TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

[X-Post from /r/tinder] Every Guy Needs To See This...

misc412

October 17, 2015
3706 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://imgur.com/a/vsAot
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title [X-Post from /r/tinder] Every Guy Needs To See This...
Author

misc412

Upvotes 3706
Comments 522
Date October 17, 2015 3:30 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3p2ntc/xpost_from_rtinder_every_guy_needs_to_see_this/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/x-post-from-rtinder-every-guy-needs-to-see-this.969244
https://theredarchive.com/post/969244

Comments

[–]I3ut 155 points156 points157 points 10 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I get that no means no, but when does yes start meaning yes?

[+]snarkinator 10 years ago [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

The part that's scary is that, according to some people, yes can later mean no.

[–]backtotheocean 40 points41 points42 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

PIV is always rape to feminazis.

[–]NinjaRobotPilot 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So anal is a-ok?

[–]backtotheocean 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Only if it's a surprise.

[–]NDbigdog 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And in prison

[–]Mr_Star_Cloud 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't drop that soap

[+]DewArmy 10 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

PIV?

[–]passiveegalatarian 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Penis in Vagina. Some feminists think all sex with men is rape and women who have sec with men are gender traitors)

[–]DewArmy1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That's pretty disturbing of a mindset. How mentally damaged does someone have to be to actually believe that?

[–]Tyrone_Shekelstein 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're feminazis because nobody wants to fuck them so they hamster away and decide all intercourse must be bad since they aren't getting any.

[–]Gasster1212 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This sort of sounds like you mean you can't revoke consent. I know what you mean though

[–]snarkinator2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yeah, that's certainly not what I meant given the context.

[–]Rikhart 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never. Unless sometimes. Idk.

[–]Dangerdave13 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It means yes in ten minute intervals, you fuck boi! DUH.

[–]DaNiceguy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's even worse that no doesn't always mean no!

[–]Imissyourgirlfriend2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's funny, scary, and true.

[–]I3ut 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know. When did language get so confusing that yes and no don't mean yes and no? If I say, have sex with me, she says yes and then afterwards yes, that was fun, see you, a "I was raped" should be meaningless.

It will come down to consent forms and contracts in the end.

[–]Ballem 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes means yes when the scum of the Earth are wiped out.

[+]InternetSafety101 10 years ago* [recovered] (27 children) | Copy Link

I had a friend tell me she was raped. I was shocked and she ended up telling me how it went down. Turns out they were messing around and he started to go a little further than she wanted to go. I said "Did you tell him no or tell him to stop?" She said "No I was in shock I didn't know what to do! I couldn't believe what was happening!" And I sat there like wtf and then she goes on to tell me "Yeah that's not the only time he raped me either! Every time I went to his house he would rape me..." At this point I had heard enough I said "Ok that sentence right there. That doesn't sound like rape... Because you don't keep going back to your RAPISTS house!"

We went on talking about it and she ended up admitting she just had screwed up and felt bad about it. Literally slandering some guys name because she felt bad. It made me furious.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 87 points88 points89 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stay away from her or she'll make false accusations against you.

[–]ILikeMyDogNotYours 29 points30 points31 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I once had a girl drive like two hours to "watch movies", and I told her before she left that if she was coming as "just a friend" that she should just stay home.

Anyways, she gets to my house, and we wind up having sex. Half way through we take a break, and she states she wants to keep going. We have sex again the next morning, in which she literally said yes to.

a few months later, I text her to see if she wanted to come back over. She goes off, accusing me of rape.

[–]GSstreetfighter 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Makes me wonder how many ruined men she's left in her wake.

[–]CaptCrit 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry for replying really late but I had a similar experience. In high school I dated a girl for about a year. We lost our virginity to each other. Obviously it was a long, drawn out process of being awkward high schoolers and constantly not knowing what was normal so we constantly asked "is this ok?" Everything was consensual because, ya know, consent is sexy. Anyways, we both enjoyed ourselves and had sex several more times throughout our relationship but eventually parted ways.

Fast forward a few years and we're both in college. Reconnect with her and decide to meet up to catch up in person. We start to talk about old times like ex-couples do and she bursts out "YOU RAPED ME!" I'm taken aback because like I said everything was consensual. As a young college male I was scared because if she ever told an authority it's basically her word versus mine and we know how that usually goes.

Anyways, it never went further than that thankfully. Haven't seen her since and don't really plan on it for my own safety.

[–]ryeshoes1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

See, I do know women who were raped - they said no, fought off the guy, and don't have PTSD

/u/InternetSafety101 's friend is just one of those "teehee I had regret sex give me attention" women. That alone would be grounds for me not to socialize beyond respectful platonic boredom level - plus I would be scared that anything I did to her that was remotely sexual would be used against me on other people.

[+]queequeg092S -7 points-6 points-5 points 10 years ago* (21 children) | Copy Link

That's not necessarily true that she wouldn't go back, if mental illness is involved. And some people do freeze up, but usually they'll protest with actions which gets the message across to most peopke. Tbh, it sounds like this person had previous emotional issues.

 

I want to say, similar things happened to me(stayed with the person) I had previous emotional and mental health issues, but in my situation I told him no or to stop and then I'd freeze up. I think a lot of girls expect a guy to read them, but that doesn't happen often during sex. I expected the guy to read me, and when he didn't I felt horrible. I'd wonder how someone could keep going and not look at my face or hear what I was saying and have to stop themselves. But I said no.

 

For any guys afraid of this shit, I'd seriously recommend paying attention to a girl's facial expressions, keep your ears open, and asking a girl who seems quiet or a little less excited about sex than you are, if she's enjoying it throughout. Girls normally don't mind some talk, and that way if she claims a false rape later, you have that to go back on. You were checking in and being caring and responsible, so you've got your ass covered.

 

This girl sounds like she just had previous issues that caused her to not act in this situation. And it doesn't sound like she spoke with him either to try and gain any understanding. Who knows, he may have felt horrible if he heard her version of what happened. I feel like all this false rape talk just has to do with women's skewed view on themselves sexually. But I do want to say that coercion and pressure is completely fucked up and considered rape- but not necessarily legally. Just don't do it, and don't let a girl do it to you either.

[–]Lance_lake 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

For any guys afraid of this shit, I'd seriously recommend paying attention to a girl's facial expressions, keep your ears open, and asking a girl who seems quiet or a little less excited about sex than you are, if she's enjoying it throughout.

So you are recommending to guys to take body language into account when making the decision to proceed forward.. Right?

Isn't that against the rules since you need to get verbal consent nowadays and can't rely on non-verbal cues?

[–]queequeg092S -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Haha well you make a great point. I think body language should be taken into account, but women also need to be taught to speak up and not be afraid of hurting feelings or making things weird or anything else.

 

I do think verbal consent is a really smart choice and you can't rely on non-verbal cues, but if something tells you something is wrong(uncomfortable expression or anything), it wouldn't hurt to ask-but don't obsess over it.

 

Overall, verbal cues are most important, I was just recommending to pay attention to body language to avoid people who claim false rape. Just because if she looks uncomfortable, then at least you checked and she had a chance to say something-if for whatever reason she was avoiding it. This shouldn't be a responsibility even though it's a nice thing to do once in a while, and people having sex should be mature enough to speak their mind and not be shy, but most people aren't. Things need to change with women not speaking up, and hopefully they will in time.

 

I mean, I've been in a relationship for 6 years and my bf and I usually talk about when we want sex, but spontaneity is great. Though he gets that if I push a hand away, ignore him (this doesn't actually happen often at all) and or say no, he should stop. And in the middle of sex he has stopped plenty of times if I start to look uncomfortable or something to ask if I'm ok. I like that a lot because it feels more intimate, but there are also times when he does something and I reciprocate and nothing is said, and I personally don't see the problem with that when you trust each other's judgement.

 

I think talking is safe and a good call most of the time, especially when dealing with casual sex. In a relationship that's longer term, you eventually get a connection with someone where I think you are pretty safe to judge if it's ok and you learn the other person's body language. If you're not talking, body language is good to pay attention to anyway, but don't obsess over it. I guess when it comes down to it, you should access your relationship to the other person. But when in doubt, talk is most reliable. Even if she says she didn't consent, at least you can look back and remember her wanting to do it and saying it. Sorry if this is a little jumbled btw, I wanted to respond while I was still thinking about all of this, but I'm a little tired. Haha

[–]Lance_lake 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for the clarification and I agree with almost all of it.

The only thing I have different thoughts about is that those girls who claim false rape (at least from what I hear) are those who feel uncomfortable after the fact. The next day for example. I'm all for talking and making things clear before and while (though when doing the act, it's more about reading body language and not asking every 5 mins. if they are ok). But I hear stories constantly of people who had sex and the next day, being called a rapist. That kind of thing has to stop.

If you are not mature enough to say no, then you aren't mature enough to have sex. Period.

[–]queequeg092S 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Np :) And yeah, I totally agree with everything you've said. I think most of them probably are just those who feel uncomfortable afterwards too, which I guess means obsessing over precautions won't do much anyway. :/ I would just hope that it'd make them think more the next day, but I suppose these people have to be heartless, so it probably wouldn't. :/ Thinking of things this way makes me regret my initial post because it makes it seem like something avoidable on a guy's part, but that's not what I meant and I think you're right. Everyone involved should pay attention and everything, my hopes would just be that that would make someone hesitate before calling it rape and feel more comfortable speaking up if they were uncomfortable right then and there. But again, those people shouldn't be having sex anyway, and they're already heartless and possibly crazy, so I'm sure those people would still rarely hesitate to claim false rapes. Which just sucks.

 

And that's great that you're open to talking and being clear :) but yeah, every 5 minutes would be pretty excessive haha. And definitely agree that if you aren't mature enough to be open, clear, and say no, sex should definitely not be on your agenda any time soon. I still feel that instead of teaching teenagers and young adults to not have sex, we should totally be teaching them shit like this, like how to be assertive, to be confident in what you want, and for sure, not to fuck someone's life over but instead deal with the guilt.

[–]Lance_lake 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I still feel that instead of teaching teenagers and young adults to not have sex, we should totally be teaching them shit like this, like how to be assertive, to be confident in what you want, and for sure, not to fuck someone's life over but instead deal with the guilt.

Bravo. :)

[+]WPKage 10 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I feel like all this false rape talk just has to do with women's skewed view on themselves sexually.

I think it's more that men/boys have been so demonized that we're seen as unworthy to talk to or openly communicate with.

99.9% of guys want nothing more than to please the girl they're with, they want to do what makes her happy. But by what you're saying then there's a no small percentage of women that have so convinced themselves that men are such monsters that they can't even talk to us.

On top of that we have to be practically psychic or pesto we're rapists, god help the boys growing up with social anxiety/socially awkward.

It's gotten to the point where it's literally easier to call a guy a rapist (which shouldn't be a light charge to levy against someone) than it is to simply talk to him like a fellow human and avoid the ambiguity that leads these "technical rapes" in the first place.

Maybe instead of consent classes we should teach women not to do anything remotely date-like/intimate with any guy they don't see as human enough to talk to.

[–]queequeg092S 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It may very well be both? I agree with most everything you've said though. Personally, I've been through a lot with men but I've never viewed them as inhuman. I have felt aftaid of men, but I have always known that's ridiculous and unfair. It is biological, that after an animal is hurt it learns to fear, but also, dumb and unfair.

 

I have more male friends than female, and I just genuinely like men. But yeah, if a woman does feel that way about a guy, by all means she should not even associate with him for both their sakes.

[–]I_am_Anon_ 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But you did say no so I get where you are coming from.

[–]queequeg092S 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I did, every time. And I don't speak badly of him, and no one but my therapist knows. I've even spoken to him about it to see where he was coming from, even though I get how dumb that is. He said that initially he wasn't aware of what he was doing, but has admitted to what he did and why, to my surprise.

 

But I'm still not going to shit talk him because 1.I stayed 2. He's apologized and 3. I'm not a shitty person and I was fucked up and loved him regardless.

[–]InternetSafety101 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Coercion and pressure are NOT rape. You have no idea how offensive you sound to REAL rape victims. Rape is when someone physically forces you to have sex or threatens you to have sex.

Coercion and pressure are disrespectful, but not even close to rape.

If someone pressures you to smoke a cigarette and you say no and they get upset, that's completely different than someone sticking a cigarette in your mouth after you said no.

Both are wrong, but there is a BIG difference.

[–]queequeg092S -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I am a REAL rape victim. I was forced to have sex with someone. Did you read my whole post? Yes, both are wrong. But under definition of rape, coercion meets criteria. I'm not going to try convincing anyone of that, and I've attempted to keep it peaceful here and only given my own opinion and what I've learned. But I am a real rape victim, and I believe this. I am open to changing my opinion, but as of now that is what it is.

[–]InternetSafety101 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Coerce by definition: to persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats.

This would classify as rape however, I have a feeling in the context you are using coerce you are meaning more along the lines of "persuade" or "coaxing" correct?

[–]queequeg092S 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No actually, I meant using force or threats. Thanks for checking btw. Idk if that sounds weird, but a lot of people just jump to conclusions and decide that it's correct before asking haha

 

I do think a lot of people confuse coerce with coaxing, and perhaps that has a lot to do with people assuming they were raped. I think we need to figure out how to deal with actual rape and feeling violated, even by your own will. Both are ok to admit, but it's clearly wrong to go about ruining people's lives because you feel violated by something you chose. And obviously, persuading or coaxing someone is totally fucked up and wrong anyway, and can fuck someone up as well, but I wouldn't jump on calling it rape. But I still think people who do it are pieces of shit. Lol

[–]I_am_Anon_ 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

For any guys afraid of this shit, I'd seriously recommend paying attention to a girl's facial expressions, keep your ears open, and asking a girl who seems quiet or a little less excited about sex than you are, if she's enjoying it throughout. Girls normally don't mind some talk, and that way if she claims a false rape later, you have that to go back on. You were checking in and being caring and responsible, so you've got your ass covered

This sounds like some BS. Why do we have to walk on eggshells when it comes to sex. None of my friends or I go around just expecting sex. How about this, if we mutually start fooling around and then we mutually start having sex let's just call it good. Sex is complicated enough, I don't need to worry about wether she changed her mind or not, by checking her blood pressure, verifying it against an enjoyment chart and seeing if I'm still within the bounds of mutual sex or not. I gotta worry about my penis staying hard all while not popping off too quick. How about this, if you want to have sex with me great, let's have sex! If you don't want to have sex with me, then cool, let's not have sex.

[–]queequeg092S 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

You don't have to. But being aware of yourself and your partner is respectful. For both people. I was giving advice, which doesn't need to be taken. I just thought it was a decent suggestion. Also, some things seem mutual, but may not be. Women are very non verbal, and yes, that is a flaw for them that needs to change.

 

I agree though, if someone doesn't want to, then they shouldn't. If they do, they should. And they should state if they want to continue. But on the other side, people should be aware and communicate. I'm more talking about staying on the safe side to avoid women who falsely claim shit. But I get that you shouldn't have to to begin with. And that just requires education for women, and men.But yeah, suggestions aren't demands. And I'm not looking to put anyone down or start shit with people. I just liked some of the things I found here and decided I would try to contribute in a non confrontational manner. I mostly want people to be aware that mental illness is a thing, and it can cause all kinds of shit that makes no sense for a healthy minded person. Even looking back, I know how stupid I looked as well. Lots of women are unecessarily complex and fucked up.

[–]I_am_Anon_ 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I get that and I know it's more complicated, but it should just be simple no is no yes is yes, minus mental disorders of course, that's a while different conversation. I apologize if I came off a bit "yelly" before.

[–]queequeg092S 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's cool! :) I totally agree

[–]I_am_Anon_ 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Sweet best friends?

[–]queequeg092S 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha sure! Friends are fun :D confetti

[–]I_am_Anon_ 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'll be your Ishmael! *hands you harpoon

[–]queequeg092S 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes! The harpoon! Yay for catching the Queequeg reference :D

[–]KnowsAboutMath 446 points447 points448 points 10 years ago (76 children) | Copy Link

Just by way of providing credit to the original artist, this is an altered version of a Questionable Content strip.

[–]TheDrunkenChud 97 points98 points99 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Thank you. I was thinking to myself, JJ never really ventured into that realm of darkness before, and he actually strikes me as highly feminist from his writing. No way qc went down this road.

[–]Dangerdave13 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like he doesn't touch real issues just polite versions of real issues.

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_CLIT 22 points23 points24 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's one of his comics with the order of panels reversed, and the text completely altered. The actual comic is about consensual sex.

[–]Dangerdave13 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It about body acceptance. I just barley looked at it come on man.

[–]Seicair 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, the girl is trans, and it's implied she's preop.

[–]Dangerdave13 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My point was about context. Also no dick bulge nothing inherent in that one panel if you saw it for the first time would let you know that.

[–]tomburnes 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–]MrLaughter 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm kinda upset someone butchered that scene for their political agenda

[–]raffastafarian 28 points29 points30 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Meanwhile, I'm kinda upset someone butchered men's due process and presumption of innocence until proven guilty for their political agenda

[–]MrLaughter 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that is upsetting too

[–]ApplicableSongLyric 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm kinda upset that Questionable Content is such warmed over garbage that it can even be used in a good remix.

First few hundred comics are great. Everything you want out of a webcomic that was created to make fun of hipsters and their music.

After then, cringefest. Jeph didn't stab his hand hard enough.

[–]Cannon0006 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

history books are butchered the same way

[–]Dangerdave13 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It isn't right to steal but they didn't butcher anything it's a complete separate issue.

[–]secv808 33 points34 points35 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks, I was going to ask because I don't think I'd ever seen the original.

[–]jojotmagnifficent 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Definitely pick it up, it's a great web comic (the art to start with wasn't nearly as good, but it improves steadily). It's been going for ages, if my bookmarks are to be believed there is over 3000 pages so far, so it should keep you going for a LOOOONNNGGGG time.

[–]nodeworx 31 points32 points33 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I know that Jeph who creates QC is part of the 'progressive' lot, but I doubt that even he would go as far as supporting this.

[–]PedroLG 32 points33 points34 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I have read QC for years and never felt it as progressive... But yeah, a guy that has dominatrix mother, a gay father and goes from a bi girlfriend to a transgender one. Yeah...

[–]Andrew_Squared 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No judgement, but that's the definition of socially progressive.

[–]jojotmagnifficent 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Not just any dominatrix, she is like some famous porn star/bondage community leadership figure. Also, Marten is like the most chill dude in the universe, really couldn't see this scene going down any other way than how it did in the original comic.

[–]CyrexCore2k 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like Faye is gunning for a threesome.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+]Lawnmover_Man -55 points-54 points-53 points 10 years ago* (34 children) | Copy Link

I think it's not. Why would it be?

Edit: I meant in context of the altered version in this post. It is of course essential in the original version. But not in this particular altered version. Am I now some kind of transphobic or something? :)

[–]ffngg 67 points68 points69 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Becuse in the comic this is a pretty big moment for both of theese two. Her becuse sehs never been intimate with anyone as a transgender and the guy becuse hes been pretty misrable lately.

[–]NoGardE 97 points98 points99 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Lately

For about the last 3000 panels, yeah.

[–]Thesaurii 35 points36 points37 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Three thousand panels, or about eleven days.

[–]ffngg 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hmm yeah you're right

[–]NerdCrush 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He has been miserable since Faye. Possibly before that. He is just a miserable dude.

[–]A_Sleepy_Panda 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It was kind of a really great moment in the comic.

[–]JELLY__FISTER 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It was a great moment in the comic, but that's not the point here

[–]A_Sleepy_Panda 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think knowing the context of the original work makes an impact on how twisted this new version is. But that wasn't my point. I just love the comic.

[–]Lawnmover_Man 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But this doesn't add anything to the context of this post. It is irrelevant if she is transgender or not. That is what I meant. :)

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]hypertown -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh ok I didn't know we were supposed to have read the last 3000 comics in the series, whoops my mistake.

[–]kinyutaka 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

This is the first time I've seen this comic, and that's what I took from it. Either she has a penis, or she has a hideous disfiguration that she's self-conscious about.

Both would end up with the same response from a man who loves the girl enough, but only one is more likely.

Edit: The altered version is much different because the different sequence of events leads to a different characterization. The girl is not happily getting naked for her boyfriend and showing him her penis, she is putting her clothes back on and happily telling him that she is going to say he raped her.

[–]Dangerdave13 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I call bullshit. I dont think anyone could logically look at just that panel and say that overly feminine character who looks lIke no Transgender person I have ever seen in real life has or had a dick or some dismemberment. Especially since she is naked shown I many diffrence views.

[–]kinyutaka 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe I'm just more perceptive of you, but look at the situation.

You have an attractive woman, who the guy is clearly into, and has no need for outside validation... because look at her. She stops her lover and reveals her body, with the moment of awkwardness being when she removes her panties.

This tells me that what she is most self-conscious about is between her legs. Therefore, either she has something there that doesn't belong on a girl (penis or tentacles, take your pick) or there is a disfiguration of some kind (such as scarring from a traumatic injury)

[–]Dangerdave13 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I still believe you projecting known info, there is no way a person looks at this first time and gets that impression regardless of perfect perception or not. Many if not most woman have these exact issue. Your a fibber fibber something cleaver that rhymes with fibber.

[–]kinyutaka 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Believe what you want. My first thought on seeing the unedited strip was "she has a penis"

[–]masuabie 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's a really good comic. I highly recommend it. It is pretty far along though so it would take awhile to catch up

[–]kinyutaka 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

starts reading

I want a Pintsize for myself.

[–]masuabie 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Me too! There are some awesome robots in the comic that all have their own personalities

[–]kinyutaka 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd let him keep the laser, even.

edit: Look! Look!

[–]masuabie 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is awesome!

[+]captain_craptain -12 points-11 points-10 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Girl? I thought they said it was a boy.

[–]kinyutaka 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

male-to-female transgenders like being called girls.

[+]Waitwait_dangerzone -9 points-8 points-7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is one of those pretendy things

[–]DO_YOU_EVEN_BEND 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're only a transphobic because your upvotes are in the negatives. Had you been lucky enough to get a few upvotes at the beginning you would have just been asking a simple question.

That being said BURN THE WITCH. /u/Lawnmover_Man is a WITCH!!!

[–]Eagles_63-6 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Do you not want to admit to being wrong or something?

[–]VicisSubsisto5 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

He didn't call anyone an it.

"I think it's not" is response to "also worth noting" is a shortened form of "I think it's not worth noting" where the "it" refers to the fact that the character is transgender, not to the character herself.

[–]Eagles_631 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Just woke up and misread. He was talking about the comic I gotcha.

Why would that be a shortened form of the exact opposite sentence though?

[–]VicisSubsisto1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

He didn't state what it was not, his statement was just an open-ended negation. Because of this, his reference must be implied through context, which we get from what he is replying to.

"Also worth noting that the character is transgender" is short for "It is also worth noting that the character is transgender." Thus, there is an "it" implied in the previous statement, and the "it" in "I think it's not" can be assumed to refer to that same "it," especially since the pronoun "it" is not typically used to refer to humans. Had he used "he" or "she" we could infer that he was referring to the character ("I think she's not [transgender]") since the phrase "I think she's not worth noting that..." makes no sense.

[–]Eagles_631 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Your quotes are just fucking throwing me off. The 2nd and 3rd quote made it seem like it was the same person the way you worded it.

[–]VicisSubsisto1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'd color code them but Reddit doesn't allow that.

[–]NerdCrush 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I used to be really into this comic, I can't believe it is still a thing.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]AdmiralShark 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You can't say that and not give me clues to find it or a link!

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]StopEnjoyingThings 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

God dammit, that's way more funny that the tiny hats.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

here's a recent strip that shows an accurate representation of qc and sex

(just hijacking the top post)

[–]jjmitchell 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep came here to say that too.

[–]Dangerdave13 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most boring comic ever.

[–]ihavehedinjury 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Thanks, just clicked next like 20 times haha...that's a pretty good comic strip

[–]Dangerdave13 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you explain why that's your opinion, I don't see any enjoyable aspect of it other then progressive maturbation, but I only read like seven of them?

[–]ihavehedinjury -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i dunno, its funny in a different kind of way. to each their own i guess, some people may not like it i guess.

[–]Antarioo 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

i jumped in at ~1400 or so, totally worth going from the start even if his art was pretty basic to start with.

plus it'll keep you occupied all weekend and probably into next week.

[–]Khanman88 -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

it's still basic. Even after 12 years. I just can't get over the horrible art and the fact that the guy hasn't gotten any good at art after 12 years. I can't get over the Y-shaped mouths.

[–]FightingPolish 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Seems like he got a lot better to me, the way the comic looked in the beginning is way different than now. What do you want, photorealistic drawings?

[–]Khanman88 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He's gotten better sure. But now his style looks creepy as fuck and looks like everyone has no soul. It looks very generic and looks like he hasn't put effort into his art for years. I've seen artists go from his original skill way beyond his skill much faster. It really looks like its copypasted shit every panel.

[–]FightingPolish -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sure a lot of it is copy and pasted, it's drawn on a computer, not paper. It's a fairly in depth comic with quite a few panels put out at a relatively high volume. I think the art is pretty good, he has his style that he draws his characters in but I don't think it's the same thing every time, the characters are done from lots of different angles and perspectives and they seem realistic and human like in their appearance to me. You can see it in the different angles and body poses shown in the OP. If you're not a fan of the style that's fine, I'm not a fan of the style of the Cathy or Doonsberry comics, but everyone that does a comic strip comes up with their own style that works for them so they can pump out as much content as fast as they can and I'm sure that a lot of that is taking shortcuts and reusing material so it doesn't need to be done again over and over.

[–]ihavehedinjury -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, it seems like it would be a good time passing reader for sure, when i have time that is haha

[+]SillyMarbles -19 points-18 points-17 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ahh yes, that particular strip from QC was one of the final nails in the coffin that made me stop reading it.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (206 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]kileyjay0311 224 points225 points226 points 10 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

I dated a guy who went on a date with a girl about two months before we started seeing each other. One day we were at the mall and saw this girl and he dragged me out suddenly without explanation. When we got to the car I managed to get him to tell me what was going on. Apparently he took this girl on a date to the restaurant we worked at, afterwards they went back to his place which was in the country in the middle of nowhere. When they got there they shared a joint and then had sex. She wanted to go home then so he took her home. By the time he got home, she had texted and said she decided that he had raped her and was going to the hospital to have a rape kit done. A couple days later, two cops came to our work and escorted him out. He spent 10 days in jail. The girl had told the police that he was 170lbs, he was really 130, that he had one of his coworkers drug her salad dressing and that he took her a confusing way to her house so she wouldn't know where they were going. Basically the police just told my ex to stay away from her and leave anywhere he is at that she is. She came into our place of work and declared that she couldn't sit in his section because he was her rapist. I was a host at the time and could have punched her in the throat. He was always very sweet to me and never tried to force anything on me. I've met the girl and have talked to her since the guy and I have broken up and she's a hot mess. She made up so many stories in the hour I talked to her that she couldn't remember all the details she said. It's so sad that there are women out there that even when having a good time and a nice date with a guy, they are still willing to just ruin a guy's life for attention.

[–]katamuro 19 points20 points21 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

which makes me even more cautious of actually going out and dating or even trying one of those tinder things. I mean I get that its not very common but WHAT IF? Because if someone decides to say that about me there is no way the police is going to believe me(I am 6.3 about 280 pounds, not anglo-saxon.)

[–]Kunai118 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Im about the same size as you. I had a feminist former friend tell me that because of my size and the fact that i "look scary" that i should never be the one to initiate as many women would just go along with it out of fear.

[–]katamuro 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

yeah see, plus I have what people think of angry face. I am not angry its just my face. And since I am sort of average, not exactly what women find appealing from just looking so they don't approach me. So yeah...

[–]Dangerdave13 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It sucks to have resting bitch face or the male equivalent.

[–]katamuro 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know, and you know it starts to get annoying when several people walk up to you and ask why you are angry so then you get angry...and you get it...its a self-perpetuating thing

[–]queequeg092S 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol that's. ..sexist. size-ist? O.0

[–]iandmlne 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

i feel the same way, different perspective though, i deluded myself for a bit into thinking maybe if i joined a church i could meet a woman who was decent and not insane, im an atheist though, so the whole thing just sort of fell apart when i couldn't reconcile pretending to believe in god, even though that's what most of them seemed to be doing anyway.

[–]katamuro 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

yeah I wouldn't go to a church to find women, I have known a few and some of them are shrewder then the ones who don't go to church. There was a guy I knew a few years ago who was going out with a girl who was in one of those evangelist churches and man she was making him crazy. She slept with him and then was in hysterics because she felt guilty for "adultery", broke up with him, got back together because she "loved" him. Broke up with him because her "church" did not approve. Then begged him to come back. Rinse and repeat for two years and he was making life miserable for the people around him because he was in constant "give me advice" mode while doing nothing. So yeah I learned that lesson by proxy. Another lesson I learned by proxy is how a young woman was two timing with two guys who were best friends telling each that she wanted to keep it a secret because it was more romantic that way(plus she was really hot) so both idiots agreed. Went on for quite a few months. Ended badly for the guys, the girl just skipped to the next one. Lesson learned, if its secret and seems too good to be true then it is. A third lesson was of a girl going out with a guy and then trying to marry him promising him stuff like ability to invite other girls into the bedroom or even just cheat on her, turns out all she wanted is to stay in the country. Another lesson was personal, liked a girl, asked her if she wanted to be more than friends, told me she didn't want that with anyone at the moment, find her in bed with my brother a week later. Lesson learned. Plus considering the marriages of my relatives...well I am not sure its worth the trouble really. I have been on dates but it never got anywhere beyond that.

[–]GSstreetfighter 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, you certainly have your eyes wide open, so you got that that going in your favor...

[–]katamuro 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

maybe a bit too wide... I would like some female company however it seems there is no even relatively safe way to get there

[–]MrBokbagok 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

She made up so many stories in the hour I talked to her that she couldn't remember all the details she said.

Actually sounds like she needs to see a therapist.

[+]StoryAboutABridge 10 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

According to her, she already saw the rapist.

[–]greasywiener 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should go to an analrapist.

[–]kileyjay03110 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I would agree wholeheartedly.

[–]smasters908 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

A therapist named knuckles.

[–]TheMightyNumberNine 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's got a surprisingly diverse resume, for an echidna.

[–]MakeNoERROR 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Violence against someone physically inferior to you achieves nothing.

[–]smasters908 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, just spiteful thinking is all.

[–]Grasshopper21 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Eh. Sometimes it feels really good to just put a person in their place

[–]CarterKillss 511 points512 points513 points 10 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

I've had sex with a woman, both of us totally sober.

The next day, I totally regretted having had sex with her.

Never thought in my wildest imagination that it was Rape.

I don't even know how to rationalize that as rape.

error;

[–]VAGINA_BLOODFART 361 points362 points363 points 10 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

See the problem is you have it backwards. You feel bad about it because you realized you raped her and you feel guilty. You'll come to see that in a few years when she presses charges.

[–]Jaewok 69 points70 points71 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

your username made me spit up a little

[–]teruma 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Eh. Happens.

[–]RyanAlready 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

8 am and I've already seen VAGINA_BLOODFART and DICKVOMIT

It's gonna be a day..

[–]nolasagne 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Are you a nurse?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

or a woman who has consensual sex and a menstrual cycle

[–]RoboLegGaming 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

or a woman who has consensual sex rape and a menstrual cycle

FTFY

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

really, why.

[–]shemihazazel 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reddit brings out the Tourette's in all of us.

[–]buttsecksyermum 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tell yer mum I said hi.

[–]wehiird-5 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Edit: a word

[–]Euphoric_Redditor 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

When I lived in Canada, there was a wooden fence by my house that someone had spray painted "Vagina Bloodfart" on. My roommates and I always wondered who would come up with something like that, let alone write it on the wall.

Was it you? Are you the little hoodrat who graffiti'ed that?

[–]VAGINA_BLOODFART 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I do live in Canada, but that was not me. This username came to me at random while I was taking a crap, trying to come up with a new username.

[–]Bwhitty23 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Likely story pilgriiiim

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]VAGINA_BLOODFART 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not particularly. Due to medical issues you can find out about if you look into my post history I can't push hard without very severe pain and, well, bleeding.

[–]RASion4191 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Crohns/UC?

[–]VAGINA_BLOODFART 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Damage from surgery for a pilonidal cyst

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for the warning about not getting this surgery.

[–]VAGINA_BLOODFART1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I still strongly recommend it. My life is about a thousand times better than pre surgery.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Thanks for the information and I hope your recovery gets better.

[–]CarterKillss 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ROFL. Touche

[–]Dangerdave13 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't care if your a dude I'm beating it to your username.

[–]Ragnrok 46 points47 points48 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I once smelled my dick the morning after a hookup with a girl from OkCupid, and then regretted literally every choice I had made from birth to that moment. Does that mean every person I've had sex with has raped me?

[–]DarleneWilhoit 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bad strange is literally rape

[–]washburncrosby 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Dick don't pay for strange. You know that."

[–]davesterist 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Everyone has raped you. Even the people you've only met in passing.

[–]VicisSubsisto 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It also means you're impressively flexible.

[–]el_chief 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Still got her number?

[–]SigmundFloyd76 42 points43 points44 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Right? No kidding. The feeling of regret that comes with "bad sex" (yes men have that too) is an emotion in and of itself.

That weird feeling of awkwardness, guilt, shame etc. Apparently, there is a thing called "regret asymmetry", and the idea is that woman have this powerful sense of regret too, but more so.

I can only imagine having that particular emotion coupled with "he raped you" drumbeat from every source is what makes all these girls claim they were raped.

They no longer have any accountability for their own actions. I promise you that in many cases, the guy feels just as awkward and regretful. Bad sex is usually bad for everybody involved.

To suffer the shame of an awkward sexual encounter and then be accused of rape, as if it wasn't already a bad experience, must be absolutely spirit crushing.

I've had my spirit broken, it sucks.

[–]Waitwait_dangerzone 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Apparently, there is a thing called "regret asymmetry", and the idea is that woman have this powerful sense of regret too, but more so.

Not sure my self confidence needed another hit today.

[–]SigmundFloyd76 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, my ex got all mine in the divorce.

Turns out it's important.

[–]Dangerdave13 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have had some bad sex, always feel great after. I have never heard of any male saying this can I get some proof? Not that it's real just that its semi common?

[–]Stephen1985 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I too had sex with a girl due to peer pressure. I'm a survivor

[–]jewboyfresh 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's easy

You need someone to convince you that you were raped

Once enough guys talk you into it then you can go and file a lawsuit, but through the college of course, not through the actual judicial system

[–]HoundDogs 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You'd just have to be incredibly stupid.

[–]Alarid 126 points127 points128 points 10 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link

There was a story going around, that an actual rape victim went up at one of these and just said: "My dad molested me when I was 11" and knocked the mic over.

The room went quiet and they had to turn the lights on to fix the mic.

Edit: Mike to mic

[–]Artector42 97 points98 points99 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

That's what I was wondering. How the fuck would an actual rape victim react to that shit?

[–]Alarid 37 points38 points39 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The world tells them to shut up about their assault, then turns around and supports anyone brave enough to talk about it publicly, regardless of circumstance. They can't be too happy about it.

[+]systadmni 10 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

All rapes matter bro!

[–]olican101 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not of its fake.

[–]Grasshopper21 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or, according to our society., especially if it's fake

[+]Drabbeynormalblues 10 years ago* [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

I can't speak on behalf of all rape victims but I can speak for me. My mom raped me from when I was in diapers until I was 10 years old and sold me for $20 a session to other pedophiles. When I tried to tell my aunt and grandma what was happening I was told I had a vivid imagination. When I persisted they told me they were going to send me to a mental institution and lock me up for life. I was a 5 year old child at the time.

What I can say about rape victims is that they don't always act logically and my default setting is to believe them. There are those that regret what happened and use rape as an excuse to explain their feelings but in my experience those are very few and far between. In my experience I have ran across the following scenarios.

Consent can be revoked at any time and that includes being in the act. Just because I consent to what we were doing 5 minutes ago and was into it in a text message I sent you 45 minutes before does not mean that someone has the right to say, do, or touch me in a way that I don't like. I think we can all agree that's reasonable. If you're a guy that's not into anal play and suddenly a woman tries to push a dildo into your butt and you don't want it but you consented to the sex in a text message you sent her 3 hours before without knowing about the dildo I think we can agree that consent for that act would be revoked because you're not into anal play. If I'm in a relationship with someone does that mean that even if I say yes to sex that they have the right to do whatever they want even if I don't like it and don't want it? I don't think so.

Drugs is another factor that has to be taken into consideration. How much is too much until you legally can't consent because you're stoned or drunk out of your mind? Would it be reasonable to say that someone consented when they were at a point that they were blacked out because they said yes as the time but have no idea what they did until they checked their phone the next morning and saw that they slept with someone? At what point does it pass from being merely buzzed to fully drunk? I'm not a medical doctor and I don't have a magical test to be able to judge and say nah you were just drunk and regret it versus you were unable to consent. In the eyes of the law drunk or otherwise people who use drugs can't consent and that's the reason why.

What if I'm stone sober but I feel coerced? I just want to play guitar but they keep caressing my leg and trying to kiss my neck. I tell them no and they back off but try again 10 minutes later. This keeps happening and you keep telling them no. You get up and go to the bathroom and they corner you in the hallway and give you a big kiss and caress your butt. It's been two hours now and you have told them no 100 times but they complain that they feel neglected because you haven't had sex in 3 days. You finally say yes so they will leave you alone. You're not into it and they decide to get a little rough with you because they've wanted it for 2 hours now and they're ready to go but you don't want it rough. You tell them to slow down or be gentle and they continue to be rough with you. You don't want it and it hurts and you try to make it stop but they continue to go on anyway. Is that rape? Is it consensual because I agreed to the original act in the hallway but when I tried to get them to stop repeatedly being rough they continued to do something that I clearly did not want and did not like?

The flight or fight response is different for everyone. Some people fight, some people flee, and others freeze. My default setting is generally freeze but various jobs have made me more into a fight person now because I have to be to be effective at the job. For a person who freezes when they're scared when they're faced with a situation that scares them they know they should do something about it but find themselves unable to move or do anything to stop it. A great example of this is when my fiance and I were doing construction on our house we had a solid heavy door propped up against a wall that we were about to install. My dog was wagging her butt excitedly and knocked the door and it started to fall on top of her. I was standing right next to it and could have easily caught it before it fell and smashed my dog but instead I instantly panicked and just stood there like an idiot and said mechanically "the door is going to fall on the dog." I willed my limbs to move but nothing happened. My dog took off running and the door just missed her. I do a lot of plumbing underneath houses. The same thing happens with me and bugs. It does not strike me as the least bit odd that if someone revokes consent in the middle of sex that they might have a similar experience and be unable to move or stop it.

After a person is raped they might go into a deep denial about what just happened. Women are told that a rapist will probably be some shady guy in dark clothes that you don't know. Nobody ever tells you that the person you've been seeing for 6 months may do something that makes you uncomfortable and that you don't want and either they don't hear or acknowledge that you don't want it anymore. You just want things to go back to normal. So you talk and act as if nothing happened because you don't know how to process what happened. I liked it up to x point and then after x point I didn't want it anymore but it continued even after I protested. What if I said no but didn't fight him off? Was I raped? Would it be rape if I just said no versus if I said no and fought as well? I can't be raped because we're dating / friend / we know each other. So you try sex again but you find you feel full of fear or disgusted or both. You don't know or understand what's going on. You try to talk with your partner about it and they act as if they don't know what the hell you're talking about and call you crazy for bringing it up.

Suddenly you see a post from some bewildered guy who says that they have text message proof that their girl consented to sex. There are women out there that genuinely do regret what happened and consider that rape when it's not. In my experience those are very few and far between. I don't judge either party involved because I wasn't there and I'm only hearing one side of the story. What I do know is that we need to raise awareness of consent for both males and females and what that looks like. It seems to me that it would avoid some of these situations from happening or at least change the way we communicate with each other.

[–]marswithrings 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Consent can be revoked at any time and that includes being in the act.

but it does not include after the fact. and if you think the exception might be, as an example - yourself, as a child - the problem is as a child you could not legally consent in the first place. so i would argue that's not a retroactive revocation of consent, there just never was any consent.

honestly the rest of the paragraph following that sentence, i think everyone here agrees with. the one stipulation is that this revocation of consent must be communicated. it's not acceptable to change your mind in your head and just keep it to yourself, if the "rapist" has no idea you no longer want to continue, how are they supposed to know?

Drugs is another factor that has to be taken into consideration.

they are, certainly. but i literally saw a post a couple days ago where some "feminist" was arguing if a woman has "come into contact with" any sort of mind-altering substances "within the last 72 hours" it is rape. i think everyone here would agree if someone is passed out they can no longer consent, but most people here think some of the standards other people are trying to push are ridiculous. we hold people responsible for when they drive drunk, why not when they sex drunk? perhaps more importantly, why do we only seem to care when the woman is drunk, but it doesn't matter if the man is drunk?

it's a hard line to define, i totally agree. especially because everyone reacts differently to drugs. but i think if a couple likes to hit the bar for a bit before they come home and have sex they should have the freedom to do so.

What if I'm stone sober but I feel coerced?

coercion negates whatever "consent" was obtained. i am not quite convinced the situation you described is coercion... it's a little hard for someone not in the situation to judge that, but i think you might have used the word a little too lightly there.

the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.

i definitely didn't see any threats. i'm not sure persistence is interchangeable with force. either way, the trend continues - i think everyone here agrees there is a line that can be crossed. but i think most of the people here think the incredibly stringent rules that "feminists" are pushing are just puritanical.

if we made those standards into law we'd be severely limiting the freedom of normal couples to enjoy sex the way they want it, and especially if we allow consent to be revoked after the fact, we make it so there's no meaningful distinction between a guy who had sex and a rapist.

[+]Drabbeynormalblues 10 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree with what you said but there's a huge difference between not consenting in the moment and revoking consent after the fact and my post never said anything about people revoking consent after the fact but people who were not consenting in the moment. If that was unclear that was my fault because that was not the intention of my post. Revoking consent after the fact is wrong. What I was trying to get across was that there are sometimes reasons where things are missed in moment and that may be why it looks like some cases are revoked after the fact when in reality they weren't consenting in the moment. I also wasn't trying to compare what I went through to any of it. I'm just stating that I am a rape victim because the OP I was replying to wondered what a rape victim's perspective would be.

As far as drugs go it's already law that people who are incapacitated by drugs can not consent to sex but 72 hours is long enough for someone to sober up. There's a difference between that an having 8 drinks at the bar and getting raped 45 minutes after leaving the bar. When you don't hold people responsible for sex that they have when incapacitated that opens up a lot of doors to victim blaming. When you victim blame you shame them and people are unwilling to come forward who are true victims. This is different than holding someone responsible for drunk driving. I can plan ahead and get a designated driver and take measures to ensure I don't hurt others. There's no one I can call to make sure that my booty call doesn't come over at 3 am and engage in non consenual sex with me after I've consumed so much that I'm blackout drunk.

There is also nothing stopping people from having a few drinks at the bar and coming home and having sex. I have been with my partner for 13 years and we've had sex while having a few drinks many times and I don't consider that rape. There's nothing wrong with that in the slightest and I never meant to imply there was. The problem becomes when one or both becomes so incapacitated that they are not capable of consenting in the first place or that they don't hear or understand that consent is being revoked. If my guy is plowing away and I'm slurring my words "naaaa" and what I'm trying to say is no because I'm on the verge of passing out and he continues away that's a problem.

Coercison is complicated. Like I said in my post I'm just using real life examples that I have seen. I have also seen many where there's force involved but I was going for examples where the guys aren't habitual rapists and have no intent to rape but find themselves in a situation where consent is being revoked instead of someone who is out trolling for a victim. Maybe I should have used more forceful examples to make my point more clear.

Some of these issues of consent apply just as equally to men. I have talked with many men on this sub who are in denial that they were raped because they believed they can't be raped in spite of not wanting it. The issues with victim blaming and not being believed are very similar.

[–]marswithrings 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

my post never said anything about people revoking consent after the fact

well, perhaps not explicitly, but you said "consent can be revoked at any time" in a thread that is specifically about people revoking consent after the fact, so i think the confusion was understandable. i'm glad to hear you're not defending that idea, though.

I can plan ahead and get a designated driver and take measures to ensure I don't hurt others. There's no one I can call to make sure that my booty call doesn't come over at 3 am and engage in non consenual sex with me after I've consumed so much that I'm blackout drunk.

kinda missing the point of the comparison. again, everybody agrees if somebody has literally up and passed out they are not able to consent.

the comparison is about the person's agency. if someone is drunk, but cogent enough to come on to somebody else and initiate sex, why are they not held responsible for that?

if that same person chose to get in a car and drive off, we would hold them responsible for the choice they made while they were drunk. why are we arguing they are not responsible for sexual advances they make while drunk?

your comparison is to a person who is so completely incapacitated they probably wouldn't even be able to get themselves in the car to try to drive off in it. if they've lost the ability to drive drunk, certainly they've lost the ability to consent.

Coercison is complicated.

to say the least, haha. but i think a lot of people are using that word to describe situations where force/threats are not present. look at the other guy who responded to my comment, saying that coercion does not negate consent - but he says this because to him, "tricks" count as coercion.

coercion would be slightly less complicated if we didn't allow the definition of the word to become quite so convoluted...

[–]Grasshopper21 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Coercion does not negate consent. Some one who "tricks" you info having sex with them does not make them a rapist anymore than a woman who demands favors of her husband in exchange for sex. Ie tricking him into doing something for sex. You have every right to nope out of either situation. Now if one party uses a legitimate threat of violence then you've got a claim. But that legitimate threar needs to be A. Provable beyond a reasonable doubt (like you better have an audio record or something equivalent as he said she said situation should never be enough to convict without hard evidence) and B should be addressed promptly by an IMMEDIATE visit to the police.

[–]marswithrings 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"tricks" are not coercion. look at the definition i included in the previous comment, coercion means there must be force or threats. somebody pulling a page out of barney stinson's playbook is arguably immoral, but they have not used coercion.

coercion does negate consent, you're just defining it wrong.

[–]justsomedude2257 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

trolol

[–]Drabbeynormalblues-1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What exactly in my post did you have an issue with? I'd be more than happy to clarify anything for you.

[–]GSstreetfighter -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

trolol

[–]Elvick 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I were a rape victim, I would go up there and do that. Fuck these people. Fortunately, I have never been raped. But unfortunately, that means I can't give these idiots the perspective they need. Plus I'm a man, so they wouldn't care anyway.

I've had unwanted sexual advances happen, but they stopped when I finally said I didn't want to do anything. And that hardly makes something "rape". It may feel really disgusting to have that happen, which it did, but it's not rape. Not even close.

Yet feminism convinces people their gross feeling is because they were "raped". Sorry, convinces women of it. It's a shame. They are desensitizing people to one of the most abhorrent crimes out there with this shit.

[–]wehiird 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Foock

[–]Waitwait_dangerzone 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

mic

[–]Dangerdave13 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She is an actual hero the rest seem like they are basicly rapists but there tool is societal.

[–]dainty_flower 83 points84 points85 points 10 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

This reminds me of children that made false accusations about being in satanic cults based on coaching from adults. With the right suggestions, if you hear something enough, or are told something enough about your own experience you may later re-interpret it. It seems at colleges that rape is the new "satanic cult" accusation.

[–]eriman 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

I think you're thinking of that play the Crucible.

[–]doubleunplussed 43 points44 points45 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No, it was a real thing

Satanic ritual abuse (SRA, sometimes known as ritual abuse, ritualistic abuse, organised abuse, sadistic ritual abuse and other variants) was a moral panic that originated in the United States in the 1980s, spreading throughout the country and eventually to many parts of the world, before mostly diminishing in the late 1990s. Allegations of SRA involved reports of physical and sexual abuse of people in the context of occult or Satanic rituals.

...

The panic was influenced to a large extent by testimony of children and adults that were obtained using therapeutic and interrogation techniques now considered discredited.

[–]ThatsNoMun 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I met a "former child satanic cultist" in the 90s who got invited to speak at my parents church. I didn't believe him then and with good reason it seems.

[–]denshi 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The last remaining case was only overturned earlier this year.

[–]dainty_flower 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can use the same techniques to minimize trauma if you go the other route. For example, let's say your 4 year old's only memory of the dentist is bad, if you focus only on the positives of the experience "new tooth brush" and "afterwards we had a happy meal." The child will focus on the good parts of the memory, and if you ask them about the dentist they will respond positively.

In the case of this event, it sounds like everyone recalled a regrettable incident and reframed it over and over until it became a bad memory. The "badness" of the memory was reinforced by group think, and suddenly "I probably shouldn't have done that" has transformed through suggestion, group think and negative reinforcement into a rape accusation.

[–]dainty_flower 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Not really, I was thinking of "Satanic Panic" and all of the false accusations in the 80's - that were actually coerced/altered/implanted memories in people which made them believe they were victims of some terrible things. It's interesting, and fits in really well in this context.

[–]just3ws 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The only abuse I remember from the 80s involving the Satanic Panic was that I was forbidden from listening to satanic music (apparently they had a whole section in Sears) and was told that Dungeons and Dragons is a satanic ritual meant to trick me into hell.

[–]buttsecksyermum 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

"But we don't shout with the devil, we Shout at the Devil"

[–]Doctor_Loggins 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I really doubt Satan wants a bunch of neckbeards in Hell.

[–]iandmlne 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

unceasing and boring arguments over the form and nature of specific punishments and their validity to their sins.

[–]just3ws 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That sounds like Heaven.

[–]mafiaking1936 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Satanic Panic sounds more like an 80s punk band...

[–]Llim 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Meh now that Iron Banner is on for the week I'd rather play that instead

[–]VicisSubsisto 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm partial to PvE myself... Dick move of them to put out a Crucible-only test weapon during Iron Banner week. No way I'm gonna be the weak link with a 200 hand cannon in IB.

[–]Llim 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Agreed I usually like PVE too but for some reason I do really well in Iron Banner. Have you beat King's Fall yet?

[–]VicisSubsisto 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

No, I'm still working towards 290. Haven't beat VoG or CE either.

Partially since I don't have many friends on PS4 and don't have time to arrange a PUG usually; I have to solo anything without matchmaking.

[–]NinjaRobotPilot 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Hit up r/fireteams for some randoms to help you out. Got some good people out there, some are now added friends.

At 280-290 the old raids will be simple.

[–]VicisSubsisto 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm subbed to it and /r/destinysherpa (can be quite annoying at work). Still doesn't work if I only have 30-60 minutes to play in a day, and don't know when I'll be online.

[–]Llim 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's also destinylfg.com

The raids take hours to do but you can just do parts of them and you get a checkpoint for each part you finish. So you can do Vault of Glass in hour or two hour long sessions over 2-3 days :)

[–]Dangerdave13 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Vog is so fun, probably super easy now.

[–]VicisSubsisto 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I made it to Atheon, never finished, tried to solo him at level 40, found my checkpoint was lost in the intervening year.

[–]Sadistictoastie 61 points62 points63 points 10 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

This is one of the things i hate the most about feminism at the moment, that most of them push regret as rape. For a couple reasons 1) It's fucking stupid, if you give your friend some money, you can't then change your mind two days later and say he mugged you. 2)My wife was actually raped. She was basically tortured by a psychopath for years when she was only like 8 years old. If i told that to these idiots, they would believe their suffering is exactly the same as hers. I hate it, because it ignores and hurts real victims (but then again that's what feminists seem to do now-a-days) and completely innocent men, go to jail.

[–]gensyms 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My feminist ex-friend borrowed $250 from me to go to a music festival a few months ago. She kept dodging the issue of reimbursement until a couple weeks ago.

She tried to pay me only $60 because she had been arrested and missed most of the festival. After a huge fight I managed to get it all -- but she was completely unable to understand why she should be held responsible for the time she was in jail.

I even tried explaining to her that nobody had given me a partial refund for her ticket because she hadn't enjoyed her weekend.

Motherfuck this planet.

[–]Sadistictoastie 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that has anything to do with her being a feminist. I think she was just a bitch.

[–]gensyms 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Still is.

[–]Dangerdave13 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Troof

[–]hypertown 22 points23 points24 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm desperate for physical intimacy with another woman but this thread makes me want to stay the hell away from them.

[–]AKnightAlone[🍰] 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why men need #sexbots.

[–]dalthorn 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Every time I read crap like this it makes me happy I'm bi and prefer men over women.

[–]Dangerdave13 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't be desperate or you will only find the wrong type of girl, but the issue though horrible isn't very common, although you may not be able to socially tell crazies since you seem to have no game. I'd say find cool people work on yourself because woman are going to expect things from you because that's what society tells them is acceptable and or what they can get away with. Keep your head up homie.

[–]crunchthenumbers01 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just date post college girls

[–]st_gulik 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, us PTSD folk fucking hate their bullshit trigger crap all over the place. Do you vomit, go into shock and passiut when you see ot hear or smell a medical office/situation? Because I fucking do. Fuck these entitled assholes.

[–]Sadistictoastie 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah i know, my wife used to have a panic attack (and as a result, an asthma attack) if she had a photo taken, if she was in crowds, or there was any visual of sex really (she had to skip most of sexual education, because it was too traumatic).

Yet we hear every day about how people get PTSD "worse than soliders" from fucking twitter.

[–]buttsecksyermum 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those goddamn liquiders are way worse than soliders.

[–]Splendidbiscuit 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Most of them pushing 'regret as rape' should be changed to a small minority of them.

In the same way a small minority of feminists are delusional and label every third man a rapist or some other overblown nonsense some people label 'most' feminists as delusional in the opposite direction, the amount of these people on both sides is actually quite small. Crazy people talk more, and talk louder.

[–]Sadistictoastie 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Regardless of how many of them actually believe it, that's what's being pushed. It's becoming more and more common for University's too have batshit rules on rape and there very rarely appears to be any public outcry from other feminists when University's change their rules to suit this. I do believe that feminists can be good, smart people. But if they exist, they don't seem to do much, since the "small minority" of stupid feminists, seem to be the only ones i encounter in real life or online. Even the more sane feminists i meet believe in the patriarchy, or the wage gap or the 1 in 5, and i've never actually met someone who called themselves a feminist, who believed that sexism against men really happened on a regular basis.

[–]Splendidbiscuit 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My experiences of people are the polar opposite of this, and I guess we both have statistics and evidence we've seen. Nothing to do about that I guess.

universities and other institutions do have batshit rules about this kind of thing, I'd argue they are against women as much as men, no one on mensrights talks about the same thing happening but the other way around, that is how tribes of people are. And I'm been conservative for the sake of been agreeable.

[+]olican101 -7 points-6 points-5 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

What does this have to do with feminism? Just becaise i believe in woman's rights doesn't mean i support people crying (fake) rape.

[–]Sadistictoastie15 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Because what feminism should be and what feminism is are very different things. It's fine to say "well as a feminist, i don't do these things". But these things still happen, and it is because of modern feminism that it happens. I do believe in equal rights, everyone with a brain should, but in almost all the western world, women have equality (that's not saying they're treated exactly the same, society in some ways favours men, in some way favours women, both sides have their disadvantages) But most modern feminists seem to either state that women are still an oppressed class (the wage gap, the 1 in 5 rape "statistic"), or say that women are the only one's with problems.

They are responsible for the fact that a man can be kicked out of university, even after he's been deemed not-guilty. Even being accused of it, can ruin their life. So now more and more people make false accusations, or use these stupid defintions of rape " i regrretted it so it was rape" "we were both drunk, so even though i said yes it was still rape" "he lied about his job/marrying me/his wife so it was rape", and many feminists support these rediculous definitions of rape, which makes it harder for real victims to get help.

The problem is, most modern feminists i've met, want to seem like victims, when in reality they're more priviledged than anyone else.

And don't respond with "not all feminists", because i know not all feminists do this, i understand that. But the loudest feminists, the ones that seem to make the most impact do. It's a very rare day when i see anyone who calls themselves a feminist go against these people who are encouraging this.
Then again, it's a rare day when i see a feminist that isn't like this, but it's for that reason so many people refuse to call themselves feminist, prefering egalitarian, because so many feminists have corrupted a movement that actually stood for something, and instead of adressing real issues of equality (the treatment of women in the middle east, the rotheram rape scandle in the UK, the circumcision of males in america). They just create nonsense issues (stare rape, mansplaining, meninism) or just make them up (1 in 5 women get raped, or the wage gap).

[–]GSstreetfighter2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The fact that you can get railroaded out of school with absolutely no proof says a lot about feminism.

[–]Sadistictoastie2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yeah, and while i do understand that not all feminists support these men being kicked out of school. I never see any feminists trying to do anything about it. I only ever see support for it.

[–]GSstreetfighter1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Anybody who disagrees will be disinvited from speaking at the school, so it's tough to get a podium from which to speak.

[–]olican1011 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Im sorry. What? "feminism: the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes." amything more than this has nothing to do with feminism.

Being a feminist does not make you a man hater any more than being pro-black makes you a white hater. Sure there are pro-black people that hate white people, but should we judge the whole community by those select few?

Women are still an oppressed class in the moddle east. I have personally witnessed a woman working in IT get asked if a male was available to help them with their issue.

If a person identifies as feminist and wrongly states that women get paid less than men (im the same field), is that an issue with feminism or that person? The answer isn't feminism so why blame feminism?

If someone LGBT makes a mistake, is it the LGBT communities fault or that person's fault?

Wtf does false rape accusations have to do with "the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes."? Absolutely nothing. Why blame non-guilty feminista for the actions of guilty feminists? Its like blaming all LGBT people for a few having HIV.

"I regretted it so it was rape" has NOTHING to do with feminism. Maybe blame the people promoting this bullshit instead of blaming a movement that, by definition, CANNOT have anything to do with this. Are they women? Why not blame all women? Are they white? Blame all white people. Are they christian? Blame all christians. See how obscene that sounds?

I am a male. I completely fail to see how identifying as a feminist makes me a victim. Surely under your (false) ideal of feminism i would be the villan?

Its a rare day when i see somebody straight at a gay pride. Doea that mean straight people cant be pro-lgbt?

Stop judging a huge community by the actions of a few. Next you will be saying that as a gay male i will be having sex with a different guy every night. When i have been in a commited relationship for 4 years.

Judging people by what they are instead of who they are doesnt help anybody. The only reason people are so against feminism is because people like yourself have no idea of what feminism is and judge feminism instead of individuals.

Feminism means "the advocacy of women's rights" nothing more. Nothing less.

[–]Sadistictoastie1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The thing is, i'm not judging it by the actions of a small few, i'm judging it by the majority of feminists i've met in real life, the majority that have any effect online, and the majority i read or see about in the news.

You keep throwing that definition around, that is what feminism, is supposed to be. But now, the vast majority have corrupted it, and so modern feminists claim they advocate for women's rights, but they don't.

And it is modern feminism that pushes the bullshit i regretted it was rape, it is feminists that push that women get paid less than men.

I judging people by what they do, not what they are, and quite frankly, the vast majority of feminists seem to act like this. You can say "but that's not the definition" as much as you like, but it doesn't reflect the actions.

People who call themselves feminists, push these ridiculous rules that get men expelled even when proven innocents, no "real" feminists come to stop them.
A typical response to that is "it's not a women's issue, so that's not our problem" and that's fine. You don't have to stop them, or even publicly disagree with them. But if the vast majority of feminists that i see in reality, online or in the news act this way, then that's what feminism is.

Saying feminism is all about the advocacy of women's rights is like saying "PETA is for the advocacy of animal rights, So you should support it, just because most of their major members and opperations kill thousands of domesticated animals and act like eco-terrorists, doesn't mean that's what they're like."

You can say that's the definition of feminism, and at one point, you would have been right, and many people might believe in it, and actually try to achieve it. Same with PETA, many people who support them genuinly want to help animals, and just don't know about the things that PETA uses it's money for.

I mean, even if PETA does kill thousands of innoccent animals a year, you can't blame them, because by definition they CANNOT commit harm to animals.

What feminism is in theory, and what it is in reality are two different things.

But even if Feminism is about women's rights, it still raises problems, because feminists switch between "it's about equality" and "it's about women"

If men try to meet to talk about male issues, they get protests, get the fire alarms pulled, etc. Because one major problem is, most feminists, seem to not believe men have any issues in the world at all, and hate it if people try to say there are.

Technically, feminism as a concept, is about equality, but modern feminists are not. Not from what i've seem

[–]olican1011 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The thing is, i'm not judging it by the actions of a small few, i'm judging it by the majority of feminists i've met in real life, the majority that have any effect online, and the majority i read or see about in the news.

I am from England so it may be different. But in my language (english), feminism means nothing more than woman's rights. Every person I know bar two are feminists. Those said two are basically anti-woman. Neither believe that women should be able to work. I don't socialise with these people as they aren't the kind of people that I would want in my life. Feminism literally means "woman's rights" nothing more. Sure you may have met some crazy people that identify as feminist and are crazy. But I have met some homophobic heterosexual people. Does that make all heterosexual people homophobic? it doesn't at all.

And it is modern feminism that pushes the bullshit i regretted it was rape, it is feminists that push that women get paid less than men.

Feminist =/= Feminism. Someone can be feminist and have a belief that has nothing to do with feminism.

Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbxSGu-SDg She explains what feminism is.

I do not understand this whole thing of men's rights advocates attacking feminists. Surely we should work together? I mean, don't we want the same thing? Equality?

Men and women both face issues. Femisism is also for men, not just women. Most Feminists believe that there is too much shaming on effeminate men. Which there is. Kids get bullied if they aren't "alpha male".

PETA is a company. Not a movement. They don't have a definition. What you are saying is basically "I have seen lots of people say "I could care less" therefore that saying is correct. When it isn't, the saying is "I couldn't care less"." Just because you have seen something incorrect does not make that thing correct.

Most men's rights advocates I have seen are anti-feminist. does that mean that the men's rights movement is anti-women? not at all. And you probably wouldn't like it if I did state that as fact.

[–]Sadistictoastie1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I am from england to. Fine let me rephrase what have been saying. Feminism isn't responsible for this. Modern feminists are. But i tend to assosiate the members of a movement with the movement itself, as they follow (or believe they do) feminism.

Well i'd have no problem with you saying most mra's are anti-feminist. But not anti-women, as that is not the same thing, as i have said, most feminists i have met are exactly as described.

I don't understand how can feminism be for men? i mean the definition is "for women's rights" you can't have your cake and eat it to. If the definition of feminism is for women's rights, you can't claim it helps men to, because that's against the definition, and if i say feminism is something against the definition, that's wrong.

PETA does have a definition People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. It's an acronym. And it was an analogy, i know they're not exactly the same.

And in theory, yes mra's should work with feminists, it's called egalitarianism. However, most feminists i have met, don't care about male issues, in fact, most of what i see in real life, the news, and online they activley oppose it.

You can't bat away my criticisms by saying "the definition of feminism is women's rights" then say "but it can help men too" because that's not in the definition. That's just being hypocrytical.

Also being anti-feminist is not anti-female. My wife is anti-feminist, plenty MRA's are female and anti-feminist and do you want to know why? most feminists we see in day to day life, don't care about equality, they are hateful, spiteful people, who believe in female superiority, or are spoiled rich kids who think they're the most oppressed people in the world. And you can't just say "oh they're not feminist, because they don't follow the definition" for a few reasons 1)When they make all these "non-femenist" claims, no real feminists stand up to them, or tell them they're wrong, so they are left to represent the femenist movement. 2) I am a christian, i think the westbero baptist church is a horrible thing, but i don't say "they're not christian, because they don't follow my rules", i accept that they are christian too, even if they are radically different to me, and it is my responsibility as a christian, to give our religion a good name, so most people don't think they represent us. 3)definitions change, wicked used to mean horrible nasty as in "wicked witch" but then it changed to mean awesome "wicked man". Language is just a means to label things. And feminism as an orginisation, used to be about equality, but western feminism, in modern times does not mean that at all (well, the majority of active or public members don't, from mine, and a lot of other peoples experience).

If all you're going to say is "but that's not the definition", then i can't talk to you about this anymore, since we're operating from two completley different standpoints and there is little point in continueing. Let me clarify, feminism as a theory (equality for women) is a good thing it was necassery, and will be needed in the future, however in the western world, there is little need for it, and i believe it has been corrupted, and modern feminists no longer act as they should, fighting against invisible enemies like "rape culture" or the "patriarchy", treating all men like rapists, and fighting for stupid goals. Not all feminists are like that i admit, but most i interact with are, so that is what i mean when i say feminism. If you want to get a picture of what i mean Sargon of Akkad (a youtuber) did a video series called "why do people hate feminism". I know you probably don't have the same views as most of the feminists they're talking about, but it's worth a look as to why so many people, like myself, talk about feminism so negatively.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua8T4nSTCWA

[–]iandmlne2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

feminism isnt the support for womens rights, if you support womens rights, just say that, it doesnt make you a "feminist" by default.

i support womens rights, but im an anti-feminist.

it's not a contradictory statement, but saying that if you support womens rights you are a feminist, is.

[–]olican1010 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"Feminism: the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes." If you oppose Feminism then you oppose womens rights on equality of the sexes. Its right there in english. I believe that women should be equal to men. So i am a feminist. It isnt hard to understand.

Women in the middle east dont have womens rights. Women in IT are often asked if a male is available to solve their issue also. Sexism is very real. That is why i am a Feminist. Because i believe in equality of the sexes. Its the very definition. If you dont like it then call up the Oxford dictionary. Untill then i will follow the english definition when i am speaking english.

I could say that earth isnt a planet. Doesnt make it true.

Buy a dictionary.

[–]iandmlne0 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

what's patriarchy theory?

[–]olican1011 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Something that is very real in the middle east. And is a huge issue for women living in those places?

[–]iandmlne1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

try not to vilify white men on your way out.

[+]kaihau 10 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

It's amazing how the human mind can be manipulated.

I've had sex with guys that I've regretted the day after. Was it rape? Absolutely not. I may have been a little tipsy, but I was still conscious and able to make my own choices. I had a little talk to myself, "Kiely, don't do that again", and moved on.

I know guys do this too, and just move on.

[–]Aaronf989 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yea, i just dont get this kind of mentality. People make mistakes, its human, What you wanted a hour ago, in the heat of the moment is different post-orgasm and once your emotional state goes back to normal. To think people want to ruin other peoples lives because they felt bad about themselves afterwards its just utterly crazy. I have done sexual things with a couple girls that even going in i wasnt sure about. Did i call the police or anything? No cause thats stupid, i moved on with my life. While its a little more serious, the best way to put it is, you know how you were still a little hungry and you thought "I could finish that pizza" And after you finish it you completely regret yourself for it and feel ashamed? Yea, you move on, you dont call all your friends up and ruin the business because you made a bad move lol

[–]icculushfb42 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The mentality is "if I blame someone else, I can absolve myself of any accountability I may have regarding the choices that I make with my life."

[–]jonahewell 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess the equivalent would be a snarky one star yelp review.

[–]PorcupineWine42 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Sometimes they will do this years later. Remember sex nine years ago? I've now convinced myself it was rape. Prepare to have me attempt to destroy your life over my delusion.

[–]geekon 26 points27 points28 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Here's the problem: no authoritative women are standing up and telling these twats that they are delusional and should sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up. Thus their delusions simply get further reinforced and spruiked to other impressionable women as gospel.

Why are the rational women silent on this issue?!

[–]NecroticFury 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

its either there are no rational women, or women believe this sort of thing is justified.

it has to be something. Doesn't look good for them either way.

[–]WouldYouLikeTocuddle 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's simplistic. I live in an area dominated by far right Christians, but having grown up in the church, I know half of them don't believe that shit. But they'll even go to church because it's part of their role in their community. When the circlejerk is strong enough, you give in or just ignore it. My sister has to go on missions trips with her company to market herself for promotions. How do you think they'd feel if she spoke out against a company "motivating" it's employees to take part in it's religion? She'd lose connections.

I'm willing to bet there's at least one RL circlejerk you pay lipservice to.

[–]NecroticFury 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If the circlejerk exists, that means the average woman is on board with it.

[–]WouldYouLikeTocuddle -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No it doesn't. Most people don't give a shit about weed, but you can't fucking say that at work. An idea being establishment doesn't mean it's even the majority opinion. It just makes it entrenched. And even if you are right and 51% of women are behind it, "there are no rational women," is both mathematically unfounded and sexist as hell to say. Ironic in an "egalitarian" subreddit.

[–]DancesWithPugs -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe they don't want to deal with getting a rash of shit from hyped up ideologues. Not everyone is brave enough to stand up for common sense.

[–]Frankly_George8 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Maybe they don't want to deal with getting a rash of shit from hyped up ideologues.

That's ok, then they can suffer in silence with the ideologues once the pendulum swings against them. Their silence is complicit consent to allow these people to speak for them; so that makes them their spokesperson.

[–]ShaidarHaran2 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"If you regret having sex, it's rape"

So, many of those girls would be rapists by their definition, since a lot of the guys would be regretting sticking their dicks in crazy. Did anyone run that by them?

[–]Meatslinger 23 points24 points25 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Men can't be raped because something something power structures and privilege blah blah blah.

[–]Grasshopper21 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

White men.

[–]Jackson530 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't expecting the end

[+]unitedamerika 10 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

The end makes me jealous. Way to totally bypass the system.

[–]benzabs7 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

There was a comedian who said that's why God doesn't like gay people, they've found their way around Gods punishment from the garden.

Actually super hilarious.

[–]Broccoli_Thief 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is... Incredibly disrespectful to people who actually need that kind of help and have the history. I was sexually assaulted by an adult when I was about 8-9 years old and believe me, that meeting you're talking about (assuming it's real) kinda pisses me off simply because of it's disrespect alone.

[–]overtmind 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What i've come to realize that that some people think sex is really a huge ordeal. For some reason certain types of people feel really guilty about having normal urges and satisfying them.

[–]DancesWithPugs 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That reason is cultural puritanism, which is strongly encouraged by most religions.

[–]K8af48sTK 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

they wanted it to stop in the middle of it and it didn't

...

[–]MakeNoERROR 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If I weren't heterosexual and so disgusted by anal I'd prob be gay too.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]MakeNoERROR 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah everyone is different and to be honest I'd prob get along with a male partner much better than a female one

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Vance87 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm single and hetero and looking to switch sides for convenience LOL

Or I may be just really buzzed.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Vance87 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure.

[–]Yeahdudex 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

According to those women i've been raped several times by multiple women. :(((((((((

[–]davesterist 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Pm me if you need to talk. You need to come forward with this and report them.

[–]Yeahdudex 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You just raped me

[–]Grasshopper21 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ditto

[–]pantstickle 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why is there no grown up to tell them they aren't using it right? If I was an actual rape victim, I would take issue with those girls.

[–]hypertown 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm so god damn lonely, I'm desperate for any affection from a woman, but this makes me want to stay away. That's not fair. Am I not allowed to fall in love? Am I not allowed to have flings? Should I just stay by myself my whole life?

[–]Uncouth_Troglodyte2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No, you should just have a gander at their tumblr account first.

[–]zeusssssss 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why women should be replaced with realdolls we can't afford to take the chance of sex with a woman since it can be rape any time after.

[–]iandmlne 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

is there any way you could figure out the name of the event?

[–]a3rospace 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This fucking scares me.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The notion that they need to be oppressed to matter is really heavily drilled in to a lot of women. So if they weren't raped then they are somehow not cool. So they have to get creative with what they call rape.

It's like how suddenly after the Soviet revolution everyone came from a proud peasant background and worked with their hands in some simple labor.

[–]HighResolutionSleep 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd hate to be a wet noodle, but reading this caused my "didn't happen" sensor to go haywire. Still trying to calm it down.

Could you possibly "accidentally" crash one of these meetings with your phone recording in your front pocket?

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]HighResolutionSleep -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe you.

I think it would be quite a revelation if you could grab evidence of something like this happening.

Do it if you can,

[–]HeroicPopsicle 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is what i dread... That one day ill be standing infront of people talking about -real- rape.. After hearing them talk about how a consentual encounter that they regreated counts as "rape"... The day you have a knife to your throat and someone threatening to kill you if you dare even mention what happened all those times, that if you ever talked about it you'd be locked up in a jailcell and get "marks" on you that employers / future girlfriends can see by a simple google search. Getting beaten and having to lie why your rear hurts, and how you cant partake in PE class cause your 'behind' still bleeding from the night before.

Ill blow a gasket, swear to god.. This is why i never even thought about joining a "group session".. Rather just talk about it on the internet.. :/

[–]Elvick 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Their stupidity is offensive.

If they were raped, they would know it. There is no "hurr durr, 2 years later I took a gender studies course and knew I was raped that one time!" "After I talked about my consensual sex with some feminists, I realized I was raped!"

No, that's not how it works. You either agreed to have sex, or you didn't. And you later deciding you regret your decision doesn't make it rape. You fucking loons.

It's like black people whining about innocent use of "nigger". If someone didn't mean it hatefully, why are you so offended? Maybe they shouldn't say it, but if it was along with a song, don't be offended like they just whipped you.

The only way I can see being offended, is if they don't really experience actual hatred in their lives. So they don't know the difference. Just as these women don't know what real rape is, so they don't know the difference.

People need to calm down, feel less and think more.

[+]Akesgeroth -29 points-28 points-27 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

/r/thathappened

[–]crunchthenumbers01 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've seen meetings like this on my campus i wish it was just thathappened material.

[–]crunchthenumbers01 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It wasn't as bad as this is making it out but still colleges need to stay out of rape and let campus police or local pd handle it.

[–]Shen72 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You're right, that did happen. Good job picking that up!

[–]Akesgeroth-21 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Really? Where? When? Did someone film it? Do we have other people who were present?

[–]Shen723 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Really? Are there multiple occasions of this happening? Is it not believable? What are we missing?

[–]Akesgeroth-4 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Are you fucking kidding me? Do you also believe that story about the marine knocking out the mean liberal atheist college teacher in the name of god?

[–]Shen722 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Do you also believe that jet fuel can't melt steel beams? Stories such as the one this guy typed happen more often than you would think. Who's to say it didn't happen? You don't know, and neither do I. So, let's be less of judgemental pricks and move on.

[–]Akesgeroth0 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

https://youtube.com/watch?v=YWdD206eSv0

[–]Shen721 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Never seen that one before! So original.

[–]cyberslick188[🍰] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You got downovted to shit, but honestly it was my first thought.

These women absolutely exist, but who the fuck just "stumbles into a rape counsel" meeting, particularly as a man.

Who then just sits in the back and takes notes and no one else minds.

Who also happens to be a frequenter of /r/mensrights.

Please. How fucking dumb is this subreddit sometimes.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]cyberslick188[🍰] -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh I read it, I just think you're lying to pander to a gullible and emotionally charged audience.

[–]The_Intense_Pickle 26 points27 points28 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This shit is not empowering women, its treating them like children.

[+]Frankly_George 10 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

its treating them like children.

I fail to see the issue with this as they have not demonstrated adult-like capabilities for understanding cause and effect or acceptance of responsibility for their own actions. Why not treat them like they act?

[–]Spidertech500 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This will be hilarious because in a few years since feminism has said they can't be held responsible for their action it will begin working counter intuitively and stripping them of rights

[+]mean0dean0 10 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Why is there even such a thing as retroactive rape? If you give consent in the moment, then consent is given. You can't give consent, clearly and without coercion, and then later say you didn't give consent. I swear, this generation of girls is literally necessitating the use of dashcam-style cameras in the bedroom to keep people from being dishonest about rape.

[–]Spidertech500 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've considered using cameras for this reason

[–]NecroticFury 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you do, you will get sued by her for recording her without her consent.

Literally has happened in false rape cases. Man gets away from criminal court only to get nailed in small claims.

[–]Spidertech500 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Id rather that, also can argue it's security footage

[–]tucsonled 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd like to see someone argue an actual contract with that logic.

"So you agreed to the contract at the time?"

"Yes"

"But now you regret it and are claiming the contract is null and void?"

"Yes"

[–]Lance_lake 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not a contract, but here you go. :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Qv-swaYWL0&t=4m19s

[–]Mythandros 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is so true that it's not funny. The fact that a woman can change her mind AFTER the fact and still be taken seriously proves that there is something seriously wrong with people in our society.

[–]balluka 30 points31 points32 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I worked as campus police for about two years and this comic is absolutely true. Everyone involved on our end thinks the male is guilty right from the get-go.

The worst part of it is, at least at our University, was the entire investigation was conducted by security guards (that's really all campus police is). There is no evidence, unless we were extremely fortunate, and there is no interrogating the suspect as the entire basis of the case relies on word of mouth from the victim and any "witnesses" (her friends who want the victim to save face).

Title IX and the people working Title IX for schools are PR. They have a reputation to uphold for the school and do not care about the truth as long as the statistics (schools have to meet certain Title IX requirements) look good.

[–]Limbonic_ek 23 points24 points25 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That feeling of regret and disgust after a session by myself. TIL I have been raping myself

[–]megaderek2011 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mirror?

[–]tksmase 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she has touched alcohol, do not touch her.

What if she touched me after I had alcohol? I scream rape, give me my cash.

[–]OriginalPostSearcher 25 points26 points27 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

X-Post referenced from /r/tinder by /u/kristianstad
PSA for all the men. Be careful!


I am a bot made for your convenience (Especially for mobile users).
Contact | Code

[–]b-monster666 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cuz you know, if women drink alcohol, they aren't responsible for their actions. Unlike men who have better brain powers and if they consume alcohol, they are completely responsible for all their actions.

[–]King032 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If anyone still wants to see it I think this is it?

http://www.memecenter.com/fun/6069913/lmao

(didn't see the original so not sure but seems like it)

[–]neoj8888 125 points126 points127 points 10 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

That cartoon is sickening to even read. We've come to a point of pure insanity.

[–]Woozer 171 points172 points173 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

It's a rewrite of a strip of the webcomic Questionable Content. The original author did not write it that way, in fact the panel order is reversed. This was almost certainly part of the big group of rewrites that 4chan did.

[–]andrew-wiggin 35 points36 points37 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The original author did not write it that way, in fact the panel order is reversed.

So what you're saying is that it's completely different than the original comic

[–]eekamike 19 points20 points21 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, it's basically stolen artwork at this point.

[+]Toalmaster 10 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Here is the comic. The interesting thing about this is that the girl is trans and this is the first time getting naked with her new BF

[–]MrLaughter 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Martin is actually a good example for consensual sex, he's all about letting her take her time and call the shots.

[–]soalone34 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What does her calling the shots have to do with it?

[–]Sketchy_Uncle-2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Interesting read. Later you find out she is transgender. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2901)

[–]Toalmaster6 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You actually find out WAY earlier

[–]Andrew_Squared -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Political satire

[–]NibblyPig 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like this

[+]WolfeBane84 -50 points-49 points-48 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

part of the big group of rewrites that 4chan did.

Yes, because shit like this would never happen, so it must be a 4chan green text...

[–]easy2rememberhuh 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

haha, a friend of mine had this happen to him but it was more like he was in a relationship with her for a while (think 4 or 5 months) and they broke it off but at this point she decided that she regretted a few of their sexual encounters they had while together so she decided to tell a friend

this friend ended up writing an article that was posted on a website and included the guys name in the title and article with details about him, now he uses a different name when applying to jobs because otherwise a simple google search will lead employers to a site saying he has raped a girl and they would not want to be associated with this

[–]Im_a_Seal8 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Do you even know what a greentext is?

[–]Alannasthrowaway 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/4chanexploitables

[+]wilc8650 10 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Do people really think this is a prevalent problem?

[–]Grubnar 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The people who live it sure seem to think so. There are many well know cases of (mostly) young men suing their collage for expelling them after they were (proven to have been) falsely accused of rape.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]iandmlne 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

meh

[–]neoj8888 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are there people who think it isn't?

[–]_Fallout_-4 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Here's one thing that none of the guys in this thread are getting (and I'm a guy).

Consent can be revoked. If you're having sex with a girl, and she tells you to stop, then stop. You can get formally written consent notarized by an official notary, but none of that matters if consent is revoked during the act of sex.

Now, for the particular case mentioned in the picture, this guy is getting his life really fucked over by a rule that should not be in place. Both parties said it was consensual after the sex happened. The rule should be changed.

But to pretend like this is an extremely prevalent thing is delusional. If you're just a regular guy who doesn't want to rape people, just make sure the girl is coherent and actually wants to have sex with you and you'll be completely fine. Don't be creepy and coerce her. This fear monger isn't helpful or even relevant.

[–]Anon3mous13 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Consent can be revoked during sex. Consent cannot be revoked after the sex has already occurred.

[–]GSstreetfighter3 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

But it's being done, and ruining young men's lives, over and over. How is this not apparent?

[–]a_posh_trophy 48 points49 points50 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I find it hilarious that in this day and age, we as men have to do this shit.

[–]SHAnaNEgans 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We go through too much bullshit just to mess with these drunk and hot girls

[–]iandmlne 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

burqa time?

[–]iamnotfromtexas90 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This makes me glad I was a 'loser' who didn't get any action in college. As the great Bill Burr says, 'just rub one out and then rethink the situation.' That wisdom applies to so much.

[–]pelasgian 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why don't men start accusing women of rape when they regret it? Maybe, in doing so, women will see how ridiculous their position actually is.

[–]DavidByron2 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only way these laws get changed is when women are the victims.

[–]STEM_logic 20 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You realise an end to college hookups is exactly what the sex-negative crowd want, right?

Advice like this is the end goal they unconsciously want.

[–]molodyets 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just because someone believes in abstinence until marriage doesn't mean they are sex negative.

[–]DavidByron2 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They want an end to male-female relationships. they want men and women to hate and fear each other.

[–]pnw_diver 77 points78 points79 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Just assume she's psychotic and empowered over you.

End of story.

Dear College Men:

Avoid American women like you avoid Bubonic Plague.

[–]A-T22 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm sure most girls are fine, it's just that the whole ordeal is so balls to the walls retarded that whenever it happens there's a lot of fanfare around it.

Might want to get her to agree in some kind of text form tho <sup>just</sup> ^<sup>in</sup> ^^<sup>case</sup>

[–]demonsoliloquy[🍰] 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So don't even worry about it because it's such a rare case that only kooks worry about? Gotcha.

[–]Ooshkii 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But... We don't avoid that plague because it doesn't exist in human populations anymore. Are you saying that we should not avoid women? /s

[–]Grubnar 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think many college men do not know what the bubonic plague is.

[–]_Fallout_ -5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm a guy in college. Your advice is really fucking dumb and based entirely off of statistically negligible occurrences.

[–]iandmlne 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

cool, glad to hear all this hype is unwarranted.

[–]DavidByron2 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically you have to hope that the girl never gets pissed off with you any time before you graduate or you're fucked. Oh and remember there's an entire department of your college that lives to try and make her pissed off at you. Good luck with that.

[–]Gwuc 21 points22 points23 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Why do colleges investigate such serious heinous criminal activity while the police do not in these situations?

[–]Sirus804 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If similar stories like these didn't gain any traction within the media the college's wouldn't do much about it.

It is only because some story went viral that the college has to back away and distance itself from any liability. That mostly means expelling the male even though the female is in the wrong.

By the time the police come to a conclusion the male will already be expelled so the school doesn't get any hard press. The police may and often find that there was no foul play by the male but the college reputation matters more. Better get rid of him before a verdict comes out.

[–]overtmind 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Money. They're worried about losing money.

[–]Fuzzy_Noodle 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So in American college you don't get charged with a real sex crime, just publically shamed and kicked out of college?

[–]brahtat 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. When I went to college a kid was accused of raping two different girls, turns out it was consensual with both they just didn't want admit to having sex with this kid when he was seen leaving their dorm rooms. The girls banded together and told the university and the kid was immediately expelled. Even when the city police concluded that he in fact did not rape these girls the university still did not let him back in.

[–]lasciate 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also they keep whatever tuition you've paid and give your spot to a wait-lister so they lose nothing. There's no incentive to do the right thing except human decency and plenty to do the wrong including running afoul of the Dept. of Ed.

[–]chasinguphill 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I haven't seen an anybody actually answer your question so here's the real answer. The federal government sent out a Dear Colleague letter to colleges in the US saying that part of Title IX (gender equality in education), they need to respond to rape accusations on campus or else they will lose the majority of their funding. This was later expanded upon by a White House Task Force which included a statement stating that some schools have had success by having a single person act as investigator, judge, jury, and executioner. It additionally supports denying all due process guaranteed in the Constitution.

The police can do their own investigation, but oftentimes the alleged victim will not cooperate with the police. Such instances lead to the "Mattress Case." Where a young woman did not work with police, but rather received college credit for art by carrying a mattress around campus while bullying the person she claimed raped her.

[–]bcrabill 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Investigate? It's usually just the college yelling "you're guilty, you're guilty, you're guilty" and then expelling whoever was accused. It's basically never anyone who has any sort of background in criminal justice either. The police will investigate if you go to them but police and college dealings with the issue are usually fairly independent of each other, not a one or the other situation. The reason you'll hear more about university investigations is that they typically have much lower thresholds for evidence, because well, the police are the police.

[–]kronox 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From what I understand, the police will ask them to press charges, then they don't because they would have to prove it. However U.S. college campus courts only need a 'preponderance of evidence' to convict (more then 50% likely). Also the colleges are pressured through funding to deal with these things and federally required to for some reason.

[–]DavidByron2 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because cops still have to abide by minimal standards of civil rights and feminists hate civil rights because they want all men punished just for being male.

[–]Yeahdudex 27 points28 points29 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disclaimer: Only for Muricans.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]InternetSafety101 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

False rape accusations deserve jail time. Only way to stop this shit.

[–]backtotheocean 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Recently heard of a woman getting time for false accusation.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]superdownvotemaster 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Title 9 is a fucking witch hunt!

[–]DavidByron2 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Title IX is reasonable and gender neutral. What the feminists claim that title IX says is of course utterly the opposite.

[–]continuousQ 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, might be better to make your own drawings for this, or at least stick a huge disclaimer on it explaining this is an altered comic and linking the original.

[–]Frobenioid 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Start here instead: MGTOW.

[–]overtmind 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Better learn how to make that FiFi

[–]itswheresfluffy 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

What's funny is that girl has a penis.

[–]Cerxi 37 points38 points39 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Not necessarily true. The point of that page of the comic was that neither the audience nor Marten knew if she has a penis. Now Marten does, but we still don't. It's basically Jeph saying "it doesn't matter, she's a girl."

But yes, she's transgender.

[–]Dead_HumanCollection 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not going to lie. Transgender people can have their day and enjoy themselves, but if I got to that stage and found out that I had been lied to and led on I would be very unhappy. It does matter, you are misrepresenting yourself to your potential partner.

[–]lasershurt 24 points25 points26 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They talked about it before-hand like sensible people.

The chances of someone "misleading" you to that point are tiny, because that's usually a good way for them to get their asses kicked or killed. So, not a popular 'tactic'.

[–]mrstickman 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, transgendered people IRL do in fact know to talk about this with partners before naked time. Giant surprises at the start of sexytime aren't a great idea.

That said, here's a friendly reminder that it's rude to ask this about people if it's none of your business. Basically, you need to be their doctor or their lover to be allowed. Otherwise it's as rude as asking "Hey, are you pregnant or just fat?"

[–]killcat 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except that the language used does the tricking, the use of Feminine pro-nouns (she) and referring to them as a "girl" (lit: a female child from birth to adulthood, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/girl).

[–]FightingPolish -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She didn't misrepresent herself, in the comic she doesn't go around telling every person that she talks to that she's transgender every time she talks to them but she makes it known that she is when she needs to and to this group of people it doesn't matter at all. It's not very realistic that people would react this way in the real world, more idealistic about the way it should be than anything but the comic has a lot of things that aren't realistic that people treat as everyday things, sentient robots that have the same rights as humans for instance.

[–]Flatogeo 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Spoilers! I'm still working my way through it!

[–]itswheresfluffy 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oopps, sorry.

[+]WolfeBane84 -8 points-7 points-6 points 10 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

So, I did a little bit of quick perusing of that comic.

One thing I've never understood is this. If theres a guy, who "feels" he's a woman. Isn't that just some sort of "rationalization" for wanting dick, but not wanting to come out as gay?

I'm just confused about all the "transgender" stuff, never really had occasion to interact with such people.

[–]cypher197 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

For heterosexual/mostly hetero males, pairing with pre-op transwomen: Some people are purely attracted to secondary sexual characteristics (breasts, hips, lips, etc) rather than primary sexual characteristic (genitalia).

For transwomen themselves, we have reason to believe it's neurologically rooted because the gendering process in the human brain is actually relatively indirect and complex, and can potentially go wrong at a lot of different points. (Structural similarities between brains of un-hormoned transwomen and natural-born women have been observed scientifically.)

Additionally, some transwomen only date women and not men, so we could hardly say they only want dick. :P

[–]Azothlike 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

. (Structural similarities between brains of un-hormoned transwomen and natural-born women have been observed scientifically.)

This is misleading at best, and a blatant lie at worst.

Scientific observation has been done, yes; but it has proven that MtF transsexual brains are extremely consistent with cisgender male brains, for people that haven't been on artificial hormone replacement / treatment.

In heterosexual samplings done via MRI, for instance, MtF brains are consistent with cisgender male brains in 5 out of 6 areas, and consistent with female brains in zero out of six areas.

There are biological arguments that can be made to correlate with transgenderism, but 'they have the wrong gender brain' is not one of them.

[–]cypher197 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Citation, please?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_transsexualism#Brain_structure has some data, and it doesn't look like "extremely consistent" is entirely a correct characterization.

[–]Azothlike 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wiki is not a good source. Wiki is not scientific or objective, and is often biased in how it chooses to represent an issue and which edits or editors it allows in an article.

Wiki can point you to good sources, via it's own sourced statements, though.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180619/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754583/

Here are two solid studies that can be used as sources on the issue.

The TL;DR of these studies is such, paraphased fairly by moi, is:

Untreated MtF transgender individuals have brain structure and grey matter volumes largely consistent with biological cisgender males; however, homosexual MtF transgender individuals do differ in significant and generally consistent ways, in some areas. These differences are in the direction of female standards, but still closer to male averages than female averages.

Relevant direct quotes to source that TL;DR:

We analyzed MRI data of 24 male-to-female (MTF) transsexuals not yet treated with cross-sex hormones in order to determine whether gray matter volumes in MTF transsexuals more closely resemble people who share their biological sex (30 control men), or people who share their gender identity (30 control women). Results revealed that regional gray matter variation in MTF transsexuals is more similar to the pattern found in men than in women.

and

Overall, our study provides evidence that MTF transsexuals possess regional gray matter volumes mostly consistent with control males.

and

The Rametti team used an MRI technique called Diffusion Tensor Imaging to compare homosexual male-to-female transsexuals (n = 18) with nontranssexual, heterosexual control males (n = 19) and with nontranssexual, heterosexual control females (n = 19). They contrasted the male controls with the female controls to identify the sex-dimorphic portions of the brain and then contrasted the homosexual transsexuals with each of the control groups on the dimorphic brain regions so identified. The initial contrasts identified six sex-dimorphic brain regions. The homosexual transsexual sample was intermediate in volume on all six brain structures, significantly different from the male controls on five of the six (and significantly different from the female controls on all six).

and

Savic and Arver (2010) applied anatomical MRIs with an analogous research design, identifying the sex-dimorphic portions of the brain and contrasting the (this time) heterosexual transsexual sample (n = 24) with each control sample (n’s = 24 each) on the sex-dimorphic brain regions. Of the eight brain regions that distinguished male from female brains, the heterosexual transsexual sample differed from the male controls on none (Savic & Arver, 2010, Table 3). Of the four brain regions that distinguished these heterosexual transsexuals from the male controls, sex-dimorphism was present in none (Savic & Arver, 2010, Table 3). As Savic and Arver themselves emphasized, “Contrary to the primary hypothesis, no sex-atypical features with signs of ‘feminization’ were detected in the transsexual group….The present study does not support the dogma that [male-to-female transsexuals] have atypical sex dimorphism in the brain” although that statement should have been restricted to refer to heterosexual male-to-female transsexuals only.

This is why I said your post was misleading at best, and didn't outright call it a lie. If the intention of your post was "transsexual brains are different", than the answer would be, 'A little bit, yes; but for heterosexual transgender people, not in any way associated with sex, and for homosexual transgender people, not enough to say they have the wrong sex brain, or a brain closer to their desired gender than their birth sex, and we don't even know why they're different, and if it's a cause of transgenderism or a result".

If you meant it as "Transgender people are just people born with the wrong gender brain!", which is something of a feel-good myth that's been around ever since transgender identities became a known mainstream thing, the answer would be no. That's a lie, as it's unfortunately nowhere near that simple.

[+]WolfeBane84 -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

can potentially go wrong at a lot of different points.

go wrong.

Isn't that an admission of what some say about it when using it for the argument that it's not natural and should be treated as a mental illness?

[–]Ariensus 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Just because something developed irregularly doesn't make it unnatural. Nature isn't a 100% perfect process and sometimes it results in physiological irregularities; it doesn't make the irregularities unnatural, just abnormal. If that irregularity is in the brain, then it will manifest in psychological effects. Just because the symptom is an altered way of thinking, doesn't mean it's any less real than being born with something more physically obvious, like a cleft palate.

I get the impression by your wording that you're trying to use 'mental illness' to mean 'not real' or 'all in their imagination', while completely ignoring the fact that brains are physical/chemical organs capable of having physical/chemical problems that have psychological impact.

[+]WolfeBane84 -8 points-7 points-6 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

But if the whole purpose of nature is to adapt and pass on genes then changing genders removes that, doesn't that mean it's not natural?

As to the mental illness I meant it as what the words mean. If something went wrong (bad wiring) isn't that a mental defect then?

[–]Ariensus 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If it came out of natural processes, then it is by definition natural. Some traits show up in nature because evolution is pretty random. In species like humans, a lot of stuff that doesn't have much of an impact on our ability to reproduce persists because we exist in communities that can make up for any inherited traits that are even negative. But in the case of things like being transgender, it's speculated it may be a result of hormonal imbalances in the womb that affect the development of the fetus' brain. In this case, the individual could have perfectly good genes, but the changes done by womb hormones have caused problems anatomically.

In the case of bad wiring, then yes, it would be a mental illness of sorts with a definite physiological cause. The only reason I asked for you to specify what you meant by it is that typically when people use the term 'mental illness', they use it as a way to dismiss the human that has the illness. For example, telling people with depression to "just cheer up!" when they very well could have a chemical imbalance that could be resolved with pills.

[–]Woozer 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Gender dysphoria is a mental defect, one for which a valid treatment is gender reassignment. The goal is to get a person to a state where they are capable of living a normal life, as unburdened as possible by their mental issues. If gender reassignment has (for those that seek it) generally much better outcomes than other options, why would we force people to pursue those other options? Why wouldn't we want to give them the most effective treatment possible?

That's completely aside from any evolutionary argument (because i don't want to/know how to unpack that kind of argument).

[–]Azothlike 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gender reassignment for those that seek it does not have much better outcomes.

That's why enormous criteria and investments had to be put in place, to restrict who can have the procedure done. When it was first pioneered, and given to anybody that wanted it, the result was a wave of suicides and depression from people that received the procedures. Now you have to pass certain criteria, such as living as the desired gender for X amount of time.

Even now, with those criteria in place, it's benefits are routinely doubted and questioned, and the demographics and condition of people who have received it continue inspire doubt in its effectiveness in fixing anything but anatomy.

[–]Tragic-Story 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like left handed people? /s

[–]King-Achelexus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not "natural" if your definition of that word is the same that religious fundamentalists use to justify prejudice against the queer community and everyone else they don't like.

[–]greeklemoncake 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It is a mental illness, of sorts - it's in DSM-III. But the main thing is that we don't have any other effective way to treat gender dysphoria except for transitioning.

[+]overtmind 10 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

If it's in the DSM, there's no 'of sorts' about it. It's a de jure definition.

[–]greeklemoncake 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That's DSM-III, I'm pretty sure it's not in DSM-V meaning the notion of it being a mental illness it outdated.

Edit: Just looked, this is what it has to say:

Part of removing stigma is about choosing the right words. Replacing “disorder” with “dysphoria” in the diagnostic label is not only more appropriate and consistent with familiar clinical sexology terminology, it also removes the connotation that the patient is “disordered.”

[–]TwistedPerson 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The second you try to define something as "not natural" as bad, you've made a mistake. Natural is not necessarily a good thing, rape is natural and from an evolutionary perspective (natural) it has been a successful reproduction strategy for some. Does it being natural mean that it is good or right? Fuck no.

Natural is not equivalent to good. Death and birth are natural and I'd happily stop both in their tracks.

[–]King-Achelexus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's called gender identity disorder and is treated as a medical condition treated with Hormone Replacement Therapy(HRT) and Sexual Reassignment Surgery(SRS). Simple as that.

[–]Hypersapien 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Transgender and homosexual are two completely different things. There have been guys who transitioned and lived as lesbians.

[–]Vandechoz 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

look up similar questions in /r/askreddit, basic questions about trans get asked there every once in a while and you can look through the answers

[–]thebornotaku 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it goes deeper than that.

Who you're attracted to is your sexuality. The gender you are (or want to be, or feel like you are) is your gender identity. The two are not necessarily related.

You could feel like a straight woman trapped in a man's body. You could also feel like a lesbian trapped in a man's body. You could be a gay man trapped in a woman's body. You could also be a straight man trapped in a woman's body. You could be bisexual trapped either way.

For instance, I know two people who are trans. The first is a pre-op transgender, currently male, who is attracted to women. But feels like he is a woman himself. And before anybody bitches at me about "pronouns", I've asked.

The second is a man who felt trapped in a woman's body. He has already done quite a bit of hormone therapy as well as a double mastectomy. He is also bisexual (perhaps pansexual, I can't remember which term he uses) and tends to have more relationships with other men than he does with women, at least from what I've seen.

I understand it can be hard to comprehend and I 100% thought the same way you did before I got to know and talk with these people. It's kind of an interesting and misunderstood subject though.

I hope this helps.

[–]Rain_Seven 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well as a straight man, I am not attracted to a vagina at all. Like, it feels good, but it is kind of gross honestly. You got curves and tits and look like a woman in a dress, good enough for me.

[–]King-Achelexus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I actually find penises more attractive than vaginas, too.

[–]ThinkWolf3 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Mirror anyone ?

[–]ur_mom69 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How exactly do you have sex then safely if us men constantly have to check oh is she consenting, oh! Is she alright with oh- is she ok? etc. Even if we are in the middle of doing it??

[–]Splendidbiscuit 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's like asking how do you walk alone if someone might mug you at any moment. Any interaction with another human carries risk. The number of people who are crazy are extremely low and this is very rare. People die in cars in the tens of thousands every year, and who knows how many more injured. Sometimes people pick out a particular thing, like here being falsely accused of rape, or over their, been raped and worry over it so much it grows out of all proportion.

Don't be like the women who refuse to interact with men because some men actually do rape woman and they blow the chances of that out of proportion as well.

[–]WTFppl 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Document and save her consent; never delete conversations

If the person does not know that they are being recorded, the recording would be inadmissible in court.

-- Use the recording to first bring public shame.

[–]Invicturion 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Hope this shit never hits my country...... Even though im married... And dont get sexytimes anymore......... 😭

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Invicturion 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Norway.. This shit dosnt happen on any proper scale..

[–]Drmadanthonywayne 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Have these idiots considered the idea that if everything is rape, then nothing is rape?

Seriously, it's getting to the point on college campuses that actually raping some random stranger might be safer than having consensual sex with a girl that knows your name and can later accuse you of rape.

If this nonsense keeps up, we're going to have to go back to unisex colleges and chaperones on dates.

[–]DavidByron2 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is what they want. They want men and women to hate each other.

[–]jimmywiddle 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So many comments about where this came from and if the comic author would approve....

I don't think anyone really cares, its a internet meme which makes a very powerful and clear point and demonstrates exactly what is happening a lot in US and other countries colleges and universities.

It paints a powerful message of how messed up things have gotten and how a lot of young mens lives are being destroyed by this weak definition of what rape is, which not only damages mens lives, but also reduces the chance that women who are really raped are believed and taken seriously.

[–]Throwawayingaccount 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does anyone have a mirror to the picture?

[–]SovietReunions 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone have a mirror?

[–]entropyreduction 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meanwhile new age fems claim non-equal rights.

[–]queequeg092S 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't know how I ended up here, but this is wonderful. I'm a female, I've been assaulted various times, raped/coerced/threatened various times, and I fucking hate this shit.

 

If someone is drunk and says yes, just don't do it. That is rape along the same lines as having sex with someone mentally disabled or underage is rape.

 

But if someone is fully aware and says yes-without being coerced, threatened, or guilted by someone else- it's a mistake, not rape.

 

I lost my virginity due to a mistake I consented to, by a male who later raped me. The first time was a mistake- a huge one- by me. That will never change. Things got weird and an assault took place the same night- but the sex part- I wanted to at the time. It was my own mistake. These people who falsely claim rape undermine all people who have ever been raped.

 

Yes, do look for enthusiastic "yes" and no, do not coerce or pester anyone (woman this goes for you also), yes, pay attention to your partner and what they say during. But no, if they say yes with no pressure, it is not rape.

[–]InternetSafety101 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"If someone is drunk just don't do it." Better start taking my breathalyzer with me. /s

[–]queequeg092S 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, why not just stay on the safe side? And I mean if someone is clearly drunk. Male or female. I don't care. But clearly drunk.

[–]resinate80 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Women are not worth the trouble. Stay single and adventure your whole life.

The only exception would be to deal with it until you can have a son to join you on those adventures.

[–]Demonicpoodle 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

...... I'm starting to agree.

I realize that although I get pangs of loneliness while I'm single, I'm... happy. I'm content. I'm strong enough to be happy with myself and enjoy my own company very much. I hang out with friends, go to bars, play games, work, have a fun time at work with my coworkers.

The absolute insane risk that women are, on TOP of the financial burden they' expect you to undertake, is just seeming less and less and less enticing. And the fact that the courts automatically assume you're guilty as a male...

Just why bother? I'm either turning gay since most gay men dodge all this bullshit, or I'm staying single.

Any time I decide to casually fuck a girl, I am at the very least giving her a fake name and never letting her see my ID. That's at the least. At most, I'll have a hidden camera because it just seems necessary to now. I'd rather be arrested for "illegal recording" than some psycho later deciding I raped her when it was consensual.

[–]Frankly_George0 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm either turning gay since most gay men dodge all this bullshit, or I'm staying single.

False dichotomy. Unfortunately we don't get to choose our orientation; we're born that way.

I personally feel deeply for the people who sexually identify as an Attack Helicopter--what did they do before helicopters were commonplace enough for others to understand what they were going through? How much pain it must have been for them to try and try to explain only for some ignorant peasant cis shitlord to claim they were speaking as a filthy dragonkin!

Thankfully we live in more enlightened times....

[+]_Fallout_ -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

If you're staying single because of the statistically negligible chance you'll be falsely accused of rape, you're fucked in the head.

[–]resinate80 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

False rape is far from the only reason I would want to stay single. I'm still in the process of reordering my life and son after a 11 year relationship.

A relationship is something that carries a heavy burden and while it can be a fantastic thing sometimes, it can also be hell. I do not think I will be looking for another. This way I can live my life mostly as how I would like and not have to compete with your average ridiculous woman. But who knows, maybe I'll be get surprised. Doubt it, but maybe. Until then, I'll be out in the mountains, on a lake, in the desert, or simply just chillin' in my apartment, free from all that bullshit.

[–]iandmlne 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

why do you think this forum exists? i mean, besides starting out as a feminist parody sub on the topic?

[–]_Fallout_-7 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I assumed it existed as a petty reaction towards women's rights issues and to feed the persecution complex of people who actually aren't discriminated against.

It's sort of like if people started treating "first world problems" as if they were serious problems.

[–]Demonicpoodle3 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Feel free to give reasons that you feel we aren't discriminated against, but don't think you're right just because you're saying your statements from a distance.

[–]resinate803 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm not a frequenter of these forums, but you seem greatly ignorant by calling men's rights a non issue.

I mean, have you ever been in a serious relationship before?

[–]iandmlne1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

oh, well i guess you're right.

[–]Demonicpoodle 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Luckily I elaborated and said there's a lot more reasons than that? Haha.

[–]biglebowski55 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That Jeph's copyrighted artwork was stolen to promote an agenda? I'd day this does a lot more harm than good to the cause.

[+]Penultimatemoment -9 points-8 points-7 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Fair Use.

[–]biglebowski55 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure it is. It's not a parody of the original artwork. It's not a critique of the original artwork. Is a theft and manipulation of a protected work for a political statement. The fact that is a political statement I very much agree with doesn't make it ok.

[–]NovaeDeArx 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fair Use is a bit more complex than just parody (which this is not).

The four-point test is:

Is the use transformative?

In this case, the meaning and character of the work was substantially altered. It would probably pass this point.

Nature of the work:

Here, the author controlled the "first public appearance of the work". This point is probably upheld here as well.

Amount & substantiality of the portion taken:

This is the trickiest part. The art from that strip was essentially wholly used, although out of order and without the dialogue. This is the trickiest point for non-parody use, and the use here may not pass this point.

Effect of use on the potential market:

Negligible.

So, 3/4 of the test points seem to be passed without issue. The fourth is arguable given that the intention and character of the use are not notably harmful to the author or work, and would only really be an issue if Jeph decided to take issue with this particular work. It is certainly not egregious enough to be worried about unless the author himself were to find this usage problematic.

[–]mrstickman 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Couldn't an Social Justice Warrior seeing this image on Facebook be led to think of this as Jeph's idea? Would Jeph being branded as a "rape apologist"* by that SJW cause hum substantial harm?

* Please don't hate; I'm totally not saying he would be one, or even that such a thing exists. Hypothetical Facebooking SJW is saying it.

[–]iandmlne 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

judging by the original authors chosen subject matter it would seem to be in the realm of satire or parody really..

[–]jojotmagnifficent 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems to me that it's perfectly within the bounds of fair use as a transformative work (the thing being parodied/critiqued doesn't have to be related to the original work, just look at all those knockoffs of the famous "uncle sam wants you" poster for example). Having said that I think it should come with a disclaimer highlighting that it's not the original work, or even reflective of the originals content. I say that not so much because it is a legal requirement or anything, because I think Jeph is pretty cool and I like QC and would hate to see some nutbags attack him over this.

[–]Penultimatemoment -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Unoess they are profiting in some manner or cutting into the originator's profits, it should fall under fair use.

[–]biglebowski55 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By misrepresenting the material, they are damaging the brand. Would you not agree that this is a controversial subject matter which may turn some people away? Also, we're not arguing what should be; we're arguing what is covered by the law, and fair use law is much narrower than this.

[–]Jellooooo 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My parents would probably murder me anyway for not abstaining from sex.

[–]pnw_diver 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And yes this post cannot be upvoted enough.

[–]Longjohn_Server 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The original comic.

And for reference, the woman in the comic is trans.

I can appreciate wanting to protect others against false rape accusations, but editing an artist's work to support your message is kind of a shitty thing to do.

[–]equityengineer 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For the 500th time everyone, if there is ANY alcohol involved:

  1. No fucking driving.
  2. No fucking binding business decisions.
  3. No fucking.

[–]evildc6 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You forgot #4: No fucking tattoos.

[–]Raudskeggr 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can imagine this poster making a few campus feminists heads explode. :p

[–]DaSaw 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol, does Jeph know about this?

[–]fattimus_maximus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As someone who, until just recently, only had a passing understanding of the extreme nature of these incidents; I am flabbergasted by how out of hand this crap is getting.

Is this a war on sex? Men? Are the stories being overblown or is it really getting this bad for guys who end up in a bad hook up?

[–]DavidByron2 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A war on men. That is explicitly what feminism is and always has been. A war on sex mostly by accident, but generally feminists are puritans as are the tradcons they are derived from.

[–]jojotmagnifficent 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It should be noted that this isn't the original text/panel order, the original can be found here (thanks for digging that one up, saving me the trouble /u/Toalmaster). Questionable Content is one of the only webcomics I've read that approaches topics like this and actually treats it really well instead of either being blatant fanservice to niche kinks or crazy overtly SJW/Feminist man hating (I'm looking at you Sinfest ಠ_ಠ ).

It would be nice to see a small disclaimer explaining it's not original though, if only because I would hate to see the artist Jeph get hit by reprisal from the crazies over this.

[–]Lance_lake 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It should be noted that this isn't the original text/panel order, the original can be found here

Thank you for this. I was beginning to wonder if Jeph was going crazy as I have not caught up with the comics.

[–]jojotmagnifficent 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's still pretty much the same as it's always been. It's perhaps a tad more serious than it used to be, but not by much.

[–]txroller 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is scary it's a fricking witch hunt. Glad i'm old and in a relationship

[–]bl4ck3agle 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm glad I went to college in a time where women knew how to deal with and move on from sexual mistakes. I heard a good bit of "oh I can't believe I hooked up with that guy" stories back in my day. Nowadays those guys prolly would've been arrested because a girl decided she felt bad having sex with them.

[–]firefoxredditt 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I get that no means no, but when does yes start meaning yes? "

[–]1337Gandalf 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Links broken.

[–]antdude 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's gone!

[–]N6TJA 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I dunno what's going on, but I see a screenshot of a game.

[–]Type40BlueBox 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hate when people edit an artists comic especially to make a political statement they may not agree with.

[–]Infinite_Light -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I really do not think it is ok to re-use someone's comic like this. The Author of the comic probably does not appreciate his/her work being used for a purpose like this.

[–]falloutboy90010 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That's how I felt with someone I know..

[–]iaruoksid-2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yes, clearly the second image has no outside context and we should just blindly believe that she lied about being raped. Clearly that is the only possible thing. Nope, no way she chickened out, tried to stop him, and he continued fucking her. Nope, not like he coulda forced her to have anal sex. No, obviously she's a lying whore because look at this less than one full sentence text message.

[–]DavidByron22 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The context of the real Jane/John makes her look far worse believe me. As I recall she only said it was rape months later after falling in with feminists who encouraged her to file a false rape accusation. At the time her consent before after and even during sex was well documented in her texts to friends. The college expelled him anyway.

[–]CynicalSoup-3 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Whores

[–]NotHomo-8 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

the second we invent robots as good as the real thing women are off this damn planet

[+]boobonk -10 points-9 points-8 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, fuck off for altering Questionable Content for this low hanging fruit.

[–]King-Achelexus 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That edit is old as balls.

[–]boobonk -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And still bad.

[–]King-Achelexus 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whoever made that infograph probably just took that comic out of the web, maybe not even knowing that was an edit.

[+]Keiichi81 10 years ago* [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

Ah, Questionable Content. A comic strip that started off as pretentious hipster indie music elitism, and then went straight down the SJW rabbit hole. I stopped reading it when they introduced a trans girl as the main character's girlfriend and established that he was like totally cool with her being trans and that didn't affect things in any way all in the space of a single 6 panel comic.

[–]returnofthrowaway 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

His mom is a dominatrix and his dad is gay. I'm pretty sure that as far as being accepting goes, he's probably got some experience.

[–]A_Sleepy_Panda 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Martin was super chill the whole comic. He was friends with everyone. Cool with everything. Why wouldn't he be okay with the girl he likes being transgender?

[–]jojotmagnifficent 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What? QC never went anywhere near the SJW rabbit hole. It was handled extremely maturely and basically the whole character arc theme was the epitome of "it really doesn't matter that much". And if you have actually read the comic it's exactly the reaction you would expect from Marten. It's not pandering or forced at all. It's actually the only real example I can think of that DOES handle the topic well.

If you were talking about Sinfest I could understand, but laying that on QC makes no sense.

[–]Namkcalb 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tolerating others makes you a Social Justice Advocate.

Hating others makes makes you a Social Justice Warrior.

[–]jojotmagnifficent 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tolerating others makes you a Social Justice Advocate.

Not sure I agree with that. Social justice as a concept is that people should enact justice themselves based on what is essentially popular opinion. Being a Social justice Advocate means you support and promote lynching more or less. Being a Social Justice WARRIOR just means you actually go out and lynch people (or to be more modern, doxx them, accuse them of rape and publically slander them etc.)

[–]AtomicBLB -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Knowing this situation can and does happen fills me with rage. The trivialization of such a despicable act.

[–]Ratmotored57-11 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Looks like he banged his sister.

[+]elwahrio -20 points-19 points-18 points 10 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

You're joking if you think the text messages are enough to prove whatever happened next could not have been rape. Have you got anymore details of that case?

[–]Murican_Freedom1776 43 points44 points45 points 10 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

You don't have to prove whatever happened next wasn't rape, the prosecutor has to prove beyond a resonable doubt to all the juriors that what happened next was rape.

It's called innocent until proven guilty. Not valid for non-criminal cases on college campuses

[–]squishiness2 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's called innocent until proven guilty.

Sure, but that doesn't stop the media and people making assumptions and fucking your life up.

[–]Murican_Freedom1776 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no way to really avoid that unfortunately. It is the society we live in. You pretty much have to let the court of public opinion decide what you are and what you did, then try to clear your name in civil court by suing the person who alleged the false rape allegations.

The ONLY way to prevent the court of public opinion would be through state public records law changes. It would have to be done at a state level since the Freedom of Information Act (the only federal law about disclosure of public records) only applies to federal agencies, not local police which would be the ones handling the investigation. If the campus has private police, well, that company can pretty much do whatever they want in regards to what information they choose to make public. I believe campus police fall under state jurisdiction when it pertains to public records disclosure.

That means each state would have to amend the public records disclosure laws to exclude rape victims and rape suspects information from the public records. I count the odds of that happening anytime soon at about even with the odds of me finding a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. It would be practically political suicide for a politician to suggest such an amendment, much less for an entire state legislator pass the law.

TL;DR: Court of Public Opinion sucks but there is really not much you can do about it other than let it happen and go through civil processes to get monetary compensation.

Edit: Clarification

[–]Ricwulf 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure, but that doesn't stop the media and people

Or the campus kangaroo courts that have been happening either.

[–]20rakah 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

colleges don't operate on beyond a reasonable doubt they go 2 rungs below that to preponderance of evidence.

[–]TheCyanKnight -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

In this post, the prosecutor is 'on trial' though, and the only 'proof' offered is the text. So do we get to see proof that the prosecutor didn't prove beyond reasonable doubt that it was rape?
Or do we need to be appalled that this girl showed intention to have sex and then refuse to give it up? Because that sounds actually rapey.

[–]Murican_Freedom1776 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you're asking. Could you word the questions differently?

[–]TheCyanKnight 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The post makes the accusation of false rape charges and offers a text message as proof of consent. Since we're accusing someone (school, judge, I don't even know?), shouldn't we prove beyond all doubt that there wasn't actual rape? This post seems to suggest that because she had the intention of having sex when leaving her house, the guy was entitled to sex. Lots of things could have changed her mind, maybe his dick smelled of gonnorhea and she wanted to leave but he forced himself on her.

[–]elwahrio-12 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yes, but that's not my point. The original post showed the text messages with the comment "this kid was EXPELLED", as though all other evidence is invalidated if you have a text message implying consent to sex. You can have consent to a sex act and then still rape someone immediately afterwards.

[–]olican1012 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

How can you rape aomeone when you have consent? Youre makkng so sense.

[–]elwahrio-2 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That's the rapiest thing I've ever heard.

Consent can be withdrawn at any time. If someone is communicating to you that they are no longer willing to have sex and you continue, that is literally rape. Also, consent for one sex act is not consent to all sex acts. She may think you just want PiV, but then you hold her down and fuck her in the arse, then guess what? That's rape.

I can't decide if this thread is full of 13 year olds or rapists. Maybe the feminists are right. If this thread is anything to judge by, there are a lot of people who need educating about what rape actually is.

[–]olican1011 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Ive never raped anyone. Far from it. Only had sex while in a relationshio after i am 100% sure that they feel the same.

If you ask if you can have sex with someone and they say yes. Then you have consent.

I AM a feminist. Wtf does this have to do with womens rights?

[–]Jaz_the_Nagai 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is all I could find: https://www.thefire.org/cases/occidental-college-student-found-guilty-of-sexual-assault-after-incapacitation-standard-is-misapplied/

[–]RegretfulEducation 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You'd pretty much have to film the entire thing for it to be evidence of a mistaken belief of fact (that there was consent). The truth is that you can never document if there was consent or not because it's in the other person's mind. The best that you can do is gather evidence for your defense of mistaken belief of fact.

Which means that no matter what happens, you'll have raped a woman if she didn't (in her mind) consent, but either a) society says that it's okay, or b) it was justified in the circumstances (the two operating principles behind criminal defences).

[–]Murican_Freedom1776 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

You've never been in a courtroom have you? The only thing behind criminal defense, and the only thing is the law. There is no "is this acceptable" it's "I have to make a member of the jury have a reasonable doubt that no crime was committed".

As far as your "justified" statement, I have no clue what you're talking about. Rape would never be justified.

[–]RegretfulEducation 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You've never been in a courtroom have you?

I've been in one often.

The only thing behind criminal defense, and the only thing is the law.

Yeah, I was pointing out the operating principles in the law of defences generally (excuses, and justifications).

Rape would never be justified.

There are two kinds of defences. Those that are justifications (Self-defence) and those that are concessions to human frailty (duress).

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]del_cotu 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It isn't. She could hang out with the guy two hours later and say no.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]elwahrio -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In the meme, no evidence or context is provided. Hence why I was asking for more information before deciding what the situation was. He could have held her down and fucked her in the arse for all we know from the meme. For that he would not have had consent, and he would be a rapist.

But you're right. I'm the idiot. Anyone who thinks for themselves and asks for the full story is clearly an idiot.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]tehjarvis 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have never good sex?

[–]Roflllobster 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably a 15 year old who has the inability to write any sort of subtle dialog.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HOLY SHIT WHEN DID MARTIN AND THINGY FUCK

[–]biglineman -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good thing I lost the key to my chastity belt.

[–]rabidrabbity -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Marriage is at an all time low because of men being scared off. Women will just have to lezzie themselves when all the men give up because of litigation.

[+]Rockcabbage -11 points-10 points-9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol is this a fuckin joke

[+]mymonster8u 10 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Seriously? That's the dumbest cartoon I've ever seen. This down plays rape and violence. My husband almost beat me to death I called the police because I was being held at knife point and I couldn't believe how many shitty lawyers and family members and coworkers ran to his aide to fucking help him and bail him out. You know what he did when he got bailed out? Started sending me death threats. Real fucking cute. Ya... protect yourself from rape accusations what a shameful joke.

[–]icculushfb42 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm really sorry that happened to you. Unfortunately though, it's not this comic that is downplaying what you went through, it's the movement that it is commenting on. There are actual women out there that believe (and are attempting to have laws passed to this effect) if you have consensual sec and later regret that decision, you have been raped. These are the people that are marginalizing what happened to you.

[–]Charlietorr09 -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh come on! Everyone knows no means yes and yes means anal...right?

[–]DavidByron2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Increasingly rape doesn't have anything to do with consent. Rape is simply heterosexual sex that the woman find dissatisfying for some reason even years later.

[–]goodhotchill-33 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

To be honest if you look at me in a way I'm going to think it means no. Otherwise you can say I sexually harassed you because I assumed you gave me a hint. Poor guy in the screenshot. She probably put the condom on him too.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter