Q4Men: Would you rather?

Slyfer_Seven · 2021-07-16T13:25:55+00:00

In both cases she never initiates sexually? I guess the second one, but in reality both would get old quick...

BassPotato · 2021-07-16T13:46:24+00:00

Neither, I want an actual human being with balance and nuance. Sadly that’s hard to find

bxbatman1990 · 2021-07-16T13:21:48+00:00

B, only because marraige is out of the question. If it was just about LTR than option A.

Mrs_Drgree · 2021-07-16T13:25:57+00:00

Number 1.

SylvestorTalone · 2021-07-16T14:05:02+00:00

By pretend do you mean ''we're saying in this scenario'' or do you mean ''she's pretending to be waiting until marriage''?

Jakeybaby125 · 2021-07-16T14:46:01+00:00

Wow. Surprised by some guys here. I'd pick Option 1

waraabe368 · 2021-07-16T14:52:21+00:00

Option 1, but that's also because I'd prefer to wait for marriage.

I can't separate ideology, but even if I try I still think I would prefer girl #1 as long as I believe there is some sexual attraction behind it all and she's acting out of discipline, her own morals etc.

Option 2 just doesn't seem attractive to me anymore. Maybe when I was like 21.

VitalSynthax · 2021-07-16T16:56:42+00:00

The first is literally a platonic friend.

You're asking would you rather have another female friend or an Eastern European girlfriend...bit of a no brainer mate

MasterTeacher123 · 2021-07-16T13:32:17+00:00

2 has basically been my experience aside from the dates as a couple. Once we enter the relationship it has been a your turn my turn system for dates.

1 is dead on arrival because I don’t believe in marriage anyway so I’m not gonna wait to have sex with someone lol

ArtNo6372 · 2021-07-16T14:06:50+00:00

def number 1

Barely-moral · 2021-07-16T16:29:18+00:00

Second option because I am not going to marry anyone.

If i was open to marriage I would only consider option 1 if she acted the same way in all her previous relationships, if she is a virgin or if i am her first in every aspect.

OldSimpsonsisbetter · 2021-07-16T15:29:43+00:00

The second one. Can't imagine such a scenario happening in real life though.

2021-07-16T15:33:01+00:00

I dunno. I don't really care that much about sex so in that sense I don't mind waiting. I do question how compatible I'd be with someone who cares so much about sex that they've got special rules for when it's okay to engage in. On the other hand, I doubt anything would ever happen between me and woman B considering I'm not a big initiator, sexually or otherwise.

So I guess it's woman A for me.

Playful_Art_5364 · 2021-07-16T16:27:14+00:00

Here’s the issue with the woman on here.

Men have no issue waiting. (Marriage might be the actual deal breaker since marriage itself is kinda screwed in the west but that just means it’s legal system they’re opposing not the exclusivity) If there’s a guarantee and expectation that she herself has waited in the past and is someone of high character.

Like I’m from a culture were men and women wait till marriage. Why do the men actually wait? Why do I myself wait? Cause they know the women will and that expectation of a high quality spouse is there.

A man will wait for a princes or a lady. Will not wait for a chick that in the past used to give it out easy. That’s the crux. We men are naturally jealous and don’t want to pay (in time) for what other men got for free. You feel like a chump.

So many men will pick A. If she’s hot and has a good history. Deep down we’re romantics.

BUT the current culture makes you a fool if you act like a romantic.

Historical-Agency334 · 2021-07-16T16:30:45+00:00

A is like my dream girl as long as once we are married the sex is good. Assuming they are both attractive. I wouldn't mind waiting. Not kissing is weird though.

DesperateTraffic3164 · 2021-07-16T16:34:56+00:00

Number 1, no question.

razormachine · 2021-07-16T16:50:03+00:00

I'd rather go with option 1.

However if she pulls out her penis on the wedding night I'm out!

heyitsjeape · 2021-07-16T17:38:37+00:00

Christ, what a commentary on how bad things are for guys. “Consider these two abysmal scenarios. Which do you prefer?” Neither is what anybody would want if they got to choose. Combining the best of each scenario should actually be the bare minimum for what the female side should expect to do.

username_6916 · 2021-07-16T18:16:48+00:00

A woman who approached you and initiated dates with you BUT, does not initiate anything sexual and actively refuses your sexual advances. Pretend she is waiting until marriage in this case and refuses to do anything beyond holding your hand. She otherwise behaves very enthusiastically to be with you and even pays for dates... But sex is off the table until marriage.

I see this as an absolute win.

jax006 · 2021-07-16T14:26:38+00:00

Ideally neither, but I guess A because at least that's like a roommate I could charge rent

Teflon08191 · 2021-07-16T13:59:30+00:00

I suppose the second one, if only because the transactional nature of the relationship is much more simple and straightforward.

Also because in the real world, it's not like there's going to be much sex even after marriage with woman #1, and now you're stuck with her.

CosmicBioHazard · 2021-07-16T15:31:39+00:00

Option 1; tonnes of attention and she’s waiting until marriage? Could she be any more perfect?

TimelessMystic · 2021-07-16T13:22:00+00:00

The first one, we call each other friends and I go looking for a partner who doesn't care about marriage.

FewWeek0 · 2021-07-16T14:52:45+00:00

Are we holding looks constant? Do 1 and 2 look the same?

Counter_Proposition · 2021-07-16T16:12:47+00:00

Greatly depends on what you want in life and from your partner, but I'd choose option A because I'm dating for marriage and kids, so I want a "good girl" (read: a traditional woman).

Guapscotch · 2021-07-16T16:44:21+00:00

I don’t believe marriage is a smart move in a modern context beyond providing an environment for children and since I plan on being childfree, I’m going to go with number two simply because that’s my only choice although that’s not ideal either.

I’d probably be considered an extreme outlier though due to my views on marriage and kids though

M3taBuster · 2021-07-16T17:08:43+00:00

Assuming that she would start initiating sex about 50% of the time after we were married, I'd choose the first one, easily, because I also want to wait at least a couple years, and am open to waiting until marriage anyway.

Andrew_stack23 · 2021-07-16T18:55:07+00:00

2 why would i pick 1 im the man in the relationship i dont need another woMAN in the relationship who just gonna nag my head off as soon as i get home id rather have a woman who works at mcdonalds that makes 20,000 per year who is feminine and submissive and compliant and fit

Puzzleheaded_Bet7294 · 2021-07-16T19:17:10+00:00

First one, second sounds like a gold digger that sleeps around

Deranged_Loner · 2021-07-16T20:35:24+00:00

1st one. Initiating is the part I struggle with most so that makes it easier.

And no sex till marriage is fine, I haven't done it for 25 years, I can wait another one or two.

Wing_Puzzleheaded · 2021-07-17T05:02:11+00:00

The first one has way better perks. As a Mid tier guy I just don't think dating women is worth the effort required, but I do need sex sooner than marriage. So In all honesty I don't really want any of these situations.

The-Wizard-of-Oz- · 2021-07-17T09:00:41+00:00

Does the first one pay for the dates then? Since the second one doesn't?

Also are they equally attractive? Is the second one a slut with STDS?

Is the first one a slut with STDS?

Another crucial piece of information you've left out is how the first and second women behave with all other men? Of the hat behavior can be the other option then I go for #2 Extremely ideal.

FreierSteinkopf · 2021-07-16T14:35:05+00:00

I'd go with A

She is probably low n count and marriage is something I am going for but ideally I'd like to have some form affection by my SO. Person A also pays on dates which is a sign of interest so I wouldn't worry much during dating. I assume she has normal libido.

Person B is literally just about sex which is nice and all but during dating I'd have no idea whether shes playing me when we don't have sex because she doesn't pay but if we have sex early (which would be the case) I would have a low opinion of her.

AidsVictim · 2021-07-16T15:32:11+00:00

The 2nd option and it's not even close for most men. If she's actually receptive and enthusiastic who gives a shit if you have to initiate and pay for dates?

Most (average) mens problem isn't that they have a problem with initiating, it's that they know the vast majority of women aren't interested in average men approaching them.

edit: I guess I underestimated the number of men who would choose the 1st option...

AtaCome7821 · 2021-07-16T16:03:46+00:00

Number 1, cause I've experienced(well some of it) last year. I first found out that she was into me through my cousin, and she started to get very affectionate and made excuses to get close(I walked into my room with her playing my guitar) to me, but I rejected and avoided her because I was deep in depression back then.

I've worked on my depression since then and I'll happily date her if she's still into me, I've experienced enough sex as a 22 year old, so I'd be open to a relationship like that.

EstablishmentKooky50 · 2021-07-16T15:12:20+00:00

If the above are my only options, I would rather go MGTOW. Both means trouble on the long term. Dependant on age of course, but

Is potentially manipulative (using sex as leverage) unless she is an actual virgin.
Does not show signs of desire.

BlackGriffin_1 · 2021-07-16T14:40:05+00:00

Definitely, the first option. This way when I have girls "cold approach" me it can tell me my smv and what league I stand in within society(I can properly know my worth/attractiveness). Knowing this I can have the proper confidence and knowledge to approach girls of similar smv to me and have sex with those girls, because of I know that girl is more than likely attracted to me. Instead of wasting my time with girls out of my league and thinking I don't have enough game when its really because of my looks, that I cant get her

TheSunshineMan · 2021-07-16T16:01:42+00:00

Neither, why would I want to date a girl who doesn't put out or a girl who won't pay for dates.

Adadum · 2021-07-16T16:44:56+00:00

Both, in fact, I'll buy your entire stock!

ahaha but my final, serious answer is Both. Both is good.

Murphysmongoose · 2021-07-16T17:11:54+00:00

Obviously the lesser of the two bad is the second, b/c you still some.

Caring_Cactus · 2021-07-16T17:30:41+00:00

If the man is an asexual they've kind of hit the jackpot with [A], don't you think?

An important indication to notice is that the behavior seen consistently in the beginning (without any bullshit tricks/lies) is usually a good predictor of future behavior.

Although this person sounds like they have a low libido, what a lot of people don't realize is that libido can change, and that behavioral, not hormonal, variables are strongly linked to differences in sexual desire among people(source). This is why there's a kinda funny stereotype that conservative folk are usually more sexual/kinky, it's significant because it probably carries more meaning only if they allow themselves to be of course.

So my choice? [A] all the way, at the very least you've got a best friend who genuinely shows interest in you as a person.

801735 · 2021-07-16T18:03:28+00:00

c) Non of the above.

Why can't offered women just be normal, you know, like the rest of humanity, or even better, like ALL men (hue hue), the best of all worlds.

2021-07-16T18:20:35+00:00

Option 2 sounds like there's at least potential to have fun, and I'm not really that into getting married anyway.

Shells23 · 2021-07-16T18:21:06+00:00

If I'm looking for a genuine relationship, then 1 (difficult still). If all I want is sex and a physical relationship, then 2. I've dated very religious girls and have experienced #1. That scenario helps develop the connection, however without to ability to express intimacy the relationship will be strained. Either she would accept the physical (leading to more commitment, possibly marriage), or the relationship would end. A healthy and functioning relationship needs both emotional and physical connection, without both it will be either shallow and fleeting or in will not last.

AreOut · 2021-07-16T18:41:48+00:00

"A woman who approached you and initiated dates with you BUT, does not initiate anything sexual and actively refuses your sexual advances. Pretend she is waiting until marriage in this case and refuses to do anything beyond holding your hand. She otherwise behaves very enthusiastically to be with you and even pays for dates... But sex is off the table until marriage."

well if she is interesting person we can just be friends until she makes up her mind(no need for holding hands really), of course if she doesn't mind my adventures with other girls during that time

ugliest-chad · 2021-07-16T18:57:56+00:00

Neither. If I had to pick, it'd be one. Can't build a relationship on just sex. I also desire women (or men... Or some combination of the two) who are fun and adventurous. I could live without sex for a long time if we're having fun doing other things.

Mrs_Drgree · 2021-07-16T19:33:06+00:00

[permanently deleted]

_Neon_Shadow_ · 2021-07-16T23:10:32+00:00

Neither.

TryLambda · 2021-07-17T02:10:56+00:00

Its pretty obvious that option 2 is the go to here for most dudes,

But then you have created an imaginary woman, both options are imaginary, cos women don't act like that in current society

parahacker · 2021-07-17T06:35:16+00:00

In an ideal scenario? B, probably. If I were free to initiate, didn't have to fear being the sexual solicitor being turned around on me with severe negative consequences, or was somehow already in a relationship with her and knew it was safe to ask, B.

But we live in 2021. So... still B, but I'm not going to go looking for her. Whereas A would have come looking for me. So A probably wins RL.

Electrical_Coat_8714 · 2021-07-17T10:21:01+00:00

I'm used to having to do everything for dates anyway so option 2

Besides, Marriage is dead and 2 sounds like she'd do that thing I like so

gunbusterxl · 2021-07-17T11:38:47+00:00

I don't mind waiting for marriage. +1 for the first option.

Commercial_Room_7853 · 2021-07-17T21:54:07+00:00

The first one in an instant without even needing to read the second. A woman who waits until marriage is a dream these days, not many are willing.

Joe6p · 2021-07-18T04:35:13+00:00

Two. I want it all the time and I'd get that + quality with two. Two sounds like my current gf/future wife except I cook most meals

PM-ME-YOUR-STOMACH · 2021-07-18T20:07:38+00:00

I’d honestly place my bets on the first woman. I’ve talked to girls of this type before more than once and sometimes sexual desire can override the rules they set for themselves. It sounds stupid as fuck but like you would be her “Chad” in scenario one if you played your cards right so sex could be possible.

0112358f · 2021-07-23T03:40:36+00:00

Second for sure. This sub is full of virgins imagining a great sexlife with a tradwife.

I will believe someone's sexually attracted to me when there's evidence if it. Real evidence. Been burned too badly otherwise. They really liked me they just weren't that into sex.

Workaholiconew · 2021-08-14T16:16:17+00:00

Second one. What is the value of a woman if not for sex?

Hoopy223 · 2021-07-16T13:24:15+00:00

I recently broke up with option 2 lol.

ErrendeEbecee · 2021-07-16T13:26:07+00:00

The latter how is this even a question

abaxeron · 2021-07-16T13:20:20+00:00

Pretend she is waiting until marriage in this case and refuses to do anything beyond holding your hand.

Marriage in my country and in this day and age is a question of 1 week waiting in line and 15 minutes of official procedure. In many instances, divorce is just as simple (unless there are claims for division of assets or children).

IF she refuses to marry me privately and in a week, saying she wants a $300k ceremony and 100 distant relatives as guests, then I'm saying "fook it" and taking option 2.

Bandit174 · 2021-07-16T13:41:38+00:00

What are their n-counts and does girl A become enthusiast about sex after marriage in this hypothetical scenario?

Chaotic_Licking · 2021-07-16T14:58:14+00:00

First option, of course!

WishIndependent9520 · 2021-07-16T18:58:59+00:00

I'll put it this way. I don't mind not fucking, but I do mind not fucking if she has fucked. Basically if a woman Im interested in is saving herself for marriage and is a virgin I would still date her if I actually liked her. I'd be lying if I said a relationship was easy, but her values are respectable. Hell, Im even okay with a woman who has had nothing but LTR's (relationships lasting over a year where marriage was discussed) making me wait a little bit for sex. What I do mind is a woman who has had ONS's and hooked up with several people making me wait for sex. Im not gonna force it, but youre not going to make me want to date you. The whole "Im gonna make him wait for sex because I really like him" thing only works if you've at least only had sex with serious boyfriends. Anything else and you're being a phony and are being manipulative. Which is fine, but just don't be shocked if I don't see you as girlfriend material.

TheJim66 · 2021-07-16T13:25:41+00:00

What's each girls n count? (I'm guessing the question is in the context of an LTR)

Anyway, if they are both low n I would go for the second chick. I don't particularly care about the women initiating stuff. I'm kinda used to this stuff. Both are probably bad options but still.

her_958_resistors · 2021-07-16T13:42:13+00:00

How about neither? :-)

Both are ultimately playing manipulative games, pretending to be someone they're not. As men learn to stop thinking with their genitals, we simply stop tolerating such nonsense.

Peace of mind is found in solitude. Never underestimate its value.

xFallacyx69 · 2021-07-16T13:59:45+00:00

I mean I’ve never stayed with any chick who didn’t have both… BUT I’d rather have option 2.

Sex is an important part of my relationships, and if all the kinky/fun/exciting stuff is mutually beneficial with mutual energy invested, I can look past the lack of energy/money towards dates (or at least I’d like to think I could)

PlayfulLawyer · 2021-07-16T14:31:47+00:00

2, in reality both would get old really quick, however with two I'm at least getting what I want and having an enthusiastic and fulfilled sex life, as far as number one it would be nice to be wined and dined to that level for sure but I don't do the marriage thing , and I'm definitely not going to marry a woman to fuck her, and now I'm stuck with her? No thanks

Smoogs2 · 2021-07-16T16:30:22+00:00

Number 2 and how most of my relationships have been anyway. I guess I don't really have much complaints about women not "initiating." They do in very subtle ways that we don't recognize or define as "initiating" but to them it is and it makes them feel vulnerable.

Once you pick up on their cues they might as well be initiating because it is essentially the same thing minus actually "making the move."

I do think we conflate initiating with 'making the first move' often. Without getting into the weeds of pedantry I don't mind women who do not "initiate." You can mostly read her cues and with almost certainty predict her answers of being asked out or the relationship becoming sexual. There's a grey area of course, but it's hardly an issue to where I'd rather be with some tradcon no-sex-before-marriage type.

Flaky-Professor · 2021-07-16T17:03:16+00:00

A very high percentage of women don’t initiate nor do they pay for dates. #1 is automatically out of the question, I’m not gambling sexual chemistry until after marriage. #2 possibly for a casual situation, I’d remain single if these were my options.

helloiamheretohelp · 2021-07-17T00:14:59+00:00

The second, obviously, as receptiveness and enthusiasm towards having sex is the primary symptom of strong desire.

But both situs suck.

Engineers__Assemble · 2021-07-17T05:16:52+00:00

Both are kind of like a predator targeting a prey. The first one is the standard reformed party girl trying to pick up a betabuxx via the traditional route and the second one is also the standard reformed party girl trying to "love bomb" a betabuxx into commitment but establishing a ground rule that she won't pay from anything.

Personally I'd be more into dating women from my career background.

Eastuss · 2021-07-16T15:42:41+00:00

A woman who does not initiate with you, does not plan dates, does not pay for them... But is very open to your sexual advances.

Basically my wife and all the women in my life. And that doesn't bother me. I needed female validation when I was 14 but I learned not to care, or I learned to seek it in them letting me do what I want.

KirthWGersen · 2021-07-16T13:43:23+00:00

Definitely the latter. Describes two of my lovers perfectly.

The former is simply living in la-la-land.

wtknight · 2021-07-16T15:01:02+00:00

I’d rather approach women, period. Women who approach men tend to be less attractive as they’re usually trying to go for men out of their league. That has been my personal experience, anyway.

I don’t mind paying for dates. They’re not going to be very expensive ones, though, especially if I know she has money and she purposely is making me pay for them.

Chaddamhusein · 2021-07-16T16:29:13+00:00

1 is most likely a slut and is trying to lie about it which is imo worse than 2 who is definitely a slut but isnt lying about it so 2

_lemazaki · 2021-07-16T14:46:35+00:00

Geeezus. My first choise would be NONE, because clearly they have no genuine desire, they are just moving their chess pieces.

BUT, since you are putting a gun on my head, I pick number 2. Because you did not mentioned marriage.

7SovarN · 2021-07-16T14:52:37+00:00

What are their n-counts?

ErenYeagerwasright · 2021-07-16T15:46:17+00:00

Marriage? Why would a man would want to get married? It's not 1950 anymore. But then again, you Americans are very christian. So guess it's more for religious reasons.

ex_red_black_piller · 2021-07-16T15:52:09+00:00

#2, unless she requires me to 'advance' on her for hours.

Espresso_Afternoon · 2021-07-16T16:11:55+00:00

Honestly, I would rather just sit back and wait until I found someone else. I have no issues being alone. I think of being alone as waiting for the right person.

2021-07-16T16:12:14+00:00

woman who approached you and initiated dates with you , BUT

As a Asian American 37M living in the mid-Atlantic US, nobody is going to approach me in person. On the apps (for which I pay premium), I get constant inbounds from significantly older women, obese single moms, and aspiring immigrants. So there's a small, reluctant market.

does not initiate with you, does not plan dates, does not pay for them...But is very open to your sexual advances

Fat chicks love me, so I focus on the childless ones. While they're still saving their cold approaches and overall A-game for Chad, they're willing to work with me in the interim. God help me if I shrink below 5'11.

ThenIJizzedInMyPants · 2021-07-16T16:28:14+00:00

Option B - I like initating and being in control

noletterstoday · 2021-07-16T16:33:39+00:00

Second option is better because at least nothing is totally off limits, but I'm not going to be happy in a relationship that feels like a chore.

TwoFirmFeet · 2021-07-16T16:48:14+00:00

The second option

mcjon77 · 2021-07-16T17:10:18+00:00

Easy, the second option. Who would chose the first option, unless they guy is:

a. Also deeply religious and waiting until marriage OR

b. In the closet and wants to use her as a "beard"

wekacuck · 2021-07-16T17:33:50+00:00

Dunno, I guess I'd rather the second. The first just seems... dunno. Like if it were some sort of thing where we were making out and it was clear she wanted to bang, but was enforcing a personal boundary. I'm good with that. But the refusing anything beyond holding hands is just so ... touch starved and dunno un-sparky. I just can't imagine suspending disbelief enough to think she wasn't forcing herself to tolerate me and was actually not interested.

I don't really have any problems with the second. It can be annoying at times but I have bo problem treating gender roles as a matter of protocol.

FatmanSlim93 · 2021-07-16T18:10:59+00:00

Do you have to marry either? It sounds like #2 is there better option you just can’t marry her.

Goodthingstartssmall · 2021-07-16T18:17:13+00:00

If it's so clear cut then B. Initiating isn't a big deal when i know it's gona work well.

eye_fuck · 2021-07-16T18:49:42+00:00

2021-07-16T19:40:08+00:00

MARRIAGE is off the table for me.

So Gal B all the way.

Tell her to bring a raincoat, six pairs of handcuffs and 2 rolls of duct tape.

midwesternMD · 2021-07-16T20:01:45+00:00

Easily #2. I expect to initiate date planning, pay for date expenses, and initiate sexual advances. I’m pleasantly surprised when a woman takes initiative in any/all of the above.

ChibsFilipTelfordd · 2021-07-16T20:53:29+00:00

Well this is an easy one for me. The latter no doubt, as i am totally fine initiating 100% of the time. I accept that male gender role gladly. My gf initiates sometimes but i initiate more and that's totally cool w me

E: oo i missed the never pays part lol well we split payments

Cedo_Alteram · 2021-07-16T20:53:53+00:00

Definitely scenario 2. There's nothing that will get me to pursue a chaste romantic relationship.

rivetcitymayor · 2021-07-16T23:01:29+00:00

Obviously the second choice , what kind of question is this ? 😂

moresleepy1 · 2021-07-17T03:54:25+00:00

why do you guys want asexuals to be normal I just dont get it. Im an adult an adults have sex so im go with the second option.

B. final answer.

BruddaMSK · 2021-07-17T09:38:11+00:00

Of course the second one. Sex is what relationship is mostly about. the first option is basically dead bedroom from day 1. I don't have any first hand experience but literally everything I've read confirms sex life gets only worse by time. I am not that deluded to assume some woman can ever be that attracted to me she actually wants something sexual but with the first option it is clear she wants a sexless relationship and 'waiting' is just a trick and excuse. We are living in 21st century and these days it's not normal to wait until marriage, not in the culture I belong to at least (in case that was normal for someone of her background I might consider it but very reluctantly).

AutoModerator · 2021-07-16T13:12:42+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Mrs_Drgree · 2021-07-16T15:39:13+00:00

Is the first woman going to report me to the police for trying to escalate, and does the first woman want children?

M_LaSalle · 2021-07-16T16:04:08+00:00

Let me get this straight. You're asking if having a woman ask me out is worth becoming celibate?

2021-07-16T21:36:26+00:00

one in the middle.

aerial_coitus · 2021-07-16T22:30:04+00:00

Is this a joke?

just_a_place · 2021-07-17T01:56:55+00:00

The answer to that question depends on what I would rather have that girl for now doesn't it?

If I want a girl just to fuck then very obviously I would rather have girl B

If I want a girl that I can commit to then definitely A, although I am against marriage so the sex is probably never gonna happen then. I would be ok with that as long as I can still pork girl B on the side with girl A's consent. But if girl A is dead set on that marriage thing then nop, I would end it with her and go with girl B. My freedom from marriage is non-negotiable.

adwaitparab31 · 2021-07-17T04:40:45+00:00

Honestly depends upon the woman in question.

DP8414 · 2021-07-17T14:32:41+00:00

Option 2, without a doubt. I think all of us guys who are shy about approaching would quickly grow out of that shyness if we knew for certain that the juice was always worth the squeeze. If girls were open to our sexual advances, approaching her and initiating things would be no more painful than placing your food order in the drive thru. Its the fear - and the reality - of rejection that makes initiating and approaching so taxing.

Title	Q4Men: Would you rather?
Author	Mrs_Drgree
Upvotes	32
Comments	225
Date	July 16, 2021 1:12 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/olglr1/q4men_would_you_rather/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/q4men-would-you-rather.793072 https://theredarchive.com/post/793072

Comments