female footballers got paid the same I doubt they would even bother organizing the event. If you want equal pay then generate equal income.
[–]MasterLeonSeb 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ugh plus its a supply demand thing men soccer i more popular and generates more hence the people generating more are paid more common sense 101
[–]_zukato_ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
r/unpopularopinion
[–]Olijzl 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What’s the percentages like with club football? Would be interesting
[–]HNutz 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Damn good point.
Also, the Men's World Cup brings in a TON more money.
"As Dwight Jaynes pointed out four years ago after the U.S. women beat Japan to capture the World Cup in Vancouver, there is a big difference in the revenue available to pay the teams. "The Women’s World Cup brought in almost $73 million, of which the players got 13%. The 2010 men’s World Cup in South Africa made almost $4 billion, of which 9% went to the players."
"As Dwight Jaynes pointed out four years ago after the U.S. women beat Japan to capture the World Cup in Vancouver, there is a big difference in the revenue available to pay the teams.
"The Women’s World Cup brought in almost $73 million, of which the players got 13%. The 2010 men’s World Cup in South Africa made almost $4 billion, of which 9% went to the players."
www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/03/07/world-cup-soccer-pay-disparity-between-men-and-women-is-justified/amp/
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And then he was either ignored or harassed.
[–]HogMeBrother 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s actually a bit complex
The pay structures are different at our national level which can cause scenarios where women or men are paid more. One thing that can have women appear to be paid more is they play more games and have a base salary.
At the FIFA level women make significantly less. This is the difference in the prize pool. This is why the optics are so bad. USSF hides behind the prize pool as a reason the women make less.
[–]LegalGraveRobber 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If I’m reading this right, women earn more percentage wise from their World Cup compared to men but make less as the men’s World Cup brings in far more money. So what’s the problem? If they want equality of pay then they should’ve signed for a set pay rate regardless of how much money their World Cup earned, unless that isn’t how it would work.
[–]JesterofMadness 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The women's total prize money this year was $30 million, whereas the mens prize money was around $400 million The women's world's cup champions earned about 7.5% of that what the men made.
[–]Lotti_Codd 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is the same as with pro tennis. Women get the same as men but play a lot less.
[–]Okilurknomore 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because of TitleIX requirements we spend $100M on womens college soccer scholarships each year. If we start paying the professional the same amount then can we at least use some of that scholarship money to revive US mens collegiate soccer?
[–]CommanderHeMan 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Men’s teams don’t even get paid to play international football.
[–]tame17 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why not lump men's and women's federation and have one pot to pay everyone out of. No matter how much each generates? This is a lazy whataboutism
[–]aycalib3r2 points 7 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
A lot of people are talking about how women's national teams were getting beat by U15 boys. I have personal experience with this. In high school I played varsity soccer, and sometimes we scrimmaged against the women's varsity. The women's coach handicapped the boys, stating that we could only touch the ball 3 times, and then we had to pass it. He also didn't allow us to be physical at all, and all of our shots had to come from outside the goalie box, and other limitations. We still destroyed the girls. Nearing the end of the game, we we're basically just playing monkey in the middle with then. What's even funnier is that our girls team was extremely good, and it had won county, while us boys lost every single game we played. No matter what, the men with always have the advantage. In soccer specifically, men are faster, more physical, are quicker on their feet, are faster at dribbling, can kick much harder, can jump much higher, have more stamina, and have faster reflexes.
[–]TylerD123483 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What I haven’t been hearing/seeing in these comments is that a U16 girls team beat the national team too.
[–]the1kingdom 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are these legit numbers? Where can I find original sources for this?
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This thread is being brigaded by mods @ r/TwoXChromosomes
https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/cahjog/he_aint_wrong/eta4xaw/
My original comment:
[–]Ganondorf-Dragmire 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Can we get a source on the numbers? I like to see for myself instead of reading screenshots of social media posts. Doesn't matter if I generally agree with the person posting. Doing my homework properly before saying important shit is something I like to do on principle.
[–]CounterSniper 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well, if you like doing your homework then do it. I support you in your principles. Once you’re done bring it back and your fellow Redditors will grade you. Happy hunting.
[–]Vinifera7 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What do the facts actually say about this? I keep seeing this statistic brought up:
From 2016 to 2018, U.S. women’s soccer games raised approximately $50.8 million in revenue, compared with $49.9 million for the country’s men’s side, according to the U.S. Soccer Federation’s audited financial statements, the Wall Street Journal reported last month. In 2016, the women’s team generated $1.9 million more than the men’s.
Yet I also keep seeing it repeated that the men are bringing in substantially more revenue than the women. So which is it?
[–]jonsantana19800 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
FIFA generates more money for the Men’s World Cup than it does for the Women’s World Cup.
US Soccer Federation generates more money from the Women’s National Team than the Men’s National Team.
Members of the WNT are suing US Soccer because they generate more money for the national federation than the MNT does. Their issue is that they get paid much less by US Soccer than their male counterparts do, while they have accomplished so much more.
[–]leparsdon1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Thats because their union sucks, and their pay is what they negotiated and agreed to. From the WP:
It’s tough to make a straightforward comparison of the earnings for men and women players, because the two teams have different collective-bargaining agreements that outline different pay structures. A contract player on the women’s team makes a base salary and can earn performance-based bonuses. (Players without a contract have a different pay schedule.) On the men’s team, players earn only bonuses. The teams play different numbers of games each year and earn different bonuses depending on the game type, their opponents’ FIFA rank and the game’s outcome. On top of that, both teams can earn additional bonuses for winning specific tournaments. And certain events, such as the World Cup, have a separate bonus structure entirely. “The male players are paid when they play, but not when they sit,” McCann said. “USMNT players must thus be on the roster to be pay eligible. USWNT players, in contrast, are guaranteed pay.” The lawsuit from the women’s team sketched out the following scenario: If both teams played 20 friendlies in a year, a top-tier women’s national team player would earn $164,320 less, or “38% of the compensation of a similarly situated MNT player.” That was true under the previous collective-bargaining agreement that ended in December 2016. The Fact Checker obtained the new agreement, which took effect in April 2017. Using the same 20-game scenario, we calculated the player on the women’s team would earn $28,333 less, or about 89 percent of the compensation of a similarly situated men’s team player. If both teams lost all 20 games, the players would make the same amount. That’s because the men earn a $5,000 bonus when they lose and the women have a $100,000 base salary.
It’s tough to make a straightforward comparison of the earnings for men and women players, because the two teams have different collective-bargaining agreements that outline different pay structures.
A contract player on the women’s team makes a base salary and can earn performance-based bonuses. (Players without a contract have a different pay schedule.)
On the men’s team, players earn only bonuses.
The teams play different numbers of games each year and earn different bonuses depending on the game type, their opponents’ FIFA rank and the game’s outcome. On top of that, both teams can earn additional bonuses for winning specific tournaments. And certain events, such as the World Cup, have a separate bonus structure entirely.
“The male players are paid when they play, but not when they sit,” McCann said. “USMNT players must thus be on the roster to be pay eligible. USWNT players, in contrast, are guaranteed pay.”
The lawsuit from the women’s team sketched out the following scenario: If both teams played 20 friendlies in a year, a top-tier women’s national team player would earn $164,320 less, or “38% of the compensation of a similarly situated MNT player.” That was true under the previous collective-bargaining agreement that ended in December 2016.
The Fact Checker obtained the new agreement, which took effect in April 2017. Using the same 20-game scenario, we calculated the player on the women’s team would earn $28,333 less, or about 89 percent of the compensation of a similarly situated men’s team player. If both teams lost all 20 games, the players would make the same amount. That’s because the men earn a $5,000 bonus when they lose and the women have a $100,000 base salary.
Under the women’s new bargaining agreement, the players can also earn attendance bonuses, payment for commercial appearances and per diems that are equal and tied to what the men can earn.
[–]KapnKaveman 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Is JK Rowling overpaid compared to male authors?
Was Ophrah overpaid compared to male talk show hosts?
[–]Nybaz 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's horrible! Unknown male writers should be paid the same money as JKR, if they write books with the same number of pages!!!! 11one!
[–]KapnKaveman 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I wrote a novel about a magical Otter called "Hairy Otter", I put in twice as much time as JK did for any of her books! I demand to be paid twice as much!!
[–]AndWhite 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your book sounds impressive. When does it come out on audible? You’ve got a reader over here.
[–]Sethowar 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
?
[–]KapnKaveman1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Does this work both ways? ie, can male authors claim they work as hard as the author of Harry Potter, so they deserve equal pay?
[–]Sethowar1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Right, you’re agreeing with the point in OP yeah? No worries 👍
[–]KapnKaveman2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, I am pointing out that in some fields, women make the most $$.
I've never heard a crowd of men chanting "equal pay" for some lesser male author who can't sell books like Rowling though. Wonder why?
[–]Wacky556 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t like Matt but damn is he right
The actual renenue quoted in Forbes is Men = $4B and women = $73M. Not even remotely close.
[–]zanderkingofzand 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I dont care how committed and dedicated you are to a SPORT you should not be paid more than doctors, cops, firefighters, or teachers period.
[–]scriptx1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Equal work get equal pay... 4bn to 73m. Work harder, whine less and someone may watch your slower games...
[–]swimseven 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's just unfortunate that women are told that their talents and accomplishments in sports are simply not as valued by society, because it's just true. So instead of campaigning for equal pay, how about we work on getting the public more excited about women's sports? It's not gonna be an immediate fix, but that's where the root of the problem lies with this. Equal pay will come as a consequence.
[–]Cheesemonster5 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This right here is a good answer
[–]ImitationButter 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If they want equal pay... give em 9% like the men
[–]acesover01 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How good you are or how many trophies you have has ZERO to do with pay...when you can bring in even a third of what the men do then we can talk. 2014 sponsers spent 529 mill. 31 times more than this yrs world cup. Make more when you bring in more.
[–]Danamaganza 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Sports people get paid enough, Christ. What is wrong with people.
[–]MarcusOReallyYes 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Just tell them they’re welcome to play for the men’s team if they think they’re underpaid on the women’s team. No one is stopping them from trying out.
[–]A-whole-by-choice 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Rapinoes hair dye is effecting her mathematical abilities.
[–]BohemianShark 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’m nature organisms develop bright colors to warn everyone of their toxicity...
[–]stawny 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The men’s World Cup generates $400 million and the woman’s generated $30 - $60 million.
I’d take 9% of $400 million before I took 13% of $60 million
[–]pynewbie 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Women's anything is boring as fuck.
[–]BohemianShark 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Idk volleyball and gymnastics are pretty cool
[–]Luftwaffel64 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women's MMA is fun
[–]Iconoficons 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I dunno Amanda Nunez is pretty fun.
[–]sibears99 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
Ya but the US women get paid 8k less per game than the men while the women's team has earned more revenue than the men's team since 2016.
http://www.sportspromedia.com/news/uswnt-us-soccer-revenues-lawsuit
[–]Moogatoo 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
That's because the men's soccer clubs they come from are MUCH more popular. To get players from those clubs that pay them more, they expect more. Woman's world cup is literally the only woman's soccer Event that gets any viewers. Men's soccer is watched all year.
[–]Dizlap-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So you’re saying that since all of the men’s players are already well-paid they should be paid more? Meanwhile, many of these women have legitimate livelihood concerns. When the olympics happen, the Men’s Basketball Team gets paid the exact same payouts as the Women’s Team even though the men are paid more by their pro teams. Do you think Lebron and Steph should start asking for more money?
[–]Moogatoo5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm saying that you are paid based on a value given to you. Just like actors. if your club thinks 30 games from you is worth 5 million, you are going to expect a similar rate... Since no one watches woman's soccer outside of the world cup, they have MUCH less negotiating power in this respect. NO ONE GETS PAID FOR THE OLYMPICS YOU DUMB DUMB, they have expenses paid and get a perdium. but if they did, YES, Lebron and Steph would get paid much more than the Woman, and essentially they do, because guess what? They get endorsements and sponsors when they go to the olympics that the woman do not.... So....?
[–]Dizlap-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/02/16/how-much-olympic-athletes-get-paid.html
They do get paid when they win. When representing their country, the concept of equal pay is not outrageous or unprecedented. No one at the US Olympic Committee thinks that negotiating power is an important factor in the payout for a gold medal.
The US Men’s Soccer Team is also not paid based on their club value. If that were the case, Pulisic would get paid more than the rest of the players but he is not. Instead, the USSF thought that even though different players are valued differently, they should all be paid the same for representing their country.
[–]Moogatoo2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Getting performance bonuses is VERY different from getting a negotiated salary lol..... VERY different. Why would negotiating power play a role in performance bonus....?
And you think some men don't avoid the team for that exact reason...? You don't think the risk reward isn't there for that reason in some cases, whereas in the woman's case it is ALWAYS worth it ? How many woman are playing below their club rate?
[–]Dizlap1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I think I get to say lol. Why would a performance bonus be any less subject to negotiating power than base salary? One of the main differences in the men’s and women’s team pay is a performance bonus, which you specifically said was due to negotiating power. You literally just made an argument for why the bonuses should be the same.
Please name a us men’s soccer player that avoided playing for the national team due to pay.
I did not specifically say performance bonuses are equal to negotiating power at all... Quote me.
I don't know in particular but I do know that if the pay is so much less than you make for club, yes there are people that would obviously not play. it's really simple. If you were worth 40 Million dollars with a long career ahead of you, would you not pause when risking that for much less....? I think this quote from Ronaldo sums it up fine... "I would be the first to tell the coach if I were unable to play, I would never put my career at risk even for a World Cup,” the reigning FIFA player of the year said.
[–]Dizlap0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So you can’t name a player. The pay is already so much less for many of the players and they still play so it’s obviously not that simple.
[–]Moogatoo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm not digging through google right now when it's flooded by womans team news. you can google it, it's pretty known high paid players take it much less seriously, I linked Ronaldo talking about it...
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They should be paid proportional to what they produce. Men's soccer produces more revenue. Period.
No when they women draw the crowds they can ask for more money like the men did.
If they are drawing he crowds to pay for their raises they’ll get it if they aren’t they won’t.
This is business, not a Gilliad conspiracy.
[–]sibears99-14 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ya except in the United States the womens team is obviously more popular than the mens team because they out earn them. Your arguement is like saying your coworker who's work isnt as good as yours and has less impact on the company's bottom line should get paid more because his degree was from Harvard and yours is from a state college.
[–]Moogatoo13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They don't out earn them. The woman's National soccer league isn't even on TV... Or it's just now starting to get on TV... MLS is over 20 years old. They don't out earn the men's team because they are more popular... They win and play more. Do you honestly think the ratings would be anywhere near comparable if both teams made it to the final....?
And again this just ignores the whole point that people literally only watch woman's soccer once every 4 years while men's soccer is steady at a club level...
No my argument is more like if you want to hire a scientist from Harvard who has been doing groundbreaking work for 20 years, you're going to pay him more.
[–]sibears99-10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm not talking about mens soccer vs womens soccer. I'm talking about USWNT and the USMNT. The womens national team makes more money than the mens national team for USA soccer. USA soccer shouldn't be paying the women less than the men. If the men were making more for US soccer then they should get payed more. This is America they should be payed based on the money they generate.
You're making the situation overly simplified by looking at one factor. this isn't a microeconomics class, things are a bit more complicated than that.... Answer my question, do you think all the men will play if the rate is so far below the average of their club earnings? and inversely, is any woman going to say no to a rate equal to or greater than their club rate...?
[–]sibears99-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You're right about that. No way the men would play and risk injury if they weren't getting something comparable to their club salary. But that doesnt make it okay to pay the women less because is comparably more than what they make at their clubs. Especially when they dominate the world and the men can't beat some countries with populations smaller than Wyoming. The national team should be equal. America pays all Olympians the same for medals earned whether it was basketball or equestrian dressage. Soccer shouldn't be different.
The Olympic players get sponsored out of the ass to compensate for it. Mens soccer also draws in what... 100X the viewership worldwide as womans...? prolly more. it makes sense.
[–]sibears991 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You keep talking about globally. I know no one globally cares about womens soccer. But in america the women's national team has out earned and out performed the mens national team for a while. They should probably get a raise from US soccer. US soccer is lighting money on fire giving it to the men and getting nothing back.
US soccer in general woman are MUCH less popular. it's literally this one tournament every four years people care about, otherwise they can barely get on TV... and also, this tournament is completely different from the men's because the level of competition is SO MUCH lower. not to mention the fact that because no one else in the world gives a shit, all of the teams other than western nations are awful. it's bad competition and the US team is literally leaps and bounds ahead of the others. it's boring.
[–]Dizlap-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ussoccerplayers.com/2019/03/usmnt-statement-on-wnt-players-lawsuit.html/amp
I’ll answer for them. Yes they will. They literally released a press statement supporting equal pay.
Ticket sales and telebroadcast.
[–]TylerD123483 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Now I may be wrong, but I think that includes the women’s World Cup revenue and since men’s team didn’t make the World Cup and the women’s team won the World Cup that accounts for some of that.
It should, the men's team has been disappointing.
[–]steveinbuffalo 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The men should insist on the same percentage. Let is backfire.
[–]BohemianShark 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Everyone should get 13% like the women do. Men getting 9% isn’t fair /s
[–]steveinbuffalo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
amen!
[–]two0seven 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would argue that this belongs on /r/PussyPass the women get a greater percentage than the men.
[–]Carter0108 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The gender pay gap statistics are all based on median salary across the entire country. Completely useless and meaningless statistic.
[–]NoShameInternets-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The 75% number is, yes. The actual number is 87% when comparing apples to apples. Still lower, but not as bad.
I love soccer, but these dumbass bull dykes need to get their heads out of their asses and look at the facts.
[–]arealbigboss2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It’s very simple lol
[–]kevnatelevle2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Am I wrong or did you compare how much the USA mens team made to the revenue of a tournament they didn’t even qualify to compete in?
[–]ZachTheInsaneOne 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh, I honestly thought they were already paid roughly the same percentage of profit generated... In that case, EQUAL PAY! EQUAL PAY!
[–]blau_wie_das_meer 7 years ago* [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link
In case of the US team, this is simply not true. The US womens team has a higher market share than the mans team and generates bigger revenue through trikot sales.
[–]Moogatoo 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Only during the world cup... If you want to get men to play that are in a more popular league you have to pay them more. Woman's world cup is the only time the woman get any ratings... The mens regular league is watched year round, meaning the salary they expect is higher.
[–]blau_wie_das_meer-11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well, this article is about the US Female World Cup team, isn't it?
[–]Moogatoo11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They only play the world cup once every four years.... The woman's soccer clubs are almost never watched and are rarely on TV... Mens have a solid viewer base and are always on TV. If you want to get athletes from a league that pays more... You pay more. It's kinda simple.
[–]welcum2erf-8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So, just not going to address the question I guess?
[–]Moogatoo7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What's the question.... ? I believe explaining that you get paid based on the salary you already earn is a pretty simple concept. If I have to hire someone once every 4 years who makes little to no money, and I have to hire another person every 4 years who makes good money.... One of them has more negotiating power than the other.
If you generate more money you are worth more. The women's team out-earns the men's.
If you want to ignore where they come from this is true... If you take into account the fact that the men's team come from a position of power because they earn a steady income then it's not true... How hard is this concept ? If a woman player makes 1 million over 4 years playing they are going to compensate her accordingly. If a man makes 6 million over 4 years playing, they obviously need to offer that man more if they want to get him on the team. It also completely ignores the potential that if a men's team ever does make the final, the revenue earned will shit on a woman's final, hell it would shit on 4 woman's finals combined.
There's many factors at play here, and you only care about one.
Edit: also to throw your own logic back at you... The men earn much more in clubs, so they are worth more to buy onto a team...
[–]welcum2erf-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Big IF on the men making it to the finals, not likely. Meanwhile the women did, and won, and pulled in more for the US than the men. Not a difficult equation. Justify this on IF's if that's all you've got, but there's always this lousy theoretical pushback on issues like this, not a shocker.
Risk reward is pretty common in evaluating pay. the men's team has higher risk but much higher reward.
[–]welcum2erf1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If you asked 1,000 people involved in the decision-making process on this issue, you might find one who says "risk-reward".
What ...? First off risk reward is super common in evaluating any type of monetary situation. Secondly this really comes down to the fact that they are rewarded based on how much money the tournament makes... And the men's tournament makes alot more, by no small factor. The men's team gets 9% of it and the woman's get 13%>
[–]benjick-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Facts are not welcome in this sexist cesspool
[–]Watayatalkinabeet 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women’s soccer is boring though
[–]carterburkefuckyou 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Plus they're shit at footy
[–]saintandvillian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
There are so many instances where people are paid and/or overpaid based on their output. For example, the some of the people on reddit right now should be working and are committing time theft. Also, I wonder how many of the feminism haters who are commenting have ever had a wife, daughter...etc.
[–]soyb0ybetacuck 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How is output measured in sports exactly?
[–]Luftwaffel641 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How much revenue you produce for the people who sponsor your shit
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Good stuff, I agree. The women’s WC brought in about 73 million, the men’s brought in 4 billion. The men get actually get a smaller share than the women do, the pot is simply bigger.
[–]American_Londoner 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-womens-national-team-world-cup-pay-vs-men-2019-7
[–]joeality 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why are the women overpaid? The men are underpaid.
FIFA is a corrupt as a political party, they certainly don’t need more money.
[–]potatium 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm glad we agree that pay should be a function of your productivity.
[–]kahoottrash 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s actually more like 23% for women and only 7% for men, IIRC from a Forbes article
[–]JamesDAnnoying 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Is there a source for this?
[–]Unsuitablemasta 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The womens world cup winners also lost to an under 15's local boys group after complaining about this
[–]Gordon-G 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Title IX actually created inequality
[–]anianianianiani 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lmao sit down
[–]Desiciox 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
we want money for doing NOTHING
[–]UnableSilver 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'll just leave this here....
In preparation for two upcoming friendlies against Russia, the U.S. women’s national team played the FC Dallas U-15 boys academy team on Sunday and fell 5-2
[–]Cerebral_Cortices 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oof
[–]mkvamm 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well nobody’s gonna make a fuss out of them getting 13%.
[–]NotFromHaiti 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In fact men earned less than 7% in the 2018 world cup and wonen earned in the 13% this year. Men generated 6.1 billions and women around 120 millions (1.96% of the revenue).
[–]Nuttin_Up 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
With equal pay comes equal performance. If you can't perform then you don't get the pay.
[–]Delta_KVTA 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
His follow up tweets:
“Correction: I vastly understated the revenue disparity. The men generate 4 billion while the women generate less than 100 million.” (More than 40 times as much)
“Wow. I REALLY understated it. If the women were paid “equal” to the men, they’ve make 5 times more than the women’s World Cup generates. I mean it’s just an absolutely absurd concept that only the dumbest sycophant could endorse.”
[–]Alex_j300 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty sure the english mens team donate their pay to charity aswell.
[–]gprime 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I knew they weren't being underpaid, but I never bothered to do the math to realize they were being overpaid. I guess since feminists claim to be all about equality we need to start reducing payer play for women until their share of revenue drops down to male levels.
[–]SomeGuyClickingStuff 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Make everything equal. Men exchange jerseys after the match, I don't see women doing that.
[–]Jedibbq 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They're not interested in facts. Just whatever they can have a parade to.
[–]aPosast 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Finally. Someone doesn’t talk without seeing the facts
[–]serial_crusher 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Notice the “for equal work” part of the chant got dropped along the way...
[–]DRBlast 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I thought this was obvious. NBA stars don’t get paid hundreds of millions just because. They sell out arenas, merchandise and the list goes on. The WNBA on the other hand has a hard time filling the seats at a lot of their games. If people don’t tune into or fill the seats at WNBA games then the previous formula falls apart.
If the revenue generation was equal then it would be horrible. That’s not the case. I think the WNBA gets paid 40 million from ESPN to broadcast compared to near 3 billion it pays the NBA.
[–]Johnnypoopoopantss 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They had a meet and greet near my work in Frisco. Took up all the Parking, signs everywhere, and I think less than 20 people showed up. It was a bit embarrassing
Edit: on mobile
[–]wantgold 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People that complain about this, change the channel after seeing women's football on TV.
[–]leparsdon 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
how can they make the same as men if they dont make the same as men
[–]ifoundthefud 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yep it's never been about equality
[–]UncleBobLoblaw 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Actually he is wrong, men bring in something closer to 40 times as much, not just 4 times as much.
[–]sunsurf520 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Unfortunately the men bring in more of the money that's why they get bigger paychecks . this is never going to happen in sports and it's a stupid stupid stupid request.
[–]sidescrollin 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Aren't the people clamoring for this pay bump also the people who hate the 1% and want to tax most of their income away? Wouldnt this be making them part of the 1%?
[–]pnadlerlaw 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
While this is all true, and I’m not white knighting here, there is also a difference in the MARKETING SPEND between men’s soccer and women’s soccer, the World Cup for men and the World Cup for women. Just saying. Being objective and fair all around.
[–]Beantown5000 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
They should play each other. Winner takes everything.
[–]Claspedtangent03 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Im not gonna lie, with how good the womens team is and how shitty the guys team is, this might actually be a good idea lol
[–]Beantown50001 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They lost to the mens under 15 team lol
[–]Alida2001 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Would suggest to bring the men's pay rate down to the women's pay rate but that's unfair on the men.
[–]BlondeEgoElf 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Has anyone checked these numbers?
[–]Not_The_Batman__ 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They should charge more for women's tickets then. See what the crowd says then.
[–]30caliberclipazine 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not THAT kind of equal
[–]drpepper02 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Instead of chanting how about they get up go to the pro shop and buy the teams merchandise?
[–]FeedMeYourPlacenta 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean I get what u are thinking and the precents are not fair but I would hope that someday people could maybe just make an even amount and it wouldn't matter anymore.
[–]Redditorreddit12 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You know what, face off. USMNT v. USWNT. Whoever wins gets better pay. Let’s see how good you are now ladies.
[–]goldenarms 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The controversy isn’t over how much FIFA pays the athletes, but how much US Soccer pays their athletes. If you look at how much money both teams generate for US Soccer, they have a very legitimate gripe.
[–]eag19691 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Another comparison is major league vs minor league. Talent in both but major brings in the money.
[–]chambertlo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
BuT MaH WaAaAhMeN’s EqUaL PaY!!!!!
[–]toffmudda1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
My brain broke trying to follow his logic...
[–]twojace211 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You must have a pretty weak brain then
[–]Ominaeo1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The astroturfing has begun.
[–]rodders02231 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I wouldn't watch that shite if they were playing for free in my back garden
[–]Xyexs1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They're not overpaid, they have far more success as compared to than the male team. If 9% of the revenue is fair for the men, the women should get more than 13%.
[–]KnuckleBuster1111 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
My argument would be that the U.S. Women’s Team is a better team. I’ve said multiple times they could beat the hell out of our men’s team. Give them what they deserve. I’m a straight, white, man from the south.
[–]pmannyy1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol the men would crush them, women’s team lost to some 15 year olds. Women can’t match up with the speed and power of men
[–]gayvibes11 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The amount of people I've argued this with! Do you want to subsidize them further with your taxes? No? Then where is that money meant to come from..? Simple supply and demand economics and almost always, with the irony very lost on them, they don't watch the games or buy the merch..
[–]Distorted_Gamer1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Matt Walsh being correct for once?
[–]Yucrisp0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Post this to r/murderedbywords i wanna see
[–]SymmetricBrightTiger0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's sad how these people only talk about equal pay when it comes to professions that are already highly paid. While they ignore women in the bottom rung of society.
[–]FennecsitoUwU0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I don't know the US situaition, but in my country as far as I remember they win less than men, altough every deportist win less than male soccer players
[–]supergrl1263010 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
at least the women's team wins.
[–]GoodSpirit90692 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They did lose againsts a team of 15 year old high school boys tho lol.
www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/amp/
Just imagine what the outcome would be if they played againsts the national mens team.
[–]supergrl1263011 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
i think we should tweet at both teams, make it happen and we'll see
In the US, the women’s team makes overall more revenue in viewership, and merchandise deals than the men do. When you look past the World Cup- where yes on a global level the men make more- the argument makes sense.
[–]djrunk_djedi0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because the only value a person has is what they contribute to revenue
This but unironically.
That's how compensation is determined guy. If a certain percentage of the budget is set aside for employee wages, then that number goes up the more profitable the business in question is. Exactly where are you suggesting the money for these wages far in excess of earnings should come from?
Only in this context
[–]brandonscript0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
No. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/?utm_term=.6fd29e538626
[–]OutgoinglyAwkward0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You do realize that they’re not just getting paid for the tournament alone right? Jill Ellis, the manager of the USWNT, is paid less the USMNT U-21 Manager, what pot are they in again? What WC revenue do the U-21’s make in their WC vs the USWNT? It’s not just the players getting underpaid, and it’s not only based on WC overall revenue. Do any amount of research before responding please.
Btw maybe the pot allocation is unfair considering the USWNT won the damn thing and the best the USMNT can do is make R of 16 yet they make more based on overall WC revenue?
[–]c_x_i0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And they lost to mexico again lmao
[–]cornhack0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women are getting out of hand. Time to kill them all and have sex robots to fill our needs.
[–]xLozaax0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The male usa doesnt generate that, the female usa team its by far the best in the world and they are being Pay LESS than a team that wont even qualify for the world championship
The male team brings in more money, a lot more
[–]xLozaax1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Because the male WC produce More money, not because of them
Which boils down to the male team bringing in more money..
[–]JPT_Corona0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Unpopular opinion here but I honestly want the Women's soccer team to get paid more, since they've been achieving more than the men's US team in the past few years.
Sad reality though is that they simply don't generate the same amount of views. It's like watching talented singers and musicians get a fraction of what Justin Beiber made saying "baby" 15 times. That's business for ya'.
More viewers = more fame = more money. Talent is just an add-on in all this.
[–]Nybaz1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is the harsh reality. You could be the greatest player ever born in an unknown sport, and still earn nothing compared to a second or third class soccer player.
[–]chefboi550 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Its never about "equality" with women it's all about money and power and sex always has been . Honestly I want them to pay them the same. So when the whole thing collapses on them and they looking stupid cause they don't understand economics. I will laugh and watch as they blame it all on men.
[–]Motiv3z0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Incels out in force on this one.
[–]Nybaz5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Old incel meaning: involuntary celibate.
Today's meaning: everyone disagreeing with the latest feminist idiocy.
[–]zquid-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women's soccer used to be more popular than mens and bring in a lot more money due to its rise in popularity during ww1. After the war, men's soccer couldn't catch up so the sport was outlawed for over 50 years and ridiculed once the ban was lifted.
There's a reason why it's lagging behind..
[–]clydefrog811-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
These comments. Yikes.
Yikes indeed.
[–]OutgoinglyAwkward-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Genuine question but why do you guys care? Like how does them not getting paid equally matter to you? The Netherlands already pays both NT’s the same. I don’t see why its a massive deal when the men are already getting paid SIGNIFICANTLY more in their clubs, whereas the women aren’t making nearly as much.
And before anyone says b-b-but ReVeNuE!! The real revenue is going to FIFA who do jack shit with it, maybe if they reinvested it into women’s soccer development and recognition then it becomes less of a disparity.
[–]Chopersky4codyslab2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is not true, they will start paying both teams equally by the year 2023. People care because, more often than not, it’s more of an attack on men than an attack on inequality.
That’s only because of the stupidity that social media causes, they have a valid case and it genuinely shouldn’t be that big of a deal, research how the USMNT feel about it and you see what I mean.
[–]soyb0ybetacuck3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How do they have a valid case? The men’s WC brought in 4 Billion, the women’s WC 73 Million. The women get a bigger piece of the revenue they help generate. It’s pretty simple.
[–]OutgoinglyAwkward-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sorry, are you basing you argument on overall WC viewership of ALL teams? Because then you’re jumping into the issue of women’s development and pay equality in every nation that participated in the WC. If you’re just arguing against equal pay for the USWNT then why not base it off viewership of them vs the men’s team in the last WC’s, because in that case the USMNT DIDNT EVEN QUALIFY. Therefore, making $0 in revenue.
And they didn’t make any money off of that pool that year, see how it works? You generate the revenue, you get paid. You win games, you get paid. The men didn’t so they didn’t get paid. When they do get paid they are drawing from a bigger pool of cash as the men’s WC generates more revenue. They each get paid out of the pot of money they help fill. If women want to be paid equally they should increase the size of their pot. It’s pretty simple.
[–]ColDaddySupreme1-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I know that this is technically what this sub is for, but this feels like it belongs on r/libertarian
These soccer players didnt do anything wrong
[–]RhEEziE-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The fair thing would be to bring down the mens pay since they are hot garbage.
They get paid less percentage wise, it’s just that the men’s World Cup brings in a lot more money.
[–]ThePenultimateOne-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except in the US, the women's games are watched more and get more advertising revenue.
[–]TylerD1234831 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I’d really like a source
[–]ThePenultimateOne1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yes these sources are credible and have valuable facts, to compare the men and women’s leagues correctly you should judge the entirety of the World Cup not just the best team from the women’s league and a team that has been on a bad streak from the men’s league. According to this source “The men still pull the World Cup money wagon. The men’s World Cup in Russia generated over $6 billion in revenue, with the participating teams sharing $400 million, less than 7% of revenue. Meanwhile, the Women’s World Cup is expected to earn $131 million for the full four-year cycle 2019-22 and dole out $30 million to the participating teams.” This shows that the men’s World Cup brought in more revenue so they were able to dish out more money.
Except that's bogus, because we are talking about this in an American context. It turns out that this is the American team, and the revenue brought in by other nation's teams should have no impact on what we pay our players, except for the portion of that revenue that gets distributed to our team.
This feels a lot like saying "my secretary in [other country] is paid less because she is a woman, so you shouldn't mind either, even though you clearly contribute more to the team".
Except saying “your secretary in another country is paid less because she is a woman...” does not directly affect your country. In the World Cup it does because revenue is split between participants. Other countries bringing in more revenue will directly affect the pay of USA. And since a lot of other countries couldn’t give a shit about their woman’s program, those countries revenue is lost, however the men’s is still actively watched. And the amount more revenue that men’s team gets is outrageous. In American context, the woman’s team gets paid whether they qualify for World Cup or not and the men’s gets paid strictly when they qualify, so that helps boost the amount that is distributed.
Also, going back to your original statement, one single woman’s match would not bring in as much revenue as a men’s game, they play more often and are greatly more supported compared to other country’s teams, therefore have an advantage against other countries, allowing them to make the World Cup more often, and ultimately make more money than they would if other countries had the same support for their woman’s teams.
Okay, but my impression is that they aren't asking for equal per-game, they are asking for equal as a share of revenue. Am I mistaken there?
You might be mistaken because in the post it says they chanted for “equal pay” and other posts say that there was a lawsuit for “equal pay”. Because in terms of revenue I believe they get more according to some article I was looking for information on.
[–]8man-cowabunga-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I read that the US women’s team generates more revenue than the US men’s team and it paid less. When you break it down that way there is unequal pay, no?
[–]LiveOnSteak-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
As always, the real struggle is not men vs women, it's the owners who keep most of the money vs the people who actually earn that money. Any divide other than the 1% vs everyone else is just capitalism distracting you from the real issues.
[–]3wanw1ld-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The USA women's team is so much better than the men's too, it's a shame they don't get as many viewers in, but it's just how it is for now
[–]Sage010101-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How he would have been trolled for saying the right thing! The times we live in !!
[–]DEATHLENDER123-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Dude because it's easier than editing the comment after I have posted it as it doesn't let you edit it right away😁
[–]bfmGrack-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics
[–]Valbuena2009-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Basic math:
Top 100 35 year old professionals working their ass off. Likely >50% are female today given university attendance rates or will be in the future, but let's assume 50 males and 50 females. Paying people differently for the same work is also illegal.
Out of those, how many women will choose to be a stay at home parent vs their male counterparts? Let's say 5 more women choose raising children over the next useless material thing most people think they want. In the next 15 years, the pay "gap" between all males and all females in the 100 will exist.
If you want no gap, the women need to earn than their male counterparts, not the same.
[–]starpowernow-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is news to me. Not too long ago, the Women's world cup soccer team was getting paid substantially less despite outperforming and bringing in more money than the Men's World Cup for that respective year. The women's team only got paid for wins, while the men got payed just for playing.
I hate this equal pay stuff as much as the next guy, but this was actually a serious problem and I'm sure a majority of people knew nothing about it or how far the Women's team has come in recent years. Give the crowd a break, the Women's team were screwed over too many times.
One example
[–]sonny_goliath-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine if women’s sports had the same amount of media attention and advertising support that men’s sports do though? This isn’t so much about equal pay as it is about equal exposure. The WNBA may not be as exciting a product as the NBA, but if you’re a basketball fan it absolutely satisfies that and arguably more so because it is more fundamentals and shooting than raw athleticism, but when do you EVER see WNBA coverage on ESPN?
Just a wild guess: they are not covering it because no1 would watch the coverage.
[–]brother_p-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I wonder who it was who originally decided not to show women's soccer on television, not to provide promotional opportunities or endorsement deals for the players, not to encourage youth development programs, and not to highlight the accomplishments of female soccer players.
Women, right?
[–]PissOnTheToiletSeat1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The fact that no one cares to watch it. When’s the last time you saw a filled out stadium for woman’s soccer? It may have happened but I have never seen it. Not even in their World Cup
[–]louisianajake-3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Men: don’t qualify Women: Win World Cup
Men in America: HaHA EcOnOmIcS
[–]Japes-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/
Imagine you are in a league, there is a higher and lower division. People would rather watch the higher division even if you are the worst team in it rather than watching the lower team win the lower division. It’s because it’s higher level of the game. Faster, more physical, and more skilled.
[–]OopsNipsCameOff-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This doesn't start and stop at the top. Equalising prize money is intended to help break down the barriers from the bottom up, and counter the absolute leck of opportunity some women face , where men do not face the same barriers.
[–]Wes_Anderson_Cooper-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Imagine using professional moron Matt Walsh to make a point.
You guys are some sexist idiots. Everyone here thinks these women didn't bother doing any research and are just complaining based on facts they read on Facebook, what a joke. While OPs article is coorect that the FINAL brings in more money for men, the entire season makes for more money for women and therefore they are completely underpaid for the job they are doing https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/19/us-womens-soccer-games-now-generate-more-revenue-than-mens.html?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
[–]wwaxwork-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yet the men still can't play for shit.
Yikes
[–]PortalsOfKamarTaj1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They have failed to respond
Your men maybe
Now you’re attacking men because we get payed more to play at a higher level
You mean USA men.
[–]tequilasodalime-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It wasn't a chant to FIFA, it was a message to U.S. Soccer. The women are underpaid. Period. Old news, man -- https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/22/sports/soccer/usmnt-uswnt-soccer-equal-pay.html. But good try.
[–]memedog11 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Shut up dumbfuck
[–]nbhoward-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is a tweet, there are plenty of actual articles that disprove it. Facts don’t care about your misinformed sexism. This sub is trash.
Not this sub but this post inflicts sexism. The sub is mainly men who don’t approve of “You can’t hit a woman”
[–]High5assfuck-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They are a National team. Not in an individual sport or a private league. They are asked to play for and represent their country. They are asked to dedicate their time to the National team. Is their time worth less because they’re women ?
No one is forcing them to play soccer. They are making less because the men’s WC brought in 4 billion in revenue and the women’s WC brought in 73 million. It’s as simple as that.
[–]High5assfuck1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hey hero. You might want to double check those figures again. According to everything I’ve seen, viewership and revenue from the women at this World Cup was greater than the last men’s. But you know, it’s all about revenue
Yes it’s obvious more people in the US tuned in to watch the USNWT play in a final match vs watching France play Croatia. About 15 million people watched the game and that includes streams. Now compare that to the 24 million that tuned in to watch the men play a group stage game in 2014. A men’s group stage game drew more viewers than a women’s final. In addition 3.5 billion world wide watched the men’s final last year, the total viewership across all games in the women’s WC was 1 billion. Perhaps do a cursory Google search before calling people out.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/world-cup-2014-record-u-s-tv-ratings-sure-sign-of-soccers-rapid-growth-here/
So more Americans watched the American women play and they generated more revenue than the American men ? You’re making an asshole argument hero
The WC winnings are a pool which all teams share from. The women’s team gets 13% of their pool, the men get 9% of theirs. The men’s World Cup makes 4 billion while the women’s makes 73 million. I’m starting to think rational thought and mathematics might be a difficult thing for you so do I need to explain it further?
[–]High5assfuck0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I think you’ve made you’re stance pretty clear. You’re a hero to “Western Chauvinists” everywhere. You’re a good little follower spewing all the catch phrases zingers. Keep towing that line hero, all the boys will love you for it.
Jesus you are bizarre. You know I’ve never met a person like you in real life, only online. I sometimes wonder if you guys are an algorithm just meant to agitate people and keep them busy in a futile attempt to argue a point with reason and statistics. If you are, good job, you did it. If not and your just an angry 14 year old boy(girl?)somewhere I’ll leave you with this. In the real world, you can do the same job as another person, the same exact thing, but if the product someone else sells makes 100x the money yours does, that other person is going to take home a bigger paycheck. If you can’t understand or accept this you will have a very tough time once you leave your parents house.
The American women generated more revenue in this World Cup than the American men’s team did. Both teams are paid by the United States soccer federation. We’re just talking the American teams not the World Cup FIFA as a whole just the American teams. In the past, the women didn’t generate as much, but that changed with this World Cup. The reality is, nothing will change your opinion. You’ll always make an excuse, you’ll always find a stat. You will always find a way to ignore things that upset BetaCuck’s world.
Because the men didn’t qualify for the last WC. Compare the “record breaking” final the women just played, 22 million viewers to an average group stage game the men play, 24 million viewers and you can see why the men are paid more. In the US, female gymnasts and figure skaters make more than their male counterparts. Where’s the outrage?
You started out with the argument that it was about how much revenue they generate. Then went to the “life isn’t fair” argument. Now you’re on to comparing apples to oranges. Look dude, just say you don’t think the women deserve to be paid as much. You don’t need to keep doing verbal gymnastics to justify your basic misogyny. Man up and own your bias. You’re predictable because you’re a follower. Don’t bother writing back, it will just me more boring, proud boy, INCEL, 4chan fanboy BS. Dude you can’t even come up with a name on your own, you had to use buzz words to identity yourself to people that think just like you. You know why you only run into people like me online ? It’s because you don’t go out into the real world and converse with people. You’re stuck in your alt-right “but ma Free speech” bubble. The truth is you’re frightened by things and people you’ve never personally interacted with. You’re a sad little man
Yup. Everyone that thinks people should be paid what they contribute is an incel, Nazi bigot. The fact remains they do in fact bring in less revenue. You are using one instance of one WC cycle where the men didn’t happen to qualify to make a point. You didn’t answer my question, why aren’t male and female gymnasts paid the same?
[–]NoShameInternets-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
According to everyone here, yes, absolutely.
[–]Light67-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That's not how wages work, you get paid for the job, not the people that watch.
This is a serious question, I’m not trying to be an asshole. Are you in your teens? I only ask because you seem to not have a concept of how economics work.
Except that's not how the entertainment industry works at all. You get paid for the people that watch.
[–]Light67-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Football's not YouTube
What a good observation. They actually usually show soccer on TV programs, which are part of the entertainment industry.
[–]Light67-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yes but in YouTube you get paid after the fact, advertisers pay in advance based on previous experience and past ratings. Also TV doesn't pay players, sport teams and federations do, and in turn they get paid by sponsors. TV has almost nothing to do with that
[–]Japes-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"TV" doesn't pay actors, the studios do. These studios can easily be compared to athletic leagues as they recruit/audition potential entertainers and then have them sign contracts for their services. How can you honestly not see that these are the same things?
[–]twojace213 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Right! Like, the CEO of a local hot dog stand should get the same pay as the CEO of Microsoft. I mean, it’s the same job right. It doesn’t matter how many people buy their product.
[–]Light671 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Same position is not same job.
[–]twojace212 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Then you should know that women’s and men’s soccer are not the same job
Thank you and well said
Yeah my fucking 3 year old doesn’t get paid the same as a top tier fucking player because “the top tier player brings more money for the team.” Well fuck that my son should be getting paid to play damn soccer.
You are either a troll, or very, very naive.
[–]massiveZO-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
but the womens cup makes less money because of the implicit sexism in society; that women have too face everyday
Good joke.
[–]KnockingNeo-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except NO the men DON'T, and YES he is WRONG lol... the men also win at a fraction of the % women do as well as considerably lower ratings for televised games, ESPECIALLY the world cup. Dense and ignorant mfs....
[–]raregek2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
ok reatard
Holy shit did you actually call us dense/ignorant because men:
Play a higher level of the game, therefore bring more money in, which ultimately, you guessed (hopefully you guessed it), allows for more money to be paid.
Strange how if women don’t bring as much revenue they don’t get paid as much🤔. Don’t even say the bring in more because they don’t. Not nearly as many viewers watch women soccer as they do men’s soccer. Most men who watch soccer watch men’s soccer and not women’s soccer. Most women who watch soccer watch both. But Incase you didn’t realize, not as many women watch sports as men do.
[–]ggfr-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Woa the comment section is so toxic. Let’s take one extreme exception and use it to bash feminism. Ridiculous. Btw https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_pay_gap_in_the_United_States
Where do you think you are?
[–]ggfr0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Reddit front page sadly
[–]Youkindofare-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
A lot of the commenters here with strong and negative opinions seem to have a tenuous grasp on English. I wonder why that is... 🇷🇺
[–]soyb0ybetacuck4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The world must be a terrifying place in your head. Do KGB agents lurk behind every corner? Are you being watched?
[–]Youkindofare-5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I guess ignoring the reality we live in is an option. Seems to work for you.
Terrifying, terrifying place. Be safe comrade.
[–]Youkindofare-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sure thing, traitor.
[–]TurboOwlKing3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'd be careful talking to a KGB agent like that
[–]Youkindofare0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
KGB ain't shit, just look at that gay, bitch boy, Putin.
[–]TurboOwlKing0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Then no need to be so scared of them I guess
Scared? Lol.
KGB doesn't exist anymore regardless.
I'm sure your opinion on Russia would change as fast as Trump's opinion on Fox News if they help a Democrat with anything in any way.
Sure dawg
[–]Youkindofare1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Holy shit, say hi to the very, very early 2000s for me!
[–]TurboOwlKing1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Will do
[–]Nybaz0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fun fact: English is not the only language spoken in the world.
There are a lot of people, like myself, who are not native English speakers, but have an understanding of your language sufficient to read about the so called "pay gap" of US soccer players. And a sufficient grasp of economics to think that it's BS.
Okay? Not what I'm talking about, psycho commenting on a dead post.
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_42-8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well it sounded stupid at first for me as well but they demand to be paid like the male USA soccer team not to be paid like the winners of the male WC. And the demand is reasonable as they make more money in merchandise and sponsorships than their male counterparts. Don't know about all the details but this seems reasonable
[–]HalfwayHoagie13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except the women's team get paid whether or not they play, the men don't.
They have different contracts. Don't like the contract? Negotiate. They could have leverage if they were willing to up and leave, and if the league really needs them to remain profitable the league will bend.
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_42-4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ofc, this is just some pr pressure to get better contracts on resigning. It's just that this implies that they demand to have equal winnings after winning the WC which is to my knowledge simply wrong. They want better contracts that's all
[–]HalfwayHoagie8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Their league brings in almost no money.
When was the last time a women's league game filled a stadium? Have they ever once did that?
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_42-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Merchandise and sponsorships apparently earn quite a buck so they are outearning their male counterparts
[–]HalfwayHoagie4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I have not once seen someone wearing a pro women's soccer jersey, hat, shorts, anything. But I live near Philadelphia and almost every single weekend I see at least one person wearing a Philadelphia Union jersey. I even own one and so does my brother.
I have a difficult time believing that the women's teams make more merch revenue from their league sales when they are only in like 7 or 8 cities. And I also have a hard time believing the once every 4 years uptick in sales for the womens world cup closes that gap.
Either I'm way off, and I'd be happy to see where you got that info, or you're way off.
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_420 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Have you seen a jersey from the male soccer team? Soccer just in general isn't big in the USA. Doesn't take much to surpass them. Anecdotal evidence isn't really proof you know. Saw an article on my troll twitter acc
Dude, the second sentence I wrote, "But I live near Philadelphia and almost every single weekend I see at least one person wearing a Philadelphia Union jersey."
Which I assume you had no idea that the Philadelphia Union are an MLS team.
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_421 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You don't have to be an American to have opinions on reddit. The point is this isn't a pussy pass. Their claim may be wrong idc but it is not far fetched like this post claims. Also anecdotal evidence isn't always 100% correct you know
First of all I didn't say you had to be an American to have an opinion on reddit. I assume you said that because you are claiming ignorance on the MLS teams in the US. I didn't assume you were American, but calling it soccer is a pretty American thing.
I also didn't claim that anecdotal evidence is the end all and be all, I would never claim that. But I provided my experience as the starting reference point. I expand from there. I said I would be happy to know where you got your info, because your info is backed by nothing you provided, and mine is backed by my anecdote. Anecdote beats nothing at all.
I could be wrong, I don't know. I am expressing skepticism that their league's revenue outstrips the MLS revenue. Especially because there are like four times the number of men's teams to the womens teams. And the MLS teams made a revenue of approximately $40 mil per team in 2016. (assuming wikipedia is correct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_professional_sports_leagues_by_revenue)
I'm just saying what they claim, I can't be arsed enough to go back to twitter and to find that article and the whole thread again. It's just that all of this isn't about wc winnings like this post suggests (which would be very apsurd)
[–]HalfwayHoagie2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And they have bitched before and it bore no fruit because they were wrong.
They deserve what they are getting and if any inch of their argument compares themselves to the men's league's they have to fight back on every single point.
If they deserve more money on their own merits regardless of the men's pay, then they ought to make the argument on those grounds.
This is a pussy pass denied because they are building the case on them in comparison to men. If they just built the case on their own they wouldn't be getting flack from me.
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_422 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I wholeheartedly agree
[–]HalfwayHoagie3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well then Mister_Sweg_42 have a wonderful day. I see no better place to leave this conversation, and I appreciate you having it with me.
[–]TekkDub-2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The US Women’s Jersey is the top selling soccer jersey in the country according to Nike.
Edit: Why do people downvote facts that don’t agree with their worldview?
To outpace the revenue of the men's league it would need to be more than the combined amount for all men's teams. There are 22 men's teams in MLS. There are 6 women's teams.
[–]TekkDub1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Or, you’re wrong. https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/world-cup/news/u-s-womens-world-cup-home-kit-becomes-nikes-highest-selling-soccer-jersey/
[–]HalfwayHoagie1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That is for a single event jersey. Like I said, if their merch sales, overall, combine to a value greater than the men's leagues in the US, then we can talk.
But there are 22 men's teams, does thus article have a secret paragraph where it outlines the sale of the MLS merch in comparison to the US Women's team jersey for the 2019 world cup?
Why do you hate women so much?
[–]DustySignal2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There are a lot of sexist guys in this thread, but the guy you're responding to isn't one of them. He's just explaining the numbers.
lol.
When did you stop beating your wife?
[–]Uws1022 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not in leagues. Women’s club soccer isn’t even on tv.
[–]Treasonburger-9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
LoL! Matt Walsh? Haha GTFO. He is absolutely WRONG.
[–]Chopersky4codyslab3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And why is that? Simply saying he is wrong doesn’t make it true.
[–]Treasonburger-7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It’s Matt Walsh 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s Hillary Clinton 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s a woman 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s Obama 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s a Canadian 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Makes no sense
Aww did I insult your fragile manhood? Go jerk off to his podcast incel.
[–]Chopersky4codyslab6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How is this constructive? And by the looks of it you’re the one that’s triggered. You are spewing insults to me!
[–]Totally-Not-A-Synth3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
LMAO don’t worry it’s u/Treasonburger he’s absolutely WRONG
[–]Treasonburger-1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
LMAO matt walsh, I’m still laughing.
[–]REMA5TER-9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol look at all the incels jerking over a random dude making up some numbers.
[–]DoctorWaluigiTime-10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
lol the amount of "I'm not sexist but"-style dogwhistling in this thread.
[–]Hansoloai-12 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
But in America the woman's team brings in more money than the men. This guy doesn't have a clue.
[–]JudasRevived13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Except that it doesn't. The figures that are being thrown around claiming the women make bring in more revenue are really misleading.
[–]HalfwayHoagie6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's not about the specific team is the league and the contest.
The women's world cup brings in like 10% of the men's world cup.
Where do you intend to find a 90% increase in revenue for the womens league?
[–]I_fell_on_a_dog5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
They do bring in more money, on World Cup years, in which the men don’t have a World Cup.
No shit.
[–]soyb0ybetacuck2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You’re not very good at math I assume. 13% of 100 is less than 9% of 1000.
[–]Millionswilldie-17 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Jesus this sub is full of incels.
[–]MightyKronos9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Thank god the le nice guy Redditor is here
[–]paco3218 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
tips fedora
[–]charliemike-19 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It’s attitudes like these that create the revenue disparity. Fuck you and this sub for your toxic bullshit.
[–]Uws1027 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The product is worse in women’s sports. They are not as good at the game as men, so people prefer to watch men play. It’s not rocket science lol.
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Females are always free to get better unilaterally and increase the demand for the product.
[–]bablfish-21 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
/r/pussypassdenied
[–]charlesireland9344 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Someone should definitely post it there
[–]endlessbishop13 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You do realise that’s where you are right?
[–]Billaskrill4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
/r/lostredditors
[–]Joss-Laypeg-26 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If the US women's soccer team played the US men's soccer team, they would beat them easily.
How does this make you feel?
[–]startsbadpunchains15 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Makes me feel like you lying didn't the women's team get beat from a bunch of schoolboys lmao.
[–]angelohatesjello11 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Highly doubt that.
[–]ShillyMadison10 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
LOL good one
[–]HalfwayHoagie7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Do you actually think that?
[–]Broj_Krun2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It makes me feel like you don't know what you are talking about.
You’re totally right. That’s why the the US women’s couldn’t beat 15 year old boys, but can beat the best players in the US.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Brockkilledspeedy 3291 points3292 points3293 points (499 children) | Copy Link
[–]TopHatCock 1381 points1382 points1383 points (336 children) | Copy Link
[–]malfurionpre 1310 points1311 points1312 points
(198 children) | Copy Link
[–]ColonelError 888 points889 points890 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_MAZZTer 854 points855 points856 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fudgiee 261 points262 points263 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DfduuptIsFINISHED 70 points71 points72 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bazurke 25 points26 points27 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]grendelsnightmare 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nangabatman1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]_NotAPlatypus_ 82 points83 points84 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CiDirkona 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KrypticFade 30 points31 points32 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CouchMountain 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pacattack571 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Toph-01 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IsThisNameValid 61 points62 points63 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel 95 points96 points97 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]yodarded 37 points38 points39 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fsck_Reddit_Again 18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]homegrowncountryboy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]yodarded2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nickvr628 18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GulfAg 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Aesthetiics 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]attemptedcleverness1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xkbjkxbyaoeuaip1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jrod814 156 points157 points158 points (38 children) | Copy Link
[–]malfurionpre 66 points67 points68 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]ambulocetus_natans 41 points42 points43 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 135 points136 points137 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]Aclef 27 points28 points29 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Acid_Enthusiast1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JDGWI-18 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brimnac11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JDGWI-21 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JDGWI-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]D4rkr4in2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob14 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JDGWI0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JDGWI0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JDGWI-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JDGWI1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]BlakeClass 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]troglador64-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Traze-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twocentman1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twocentman1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twocentman1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twocentman1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twocentman1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jrod8142 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]hellraisinhardass 120 points121 points122 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Man_with_lions_head 75 points76 points77 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]dukunt 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Man_with_lions_head 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MerakiKosmos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jman-laowai0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Bigdaddy_J 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ReasonReader1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]I_munch_butts_AMA1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Xylitolisbadforyou 141 points142 points143 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Namesbutcher 46 points47 points48 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Xylitolisbadforyou 25 points26 points27 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shagfabulous 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Andre4kthegreengiant 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]these_days_bot1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]m0128921 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MacItaly 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fsck_Reddit_Again1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheEarlobe-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Man_with_lions_head3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jman-laowai 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]clamy24 50 points51 points52 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TopHatCock 82 points83 points84 points (103 children) | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus- 118 points119 points120 points (78 children) | Copy Link
[–]TopHatCock 26 points27 points28 points (52 children) | Copy Link
[–]Demi_Bob 123 points124 points125 points
(6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Joooseph2 114 points115 points116 points
(5 children) | Copy Link
[–]godswater 30 points31 points32 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Namesbutcher 20 points21 points22 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ryachaz4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ANAXA-XXVII0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TommyRiddle6660 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Gwyntorias 8 points9 points10 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]GymSauce 45 points46 points47 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]TopHatCock 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Gwyntorias 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]atniomn 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CromulentDucky 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TryingToReadHere 29 points30 points31 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]xo-thehost 18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]noiserr1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TroggerFrogger5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TroggerFrogger3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]Buceteiro 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Charlouse22 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Charlouse21 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus-0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Tehmaxx8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SpecialSause0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GaiusGracchus1213 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nikdahl3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sobbe92-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dukunt-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MisPlacedNeuroBlue 21 points22 points23 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Tehmaxx31 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JonathonWally 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus- 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Applied_Mathematics2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ruleofmen1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]WikiTextBot1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Applied_Mathematics1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]fat_lesbians_lul1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Hobbesisdarealmvp1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]muricanwerewolf17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Toph-01 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Amputatoes-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]troglador641 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Amputatoes1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]troglador642 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]notmemes_exe2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Fudgiee-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Ian51502 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zeabos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VexonCross 108 points109 points110 points (44 children) | Copy Link
[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 87 points88 points89 points (43 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 58 points59 points60 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]HeyGuyReachForTheSky 14 points15 points16 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ArtsAlcoolique1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]yodarded 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]zUltimateRedditor1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Shrew_Taming3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]zUltimateRedditor2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]horusporcus1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 20 points21 points22 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vlaxilla 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]cryptic_meme 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cryptic_meme2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cryptic_meme2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]carseatsareheavy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sucks_at_usernames1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus- 18 points19 points20 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]timeiwasgettingon 16 points17 points18 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus- 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus- 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Valac_I whiteKnight for fatties 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TroggerFrogger0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Man_with_lions_head 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Steeltrap6661 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MerakiKosmos1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Psy_Kira 53 points54 points55 points (55 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheRandomRGU 12 points13 points14 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Psy_Kira 41 points42 points43 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]GetRidofMods 62 points63 points64 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Foxyboi14 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]I_should_go_to_work1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Gregapher_ 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]muricanwerewolf1 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]xkbjkxbyaoeuaip1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xkbjkxbyaoeuaip1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ambulocetus_natans1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sobbe921 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]byscuit1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TacosAreDope1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ambulocetus_natans6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Milsurp_Seeker4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]6ofakind5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]6ofakind1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sunnyskinhead2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sunnyskinhead1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Kingspot0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Kingspot1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheCrabWithTheJab1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ernie092 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheStateIsImmoral1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NohoTwoPointOh1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NohoTwoPointOh1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]noiserr1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GxPand 105 points106 points107 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]melgibson666 37 points38 points39 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]OrangeKlip 9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]melgibson6661 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Baybob1 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheFakePhoKing 28 points29 points30 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheMeanestPenis 16 points17 points18 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]jagua_haku 23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]muricanwerewolf1 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dethmaul 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rdrunner_74 26 points27 points28 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]HairyButtle 15 points16 points17 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]_realitycheck_ 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mystery_Man_141 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheCrabWithTheJab 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hellraisinhardass1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]noddddd1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheDoubleDoink 19 points20 points21 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]shaggy1452 9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]a-real-crab 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]shaggy14521 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]a-real-crab-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bjjpolo 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zUltimateRedditor 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UniqueCoverings[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KidHudson_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zalapadopa1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]skant1531 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jw88151 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sprvlnmo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PetTheWolf1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Three_Muscatoots1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiscllaneousShitPost 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gerald_targaryen 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]gerald_targaryen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (104 children) | Copy Link
[–]eccentricelmo 15 points16 points17 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lifeless_burden 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]eccentricelmo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]milespencer 87 points88 points89 points (42 children) | Copy Link
[–]massiveZO 25 points26 points27 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted]-11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]massiveZO17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]foresttravestys8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kapinski 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sizzlingwall711 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]-16 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]milespencer20 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VincentInVegas6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]toffmudda0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OldSchoolNewRules6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MartyRobinsHasMySoul1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OldSchoolNewRules2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kapinski-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OldSchoolNewRules1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kapinski2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Aesthetically1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dukeofsnork1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Azurehue220 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Chukchin7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Azurehue220 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]invisible_bra-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]phughes-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]caitlinreid-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]catbandana0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NeonRedSharpie-24 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ProfessorBeast5524 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LovesBeerNWhiskey1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]marsthedog 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]marsthedog 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]splatmynamedawg 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]splatmynamedawg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]AngryTrucker0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Keladry1450 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Keladry1451 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Levsque0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FloppyTunaFish1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Levsque1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Insanity_Pills2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luck_panda-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luck_panda1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Skepsis93-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Slizzoro4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Skepsis931 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Skepsis931 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Teapot8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jayhawks16443 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]notreallyhereforthis3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]giantgladiator2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]giantgladiator0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]10z20Luka-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]internetmouthpiece7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Brockkilledspeedy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy-13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Scabrous40312 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Scabrous4032 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Scabrous4031 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SimplyFishOil2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tionanny-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sizzlingwall717 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bassplayer96 412 points413 points414 points (38 children) | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould 129 points130 points131 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Vlaxilla 36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boop121314 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]SayNoMorty 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GulfAg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PoopMobile9000 0 points1 point2 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoeFalcone26 29 points30 points31 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]PoopMobile9000-13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JoeFalcone2616 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PoopMobile9000-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NinjaPenguinGuy10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JoeFalcone263 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SuperSMT2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]super_ag 17 points18 points19 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kizz3r-8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Kizz3r-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Kizz3r1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]valiantlight2 7 points8 points9 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]SweatpantsDV-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HillaryWon13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SweatpantsDV1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HillaryWon11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SweatpantsDV0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HillaryWon11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shawn_Spenstar1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PoopMobile90000 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HillaryWon13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PoopMobile90001 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]aybbyisok 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_Flowers_of_Evil1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bassplayer966 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]clumzazael 74 points75 points76 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]super_ag 38 points39 points40 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TylerD123483 23 points24 points25 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]clumzazael 13 points14 points15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TylerD123483 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]clumzazael 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NyteBag 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]electric_screams 387 points388 points389 points (70 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gordon-G 205 points206 points207 points (69 children) | Copy Link
[–]Denncity 246 points247 points248 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]WorkIsWhenIReddit 23 points24 points25 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrMaxCoytus 36 points37 points38 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BeautifulType1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]WorkIsWhenIReddit1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DrMaxCoytus1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]gfa22 11 points12 points13 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]topspin49 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Murasasme 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Scudstock0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Fsck_Reddit_Again0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valac_1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PumpingFeFe1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brain_on_drugs8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PumpingFeFe2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Biggordie1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DecentCake1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Biggordie1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bradtwo 21 points22 points23 points (44 children) | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M 101 points102 points103 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]gobie25 51 points52 points53 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uws102 48 points49 points50 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Daedeluss 18 points19 points20 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jmsaint 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Swindel921 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RyanG7 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Huggybear__12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IsThisNameValid9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brain_on_drugs11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brain_on_drugs4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GaiusGracchus1217 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]UGHToastIU1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]gobie251 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bogus_otis1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]beeshaas 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ishibaunot 9 points10 points11 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]TastyAnimal0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]johnnysoccer12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Loocha11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]BlckMrkt4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cclgurl952 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]AnotherUnfunnyName4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]WikiTextBot2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TastyAnimal2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rabelsdelta4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TastyAnimal2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rabelsdelta0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TastyAnimal0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rabelsdelta1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TastyAnimal0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rabelsdelta1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus- 11 points12 points13 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ElementallyEvil 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DavenIII 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BiggusDickus-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TangoZulu 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]newtlong 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]colby983 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hungry4danish 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jmsaint 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InsaneInTheManBrain 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Latest-greatest 1464 points1465 points1466 points (304 children) | Copy Link
[–]livear [recovered] (83 children) | Copy Link
[–]ntvirtue 410 points411 points412 points (50 children) | Copy Link
[–]livear128 points [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]ntvirtue 85 points86 points87 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mentalseppuku 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TCBinaflash 36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]monkwren-17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MartyRobinsHasMySoul17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Yungdodge91113 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LeviathanPWN 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ConstantineSX1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Onein1024th-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mentalseppuku-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Poopsmcgeeeeee2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mentalseppuku2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Poopsmcgeeeeee-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Schnazzmizzlez 42 points43 points44 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Stephenrudolf 46 points47 points48 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 26 points27 points28 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shadepanther 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]orlandofredhart1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ntvirtue-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]worfres_arec_bawrin1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]coolcid21121 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VegasLATraffic0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DrLumis-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ntvirtue6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SoykaBlyat-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]187ForNoReason5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PintSizedPinata-14 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ntvirtue10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]EVANO26 36 points37 points38 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]MouthSpiders 12 points13 points14 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]sirkevun 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]They_Call_Me_L 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]am_a_burner 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BetterOFFdead007 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tehmaxx2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]benjick0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]livear3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]benjick0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GiantWindmill-28 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy91125 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HotelMohelHolidayInn4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy9116 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GiantWindmill-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy9112 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GiantWindmill-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy9112 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GiantWindmill-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy9112 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GiantWindmill-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy9111 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy9112 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GiantWindmill1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]YogaBoy9112 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GiantWindmill1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]livear1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]joshaayy-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]livear6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ApplePeachPine3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheBeardedSingleMalt-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]livear5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kerayeu 62 points63 points64 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 88 points89 points90 points (31 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheRandomRGU 52 points53 points54 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fusspot1 32 points33 points34 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]centipedesareano1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IbrahimAlgosair-14 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Fusspot116 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IbrahimAlgosair-17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]drwuzer7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Robo_warlock2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SicViPancakeParaBacn 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_k_i_n_g-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cunninglinguist96-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mystery_Man_141 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cunninglinguist961 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mytownisbeingruined-18 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MyNameIsSushi6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MyNameIsSushi-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Flux_78 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MyNameIsSushi-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mytownisbeingruined1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GobBluth190 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MyNameIsSushi-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ruggnuget4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Taste_the__Rainbow-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]coolshadesdog-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]the_k_i_n_g-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sickofURshit420x69-10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nocivo 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VageCheese 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank 20 points21 points22 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]dodosphinx-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]illdothiseventually-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]whitewolf218 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Latest-greatest1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]whitewolf2181 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Latest-greatest1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]themasterbot 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kizz3r1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ImANibba0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xrock24x0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Thunder_Munch-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]uk_8-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Juan_Taco-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Aver3-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Latest-greatest1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]hawleyal-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]50aneigth5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]hawleyal0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TwatsThat-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]captainpuma25 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]samdavi-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]packerpickens15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nosoupforyou3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nosoupforyou3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]packerpickens2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nosoupforyou1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TwatsThat0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]packerpickens2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DJanother110 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RubyRhod-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]knotty_pretzel_thief-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]riseofazrael-14 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SiIic0n10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Useful-ldiot3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SiIic0n5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Hi_Im_Insanity0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]riseofazrael-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SiIic0n8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Kizz3r1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Taste_the__Rainbow-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp-15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M20 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Born_Ruff-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Born_Ruff0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Born_Ruff-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Born_Ruff0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Born_Ruff1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]orangeblueorangeblue4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp-29 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]joshaayy3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]I-Code-Things-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trumpeduppickles2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trumpeduppickles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trumpeduppickles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trumpeduppickles2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trumpeduppickles2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nazihatinchimp1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trumpeduppickles2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bagelmakers-26 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Aesidius44 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Thoughtofajoke2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Thoughtofajoke1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Aesidius1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Thoughtofajoke-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Taste_the__Rainbow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Aesidius-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains28 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]saitselkis4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bagelmakers-16 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HotelMohelHolidayInn5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheRussian2724 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Drinky_McGambles-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bagelmakers-15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SneakersInTheDryer3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Craig_M0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luciferisgreat15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Benandhispets-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luciferisgreat12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Benandhispets-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luciferisgreat3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luciferisgreat1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Trilodip76-24 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]I_Hate_Reddit15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cepheus42-8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]I_Hate_Reddit5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cepheus42-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]I_Hate_Reddit2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]k_p4nt4l00ns12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheRussian273 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]King_Of_Throws3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Trilodip761 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]King_Of_Throws1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]luciferisgreat1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sizzlingwall712 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sizzlingwall711 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sizzlingwall710 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bedford_bypass0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sizzlingwall711 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ronin1066-49 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould 789 points790 points791 points (148 children) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 206 points207 points208 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]queendead2march19 128 points129 points130 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 84 points85 points86 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]GurkanG 34 points35 points36 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 38 points39 points40 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yungdodge911 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Taha_Amir 18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]thedarkestone1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould 36 points37 points38 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 79 points80 points81 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]rcrfc 32 points33 points34 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin 21 points22 points23 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]rcrfc 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Raptorsnest1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GeraldoOfCanada 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sicosqurial0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sicosqurial-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sicosqurial-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sicosqurial-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sicosqurial-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]confusedddddddd999-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Morbidly-A-Beast-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Mattreddit760 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thepresidentsturtle-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thepresidentsturtle-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thepresidentsturtle-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]p3ngwin3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thepresidentsturtle-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sghettii 263 points264 points265 points (41 children) | Copy Link
[–]ruairidhrb 28 points29 points30 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Biggordie0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ruairidhrb2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould 118 points119 points120 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]moobied 65 points66 points67 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vladimir-KG 153 points154 points155 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]johnnymoha 83 points84 points85 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rg90184 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Vladimir-KG 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]abdullah_4 23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]livear [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Puncherfaust1 17 points18 points19 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]werewolf914 14 points15 points16 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]frn1 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dezmodez 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]werewolf914 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]moobied 29 points30 points31 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]I-AM-BEOWOLF 26 points27 points28 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]moobied 34 points35 points36 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]The_Terminatah 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]majaka12341 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ChefSqueaky1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]fahque650 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zelthia 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OptimalAdhesiveness 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chapterpt 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]benjick 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]slow_joke 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tak7ics 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ProbablyJustArguing-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Trollileo1235 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ProbablyJustArguing-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Trollileo1231 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ProbablyJustArguing1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Trollileo1231 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]mlg2433 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CabbageCarl 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile 6 points7 points8 points (24 children) | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould 8 points9 points10 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Houstonearler1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Houstonearler1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]orangeblueorangeblue 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]312land-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imbillypardy0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay-18 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay-12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nbxx5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jabahonki5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HermanGould6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RDay1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TwentyReddit-51 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sghettii32 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TwentyReddit-28 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]USMA18 259 points260 points261 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ketsa59 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]squirrelmonkie 40 points41 points42 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]CabbageCarl 34 points35 points36 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ParmesanHomeboy2 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cleavily0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]exoticsancheeze7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Cleavily1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]amayako3532 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Cleavily2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]amayako3532 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Cleavily1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]n1ckrath1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Cleavily1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Maester_May0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jacobbrog0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile 131 points132 points133 points (45 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile 10 points11 points12 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile 5 points6 points7 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rockyTop101 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rockyTop103 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rockyTop103 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rockyTop102 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tremens1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pcyr99991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pcyr99991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pcyr99991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pcyr99991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pcyr99991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]orangeblueorangeblue1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]orangeblueorangeblue1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]j-29 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Apprehensive_Clock 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]shlem1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]j-291 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Apprehensive_Clock2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]j-291 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]j-291 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]livesomelearnsome 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rownpown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rownpown1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tothecatmobile1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bonecrusher1 104 points105 points106 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]IIceWeasellzz 84 points85 points86 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bjarnehaugen 43 points44 points45 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Milsurp_Seeker 19 points20 points21 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]FoolishFishFood 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]benjick-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThewannabeTemplar 88 points89 points90 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]thatsmybipolarshit 30 points31 points32 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]bagelmakers 48 points49 points50 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WorkIsWhenIReddit 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]livesomelearnsome 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette-12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kambo_rambo7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]livesomelearnsome0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sensefuldrivel2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pcyr99991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]youthedog40 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sensefuldrivel1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_Y0UR_B0OBS_2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Beepboopcomrad 18 points19 points20 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]carterburkefuckyou 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]snizarsnarfsnarf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]legzMcGee[🍰] 70 points71 points72 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]PM_ME_YOUR_FOOD_ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette-19 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MarcusOReallyYes7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MarcusOReallyYes7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]legzMcGee5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]legzMcGee3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Santiago13131 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]The3liGator1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]stationhollow1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Santiago1313-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]aroh100876 13 points14 points15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoveKina 20 points21 points22 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]MakeGoodBetter 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]LoveKina 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MakeGoodBetter 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MakeGoodBetter1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OliverCromwell1650 69 points70 points71 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]xxcups 30 points31 points32 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]PortalsOfKamarTaj 17 points18 points19 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]super_ag 19 points20 points21 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]PortalsOfKamarTaj 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]super_ag 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xxcups1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Velixis1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Monistico 10 points11 points12 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]CampariOW 5 points6 points7 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]chunkynyquil-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]BeautifulType 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]OliverCromwell1650 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]andysaurus_rex-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-16 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]super_ag12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]super_ag2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Huhhuhuh1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Half_Man1-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]super_ag11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Half_Man10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]super_ag6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pcyr99991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TrustTheFriendship5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TrustTheFriendship6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brain_on_drugs5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xxcups0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]digitalEarthling 31 points32 points33 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GayWolfGoneOwO 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Darigone 21 points22 points23 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SpecialSause 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ganondorf-Dragmire 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lord_Teapot 15 points16 points17 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]super_ag 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BohemianShark1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]live3orfry 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gahd95 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ketsa13 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Half_Man1-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]welcum2erf-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Ketsa3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]welcum2erf0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LosebVis 9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]MakeGoodBetter 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LosebVis1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]williocheerio33 8 points9 points10 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire99 1 point2 points3 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]BohemianShark1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]BohemianShark1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bradtwo 7 points8 points9 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]55Trample 8 points9 points10 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie6 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]55Trample 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie6 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoeFalcone261 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]55Trample1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TopPangolin [recovered] (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]I-AM-BEOWOLF 38 points39 points40 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]bagelmakers 17 points18 points19 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]2010_12_24 30 points31 points32 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shr3dthegnarbrah 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]fahque650 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]drwuzer 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SweatpantsDV1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]orangeblueorangeblue 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MeistariJoi-11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tremens 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]honeypunchsofthr0ats 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]scottishere 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ronin1066 -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]GVas22 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]imissmyoldaccount-_-18 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]imissmyoldaccount-_-13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]make-poo-poo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Half_Man1-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kigganon19 15 points16 points17 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]JudasRevived 18 points19 points20 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]doctorralph-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JudasRevived11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]inkyness 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jedditor[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]a-real-crab 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]repsaj331 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jerodmayo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tamwin51 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brain_on_drugs3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]animebop1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jeromestad5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]EagleDarkX 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fatrick3 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]markanthony2487 2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Japes- 3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]markanthony24871 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]markanthony24873 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]markanthony24870 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lynx_and_nutmeg0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Banned_For_Opinion 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kinzlei 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]exoticsancheeze 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SwagAntiswag 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gordon-G 37 points38 points39 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]BohdyP 16 points17 points18 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]skitzofrenix013 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MyNameIsSushi 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]BohdyP 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]pomlife 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BohdyP1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]eldertortoise1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]BohdyP1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]benjick-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Gordon-G2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]heckler5000 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]abdullah_4 34 points35 points36 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spitzly 63 points64 points65 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]abdullah_4 34 points35 points36 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pwnage_Peanut 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Relevant_Answer 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]memphisballer125 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JungleMuffin-13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JamesonAFC6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JungleMuffin-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tolandruth 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tamwin51 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Kerbalz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RhEEziE-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TekkDub-10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RhEEziE10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sage010101 11 points12 points13 points (35 children) | Copy Link
[–]C_B_- 8 points9 points10 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]kierdoyle-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kierdoyle-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kierdoyle-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]youthedog4-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]youthedog4-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]smenti-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]youthedog41 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]youthedog43 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]C_B_-0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]smenti1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tamwin52 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jinjrax-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sage0101013 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jinjrax1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sage0101011 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Puncherfaust12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jinjrax0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Puncherfaust11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jinjrax1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Puncherfaust11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jinjrax1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Jinjrax1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]okron1kPPD Poet Master 3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]okron1kPPD Poet Master 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Puncherfaust1 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]okron1kPPD Poet Master 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CrustyCumBollocks 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dmank007 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TwentyReddit 15 points16 points17 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spe019 19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AwesomePopcorn 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GxPand 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MasterLeonSeb 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]_zukato_ 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Olijzl 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HNutz 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HogMeBrother 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LegalGraveRobber 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JesterofMadness 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lotti_Codd 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Okilurknomore 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CommanderHeMan 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tame17 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aycalib3r2 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TylerD123483 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the1kingdom 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CloudStrifeFromNibel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ganondorf-Dragmire 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CounterSniper 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vinifera7 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]jonsantana19800 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]leparsdon1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KapnKaveman 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]KapnKaveman 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AndWhite 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sethowar 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]KapnKaveman1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sethowar1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KapnKaveman2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Wacky556 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zanderkingofzand 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]scriptx1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]swimseven 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Cheesemonster5 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ImitationButter 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]acesover01 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Danamaganza 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarcusOReallyYes 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]A-whole-by-choice 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BohemianShark 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]stawny 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pynewbie 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BohemianShark 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Luftwaffel64 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iconoficons 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sibears99 8 points9 points10 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo 18 points19 points20 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dizlap-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Dizlap-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Dizlap1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Dizlap0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]splatmynamedawg1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sibears99-14 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sibears99-10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sibears99-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sibears991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Dizlap-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD123483 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]sibears991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]steveinbuffalo 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BohemianShark 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]steveinbuffalo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]two0seven 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Carter0108 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]arealbigboss2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kevnatelevle2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ZachTheInsaneOne 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]blau_wie_das_meer [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo 20 points21 points22 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]blau_wie_das_meer-11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]welcum2erf-8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]welcum2erf-8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]welcum2erf-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]welcum2erf1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Moogatoo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]benjick-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Watayatalkinabeet 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]carterburkefuckyou 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]saintandvillian 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Luftwaffel641 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]American_Londoner 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]joeality 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]potatium 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kahoottrash 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JamesDAnnoying 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Unsuitablemasta 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gordon-G 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]anianianianiani 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Desiciox 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnableSilver 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cerebral_Cortices 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mkvamm 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NotFromHaiti 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nuttin_Up 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Delta_KVTA 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Alex_j300 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gprime 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SomeGuyClickingStuff 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jedibbq 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aPosast 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]serial_crusher 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DRBlast 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Johnnypoopoopantss 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wantgold 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]leparsdon 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ifoundthefud 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UncleBobLoblaw 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]sunsurf520 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sidescrollin 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pnadlerlaw 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Beantown5000 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Claspedtangent03 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Beantown50001 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Alida2001 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlondeEgoElf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Not_The_Batman__ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]30caliberclipazine 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]drpepper02 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FeedMeYourPlacenta 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Redditorreddit12 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goldenarms 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]eag19691 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]chambertlo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]toffmudda1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twojace211 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Ominaeo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rodders02231 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Xyexs1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KnuckleBuster1111 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pmannyy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]gayvibes11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Distorted_Gamer1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Yucrisp0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SymmetricBrightTiger0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FennecsitoUwU0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]supergrl1263010 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]GoodSpirit90692 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]supergrl1263011 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Half_Man10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]djrunk_djedi0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Voltaire991 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Luftwaffel641 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brandonscript0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OutgoinglyAwkward0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]c_x_i0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cornhack0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xLozaax0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pmannyy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xLozaax1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]pmannyy1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JPT_Corona0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]chefboi550 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Motiv3z0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]zquid-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]clydefrog811-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Luftwaffel641 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OutgoinglyAwkward-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Chopersky4codyslab2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OutgoinglyAwkward0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OutgoinglyAwkward-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ColDaddySupreme1-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RhEEziE-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThePenultimateOne-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThePenultimateOne1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThePenultimateOne1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThePenultimateOne1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]8man-cowabunga-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LiveOnSteak-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]3wanw1ld-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sage010101-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DEATHLENDER123-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bfmGrack-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Valbuena2009-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]starpowernow-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sonny_goliath-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]brother_p-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PissOnTheToiletSeat1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]louisianajake-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OopsNipsCameOff-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Wes_Anderson_Cooper-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]VickVinaigrette-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]wwaxwork-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Luftwaffel641 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PortalsOfKamarTaj1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Luftwaffel641 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tequilasodalime-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]memedog11 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]nbhoward-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]High5assfuck-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]High5assfuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]High5assfuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]High5assfuck0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]High5assfuck0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]High5assfuck0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Light67-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Light67-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Light67-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twojace213 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Light671 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]twojace212 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]massiveZO-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KnockingNeo-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raregek2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TylerD1234831 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ggfr-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoShameInternets1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ggfr0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Youkindofare-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Youkindofare-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Youkindofare-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TurboOwlKing3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Youkindofare0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TurboOwlKing0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Youkindofare0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TurboOwlKing0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Youkindofare1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TurboOwlKing1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Youkindofare1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_42-8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_42-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_42-6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_420 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_421 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_421 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MiSTeR_SweG_422 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TekkDub-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TekkDub1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TekkDub1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DustySignal2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Uws1022 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Treasonburger-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Chopersky4codyslab3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Treasonburger-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Chopersky4codyslab3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Treasonburger-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Chopersky4codyslab6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Totally-Not-A-Synth3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Treasonburger-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]REMA5TER-9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DoctorWaluigiTime-10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Hansoloai-12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Hansoloai-12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JudasRevived13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]I_fell_on_a_dog5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]soyb0ybetacuck2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Millionswilldie-17 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MightyKronos9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]paco3218 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]charliemike-19 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Uws1027 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FaggotsArePedophiles3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]bablfish-21 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]charlesireland9344 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]endlessbishop13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Billaskrill4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Joss-Laypeg-26 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]startsbadpunchains15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]angelohatesjello11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ShillyMadison10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]HalfwayHoagie7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Japes-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Broj_Krun2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PortalsOfKamarTaj1 point [recovered] | Copy Link