TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

r/TheRedPill quarantined

Hystericalprince

September 27, 2018
113 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate

https://www.reddit.com/quarantine?dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FTheRedPill%2F

Reddit quarantined the TRP subreddit. Thoughts on this?

Archived from /r/PurplePillDebate

r/PurplePillDebate is a neutral community to discuss sex and gender issues, specifically those pertaining to /r/TheBluePill and /r/TheRedPill.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/PurplePillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title r/TheRedPill quarantined
Author

Hystericalprince

Upvotes 113
Comments 885
Date September 27, 2018 7:28 PM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9jfwno/rtheredpill_quarantined/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/rtheredpill-quarantined.260679
https://theredarchive.com/post/260679
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by Hystericalprince

Q4RP, is there like any cool TRP advice

8 upvotes
May 16, 2019
/r/PurplePillDebate

Q4RP, why are you guys so obsessed with feminism?

5 upvotes
February 6, 2019
/r/PurplePillDebate

Why don’t girls hang pictures of old rich powerful men in their rooms?

4 upvotes
December 29, 2018
/r/PurplePillDebate

Comments

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 107 points108 points109 points 7 years ago* (23 children) | Copy Link

lol I just checked out the home page of that university. Their focus articles:

  • Guys Who Get It: The Men of the Women’s Movement ...

  • Activists Meet Researchers "Challenging Homophobia, Challenging Masculinities" ...

  • “When you have Angelina Jolie and Gwyneth Paltrow in the same sentence, well, people take note,” ...

  • Conservatives find out that women are studying toxic masculinity, meltdowns ensue

  • ... Men as Allies in Preventing Violence Against Women

  • Angry white men' ...

This could be satire.

Anyway, reddit has about run its course anyway. Its getting rather boring. Most subreddits seems to be overrun with hysteric ideology driven shrills which accept no thinking outside the accepted parametres of their ideology. Reddit used to be a place where you could meet people with different thoughts, and you could have an honest conversation. Now, you'll just get downvoted and probably shadow banned.

[–]LeJacquelope 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Lucky Beast wrote above:

What these manchildren conceive of as "positive masculinity" is nothing more than crying that men should be docile and doormats for women.

And you just showed that this is exactly what that university's content is about.

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 49 points50 points51 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Its a joke. 50% (3/6) of the articles are about women. The rest are about toxic masculinity. Its like a textbook example of the reason trp says why we need trp. And I have to give them this. That university site will give men nothing useful or positive to take home.

[–]LeJacquelope 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Ironically TRP leads men to toxic solutions.

We need a section of the manosphere that is critical of mainstream feminism while steering men away from the far right and the other clearly misogynistic crap (and I don't mean kowtowing to the "everything is muh soggy knees" paranoia of mainstream feminism).

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Yes. It boogles the mind they'd choose to link to this joke of a university site. But I don't know where you'd go for the masculine orientated non-trp content.

[–]DebatesNotBans4 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Censorship is NEVER the solution. You either:

  1. (Freedom) Have people of different points of view explain and discuss their opinions with each other, and perhaps learn from each other, or even change their minds. OR:
  2. (Censorship) Have people with the """wrong""" opinion be outcasted from the """normal""" people and villified, thus creating an echo chamber, where no fresh viewpoints are added.

The only problem with 1. is that it requires the strength of mind to admit and change when you're proven wrong, AND it requires people to be able to have logical arguments, and not just yell and throw insults or passive aggression at each other.

(Which most people seem incapable of doing)

[–]LeJacquelope 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

It's time for someone to make such a thing.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

we call him jordan peterson

[–]LeJacquelope 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Seems there's a lot of controversy around him. Been trying to make sense of it.

[–]the_calibre_catNo Pill Man 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, you see, he doesn't tow the feminist/leftist line and disagrees with some aspects of it, so, you know, obviously that means he's a Nazi.

[–] JeanClaudeDruncker 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Peterson is a shill for the United Nations' sustainable development nonsense. He is controlled opposition to steer men away from starting an actual revolution that could uproot the establishment.

Notice how he concedes on the main pillars of extreme left wing ideology, like equality, while always warning about the "far right" boogeyman.

He was recently invited to a Trilateral Commission event, along with a who's who of establishment eurocrats who are currently turning Europe into a far left dictatorship.

He's a fraud.

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

But feminists hate him.

And what revolution are you talking about? The only revolution I want to see is nonviolent nonparticipation.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

The trendy charlatan hack?

The guy who says men and women aren't on equal footing in debate because women have no fear of physical reprisal?

That is, women aren't equal because we can't hit them?

That guy?

[–] the_calibre_cat No Pill Man 11 points 12 points 13 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

He's not wrong about that. Men's advantage over women is physical strength, which we are forbidden from using. Women's advantage over men is social intelligence and sexuality, which they are free and in many cases protected (especially by members of the left) in using. Note: This isn't an objection to the notion that we should be forbidden from using our physical strength, it's an observation.

See: The ability to accuse a man 35 years after the fact and have an entire political ideology bend over backwards for you, and never utter one sentiment of skepticism about it.

[–] JuJu_Smith-Schuster 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

They like to disguise it as the #MeToo movement.

[–] Mr_Smoogs The 2nd most obnoxious poster here 5 points 6 points 7 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

His words were in an altercation, not a debate. "Men can't control crazy women" is his exact quote.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL3Hrwg3A3w

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -3 points -2 points -1 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol of course you subscribe to this fraud's bullshit.

[–] Mr_Smoogs The 2nd most obnoxious poster here 5 points 6 points 7 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Merely correcting your misrepresentation.

Why do you think the domestic violence against men is more common than domestic violence against women?

[–] hammerhaunts 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that guy, the horror

[–] Merger-Arbitrage Triggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap... -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you sure? Maybe it will give the minority of toxically-masculine men a real source of therapy? Most people do fine without RP - remember?

[–] JeanClaudeDruncker 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

They really don't. Most married men today get divorced and a majority of them gets to pay for kids they don't get to raise because they believe that all women are wonderful and it will never happen to them.

The red pill has literally saved lives in that regard.

This is coming from someone who would like to believe in relationships, marriage and family, by the way. But healthy male-female relationships are just not possible in areas with high levels of feminism and social justice indoctrination.

All the red pill does is teach men to get laid and survive in such areas of the world without getting their lives destroyed by toxic women.

The fact that the establishment silenced them only proves how necessary they are.

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap... 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Who assigned that link to the quarantine page? Reddit admins?

[–]wekacuck 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

According to this the new quarantines use the following categories:

  • Default
  • Life After Hate
  • Positive Masculinity
  • Communism History
  • Holocaust History
  • 9/11 History

Each category has its own message set by admins. Lists of subs quarantined into each category and screenshots of the warnings included in the post linked above.

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap... 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well the Communist one is barely OK, but the Positive Masculinity one is awful. Like deliberate incitement. Looks like no one is going to teach those people a balanced approach.

[–]harbo 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most subreddits seems to be overrun with hysteric ideology driven shrills which accept no thinking outside the accepted parametres of their ideology.

That's not true at all; try r/wine or r/weightroom for some eyebleach.

[–]wtknightBlue-ish Married Passport Bro ♂︎ 192 points193 points194 points 7 years ago (211 children) | Copy Link

The Red Pill sub has a lot of misogynist masculinism, of course, but I doubt that they are doing anything about feminist subs where misandrist views are often represented. Double standards bother me in general.

[–][deleted] 104 points105 points106 points 7 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Welcome to the left wing of politics, enjoy your stay.

[–]wtknightBlue-ish Married Passport Bro ♂︎ 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think that some left-wingers are more tolerant of free speech than others.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some. Not most which is the problem.

[–]the_calibre_catNo Pill Man 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If they are, they have let the anti-free speech extremists speak loudly on their behalf. I've not heard a single leftist say that racist speech is free speech. It is. It is odious, but it is nonetheless an example of the exercise of free speech.

[–]wtknightBlue-ish Married Passport Bro ♂︎ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are definitely some ACLU-like leftist types who support the right to speak freely. But yeah, they are probably getting drowned out now by the more authoritarian left-wingers who believe that allowing any kind of right-wing speech is some kind of potential fascist threat and therefore must be curtailed.

[–]gunbusterxlYou people are fucking disgusting0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't think I'd ever upvote a single post you ever make. I stand corrected.

[–] Quetzie -3 points -2 points -1 points 7 years ago   (25 children) | Copy Link

Welcome to binary thinking, now grow the fuck out of it please.

[–] Transmigratory 20 points 21 points 22 points 7 years ago   (13 children) | Copy Link

He's not wrong. It so happens that the right wing leaning sub got quarantined while all the left wing leaning ones did not.

[–]FalseBuddha1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Which left-leaning subs do you think should have been quarantined? And why do you think they're equivalent to TRP?

[–] peanutbutterjams No Pill 12 points 13 points 14 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

/r/GenderCritical is a pretty solid example of one hate sub (out of many) that escaped quarantine. They're TERFs, though, so I wouldn't even call them left-leaning; it just so happens that their particular brand of hate (misandry) is considered to be only 3/5ths of a Bigotry.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Transphobia isn't misandry.

[–] peanutbutterjams No Pill 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

You should check out the rest of the sub. It's fundamentally misandric. It's so misandric that it's a safe haven for TERFs, people who attempt to deny the rights of trans women (they see them as men taking up female spaces).

[–]EminemLovesGrapes2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Good example here;

And of course in a completely suprising twist of events FragileJewishRedditor gets quaranteend but FragilewhiteRedditor did not. You can't explain that.

To quote a comment on that sub

fragilewhiteredditor has shabbos reddit's full support. :) The tribe found that banning communities didn't work, so now they want to limit people into confined spaces where they can be controlled. /u/spez is saying with great pride (((they))) are still experimenting on how to handle communities with unwanted speech.

It's basically reddit trying to conform to whatever the MSM says is right. Which is not a move I didn't expect.

They're trying to sanitize their content as much as youtube did. Youtube still hosts appalling videos hosting borderline child porn(weird russian videos). But no-one talks about that so it's all fine.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

And of course in a completely suprising twist of events FragileJewishRedditor gets quaranteend but FragilewhiteRedditor did not. You can't explain that.

You can definitely explain that. One sub was openly racist, the other is poking fun at whiny racists.

[–] redpillschool Red Pill 8 points 9 points 10 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

You can definitely explain that. One sub was openly racist, the other is poking fun at whiny racists.

It isn't called fragileracistredditor. It's called fragileWHITEredditor.

It is racist.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't seem very racist to me. Looks like a bunch of folks who have never had to acknowledge their privileged position in life.

[–] [deleted] 7 points 8 points 9 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Because all whites have privilege right? Women and minorities don't have privilege apparently.

[–] the_calibre_cat No Pill Man 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course it doesn't, it's catering to your shitty views.

[–] EminemLovesGrapes 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago *   (0 children) | Copy Link

I figured it was just like milliondollarextreme, just a bunch of people criticising western society, just as how here they're poking fun at how anything criticizing jews is seen as something out of line.

I honestly don't know whether they're serious or not. A bit like r/menkampf, which is still fine. That one takes tumblr posts/blog stories/news stories and replaces the word men/male/white with jews/jew/aryan to poke fun at how openly racist most of the comments actually are.

If they are serious then yeah, it was probably for the best. I honestly can't tell sometimes whether a subreddit is kidding or not. I always just assume the best and think it's a joke.

[–] Transmigratory 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe trash like 2X would be a nice start. Though, they don't use curse words that trigger people OUTSIDE their sub.

[–] LeJacquelope 10 points 11 points 12 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

Flawless victory. I'm a Democrat but I hate radfems almost as much as the far right.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 7 points 8 points 9 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Radfems are marxists, not "Democrats"

[–] Quetzie 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

No they aren't 'Marxists,' they are Radfems.

This whole 'everything on the left is the same' crap is exactly what I was railing against, it is how having only two political parties poisons the American minds for politics.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Go look up what radical feminism was/is.

[–] Quetzie 4 points 5 points 6 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

I have, seems like you might want to do so next time.

Radical feminists locate the root cause of women's oppression in patriarchal gender relations, as opposed to legal systems (as in liberal feminism) or class conflict (as in anarchist feminism, socialist feminism, and Marxist feminism).

I.e., Radfems aren't Marxist because they fundamentally disagree with Marxists on where the problem comes from.

[–] the_calibre_cat No Pill Man 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Replace "class" with "identity."

[–] Quetzie 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Why?

[–] Jex117 5 points 6 points 7 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

When politics has become a dichotomy it's not binary thinking to label the parties with their respective actions.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

If only I thought that way.

[–] Quetzie 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

You just demonstrated you do.

[–] [deleted] -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Despite I didn't.

[–]GayLubeOilTrue Red Pill 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Misogynist Masculinism are bullshit social constructs. To give full credence to them proves Red Pills thesis of an alternative bloop reality

[–]-AveMaria- 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago* (161 children) | Copy Link

TwoX is literally a celebration and promotion of baby murder. It's literally like:

'Hey everyone, I just found this subreddit. I'm pregnant and I...'

" GET AN ABORTION!"

But baby murder is considered a good thing by the left, so TwoX is literally on the top bar. The people in power get to define what is positive and what is negative. And reddit has always been left wing. It was only a matter of time.

[–]VermiciousKnidzzBlue Pill Man 35 points36 points37 points 7 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

i didnt realize red pillers were so conservative about abortion

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

It’s a real bummer and totally irrational from people who wanna Fuck

[–]We_Are_LegionAutumn Red 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

What a disgusting mindset. I wouldn't rape because I want to fuck. Why would I kill a child?

The theory is amoral. Not me. The theory is evolutionary-science based and there doesn't seem to be morality in evolution. But the people who understand theory can still choose to act morally or otherwise.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't rape because I want to fuck.

[pushes past "last minute resistance"]

[–] the_calibre_cat No Pill Man 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

[resorts to baseless character assassination to get his way]

[–] VermiciousKnidzz Blue Pill Man 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

are you not red pill?

[–]ayywumao 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

Define the word child

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago *   (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] VermiciousKnidzz Blue Pill Man 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

people always spin the abortion debate into "when does life begin?" which is too subjective to ever come to a conclusion to let alone on some reddit thread

say your sibling needs a new kidney to survive some accident and youre the only one that can supply it. no one can force you to give them your kidney. its just not ethical to force you to do any medical procedure like that.

abortion's the same. you just cant force a woman to have a baby. the option to terminate a pregnancy needs to exist.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Fetus’ aren’t children.

Anymore than an acorn is an oak tree.

It can become one. But where the law makes abortion legal in my country and yours it has not yet become one and (critically for the law) it absolutely needs an adult to consent to continuing to provide the inputs needed to become one.

If that adult declines to do so... then like an acorn unwatered, unplanted, and without light it will not become a child.

[–] We_Are_Legion Autumn Red -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

Whenever humans want to kill, they convince themselves that the victim is not human. People have used the "its a subhuman" rationalization to enslave, rape, murder for all of history.

The Nazi's dehumanized jews. The slavers dehumanized blacks. Fetus are particularly easy to dehumanize.

And its such a practical convenience to do so.

You're firmly in your delusion. You need it to not feel guilty. I cannot convince you that fetus are human. My effort is that you are making a subconscious effort to believe something, and if you believe the opposite, you will feel incredible guilty and cognitive dissonance.

Explore the argument for why a fetus is human. Try imagining that it is true.

[–] TheGreasyPole Objectively Pro-moderate filth 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago *   (7 children) | Copy Link

Whenever humans want to kill, they convince themselves that the victim is not human.

I’m not trying to convince you the fetus isn’t human. It’s as human as the blood cells and sperm are human.

Being “human” is not a sufficient qualifier to make “killing the human thing” murder.

People have used the "its a subhuman" rationalization to enslave, rape, murder for all of history.

Nor am I attempting to say they’re “sub human” either.

However they don’t meet at least 2 of the 3 qualifying criteria applied broadly across the legal spectrum for murder, even outside abortion.

The Nazi's dehumanized jews. The slavers dehumanized blacks. Fetus are particularly easy to dehumanize.

Look, this is all wasted as I never claimed they are not human. I never claimed the blood cells or sperm was not human either.

You're firmly in your delusion.

If you assume my delusion is saying fetus’ are not human... you’re the one who is deluded. I neither said nor intended any such thing.

Being “living human cells” is absolutely NOT the criteria for the dividing line between murder and not-murder. Not for abortion. Not even in other legal circumstances. And there are excellent moral reasons why that is the case.

My effort is that you are making a subconscious effort to believe something, and if you believe the opposite, you will feel incredible guilty and cognitive dissonance.

Well it’s nice that you project your personal means of making decisions onto me, but it does not apply.

If abortion was murder I’d feel no pangs of conscience concerning any action I’ve ever taken.

Explore the argument for why a fetus is human. Try imagining that it is true.

I have done so, I did so a very long time ago. Possibly as long ago as to be before you were born.

The criteria to “be a human” for the purpose of being murder if you end something’s life are....

a) It must be human b) It must be capable of living independently so long as 1 human consents to support it with the things it needs to live c) It must be sentient at least to the level of receiving stimuli, processing a response, and responding.

Early term fetus’ fail 2 of 3 (if the pregnant woman does not consent). Late term fetus’ fail 1 of 3. Adult “vegetable” coma patients fail 2 of 3.

So I’m happy for “life support” to be turned off for the vegetables and early term fetus’ so long as the responsible human decides to do so....and I’m happy for even late term fetus’ to be aborted should there be good medical reasons to do so although I require more safeguards there.

This isn’t my first rodeo. You’re going to have to do better than calling me a Nazi to change my mind. You’re going to have to understand how human ethics works for a start.

[–] Deus_es 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

"I’m not trying to convince you the fetus isn’t human. It’s as human as the blood cells and sperm are human" Sperm does not even have the correct amount of generic material, left on its own it will not become a human. Red blood cells do not even divide, and will not become human if left to their normal course. A fetus will. That argument you make is particularly weak.

[–] TheGreasyPole Objectively Pro-moderate filth 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

"I’m not trying to convince you the fetus isn’t human. It’s as human as the blood cells and sperm are human" Sperm does not even have the correct amount of generic material, left on its own it will not become a human.

Neither will a fertilised egg left on its own.

Red blood cells do not even divide, and will not become human if left to their normal course. A fetus will.

It won't fertilise an egg and leave it on the side, and it won't become a human either.

That argument you make is particularly weak.

It's meant to illustrate part of an argument, not be the whole thing in itself.

If we were amoeba's your objections would be perfectly valid, we're not.

[–] Deus_es 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

A fertilized egg in the womb will form a fetus, a red blood cell will not. An unfertalized egg will not.

[–] TheGreasyPole Objectively Pro-moderate filth 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but a fertilised egg in the womb requires that the woman who has that womb continues to provide it nutrients and otherwise agrees to provide it the inputs it needs to grow into a baby.

If she does not do so, if she refuses to provide those things it doesn't become a baby. So human intervention and agreement are required for it to become a baby, if an already grown human does not do so it doesn't grow.

And your red blood cell has the same situation. If a human intervenes to take the genes from it's nucleus, and inserts them into an egg, and implants the egg in a human females womb... that red blood cell can "become a child" too.

Admittedly this takes MORE human intervention than in the other case. But ultimately, it's in the same position. Given the agreement of other humans, and their providing of the things it needs to become a baby, it too can become a baby.

A fertilised egg does not become a baby by itself, it only does if another (already adult) human agrees to essentially "make it grow". Where they decline to do so, no baby.

[–] Deus_es 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

An embryo is already fertilized. An egg is not. You can't take the DNA from a red look cell and put it in an egg, it has no nucleus and an egg only has half of the required genetic material. Once they egg is fertalizrd it will grow to a child in the majority of cases without any specific intervention, a red blood cell will not. An unfertalized egg is a different matter, but you don't abort an unfertalized egg. Unless she takes action to aborting the baby or kills/ starves herself the fetus will grow. There is no situation a red blood cell can become a child, even with genetic engineering as they lack nuclei.

[–] TheGreasyPole Objectively Pro-moderate filth 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

An embryo is already fertilized. An egg is not.

Thats true, but makes no difference here.

There are in fact millions of fertilised eggs out there in various liquid-nitrogen cooled flasks. No woman is under any obligation to incubate them either.

The point here is that there remains... for the eggs in flasks, and for the egg in the womb, and for red blood cells... a neccessity of adult humans providing things to turn them into babies. When a human refuses to do so, it doesn't become a baby.

There is nothing "automatic" about it, and there won't be until you can put a fertilised egg on a table and come back 9 months later to find a baby has grown there.

You can't take the DNA from a red look cell and put it in an egg, it has no nucleus and an egg only has half of the required genetic material.

Yes, I realised after I'd typed that there was something odd about red blood cells ( I couldn't remember what) that made them unsuited to this. I should've used a skin cell instead, or hundreds of other examples to illustrate the same point.

However, this doesn't affect the argument.... as I'm sure you'd be arguing the same if I'd used a skin cell instead.

Once they egg is fertalizrd it will grow to a child in the majority of cases without any specific intervention

OK, lets prove what you're saying is true. Lets get a fertilised egg. Put it on a table. Watch it grow into a baby!

The fact it doesn't shows that further inputs are required.

An unfertalized egg is a different matter, but you don't abort an unfertalized egg.

No, but if a human provides it an input (in this case sperm) it too could be a baby! Do human males now have a requirement to have sex with a woman to provide that input ? Is he "murdering a baby" if he does not ?

So how does that differ from a woman refusing to provide her inputs to the process ?

The point here is you are continually trying to ignore the fact that in order for the fertilised egg to become a baby a woman has to agree to provide further inputs for 9 months.

If she declines to do so, no baby.

Unless she takes action to aborting the baby or kills/ starves herself the fetus will grow.

Yes, if she agrees to providing inputs the fertilised egg will grow into a baby.

Just as, if a man agrees to provide inputs and a woman agrees to do so too an unfertilized egg will become a baby too.

And if a woman refuses to provide those inputs the fertilized egg will not become a baby.

And if a man and a woman both refuse to provide inputs the unfertilized egg will not become a baby.

There is no situation a red blood cell can become a child, even with genetic engineering as they lack nuclei.

OK, well lets use skin cells. Again, with the right inputs that humans agree to provide they can become babies too!

We don't hold out that refusing to provide those inputs is therfore "killing a baby" because the skin cell is not a baby, nor is an unfertilized egg, and nor is a fertilised egg. NONE of those are babies.... although they ARE all things that "can become babies" if humans agree to provide the inputs necessary to do so.

[–] Deus_es 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

"There are in fact millions of fertilised eggs out there in various liquid-nitrogen cooled flasks. No woman is under any obligation to incubate them either." Those are unfertalized eggs, once again that is the main difference you don't seem to understand. The eggs that are frozen only have half the required generic material, as does sperm.
"OK, well lets use skin cells. Again, with the right inputs that humans agree to provide they can become babies too!" No, that is not possible whatsoever. If you want to argue any cel can become a baby you would be talking about a pluripotent stem cell and right now the only cells that can be pluripotent stem cells are fertilized embryos within the first couple of weeks of fertilization. We have not been able to get any other type of cell to revert to a pluripotent state. No cell, besides a fertilized embryo, will become a baby in its natural state. The fetus that is a pluripotent stem cell follows genetic instructions to divide an form the cel lineages that become each organ system. A skin cell cannot do that, it cannot become a neuron. A fertilized embryo can and will become every type of cell in the human body. "Yes, if she agrees to providing inputs the fertilised egg will grow into a baby." Once the egg is fertilized she has already provided the input by having sex and fertalizing it. You are confusing an egg with a fertilized egg. The female egg has half of the genetic material, and if. It fertalized will be discarded at the end of the woman's cycle. A fertilized egg will not be, instead it implants in the uterine wall. "No, but if a human provides it an input (in this case sperm) it too could be a baby! Do human males now have a requirement to have sex with a woman to provide that input ? Is he "murdering a baby" if he does not ?" No, because you do not seem to grasp that a sperm is not a fertilized fetus, it only has half of the genetic material. Without an unfertalized egg it will die. An unfertalized egg and a sperm are not a fetus, you cannot abort either. When they combine you have a fertilized egg/ fetus. At this point, if left alone in the womb it will become a child, baring medical abnormalities.

[–]-AveMaria- 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not a red piller xD

[–]zeitgirl_ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you Christian? Guessing from the username..

[–]-AveMaria- 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good guess! I'm traditional Catholic.

[–]tubarao312 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm A RP, but I fully support abortion.

[–]GayLubeOilTrue Red Pill 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A whole generation of our brothers and sisters were taken from us. The most valuable thing a man has is his people.

[–]peanutbutterjamsNo Pill 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Looking at their nick, I'd guess Catholicism plays a part here.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

[–]alecesne 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That isn't a universal.

[–] We_Are_Legion Autumn Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Whenever humans want to do evil, they trick themselves into doing so. The dehumanization trick was used to enslave, massacre and murder.

Just because the red pill has become nihilist does not mean we don't understand morality. It is not part of a red pill's platform, but it is part of its recognition of reality. That women are human, and humans are awful. Women only love until they feeeel it. And they can always rationalize away the feelings associated with the awful things they do. You can spot the rationalization efforts.

According to US CDC stats, 99.7% of abortions are not done for any legitimate reason (like self-defense against rape or medical reasons). 99.7% of the time, abortion is killing a child for your convenience. Observing the various rationalizations for murder (it wont feel it, it might be unhappy, etc.) is farcical.

TRP may be amoral, but to me, abortion is a disgusting, inhumane, and anyone who has done it should be ashamed of themselves, regardless of religious creed.

[–] VermiciousKnidzz Blue Pill Man 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

say your sibling needs a kidney to survive some horrible accident or disease. no one can force you to give your kidney. it just wouldnt be right to force you to undergo that procedure. abortion is the same idea. no one can force someone to have a pregnancy. the right to terminate is very necessary for the same reasons your right to not donate a kidney exists. there are many more legit reasons to abort beyond rape or medical reasons.

if you're so against abortion, surely you are also as supportive of birth control and sex education? as the USA becomes more accepting of real sex ed and birth control the abortion rate continues to decline, except in areas where birth control is hard to get and kids are only exposed to abstinence-only sex ed. abortion rates were the lowest ever under obama.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993 22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (82 children) | Copy Link

well, males on trp talk shit about others (women), women discuss what goes on in their own bodies (abortion). hardly similar. and dont get me started on abortion. it isnt murder.

[–]We_Are_LegionAutumn Red 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

dont get me started on abortion. it isnt murder.

Women only love until they can feel it. Nothing is anything until they feel it.

Murder is not murder.

Dehumanization is the oldest trick in humanity's playbook, when people have wanted to do something awful. I could probably convince a country to massacre and rape if I could convince the targets were not as human. Women do that on an individual level all the time.

[–]IStumbled 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And you desperate sad male does it all the time with women or people you don’t agree with. Be a man, share the guilt

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

it is removing a parasite. nothing else. everything else is someone's opinion of it, usually stemming from the desire to control life through a woman's womb.

some parasite growing inside of a woman's body doesnt override her bodily autonomy. to say otherwise would be dehumanizing.

comparing exercising autonomy over one's OWN body to mass rape (of women) is...nonsensical. tells more about you than the topic. awful.

[–]We_Are_Legion 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (31 children) | Copy Link

everything else is someone's opinion of it, usually stemming from the desire to control life through a woman's womb.

you characterizing it as a parasite is your own rationalization. whether you are right or wrong, it is the same method that men used to mass rape and murder and enslave, WITHOUT feeling guilty.

The fetus is no more human to you as a woman/black/enemy was to a ancient solder.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (30 children) | Copy Link

it isnt rationalization, it is a fact. you can think whatever you want, its obvious you find this personal.

why would you compare actual acts of crime (males raping and killing) to removing an unwanted clump of cells within one's own fcking body? how does harming numerous women compare to harming literally no one? you are being ridicilous.

spoils of war =/= aborting a parasite. i dont understand. is this ridicilous comparisson supposed to make me rethink abortion?

well, it did make me rethink, im now even more adamant on "killing" a parasite.

[–] We_Are_Legion Autumn Red -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago *   (29 children) | Copy Link

it isnt rationalization, it is a fact

All rationalizations seem like facts. Otherwise, they wouldn't be very good rationalizations.

You seem to be thinking I'm debating you on your stupid argument that babies are parasites and we should kill babies. I'm not.

What I'm saying is facts don't matter. People believe in causes all the time that are not based on facts. And even the ones that do, don't believe in those causes because of the facts, but because it feels right. Humans aren't fact machines. We believe what we want. There is a functional component to the beliefs we choose.

I know your argument is full of holes. But I'm not going after them. This is not a debate. I know that those don't matter. What I'm trying is to get you to recognize that your argument is only supposed to make you feel better about something that would tear you apart with guilt if you did not have this rationalization.

This is the portion that is comparable with the dehumanization that Slavers and Nazi's employed. That is not to say that you are as bad as the slavers (though you are lmao), but that you are using the same aspect of human psychology on yourself in order to bypass your socialization and commit something you would see as a travesty otherwise.

The difference between you and an abortion-hater isn't that you are right or they are, but that you have a rationalization to justify your murder and they don't. When they do, they'll be hypocrites and murder just as well as you.

The particular rationalization to kill doesn't matter.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (26 children) | Copy Link

false, you have no arguments at all. i dont feel guilty over killing an unwanted parasite the same way i dont feel guilty over killing an insect. take your mansplaining somewhere else, it doesnt work on me. nothing will make me change my opinion on abortion.

[–]SelfTaughtPiano2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

i dont feel guilty over killing an unwanted parasite the same way i dont feel guilty over killing an insect.

Thats what he said.

If I considered a woman less than human. Perhaps if I genuinely believed her "insect brained"... then I could enslave it or kill it or rape it and never feel bad about what I did, because I'd never even think I was wrong. I'd have already hypnotised myself.

In the same way, you consider a fetus less than human.

Your entire post is saying he is wrong to equivocate fetus with a full human but you are missing the point of the argument. The mechanism certainly is the same. The parasite argument is not bulletproof

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (23 children) | Copy Link

hey hey hey

i dont care. no woman will suffer for killing a crotch spawn. on the other hand, males like you who are so eager to rape and kill will be shot. who is in the wrong here? some rando woman who exercises bodily autonomy or a maniac who wants to rape women?

[–]SelfTaughtPiano1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

males like you who are so eager to rape and kill will be shot

holy shit, you are stupid. you don't even understand a point. its all about the language i use and how it makes you feel.

no woman will suffer for killing a crotch spawn.

And a mindless, bitter ideologue.

I'm sorry, me, for wasting my time. I should've turned back at "radfeminist".

Good luck with your mental illness.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (16 children) | Copy Link

one cannot simply bring up males raping and killing to "make a point" especially if the topic has nothing to do with it. you are stupid.

how's exercising bodily autonomy mental illness? why are you sager to convince someone that abortion is bad? how can you dehumanize women like that?

seek help, mate.

[–]SelfTaughtPiano1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yes, THEY CAN.

This is the difference between male and female communication. Making a point supercedes all emotional considerations short of punching the other guy, and sometimes even includes that.

This is locker room talk. That women ruin.

This is why men have insights. And invent things and make great observations. And address the ugly challenges of nature and reality that women would never do.

Women just commiserate.

You particularly just want a hugbox. Not a theoretical discussion. Not a debate. You want to be outraged. You want to rehabilitate someone.

how can you dehumanize women like that?

THE IRONY. This entire discussion, which you don't seem to understand, is about the process of dehumanizing. Not judging the effects (though I do agree with OP that abortion is wrong), but in fact, identifying and agreeign on the process of dehumanizing before proceeding the debate.

The point is we can dehumanize anyone. You, me, babies, fetuses, women, jews, blacks, you name it. And then we can do horrible things to them. THE OP WAS FUCKING SHOWING YOU that this is the method "how you bypass your socialized guilt instinct".

You are shocked how we can dehumanize BASED ON OUR HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE OF THE RESULTS OF DEHUMANIZATION. You don't even get the point of the example. You are just shocked as a feminist anyone could address women as less than the holy protected objects removed from nature, evolution and the harshness of reality. You do not understand when people point out that you are dehumanizing, just like others are... and then you mock and instigate the other person to not take you seriously. Poor show.

Use the following to have a good discussion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_humanity

http://www.kwesthues.com/regiftedxmas12.html

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago *   (14 children) | Copy Link

no, you are using abortion to justify your hatred towards women. you are not fooling anyone.

go back to the cesspool you crawled out of.

[–]SelfTaughtPiano1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You will see only what you want. That is a curse.

I wish you luck with your mental illness, and that heavy load of suffering that it causes you.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (12 children) | Copy Link

you are ridicilous. i wish you a lifetime of misery.

[–]SelfTaughtPiano2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I still wish you luck with your mental illness.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (10 children) | Copy Link

k.

[–] ArcheryDude101 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

I think that both of you are simply misunderstanding each other. I will agree with Jezebel that women do have a right to their own bodies (as does anyone). But I must disagree with the fact that people should have the right to abort a baby. As a male, I do not know the perspective of a female of this matter, due to the fact that I am not a girl/woman. However, I do know the basic, old tenets of masculinity, including the fact that men are not just supposed to, but are required to by male honor to take responsibility for any messes they make, even in this day and age. While this idea is old, it does have relevance in this debate. I am a believer that women are just as capable as men in anything that they do, and are more than capable of living their lives just as honorably as many men in our society do. That means that if they consent to have sex before they are able to take care of a baby, they should take care of the child along with the man, who would be bound by this law too.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

what if they do take care of it but a) condom breaks (happens more often than you'd think, b) BC fails the woman (also common)? neither the male and female want to have kids.

[–] ArcheryDude101 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

If they were having sex, and weren't prepared for the worst possible scenario, they should either a) give the baby up for adoption, or b) raise the kid. Its not the kids fault that their parents were not responsible enough to at least have a plan b if things went the wrong way.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

or c) abort. if neither wants the kid no one should go through pregnancy.

[–] ArcheryDude101 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Is that so? A kid is a human, not a parasite as you so described. In order for it to be human, the kid must be alive, and as a result, you can say that it is murder at that point. No one has or should have control over another persons life. From what I read, you believe the same thing with women, and I completely agree with you on that point. No one but the woman to whom the life belongs to should have even a modicum of say in what that woman must do or be. You and I share many similar beliefs, however, its not fair if those beliefs are applied only to a select group in a larger population. The quickest route to true equality is through leveling the playing field. As long as we try to get privilages for some groups and not others, the longer something as beautiful as true equality will take.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

true equality like what? when it comes to pregnancy the male has no say whatsoever except whether he wants to be the father or not. im all for financial abortion.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

the kid has human rights once out of the womb. til then it is dependent on the woman and thus its her call to do what she wants. i think its only fair that she decides what happens to her body and the kid inside.

[–] ArcheryDude101 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

The kid does take nutrients from the mother who recieved those nutrients from the food she ate, which either came from an animal or plant. In other words, all she does in the process is carry the baby, nothing else. The baby is merely hitching a ride until birth, at which point, the mother can choose to willingly give up the baby for adoption. The baby is a completely different being, as proven by genetics, tethered to a mother who made bad life choices and isn't willing to face the consequences. Why should an innocent child have to give up their life so that the mother can take the easy way out. Men who make bad life decisions are expected to work through them, why can't women be as well? The only situation when I would concur with your current position is if the mother was raped and carrying the baby might result in mental health problems like depression.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

i urge you to read on what goes on inside the pregnant body. i wish it were the way you described. i wish. tokophobia isnt really a phobia, it's legit.

the child isnt innocent. the child has no sense of self. i dont see why should women be punished for sex and pregnancy they didnt want. i dont see why you have any interest in what a woman does with her own body and the thing inside. by that logic, i could say males should get a vasectomy as early as possible because they get women pregnant and women cant abort unless their life is threatened.

it takes two to tango.

[–] ArcheryDude101 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Vasectomies are illogical due to the fact that they are considered permanent and for good reason. If you wanted to reverse a vasectomy, you need to undergo complex surgery. Also, the child is innocent. The baby literally did not do anything to create its own existence, its parents were to blame for screwing up. If you screw up, then you fix the issue, not push the issue onto someone else. Having sex is a commitment, and not following through with said commitment if the least desirable outcome happens is your fault and you have to take responsibility. A new mother may see it as punishment, but to the baby, it is quite the opposite. The baby may not be sentient at that stage yet, but it is still human, and quite helpless until it is born. The only time when I would actually be okay with abortion would be when the baby is just a clump of cells(really early in the pregnancy). No one has the right to anyone else's body and while the baby depends on the mother for nutrients, it was both the father and mothers decision to put a sperm cell in a position where it may meet an egg cell. If you can make the decision to engage in reproductive behavior, even for pleasure, don't you think its wrong to have to kill a person in order to make yourself feel better about engaging in risky behavior?

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

TRP is to be banned soon. is that why you are here?

if only we could ban people like you...

[–]SelfTaughtPiano1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Good luck with your vagina anger and mental illness.

Be sure to take it out on your spawn so that you genes end with you.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

ah, see, i think in advance. i froze my eggs before i burned my uterus. so, once surrogacy becomes legal, i'll have some woman receive my eggs. thus, my genes will be spread and i will not be bothering raising the kid. that woman will.

win fcking win.

[–]SelfTaughtPiano1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I wish you luck with your mental illness

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

since when is planning ahead for your future a sign of mental illness? should i perhaps follow your footsteps into the abyss of self-hatred and woe-is-me mentality?

dont worry, fam, something tells me trp will find another way to suck you back in.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

yep, it requires mother to feed it and take care of it. if it cant take care of itself, and it cant, it's a parasite.

[–]-AveMaria- 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link

literally ending a human life.

not murder.

[–]muddyrose 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

If it can't sustain itself outside of the womb, it isn't alive

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If it can't sustain itself outside of the womb, it isn't alive

Women who can't sustain themselves outside of welfare and food stamps must not be alive either /s

[–]We_Are_Legion 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (6 children) | Copy Link

What an illiterate comment. You literally don't understand the damn law you are extracting logic from.

Roe vs Wade doesn't use the standard "sustain itself outside the womb" to say a fetus isn't alive, it uses it to decide if a woman is obligated to let it survive. Two different ideas.

[–]muddyrose 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

LOL I'm the illiterate one? Where in the fuck did I even mention or reference Roe vs. Wade haha

You know, there can be other reasons why people think abortion should be a choice. A big point of contention people have is when a fetus is considered alive.

But no, don't bother actually replying to what I've said. Make up your own argument 😂

[–]We_Are_Legion 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

Where in the fuck did I even mention or reference Roe vs. Wade haha

My mistake. I assumed you knew the history of the abortion issue, if only in passing. The "survival outside of womb" standard you are using starting being a law and simultaneously a prominent pro-abortion argument after Roe vs Wade. Not before.

So I assumed you had heard of the law, heard of the standard that the law uses to allow abortion, but were only mistaken about the reasoning behind the standard (which has been endlessly criticized and dismissed, as everyone knows there are practical reasons the law was passed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade).

But it seems you don't know the law. You only heard of the argument in passing. It looks like you are just hearsay. Your version of the Roe vs Wade standard makes the litmus test for life the ability to survive outside the womb.

For that, I challenge you to produce a single medical professional, anywhere in the world, who will uphold your definition of life.

A single biologist on planet earth, who says

If it can't sustain itself outside of the womb, it isn't alive

and I will concede.

At that point, its not worth it to argue with someone so stupid. Just say "i will commit murder and i need no reasons."

[–] muddyrose 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Lmfao, this is priceless.

I'm not American buddy

So no, I don't know the intricate details of how your laws came to be. I have my own country to worry about.

I don't wake up every morning thinking "I wonder what I can learn in detail about American history today!"

And even then, I probably know more about your country than you know about mine.

For that, I challenge you to produce a single medical professional, anywhere in the world, who will uphold your definition of life.

Doctors who perform abortions tend to hold that stance. Thanks for conceding.

Have a great day.

[–]We_Are_Legion 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

"Doctors who perform abortions tend to hold that stance."

what fucking doctor defines life from a stupid understanding of roe vs wade. How in the do you claim you don't care about american definitions and then QUOTE THE ROE VS WADE STANDARD to define life?

But seriously what fucking doctor? Show me a single reference. The one who dropped you on your head?

Go away you child.

[–] muddyrose 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

I swear you're trolling me right now.

I am not talking about Roe vs. Wade. You're the only one bringing that up.

Do you understand what that bolded sentence means? If you still somehow think I'm talking about Roe vs. Wade in any way, just stop reading.

I worked in an OR for 6 years. The doctors who performed abortions viewed a fetus under 20 weeks old about as alive as a tumor. It's living cells, yes, but it is not human life.

Regardless, I'm declining to interact with you further. You call me dumb and a child, completely without irony. You're not worth my time.

[–] -AveMaria- -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (27 children) | Copy Link

Lol, that must be the most stupid thing I've heard all day.

[–] muddyrose 6 points 7 points 8 points 7 years ago   (12 children) | Copy Link

What makes that stupid?

Do you get this offended when a woman miscarries? Do you consider that involuntary manslaughter?

[–] -AveMaria- 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

I do if she was doing crack - because then it's directly on her.

But if it was an accident, then obviously it is not.

But it's still treated like a loss of a human life. By the mother and everyone else. Because it is a loss of a human life.

[–] muddyrose 7 points 8 points 9 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

Involuntary manslaughter is murder without intent. If a fetus is a living creature, and a woman's body rejects it which causes it to die, that's involuntary manslaughter.

How do you draw the line there? Abortion is murder but miscarriage is not involuntary manslaughter? Weird.

[–] We_Are_Legion Autumn Red 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Abortion is not murder yet killing a pregnant woman is double murder.

It seems the standard for human is "wanted".

Women are disgusting with how much they can rationalize. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9jfwno/rtheredpill_quarantined/e6s7kh9/

[–] muddyrose 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol okay buddy

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

This is absolutely ridiculous. Are you saying that I am being a hypocrite because I don't hold women responsible for miscarriages? Do you realize how insane this argument is?

If a mother's 1 month old child dies of some illness, is she to be held accountable for that too?

Because miscarriages are often equally as out of the mothers hands as illness is.

Your argument only makes sense if the mother could somehow be held liable for the miscarriage becasue she could have prevented it somehow. As I said, if the mother killed the baby out of deliberate negligence by drinking and stuff like that, I would say that it was manslaughter.

It's clear to me you don't have an argument and are clutching at straws here.

[–] muddyrose 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

No, I'm not saying that at all.

You think abortion is murder, because it's a choice to end a human life.

I'm wondering why you don't consider miscarriage involuntary manslaughter then. No, there's no way a woman can stop a miscarriage. She doesn't mean to do it. But the fetus is dead. That's the definition of involuntary manslaughter.

So how do you come to that conclusion? You don't think that stance is ridiculous?

You think that considering a miscarriage as manslaughter is incorrect. That's how pro-choice people feel about considering abortion murder.

[–] -AveMaria- 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago *   (3 children) | Copy Link

Manslaughter as a legal term holds the person responsible for that manslaughter guilty of a crime. Because they are held to be responsibile through negligence or etc.

If its a total accident without any malicious intent or a result of any actions taken by the female, it is NOT MANSLAUGHTER.

THIS IS NOT A MORAL ARGUMENT, its you not understanding legal terms.

[–] muddyrose 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you still going on about this?

It's fine that you want to completely miss my point, but I'm not interested in repeating it over and over again.

You can go ahead and think abortion is murder, you have that right. I'm assuming that you're a guy, I wonder how strongly you'd feel about the government interfering with citizens bodily autonomy if the shoe was on the other foot.

Luckily for women, abortion is legal and they have that choice. 🤷‍♀️

[–] -AveMaria- 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

You assume incorrectly. I'm not a guy. And lots of women are prolife. Not all women are so happpy to murder children.

So you lost the argument. Cool.

[–] muddyrose 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Just went through your post history.

You're an extremely toxic person. I hope you get some real help someday.

If telling yourself you "won" something on Reddit helps you feel better, I'll let you have that. You clearly need it, no one should be as miserable as you.

[–] vandaalen Red Pill EC 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

What makes that stupid?

The fact that a newborn cannot survive on its own as well. The amount of mental gymnastics is hilarious.

[–] muddyrose 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha yes, I totally meant that newborns can take care of themselves.

I should have realized I had to spell it out exactly or else people would latch on to any strawman they could.

A blob of cells is not able to physically live outside of the womb.

Is that easier for you to understand?

[–] i_have_a_semicolon Purple Pill Woman 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (13 children) | Copy Link

It's not murder, and those who think like you do aren't gaining much traction. The benefits of abortion far outweigh your moral outrage.

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Its beneficial, so I am going to convince myself that it's not murder.

[–] i_have_a_semicolon Purple Pill Woman 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Murder has a specific definition. terminating pregnancy isn't included. no need to convince myself

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Right. It's not murder. It's just killing.

Nice distinction.

[–] i_have_a_semicolon Purple Pill Woman 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Your shaming tactics aren't going to work on me. But nice try.

[–] We_Are_Legion Autumn Red -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

Here we have it. When women need something, they'll kill their own children to do so.

They have no morals. This is not the fairer sex. They love until they can rationalize cheating away. And it happens like a light switch.

[–] i_have_a_semicolon Purple Pill Woman 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

The fetus is a couple of cells in a bag, not a life form with limbs and a head etc. I don't feel bad about ovulation and ejactulation going to waste. Some people don't believe the mix bag of cells is a child.

Your drama is uncessesary. Men cheat / abuse / violate etc just as much as much if not more than women. I don't agree there's a fairer sex. All humans have the capacity to be shitty. Cheating / violence etc is always shitty.

But an abortion isn't always shitty. An abortion isnt a moral outrage. Most people...men included (billions of men) have little problem with it. Your moral outrage is akin to being upset about stem cell research. Only the truly outrageous people are pissed. Also, youre so crazy that you go on and on about other shit that's not relevant to the stream (women are the fairer sex, cheating and losing love for someone etc). Those aren't the same in the slightest. Most people at least think they love someone and work cheat until it "happens". Abortion is not rationalized in the same manner. Most people decide early on (adolescence) what their stance Is and stick with it. It's not "rationalization" to agree with a widely accepted and understood reasoning in favor of abortion.

I do not wish to argue with you.

[–] TheBlackQuill 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago * [recovered]   (6 children) | Copy Link

Eh it is kind of a mix bag. Some women who agree with abortions defend it because they cant support the baby which is not really rationalization. Some also did it because they didnt want to bring shame to the family. Irl, I never heard women who did abortion rationalize the baby as not alive or whatever. They will outright tell it is for convenience or to protect their pride and their family's. So no rationalization there.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] TheGreasyPole Objectively Pro-moderate filth 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

It’s alive, in the same way as the cells in a drop of your blood are alive, or your spark are alive, or a chunk of skin you scraped off accidentally are alive, or an earthworm in your garden is alive.

It’s not murder, because that sense of alive is not one murder laws recognise.

So the reason “fetus’ are alive but terminating then is not murder” is the same reason as why “wanking into a sock” or “spilling blood into a flame as part of a satanic ritual” are not murder even though blood and semen are also alive or “deliberately stepping on a worm” is not murder even though the worm is alive.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] TheGreasyPole Objectively Pro-moderate filth 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (0 children) | Copy Link

Fetus is a genetically complete unique individual of the human species, unlike a blood cell or a spark.

Assuming you meant sperm, no it’s not.

A sperm is just as genetically distinct as a fetus. Like them it’s a unique combination of human dna that will not recur.

A sperm is not just a copy of its Male makers dna. It’s a unique combination in its own right.

It meets the dictionary definition of person.

It does not. Assuming you’d be prepared to accept Wikipedia as a fair reference point...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person

A person is a being that has certain capacities or attributes such as reason, morality, consciousness or self-consciousness, and being a part of a culturally established form of social relations such as kinship, ownership of property, or legal responsibility.[1][2][3][4] The defining features of personhood and consequently what makes a person count as a person differ widely among cultures and contexts

.

It is destined to grow into an individual, given just months. It is actively in the process.

ONLY if a single actual person (the mother) consents to giving it all the inputs to do so.

If she does not, then it will not grow into an individual.

If she elects to remove those inputs, it will never be a person in the way that term is defined.

We’re what you said above true.... fetus’ removed from their mother in an abortion procedure would grow into full persons in any case and so they’d actually be no moral debate about abortion.

A sperm and blood is not in any way comparable

They’re comparable in that they are living things that are also human. (Your original point). They were intended to show you that “being human” is not a sufficient condition by itself for”murder”.

Do not make a mockery of biology to say that a fetus is the same as a blood drop or skin flake.

I’m not saying it’s “the same”. I’m addressing your initial point. They are not “the same” but they are equally human.

You need your rationalization. Just recognize that and admit that its not waterproof. You depend on it to not feel guilty and so you'll write this un-nuanced garbage and pass it off as a valid scientific opinion.

OK, can we stop projecting your personal means of making decisions on everyone else, assuming they work the same way you do.

That’s not the cause of our disagreement.

We differentiate between humans and worms. Liberals are disgusting to the lengths they'll go.

We do!

And how we do so (worms are not sentient) is an important part of the ethical debate concerning abortion and other ethical dilemmas.

I’m trying to draw your attention to how this is worked out, which involves factors other than “is human” and “is unique” and other things.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago * [recovered]   (1 child) | Copy Link

You think women who aborted spend time arguing or justifying their choices? In my experience most of them dont even want to talk about it.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

it isnt a human life form, its a parasite.

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Psycho.

[–] JezebeltheQueen5656 Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

bwahahaha

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

talk

Talking is done with their own bodies, too. You defeated your own “argument”, but it’s your bigotry and you can do whatever you want with it.

[–]the_calibre_catNo Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it isnt murder.

I agree, but this can be roughly translated to: "Everyone should abide by MY views on when humans become eligible to claim the protection afforded by rights!"

It's okay though. Just accuse anyone who disagrees with you as being morally bankrupt, and of wanting to "control women". Best put it on a YouTube video and attach your patreon to it, too.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i never said this. i never accused anyone of being morally bankrupt, it was done to me.

[–] KrispyMcSockington 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

And don't get me started on abortion. It isn't murder.

Yes, yes it is. I support a woman's right to murder her child before it's born. But the determined, willing killing of unborn children is what it is: murder.

Women don't want to call it that because they don't want to feel guilty. I don't think there's anything wrong with it in a world that murders full grown adults anyway. But if it wasn't such a serious issue, women would feel absolutely nothing after killing their unborn children. And yet the effects are felt for a while after.

[–]gabriotDidn't know it was purge week 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

There is nothing wrong with the twox subreddit, if you wanna compare trp to that sub it is night and day with trp being so much more toxic

[–]-AveMaria- 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

It's sooo super toxic are you kidding.

Half the topics are about abortion, domestic abuse, divorce and feminism.

Like do these women have NOTHING else to talk about other than how they are such victims? It's kind of sick (not to mention delusional and weird.) It reminds me of incels.

[–]HawanjaAncient Deadly Ninja Baby 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Those things you just mentioned aren't toxic subjects, in and of themselves.

[–]-AveMaria- 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It creates a really toxic environment when you just keep on talking about negative things, and just base your entire identity on collective victimhood.

[–]HawanjaAncient Deadly Ninja Baby 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But isn't the point of these subs to talk about these subjects?

So what should they talk about? Which kitchen apron gives the best knee support so they can give blowjobs and make sandwiches at the same time?

[–]-AveMaria- 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

apron gives the best knee support so they can give blowjobs

Ew.

Well lets see.. my friends and I talk about movies, celebrities, guys/ husbands, fashion, cooking, dieting, marriage, random gossip etc.

I dont know what your group of friends talks about, but I find TwoX incredibly weird.

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

My point is the subjects discussed don't automatically make a sub toxic.

[–] -AveMaria- 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

The narrative they construct is.

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

That's bullshit.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Oh NO! Not women sharing their stories of domestic abuse!

THE HORROR!

do these women have NOTHING else to talk about other than how they are such victims?

Huh... it's almost as if having a space to talk about women's issues results in women talking about women's issues!

[–]-AveMaria- 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The frequency at which they talk about negative things is astounding to me.

That's not what my group of friends talk about at all.

It's so rare to come across them talking about normal feminine things.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I already responded to your other comment. It's a support sub. It shouldn't be surprising that women feel safe sharing their stories there.

That's not what my group of friends talk about at all.

quelle surprise

Maybe you need more supportive, open friends.

[–]PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Does your group of friends include tens of thousands of women? No? Then there are probably fewer cases of abuse among them don’t you think?

[–]-AveMaria- 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The scale shouldn't change what we discuss. These people have no individual identities. It's beyond crazy. It's like how even can you just talk about abortions, rape, abuse, divorce, oppression, ALL THE TIME.

That's not what being a woman is about. Not in the traditional sense.

This is collective victimhood. People coming together to feel sorry for their collective identity. And it breeds a lot of toxicity. Liberal women are extremely toxic. Its just toxicity that has become acceptable.

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe because those issues are the most traumatic and thus they get upvoted more than a conversation about fashion or whatever other stereotypical female conversation, take your pick.

It's really not that hard to understand, but you have a certain ideological narrative that you want to push hard so you are blind to it.

[–] -AveMaria- 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

They don't just get upvoted. That's all the posts there are.

Let me demonstrate. Lets go through the 'new' list on twoX right now and make a list. 4 are about sexual assault and harassment, 1 about abuse, 2 about abortion and contraception, 6 about feminism and general oppression. So 13 out of 25 posts are about a victim narrative. And half of the one's that aren't are men asking the women questions.

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

So you want more posts about fashion or that cute guy at the office?

[–] -AveMaria- 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Yep.

That is what normal women talk about. We talk about guys, talk about husbands, talk about kids, talk about cooking, fashion, decor, exercise, sex, health, dieting... etc.

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

And there are a multitude of other subs devoted to those topics.

They say that sometimes women's worst enemies are other women. You are literally criticizing women for coming to a forum where they can share traumatic experiences like rape, assault, and abuse that they might not feel comfortable sharing with anyone in their personal lives. Maybe they don't have family members they can trust. Maybe they are low on friends.

You probably see yourself as different than most women. Not as weak and irrational as the rest. You pride yourself in that difference. I'm going to be very direct with you in case no one has about this before in your life:

You are cold hearted.

I'm not even going to blame you for how you became like this. I have no doubt in my mind that it is a result of your upbringing. I'm sure you learned that emotions and the such were for the weak. It is genuinely not your fault.

I will say that it is your responsibility to grow. I don't expect you to open up to me and admit anything in a conversation like this, but I challenge you to think about how you became calloused. I know that it feels safe to maintain those walls and not let the messiness that comes with being emotionally dynamic entails. However, you are living life missing out on a significant part on what it means to be alive.

I have a therapist and it has helped me grow leaps and bounds in my own emotional maturity. I recommend it for everyone. We all have ways that we can grow and the stigma around going to a therapist is a snare on our society. Please consider it. (And it doesn't have to be expensive.)

I wish you the best.

[–] -AveMaria- 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

There are multiple subs for rape, assault, divorce, feminism etc. too.

The point is that this is what liberal women have constructed as a CORE part of their identity. Being victims. It's reflected in the fact that on a general female topics thread, women are overwhelmingly talking about victim narratives.

I don't like that. I find it gross. I mean, many women get raped, many women get abused. But most don't, and it's ridiculous to consider this a part of the 'female experience' and something that needs to be a core part of our identity.

I like being a woman. I don't feel discriminated against often. I like men doing things for me because of chivalry or whatever. I don't care or believe in the pay gap. I don't think I have a huge chance of being raped if I behave responsibly and safely. In short, I don't think my life sucks and that I'm oppressed.

So I guess I just don't see it the way they do.

But I'm very happy. So it's strange that you say that I should go to a therapist.

But anyway, I go to confession, and I believe that's helped me with emotional maturity. I've thought about these things, and have arrived at what I think is a well thought out, mature, position.

[–] wekacuck 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, I can sort of see her point. She wants a women's community where that isn't front and center and drowning everything else out. Reddit really sucks for filtering out prolific portions of communities that you just have no interest in engaging.

Sort of like how it would be nice to have a men's relationship community where how to hate and abuse women wasn't front and center and drowning everything else out.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

And hating men, but somehow that's okay but men having their own space and doing the same isn't allowed. As we all know only men's spaces are toxic unlike women's spaces never ever become toxic.

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Imagine basing your identity on collective victimhood. As a group who is raped, abused, oppressed etc.

That's what TwoX is.

And its quite pathetic and toxic.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (2 children) | Copy Link

Sharing your story isn't basing your identity on victimhood. Do you think these women spend every second of the day wallowing on their forum, the way TRP and MGTOW and Incels do? Are you by any chance projecting?

Let's take a look at the current threads on TwoX:

“When men imagine a female uprising, they imagine a world in which women rule men as men have ruled women.” -Sally Kempton

Empowering women is not toxic.

I'm a male who was raped several times by two older boys between the ages of 11-14, I wanted to report it so bad but never did. I understand why many of you didn't.

Huh. A male victim sharing their story in a community designed to share these kinds of stories. Is that "pathetic and toxic?"

My Wife Works at a Rape Crisis Nonprofit and They Are Getting FLOODED with Survivor Calls

Huh. Another man sharing a positive story about his wife.

With everything going on, I have to say this somewhere. I’m a 20 y.o. Male and a month ago I was raped by my therapist

Hmmm...

I was raped by my husband 46F support

Here we have a woman who was subjected to marital rape. She's looking for support from the community. Is that pathetic or toxic?

The rest of the threads appear to be women (and men) sharing their WhyIDidntReport stories.

I'm sorry that people trying to work through trauma is "pathetic and toxic" to you. Would you prefer it if they wrote fanfiction field reports about all the hot babes they definitely boned in real life for real?

[–]PM-HENTAI1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh no, these men sharing their stories of the inquisitorial family court!

THE HORROR!

well at least to reddit admins

[–] -AveMaria- -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks for taking the time to prove my point.

The point is, this is not how normal people behave. If my friend group and I were to have a women only online chat space, it would not include repeated instances of subjects like rape, abortion, domestic violence etc. The reason that this is the case in TwoX is that these women place their collective identity above their individual one. So whats the point about talking about stuff like fashion, cooking, gossip, movies, etc? Better to talk about things that fit the victimhood narrative that is being constructed there as THE core part of female identity.

And it's not even exclusively support sub, thats the thing. It's a sub for women. To discuss women things.

Also you are acting like I'm a TRPer. a) I'm not a man. b) I'm not pill affiliated.

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

It is truly a sad state of affairs having a woman criticize other women (and men) for opening up about their abuse.

[–] [deleted] -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

There is nothing wrong with the twox subreddit

You mean besides how they constantly have at least man hating thread on the front page?

[–]RollCaltropsNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Obviously people who support abortion don’t see it as murder and obviously no one thinks abortion is a great time. A difference in opinion about what point a bunch of cells becomes a human is basically determined by how science-based vs superstitious your system of thinking is. Fortunately we can all agree that rape, abuse, violence towards and murder of people who have actually developed into humans is horrifying and that certain ideologies increase the likelihood of these acts occurring. This isn’t defining positive or negative, this is drawing a line between hate-filled echo chambers and their necessary real world effects, and the opposition of having civil supportive conversations without vitriol directed towards another gender.

[–]-AveMaria- 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Doesn't matter whether they see it as murder. Criminals often don't see what they are doing as crimes.

how science-based vs superstitious your system of thinking is.

Neither science nor 'superstition' is supportive of Roe v Wade laws. Babies become living, breathing human beings in most manners of the word in the first trimester. They become human persons (develop early consciousness) in their second trimester. Your ''bunch of cells' excuse only works for the first few weeks.

Fortunately we can all agree that rape, abuse, violence towards and murder of people who have actually developed into humans is horrifying and that certain ideologies increase the likelihood of these acts occurring.

But yeah, sure we can agree on that. Of course, I don't believe the red pill advocates this stuff. And let me be clear, I don't like the red pill. But nor am I going to participate in typical liberal hysteria.

There are a lot of hate filled echo chambers on reddit.

All I'm saying is that it's a question of values. People in power get to decide whats right and whats wrong, and it's often based on their personal biases. For me, TwoX is much worse than TRP, because it actually cheerleads and promotes murder (abortion), while TRP just promotes some toxic ideas.

[–]RollCaltropsNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It matters how people see it when what they are doing is not a crime. I don’t really know what’s up with the American laws in an up to date way so I can’t comment much on what you’re talking about re: Wade vs Roe except to say that the whole world isn’t the US and doesn’t hinge on the validity of that case. People in power decide what’s right and wrong with the input of and pressure from the people they serve if you’re lucky enough to live in a democracy. Anyway I invoke science here because if most people believe killing a grown mammal to eat is somehow not murder, then terminating some frogmush in the uterus is certainly not. I don’t mean to get into a mad off-topic debate but I really think your characterisation of what those people you’re talking about are doing is unfair and coloured by unsupported beliefs. It reads as though you believe those who support the right to abort before a certain gestation period actually enjoy it frivolously or do it just because they can, and encourage others to do the same. It’s a ridiculous caricature of living breathing women with a life changing decision to make.

I don’t believe TRP advocates for what I mentioned either, except for basically being by definition nothing but a textbook on how to abuse.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

'Hey everyone, I just found this subreddit. I'm pregnant and I...'

" GET AN ABORTION!"

Find me a single example of this. You're just plain lying.

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (10 children) | Copy Link

I'll start caring when they begin engaging in adult murder, like redpillers tend to do time to time.

[–] -AveMaria- 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

Hyperbole

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

Can you give me the name of radical feminist who has gone on a killing spree lately?

No, it's not hyperbole.

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, feminists in Canada pushed for third trimester abortion. Every single baby that was terminated in the third trimester (or the second or that matter, but definitely the third) was killed by every definition of the word.

So that's blood on all of their hands

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

No, abortion is not the same thing as murder. Terminating a pregnancy is not the same as getting a gun and shooting someone in the head.

Do you have examples of radical feminists going on killing sprees, yes or no?

[–] -AveMaria- 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Women don't have testosterone. We never commit mass murder.

But killing your own child? It's the sickest thing in the world for me. Especially the late second (and THIRD, in the case of Canada) trimester abortions that feminists promote.

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

Come back when a woman gets a gun, gets in a car, and blows away eight or nine people. Then we can say "its the same thing."

Abortion is not murder.

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it is.

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Except in real life it's not.

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a question of values.

I happen to think that protecting the most vulnerable members in our society is of paramount importance.

You think that bashing the skull in of a human fetus and then ripping its limbs out piece by piece before taking a vacuum and removing whatever parts remained of the poor thing is totally cool.

Yes, thats what happens in second trimester abortions.

[–] Hawanja Ancient Deadly Ninja Baby 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I do think it's totally cool, because I also think it's totally cool for people to decide if and when they want to have children, and not cool for you or anyone else to tell them otherwise.

See, you think you're being "shocking" and stuff with your description. What you fail to realize is that our society condones the killing of human beings all the time. Cops kill people. The military kills people. People kill themselves. Corporations spew poisons into the air that give people cancer. Companies manufacture weapons which are capable of murdering dozens of people at a time, which we as a society have somehow determined it's a god given right for everyone to own, yet everyone acts surprised when a crazy person does exactly that. Prisoners, soldiers, entire families wiped out by drone strikes, people dying of aids or cancer or drug addiction, all of which could easily be stopped if we just gave a shit as a society - none of you right-to-lifers give much of a shit when all these people die, but suddenly when it's a fetus you do? Sorry but I don't buy it. The truth is you people don't actually give a shit about unborn fetuses, and you know how I know? Because you're the same people who fight against sex ed, and birth control. Don't tell me you give a shit, because you don't. If you really did you'd do something about it, like support sex ed, give out free condoms to teenagers, etc. But you people never do that, because it's not about saving children's lives with you people, not really.

So no, killing a person before it's even a fucking person is not murder, any more than cooking an egg is the same as cooking a chicken. That's dumb.

[–] VoidInvincible Full Measure -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Ugh. They make me sick. Murdering pieces of trash.

[–] Pope_Lucious Separating the wheat from the hoes -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Naw, TwoX is more a case of “the blind leading the blind”.

[–]mossiness 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The original femcels got banned :(

[–]wtknightBlue-ish Married Passport Bro ♂︎ 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Okay, well then I suppose that it's justified if Reddit is trying to tone police on both sides of the spectrum. I just know that I've read some negative generalizations about men on other subs (no links, though, and I don't feel like searching) and not as many people seem to have the same issues with those as they do with negative generalizations about women.

[–]VermiciousKnidzzBlue Pill Man 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

same, but do you have any examples of violent feminist subs?

[–]Pope_LuciousSeparating the wheat from the hoes 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

How is TRP violent?

[–]BaldManlet4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Twox celebrates killing their babies

[–]zeitgirl_ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

It is largely a misogynist hate sub. People talk about the "gems" in there, which I agree with but there has been too much BS added on top. It's not about "sexual strategy", it's almost about strategically and revengefully hurting women as payback for their crazy-bitch ex gfs who they should have vetted better.

[–]Pope_LuciousSeparating the wheat from the hoes 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I asked how is it violent?

Who gets to define what a “hate sub” is?

[–] zeitgirl_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

Violence. Noun. Actions or words that are intended to hurt people.

Who gets to define what a “hate sub” is?

To me, a sub becomes a "hate sub" when it shares more "hate" than anything else. You do you, man.

[–] Pope_Lucious Separating the wheat from the hoes 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

Words are not violence.

If you truly believe people should “do you man”, you wouldn’t be for banning subs with content you disagree with.

[–] zeitgirl_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (3 children) | Copy Link

I didn’t say I agree with the ban at all. Your question was how is it violent. By the definition of violence, words are violence, whether you subjectively agree with it or not.

[–] Pope_Lucious Separating the wheat from the hoes 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

No it isn’t. Violence is use of physical force intending to hurt someone. Words can incite violence, but words are never violence, in and of themselves.

[–] zeitgirl_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Respectfully, I disagree.

[–] Pope_Lucious Separating the wheat from the hoes 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough.

[–] Fuzz2 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

If words are not violence then why would we ban talking about terrorism online? Would you suggest we not do that? Also the subreddit did not get banned. It is still there, it just won't appear on r/all.

[–] Pope_Lucious Separating the wheat from the hoes 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Because words can obviously be used as communication between terrorists who may act in violent ways. The communication itself is not violence.

[–]wtknightBlue-ish Married Passport Bro ♂︎ 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not violent, no. I don't think I've read any violent posts on TRP, but I admit that I don't visit there that often anymore. Perhaps it has gotten worse than what I remember and the quarantine is justified.

[–]toronto87 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (15 children) | Copy Link

For information on positive masculinity, please see the resources available at Stony Brook University's Center for the Study of Men and Masculinities

What a bunch of bullshit.

[–]LeaneGenovaBreaker of (comment) Chains 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Oh dear God no we won't.

[–]toronto87 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you please bold three random words in your message, otherwise my bolded word diet wont be met

[–]IrrationalIrritation 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughInternet/comments/7svtm2/bird_shat_on_car/dt91g04/?context=3

That should fulfill your bolded word diet for a few days at least.

[–]We_Are_LegionAutumn Red 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

What a shocking response to this refugee crisis.

Won't you accept the women and children streaming in from TRP?

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure but not the crying manbabies who needed to be told that lifting weights and dressing well was cracking some sort of female code.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

refugee crisis

Holy shit lol

[–]We_Are_LegionAutumn Red 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a shocking response to this refugee crisis.

Won't you accept the women and children streaming in from TRP?

[–]Dmva100 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

All women want to be sexually abused. Katy Perry is a feminist and her popular ET song states "...I wanna be a victim..." so it's true for all empowered females

[–]toronto871 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The fuck?

[–]Young_Oryxlike a literate crocodile 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, where will I get my dose of rants with randomly bolded text now? Will PPD step up to the plate?

Yeah, I'm disappointed for this reason alone. I don't watch reality TV. This is where I get my kicks from.

[–]EmpathyIsAHabit 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

APA has some good material as well on their division 51 web page.

Redpill Tears. Link for the lazy.

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The Donald is a good place for bold text and odd language.

[–]toronto87 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

No thanks.

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ah well. The blue pill is also a nice for randomly placed all capital words. They tend to use words like "feeemaales" and "the menz" etc. You need to acclimate yourself to their clique speak in order to understand.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow.

[–]InformalCriticismProbably Red 83 points84 points85 points 7 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link

My girlfriend said she can't even enter it on mobile. There's no option to continue "[at your own risk]" like there is on PC.

It's proof that Reddit has an agenda that doesn't align with the growing popularity of seeing female nature for what it is.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think them pointing a link pointing to "positive" masculinity on the warning page says it all. This is besides the fact the only subs that are now under quarantine are once again right wing subs.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

subs that are now under quarantine are once again right wing subs

If only there were a known link between the right wing and hate...

[–] [deleted] 6 points 7 points 8 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Because we all know the left wing never contains hate......

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Show me hate on the same level as the far-right.

[–] [deleted] 6 points 7 points 8 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/Anarchism /r/TrollXChromosomes /r/GenderCritical /r/LateStageCapitalism /r/FULLCOMMUNISM

Then you got antifa. I am going to call your reply right now and say you are going to deny all this hate being on the same level as the far right. In fact I bet you aren't even going to consider it hate. That what happens when you got blinders on.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I can hear the crickets across the valley. Let me guess lost your tongue?

[–]Ascimatorsmirks audibly 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

People and their conspiracy theories. It's simpler. The way redpillers speak is icky, so people get iffed and pester the mods to remove the icky weirdos, so the mods do.

[–]adool444 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Dude, there are worse subs out there.

[–]Ascimatorsmirks audibly 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They're not being scary and relevant enough then.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's true. Incel is the most terrifying feed of saddens I've ever seen.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why aren't their checks & balances here you can just keep redflagging shit until they get banned without a fair hearing from the other side?

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

It works for me on mobile

[–]InformalCriticismProbably Red 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Might be an iPhone thing.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I’m on iPhone - could be an app thing is she using official reddit app?

[–]InformalCriticismProbably Red 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, definitely. She uses a reddit app, not sure which.

[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I am. It's gone on the app

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think I figured it out - when I click the link in the OP it does pop up for me with the continue option but it’s technically pulling it up through browser even though I got there through the app.

I think if I just went and searched for TRP on my app I’d have the same issue y’all are having.

[–]sivariasToo old for bullshit, man 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

On mobile access or the app it's blocked completely. You have to load the full desktop version for it to even be an option.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok all I know is it isn’t blocked for me on mobile the way my phone apparently defaults when I click on ops link.

[–] sivarias Too old for bullshit, man -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

You default to website browser then, rather then mobile.

[–] sublimemongrel Becky, Esq. (woman) 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah I literally just tried to explain that sorry I didn’t use the proper computer phrasing or whatever.

[–] sivarias Too old for bullshit, man 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

You ok? Pop in and talk to us we wouldn't mind a chat.

[–]redpillschoolRed Pill 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have to click continue on the old site or on desktop before it works on mobile app.

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Quiet female nature the men are talking.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Why in the world would you ever show your girlfriend your misogynist hatespace?

What woman would stay with a man who believes this bullshit?

[–]InformalCriticismProbably Red 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

She found it because I didn't attempt to hide it from her. I don't lie to my girlfriend, and I don't want her to be with me if she doesn't know who or what I am.

If you're asking me what I think of her, I'd call her an attractive tradcon who wants me to marry her and give her babies. Someone with principles and a realistic point of view - one you could neither be, nor could you understand if your life depended on it.

[–]BisquitBill 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Beautiful. Sometimes PPD is worth reading.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Truth.

[–]Silveresquemania 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What does she think of a Red Pill ideas?

[–]SkrattGoddess 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

I was wondering when they’d come in and quarantine the shit. It was just getting worse and worse.

[–]Transmigratory 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if you actually read the sub or just saw a couple of posts which rubbed you the wrong way.

[–]AstuteBlackManRed Pill Man 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

“Goddess”

[–]SkrattGoddess 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You read a word. Congratulations.

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago   (13 children) | Copy Link

Unsure what you consider shit, but you're certainly entitled to an unsubstantiated opinion.

[–] Skratt Goddess 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (12 children) | Copy Link

When I first saw the "women are children" thing I knew y'all were entering the gutter

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (11 children) | Copy Link

You don't even know what it means, so why bring it up?

[–] Skratt Goddess 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (10 children) | Copy Link

I do know what it means .-. Next question?

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

Tell me why TRP says that, and we can continue.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

Oh idk, I didn't study it XD I just remember everything making sense, then I leave for a month and come back and in bold letters at the top "Women Are Children" that's all I really remember.

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

It's a perspective to keep men from slipping into the feminist frame of total equality - to keep men in the mentality that they are responsible for decision making, and female behavior can be reduced to child-like behavior when in the context of the male-female dynamic.

It's meant to keep men sharp and aware to their role and responsibility in the relationship.

It's not simply denigrating to women any more than dread game is meant to make women suffer emotionally - the purpose is always higher and always for the betterment of the relationship.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

That's a cute way of putting it xd

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

All of TRP is designed this way. Brash up front, but wholesome and healthy once imbibed.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

Well that's cute x)

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Eight equals equals equals D tilde tilde.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (2 children) | Copy Link

LOL! I just drew that out to see what face that would make. XD Nasty self.

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Bane: Oh, you think darkness is your ally. But you merely adopted the dark; I was born in it, moulded by it. I didn't see the light until I was already a man, by then it was nothing to me but BLINDING! Bane: The shadows betray you, because they belong to me!

You think the Internet is your ally, but I was born into it, moulded by it. I didn't see real life until I was already a man. The Internet betrays you because it belongs to me!

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (0 children) | Copy Link

Showing out XD

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn man.

[–] jackandjill22 Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck are you guys talking about?

[–]Truedemocracy4 116 points117 points118 points 7 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link

Remember when the left and Reddit stood for free speech so much that even banning young teenage porn subs drew outrage? And that "slippery slope" was just a fallacy?

History does not reflect well on those that try to write the truth by silencing others. Often times the worst villains we have had thought they were heroes.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol r/jailbait was just beach bikini pics from Facebook , p far from porn imo

[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

Omdz its just a fucking subreddit lol

[–]toronto87 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (41 children) | Copy Link

And if the CIA infiltrates reddit in the name of national security and starts silencing pro-feminism subreddits? Will you say that it's 'just a fucking subreddit' then?

[–]TheImpossible1 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

Is everyone forgetting the feminist reddit was full of Iranian bots at one point?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Do tell

[–]TheImpossible1 22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Well there was a post on r/announcements on the bot problem, then T_D mods went through and called out their associations in a post on their sub. A few hours after, all the accounts got wiped.

Found the T_D post - https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/9bw66t/surprise_surprise_leftyreddit_eats_up_iranian/

It doesn't surprise me that feminists would side with pure evil to hurt men. You just have to look at the Corbynites who support an anti-Semite because he's a feminist, while calling Trump a Nazi.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Amazing thanks

[–]dolforrot7 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Why the hell would the CIA silence feminism? They've been funding it since the 60's.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-gloria-steinem-cia-20151025-story.html

[–]PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Five accounts = full of Iranian bots? Wat?

[–]TheImpossible1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

There were more than 5. Reddit just chose to show 5.

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

So your basis for your confident unqualified claim that it was “full of” is what exactly?

Yet another example of “fake news” just being projection from the right.

[–] TheImpossible1 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

"To date, we have uncovered 143 accounts we believe to be connected to this influence group. The vast majority (126) were created between 2015 and 2018. A handful (17) dated back to 2011."

From the announcement post.

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

Again, your evidence that twoX was “full of” these bots is what? Simply that?

Yea, projection indeed.

[–] TheImpossible1 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

Twox? I never mentioned them. Shitty default sub with highly inflated sub count, but overall nothing odd.

r/feminism however..

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

My bad I was confusing you with someone else.

But that’s even worse. You extrapolate five accounts to all of “feminist Reddit” instead of just one sub.

Can you admit that you wanted to believe that they were “full of” bots and maybe stretched the evidence to fit that belief?

[–] TheImpossible1 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

Well if the majority of top contributions on T_D were Russian bots, you'd have it shut down.

Yet when feminists have theirs all Iranian bots with thousands of upvotes, their sub survives.

Yes not every user was, but the majority of the top posts were.

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Again, you are making claims without the evidence to back it up. It’s unfortunate that you’re not able to stop yourself.

[–] TheImpossible1 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

As we're arguing about feminism, you have to prove they're not full of Iranian bots.

You know like they assume guilt before innocence? Except in the case of their child rapist leader...

[–] PM_ME_U_BOTTOMLESS_ 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

So now you are trying to justify your spreading of fake news. You guys can never admit you made a mistake can you?

[–] TheImpossible1 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

No I'm not spreading fake news. There were Iranian bots making major contributions to that sub.

Also, the current feminist leader is a child rapist.

[–]toronto87 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (6 children) | Copy Link

Why is that surprising? Foreign intelligence agencies have been heavily involved in feminism from the start. They knew exactly what they were doing.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What foreign intelligence agencies were involved in the womens movement of the late 1800-early 1900s?

[–]WestsideMoonWalker 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You could go back further to the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848 honestly, if you want a starting point.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeh that's what I meant

[–]WestsideMoonWalker 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. It was a grassroots movement as far as I am aware. My memory of that era of history isn't quite a strength though.

[–]TheImpossible1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't know that, could you send me a link or a source to read?

I'd be particularly interested if they were shown to be backing radical feminism.

I've always wondered where these "Kill all men" people got their influence and money from.

[–]the_calibre_catNo Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hmm! Weird, I guess it only draws outrage and mainstream media attention when it's a foreign power infiltrating conservative groups.

[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

The CIA 😂

Yes I would....now where’s my aluminium hat? I wanna get in on this...

[–]toronto87 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (15 children) | Copy Link

It's weird how we live in a world where we can accept that 30 years ago the CIA was recording all of our communications and was actively involved in every major media organization in the west, but today people think the idea of intelligence agencies doing their job is tinfoil hat material.

[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

More like shutting down a sub of whiny men in the tiny corner of the internet would have any type of CIA interference at all. Noone cares enough

[–]crumblesnatch 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (8 children) | Copy Link

The incels who go apeshit put their communities on government watch; that's not tinfoil. But quarantining/banning is just regular reddit bullshit lol.

[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yeah last time I checked reddit was private for-profit company they can do what they like. Including pre-emptive actions to avoid negative publicity

[–]Young_Oryx8 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Fucking thank you.

If one more person tells me that a company taking down material that is bad for their bottom line violates "muh free speech," I am going to scream.

[–]crumblesnatch 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly. The whole point of "free speech" is that the government won't tell you what not to say, but the people who have to listen to it can and will kick you off their property.

[–]WestsideMoonWalker 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right? People aren't owed a platform. If someone wants to talk about how they want to kill all the Jews, they can, but they can also expect people, companies, and everyone else, but not the govt., to relegate them to yelling at clouds, or whatever. Free speech doesn't mean a free platform to speak upon.

[–]SkrattGoddess 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Reddit is not the government. It’s their choice to remove whatever they want from the site. But you do have the choice to build your own website with no rules, by all means.

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Except they don't want to do that because reddit has a massive user base that they can easily recruit from. Pulling themselves up by their TRP bootstraps will get them a fraction of their current traffic on a new site.

So, on queue, they bring up the censorship and 1984 arguments.

[–] 321PK 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I thought they already did that tho

[–]Transmigratory 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's cool, but then no-one should act sensitive when people say Reddit doesn't treat all views equally. Of course, bloops will take this as some sort of win.

[–] Pope_Lucious Separating the wheat from the hoes -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Reddit is free to do what they want. But they aren’t a company committed to free speech ideals.

[–] LaughingVergil 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Of course, the CIA recording US citizens isn't their job.

That's the FBI's job.

[–]toronto875 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

MI6 and CSIS spy on American citizens and give the information to the CIA and the CIA spies on British and Canadian citizens and gives them the information. I left out New Zealand and Australia to simplify the explanation.

[–] 321PK 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

Ugh. I could give a shit. I’ve got nothing to hide. Hello out there. Wanna hear me chat my gfs about if I should get the white stretch pointed booties or the Prince of Wales plaid pair? Or me yell “harder” at my husband??? Srsly. Why do I care?

[–] AutismoCircus No pills 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve got nothing to hide. Why do I care?

Hello there, Goebbèls

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

History does not reflect well on those that try to write the truth by silencing others.

I think history will reflect well on any site that bans hategroups.

[–]Truedemocracy4 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Let's create a perfect society in terms of how we see fit by taking away rights of others. That has never gone wrong in the past!

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Private companies don't owe you a safe space to spread hate. Sorry.

[–]the_calibre_catNo Pill Man 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

^ remember this, libertarians. They will use your arguments when convenient, and then whine "but but regulation!/muh public good!" whenever it's convenient for them.

[–]Truedemocracy4 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stop spreading your hate

[–]Tedesche 70 points71 points72 points 7 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Jesus, what fucking garbage. Reddit admins are a bunch of social justice morons. This is nothing but enforcement of their political views on others, a literal trigger warning on content they deem personally offensive.

The Left is once again being consumed by it's personal bane: PC culture. Another generation has to experience this mistake anew.

This is what modern feminism has wrought.

[–]apube9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

Do you honestly think reddit, a for-profit company that has hosted subs far worse than TRP in the past, is suddenly crusading for ideology at the cost of potential profits? Or do you think that they have received pressure from advertisers who don't want to have their brand associated with controversy? Or maybe they're trying to appeal more to their far larger, more liberal demographic, and trying to become a more mainstream social media platform (potentially with less anonymity)? Why is your theory more reasonable than simply a company attempting to maximize profits?

This is what modern capitalism has wrought.

[–]Tedesche 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think there’s anything sudden about it; they’ve been doing this for years. They seem to do it in waves, to a bunch of subs at a time, for whatever reason—probably to give SRS time to create a new list.

I don’t think it has a thing to do with money; I think it’s straight up political bias. But it doesn’t really matter either way, I still think it’s wrong to police political groups as a social media company on your platform.

[–]LeJacquelope 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But capitalism says "my property, my rights" does it not?

[–]YetAnotherCommenterDark Purple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But capitalism says "my property, my rights" does it not?

Capitalism also says you have the right to complain, to communicate your preferences and to criticize. Just because a business may have the right to do something doesn't mean that every action that business takes with their own property is right.

Not only that, but Reddit operates under a set of legal protections given to it as a platform. If Reddit curates content on a discretionary or editorial/party line basis, it stops being a platform and becomes a publisher. If Reddit is a publisher, it stops receiving certain protections it enjoys under US law (i.e. it becomes responsible for all the content posted on Reddit by Redditors).

[–]LeJacquelope 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL then take it to court and let's see how far y'all get!

[–]Tedesche 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don’t care about capitalism, LOL, it’s not about economics to me. They’re legally allowed to do as they please, I just don’t think it’s good for the site or the public. Communities are only made weaker by preventing them from discussing certain views or topics. Unbound capitalism is no better for society than communism; that’s why every capitalist country still regulates certain corporate behaviors at the end of the day.

Honestly, I don’t know why the notion that the principle of free speech is worth defending at nearly every level of our society, in every sphere is so difficult for so many people today to comprehend.

[–]LeJacquelope 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow you're like the second MRA I've seen in my lifetime that doesn't care about capitalism. (Me being the first.)

[–]Ascimatorsmirks audibly 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It wasn't the admins who had spread the general "redpiller = unlikeable incel moron" attitudes on reddit.

[–]Tedesche 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it was the admins who decided they needed to reinforce people's personal political preferences with site-wide administrative rules and policies. Everyone who dislikes TRP can easily avoid it on Reddit. Putting a quarantine up is purely meant as an insult and a disincentive to newcomers.

[–] Ascimator smirks audibly -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Every website that has a reason to care for people's opinion polices itself. That's not new and not exclusive to Reddit.

[–] Tedesche 4 points 5 points 6 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

I don’t believe social media platforms should be policing the content of their sites along political lines.

EDIT: Reported for obvious downvoting.

[–] Ascimator smirks audibly 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Anything can be political. Also, wrong on that one. Funny how that works, every time someone has an inexplicable need to accuse me of downvoting out loud, they completely miss the mark.

[–] Tedesche 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Anything can be political.

I said along political lines as a contrast to reasons for censoring content along lines that have nothing to do with politics. For example, banning a sub for doxxing people is not about politics; that’s based on an apolitical priniciple about defending anonymity on the internet—a principle. There is no real disagreement that doxxing sucks, regardless of who’s doing it. Banning or even quarantining a sub, because some users might find its content offensive is appealing to a particular political mindset and holding it above the rest. It’s censoring certain views, rather than objectively bad and malicious actions.

[–] Ascimator smirks audibly 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh no, the principle of defending anonymity on the internet is political. It's a dominating principle right now at this day and age, but still ultimately an arbitrary issue.

[–] Tedesche 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL, by that logic, the view that murder is wrong is political. If you need to drag this discussion that far out of the realm of common sense to make your point, I’d suggest you reconsider the merit of the point itself. I made the distinction quite clearly: banning malicious actions can simply be about preventing everyone from harming each other in some substantial way; banning certain views, no matter how objectionable to the masses, is censorship.

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

LOL try and go to Redstate.com and post liberal views on there. Or Breitbart...

[–] Tedesche 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Neither of those are social media sites.

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Because... magic?

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost 77 points78 points79 points 7 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

This is what happens when visibly power hungry people people get enabled

At first they start banning things that seem really bad

Then if nobody cuts them off they move on to things that are sorta bad

And if nobody cuts them off before you know it they will attempt to direct every aspect of everyone’s life , they will never be satisfied

[–]apube18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago [recovered] (34 children) | Copy Link

Is it power hunger or is it pressure from advisterers etc. to make a more palatable platform for the masses? I mean they're trying to make reddit look like Facebook, there seems to be a push to make it more mainstream. I find it hard to believe this isn't about $$$

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Both really. Its about money but also ideology. Every subreddit has banned except for one has been a right wing sub. This is even tho subs like /r/Anarchism break reddit's rules numerous times. But because its a left wing sub it gets to stay.

[–]apube8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

Just visited /r/anarchism where they're talking about /r/fullcommunism getting quarantined as well, which apparently was a left leaning sub that also broke the rules.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

/r/Anarchism has broken the rules numerous times yet the admins do nothing. I can only imagine what /r/full communism did.

[–]sivariasToo old for bullshit, man 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

it's the left wing r/SubOfPeace

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That isn't a left wing sub but a right wing one.

[–]sivariasToo old for bullshit, man 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

sighs

Yes, that was my point. r/fullcommunism is the left wing version of r/SubofPeace (which is right wing). They are both meme sites dedicated to their extreme beliefs

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Ya that wasn't clear.

[–] sivarias Too old for bullshit, man 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

I was replying directly to your comment, which means your comment is the only source for the "it's" definition. What else could I have possibly meant? The only possible reference I could have made was to

I can only imagine what /r/full communism did.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

You could have said /r/SubOfPeace is the right wing version of /r/FULLCOMMUNISM for one. Like I said what you said wasn't clear.

[–]_justagumnut_ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Reddit is a left leaning company, they're not bound to be "fair" to subreddits they don't want to be associated with.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I know that. But doing what they are doing is going to backfire on them.

[–]_justagumnut_ 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I doubt it

[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Controversy sells

[–]_justagumnut_ 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You're overestimating how much of reddit TRP takes up.

[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Alex Jones wasn't that big ethier, but several thousand YouTube channels made money bashing on him

[–]_justagumnut_ 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ok come back to me in 6 months and show me how reddit has crashed and burned because they quarantined TRP

[–] squidracer 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't be so dramatic. Oh wait, that's impossible for bloopers

[–] _justagumnut_ 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago *   (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm red. How am I being dramatic? I'm literally saying nothing is going to happen lol.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

It will as when you pull double standards it often not backfires on you.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

and this is where capitalism inhibits free speech, and by free speech i do not mean the first amendment specifically, but the ability to speak freely

[–]apube3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

And you can't actually have this real conversation about the limits on actual free speech online. It's impossible. Not because you can't start talking about it...

But because when you do Americans can't stop making it a conversation predicated on the first amendment, and telling you "but corporations are allowed to do what they like stopping people speaking freely, because they're not the government. So they can just go ahead, it's legal and right that they close of whatever speech they want to close off, and remove it from the public commons".

Witness this thread. This has already been said a dozen times by a dozen posters, at a bare minimum.

There isn't a free speech debate you can have in a space dominated by Americans that can in any way deal with any threat to free speech that doesn't come from the government. To them that doesn't exist as a problem, even whilst they watch speech being banned and restricted in all sort of places they personally use to speak.

It's bonkers. "Oh, we've got perfect free speech. The govt. doesn't interfere. It's just that everywhere I personally speak it's restricted completely by private companies 99% of the time to only things they want to allow to be said".

Private companies that are allowed to make money off of becoming the venue of the common public conversation should be legally expected to protect free speech within it.

Not, perhaps, to the absolute level of the 1st amendment for governments. It could not go that far. But private entities should not be given free reign, to subvert the common conversation by censorship because they can make more money from a censored public conversation than they can from an open one.

So much of our public space and conversation is now mediated by private corporations and entities that if free speech is not protected there .... then we don't have any free speech worth having.

Companies that offer fora for public discussion that form part of the common public square should be treated with special rules and protections.... much as we do Journalism (or used to do for Journalism in the US). They have additional responsibilities, and should legally be treated that way.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One of the best comments I’ve ever read on Reddit, saved.

I may plagiarize bits of it for a massive effort post on r/changemyview someday. Maybe I’ll pm you to come back me up!

[–]fall2041 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Some of us (Americans) do want free speech online as well. The moral issue comes from (as you've read 1000 times) us telling them what to do with their property. Let's say some dude is screaming random shit at your house. You have the right to kick him out, no? Same deal with these places online.

I think some sort of healthy medium needs to be reached, but the truth is that it's mostly in the hands of consumers. People can CHOOSE to go to a website that follows the principle of free speech. People can also choose to stay here where free speech is trampled on if you don't follow the same politics as the owners.

However, this sucks for the individual because I can't just make everyone go to pro-free speech platforms. Most of them will stay here / on Facebook simply because they're lazy, and many of them don't WANT free speech because they think some shit should be censored.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's say some dude is screaming random shit at your house. You have the right to kick him out, no? Same deal with these places online

That’s the point. If they’re monetising the public commons it is no longer “their house” but a public space we are allowing them to make money off of.

The equivalent is not someone’s house. The equivalent is a public square, used for public gatherings, that we allow people to sell beer at.

The beer sellers should not, then, be able to restrict access to the public square purely because they think it will increase their beer sales.

People can CHOOSE to go to a website that follows the principle of free speech. People can also choose to stay here where free speech is trampled on if you don't follow the same politics as the owners.

Not if you’ve sold off all th public squares to beer retailers.

Our public square these days is the internet. There is no portion of it that isn’t controlled by somebody. We have to have protections from those somebodies.

However, this sucks for the individual because I can't just make everyone go to pro-free speech platforms. Most of them will stay here / on Facebook simply because they're lazy, and many of them don't WANT free speech because they think some shit should be censored.

It’s worse than that. The spaces that are “free speech spaces” are only so because no-one is there.

If you persuaded everyone to leave Facebook and join Voat (say) the moment they’d cornered that space, they’d do the same thing.... fuck with it however they need to in order to increase profits.

Just as Reddit, Facebook and Twitter did.

That’s the monetisation end game for everywhere even if some sites haven’t reached the end game portion yet.

[–] Jex117 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Not just the ability to speak freely, but the ability to think freely. The mass censorship causes a chilling effect that inhibits the full freedom of thought.

It's a subtle form of mind control.

[–]toronto87 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

This sounds familiar. Who remembers digg?

[–]awakenedspirit1it is what it is 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RIP

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Two sides of a coin , they go hand in hand

[–]sivariasToo old for bullshit, man 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean The_Donald isn't being considered for quarantine because the users buy and use so much gold, so yes.

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

$$$

That’s the best definition of power bra.

[–]apube0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but he clearly didn't mean it like that

[–]DebatesNotBans 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's already happening. Fucktons of people are making excuses for subs like /r/Racism, for example. A 12k+ sub with MASSIVE anti-white hatred.

[–]Tolpis 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

First I'd ever heard of this sub, but it doesn't seem overtly racist to me. Can you point out any examples of anti-white racism that were popular on that sub?

[–]DebatesNotBans 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Their use of "mayo" as a racial slur against white people.

Them instnatly banning and muting anyone who claims they're white, or defends white people in any way.

[–]ImpalaLama73 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Red pill IS really bad tho

[–]LeJacquelope 60 points61 points62 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

"Positive masculinity"

That by itself means I will never go anywhere near that place. Most likely a swamp full of male radical feminist indoctrination. Fuck that.

I almost feel sympathy for TRP now. Almost.

[–]OneInAZillion 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you saying you don't donate 30% of your income to feminist charities?

[–]LeJacquelope 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sg-wtsocxHY

[–]sivariasToo old for bullshit, man 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The top page talks about women and how men should get involved in the feminist movement.

[–]LeJacquelope 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm talking about Stony Brook University's Center for the Study of Men and Masculinities - I will never go near that place.

Here's why - from the front page:

Guys Who Get It: The Men of the Women’s Movement

Activists Meet Researchers "Challenging Homophobia, Challenging Masculinities"

Conservatives find out that women are studying toxic masculinity, meltdowns ensue

Men as Allies in Preventing Violence Against Women

Angry white men

Now mind you I hate Trumpanzees and right wingers as much as any feminist, but look at the consistent theme here -

1) blame men

2) men serve women

3) masculinity is bad, m'k?

[–]sivariasToo old for bullshit, man 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that was entirely my point.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The fact the admins put it there makes me puke. But again its not like its not known how the admins are all left wing.

[–]LeJacquelope 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Left-Right wing, actually.

See: Horseshoe theory.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

In this case its not.

[–]LeJacquelope 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

There are people with "banned from TRP" flairs bragging about how they got banned from TRP for daring to disagree with them.

Both sides are quite intolerant of opposing views.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Both sides are quite intolerant of opposing views.

True. Doesn't make it horseshoe theory in this case.

[–]LeJacquelope 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

They behave identically. That's horseshoe theory.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I know what horseshoe theory is. Right wing subs aren't banning left wing subs which would be horseshoe theory. You need more than one similarity to fit the theory.

[–]LeJacquelope 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not if the similarity is so large it bends light from its sheer mass, which is the case here.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Again its not on the one thing you are talking about.

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes it is. Who are you trying to con here? I ain't the one. This is absolutely an example of Horseshoe Theory.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

What subs have the right wing banned?

[–]Jaxx_TellerPurple Pill Man 27 points28 points29 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

This is pathetic, but it is expected in today's climate. The biggest problem I have with this, is that there are some men who digested certain material from the sub which improved aspects of their lives or made them happier people.

[–]Transmigratory 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The ones who believe there's a conspiracy against them have been validated seeing as the quarantine can be seen as them being censored.

[–] Skratt Goddess 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

And there are some who became incels screaming about the 80/20 rule and how IT’S OVER!!! Time to take that toxic shit somewhere else.

[–] Jaxx_Teller Purple Pill Man 11 points 12 points 13 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

became incels

Ok

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Go celebrate your birthday xD You'll never catch me here on my birthday.

[–] orcscorper ..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..|| 13 points 14 points 15 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

That makes no sense whatsoever. An "incel" is a man who is involuntarily celibate: hence the name. How in hell would a man who is getting some find TRP, and apply its advice to improve his love life, and then become an incel? The fuck!? All he would have to do to escape inceldom is go back to what he was doing before he found TRP.

In future, try to think before you write a bunch of stuff that doesn't make any sense. It will save us all time.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago *   (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] TheGreasyPole Objectively Pro-moderate filth [ M ] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

No it’s not purge week, and we know what you wrote before you edited it.

Be Civil. This is a warning.

[–]Transmigratory 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

The subsection knew this would happen. For all the Bloops who tricked themselves into thinking that there are no double standards and that there's nothing against ideologies which put men first, this is evidence that you were *wrong*.

​

​

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

For all the Bloops who tricked themselves into thinking that there are no double standards and that there's nothing against ideologies which put men first

TRP doesn't put men first. It just puts women last.

[–]Transmigratory 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

You're being dishonest. They put men first and you know it.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (10 children) | Copy Link

If they were putting men first, they wouldn’t be indoctrinating them to be selfish and hateful.

[–] Transmigratory 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

They never did that. The only people who reach that conclusion are people who didn't actually read about TRP or go by the triggered bloops in PPD or bad subs like 2X.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

I’ve read your previous hatesub. It’s vile. The “men” it produces are vile.

[–] Transmigratory 4 points 5 points 6 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

You must find assertive men vile.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

As one, no I don’t.

I find men who hate women vile.

[–] [deleted] 5 points 6 points 7 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

Let me guess women who hate men aren't vile?

[–] Transmigratory 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

He probably thinks that, tbh.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

I won't be surprised.

[–] Transmigratory 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

I noticed that all the RP leaning posts tend to be down voted. XD

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Report him. I did for downvoting which against sub rules.

[–] Transmigratory 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

The sub which talks about men and how men can improve their lives = hate women.

Lets humour you, as an "assertive man" you either don't like communities which tell other men to be assertive or communities which tell them to not consider all women as queens.

You've obviously not put much thought into this.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is putting men first. Like how feminism puts men last.

[–]LittleGanymede 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would actually argue that TRP does put women first. The ultimate goal of TRP is to teach men to improve with the ultimate goal of sniffing panties. Like DL Hugley's son. If your ultimate goal is the acquisition of sex with women I'd say that you are putting them first because everything you do is about them.

[–] frogsgoribbit737 Purple Pill Woman -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh what fucking ever. As long as T_D exists, I will never believe that.

[–] Transmigratory 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

You're probably the sort of person who wouldn't believe anything no matter how clear the evidence is, to be blunt.

[–]sadomasochristNo pull out game 79 points80 points81 points 7 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

Thankfully the Ministry of Truth told me this when I tried to access it.

For information on positive masculinity, please see the resources available at Stony Brook University's Center for the Study of Men and Masculinities

Fuckin' LOL reddit and libtards. Yeah let me check out that link to set my sex life back 15 years to punish my balls.

[–]NeedingAdvice86 27 points28 points29 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't know about TRP but that site which I did visit is a how-to guide and fast track to never, ever seeing an attractive girl's pussy in your lifetime.

I grew tired of the fabulists and some of the more basic shits on TRP forums but a quick look at that Stony Brook site is an embarrassment to men and I hope that none of the resident dunderheads think following or espousing that crap is going to get them ANY SUCCESS whatsoever with women.

And is it true that the main author on that site just got ousted from his post at the UN because of sexual harassment......of course, having the proper political views will often get you a pass in the US about groping and molesting any number of women.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Got a link to it?

[–]ffbtawPurple Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/08/06/sociologist-facing-harassment-rumors-defers-award

Haven't heard about the UN thing. He deferred an award from the American Sociological Association for six months. I suspect it will be swept under the rug.

[–]reluctantly_red 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My dad was a professor at Stony Brook when I was a little kid. Maybe that's why I turned out blue. :(

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, it certainly is patronizing.

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm perusing the site right now and I can feel my masculinity changing from negative to positive. Thanks women of PPD for helping me remove the need to have testicles. Thank you! Mwah! YAAAASSSSSS.

[–]bamename 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think you may be just a tad insecire about yourself.

[–]AutismoCircus 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think you may just be a tad of an condescending bitch.

[–]bamename 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

lmao

*a

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Don't you love it when the admins are pushing their agenda. And the liberals and especially SJW claim the admins are supporting the right wing on this site. Its now a matter of time before another right wing sub gets banned while subs like /r/Anarchism and /r/GenderCritical stay up.

[–]yaseedog will hunt 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

r/FULLCOMMUNISM got quarantined tho

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Shocking, but I wager they be given a pass.

[–]sadomasochristNo pull out game 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"See, the dispute system works!"

[–]yaseedog will hunt 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

time will tell :) in the meantime 🍿

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

r/communism is still up tho.

[–]yaseedog will hunt 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

so's r/the_donald

[–]TheImpossible1 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting fact : the dipshit they link so much is a gender studies major.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart - creator of the field.

Reddit literally supports killing men off.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus

[–]vicious_troll 53 points54 points55 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Happy 1984!

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

TIL Reddit = government.

If you believe reddit a free speech platform you're quite blue pill.

[–]vicious_troll 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's freeer than mainstream media and campuses for sure.

[–]We_Are_LegionAutumn Red 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Little by little, they took those over.

They're doing it to games as we speak.

Where will you go?

[–] theambivalentrooster Literal Chad -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh really? So Universities in Texas and Alabama and Georgia and South and North Carolina and Ohio and Colorado and Idaho and Minnesota and Iowa and Florida and Kentucky and Mississippi are all bastions of liberal power and SJW microagression gender studies hellscapes? The wacky feminists finally killed off greek life en masse?

The SJW issues at universities are real at the institutions they are happening at. But to pretend it's a majority or even 'a lot' of universities in America is hysteria on the order of 3rd wave feminism.

[–] hammerhaunts 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Mississippi is one, did you see the Missou thing

[–]honoraryjap 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

It used to be, pretty much. But this is bigger than just Reddit.

If they succeed, Reddit = Government = 1984.

First they came for the “Nazis” and then they just slid down the slippery slope because they couldn’t bother with the facade.

It is not okay to be White. It is not okay to be a male. It is not okay to be smart. It is not okay to be strong.

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually first they came for /r/jailbait...

[–]_justagumnut_ 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Reddit is a private business, they can disallow whatever they like. It has nothing to do with 1984 lol

[–]FalseBuddhaSomething borrowed, something Blue3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

It is not okay to be White. It is not okay to be male. It is not okay to be smart. It is not okay to be strong.

What an absurd persecution complex.

[–]honoraryjap 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

lol At least, if your post history is to be believed, you have found a man to protect you despite your many flaws. Keep him. You will need him.

[–]_justagumnut_ 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I'm planning on it thanks 😘

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Today you didn’t learn how metaphors work.

[–] CombatStacey Blue ovaries 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes, because trp will be hounded off the internet altogether and made to communicate via snail mail with each other, until that route is shut down, too, and then all that will be left for trp is each of them sitting in their bedrooms and writing their turgid thoughts down in their diaries, placing a tiny spot of dust on the cover after each Dear Diary , I hate women session, until the day they discover the CIA has been infiltrating their diary all along and replacing the dust each night.

And then they are taken to "the room". Instead of rats eating their faces, they'll be required to watch non-stop feminist videos, until their brains are burned and they cry out I love feminism!

[–] vicious_troll 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, we won't reach that point. Islam will take over soon and the West will need to embrace toxic masculinity again in order to fight the invaders and save secularism. It will be the feminists who'll ask for Western men's protection crying, because they'll be scared to death to have their clitorises cut.

[–]toronto873 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I think it's substantially more likely that the CIA will be dismantling the western feminist movement now that it appears that the pentagon and western intelligence agencies are starting to comprehend the threat posed by China.

[–]crackrocksteady7 32 points33 points34 points 7 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

Midterms coming up no right wing speech allowed

[–]321PK 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

You might be overstating it’s significance tho. I never heard of this action before. Have there been others?

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Reddit has only banned right wing subs (to date only one left wing sub got banned). And the admins allow left wing redditors to carry out witch hunts and openly break the rules while not the same for those that are right wing.

[–] 321PK -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago *   (16 children) | Copy Link

Well that’s bullshit!!

Edit: I mean, bullshit that they did it. That’s not right.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (15 children) | Copy Link

Yup. Sadly its only going to get worse for here out and only thing to do really is to make huge noise over it and get the media's attention.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (14 children) | Copy Link

Please. Do. I’d love to see a media outrage. I’m already omw to SRD.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

One needs to create enough of a backlash and enough evidence to give to the media as the media ain't going to attack their own without enough evidence.

[–] Skratt Goddess 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

Lol, y’all ain’t gon do nothin. sips tea

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

lol. Maybe. Though /r/CringeAnarchy is a good size sub with subs in the 300k area. With with what's going on with /r/news (banning people without reason), there's possibility there.

[–] Skratt Goddess 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

They ain't gon do shit but complain.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Sometimes that is all is needed. Though seeing reddit is looking to make money, it be pretty bad if people started to target left wing subs and point out the hate and the rule breaking there.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

XD Lel

[–] crackrocksteady7 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

You mean the media owned by the same people censoring reddit? Lol

[–] 321PK 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

I just saw your flair. What do you think should happen with Kavanaugh? I really don’t know. Jw what you think.

[–] crackrocksteady7 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

i think we need to halt the nomination process and wait for an FBI investigation to clear him of the very serious charges that he cut up my newborn children with a blender and served them for dinner. I think as a victim the people need to hear my voice and that I should be believed

[–] 321PK 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Omg! 😂 I’m serious! I bet you don’t even have children anyway lol

[–] crackrocksteady7 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm serious too. That's what I think. Nothing the democrats had in today's hearing is any more substantial than the claim I just typed. I think Kavanaugh should be confirmed and there's likely evidence out there to put multiple people who spoke today in prison for perjury

[–] yasee dog will hunt 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

who do you think perjured themselves?

[–] crackrocksteady7 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

atleast ford and feinstein

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

What? ._.

[–]crackrocksteady7 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

Alex jones made tons of videos leading up to the 2016 election of leftist violence, idiocy, gone. r/milliondollarextreme is gone. I'm sure others can list more theres so many twitter bans youtube bans etc for the right

You might be overstating it’s significance tho

it's all pieces of a puzzle of an alternate media web not publishing and distributing the same MSM bullshit and right now the mega tech corps are playing whackamole because the message they're pushing doesn't stand up to any scrutiny when an alternative is presented

[–]SkrattGoddess 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I hope you’re joking about MDE, take your racist asses back to voat xD There’s no way to justify that sub at ALL.

[–]crackrocksteady7 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

why does a sub have to be justified again?

[–]SkrattGoddess 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Because the owners of Reddit can do what they want with their domain?

[–]squidracer 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can they? Yes. Should they? Well there is always a risk

[–]crackrocksteady7 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

so youre agreeing the tech corps are playing whackamole because the message they're pushing by banning anything pro white man doesn't stand up to any scrutiny when an alternative is presented?

what about when a private company refuses to make a fag a cake? (something much less powerful than limiting the spread of information)

[–]SkrattGoddess 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

doesn't stand up to any scrutiny when an alternative is presented?

LOL, what alternative? XD

what about when a private company refuses to make a fag a cake? (something much less powerful than limiting the spread of information)

Is it their raggedy choice to refuse to make someone a cake? Absolutely. Idk if you expected a different answer from me but it's still their choice, whether I agree with it or not.

(something much less powerful than limiting the spread of information)

Calling people fags and saying women should be in the kitchen is not spreading information. Y'all are spreading disease.

[–]SpaceWhiskey🍃 Social Justice Druid 🍂 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I’ve only heard about that place since it’s been removed, what was MDE all about?

[–]crackrocksteady7 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://i.imgur.com/6SzTJmZ.jpg

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was a YouTube comedy channel that was firefly featured on adult swim iirc. Edgy humor that you could tell was made by “alt lite” dudes, but on its surface not actually racist.

His videos mocking Ted talks and gym culture were hilarious and non partisan . Other stuff was kinda cringe

[–]Bloodypalace 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Masculinity is a right wing ideology now!!1

What the fuck are you even talking about?

[–] crackrocksteady7 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

team man is overwhelmingly net right wing

I'm struggling to find the image with the electoral map with 2016 election actuals if only men voted, which was up, because google is clearly hiding it now. Funny since the topic of this thread is leftist media censorship. But here's the projection before the election

https://images.onmogul.com/uploads/story/thumbnail/53383/9bccfb93ce.jpg?ixlib=rails-0.3.2&ch=Width%2CDPR&fit=crop&h=465&w=820&s=e0936e7c6a5db03f8c5978b2965f522d

What the fuck are you even talking about?

lol

[–] Bloodypalace 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

US politics is a clown show. You guys don't even have a left wing party. In any other country the democtrats would be a right wing party and the Republicans would be the fringe extreme right party.

[–] crackrocksteady7 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

excellent NPC analysis the television box couldn't have said it better

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's not even politically affiliated.

[–]crackrocksteady7 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Only to try to avoid being banned. Everyone knows TRP's political affiliation

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm still amused at the unintended consequences o...

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/9kmp3y/the_reddit_administration_recants/e70euj9?utm_source=reddit-android

[–]DebatesNotBans 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

/r/GenderCritical and /r/racism/ are neither banned nor quarantined. That is all.

[–]petrichordiummerged perfectly with the hallway 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

GenderCritical is gonna be my FAVORITE bumfight to watch people argue over.

[–]Ascimatorsmirks audibly 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From what I browsed of r/GenderCritical, they are far less extreme than trp or some SJW den from the other side of the spectrum.

[–]Young_Oryx 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (15 children) | Copy Link

It worries me a tad on a selfish level, because I expect that PPD will be on the chopping block soon enough. Apparently people in other parts of Reddit already see us as a hate group.

[–]Tyler_GatsbyUpperWhiteTrash 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm scared to ask if PPD is actually mentioned anywhere outside the sex-o-spheres as a hate group, but am now curious how/where/who?! As guilty by association to TRP?

I like this place. I like reading different views, especially conflicting views of my own. I like trying to figure out what makes those people tick, and how they see it as they do.

I like reading those ideas test each other's logics and reasonings, in a fair and open manner. Places like this need to exist. There should be a neutral ground that everyone on a side of an issue can freely propose ideas, and yes, even vent to some degree at the opposing side.

It's healthy for all ideals to be tested, so they can progress, and evolve, or fall by the wayside if they become obsolete.

[–]Young_Oryx 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

Some feminist/female-oriented subreddits, I forget the exact ones. A few of my friends got banned preemptively for "Participating in the hate group r/Purplepilldebate."

Bonkers. No nuance at all.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m not worried that we’ll get quarantined or banned. I think that’s extremely unlikely if even one admin reviews our content and notices it’s a debate sub and not a proponent of either side.

I think the issue for us will be losing our last major source of new blood since TBP has more or less wound down.

TRP will get banned, and we’ll gradually lose relevance and fade away until it’s just regulars posting and we die off through lack of interest. That, I think, is the real threat to us.

EDIT: From an admin comment on the quarantine thread...

In evaluating a subreddit for a possible quarantine, we consider what it is dedicated to overall. That is, a few off-color comments do not warrant a quarantine, nor do heated conversations or even controversial themes overall. Instead, quarantine is intended for subreddits that are explicitly dedicated to things like racism or anti-semitism, misogyny, hoaxes, gore/extreme morbidity, and other extreme communities that may have received multiple warnings from us and have not made efforts at change. We’ll continue to evaluate on case by case basis.

Having never received any admin warnings or demands to change our content I think were safe.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Interesting they left out misandry in their no no list.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But surely everyone realises misandrism is just unpossible. There is no way the patriarchy would allow such a thing, so there is no need to offer equal protection to men. /s

[–]NalkaNalkaActual Red Pill Man, not covert BlackpillTradconJihadi 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a recurring topic at TBP that PPD is just as bad as the red pill. "if you are willing to entertain any of their ideas then you are just as much of a misogynist as they are".

[–]hammerhaunts 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For the ten people who still post there

[–]sketch162000 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I'm thinking our days are numbered. There's a real resistance to taking any kind of antagonistic stance towards feminism/women when discussing men's issues, and this is one of the few places that allows that.

Problem is, you usually have to flip off the dominant narrative which inevitably is going to piss people off if you want any change. The idea of "feminist approved" men's issues is kind of dubious on the face of it, because they are naturally going to resist any change that hurts thier agenda, even if it's on the "right side of history."

[–]squidracer 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Mgtow is still there. Oddly

[–]Young_Oryxlike a literate crocodile 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So are all the other RP-affiliated subs, so I don't really get it. Is this just a token, "Look, we're doing something!" effort on Reddit's part?

[–]sketch162000 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

MGTOW's probably on the chopping block tbh. Those dudes seem way more bitter than TRP at first glance.

Tinfoil hat me says that this is the beginning of a manosphere purge. All the RP/incel affiliated subs (including PPD) as well as r/mensrights are probably on watch.

I get the sinking feeling that there is being defined an "approved" way to talk about men's issues, namely one that makes sure to never be threatening, critical, pissed of at, or blaming women and/or feminism in any way. Which is concerning since the female narrative is the dominant perspective in the gender dialogue and people in power almost never give that power up voluntarily in the name of fairness.

[–]LittleGanymede 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if r/redpillwomen will be banned? Probably not. They are women after all.

[–]NeedingAdvice86 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well as we are learning in the US this month...it only takes one.

And it doesn't matter if you have 10 thousand supporters which can document the exact opposite...it does not matter, and the good news is that you don't even have know or provide when, where, how said hate occurred.

[–]Whodunnit88Survivied Purge Week 2018 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's true, they do see it like that. Reddit is not known for its nuancy.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 39 points40 points41 points 7 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

In a counter intuitive way it's probly the best thing that could happen to the red pill because I really think it needs to get away from the population of reddit

[–]Truedemocracy4 24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Idk if doing this will make it more incel by nature though. Cut off the pipeline for normals and it becomes a nasty echo chamber. I'm RP but there are some angry fucking people on there

[–]machimusMahogany Pill ♂ 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was already overrun by incels and neoreactionaries. They had a few reasonable contributors left last I heard, but they had been pushing out moderates over the last year.

[–]LowCreddit♂ I am Kenough 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Reddit admins give the TRP mods reason to stay focused on sexual strategy. You can tell that the mods are chomping at the bit to turn TRP into a right wing sub which is a shame. TRP needs reddit or it will just die off from lack of new people and pushing away current people.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

The manosphere was WAY more normal before reddit, WAY more. Reddit infected it with incels

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The manosphere was WAY more normal before reddit, WAY more. Reddit infected it with incels

The manosphere has always been the land of incels. Do you really think Matt Forney and Roosh are getting laid without paying for it or going to a third world country? I have yet to see a manosphere guru that can even do above average with women.

Normal people don't need the manosphere but the manosphere needs them (Rollo's bank acocunt depends on them)

[–]CombatStaceyBlue ovaries 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The manosphere was WAY more normal before reddit,

How could it ever be normal? I've read the articles from way back when - they're just as idiotic as they are now. All the stuff about bringing patriarchy back and putting women in their place and weird theories about women.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I wasnt talking about that. I was talking about the autism and incels its acquired on reddit.

[–]hammerhaunts 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Except for Roosh n Rollo

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Roosh is not and never was an autistic incel. Rollo is just an old disappointed married dude who read Roissy

[–]321PK5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You forgot “with intellectual pretensions.”

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (17 children) | Copy Link

Rollo is on a different level IMO.

[–] EmoryUpton 5 points 6 points 7 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

He's a content aggregator and a not-very-good writer.

He is very very good indeed at aggregating content, but his writing needs a LOT of work.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 4 points 5 points 6 points 7 years ago *   (15 children) | Copy Link

Rollo is a tzecrukheneh (tsecrocheneh?), sad sack male ISFJ who embarrasses me by existing

[–] -AveMaria- 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Ahahahahaha. What the heck is a tzecrukheneh xD

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

its yiddish for, like...twisted and broken in spine, weak and bent

[–] -AveMaria- 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Ahahahaha! That's an awesome insult.

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (11 children) | Copy Link

Impressive to find a word that has no Google results.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (10 children) | Copy Link

its hard to transliterate, i found one result for tsecrochen translates it as "broken down", thats not how my family used it

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

Is that Russian for autist?

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

its yiddish

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

For Autist?

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

no

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand what "broken down" means in terms of Yiddish. You'd have to elaborate.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

physically weak and broken, like without a spine

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

I think so long as he's talking framework mostly that's alright. You're pretty picky on body types though, you are an unabashed genetics snob.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Please stop trying to overinterpret what I'm saying. His face looks weak and drawn, he looks like an over the hill youth pastor. Hes looks like an Anglo saxon grandmother. I dont give a fuck about his body

[–] wekacuck 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly he looks like he's going through chemo at the moment.

[–] FairlyNaive Red Pill Man 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

autist is Russian for autist

[–]Transmigratory 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The incels went to braincells, sluthate and the blackpill.

[–]darudeboysandstormHaving Instagram makes you a thot 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Humans in general have been tainted by the web.

The ability for autism to become a contagious disease was born.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

yes

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I’d prefer it get away from the population of Earth.

[–]squidracer 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But then what will you be angry about?

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..|| 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I'll take things that don't surprise me even a little bit for $1000, Alex."

[–]InformalCriticismProbably Red 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I think you might be right. I got banned from atheism for suggesting women are capable of protecting power over [X], just like religious people do. I never would have dared point to hypocrisy like that without TRP.

[–]organicfluxx 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

> I got banned from atheism for suggesting women are capable of protecting power over [X]

​

What do you mean?

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

IRCC, it was a reply to comment where someone was saying evangelical republicans showed they're more willing to protect power than women. And the reply comment was [religious people] are more willing to protect power over X. So I immitated the tone and cadence to reflect women not in a victim role, but a human one, and that eventually got me banned.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What did this comment mean?

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

IRCC, it was a reply to comment where someone was saying evangelical republicans showed they're more willing to protect power than women. And the reply comment was [religious people] are more willing to protect power over X. So I immitated the tone and cadence to reflect women not in a victim role, but a human one, and that eventually got me banned.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

What does "protect power" mean?

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Confirming Kavanaugh instead of believing 11th hour victim statements or some such.

[–] Atlas_B_Shruggin ✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh, like "protecting those in power already", got it

[–] InformalCriticism Probably Red 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

In essence, yes. It seems the mods over at /r/atheism have not adopted the full power of critical thought to their policies.

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Back to misc it is.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a desperate need for quality over quantity.

[–]daveofmarsFor Martian Independence 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

reDdIt iS A prIVate CoMPany So tHEy cAN dO whAt ThEy waNT

Until every company in silicon valley zeroes in on the same kind of speech that triggers the tumblrites and soyboys and bans it all at once. Yeah, that shouldn't be a concern to anyone at all.

But I could go either way on this. If TRP is back then alright, it doesn't affect me much since I rarely need to read it. On the other hand, I kinda want reddit to ban everything that's mildly controversial and turn this place into tumblr so it can crash and burn, and something better can take its place. I'd roll the dice on that.

[–]_justagumnut_ 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Voat already exists, just go there?

[–]IrrationalIrritation 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, when T_D moved to Voat, they were completely unprepared for the levels of racism and calls for violence (far worse than what T-D had ever done), and they came running back to Reddit with their tails tucked between their legs. That's how bad Voat is.

[–]AstuteBlackManRed Pill Man 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Pretty sure red pill isn’t the worst community out there.

[–]_justagumnut_ 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not about "worst", it's about who reddit, the brand, wish to be associated with.

[–]TheImpossible1 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

When is r/TheBluePill going down?

When is r/GenderCritical going down?

Women have quarantined one of the few places that warns of their shitty nature and how they really feel about men. We are subhuman to them.

[–]Ascimatorsmirks audibly 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I don't think men think too high about people like you either.

[–]TheImpossible1 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Well if you are a man, I'm assuming so.. you should be worried.

The link that they promote as "healthy masculinity" is by a gender studies major.

Do you know who created the first gender studies class?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart

Make no mistake. "healthy masculinity" is not healthy at all.

[–]Ascimatorsmirks audibly 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

you should be worried.

I've better things in life to do than creating an ideology out of attribution errors.

[–]TheImpossible1 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll bite. What do you mean?

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I'm a man. I'm not worried.

I've even gasp taken Gender Studies courses in college!

Feeling pretty masculine and healthy, thanks.

[–]TheImpossible1 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Well that's good for you. I personally wouldn't take a class written by someone who wants me dead, but that's just my opinion.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (9 children) | Copy Link

They don't want you dead. You're being ridiculous.

[–] TheImpossible1 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

Oh really? Why don't you enlighten me as to why that is.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

Because they don't? You're free to educate yourself by reading the material or taking a course.

I'm not sure exactly what kind of evidence you'd like.

It's about equality, not the elimination of men.

Equality seems like oppression when you're in a privileged position.

[–] TheImpossible1 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

The literal founder of the class said she wants the male population reduced to 10%.

I don't need to take one to know that "healthy masculinity" is being a good little beta bucks until they have no use for you.

What do women lack in terms of rights exactly?

I just saw some of the Kavanaugh hearing, I'm pretty sure women are the privileged ones.

Providing no details whatsoever, yet his life was ruined.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA "his life was ruined."

He's about to be rammed through to the Supreme Court with We The People's consent. It's a lifetime appointment. SUCH A RUINED LIFE!

Never mind the lives he ruined through sexual assault.

[–] TheImpossible1 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

his life wasn't ruined

calls him a rapist in the next line

Oh the irony.

And you really homed in on that line, because you had nothing else going for your side.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't need to provide you evidence for "my side." I experienced it first-hand.

I've taken the courses, you haven't. You have no experience in Gender Studies beyond being a misogynist on the internet.

[–] TheImpossible1 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Well then you're never going to prove your point if you're so arrogant and act so aloof.

misogynist on the internet

I love this line. Yes I am. I'll admit that. What I won't agree with is that it matters in any way.

You would be too if you read the same news I do.

You would be too if you saw women writing articles about how rigging courts against men wasn't a big deal.

You would be too if you lived in a feminist shithole nation state, where criticism of women is about to become a crime because an anti-Semite is using women to deflect from his Nazi beliefs.

[–] SlimLovin High Value to Own the Libs 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Well yea. I'd certainly be a much more angry person if I purposefully looked up news that upset me in order to confirm my bias.

I'd be even more angry--you might even say "radicalized"--if I spent my time in misogynist shitholes that spread exactly that kind of news.

You're indoctrinating yourself, which is exactly what this quarantine message is warning you against. How can you not see that?

[–] TheImpossible1 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

If you look at most of my posts (not comments) they highlight clear anti-male bias, and come from reputable sources.

I'm not radicalised, I leave the dreaming of genocide to the women. I still have some semblance of morality, unlike them.

If it was about that they wouldn't link some pathetic "how to be a woman's slave" page, they would link something that gives good news about women, that makes redpillers feel they're not all bad.

It's rather telling that the only way people can sympathise with what women are now, is with brainwashing and laws that punish you if you don't.

It's like some gender based replica of the GDR here in my country. We even have our version of the Stasi.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Doesn’t really seem like that has much teeth to it but this is the first time I’ve ever heard of “quarantining”.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago [recovered] (20 children) | Copy Link

r/incels was "quarantined" prior to ban

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

K, do reds believe TRP is next?

[–]wekacuck 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

The plot twist this time is that there is a new shiny quarantine appeals process.

Moderators will be notified via modmail if their community has been placed in quarantine. To be removed from quarantine, subreddit moderators may present an appeal here. The appeal should include a detailed accounting of changes to community moderation practices. (Appropriate changes may vary from community to community and could include techniques such as adding more moderators, creating new rules, employing more aggressive auto-moderation tools, adjusting community styling, etc.) The appeal should also offer evidence of sustained, consistent enforcement of these changes over a period of at least one month, demonstrating meaningful reform of the community.

Previously, there was no way to come back from quarantine status. Quarantine behaves sort of like a voluntary-access private subreddit. If you're not opted into the quarantined subreddit, you don't see posts or comments there in anyone's comment histories.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like the appeal process is bullshit and a way for the admins to ban right wing subs.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I see

[–]wekacuck 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

redpillschool put up a post where he seems to be throwing in the towel on TRP. But he's a drama queen so who knows.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Looks like he’s linking another forum

[–]wekacuck 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes, he's been running that for years as a backup for what he's always called inevitable. It's his version of a doomsday cult.

[–]isweartoofuckingmuch19 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

i mean turns out he wasnt too far off

[–]Transmigratory 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except he was right, it looks like things are being set up for the sub to be shut down.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The assumption that we're living on borrowed time on reddit has been around for years now; so yeah, I would guess this is a common perception atm.

And quite frankly, it's not too far-fetched.

[–]Transmigratory 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Do you seriously think they *won't* be banned?

[–]wekacuck 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Of course they will. Nothing will stand between RPS and his thirst for internet martyrdom.

[–]Transmigratory 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But he was right, TRP is going to be deleted because reddit doesn't approve of TRP's views....

[–]wekacuck 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Why? It's just quarantined. A quarantine gives the reddit company the ability to say they've washed their hands of it and have been completely reasonable and still allow free speech. TRP can just stay exactly as they are today within the quarantine. What's the big deal? They only have to kowtow to get the quarantine lifted. It's not some sort of timebomb or existential crisis. They can just stay under quarantine and keep the riff-raff out.

I get that RPS has already put work into his server, but he's just running off of irrational fear mongering and sunk cost fallacy at this point. Frankly it's pretty much like running a donated discord server at this point. You don't even have to have a verified email to access quarantines anymore.

Complaining about a one-time click to access TRP vs going and creating a whole new account elsewhere that has no apps and will be hacked to kingdom come and harvested for kompromat in short order is just plain silly.

[–]Transmigratory 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Except they don't allow free speech and tried to take them to some other source of masculinity. The purpose of the quarantine isn't to keep the "riff-raff" out. It is likely to get the sub ready for deletion.

​

You're not considering what the quarantine could mean and what most of reddit thinks of TRP. Like you said reddit wants the ability to "wash their hands of [TRP]" while pretending they allow free speech.

​

Reddit doesn't need to facilitate free speech, but it shouldn't pretend that it is all for it.

[–] wekacuck 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

But what speech haven't they allowed? They've just erected a one-time content warning.

TRP already has quite a reputation for being a hotbed of misogyny. Slapping a notice on it that essentially says "look out this actually is horrific misogyny" doesn't deminish it's reputation.

[–] Transmigratory 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

A warning after they reach a certain amount of subs? What have they done to warrant a warning; what supposedly new content emerged?

A reputation posters such as yourself decided to slap on it because it puts men first and doesn't use nice language. Its already established that most, especially non-RPers in PPD, never actually read the content.

[–] sublimemongrel Becky, Esq. (woman) -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

I have no idea

[–] Transmigratory 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Chances are yes, RPS was right in hindsight.

[–]hammerhaunts 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They do

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It certainly has teeth as it means ban incoming. No sub ever gets out of quarantine.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. (woman) 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well I didn’t know what it was I just clicked on the link and you click continue and boom you’re able to see the content so that alone did not seem like some big barrier.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its not a barrier to the user. Its more how reddit deals with subs not behaving though in this case its subs that don't align with its political ideology.

[–]SRU_91 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

No way. Braincels is ten times worse than TRP.

[–]MoodyBrizo 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

Braincels is more a less a joke sub though. TRP had a few claws that scratched the SRSempire.

[–]SRU_91 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not a joke sub, lmao. That's how they disguise their hatred. "Oh no, it's just parody ... honest!"

[–]crackrocksteady7 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

daily reminder that TRP started T_D

[–]wekacuck 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Didn't they lose it in a mod war with the alt-right?

[–]crackrocksteady7 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

the original mods got replaced by anonymous accounts, it's suspected that someone bought out the moderator team

and it's the exact opposite the original mods were fine with having T_D be a pol colony on plebbit and since then it's been made oy vey approved

[–]wekacuck 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, right. That's what I meant. They were kicked out by more Trump campaign-friendly types in the runup to the election.

[–]wekacuck 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

braincels is quarantined, too. 😏

[–]LookSafeFromFarAway 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Goddamnit, that was one of my favorite rage-in-the-form-of-memes lol subs. Can't even see it on mobile anymore. It's OVER for my killing time scrolling.

[–]wekacuck 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just use a PC browser to accept entry to the quarantine.

[–]LookSafeFromFarAway 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Sweet. Rage-meme ascension incoming. My daughter actually found that sub before me and had questions. Never have I ever had to mom so hard on such short notice.

Edit: can'tspellcel

[–]SRU_91 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To think, everyone thought that banouts2018 thing was fake.

[–] decoy88 Men and Women are similar 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Incels are the cause for both either way

[–]dicklord_airplane 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I checked out some of the links about positive masculinity, and this one about profiling men who get into extremist organizations is actually useful and well-researched. https://www.playboy.com/read/what-makes-a-jihadist-a-nazi-the-science-of-extremism

"They don’t get in [to extremist organizations] because they have racist ideas. They get racist ideas because they get in."

Understanding this can help us intervene before vulnerable men are taken in and indoctrinated by gangs, cartels, hate groups, terrorists, paramilitaries, etc.

The rest of those links are garbage full of rhetoric and political posturing. Funny how Playboy published the most academically sound article in that college website's list of highlights.

[–]VoidInvincibleFull Measure 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is funny. Playboy is the most legit out of all those? Who would have thought.

[–]songofmelancholy 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

TRP is a gen x/late millennial thing. /r/JordanPeterson is the future.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/JordanPeterson is going to be next watch.

[–]hammerhaunts 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/Derrida is the future

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/JordanPeterson

is the future.

Don't know if being lectured by Kermit the Frog is a good idea.

[–]crackrocksteady7 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

yeah some cucked watered down PC approved version of the message is the future ok

[–]vandaalenRed Pill EC 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

which essentially wants to push back men into their roles of a provider to enable women to consume.

That has already been disected by esther vilar in her 2The Manipulated Man" book.

[–]321PK 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (7 children) | Copy Link

Dude. I’m not anti rp but come on, men are the majority in positions of power in virtually every institution. If y’all don’t like the way things are then he’ll, link up your dicks and take back the world, duh. And don’t bother bleating “apex fallacy” or something something.

[–]crackrocksteady7 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Dude. I’m not anti rp but come on, men are the majority in positions of power in virtually every institution.

Would you say white men are in the positions of power?

[–]321PK 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

I’d feel comfortable wagering my savings that the majority of federal and circuit judges, congressmen, police chiefs, university presidents, Fortune 500 ceos, mayors, county executives, city and county council chairs, public school superintendents, sherrifs, governors, and state legislators are white men.

[–]iLLprincipLeS 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

What about culture, media, education? They are white alright, but you'd be surprised by their religious denomination.

[–]crackrocksteady7 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are white alright

Lol

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are white alright, but you'd be surprised by their religious denomination.

No anti-semitism in the manosphere, no siree!

[–]vandaalenRed Pill EC 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wheredid I say something else? What's that got to do with what I wrote?

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/JordanPeterson is the future.

That charlatan's star is fading fast.

[–] WhatIsTheMeaningHere 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

When I think of getting laid with hot women, I think Jordan Peterson. /s

[–] yasee dog will hunt 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

the sexiest of muppets

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

BluePill 2.0, the reboot, roughly speaking.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

surprised this didn't happen years ago tbh, like 2015

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This fucking sucks man.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, nothing lasts forever, the SJW subs will meet their maker one day too

[–]VoidInvincibleFull Measure 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it still up in the air what happens or not? What exactly does quarantined mean?

[–]killallthenarcs 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've got no major problem with reddit deciding that any community could do with quarantining. Even if reddit decided to quarantine a community that is obviously useful and harmless... for example if it decided to quarantine /r/mycology because stinkhorns look like scalded dicks dipped in shit... I'm only going to be a little annoyed, not a major problem. Reddit is a freaking business, these are not just ethical decisions they are business decisions that influence the sustainability of business activity within various contexts. Quarantining is not silencing, it is merely placing some of the responsibility for expending effort for signal amplification back upon the individuals who wish to be heard.

[–]peanutbutterjamsNo Pill 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I think /r/GenderCritical is an interesting case. They're very much a hate sub. But they're also TERFs, which, for those in the dark, are people who hate men so much they can't stand the idea of trans women.

So you have a sub filled with hate speech against men, much of which is undeniably transphobic.

No quarantine.

Would a sub that was primarily transphobic have received a quarantine? (Genuine question. I'd rather not google "TransHate reddit" to find out.)

If it stands to reason that such a sub would be quarantined, does that mean that the transphobia was balanced out by... misandry? That only by the virtue of hating men they allowed to continue their hate trans women?

No. That's ridiculous. No sarcasm.

Who goes around saying "Today, I'm going to balance out hate in a conscious and measured fashion!"?

Nobody.

We process mountainous amounts of data every day. And we deal with it, by ignoring most of it.

We're influenced in ways beyond our control, every single day. It takes a lot of practice, time, and energy to withstand it in a logical, empathetic manner.

Most of us run on automatic. We're mostly water, and we follow the path of least resistance.

Turns out, it's safer to quarantine a sub that's said to hate women than it is a sub that's said to hate men. It's so damnably regressive, but it's not the result of a purposeful agenda. It's just people reacting to people reacting.

Small things matter. Every instance of hate hurts us. If it's the journey, not the destination, and humanity is a project that will never reach its conclusion, then everything is exponential. Including hate, in whatever direction.

[Edit: Yeah, fuck it, I lost the thread a bit.

Point being:

/r/GenderCritical wasn't quarantined!

Stupidly Exaggerated Reaction Thumbnail

 

Please like and subscribe.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm becoming increasingly convinced you can either be a free-speech absolutist or a capitalist, but not both.

Reddit is a business. They want to make money. They have quarantined TRP because they think this will help them make money.

Absolute free speech for all isn't actually possible, but the nearest things to it are incompatible with with capitalism. A true free-speech platform CANNOT have a profit motive, because capital WILL favor its own interests.

[–]BajaBlast90 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the issue is that Redditors have a tendency to be self-absorbed and think they are entitled to a platform. Actually, most people on the internet forget that social media and forums are companies.

Reddit built this site, they make the rules, they have full control over what occurs here. Therr is nothing illegal about what Reddit is doing, nor is it unconstitutional. It might be unfair but that's life.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually, most people on the internet forget that social media and forums are companies.

Yep. Private businesses do not owe you anything.

[–]gabriotDidn't know it was purge week 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m looking through the front page of it looking for these supposed man hating threads and just like literally every time someone makes this claim - there are absolutely none to be found. Unless you can please enlighten me to where they are on the front page currently.

[–]thereddespair 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

so its true huh.

that move has to be the dumbest crap on reddit ive dealt with lol. i guess you really just need to chug soy everyday to idk fit in reddit lolol

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap... 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The best part of this is the reactions of the ECs and SECs, most of whom have the charm of a... sulfurous fart. The morons clearly have no clue how obnoxious they are. Good thing they can just move somewhere else and continue to entertain.

[–]sivariasToo old for bullshit, man 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You know, I could see them linking to The Art of Manliness (it even has it's own sub r/theartofmanliness) as an alternative, but the one they listed is literally completely antithetical to RP and most who got there have already tried to do all that shit to no avail.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. There was a way to do this that pointed people away from the toxicity of TRP but towards information that they were looking for. TaoM is a great example of where they could have linked.

Instead they’ve linked to TRPs polar opposite. That’s a definite slap down of even the non-toxic parts of TRPs message.

[–]the_calibre_catNo Pill Man 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

If you believe in a center right economic system, the presumption of innocence as a judicial standard that should not be replaced with mob justice in the court of public opinion, and any semblance at all of individual rights and responsibilities, the contemporary left in this country has demonstrated their open hostility to all of these ideas. None of these have anything to do with race. If you are white, black, Hispanic, and you own a dick, you are are presumed guilty by these people. You are an aggressor, a rapist in waiting, and you do not deserve prestigious employment no matter how hard you're worked for it - you are to be held guilty (whether or not you are eventually exonerated as innocent is immaterial, you'll still be punished as guilty) for the sins of your fathers.

They are not objective and they are not fair. They will employ publications like the New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, The Guardian, Salon, Slate, Vox, The Atlantic, The New Republic, and Politico to relentlessly push their message and nothing else, despite there being completely credible, relevant, rational reasons for skepticism. They will employ platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit to take down conservative forums at the slightest whiff of rule violation, while leftist subreddits that routinely call for violence (see: /r/latestagecapitalism, literally every fucking day) regularly get to the front page and somehow escape the banhammer.

Because these people want two sets of rules: One for people who agree with them, and one for people that don't. The Kavanaugh hearings have drawn a fucking line in the sand. I don't know if he's guilty, but this cabal of people who feel entitled to political power, to the power to dictate to you how you must live your life and what you must believe will stop at nothing to get it. They are dangerous and they should be fought with extreme prejudice.

[–]DiaperShit 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m ready to move to like Singapore or something. The language barrier would suck, but it’d be better than having to deal with the psychopaths in this country.

[–]the_calibre_catNo Pill Man 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Vote, motherfucker. I'd vote for a Democrat, if they weren't race-baiting socialists. Unfortunately, they're race-baiting socialists, so the (electoral) beatings must continue until morale improves.

Plenty of existing welfare states in the world for the socialists to move to, they don't need to foist their discredited system on the one country that has successfully resisted it and doing so become the preeminent world power.

[–]RockinSocksII 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well crap. Here comes the superiority of "they're trying to silence us, therefore we are right!"

[–]Transmigratory 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hard to argue against it now when they've been validated.

[–]lucky_beast 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The TRP sub is lame and has been for a looong time, don't really care too much about the quarantine since reddit liberals have always been little crybabies who can't stand the existence of other opinions.

What gets me though, in a humorous way, is the little banner talking about "positive masculinity." As if any of the men who complain about so-called toxic masculinity have a drop of any masculinity whatsoever in them. What these manchildren conceive of as "positive masculinity" is nothing more than crying that men should be docile and doormats for women. Which isn't surprising, since they feel incredibly insecure about their own inability to live up to a masculine image so they have to recreate masculinity where their impotence becomes inner strength, their timidity becomes stoicism, and their weakness becomes patience. They have to convince themselves and others that their weakness and shortcomings are actually positive.

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

TRP is indeed utter misogynist trash for the reasons you stated, but the Stony Brook University's Center for the Study of Men and Masculinities is entirely nothing but blaming men for everything that's wrong with the world.

Neither are good resources for men.

[–] LittleGanymede 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Is feminism misandrist? There are individuals who are part of the feminism movement who outright state that all men should be killed.

If you don't believe that feminism hates women then what criteria are you using to claim that TRP hates women that doesn't also apply to feminism?

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

Mainstream Feminism is indeed highly misandrist, and their misandry quite often hurts women, too.

[–] LittleGanymede 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Makes sense. I know I don't hate women, which is a prerequisite for misogyny, though I do hold many of the views of TRP. Like the fact that hypergamy exists, women don't feel true love (the disney fantasy where love is eternal and unflinching).

Yet despite believing these facts many would call me misogynist for espousing bellies they disagree with. As if they can know how I "feel." Unless I actively state "I hate women" then you nor anyone else has no idea how I feel, or anyone else from TRP feels regardless of what opinion they aspouse.

I'm basically saying all this is the reason that I dismiss anyone who claims a group is a "hate group" if that group doesn't outright admit it, like the KKK or something. Hell, I believe that you can even hold some of the beliefs of the KKK without feeling hate, ignorant as they may be. This coming from a black man.

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

It's not about misogyny with TRP. TRP's problem is not whether they accurately describes the nature of most women. Thay are quite accurate about that. Where TRP goes wrong is their solutions. They seek to win the affections of hypergamic women rather than swiping left on these women and holding out for someone who's not like that.

I think most of the problems of TRPers is that they judge women by their looks. If she's not a 8-10 then she's trash, in their eyes. This is hypergamy in terms of looks. It makes them no better, IMHO.

And I'm sure the KKK believes the sky is blue :P

[–] LittleGanymede 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

The thing is that you can't swipe left on hypergamy because women generally seek a man of higher status. Pretty much all the statistics bear this out.

A female laywer isn't going to seriously date or marry a male manager at Mcdonalds no matter how much "chemistry" they have.

Couples where the women makes more than the man have significantly higher rates of divorce.

The highest reason for couples getting divorce isn't abuse or neglect, what you'd expect if hypergamy didn't exist. It's exactly what you'd expect in a world with hypergamy. Money. "Financial reasons."

Simple facts that many would deny. Yet reality doesn't care about how you "feel" about the facts.

And you are right. Men, all things being equal, would prefer a more attractive partner than an uglier one. However that's another conversation all together. Here is the simple reality.

Men aren't dating men so that information obviously isn't relevant to them. Also no TRP man is going to reject an otherwise good woman because she is 2 points down the SMV totem than he is. In fact most men marry below their SMV. Which makes sense since it's much harder for men to get SMV than women. Women start with extremely high SMV and most men have to work their way up the ladder. They have to gain confidence, work out, get money, etc. A woman just has to exist and not look like a whale.

But the REAL most important point that NEEDS to be address by TRP is the way in which society treats this. Yes, men prefer more attractive women but they are shamed for having preferences and told to accept a women no matter what she looks like. Told that it is shallow for having physical standards.

I grew up in America. That's the narrative that society pushed. Society encourages men to ignore their "hypogamy". Men evolved to prefer youth, beauty, and health. Yet we are actively discouraged from judging women by those standards. We also evolved to spread our seeds as much as possible. Yet we are also HEAVILY discouraged from this by general society.

This truth coupled with the fact that women are ENCOURAGED to act on their hypergamy and told it's a good thing leads to disastrous results. They are told they are princess and queens and "deserve" a top tier men. So it creates this huge disadvantaged system.

Men are taught to choose mates like Disney princesses. Disney princesses don't really see physical appearance outside of gender. They see what's on the inside. Disney princess love eternally, unflinching, unconditionally. A disney princess or queen would love their husband even if he turned into a frog. Warts and all.

Yet this is the exact opposite of how women behave. Many won't even look at you if you don't seem to have money or some other symbol of status like good looks or charisma. Some trait she can use to show you off to impress other women. For those that do choose lower status men, they will drop you for the most hypergamist of reasons. Like...."he doesn't make enough money to support the lifestyle I think I deserve. So I'm going to fall out of love."

That's why TRP is needed. And that's why there is no "swiping left." If men swiped left on all women who displayed hyergamy there would be no women left to swipe right for. All men would be MGTOW.

Hypergamy, Hypogamy, these are just fancy words for "human nature." No women is beyond human nature. We can suppress them if put under the right situation. Like the Amish. Probably the most Nawalt of any group. Yet when put under the right situation everyone is subject to that nature. And we live in a society which encourages women act on that toxic nature which is both damaging for themselves and men.

Society doesn't function well under hypergamy. Many are left out of the race, including women who grow old and lonely because their standards were too high because they can't see themselves as anything less than a "queen" that deserves a 6 foot tall man with a six pack that makes six figures. And those that do settle for less are often not happy with that decision and end up divorcing because they are all over social media and comparing themselves to others. Social media being the buffet to feed hypergamy.

Unfettered hypergamy in society is a lose lose for everyone. Can SOME succeed? Sure. A man that consistently makes six figures, has good charisma and leads well MAY find a decent looking woman who acts feminine and is loyal. But the game is severally rigged against that outcome. And even if you do find that it's likely to change when that couple falls on hard times.

Without TRP society and gender relations as a whole is really going to degrade, creating an army of angry men and women who legitimately hate each other because neither know how to or care to give each other what they REALLY want. I can't see things ending well.

[–] LeJacquelope 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Without TRP society and gender relations as a whole is really going to degrade, creating an army of angry men and women who legitimately hate each other because neither know how to or care to give each other what they REALLY want. I can't see things ending well.

Now if only that collapse were to happen in my lifetime...

[–]whitetrashcarlselfish ghost 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Unfortunate I never subscribed to it bc by and large it was garbage content, still I liked to check in on it now and then. Oh well small loss I guess

[–]BaldManlet1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Next it will be a sub you care about

[–]Johnnadawearsglasses 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I never found it any more hate filled than many of the other subs on reddit. Was mainly frustrated guys venting. I see a lot of subs making fun of people for disabilities or just being generally “losers”. None of them banned.

[–]BaldManlet2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Twoxchromosomes has just as much misandrist content.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link

That would be more relevant if it happened some years ago and TRP wasn't dying

[–]Aggressive_BetaBeta Male 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

How is it dying?

[–]hammerhaunts 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Declining in membership and attention from its peak

[–]Transmigratory 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The membership was increasing, however. The got the quarantine once they hit 300k subs.

[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But the"here now" has been a low number for awhile

[–]Transmigratory 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People lurk, not everyone posts. However, it is still pretty suspect that they got the quarantine shortly after hitting 300k subs.

[–] cxj 75% Redpill Core Ideas 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

My guess is that 200k don’t care anymore

[–] Transmigratory 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Is that a random guess you pulled out of your ass or is there something to substantiate that guess?

[–] cxj 75% Redpill Core Ideas 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Random guess from the ass 💩

[–] Transmigratory 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Not surprising.

[–] Skratt Goddess -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]crumblesnatch9 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

For information on positive masculinity, please see the resources available at Stony Brook University's Center for the Study of Men and Masculinities.

This made me cackle. Hahahaha, wow.

[–]SilentLurker666Why are there so many Bluepill with Red/Purple Flair? 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/purplepilldebate is next

[–]yaseedog will hunt 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

heh

[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Incel ruin everything

[–]Littleknownfacts 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Link didn't work for me. What just happened?

[–]hyperrrealTolerable Shitposter1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/9jf8nh/revamping_the_quarantine_function/

The admins explain here. Basically TRP, CA, Braincels, and a bunch of other subs have been segregated from reddit b/c ad dollars. Most will probably get banned soon.

[–]LeaneGenovaBreaker of (comment) Chains 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hiiii bby. We miss you! <3 <3

[–]hyperrrealTolerable Shitposter2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Hey! Right back at ya 😎😎🤗🤗

Seems like PPD is a still the same bastion of mature, thoughtful discourse.

[–]LeaneGenovaBreaker of (comment) Chains 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As always! And you're back just in time for purge week.

[–]hyperrrealTolerable Shitposter1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

And you're back just in time for purge week

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFtb3EtjEic

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus..need to change my flair.

[–] LifterofThings 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

PRUTEK WAMEN

[–] Cuckleberry-Finn Blue pilled alpha chad -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

LMAO owned

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So when it goes down should this sub go down with it?

[–]Tyler_GatsbyUpperWhiteTrash 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I hope not. Maybe there's enough balance here, or at least a diverse enough mix that no one can lump everyone in one bad box they can put a label on.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Nah I don't mean will it be banned. It won't be banned, cos its used by women. Wouldn't it be a bit pointless for the SJWs to rage at TRP after it's been kicked off Reddit.

[–] Tyler_Gatsby UpperWhiteTrash 4 points 5 points 6 points 7 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

Ahh, good point. Maybe places like this will still give them all somewhere to crusade and argue each other. I don't remember the last time I clicked in TRP, but I think it needs to exist. People don't have to click, and there are filters for that reason.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess it could go on as a discussion of whatever. The most annoying thing about this sub is that there can't be many proper red pill posters on here anyway so the discussion often gets nowhere.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well it was always going to happen.

I laugh at conservative/libertarian types who say "muh free market" yet the biggest companies of this so called free market that you rely on hate you. Twitter, facebook, reddit; they all hate what redpillers stand for.

You guys have two options.

1) Make a popular social media site that even celebrities love and use that supports ALL free speech (very hard as twitter etc. already have that on lock)

2) Have a right wing party/leader with balls that nationalise these companies so they do what you want them to do.

But no, you guys will keep with the "muh freedom" bullshit until all of your little sites are banned. You'll just have to use Gab or Voat (which nobody except your own kind uses) lol lol lol

[–]LeJacquelope 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

LOL so frigging true! It's so hilarious watching the right wing zombies cry when the private property ideology comes back to bite them on the ass.

Got umbrella?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The invisible hand slapped them in the face

[–]Currycell921 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Given that social media is pretty much a monopoly and the role it plays in information desspiation it has to be nationalized.

[–]CombatStaceyBlue ovaries 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm for free speech.

But I don't know what else is happening. Some have openly advocated some pretty woeful stuff in trp. It is indeed hate speech.

What does it mean to be quarantined though?

[–]goatismycopilot 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

TRP is going to continue doing what they have been anyway which is show up in other subs so their POV is still going to exist. Reddit is a product, a brand so it was an optics decision. If anything if I was a TRP big name I would be happy about it. And they can re-organize into another sub and dance the persecution boogie or do some night of the long knives here in PPD. The men here don't really wants chicks around unless they are confirming a TRP position they bitch about laydee people lying especially when they are trying to actually blah, blah their truth.

This is rooted in their disgust that none of the PPD women appear to be average enough so they are considered useless to interact with.

So TRP can easily come here and shove the other bird eggs out of the nest. Either PPD will become a new home or could end up being proxy targeted by Reddit. Much though I like some individual people here I am hardly going to lose my mind if something happens to it, it is just a sub you can find a new sub whether you are PPD or TRP.

[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most of trp left for other subs years ago. What was left was just the incel invasion. Now the incels will be lose again

[–]tiger1296A little bit of both6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (109 children) | Copy Link

I got banned from there anyway so don't really care, it's more of a white supremacist far right subreddit then an alternative PUA style program they like to label themselves as, so my interest dwindled when I saw blatant racism supported by the guys over there. Also the whole "I hate women, but i'm going to spend all my time to shape up and work out all for women, who I will shape my entire life around" hypocrisy was unreal

Originally a good idea, but it's been convoluted by man children and incels, moving away from Reddit probably will help weed out the rubbish and maybe it can go back to being a semi decent place

[–]DebatesNotBans 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

white supremacist far right

I hate women

Smells awfully of Blue in here.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both -4 points -3 points -2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

A perfect description of what a typical trp user is

[–]vandaalenRed Pill EC 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

it's more of a white supremacist far right subreddit then an alternative PUA style program they like to label themselves as

Oh really? I would really like to see some proof for that horseshit claim.

"I hate women, but i'm going to spend all my time to shape up and work out all for women".

That is so old... and still fucking wrong.

[–]tiger1296A little bit of both 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Search the entire subreddit, brigaded by pro trump incels.

Bullshit is it wrong, you have a post nearly every week about someone moaning how trp has turned into a subreddit all about chasing skirts and how it was better back in the day.

[–]vandaalenRed Pill EC 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Search the entire subreddit

I don't have to. I read nearly every post.

brigaded by pro trump incels

never signivicantly upvoted

you have a post nearly every week about someone moaning how trp has turned into a subreddit all about chasing skirts and how it was better back in the day

Are... are you implying that concern trolling really is a thing? You don't say...

[–]tiger1296A little bit of both 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

never significantly upvoted

But always lurking none the less

[–]vandaalenRed Pill EC 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hahahaha. OK. I've heard those people also watch TV from time to time. Damned white supremacist TV manufacturers.

[–] 321PK 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Why do you think this happened?

[–]DebatesNotBans 1 points 7 years ago* [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

pro trump incels

"Anything I dislike is a racist sexist alt right white supremacist incel trump supporter"

[–]tiger1296A little bit of both 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or you know, they actually are how they are described

[–]whydib 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Please pull up an example. You know, burden of proof and all that. "Search the entire sub-reddit" as a response proves about as much as saying "look outside" if I were to ask you about climate change or atmospheric science.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's going on I was just on there like 2 days ago.

[–]sadomasochrist 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (44 children) | Copy Link

Just because you don't like GLO doesn't mean it's a white supremacy sub you moron. Jesus christ.

[–]tiger1296A little bit of both 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

But it is, I've seen blatant racism and right wing propaganda spread there, most are default trump supporters.

[–]DebatesNotBans 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

blatant racism

How do you feel about the /r/Racism sub?

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (15 children) | Copy Link

An anti racist subreddit? What's there to say?

[–] DebatesNotBans 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (14 children) | Copy Link

anti racist

Lol what? What's "anti-racist" about shittalking white people, and saying how "fragile" they are, and using the slur "mayo" towrads them?

What the fuck is "anti-racist" about that?

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

Sounds to me like she’s just frustrated at the mods coming out on her for not being ‘soft’ enough on this racist ass woman, much like y’all are frustrated at the mods for coming out on this sub for not being ‘soft’ enough on women. It’s the exact same thing.

[–] DebatesNotBans 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

What are you talking about?

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

WHAT THREAD are you talking about when you say “white fragility” because I see one on that front page, so which thread are you talking about?

[–] DebatesNotBans 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

WHAT THREAD

I see one on that front page

You answered yourself dude.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

Then you know what I’m talking about.

[–] DebatesNotBans 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Again, what are you talking about? It sounds like you're agreeing with me.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

They’re upset at the weak ass mods censoring them, just like they’re censoring YALL favorite sub. I don’t see nothing wrong with what she said. Get mad at Reddit, not white people.

[–] DebatesNotBans 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

There seems to be a misunderstanding. I'm the one DEFENDING white people.

[–] Skratt Goddess 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. Well she’s angry at the weak, soft mods that banned her for telling that old racist bitch that she was wrong. What she said was racist but her anger isn’t wrong to me. And most people arent soft liberals.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

I've never been on there so I don't know what kind of comments people are posting or how the community is generally aligned.

If this is your attempt at whataboutism it's a pretty poor attempt at it.

[–] DebatesNotBans 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

I asked you what your opinion on the sub was, and you answered me only having looked at the sub's name. You're assuming it's anti-racist.

your attempt at whataboutism

Oh sure, I'M the bad guy, just because I think racism is wrong, no matter who does it.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

I clicked on the subreddit and read the side bar, where it said it was an anti racist subreddit, therefore I believe that is the purpose of it.

You didn't say all racism is wrong, you just whined how white people are victims to challenge my comment on a subreddit being full of white supremacists.

[–] DebatesNotBans -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

it said it was an anti racist subreddit, therefore I believe that is the purpose of it.

What. So you're completely incapable of thinking for yourself? "WELL IT SAID IT'S ANTI-RACIST SO I GUESS IT'S AGAINST RACISM!" Not like you could divert your eyes 20cm left and see all the hatred against white people there.

whined how white people are victims

a subreddit being full of white supremacists

Holy shit, can you make it any more obvious that you hate white people?

I mean, you immediately dismiss white people being singled out, insulted, being called slurs as "anti racism". And your go-to insult is "white supremacist".

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I checked out the top posts, one of which was about turkish people, one about Indian Americans and one about the texas shooting. Where exactly is the "hatred for white people"?

Holy shit, can you make it any more obvious that you hate white people?

What? Are you stupid? Where did I immediately miss white people being singled out? What white people were being singled out and where?

[–]sadomasochristNo pull out game 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

That's because we're not anti free speech. I know this is impossible for you to digest because you didn't grow up learning to respecting that.

There is, with 100% certainty, no interest from the sub mods or ECs. I'm an EC there.

Any race stuff is from GLO, and he is allowed to shit post as hard as he wants. And we wouldn't have it any other way.

[–]tiger1296A little bit of both 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Lol, not anti free speech fuck off I got banned for voicing my opinion so yeah, chat as much shit as you want, trp is just as bad as any other right wing subreddit, not open to any sort of discussions and immediately ban you for offering alternate views

I have no idea who GLO is, but the racist and white supremacist aspects is no one user, it's many. Your blatant lies might work in trp, but not here buddy

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

Lol, not anti free speech fuck off I got banned for voicing my opinion so yeah, chat as much shit as you want, trp is just as bad as any other right wing subreddit, not open to any sort of discussions and immediately ban you for offering alternate views

Yeah no. I spent two years challenging the sub. The only time I got banned was when I was wrong.

We ban users for being morons who are unable to understand the content. I know it took me a solid two years to get it, so it's understandable.

It's sort of like a detox program. Sometimes you relapse, other times you just want to get high etc.

Eventually attendees begin to see the light and accept treatment. And then we tell them that white men are superior to blacks.

I have no idea who GLO is, but the racist and white supremacist aspects is no one user, it's many. Your blatant lies might work in trp, but not here buddy

K.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 5 points 6 points 7 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

And then we tell them that white men are superior to blacks.

So you are pretty much agreeing with what I said?

lol my ban message was "toodles". So much for mature conversation

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Are you joking or not? I can't tell. I mean if you can tell I was joking then you shouldn't think TRP is racist. If you can't tell I'm joking then I understand why you think what you think.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

I can tell you were joking, but it doesn't change anything, the ideology isn't racist, but a large number of followers are, that is my point.

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

That would be like saying that PPD is a subreddit for Atheists.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Atheists don't carry the same stigma racists do. trp has been stained by it and quite a lot of people are proud of it

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

You're being too solipsistic. We just don't care. You're calling 100% of the users racists, when only 2% are.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

75% mate

[–]321PK 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ya but having a cartoonish jester as your figure head is kinda a dumb move.

[–] crackrocksteady7 -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

why? have you seen who's in the white house? Cartoonish jesters are in

[–] 321PK 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

So you think he’s a fool?

[–] crackrocksteady7 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Trump or GLO? I think they're both fools, and they're both perfect for the moment. They're the perfect antidote for modern leftists and modern feminists respectively.

[–] sadomasochrist No pull out game -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

A. He's one of us. So am I. We're not monolithic but we're similar. Such is necessary for the racial cleansing.

[–] 321PK 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Wut?

[–]Transmigratory 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't forget the stupid fucks who think Brexit was a slave revolt.

[–] vandaalen Red Pill EC 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

You haven't seen that in any significantly upvoted post, let aside from an endorsed poster.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

I don't need you to tell me what I have and haven't seen, i've shown trp to people who have simply skimmed through the subreddit and for them to comment how it reeks of right wing incels. This isn't some "fake news" bs, this is reality.

[–] vandaalen Red Pill EC -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't need you to tell me what I have and haven't seen

Oh no. You don't understand. I don't assume that you don't know better.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

Is this your attempt at an "holier than thou" attitude? If you are in denial about the whole thing then sure, not really my issue, but my sympathies will not go to a place that houses racists, simple as

[–] vandaalen Red Pill EC -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

my sympathies will not go to a place that houses racists

I don't care about your "sympathies". This is about making sure that your horseshit doesn't stay here uncommented.

[–] tiger1296 A little bit of both 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

You haven't really countered anything i've said, and if I was so wrong, why does trp as a subreddit have such a stigma? You're only response is "but the whole world is bluepilled, blah blah" where in the reality is that trp houses a lot of angry racist people marginalised by society that ended up in some alternate philosophy and latched onto it, making angry comments to everyone that people see and ridicule.

If you think i'm saying trp is racist, then no I am not, i'm just saying there are a lot of white supremacists that make up the followers.

[–] LeaneGenova Breaker of (comment) Chains [ M ] 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Play nice with others, please. Otherwise you'll be sent to your room with no dinner.

[–] Littleknownfacts -2 points -1 points 0 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil.

[–]LeJacquelope 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And that is why I cannot quite bring myself to have sympathy for TRP.

[–]xanacop 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

Yea, I have to be very careful when navigating through subs that discuss men's issues. It's usually is a place where the far right, white male supremacist posts while under the guise of trying to improve the problems in men, when in reality, they want white male superiority.

I've found /r/menslib to be much more welcoming and there's no women hating.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago [recovered] (27 children) | Copy Link

Mens lib teaches you how to be obnoxious shrill and unliked by women

[–]xanacop 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

No, it discusses men's issues in a more introspective way instead of just blaming women and society for men's problems. Sure, some of men's problems are caused by them, but playing the blame game won't fix it.

[–]MagicGainbow 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

it discusses men's issues in a more introspective way instead of just blaming women and society for men's problems.

...But completely denies cases when either of those things are at least partially responsible for mens problems.

but playing the blame game won't fix it.

Agreed, but menslib just shifts the blame elsewhere, I have yet to see any decent advice on there.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

The 'solutions' mens lib provide teach you how to be obnoxious shrill and unliked by women

[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Had a skim through and this is not the impression I’m getting

[–]MagicGainbow 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You need more than a skim, try srssucks, it has a decent highlights reel of most of the bullshit, also plenty of stuff gets deleted by mods(followed by a ban from menslib) so ceddit may help.

[–]decoy88Men and Women are similar 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

try srssucks,

???

also plenty of stuff gets deleted by mods(followed by a ban from menslib) so ceddit may help.

Well if the mods delete the posts its not really representative of the sub isit?

[–] MagicGainbow 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (8 children) | Copy Link

???

r/srssucks

Well if the mods delete the posts its not really representative of the sub isit?

It does show what the sub is representative in that only certain modes of thought are allowed, while anything else that goes against their stated view of how the world is gets deleted no matter how topical/relevant.

Looking at what is deleted and you can see that the sub has no real desire to get truly stuck in to mens issues, it manages to make a sub about helping men be mostly about women to the exclusion of the men they are supposedly helping.

It's shallow appeasement and male flagellation, and even just judging by its numbers/growth rate compared to other subs that tackle male issues, its clear to see that its not very good.

[–] decoy88 Men and Women are similar 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (7 children) | Copy Link

Can you link me to some ceddit deleted things that were removed?

They seem to talk a lot about mens issues in related to being assumed the threatening party, the negligent half of child carer and other shit.

I don't see a lot about women. They talk alot about mens feeelings which is maybe why you hate it so much?

I don't get the purpose of r/srssucks

[–] MagicGainbow 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (6 children) | Copy Link

Can you link me to some ceddit deleted things that were removed?

https://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/search?q=menslib&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on

All the links you could want, some times ceddit does not work as mods removed things before they could be saved(had to be there at the time I guess).

I don't see a lot about women.

Their is lenty if you do more than just skim.

They talk alot about mens feeelings which is maybe why you hate it so much?

Don't assume my motivations, I have no problem with them discussing emotions, but their discussions to end to be a toxic masculinity circlejerk that fails to mention the part that women have in encouraging the the stereotype of boys don't cry.

But more so their discussions fail to achieve anything productive in terms of lessons learned or solutions thought up (like most of their threads).

I don't get the purpose of r/srssucks

Read the side bar.

Their is also r/MensLibWatch it just concentrates on menslib stupidity but its only been around a bit so has only a fraction of the links srssucks has.

[–] decoy88 Men and Women are similar 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

Their is lenty if you do more than just skim.

I'm reading further an I really can find anything like wet blankets. Sure if you specifically seek it out I'm sure you'll find, but far from the majority or top comments

fails to mention the part that women have in encouraging the the stereotype of boys don't cry.

does this need to be explicitly mentioned? I read a few stories about women at schools and nurseries contributing to toxic masculinity. Do you need to read "WOMEN DO IT TOO!" in every post and discussion?

MensLib seems to avoid the blame game which I get some people won't like. and your SRSsucks sub seems to hyperfocus on any extreme unpopular comment. It's selective bias it seems.

I've open to be proven wrong

[–] MagicGainbow 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm reading further an I really can find anything like wet blankets

What does wet blankets mean in this context?

Also I remembered that some threads are also deleted, I guess that things will look differently to someone just checking out the sub today rather than someone that has read it since its inception.

does this need to be explicitly mentioned?

It does for balance when you get circle jerks that solely blame men, and any discussion about how things can be fixed aren't going to work if you focus on one cause without even acknowledging another that has possibly contributes just as much.

MensLib seems to avoid the blame game which I get some people won't like.

They blame plenty, but only menslib approved targets.

and your SRSsucks sub seems to hyperfocus on any extreme unpopular comment.

I think it focuses on the absurdity of menslib, like this thread wherein the guy talks about getting abuse in feminist spaces for being a male rape survivor...but then goes on to recommend feminism to everyone or the various times mods have swooped in to delete comments/lock threads and ban people when people talk about experiences that cast feminism/feminist thought in a bad light for example.

Personally I think the mods are the main problem, discussion is stifled and at this stage the only people left in the sub are people that 'toe the party line' so to speak, a middle sub with reasonable mods is needed, r/mensrights has a tendency to get too angry at feminism etc. while menslib is the opposite and basically an offshoot of feminist subs but with a thin veneer of ''we are helping men!!!''

I've open to be proven wrong

I doubt that but, I think if you really look at the srssucks stuff involving menslib mods you can see a clear bias, its hard to see on menslib itself due to all the censorship.

[–] decoy88 Men and Women are similar 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

What does wet blankets mean in this context?

Self flagellating fools that wanna suck on feminisms cock

It does for balance when you get circle jerks that solely blame men, and any discussion about how things can be fixed aren't going to work if you focus on one cause without even acknowledging another that has possibly contributes just as much.

As I understand it its primarily a man space no? Talking about what women can do to an audience of men seems pointless?

I think if you really look at the srssucks stuff involving menslib mods you can see a clear bias, its hard to see on menslib itself due to all the censorship.

alas, my laziness is more superior than my curiosity

[–] MagicGainbow 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Self flagellating fools that wanna suck on feminisms cock

I've seen plenty of that in r/menslib lol.

As I understand it its primarily a man space no?

Not really, at least a few mods are female(unsurprisingly the ones that often ban/delete the quickest) and plenty of women show up and get a far better reception than any male would get in a feminism sub...its at times embarrassing to read, i'm almost expecting to see every single comment get gilded lol.

Talking about what women can do to an audience of men seems pointless?

Not at all, a lot of the male behaviour that menslib laments like being too stoic for example is something that women very much have a hand in enforcing...but you will barely see that discussed at all let alone great detail, as far as menslib and its mods are concerned, patriarchy is the cause of all mens problems ever.

alas, my laziness is more superior than my curiosity

I can understand that, I have to say, some of the stuff makes for morbidly fascinating reading, some real gems of double-think can be found.

[–] decoy88 Men and Women are similar 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Well I guess I'd need to look deeper which I cba to do.

as far as menslib and its mods are concerned, patriarchy is the cause of all mens problems ever.

This is always funny to me because Patriarchy includes both men and women but people still get triggered

[–] MagicGainbow 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

This is always funny to me because Patriarchy includes both men and women but people still get triggered

Yep, but start a thread about how women reinforce the patriarchy/are not just passive victims and see how far you get lol.

[–] xanacop -3 points -2 points -1 points 7 years ago   (5 children) | Copy Link

...But completely denies cases when either of those things are at least partially responsible for mens problems.

I have seen numerous comments blaming at least to some part, society and feminism for some of the plights men face. While they are friendly to feminism, they're not going to pretend that feminism has been a perfect movement.

[–] MagicGainbow 7 points 8 points 9 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I have seen numerous comments blaming at least to some part, society and feminism for some of the plights men face.

You forgot to add that said commenter is usually banned/censored afterwards.

While they are friendly to feminism,

An understatement.

they're not going to pretend that feminism has been a perfect movement.

Given the general tone/direction of the sub i'd bet they would if they thought they could get away with it.

[–] LeJacquelope 4 points 5 points 6 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Not kowtowing to feminists = being an obnoxious shrill and unliked by women.

Get with the indoctrinationprogram, citizen!

[–] [deleted] 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

they're not going to pretend that feminism has been a perfect movement

Ya they do. You are not allowed to be critical of feminism there. You in fact get banned for it.

[–] xanacop -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9jfwno/rtheredpill_quarantined/e6r6yab/

[–] [deleted] 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

And?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Wrong, its a place to talk about women's issues and saying how men are at fault.

[–] xanacop -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9jfwno/rtheredpill_quarantined/e6r6yab/

[–] [deleted] 2 points 3 points 4 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

And?

[–] xanacop 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

The problem men now face with the current structure of Feminism is the lack of that same support from women. Women are just as responsible for trying to inflict male gender roles onto men as men are themselves. Men see the double standard being shown and that is what helped spur the support for someone like Trump.

Current Feminism is not treating men like they did women, men are both as a class the victim and perpetrator. Where women as a class were just the victim. It's hard to elicit change from a group/class of people if they are just going to be vilified.

Mens issues are not as important to society, its a fact; a sad fact but none the less its true. Once we can shift the focus from male villainy to male victims then change will happen. We need Feminism to step up and stop the rhetoric so men can elicit change. This article was a perfect example of what I am talking about, as it discusses the problems men face by blaming men at the same time.

[–] [deleted] 3 points 4 points 5 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

And? That user hasn't posted in that sub for some time. While there's no mod note saying they are banned I can only wager they are banned for being critical of feminism.

[–]ImsomnilandNo Pills thnx 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meh it's actually pretty chill tbh

[–]BirdManBrrrr 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

God forbid men get together to discuss their issues without the mandatory label of "pro-feminist", lest you be -ist or -phobic or whatever.

Glad you had to have that seal of approval from women to exist; Real Men ask permission and say all the right things lest the ladies get mad...

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..|| 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nothing makes a woman wet like a man asking permission before they say or do anything. Respect women's authoritah! Never make a woman even a tiny bit uncomfortable. You will be neck-deep in poontang before you know it.

[–]officerkondoRedder Shade of Purple Man 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I've found /r/menslib to be much more welcoming and there's no women hating.

They can't even see the women on a pedestal that high.

[–]SRU_91 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They banned me just for saying that women are for the most part hypergamous (compared to men): they said that I was spreading "red pill philosophy".

[–]Talbooth 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Menslib is IMO just feminism in the disguise of wanting to help men, TRP is the opposite, it's kinda incelish. I found that r/mensrights is a good middle ground in the stricter subject, and broadly here at PPD is the real thing.

[–]SRU_91 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just throw my lot in with egalitarianism for a middle ground.

[–]LeJacquelope 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just posted a remark there about lesbian partner violence. Let's see how I fare!

[–]xanacop 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If you compare menslib with mgtow, trp or mra, the difference is outstanding. The last three have countless posts of blaming and making fun of women's privilege while menslib actually has a discussion if women are to blame for certain aspects of male's issues.

[–]officerkondoRedder Shade of Purple Man 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

While I state no opinion about the MGOTW, MRA, and TRP subs, can you think of an example of a MensLib thread where the general consensus was that women were to blame for a given male issue?

[–]xanacop 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/95e9ke/women_changed_too_many_men_didnt_what_happens_next/e3ttnak/

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/95e9ke/women_changed_too_many_men_didnt_what_happens_next/e3sum44/

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/93oyty/menslibs_official_position_on_the_mens_rights/

We, however, do acknowledge that there are some branches of feminism and individuals that carry the banner of feminism who present problems not only for men but to the feminist movement itself. There are certain feminists like Mary Koss and Andrea Dworkin who have had some, for lack of a better word, controversial arguments attributed to them during their heyday, including that men cannot be raped (Koss) and that all heterosexual sex is coercive and akin to rape (Dworkin). There are feminists who use the movement as a cover to espouse hatred towards men and that such animosity is integral to true understanding and full participation in feminism.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not try post something critical of feminism in there and see what happens. Go on.

[–] officerkondo Redder Shade of Purple Man 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you very much. I will read those threads.

[–] ffbtaw Purple Pill Man 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

If you compare menslib with mgtow, trp or mra, the difference is outstanding.

True, I haven't seen men on mgtow, trp or mra who hate themselves so much for being male that they want to castrate themselves.

[–]Transmigratory 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's why they're staying.

[–]87x 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Please don't. /r/MensLib is absolute garbage. I'd rather be a twox mod.

[–] SilentLurker666 Why are there so many Bluepill with Red/Purple Flair? 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

I found /r/menslib anything but a men's liberation. It's full of underlying messages that "discuss" men's problem in society, but is afraid to talk about what caused these issue, because anyone of average intelligence and an unbias mind will know that today's men's problem stem from a society that favors women over men in certain areas including law, the application of said laws, social media as well as the portrayal of men in today's media.

[–] xanacop 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/9jfwno/rtheredpill_quarantined/e6r6yab/

[–]SkrattGoddess 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, right about when I got banned it started going downhill. It was actually good when I first subbed to it.

[–]SasquatchMcKraken 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm far more sympathetic, and think nearly all censorship is bullshit. But nobody can say (without sarcasm) that it couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of guys. I'll definitely admit that.

[–]tiger1296A little bit of both 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fair to say nobody will miss them

[–]SasquatchMcKraken 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Eh, I sort of will. Not as much as I would've a year ago though. I got bored and frustrated with the direction it was headed towards the end and said so. In fact I thought I'd been banned until I found out it'd been quarantined.

[–]reluctantly_red 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I got banned from there anyway so don't really care, it's more of a white supremacist far right subreddit

Yeah -- I got banned too when I called out some of their regulars on their xenophobia and immigrant bashing.

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

When a community becomes toxic to itself it's best to euthanize it.

But we can recreate TRP!

Here, I'll start:

Women are terrible and irredeemable and while they don't necessarily deserved to be raped I deserve to have sex with 8/10+ quality females so somebody needs to figure that out.

Oldest reeeeeeenager in the house. Hypergamreeeeeeeee. Chad. Stacey. Poundmetoo. Plates. I've been lifting and doing steroids for 3 weeks now why don't roasties want my dick yet???

(((F E M I N I S M)))

[–]DebatesNotBans 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is the biggest strawman I have ever seen on leddit.

[–]yaseedog will hunt 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

what about now?

[–] theambivalentrooster Literal Chad 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

It's only a strawman in the loosest sense. More like a representation of the gestalt consciousness of the losers over at TRP.

[–] whydib 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Its straw manning by definition. One point of TRP for example, is deconstructing the idea that anyone deserves anything. Especially the idea that anyone, as an individual, is pressured/obliged to accommodate other people because they think that they deserve better.

[–] christmas_miracle_69 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s really not at all

[–]adool444 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I followed TRP, I got laid more and have a gf now.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I followed TRP, I got laid more and have a gf now.

Congrats you're now just like the average guy.

Now leave reddit and never return. Redpillers and also other redditers will drag you down and make you weird. Go for a nice spa and massage (with a nice ending wink) at some overseas resort, treat yourself to a nice week and detox from all the bullshit these social media sites feed your brain.

You'll find that you never needed the redpill, but the redpill needed you (for $$$$$$).

[–]isweartoofuckingmuch2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Lmao what the Fuck are you even saying

[–] adool444 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Go for a nice spa and massage (with a nice ending wink) at some overseas resort

Just said I have a gf. It helped me understand what women react to. I went to a boys only school in a religious environment and needed to understand the casual sex market. The red pill is great for that.

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Tisk tisk, femoids are not for relationships, only plating. Relationships are blue pill behavior.

[–]adool444 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

fuck off. It is useful for any man's dating life.

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You sound like you're in the female frame my dude.

What sort of man wants a relationship with a woman?

In 2018 relationships only serve the female imperative.

[–]adool444 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

relationships != marriage

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you do more than have sex with her you're serving the female imperative.

C'mon man that's TRP 101.

[–]christmas_miracle_692 points3 points4 points 7 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s not really at all. There’s not debating with you but the red pill just promotes living your life how you want to live it, and if you want to be in a relationship, you can do that if it makes you happy, but don’t accept a shitty relationship.

Sounds simple but it’s hard to grasp and difficult to execute for a lot of people. I significantly improved the quality of my life through the red pill, going from a semi alcoholic loser in my early 20s to a successful man in my late 20s, with a good dating life and a life of meaning.

Think what you want about it but that was my experience.

[–]vandaalenRed Pill EC 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a pretty accurate impersonation of a blooper. 10/10

[–]MMDT 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

stop embarrassing yourself

[–]Currycell920 points1 point2 points 7 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Braincels gone too. Reddit admins can eat shit and puke.

[–]SkookumTreeThe Hock provideth. 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No you want them to lay down and rot.

[–]CainPrice 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is what happens when a bunch of angry internet kids who can't get laid hijack a forum about male sex and relationship advice and turn it into an autistic, woman-bashing circle jerk.

[–]LeJacquelope 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

autistic

woman-bashing circle jerk

Making fun of autistic people while protesting misogyny. There is a black hole where your self-awareness should be.

[–]Johnnadawearsglasses 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The hypocrisy is so obvious it’s scary. There are a lot of horribly ableist and otherwise prejudicial subs that will never be banned.

[–]LeJacquelope 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm shocked the mods here don't whack the ableist crap. I mean if the posts I read are right then there's a ton of people with Asperger's on here...

[–]FalseBuddhaSomething borrowed, something Blue0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean, people with an illness that prevents them from understanding social interactions are not going to understand social interactions. I'm not going to listen to someone born a paraplegic give me advice on how to ride my bike. Their autism is relevant.

[–]LeJacquelope 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In addition to the shocking ignorance and bigotry of your statement, the other problem with all of PPD is everything people don't like is called autism now. You people throw autism and spergy around like it's glitter.

[–]Dmva100 1 points 7 years ago [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

The redpill has been flattened by the glob✡list homos and their big latke steamroller bagel machine.

All because everyone has realized that all women lie about sexual assault unless due process reveals otherwise.

Time to go to popeyes.

[–]SpaceWhiskey🍃 Social Justice Druid 🍂[M] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

None of that please.

[–]Dirty_Socks_Mullins 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

big latke steamroller bagel machine.

Man, that sounds awesome. How big are these latke bagels you're talking about? They sound huge.

[–]Dmva1001 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

A newspaper (or any other form of ZOG media).

[–] Dirty_Socks_Mullins 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

no fuck that I want a literal giant latke bagel machine.

[–]yaseedog will hunt 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

suggestion to mods: start purge week right now! the timing is flawless

[–]squidracer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And they're is absolutely no chance the users of trp will flock to other subs.

[–]crackrocksteady7 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/bodybuilding is basically TRP already

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

time to leave reddit for good

[–]Boeijen666 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What I want to know is how did such a toxic double-standard thought process like todays leftism invade most social media, schools, universities, entertainment industries etc over the last 10-15 years or so??? Id be in awe of its brainwashing strategy if I werent so sick to the stomach. Whats scarier is that today's Leftism is straight up Fascism. If you don't agree with us, you're banned. Scary times.

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago   (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] SkookumTree The Hock provideth. 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep!

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points 3 points 7 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

Oooh like a PUA secret society?

[–] WiseMonkeyGoodMonkey 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I have an idea. Let's make Orwell fiction again. Can we do that?

[–] yessir999 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Completely disgusting - reddit should be ashamed.

[–] largepaycheckaddict 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Stony brook might as well be named “institution of cuckoldry”

[–] lakazepo 0 points 1 point 2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Well... fuck reddit now.

[–]oroyplata-6 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It's a subreddit dedicated to subjugating women.

Fuck them and fuck anyone that claims groups dedicated to undermining civil society are entitled to "free speech".

Edit: Want down votes? Criticize the religion of you troglodytes. Eat turds, the whole lot you.

[–] petrichordium merged perfectly with the hallway -1 points 0 points 1 point 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve always thought Ai Wei Wei was a deeply mediocre artist, but the Chinese government’s crackdown on him gave his stupid little jokes a lot more gravity than if they’d just commodified it to death like capitalism does with all forms of counterculture.

What i mean to say is, LOL this seems pointless. This garbage will always exist; now it will be in a less easily searched and giggled at format.

[–] ladel-grill No Pill -4 points -3 points -2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

The evil is defeated

[–] -AveMaria- -4 points -3 points -2 points 7 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Ahahahahahaha.

This is awesome.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter