TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Feminist outrage over new phone app which allows users to video their date agreeing to sex to protect them against rape claims

TR6Cool

July 13, 2015
1500 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://archive.is/t9fWH
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Feminist outrage over new phone app which allows users to video their date agreeing to sex to protect them against rape claims
Author

TR6Cool

Upvotes 1500
Comments 381
Date July 13, 2015 3:21 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3d4v7r/feminist_outrage_over_new_phone_app_which_allows/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminist-outrage-over-new-phone-app-which-allows.975542
https://theredarchive.com/post/975542
Red Pill terms in post
feminist
Top posts by TR6Cool

Native American inmates in Alabama lose battle to wear their long hair due to 'security and hygiene reasons' but all female inmates across the USA are allowed long hair. Blatant gender discrimination.

3847 upvotes
August 7, 2015
/r/MensRights

Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.

3125 upvotes
October 5, 2015
/r/MensRights

Mother who beat her three-year-old son to death is living in a luxury jail cell with ensuite shower and her own KEY. Whilst men are locked in a cell for 23 hours a day.

2732 upvotes
December 19, 2015
/r/MensRights

'Kind, funny and bright' student, 17, hanged himself after being falsely accused of rape and finding it 'difficult to cope with the investigation'

2603 upvotes
October 1, 2015
/r/MensRights

The male Pill is coming - and it's going to change everything. New forms of male contraception are estimated to hit the market in two years and - unlike women's options - most won't contain hormones.

2221 upvotes
June 18, 2015
/r/MensRights

School sends 11-year-old boy home because of his long hair - which he's growing to raise money for cancer charity. 'It is gender discrimination and sexism. Girls can have short or long hair, why can't boys?

1926 upvotes
September 25, 2015
/r/MensRights

Justin Bieber's penis has held a mirror up to our alarming double standards on privacy. If this hadn't been Bieber, but a female celebrity, would the reaction have been the same?

1581 upvotes
October 10, 2015
/r/MensRights

Today could be a turning point in the history of men's rights. For the first time, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission will be called upon to recognise formally that men and boys can be in positions of systemic disadvantage.

1216 upvotes
December 18, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]tookMYshovelwithme 603 points604 points605 points 11 years ago (122 children) | Copy Link

False accuser shaming. Can't be having that.

[–]eaton80 451 points452 points453 points 11 years ago (115 children) | Copy Link

The outrage proves this was never about consent, justice, or rape-prevention in the first place.

It is about reserving the right to change her mind after the fact, i.e. having the retaliation capability if the guy doesn't call her back afterward.

[–]gprime312 154 points155 points156 points 11 years ago (112 children) | Copy Link

This app seems to completely misunderstand sexual consent as an ongoing process rather than a one-off decision

As if there was any doubt.

[–]lukie95 143 points144 points145 points 11 years ago (111 children) | Copy Link

So they're saying that once a woman consents, she reserves the right to revoke her consent at any point and for any reason? Essentially she has the right to say that consensual sex was actually rape because she says so. That's fucked.

[–]666Evo 106 points107 points108 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

She does have the right to revoke consent at any point and for any reason during the act.
It's the post coitus, "I didn't really want to because I now realise he's disgusting so it must be rape." thinking that there is a serious problem with.

[–]mrturretman 38 points39 points40 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I agree, during the fact yes anyone can say "I don't want to do this anymore", but afterwards you can't just call it rape because you're having second thoughts.

[–]mochacola 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

Why can't they have second thoughts and call it rape? That is why this entire "miscommunication of consent" was invented. To redefine rape not as a violent crime committed by handful deviant individuals who disregard other human lives, but define rape as "miscommunications of consent" between dates. Which then makes it much easier to claim rape when a woman regrets it.

In the new "yes means yes" campaign, I guess a man can be having sex, and then do an act, say he came in her mouth or whatever, which she didn't say "yes" to. And guess what, that is rape, if she chose to claim so. Feminists was trying all efforts to justify regret of bad sex as rape, and it is now backfiring because that effort had trivialized a serious violent crime ( 2nd most serous crime, 1st is murder ) into "miscommunication of consent".

[–]Stephen1985 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I often gain consent before each thrust, just to be sure.

[–]mochacola 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure her repeating "yes" with your each thrust was not about consent, that was just her getting high. Because women had been doing that stuff before these consent laws.

Maybe us men should lobby for "yes means more", and "more means yes" that applies to both genders.

[–]666Evo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not even that is a safe bet anymore...

[–]IneedtoBmyLonsomeTs 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well many of the vocal feminists overuse the word rape all the time, i mean many claim that they are "raped" when men look at them.

[–]mochacola 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What makes you think when a woman express she does not like what's going on, a man will continue with it? A normal man would stop, a rapist won't. What's so hard to understand?

If, feminists never made rape an issue of miscommunication of consent, none of these would happen, would it? It's backfiring. First, make excuses for rapists that it's not their fault, it is society's rape culture. Now, give rapists a way to get consent to rape because rape is not vile criminal behavior of individuals, but non-clarity in consent between two dates. Who started all these farce? Feminists.

All that needs to happen, is simply understand men have sexual urges, but men do not have urges to rape. Feminists can say this and that is rape, and it's wrong, but rapists won't give a fuck.

If a woman feels she had been raped during the act. It is not because the man had no clue what he was doing disgusted his partner. It was because the man she was with, was a rapist. But if the man she was with was a normal human being, even if she felt any discomfort at all during the act, the guy would have stopped.

[–]xa3D 33 points34 points35 points 11 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm as anti-SJW as anyone on the sub, but to be fair, if ongoing intercourse escalates to a situation that is no longer enjoyable, you can ask your partner to "stop," and you can have second thoughts.

It is possible to escalate a consensual scenario to that of rape when one withdraws consent.

[–]lukie95 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I see your point. I was going for if at some point in consensual intercourse she stops and says you raped her more than the she says stop and you don't.

[–]xa3D 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I see, yeah that's fucked up. I guess the only solution now is to just record the whole thing. God we are so fucked. lol.

[–]mochacola 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No one has a problem with your scenario. The issue is, feminists assume most men would continue to keep at it with total disregard to how women feel. Hence, laws need to be in place to tell men that is rape so men would respond accordingly as they should. That's their logic. As if those laws will stop rapists from rape.

Basically, feminists think men do not know how to have sex and may accidentally go into rape mode, so laws need to be in place to prevent that. It's idiotic.

If a woman finds herself being in bed with a vile man with total disregard of her, she can file for rape. I don't see how all these "cultural issue", "consent issue" come into play. It's either she was forced into an act she wish no part of, or she was not. A guy can have a knife at her throat and ask her, "Are you enjoying this?", can he not? She can answer whatever the guy wants to hear so she does not get slit in the throat, that is still rape.

It's feminists themselves complicating things.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

But recording what one is consenting to can only help both parties in such a case. If the recording says, "no butt sex, no oral, and our safe word is 'bunnies'", then it can be used just as much against the alleged rapist if they cross one of those agreed-upon limits.

Only SJW's think that taking evidence out of the accusation process actually helps. They want to do away with pesky evidence altogether and just send men to jail on a mere accusation. This is why they are furious here, because they feel that their "narrative" is being threatened, as opposed to welcoming added evidence and the idea of dealing with the actual facts on a case by case basis.

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

this is exactly what "sjws" think too. Literally wveryone, including feminists, think it's ridiculous to withdraw consent AFTER the fact. The whole idea of taking it back the next morning after you regret the night before is some ridiculous straw man that you guys have created. Of corse that's nonsensical.

I've had someone call me a slur in the middle of sex and you damn well better believe I withdrew consent at that point, and that's ok.

What you said was totally reasonable though.

[–]Peter_Principle_ 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The whole idea of taking it back the next morning after you regret the night before is some ridiculous straw man that you guys have created.

And yet it was feminists who expressed strong support for Emma Sulkowicz and her post-coital consent retraction mattress harassment campaign, feminist who support "Dear Colleague" and preponderance of evidence, refusing to accept the existence of the prevalent false rape accusation problem, rape shield laws and Duluth Model nonsense. Is your experience so ahistorical that you do not see your responsibility in this?

[–]ezetemp 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally wveryone, including feminists, think it's ridiculous to withdraw consent AFTER the fact.

And literally everyone, including mra's, thinks that consent should be an ongoing process while having sex and would never, ever, continue with something that someone doesn't want. Which means that for the vast majority of men, the only way that they'd ever be accused of rape would be due to post-fact withdrawal of consent, ie, false accusation or possibly some horrific miscommunication. That is why erosion of due process and mandatory documentation become such significant issues for men.

I've had someone call me a slur in the middle of sex and you damn well better believe I withdrew consent at that point, and that's ok.

Heh, I had a partner who challenged my capacity for coming up with things to call her. Apparently quite a turn-on for her. Do you run through the do's and don'ts of having sex with you before to avoid such nasty surprises? Perhaps it's time for the more vanilla communities to learn from the bdsm scene to actually talk things through first a few times...

[–][deleted] 90 points91 points92 points 11 years ago* (70 children) | Copy Link

That's right, just like when I consent to let you borrow my car, once you start driving it, I can call the police and tell them you stole it because I revoked my consent. I could even call the police after you returned the car because you went to someone's house I dislike instead of the store like you told me you were going to.

[–]Retbull 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (68 children) | Copy Link

The only context that I agree with that is if I say "please borrow my car but don't speed." If you speed fuck you get out of my car. That works for sex if you agree to have sex and then the girl starts hitting you in the face claiming she is into that and you already agreed to sex so shut up.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 11 years ago (67 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah, of course those situations exist. Like if we had sex and you were enjoying it, and then I hold you down and fuck you in the ass while you protest, that's clearly fucking rape.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (66 children) | Copy Link

...and this app would do nothing to protect Retbull in that case, and might even make it harder to prosecute you in that instance. The criticisms are valid. It's not ALL about after-the-fact mind changes.

I think changing your mind after the fact is stupid as fuck. But at least this app can prove that you consented beforehand, and that's something. It's a tool that will have to be used judiciously.

IMO you should have to record an "after" video, too, to prove that the sex was consensual all the way through. But then, a person could just record the before video, and the LACK of an after video looks super suspicious.

[–]mochacola 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago (57 children) | Copy Link

All these nonsense is based on feminists' false believe that when a woman is uncomfortable with what's going on, the guy would not stop. Feminists see men as violent beings who enjoy oppressing women and sex is just another form of it. Feminists have no clue men enjoy sex when their partners enjoy it.

As Camille Paglia puts it, "Leaving sex to the feminists is like letting your dog vacation at the taxidermist."

On the other hand, feminist can dispatch their most hateful dyke to teach potential rapists what consent is, and those rapists won't give a shiet.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (56 children) | Copy Link

false believe that when a woman is uncomfortable with what's going on, the guy would not stop.

Well it's not really the guy that would stop that we're worried about here, is it?

The fact of the matter is, if this app is taken seriously, then it damages potentially true claims that consent was withdrawn but sex was not aborted. A sick fuck could use an app like this to bolster his case that sex was consensual throughout, and then start doing depraved shit that the other party wasn't comfortable with halfway through. Like if someone was fucking a girl and then started violently shoving his fingers in her asshole and wouldn't stop.

It's true that in a perfect world, we wouldn't look at this app as anything more than pre-coitus consent, but people are dumb.

As usual, the only real way to prove perfect yes-means-yes consent is to film the act all the way through. A better strategy is to only have sex with people you trust, because even though in a perfect world, you should be able to do what you want, well, in a perfect world a woman would be able to get hammered while naked with the words FREE SLUT written on her in magic marker without consequences. But we don't live in a perfect world, so everyone men have to protect themselves.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The only way to be sure would be to have everyone film every sex act they are part of, but that is ridiculous.

You know what, maybe installing a secret camera in your bedroom isn't such a bad idea. I mean, it's absolutely illegal, but I would rather face the consequences of illegal recording rather than the consequences of being an alleged rapist.

[–]mochacola 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He: "Hey, I'm going to make a sex tape of the two of us."

She: "Why?"

He: "Just in case you need to sue me for rape, you'll have evidence!"

She: "Great!"

He: "I'll need to keep a copy in case you sue me when I think I did no wrong."

She: "That's only fair, I guess."

How feminism had made it easier for guys to make sex tapes.

[–]Stephen1985 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How about consent before hand and then again after

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Suppose A and B both consent before, and sex proceeds amicably. Then after, B says that she didn't consent. Now she's on camera making a false accusation minutes after the deed. That doesn't help anybody. Or if she just doesn't make a video at all.

Honestly nothing proves anything. And that's the tricky part about rape cases

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The criticisms are valid. It's not ALL about after-the-fact mind changes.

The criticism is only relevant to the Emma Sulkowicz style "but then he started raping me in the butt" accusations, but that's really not what the majority of accusations, false or otherwise, are about. For false accusations, the motive is often such that it would only make sense if the sex wasn't consensual in the first place (e.g. "I wasn't cheating... it was rape" or "I'm not a slut... it was rape").

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But it is possible that a one night stand could take a turn one of the participants didn't want or expect, like for a plausible example--consensual sex, and then fingers being placed in the butt without permission, then the offended party says no, I'm not okay with that, and the offender continues with the action. Or for another plausible scenario, things are going fine until one of them decides it would be sexy to choke the other, and then instantly the chokee decides, I don't want to do this anymore.

We should be able to protect the rights of those people, and this app kind of muddies the water for these scenarios, which is why I think its use is limited. As always, either film the entire act (yeah, ok), or only fuck people that you trust.

[–]Grasshopper21 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldnt agree with an after video, because that still gives the women the ability to change her mind after the fact and now there would be a recording of it.

[–]Stephen1985 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You could do that but you would be an asshole and you'd be lying.

[–]Macismyname 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, she has the right to revoke consent at any point. She can't revoke consent after sex, but at any point during she can be all 'nah you know what, I'm done'

But she still consented to everything that happened up to that point.

But still, these fucks here. Title IX makes it so the accused have to somehow prove themselves innocent. The burden of proof is on the accused. So people try to come up with a way to protect themselves, and short of filming sex, this is the best possible solution. But it's of course somehow not okay? What the fuck is wrong with these people?

[–]Novaer 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

It's completely fucked. I've been in a situation where a guy fed me drinks and stayed sober and then we had sex.

Guess what? It wasn't rape. I can say for sure that I was taken advantage of and my judgement was clouded but it was simply a fucked up night with an asshole who I agreed to have sex with.

I have had girlfriends tell me to charge him with rape since it was "sexual assault."

The situation with him was we had history but I was simply working on getting back into a relationship with a previous person. Welp, got drunk and fucked that up.

And that's what happens. You suck it up, be pissed at yourself for a while, let the other person know it was a bad idea, part your ways and get over it.

It's always a touchy topic for me to bring up with people because people label me either A. A victim or B. A slut.

Sex happens. You can make bad sexual decisions. Bad sexual decisions ARE NOT RAPE.

[–]lukie95 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can I label you as C, awesome? It is good to know that there are rational people out there that know when they messed up and get through it themselves rather than throw it on someone else and lie about what happened.

[–]GSstreetfighter 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Your girlfriends say it was sexual assault, or you say it was sexual assault? I'm not real clear with that wording.

[–]Novaer 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My girlfriends and others tell me it was sexual assault. I see it as me being taken advantage of but it's not assault.

It's a shitty thing to do but it didn't traumatize me and I did go of my own free will. People try doing the whole "But you wouldn't have done that sober!" consent bullshit but there's A LOT of things people wouldn't do if they were sober. Shit happens

I hope my comments aren't coming across as trivializing actual assault and date rape and whatnot. If I was passed out and he had sex with me I would 100% consider it rape. But no, we made moves on eachother and eventually fucked. That's consent. A very slurry and regretful consensual contract was made but a consensual one nonetheless.

[–]GSstreetfighter 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel so sorry for people coming of age in these treacherous conditions. Empty the prisons of casual drug users, fill'em back up with sexual offenders.

[–]gtz442 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Can she revoke consent mid-thrust?

You had consent when you're penis entered me, but now that you're 4 inches in, I don't want to have sex anymore.

[–]xa3D 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You can withdraw consent, regardless of gender. If you were having sex with a girl, and she pulls out a strap on -you say no- but she instead hits you with a bat, and butt fucks you. Are you gonna argue you weren't raped? Edge case perhaps, but it shows you that things can escalate, and you -even as a man- can exercise a withdrawal of consent.

[–]gtz442 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My point is that, if she revokes consent as you're inside her, then technically you're raping her even as you're pulling out.

[–]TheLonelySnail 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I would say yes. I mean, people get turned of by shit. Se changed her mind etc.

Now I wouldn't be happy about it, but would respect their wishes.

It's called not being an ass hat

[–]gtz442 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You totally missed my point- which is that, if she revokes consent as you're inside her, then technically you're guilty of rape at that very instant, even if you make every effort to pull out immediately. See /u/bw13187's argument below.

[–]TheLonelySnail 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh... guess I didn't think about it in that short of a timeframe.

[–]ezetemp 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone can revoke consent/object at any time, with or without mandatory consent laws. But the legal system can deal with grey areas, so, legally, you'd still need to understand that the situation has changed to be liable which would mean there's some leeway for communication to happen.

[–]ether_reddit 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That's a strawman.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, it's also a relevant question if we consider that people have the right to revoke consent mid-coitus, which I agree they do.

But what does it mean? How many seconds do you have to stop pumping once she says no? If you touch her boob accidentally when rolling off of her, is that sexual assault? If you don't hear her and keep going, is it rape?

What if she decide she revokes her consent but doesn't say anything? Like she has a moment of clarity that she should stop but can't talk. What if part of the sex involved putting a gag in her mouth? What if she forgets the safe word?

There's a hell of a lot of sticky questions to figure out once we reserve the right to revoke consent at any moment, and it's worthwhile to talk them out, rather than to just say herp derp strawman.

[–]ether_reddit 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's worthwhile to talk them out

That's fair. Thanks for the thoughtful response!

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it? Consent can be withdrawn at any time.

[–]PerniciousOne 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She can remove consent, during, minutes after, hours, weeks, months, or even years later.

[–]tabbykits 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think they just want us to film the whole act.

[–]bunker_man 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're trying to say that people can say no after consenting at first while its going on and still be raped. Its not like that's not a real thing or possibility.

[–]Vordreller 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, about power.

Just putting that out there.

[–]TheLonelySnail 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aka buyers remorse

[–]Raudskeggr 21 points22 points23 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Well, hang on a second here though. There are a few problems with this.

For one, what if one person changes their mind after recording their consent, but before or during sex?

Second, who's to say that the person holding the camera in one hand isn't holding a gun in the other?

I mean, it starts off as a nice idea, but practically, it won't stop either violent rapists, nor can it really stop false accusations.

[–]megapoopfart 44 points45 points46 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not really about the app. It's about having evidence that you wouldn't otherwise have if a case were to be presented. No a video recording is not incontrovertible evidence of consent, but it is much better than without it when a crazy false accuser lies. Every case needs to be judged by all of the evidence, and the more the better.

[–]tookMYshovelwithme 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What if an alien comes down probes me in the ass and then wipes my memory, it doesn't prevent that either. Things don't have to be a complete dichotomy.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's useless if they claim they changes their mind and you ignored their "stop." But it's at least something to show they were reasonably sober and said yes at least at one point.

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The app should have the option for a second recording to be made just after the sex is over.

[–]xa3D 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Make an app that records the whole thing. lol.

[–]stop_stalking_me 396 points397 points398 points 11 years ago (93 children) | Copy Link

  • Feminists want (stupid) consent laws to reduce "rape culture" or some shit.

  • Someone makes an app to document consent was given according to said consent law.

  • Feminists rage.

What the fucking hell, you can't win with these people.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 292 points293 points294 points 11 years ago (41 children) | Copy Link

What the fucking hell, you can't win with these people.

you're not supposed to win. You're supposed to meekly sit quietly until a woman tells you why you're wrong.

[–]Ophites 106 points107 points108 points 11 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

This x1000. The main source of conflict in my marriage. I will not be spoken to like I'm someone's bitch.

[–]denyjunctionfunction 46 points47 points48 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like you need a divorce. Go reserve a good lawyer.

[–]NotRoosterTeeth 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Another Men's Rights issue right there. You go to get a divorse. Ok, she takes half what you own, half you own together and everything she owns with her. Do you have kids? Yes, she can take whatever she wants and than take half of your income for the rest of your life. Did you ever have sex? Yes, she is able to change her mind, call it rape and you get put in jail for a long time little to no questions asked.

Welcome to a western culture where Feminism has never been controlled so men are oppressed.

[–]shadowboxer47 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can confirm.

Happened to me. :(

[–]blamb211 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Based off of one sentence? Talking about jumping to conclusions...

I'm not gonna say there's no problems, but I don't know the guy or the relationship.

[+]Uzinero -12 points-11 points-10 points 11 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

/r/TheRedPill is your friend.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points42 points 11 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

The red pill is nobody's friend.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Personally I think TRP takes things to the extreme. There's a lot of good shit in there, and there's a lot of ridiculous extreme shit too. The best parts of TRP talk about self-improvement, valuing yourself and your wants/needs and all that jazz.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not the person you were originally talking to, was just offering my 2cents.

[–]Recycle0rdie 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Really sorry about that. I'm on mobile, and wasn't paying attention to the usernames.

[–]Time_on_my_hands 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's, uh... It's not the same guy.

[–]Meto1183 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

And the fact is that if someone understands that, they can probably get away with banging 4 chicks a week (and yes, ruining all those women's days while later when they don't call). Doesn't make it the fault of the information.

[–]Terry_Bruce_Dick 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You are misunderstanding a basic principle. PUA is banging 4 chicks a week and then ruining those women's days when you don't call. TRP is banging 8 chicks a week, and then calling, and then banging four of them again when one of them suggests a 5-some with the other three.

[–]Meto1183 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a not a basic principle that's just a different situation/story that would serve the same purpose as what I said

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The notion that self-respect/not being her bitch automatically equals fucking four chicks and not giving a fuck is one of those aspects of TRP that I find offputting. (And in general how focused it is on casual sex like it's the pinnacle of masculinity.)

As always with life, there's a middleground. Respect yourself and don't put women on a special pedestal, but you don't have to give up on the concept of a regular relationship either.

It's interesting when you compare some of the shit on TRP with TRP Women. TRP Women is about women understanding the traditional relationship dynamic and loving and respecting their man for lack of a better word, being "alpha". TRP is mostly about spinning plates and disrespecting girls so only the beta ones with low self-esteem in need of validation keep coming after them.

[–]Meto1183 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

yeah but just because it's what everyone talks about doesn't mean thats what everyone gets from it. I mean, it has like over 100k people on it, and i don't think all of them are womanizers. That means those other few are likely getting advice that they aren't using to be dicks but to be better people.

[–]maniakb416 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I think theredpill is like religion. Some people find it, use it properly to make a change for the better and go on to have perfectly healthy relationships. Then there are the ones that take it too far and want to completely misuse the information and it's purpose.

[+]Kaminohanshin -9 points-8 points-7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

idk, They literally refer to women they have sex with as 'plates' and they have the acronym 'AWALT' (All Women Are Like That) which actually is a misogynistic way of thinking. Its no different than 'all men are rapists', because they are basically saying 'all women are whiney children and golddiggers looking to steal your money'.

[–]warsie -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RedPill promotes imperialism over isolation (MGTOW).

[–]Bry6n 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

How so? At its core it is simply a promotion of confidence and a knowledge of how to value oneself. These are factors often associated with success in relationships and the social world. Furthermore it makes the simple claim that humans are frequently self-indulgent and judgemental, a claim backed up by theory and example. The Red Pill describes a method of accepting these traits and effectively dealing with them. From what I can see, it appears to be reasonably applicable to the original comment.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]RubixCubeDonut 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminism has never been about equality. It's always done the same thing it does now: claim women are oppressed without any interest in looking at the issue scientifically or even logically, just claim women have life harder and conveniently ignore male suffering in order to "prove" it.

[–]Kaminohanshin -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, there's the whole treating women as children or little more than sex toys that has latched onto it and bleeds into every post.

[–]Bwhitty23 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well look at the sub you're on and the stuff you've seen and know about feminism. They want all the positive but at a moments notice want to be the helpless damsel that didn't know what to do. There is certainly a tendency to not want agency and be able to go though life without taking responsibility for their actions. You can see that in the stories they post and even beyond the sub.

[–]Kaminohanshin -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, because a bunch of whiney bitches with a victim complex have seen how they can latch on and manipulate the movement. The majority of women you meet in your life are not like that. I have enough females in my life to know most of them aren't all little princesses who always need attention. Some do, some have varying degrees of that, but for the most part? I can stand to have a lot of them hanging around for long periods of time. Do I occassionally meet the little cunt who needs to make everything about her? Yeah, at about the same rate I meet stuck up pricks who think everyone should shower them with glory for being the best thing ever.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.

If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]Meto1183 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If someone experiences things that make them cynical, how is it fair to look negatively on them for being cynical? I mean, they're the ones who've had shit go wrong. Don't be an ass.

[+]jewboyfresh -16 points-15 points-14 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

We dont need your kind on this sub

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, we need the other kind of people from TRP here, the ones who rewrite the same ideas in a bit more politically correct way and get upvoted all the way to the top.

[–]Uzinero 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The kind that has different views to you? Lol fuck off.

[–]theycallmecade 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm so glad my wife is an anti-feminist.

[–]Xuan_Wu 17 points18 points19 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is almost no woman more attractive than one with sound mind, strong morals, and a claim to good ideologies.

[–]CzechoslovakianJesus 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And make sure to sit with your testicles smashed.

[–]acelister 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women tell you WHY? Man, I wonder what that's like... I'm always just wrong.

[–]regis-satanis 57 points58 points59 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

They want to end rape culture. Just not at the expense of women who lie about rape. Which according to them, women never do anyway.

[–]AtticusFrenchToast 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah they say they want to end rape culture, but they aren't acting like they want to stop actual rape. When faced with demonstrably successful ways of preventing rape, they refuse to take part because they shouldn't have to do those things. Okay great, but pretend "not being cautious and also not being raped" isn't an option, would you rather not be cautious or not be raped? Argh.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Seriously, apply it to every other dangerous situation and it makes sense, but apply it to rape and everyone loses their mind.

They want to live in a bubble where they can get as fucked up as they want, and never have anything dangerous happen to them.

Don't want to get taken advantage of while drunk, how about not drinking with people you don't trust and have never met, and encouraging your friends to do the same. Nope, that's aparantly unacceptable.

I understand the ideal of wanting to make the world a safe place but that will literally never happen, there will always be dangers, and yeah, some anxiety is warranted every day.

[–]Demonspawn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but apply it to rape and everyone loses their mind.

Because you start to suggest that women are responsible for their decisions, rather than men being responsible to women.

[–]weeglos 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather not be mugged. I should be able to walk around the south side of Chicago at 11pm with a suit made of $100 bills and a sign that says, "beat me and rob me, I'm rich!"

[–]ether_reddit 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well you should be able to. But that doesn't change the fact that doing so is still pretty dumb, because our ideal world is not reality.

[–]warsie 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I live in the South Side of Chicago, and to be pedantic well you -can- do that.

[–]Endless_Summer 19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But, feminists are the only ones creating a rape culture... The head is eating the tail, so how long until it disappears?

[–]anxdiety 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The origin of rape culture is a reference to men being raped in prison. The term has been taken hostage.

[–]DaVincitheReptile 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Whoa really?

[–]mushybees 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yarr, rape culture is a system where rape is a normalized, everyday occurrence where the authorities and society at large don't care about the victims. i.e. prison

[–]Endless_Summer 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Now it's just something to screech when someone says or does something that feminists don't like. Since there's no logic or rationality to their movement, they just claim 'rape' to have things or people removed or punished, regardless if there was even a shred of an implication of rape or not.

[–]CzechoslovakianJesus 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

End rape culture? They created it! It's their biggest cash cow! Why would they want to end it?

[–]cynoclast 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

b.b.b.but Listen & believe!

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ether_reddit 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Someone creates a nail polish which detects the presence of date rape drugs

Is this a real thing? because that would be totally awesome.

[–]speedisavirus 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/26/students-develop-nail-polish-to-detect-date-rape-drugs/

[–]warsie 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's real but it works only for a small amount of drugs, given a lot of stuff can be used for 'date rape drugs'

[–]HeadCornMan 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but it does work the most common ones. Just like this app we're all discussing, it isn't perfect but every little bit helps.

[–]warsie 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It does? oh, I saw some bad stuff abou how it's really ineffective. The app IMO seems to be more 'practical' though. Again, IMO.

[–]HeadCornMan 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You may be right. I haven't kept up to date on it after the initial articles came out.

[–]Terry_Bruce_Dick -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Because using the bar bathroom, and then sticking your finger in your drink is a great idea.

[–]ether_reddit 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I must be the only person on the planet who washes their hands, I guess? :)

[–]Terry_Bruce_Dick 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You aren't. But how many people didn't, and then touched the door, or other bar surfaces? My point was that bar bathrooms don't exactly have a reputation for cleanliness.

[–]thetarget3 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just gotta have high enough alcohol content that it sterilises your finger.

[–]Terry_Bruce_Dick 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Everclear for everyone!

[–]koji8123 34 points35 points36 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

raped if you do, raped if you don't.

brought to you by: Jokes in poor taste.

[–]TrevorNWhite 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

"Well, I'll be raped."

[–]mochacola 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

optimists: the glass is half full

pessimists: the glass is half empty

feminists: the glass was raped

[–]TheLonelySnail 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Paradoxilly, the liquid in the glass is also being raped.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

For those who remember the old Dr. Pepper commercials ...

I'm a Rapist !

You're a Rapist !

Wouldn't you like to be a Rapist, too !

Be a Rapist !

Drink Dr. Rapist!

Yes, it is done in extremely poor taste ... the joke. Not Dr. Pepper which is actually quite delicious when served cold. Just not warm. Room temperature cola is blech.

[–]AtticusFrenchToast 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ok, I'm not easily offended, but you've crossed a serious line here, and you really need to edit your post to be more sensitive on this important issue: Dr Pepper does not have a period in it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh my. You're right. It's supposed to be Dr Pepper.

I should drop to my knees and beg forgiveness for this horrid oversight. I should begin whipping myself with a cat-o-nine-tails. Blood is only way to repent for my horrible sin of misspelling the name of that cola. /sarcasm

[–]iMADEthis2post 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's almost like they don't want to admit just how many rape claims come down to regret.

That and their entire ecosystem depends on false allegations.

[–]Lucius_Martius 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

An app like this will never be enough for feminists, and I can even understand why.

There are even rational reasons for 'revoking' consent during the act. A video or app like this just cannot cover the complexity that is human sexual relations. It would be more prudent to record a video after all sexual contact has ceased instead of before.

But the true answer that will annoy feminists even more is to just not stick your dick in crazy. And to identify women as crazy you have to get to know them first and build up trust. Men will have to learn to give up casual sex and pickup culture. In this political climate (and the world will never go back to how it was) anything else is plain stupid.

Maybe they should develop an app that takes the women through some moral challenges and delivers a verdict on a scale from sane to crazy.

[–]acelister 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But then it's testing women, which is very anti-feminist because "Why should I prove I'm not crazy? Patriarchy!"

[–]Lucius_Martius 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"You should want me despite my obvious craziness! That's ableism and psychopathy-shaming, shitlord!"

[–]stop_stalking_me 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they should develop an app that takes the women through some moral challenges and delivers a verdict on a scale from sane to crazy.

I could only imagine how well that would go over

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Wordshark 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Well I for one would really like to read that article.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

here you go man!

http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/12/3-ways-the-gay-rights-agenda-has-perpetuated-oppression/

Feel free to criticize my interpretation

[–]Wordshark 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well there wasn't anything about suffrage, it was really just about recent gay rights victories, but yeah, it's along the themes you're talking about.

Well, except it wasn't actually feminists bitching about feminist victories, because gay rights victories aren't feminist victories. No matter how much feminists like to claim otherwise, they don't get to appropriate our suffering.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're right. That is how I interpreted their understanding from what was written.

[–]warsie 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, reading the article it's talking about intersectionality, how only the richest, buff young-to-middle age white dudes benefit the most from those rulings. And how gays in the US, I guess similar to atheists in the UK can be probably goaded into imperialism (compsre hitchens shilling for iraq war because a secular arab nationalist state was apparently an islamist state lol)

[–]Recycle0rdie 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And me too!

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and for you

http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/12/3-ways-the-gay-rights-agenda-has-perpetuated-oppression/

Feel free to criticize my interpretation

[–]Manakel93 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And my axe!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

an axe to grind?

http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/12/3-ways-the-gay-rights-agenda-has-perpetuated-oppression/

Feel free to criticize my interpretation

[–]Manakel93 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well of course TGA is misogynistic. Gays only date other men because we just hate women so much.

[–]modsrliars 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's why;

This app gives men security and some amount of confidence. If it works the way it should, men can protect themselves from vindication and malice.

They don't want that. They want men to he sniveling servants who fulfill their every request.

Unless those men are Brad Pitt.

[–]pnw_diver 165 points166 points167 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Feminists seem.bothered that men have responded to the rape hysteria and "affirmative consent" by trying to produce tools which a) meet the standard of affirmative consent in a way which would show visually what happened, and b) protect men from false allegations.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]pnw_diver 36 points37 points38 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why would they want the issue addressed by a tool that records consent? Its much better to have total ambiguity in many cases along with the automatic extra-legal assumption that the man is guilty because a woman says so.

[–]GSstreetfighter 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they're upset because this app would remove the "too inebriated to consent" method of rape accusation. One which particularly concerns college students.

[–]NaturalisticPhallacy 24 points25 points26 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you look carefully, they're simply employing the same solution they've employed for thousands of years: Nag until the problem is fixed by men.

That's all this bitching is. All this 'smashing the patriarchy' by running your mouth on Tumblr, or facebook. It's just trumped up nagging.

[–]Senuf 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men now have what tool? How dare they!

[–]andelocks 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It goes against their idea that these people accused of rape aren't, in most drunken situations, rapists. It's a misunderstanding. There's not much you can bitch about or definitive sides of the argument to take when its a misunderstanding.

[–]Electroverted 48 points49 points50 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"How dare you logically respond to our illogical demands?!"

... They never intended for anyone to fix this. They just want submission.

[–]The_Natty_King 79 points80 points81 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

They'll probably just say the app encourages duress.

The funniest part? Hearing women constantly touting stats about "male deserts", why men are losing interest in women, why the marriage rate is in free-fall, why men are fleeing college campuses.

Add this to this list. Protecting your neck in a relationship to avoid false rape accusations equals rape culture.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]The_Natty_King 45 points46 points47 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

  • "We invented a cure for pancreatic cancer!"
  • "That ignores the sufferers of less prevalent cancers"
  • "Wait, we created a cure because we hate cancer as much as everyone. We're trying to make life better and eliminate illness"
  • "Your medical advances promote Cancer Culture."

Feminist logic.

[–]Musgabeen 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also:

  • "With our nail polish, any woman will be empowered to discreetly ensure her safety by simply stirring her drink with her finger."

  • "Rape Crisis does not endorse or promote such a product or anything similar. This is for three reasons: it implies that it’s the woman’s fault and assumes responsibility on her behalf, and detracts from the real issues that arise from sexual violence.”

[–]scurvebeard 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy

[–]GSstreetfighter 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

http://imgur.com/a/QDbyt#0 The referee is missing for this one.

[–][deleted] 92 points93 points94 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

This is why MRAs cant try and work with Feminist groups. They are not about equality, but they can't even keep their shit straight. They say one thing, and when someone tries to solve an issue, they claim the it isn't the issue.

It is obvious that Feminist aren't about solving issues, but to try and maintain a perpetual victim status. This is why the MRM can't try and work with Feminist for equality, because the goal is widely different.

[–]SqueaksBCOD 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is obvious that Feminist aren't about solving issues, but to try and maintain a perpetual victim status.

Well, if they did not keep women weak, how would they bully other women!

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If they did not keep women weak, how would they justify their own existance? There is a reason that feminists support open borders.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mochacola 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It does not matter how reasonable some feminists are. Their belief system is that all problems in the world will be solved when men stop behaving like the vile and violent being they are. That men should just allow themselves to be taught by feminists how to be decent human beings, and everything will be alright for both men and women. Which is just a load of crap.

That is like saying, once women stop acting like women, they won't be raped. And once women allow men to teach them how to be proper human beings, then, there will be no sluts, no gold-diggers, and therefor no supply of such which also means no pervy old men, no deadbeat dads. See how stupid that sound in reverse?

Feminists who can talk like normal people still believe in that their b.s. nonsense is the cure.

[–]mochacola 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I always say this. There is no point for MRAs to talk with feminist groups. All communication between the two should stop.

Feminist movement is about making imaginary shit up to blame it on men. MRAs are looking at real world issues trying to solve real problem.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly. Plus the fact MRM is about opposing feminism and the lobbying they have done in the name of "equality" that have actually made thing unequal. MRM is about equality while feminism is about superiority.

[–]mochacola 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I would say feminism is about dreaming up what more stuff they can blame on men to lobby for legislations to go their way. At the expense of creating an entire nation of fatherless homes. No shelters for victimized men. While MRM is trying to clean up the mess feminist movement had made.

[–]Blutarg 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wish I could upvote this a thousand times.

[–]MrFrillows 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I understand your point but I think there are varying degrees of MRAs as well as feminists. To push everyone into exactly 2 groups and claim they cannot work together is, in my opinion, a great way to further divide and derail conversation.

[–]SqueaksBCOD 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well women who elect to label themselves "Feminists" need to understand that label comes with implications. People that openly identify with groups, tend to share many of the same views. Women can be for equality without labeling themselves "feminists". For that matter Men can chose not to use the label MRA but still think there are equality issues that affect men.

By labeling themselves "feminists" they are largely labeling themselves "don't want to work with you"

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not so sure that is true. MRM is fairly well defined and doesnt cover such a broad group. Feminism is very broad and ties and cover a wide range of things, as well as have many different views. Mens groups that are against feminism generally have different goals and different labels, though some things might overlap. You can't say that MRM is the same as PUA, then you have MGTOW while having common ground, still have a different way of dealing with the issue.

Feminism doesn't have that. It's very much like a religion, where you have a central belief and generally follow what the elders in the organization preach, all while not really researching any of it.

It is not a derail of conversation either. MRM is around simply because it opposes feminist ideals and actions. It's like thinking you can get homophobes and GLBT to work together to get rid of homophobia.

[–]Lrellok 142 points143 points144 points 11 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link

Well, Duh! How many times do I have to repeat, consent rules are not about "grey rape", they are about blackmailing young men into abusive relationships. Lemme do this again.

chad and suzy hook up at a party, suzy takes chad home, enthusiastic consent is given all around, and chad leaves the next morning. A few days later chad gets a phone call. "I want a relationship" says suzy. "Um, we agreed that was ONS only" replies chad. "Well I don't seem to remember you asking to kiss my left nipple after you kissed my right nipple, so if you want anything resembling a future, we are now dating and I am never to hear about you sleeping with anyone ever again."

Yes means yes consent can be understood better as "revenge of the plates.". It is never supposed to be provable that consent ever existed, its a trap law, written so as to be completely impossible to follow. It exists to make thunderboy chad settle down on her term, to her schedule, whenever she chooses. That is its one and only function, and in a single phone app, its function is voided.

Yeah, I am certain the young women who cooked this scheme up are furios right now.

Ps; the reason I tend to laugh at PUA/TRP is they still seem not to have figured the above out.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]warsie 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

TheRedPill doesn't give half a shit about legal reforms, remember a lot of them bitched about MRAs just being betas because they actually give a shit about being fucked over legally by females. And they claim 'well TRP is for practical living in ths world we live in, not the world we would like to live in'.....

..which apparently includes fucking advice which increases their probability to being put into false rape accusations, which can at lhe least cause fucking drama.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't take much to see how abysmally stupid the lion's share of TRP 'philosophy' is.

>inb4 butthurt brigade

[–]kn33 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

A few days later chad gets a phone call. "I want a relationship" says suzy. "Um, we agreed that was ONS only" replies chad. "Well I don't seem to remember you asking to kiss my left nipple after you kissed my right nipple, so if you want anything resembling a future, we are now dating and I am never to hear about you sleeping with anyone ever again."*

Well, good thing I record all my phone calls

Edit: formatting

[–]dalovindj 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How do you do that?

[–]kn33 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I use RMC

[–]warsie 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus fuck. So that's a way to have a batshit crazy Yandere snag you. Especially given lol, Suzy was the active participant who apparently brought chad to her place. D:

Hello, Yuno

[+]rockidol -24 points-23 points-22 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

That seems kind of paranoid, and Chad could bust her for blackmail.

[–]Lrellok 30 points31 points32 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Antioch college alum! I sat in the meeting where this was discussed.

Also, feminists are currently campaigning for women not to be jailed, ever, so no, charging her with blackmail would be pointless.

[–]rockidol 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

A few of them are campaigning for it but they haven't succeeded anywhere. Not that jail is the only possible consequence of a blackmail charge.

[–]dangerousopinions 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's not been entirely unsuccessful over the years. Just look at the difference in male and female prison populations as well as prison conditions for men vs women.

[–]rockidol 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just look at the difference in male and female prison populations

I don't think these are caused by laws but by unconscious biases in judges because men are thought of to be more violent/dangerous.

[–]dangerousopinions 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely, and that is the primary issue. But women's groups have also fought to reenforce this view as well as lobby for leniency for women only and special treatment for female inmates. I won't pretend that feminists and women's groups are primarily responsible for this issue, but they haven't been completely ineffectual either.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

A few of them are campaigning for it but they haven't succeeded anywhere.

See Scotland, where a lot of women's crimes are being changed to a type of community service, where you serve your time in a local regional jail, with relaxed requirements, and with time in the community that male prisoners don't get.

It's started.

[–]mushybees 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

it's working in scotland. they're atm trying to make it so there's only 80 spaces for women prisoners and when it's full any more criminals get non-custodial sentences

[–]rockidol 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Source?

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://archive.is/9lpiS

full report at: http://www.gov.scot/resource/0039/00391828.pdf

edit: my bad, 180 places not 80

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you aren't BSing, you need to give us a thread on this.

[–]Lrellok 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Gimme a second, the college closed so the full text might be gone.

EDIT My phone cannot handle pdf and the wiki they set up got axed. When I get somewhere with internet I will get you that thread. If you wanna feel impatiant, google "Antioch SOPP". FIRE has a good breakdown on the first page.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I remember reading about it. What was it like on campus back then?

[+]robotiger101 -15 points-14 points-13 points 11 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

These malignant perceptions of victims, particularly female victims, are what is being critiqued. An example would be what you are stating in your comment. You're making baseless assertions pertaining to the dynamics between rapists and their victims, claims that victims are lying harpies (which is baseless), trivializes actions that are non-consensual after consent was initially given, et cetera. You're merely positing that those who are accused of rape are necessarily victims of a scam, while those who accuse them are lying harpies who are out to harm and abuse.

It is never supposed to be provable that consent ever existed, its a trap law, written so as to be completely impossible to follow.

If I accuse you of stealing my wallet, and you are indeed in possession of my wallet, it needs to be proven that you and I consented to giving you my wallet. The same goes for consent with sex.

That is its one and only function, and in a single phone app, its function is voided.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3d4v7r/feminist_outrage_over_new_phone_app_which_allows/ct23fbf

[–]Endless_Summer 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

These malignant perceptions of victims

If you have consensual sex, how are you a victim?

[–]warsie 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

a combination of 'traditionalist shut shaming' which says female sexuality is valued more by males, and uh sex negative feminism which says something similar

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Endless_Summer 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is why feminists hate the app, because it proves consent. When your entire movement is based on playing the victim, you can't allow things like this

[–]Lrellok 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

You're making baseless assertions pertaining to the dynamics between rapists and their victims, claims that victims are lying harpies (which is baseless), trivializes actions that are non-consensual

suzy takes chad home, enthusiastic consent is given all around, and chad leaves the next morning.

Reading comprehension is a good skill.

If I accuse you of stealing my wallet, and you are indeed in possession of my wallet, it needs to be proven that you and I consented to giving you my wallet.

I have no idea what nation you live in, but as I live in the united states, and have been in EXACTLY THAT SITUATION, that is not remotely how that works.

If you are in posession of a wallet, and I claim it is mine, the police will 1) ask for evidence the wallet was ever mine (usually knowledge of the contents), and 2) ask how you came into posession of it. They will not assume it was stolen unless you cannot identify its contents. This is called innocent until proven guilty. And consent should work the same way.

[–]robotiger101 -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

suzy takes chad home, enthusiastic consent is given all around, and chad leaves the next morning. Reading comprehension is a good skill.

There is no evidence to suggest that your story is an accurate portrayal of reality. This was made clear in my comment. Reading comprehension skills would do you good in this case.

I have no idea what nation you live in, but as I live in the united states, and have been in EXACTLY THAT SITUATION, that is not remotely how that works.

This is anecdotal. Please provide a concrete citation.

I presume that you believe that those who make false accusations ought to be punished by law. With that said, you need to prove that accusation is indeed false. To say it didn't is to make the positive claim that another one occurred in its place. So, with that said, you need to prove that she is lying, and the app does little to prove this because it does not take a variety of factors into account, which I laid out in the comment I linked to in my previous comment.

[–]Lrellok 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

My story is not an acurate protrayal of anything, it is a story, it is there to illistrait a point. The point being, it is impossible to prove something occured if one person has a vested interest in lying.

Please provide a concrete citation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

I presume that you believe that those who make false accusations ought to be punished by law. With that said, you need to prove that accusation is indeed false.

You presume correctly. However, your conclutiion does not follow. I do not care if the app proves anything at all, though if it does that is very nice. I care that you are destroying mens lives at whim. If there is no proof that anything happened, then no one should be punished.

Since you seem to like questions, please answer one of mine. Person a accuses person b of violating consent. What evidence would you consider sufficent to show person b did not violate consent?

[–]robotiger101 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

My story is not an acurate protrayal of anything, it is a story, it is there to illistrait a point. The point being, it is impossible to prove something occured if one person has a vested interest in lying.

If it's not an accurate portrayal of anything, then why bring it up when we are discussing real world issues? You're misleading your readers.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

I'm talking about the American justice system and how individuals in law enforcement conduct themselves. Providing a link which provides a definition of a concept does nothing to verify your assertion.

You presume correctly. However, your conclutiion does not follow. I do not care if the app proves anything at all, though if it does that is very nice. I care that you are destroying mens lives at whim. If there is no proof that anything happened, then no one should be punished.

Why are you commenting on this thread if your point is in no way topical?

Since you seem to like questions, please answer one of mine. Person a accuses person b of violating consent. What evidence would you consider sufficent to show person b did not violate consent?

I never asked a question. I made a statement, which was that I was engaging in the act of presuming that you are someone who believes liars deserve to be punished.

With that aside, lets get down to business. Yes, they do need to verify that said unconsentual act happened to them. However, there are problems with issues pertaining to acts that occur when there is no concrete evidence on the matter or any witnesses. It's like accusing someone of verbally abusing you when no one is around. When it comes to rape, the rapes that are reported should be unconditionally investigated. With that said, it is important that both parties, when it comes to our justice system, cooperate with the authorities when it comes to garnering enough evidence for a case to be made. This includes cross-examinations being conducted, a verification of where each party was when the attack took place, a look at DNA evidence, rape kits, polygraph tests, and any other means of garnering evidence that is needed in order to come to a concrete empirical conclusion. You need to take accusations seriously and investigate them if you are going to come to valid conclusions, as opposed to allowing perpetrators to go free.

[–]Lrellok 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I am not misleading my readers, any more then any more then the author of "The racist tree" is missleading their readers. But if you are absolutely hellbent on an example, here, have one I stumbled across. https://np.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/3cvui3/uh_this_is_kinda_bullshit/cszpcbx?context=3

unconditionally investigated.

Define "Unconditionally". Does this mean ignoring due process?

a verification of where each party was when the attack took place, a look at DNA evidence, rape kits,

None of which would deliniate between two people having consentual sex and two people having non consentual sex.

Polygraph tests

I had thought this was common knowledge, but ok. http://www.apa.org/research/action/polygraph.aspx

So you have three proposals that would not differentiate between consentual and non consentual sex, and one proposal which the APA calls innacurate.

I think I like the standard of "If you cannot prove consent was violated, it wasn't." I am fine with taking accusations seriosly, in fact, my problem is that feminists seem to not be taking them seriosly enough.

[–]robotiger101 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I am not misleading my readers, any more then any more then the author of "The racist tree" is missleading their readers. But if you are absolutely hellbent on an example, here, have one I stumbled across.

What is normative is not necessarily valid. Nice try.

There is also no evidence to suggest that said claim is true.

Define "Unconditionally". Does this mean ignoring due process?

No, it means that an investigation needs to be undertaken in order to ensure that justice can indeed be served. No rights are being violated via bringing in someone for questioning. Keep in mind, only 2% to 8% of reported rapes have been proven to be false, so there is a good chance that the accuser is being honest, thus the need to investigate the claim in order to ensure that the truth can be revealed.

None of which would deliniate between two people having consentual sex and two people having non consentual sex.

You're presuming that consent is the default, then there is indeed no default. We do not know what had taken place, and we therefor need to investigate. You're claiming that one positive claim is immune from a burden of proof while another is not, the one that is indeed immune being the one of consent being given. We cannot know what occurred at that time, and we therefor need to investigate.

I had thought this was common knowledge, but ok. http://www.apa.org/research/action/polygraph.aspx

You're ignoring the fact that I used the term "et cetera", which insinuates that other factors are included which are too tedious to list. I am not qualified to make such assertions pertaining to anything further, so I am not going to make such statements.

[–]Lrellok 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You're presuming that consent is the default, then there is indeed no default. We do not know what had taken place, and we therefor need to investigate. You're claiming that one positive claim is immune from a burden of proof while another is not, the one that is indeed immune being the one of consent being given.

I am either missunderstanding you or I would rather not explore the alternitive. First, presumption of innocence means that not breaking the laws is the defualt assumption. If we do not know what took place, we assume no laws where broken until the contrary is proved. I am there fore contrasting a positive (laws where broken) with a negetive (no laws where broken).

Ect does not answer the question I asked. If person A says sex was consentual, and person B says sex was not consentual, what would satisfy you personally that sex was consentual.

[–]robotiger101 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

First, presumption of innocence means that not breaking the laws is the defualt assumption.

I'm suggesting that questioning the accused is necessary in order to establish what happened in many cases. This does not make the positive claim that he is guilty. It makes the positive claim that reported crimes ought to be taken seriously, and that investigating crimes such as rape and sexual assault are important so that victims can seek justice for what happened to them.

There are very few known ways in which one can prove that they had indeed been raped prior to reporting it to the police, which is why it is necessary for the police to take reports seriously in an effort to allow them to verify their claims.

If someone is raped, they and their rapist are both witnesses. If someone is accused of being a rapist, then any information pertaining to any sort of interactions they had with their alleged victim is relevant because they are a witness, or at least a potential witness. If they had sex with the person in question, yet did not violate consent, then their eye witness testimony would be relevant, and vice versa. However, it would be easy for them to lie about what transpired, so further questioning and a cross examination would be highly relevant and useful in determining what had transpired.

If there is physical evidence that consent did not take place, that would be enough to suggest that said rape did indeed take place, and that the eye witness account of the victim is what the actions should be based on. If there is no evidence, that does not mean that consent was not violated, and a further examination of various factors need to be taken into account. This would include questioning the accused and other relevant individuals, who may verify that the accuser and the accused had sex, which would then lead to a need to question whether or not consent was given or revoked, along with blood alcohol content.

How would you define lying about being raped? Would it be simply making unfounded claims or would it need to be proven that the entire instance was fabricated?

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

With that aside, lets get down to business. Yes, they do need to verify that said unconsentual act happened to them. However, there are problems with issues pertaining to acts that occur when there is no concrete evidence on the matter or any witnesses. It's like accusing someone of verbally abusing you when no one is around. When it comes to rape, the rapes that are reported should be unconditionally investigated. With that said, it is important that both parties, when it comes to our justice system, cooperate with the authorities when it comes to garnering enough evidence for a case to be made. This includes cross-examinations being conducted, a verification of where each party was when the attack took place, a look at DNA evidence, rape kits, polygraph tests, and any other means of garnering evidence that is needed in order to come to a concrete empirical conclusion. You need to take accusations seriously and investigate them if you are going to come to valid conclusions, as opposed to allowing perpetrators to go free.

that's a lot of words considering you're not actually saying anything at all

[–]Sour_Badger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You can't be that dense.

[–]robotiger101 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Say something constructive or don't say anything at all.

[–]Sour_Badger 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Funny thing is that one sentence said 10 fold what your incoherent ramblings stated.

[–]robotiger101 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I said that reported rapes need to be investigated unconditionally in order to ensure that the truth can be revealed, thus ensuring that justice can be served. Such investigations involve questioning the accused, among other things.

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I accuse you of stealing my wallet, and you are indeed in possession of my wallet, it needs to be proven that you and I consented to giving you my wallet. The same goes for consent with sex.

no. if you accuse me of stealing your wallet, and i am indeed in possession your wallet, it needs to be proven that you did NOT consent to giving me your wallet.

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points38 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

"Developers say their app will end 'misunderstandings' but rape support groups say they are wrongly suggesting rape is about disagreements about consent rather than a decision made by a rapist."

What about all the "you can rape without even knowing it" stuff? What about people thinking they had consent because a formal no was not given being rapists? Now you say that a rapist is only someone that makes a decision? I don't understand how these people think.

[–]dangerousopinions 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think I agree with feminists here, but for wildly different reasons and on wildly different terms.

Rapists do make a decision to rape. They do what they do knowing that it's wrong and do it anyway. They don't fail to understand when they've received consent or not, they don't care. I don't think all rapists necessarily see it that way, but I doubt all criminals view their acts as criminal either.

However, this in my opinion is a very strong argument against affirmative consent which is really designed to treat women like children and men like perpetrators. It very much does treat rape as an accidental crime, which it's not, unless you define rape as any slight unpleasantness during sex or a regrettable encounter. Affirmative, ongoing consent reverses the burden of proof and due process and requires men to read minds in order not to rape. Intent is left out of the equation entirely. How anyone could argue that you can have both affirmative consent definitions and only intentional rape is crazy since affirmative consent completely redefines rape and lowers the bar dramatically. It also does away with the idea that rape requires any kind of intent. They can't have their cake and eat it too. Either rape is a crime of intent or at very least, a crime that requires one partner to ignore the others objections or lack of consent, or it's a crime one can commit without knowing it, or without being objected to in any way shape or form. If it's the former, affirmative consent is only intended to criminalize sex women later regret and if it's the latter, rape does not require intent or even the knowledge that one has committed a rape.

[–]ezetemp -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Affirmative, ongoing consent reverses the burden of proof and due process and requires men to read minds in order not to rape.

Not in itself. Which of course makes your argument even stronger.

Affirmative consent does nothing to deal with intentional rape as in a word-against-word scenario it merely means an actual rapist has to describe why the victim was consenting rather than why the victim wasn't objecting. It's not a significant difference. It doesn't in itself shift the burden of proof, it merely changes what has to be proven. Still, considering what we know about court bias, it can still cause due process problems.

The specifics of what level of 'mind reading' will be required is of course up to the courts to eventually decide as the cowards making the laws don't dare try to codify the specific actions, which leaves a lot of people up to be victims of the judicial system until that gets codified. But I think we can assume that it would be technically illegal to have sex with anyone who is somewhat prudish or not very enthusiastic by nature.

If it's the former, affirmative consent is only intended to criminalize sex women later regret and if it's the latter, rape does not require intent or even the knowledge that one has committed a rape.

Unfortunately, I think it's very much a case of wanting to have cake and eating it as well. Combined with a lack of knowledge of how the law works and a lack of experience with human nature. Some think it will change the outcome in word-against-word cases, some think that it will shift focus and 'embarrasment' to the alleged perpetrator (who will basically just have to repeat the last porn flick he watched to the courtroom). They all fall victim to the largely female fantasy that non-verbal communications are universal and can be codified which would be required to, as you note, demonstrate mens rea in any case.

So I agree with you, for most, the intention is largely the former. But the result will be mostly the latter.

[–]dangerousopinions 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

it merely means an actual rapist has to describe why the victim was consenting rather than why the victim wasn't objecting. It's not a significant difference.

That is a very good example of reversed burden of proof. If applied to a prosecution the burden of proof is on the defendant to prove they received consent and not on the state to prove they didn't. In this same way it assumes guilt if no evidence to the contrary is presented. This is definitely a due process concern in that sense.

The burden of proof is supposed to be on the state. It is not the responsibility of the accused to prove innocence but the responsibility of the state to prove guilt. The defence will often try and prove innocence in response to the prosecution, but it's not required, especially if the state has failed to meet their burden of proof and provide a compelling case showing the guilt of the accused. This is a basic principle written into every constitution in the modern world.

I don't want to be a dick here, but I don't think you clearly understand the burden of proof since you gave me a textbook example of the reversal of the burden of prove and lack of due process as an example of the opposite.

[–]ezetemp -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't shift the burden of proof because the due process concerns are already there in word against word cases. Whether you have affirmative consent or not you can expect to have to account for your version of events to counter the alleged victims narrative. Technical evidence is still usually required either way to prove your presence and to some extent activities, but once it's been proven that there was sex the protections of burden of proof aren't quite as reliable.

[–]dangerousopinions 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You don't understand. "The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi) in the United States is the imperative on a party in a trial to produce the evidence that will shift the conclusion away from the default position to one's own position."

In the case of a criminal prosecution, the default position is innocence. If it is incumbent on the accused to prove his or her innocence rather than for the state to prove guilt, the burden of proof has been reversed. This is the case with affirmative consent which as a rule requires the accused to prove that they received consent and assumes a default position of guilt as a result, rather than requires the state to prove that consent was not given.

Currently, the wording of the law requires the accused prove they "took reasonable steps to ascertain whether the or not the complainant affirmatively consented". That is very much placing the burden of proof on the accused which ordinarily wouldn't be required to prove they did or didn't do anything.

Is the defense going to attempt to prove innocence? Yes, in most cases, but the default is innocence so it's not actually required of them under the law. This is the opposite with affirmative consent.

Here are some articles that address this issue:

http://time.com/3222176/campus-rape-the-problem-with-yes-means-yes/

http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.ca/2014/10/yes-means-yes-case-for-affirmative.html

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/yes-means-yes-affirmative-consent/

[–]ezetemp -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you have an overly hopeful view of what is regarded as proof in a rape trial. Once sexual activity has been proven, the rest can come down to completely unsupported claims. The prosecution doesn't have to prove that the alleged victim actually said 'no'. If the alleged victim is credible, it's enough that they claim they did. If you can't come up with an at least somewhat equivalent credible counter narrative, the default presumption of innocence won't be enough to win.

The second article you link describes the issue fairly well: 'Many rape trials adopt a “he-said-she-said” format. The sexual intercourse is not denied, but the parties have very different interpretations or recollections of what happened. An affirmative consent standard can do nothing to avoid the epistemic problems associated with this trial format: it will still come down to a question of whose account is more credible. All that the affirmative standard can do is eliminate certain lines of argument from the defendant’s arsenal. He can longer argue things like “I thought she was consenting because she said nothing” or “I thought she was consenting because she was so friendly to me earlier in the evening”.'

I don't think it's a good thing, but I think the significant parts of the erosion of the presumption of innocence have already happened. That date rape convictions can happen at all in he-said-she-said cases means you already can end up in a situation where the defendant has to provide, if not proof, at least a credible account supporting his position.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"Developers say their app will end 'misunderstandings' but rape support groups say they are wrongly suggesting rape is about disagreements about consent rather than a decision made by a rapist."

Funny. Wasn't there a survey that asked women whose initial responses constituted an affirmative to being raped? I believe around half said it was really a miscommunication, and another quarter said no crime had been committed.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Since when do feminist give a fuck about what women think?

[–]Blutarg 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mind-blowing, isn't it? Feminists have spent years pushing "yes means yes" but when someone tries to document the yes feminists say "what are you talking about?". What a bunch of useless tossers.

[–]zyk0s 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's about moving the goalposts. That's what all discussion about rape has been over the past half a century. It's important people think of rape as a violent attack but that it be legislated as a lack of communication. The reaction of these groups is just the latest effort in that direction.

[–]Rikvidr 52 points53 points54 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Lines like this one are troubling:

Among critics of the app is the Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Centre, which slammed it for apparently showing rape is the result of misunderstanding rather than an attack.

So, they're saying that the app is a bad idea, claiming that it categorizes rape as a misunderstanding. Meanwhile, they're saying all rapes are attacks. There are absolutely rapists waiting in parking lots for women, but there's also rapes that happen because both parties were too drunk or high. These RSASC people are willing to lump all rapes in together a "vicious attacks", but are outraged at the app for even asserting that there could be rapes that aren't premeditated rapes. Hypocrisy strikes again.

[–]AloysiusC 43 points44 points45 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But it is constantly argued that rape can happen because men don't understand consent and need to be taught not to rape.

So this is how they bait everyone:

1) Assert rape can happen by accident and as a result of a misunderstanding.

2) Use that to spread the notion that rape is everywhere and implement massive re-education and thought-programming action. Nobody can be sure they haven't been raped and no man can be sure he isn't a rapist.

3) Once that's settled, re-classify every rape as a deliberate attack and use that to .... I'm not looking forward to 4)

Basically they're shifting the goalposts so that, at all times, men are on the defensive and women are in control. On the one hand, rape is the most terrible form of attack and rapists are as bad as murderers and pure evil. On the other hand, it can happen so easily that a man could just do it any time without having the slightest intention to do so. They'll pick either of those depending on what supports their narrative best.

[–]Pathfinder24 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but there's also rapes that happen because both parties were too drunk or high.

That isn't how consent works. People are accountable for their actions; since when does alcohol reduce your social responsibilities? In no other facet of law are there special accomodations made for people who choose to intoxicate themselves and do things which they regret.

This is just another tool of control given to women under the fictitious belief that they are always victims.

[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

there's also rapes that happen because both parties were too drunk or high.

Both? You mean they raped each other?

[–]dangerousopinions 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are absolutely rapists waiting in parking lots for women, but there's also rapes that happen because both parties were too drunk or high.

But there aren't rapes like this. This is a bad sexual experience, probably for both parties. There is certainly nonconsensual sex I.e rape that results from one party being incapacitated or nearly so and the other party taking advantage, but the situation you describe would require that both parties raped each other which is absurd.

but are outraged at the app for even asserting that there could be rapes that aren't premeditated rapes.

There really aren't unintentional rapes if you're defining rape in any reasonable way. Under the existing definition of consent, rape is not an accidental crime that one could commit without knowing it. And I believe firmly that that definition reflects reality. Could a rapist not consider themselves a rapist and still have committed rape under the current definition of consent (no means no), absolutely. But the standard is reasonable and doesn't require one party to read the mind of another either.

The problem here is not that the people are defining rape unreasonably but that they want two conflicting views of rape to exist simultaneously. I agree with them, rape is generally a crime of intent and not one that occurs by accident. But it's impossible to define rape that way and then say that affirmative consent is necessary to prevent rape. If rape is a crime of intent or one that requires no consideration for the consent of the other partner, then affirmative consent is pointless and only serves to trap non-rapists in a losing situation. But they can't argue that affirmative consent is reasonable and necessary and then say all rape is an aggressive, intentional crime. If they believed that to be true they wouldn't support affirmative consent definitions since they will do nothing to reduce the likelihood of rape or even increase the likelihood of a successful prosecution.

[–]wanderer779 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

yeah the argument is pretty funny. It's almost like she thinks the developer did this to make a political point. The developer is just serving a market that feminists created with their crazy laws. He's in it for the money. Instead of running around shrieking she should be wondering why people would pay for this, and again it's not to make a statement about rape.

[–]Blutarg 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"It's almost like she thinks the developer did this to make a political point."

She's projecting.

[–]Electroverted 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Among critics of the app is the Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Centre, which slammed it for apparently showing rape is the result of misunderstanding rather than an attack.

Which is exactly what happens when you blur the line between violent sexual assault and young adults sleeping around and making bad romantic decisions. That is completely on you, not them, and this is only going to get worse for you.

Does anyone else think they thought at face value this was low hanging fruit, which is why they went after it? Like, "men won't fight these changes." Really? You're telling men that drunk sex, spontaneous sex and aggressive sex is now considered rape? And they'd just sit there and say okay? What world do they live in...

[–]Z027 23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

can we take a minute to imagine using this app

you get a girl home from the bar,

"hey, wait a second babe, i need to take a video of you saying you want to have sex with me, because bitches be trippin'."

[–]schmeer_spear 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Hey girl, you know wanna make a sex tape? I mean.. Consent tape. Yeah gurl.. Consent tape uhnnnnn"

[–]The1KrisRoB 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also can you sign these 3 forms of consent, plus my nan has to watch as a witness too just in case you change you mind mid coitus. It used to be ok for my room mate to watch, but apparently because he's a dude then it becomes gang rape.

[–]CeruleaAzura 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd imagine nobody would be having sex after that. It makes sense as an idea but how much would that kill the mood?

[–]KickedToTheTop 34 points35 points36 points 11 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link

I realised something today after reading about this app. "Yes means yes" laws are not about helping women to defend against rape (having sex with an incapacitated person is already illegal in most places). They are a social reaction to the breakdown of monogamous culture and delayed parenthood, and the years of meaningless (non-procreative) sex that are sandwiched by adolescence and parenthood.

The reality is, people who are anxious, stressed and unhappy with their sex lives, men and women both, think "yes means yes" is the best way to stop some men getting all the fun out of sex (sleeping around endlessly) while some men get none, and of dealing with the fact that most women feel varying degrees of regret and anxiety about random, meaningless sex. The alliance works because the men are actually happy to see sexually successful men get labelled rapists, and the women are keen for more legal, social and moral pressures that will make successful men stay with them and not just enjoy meaningless sex with them.

After all, it's not a coincidence that the people getting repeatedly Title IX'd are attractive, successful students - and similarly with high profile cases in sports etc. In our modern culture, being a good looking, athletic man who sleeps with many women is converging with a "rapist" stereotype - it's incredible that we don't even realise how senseless this is, that the men who least need to rape anyone (because women are throwing themselves at them) are the ones most likely to be thought of as rapists!

"Yes means yes" is not about rape - it is about psychologically clamping down on the sexually successful, in the hope of creating a more balanced playing field for men who have not found partners.

If I'm correct about this, then I predict that apps like this will not work - the wider society will not allow them to. Equally, things like recording the goings on in your private property, to self-protect, will be banned for all but the richest people - the trick only works if the underlying psychological fear of having meaningless sex with numerous women is strong.

[–]Blutarg 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

"the breakdown of monogamous culture and delayed parenthood"

Which feminism is largely responsible for.

[–]GSstreetfighter 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm old enough to know that this is very, very true.

[–]KickedToTheTop -5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not necessarily. People are delaying parenthood because they live longer lives and the world is overcrowded.

[–]BassBeerNBabes 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

People are delaying parenthood because it's a better decision financially, as well as sexual intelligence is growing rapidly. It helps to live longer, but being stable is also promoting a longer life with less stress anyways.

To u/Blutarg: I agree, feminism is partially responsible. With women in the workplace beyond their 20's, and men being more responsible with their seed, child-bearing years has gone from late teens to mid thirties in just a few decades.

Not a feminist, an "equalist". I think all of this is a good thing for our society.

[–]warsie 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The thing is, Iran has those same sort of demographic changes and would you say 'feminists' are responsible for that?

[–]dangerousopinions 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

One of the things that is rarely discussed in all of this hysteria, is that consensual sex has inherent risks, considerable ones. It can cause emotional trauma, unwanted pregnancy, disease, depression, anxiety, conflict etc. It can also be none of those things and be a wonderful experience. Which one of those experiences it will be is largely dependent on the individual, and this is often lost in the sex positivity message, which seems to have morphed into "you should be fucking different people constantly" rather than "you should be doing what makes you happy without shame or judgement".

I think the message needs to be different. I am not pro traditionalism, but some people will be more comfortable than others having many partners or more casual encounters, and for some people it will cause a lot of strife for them. I think we need to encourage people to acknowledge their own feelings about sex and act accordingly rather than pretend it's a one size fits all and that if it doesn't fit, you're being closed minded or uptight.

For me personally, casual sex doesn't make me happy. I don't feel ashamed by it, I don't come from a traditionalist family and I don't have negative views of sex, but I also don't like sex without a minimum level of comfort and familiarity with my partner. I assume there are many like me. For those people, the current sex positive message is a bad one. One that suggests there is something wrong with them if they're not enjoying many casual partners. I don't mean to suggest that all sex positive people feel this way, but that particular message is common enough and it's misguided and causing problems.

This is tough territory to navigate though. On the one hand there is valid criticism of treating casual sex as a one size fits all activity. On the other hand, reasonable rhetoric in opposition is likely to attract unwanted traditionalists and sex negative groups and individuals.

[–]KickedToTheTop 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup, you're totally right about that. When I was younger, I was a very one-night-stand person. I acted on that instinct often, and rarely had long-term girlfriends.

But the problem remains that many men feel some degree of envy towards typical "shaggers" (I mean, shit, I feel it myself sometimes to be honest), while some women resent sexually successful men who are willing to have sex with them, but not carry things on from there. And this is what I think "yes means yes" is about.

[–]dangerousopinions 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you. I was really just addressing the issue of the extreme "sex positive"* message that has become popular.

*I put that in quotes because I think the sex positive message has been highjacked to some extent. I don't think many of the people who promote sex positivity, particularly early on, were encouraging hook up culture for everyone or a one size fits all approach to sex and relationships.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep, I'm also about the only guy in my group of friends that prefers not to have one night stands. All of them prefer to sleep around casually. Like you though I actually don't mind their habits. Sometimes it impresses me how often they can get laid with a stranger. I'm fortunate that they also don't judge me and my preference, so I was fortunate that sex positivity where I'm from seems to be "do what you want (safely) without fear or judgement".

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with all of the above. In the UK you are allowed to video in your own home. You can place a hidden camera anywhere in your house if you have good reason even the bedroom. To protect yourself from a false allegation is probably a good reason. But you are not allowed to use the resulting tapes for a sexual purpose and you cannot show anyone unless the court demands them for example to prove your innocence. It is not a crime to record. The Police video strip searches and the toilet area in the cells at the police station for security . You can do the same. But you must not view the resulting video for sexual pleasure.

[–]warsie 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Counter: I would say those cases are reported on the most, because well they have the most cultural capital - fraternities and athletes have more social capital on universities, especially given the whole 'fraternities are social networking for future business/politics' thing. And their connection with the dean and whatnot.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Yes means yes" is not about rape - it is about psychologically clamping down on the sexually successful, in the hope of creating a more balanced playing field for men who have not found partners.

You have it backwards. The purpose is to separate AF/BB. They don't give a flying fuck about guys who can't find partners lol.

[–]questionnmark 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You could be right in a way. I always thought the end result of sexual liberation was something akin to casual polyamory. The reason for this is that I believe a woman's enjoyment of sex is related to the quality of the source of the sperm outside of a relationship. In a casual sexual encounter the guy only brings his genetics to the table -- I.E. is he tall, handsome, symmetrical etc. Even things like the strength of the erection and his 'stamina' in bed are tests of his genetic worth.

One thing that I believe feminists hate is the fact that the casual sex environment gives some men enormous power. 80% of men are 'below average' according to okcupid. If you're one of the 20% who 'aren't' then there are more women who want have sex with you than there are men that are competing for these women. The high end of the sexual market is just a few % of men having sex with a significantly large number of women.

[–]KickedToTheTop 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If attractive men develop reservations about having sex with women who are below their expectations, those women will either have to go without sex, or hook-up with someone less attractive. So in a very odd way, I can see how it might actually do something in that regard.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]augizzz999 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Triggered*

[–]dewse 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm also outraged that this app even has to exist.

[–]Imnotmrabut 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm pissed off that I wasn't able to get support for it when I suggested it back in 2012 as the Rape Culture Hysteria bandwagon was running down hill at speed!

“When religion and politics travel in the same cart, the riders believe nothing can stand in their way. Their movements become headlong - faster and faster and faster. They put aside all thoughts of obstacles and forget the precipice does not show itself to the man in a blind rush until it's too late.” ― Frank Herbert

[–]T2112 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately things needs to get worse before solutions are found it seems.

[–]Imnotmrabut 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Necessity is the mother of invention - and all them college feminists will now find it's a necessity to invent a Vibrator that Pays on a date!

The number of young guys, pre college, saying they will only date none college women and off campus is going to bite!

[–]T2112 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm 24 amd refuse to date any girls in college and generally my own age. I have been taking this time to cougar hunt as I enjoy thier company more.

The things that younger women say today really make me think that we have failed as a society.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]p3ngwin 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I can think of no legitimate reason to oppose something like this...

Oh i can think of a HUGE one.

Women no longer able to absolve themselves of personal responsibility when they regret sex the night before.

Now they'll have to live with the consequences of their mistakes, with no scapegoat to maintain their deluded sense of "integrity".

[–]dangerousopinions 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A law that criminalizes the normal behaviour of the majority of the population is not a good law. This is true of affirmative consent. Affirmative consent is a good suggestion for people with new partners who want to be cautious and courteous, but as a law, it makes what most married people and people in relationships do a crime. If the bar is that low, it's clearly a bad law that can be easily abused. Various legal associations have said exactly that and warned of the potential abuses. It's also likely that it would be used in a pointed fashion much like drug laws. The majority of white americans have used drugs and many do so with regularity, but most of those in prison for these crimes are poor black men. The same will be true of affirmative consent laws which will leave many of us unaffected but will be used to abuse younger and poorer demographics when it's convenient to do so.

[–]ExpendableOne 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If this became widespread, it would pretty much make any guy who cheats on his girlfriend and every guy who has sex with a girl who is cheating on her boyfriend a rapist. A girl who is cheating on her boyfriend will not want video evidence of her cheating on him, therefore making the consent unverifiable. A guy who is cheating on his girlfriend will not want video evidence of him cheating on her, therefore making the consent unverifiable.

[–]weapawn 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Judge: How do you know she gave you consent? Me: She kept yelling "Fuck me harder!" Neighbor: I can testify to that. Judge: Case dismissed.

Also, women have no problem saying no. Don't believe me? Try sticking your finger in her butt.

[–]Catcher_in_the_Eye 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

women have no problem saying no. Don't believe me? Try sticking your finger in her butt.

Anecdotally, this doesn't reliably produce a "no" response, as some people are into that.

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i've done this tons of times, and only gotten a 'no' once

[–]BassBeerNBabes 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're a goddamn genius.

[–]weapawn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you good sir.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I usually time that for near orgasm to push them over the edge. Only complaints I've received after using this with multiple women?

My fingernails had gotten too long, and or, too many fingers.

Each girl is a puzzle, but the basics are the same.

[–]scanspeak 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I propose any guys or girls participating in sex now wear a GoPro on a headband and record the entire event. It can be a new fashion trend.

[–]runnerrun2 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I already do this.

[–]MrWinks 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I looked into the app. It requires $5 a year (subscription), isn't in the app store (apple, anyway), and requires signing up with phone number and email address. I'm skeptical and don't wanna give out my personal information.

BUT. I still want this app, so I might find ways around the bullshit just so I can grab it.

[–]Captaincastle 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It'd be super funny if this is a false flag and they're just collecting personal info and sub money from MRAs lol

[–]MrWinks 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Truth be told, it's very likely collecting data but that it's not just directly in the app store is what's making me pause.

[–]Sukasa 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Given that the App store can simply pull apps at any time, it's not surprising that this isn't there.

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

just use your phone to videotape the whole of every sexual encounter. make sure you get affirmative consent beforehand, and as long as consent isn't withdrawn at any point during, you're golden. if consent is withdrawn, you stop. job done.

also has the handy side benefit of your being able to show it to anyone if she starts spreading lies about you.

[–]MrWinks 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Have you seen the art project by Mattress Girl? The one where she shows a video reenactment of the entire encounter? That was rape, but you wouldn't know it if she didn't tell you.

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

no i haven't watched it, but i thought that nungesser was innocent? some porno she makes as an 'art project' isn't the true facts of the case, or even a factual account of the events of the evening, it's just a porno

[–]MrWinks 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm sorry if it wasn't clear, but I was being sarcastic. Her intent of the video was as I said, but my implication was that even though it was ridiculous it was an argument that is given merit: Even if you legally recorded the encounter like in that video it could still be rape because she can argue unseen circumstances.

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ah i see, sorry i've been hanging out in /r/changemyview so i didn't get the sarcasm. this is why i said

make sure you get affirmative consent beforehand

meaning get it on the tape. as long as they're fully awake and alert, and clearly not under duress, and then they're an active participant during, then you should be ok

[–]denyjunctionfunction 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

'It seems the creator is more concerned with the reputations of perpetrators than the well-being of survivors of sexual assault.

Lovely comment. They don't seem to understand that the creators made this to protect people from falsely being accused and/or misunderstandings, not people who actually rape. Unless they are saying "consent doesn't matter, it is all sexual assault".

[–]CzechoslovakianJesus 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

consent doesn't matter, it is all sexual assault.

Sounds like a lot of what Feminists are saying.

[–]mushybees 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems the creator is more concerned with the reputations of perpetrators than the well-being of survivors of sexual assault.

should read: it seems the creator is more concerned with the reputations of the falsely accused

[–]Meistermalkav 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Simple: This is great.

Why?

Because it helps without following narrative.

Look at all the criticism, it basically goes, "Well, I think the idea is a step in the right decision, but it does not support the narrative we are trying to tell. " "Great app, sad they do not follow our definition of rape. "

I am sorry. The web devellopers went, and actively attempted to FIX the fucking problem, instead of waiting for years and having a societal discourse.

The devellopers care more about rape victims then the whole fucking lot of feminist critics of their app. Their only fault is that they are not following the feminist narrative.

A fault which I can completely forgive.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The devellopers care more about rape victims then the whole fucking lot of feminist critics of their app. Their only fault is that they are not following the feminist narrative.

that's because Feminism needs rape to exist...they want more rape, not less. That's why they want to device everything they can under the umbrella of rape so they can build a political platform on it.

Make rape go away overnight and Feminism basically loses their only big gun.

[–]Imnotmrabut 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is very True! Feminism has needed controversy, false data, Woozles and Moral Panics to survive. Also crass bias claiming all are equal based upon political dogma and not science or reality.

It's funny watching the Cult Implode.

[–]texasjoe 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I thought they wanted affirmative consent... This is the free market's answer to facilitate sex.

Do they really just want no sex to happen at all? I'm starting to think these folks are puritans in sheeps' clothing.

[–]MaestroLogical 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What they seem to have actually wanted was an easy way to gain power over all men. Consent never had anything to do with it.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

'This app seems to completely misunderstand sexual consent as an ongoing process rather than a one-off decision.

Then record yourself relinquishing consent, and/or make a panic button app for your phone.

[–]PrimesteFericera 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And they wonder why nobody is invests in their cause or tries to help them. A designer takes time to make an app, potentially useful color changing nail polish, or put a female in a game, and they get bullied and blogged into oblivion because nothing is ever good enough.

The nail polish and app aren't a useful tool made available if wanted, it's victim blaming. The character is either too scantily dressed or not womanly enough. Their entire worldview is about fighting battles by tearing people down and feeling part of something historical and "big", not about actually finding solutions, or creating anything.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh my God. Chappelle was right.

[–]Terry_Bruce_Dick 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course he was. Also, he wasn't the first person to say it.

[–]duganaok 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Myth of miscommunication" like women have never verbally agreed to have sex and then make a false rape accusation. If that is their argument then the app would be useless. It's disgusting.

[–]Stephen1985 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Critics say it suggests rape is due to misunderstanding not sexual violence

Im willing to bet that 70-90% of rapes are due to misunderstanding rather than forced sexual intercource

[–]cajunrevenge 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a handy thing for telling which feminists are full of shit and which ones are sane. At the least you would think feminists would be happy because nothing says affirmative consent like "hey come take a picture on this app and say you want to have sex with me".

[–]Peytoria 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats literally what they've been wanting. What the fuck

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope if this gets a lot of use that the videos are public available. Image all these super awkward people talking to a phone camera about all the thing they are about to do. It will be so amazingly awkward.

[–]TrevorNWhite 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Isn't this what they wanted? Christ on a cracker.

[–]scanspeak 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This outrage exposes the reality of feminist ideology. They view ALL heterosexual sex as rape and won't be happy until sex is outlawed completely.

[–]General_Fear 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"But after I agreed to have sex. I changed my mind."

All of these tools and video tapes and contract means chit because according to the law the woman has a right to changer her mind. Sex can be revoked at anytime. And then it will be your word against hers'. She squeezes out a few crocodile tears. Guess who they will believe.

[–]RockFourFour 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

THIS IS YOUR FAULT, YOU DUMB FUCKING CUNTS.*

*This is the exact scenario where calling someone a cunt is perfectly cromulent.

EDIT: So apparently, calling these people cunts isn't proper even though they are about as cunty as a person could possibly be. Keep it classy, guys.

[–]dangerousopinions 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not sure why you're being downvoted, except for language. It is their fault. They lobbied for these standards and they were the ones that wanted to define and treat rape as an accidental crime that occurred as a result of not understanding consent. Now in many places that's how it's viewed and treated and they're trying to argue, even under the standard, that rape is not a crime of misunderstanding but a form of intentional violence. I happen to agree with the latter and would assume the MRM does as well. But if it's a crime of intent, affirmative consent has no place and they can't have it both ways.

[–]mochacola 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very much this. Someone who understands what's going on.

[–]Sukasa -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Keeping it classy generally preempts the use of ad hominem and attacks against the person

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  • Insults

  • Ad Hominem Attacks

Those are two different things. "You're a cunt" is an insult. "Your argument is wrong because you're a cunt" is an ad hom.

[–]Brookface 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Why would ANYONE be upset about this? Explain. Offer ANY argument that this hurts anybody. Go.

[–]Imnotmrabut 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It hurts the Bunny Boilers! 8¬0

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's right there in the article.

It isn't about actually helping the victims, it's about controlling the narrative.

Never mind that a big part of said narrative was (and will continue to be) that lots of men are rapists and don't know it.

[–]ethos1983 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Politics aside, I can see one potential problem.

Man and woman hook up, agree to have sex, use app.

Man slips it into her ass.

Woman does not want this, yells for him to stop, tries to get him to stop.

Man continues.

"But Officer, it was entirely consensual. Here's the proof."

[–]mochacola 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why would that be a problem? Rape is rape. A husband can't pull out their marriage certificate when his wife claim she was raped or suffered domestic abuse by her husband. Why would an app have more power than a marriage?

I see the app being useful to detect nutcase. If a guy pulls out this app and his date get pissed, it's a good sign to run away from that woman. If the woman laughs at the ridiculousness of it. Then, it's great time guaranteed.

[–]ethos1983 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because a marriage certificate isn't consent, as has been repeatedly established by the courts. This is consent, and the few seconds it records isn't enough to sit down and list everything that person is consenting to. Thus, as a false rape preventer, it fails because it goes right back to a he-said, she - said argument. Only this time, more "evidence" is on the side of the accused.

[–]mochacola 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I did not say marriage is consent for abuse. You missed my point. When evidence of violent abuse is present, whatever that app said, would be thrown out the window. Even marriage, which carries far more weight than an app sign off, can be discarded. So, it would not be a problem.

The app is not just a false rape preventer, it is a useless app because rapist will rape, which is why all these "miscommunication of consent" is b.s.

It also offers no protection for the accused either because the court will not consider it as evidence. Feminists hate the app only because it leaves breadcrumbs to take away their rights to freely recount events they way they see fit.

[–]Scimitar66 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is this not proof that in reality feminists are only interested in securing power for themselves?

[–]miroku000 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They claim the videos are only available with a court order? That makes the app rater useless for colleges then... Since they do everything they can to not get it into court.

[–]Griever114 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I really wonder why any male would even bother with sex anymore. It really just doesnt seem worth it. God forbid I end up divorced or a widower, I would just devote time to my kids and hobbies.

Sex just doesnt seem worth it anymore.

I feel sorry for any male going into high school/college and having to start dealing with this shit.

It sounds like we will really end up with:

Do you consent to this thrust Y/N? Do you consent to this thrust Y/N? Do you consent to this thrust Y/N? Do you consent to this thrust Y/N?

[–]zacktheking 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gay ftw.

[–]SuperDadMan 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fems: why do men always have to fix everything? Why can't they just sympathize with us?

[–]kragshot 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"It's Not About the Nail," man.

[–]Wargame4life 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I honestly cant think of two words that have less impact than "feminists outraged"

might as well write "toddlers crying over"

[–]wanderer779 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

hilarious comments from the feminists as expected. Obviously a real rapist won't use it, so why should it be a problem? Unless you are sticking to their definition of rape which seems to be that a rape occurs when a woman says it did.

[–]mochacola 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

"Do you like to rape? There's an app for that."

It's also funny how this group remain open to welcome ideas being challenged but feminist groups only accept posts that agrees with them.

[–]wazzup987 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Start accusing women under this law. it gender nuetral. does she give you a less than satisfying fuck? its rape, can she prove consent? doesn't matter its how you feel after the act. seriously lets see how feminist react when women start getting watoningly accused. see how fast that law change after mattress girl 2.0 gets kick out some prestigious college.

Fuck it i am so fucking done with feminists

[–]p3ngwin 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

small problem though, men "can't be raped".

For anyone wondering what the law says on this, according to the FBI, who recently (2011) brought their rules for rape cases in line with the majority of states... "The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim."

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/attorney-general-eric-holder-announces-revisions-to-the-uniform-crime-reports-definition-of-rape

You can thank the feminists for that one, literally redefining rape in a way that women are literally incapable of rape according to national law. How's that for gender equality ?

http://www.polity.co.uk/investigatinggender/blog/post.aspx?id=135

[–]manofsea 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let them rage about stupid shit. They will waste time and money on a common sense app, just like they did on the date rape test nail polish. They will continue to remove consent from women and destroy gender relations.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a great tool, but unfortunately I suspect it won't catch on, because the men who need it think it won't happen to them and their partners will treat it like the turn-off it is.

[–]xereeto 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus, all feminist shit aside for a moment... Could you imagine actually trying to get someone to use that thing? It'd seriously kill the mood. I get the point of why it was made and while it is a good idea, FUCK it would be awkward to put into practice. And that's completely disregarding that it implies you think your hookup's gonna cry rape.

[–]iNVWSSV 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you mean every guy doesn't have a camera hidden in his bedroom?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sounds like a good app, buuut Its the DailyMail, we should link to higher quality news sources than tabloids :/

[–]ChasingLamely 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen it reported elsewhere, but you're right; the Daily Mail should never be your source for anything. It's almost as reliable as The Onion.

[–]skinnyguy699 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree that it's a positive step in the right direction, but I also agree with critics who say consent is an ongoing process.

[–]zomgitsduke 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a great idea and all. However, this did come to mind as a potential issue and should at least be considered:

People can retract consent during sex. I know it doesn't happen much, but this may be used against anyone if they retract mid consent...

[–]IBdeadshadow 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If there is less rape than feminazis cant get people to rally behind them if there is more rape they can use that as the means to an end.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait, you mean the camera on the phone?

[–]Stephen1985 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok how about a video consent to start and then and audio recording of the act? best i can come up with for total protection.

I know there would still be ways to fuck with it but its the best i can come up with.

[–]Savipalooza 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

A recording of someone giving consent is worthless. Consent can be withdrawn at any time.

Edit: Furthermore, if consent is withdrawn after the video has been recorded, rapists now have a better chance of getting people to side with them. They'll just show people the video, and they'll think the victim is making false accusations.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Granted, in the mind of a feminist it is, but anyone sane will look at that just like they look at porn and go yup, they're consenting alright.

[–]Jokkerb 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For once I would like to see the femrage crowd suggest a solution that they could live with instead of a chorus of whargarbl and outrage.

[–]ChaosOpen 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They've done that, remember #killallmen? That is the caliber of people we are dealing with, the sooner people stop listening to feminists, the better.

[–]modern_rabbit 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but rape support groups say they are wrongly suggesting rape is about disagreements about consent rather than a decision made by a rapist.

Wait, did they just pull a 180? And they don't see the irony here???

[–]wazzup987 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its funny it like they don't realize how AC laws undermine their other positions. Like women strong powerful and independent until it comes to sex and alcohol then they have no agency what's so ever and it all men's fualt

[–]Lachtan 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least the source is credible.

[–]cauldron_bubble 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What about if at the beginning of the sexual encounter both parties are into it, but then as things progress, one of them changes their mind? I've been in that situation, and fortunately the girl I was with understood and stopped when I felt uncomfortable, but what if she had recorded me agreeing to have sex and then decided to use that recording to cover her ass after going too far and perhaps injuring me? And what's to stop the type of scumbags who prey on vulnerable people from getting them to agree to have sex and then being too rough with them? If the person they convinced changes their mind partway into the act, they are literally screwed, because there's a recording of them agreeing to have sex.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This app will do nothing. People will just say they were forced to because the other party threatened them.

[–]theelectricmayham 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's about time someone actually drafts the love contract Dave Chappellle foretold

[–]Hanzo44 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not seeing any outrage. Some soap boxing to garner attention maybe.

[–]elborracho420[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This app can't definitively prove consent though. Any court that believes it does would be absurd in that belief.

[–]bsutansalt 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I much prefer my app idea, which I haven't been able to get made for cheap/free....

When your heart rate via a smartwatch or Fitbit crosses a defined threshold, the phone's camera and/or microphone automatically starts recording. This can be used for sexual encounters, interactions with police, getting mugged, or any number of other uses. Bonus points if the video/audio is automatically immediately streamed or uploaded to some kind of storage or streaming website online. Dropbox and Youtube are good candidates.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe pornhub?

[–]robotiger101 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The app is useless, mainly due to the fact that it fails to provide evidence for various relevant factors, such as whether or not the victim was drunk, whether or not the victim was coerced into giving verbal consent for the sake of acquiring a recording, whether or not consent was revoked after the recording was made, et cetera.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's actually supposed to be able to detect inebriation level, according to the creators.

[–]GSstreetfighter 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ascertaining sobriety could be very valuable on campus, as too many are already being caught in that net.

[–]Jack92783 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I fucking hate these stories.

"X outraged over Y which provides an option to Z"

Look, if you don't want to use the app... don't use the fucking app. Why is this news?

It's like CNN with their fucking "Twitter trends of the day" segment. I honestly don't care, how about you show some actual news and not what a bunch of idiots with free time on their hands happened to make up to bitch about today?

[–]scamp41 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I can see a legitimate argument against this app as it would not take withdrawn consent into account, and it could be argued that using this app enables someone to do whatever they want afterwards since they have physical evidence that consent was given.

[–]SuperDadMan -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. Not only is it ridiculous to need an app like this to begin with, but honestly for a rapist, is it easier to forcibly rape someone or to convince them to give consent on an app? This just looks like a rapists best friend to me... maybe not a violent, attacks you in the woods rapist, but definitely a manipulative, pressuring rapist.

[–]iamcrazyjoe -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Completely agree, this is an actual date rapist's friend.

[–]deegan87 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate to agree with the crazies in any way, but I do see genuine dangerous potential in this.

What if the couple is having sex and the mag starts choking or hitting the woman while she screams for him to stop?

That has become rape, consent tape be damned.

[–]skankstro 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This can be a dangerous app. Because consent can change really at any time before and during, it's like a video contract for sex.

As someone who was falsely accused of rape, I like the idea but there's gotta be a way to maintain the knowledge that they both consent.

[–]Tmomp -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Moderate business contracts take several rounds of clarifying what important terms mean, duration, etc.

Someone thinks a contract involving sex, risk of disease, pregnancy, etc can be worked out in a few seconds of talking to a camera?

I guess the app works in the fantasy where the laws motivating it work. People believed prohibiting alcohol would stop drinking too. I wish they wouldn't impose their fantasies on others through the legal system. I wish they spent as much time thinking of what unintended results their laws might create.

[–]TacoNinjaSkills 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If anything this points out how ridiculous these affirmative consent laws/policies can be. IMHO the best way to fight them (once passed) is to follow them to the letter. When women start complaining about them maybe the will change.

[–]wazzup987 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

dont for get about reporting every 'rape' a woman commit these laws are gender neutral.

[–]GoogleOgvorbis -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The apps are stupid anyway. A woman can simply say she was coerced into making the video. She can say that the man simply did acts to her to which she did not agree. It's a total waste of time.

[–]outcastded -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are so many things weird about this app. First of all, you don't need an app to record a consent video. All phones have video cameras nowadays. Has there been a problem with people making consent videos that were not good enough? I doubt it. I doubt a lot of people have been making videos with consent in the first place.

Making a video of consent sounds more or less like a variation of the joke that "people should have a written and signed consent before sex." Writing a consent is probably simpler.

As I understand it, some of the criticism is that someone can still be raped, even though she/he consented at first. It's a valid point. If a person changed his/hers mind mid-foreplay or mid-sex, that person should be respected. That video doesn't protect against such a scenario. All false allegations could probably just change to "I changed my mind mid sex, and then I was raped."

The only real proof would be to have constant video surveillance, with sound, in the bedroom.

[–]UndeadTurning -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

But what if they say no after the recording, and someone rapes them or something? Is the court just gonna let it go because they said yes on camera? What a stupid app.

[–]yelirbear 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

That's where I can see this being controversial. Consent can be revoked for any time before or during sex so consent beforehand is not the whole story. That being said, as we saw in a study a short while back, most "rape" is from misunderstanding so this tool is a way for both parties to really discuss the consent beforehand. Feminists keep going on about wanting to talk about consent so they should be celebrating this tool.

[–]BassBeerNBabes -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

consent can be revoked [...] during sex

What? No. If you're mid-plowing and decide you fucked up, you done fucked up. But it was OK at the time the dick went in, so it's a bit late to say you didn't want it.

[–]yelirbear 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't mean retracting previous consent, I mean revoke consent to continue. You can stop at any time you want. If mid sex you choose you don't want to continue you can revoke consent and stop.

[–]BassBeerNBabes 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

OK, I'm just gonna bullet it for you:

  • "this is a bad idea..." is cue to just stop, also probably a sign she isn't into the sex. Bummer bro.

  • "too late..." is just douchey.

  • She consented earlier, your dick went in. She didn't like it. Too bad, she made the choice. Still not rape.

[–]yelirbear 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Where I am (Canada) this is the definition for consent:

273.1 (1) Subject to subsection (2) and subsection 265(3), “consent” means, for the purposes of sections 271, 272 and 273, the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.

(e) the complainant, having consented to engage in sexual activity, expresses, by words or conduct, a lack of agreement to continue to engage in the activity

I'm pretty sure it's the same in the US. By law you can retract consent at any time, as it should be.

Also, to reiterate, I don't me retracting previous consent to make the entire session rape. I mean retracting consent to continue. If someone says stop you must stop but that doesn't mean everything before is rape.

[–]BassBeerNBabes -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is bogus. Obviously to just keep fucking is just rude and inconsiderate. But to call any recanting post-coitus change of mind "rape" is stupid. It's a life choice.

[–]yelirbear 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay I still think you're confused so I'll try to explain this in a different way.

If two people are having sex and person A says they want to stop then they must stop. If person B forces to continue then it is rape.

If two people are having sex and person A says they want to stop then they must stop. If person B stops everything is fine and no crime has been commit.

In summary; stop means stop.

[–]Crowbar_Abortion -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Introducing the "D.E.N.N.I.S." app. When your on our app, your always recorded.

[–]BruceCampbell123 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There would be outrage over something like this these days.

[–]eggoChicken -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

False rape accusers aside. This app is kind of stupid. It's still rape even if consent is given and then 20 seconds later she changes her mind. This might maybe help in a case where a girl pretends to have never said she was down to pound, but I can't imagine it would make a tidal wave of difference.

This app is just as pointless as a fart simulator.

[–]BassBeerNBabes 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The dick's inside, the choice was made beforehand, actions were taken. Just because she's suddenly upset with herself doesn't mean she didn't consent. Can't stop a skydive once you've started either. Did you get pushed or jump?

[–]eggoChicken -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Unless this video is taken the second before penetration yes she could be pushed. Consent doesn't sit in a permanent state.

Even if dick was inside if someone asks the other to stop and it doesn't it's rape. Male or female.

[–]BassBeerNBabes 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is it unreasonable to assume that if two people are naked in the same room, and engaged in sexually directed behaviors, that sex is consented? I mean, it's not like intelligent grown adults start making out, and then take their clothing off without some idea of where that's headed...

[–]eggoChicken 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever been half way through a Taco Bell binge and decided you probably shouldn't have had Taco Bell so you say "No more" and stop eating Taco Bell. Now imagine the Taco Bell, knowing you didn't want to eat anymore because you said so, forces you to keep eating.

[–]geniice -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Believing anything you read in the daily mail. Not even once.

[+]spacedogg -7 points-6 points-5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When is it rape-a-feminist day?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter