The idea that women "reward" high-tier men with "better sex" if the man is hot/rich/famous seems to run on the assumption that a woman's pleasure is irrelevant. The sex is "for the man's pleasure", and she'll (apparently) do any sort of deranged sex act for him if he's hot enough, meanwhile the narrative paints the average man as getting starfish sex, where he only "gets to" fuck her while she lays there and "rewards" him by letting him pump a load into her.

Which sounds pretty fucken gross, tbh. These conversations always seem to be around what the man "gets", and the more he gets to "do to her", the happier he apparently is. The concept of her having the sex to reward herself seems to be entirely absent.

My issue is... no one is actually thinking about how women behave when they're actually pursuing their own pleasure, where they actually get to have sex they can also enjoy, when they want it.

I'm gonna use anal sex as an example, because that's a big one that feels great if you like it and want it, and feels terrible if you're not into it. So here we go:

If a woman LIKES anal sex, she will want to have anal sex with whoever she's having sex with. Because she actually likes the feeling of anal sex. She won't "hold out" and refuse to let her average boyfriend fuck her ass because he's not "alpha" enough. Men who think this way are essentially admitting they don't care if their partner enjoys herself as long as they get "the reward".

(Note: I'm just a normie artist dude who went to art school, so a lot of my sexual experience is very laid back and casual. I'm also bi. So maybe I just don't understand why anyone would ever want to have duty sex. It sounds pretty unrewarding. But I'm also a hedonist so maybe I'm over-assuming how many people actually pursue their own pleasure.)