Woman are actually pretty bad at filtering.

(yes there was a "Ask Woman" but most people refused simply to answer the original question)

So at first. Yes most woman can filter a little bit, the fat stoner with anger problems would not be a good parter, but after that woman are pretty bad at it.

So what is Survivorship bias? Survivorship bias is when we only look at the people who succeeded and ignore everyone who failed, which leads to wrong conclusions.

Classic example: In WWII, the military wanted to armor planes where returning planes had bullet holes. A statistician pointed out the mistake—the planes that didn’t return were likely hit in the areas without bullet holes (like engines or cockpits). Those were the places that actually needed armor.

The lesson: what you don’t see matters more than what you do. Success stories alone don’t explain success.

So woman Date filter by bonkers metrics and say then "you see? from my 5 boyfriends only 1 was shit" So 20% of the non "emotion unstable junkies" are Men wo cheat, lie, steal and are just assholes? There are a ton of story's where womans filtering is proven as failed.

There are no arguments against this, there is no science proving right, just Survivorship bias

think it the other Way around. what if only 2% of men are shit? what if woman actually filter more good guys then bad one?

EDIT/END

After 1 Hour of rambling, personal attacks, reports, reversal of the burden of proof i got my first coherent and sane real reply

>Everyone's bad at filtering. It ain't just women. Women just happen to escape any semblance of accountability.

i dont think this makes any sense here,

if you cant debate your point

your point isnt true

we here all the time how woman can "filter bad man" but there are no answers why, just bias

have a good day