This is the sort of article that was becoming very common pre-pandemic and is apparently now making a return

The data is apparently from a business supported research organization called "the conference board".

The Conference Board states unequivocally: “A growing percentage of young men without a bachelor’s degree are living at home. This trend is contributing to a lower labor force participation.”

So what gives?

Is it drugs?

Nearly half of prime age men who are not in the labor force take pain medication on any given day; and in nearly two-thirds of these cases, they take prescription pain medication.”

Is it video games?

To be out of the labor force means that you don’t have a job and you’re not actively looking for one. Improvements in video-game technology help account for young men’s detachment from the labor force, according to a 2017 paper by economists from Princeton, the University of Chicago, and the University of Rochester. It found that an increase in the playing of video games by men 21-30 accounted for somewhere between 38% and 79% of the differential in the decline in their time spent on paid work vs. the smaller decline of work by older men.

And as relevant to ppd, could it be that men who are living at home and not working may have some overlap with the oft cited sexlessness statistics?

The article itself is pretty surface level as it doesn't really explore what's happening beyond identifying the rising "NEETism" among men and then providing a couple of hypotheses as to what may be the cause.

There also may be cultural factors that make the "not working"/"living at home" Venn diagram not a circle...a lot of immigrant populations have a more routine culture of living with family as adults even when working